Latest / The Epstein Chronicles / Ghislaine Maxwell And The Covid-19 Quarantine

Transcript

Ghislaine Maxwell And The Covid-19 Quarantine · The Epstein Chronicles

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: Our article today is from Courthousenews dot com and the
• 0:06
  Speaker 1: headline is pandemic won't slow fight over sealed Jeffrey Epstein documents. Well,
• 0:12
  Speaker 1: that's good. I'm glad to hear that. You know, I
• 0:14
  Speaker 1: know that we're in the middle of the pandemic, and
• 0:16
  Speaker 1: you know, it's definitely a tough time for a lot
• 0:19
  Speaker 1: of people, but we have to keep some semblance of
• 0:23
  Speaker 1: the rule of law going right. We have to make
• 0:25
  Speaker 1: sure that the courts don't get backed up, and we
• 0:27
  Speaker 1: have to make sure that they're processing as many cases
• 0:30
  Speaker 1: as they possibly can. So it's good to know that
• 0:34
  Speaker 1: the pandemic isn't going to slow the fight over the
• 0:37
  Speaker 1: sealed documents in the Epstein case, because it's crucial that
• 0:41
  Speaker 1: those documents are published for the public to see. It's
• 0:44
  Speaker 1: very crucial that that ends up happening, because there's already
• 0:50
  Speaker 1: the air of secrecy around this whole entire thing. The
• 0:53
  Speaker 1: whole entire shroud has been thrown over this case from
• 0:56
  Speaker 1: the beginning. And if they keep on doing it, and
• 0:59
  Speaker 1: they keep on keeping things in the shadows and away
• 1:02
  Speaker 1: from the public, all they're going to do is foster
• 1:06
  Speaker 1: more resentment and foster more mistrust in them being the
• 1:10
  Speaker 1: Justice Department, because this is not the case the kind
• 1:14
  Speaker 1: of case where you can hold stuff back and say it's,
• 1:16
  Speaker 1: you know, national security. There's no national security implications here, unless,
• 1:21
  Speaker 1: of course, the CIA gets outed as being involved, then
• 1:25
  Speaker 1: I guess that could be sort of a problem. But
• 1:27
  Speaker 1: at the end of the day, that's not for the
• 1:29
  Speaker 1: courts to decide. The courts need to just go after
• 1:32
  Speaker 1: whatever whatever's on their plate, right and they can't worry
• 1:35
  Speaker 1: about all that other crap. So it's good to see
• 1:38
  Speaker 1: that the courts are still processing this case right now
• 1:41
  Speaker 1: throughout this pandemic, and it's going to be interesting to
• 1:44
  Speaker 1: see how this all ends up. This article was written
• 1:48
  Speaker 1: by Adam Klassfeld, the federal judge who holds the key
• 1:52
  Speaker 1: to secret records concerning the late pedophile Jeffrey Epstein refuse
• 1:56
  Speaker 1: Tuesday afternoon to approve a month long delay in the case. Well,
• 2:01
  Speaker 1: what would a month long delay do anyway? I mean,
• 2:03
  Speaker 1: in about a month, another couple of weeks, three weeks,
• 2:06
  Speaker 1: the pandemic will be peaking. But even after it peaks,
• 2:10
  Speaker 1: well supposedly going to peak. After it peaks, there's still
• 2:13
  Speaker 1: going to be ripple effects being felt throughout not only
• 2:17
  Speaker 1: the nation, but you know, the court system, et cetera,
• 2:19
  Speaker 1: et cetera. So I don't know what a month long
• 2:21
  Speaker 1: delay would have even accomplished. Seems to me like it's
• 2:24
  Speaker 1: more dragging of the feet by the defense. Seems to
• 2:28
  Speaker 1: me like it's more, let's try and pause this as
• 2:30
  Speaker 1: long as possible, and we'll try and you know, avoid
• 2:33
  Speaker 1: the inevitable for as long as we can. Attorneys for
• 2:38
  Speaker 1: people named in the secret batch of files sought the
• 2:40
  Speaker 1: reprieve to extend how long they have to raise objections
• 2:43
  Speaker 1: about public scrutiny after first receiving notice about their involvement.
• 2:49
  Speaker 1: So because of the pandemic, they'll use that as an
• 2:51
  Speaker 1: excuse and they'll try and you know, use that as
• 2:53
  Speaker 1: a way to navigate through this minefield. And we see
• 2:58
  Speaker 1: it all the time and from the these kind of people,
• 3:00
  Speaker 1: from people like Epstein, the way that they jump through loopholes,
• 3:04
  Speaker 1: the way that they avoid certain things within the justice
• 3:07
  Speaker 1: system because they have high profile lawyers who know the
• 3:10
  Speaker 1: tricks of the trade. And we see it on a
• 3:13
  Speaker 1: regular basis, them trying to drag their feet and trying
• 3:16
  Speaker 1: to make it a drawn out process. At this point,
• 3:21
  Speaker 1: fourteen days is certainly adequate. US District Judge Loretta Presca
• 3:25
  Speaker 1: told an attorney for one of those anonymous men during
• 3:28
  Speaker 1: a phone conference, referring to the length of time needed
• 3:31
  Speaker 1: to respond to a notification, I mean, you need more
• 3:35
  Speaker 1: than fourteen days to respond. Fourteen days should be plenty
• 3:38
  Speaker 1: of time for you to get with your high profile
• 3:40
  Speaker 1: lawyers and figure out a way to lie. Why do
• 3:43
  Speaker 1: you need more than fourteen days, mister anonymous man? And boy,
• 3:48
  Speaker 1: we go all day thinking about who the anonymous man is, right,
• 3:52
  Speaker 1: there got to be several of them, definitely several of them.
• 3:55
  Speaker 1: Maybe we'll talk about that at some point. Maybe we'll
• 3:57
  Speaker 1: do like a speculative episode where we discuss who the
• 4:00
  Speaker 1: anonymous men could be, who are trying so hard to
• 4:04
  Speaker 1: drag their feet here and trying so hard to delay
• 4:06
  Speaker 1: the case. Like many US court proceedings during the coronavirus crisis,
• 4:13
  Speaker 1: today's hearing took place in the form of a telephone conference.
• 4:16
  Speaker 1: As proceedings began, the former chief judge for the Southern
• 4:19
  Speaker 1: District of New York quipped that many have been boosting
• 4:22
  Speaker 1: their vitamin C reserves with quarantinas. I don't even know
• 4:26
  Speaker 1: what that means, and why is she quipping anyway? Stick
• 4:28
  Speaker 1: to the stick to the case, Judge Prescin, You're not
• 4:31
  Speaker 1: there to be a comedian. Nobody finds you funny. Do
• 4:34
  Speaker 1: the right thing and unseal these documents. Save your your
• 4:37
  Speaker 1: comedic act for the night crew. The second Circuit put
• 4:42
  Speaker 1: Presca at the cases Helm last July, long before the
• 4:45
  Speaker 1: novel virus COVID nineteen first erupted in China, spawning a
• 4:50
  Speaker 1: global pandemic and national emergency. Her task is to review
• 4:55
  Speaker 1: and potentially unseal files from a lawsuit that Epstein accuser
• 4:58
  Speaker 1: Virginia Roberts brought against the now deceased Pedophiles ex associate
• 5:04
  Speaker 1: Gilayne Maxwell ex associates better than madam I guess, or
• 5:07
  Speaker 1: better than socialite. But I'll take it a step further.
• 5:10
  Speaker 1: His co conspirator. That's what Gilayne Maxwell is, folks. She's
• 5:14
  Speaker 1: a co conspirator. She was just as involved in Jeffrey Epstein.
• 5:18
  Speaker 1: She was just as involved. She might not have been
• 5:21
  Speaker 1: abusing all of the girls, but she was involved in
• 5:23
  Speaker 1: some of the abuse. She was certainly involved in the planning.
• 5:27
  Speaker 1: She was certainly involved in the logistics. She was certainly
• 5:29
  Speaker 1: involved in the grooming, so co conspirator is the proper
• 5:34
  Speaker 1: title to slap on Gilayne Maxwell in my opinion, Well,
• 5:39
  Speaker 1: that and also when she gets her prisoner number, when
• 5:42
  Speaker 1: she originally eventually gets arrested, that'll be great. We could
• 5:45
  Speaker 1: just identify her by that number. Then you want to
• 5:47
  Speaker 1: talk about the biggest slap in the face. If Maxwell
• 5:50
  Speaker 1: ever gets arrested, and she ever goes to jail for this,
• 5:53
  Speaker 1: we will refer to her by her prison identification on
• 5:56
  Speaker 1: this podcast, not by her name. Disclosure could prove limited.
• 6:02
  Speaker 1: In January, PRESCA ruled that only records that form the
• 6:06
  Speaker 1: basis of court rulings in roberts Old lawsuit against Maxwell
• 6:10
  Speaker 1: would be entitled to the presumption of public access. She emphasized, however,
• 6:15
  Speaker 1: that her ruling would not end the case. See this
• 6:18
  Speaker 1: is what's going on with PRESCA here. She's trying to
• 6:22
  Speaker 1: tow the line on both sides. She should just release
• 6:25
  Speaker 1: all of this, all of these documents, be done with it,
• 6:28
  Speaker 1: and move on with her life. But instead she says, well,
• 6:32
  Speaker 1: you know, they're not all entitled to the presumption of
• 6:34
  Speaker 1: public access. But this ruling, this doesn't end the case.
• 6:38
  Speaker 1: So what she does is she leaves the door open
• 6:40
  Speaker 1: for what reason. I don't know. I'm not a lawyer
• 6:42
  Speaker 1: or a judge or anything like that, so I don't
• 6:45
  Speaker 1: know the motivation behind something like this, but I think
• 6:47
  Speaker 1: it's a bunch of bs, if you want my opinion
• 6:49
  Speaker 1: on it. I think that Judge Presca should just come
• 6:52
  Speaker 1: out swinging and release these documents because there's no reason
• 6:57
  Speaker 1: not to release them. All right, who are you protect
• 7:00
  Speaker 1: and why? Why are the rich and the powerful always
• 7:03
  Speaker 1: protected by the justice system. The court is mindful of
• 7:09
  Speaker 1: the fact that there is a great deal of public
• 7:11
  Speaker 1: intrigues surrounding the unseiling of the documents at issue here,
• 7:14
  Speaker 1: Presco wrote with that in mind, this court emphasizes that
• 7:18
  Speaker 1: this ruling is a narrow one, and that's definitely a
• 7:22
  Speaker 1: good thing. That's an opening in the case for these
• 7:25
  Speaker 1: documents to be released. And she had said that previously, right,
• 7:29
  Speaker 1: that it's not ending the case. It's you know, just
• 7:33
  Speaker 1: it just emphasizes that the ruling is a narrow one,
• 7:37
  Speaker 1: so it's up to interpretation and her mind can be changed,
• 7:41
  Speaker 1: is what that means. Much of the public's interest in
• 7:44
  Speaker 1: Epstein's case stems from the investigative journalism of the Miami
• 7:48
  Speaker 1: Herald and its reporter Julie Brown, whose series Perversion of
• 7:52
  Speaker 1: Justice spurred the resignation of Trump's former Secretary of Labor,
• 7:56
  Speaker 1: Alexandra Acosta. Let's not get carried away, Okay. I think
• 7:59
  Speaker 1: Julie Julie Brown's work was what initiated the whole reinvestigation.
• 8:05
  Speaker 1: But I think that there was people that were very
• 8:09
  Speaker 1: interested in this case even before that. Now, they might
• 8:12
  Speaker 1: not have had the resources of Julie Brown. And Julie
• 8:15
  Speaker 1: Brown was the one who certainly kicked in the door.
• 8:17
  Speaker 1: There were a bunch of people who were still covering
• 8:20
  Speaker 1: this case. I mean from the beginning. There are people
• 8:22
  Speaker 1: that have been covering this case since, you know, two
• 8:24
  Speaker 1: thousand and seven. So I think that I think that
• 8:30
  Speaker 1: Julie Brown is certainly the one who got the door
• 8:33
  Speaker 1: kicked in for this second time around. She deserves all
• 8:35
  Speaker 1: the credit in the world. Her reporting was fantastic, The
• 8:38
  Speaker 1: reporting of the Miami Herald was fantastic, and the way
• 8:42
  Speaker 1: that she doggedly went after the case is just just awesome.
• 8:46
  Speaker 1: And she deserves a lot of a lot of credit
• 8:48
  Speaker 1: for that because without her hard work, you know, the
• 8:51
  Speaker 1: second time around, there had been zero chants that this
• 8:53
  Speaker 1: case would have been reopened zero chance. So it's nice
• 8:57
  Speaker 1: to see that Julie K. Brown is is charged so
• 9:02
  Speaker 1: hard against this against these people, and took this case
• 9:05
  Speaker 1: as seriously as she did and saw it through to
• 9:09
  Speaker 1: an outcome such as Jeffrey Epstein getting arrested. It's pretty
• 9:12
  Speaker 1: awesome work and she should be commended for it. But
• 9:14
  Speaker 1: there are other people who have been researching this case
• 9:17
  Speaker 1: for a very long time as well. They just don't
• 9:19
  Speaker 1: have the stature of Julie K. Brown. The papers reporting
• 9:24
  Speaker 1: also reanimated civil litigation from the convicted pedophiles survivors and
• 9:30
  Speaker 1: has been credited for Epstein's federal sex trafficking indictment, whose
• 9:34
  Speaker 1: investigation has outlived it's key defendant. Yeah, hey, look like
• 9:38
  Speaker 1: I just said. She definitely deserves all the credit in
• 9:40
  Speaker 1: the world for that. Julie K. Brown's a hero in
• 9:42
  Speaker 1: this story, and her investigation into this case should win
• 9:48
  Speaker 1: awards because she really did the job of fifteen investigative
• 9:53
  Speaker 1: journalists and she was dealing with some very dangerous people
• 9:56
  Speaker 1: and she was never deterred. She just kept going and
• 9:59
  Speaker 1: kept pounding and kept grinding, And that's exactly the sort
• 10:03
  Speaker 1: of thing you need to do if you're going to
• 10:05
  Speaker 1: chase down people like Jeffrey Epstein. A little more than
• 10:09
  Speaker 1: an hour before today's telephone conference, the Herald signaled it
• 10:12
  Speaker 1: would remain a thorn in the side of Epstein's associates
• 10:15
  Speaker 1: in a memo giving Maxwell's legal team a lesson in
• 10:17
  Speaker 1: press freedom. Miss Maxwell's attack on The Herald and Brown's
• 10:21
  Speaker 1: reporting on this case of significant public interest is wholly unwarranted,
• 10:26
  Speaker 1: and her positions demonstrate her interest and continues to hide
• 10:31
  Speaker 1: from public scrutiny that which has already been sealed for
• 10:34
  Speaker 1: far too long. The paper's attorney, Christine Walls wrote. She
• 10:38
  Speaker 1: further fundamentally mischaracterized the role of the media in seeking
• 10:42
  Speaker 1: access to court records. The media are not distinguishable from
• 10:45
  Speaker 1: the public. They are the surrogates for the public, and
• 10:48
  Speaker 1: that's for sure. The media, the fourth Estate's real job
• 10:52
  Speaker 1: is to expose stuff like this. The media's real job
• 10:55
  Speaker 1: is to let the public know that there is corruption
• 10:58
  Speaker 1: going on. The media is job isn't to play sides.
• 11:01
  Speaker 1: The media's job isn't to have a political bent. The
• 11:04
  Speaker 1: media's job isn't to tell you what to think. The
• 11:07
  Speaker 1: media's job is to report the facts and then you
• 11:10
  Speaker 1: are to form your own opinions. And especially the media's job,
• 11:14
  Speaker 1: or a content creator's job, or a reporter's job is
• 11:17
  Speaker 1: the most important thing is that you don't become the story.
• 11:21
  Speaker 1: And there seems to be a lot of people who
• 11:23
  Speaker 1: want to be the story in this case. And thankfully
• 11:26
  Speaker 1: Julie Brown and some of these other reporters that have
• 11:29
  Speaker 1: been working doggedly for the Miami Herald have not done that.
• 11:34
  Speaker 1: It's always been about the survivors and justice for the survivors,
• 11:38
  Speaker 1: and that's definitely respectable. In my opinion, I think Julie K.
• 11:41
  Speaker 1: Brown deserves a lot of credit for the way she
• 11:43
  Speaker 1: went about this, highlighting the potential for further press scrutiny.
• 11:48
  Speaker 1: Walls took umbrage during today's phone conference with Maxwell's bid
• 11:51
  Speaker 1: to have the language of the notifications emphasized the consequence
• 11:55
  Speaker 1: of the information becoming public. Look, Maxwell doesn't want this
• 12:01
  Speaker 1: stuff out there, doesn't want it to become public, because
• 12:04
  Speaker 1: that's one less bullet in her chamber. If this stuff
• 12:06
  Speaker 1: is public and these guys are outed, what does she
• 12:09
  Speaker 1: have holding over their heads? How can she blackmail them?
• 12:12
  Speaker 1: How can she you know, force them into doing what
• 12:14
  Speaker 1: she wants them to do. If this all becomes public,
• 12:17
  Speaker 1: she loses all the ammunition from her gun, and then
• 12:21
  Speaker 1: what what is she left with? Nothing? She has left
• 12:24
  Speaker 1: with nothing, and she knows the only thing that's keeping
• 12:27
  Speaker 1: her hat out of prison at this point are the
• 12:29
  Speaker 1: dark secrets that she knows and the powerful people that
• 12:32
  Speaker 1: she can she can unmask inside of this entire, this whole,
• 12:38
  Speaker 1: entire criminal enterprise, and that's what they're scared of. And
• 12:41
  Speaker 1: if they take that away from her, if they take
• 12:45
  Speaker 1: that away from her, she will have nothing left. And
• 12:48
  Speaker 1: the self preservation that we see her involved in for
• 12:51
  Speaker 1: so long will soon be gone, and she will have
• 12:55
  Speaker 1: no choice but to be questioned by the FBI at
• 12:59
  Speaker 1: that point. Judge Presco agreed the semantic change Maxwell proposed
• 13:06
  Speaker 1: does sound terribly scary and was not needed, as the
• 13:09
  Speaker 1: notifications already state that the files would become publicly available. Accordingly,
• 13:14
  Speaker 1: the proposed language is denied. Presca said, well, that's good.
• 13:18
  Speaker 1: A denial to Gillane Maxwell's team, a denial to Gillane
• 13:23
  Speaker 1: Maxwell and her attempts to keep things quiet and to
• 13:29
  Speaker 1: keep these names sealed. It's it's always nice when you
• 13:31
  Speaker 1: see her and her team get a slap in the
• 13:33
  Speaker 1: face when the Second Circuit unsealed the initial tranch of
• 13:37
  Speaker 1: files in August. Their release turned up public scrutiny on
• 13:41
  Speaker 1: model scout Jean Luke Brunel, New Mexico governor Bill Richardson,
• 13:45
  Speaker 1: financier pedophile Glenn Dubin, and former Senator George Mitchell, to
• 13:50
  Speaker 1: name a few. Another of these individuals, Britain's Prince Andrew,
• 13:53
  Speaker 1: has been dogged by controversy ever since. Oh as he
• 13:57
  Speaker 1: well should, as he well should. This man is an
• 14:01
  Speaker 1: absolute black eye for the English people, an embarrassment to
• 14:06
  Speaker 1: the Royals, and that's saying a lot considering all the
• 14:08
  Speaker 1: embarrassments that they've had in their family. And for this
• 14:12
  Speaker 1: guy to still run around and act like he hasn't
• 14:15
  Speaker 1: done anything, and to thumb his nose at the rest
• 14:18
  Speaker 1: of us by hiring this legal team and hiding behind
• 14:21
  Speaker 1: them after saying he was going to talk to the authorities.
• 14:24
  Speaker 1: It just goes to show you the kind of person
• 14:26
  Speaker 1: that Andrew is. Andrew, who is Queen Elizabeth's second son,
• 14:31
  Speaker 1: is still reeling from a public relations disaster that transpired
• 14:35
  Speaker 1: with a BBC interview in November. Federal prosecutors in New
• 14:39
  Speaker 1: York disclosed earlier this month that the Prince completely shut
• 14:42
  Speaker 1: the door on voluntary cooperation forming the US, forcing the
• 14:46
  Speaker 1: US Attorney's Office to weigh other options. Former prosecutors for
• 14:51
  Speaker 1: the district say those measures could include everything from a
• 14:54
  Speaker 1: request under the Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty or MLATT to
• 14:58
  Speaker 1: an arrest warrant. Well, that's pretty horror strong, a pretty
• 15:05
  Speaker 1: strong statement, huh. And arrest warrant for Prince Andrew. That
• 15:08
  Speaker 1: would be nice. I'd love to see that. I don't
• 15:10
  Speaker 1: know if we we'll get to that point anytime soon,
• 15:12
  Speaker 1: but i'd love to see it. In my opinion, the
• 15:14
  Speaker 1: only way we can get there is if we do
• 15:17
  Speaker 1: the do it correctly and go after the lieutenants first,
• 15:21
  Speaker 1: round them all up, have them all start ratting on
• 15:23
  Speaker 1: each other, build the case against Prince Andrew that's so
• 15:26
  Speaker 1: iron clad that they can't deny the request, and then
• 15:29
  Speaker 1: present the evidence to the English authorities and have them
• 15:32
  Speaker 1: get on board. That's pretty much the only way we're
• 15:34
  Speaker 1: ever going to get Andrew wrapped up in this, especially
• 15:37
  Speaker 1: if there's an arrest warrant, it's gonna have to be
• 15:39
  Speaker 1: an ironclad case. But the other ones, the core four. Look,
• 15:44
  Speaker 1: they're right here in America. They're right here for Berman
• 15:47
  Speaker 1: to go after, and they're not going to be protected
• 15:49
  Speaker 1: by that immunity deal according to the SDNY. So what
• 15:52
  Speaker 1: are you guys waiting for? Go get the Core four,
• 15:56
  Speaker 1: start the interrogations, have them all start singing like little
• 15:59
  Speaker 1: song birds, and then mass arrests. I am talking mass
• 16:05
  Speaker 1: arrests everybody that was involved, all the employees who covered
• 16:08
  Speaker 1: for him, the pilots who covered for him, Everybody who
• 16:12
  Speaker 1: does not cooperate gets arrested. Everybody gets hit with rico charges.
• 16:17
  Speaker 1: Everybody is getting rid in fear of having all of
• 16:22
  Speaker 1: their finances seized by the federal government. That should be
• 16:26
  Speaker 1: what's going on right now now. Prince Andrew is certainly
• 16:30
  Speaker 1: that you're going big game hunting when you're going after
• 16:32
  Speaker 1: Prince Andrew, and there's no doubt you want to put
• 16:34
  Speaker 1: that feather in your cap and you want to bring
• 16:36
  Speaker 1: him to justice. But I think the proper course is
• 16:39
  Speaker 1: to go after the Core four in Gelan. First, get
• 16:42
  Speaker 1: them caught up, get them wrapped up, get them singing,
• 16:45
  Speaker 1: get them ratting, and then build that ironclad case that
• 16:48
  Speaker 1: nobody can pick apart, and then slam it right down
• 16:52
  Speaker 1: on the Prince of punk Asses aka the Prince of Lies,
• 16:56
  Speaker 1: Prince Andrew. Hopefully we get some more movement in this
• 17:00
  Speaker 1: case soon. Hopefully PRESCA does the right thing and releases
• 17:05
  Speaker 1: the materials that should be released, and hopefully the lawyers
• 17:09
  Speaker 1: for Virginia can continue to battle tooth and nail to
• 17:13
  Speaker 1: get this stuff released for the for public consumption. It's
• 17:16
  Speaker 1: it's a tragedy that this has not been released already.
• 17:19
  Speaker 1: This is something that concerns the whole entire nation and
• 17:24
  Speaker 1: it is still being kept under wraps. We deserve to
• 17:27
  Speaker 1: know who was involved with Jeffrey Epstein, and the survivors
• 17:30
  Speaker 1: deserve to be vindicated by those people being put on
• 17:33
  Speaker 1: blast as well. All Right, folks, if you'd like to
• 17:37
  Speaker 1: contact me, you can do that at Bobby Kapuci at
• 17:39
  Speaker 1: ProtonMail dot com. That's bo b b y c ap
• 17:42
  Speaker 1: U c c I at ProtonMail dot com. You can