Latest / Paging America / Trifectas on the Table: How State Races Could Reshape Health Care
Transcript
- 0:00SPEAKER_00: Particularly small communities,
- 0:01SPEAKER_00: hospital is like the center of that town, of that community for jobs.
- 0:05SPEAKER_00: You know, if those hospitals close, people just leave town.
- 0:08SPEAKER_00: They don't have anything else to do.
- 0:10SPEAKER_00: And so making that connection between Roger Marshall's supporters' corruption
- 0:14SPEAKER_00: and Roger Marshall's corruption,
- 0:16SPEAKER_00: directly increasing costs, directly taking away healthcare, that is the story.
- 0:21SPEAKER_00: People are pissed about corruption,
- 0:22SPEAKER_00: but I think they're pissed about it in the guise
- 0:24SPEAKER_00: of it actually making their lives more difficult.
- 0:30SPEAKER_00: Miles, it's good to see you upright today.
- 0:33SPEAKER_00: You were down.
- 0:33SPEAKER_00: You were down yesterday.
- 0:34SPEAKER_00: Yes, I was.
- 0:35SPEAKER_02: What's going on?
- 0:36SPEAKER_02: I don't know.
- 0:36SPEAKER_02: I've been burning the candle at both ends because we're mid-election season, so I was down.
- 0:40SPEAKER_02: But I'm feeling a lot better today.
- 0:42SPEAKER_02: You were at an event with a lot of physicians supporting Dr.
- 0:48SPEAKER_02: Abdul El-Sayed down at the Detroit debate.
- 0:50SPEAKER_02: Is that right?
- 0:51SPEAKER_00: Yeah, we're outside the studio,
- 0:53SPEAKER_00: doctors in white coats, you know, supporting our fellow Dr. Abdul El-Sayed.
- 0:58SPEAKER_00: Also kind of on the heels,
- 0:59SPEAKER_00: you know,
- 0:59SPEAKER_00: of a big letter coming out from doctors in Michigan and healthcare providers,
- 1:03SPEAKER_00: over a thousand healthcare professionals in Michigan,
- 1:06SPEAKER_00: you know, declaring their support for fellow Dr. Abdul El-Sayed.
- 1:09SPEAKER_00: And I'm going to tell you,
- 1:11SPEAKER_00: Some of the just meanest people I've ever seen in real life on
- 1:16SPEAKER_00: the other side just screaming at us with Mike Rogers signs.
- 1:19SPEAKER_00: Just like every racist rant against Abdul and just socialism.
- 1:28SPEAKER_00: Someone looked and said my white coat was from Party City.
- 1:31SPEAKER_00: That's pretty funny.
- 1:35SPEAKER_00: But it was a person in a Dalmatian suit with a megaphone.
- 1:39SPEAKER_00: And I think...
- 1:41SPEAKER_00: Like guns is a real divisive issue in this country.
- 1:44SPEAKER_00: I think megaphone control needs to be a thing we talk about.
- 1:48SPEAKER_00: This person didn't need a megaphone and really shouldn't have had one.
- 1:53SPEAKER_00: And also, somebody brought, I think, a 30-foot Jeffrey Epstein to this rally.
- 1:59SPEAKER_00: Like an inflatable?
- 2:01SPEAKER_02: I watched it on the internet.
- 2:02SPEAKER_02: I wasn't able to be there, but I was watching it.
- 2:04SPEAKER_02: Yeah, yeah,
- 2:05SPEAKER_02: I just know that the Mike Rogers protesters,
- 2:07SPEAKER_02: the ones who were there protesting Abdul or supporting Mike Rogers
- 2:11SPEAKER_02: and screaming their heads off like crazy people,
- 2:14SPEAKER_02: they spent a lot of time trying to cover up Um,
- 2:19SPEAKER_02: the giant inflatable Jeffrey Epstein, like with their signs.
- 2:22SPEAKER_02: It almost looked like Jeffrey Epstein was,
- 2:25SPEAKER_02: uh, like the big inflatable Jeffrey Epstein was supporting Mike Rogers.
- 2:29SPEAKER_02: But irony is dead if these guys spent their time trying to cover up the phrase on
- 2:35SPEAKER_02: the thing that said,
- 2:36SPEAKER_02: Epstein class,
- 2:36SPEAKER_02: that the Mike Rogers people were trying to cover up the Epstein class,
- 2:40SPEAKER_02: were engaging in a cover up.
- 2:41SPEAKER_02: They were totally unselfaware.
- 2:43SPEAKER_00: A little too on the nose, right?
- 2:47SPEAKER_02: Back in the day,
- 2:48SPEAKER_02: a long time ago,
- 2:50SPEAKER_02: wild-eyed protestors were the providence of the left,
- 2:53SPEAKER_02: and it seems like it's the right now.
- 2:57SPEAKER_02: You have physicians and nurses calmly showing their support,
- 3:01SPEAKER_02: and these people just going absolutely nuts.
- 3:04SPEAKER_00: Hey, man, it started with the Tea Party.
- 3:06SPEAKER_00: It ramped up on January 6th, right?
- 3:09SPEAKER_00: Like that was the ultimate, like actually attacking police officers.
- 3:13SPEAKER_00: And they, you know, the rhetoric just continues.
- 3:16SPEAKER_00: And yeah, it was ugly.
- 3:17SPEAKER_00: I was not,
- 3:18SPEAKER_00: I was kind of not prepared for like that level and the ability
- 3:22SPEAKER_00: to not completely engage.
- 3:24SPEAKER_00: I'm not going to say I didn't engage a little bit, but like, you know, to not really go off.
- 3:28SPEAKER_00: That took a lot of restraint, 55 years of living in restraint to not go there.
- 3:34SPEAKER_02: All right, everyone.
- 3:35SPEAKER_02: Welcome back to Paging America.
- 3:37SPEAKER_02: This is the show where we explore the power and profit shaping American healthcare
- 3:40SPEAKER_02: and your home base for news and interviews from people building
- 3:43SPEAKER_02: the universal healthcare movement.
- 3:44SPEAKER_02: I'm your host, campaign strategist Miles Baker.
- 3:46SPEAKER_00: And I'm Dr.
- 3:47SPEAKER_00: Rob Davidson.
- 3:48SPEAKER_02: And we have a great Great show for you today,
- 3:50SPEAKER_02: but before we get started,
- 3:50SPEAKER_02: please head over to our YouTube and hit the subscribe button.
- 3:53SPEAKER_02: Help us fight misinformation and disinformation on the platform
- 3:56SPEAKER_02: with real healthcare news and opinions.
- 3:58SPEAKER_02: Thank you.
- 3:58SPEAKER_02: So we got a big show today, Rob.
- 4:01SPEAKER_02: We're going to talk a little bit.
- 4:02SPEAKER_02: There's a lot in the news about what's happening federally,
- 4:05SPEAKER_02: and a lot of people are covering that in a great way,
- 4:07SPEAKER_02: but we're going to dive a little deeper into what might happen in states and
- 4:10SPEAKER_02: the implications for healthcare policy.
- 4:12SPEAKER_02: We're going to touch on the physician running for re-election down in Kansas,
- 4:17SPEAKER_02: Dr. Det, Roger Marshall, as he limps through the finish line.
- 4:22SPEAKER_02: RFK Jr.
- 4:22SPEAKER_02: will head up the new White House Women's Health Task Force in one of the craziest,
- 4:26SPEAKER_02: I mean, just stupid ideas ever.
- 4:29SPEAKER_02: And then a vaccine research program in Guinea-Bissau touted by RFK has major ethical issues.
- 4:35SPEAKER_02: And then, Rob, who did you, I know you did the interview yesterday.
- 4:39SPEAKER_02: Who did we talk to?
- 4:40SPEAKER_00: I talked with oncologist Dr. Mikhail Sekiris.
- 4:43SPEAKER_00: We talked a bit about Pope Leo and his lung cancer diagnosis and surgery
- 4:47SPEAKER_00: and potential prognosis.
- 4:48SPEAKER_00: Now, since then, I will say, news dropped yesterday that the Pope is done with treatment, right?
- 4:52SPEAKER_00: They cured his cancer.
- 4:53SPEAKER_00: We're all very happy.
- 4:55SPEAKER_00: For the Pope, right?
- 4:56SPEAKER_00: Great voice of reason and promoting peace in this world.
- 5:01SPEAKER_00: But we talk more about cancer, particularly cancer and nonsmokers.
- 5:06SPEAKER_00: It's just,
- 5:06SPEAKER_00: I think,
- 5:07SPEAKER_00: an interesting conversation,
- 5:08SPEAKER_00: a little different than what we sometimes do,
- 5:10SPEAKER_00: but I think interesting and definitely worth a listen.
- 5:12SPEAKER_02: Okay, yeah, so stick around for that if that's an interesting topic for you.
- 5:16SPEAKER_02: All right, let's get into some polling.
- 5:21SPEAKER_02: I'll say it again.
- 5:21SPEAKER_02: This year has been a deluge of polling.
- 5:25SPEAKER_02: Too many pollsters.
- 5:26SPEAKER_02: All right, guys, cool it, everybody.
- 5:28SPEAKER_02: We've got these fake pollsters.
- 5:30SPEAKER_02: Not everyone needs a research shop, you know?
- 5:33SPEAKER_02: But the Times-Siena poll came out, and that's really considered the gold standard.
- 5:39SPEAKER_02: The New York Times-Siena poll was showing that Dems are at
- 5:42SPEAKER_02: a plus 11 generic gubernatorial,
- 5:46SPEAKER_02: plus 5 for Senate races, and then plus 11 for Congress.
- 5:50SPEAKER_02: Trump has a 59% disapproval rating and 36% approval,
- 5:55SPEAKER_02: and a plurality of voters will vote for candidates who provide a check on Trump.
- 5:59SPEAKER_02: We were saying that this might be as bad as Bush in 06 or Clinton in 94,
- 6:06SPEAKER_02: but we are fully into Harry Truman territory.
- 6:10SPEAKER_02: There is not really a modern precedent for how unpopular the president is.
- 6:15SPEAKER_02: That does bode well for the Democrats in the midterms.
- 6:17SPEAKER_02: 43% of people are very dissatisfied with the Democratic Party,
- 6:20SPEAKER_02: but 52% are very dissatisfied with the GOP.
- 6:23SPEAKER_02: People trust Democrats over the GOP on a wide range of issues.
- 6:26SPEAKER_02: On health care, it's a 20-point gap.
- 6:29SPEAKER_02: So this year, a remarkable number of states.
- 6:32SPEAKER_02: So federally, that bodes really well.
- 6:34SPEAKER_02: And I know we're all really concerned about the House and the Senate.
- 6:37SPEAKER_02: And yeah, it makes sense to be concerned about those.
- 6:40SPEAKER_02: But a place where there's like some real interesting,
- 6:43SPEAKER_02: and the thing that could be really interesting this year,
- 6:45SPEAKER_02: is a remarkable number of states could end up with trifectas.
- 6:50SPEAKER_02: And it has sort of the corporatist group,
- 6:52SPEAKER_02: the State Policy Network, which is the Koch Brothers funded bill mill.
- 6:57SPEAKER_02: People have called it a bill mill.
- 6:59SPEAKER_02: It has them rattled according to their...
- 7:01SPEAKER_02: So this is from a right-wing think tank, not Democrats.
- 7:05SPEAKER_02: Their analysis says seven states have paths to new democratic trifectas.
- 7:09SPEAKER_02: That includes Nevada, Arizona, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and New Hampshire.
- 7:15SPEAKER_02: In addition,
- 7:15SPEAKER_02: eight existing trifectas could break,
- 7:17SPEAKER_02: including seven Republican trifectas and one Democratic trifecta.
- 7:21SPEAKER_02: Maine's Dem trifecta could break,
- 7:23SPEAKER_02: and the seven vulnerable GOP trifectas are Texas,
- 7:26SPEAKER_02: Iowa, Ohio, Georgia, South Carolina, Florida, and New Hampshire.
- 7:29SPEAKER_02: Obviously, like Dems taking the chamber in Florida, Maybe even Texas.
- 7:34SPEAKER_02: These all seem like a little challenging, but they're worried about them.
- 7:38SPEAKER_02: I'm not so sure that some of these Southern states are going to go,
- 7:41SPEAKER_02: but also,
- 7:42SPEAKER_02: a lot of them have super majorities,
- 7:44SPEAKER_02: and you're going to see wipeouts of super majorities,
- 7:46SPEAKER_02: and that has real implications if they end up in divided government.
- 7:51SPEAKER_02: Exciting stuff in the states.
- 7:53SPEAKER_02: And I will just say, like,
- 7:54SPEAKER_02: you have,
- 7:55SPEAKER_02: along with me and all of our friends at the Committee to Protect Healthcare,
- 7:59SPEAKER_02: we have done healthcare advocacy in states with divided government.
- 8:03SPEAKER_02: I'm wondering if you have any reflections on how difficult that is.
- 8:06SPEAKER_00: Yeah, yeah.
- 8:07SPEAKER_00: I mean, policy advocacy, right?
- 8:09SPEAKER_00: It's even tough with unified, you know, trifecta government.
- 8:13SPEAKER_00: And hopefully they've all and we've all learned a lesson now and don't read too much
- 8:18SPEAKER_00: into a big night on election night saying, Wow, everyone loves Democrats.
- 8:23SPEAKER_00: It's like, no, you have to do something, people.
- 8:25SPEAKER_00: You have to make people's lives better.
- 8:27SPEAKER_00: When it comes to healthcare,
- 8:28SPEAKER_00: it's lowering prescription drug costs,
- 8:29SPEAKER_00: like lowering insurance costs,
- 8:31SPEAKER_00: like breaking up these massive profit-driven monopolies
- 8:35SPEAKER_00: that hospitals have driving up prices.
- 8:37SPEAKER_00: You have to do those things.
- 8:39SPEAKER_00: But man, like trying to do anything when you don't have.
- 8:43SPEAKER_00: And again, we just got to be real here.
- 8:46SPEAKER_00: It is the Democrats who have done anything in states to lower prices when it comes
- 8:52SPEAKER_00: to health care, seemingly when it comes to anything.
- 8:54SPEAKER_00: And so getting full Democrat control in these places,
- 9:01SPEAKER_00: it just opens up the possibilities to a public option in Wisconsin,
- 9:05SPEAKER_00: to a prescription drug board or other ways of lowering drug prices in
- 9:08SPEAKER_00: a state like Michigan.
- 9:10SPEAKER_00: And so I'm ecstatic at the possibility of this because it just opens that aperture
- 9:16SPEAKER_00: on the places.
- 9:17SPEAKER_00: Because let's be real,
- 9:18SPEAKER_00: it's going to be tough to get anything significant done in Washington, D.C.
- 9:23SPEAKER_00: Or somebody who is a Republican will still be president until January 20th of 29.
- 9:29SPEAKER_02: The Hawaii Senator Brian Schatz thought that maybe they could restore Medicaid cuts.
- 9:33SPEAKER_02: And I'm glad he's saying that.
- 9:34SPEAKER_02: And I'm glad they're looking at it.
- 9:36SPEAKER_02: But I'm just very skeptical that Donald Trump is going
- 9:40SPEAKER_02: to let any health care restoration happen.
- 9:42SPEAKER_02: It doesn't benefit him personally.
- 9:44SPEAKER_02: They're not able to skim off the top.
- 9:45SPEAKER_02: It's not on his agenda.
- 9:46SPEAKER_02: He'll use the veto pen.
- 9:47SPEAKER_00: But I hope they call whatever they do Trump care.
- 9:50SPEAKER_00: Just give it to him.
- 9:51SPEAKER_00: I don't give Gild it, right?
- 9:55SPEAKER_00: He can get a peace prize out of it.
- 9:57SPEAKER_00: Who gives a shit?
- 9:57SPEAKER_00: We just gotta get relief for people.
- 9:59SPEAKER_02: Yeah, I'm fine for calling it that.
- 10:03SPEAKER_02: Just to run through some of the possibilities in the trifecta.
- 10:06SPEAKER_02: So ABC News reports that Dems plan to codify abortion rights if they win a trifecta
- 10:09SPEAKER_02: in Pennsylvania.
- 10:10SPEAKER_02: That's great.
- 10:11SPEAKER_02: Minnesota Dems say they plan to work on affordability and the cost of healthcare and housing.
- 10:16SPEAKER_02: That would be great.
- 10:17SPEAKER_02: A public option has been floated in the past in Minnesota.
- 10:20SPEAKER_02: I will say the Democrats weren't able to get that done because of
- 10:23SPEAKER_02: a left-wing Democrat, not because of a right-wing Republican.
- 10:27SPEAKER_02: The public option in Minnesota got tanked by a Medicare for All diehard,
- 10:31SPEAKER_02: which was very uncool of him because Medicare for All is not available at
- 10:35SPEAKER_02: the state level.
- 10:36SPEAKER_02: So it was just like a really, it was like a, you know, that was too bad.
- 10:40SPEAKER_02: So it's just like,
- 10:41SPEAKER_02: even if you have a trifecta,
- 10:42SPEAKER_02: it's not a foregone conclusion that you're going to be able
- 10:44SPEAKER_02: to pass significant healthcare reform.
- 10:46SPEAKER_02: Healthcare affordability is a top priority in Nevada for Aaron Ford,
- 10:49SPEAKER_02: who's running against Joe Lombardo, who held up the Nevada public option.
- 10:53SPEAKER_02: That's one of his claims to fame.
- 10:54SPEAKER_02: Joe Lombardo,
- 10:56SPEAKER_02: the current governor of Nevada,
- 10:58SPEAKER_02: basically has slow rolled a robust public option that was passed by the legislature,
- 11:03SPEAKER_02: and he's intervening on it at the executive level.
- 11:05SPEAKER_02: That's not going to happen if Aaron Ford wins.
- 11:07SPEAKER_02: In Arizona,
- 11:09SPEAKER_02: they're going to pass reproductive rights legislation,
- 11:11SPEAKER_02: and in Michigan,
- 11:12SPEAKER_02: Lowering prescription drug costs
- 11:14SPEAKER_02: and potentially putting hospital consolidation oversight inside of
- 11:18SPEAKER_02: the attorney general's office are on the table there.
- 11:20SPEAKER_02: So just really exciting.
- 11:21SPEAKER_02: Just like a list of like,
- 11:23SPEAKER_02: it's not as exciting as big universal health care proposals at the federal level,
- 11:26SPEAKER_02: but these are things that can make meaningful differences in people's lives in
- 11:30SPEAKER_02: the states.
- 11:30SPEAKER_02: And so the way that
- 11:32SPEAKER_02: the state legislators are shaping up could have Some really cool outcomes
- 11:36SPEAKER_02: for healthcare and healthcare politics.
- 11:38SPEAKER_00: What's the saying?
- 11:39SPEAKER_00: States are the laboratory of democracy or something like
- 11:42SPEAKER_02: that, right?
- 11:42SPEAKER_02: Laboratory of democracy.
- 11:44SPEAKER_02: Yeah.
- 11:45SPEAKER_02: One of the things that is true about public option healthcare,
- 11:49SPEAKER_02: we have not expanded healthcare in this country
- 11:53SPEAKER_02: that did not include significant giveaways to the private sector in
- 11:57SPEAKER_02: a very long time.
- 11:58SPEAKER_02: You start to experiment with that at the states and you can show that it can happen federally.
- 12:04SPEAKER_02: You know, it's just like it's been years since that's happened.
- 12:07SPEAKER_02: And so there's like,
- 12:08SPEAKER_02: you know, I think for some people that it's their imagination can't go there.
- 12:12SPEAKER_02: It's easy,
- 12:13SPEAKER_02: you know,
- 12:13SPEAKER_02: like for a policymaker,
- 12:14SPEAKER_02: for activists and for people who care about this stuff,
- 12:16SPEAKER_02: it's just like Medicare for all or federal public option.
- 12:19SPEAKER_02: And it's like so much easier said than actually done.
- 12:22SPEAKER_02: But if you go do the hard work,
- 12:23SPEAKER_02: the shovel work of getting some of this done in the states,
- 12:26SPEAKER_02: show the feds that it can happen.
- 12:28SPEAKER_02: It creates momentum, and the laboratories of democracy are at work.
- 12:32SPEAKER_02: So, yeah.
- 12:33SPEAKER_00: I think the other piece of this is, you touched on it, it's a proof point, right?
- 12:38SPEAKER_00: But it's also a proof point electorally.
- 12:40SPEAKER_00: And if you look at,
- 12:42SPEAKER_00: you know, like,
- 12:43SPEAKER_00: I hear all the time,
- 12:44SPEAKER_00: well, the Democratic Party is less popular than Trump or whoever, right?
- 12:49SPEAKER_00: But a lot of that unpopularity is from people who are Democrats, right?
- 12:53SPEAKER_00: People who are on the left or just pissed at their party for not doing enough.
- 12:57SPEAKER_00: It isn't like, no.
- 12:58SPEAKER_00: You lowered costs too much, right?
- 12:59SPEAKER_00: You gave too much healthcare.
- 13:01SPEAKER_00: It's like you're not doing enough.
- 13:02SPEAKER_00: And so if you can show in these states, okay,
- 13:05SPEAKER_00: you went to the mailbox,
- 13:06SPEAKER_00: you voted in a trifecta in Michigan,
- 13:08SPEAKER_00: in Arizona,
- 13:09SPEAKER_00: in Minnesota,
- 13:09SPEAKER_00: you know,
- 13:10SPEAKER_00: Wisconsin,
- 13:10SPEAKER_00: across the board,
- 13:11SPEAKER_00: and then look what you did It's saying, okay, now, 2028,
- 13:17SPEAKER_00: let's do this in a bigger way because we already showed you we could do it
- 13:20SPEAKER_00: in your state.
- 13:21SPEAKER_00: What the hell could we actually accomplish in DC if you give the reins of power
- 13:25SPEAKER_00: and we run on that and then we actually do it?
- 13:28SPEAKER_00: Like I think it's a one, two, three, however many step process to actually do it.
- 13:32SPEAKER_00: But I think it's essential if anyone's going to trust them heading into 28 and trust
- 13:38SPEAKER_00: the rhetoric that's going to be coming out in the Democratic primary
- 13:42SPEAKER_00: of helping people when it comes to lowering costs, particularly with health care.
- 13:46SPEAKER_02: Yeah, that's exactly right.
- 13:48SPEAKER_02: All right, enough on the states.
- 13:50SPEAKER_02: I know people don't want to,
- 13:51SPEAKER_02: I feel like when we talk about state politics,
- 13:53SPEAKER_02: it's kind of like serving up vegetables to people.
- 13:55SPEAKER_02: But if you're this interested in healthcare policy,
- 13:57SPEAKER_02: that you're listening to Paging America, you're probably interested in this state.
- 14:00SPEAKER_02: So that's a little rundown.
- 14:03SPEAKER_02: We'll be watching it on election night.
- 14:04SPEAKER_02: And I will share,
- 14:06SPEAKER_02: we will be circulating in the show notes,
- 14:08SPEAKER_02: not next episode,
- 14:09SPEAKER_02: but before election day,
- 14:11SPEAKER_02: A comprehensive tracker of all the state elections
- 14:14SPEAKER_02: that have healthcare policy implications.
- 14:16SPEAKER_02: So that'll be a resource that we're going to be providing for folks,
- 14:18SPEAKER_02: and you can take a look at it.
- 14:20SPEAKER_02: That'll be sponsored by the Committee to Protect Healthcare.
- 14:22SPEAKER_02: We'll make sure that we make it available to listeners of this show as well.
- 14:25SPEAKER_00: Are we going to have a nerd alert with it?
- 14:27SPEAKER_02: Nerd alert?
- 14:27SPEAKER_02: Yeah.
- 14:28SPEAKER_02: Nerd alert.
- 14:28SPEAKER_02: Amen.
- 14:29SPEAKER_02: I'll be looking at it.
- 14:30SPEAKER_02: I'll be on it.
- 14:30SPEAKER_02: I'll be on it all day.
- 14:31SPEAKER_02: I'll have a real nerd alert.
- 14:33SPEAKER_00: Yeah, yeah, yeah.
- 14:33SPEAKER_00: Okay.
- 14:35SPEAKER_02: All right, so let's transition over to federal elections for healthcare.
- 14:40SPEAKER_02: And this is my favorite Senate race in America, Alaska to Miami.
- 14:44SPEAKER_02: This is the best one.
- 14:45SPEAKER_02: It's the most exciting.
- 14:46SPEAKER_02: Vulnerable Republican, Kansas Senator Roger Marshall.
- 14:50SPEAKER_02: He's limping into Election Day.
- 14:53SPEAKER_02: He's run an absolutely pathetic campaign.
- 14:56SPEAKER_02: His congressional finance report
- 14:59SPEAKER_02: with no staff makes it seem like he's probably doing a federal crime
- 15:04SPEAKER_02: by having his government employees run his campaign.
- 15:07SPEAKER_02: Allegedly, no one's proved that yet, but I bet when he loses, he's in trouble.
- 15:14SPEAKER_02: On the heels of absolutely brutal reporting by The Times
- 15:17SPEAKER_02: about Roger Marshall suing his indigent patients and having them arrested,
- 15:21SPEAKER_02: in the final days of the election cycle,
- 15:22SPEAKER_02: his campaign is looking very much in jeopardy.
- 15:24SPEAKER_02: First, he's on the record and on camera saying that Kansas don't care about
- 15:28SPEAKER_02: the astronomical cost of gas,
- 15:30SPEAKER_02: and they don't care about having no money because,
- 15:32SPEAKER_02: well, let's just watch his own awful words.
- 15:36SPEAKER_02: So what I'm trying to say,
- 15:37SPEAKER_02: answer your question,
- 15:38SPEAKER_02: certainly the cost of gas is an issue,
- 15:40SPEAKER_02: but now people are coming home saying, oh, What's more important than money?
- 15:44SPEAKER_02: There are things more important than money to Kansans.
- 15:47SPEAKER_00: Two weeks out?
- 15:49SPEAKER_00: This is what you say, two weeks from election.
- 15:51SPEAKER_00: I mean, it's a hell of a closing message.
- 15:53SPEAKER_00: People might be voting.
- 15:53SPEAKER_00: I don't know the early voting calendar in Kansas.
- 15:55SPEAKER_00: They might be.
- 15:56SPEAKER_00: I don't know.
- 15:56SPEAKER_00: But hell, two weeks?
- 15:57SPEAKER_02: Yeah, it's a hell of a closing message.
- 16:01SPEAKER_02: Also, last night on the debate stage,
- 16:03SPEAKER_02: one, Roger Marshall got absolutely thumped in his second debate.
- 16:08SPEAKER_02: It was just ugly.
- 16:10SPEAKER_02: I was trying to keep track.
- 16:11SPEAKER_02: There was the Crowley debate, the Abdul debate, and the Roger Marshall-Adam Hamilton debate.
- 16:17SPEAKER_02: I was trying to keep track of all three of them last night.
- 16:19SPEAKER_02: But it was almost like, oh, let him up.
- 16:23SPEAKER_02: He's hurt.
- 16:24SPEAKER_02: But he looked like he had a Miami tan.
- 16:27SPEAKER_00: Oh, yeah.
- 16:28SPEAKER_00: Oh, he's another Florida guy.
- 16:30SPEAKER_00: He lives in Florida.
- 16:31SPEAKER_02: And he looks like he just like, I wanted to check his feet for sand.
- 16:36SPEAKER_02: The guy looks like he just got in from Tampa or something.
- 16:40SPEAKER_00: And he bolted after, right?
- 16:41SPEAKER_00: Like the news organization who hosted it, they interviewed Adam Hamilton.
- 16:45SPEAKER_00: They said, well, we tried to interview Senator Marshall, but he left.
- 16:48SPEAKER_00: He left.
- 16:48SPEAKER_02: Yeah, he left the room.
- 16:50SPEAKER_02: He like ran out of the building.
- 16:52SPEAKER_00: He knew, man.
- 16:53SPEAKER_02: It's incredible to watch some of these red state Republicans who just kind of luck
- 16:56SPEAKER_02: into their seats because of endurance or just like,
- 16:59SPEAKER_02: they're just like around and easy to elect,
- 17:02SPEAKER_02: that the minute the spotlight hits them,
- 17:04SPEAKER_02: you're like, oh,
- 17:05SPEAKER_02: this person is like,
- 17:07SPEAKER_02: you know, I wouldn't trust this person to do anything in my life.
- 17:10SPEAKER_02: One of the more.
- 17:12SPEAKER_00: And Adam Hamilton said, well, did you call ICE on those people right after they delivered?
- 17:16SPEAKER_00: You know, like, because that is the reality.
- 17:27SPEAKER_00: What's going on now, right?
- 17:29SPEAKER_00: And I don't know.
- 17:30SPEAKER_00: I mean, and for a guy who sued people for bills as low as $100,
- 17:34SPEAKER_00: some of them ending up in jail,
- 17:36SPEAKER_00: when he was making three quarters of a million dollars and he set
- 17:40SPEAKER_00: the loan shark rate of 18% on the debt people owed him,
- 17:45SPEAKER_00: this guy is saying, well, Kansans care about more things than money.
- 17:48SPEAKER_00: Well, he sure as hell didn't.
- 17:49SPEAKER_00: Like, that's all he cared about.
- 17:51SPEAKER_00: Like, it's crazy.
- 17:52SPEAKER_00: You know, what's good for you, but not for me.
- 17:54SPEAKER_00: It's insane.
- 17:54SPEAKER_02: And that's not all.
- 17:55SPEAKER_02: We have more.
- 17:56SPEAKER_02: Sorry, we're gonna go in on Roger Marshall, because this guy's such a scumbag.
- 18:00SPEAKER_02: The American Prospect has a piece out this week titled,
- 18:02SPEAKER_02: A Major Roger Marshall Donor Is a Hospital Bandit.
- 18:07SPEAKER_02: In it, they reveal that one of Marshall's top donors One of those owners
- 18:10SPEAKER_02: a rapacious private equity investor who buys hospitals,
- 18:14SPEAKER_02: strips them of all their value, and then dumps them.
- 18:16SPEAKER_02: Four months ago,
- 18:17SPEAKER_02: a Kansas-based private equity mogul named Dan Tasset posted on LinkedIn
- 18:20SPEAKER_02: about his admiration for a trusted representative in Congress.
- 18:24SPEAKER_02: Raising Marshall in his capacity as a constituent,
- 18:27SPEAKER_02: he and Marshall have been business partners for nearly 30 years.
- 18:31SPEAKER_02: Going back to the co-ownership of a health facility in Great Bend,
- 18:34SPEAKER_02: Kansas in 1998,
- 18:35SPEAKER_02: Marshall and his family have also invested in several of TASIT's venture funds,
- 18:39SPEAKER_02: as TASIT's private equity firm, Nutera,
- 18:42SPEAKER_02: where the business model is familiar for private equity forays into healthcare.
- 18:46SPEAKER_02: Nutera and its affiliates,
- 18:47SPEAKER_02: which TASIT claims have developed, quote,
- 18:49SPEAKER_02: More than 150 surgical facilities across 38 states have a nasty habit of buying
- 18:54SPEAKER_02: and strip mining hospitals that spiral into bankruptcy.
- 18:57SPEAKER_02: Two hospitals in Missouri and one in Florida have suffered this fate in the last decade.
- 19:02SPEAKER_02: Tacit brags on its website that it has deployed more than $850 million
- 19:05SPEAKER_02: in capital,
- 19:06SPEAKER_02: helped create approximately $4.5 billion in enterprise value,
- 19:10SPEAKER_02: and distributed more than $3 billion to investors.
- 19:12SPEAKER_02: It gets worse.
- 19:13SPEAKER_02: In addition to direct funding,
- 19:15SPEAKER_02: Marshall's campaign,
- 19:16SPEAKER_02: a tacit-affiliated company gave $100,000 to a pro-Marshall super PAC
- 19:19SPEAKER_02: that helped him win the Senate seat back in 2020.
- 19:22SPEAKER_02: So the game is they use private equity.
- 19:26SPEAKER_02: They invest in clinics and hospitals.
- 19:28SPEAKER_02: They strip mine those.
- 19:30SPEAKER_02: They flip some of the profits into a super PAC to make this guy a senator.
- 19:34SPEAKER_02: And then once anyone looks at it, they're like, he's the worst senator.
- 19:38SPEAKER_02: That's where we're at in Kansas.
- 19:42SPEAKER_02: Yeah, Marshall has worked to return the favor,
- 19:44SPEAKER_02: repeatedly introducing legislation to benefit Nutera.
- 19:46SPEAKER_02: In at least one instance,
- 19:47SPEAKER_02: legislation Marshall introduced benefited specific tacit companies
- 19:51SPEAKER_02: that Marshall's family was personally invested in.
- 19:53SPEAKER_02: This is the corruption.
- 19:55SPEAKER_02: This is the corruption that is driving up costs.
- 19:59SPEAKER_02: It is case number one.
- 20:01SPEAKER_02: This guy,
- 20:01SPEAKER_02: if Roger Marshall makes it back to the Senate, I mean,
- 20:06SPEAKER_02: I know the Senate doesn't really investigate other senators,
- 20:09SPEAKER_02: but this guy's engaged in some of
- 20:11SPEAKER_02: the grossest healthcare business practices you could possibly be engaged in.
- 20:15SPEAKER_02: And this is the waste and fraud.
- 20:17SPEAKER_02: Anyway, Rob, what do you think?
- 20:18SPEAKER_00: Yeah.
- 20:18SPEAKER_00: Well, and I think your analysis is exactly where I think we've seen John Ossoff talk
- 20:23SPEAKER_00: about this a lot.
- 20:24SPEAKER_00: Like, it's not just corruption for corruption's sake.
- 20:26SPEAKER_00: Because most of us,
- 20:27SPEAKER_00: I think most people in this country can look at what Trump's doing in office
- 20:30SPEAKER_00: and think this is just gross, right?
- 20:32SPEAKER_00: The crypto schemes and all that.
- 20:34SPEAKER_00: But it's like the corruption directly linked to driving up costs,
- 20:38SPEAKER_00: or in the case of this guy,
- 20:40SPEAKER_00: right, taking away hospitals, taking away jobs for people at hospitals.
- 20:45SPEAKER_00: In most communities,
- 20:47SPEAKER_00: particularly small communities,
- 20:48SPEAKER_00: hospitals It's like the center of that town, of that community for jobs.
- 20:54SPEAKER_00: You know,
- 20:55SPEAKER_00: if those hospitals close,
- 20:56SPEAKER_00: it's what we're going to see, frankly, from the HR1 Medicaid cuts.
- 21:01SPEAKER_00: Like people just leave town.
- 21:02SPEAKER_00: They don't have anything.
- 21:04SPEAKER_00: And so, like,
- 21:06SPEAKER_00: making that connection between Roger Marshall's supporters' corruption
- 21:10SPEAKER_00: and Roger Marshall's corruption directly increasing costs,
- 21:13SPEAKER_00: directly taking away healthcare, like, that is the story.
- 21:17SPEAKER_00: People are pissed about corruption,
- 21:18SPEAKER_00: but I think they're pissed about it in the guise
- 21:20SPEAKER_00: of it actually making their lives more difficult.
- 21:23SPEAKER_02: Yeah.
- 21:24SPEAKER_02: This is, like, how countries, like, go under.
- 21:26SPEAKER_02: It's, like, the impunity for corruption.
- 21:28SPEAKER_02: It is, you know,
- 21:29SPEAKER_02: the United States had, like,
- 21:31SPEAKER_02: There's been a lot of discussion around legalized corruption in the United States
- 21:35SPEAKER_02: for a long time,
- 21:36SPEAKER_02: but it just seems like it's so accelerated during the Trump era
- 21:40SPEAKER_02: that it just makes nothing work right.
- 21:43SPEAKER_02: Yeah.
- 21:43SPEAKER_02: Yeah.
- 21:44SPEAKER_02: So anyway, Roger Marshall, you're a bad guy.
- 21:48SPEAKER_02: Best of luck to you, Adam Hamilton.
- 21:49SPEAKER_02: Oh my gosh.
- 21:50SPEAKER_00: I am maybe going to be, I'm with you.
- 21:51SPEAKER_00: I'm going to be watching that almost more than any other race.
- 21:55SPEAKER_00: It would be so beautiful to see Dr. Dett go down.
- 21:58SPEAKER_02: Tacit bragging that they've helped create approximately $4.5 billion in enterprise value.
- 22:05SPEAKER_02: That's the private equity phrase that makes me want to vomit on my own shoes.
- 22:09SPEAKER_02: That's the four-point strip mining hospitals creates enterprise value.
- 22:12SPEAKER_02: You're gross, Roger Marshall.
- 22:13SPEAKER_02: Get out of here.
- 22:15SPEAKER_02: Okay.
- 22:17SPEAKER_02: Trump created a new White House Women's Task Force and handed it to a leathery man.
- 22:24SPEAKER_02: Trump made the announcement at an event
- 22:26SPEAKER_02: for his latest executive order advancing women's health to improve outcomes
- 22:29SPEAKER_02: in all phases of life,
- 22:31SPEAKER_02: which featured a rare appearance by his wife,
- 22:33SPEAKER_02: Melania,
- 22:33SPEAKER_02: who Trump says is responsible for the creation of the new division of women's health
- 22:37SPEAKER_02: within the National Institutes of Health and a new Women's Health Task Force within
- 22:41SPEAKER_02: the White House.
- 22:42SPEAKER_02: I'm sure Melania Trump is qualified to conceive of that and design it.
- 22:47SPEAKER_02: I'm sure she was a real driving force behind it.
- 22:49SPEAKER_02: It seems hard to believe.
- 22:51SPEAKER_02: Frank Yemi at Alternet reports that Trump took the opportunity to humiliate his wife
- 22:56SPEAKER_02: and make her look insignificant.
- 22:58SPEAKER_02: After signing the document,
- 22:59SPEAKER_02: Trump bragged about his signature,
- 23:01SPEAKER_02: got laughs from officials,
- 23:02SPEAKER_02: and handed a pen to his wife and invited to add her name before adding
- 23:05SPEAKER_02: a dismissive remark.
- 23:06SPEAKER_02: I don't know if her signature means anything,
- 23:08SPEAKER_02: the president told the crowd, which responded with uncomfortable laughter.
- 23:12SPEAKER_02: The New York Times reports that there is actually already a women's health office in the NIH.
- 23:16SPEAKER_02: So this is kind of, you know, we don't really know what this is.
- 23:20SPEAKER_02: This is kind of for show.
- 23:21SPEAKER_02: The NIH already has an office of research on women's health created in 1990 during
- 23:25SPEAKER_02: the administration of President George H.W.
- 23:27SPEAKER_02: Bush.
- 23:28SPEAKER_02: It is unclear whether the Trump administration is putting any money behind the new division.
- 23:32SPEAKER_02: Women's organizations and patient groups have been clamoring for years for
- 23:35SPEAKER_02: the federal government to spend more on women's health.
- 23:37SPEAKER_02: Some said the executive order would accomplish little without new funding from Congress.
- 23:41SPEAKER_02: In April of last year,
- 23:42SPEAKER_02: a few months after Mr.
- 23:43SPEAKER_02: Trump took office,
- 23:44SPEAKER_02: the Department of Health and Human Services decided to slash funding for
- 23:47SPEAKER_02: the Women's Health Initiative,
- 23:48SPEAKER_02: a long-running taxpayer-funded study by a broad range of women's health issues
- 23:52SPEAKER_02: that began in the 1990s.
- 23:53SPEAKER_02: But officials restored the money after a public outcry.
- 23:56SPEAKER_02: In announcing the White House Task Force,
- 23:58SPEAKER_02: Trump revealed that the Women's Health Task Force would be chaired by a man,
- 24:02SPEAKER_02: but not just any man,
- 24:03SPEAKER_02: by leathery RFK Jr.,
- 24:05SPEAKER_02: Who he described as a little different and suggests the jury is still out
- 24:10SPEAKER_02: on his tenure at AJ's Chats.
- 24:11SPEAKER_02: I did say that.
- 24:12SPEAKER_02: That's so crazy.
- 24:13SPEAKER_02: All right.
- 24:13SPEAKER_02: Do we want to watch a clip on that?
- 24:15SPEAKER_02: Let's watch a clip on that.
- 24:16SPEAKER_00: Oh, yeah.
- 24:16SPEAKER_00: Also establishes the White House Women's Health Task Force,
- 24:20SPEAKER_00: which will mobilize the entire federal government to coordinate action focused
- 24:24SPEAKER_00: on improving women's health.
- 24:26SPEAKER_00: And this task force will be led by Secretary of Health and Human Services, Robert F. Kennedy.
- 24:32SPEAKER_00: That's a big one.
- 24:34SPEAKER_00: And he's been fantastic, I have to tell you.
- 24:37SPEAKER_00: He's a little different.
- 24:38SPEAKER_00: We understand that, don't we?
- 24:40SPEAKER_00: Cheryl, do we understand?
- 24:41SPEAKER_00: He is a little different.
- 24:43SPEAKER_00: But that's what makes him good, I think.
- 24:46SPEAKER_00: I'll let you know about it.
- 24:49SPEAKER_00: That's what makes him good.
- 24:51SPEAKER_00: I mean, he's a
- 24:53SPEAKER_02: funny guy.
- 24:54SPEAKER_02: He's falling off a cliff, man.
- 24:55SPEAKER_02: His brain's mush.
- 24:56SPEAKER_02: He's so toast.
- 24:58SPEAKER_02: I agree with the president.
- 24:59SPEAKER_02: Bobby Kennedy is a little different.
- 25:01SPEAKER_02: A little.
- 25:02SPEAKER_02: He's a little different.
- 25:03SPEAKER_02: Jesus.
- 25:04SPEAKER_02: Do we have a lot of hope for this new old I
- 25:08SPEAKER_00: mean,
- 25:10SPEAKER_00: these signing ceremonies, it's the pomp and circumstance that he loves.
- 25:15SPEAKER_00: It's getting an audience, people to clap, laugh nervously.
- 25:18SPEAKER_00: He gets a chance to make fun of his wife, make fun of Bob Bobby Kennedy.
- 25:23SPEAKER_00: Like, it's so bizarre.
- 25:25SPEAKER_00: It's just a PR stunt, right?
- 25:27SPEAKER_00: He's done this so many times, these executive orders.
- 25:30SPEAKER_00: Meanwhile, I mean, I was doing some research on this back in April of last year.
- 25:34SPEAKER_00: The Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, the 17-member task force, they got rid of it.
- 25:39SPEAKER_00: Done.
- 25:39SPEAKER_00: They're gone.
- 25:41SPEAKER_00: They fired nearly the entire Division of Reproductive Health at the CDC around
- 25:45SPEAKER_00: the same time, you know, with the HHS reduction in force, partly from Doge.
- 25:50SPEAKER_00: Just kind of got rid of it, right?
- 25:51SPEAKER_00: So these actual programs that have been there trying to address women's health and
- 25:57SPEAKER_00: the disparities in women's health, they got rid of.
- 25:59SPEAKER_00: And now they're just going to form a, quote, task force, right, at the presidential level.
- 26:03SPEAKER_00: The other piece, the abortion bans that are a direct result of Trump 1.0, right?
- 26:08SPEAKER_00: His Supreme Court that he got on there and got rid of Roe v. Wade.
- 26:13SPEAKER_00: Maternal mortality in the U.S. after abortion bans is higher in banned states.
- 26:18SPEAKER_00: Like, dramatically higher, right?
- 26:20SPEAKER_00: They're creating deserts of OBGYN care because of these bans and policies
- 26:26SPEAKER_00: that allow women to bleed out in parking lots of hospitals because
- 26:30SPEAKER_00: of their legislation.
- 26:32SPEAKER_00: Like, geez, it's such a slap in the face to people who actually want to improve women's health.
- 26:37SPEAKER_00: And again,
- 26:37SPEAKER_00: it's just a PR stunt for this guy to feel good,
- 26:41SPEAKER_00: or maybe not, for them to say that they're doing something.
- 26:44SPEAKER_02: Man, yeah.
- 26:45SPEAKER_02: We hate that.
- 26:47SPEAKER_02: Yeah, I think that putting, I mean,
- 26:50SPEAKER_02: Bobby Kennedy shouldn't be in charge of a pair of shoes,
- 26:53SPEAKER_02: let alone a new task for us, let alone HHS.
- 26:57SPEAKER_02: He's bursting with madness every time we see him.
- 26:59SPEAKER_02: He seems to be getting weirder with each passing day and a little different, we might say.
- 27:04SPEAKER_02: This is a little different.
- 27:07SPEAKER_02: All right.
- 27:07SPEAKER_02: A little more on the, you know, that's dark, but it's like a PR dark.
- 27:11SPEAKER_02: This is actually really dark.
- 27:13SPEAKER_02: This other thing Bobby Kennedy's up to.
- 27:15SPEAKER_02: So a vaccine research program in Guinea-Bissau touted by RFK Jr.
- 27:19SPEAKER_02: and financially supported by the CDC has major ethical issues
- 27:23SPEAKER_02: and was abruptly halted this week.
- 27:25SPEAKER_02: From reporting from The Guardian,
- 27:26SPEAKER_02: the U.S.-backed hepatitis B vaccine trial in African newborns
- 27:29SPEAKER_02: that drew global backlash was halted.
- 27:31SPEAKER_02: The lead researcher said on Wednesday,
- 27:34SPEAKER_02: it was now clear that the study will be moved forward in Guinea-Bissau.
- 27:38SPEAKER_02: Frederick Schatz Buchholzer,
- 27:40SPEAKER_02: a Danish researcher,
- 27:41SPEAKER_02: wrote on LinkedIn, adding, we're not given the necessary government approval.
- 27:46SPEAKER_02: The study was to be funded with $1.6 million from the U.S.
- 27:50SPEAKER_02: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,
- 27:51SPEAKER_02: along with another $1.6 million from private partners.
- 27:54SPEAKER_02: In separate reporting,
- 27:55SPEAKER_02: The Guardian said that Kennedy praised the Danish researchers at
- 27:58SPEAKER_02: a recent anti-vaccine conference, calling them the deities of vaccine research.
- 28:02SPEAKER_02: The weird language continues.
- 28:05SPEAKER_02: Sid Wapp explains why the study was controversial.
- 28:07SPEAKER_02: The University of Southern Denmark confirmed that it has given the green light to
- 28:10SPEAKER_02: a controversial study in Guinea-Bissau funded with $1.6 million from the U.S.
- 28:14SPEAKER_02: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention that plans
- 28:17SPEAKER_02: to offer life-saving hepatitis B vaccines to only half of the enrolled babies.
- 28:22SPEAKER_02: So news of the study,
- 28:23SPEAKER_02: first reported in December by CIDRAP News,
- 28:25SPEAKER_02: prompted an international outcry from health groups and political leaders
- 28:27SPEAKER_02: who condemned its design as unethical.
- 28:29SPEAKER_02: Nearly one in five people in Guinea-Bissau are infected with hepatitis B,
- 28:32SPEAKER_02: which kills 15% to 25% of people with chronic infections by causing cancer
- 28:37SPEAKER_02: or liver failure.
- 28:38SPEAKER_02: Vaccinating babies at birth is safe and can prevent lifelong infections.
- 28:41SPEAKER_02: So they are doing randomized controls for a vaccine that we know already works,
- 28:48SPEAKER_02: basically making sure that these folks in Guinea-Bissau are in the control group
- 28:53SPEAKER_02: and do not have access to the vaccine.
- 28:56SPEAKER_00: In a place where hepatitis B is running rampant, right?
- 29:00SPEAKER_00: And the downstream outcomes of not getting vaccinated are dire, like liver failure, cancer.
- 29:05SPEAKER_00: I mean, it's horrific.
- 29:06SPEAKER_00: Like this is a place where Dr.
- 29:09SPEAKER_00: Senator Bill Cassidy, soon to be former senator, has been very animated, right?
- 29:14SPEAKER_00: Because he was a gastroenterologist, right?
- 29:16SPEAKER_00: He still put through these idiots and maybe he'll come clean now with Heidi Overton
- 29:21SPEAKER_00: and not put her through.
- 29:22SPEAKER_00: But like, this is a huge deal.
- 29:24SPEAKER_00: It's why we have institutional review boards at hospitals and universities
- 29:28SPEAKER_00: that approve studies and say, is this actually ethical?
- 29:31SPEAKER_00: This would be like taking half of the population of wherever and saying,
- 29:35SPEAKER_00: you guys don't wear seatbelts for You guys do,
- 29:38SPEAKER_00: and let's see who dies more in car accidents.
- 29:40SPEAKER_00: So, you know, you kids don't wear helmets, and you do.
- 29:42SPEAKER_00: It's like, no, you have a thing you know works.
- 29:44SPEAKER_00: Just do it.
- 29:45SPEAKER_00: And if you want to fund it, yes, hell yes, fund it, right?
- 29:48SPEAKER_00: Save these kids.
- 29:48SPEAKER_00: Save these folks.
- 29:50SPEAKER_00: It's terrible.
- 29:50SPEAKER_00: I just want to say the other thing.
- 29:52SPEAKER_00: Your ability to pronounce the name of the Dutch researcher
- 29:54SPEAKER_00: and Guinea-Bissau astounds me because it's perfect, and yet Haemophilus kills you.
- 29:59SPEAKER_02: It's just the science terms, Rob.
- 30:01SPEAKER_02: Sorry.
- 30:02SPEAKER_02: Rob, I read good.
- 30:04SPEAKER_02: It's just the science terms, you know?
- 30:06SPEAKER_02: Okay.
- 30:06SPEAKER_02: It's just tossing crazy fake Latin that you guys come up with in the lab at me all the time.
- 30:12SPEAKER_02: Anyway.
- 30:13SPEAKER_02: Yeah, yeah, yeah.
- 30:15SPEAKER_02: Just kidding.
- 30:15SPEAKER_02: So, yeah, I mean,
- 30:17SPEAKER_02: I think, like,
- 30:18SPEAKER_02: the callousness,
- 30:19SPEAKER_02: which they treat, like, African life, essentially, with USAID and this.
- 30:26SPEAKER_02: But it even goes beyond that because if they could get away with it,
- 30:30SPEAKER_02: they'd come up with some of this weird shit right here in the United States.
- 30:33SPEAKER_02: Oh, yeah.
- 30:34SPEAKER_02: Kennedy's like long,
- 30:36SPEAKER_02: his insane campaign in American Samoa that led to the deaths of all those children.
- 30:44SPEAKER_02: We just got to have him not have any levers of government.
- 30:48SPEAKER_02: He needs to have his hands off anything that has range or budget because he goes
- 30:52SPEAKER_02: and does insane things with it every time.
- 30:56SPEAKER_02: God willing,
- 30:57SPEAKER_02: the Dems get the Senate and we can do something about
- 31:00SPEAKER_02: The mad scientist science projects that Bobby Kennedy's up to over at HHS.
- 31:07SPEAKER_02: Yeah.
- 31:08SPEAKER_02: All right, Rob, why don't you intro the interview.
- 31:13SPEAKER_00: Let's... Yeah, I spoke with a great guest, Dr. Mikhail Sekharis, oncologist down in Miami.
- 31:20SPEAKER_00: And we talked a lot about Pope Leo and his lung cancer diagnosis.
- 31:23SPEAKER_00: I learned a lot.
- 31:23SPEAKER_00: Like, I'm a doc, right?
- 31:25SPEAKER_00: I know more than you maybe about cancer,
- 31:27SPEAKER_00: but certainly I have a lot to learn from an oncologist,
- 31:30SPEAKER_00: and I think people will learn, and he's just an interesting dude.
- 31:33SPEAKER_00: So, yeah.
- 31:34SPEAKER_00: All right.
- 31:34SPEAKER_00: Let's talk to that now.
- 31:47SPEAKER_03: Welcome back to Paging America, everyone.
- 31:49SPEAKER_03: Really excited to be joined by Dr.
- 31:51SPEAKER_03: Mikhail Sekeris today,
- 31:53SPEAKER_03: who is a professor of medicine and chief of the Division of Hematology
- 31:56SPEAKER_03: at Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center at the University of Miami.
- 31:59SPEAKER_03: His research focuses on the epidemiology,
- 32:02SPEAKER_03: genetics,
- 32:02SPEAKER_03: and treatment of cancers of the blood and bone marrow,
- 32:04SPEAKER_03: and he is the author or co-author of over 500 peer-reviewed scientific manuscripts
- 32:09SPEAKER_03: and 650 conference abstracts.
- 32:11SPEAKER_03: He has written over 100 essays for The Washington Post,
- 32:14SPEAKER_03: The New York Times,
- 32:15SPEAKER_03: The Wall Street Journal, Huffington Post, and more, and has authored eight books.
- 32:19SPEAKER_03: Dr. Secharis, welcome to Paging America.
- 32:20SPEAKER_01: What a pleasure it is to be here.
- 32:22SPEAKER_01: Thank you for inviting me.
- 32:23SPEAKER_03: Yeah, great to have you, and wanted to talk to you a bit today.
- 32:26SPEAKER_03: It's a little different for this show,
- 32:27SPEAKER_03: for listeners,
- 32:28SPEAKER_03: but I think something that we're all interested in,
- 32:30SPEAKER_03: and we saw you wrote a bit about it in the Washington Post,
- 32:33SPEAKER_03: and I wanted to talk to you about Pope Leo.
- 32:36SPEAKER_03: This has been in the news.
- 32:37SPEAKER_03: I mean, Pope Leo is certainly a massive figure,
- 32:39SPEAKER_03: obviously, worldwide, whether you're Catholic or not.
- 32:42SPEAKER_03: And with all the conflicts going on,
- 32:44SPEAKER_03: certainly has a lot,
- 32:45SPEAKER_03: kind of his involvement and his words on that are really important.
- 32:48SPEAKER_03: And a lot of our listeners, I think, would share that.
- 32:50SPEAKER_03: But he had the lower lobe of his right lung removed and was diagnosed with adenocarcinoma.
- 32:55SPEAKER_03: And I'm just, I guess, from what's been made public, what is this cancer?
- 33:00SPEAKER_03: And from kind of what we know, what kind of prognosis might Pope Leo be looking?
- 33:05SPEAKER_01: Yeah, so good for Pope Leo.
- 33:08SPEAKER_01: And I really think he's a special guy.
- 33:11SPEAKER_01: I'm not Catholic, but everything I've seen from him, he seems to really be like real people.
- 33:15SPEAKER_01: And, you know, it's easy for us in the U.S. to say that because he is.
- 33:19SPEAKER_01: He lived in the U.S. For a long time, even a Chicago White Sox fan.
- 33:24SPEAKER_01: And he was very upfront about his diagnosis.
- 33:28SPEAKER_01: And not everyone is for their own reasons.
- 33:32SPEAKER_01: But in being upfront about the diagnosis,
- 33:34SPEAKER_01: he's probably This has spurred a lot of people to go out and get screened and
- 33:37SPEAKER_01: to follow up on symptoms that they have in their own lungs.
- 33:41SPEAKER_01: We don't know a lot, so some of this is speculative.
- 33:44SPEAKER_01: He has pulmonary adenocarcinoma, and he is not known to be a smoker.
- 33:48SPEAKER_01: And those two facts actually go together pretty well.
- 33:51SPEAKER_01: Lung cancer,
- 33:52SPEAKER_01: as I think most of your listeners know,
- 33:54SPEAKER_01: is one of the most common cancers in the U.S.
- 33:56SPEAKER_01: It affects about 230,000 people each year.
- 34:00SPEAKER_01: And that represents about 11% of all cancer diagnoses.
- 34:03SPEAKER_01: The prognosis has improved over the past couple of decades,
- 34:07SPEAKER_01: but still only 30% of people diagnosed with lung cancer live for five years
- 34:12SPEAKER_01: after their diagnosis.
- 34:13SPEAKER_01: So that's lung cancer all comers.
- 34:15SPEAKER_01: What we don't know is his stage, and that's really going to affect his prognosis.
- 34:22SPEAKER_01: You know,
- 34:23SPEAKER_01: I took a special interest in this story because my mom was diagnosed
- 34:27SPEAKER_01: with lung cancer about eight years ago.
- 34:29SPEAKER_01: Now, she was a smoker, but her path to diagnosis and staging, I think, might be illustrative.
- 34:37SPEAKER_01: You'll allow me the hubris of a minute to talk about it.
- 34:42SPEAKER_01: She was diagnosed where she was living in Rhode Island at the time I was practicing
- 34:47SPEAKER_01: in Cleveland,
- 34:48SPEAKER_01: and she underwent a biopsy,
- 34:51SPEAKER_01: CAT scans, She was a PET scan, and she was told that she had stage 3 lung cancer.
- 34:56SPEAKER_01: Now, stage 3 lung cancer is pretty advanced, but potentially surgically resectable.
- 35:01SPEAKER_01: To get to that surgical resection,
- 35:03SPEAKER_01: though, people have to receive chemotherapy and radiation therapy.
- 35:07SPEAKER_01: It has to shrink enough so that it can then be resected and then people undergo
- 35:10SPEAKER_01: a pretty massive surgery to get there.
- 35:12SPEAKER_01: I was having trouble as a doctor coordinating her care across multiple states.
- 35:17SPEAKER_01: And I'm sure many of your listeners have been in the same situation where we're in
- 35:21SPEAKER_01: the sandwich generation.
- 35:22SPEAKER_01: I had young kids at home.
- 35:24SPEAKER_01: I was trying to get my mom adequate cancer diagnosis and care.
- 35:29SPEAKER_01: Even when I had the phone number to the back rooms and doctor's offices,
- 35:34SPEAKER_01: I wasn't getting anywhere.
- 35:35SPEAKER_01: So I finally said to her,
- 35:36SPEAKER_01: why don't you come to Cleveland where I have a little more control over it
- 35:38SPEAKER_01: and let's go through this.
- 35:41SPEAKER_01: And she did.
- 35:41SPEAKER_01: She came to Cleveland.
- 35:42SPEAKER_01: I showed her the scans that she had undergone to one of my besties who was head
- 35:48SPEAKER_01: of our lung cancer program but also coached my kid in Little League,
- 35:51SPEAKER_01: so he was a friend.
- 35:53SPEAKER_01: And he looked at the scans and said, you know, I don't believe this is stage three.
- 35:58SPEAKER_01: I'm going to send you for a bronchoscopy to try to see if these lymph nodes
- 36:02SPEAKER_01: that are lighting up on the scan are real.
- 36:05SPEAKER_01: And she underwent that bronchoscopy and the results came back and she was downstage
- 36:08SPEAKER_01: to a stage one.
- 36:10SPEAKER_01: You know,
- 36:10SPEAKER_01: the teaching point,
- 36:11SPEAKER_01: I think,
- 36:12SPEAKER_01: from this experience to me was it's worthwhile to go to a major medical center with
- 36:17SPEAKER_01: a diagnosis of cancer,
- 36:19SPEAKER_01: make sure the staging is accurate, make sure the diagnosis is accurate.
- 36:23SPEAKER_01: And make sure that you get the right treatment for the right cancer.
- 36:26SPEAKER_01: So instead of having to undergo chemotherapy,
- 36:29SPEAKER_01: radiation therapy,
- 36:30SPEAKER_01: and then a massive surgery,
- 36:32SPEAKER_01: she underwent the same surgery that Pope Leo XIV underwent.
- 36:37SPEAKER_01: And that's resection of a portion of her lung.
- 36:39SPEAKER_03: And that tells us something about his staging probably or possibly, correct?
- 36:43SPEAKER_01: Probably.
- 36:44SPEAKER_01: So it's a great question, right?
- 36:47SPEAKER_01: Stage, if it's truly a stage one lung cancer,
- 36:50SPEAKER_01: he has a decent chance of being alive five years from now.
- 36:54SPEAKER_01: If it's not,
- 36:55SPEAKER_01: let's say they do the surgery,
- 36:56SPEAKER_01: they remove the lung cancer,
- 36:57SPEAKER_01: and then they sample some lymph nodes around there,
- 36:59SPEAKER_01: and whoops,
- 37:00SPEAKER_01: by accident,
- 37:00SPEAKER_01: all the pre-test scans were wrong,
- 37:02SPEAKER_01: and those lymph nodes have lung cancer in it,
- 37:05SPEAKER_01: then we're talking about a stage 2 or stage 3 lung cancer,
- 37:08SPEAKER_01: and his chances of being alive five years from now are much lower.
- 37:12SPEAKER_03: Okay, okay.
- 37:13SPEAKER_03: But merely by the fact that they went in primarily with surgery,
- 37:16SPEAKER_03: he did not have chemo or radiation or,
- 37:18SPEAKER_03: you know,
- 37:18SPEAKER_03: any other treatment before surgery would argue at least they were thinking,
- 37:22SPEAKER_03: hey, this is something we can we can cure with surgery.
- 37:25SPEAKER_01: You got it.
- 37:26SPEAKER_01: I mean, I heard this whole story and thought,
- 37:28SPEAKER_01: my word, I'm reliving my mom's diagnosis eight years ago.
- 37:31SPEAKER_01: This sounds like stage one lung cancer.
- 37:34SPEAKER_03: Yeah.
- 37:34SPEAKER_03: Well, that's good for him.
- 37:35SPEAKER_03: I think good for all of us.
- 37:37SPEAKER_03: Now, you did write in the Washington Post about lung cancer in nonsmokers.
- 37:40SPEAKER_03: And as far as we know, he is not known to be a smoker.
- 37:44SPEAKER_03: I think that's the way you put it.
- 37:44SPEAKER_03: That's probably the right way to put it.
- 37:46SPEAKER_03: We don't know.
- 37:46SPEAKER_03: But that is not thought to be the case, at least.
- 37:49SPEAKER_03: What is your main message?
- 37:50SPEAKER_03: And what was your main message from the article?
- 37:52SPEAKER_01: So if you look at lung cancer diagnoses,
- 37:55SPEAKER_01: it's kind of similar to some other cancer diagnoses in the U.S.,
- 38:00SPEAKER_01: and that is that they've changed over time.
- 38:03SPEAKER_01: So, for example,
- 38:05SPEAKER_01: because of smoking cessation programs,
- 38:09SPEAKER_01: it's estimated that from 1975 to 2020,
- 38:10SPEAKER_01: 3.4 million lung cancer deaths have been averted in the U.S. 3.4 million, Rob.
- 38:19SPEAKER_03: From public health.
- 38:20SPEAKER_03: From public health.
- 38:21SPEAKER_01: That's from putting messages on packages of cigarettes that say this can lead
- 38:26SPEAKER_01: to lung cancer,
- 38:27SPEAKER_01: this can lead to birth defects in women who are pregnant,
- 38:32SPEAKER_01: that smoking is bad and can directly lead to lung cancer.
- 38:35SPEAKER_01: It's not messing around with the message, right?
- 38:39SPEAKER_01: That's a tremendous victory for cancer avoidance in the U.S.
- 38:46SPEAKER_01: The rates of new cases continue to fall on average by 2% per year since 2014
- 38:52SPEAKER_01: and death rates have dropped an average of 4% per year.
- 38:55SPEAKER_01: And that's a combination of effects.
- 38:57SPEAKER_01: It's because people who are in higher risk groups,
- 39:00SPEAKER_01: like smokers, are undergoing CT scan surveillance.
- 39:05SPEAKER_01: And that has been shown to be able to detect lung cancer when it's at an earlier
- 39:09SPEAKER_01: and potentially curable stage.
- 39:11SPEAKER_01: It's also a testimony to some of the new treatments we have for lung cancer.
- 39:16SPEAKER_01: But if you really dive into those statistics,
- 39:19SPEAKER_01: the rate of decline in lung cancer diagnoses for women during that time It's only
- 39:24SPEAKER_01: about one-third of the decline from men.
- 39:27SPEAKER_01: You know,
- 39:27SPEAKER_01: we think about women in cancer and immediately what jumps to mind is breast cancer,
- 39:31SPEAKER_01: right?
- 39:31SPEAKER_01: Just like when we think about men with cancer as an isolated group,
- 39:35SPEAKER_01: we think about prostate cancer.
- 39:37SPEAKER_01: But lung cancer remains the number one cause of cancer-related deaths in women in the U.S.
- 39:43SPEAKER_01: But up to 20% of lung cancer diagnoses occur in non-smokers.
- 39:49SPEAKER_01: How does that happen?
- 39:51SPEAKER_01: And this is particularly more common in women.
- 39:54SPEAKER_01: So all these public health campaigns about stopping smoking,
- 39:56SPEAKER_01: that definitely cuts at the majority of causes of lung cancer.
- 40:00SPEAKER_01: Yet lung cancer and nonsmokers persist.
- 40:03SPEAKER_01: So what are some of the causes of that?
- 40:05SPEAKER_01: Well, it could be secondhand smoke.
- 40:08SPEAKER_01: Maybe, for example,
- 40:09SPEAKER_01: Pope Leo didn't smoke,
- 40:11SPEAKER_01: but all the people in his household when he was growing up were smoking and all
- 40:14SPEAKER_01: the people he's around now are smoking.
- 40:16SPEAKER_01: I find that Probably a bit of a stretch.
- 40:19SPEAKER_01: It could be exposure to other environmental factors.
- 40:24SPEAKER_01: I don't know the last time you bought a new house in the Northeast,
- 40:29SPEAKER_01: but in the Northeast,
- 40:30SPEAKER_01: we have these things called basements,
- 40:31SPEAKER_01: which we don't have in Miami,
- 40:33SPEAKER_01: for obvious reasons,
- 40:34SPEAKER_01: because it would quickly transform from a basement to my underground pool.
- 40:39SPEAKER_01: But in basements,
- 40:40SPEAKER_01: whenever I bought a new house in Shaker Heights,
- 40:43SPEAKER_01: Ohio, where I lived, we would have a radon test.
- 40:47SPEAKER_01: And what that was doing, and they always put this canister in the basement.
- 40:50SPEAKER_01: Why the basement?
- 40:51SPEAKER_01: Because radon comes from the earth.
- 40:55SPEAKER_01: So the closer you get down into the soil, the higher the radon rates.
- 41:00SPEAKER_01: It turns out radon is a There's a very specific risk factor
- 41:03SPEAKER_01: for developing not just cancer, but lung cancer.
- 41:07SPEAKER_01: And there are mitigation things that we can do to minimize radon effects.
- 41:11SPEAKER_01: So exposure to radon could be a cause as well.
- 41:14SPEAKER_01: That's number two.
- 41:14SPEAKER_01: So secondhand smoke, number one.
- 41:16SPEAKER_01: Radon number two.
- 41:18SPEAKER_01: The third are environmental pollutants.
- 41:21SPEAKER_01: So there are some epidemiology studies that have shown that if you're in areas of
- 41:25SPEAKER_01: the world where there are high rates of pollutants,
- 41:28SPEAKER_01: it turns out that non-smoking associated lung cancer rates are also high.
- 41:34SPEAKER_01: So maybe that's one of the reasons that is contributing to the increased recognition
- 41:41SPEAKER_01: of lung cancer in non-smokers.
- 41:43SPEAKER_03: Okay, okay.
- 41:44SPEAKER_03: It's fascinating because whether it's smoking and the campaign that resulted in
- 41:51SPEAKER_03: so many fewer smokers or testing for radon and then doing mitigation from there
- 41:57SPEAKER_03: or limiting other environments.
- 41:59SPEAKER_03: I always tell people...
- 42:15SPEAKER_03: Sometimes people poo-poo the contribution of public health doctors to overall patient care.
- 42:23SPEAKER_03: And it's like,
- 42:23SPEAKER_03: I've worked 28 years as an ER doc,
- 42:25SPEAKER_03: and if someone works in public health,
- 42:27SPEAKER_03: they've saved far more lives I have in my career, right?
- 42:31SPEAKER_03: They don't know the names of the people whose lives they've saved.
- 42:34SPEAKER_03: And I don't know if that sounds like it may be also true for oncologists.
- 42:37SPEAKER_03: Like one of my best friends is an oncologist.
- 42:39SPEAKER_03: You guys do amazing work.
- 42:41SPEAKER_03: Our families had to deal with oncologists before.
- 42:43SPEAKER_03: But man, stopping people from smoking, right?
- 42:46SPEAKER_03: Teaching people to test for radon and then mitigate,
- 42:49SPEAKER_03: if necessary, other environmental pollutants.
- 42:52SPEAKER_03: This is such a huge driver of decreasing the rates of cancer, particularly lung cancer.
- 42:58SPEAKER_01: It really is, and of a number of different cancers.
- 43:00SPEAKER_01: Cancer avoidance is our best tool for better survival rates
- 43:05SPEAKER_01: because people hopefully don't get cancer,
- 43:08SPEAKER_01: or if they do, they get it at a lower stage.
- 43:10SPEAKER_01: The challenge with it,
- 43:11SPEAKER_01: as you know, Rob,
- 43:12SPEAKER_01: from a public health perspective,
- 43:14SPEAKER_01: is that it's hard for an insurance company to pony up a lot of cash
- 43:18SPEAKER_01: for these cancer avoidant behaviors.
- 43:21SPEAKER_01: Because someone might not stick with the same insurance company long enough for
- 43:25SPEAKER_01: the insurance company to then reap the benefits of it by
- 43:27SPEAKER_01: the person not having cancer.
- 43:30SPEAKER_03: I mean, I think as much as public health is so critical,
- 43:34SPEAKER_03: I think we've seen it's been massively underfunded.
- 43:37SPEAKER_03: The funding of the public health apparatus in this country certainly has taken a bit of a hit.
- 43:41SPEAKER_03: And I think we need to get back to the point of prioritizing that.
- 43:45SPEAKER_03: I remember as a kid, see Everett Coop.
- 43:47SPEAKER_03: I mean, you couldn't forget his beard, but he was the first one, right?
- 43:50SPEAKER_03: The Surgeon General warning on the cigarette packages.
- 43:55SPEAKER_01: And I was actually in med school at Penn when he was at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia.
- 44:01SPEAKER_01: So he was kind of a local celebrity when he was doing this.
- 44:04SPEAKER_01: And I'm sure you remember the history as I do.
- 44:08SPEAKER_01: He was hired because he wasn't supposed to be this public health zealot.
- 44:15SPEAKER_01: He was supposed to practice pretty conservative policies.
- 44:17SPEAKER_01: It was in the Reagan administration.
- 44:19SPEAKER_01: But then he realized that the public good trumped any kind of political affiliations he had.
- 44:24SPEAKER_03: Man, yearn for the days, right?
- 44:29SPEAKER_03: Wow.
- 44:29SPEAKER_03: Wow.
- 44:29SPEAKER_03: That's saying something.
- 44:31SPEAKER_03: We had a little something here that Yul Brynner, his last message was just don't smoke.
- 44:36SPEAKER_03: Like so after he had died, I think it was a posthumous message.
- 44:38SPEAKER_03: But a story came out recently.
- 44:41SPEAKER_03: This is an interview by Palantir Chief Technology Officer Shyam Sankar on Face
- 44:47SPEAKER_03: the Nation a little over a week ago.
- 44:49SPEAKER_03: And he had stated,
- 44:51SPEAKER_03: so many AI researchers have started smoking to signal how much they believe in AI
- 44:56SPEAKER_03: and they're betting it will cure cancer.
- 44:58SPEAKER_03: One, I'd love your thoughts on that kind of statement or that kind of behavior.
- 45:01SPEAKER_03: And then second,
- 45:03SPEAKER_03: as AI is having so many concerning impacts on society and the risk of,
- 45:09SPEAKER_03: I guess,
- 45:09SPEAKER_03: the downfall of humanity,
- 45:11SPEAKER_03: potentially, what are your thoughts on AI in the fight to, quote, cure cancer?
- 45:17SPEAKER_01: Yeah.
- 45:17SPEAKER_01: Well, so first of all,
- 45:19SPEAKER_01: with the Yul Brynner message,
- 45:20SPEAKER_01: I remember that was a television commercial that he filmed.
- 45:23SPEAKER_01: And he basically started off the commercial by saying,
- 45:26SPEAKER_01: if you're seeing this, I've now died as a consequence of smoking.
- 45:30SPEAKER_01: Right?
- 45:31SPEAKER_01: It was this very powerful message from someone who was a really famous movie actor.
- 45:36SPEAKER_00: Yeah.
- 45:37SPEAKER_01: You know,
- 45:38SPEAKER_01: the notion that people are deliberately going to engage in risky behaviors
- 45:42SPEAKER_01: because they're so confident that AI is going to help them down the line seems,
- 45:46SPEAKER_01: to me, myopic and rather foolhardy.
- 45:49SPEAKER_01: Why would you tempt fate?
- 45:51SPEAKER_01: Cancer's bad.
- 45:53SPEAKER_03: Yeah, right.
- 45:55SPEAKER_03: You're right.
- 45:55SPEAKER_03: Just because something could potentially cure it,
- 45:57SPEAKER_03: just like you said, avoiding it is really the key.
- 45:59SPEAKER_01: I always say I'm involved in clinical research and some translational research
- 46:06SPEAKER_01: in cancer because eventually I want to put myself out of a job.
- 46:10SPEAKER_01: I don't want to tempt fate and I don't want to tempt genetic changes in our cells.
- 46:15SPEAKER_01: There's, in general, a lot of concern about AI.
- 46:18SPEAKER_01: There's also a lot of good that's already coming out of it in medicine.
- 46:22SPEAKER_01: So, for example,
- 46:23SPEAKER_01: there's this terrific study where tens of thousands of women were randomized
- 46:30SPEAKER_01: to undergoing regular mammogram screening for breast cancer or Mammogram screening
- 46:35SPEAKER_01: with the assistance of AI.
- 46:37SPEAKER_01: So AI assisting the radiologists who were reading those mammograms.
- 46:41SPEAKER_01: The addition of AI It's kind of a funny conclusion, so let me walk you through it.
- 46:47SPEAKER_01: The addition of AI reduced the rate of intercurrent breast cancer by about 12%.
- 46:54SPEAKER_01: What that means is that the use of AI detected abnormalities in the breast
- 47:00SPEAKER_01: that were breast cancer so that they could be removed right then and there.
- 47:04SPEAKER_01: So the next time a woman underwent screening,
- 47:07SPEAKER_01: No breast cancer was detected because it was already detected by AI.
- 47:11SPEAKER_01: The teaching from that is that AI,
- 47:15SPEAKER_01: in combination with humans,
- 47:16SPEAKER_01: with radiologists,
- 47:18SPEAKER_01: looks like it's doing better for reading screening mammograms
- 47:21SPEAKER_01: to detect breast cancer It also allowed radiologists to reach
- 47:28SPEAKER_01: a diagnosis almost 50% faster than without AI.
- 47:33SPEAKER_01: So there was a higher volume that radiologists could look at for detecting the breast cancer.
- 47:38SPEAKER_01: We're going to have some research at the American Society
- 47:40SPEAKER_01: of Hematology annual meeting, which occurs in December, using AI techniques.
- 47:45SPEAKER_01: To diagnose a type of leukemia called myelodysplastic syndromes.
- 47:49SPEAKER_01: So I was fortunate to be the chair of the National Heart, Lung,
- 47:55SPEAKER_01: and Blood Institute,
- 47:56SPEAKER_01: the NHLBI,
- 47:57SPEAKER_01: which is a college within the NIH,
- 47:59SPEAKER_01: MDS Natural History Study,
- 48:01SPEAKER_01: where we collected information on over 2,000 people in the U.S.
- 48:04SPEAKER_01: who were suspected to have a bone marrow cancer.
- 48:08SPEAKER_01: They all underwent bone marrow biopsies.
- 48:09SPEAKER_01: About half were diagnosed with myelodysplastic syndromes or its precursor,
- 48:14SPEAKER_01: and about half weren't.
- 48:16SPEAKER_01: The other half had things like vitamin deficiencies or maybe endocrine abnormalities.
- 48:20SPEAKER_01: When those bone marrow biopsies were performed, we digitized all of them.
- 48:24SPEAKER_01: And in this study,
- 48:26SPEAKER_01: we allowed AI to read the digital bone marrow biopsies and its accuracy is now well
- 48:33SPEAKER_01: over 80%.
- 48:35SPEAKER_01: So we're starting to use it even to read cancer diagnoses to distinguish cancer
- 48:40SPEAKER_01: from non-cancer diagnoses.
- 48:42SPEAKER_03: Yeah.
- 48:43SPEAKER_03: I mean, I think it's important to always remember, right?
- 48:46SPEAKER_03: I mean, I think there certainly are concerns with AI and it needs guardrails and,
- 48:50SPEAKER_03: you know, I would argue some level of regulation.
- 48:52SPEAKER_03: But, you know,
- 48:53SPEAKER_03: as a tool,
- 48:54SPEAKER_03: right, to augment our ability to care for patients and And to diagnose disease.
- 48:59SPEAKER_03: I'm wondering, I think it has huge promise.
- 49:02SPEAKER_03: I mean, the site that I most recently worked at,
- 49:06SPEAKER_03: a hospital,
- 49:08SPEAKER_03: every radiology read of a plain film would come through with an AI fracture,
- 49:12SPEAKER_03: no fracture.
- 49:12SPEAKER_03: It was like, it was a very much a dichotomous decision, yes or no.
- 49:16SPEAKER_03: And it wasn't always right,
- 49:19SPEAKER_03: but there were times where it was actually quite helpful before
- 49:21SPEAKER_03: the official read came in,
- 49:23SPEAKER_03: where you saw some that looked pretty good,
- 49:24SPEAKER_03: you know,
- 49:25SPEAKER_03: especially in the hand,
- 49:26SPEAKER_03: multiple bones or in the foot,
- 49:28SPEAKER_03: and then you start zooming in a little bit and you,
- 49:30SPEAKER_03: oh, okay, I think I see what it's looking at.
- 49:32SPEAKER_03: That's kind of anecdotal right there.
- 49:34SPEAKER_03: I guess I'm wondering from a cancer perspective,
- 49:38SPEAKER_03: kind of helping devise new treatments,
- 49:40SPEAKER_03: are there currently models that are out there being utilized by researchers?
- 49:46SPEAKER_03: Researchers,
- 49:47SPEAKER_03: you know,
- 49:47SPEAKER_03: looking at ways to,
- 49:48SPEAKER_03: you know,
- 49:48SPEAKER_03: potentially anticipate how people respond to certain kind of treatments,
- 49:53SPEAKER_03: that kind of thing.
- 49:54SPEAKER_03: Is there sort of a horizon where that looks like it could be promising in
- 49:58SPEAKER_03: the treatment of cancer?
- 49:59SPEAKER_01: Oh, absolutely.
- 50:00SPEAKER_01: You nailed it.
- 50:01SPEAKER_01: And first of all,
- 50:01SPEAKER_01: I want to say,
- 50:02SPEAKER_01: God bless you for reading those x-rays in the ER and trying to figure out
- 50:06SPEAKER_01: if somebody has a broken bone or not.
- 50:08SPEAKER_01: That is not easy work.
- 50:10SPEAKER_01: Yeah, there are a couple different ways it's being used.
- 50:11SPEAKER_01: So one way is looking at huge data sets of patients who have cancer
- 50:17SPEAKER_01: and identifying those who are responders versus aren't responders and trying to get
- 50:21SPEAKER_01: at the meat of Of why they may be responders or not responders.
- 50:25SPEAKER_01: So looking for patterns,
- 50:27SPEAKER_01: whether those are clinical patterns,
- 50:28SPEAKER_01: pathologic patterns, or genetic mutational patterns that might lead to response.
- 50:35SPEAKER_01: Mining different genetics databases to find some of those rare mutations
- 50:40SPEAKER_01: that we don't put into our standard 60 gene panels
- 50:43SPEAKER_01: for diagnosing something like acute leukemia.
- 50:47SPEAKER_01: They're also looking at it in a drug discovery perspective.
- 50:50SPEAKER_01: And I think we've both seen in the news within the past month,
- 50:55SPEAKER_01: some of these drugs are now moving into clinical trials for the first time,
- 50:59SPEAKER_01: something that was generated by AI.
- 51:01SPEAKER_01: It's a really special time.
- 51:04SPEAKER_01: I think that the guardrail on this is that all of this still needs
- 51:08SPEAKER_01: a tremendous amount of surveillance by us.
- 51:11SPEAKER_01: So I can imagine,
- 51:13SPEAKER_01: so interesting,
- 51:13SPEAKER_01: we have like a green light, red light for fracture versus no fracture, right?
- 51:18SPEAKER_01: But it still takes you looking at the x-ray and saying, I agree or I don't agree, right?
- 51:24SPEAKER_01: And maybe when it says, yep,
- 51:26SPEAKER_01: you got a fracture there,
- 51:27SPEAKER_01: it would make somebody like me take a closer look to see what is it seeing
- 51:31SPEAKER_01: that I'm not, right?
- 51:32SPEAKER_01: To try to figure out what confirmed the diagnosis or tricked AI.
- 51:37SPEAKER_01: But it still needs that human guidance, doesn't it?
- 51:39SPEAKER_01: Yeah.
- 51:40SPEAKER_03: I think the pattern recognition,
- 51:42SPEAKER_03: the first piece where you said where you put all these cases into a database
- 51:46SPEAKER_03: and it tries to kind of mine it for something you could,
- 51:49SPEAKER_03: you know, maybe elucidate that is common to the folks maybe who weren't responders.
- 51:54SPEAKER_03: That really gets at when I see, I mean, I've seen Elon Musk talk about it.
- 51:58SPEAKER_03: I've seen people at HHS talk about, well, AI is going to replace doctors, right?
- 52:01SPEAKER_03: You won't need this person.
- 52:02SPEAKER_03: You won't need that.
- 52:03SPEAKER_03: I'll be AI.
- 52:04SPEAKER_03: And I think about this myself in my career in 20-some-odd,
- 52:08SPEAKER_03: almost 30 years of practicing medicine, so much is, it is evidence-based, right?
- 52:14SPEAKER_03: We should know the science,
- 52:15SPEAKER_03: know the data, know the latest research, but so much is pattern recognition.
- 52:19SPEAKER_03: I've seen this so many times.
- 52:20SPEAKER_03: I've seen this kind of case.
- 52:22SPEAKER_03: I can remember this one.
- 52:23SPEAKER_03: And I think that it discounts that.
- 52:25SPEAKER_03: I mean, it's good to know that you can plug these into AI.
- 52:28SPEAKER_03: It can look for patterns maybe that it would take dozens or hundreds or thousands
- 52:33SPEAKER_03: of doctors to come up with on kind of rare diseases or non-responders
- 52:37SPEAKER_03: that we don't know why they didn't respond.
- 52:40SPEAKER_03: But it also feels like the accumulated knowledge of individual people Still has a place.
- 52:46SPEAKER_03: And I think having AI as a tool, all for it.
- 52:49SPEAKER_03: I think as a replacement,
- 52:50SPEAKER_03: man, seems like a stretch, at least right now, to be able to predict that.
- 52:55SPEAKER_01: At least right now.
- 52:56SPEAKER_01: But the way that AI is performing and...
- 53:00SPEAKER_01: My word, and taking over.
- 53:03SPEAKER_01: Listen, we're in the middle of,
- 53:05SPEAKER_01: my youngest is applying to college right now,
- 53:07SPEAKER_01: so he's in the middle of college essay writing season, right?
- 53:11SPEAKER_01: And he's doing it the old-fashioned way.
- 53:13SPEAKER_01: You sit in front of a computer and write an essay.
- 53:15SPEAKER_01: But increasingly,
- 53:16SPEAKER_01: colleges are moving away from essays even because of the fear that AI is generating
- 53:21SPEAKER_01: so much of them.
- 53:22SPEAKER_01: Right, man.
- 53:23SPEAKER_03: So you have a new book coming out, I think it is now, yeah, Chasing Truth and Cancer.
- 53:27SPEAKER_03: I wonder if you could tell us a little bit about what it's about and when's it coming out?
- 53:30SPEAKER_01: Yeah, thanks for the opportunity.
- 53:32SPEAKER_01: So in early 2027, it's gonna be published by University of Toronto Press.
- 53:38SPEAKER_01: And the book is very similar to the articles I write monthly in the Washington Post.
- 53:43SPEAKER_01: So the first half of it talks about cancer,
- 53:47SPEAKER_01: the risks for developing cancer, and what we can do to minimize that risk.
- 53:52SPEAKER_01: And these are not instructions to eat eight servings of vegetables a day
- 53:57SPEAKER_01: while standing on your head drinking a gallon of water, right?
- 53:59SPEAKER_01: They're not these things that are...
- 54:02SPEAKER_01: That are hard to do.
- 54:03SPEAKER_01: They're behaviors that we can all adapt to and incorporate into our lives to lower that risk.
- 54:10SPEAKER_01: The second half of the book is geared towards people who have a cancer diagnosis.
- 54:15SPEAKER_01: So it explains the rudiments and theory behind the therapies people receive.
- 54:20SPEAKER_01: I find that a lot of my patients have no idea why we give,
- 54:22SPEAKER_01: for example, multiple courses or cycles of chemotherapy to treat cancer.
- 54:27SPEAKER_01: And also talks about behaviors people with a diagnosis of cancer can engage in
- 54:32SPEAKER_01: to actually enhance their chance of being cured.
- 54:35SPEAKER_01: It was a really fun book to write,
- 54:37SPEAKER_01: and I incorporate in it a lot of patient stories,
- 54:40SPEAKER_01: which is very similar to how I write for The Post or some of the articles I wrote
- 54:45SPEAKER_01: for The New York Times.
- 54:46SPEAKER_01: And also some personal stories,
- 54:48SPEAKER_01: like about my mom and her lung cancer diagnosis and how we manage that as a family.
- 54:52SPEAKER_03: Yeah.
- 54:53SPEAKER_03: Any teasers for the people tuning in and for myself from the first half of the book?
- 55:00SPEAKER_01: So there's some obvious things like don't take up smoking.
- 55:05SPEAKER_01: Duh.
- 55:06SPEAKER_01: I do believe the surgeon The lowest category for alcohol intake is one
- 55:10SPEAKER_01: to two drinks per day, which to me seems like a lot, but maybe a lot.
- 55:12SPEAKER_01: Yeah.
- 55:29SPEAKER_01: So ways to minimize alcohol intake,
- 55:33SPEAKER_01: some directions on exactly the type of exercise to engage in
- 55:38SPEAKER_01: to lower your cancer risk as well.
- 55:40SPEAKER_01: And some, you know, I do dive into the epidemiology, Rob.
- 55:43SPEAKER_01: I have a background in epidemiology and I find that statistics are really hard
- 55:47SPEAKER_01: to manipulate and really hard to understand.
- 55:49SPEAKER_01: So there's kind of a basic clear explanation on how to understand statistics and how
- 55:55SPEAKER_01: to critically appraise medical literature as it comes out.
- 55:58SPEAKER_03: Great, great.
- 55:59SPEAKER_03: And you mentioned the Washington Post and your book coming out in early 27.
- 56:03SPEAKER_03: Where else can folks find you?
- 56:05SPEAKER_01: More information about the stuff I've written.
- 56:07SPEAKER_01: It's almost embarrassing to say this, but I have my own web page.
- 56:11SPEAKER_01: That's okay.
- 56:12SPEAKER_01: That's okay.
- 56:12SPEAKER_01: We're happy to let you promote it, for sure.
- 56:14SPEAKER_01: So find MikhailSekaris.com,
- 56:16SPEAKER_01: and that has a list of a lot of the essays I've written and information
- 56:21SPEAKER_01: on other books.
- 56:22SPEAKER_03: Great, great, great.
- 56:22SPEAKER_03: Well, Dr. Mikhail Sekaris, it's really been a pleasure talking to you.
- 56:25SPEAKER_03: Thanks so much for joining me.
- 56:26SPEAKER_01: It's been absolutely delightful.
- 56:27SPEAKER_01: Thank you, Rob, for focusing on this.
- 56:31SPEAKER_02: Great interview.
- 56:31SPEAKER_02: Why don't I go ahead and read us out?
- 56:33SPEAKER_02: Today's episode was written by Chris Savage, Dr.
- 56:35SPEAKER_02: Rob Davidson, and me, Miles Baker, Paging America, The Situation Womb.
- 56:39SPEAKER_02: And all of our on-call segments this week were produced by Peter Ogburn and Chris Savage.
- 56:43SPEAKER_02: All shows were edited by Peter Ogburn and April Stewie.
- 56:45SPEAKER_02: Our music is by Annette Somerset at Duneflower Productions.
- 56:48SPEAKER_02: And if you enjoyed today's show,
- 56:49SPEAKER_02: please subscribe and leave us a rating on YouTube,
- 56:50SPEAKER_02: Spotify, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen.
- 56:53SPEAKER_02: And physicians, your voice matters.
- 56:55SPEAKER_02: Join the fight for better American healthcare by becoming a member of the Committee
- 56:58SPEAKER_02: to Protect Healthcare.
- 56:59SPEAKER_02: Visit www.committeetoprotect.org to learn more.
- 57:02SPEAKER_02: And if you're not a physician,
- 57:03SPEAKER_02: if you're a nurse practitioner or an RN, Or a physician's assistant.
- 57:09SPEAKER_02: There are also going to be some options post-election at thecommitteetoprotect.org
- 57:12SPEAKER_02: for you as well.
- 57:13SPEAKER_02: So stay tuned on that and visit us sort of mid-November and you can check it out.
- 57:19SPEAKER_02: And so, Rob, it was great chatting with you today.
- 57:22SPEAKER_02: Thanks for getting after it this Thursday morning.
- 57:24SPEAKER_00: You too.
- 57:25SPEAKER_00: Have fun on the Polo Coaster.
- 57:26SPEAKER_00: See you in a week.
- 57:27SPEAKER_02: Yeah, I'm going to maybe close my laptop today.
- 57:29SPEAKER_02: Anyway, thanks for listening, everybody.
- 57:31SPEAKER_02: See ya.