Latest / Talk to Prince Show - Solving World's Problems / Prince Israel Zaar on: The Fairness Declaration of Prince Israel Zaar 09022025

Transcript

Prince Israel Zaar on: The Fairness Declaration of Prince Israel Zaar 09022025 · Talk to Prince Show - Solving World's Problems

• 0:01
  Speaker 1: The world. Peace and yearning for peace is constantly spoken
• 0:18
  Speaker 1: and is. It's something that most of humanity, something that
• 0:32
  Speaker 1: most of humanity want. Peace is something that most humans
• 0:43
  Speaker 1: pray for, and peace is something very expensive for human organizations,
• 1:00
  Speaker 1: societies and government. To keep peace is a very expensive expenditure.
• 1:13
  Speaker 1: The expenses on law enforcement, on the rule of law,
• 1:23
  Speaker 1: law and order, and the courts. Is to keep peace.
• 1:33
  Speaker 1: The government and the military and the war chess and
• 1:43
  Speaker 1: the weaponry and the amount of soldiers or troops and
• 1:56
  Speaker 1: in sea, on line, in space and places public hidden
• 2:05
  Speaker 1: to the eyes, hidden from the eyes of the war
• 2:09
  Speaker 1: of the world. It's all in the intention to secure peace,
• 2:15
  Speaker 1: to protect peace. That peace in itself becomes war preparation.
• 2:32
  Speaker 1: Countries in large their military budget in the name of peace.
• 2:40
  Speaker 1: Countries in large the size of their larger the size
• 2:46
  Speaker 1: of their army in the name of peace. Countries undertake
• 2:54
  Speaker 1: military parades and to showcase their weaponry and the strength
• 3:03
  Speaker 1: of their force in the name of peace. Some people
• 3:11
  Speaker 1: even said war through strength in the second peace and
• 3:20
  Speaker 1: somehow the slogan peace through strength place in it serf
• 3:31
  Speaker 1: becomes a preparation to war or place in it serf
• 3:39
  Speaker 1: becomes the first strike the war itself. They can't take,
• 3:47
  Speaker 1: for example, most of the wars in the world. The
• 3:52
  Speaker 1: countries are going to the war with the intention to
• 3:56
  Speaker 1: safeguard peace, to fight again aggression, or to create state
• 4:08
  Speaker 1: a buffer zone for the sake of peace. So the
• 4:14
  Speaker 1: bottom field, the buttle car and the cry, the battle
• 4:24
  Speaker 1: or the war, it is always one side singing, singing
• 4:33
  Speaker 1: the chant the chance of peace while bombing and destroying
• 4:41
  Speaker 1: at the countries. Each time there is a war, there's
• 4:51
  Speaker 1: always the talk of peace or they talk about peace.
• 4:57
  Speaker 1: Peace becomes that expensive expenditure that in itself is a
• 5:07
  Speaker 1: reason for war or the reasons why people go to war.
• 5:20
  Speaker 1: Humanity earns for peace. It becomes something of an illusion,
• 5:31
  Speaker 1: of a drain, of an imagination. Peace becomes something that
• 5:39
  Speaker 1: is so far far away from humans. There's something I've
• 5:47
  Speaker 1: spoken about every day in a microscopic level, peace within
• 5:57
  Speaker 1: the human being itself. It's sometimes challenging to find. The
• 6:06
  Speaker 1: human being itself is supposed to be a peaceful being.
• 6:12
  Speaker 1: It's born with serenity, with the power of silence and
• 6:19
  Speaker 1: the power of stillness. In a world that is aggressive, inequitable, unfair,
• 6:36
  Speaker 1: just un kind, cruel, broader, rude, disrespectful, expectative, neglecting, discriminatory, oppressive,
• 6:55
  Speaker 1: dictatoria and even sometimes tyrannical. Humans live in the world
• 7:05
  Speaker 1: that was supposed to be peaceful, and that peace was
• 7:08
  Speaker 1: supposed to come from with them. But the human being
• 7:14
  Speaker 1: is raised in a tradition, in a religion and a culture,
• 7:19
  Speaker 1: either voluntarily or on voluntarily. That's the beginning of the
• 7:24
  Speaker 1: thing that gives a human peace, or gives the human
• 7:28
  Speaker 1: the reason to create another person, or give the human
• 7:33
  Speaker 1: being the reasons to despise another religion that in the
• 7:37
  Speaker 1: surf is the source of conflict. The question we ask,
• 7:43
  Speaker 1: without tradition, religion and culture, or without politics, with the
• 7:51
  Speaker 1: human being know anything about war with the human beings
• 7:57
  Speaker 1: sek war the human human being will be peaceful with itself.
• 8:08
  Speaker 1: And the question can go back to the beginning that
• 8:13
  Speaker 1: in the state of nature, what's the human being at
• 8:17
  Speaker 1: peace with itself? Or did you go to war with everybody?
• 8:26
  Speaker 1: One word stands out survivor survivor. In the state of nature,
• 8:39
  Speaker 1: the human being was at war with itself, fight survivor
• 8:51
  Speaker 1: the survivor back in the other man kingdom, it's a
• 8:57
  Speaker 1: basic existence. Basic exists tense, how to feed yourself, had
• 9:09
  Speaker 1: to survive in the younger without being killed by somebody else.
• 9:17
  Speaker 1: How to live in an environment that's not noisy, that's
• 9:22
  Speaker 1: not rice. Care to have that serenity that in that peace,
• 9:32
  Speaker 1: that's silence and still that one deserves when one wants
• 9:47
  Speaker 1: the serenity that one deserves. One wants is something that's
• 9:53
  Speaker 1: difficult to come by, as what's in the beginning in
• 9:57
  Speaker 1: the younger of the of the human being itself, and
• 10:03
  Speaker 1: it must fight for resources and means for food supplies
• 10:07
  Speaker 1: or food child. It must fight for good harvest. It
• 10:18
  Speaker 1: must not be hidden, and they eat others, and one
• 10:26
  Speaker 1: word comes out again, weakness. They cannot be paced within
• 10:36
  Speaker 1: the human being. When that human being is weak, that
• 10:42
  Speaker 1: human meaning is a coward, just as in the microscopic world.
• 10:53
  Speaker 1: In the microscopic world, weakness of the nation of the
• 10:58
  Speaker 1: people gives reasons for aggressives, for intruders to invade their peace.
• 11:16
  Speaker 1: To be weak in itself a source for instability. The
• 11:30
  Speaker 1: projection of weakness in itself gives reasons for invasion. By
• 11:39
  Speaker 1: being weak in itself, this deprives the weak person from
• 11:48
  Speaker 1: their peace and deprive the intruding person of the intruding
• 11:53
  Speaker 1: country from their own pace. So weakness in itself jobandizes peace,
• 12:06
  Speaker 1: Isn't that? The reason is that the reasoning behind countries
• 12:12
  Speaker 1: fortifying their borders, expanding their military, showcasing strength, always trying
• 12:20
  Speaker 1: to project toughness, stand tall, looks strong, and the bravado
• 12:26
  Speaker 1: of greatness and strength, and the proper grand of having
• 12:33
  Speaker 1: the greatest gadgets the military, the best of the best
• 12:39
  Speaker 1: weapons that can do the most harm is in that
• 12:43
  Speaker 1: the extent of country going as far as having nuclear weapons.
• 12:49
  Speaker 1: Nuclear weapons a very dangerous thing. Scientific dooms their invention,
• 12:59
  Speaker 1: that's what it plear weapons, scientific dooms, day invention as
• 13:11
  Speaker 1: the I, or scientific doomsday invension, as the AI said
• 13:33
  Speaker 1: I or as di society dies, scientific doomsday invention, the
• 13:46
  Speaker 1: murder of all bombs created in the name of preserving peace.
• 13:54
  Speaker 1: How can that be? How can you have the deathless
• 13:59
  Speaker 1: weapon and see you're preserving peace. What happens if there
• 14:09
  Speaker 1: is a leak, something goes wrong, some crazy terrorists does
• 14:15
  Speaker 1: something so sinical, so so inhumane, or so psychopathic. What
• 14:25
  Speaker 1: what if the thing that protects you becomes the thing
• 14:31
  Speaker 1: that cills you. Like in the home, the father says
• 14:39
  Speaker 1: in his guns to protect himself and the family, and
• 14:45
  Speaker 1: mistaken eachild takes the gun and shoots their father. I
• 14:49
  Speaker 1: think that was supposed to bring peace. Peace becomes the
• 14:54
  Speaker 1: thing that kills, hurts, harms, and that brings war, or
• 15:04
  Speaker 1: that I think very existence of humanity. The question becomes
• 15:16
  Speaker 1: what big humans saying that having more weapons we seekure peace?
• 15:28
  Speaker 1: Has that ever happened? If that be it we are
• 15:34
  Speaker 1: the weapons that humans have today, will there be peace?
• 15:42
  Speaker 1: What about the greatest count on the planet, that planet
• 15:45
  Speaker 1: act that has the most weapons. Is there peace that
• 15:53
  Speaker 1: we still go to war preemptively? Proactively? And if so behaved,
• 16:03
  Speaker 1: I will have that strength that peace over says, And
• 16:09
  Speaker 1: no country dares that. Are human beings afraid of us,
• 16:15
  Speaker 1: who therefore be peaced internally? Wont we therefore have internal peace?
• 16:24
  Speaker 1: Are we peace? For with them? It is our politics peaceful,
• 16:37
  Speaker 1: our people peaceful? Can they be paced without intender security?
• 16:47
  Speaker 1: At the straight? Safe? Can people go away the want
• 16:55
  Speaker 1: without fear? Hm? The home safe is the pace in
• 17:02
  Speaker 1: the home and the pace comes back to the person.
• 17:12
  Speaker 1: What is peace to a to a hungry person? What
• 17:18
  Speaker 1: is peace or unemployed person? What is paced to an
• 17:25
  Speaker 1: insecure insufficient inadequate person, a person feeling that are not
• 17:33
  Speaker 1: treated with dignity, with justice, with finess, with equity. What
• 17:41
  Speaker 1: is pace to that people or to that person? What
• 17:47
  Speaker 1: is pace to a person is constantly being discriminated upon
• 17:53
  Speaker 1: we proved false access force e scisive use of force?
• 18:02
  Speaker 1: What is peace to any politic in a partistic state,
• 18:09
  Speaker 1: a segregated state? What is peace living within the community
• 18:18
  Speaker 1: with racism, sexism and bigotry? What is peace when a
• 18:24
  Speaker 1: group called minorities, even though protected by the constitution, have
• 18:32
  Speaker 1: been disrespected, disabuse, under paid, ridiculed, suffer excessive punishment, sometimes
• 18:48
  Speaker 1: jailed with that pair? What is peace to a child
• 18:55
  Speaker 1: that has been abandoned that the father is in prison
• 18:59
  Speaker 1: MHM and the mother is a drug addict, and that
• 19:04
  Speaker 1: chi is left in the whims and caprices of an
• 19:09
  Speaker 1: unsafe neighborhood, subjected to rape, abuse, delinquency, tru Wan say,
• 19:18
  Speaker 1: abandoned man neglect? What is peace to human being that
• 19:25
  Speaker 1: cannot afford health care leaving the richest counter implanner earth
• 19:32
  Speaker 1: a human Blanees is sick, but the forego medication of
• 19:37
  Speaker 1: the fogod doctor's appointment because they cannot afford What is
• 19:44
  Speaker 1: peace to an addict? What is peace to a mental
• 19:49
  Speaker 1: health person? What is peace to society strangled by misinf information?
• 20:00
  Speaker 1: This information proper can our conspiracy hiding the truth from
• 20:06
  Speaker 1: the people and cast lighting them to fight one another,
• 20:09
  Speaker 1: and to fight one another and kill one another, shoot
• 20:11
  Speaker 1: one another? What is peace when people have the right
• 20:17
  Speaker 1: to bear arms but not the right the mental health treatment.
• 20:24
  Speaker 1: When you give a gun to a mental health person,
• 20:27
  Speaker 1: I can daily peace so that person I can be
• 20:30
  Speaker 1: peace in the straight? What is pace to a child
• 20:35
  Speaker 1: that has gone down praying to God in the church,
• 20:39
  Speaker 1: in fucking Jesus and being shot in the back? So
• 20:44
  Speaker 1: gruesome to think about an image you don't want to
• 20:48
  Speaker 1: have my apologies forgive me? What is peace? The people
• 21:01
  Speaker 1: that cannot have a free on fire elections when the
• 21:04
  Speaker 1: democracy is being taken over, Their will is not respected,
• 21:13
  Speaker 1: Their privileges are taken a while the rights and freedoms
• 21:18
  Speaker 1: are being abused. The courts don't represent them the court
• 21:25
  Speaker 1: the courts punishes them. Their leaders don't provide for their
• 21:31
  Speaker 1: well being. Their leaders plunder their wealth and reach themselves
• 21:41
  Speaker 1: an experience of their own people. Why is peace? Why
• 21:50
  Speaker 1: does peace reside? Where can human beings find peace. Where
• 21:59
  Speaker 1: is pastry? Child? I need education, I need I need
• 22:09
  Speaker 1: the warmth and care and tenderness of a parent. What
• 22:17
  Speaker 1: is peace to a child that's not been attended to,
• 22:23
  Speaker 1: but all that child is given it's a cell phone,
• 22:29
  Speaker 1: a computer with apps of addiction, a child abandoned to
• 22:39
  Speaker 1: the computer, or the child abandoned this cell phone. With
• 22:45
  Speaker 1: all that is in this world within the click of
• 22:48
  Speaker 1: a child and supervised child on the internet or the
• 22:53
  Speaker 1: cell phone, I can never have peace because such children
• 23:03
  Speaker 1: soon take or take their own lives away from the earth.
• 23:10
  Speaker 1: How can it be that even the very scientific catches
• 23:14
  Speaker 1: that humans talk and the ai that they talk about,
• 23:18
  Speaker 1: and all they talk about, the better world, the peaceful world,
• 23:21
  Speaker 1: a happier one. It's always an illusion. It's always something said,
• 23:28
  Speaker 1: use the money is made of which is supposed to
• 23:31
  Speaker 1: be made because humans invited to get something on the turn.
• 23:36
  Speaker 1: But the promises of peace becomes something that is a
• 23:44
  Speaker 1: thing in itself, that it's not a thing, but nothing
• 23:48
  Speaker 1: more than the world that is used to propagate, to instigate,
• 23:56
  Speaker 1: to promise something that cannot be delivered, where in the
• 24:00
  Speaker 1: name of that piece, something else can emerge out of it.
• 24:06
  Speaker 1: War against the order hatred for the oder de previdation
• 24:14
  Speaker 1: from the other explotation of the order. It becomes the
• 24:20
  Speaker 1: thing that the piece of another body should mean, the
• 24:27
  Speaker 1: lack of design then another person. It becomes a war,
• 24:34
  Speaker 1: becomes a war a war. Well, for me to be peaceful,
• 24:38
  Speaker 1: and must deprive you from your peace. For me to
• 24:41
  Speaker 1: be wealthy, you must be poor. For being to be safe,
• 24:46
  Speaker 1: you must be on side. For me to be respected,
• 24:48
  Speaker 1: it must be disrespected. It becomes a world where somebody's
• 24:53
  Speaker 1: dignity it's a experts of the adignity of another, where
• 24:59
  Speaker 1: somebody's frail means oppression on the other. And humans start
• 25:07
  Speaker 1: to wonder and ponder and ask through education to enlightenment,
• 25:14
  Speaker 1: to religion, and they go back to the scripts of
• 25:18
  Speaker 1: ansient to find peace. Religion became that thing and if
• 25:26
  Speaker 1: you believe, if you have faith, and you will be peaceful.
• 25:34
  Speaker 1: And people did, and people became their religious. There are
• 25:40
  Speaker 1: so many churches and planning us, so many mosques, so
• 25:49
  Speaker 1: many synagogues, and so many places of worship. They talk
• 25:58
  Speaker 1: about peace, and someone used the scripture to talk about peace.
• 26:05
  Speaker 1: But still the human being it's not peaceful. The human
• 26:13
  Speaker 1: being is constantly and at war with itself, fighting one another, arguing,
• 26:21
  Speaker 1: fighting over nothing, sometimes living for the wrong thing, fighting
• 26:27
  Speaker 1: over their own thing, and dying for the wrong reasons.
• 26:31
  Speaker 1: Humans will live church and fight in the car. The
• 26:37
  Speaker 1: human will leave church. I'm going to hurt another human being.
• 26:43
  Speaker 1: Supposed to be the other way around that when we
• 26:46
  Speaker 1: leave church. It don't hurt and leave church. You don't kill.
• 26:52
  Speaker 1: The way believe in God, you become an example of God.
• 26:58
  Speaker 1: They don't tell us where God kill people. They don't
• 27:02
  Speaker 1: tell us when God went to war. Do they tell
• 27:06
  Speaker 1: us when humans kill people in the name of God,
• 27:12
  Speaker 1: when humans had one another in the name of God,
• 27:16
  Speaker 1: God in itself that was supposed to be the peace itself.
• 27:22
  Speaker 1: Let you be peace a God that is a symbol
• 27:27
  Speaker 1: of peace. It's the same God that people used to
• 27:32
  Speaker 1: go to war. They say, God is on my side?
• 27:37
  Speaker 1: How could God be on your side when you're killing
• 27:39
  Speaker 1: all the human beings? Is I got the killing gods?
• 27:46
  Speaker 1: I got the sword, the bullet, the killer drone or
• 27:57
  Speaker 1: the doom stay bound? Everybody uses God. Isn't it ironica
• 28:06
  Speaker 1: that somebody goes to the Bible and goes to war
• 28:09
  Speaker 1: with the Bible, reached the Bible and prays for God's
• 28:16
  Speaker 1: protection and kill another person. Isn't it iron God that
• 28:25
  Speaker 1: somebody says, I pray to God, not my pray falls
• 28:31
  Speaker 1: with the arrange for me to kill that person or
• 28:33
  Speaker 1: the person? And people went to culture. If they believe
• 28:41
  Speaker 1: in their culture in a way of life, they'll find peace.
• 28:48
  Speaker 1: They then they soon use their culture against peace. They
• 28:53
  Speaker 1: soon create superiority complex and they say to themselves, our culture,
• 29:00
  Speaker 1: our civilization is more superior to those of artists. And
• 29:04
  Speaker 1: for that reason, we will invade them, we will colonize them,
• 29:11
  Speaker 1: and we deprive them from everything that gives them dignity.
• 29:16
  Speaker 1: We will call them pagans and say we're supposed to
• 29:19
  Speaker 1: bring them to God. So become the decree of discovery,
• 29:30
  Speaker 1: the decree of discovery that because our countires organization is superior,
• 29:37
  Speaker 1: when you discover them, you own them. So become it
• 29:42
  Speaker 1: that the person comes to a country or to a
• 29:44
  Speaker 1: place that has humans, humans who will be living there
• 29:50
  Speaker 1: for billions or thousands or millions of years, and that
• 29:54
  Speaker 1: person therefore has the audacity to say, I discover a
• 30:02
  Speaker 1: discovery people at place. We talk about vasco da gament
• 30:07
  Speaker 1: for discovering a place I don't want to call the
• 30:11
  Speaker 1: name we talk about Christopher Columbus of discovering the place
• 30:18
  Speaker 1: or zin Graph of discovering place, not that the place
• 30:24
  Speaker 1: did not exist. You don't discover human beings, You just
• 30:34
  Speaker 1: learn that humans are living here. But by the word discovery,
• 30:42
  Speaker 1: isn't it the same thing that humans were supposed to
• 30:44
  Speaker 1: use their cultures to say peace, where they use the
• 30:52
  Speaker 1: culture to create civilizations of superiority over other humans, and
• 31:00
  Speaker 1: by so doing, the peace of those humans were being disrupted,
• 31:07
  Speaker 1: and the peace of the so called colonizer of the
• 31:09
  Speaker 1: person that's coming to enlighten a person is being disrupted.
• 31:14
  Speaker 1: It's on least the war, isn't ironic? It sometimes that
• 31:19
  Speaker 1: the human being were called the war of independence, the
• 31:22
  Speaker 1: war freedom, the wolf liberation. For isn't it true that
• 31:28
  Speaker 1: the wolf independence is to make people afraid to be
• 31:31
  Speaker 1: self determined and free within themselves and take care of
• 31:34
  Speaker 1: themselves and to the social contracts, an amendment and consensuspiriting
• 31:41
  Speaker 1: and understanding that there are one people, indivisible and the God.
• 31:50
  Speaker 1: Isn't it within that system after the war of independence
• 31:53
  Speaker 1: that es a declaration that all humans are created equal?
• 32:00
  Speaker 1: The question becomes what makes another human being questioned? The
• 32:05
  Speaker 1: humanity of another human to the extent that it needs
• 32:07
  Speaker 1: to fight to state within the edits that all humans
• 32:13
  Speaker 1: are created equal. Why does it need to make that statement.
• 32:19
  Speaker 1: Is it that it's been taught to tradition, to the
• 32:23
  Speaker 1: culture and civilizations that humans are not equal? I need
• 32:28
  Speaker 1: to I need to put in the law to be
• 32:33
  Speaker 1: affirmed that we hold this truth to self evident. I
• 32:39
  Speaker 1: come that humans need not know that they're equaled to
• 32:41
  Speaker 1: another humans. When I talk about equality, equality is in
• 32:45
  Speaker 1: equality it self a silly state? Man, What does it
• 32:48
  Speaker 1: mean to be equal to the human being? Equal to
• 32:50
  Speaker 1: nothing but itself? Now? What is self? Not? What any self? Equality?
• 32:55
  Speaker 1: The thing is a political statement. It's a statement that
• 32:58
  Speaker 1: means nothing. Human being is equal to nothing but itself.
• 33:07
  Speaker 1: Wasn't it better for the declaration of the sat or
• 33:09
  Speaker 1: human beings? Because all human beings are who they are,
• 33:14
  Speaker 1: intrinstic in their individuality, free in their persons, have the
• 33:20
  Speaker 1: right to be treated fairly. Wasn't the world? Equality is
• 33:27
  Speaker 1: a misuse of world? Wasn't it supposed to be fairly?
• 33:33
  Speaker 1: I hold this truth to perself evidence that all humans
• 33:35
  Speaker 1: should be treated fairly for there to be peace, Because
• 33:44
  Speaker 1: the concept of inequality is debatable. It means nothing, but
• 33:48
  Speaker 1: faine has been something. Equalities are in measurements, in mathematics,
• 33:54
  Speaker 1: in things, not in humans, measure your fainness. Isn't that true?
• 34:05
  Speaker 1: Don't you know where you're not treated fairly? Whay you're
• 34:07
  Speaker 1: not treated another person fairly? And isn't it true that
• 34:11
  Speaker 1: if it was all about fairness, humans were hardly go
• 34:15
  Speaker 1: to war because they all know it's not fair. Fairness?
• 34:25
  Speaker 1: Wasn't the word equality and misuse of word that has
• 34:28
  Speaker 1: been chanted in constitutions? In declaration we took about the French,
• 34:37
  Speaker 1: the French Revolution, the Versailles, You remember the French kings,
• 34:47
  Speaker 1: King Louis, the fourteen fifteen, the sixteen the revolution was
• 34:55
  Speaker 1: all about egality, e gality, equality, equality, fraternity, liberty, egality, egality.
• 35:08
  Speaker 1: Wasn't that what egality borrowed by the Americans? Benjamin Franklin
• 35:14
  Speaker 1: that world equality became the thing that we talk about today,
• 35:20
  Speaker 1: and fairness is forgotten now what equality has been spoken
• 35:24
  Speaker 1: for so many times? And that word equality because it
• 35:29
  Speaker 1: means nothing. Humanity is concerned whit itself. Were you fighting
• 35:35
  Speaker 1: for your equality? What does that mean? Is? Are you
• 35:39
  Speaker 1: fighting for your peace? What does equality means how can
• 35:46
  Speaker 1: humans be equal? What a silly word? Why did not
• 35:52
  Speaker 1: talking about fairness? Because fairness appears to your conscience do
• 36:00
  Speaker 1: to add us where you're like, doesn't do UPTI year,
• 36:04
  Speaker 1: that's the call to peace. But that's not what they
• 36:07
  Speaker 1: is spoken about. Jesus spoke about this. Confucials spoke about
• 36:14
  Speaker 1: that that do to add us what you like them
• 36:20
  Speaker 1: do unto year, and I call that fairness. Fairness is
• 36:28
  Speaker 1: that said that it says in the universe, that is
• 36:33
  Speaker 1: that resides within the human being. That if fairness is
• 36:37
  Speaker 1: not the thing that is started school, in the church,
• 36:41
  Speaker 1: at work, everywhere humans go and live, the humans will
• 36:48
  Speaker 1: never know peace because fairness is a thing within the
• 36:53
  Speaker 1: thing itself that gets its own stability, that sikes the
• 36:57
  Speaker 1: harmony in a peace within that person. For that person
• 37:01
  Speaker 1: to have peace, to do what is right, to do
• 37:06
  Speaker 1: the right thing. You have compassion for fellow humans, have
• 37:11
  Speaker 1: empathy to be human, it's what they call humanity. But
• 37:21
  Speaker 1: when fairness is not there, what do you have? You
• 37:26
  Speaker 1: have empathy, you have psychopathy and right you have humans
• 37:34
  Speaker 1: with their conscience and humans talk about equality, it takes
• 37:43
  Speaker 1: away the peace with them. The metrics of measurement becomes
• 37:49
  Speaker 1: the government and on fair states decide on what is equality?
• 37:58
  Speaker 1: Think about it? Then an oppressor talks about equality, and
• 38:04
  Speaker 1: the tyrant talk of equality, and a dictator talk about equality,
• 38:11
  Speaker 1: and a warmonger talk about equality, and the racist talk
• 38:15
  Speaker 1: about equality, and the sexiest talk about equality, and the
• 38:20
  Speaker 1: biggot talks about equality, and a mental health person talks
• 38:25
  Speaker 1: about equality, and the psychopa talks about equality. Then you
• 38:33
  Speaker 1: know they can never be peace in the construct of equality.
• 38:44
  Speaker 1: What do we have? We therefore created coup metrics that
• 38:49
  Speaker 1: will be used to measure equality because we are going
• 38:53
  Speaker 1: to talk about equality. We created racism because we are
• 38:56
  Speaker 1: going to talk about sex equality to be created. Sexism
• 39:05
  Speaker 1: means equality in the sexist or resist state in itself,
• 39:11
  Speaker 1: a state of being at the state in its externality.
• 39:16
  Speaker 1: Deface the word equality in the serf not what equality
• 39:20
  Speaker 1: has been the trick in the books for all politicians
• 39:24
  Speaker 1: from time in Memoria. Isn't it intelligent to substitute the
• 39:29
  Speaker 1: word equality and talk about fairness? That humans just to
• 39:33
  Speaker 1: start talking about fairness. When you talk about fairness, they
• 39:38
  Speaker 1: ever need to talk about justice, because justice is fairness.
• 39:45
  Speaker 1: When we talk about fairness, you ever need to talk
• 39:48
  Speaker 1: about peace or do you think because peace is fairness
• 39:55
  Speaker 1: where you talk about wawlessness, they don't need to talk
• 40:02
  Speaker 1: about why just talk about peace. We talk about peace,
• 40:10
  Speaker 1: it needs to talk about fairness. Humans go to war
• 40:15
  Speaker 1: because they don't believe in peace. Humans go to war
• 40:20
  Speaker 1: because they don't believe in fairness. If there is fairness
• 40:24
  Speaker 1: still the consensus that we are understanding respect, Humans go
• 40:29
  Speaker 1: to war because they don't believe they don't respect others.
• 40:35
  Speaker 1: There can be no peace in the world if there
• 40:37
  Speaker 1: is no fairness, and they cannot be fairness if there
• 40:40
  Speaker 1: is no respect. So in the books of ancients, it's
• 40:44
  Speaker 1: thretten that do to others well like others, don't hear
• 40:47
  Speaker 1: with the name of culture, with criy civilizations, and say
• 40:50
  Speaker 1: to ourselves our civilizations superior to others. And by that reason,
• 40:55
  Speaker 1: so we use the word equality on our terms to
• 41:00
  Speaker 1: become some sort of progression of gradualism one step forward,
• 41:08
  Speaker 1: ten steps back. The people are constant in the street
• 41:13
  Speaker 1: junting equality, equality. I want to be free and need
• 41:18
  Speaker 1: to be treated with equality, and ask yourself, what do
• 41:22
  Speaker 1: you mean how can I treat you with equality? If
• 41:26
  Speaker 1: I were intellect This stuff the same. I cannot treat
• 41:31
  Speaker 1: you with equality when I have advantages that you don't have.
• 41:36
  Speaker 1: I cannot treat you with equality when I have a
• 41:38
  Speaker 1: bigger army that you don't have. I cannot cheat you
• 41:42
  Speaker 1: equality when I'm fancying technology. When I talk about nanotechnology,
• 41:48
  Speaker 1: you're still talking about coal. When I'm talking about nuclear
• 41:53
  Speaker 1: green technology, you're still talking about co I cannot treat
• 41:59
  Speaker 1: you dignity. I can do with equality when i'm when
• 42:04
  Speaker 1: I have the most nobel law rates. When you used
• 42:08
  Speaker 1: to live in what I call it that world or
• 42:10
  Speaker 1: the jungle, what categorization or stratification that I've chosen to
• 42:14
  Speaker 1: give to you? What does equality means? It's something I give.
• 42:22
  Speaker 1: It's something the oppressor give gives to the oppress that
• 42:26
  Speaker 1: will press fight their whole lives for something they would
• 42:29
  Speaker 1: never get. Because the word in itself means nothing nothing.
• 42:37
  Speaker 1: It's time to hear the word equality. If you're not
• 42:40
  Speaker 1: in equalibrium or use equality in mathematics and measurement in
• 42:46
  Speaker 1: physics or chemistry, that won means nothing. Equality is not
• 42:53
  Speaker 1: the thing. It's not the measurement for humans. The measurement
• 42:58
  Speaker 1: humans interaction, human co human cohabilitation, or coexistence. It's fairness.
• 43:11
  Speaker 1: But culture came over fairness and civilizations were made. That
• 43:23
  Speaker 1: word civilization hiden within the code of every civilization is
• 43:28
  Speaker 1: the concept of superiority. Within every civilization, the concept of
• 43:34
  Speaker 1: the is the construct of superiority, and the construct of
• 43:38
  Speaker 1: superiority is in in many ways. Some cultures thought they
• 43:43
  Speaker 1: were superior because of their invasion and technologies, like the Egyptians,
• 43:48
  Speaker 1: and some used that concept of technology, but it did
• 43:51
  Speaker 1: not matter. They thought they were superior because of their race.
• 43:57
  Speaker 1: And in some cultures of the latter world that thinks
• 44:02
  Speaker 1: where it is to nothing, it humanna be becomes became
• 44:06
  Speaker 1: superior because of its care. It gives itself. It gives
• 44:10
  Speaker 1: itself a color, a color that it is not in
• 44:14
  Speaker 1: this naturality. But it did not matter, because the color
• 44:17
  Speaker 1: color in itself, it's a symbol of superiority, civilization and superiority.
• 44:30
  Speaker 1: It's a good word. I I'm better than you. So
• 44:37
  Speaker 1: most civilizations came with their caveats. There were civilizations because
• 44:43
  Speaker 1: they subjecated others. Within every civilizations lie the blood and
• 44:48
  Speaker 1: the carnage, the brutality, the humanity, the slavery, the subjugation
• 44:53
  Speaker 1: of the killings of humans. Every great monument you see
• 44:58
  Speaker 1: in the name of civilization and lies the blood and
• 45:03
  Speaker 1: indignities and crutius comminated to other against other human beings.
• 45:09
  Speaker 1: Those monuments cannot be the symbol of peace. The lioneteer
• 45:15
  Speaker 1: their symbols to remind you that somebody did some terrible
• 45:20
  Speaker 1: things to your ancestry, of which history in itself, it's
• 45:26
  Speaker 1: not spoken by the losers, but by the winners the victory,
• 45:34
  Speaker 1: those who have victorias. They write the history to glamorize themselves,
• 45:40
  Speaker 1: to promote strength and war. They create the road map.
• 45:52
  Speaker 1: They created blueprint for further war. We defeated, the war
• 45:57
  Speaker 1: for resistance, the war victory, the war of this, the
• 46:01
  Speaker 1: war of that. Therefore followed the broom, the blueprint and
• 46:07
  Speaker 1: use science and technology to make that blueprint more later
• 46:14
  Speaker 1: in the future, to use it and care about humans
• 46:20
  Speaker 1: and destabilize peace. You cannot build a war chess and
• 46:26
  Speaker 1: talk about peace. He's just waiting for the trigger, miss signals, miscommunication,
• 46:38
  Speaker 1: a humans art war, war and peace came to be
• 46:51
  Speaker 1: because something was missing fairness. Isn't it true that for
• 46:58
  Speaker 1: countries to start to talk about fairness and to create
• 47:03
  Speaker 1: the peace that they want. They need to start to
• 47:06
  Speaker 1: talk about Melito cares Merito crazy over nepotism, because the
• 47:11
  Speaker 1: partisan creates corruption. Nepotism and corruption does don't bring the
• 47:15
  Speaker 1: best out of humans. Nepotism and correation creates a client
• 47:20
  Speaker 1: of humans not on the best of the past. But
• 47:25
  Speaker 1: they know how to preserve power and keep power and
• 47:28
  Speaker 1: pass power on to their siblings, to their gin goode,
• 47:32
  Speaker 1: from generations to generations. They are more shrewd in preserving
• 47:37
  Speaker 1: and passing power to themselves than developing the people. So
• 47:43
  Speaker 1: thepotism and corruption in itself and not peace in themselves,
• 47:56
  Speaker 1: nepotism doesn't have the ingredient of peace. Us have the
• 48:00
  Speaker 1: ingredient of peace. A corrupt state great anarchy, great instability.
• 48:07
  Speaker 1: A corrupt state cannot develop itself, cannot protect itself, cannot
• 48:10
  Speaker 1: take office of people, cannot fad its people. A corrupt
• 48:14
  Speaker 1: state in itself is the big enough on fairness. What
• 48:20
  Speaker 1: takes it with fairness is corruption and nepotism. And fairness
• 48:26
  Speaker 1: came from corruption. Disparity in criminal justice system with disparity
• 48:32
  Speaker 1: in wealth comes out of corruption and nepotism. The one
• 48:39
  Speaker 1: thing that the human that the human beneaths is fairness
• 48:43
  Speaker 1: the one thing that humanity should become or him for it.
• 48:48
  Speaker 1: It's fairness. There is no freedom without fairness. There is
• 48:54
  Speaker 1: no peace without fairness. There is no co existence without fairness.
• 49:00
  Speaker 1: It is no cohabitation without fairness. It is no joy
• 49:08
  Speaker 1: sustainable joy without fairness. It is unsustainable happiness without fairness.
• 49:15
  Speaker 1: Now which the human being sick is something different from
• 49:21
  Speaker 1: what they get when you seek their wrong thing, to
• 49:26
  Speaker 1: get the wrong thing in return, humans are constanted seeking
• 49:31
  Speaker 1: for justice equality and fairness becomes something that is missing
• 49:39
  Speaker 1: with him. Humans are seeking for one thing, fairness. Isn't
• 49:49
  Speaker 1: it therefore right to ask the question that if fairness
• 49:51
  Speaker 1: is the thing that human being should sick, I shall have,
• 49:56
  Speaker 1: why is it difficult, therefore for humans not to be fair,
• 50:00
  Speaker 1: not to treat each other with fairness. You cannot talk
• 50:04
  Speaker 1: about dignity with that fairness. You cannot talk about democracy
• 50:09
  Speaker 1: with a fairnace, You cannot talk about that. We hold
• 50:15
  Speaker 1: this truth to evidence ignoring fairness. Humans we always go
• 50:22
  Speaker 1: to war if they are not treated with fairness. Sometimes
• 50:29
  Speaker 1: humans we go to war if they are treated with equality.
• 50:37
  Speaker 1: Most of the far right movements in the Wall it
• 50:42
  Speaker 1: is hatred for fairness and for equality, no hatred for fairness.
• 50:52
  Speaker 1: An equal state creates a communist state, and a communist
• 50:56
  Speaker 1: state is a state that runs away from itself and
• 50:59
  Speaker 1: try to be something that's or LeAnn itself. A communist
• 51:03
  Speaker 1: state left to itself cannot survive, cannot fit itself, cannot
• 51:09
  Speaker 1: develop itself. That's why I mean most communist state adop
• 51:14
  Speaker 1: something called socialism with something called characteristics, and adopt something
• 51:20
  Speaker 1: capitalism with something called capitalistics, such a communism with some
• 51:25
  Speaker 1: adopt capitalism with the world with the caveat called characteristic
• 51:31
  Speaker 1: or capitalism with the caveac or democracy with the caveac.
• 51:37
  Speaker 1: Because in the communist state and itself the human beings
• 51:41
  Speaker 1: and it's equal state, what does that mean? And equal state?
• 51:46
  Speaker 1: A human being does nothing? Why should I do something?
• 51:51
  Speaker 1: Why should I do more? So you cannot you cannot
• 51:59
  Speaker 1: be sick and quote tear in the political state of
• 52:04
  Speaker 1: being in the government, instead of being not doing be developed.
• 52:13
  Speaker 1: Humans were in the state of nature because everybody's were
• 52:15
  Speaker 1: equal to themselves. Nobody did anything in the group. Nobody
• 52:19
  Speaker 1: was in charge and responsible, nobody wanted to do more.
• 52:23
  Speaker 1: There were no heroes in the equal state There is
• 52:26
  Speaker 1: no hero in an equal stied, there are no bill
• 52:31
  Speaker 1: oness or trailing us. In an equal state, nothing is invented,
• 52:35
  Speaker 1: nothing is innovated, nothing is created. Because you'll be different,
• 52:44
  Speaker 1: you'll be better than others. It will stand out and equals.
• 52:50
  Speaker 1: Then nobody stands out. There is no past. In an
• 52:55
  Speaker 1: equal state. There is no America. There is no Western war.
• 53:03
  Speaker 1: There is no no bad all right. There is no
• 53:06
  Speaker 1: arms Stein or Nicola Tesla. There is no railroad, electricity.
• 53:16
  Speaker 1: There is no computer. There is no internet. There is
• 53:27
  Speaker 1: no money. There is no wealth. There is no infrastructure
• 53:36
  Speaker 1: because competition is dead. Equality it's not a good thing
• 53:47
  Speaker 1: when it comes to state and governance and people. Finess
• 53:58
  Speaker 1: should be the new sign h the new world jarper
• 54:03
  Speaker 1: driven by fairness. People like within themselves to treat others
• 54:08
  Speaker 1: with fairness. The government cannot use you to talk about
• 54:14
  Speaker 1: equality and say, in the war and deprive you gives
• 54:16
  Speaker 1: your height of baktry or division and trace your mind
• 54:21
  Speaker 1: in the name of equality. If you go back to
• 54:25
  Speaker 1: the beginning about fairness due to others, we like only
• 54:28
  Speaker 1: year the men of fairness. The only thing a Chinese
• 54:42
  Speaker 1: civilization and Western civilization has in common it's something said
• 54:52
  Speaker 1: by Jesus and something said by confisis due to others
• 54:59
  Speaker 1: while you're like the done to you. I M I
• 55:02
  Speaker 1: don't know what that means. That means as a philosopher,
• 55:09
  Speaker 1: through that was born the word fairness. Fairness becomes something
• 55:22
  Speaker 1: that is not owned by the government. It's not owned
• 55:26
  Speaker 1: by any body but you. Fairness is something that's within
• 55:32
  Speaker 1: the inner peace in a being or the being itself.
• 55:37
  Speaker 1: Fairness means do what is right, but I right sometimes
• 55:42
  Speaker 1: twisted by the law because one culture differs difference right
• 55:46
  Speaker 1: different from the other. What is right in one culture
• 55:50
  Speaker 1: is wrong in another. But fairness something of conscience. It's
• 55:58
  Speaker 1: something that even ourself airs. Like John Locke that John
• 56:02
  Speaker 1: Locke talk about, you go back to Socrates and Platon.
• 56:09
  Speaker 1: That thing called furness is there, but governments don't want
• 56:15
  Speaker 1: to use it. Dictators don't want to use it, or
• 56:18
  Speaker 1: pressures don't want to use it. Tylants don't want to
• 56:23
  Speaker 1: use it. In tyranny, there is no fairness. The tyran
• 56:28
  Speaker 1: is tyranny against fairness. The dictatorship is dictators against fairness.
• 56:34
  Speaker 1: The oppression is a pressure is a pression against fairness,
• 56:38
  Speaker 1: and to cross furnace, They create an army, they create hate,
• 56:43
  Speaker 1: They create sexism and racism and bakotry. Racism, sexism, and
• 56:46
  Speaker 1: bigotry were created to bury fairness and to bury fairness
• 56:56
  Speaker 1: and to propagate an institutionalize the racism, sexism and bigger tray.
• 57:08
  Speaker 1: They created corruption and impotism. See the system of humans
• 57:14
  Speaker 1: to die, the light is fairness. But the system of
• 57:21
  Speaker 1: humans today they do everything to create darkness. It's a
• 57:28
  Speaker 1: smokes crane, Racism, sexism, bigot smokes cry. What they're taking
• 57:33
  Speaker 1: away from you is your inner peace. That inner peace
• 57:38
  Speaker 1: recite in your fainness. You can be as racist as
• 57:42
  Speaker 1: you want. You can never have inner peace. You can
• 57:46
  Speaker 1: never have in a peace if you don't need others
• 57:49
  Speaker 1: the way you like to be treated, you can with
• 57:54
  Speaker 1: that billionnaire of racist or sexist. You want to die
• 57:59
  Speaker 1: and you're dying, you willn't find peace. You cannot find
• 58:04
  Speaker 1: peace if you don't need others with finess. Isn't that
• 58:09
  Speaker 1: why people ask for forgiveness before they die. I'm sorry,
• 58:15
  Speaker 1: Sir oh Man, that was not fair. What I did
• 58:18
  Speaker 1: that I know it was not fair. Fairness, fair to
• 58:24
  Speaker 1: be fair, not first skin, fair heart, not fair heart tissue,
• 58:35
  Speaker 1: a fast soul. Don't forget your soul. Be led by
• 58:42
  Speaker 1: your soul. May your mind become your soul. And what
• 58:52
  Speaker 1: I call the soul mind or the sobeying the mind
• 58:58
  Speaker 1: that became the soul and enlightened mind, that mind being,
• 59:05
  Speaker 1: that mind code, the mind shape. A positive mind. A
• 59:11
  Speaker 1: purified mind is a mind with a soul, a mind
• 59:16
  Speaker 1: that can only create positive causalities. That mind being, that
• 59:20
  Speaker 1: mind code, that mind shape I talk about that mine
• 59:25
  Speaker 1: does purified itself from its negative causalities to sick fairness,
• 59:32
  Speaker 1: the right mind, the right side, that light of fairness,
• 59:40
  Speaker 1: that beacon of hope of a new beginning that frees
• 59:45
  Speaker 1: the human being with them and enlightened that human being
• 59:49
  Speaker 1: did all of its AI intelligences and android intelligence that
• 59:53
  Speaker 1: is free and fair in that difficial intelligence are free
• 59:58
  Speaker 1: and fair to the android intelligence and the artificial intelligence
• 1:00:04
  Speaker 1: that has purified itself in the light to the alien
• 1:00:09
  Speaker 1: intelligence or the infinity intelligence is open, for that being
• 1:00:14
  Speaker 1: can only replicate itself and multipli it self and exponentiate
• 1:00:17
  Speaker 1: itself with that good without fineness and positivity of being
• 1:00:24
  Speaker 1: that the being has no reason to hate, because the
• 1:00:27
  Speaker 1: being has one in it that's what it takes. It
• 1:00:31
  Speaker 1: has nothing to be jealous or to envy another. That
• 1:00:35
  Speaker 1: a being has reason, no reason to kill for going.
• 1:00:38
  Speaker 1: The human being kills, it kills the tissue. It does
• 1:00:41
  Speaker 1: not kill the soul. It does not kill the good
• 1:00:44
  Speaker 1: win in that human being. That tissue of Martin Luther being,
• 1:00:48
  Speaker 1: of Martin Lutak King was killed, but the soul of
• 1:00:52
  Speaker 1: that being was not killed. The soul is being venerated
• 1:00:56
  Speaker 1: when he call it his name matter Luther King, you
• 1:01:00
  Speaker 1: cannot not know that was a good person. That was
• 1:01:03
  Speaker 1: a person. That's sick. Fairness. And they talk about equality,
• 1:01:09
  Speaker 1: it's equality to me. In the equality of resources, we
• 1:01:15
  Speaker 1: talk about equality should be equal access to resources. We
• 1:01:19
  Speaker 1: talk about equality should be equal access to opportunity, should
• 1:01:25
  Speaker 1: equal access to the justice system, equal access. We talk
• 1:01:31
  Speaker 1: about equality. It's a compound now equal access. Equality in
• 1:01:38
  Speaker 1: itself is a political word. Equality has a compound. Now
• 1:01:45
  Speaker 1: means something. Equal access lists to fair competition, Equal access
• 1:01:56
  Speaker 1: leads to meritocracy, access leads to inner peace. Because equal
• 1:02:05
  Speaker 1: access it is finness. If humans have equal access to
• 1:02:12
  Speaker 1: opportunities and they blow it up, they have nobody to blame.
• 1:02:19
  Speaker 1: If everybody is given the same access and the same resources,
• 1:02:24
  Speaker 1: everything being equal. Some people better than others, and those
• 1:02:30
  Speaker 1: who are better than others they are better to merit,
• 1:02:34
  Speaker 1: to deserve, and those who are not better don't have
• 1:02:38
  Speaker 1: themselves to blame. They will not blame a government another person.
• 1:02:44
  Speaker 1: They will know that to their laziness, entitlement and victim hurt,
• 1:02:48
  Speaker 1: they couldn't make it. But in the system of corruption
• 1:02:54
  Speaker 1: and nepotism and discrimination, lazy people make excuses. But people
• 1:03:04
  Speaker 1: take advantage to hurt one another because they are hiding
• 1:03:10
  Speaker 1: under the cloth or at the clock of racism and
• 1:03:14
  Speaker 1: sexism and baquetry. They think they're fighting for eighteen I.
• 1:03:20
  Speaker 1: Destroying others equal access to opportunity well lead to finance.
• 1:03:29
  Speaker 1: I mean society will be better, the rich of richer,
• 1:03:35
  Speaker 1: the poor be poorer, not because of the act of government,
• 1:03:41
  Speaker 1: because of themselves. Because when people are free, indeed, they
• 1:03:47
  Speaker 1: can only blame themselves. When they don't seek the best
• 1:03:53
  Speaker 1: of themselves, society is fighting itself. It's true when people
• 1:04:04
  Speaker 1: are fighting against When some people are fighting for equality
• 1:04:08
  Speaker 1: and those both are always giving equality, they don't develop
• 1:04:11
  Speaker 1: the best in themselves or the fighter by equality. People
• 1:04:15
  Speaker 1: are still under the breach the equality they give certain people,
• 1:04:20
  Speaker 1: they use it for drugs, varcoholism, to buy weapons and
• 1:04:23
  Speaker 1: kill others. Because the equality in itself, it is a
• 1:04:29
  Speaker 1: weapon to self destroyer. It's an access to self destroyer's
• 1:04:33
  Speaker 1: freedom to self destroyer. Equality you can with access equal
• 1:04:41
  Speaker 1: access to something. That's what fairness is all about. Equal
• 1:04:50
  Speaker 1: access to something. And if there is equal access to opportunities,
• 1:04:59
  Speaker 1: some will lack behald and if those are lagging behind,
• 1:05:06
  Speaker 1: so the system therefore to be fair to get to
• 1:05:08
  Speaker 1: know why are they're lacking behind? Is it a mentor
• 1:05:12
  Speaker 1: state disability? The system will not fit in that inequality
• 1:05:18
  Speaker 1: and disability to make them to be addictive to dependency.
• 1:05:25
  Speaker 1: The system will therefore fix that for those people to
• 1:05:28
  Speaker 1: stand on their own. The system will not prey on
• 1:05:34
  Speaker 1: vulnerability to create slough and victim of entitlements. So the
• 1:05:47
  Speaker 1: system will not exploit inequalities. The system will fix inequalities.
• 1:05:56
  Speaker 1: The inequality in itself, now it's not a word, is
• 1:06:00
  Speaker 1: that somebody is impaired, somebody is handiccapped, disabled, since they
• 1:06:06
  Speaker 1: cannot fairly compete with someone who is able to body,
• 1:06:12
  Speaker 1: then the system can therefore create the means of opportunity
• 1:06:16
  Speaker 1: to top people if somebody is not physically competitive, that
• 1:06:23
  Speaker 1: person can be a software. If you cannot compete be
• 1:06:27
  Speaker 1: in a hardware, you can compete be in a software.
• 1:06:31
  Speaker 1: Because the human being is intrinsically born with a gift
• 1:06:35
  Speaker 1: within itself. Every human being has come here to contribute,
• 1:06:44
  Speaker 1: to give something underbody, as has to make fairness to
• 1:06:50
  Speaker 1: be the order and not the equality that is driven
• 1:06:56
  Speaker 1: that is driving today society that actually creates inequality. To
• 1:07:02
  Speaker 1: make that philosophy of fairness to work, a society that
• 1:07:08
  Speaker 1: wants to experiment this must go back to my philosophy,
• 1:07:17
  Speaker 1: the premise that the human being is the being itself,
• 1:07:27
  Speaker 1: that the being of the being is the being itself,
• 1:07:31
  Speaker 1: that that human being is in tricksic in itself, not
• 1:07:36
  Speaker 1: because the human being is a being of itself, or
• 1:07:41
  Speaker 1: that the being of the being of itself. That's second
• 1:07:46
  Speaker 1: part of the premise stage that therefore, that which the
• 1:07:49
  Speaker 1: human being has come to be only that human being
• 1:07:53
  Speaker 1: can be, means that because the human beings itself that
• 1:07:57
  Speaker 1: self in a self aging code, is a creativity, is
• 1:07:59
  Speaker 1: a mind, and that being can only be the mind
• 1:08:02
  Speaker 1: of itself. So if that being given opportunities, the access
• 1:08:07
  Speaker 1: to opportunities that human that's which the human being has
• 1:08:10
  Speaker 1: come to be. It is something that humanity needs because
• 1:08:15
  Speaker 1: it's unique and intrinsic to the human being itself. So
• 1:08:19
  Speaker 1: in a fair society, that human being will be giving
• 1:08:25
  Speaker 1: the access and the twols to get to know what
• 1:08:30
  Speaker 1: it is that nobody has his. That's the invention, the
• 1:08:35
  Speaker 1: beginning of creativity was the part of respect for the IP.
• 1:08:41
  Speaker 1: That's what I call the iphig that if the human
• 1:08:44
  Speaker 1: being therefore is given that equal access to seek to
• 1:08:48
  Speaker 1: know what it is, and the human beings is an
• 1:08:51
  Speaker 1: IP that human made has a solution to the problem
• 1:08:55
  Speaker 1: of the world, because that human being can solve someone
• 1:09:00
  Speaker 1: someone as his problem as someone as solved anas his problem.
• 1:09:06
  Speaker 1: So if that human being is the being of itself
• 1:09:11
  Speaker 1: and not an imitation to itself for something, and the
• 1:09:15
  Speaker 1: human being therefore does doesn't need to be a copy
• 1:09:17
  Speaker 1: of something else, because if the human being sick to
• 1:09:20
  Speaker 1: be the copy of something, a copy of a copy
• 1:09:23
  Speaker 1: is a copy, and the copy of a copy is
• 1:09:25
  Speaker 1: not a copy of the thing. It's a copy of
• 1:09:27
  Speaker 1: the thing itself, but it's not the thing itself. So
• 1:09:31
  Speaker 1: this is that's of fairness. You will get mentroucacy, and competition.
• 1:09:36
  Speaker 1: So the human being is not sicking to be a
• 1:09:38
  Speaker 1: copy of something else. The society is given that you
• 1:09:41
  Speaker 1: might be the equal access to seek to understand what
• 1:09:44
  Speaker 1: it is. Because the human being is the code of itself.
• 1:09:47
  Speaker 1: It's a chain code of itself. As I said, So
• 1:09:50
  Speaker 1: that's how my faintest philosophy works. The fairness philosophy is
• 1:09:57
  Speaker 1: that the human mansion and be a copy of something
• 1:09:59
  Speaker 1: as a human be the sing the be that the
• 1:10:01
  Speaker 1: thing of itself self development does. We'll talk about several
• 1:10:04
  Speaker 1: alliance as we'll talk about independence. That's what my philosophy
• 1:10:08
  Speaker 1: talk about. So philosophy talk about independence, fairness and several alliance.
• 1:10:13
  Speaker 1: It's not independence, freedoms and cell alliance that society talks about.
• 1:10:19
  Speaker 1: It's independence, fairness and several alliance within the human being itself.
• 1:10:25
  Speaker 1: To have to free access to develop your own code,
• 1:10:28
  Speaker 1: your own algorithm, your own mind shape, your own mind
• 1:10:33
  Speaker 1: being that mine the infiniteness of the human being. It
• 1:10:43
  Speaker 1: means every human being has something to offer because there
• 1:10:47
  Speaker 1: are no two algorithms within the human being. The human
• 1:10:51
  Speaker 1: beings the code of itself. We know that. My philosophy
• 1:10:54
  Speaker 1: is to seek to philoso code to decode the code
• 1:10:57
  Speaker 1: within the human being itself. It's true that I created
• 1:11:00
  Speaker 1: the work the philosophy of triangulism. The philosophy of triangulism
• 1:11:07
  Speaker 1: talks about intrinsic difference in which the human do will
• 1:11:13
  Speaker 1: never be talking about equality. The human being talking about
• 1:11:17
  Speaker 1: MPB measurement, proportionality and balance. So we're thinking so in
• 1:11:27
  Speaker 1: this philosophy or fairness of mind, I talk about humans
• 1:11:35
  Speaker 1: with self developed through access to opportunity, the equal access
• 1:11:43
  Speaker 1: to opportunities. The human being is a seed, as I said.
• 1:11:50
  Speaker 1: I said, the human being is the seed of nature
• 1:11:53
  Speaker 1: and the gingko of infinity. But the things standing in
• 1:11:57
  Speaker 1: between not realizing that infinity intelligence. It's lack of access,
• 1:12:04
  Speaker 1: lack of access to resources, lack of access to opportunities.
• 1:12:10
  Speaker 1: When as a lack of access to the resources, the
• 1:12:13
  Speaker 1: government in those countries is used to resources. So HU
• 1:12:18
  Speaker 1: must a bond with natural resources that the ecology has
• 1:12:23
  Speaker 1: given to them to get balances. It means the ecology
• 1:12:26
  Speaker 1: Nature's giving the human be the too to self develop.
• 1:12:32
  Speaker 1: It means you are bonded with wealth to use that
• 1:12:35
  Speaker 1: wealth to decode your mind. That's what they call experimentation. Invention.
• 1:12:40
  Speaker 1: That's the beauty of being. The beauty of being its discovery,
• 1:12:44
  Speaker 1: sacrifice is seeking to be something new. It's invention. That's
• 1:12:52
  Speaker 1: what my philosophy talk about. A philosophy of fairness gives
• 1:12:59
  Speaker 1: equal access to opportunity, that the human being compete within
• 1:13:03
  Speaker 1: itself to be the best of itself, not complain about others.
• 1:13:09
  Speaker 1: But that's not what's happening in society. The few I
• 1:13:14
  Speaker 1: p minds, the pheno be laureates, the few inventors of
• 1:13:18
  Speaker 1: the few philosophers, those who have made this work. But
• 1:13:21
  Speaker 1: what that is the self developed this code with them
• 1:13:27
  Speaker 1: where my philosophers. The human being is born with three codes.
• 1:13:31
  Speaker 1: Those three codes, that's what I call the three gifts.
• 1:13:37
  Speaker 1: You're born with a gift of word, you are born
• 1:13:41
  Speaker 1: with a gift of numbers as wealth. You are born
• 1:13:45
  Speaker 1: with the gift of symbols and leads to were wealth.
• 1:13:49
  Speaker 1: The gifts of the gift of words leads to were
• 1:13:54
  Speaker 1: wealth and enlightenment. The gifts of numbers leads to wealth
• 1:14:01
  Speaker 1: and for you to seek measurement, proportionality, and balance. The
• 1:14:10
  Speaker 1: gift of symbols create philosophies and codes to see harmony
• 1:14:17
  Speaker 1: and peace, to seek meaning and purpose. The philosophy of
• 1:14:24
  Speaker 1: fairness creates wealth, not fidiciary tissue, and not the fidicialy
• 1:14:37
  Speaker 1: meaning of wealth or the fiat meaning of wealth, because
• 1:14:42
  Speaker 1: the human being is the wealth itself. It means I
• 1:14:46
  Speaker 1: have something that you need or you have something that
• 1:14:49
  Speaker 1: I need. So there's something that we can tread. And
• 1:14:54
  Speaker 1: in that sense, you have what I call the competitive
• 1:14:57
  Speaker 1: monopoly of self, the competitive monopoly of self, that you're
• 1:15:05
  Speaker 1: in monopoly of something that somebody needs, and that's somebody's
• 1:15:11
  Speaker 1: a monopoly of something that you need, and therefore there
• 1:15:15
  Speaker 1: is competition. It can be a fair competition since you
• 1:15:19
  Speaker 1: have what I need, what you need, I've developed myself.
• 1:15:23
  Speaker 1: I've enriched myself to have what you need. I love
• 1:15:27
  Speaker 1: developer enriched myself to have what I need. Therefore they
• 1:15:32
  Speaker 1: can be fair competition and fair trade. So when you
• 1:15:38
  Speaker 1: see the word fair competition and fair trade in my philosophy,
• 1:15:41
  Speaker 1: that is what it means. It's not be misconstrued to
• 1:15:46
  Speaker 1: mean what the ordinary mind says it means, or what
• 1:15:50
  Speaker 1: the systems of today say. It means. Every word I
• 1:15:54
  Speaker 1: use in my philosophy has a deeper meaning. When I
• 1:15:59
  Speaker 1: talk about fair trade, fair competition. It means, first there
• 1:16:04
  Speaker 1: is the competitive monopoly with it, the intrinsic competitive monopoly.
• 1:16:09
  Speaker 1: I'll say the word again, intrinsic competitive monopoly. That's the
• 1:16:13
  Speaker 1: source cost my philosophy. The source code to my philosophy
• 1:16:17
  Speaker 1: is intrinsic competitive monopoly. I see am intrinsic competitive monopoly.
• 1:16:29
  Speaker 1: That's the beginning that the beginning of the bean is
• 1:16:32
  Speaker 1: the being itself. The being of the being is a
• 1:16:35
  Speaker 1: being itself. It means the human being is an intrinsic
• 1:16:40
  Speaker 1: competitive monopoly. So the being of the being is a
• 1:16:46
  Speaker 1: being itself and nothing else. You're intrinsic competitive monopoly to
• 1:16:53
  Speaker 1: yourself and nothing else. So, because you're that intrinsic competitive
• 1:16:58
  Speaker 1: monopoly within yourself and nobody else, you must therefore seek
• 1:17:02
  Speaker 1: to develop that which is in you. That'specially the human being.
• 1:17:07
  Speaker 1: Was must sik to develop that gift in itself that
• 1:17:09
  Speaker 1: makes itself to be intrinsic and to stand out, and
• 1:17:14
  Speaker 1: to make this to be self evidence. I have used
• 1:17:17
  Speaker 1: that intrinsic competitive monopolies within myself to create my philosophace.
• 1:17:26
  Speaker 1: I invented this phlosophare. I invented my artwork triangulism is uninvention.
• 1:17:33
  Speaker 1: You see the variations of triangulism art. You know it's
• 1:17:37
  Speaker 1: copied from Prince israels are Betcher. I know that many
• 1:17:42
  Speaker 1: people copying my work making millions of dollars. I can
• 1:17:45
  Speaker 1: see it on billboards. I live here into Las Vegas.
• 1:17:50
  Speaker 1: I passed by Strat. Strat is using my work. They
• 1:17:54
  Speaker 1: don't know they're using my work. Stract the tallest tower,
• 1:17:58
  Speaker 1: the tallest tower in Last Vegas. Strat uses trianglism. Not
• 1:18:03
  Speaker 1: kidding you, but Strat might not know they're using triangolism.
• 1:18:08
  Speaker 1: I know because I invented it. They might not know that.
• 1:18:14
  Speaker 1: But the person that gave my work to them is
• 1:18:16
  Speaker 1: a variation. It's a variation of trangolism. They see if
• 1:18:23
  Speaker 1: somebody is making money out of it, that's where the
• 1:18:26
  Speaker 1: can fair competition is still my idea making money out
• 1:18:30
  Speaker 1: of it. Since I created it, I invented it, I
• 1:18:34
  Speaker 1: should have the ip to it. I should therefore make
• 1:18:37
  Speaker 1: money out of it. I should for have wealth out
• 1:18:41
  Speaker 1: of it. That's why I said the human being is
• 1:18:44
  Speaker 1: the wealth of itself. Your doubt wish you are sicker
• 1:18:49
  Speaker 1: if that is fair access or equal access to opportunities
• 1:18:54
  Speaker 1: for you to develop yourself. When you talk about the
• 1:18:58
  Speaker 1: word equality as for equal access to develop the self,
• 1:19:02
  Speaker 1: every the human being cannot develop itself. They're in the
• 1:19:06
  Speaker 1: capitalist society. In the fair society should pay the price
• 1:19:09
  Speaker 1: for it. It cannot be incentivized, it should be punished
• 1:19:16
  Speaker 1: because humans will not develop themselves. What happens is that
• 1:19:20
  Speaker 1: people don't develop themselves. Systems make systems decide for people
• 1:19:27
  Speaker 1: because they have already created champions and losers. The systems
• 1:19:34
  Speaker 1: are better out of corruption than nepotism. That's why the
• 1:19:38
  Speaker 1: philosophy I'm talking about, it's not what is happening. When
• 1:19:42
  Speaker 1: systems talk about fairness, they don't mean fairness in Trianglism's terms,
• 1:19:51
  Speaker 1: fairness in triangulism terms humane measurement, proportionality, I balanced. When
• 1:20:00
  Speaker 1: system talk about fairness, it's not fairness for the human
• 1:20:06
  Speaker 1: being to develop itself. It's for the human being to
• 1:20:10
  Speaker 1: follow corrupt and the politic system are designed for humans
• 1:20:16
  Speaker 1: to follow the corrupt and nepotistic ways. So in the
• 1:20:22
  Speaker 1: fight for the system and go to war, it's not
• 1:20:26
  Speaker 1: about the person. It's to keep the corrupt system going.
• 1:20:31
  Speaker 1: It's to keep the neapolistic system going. A bet you
• 1:20:36
  Speaker 1: every system that you have today, it's nepotistic and corrupt.
• 1:20:49
  Speaker 1: When talk about newportisan and talk about corruption. By the
• 1:20:51
  Speaker 1: ways we talk about corruption and talk about nepotism, you
• 1:20:54
  Speaker 1: cannot talk about one without the other. You can just
• 1:20:58
  Speaker 1: choose to call corruption meaning nepotism. You can just choose
• 1:21:01
  Speaker 1: to call thepotism meaning corruption from corruption was everything wrong
• 1:21:07
  Speaker 1: made corrupt system corrupt the being itself, So the being
• 1:21:13
  Speaker 1: of the being is the being itself is erased. A
• 1:21:17
  Speaker 1: corrpt system corrupt the being about its identities, about its origin,
• 1:21:22
  Speaker 1: the use traditional religion and cluture to corrupt the mind
• 1:21:26
  Speaker 1: of the being selfe for the beings origin. One thing,
• 1:21:31
  Speaker 1: the corrupt system was given to you. That every corrpt system,
• 1:21:34
  Speaker 1: or when in the partistic system, gives you the six
• 1:21:39
  Speaker 1: eyes what I call the six eyes, the six eyes
• 1:21:43
  Speaker 1: and the instruments of corruption and nepotism. And that corruption
• 1:21:49
  Speaker 1: and nepotism lis to racism and sexism and bigotry and
• 1:21:52
  Speaker 1: wars and everything that humans are fighting against or fighting for.
• 1:21:57
  Speaker 1: That's why my philosophy said, the human being and a
• 1:22:02
  Speaker 1: corrupt being came to a corrpt system to live for
• 1:22:05
  Speaker 1: the wrong reason, fight for the wrong reason and die
• 1:22:09
  Speaker 1: for the wrong reason. Sometimes people are honored with medals
• 1:22:12
  Speaker 1: and honors for the wrong reasons. In the corrupt system,
• 1:22:18
  Speaker 1: a neopothistic system, when you're dying, you' ding for the
• 1:22:20
  Speaker 1: wrong reason. When you're fighting, you're fighting for the wrong reason.
• 1:22:23
  Speaker 1: Why you're living, and live for the wrong reason. Till
• 1:22:29
  Speaker 1: the system is not fair, you're not dying for the
• 1:22:32
  Speaker 1: right reason. That's automatic. If the answer is rule, then
• 1:22:40
  Speaker 1: the solution cannot be right. It's a worth of thinking.
• 1:22:52
  Speaker 1: So the corrupt system in itself clean nepotism. When I
• 1:22:59
  Speaker 1: talk about newpoty in my philosophy, I will try to
• 1:23:02
  Speaker 1: explain it. The partisan means you create winners and losers.
• 1:23:08
  Speaker 1: I was born in royalty. My ancestry comes from kingship,
• 1:23:18
  Speaker 1: a mondarcuy in itself the partistic and corrupt. If corrupted
• 1:23:27
  Speaker 1: the minds of the people that you're king, that by
• 1:23:29
  Speaker 1: divine right of king, they worship my father in my presence,
• 1:23:34
  Speaker 1: they'll bow to him, they call him God. He is
• 1:23:37
  Speaker 1: no God. When the minds of those people have been
• 1:23:40
  Speaker 1: corrupted to believe, or to think, or the doubt or
• 1:23:46
  Speaker 1: to ask questions. That's why my philosophy talks about TDK A.
• 1:23:52
  Speaker 1: The key to the mind is TDK. The mind has
• 1:23:59
  Speaker 1: to set of priambuse in my philosophy. Then came the
• 1:24:08
  Speaker 1: third triandalism of thought, chandelism of the mind of being.
• 1:24:13
  Speaker 1: That's what I call the mind be The mind to
• 1:24:18
  Speaker 1: be itself must fit the t DQ principle. T DQ
• 1:24:24
  Speaker 1: principle with the mind must think doubt and ask questions freely,
• 1:24:31
  Speaker 1: without repercussion, without punishment, without fear. You can not pass
• 1:24:39
  Speaker 1: that test. Your mind is not free. The mind must think,
• 1:24:44
  Speaker 1: doubt and ask questions freely. That's how the mind can
• 1:24:50
  Speaker 1: think and ask a dark question by itself. The consul
• 1:24:56
  Speaker 1: of the check on the egg or the concept of
• 1:25:00
  Speaker 1: the first plant, the first tree, the first fruit, the
• 1:25:06
  Speaker 1: first seed, the first cloud, the first things, the first human.
• 1:25:14
  Speaker 1: It cannot be answered unless the human beings can't think fairly.
• 1:25:20
  Speaker 1: But the corrupt society creates pseudo science and the answer
• 1:25:25
  Speaker 1: that for you. But I see the answer keeps moving.
• 1:25:29
  Speaker 1: But with that corrupt pseudo science interpreted of the beginning,
• 1:25:33
  Speaker 1: you can't see. Got the corrupt code already racism, sexism,
• 1:25:37
  Speaker 1: and bakotry and superiority, so that in a surface corrupt
• 1:25:42
  Speaker 1: a corrupt means cannot give a genuine answer. So the
• 1:25:52
  Speaker 1: minder cannot think and ask question fairly. In the surface corrupt.
• 1:26:00
  Speaker 1: And when the mind it's free to think that ask questions,
• 1:26:06
  Speaker 1: it miss a t d Q effect of principles, it's
• 1:26:12
  Speaker 1: to the affirmative. Then the mind's supposed to have the
• 1:26:17
  Speaker 1: second test, what I call the PPP projection perception and perspective.
• 1:26:27
  Speaker 1: So the projection perception and perspective needs to be guided
• 1:26:32
  Speaker 1: by minded think, doubt and ask questions freely. The mind
• 1:26:37
  Speaker 1: that thinks, doubt and ask questions freely. If you cannot
• 1:26:42
  Speaker 1: think and doubt and ask question freely, therefore your projection
• 1:26:46
  Speaker 1: perception and perspective of everything is given to you by
• 1:26:49
  Speaker 1: somebody else. And if you come from a corrupt system
• 1:26:53
  Speaker 1: and missing the partistic system, it miss a dictatorial system,
• 1:26:57
  Speaker 1: it miss an oppressive system. HM. Mister tylantical system or
• 1:27:03
  Speaker 1: system that projects democracy, and it's not partistic and miss
• 1:27:09
  Speaker 1: projection perception and perspective, is corrupt. And if the project
• 1:27:19
  Speaker 1: if they t if the if the p p P
• 1:27:22
  Speaker 1: is correct and the t d Q is correct, then
• 1:27:26
  Speaker 1: there is a test. The m p B measurement proportional imbalance.
• 1:27:34
  Speaker 1: Do you act out of measurement proportional proportionality and balance.
• 1:27:40
  Speaker 1: That's the finest principle. The funds and principle cannot be right.
• 1:27:47
  Speaker 1: The m p B measurement proportional balance cannot be right
• 1:27:53
  Speaker 1: if the p PP wasn't right, and if the t
• 1:27:56
  Speaker 1: d K wasn't right. HM. So for the being to be,
• 1:28:01
  Speaker 1: the being of itself must be free to think that
• 1:28:05
  Speaker 1: and ask questions, just free to think that, ask question
• 1:28:09
  Speaker 1: as a people invent and create stuff. The projection, persage
• 1:28:13
  Speaker 1: and perspective must be free, and the MPP must be free.
• 1:28:24
  Speaker 1: But that freedom can therefore not come without the mind,
• 1:28:28
  Speaker 1: without the intellect, as a fall of suffaces. That once
• 1:28:34
  Speaker 1: the human being has a free mind that Felman means
• 1:28:37
  Speaker 1: a neutral, positive mind that's not corrupted but doing my
• 1:28:40
  Speaker 1: facts of the scientific method of research and observation and proofs,
• 1:28:49
  Speaker 1: and that being would therefore find within it to seek
• 1:28:52
  Speaker 1: balance and proporsional measurement, seek to purify itself, to know,
• 1:28:57
  Speaker 1: not to create imbalances. That being when that positive causality
• 1:29:01
  Speaker 1: intelligence it's necessary for its own being, that being will
• 1:29:04
  Speaker 1: get for know that is fighting against negative consiety intelligence,
• 1:29:08
  Speaker 1: negative consartic intelligence in my work, is an external force
• 1:29:12
  Speaker 1: that's trying to erode and corrupt the inner mind, the
• 1:29:16
  Speaker 1: inner being, the positive cousarty intelligence. The being is a
• 1:29:19
  Speaker 1: positive being, not the negative being. Negativity is learned in
• 1:29:23
  Speaker 1: an out of survivor, or out of oppression and dictatorship,
• 1:29:27
  Speaker 1: or out of nepotism and favoratism or corruption. The being
• 1:29:32
  Speaker 1: is a positive being. That's what I talk about, the
• 1:29:35
  Speaker 1: positive humanity when the debate itself. Most of my work
• 1:29:38
  Speaker 1: I talk about positive. They're positive here, positive there, because
• 1:29:43
  Speaker 1: I believe in my philosophy thaty being itself and it's
• 1:29:46
  Speaker 1: balanced state, in its first state, is a positive being.
• 1:29:50
  Speaker 1: We talk about goodness, I talk about positive positivity is
• 1:29:53
  Speaker 1: a positive being. It's a good being because good sometimes
• 1:29:56
  Speaker 1: misunderstood by system. To be positive, it is to be good,
• 1:29:59
  Speaker 1: to be good. It's positive, positive of a fair So
• 1:30:03
  Speaker 1: it's a balance within the being. It's a proportionality with it.
• 1:30:08
  Speaker 1: The being a measurement with the band. So when you
• 1:30:12
  Speaker 1: read this word in my philosophy, come true them. Please
• 1:30:15
  Speaker 1: let him mean what I meant. You cannot talk about
• 1:30:21
  Speaker 1: right action without goodness. You cannot talk about goodness with
• 1:30:28
  Speaker 1: that fairness. You cannot talk about fairness without the intellect,
• 1:30:30
  Speaker 1: without the mind, the intelligence that purify itself from negative
• 1:30:35
  Speaker 1: causality and positive causality. It's a positive causality minds that
• 1:30:39
  Speaker 1: talk about fairness and goodness and right action a positive
• 1:30:44
  Speaker 1: consility mind. Mission purified yourself from negativity to negative intelligences
• 1:30:48
  Speaker 1: that come from the outside. So therefore, must self educate.
• 1:30:53
  Speaker 1: If society don't want educate to it means you must
• 1:30:56
  Speaker 1: acquire hubant education, and you must seek a personalized education
• 1:31:04
  Speaker 1: to know, to read, read books, to make discovery and inventions.
• 1:31:12
  Speaker 1: The explorer to travel, you must know the being is
• 1:31:16
  Speaker 1: a knowing being. As the bin is left in ignorance. Ignorance,
• 1:31:21
  Speaker 1: there is no positive intelligence but negative intelligence. It is
• 1:31:25
  Speaker 1: no positive causality but the native causality. In my philosophy,
• 1:31:29
  Speaker 1: I talk about intelligence. Intelligence can be negative, can be positive,
• 1:31:34
  Speaker 1: or it can be neutral. Neutral means it does not
• 1:31:37
  Speaker 1: create any positive or negative effect. That's what I call
• 1:31:40
  Speaker 1: point of zero. Point zero is the beginning of things.
• 1:31:45
  Speaker 1: The neutral becomes positive and if corrupted, the new trial
• 1:31:49
  Speaker 1: intelligence becomes negative. That plasif the human being is purified
• 1:31:53
  Speaker 1: in itself becomes a positive intelligent being. In a human
• 1:31:57
  Speaker 1: being can therefore developed its artificial are intelligences it android
• 1:32:02
  Speaker 1: intelligence the human and the machine that mission becomes the human,
• 1:32:06
  Speaker 1: or have the human to make the human Those things
• 1:32:09
  Speaker 1: and creat and invent things are positive means are intelligent.
• 1:32:15
  Speaker 1: Have that positive android it is developed that the human
• 1:32:18
  Speaker 1: being can developed artificial intelligences to help it to become
• 1:32:21
  Speaker 1: the software of itself and become the hardware it needs,
• 1:32:26
  Speaker 1: and the human being totally become the software. That's when
• 1:32:28
  Speaker 1: I said the human being therefore that positive artificial intelligence.
• 1:32:31
  Speaker 1: It can develop the alien intelligence and the infinity intelligence
• 1:32:36
  Speaker 1: and what some people call the god intelligence in religious circus,
• 1:32:41
  Speaker 1: I call alien intelligence something strange to the human being itself.
• 1:32:44
  Speaker 1: That's positive that I got the infinitiness of itself. That's
• 1:32:49
  Speaker 1: what the human being is all about. And within all
• 1:32:52
  Speaker 1: that development of human business enriching itself better in its society.
• 1:32:58
  Speaker 1: So the human business consent, seve and competent to be
• 1:33:01
  Speaker 1: the best. So this is wealth, This happiness is kindiness
• 1:33:04
  Speaker 1: because humans are intrinsic in themselves, and there's always something
• 1:33:07
  Speaker 1: to tread because somebody wants something. You want a car,
• 1:33:14
  Speaker 1: to exchange a car, you want a car, you can
• 1:33:17
  Speaker 1: buy a car, you can buy a phone. You must
• 1:33:19
  Speaker 1: get to buy what they need. They create the currency
• 1:33:22
  Speaker 1: of things. Thinks therefore, I evaluative based on measurement, proposing
• 1:33:28
  Speaker 1: to imbalance. Because I want to sell from from you,
• 1:33:32
  Speaker 1: I cannot give you a car. Then they'll be afared
• 1:33:38
  Speaker 1: of imbalanced. The monetary system becomes the MPB as I
• 1:33:43
  Speaker 1: talk about measurement proportionality imbalanced. The multi system therefore is fair.
• 1:33:51
  Speaker 1: Human competition is fair. Everybody is rich if they want to.
• 1:33:56
  Speaker 1: Everybody is wealthy they want to. Everybody is safe if
• 1:33:58
  Speaker 1: we want to. But this is not what happens. This
• 1:34:05
  Speaker 1: purified intelligence, passive intelligence be corrupted because the human being
• 1:34:09
  Speaker 1: is given an education, and the education is what I
• 1:34:12
  Speaker 1: call the applicative intelligence. Are many ais in my work,
• 1:34:22
  Speaker 1: as I call myself ai philosopher. Applicative intelligence is what
• 1:34:26
  Speaker 1: school gives you human aise. Systems are applicative intelligence, or
• 1:34:38
  Speaker 1: you learn is what you apply. That's what it means
• 1:34:40
  Speaker 1: simple applicative intelligence. You apply what you learn. So the
• 1:34:44
  Speaker 1: system of education, today's applicative intelligence assume that the systems
• 1:34:48
  Speaker 1: already corrupt and nepotistic, So you're studying corrupt applicative intelligence
• 1:34:58
  Speaker 1: nepatistic applicative intelligence. That's why the winners and losers, because
• 1:35:05
  Speaker 1: the system only create win winners and losers for the
• 1:35:08
  Speaker 1: surviver of the system. The humans work in the color
• 1:35:12
  Speaker 1: and the bartistic system for the system to survive. And
• 1:35:16
  Speaker 1: that's why humans do what they don't like and they
• 1:35:19
  Speaker 1: kill what they don't like. Humans are not happy with that,
• 1:35:22
  Speaker 1: just because they're fulfilling the wishes of a system that
• 1:35:26
  Speaker 1: works against their own well being, their mind being, the
• 1:35:29
  Speaker 1: mind cheap their mind code. But the system was supposed
• 1:35:32
  Speaker 1: to be invented and developed by positive causality intelligence. But
• 1:35:39
  Speaker 1: the systems are in the contract developer negative because of
• 1:35:41
  Speaker 1: the intelligence. When there's corruption, the tacativity and what human
• 1:35:48
  Speaker 1: beings are not treated fairly or just concerted electrically equal.
• 1:35:52
  Speaker 1: The all are not treated allcticy equot. I don't know
• 1:35:55
  Speaker 1: what that means, just true that all are not treated fairly.
• 1:35:59
  Speaker 1: But the system make you think that fairness come from
• 1:36:01
  Speaker 1: somebody else. The system makes you think that you're fighting
• 1:36:06
  Speaker 1: for equality. You're fighting for fairness. You cannot be fighting
• 1:36:10
  Speaker 1: for that which you already have that's not developed. The
• 1:36:15
  Speaker 1: chip of fairness is not developed. You're fighting for something
• 1:36:19
  Speaker 1: that's not there. That's you must not attend the fairness
• 1:36:23
  Speaker 1: that's sicking for. They're attend the equality that's safe for.
• 1:36:26
  Speaker 1: Because the system knows that the human being its self
• 1:36:29
  Speaker 1: was still developed. The education is not meant to develop
• 1:36:34
  Speaker 1: you the human being. The education is not meant to
• 1:36:39
  Speaker 1: activate your positive active, positive intelligence. The education teaches you
• 1:36:53
  Speaker 1: applicative intelligence. In AI philosophy, you both there forsake hpis
• 1:37:03
  Speaker 1: to understand yourself and to attend that bit of itself
• 1:37:06
  Speaker 1: we are talking about. You must develop your hpis. Hpis
• 1:37:13
  Speaker 1: means human personal for HP, and there are many eyes.
• 1:37:20
  Speaker 1: Maybe HP computer thought about something like that, but HP
• 1:37:25
  Speaker 1: don't think about like an HP computer. HB means human personal.
• 1:37:32
  Speaker 1: The intrinsic being, the being in the serf must develop itself.
• 1:37:37
  Speaker 1: So that being, the HP must develop itself. The human
• 1:37:44
  Speaker 1: personal it must develop is human personal intelligence, your personal intelligence,
• 1:37:49
  Speaker 1: your personal initiative, your HP intelligence, your HP invention, your
• 1:37:55
  Speaker 1: HP innovation, your HP inspiration, your HP incentive, your HP investment,
• 1:38:02
  Speaker 1: your h P, h P h P, h p I
• 1:38:04
  Speaker 1: s HPI s HPI s. That's what the human beings
• 1:38:09
  Speaker 1: to developed. That's the system that we create, a FAEROS
• 1:38:16
  Speaker 1: system that human compete because they have their own eyepiece.
• 1:38:20
  Speaker 1: Where eyep is compete, there is no fear, there is
• 1:38:23
  Speaker 1: no war, because what I have you can never have it. Triangulism,
• 1:38:29
  Speaker 1: nobody can. It can recopy triangulism. It can recopy my philosophy.
• 1:38:34
  Speaker 1: Can the coopy my invention, my artistry. You can only
• 1:38:36
  Speaker 1: copy it because I invented it. I believe that every
• 1:38:41
  Speaker 1: human being, my philosophy is a genusis being. It's a genius.
• 1:38:47
  Speaker 1: Is why it's an I p ban. So if everybody
• 1:38:50
  Speaker 1: is an I p ban and I can look be
• 1:38:53
  Speaker 1: good at what I'm good at, I'll therefore need what
• 1:38:55
  Speaker 1: you have, and the lazy ones therefore, those who do
• 1:38:59
  Speaker 1: not allop the HBIS or develop their IP minds, the
• 1:39:06
  Speaker 1: inventive minds then therefore become happy consumers. But in an
• 1:39:12
  Speaker 1: intelligent system, everybody tried to seek to develop what they have.
• 1:39:18
  Speaker 1: But the system we have to die. The system of education,
• 1:39:22
  Speaker 1: since it does not care about the HBIS, the greate
• 1:39:25
  Speaker 1: education of applicative intelligence, and the system in the SURF
• 1:39:31
  Speaker 1: is not fair. So some people are left behind. Some
• 1:39:35
  Speaker 1: people don't have the resources to go to school. Some
• 1:39:38
  Speaker 1: part are struggling, to feed themselves down. What the system
• 1:39:41
  Speaker 1: does the create winners and losers by making it difficult
• 1:39:45
  Speaker 1: for poor to get access to the resources opportunities, and
• 1:39:48
  Speaker 1: by so doing, they're living a life or the budding
• 1:39:51
  Speaker 1: of the system valuing what does not matter. Living for
• 1:39:55
  Speaker 1: us is not important, and die for what is not important.
• 1:39:57
  Speaker 1: That's why I win that system. Have what I've got empty.
• 1:40:00
  Speaker 1: It is an empty fertility being. Humans were supposed to
• 1:40:05
  Speaker 1: be fulfilled, being empty fertility because even though what they
• 1:40:08
  Speaker 1: are doing and working and dying for, the happiness giving
• 1:40:13
  Speaker 1: to that is artificial. Everything give to them is external
• 1:40:18
  Speaker 1: to themselves. The happiness was supposed to be from within,
• 1:40:23
  Speaker 1: The peace was supposed to be from within, The love
• 1:40:25
  Speaker 1: was supposed to be for within. The kindness was supposed
• 1:40:28
  Speaker 1: to be from with. But let's start. Because the system
• 1:40:36
  Speaker 1: as giving every human being the six eyes. You are
• 1:40:44
  Speaker 1: vaccinated with the six eyes, I don't mean a physical vaccination.
• 1:40:50
  Speaker 1: The education in itself fature with that, the tradition, that culture,
• 1:40:57
  Speaker 1: the religion, the borries, the wayte of life. You need
• 1:41:03
  Speaker 1: to belong, you need to fit in a feature. With that,
• 1:41:09
  Speaker 1: it takes away your intrinsic cality. It takes away your
• 1:41:13
  Speaker 1: intrinsic individuality. It takes away your difference, that beauty to
• 1:41:18
  Speaker 1: be different, to be different, to be happy with yourself,
• 1:41:20
  Speaker 1: to be with yourself, to be to appreciate yourself, that
• 1:41:23
  Speaker 1: you're good enough. And what it takes that have what
• 1:41:27
  Speaker 1: everybody needs, is taken away from you. You're inculturated, you're indoctrinated,
• 1:41:35
  Speaker 1: or you're assimilated into the six eyes. You're made to believe.
• 1:41:55
  Speaker 1: I use what may made to believe because dor true.
• 1:42:00
  Speaker 1: Made to believe that you're insufficient. That's the first eye.
• 1:42:05
  Speaker 1: You're made to believe that you're inadequate. That's the second eye.
• 1:42:11
  Speaker 1: You're made to believe that you're insecured. That's the third.
• 1:42:19
  Speaker 1: And if that is not enough, you're giving inequality. That's
• 1:42:26
  Speaker 1: the fourth. You're treated with inequity. That's the faith, and
• 1:42:34
  Speaker 1: you are made to feel in fear that's the sixth.
• 1:42:39
  Speaker 1: It's true, these six are that system creates winners and
• 1:42:44
  Speaker 1: loses the ge need. You need the system for that,
• 1:42:50
  Speaker 1: and the system therefore treats you based on what some
• 1:42:57
  Speaker 1: philosopher's side. The system you do it stigmatization, categorization, the
• 1:43:07
  Speaker 1: system to to a hierarchy. The hierarchy of needs. But
• 1:43:13
  Speaker 1: you see your gene code that's said, has been corrupted
• 1:43:21
  Speaker 1: with the sex eyes. If you don't see yourself as insufficient,
• 1:43:26
  Speaker 1: as inadequate, as insecure, then you're free. There you can
• 1:43:34
  Speaker 1: self determine, then you're independent. If you don't have that feeling,
• 1:43:44
  Speaker 1: now you're being to the inequality insecurity with inferiority, then
• 1:43:49
  Speaker 1: you are free. That's the freedom I talk about. The
• 1:43:56
  Speaker 1: system lies to you that you're not equal, are not secured.
• 1:44:05
  Speaker 1: If this inequality is created by the system, not you.
• 1:44:09
  Speaker 1: If the insufficiency is created by the system, not you.
• 1:44:14
  Speaker 1: If it's inadequacies created by the system, not you. Inequality
• 1:44:20
  Speaker 1: is gated by the system, inequities by the system, in
• 1:44:27
  Speaker 1: theiorology or superioritisticated by the system. So it's not you
• 1:44:34
  Speaker 1: that is insecured, is the system. So the in the
• 1:44:39
  Speaker 1: in the inequity is of the system, not you. The
• 1:44:46
  Speaker 1: insufficiencies of the system, not you. The inadequacies of the
• 1:44:51
  Speaker 1: system not you, The iniquity of the system not youre
• 1:44:58
  Speaker 1: the inequalities of this system not I. The inferiorities of
• 1:45:03
  Speaker 1: the system not ill. If and only if it developed
• 1:45:08
  Speaker 1: your hpis if I only if you believe that you
• 1:45:13
  Speaker 1: are the seed of nature. In order say it, there
• 1:45:16
  Speaker 1: are no two says. So they say, is sufficient in itself.
• 1:45:23
  Speaker 1: That's it is adequate in itself. That's it is equal
• 1:45:26
  Speaker 1: to itself and nothing else. That's what I'm talking about.
• 1:45:29
  Speaker 1: That's see, this is superior in itself if it's given
• 1:45:33
  Speaker 1: the equal access to development, or you find it yourself.
• 1:45:42
  Speaker 1: The piece that you're second lies with them, your chink cold.
• 1:45:51
  Speaker 1: You're the seed of nature, the chink cod of the infinity.
• 1:45:57
  Speaker 1: The piece are you second lies within the Fairness with
• 1:46:09
  Speaker 1: the pace is non external. It's with them. Kindness is
• 1:46:16
  Speaker 1: non external. It's with them. Happiness is the next externa.
• 1:46:24
  Speaker 1: It's with the War is external instabilities external on Fairness
• 1:46:36
  Speaker 1: is externa. Iniquities externa. Insufficiencies is external inadequacy, its external
• 1:46:47
  Speaker 1: inferiorities externa. We have been oppressed, oppressed, suppress, subjugated to
• 1:46:58
  Speaker 1: believe that it's intell. Now you're being told that you
• 1:47:03
  Speaker 1: had the problem. How can you be the problem with
• 1:47:06
  Speaker 1: another system? Why can't you be the problem when the
• 1:47:10
  Speaker 1: system is failing ill, it's not a system failing you,
• 1:47:17
  Speaker 1: it's because you fail yourself. You was supposed to be
• 1:47:21
  Speaker 1: the system you were supposed to build. That system that
• 1:47:25
  Speaker 1: we are talking about, the grit that you're sicking, that
• 1:47:32
  Speaker 1: system that it says, the partistic, uncorrupt, it's because you
• 1:47:36
  Speaker 1: make it nepositic, nepotistic, uncrrupt. That system that you say
• 1:47:43
  Speaker 1: is unfair, it's because you make it unfair or benefit
• 1:47:47
  Speaker 1: from nor fairness. The corrupture in the system is because
• 1:47:52
  Speaker 1: you're let it be because your profit from it. The iniquity,
• 1:47:57
  Speaker 1: the racism, the sex of the baquetry, waiting about racists
• 1:48:03
  Speaker 1: or success is a name given to those people by
• 1:48:08
  Speaker 1: the system. Those names are created by the system for division,
• 1:48:15
  Speaker 1: for dividen role, for you to fight, to go to
• 1:48:19
  Speaker 1: war with one another. Don't you know that the system
• 1:48:25
  Speaker 1: is adversara in nature and make you fight one another
• 1:48:28
  Speaker 1: for the soul of the system. But if the system
• 1:48:31
  Speaker 1: should survive, should live in nepostistic and corrupt. And if
• 1:48:39
  Speaker 1: that be is it why there is no peace? Where
• 1:48:45
  Speaker 1: they should be peace, but war against ourselves and against
• 1:48:55
  Speaker 1: the wall. Let there be peace, it's often said. But
• 1:49:05
  Speaker 1: they cannot be based unless you're the piece itself. Philosopher Prince.
• 1:49:15
  Speaker 1: They are intelligences, philosopher Prince Israel Czar from the great
• 1:49:24
  Speaker 1: City of Las Vegas, August second, twenty twenty five, on
• 1:49:47
  Speaker 1: the philosophy of fairness the fairness Philosophy of Prince israe'zar.
• 1:49:57
  Speaker 1: Thank you,