Latest / Talk to Prince Show - Solving World's Problems / Prince Israel Zaar on: Humanity is at Worst When Lives Are Reduced to Numbers or Statistics

Transcript

Prince Israel Zaar on: Humanity is at Worst When Lives Are Reduced to Numbers or Statistics · Talk to Prince Show - Solving World's Problems

0:02
Speaker 1: To every conflict that humans find themselves. There is always
0:17
Speaker 1: a positive way out if the parties in conflict or
0:26
Speaker 1: at war are willing to de escalate and look for
0:37
Speaker 1: a way out. And it depends on the will of
0:46
Speaker 1: the warring factions, and it depends on the intent of
0:58
Speaker 1: the conflict of the world, Sir, and uh how quick
1:05
Speaker 1: the conflict is resolved depends on the perception of attainment
1:17
Speaker 1: of the goals, objectives and strategic purpose for the war,
1:30
Speaker 1: because sometimes the goal, objectives and strategic purpose are different.
1:39
Speaker 1: The public knows the goal and the objectives, but the
1:45
Speaker 1: strategic purpose of the war sometimes is always hidden from
1:50
Speaker 1: the public. If the strategic purpose of the war is
1:58
Speaker 1: not made, it's very challenging for the warring parish or
2:06
Speaker 1: the parish in conflict to accept a ceasefire or accept
2:13
Speaker 1: the escalation or prepare themselves for resolution of such a conflict.
2:25
Speaker 1: So the the strategic purpose of the war is hidden
2:32
Speaker 1: and unless it's understood on both sides, they will hardly
2:42
Speaker 1: come to the table er the resolution of peace is
2:52
Speaker 1: accepted if the strategic purpose of the war is met,
2:59
Speaker 1: because if there's strategic purpose of the war is not mad,
3:04
Speaker 1: then the war is lost. So the the public objectives
3:13
Speaker 1: and goals of the war, it is most mostly political
3:20
Speaker 1: to to governize public support and the goals and objectives
3:28
Speaker 1: of the war. It's a mostly nationalistic rallying by the
3:35
Speaker 1: flag and fighting an aggressor. And you know, politicians were
3:40
Speaker 1: telling all these all these reasons why they're going to war.
3:44
Speaker 1: These are for public public consumption. But the real reason
3:52
Speaker 1: for the world is the strategic objective, the strategic purpose
3:57
Speaker 1: for the war. It might be fish, it might be
4:01
Speaker 1: self serven, and it's hardly for the benefit of the public.
4:11
Speaker 1: The strategic purpose of the war is always private, and
4:19
Speaker 1: it's always meant with animosity. And the two leaders or
4:24
Speaker 1: the three leaders going to war, they go out of
4:28
Speaker 1: hatred for one another and seeing another person defeated gives
4:34
Speaker 1: them that satisfaction and punishing the enemy gives them that satisfaction.
4:45
Speaker 1: And if they don't do this, they will not accept peace.
4:49
Speaker 1: They will not accept to discovered because war are driven
4:53
Speaker 1: by vindictiveness, that hate, anger, and that brutality to punish
5:00
Speaker 1: some key figures, some particular people that you don't like
5:03
Speaker 1: to to live. You know that there's certain people that
5:07
Speaker 1: the war at the purpose of the war is to
5:09
Speaker 1: kill them, is to destroy them, is to decapitate them.
5:12
Speaker 1: It's it's to destroy certain leaders, certain people. There's sometimes
5:21
Speaker 1: the strategic purpose of a war. It's sometimes not that
5:33
Speaker 1: important because it's self serving, but it's the driving factor
5:41
Speaker 1: that somebody will pay back. A particular person will be eliminated,
5:46
Speaker 1: and there is that joy that don't statistic or it
5:52
Speaker 1: can't be a pathetic or what type of orna narcissistic
5:55
Speaker 1: or psychopathic type of joy that my enemy is gone.
6:02
Speaker 1: A particular person will not live again, that particular person
6:06
Speaker 1: is dead. And sometimes that strategic gain person again stands
6:19
Speaker 1: the way of peace. It stands the wealth resolution of
6:27
Speaker 1: the war, no matter the the devastation that the war
6:31
Speaker 1: is causing. So if there is one person that must
6:36
Speaker 1: be eliminated and the person's they not eliminated, the war
6:42
Speaker 1: can go on despite the negative causalities in brains it brings.
6:49
Speaker 1: So sometimes there's the strategic I call it strategic purpose
6:55
Speaker 1: of the war. It's a try, not strategic in itself.
7:00
Speaker 1: It's just the primitive purpose of the world. I call
7:04
Speaker 1: it back way, the primitive purpos purpose of the war.
7:10
Speaker 1: So pp W punitive purpose of the war. It's not
7:15
Speaker 1: certain people must be punished, so that fake nativeness and vengeance.
7:22
Speaker 1: If it's not made in a particular way, parties will
7:27
Speaker 1: not accept peace, and they defending party they would like
7:41
Speaker 1: to come to the table. If there are long term
7:51
Speaker 1: strategic objective is made. See a a long term strategic objective.
8:00
Speaker 1: It's something for the greater good of the people. The
8:08
Speaker 1: long term strategic objective might be a long term piece,
8:16
Speaker 1: maybe to inflict a lot of pain on the aggressor
8:22
Speaker 1: that will make the aggressor to think twice hurling case
8:27
Speaker 1: only invade or attack or set for an excursion incursion
8:35
Speaker 1: in the long run. So the defending party got one
8:44
Speaker 1: important strategic long term goal is to make the enemy
8:53
Speaker 1: pay a heavy price not to ever think of doing
8:59
Speaker 1: such a thing again. If the long term strategic goal
9:08
Speaker 1: of the defending countries met, it means the war went
9:20
Speaker 1: to the advantage of the defending country. If the defending
9:26
Speaker 1: countries long term strategic goal is met, it means the
9:30
Speaker 1: war went to the advantage. It means a county said
9:34
Speaker 1: that they won the war, no matter the casualties, no
9:41
Speaker 1: matter what happened, no matter no matter how many people
9:45
Speaker 1: are killed. The destruction of infrastructure or no matter the
9:50
Speaker 1: long term damage that might cause to that defending country.
9:54
Speaker 1: When a defending countries victorious, if they inflict fear and
10:01
Speaker 1: a lot of damage and terror into the heart of
10:06
Speaker 1: the intruder, that they dare not do that again, and
10:14
Speaker 1: they dare calculate the consequences that might be for them
10:24
Speaker 1: not to go to war with them again. So for
10:30
Speaker 1: parties to de escalate, I come to the table. There
10:35
Speaker 1: are two different objectives. To be mad the defending country
10:46
Speaker 1: we accept a truce or to come to the table
10:54
Speaker 1: when their long term strategic objective is mad. On the contrary,
11:03
Speaker 1: the offending counter will want to come to the table
11:09
Speaker 1: when they are punitive. Right when they're punitive objective is mad,
11:21
Speaker 1: the offending country goes to war to punish, and means
11:30
Speaker 1: if they intend is to go to war to grab proper,
11:36
Speaker 1: to grab land or or some economics, some some some
11:43
Speaker 1: economic advantage or for some territorial advantage. The intruding country,
11:49
Speaker 1: even if they achieve this, god don't accept to come
11:53
Speaker 1: to the table because they got that punitive element. The
11:57
Speaker 1: offending counter will have a punitive element, and that is
12:00
Speaker 1: personal to the leader waging the war or to the
12:03
Speaker 1: soldiers waging the war. They have been indoctrinated to punish
12:07
Speaker 1: the enemy. It maybe to kill or capture. The punishing
12:13
Speaker 1: the enemy becomes the time, so they will prefer to
12:22
Speaker 1: lose the war and punish the enemy. In their mind
12:27
Speaker 1: that the number of casualties, the amount of damage they
12:32
Speaker 1: wander for the history book, it's just a trophy for
12:34
Speaker 1: the history book that I killed this so much people,
12:37
Speaker 1: I destroyed that so much. So sometimes there is the
12:43
Speaker 1: long term objective is always not there with the offending country,
12:47
Speaker 1: but the defending country goes with the long term objective.
12:51
Speaker 1: The offending country do not have a long term objective.
12:56
Speaker 1: That's why it's very easy if you want to say
13:00
Speaker 1: the end to a conflict, it's very easy to tell
13:03
Speaker 1: the offending country to stop. The offending country can always
13:09
Speaker 1: stop and politically before they declare victory because there is
13:18
Speaker 1: no long term strategy strategy when the country goes to war,
13:24
Speaker 1: there is no long term strategy. If not careful, we
13:28
Speaker 1: can just stay in the war perpetually because there is
13:32
Speaker 1: no long term strategy, or you go to war to
13:35
Speaker 1: do because once you go to war invading country, they
13:40
Speaker 1: count to a fight back. There's only a long term
13:46
Speaker 1: strategy for invading country. If the defending country doesn't fight back,
13:53
Speaker 1: if they just capitulate and surrender, and that can never happen.
13:59
Speaker 1: That's why you got never ending wars because for the
14:04
Speaker 1: for the offending country or the intruder, once they get in,
14:14
Speaker 1: they don't get out unless they are stopped. So the
14:21
Speaker 1: thing that makes the intruding or invading country to stop
14:27
Speaker 1: is the amount of pain being inflicted, amount of damage
14:33
Speaker 1: being inflicted the defending country. It's not expected to win
14:43
Speaker 1: the war, but they kind of win the war. I
14:49
Speaker 1: inflicted a lot of damage economic, political, You know, in
14:59
Speaker 1: the eyes of the war the world. They most inflicted
15:06
Speaker 1: that of damage to the offending country. They must make
15:15
Speaker 1: that country built economically, politically, and in the eyes of
15:23
Speaker 1: humanity and the defending country there's a lot to be
15:32
Speaker 1: seen as a victim. The portray especially if children and
15:41
Speaker 1: women are killed, they'll portray to the war, to the
15:47
Speaker 1: portray to humanity. If there are schools and infrastructural schools
15:53
Speaker 1: and hospital or social services are destroyed. Don't do all
16:01
Speaker 1: this to gain public relationship, to seek the same pathy
16:07
Speaker 1: the of the world, and to gain favor in the
16:11
Speaker 1: eyes of humanity, and that in itself. It's a strategic
16:16
Speaker 1: it's a strategic victory. It's a strategic tool of victory
16:24
Speaker 1: that would that would force the offending country to withdraw
16:31
Speaker 1: or to come to the table. And the offending country
16:38
Speaker 1: doesn't come to the table unless the pain is inflicted
16:46
Speaker 1: not just on itself, but on everything related to it,
16:54
Speaker 1: maybe allies or assets, or crashing the global canor me
17:01
Speaker 1: There must be something that must make the offending power
17:06
Speaker 1: to come to the table. The offending power doesn't come
17:13
Speaker 1: to the table out of weakness. The offending power comes
17:21
Speaker 1: to the table because of the damage inflicted to secondary
17:32
Speaker 1: and third parties. The damage is inflicted to the second
17:39
Speaker 1: and third parties. It's the reasons why the offending country
17:44
Speaker 1: comes to the table. It means certain people, certain countries,
17:51
Speaker 1: certain organizations, certain institutions, or certain businesses must be feeling
17:58
Speaker 1: the pain so much that they call on the invading
18:03
Speaker 1: country to stop or to put a pause a ceasefire.
18:12
Speaker 1: The second and third party force the invading country to
18:16
Speaker 1: come to the table. The invading country comes to the
18:24
Speaker 1: table itself or sick a ceasefire itself when its resources
18:31
Speaker 1: of the war are depleted. The depletion of the war
18:37
Speaker 1: resources will bring the Paris to the table for negotiation.
18:47
Speaker 1: The depletion of war resources, not even the depletion of soldiers,
18:56
Speaker 1: will cause the warring the offending party to come to
19:01
Speaker 1: the table. The thing that brings the offending party to
19:04
Speaker 1: the depletion of resources, the depletion of war resources. The
19:13
Speaker 1: offending party does not care much about casualties for the
19:16
Speaker 1: soldiers because as an offending party, you're gonna lose a
19:22
Speaker 1: lot of men, a lot of women. So they'll just
19:25
Speaker 1: recruit more, or at worse, there will false a draft
19:35
Speaker 1: for the grinding of soldiers. The offending party does not
19:39
Speaker 1: care about the soldiers. Don't let them lie to you,
19:43
Speaker 1: because they know they're going to war. It's to kill soldiers.
19:48
Speaker 1: You cannot go to a war and win the war
19:51
Speaker 1: without without losing soldiers as it was in a war.
20:01
Speaker 1: So they don't care much about soldiers. But offending party, we, uh,
20:08
Speaker 1: we we do the nationalistic appeal on of honoring the death.
20:13
Speaker 1: That they would they would throw lavish, lavish, lavish funerals
20:20
Speaker 1: for patriotic reasons, to honor the death. That's all they
20:25
Speaker 1: will do. They well use it as a source of
20:28
Speaker 1: recruitment and to encourage people to rally to the flag
20:33
Speaker 1: as if they actually care about the soldiers. They don't,
20:37
Speaker 1: because if they care about the soldiers, they will not
20:40
Speaker 1: go to war, because when we go to war, they
20:43
Speaker 1: would lose men. It's the it's the defending countries that
20:51
Speaker 1: cares for their soldiers because they are defending themselves so
20:58
Speaker 1: that they didn't they didn't wage the war, they didn't
21:02
Speaker 1: start a war. They defending themselves for the war. So
21:09
Speaker 1: they're caring for their soldiers means a lot to the population,
21:16
Speaker 1: and it's a different type of true nationalism that they
21:21
Speaker 1: see their soldiers as defending their homeland, the motherland or
21:27
Speaker 1: their fatherland. So those soldiers are they're defending soldiers are
21:33
Speaker 1: heroes because the war is forced upon them. They're offending
21:43
Speaker 1: soldiers are seen as heroes by Propa Ganda and Spain
21:55
Speaker 1: or by bye by narrative because most at times the offender,
22:08
Speaker 1: the offending countries always explains a lot of men and
22:15
Speaker 1: women and it's always most of the times proven that
22:23
Speaker 1: those wars were not necessary and therefore those soldiers gave
22:28
Speaker 1: their lives just to satisfy the political ambitions of their
22:37
Speaker 1: leaders or the power that be or the ruling class.
22:42
Speaker 1: So those soldiers were used. There were no use. They
22:48
Speaker 1: didn't defend their country that they went to offend another country.
22:54
Speaker 1: They went to invade another country and not knowing the
22:57
Speaker 1: terran the terran tur not knowing the geography, and not
23:03
Speaker 1: knowing how far the enemy will resist, so they end
23:08
Speaker 1: up losing a lot of soldiers. The soldiers become the
23:12
Speaker 1: byproduct of the war. It becomes the calculations of the
23:19
Speaker 1: war that before waging the war, the leaders understood that
23:26
Speaker 1: they're going to lose a lot of soldiers to achieve
23:30
Speaker 1: their political god. So the soldiers are the casualties of
23:36
Speaker 1: a political objective, of a political god. And if the
23:45
Speaker 1: populations start to see this way, they know oppose the war.
23:51
Speaker 1: Then the leader who will be forced a sick pace
24:01
Speaker 1: or sensation to the war, or the leader of the
24:05
Speaker 1: foster the table. That's true. Public public pressure. Public pressure
24:12
Speaker 1: mounds when the population start to lose a lot of soldiers.
24:19
Speaker 1: It becomes personal. They start to feed the pains. It
24:24
Speaker 1: means that the war is not just afar, but the
24:28
Speaker 1: war is at home because they start to bury soldiers
24:33
Speaker 1: and patriots. They start to bury patriots and they start
24:37
Speaker 1: to ask that question, that is it necessary that their
24:43
Speaker 1: lives in vain, And that becomes the burden of the
24:49
Speaker 1: politicians if they cannot convince the population that their kids
24:56
Speaker 1: are dying for a number course, and then those leaders,
25:04
Speaker 1: out of on properarity will find reasons to make a
25:13
Speaker 1: spain of victory. I come to the table when population
25:22
Speaker 1: where good soldiers are dying for no good reason, and
25:28
Speaker 1: people we take to the streets and add pressure. And
25:38
Speaker 1: when innocent children and women are dying on both sides,
25:47
Speaker 1: the conscience of humanity will take to the streets and
25:51
Speaker 1: as ask for for end to that violence. So at
25:59
Speaker 1: the end of the day, parties will come to the table,
26:07
Speaker 1: and if they don't want to because of public pressure.
26:14
Speaker 1: Public pressure therefore becomes the catalystic a war, or the
26:22
Speaker 1: thing that stops the war. For politicians to go to war,
26:31
Speaker 1: they convince the public, you know, they give the public
26:39
Speaker 1: reasons why they need to go to the war, why
26:43
Speaker 1: the publics need to sponsor or finance the war. And
26:47
Speaker 1: it's always governizing the popolice, governizing citizens towards the flag
27:01
Speaker 1: and that patriotic service, and and the politicians always created
27:09
Speaker 1: create this existential threat of protecting the homeland, and that
27:17
Speaker 1: that that if we don't go to them, they will
27:20
Speaker 1: come to us. They create a fear of imminent danger,
27:26
Speaker 1: of imminent threat, that they must act right now, right now,
27:32
Speaker 1: and the there might be false false flags, false flags
27:39
Speaker 1: attacks if the population are not convinced. There will be
27:43
Speaker 1: first flags attacks to justify the reason why they should
27:46
Speaker 1: go to the war. See, the reasons to go to
27:50
Speaker 1: wars already made by politicians. That's when I talk about
27:56
Speaker 1: uh strategic personal object. The reasons already made. But now
28:04
Speaker 1: they need to convince the public while they need to
28:07
Speaker 1: go to war. And to convince the public, it is
28:10
Speaker 1: always based on national threat, you know, imminent danger, false
28:16
Speaker 1: flag attacks. Once partians want to go to war, once
28:21
Speaker 1: that decision is made, they will do everything to get
28:27
Speaker 1: their war. The war is like a traphic politician. They
28:30
Speaker 1: will do everything to go to their war. Will convince
28:35
Speaker 1: themselves and they'll do everything to convince the population. They
28:39
Speaker 1: will send public relations agents, you know, the pressure the
28:45
Speaker 1: news will threaten everybody and they will play the patriotic,
28:51
Speaker 1: patriotic or nationalistic card. They will demonize those who go
28:56
Speaker 1: against the war. They will threaten them. You know, the fires,
29:01
Speaker 1: certain people that would imprison, people that would canceled, people
29:04
Speaker 1: that would They'll do everything to intimidate, to press, to
29:10
Speaker 1: force the chorus because they want their war. And it's
29:15
Speaker 1: always true. And when you're forcing yourself on something, it
29:21
Speaker 1: means something is wrong. To know the war is not just,
29:28
Speaker 1: to know the war is not necessary, to know the
29:34
Speaker 1: war is not eminent. You can measure this through the
29:40
Speaker 1: pressure put by politicians on the various institutions of government
29:46
Speaker 1: and power. The more the pressure on politicians, it means
29:51
Speaker 1: the war is not necessary. The more the spain. The
29:57
Speaker 1: more the propaganda of a war, it means the war
30:01
Speaker 1: it is not necessary, it miss a wor it's not eminent.
30:05
Speaker 1: That propaganda for the war is based on the fact
30:10
Speaker 1: that the war has been decided by certain parties to
30:17
Speaker 1: have interests and gains. If the war is wasted, the
30:25
Speaker 1: more the propaganda for war the model proof that the
30:31
Speaker 1: war was not necessary. Then less the propaganda of a war,
30:38
Speaker 1: it means the war was very necessary. If invade a country,
30:45
Speaker 1: for example, that's a necessary war for the population to fight.
30:51
Speaker 1: They don't need any proper gander, They just need to
30:54
Speaker 1: defend themselves. Since we wich the war the attack another country.
31:01
Speaker 1: The leaders don't need propaganda because they can see for themselves.
31:06
Speaker 1: It's just an eminent threat, an eminent danger that all
31:10
Speaker 1: the citizens are forced to rally, unfortunately sometimes behind the
31:15
Speaker 1: dictator or the personal pressing them because now they need
31:19
Speaker 1: to protect their homeland. They accorded the war of aggression.
31:26
Speaker 1: A war of aggression, it's like a gift to dictators.
31:33
Speaker 1: It's like a gift to an an unpopular government or
31:37
Speaker 1: an unpopular regime because they have reasons not to defend themselves.
31:45
Speaker 1: They can crack down on the people that can do
31:47
Speaker 1: more damage in the name of sovereignty, in the name
31:50
Speaker 1: of protecting their homeland, and they do less propa Ganda
31:57
Speaker 1: because they can sede the destruction for themselves and the
32:02
Speaker 1: highest propaganda a defending country can do. It's played a
32:10
Speaker 1: card of patriotism on or not being nationalistic enough. If
32:18
Speaker 1: invade a country, the politicians which are stelle citizens to
32:21
Speaker 1: be that they should ratherly and go to war, and
32:26
Speaker 1: those who oppose that war would be seen as unpatriotic
32:30
Speaker 1: and unnationalistic. That's why if invade a regime, he gives
32:40
Speaker 1: that region more power to stay in office and changed
32:44
Speaker 1: their power because they will resist. It gives them the
32:50
Speaker 1: opportunity to seek validity and legitimacy in the eyes of
32:56
Speaker 1: their people. So when you invade a regime, a dictatorial regime,
33:05
Speaker 1: you legitimize the power of that region because now that
33:11
Speaker 1: they have an existential threat to their power, and now
33:18
Speaker 1: they'll make the population to die to protect their power.
33:26
Speaker 1: And they don't care much about their people in the
33:29
Speaker 1: first place, so they don't care much if they explains
33:32
Speaker 1: people they will staying power, and such becomes that personal
33:45
Speaker 1: vuditive or personal punitive ambition for the invading power that
33:52
Speaker 1: they want to do everything to destroy or eliminate those
34:06
Speaker 1: in power in that dictatoria country that invade because they
34:11
Speaker 1: don't want to legitimize their power, and the invading country
34:16
Speaker 1: does everything to stay in power. It become victory for
34:20
Speaker 1: the invading countries to stay in power. It become a defeat.
34:27
Speaker 1: It become victory for the defending power to stay for
34:31
Speaker 1: the for the defending country, for the regional leadership to
34:34
Speaker 1: stay in power, and it becomes a defeat for the
34:39
Speaker 1: inva for the invading country if those leaders are in power.
34:46
Speaker 1: So the personal project of the invading power is to
34:53
Speaker 1: eliminate leadership. And the general objective might be to win
34:58
Speaker 1: the war, to invade territory, or to occupy a land
35:02
Speaker 1: or extract resources. But the personal motive of the leader
35:13
Speaker 1: of the invading country, it's decapitation and elimination of leadership.
35:20
Speaker 1: To them, they see that that particular politicians says that
35:25
Speaker 1: as an accomplishment for taking out the enemy, or taking
35:31
Speaker 1: out their colleagues, or taking out the people that can
35:35
Speaker 1: negotiate with, I should in case they're negotiating that you
35:40
Speaker 1: have an upper hand. They'll prefer to be negotiating with
35:44
Speaker 1: with with the new regime or with new people in power,
35:54
Speaker 1: with new faces the old faces, because those old faces
35:59
Speaker 1: disgusted them to the extent that they went to a war.
36:03
Speaker 1: And when they still see these faces, it's difficult for
36:07
Speaker 1: the eventing country to accept a true peace. It meant
36:13
Speaker 1: the objective was not met. So it's therefore public pressure
36:20
Speaker 1: that brings them to the table. If you want a
36:24
Speaker 1: war to come to an end, do not depend on politicians,
36:30
Speaker 1: depend on public pressure, depend on international pressure, depend on
36:37
Speaker 1: institutional pressure, depend on citizens pressure, depend on citizens going
36:45
Speaker 1: to the pole to vote. If you want a war
36:50
Speaker 1: to come to an end because they come to a
36:55
Speaker 1: true public pressure, through economic pressure, through financial pressure. If
37:12
Speaker 1: there is nothing to lose, then they didn't come to
37:19
Speaker 1: cannot come to the table as the war is lost,
37:28
Speaker 1: and they don't want to see that way. But at
37:35
Speaker 1: the end of the day, it depends on the humanity
37:41
Speaker 1: of each person, the humanity that politics aside. We can
37:53
Speaker 1: never achieve all the goals that were set to achieve
37:57
Speaker 1: in the war because every party is fighting to stay
38:06
Speaker 1: and waiting at a point in time. It's for the
38:10
Speaker 1: leaders to do to not be apathetic to the plight
38:18
Speaker 1: of humanity at the point in time. It's for the
38:23
Speaker 1: leaders to to not be so narceissistic and and sometimes
38:31
Speaker 1: psychopathic or psychotic in their thinking. And they should not
38:39
Speaker 1: make it to be so personal that they see as
38:43
Speaker 1: personal defeat to themselves, to their brand, to their name,
38:49
Speaker 1: that they should think past that for the sake of humanity.
38:55
Speaker 1: Because the war gets you a certain point where it
39:00
Speaker 1: can only become more brutal, cruel, in humane, and savage
39:09
Speaker 1: and barbaric that sometimes it keeps shocking the conscience of
39:15
Speaker 1: humanity until sometimes tells untists, somebody tells the leaders of
39:24
Speaker 1: the war to stop, because once the killing starts, the
39:34
Speaker 1: warlords become immune to it because one death is the
39:40
Speaker 1: first death becomes the thing, and the second and the
39:44
Speaker 1: third and the thought defeat. You know, they become numb
39:50
Speaker 1: to the lives of humans, and a soldier dying becomes
39:56
Speaker 1: a number, so that that feeling of a human is lost.
40:00
Speaker 1: H which were very careful not to get to that
40:02
Speaker 1: stage where human lives means nothing, where children being killed,
40:10
Speaker 1: of women, schools or hospitals meant nothing. When infrastructure, civil
40:18
Speaker 1: infrastructure just damage, and you know when when people just
40:22
Speaker 1: keep dying day by day, and we should not get
40:25
Speaker 1: numb to that. We should not allow a war to
40:30
Speaker 1: get to that trash hole where lives means nothing, when
40:34
Speaker 1: when humans just when human life becomes statistics just in number,
40:41
Speaker 1: when you just looked at how many are killed, and
40:46
Speaker 1: once lives lives are reduced to numbers, then humanity are
40:57
Speaker 1: it was humanity is at worce when lives are reduced
41:04
Speaker 1: to numbers. Sick and end to the war. Philosopher Prince
41:14
Speaker 1: e are intelligences. Philosopher Princes resolved from the Great City
41:17
Speaker 1: of Las Vegas, March twenty seven, twenty twenty six. Thank
41:23
Speaker 1: you