Latest / Talk to Prince Show - Solving World's Problems / Prince Israel Zaar on: ICE Enforcement, Lady Good, and Positive Citizenry

Transcript

Prince Israel Zaar on: ICE Enforcement, Lady Good, and Positive Citizenry · Talk to Prince Show - Solving World's Problems

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: M hm uh. Even though the eyes I see immigration
• 0:16
  Speaker 1: uh enforcement, it's not popular with the people, but uh,
• 0:31
  Speaker 1: the people must assured. Let the ICE agency do their job.
• 0:44
  Speaker 1: It's a it's a federal administration or an immigration law
• 0:55
  Speaker 1: enforcement ministre administration or whatever they did the actives that
• 1:00
  Speaker 1: they have. The citizens should should respect the rule of
• 1:12
  Speaker 1: law for the sake of the country, for the peace
• 1:19
  Speaker 1: and the continuation of the system that we hold here.
• 1:24
  Speaker 1: That the policy might not be popular, but it's an
• 1:32
  Speaker 1: administrative policy. The the fear of confrontation, the fear of
• 1:46
  Speaker 1: confront confronting people with arms uh might might not lead
• 1:57
  Speaker 1: to a positive result. It's always very unwise to be
• 2:05
  Speaker 1: confronting somebody that have the jurisdiction and the legality of
• 2:16
  Speaker 1: the use of force. You might not know the temperament, uh,
• 2:22
  Speaker 1: the the mentor set, the struggles and mentor issues, or
• 2:33
  Speaker 1: marital or financial struggles. So the officer before you, you
• 2:42
  Speaker 1: don't know their conditions, their situations and circumstances mentally, so
• 2:47
  Speaker 1: you don't know where it will go if you confront
• 2:53
  Speaker 1: people with legal authority to Perhaps that's the advice giving
• 3:01
  Speaker 1: two kids now to citizens that when you're stopped by
• 3:07
  Speaker 1: law enforcement officer with a gun with legal authority to
• 3:13
  Speaker 1: stop here. You need to cooperate. You need to follow
• 3:18
  Speaker 1: instructions and follow procedure for the sake of the rule
• 3:26
  Speaker 1: of law, and behaved that the stop might not be just,
• 3:34
  Speaker 1: then let it be educated, let it be adjudicated in
• 3:37
  Speaker 1: the court of law. You must not breach the law
• 3:42
  Speaker 1: because somebody is disobeying the law. You must not disrespect
• 3:47
  Speaker 1: the officer because somebody tells you that they are the
• 3:52
  Speaker 1: legal authority to do that. The eyes has become political
• 3:59
  Speaker 1: because immigration it's a political issue. It affects varign block
• 4:06
  Speaker 1: and so politicians have interest in immigration policies. We can
• 4:11
  Speaker 1: see that following our political system that the Democratic Party
• 4:17
  Speaker 1: is in favor of migration and the Republican Party resists migration,
• 4:31
  Speaker 1: but for strictly selective legal migration. So that's the political divide,
• 4:40
  Speaker 1: and the citizens and the law enforcement officers, the ice
• 4:45
  Speaker 1: enforcement officers a car up in this political divide. So
• 4:52
  Speaker 1: whatever happened in the strait, it's se in political lenses
• 4:59
  Speaker 1: an nothing to do with the wellbeing of the person
• 5:02
  Speaker 1: be apprehended, But it's the then political sickness and political
• 5:07
  Speaker 1: information to rally the base of both parties and to
• 5:13
  Speaker 1: align UH donations and and UH campaign strategies to prepare
• 5:24
  Speaker 1: for the upcoming elections. So what happened in the streets
• 5:28
  Speaker 1: got nothing to do with the streets. It got everything
• 5:31
  Speaker 1: to do with electing public officials in office. And they
• 5:36
  Speaker 1: will not mind if blood is sacrificed or if innocent
• 5:39
  Speaker 1: people die through act, through activism or confrontation with the law.
• 5:50
  Speaker 1: Ice is ICE. ICE did not start to die. ICE
• 5:55
  Speaker 1: is not popular with some segment of the population. And
• 6:02
  Speaker 1: ICE was there when the Democrats were there, and ICE
• 6:07
  Speaker 1: is there, and then when the Republican Party is there,
• 6:13
  Speaker 1: ICE might be created. ICE might have been created by
• 6:16
  Speaker 1: a Republican administration. Not very fearable because it's so unpopular
• 6:24
  Speaker 1: with the Buaucratic party, because it will be contadictory that
• 6:29
  Speaker 1: ICE was created by the Bocratic administration. H ICE we do.
• 6:37
  Speaker 1: What ICE is supposed to do is for the system
• 6:42
  Speaker 1: to make sure that the ICE officers are trained, trained
• 6:45
  Speaker 1: in the law. The law is very complicated and in
• 6:50
  Speaker 1: its own legal minds, and I advised that the ICE
• 6:54
  Speaker 1: officers to at least study criminal justice and to at
• 6:59
  Speaker 1: least study the Constitution, the amendments, the right to seizure
• 7:05
  Speaker 1: for amendment for the amendment City Amendment fourteen amendments, nine amendments,
• 7:12
  Speaker 1: so that they they should know their rights as well
• 7:15
  Speaker 1: as the rights of the citizens and the citizen to
• 7:22
  Speaker 1: be obstructing the law enforcement job or law enforcement duty.
• 7:34
  Speaker 1: They should be vested with the law. It's one thing
• 7:39
  Speaker 1: to do to say what you want to say. It's
• 7:46
  Speaker 1: another thing in court. It's a different thing in court,
• 7:52
  Speaker 1: the rule of law. It's a little bit complicated for
• 7:55
  Speaker 1: the common person over the lay lay person. What might
• 8:00
  Speaker 1: happen in bright daylight? My number? What it's permissively in
• 8:08
  Speaker 1: the color of law. So what do you see might number?
• 8:12
  Speaker 1: What is admissive within the corner of flaw. That's just
• 8:18
  Speaker 1: the way the law is. The law take procedures, take
• 8:23
  Speaker 1: their qualities and jurisdiction and the legality of the actions
• 8:32
  Speaker 1: as per the law, and it depends the offenders, lawyers
• 8:42
  Speaker 1: and the government prosecutor, the jury and the judge. It's
• 8:50
  Speaker 1: a it's a whole proceedure, you know, after apprehension by
• 8:57
  Speaker 1: law enforcement officers, you know, the legalities followed. It had
• 9:03
  Speaker 1: the persisticket to the collection as correctional service to find
• 9:09
  Speaker 1: that day in the courts, the legal procedure, it's it's
• 9:15
  Speaker 1: it's a it's a little ambiguous, not what the lay
• 9:22
  Speaker 1: person thinks. So because of activism, and you know, some
• 9:27
  Speaker 1: politicians or somebody been paid as an agitator, some political
• 9:35
  Speaker 1: plan that we are going to oppose Eyes, and they
• 9:38
  Speaker 1: create all this movement and resistance. It that's the first Amendment.
• 9:44
  Speaker 1: That's right to protest, but we did that right to protest.
• 9:50
  Speaker 1: You must follow the law if we want to have
• 9:55
  Speaker 1: a civilized society, and we didn't right to apprehend. The
• 10:03
  Speaker 1: ICE officers must follow the law and respect the rights
• 10:08
  Speaker 1: of citizens. If we want to live in a civilized society,
• 10:16
  Speaker 1: Eyes should be allowed to do their job, and they
• 10:24
  Speaker 1: should do their job with civility, with desency, and with humanity.
• 10:40
  Speaker 1: The ICE officer is executing a political order. What ICE
• 10:47
  Speaker 1: is doing in the street, The orders come from politicians.
• 10:54
  Speaker 1: They're executing a political policy by a polity voted in
• 11:03
  Speaker 1: office by the people, upon which they promised the people
• 11:09
  Speaker 1: what they would do if elected in office. And so
• 11:15
  Speaker 1: was it that it wasn't a joke that the people
• 11:20
  Speaker 1: elected the leaders that they wanted, and that political leader
• 11:27
  Speaker 1: is trying everything to fulfill the political promise or the
• 11:35
  Speaker 1: electoral promise that he or she made to the people
• 11:44
  Speaker 1: to deport illegal immigrants as they say, to depart criminals
• 11:51
  Speaker 1: as they say, or people were not lawfully and made
• 11:57
  Speaker 1: it into the country as they say. We can dispute
• 12:05
  Speaker 1: the legality, the humanity, the decency, the morality of what
• 12:14
  Speaker 1: the ice officers are doing with These ice officers are
• 12:23
  Speaker 1: following the law. They're not in the street by themselves.
• 12:32
  Speaker 1: They were recruited, There had exams that were trained and
• 12:40
  Speaker 1: the past the exams they were swaring, giving a badge
• 12:49
  Speaker 1: and again and directives. Women don't like the deployment hmm,
• 13:00
  Speaker 1: and wo might not like the political concept of law
• 13:05
  Speaker 1: enforcement or keeping our boders safe or no. The political
• 13:12
  Speaker 1: slogans of illegal aliens and others provocative inside incisive, you know,
• 13:20
  Speaker 1: political slogans. It's upon that that people go to the
• 13:26
  Speaker 1: to the to the polling station to vote. They voted
• 13:33
  Speaker 1: for that. As philosopher, as we always tell people to
• 13:38
  Speaker 1: be mindful of the people the vote in office, read
• 13:42
  Speaker 1: the fine prince, not just political slogans or speeches of promises,
• 13:49
  Speaker 1: but within those promises there are fine prints that you
• 13:55
  Speaker 1: didn't read. Because what the politicians are doing is what
• 14:02
  Speaker 1: they spoke about on their campaign trails. The president promised
• 14:10
  Speaker 1: the people, what hey, we're there is going to crack
• 14:14
  Speaker 1: down immigration, take criminals out of the country, you know,
• 14:21
  Speaker 1: make sure that the border is safe and people are
• 14:27
  Speaker 1: not coming in through the border un lawfully. The people
• 14:32
  Speaker 1: should coming through the door. And the so called twelve
• 14:37
  Speaker 1: million illegal migrants who are here, as they say they'll
• 14:47
  Speaker 1: do everything to deport them. That was a nuanced The
• 14:55
  Speaker 1: question where asked by the talking heads time after time.
• 14:59
  Speaker 1: How will you do that? How can you deport twelve
• 15:03
  Speaker 1: billion illegal migrants without human rights abuse, without cracking down
• 15:21
  Speaker 1: so hard, without upheavals from the population, without protests, without resistance,
• 15:32
  Speaker 1: without opposition. People kept asking the visibility of how this
• 15:39
  Speaker 1: will be carried out, And this is how it's being
• 15:44
  Speaker 1: carried out. Two ICE and it's without reason. The ICE
• 15:51
  Speaker 1: is not very popular, so they need to be an
• 15:58
  Speaker 1: understanding between the politicians, the population and the ICE agents.
• 16:13
  Speaker 1: The the culture of apprehension, what is it that it's
• 16:19
  Speaker 1: started the eyes officers away from the regular criminal justice procedures.
• 16:28
  Speaker 1: The mentality is it the warrior's mentality them against us?
• 16:34
  Speaker 1: The people are criminals, We are the good guys. And
• 16:40
  Speaker 1: what is what is the culture the subculture of ice?
• 16:46
  Speaker 1: What is being drilled in during their training? How do
• 16:50
  Speaker 1: they see the population? How do they see the so
• 16:56
  Speaker 1: called illegal migrants? What is the subculture of decency, of
• 17:05
  Speaker 1: humanity or civility? Because when a police officer stops you,
• 17:14
  Speaker 1: it is always that respect. The law enforcement officers are
• 17:19
  Speaker 1: very respectful people, very respectful most of the time. They
• 17:24
  Speaker 1: tell you why you're being stopped, They tell the instructions
• 17:29
  Speaker 1: and if you comply, if you comply, and you can
• 17:38
  Speaker 1: plead with the officer, if depending on the manarism and
• 17:41
  Speaker 1: the character in front of you, you can go to
• 17:48
  Speaker 1: the court. The psychology of the human being in front
• 17:57
  Speaker 1: of you it's something that you do not now, and
• 18:02
  Speaker 1: the psychology of the person that the ice officer is
• 18:05
  Speaker 1: talking to something that they done now. And therefore the
• 18:11
  Speaker 1: gun cannot always become the solution. It shoul gonna be
• 18:17
  Speaker 1: quick to should and kill American citizens because you have
• 18:22
  Speaker 1: the right to. Even if you have the right to,
• 18:25
  Speaker 1: shouldn't killed. The human being is not an animal. It's
• 18:30
  Speaker 1: a person. It's a brother, it's a sister, it's a mother,
• 18:34
  Speaker 1: it's a father, it's an uncle, it's an aunt, it's
• 18:38
  Speaker 1: a family member, it's a citizen, it's a human being.
• 18:42
  Speaker 1: It means you don't just take seconds to kill a
• 18:45
  Speaker 1: human being for whatever reason unless your life is actually
• 18:52
  Speaker 1: being treated. It's shameful for an officer that looks tough,
• 18:59
  Speaker 1: that talks about tough, to talk about fearing for their
• 19:03
  Speaker 1: lives lives, or to kill a woman who is not threatening,
• 19:14
  Speaker 1: to stretch victim hurt. It's not something for an officer
• 19:19
  Speaker 1: not supposed to look tough. That badge of bravery and
• 19:24
  Speaker 1: toughness cannot constantly be excused for the fear of your
• 19:29
  Speaker 1: life when you're dealing with hamless, restless, desperate, weak and
• 19:44
  Speaker 1: vulnerable citizens. The law enforcement officer or the ice officer
• 19:52
  Speaker 1: cannot be that weak, that feeble, that coward to be
• 19:58
  Speaker 1: scared for their lives when actually it's just an excuse
• 20:05
  Speaker 1: to kill somebody. I studied law. I did criminal justice
• 20:16
  Speaker 1: suspended by PhD by jurisdiction. It's law enforcement of a
• 20:25
  Speaker 1: degree in that I studied the abuse of power, excessive
• 20:30
  Speaker 1: use as force in proper training, and the psychology of
• 20:36
  Speaker 1: the warriors mentality. The warrior's mentality comes from politicians to
• 20:42
  Speaker 1: look tough to lock them up and throw the keys.
• 20:46
  Speaker 1: But the end of the day, it's between the officer
• 20:51
  Speaker 1: and their neighbors called citizens. I ways to kill somebody
• 21:03
  Speaker 1: with the pretext of scale of your life. If that
• 21:08
  Speaker 1: excuse is constantly given, then people in uniform will constantly
• 21:15
  Speaker 1: be shooting American citizens and kill it. And even if
• 21:21
  Speaker 1: they are acquitted, but the criminal charges, the civil law
• 21:28
  Speaker 1: suit always cause the citizens. It's always in the millions
• 21:32
  Speaker 1: of dollars. We studied the law, and we know the law.
• 21:42
  Speaker 1: I studied this. I will ask questions all the time
• 21:47
  Speaker 1: to my professors. It's a it's enormous responsibility to have
• 21:55
  Speaker 1: the right to shoot and kill somebody. I always tell
• 22:00
  Speaker 1: my kids and young people. Even the president of the
• 22:07
  Speaker 1: country cannot shoot somebody unless it's for self defense. I
• 22:17
  Speaker 1: tell him that even the Pope of which he will
• 22:20
  Speaker 1: not against a man of God, cannot just shoot somebody.
• 22:28
  Speaker 1: If the president don't shoot somebody, the president w't be handcuffs.
• 22:37
  Speaker 1: Think about it. I always tep with people that even
• 22:41
  Speaker 1: the troops, the troops don't just go and shoot. They
• 22:45
  Speaker 1: wait for war. So those people in the military, they
• 22:50
  Speaker 1: will live their whole life life whatever confronting another human.
• 22:57
  Speaker 1: All they will do is to go for training now,
• 22:59
  Speaker 1: to shoot and prepare for the enemy, and retired without
• 23:04
  Speaker 1: ever facing the enemy. The only people in this great
• 23:09
  Speaker 1: country that can shoot and kill pie. The second, it's
• 23:18
  Speaker 1: a person in the uniform within the jurisdiction of the USA.
• 23:25
  Speaker 1: That's a law enforcement officer, right and eyes, oh, the
• 23:37
  Speaker 1: lost branches of the criminal justice division, with the right
• 23:42
  Speaker 1: to bear arms and the right to care. The officer
• 23:49
  Speaker 1: with a gun has the right to kill pie. The second,
• 24:02
  Speaker 1: I've been in police training and the question was often asked,
• 24:12
  Speaker 1: she took care, the right that the fear of your life,
• 24:16
  Speaker 1: to care that fear. The ice officer in the streets,
• 24:27
  Speaker 1: what separates them with the citizens is a uniform. And
• 24:33
  Speaker 1: when these ice officers are of theory, they become citizens.
• 24:38
  Speaker 1: They become civilians. So when you put on the badge
• 24:43
  Speaker 1: and put on that uniform, no matter the political slogans,
• 24:47
  Speaker 1: the matter the subculture, no matter the psychology, to the
• 24:53
  Speaker 1: ice officer, always remembered, at the end of the day,
• 24:58
  Speaker 1: you are just a neighbor. It's just a citizen. Everybody
• 25:03
  Speaker 1: asks you go to the same groceries, the same church,
• 25:07
  Speaker 1: kids go to the same school. Maybe we'll look for
• 25:10
  Speaker 1: the same team sports, hang out cookouts. All of us
• 25:17
  Speaker 1: have the same loyalty for our country. Believe in the flag,
• 25:21
  Speaker 1: belief in the troops, believe in people in uniform. Believe
• 25:25
  Speaker 1: in my law enforcement officers and firefighters and ice officers.
• 25:30
  Speaker 1: That did you do the right thigh? Politicians, it's a politician,
• 25:36
  Speaker 1: but the officers trained to seekure peace for law enforcement,
• 25:46
  Speaker 1: for law enforcement, and some citizens are agitators. You know,
• 25:59
  Speaker 1: it depends on political plan or where they're coming from.
• 26:03
  Speaker 1: The one who resist, they want to oppose and they
• 26:10
  Speaker 1: want to strike in the strip, they want to marge.
• 26:14
  Speaker 1: That's what the law says. That is the first Amendment,
• 26:19
  Speaker 1: the right to protest. But you cannot make protest a job.
• 26:27
  Speaker 1: You need to go work and earn a living. That
• 26:33
  Speaker 1: are those whose job is protests and they're paid to
• 26:40
  Speaker 1: do that. So it becomes a political manifestation that I
• 26:49
  Speaker 1: can sometimes infringe or obstruct the job of law enforcement officers.
• 27:01
  Speaker 1: It means there are citizens who are paid or motivated
• 27:05
  Speaker 1: or whatever their incentives to just come an obstruct, to
• 27:10
  Speaker 1: come and make it difficult for officers, the law enforcement
• 27:16
  Speaker 1: officers to perform their beauty their duty. I'm sorry. So
• 27:21
  Speaker 1: these agitators, they they have their cell phones on. They
• 27:24
  Speaker 1: want to create a saying. They want to be saying.
• 27:27
  Speaker 1: They want to put something on the media to show
• 27:30
  Speaker 1: how tough they are, how they're resisting the law. And
• 27:35
  Speaker 1: you can see her obstructing the law enforcement officer from
• 27:41
  Speaker 1: executing their duty. There must be an understanding the legality
• 27:49
  Speaker 1: the warrant, The execution should be less comforntational, and officer
• 28:01
  Speaker 1: should be trained to de escalate. You must not pursue somebody.
• 28:07
  Speaker 1: I should then, because I don't know to what end.
• 28:12
  Speaker 1: That person is not running away from planet Earth. That
• 28:16
  Speaker 1: is that that person's car. It's not a spacecraft, right,
• 28:23
  Speaker 1: it's just human being. That car mathematically, scientifically you know,
• 28:30
  Speaker 1: has and wrong just that miles. That person must go
• 28:36
  Speaker 1: back to a particular home. The car can be tracked,
• 28:41
  Speaker 1: The movement of the person can be tracked, So letting
• 28:44
  Speaker 1: the person go is not the end of the world.
• 28:47
  Speaker 1: It must not shoot to kill especialist. The person is
• 28:51
  Speaker 1: not in the age of your life. The person doesn't
• 28:52
  Speaker 1: have gun to shoot you. There is nothing we don't
• 28:55
  Speaker 1: need to shoot and kill a person and then be
• 28:58
  Speaker 1: extrapolating and use the strong strong person or strong man
• 29:03
  Speaker 1: a strong woman to justify a killing. That it's public view,
• 29:09
  Speaker 1: plain view amidst every human being can see with their
• 29:14
  Speaker 1: plain eyes what is happening and when. When the law
• 29:23
  Speaker 1: it's not aligning what human senses is seeing, that's where
• 29:33
  Speaker 1: citizens start to feel a cooler up or something is
• 29:35
  Speaker 1: wrong with the law. Officers should not make the law
• 29:41
  Speaker 1: to be struggling to justify their actions. The law equalition,
• 29:50
  Speaker 1: not making a way that abuse of power E saysive
• 29:54
  Speaker 1: use is false, orsive use of deadly force can be accused.
• 30:02
  Speaker 1: What is right is right within the prayambers of the law.
• 30:10
  Speaker 1: The law should not be defensive. The law shap offensive.
• 30:16
  Speaker 1: When the law is defensive, it's against the people. It's
• 30:22
  Speaker 1: against the will of the people. It means the lawyers
• 30:26
  Speaker 1: is defending itself. It's covering uprights on crimes against the people.
• 30:34
  Speaker 1: The law needs to be offensive in nature. The law
• 30:39
  Speaker 1: needs to be protecting the people. Each time the lawyers
• 30:44
  Speaker 1: tried to justify the action of an officer, the law
• 30:48
  Speaker 1: is being defensive to the lawyers acting against the people.
• 30:56
  Speaker 1: So therefore the people at the enemy. The law should
• 31:02
  Speaker 1: be there to protect the people. But when those with
• 31:08
  Speaker 1: power abuse the law or abuse the people, then the
• 31:18
  Speaker 1: law is used to defend itself against the people. The
• 31:27
  Speaker 1: law should not be used to defend itself against the people.
• 31:35
  Speaker 1: The law is there to defend the people. If the
• 31:44
  Speaker 1: law is doing its job, it should be there to
• 31:48
  Speaker 1: defend the people. That's why we have the law. Law
• 32:01
  Speaker 1: should not be defending itself against the people. That's where
• 32:10
  Speaker 1: the problem lies. If the law can defend itself against
• 32:16
  Speaker 1: the people, that the law is call upon to protect
• 32:20
  Speaker 1: or to preserve the people from a bridging or disobeying
• 32:23
  Speaker 1: the law. If the law is there to come out
• 32:27
  Speaker 1: for itself and the citizens are exposed, and if the
• 32:35
  Speaker 1: law can always come for itself, that it doesn't matter
• 32:40
  Speaker 1: what the law does it miss, the law would always
• 32:45
  Speaker 1: justify it mikes use of the law. So therefore those
• 32:53
  Speaker 1: in power, those in the uniform I always write and
• 32:58
  Speaker 1: there for the people are always wrong. It's not supposed
• 33:02
  Speaker 1: to be that way. The law should not be used
• 33:06
  Speaker 1: against the people, and the people should not abuse the
• 33:17
  Speaker 1: law and disrespect or put the lives of law enforcement
• 33:24
  Speaker 1: officers in danger. The officers should genuinely fear for their lives.
• 33:40
  Speaker 1: The officers should generally fear for their lives that's protected
• 33:46
  Speaker 1: by the law. That the fear of life should not
• 33:52
  Speaker 1: be made up. If the law is making up something
• 34:00
  Speaker 1: to protect an office of the law, then the lights
• 34:06
  Speaker 1: off is corrupt, The lawyers off is nepotistic, The lawyer
• 34:14
  Speaker 1: self has become a patronage system. The lawy itself is illegal,
• 34:24
  Speaker 1: and the law is abusing the law itself to protect itself.
• 34:33
  Speaker 1: If that happens, then that's a subculture that the law
• 34:40
  Speaker 1: passes it on onto officers to know that no matter
• 34:45
  Speaker 1: what they do, the law will protect them, and no
• 34:51
  Speaker 1: matter what they do, the law protect them. So they
• 34:54
  Speaker 1: can kill somebody and bride their light, the law protect them.
• 35:00
  Speaker 1: If that is a subculture within the law enforcement sectord
• 35:06
  Speaker 1: in itself, that can therefore justify the reason of ambiguity, ambivalence, wordiness,
• 35:16
  Speaker 1: distrust between the law and the people. It means the
• 35:21
  Speaker 1: people would think that voice doesn't matter. No matter what
• 35:24
  Speaker 1: they do, they're always wrong, and no matter what the
• 35:27
  Speaker 1: law enforcement or the law does, the law is always right.
• 35:31
  Speaker 1: That's I got the conflict. It's upon this that you
• 35:33
  Speaker 1: got the them against us mentality. It shouldn't be them
• 35:37
  Speaker 1: against us. The law is there for the people, and
• 35:42
  Speaker 1: the people are there equaling to protect their law enforcement officers.
• 35:48
  Speaker 1: It should be the racist proxity, that amicability, that's such
• 35:54
  Speaker 1: a contract with the people and the law. It's not combatants.
• 36:02
  Speaker 1: The people are not enemies. The people are not terrorists.
• 36:09
  Speaker 1: They don't make up a terrorist I charge against the
• 36:12
  Speaker 1: people in order to protect the law. That's that's the
• 36:16
  Speaker 1: point I'm talking about. The people cannot be the enemy
• 36:23
  Speaker 1: because the officers themselves are the people. They are the
• 36:27
  Speaker 1: people in the uniform. Without the uniform, you are the people,
• 36:37
  Speaker 1: and the people are the law because the people make
• 36:41
  Speaker 1: the law. That's what the democracy is all about. We
• 36:45
  Speaker 1: the people. It's for the people, for the people, by
• 36:53
  Speaker 1: the people, from the people. So that that's subcusture to
• 37:00
  Speaker 1: be changed. Else we have more killings, more riots, and
• 37:09
  Speaker 1: we cannot live in that cycle of elections where we
• 37:14
  Speaker 1: use our law enforcement officers for political gains to show
• 37:18
  Speaker 1: how tough we are, or to have to show how
• 37:20
  Speaker 1: we don't like the police, how we don't like ice,
• 37:24
  Speaker 1: or to show how we love the police ban than others.
• 37:28
  Speaker 1: And at the end of the day, the law enforcement officer,
• 37:31
  Speaker 1: the ice officers, the victim in this it's the victim
• 37:44
  Speaker 1: if the law is because if the law becomes defensive,
• 37:48
  Speaker 1: the officer is a victim and the people are the victims.
• 37:55
  Speaker 1: That is what it means to have a corrupt system,
• 37:57
  Speaker 1: a dictatorial system, a tyrannical system. Why the will of
• 38:04
  Speaker 1: the people don't matter and the law is so hard,
• 38:09
  Speaker 1: so tough, so brutal, so cruel, so inhumane because politicians
• 38:19
  Speaker 1: want the law to be that way. Why do I
• 38:22
  Speaker 1: say politicians? Americans live in an election cycle. When one
• 38:28
  Speaker 1: party is in office, the law has been executed differently.
• 38:36
  Speaker 1: When a different party comes to office, that same lawyer
• 38:40
  Speaker 1: is being executed differently, that same law with the same officers.
• 38:45
  Speaker 1: They execute the law differently when there's a different political
• 38:49
  Speaker 1: party in town. Same officers, same law, same citizens, same
• 38:57
  Speaker 1: criminal prosidires, same crimes, save offenses, the miners, same infringement,
• 39:06
  Speaker 1: but the edecation is different because of the political party
• 39:11
  Speaker 1: in town. We should not meddle politics with the law
• 39:21
  Speaker 1: and put good law enforcement officers in difficult positions, or
• 39:29
  Speaker 1: give politicians give giving law enforcement officers tasks that confront
• 39:35
  Speaker 1: them with their neighbors and confront them with the people
• 39:38
  Speaker 1: that sometimes for the genuine fear of their lives, and
• 39:45
  Speaker 1: good officers end up killing somebody. When that happens, the
• 39:52
  Speaker 1: loser's officers and the person that's been killed, because politics
• 40:00
  Speaker 1: will run away with it. The left we use it,
• 40:04
  Speaker 1: the right we use it, and the loser the losers
• 40:11
  Speaker 1: are the law, the officer and the victim. The losers
• 40:17
  Speaker 1: are always the law. The officers and the victims are
• 40:23
  Speaker 1: the politicians. Once we are getting towards elections, many terrible
• 40:31
  Speaker 1: things will be happening. The law, the officers, and citizens
• 40:39
  Speaker 1: will be used unknowingly, unknowingly for political gains to elect
• 40:46
  Speaker 1: people in office without knowing. How do you know that
• 40:51
  Speaker 1: after killing, after a conventional law enforcement officers aren't led
• 40:57
  Speaker 1: to it that leads to a deadly killing. Uh? Sometimes,
• 41:01
  Speaker 1: I mean the wishes of the families is ignored by politicians,
• 41:05
  Speaker 1: by by teak tanks, by you know, by by campaigns officers.
• 41:17
  Speaker 1: You know, it's a whole political strategy. I studied political
• 41:23
  Speaker 1: science and I studied law, so I know what I'm
• 41:26
  Speaker 1: talking about. Each police killing becomes a political That police
• 41:36
  Speaker 1: officer is a victim, the person being killed is a victim,
• 41:43
  Speaker 1: and the law is a victim. It's a subculture that
• 41:54
  Speaker 1: leads an ic officer to kill somebody's sub culture that
• 42:02
  Speaker 1: leads that person to obstruct the law enforcement duty of
• 42:07
  Speaker 1: the ice office, a least to a killing. A citizen
• 42:18
  Speaker 1: will not just block the road and obstruct a law
• 42:26
  Speaker 1: enforcement process. A citizen will not have that courage to
• 42:34
  Speaker 1: just make themselves on the road a share. Something else
• 42:40
  Speaker 1: has transpired. That citizen in the car is good. It's
• 42:49
  Speaker 1: doing something curd. That citizens belief in them that they're
• 42:55
  Speaker 1: doing something curd. Where does that belief come from? Does
• 43:03
  Speaker 1: it emandate from a political plank, a political strategy, a
• 43:09
  Speaker 1: political subculture. Does it align to set the policies that's
• 43:18
  Speaker 1: why the citizen becomes a victim and the officer confronting
• 43:25
  Speaker 1: the citizens their action? Does it align with the political party,
• 43:33
  Speaker 1: a political slogan, a political plank downside the officer equalis victim?
• 43:48
  Speaker 1: Would the law therefore be used to justify they shoulding
• 43:53
  Speaker 1: and the victim outside the law? Equalism victim? The law
• 43:59
  Speaker 1: is brought into this, the officer is brought into it,
• 44:03
  Speaker 1: and the citizen that ends up dying is brought into it.
• 44:07
  Speaker 1: The law, officer, the citizen, and the law itself are
• 44:13
  Speaker 1: the victims are the victims. Why should it be that way?
• 44:26
  Speaker 1: How did we get here that we need our citizens
• 44:33
  Speaker 1: to be disobeying the officers, and the officers sometimes end
• 44:37
  Speaker 1: up killing citizens. And then it become political slogans and
• 44:42
  Speaker 1: people run for office, support groups, and it becomes the
• 44:48
  Speaker 1: base upon which the country is divided and polarize. That
• 45:00
  Speaker 1: we start to see ourselves as enemies and will lead
• 45:05
  Speaker 1: to a great lock shut down the government. Things are
• 45:08
  Speaker 1: not done. It's too much hate, too much spite, too
• 45:12
  Speaker 1: much vengeance and fignitiveness. It's too much echo chambarism. Why
• 45:19
  Speaker 1: do we do this for our great country? We know
• 45:24
  Speaker 1: now we are making our citizens the law and law
• 45:29
  Speaker 1: good law enforcement of his satis victims? Why are we
• 45:33
  Speaker 1: doing that? What perspious? The projection, the perception of the perspective.
• 45:39
  Speaker 1: Who stands to gain? Who stands to loose? A person
• 45:43
  Speaker 1: is dead? She is dead. She will not come back.
• 45:49
  Speaker 1: The lady's name is good. The lady's name is good.
• 45:58
  Speaker 1: O per case G. No one cares, Oh, oh, the
• 46:04
  Speaker 1: her name is good. How can you kill good? How
• 46:13
  Speaker 1: do we kill good? I didn't get to the point
• 46:17
  Speaker 1: that we kill good? Literally, how can we kill good?
• 46:29
  Speaker 1: How do you kill good? Or make us get there,
• 46:39
  Speaker 1: that the citizen becomes the enemy that don't know massis given,
• 46:49
  Speaker 1: and the law officer becomes the judge and executor. And
• 46:57
  Speaker 1: then the system is called upon two defend the law
• 47:01
  Speaker 1: to defend the action. Why should politicians defend the law?
• 47:10
  Speaker 1: Why can't the law defend itself? Why should the law
• 47:21
  Speaker 1: be defending itself for abusing the rights of citizens and
• 47:28
  Speaker 1: killing its own citizens? What type of society? What our
• 47:30
  Speaker 1: legal system? What our political system justify the killing of
• 47:37
  Speaker 1: its own citizens, it's own citizens? What our system is? That?
• 47:45
  Speaker 1: How civilized? How humane? A decent cannot be? That comes
• 47:50
  Speaker 1: to the point where good officers make bad decisions, knowing
• 47:59
  Speaker 1: the law with defender and so behave that the law
• 48:04
  Speaker 1: defends the officer and the psychology of that officer as
• 48:09
  Speaker 1: what I'm all about, the trauma in the manner of
• 48:14
  Speaker 1: that officer, as a good person with a bad decision,
• 48:26
  Speaker 1: the act of self defense or the aut of killing somebody,
• 48:31
  Speaker 1: it's not the person, but that defines the person and
• 48:36
  Speaker 1: all the good name and all the good works of
• 48:38
  Speaker 1: that person. If not careful, be forgotten, that action defines
• 48:44
  Speaker 1: the person, but that action is not the person. It's
• 48:51
  Speaker 1: so painful to watch, and an officer kills somebody. It
• 48:58
  Speaker 1: should have been that way. If citizens should comply, our
• 49:03
  Speaker 1: officers killed somebody. If citizens should comply, just comply and
• 49:10
  Speaker 1: go to court. Just comply and save yourself, and save
• 49:16
  Speaker 1: the officer, and save the law, and save tax payers.
• 49:22
  Speaker 1: Just comply with the law. Just comply, and let the
• 49:29
  Speaker 1: officer go home, back to the family, and let you,
• 49:34
  Speaker 1: the citizens, go back home to your family, and let
• 49:42
  Speaker 1: civility rain. We don't need to bring our humanity to test.
• 49:54
  Speaker 1: You know. The temperature, our political temperature always leads to
• 50:02
  Speaker 1: things like this, with the antics of politics, with the
• 50:10
  Speaker 1: with the frequencies that high. Citizens pay the price, law
• 50:17
  Speaker 1: enforcement officers pay the price, and the law has been
• 50:21
  Speaker 1: abuse and use, and the law has been seen as corrupt.
• 50:30
  Speaker 1: It's supposed to be that way. Citizens should be taught
• 50:35
  Speaker 1: to obey the law. Law enforcement officers should be taught
• 50:41
  Speaker 1: to obey the law. And the law itself should be just.
• 50:50
  Speaker 1: The law should be just. The word justice should not
• 51:03
  Speaker 1: come should not mean justify your action. Justice you do
• 51:10
  Speaker 1: not mean justifying your action. Justition mean doing what is right.
• 51:18
  Speaker 1: For what is right is fair, and just just means
• 51:25
  Speaker 1: what is right but I would just should not be
• 51:29
  Speaker 1: misused in the name of justice to justify our actions.
• 51:44
  Speaker 1: When we are using the law to justify our actions,
• 51:47
  Speaker 1: where do we stop, all right? Because if somebody has
• 51:55
  Speaker 1: the power to do whatever they want, and knowing that
• 51:59
  Speaker 1: don't justify with what they do, where do we stop
• 52:05
  Speaker 1: toward end? For what purpose? For what God? What greater
• 52:10
  Speaker 1: good can it be? I can heal the people, I
• 52:14
  Speaker 1: can abuild a nation, I can create trust. And do
• 52:20
  Speaker 1: we see ourselves as neighbors, as citizens, as fellows, citizens
• 52:24
  Speaker 1: as fellows humans, not as enemies. We see ourselves as
• 52:31
  Speaker 1: enemies because certain people with power or power know that
• 52:38
  Speaker 1: we use the law to justify their action. When you're
• 52:49
  Speaker 1: using the law to justify your action, it means you're
• 52:54
  Speaker 1: technically abusing the law. When you are using the law
• 53:01
  Speaker 1: to justify your action, it technically means you are abusing
• 53:05
  Speaker 1: the law, And it technically means that you have power
• 53:11
  Speaker 1: over orders, and the technically means that you can do
• 53:15
  Speaker 1: what you want. Nothing can happen because the law is
• 53:19
  Speaker 1: always on your side. And the question to ask, how
• 53:26
  Speaker 1: can the law always be on your side? Because nobody
• 53:32
  Speaker 1: is above the law. It's just a matter of time.
• 53:38
  Speaker 1: You might think you're above the law until you get
• 53:44
  Speaker 1: to realize that you are not. Nobody is above the law.
• 53:54
  Speaker 1: It's just a matter of time. It's upon God truth
• 54:02
  Speaker 1: that we find ourselves to be good citizens, to respect
• 54:09
  Speaker 1: our law enforcement officers, to respect law for others, and
• 54:20
  Speaker 1: to respect the law itself. The rule of law should
• 54:28
  Speaker 1: not be doing whatever you want and justify it with
• 54:33
  Speaker 1: that law. The rule of law should be the thing
• 54:37
  Speaker 1: that makes all of us to be wary of that
• 54:42
  Speaker 1: abuse of power, to be conscious that nobody is above
• 54:46
  Speaker 1: the law, to be conscious that we cannot have a
• 54:50
  Speaker 1: civilized human society if we can do whatever we want
• 54:56
  Speaker 1: and choose the Lord to justify our action about it.
• 55:02
  Speaker 1: American has been here for close to torn down fifty years.
• 55:09
  Speaker 1: American has been here for close to tour down fifty years.
• 55:15
  Speaker 1: How can it be that you are a single person
• 55:18
  Speaker 1: now you you internalize within you for torn down fifty
• 55:24
  Speaker 1: years to be if that is accurate, that American law
• 55:30
  Speaker 1: was made just for you to do whatever you like
• 55:37
  Speaker 1: and use that law to justify your actions. So the
• 55:42
  Speaker 1: founding fathers with the Mayflower, the Founding Fathers, the Constitution,
• 55:50
  Speaker 1: the Civil War, and the world in depend all this,
• 55:54
  Speaker 1: all this being of this great country, the dissipation of
• 56:01
  Speaker 1: powers and the American way of life. This country hold year,
• 56:08
  Speaker 1: thank God, with trust, our ideas, the seal, the flag,
• 56:14
  Speaker 1: the Constitution, the troops. So all just for you to
• 56:20
  Speaker 1: do whatever you want and then use the law and
• 56:25
  Speaker 1: then justify your actions. Is in that suspect come to
• 56:31
  Speaker 1: feel that that's too much of power, that's too much
• 56:33
  Speaker 1: for you to bear, just one human or a group
• 56:37
  Speaker 1: of humans that this time now, with this power is
• 56:42
  Speaker 1: vested in us, Now we can do whatever we want
• 56:48
  Speaker 1: and the law can justify our actions. And what type
• 56:56
  Speaker 1: of America we're talking about? How does that make us different?
• 57:01
  Speaker 1: Therefore from dictatorial tyrannical governments that we're always there to
• 57:06
  Speaker 1: protect and prevent. We must internalize the law, to externalize it,
• 57:17
  Speaker 1: for it's good. You don't know what I've done the
• 57:22
  Speaker 1: law so much that allow means nothing. You don't want
• 57:26
  Speaker 1: to abuse the law so much that a law in
• 57:28
  Speaker 1: itself means nothing. You don't want to misuse the law
• 57:33
  Speaker 1: so much that allay itself means nothing. When you mis
• 57:39
  Speaker 1: use something, the thing loses it's validity, it's reliability. The
• 57:53
  Speaker 1: law is the law because all of us respect the law,
• 57:56
  Speaker 1: no matters their powers vested in us must be that humble,
• 58:03
  Speaker 1: to be that respectful of the law, to be respect
• 58:07
  Speaker 1: for the rule of law, to respect for law enforcement officers,
• 58:13
  Speaker 1: to be respect for law, for orders, and to be
• 58:17
  Speaker 1: respect for the citizens that we serve. It is for
• 58:22
  Speaker 1: the good of the law to below abiding, just as
• 58:28
  Speaker 1: the law enforcement officers cause upon the system, upon the
• 58:31
  Speaker 1: citizens to below abiding. It's upon the law enforcement officer
• 58:38
  Speaker 1: to below our biding, and it's upon the law itself
• 58:44
  Speaker 1: to below abiding. That's the meaning of justice that comes
• 58:51
  Speaker 1: from the word just just laws, just laws. And we
• 59:06
  Speaker 1: need an informed populist, an informed public when it comes
• 59:12
  Speaker 1: to the matters of the law. Matters of law like
• 59:17
  Speaker 1: the lawy is like the Bible, The law is like medicine,
• 59:26
  Speaker 1: a book right, and the law in itself is like
• 59:37
  Speaker 1: understanding financial documents. There's something that you need a financial officer,
• 59:43
  Speaker 1: you need a lawyer, you need a doctor, because these
• 59:47
  Speaker 1: professions are very ambiguous, very laymen to understand. We don't
• 59:54
  Speaker 1: need rocket science to respect the law. Let's respect the law.
• 1:00:03
  Speaker 1: It's not weak to respect the law. That's one is
• 1:00:08
  Speaker 1: asked of you. Everybody. The officer a bus in the law,
• 1:00:14
  Speaker 1: and anybducing power a bus in the law. As a citizen,
• 1:00:20
  Speaker 1: respect the law, and that's him right. That same law.
• 1:00:26
  Speaker 1: It gives you the right to protest, and within the
• 1:00:29
  Speaker 1: right to protest, you must follow the law. The rule
• 1:00:34
  Speaker 1: of law is we must follow the law. A lawlessness,
• 1:00:42
  Speaker 1: citizens are killed a law enforcement officers. Sometimes I kill
• 1:00:47
  Speaker 1: or hurt in lawlessness. Somebody plays the price, and to
• 1:01:02
  Speaker 1: the officer, it's always a tough burden to bear that badge.
• 1:01:12
  Speaker 1: Society expect so much from you, and you expect so
• 1:01:20
  Speaker 1: much from yourself, and the law expect so much from you.
• 1:01:29
  Speaker 1: Always do that which is right, no matter the subculture,
• 1:01:35
  Speaker 1: no matter the promises that you can do what you like,
• 1:01:37
  Speaker 1: that you're above the law. You're not. You're not a
• 1:01:43
  Speaker 1: both common descency. You're an above God. Another of good conscience,
• 1:01:53
  Speaker 1: and another both guilt. When I saw h the confrontation
• 1:02:02
  Speaker 1: with the ice officer and good and lady Goods in peace,
• 1:02:14
  Speaker 1: there are two citizens that genuinely they will not like
• 1:02:21
  Speaker 1: you to end the way in it. Let's be honest.
• 1:02:26
  Speaker 1: The officer will not want to do that to that lady,
• 1:02:29
  Speaker 1: and that lady will not think that this obeying the
• 1:02:32
  Speaker 1: officer willing to hear death. Two of them are victims
• 1:02:36
  Speaker 1: of the system. The system failed the lady. The system
• 1:02:42
  Speaker 1: failed the officer. Within that system, the lady felt, I
• 1:02:48
  Speaker 1: mean that she can't do that. What she was doing
• 1:02:51
  Speaker 1: is right, and within that system, the officer takes that
• 1:02:55
  Speaker 1: using that deadly force is right. In that system, the
• 1:03:03
  Speaker 1: officize the victim, and the lady's a victim, but the
• 1:03:07
  Speaker 1: system survives. The question comes, is that the type of
• 1:03:14
  Speaker 1: system we want are We're misusing the system. We're misusing
• 1:03:21
  Speaker 1: the law A we misusing our powers. Our system should
• 1:03:29
  Speaker 1: not making the way of that law enforcements were obstructed.
• 1:03:41
  Speaker 1: I shouldn't make it no way that it takes seconds
• 1:03:44
  Speaker 1: with the law enforcement officer to kill the person. The
• 1:03:48
  Speaker 1: seconds to kill comes from the internalization of the of
• 1:03:57
  Speaker 1: the immunity and impey of the action, the ability of
• 1:04:04
  Speaker 1: the bullet. It comes with the conscious awareness of immunity
• 1:04:12
  Speaker 1: and impunity. It shouldn't be that way. That's at the
• 1:04:18
  Speaker 1: end of the day. Without iminity and impunity, we are humans,
• 1:04:26
  Speaker 1: and when human kills another human, it's too much of
• 1:04:31
  Speaker 1: a burden to bear. No matter what society says, No
• 1:04:38
  Speaker 1: matter what the law says, the officer is a person,
• 1:04:46
  Speaker 1: and I feel for that person. I could hear the
• 1:04:55
  Speaker 1: goodness of the officer despite the trauma. HM. I could
• 1:05:01
  Speaker 1: hear the voice say call now one one, Call now
• 1:05:05
  Speaker 1: one one, somebody call now one one. The officer knows
• 1:05:10
  Speaker 1: that somebody should come to the help of that lady.
• 1:05:16
  Speaker 1: I wish he shouldn't have done that, But the power
• 1:05:23
  Speaker 1: that be HM allows that officer to play within that sister.
• 1:05:32
  Speaker 1: That's a side to we live in. That officer is
• 1:05:38
  Speaker 1: a good person. It's a good person who did something
• 1:05:47
  Speaker 1: that he himself regrets. Let's just be honest. It's a
• 1:05:53
  Speaker 1: good person, well done something that has taken the life
• 1:06:03
  Speaker 1: of another person, genuinely within the officer. The officer regrets
• 1:06:10
  Speaker 1: that he wished he should have been done with Funny,
• 1:06:21
  Speaker 1: that's a lesson all of us can let from it.
• 1:06:25
  Speaker 1: And I said to the officers, I always remember that
• 1:06:31
  Speaker 1: after and the counter like that, It's gonna be with
• 1:06:39
  Speaker 1: you the rest of your life, no matter what, no
• 1:06:42
  Speaker 1: matter what he said to you, no matter no matter
• 1:06:45
  Speaker 1: what happens, no matter you acquitted, no matter what he said,
• 1:06:48
  Speaker 1: no matter what the politician says. So the law says,
• 1:06:51
  Speaker 1: you know within you, I have taken somebody's life, and
• 1:06:58
  Speaker 1: I always make sure it's right. Just let it be
• 1:07:02
  Speaker 1: journuine that you're scared of your life, because if it's
• 1:07:07
  Speaker 1: journeying the guild of that person, still upon day your
• 1:07:12
  Speaker 1: conscience is claimed. Let it be just, Let it be
• 1:07:17
  Speaker 1: righteous that you genuinely fear for your life, because that
• 1:07:24
  Speaker 1: self defense is natural, and that's the right. Self defense
• 1:07:32
  Speaker 1: is natural, and it is right. It is a right
• 1:07:36
  Speaker 1: because it's the right thing under every circumstances that the
• 1:07:40
  Speaker 1: right thing, think in mind will do. That's why they
• 1:07:44
  Speaker 1: call it a right. Not the right person at the
• 1:07:48
  Speaker 1: same situation, we do the same thing that a reasonable
• 1:07:55
  Speaker 1: person at the same situation, circumstance and condition will do
• 1:08:03
  Speaker 1: the same thing. Let it be, Jenny, I said today
• 1:08:09
  Speaker 1: the officers, for your conscience to be claimed, because at
• 1:08:13
  Speaker 1: the end of the die, you don't want to sell
• 1:08:16
  Speaker 1: your soul because the system sometimes I don't have a soul.
• 1:08:22
  Speaker 1: The system is not a moral organization. The system is
• 1:08:27
  Speaker 1: not a church. It's not a temple. It's not a basket,
• 1:08:32
  Speaker 1: it's not the system is not spiritual. The systems of
• 1:08:38
  Speaker 1: life is the person. Sometimes people within the system use
• 1:08:44
  Speaker 1: other humans, either to abuse the system or to attend
• 1:08:49
  Speaker 1: their goals. The system can defend you, but you can
• 1:08:56
  Speaker 1: not defend your own self When you know what you
• 1:09:01
  Speaker 1: did is not right. Somebody can cover for you, but
• 1:09:09
  Speaker 1: you know within you now what you did was not right.
• 1:09:16
  Speaker 1: If you know it within you, what it did was
• 1:09:18
  Speaker 1: not right, lo for ways to make amends, to apologize
• 1:09:26
  Speaker 1: to the family and to accept their grief and not
• 1:09:37
  Speaker 1: don't deny it's a mistake regrettable as a person. You
• 1:09:49
  Speaker 1: need to go to bed doing that you did the
• 1:09:50
  Speaker 1: right thing. If you know you didn't ask for forgiveness.
• 1:09:58
  Speaker 1: Pray to your God or to your own spirituality or
• 1:10:01
  Speaker 1: whatever you pray to answer forgiveness. At the end of
• 1:10:07
  Speaker 1: the day, it ends with the person, ends with the person.
• 1:10:15
  Speaker 1: No matter the powers that we have, all those powers
• 1:10:20
  Speaker 1: are society construct You can be president, you can be senator,
• 1:10:25
  Speaker 1: you can be secretary, you can be the chief of police,
• 1:10:29
  Speaker 1: you can be whatever that may be. All those are titles.
• 1:10:39
  Speaker 1: Those are titles. There's are society constructs. At the end
• 1:10:42
  Speaker 1: of the day, you go home with your conscience, with yourself,
• 1:10:48
  Speaker 1: that being that came to this earth, that was born
• 1:10:50
  Speaker 1: from the hospital. That being that came to the from
• 1:10:53
  Speaker 1: the womb at the point in time is always by
• 1:10:56
  Speaker 1: itself to confide itself. And when that time arms, learn
• 1:11:02
  Speaker 1: to forgive, learn to let go, then to move on,
• 1:11:13
  Speaker 1: then to move forward. I always assume that you do
• 1:11:21
  Speaker 1: better next time. Don't self destroyed, don't the construct. Become
• 1:11:28
  Speaker 1: part of change. Become part of the change that we need.
• 1:11:33
  Speaker 1: You can when they run for office, and be the
• 1:11:37
  Speaker 1: change agent we'll call upon to make serciety better, and
• 1:11:45
  Speaker 1: we'll make mistakes. You will not be for the system
• 1:11:51
  Speaker 1: for the citizen to be care You will not be
• 1:11:54
  Speaker 1: for the system. I don't be for the good of
• 1:11:56
  Speaker 1: the system for the citizen to PreCure. You don't be
• 1:11:59
  Speaker 1: for the good of the system for the law enforcement
• 1:12:02
  Speaker 1: officer to kill a citizen. And who must have known
• 1:12:09
  Speaker 1: that people. We always have that intellition that people are
• 1:12:13
  Speaker 1: for good reasons and that they genuinely make mistakes. We
• 1:12:19
  Speaker 1: must trust within ourselves if we want society toward society
• 1:12:24
  Speaker 1: is we can only learn from the mistakes and then
• 1:12:29
  Speaker 1: be a better society. You can. There are those that
• 1:12:34
  Speaker 1: want the officer to be punished or to be to
• 1:12:38
  Speaker 1: be to be you know, some talk about the death sentence.
• 1:12:43
  Speaker 1: It does not have anything. It doesn't help. The family
• 1:12:48
  Speaker 1: doesn't help. This doesn't help, the officer doesn't help. The
• 1:12:54
  Speaker 1: law doesn't help. Society. It helps just elements within the
• 1:12:59
  Speaker 1: society should be conscious of that. We should learn to
• 1:13:11
  Speaker 1: hear about society. We should not paralyze our politics so
• 1:13:16
  Speaker 1: much that it takes away our civility. I watch humanity,
• 1:13:25
  Speaker 1: and I want this sense and those caught up in
• 1:13:29
  Speaker 1: this you have a room to grow. Mistakes are made.
• 1:13:40
  Speaker 1: I always say that mistakes are mistakes. If such mistakes
• 1:13:47
  Speaker 1: are acknowledged, I'm corrected. The power forgiveness, it's the hope
• 1:14:01
  Speaker 1: upon which we resked. Philosopher Prince a I, Philosopher Prince
• 1:14:12
  Speaker 1: Israe'za from the great City of Las Vegas, January ninth,
• 1:14:23
  Speaker 1: twenty twenty six. Thank you,