Latest / Clinical Deep Dives / PSYCH 165: Physical Violence on Adults

Transcript

PSYCH 165: Physical Violence on Adults · Clinical Deep Dives

0:00
SPEAKER_01: So I want you to picture this.
0:02
SPEAKER_01: You are a clinician standing in a really busy emergency department.
0:07
SPEAKER_00: Or A&E, depending on where you are training.
0:09
SPEAKER_01: Exactly.
0:11
SPEAKER_01: And a woman walks in and she's cradling a fractured wrist.
0:15
SPEAKER_01: She tells you quite simply that she lost her footing and fell down the stairs.
0:19
SPEAKER_00: Which, you know, is a common enough story on any given Tuesday.
0:23
SPEAKER_01: Right.
0:23
SPEAKER_01: It happens all the time.
0:25
SPEAKER_01: But there's a really crucial detail here.
0:28
SPEAKER_01: Her husband is standing right beside her.
0:30
SPEAKER_01: And, well, he is the one answering almost all of your questions.
0:34
SPEAKER_00: Ah, yeah.
0:35
SPEAKER_00: That is the first red flag.
0:36
SPEAKER_01: Yeah.
0:36
SPEAKER_01: And you look at her and you start to notice things.
0:40
SPEAKER_01: You notice a slight hesitation before she speaks.
0:43
SPEAKER_01: You notice his, I mean, his absolute unwavering insistence on remaining in the room.
0:48
SPEAKER_01: He is physically blocking the doorway.
0:51
SPEAKER_00: It is a very specific type of physical positioning.
0:54
SPEAKER_01: It is.
0:55
SPEAKER_01: And then you see it.
0:57
SPEAKER_01: Just a flash of genuine fear in her eyes whenever the conversation even touches on
1:02
SPEAKER_01: the prospect of returning home.
1:04
SPEAKER_00: So the fracture is visible, but the actual danger is not.
1:08
SPEAKER_00: Exactly.
1:09
SPEAKER_01: And the question becomes,
1:10
SPEAKER_01: do you treat the wrist or do you treat the invisible danger in the room?
1:14
SPEAKER_00: Well, this is arguably the defining clinical dilemma for any doctor,
1:18
SPEAKER_00: especially in psychiatry, because the wrist, you know, that is simple mechanics.
1:23
SPEAKER_00: A bone breaks, a bone heals.
1:25
SPEAKER_01: Right, and it's straightforward orthopedics.
1:27
SPEAKER_00: Exactly.
1:27
SPEAKER_00: But the invisible danger,
1:29
SPEAKER_00: that dynamic playing out right in front of you in the room,
1:32
SPEAKER_00: that is a highly complex ongoing interaction of injury,
1:36
SPEAKER_00: power, vulnerability, trauma, and, well, ultimately, survival.
1:40
SPEAKER_01: And that is exactly what we are exploring today.
1:43
SPEAKER_01: We are taking a deep dive into Kaplan and Sadoc's comprehensive textbook
1:47
SPEAKER_01: of psychiatry, specifically looking at chapter 30.3 on physical violence on adults.
1:53
SPEAKER_00: And we should clarify straight away,
1:55
SPEAKER_00: this is not just going to be us reciting textbook definitions
1:58
SPEAKER_00: or throwing dry statistics at you.
2:00
SPEAKER_01: No, absolutely not.
2:01
SPEAKER_01: Our mission here is conceptual synthesis.
2:04
SPEAKER_01: We want to help you build solid mental models,
2:06
SPEAKER_01: clarify the underlying neurobiological mechanisms,
2:09
SPEAKER_01: and really strengthen your clinical reasoning.
2:12
SPEAKER_00: We want to unpack how psychiatrists actually think when they are faced with
2:15
SPEAKER_00: that exact Baker Street scenario in the emergency department.
2:19
SPEAKER_01: So we really encourage you to read alongside the chapter as we go,
2:22
SPEAKER_01: because our anchor for this entire discussion and honestly,
2:26
SPEAKER_01: the core of psychiatry itself is the study of how the brain,
2:30
SPEAKER_01: the mind and human experience interact.
2:34
SPEAKER_00: And crucially, how that process can go terribly, terribly wrong.
2:38
SPEAKER_01: Right.
2:39
SPEAKER_01: So to really understand violence clinically, where do we start?
2:43
SPEAKER_01: Because it feels like such a massive nebulous concept.
2:46
SPEAKER_00: Well, you have to stop viewing it as a single kinetic event.
2:50
SPEAKER_00: It is not just a fist or weapon or a fall down the stairs.
2:54
SPEAKER_00: It is a deeply systemic issue.
2:57
SPEAKER_01: So it is broader than just the physical impact.
3:00
SPEAKER_00: Oh, massively broader.
3:02
SPEAKER_00: When we use the term violence in a medical or psychiatric context,
3:06
SPEAKER_00: we are casting a really wide net.
3:08
SPEAKER_00: We are talking about physical abuse,
3:10
SPEAKER_00: sexual assault, domestic violence, workplace aggression, and homicide.
3:15
SPEAKER_01: Okay, so it encompasses all of those distinct categories.
3:18
SPEAKER_00: Yes.
3:19
SPEAKER_00: And there is this fascinating,
3:20
SPEAKER_00: albeit very dark paradox here that clinicians essentially have to hold
3:24
SPEAKER_00: in their minds simultaneously.
3:26
SPEAKER_01: What is the paradox?
3:27
SPEAKER_00: On the one hand, victims span absolutely all demographics.
3:30
SPEAKER_00: You know, violence does not care about your race, your gender, your income or your postcode.
3:35
SPEAKER_01: Right.
3:35
SPEAKER_01: Nobody is entirely immune.
3:37
SPEAKER_00: Nobody.
3:38
SPEAKER_00: But on the other hand,
3:39
SPEAKER_00: there are very fixed,
3:40
SPEAKER_00: structurally ingrained risk factors for specific groups of people.
3:44
SPEAKER_01: OK, the idea that everyone is vulnerable, but some people are structurally targeted.
3:48
SPEAKER_01: What does that actually look like in the clinical data?
3:51
SPEAKER_00: Well, a really stark example is that the leading cause of death for black males in
3:54
SPEAKER_00: the United States continues to be homicide.
3:57
SPEAKER_01: Wow.
3:57
SPEAKER_01: The leading cause of death.
3:59
SPEAKER_01: Not hard disease, but homicide.
4:01
SPEAKER_00: Exactly.
4:02
SPEAKER_00: Meanwhile, women consistently remain at the absolute highest risk for lifetime sexual assault.
4:07
SPEAKER_00: And then you have occupational hazards, which are immense.
4:10
SPEAKER_01: Right.
4:11
SPEAKER_01: Depending on where you work.
4:12
SPEAKER_00: Yeah.
4:12
SPEAKER_00: I mean, if you are a sex worker,
4:14
SPEAKER_00: a bartender or a law enforcement officer,
4:16
SPEAKER_00: you are facing the threat of violence just as a routine part of your workday.
4:21
SPEAKER_00: Statistically speaking,
4:23
SPEAKER_00: most people will actually become victims of violent crime at some point
4:26
SPEAKER_00: during their lifetime.
4:27
SPEAKER_01: Wait, most?
4:28
SPEAKER_01: As in over 50% of the population will experience a violent crime?
4:32
SPEAKER_00: Yes, over 50%.
4:34
SPEAKER_01: That is just a staggering reality to conceptualize.
4:37
SPEAKER_01: I mean, if the prevalence is that high, the cost to society must be completely immeasurable.
4:43
SPEAKER_01: And I am assuming we are not just talking about the financial cost to
4:47
SPEAKER_01: the National Health Service or the broader healthcare system.
4:51
SPEAKER_00: No, not at all.
4:52
SPEAKER_00: The living consequence,
4:54
SPEAKER_00: you know,
4:54
SPEAKER_00: the morbidity, that is where the psychiatric and societal burden truly lies.
4:59
SPEAKER_01: What does that look like on an individual level?
5:02
SPEAKER_00: For an individual exposed to violence,
5:04
SPEAKER_00: it results in decreased productivity,
5:06
SPEAKER_00: profound medical disability, and very severe psychiatric sequelae.
5:11
SPEAKER_01: Right.
5:11
SPEAKER_01: The trauma lingers long after the physical wounds heal.
5:14
SPEAKER_00: Exactly.
5:15
SPEAKER_00: But if you zoom out, right,
5:17
SPEAKER_00: and look at the sociological impact,
5:19
SPEAKER_00: the mere perception of violence dictates human behavior on a mass scale.
5:24
SPEAKER_01: The perception?
5:25
SPEAKER_01: You mean just the fear of it happening?
5:27
SPEAKER_00: Yes.
5:28
SPEAKER_00: The fear alone dictates where people decide to live.
5:31
SPEAKER_00: It dictates where they raise their children or where they send them to school.
5:34
SPEAKER_01: It controls how late people stay out?
5:37
SPEAKER_00: Precisely.
5:38
SPEAKER_00: It even dictates the specific routes they take when they walk home from
5:42
SPEAKER_00: the train station or drive their cars.
5:44
SPEAKER_01: Wow.
5:45
SPEAKER_01: So violence essentially acts as this geographic and societal architect.
5:52
SPEAKER_00: That is a brilliant way to put it.
5:54
SPEAKER_00: It literally shapes the physical boundaries of a community.
5:57
SPEAKER_01: It is, like an invisible fence.
5:59
SPEAKER_01: The fear of violence is almost as powerful a force as the violence itself.
6:03
SPEAKER_00: It is.
6:04
SPEAKER_01: But, you know,
6:05
SPEAKER_01: if we were looking at this from a public health perspective,
6:08
SPEAKER_01: My immediate question is, how do we even measure this?
6:11
SPEAKER_01: I mean, if so much of it is hidden,
6:13
SPEAKER_01: like the woman with a fractured wrist who says she fell,
6:16
SPEAKER_01: how do we quantify the invisible?
6:19
SPEAKER_00: It is incredibly difficult.
6:21
SPEAKER_01: And honestly, it is a known flaw in epidemiological tracking.
6:26
SPEAKER_01: In the U.S.,
6:26
SPEAKER_01: for example,
6:27
SPEAKER_01: there are two main data collection systems used to track these assaults.
6:30
SPEAKER_00: Okay, what are they?
6:31
SPEAKER_01: You have the FBI's Uniform Crime Report,
6:33
SPEAKER_01: which is the UCR,
6:35
SPEAKER_01: and then you have the Bureau
6:36
SPEAKER_01: of Justice Statistics National Crime Victimization Survey, known as the NCVS.
6:41
SPEAKER_00: Okay, the UCR and NCVS.
6:44
SPEAKER_01: Right.
6:45
SPEAKER_00: And understanding the fundamental differences between these two is absolutely vital
6:49
SPEAKER_00: for any clinician trying to grasp the actual prevalence of trauma
6:53
SPEAKER_00: in their community.
6:54
SPEAKER_01: Let's break those down then.
6:55
SPEAKER_01: What does the UCR actually capture?
6:58
SPEAKER_01: Because if it's coming straight from the FBI,
6:59
SPEAKER_01: imagine it is strictly law enforcement data, right?
7:02
SPEAKER_00: Exactly.
7:03
SPEAKER_00: The UCR collects reported crime information strictly from local law enforcement agencies.
7:08
SPEAKER_00: So it defines violent crime as murder,
7:10
SPEAKER_00: non-negligent manslaughter, forcible rape, robbery, and aggravated assault.
7:15
SPEAKER_01: Okay, that makes sense.
7:15
SPEAKER_01: Those are the big ticket crimes.
7:17
SPEAKER_00: They are.
7:18
SPEAKER_00: But here is the critical limitation, and it is a massive one.
7:22
SPEAKER_00: It explicitly excludes simple assault.
7:25
SPEAKER_01: Hold on.
7:26
SPEAKER_01: The official federal tracker for violent crime just ignores simple assault.
7:31
SPEAKER_00: It completely ignores it in that main category.
7:35
SPEAKER_01: How is simple assault even defined in this context then?
7:37
SPEAKER_01: Because it sounds like it shouldn't be ignored.
7:39
SPEAKER_00: Well, in the UCR framework,
7:41
SPEAKER_00: simple assault is an assault or an attempted assault where no weapon was used
7:46
SPEAKER_00: or no serious medically documented injury occurred to the victim.
7:50
SPEAKER_01: Wait, so what does that actually include?
7:52
SPEAKER_00: It includes things like stalking, intimidating, coercing, and hazing.
7:57
SPEAKER_00: None of that is captured in the primary violent crime statistics of the UCR.
8:01
SPEAKER_01: That sounds like a massive loophole.
8:03
SPEAKER_01: So just to be clear,
8:06
SPEAKER_01: if I am repeatedly stalked,
8:07
SPEAKER_01: harassed,
8:08
SPEAKER_01: and intimidated by a former partner,
8:11
SPEAKER_01: but they haven't literally stabbed me or broken my jaw,
8:14
SPEAKER_01: the system essentially views me as invisible.
8:16
SPEAKER_00: Yes.
8:17
SPEAKER_00: Completely invisible to that specific headline metric.
8:21
SPEAKER_01: That is wild.
8:23
SPEAKER_01: The UCR just ignores that daily reality for millions of people.
8:26
SPEAKER_00: It does.
8:27
SPEAKER_00: Which is exactly why...
8:29
SPEAKER_00: Relying solely on police data gives clinicians and policymakers a highly skewed,
8:34
SPEAKER_00: overly sanitized view of societal violence.
8:37
SPEAKER_01: Okay, so that is where the second system comes in, I assume, this survey?
8:41
SPEAKER_00: Yes, the NCVS.
8:42
SPEAKER_00: This is a survey that generates estimates based directly on victim reports.
8:47
SPEAKER_00: It surveys households directly,
8:49
SPEAKER_00: attempting to capture the true likelihood of victimization from the public.
8:53
SPEAKER_01: So it bypasses the police entirely.
8:54
SPEAKER_00: Exactly.
8:55
SPEAKER_00: Which helps catch things that are never,
8:57
SPEAKER_00: ever reported to the police,
8:58
SPEAKER_00: including those millions of simple assaults we just talked about.
9:01
SPEAKER_01: Okay.
9:02
SPEAKER_01: So if I am building a mental model here,
9:05
SPEAKER_01: the UCR is sort of like looking at a hospital's surgical admissions, right?
9:09
SPEAKER_01: Where you only see the most severe documented cases that actually made it through
9:13
SPEAKER_01: the front doors.
9:14
SPEAKER_00: Spot on.
9:15
SPEAKER_01: And the NCVS is more like pulling the community to see who is quietly suffering
9:21
SPEAKER_01: at home with a fever.
9:23
SPEAKER_00: That is a perfect analogy.
9:25
SPEAKER_01: But wait,
9:26
SPEAKER_01: if the NCVS relies solely on the victims filling out a survey,
9:30
SPEAKER_01: aren't we completely missing the perpetrators in that data?
9:33
SPEAKER_00: Ah, you have hit the nail right on the head.
9:36
SPEAKER_00: That is the exact epidemiological limitation we face.
9:40
SPEAKER_01: Right, because perpetrators aren't filling out surveys saying, yes, I intimidated my wife today.
9:44
SPEAKER_00: Exactly.
9:45
SPEAKER_00: The UCR excludes data from assaults that do not result in an arrest,
9:50
SPEAKER_00: and the NCVS is based primarily on the victim's incident report.
9:54
SPEAKER_01: So it is completely lopsided.
9:56
SPEAKER_00: It is.
9:57
SPEAKER_00: While the NCVS is excellent for defining the victim's characteristics and
10:01
SPEAKER_00: the frequency of the trauma, it cannot be used accurately to define the offender.
10:06
SPEAKER_00: We have a highly developed tool for surveying victimization,
10:10
SPEAKER_00: but we do not have an equivalent tool for surveying offending.
10:14
SPEAKER_01: That is a huge blind spot.
10:16
SPEAKER_00: It gets worse.
10:17
SPEAKER_00: Incident data from victims cannot control for a situation where
10:20
SPEAKER_00: a single offender has assaulted multiple victims.
10:23
SPEAKER_01: Oh, I see.
10:24
SPEAKER_01: So if one person goes on a spree and assaults 10 people...
10:27
SPEAKER_00: The survey might make it look like there are 10 separate violent offenders operating
10:32
SPEAKER_00: in the community, when in reality, there is only one highly active predator.
10:36
SPEAKER_00: It skews the epidemiology significantly.
10:39
SPEAKER_01: Which means we are essentially always looking at the shadow of the perpetrator,
10:43
SPEAKER_01: never the actual person.
10:45
SPEAKER_01: We are just measuring the dents they leave in society.
10:48
SPEAKER_00: That is exactly what we are doing.
10:50
SPEAKER_01: But let's look at the numbers we do have, imperfect as they are.
10:54
SPEAKER_01: What is the actual prevalence we are dealing with here?
10:57
SPEAKER_00: Well, looking at a recent representative year,
10:59
SPEAKER_00: let's say 2019,
11:01
SPEAKER_00: there were an estimated 5.8 million violent crimes in the United States.
11:05
SPEAKER_01: 5.8 million.
11:06
SPEAKER_01: Okay.
11:07
SPEAKER_00: To break that down,
11:08
SPEAKER_00: aggravated assaults accounted for about 1 million and robberies for roughly 534,000.
11:15
SPEAKER_00: But those simple assaults we mentioned,
11:17
SPEAKER_00: the ones excluded from the main UCR violent crime category,
11:21
SPEAKER_00: they accounted for an estimated 3.8 million.
11:24
SPEAKER_01: 3.8 million simple assaults.
11:27
SPEAKER_01: That is an absolute epidemic of intimidation,
11:31
SPEAKER_01: stalking,
11:31
SPEAKER_01: and non-aggravated physical violence
11:34
SPEAKER_01: that law enforcement statistics fundamentally sidelined.
11:37
SPEAKER_00: Yes, it is a massive hidden burden.
11:41
SPEAKER_00: However, it is worth noting a positive trend here.
11:44
SPEAKER_01: Okay, some good news?
11:46
SPEAKER_00: I will take it.
11:46
SPEAKER_00: From 1993 to 2019,
11:49
SPEAKER_00: the rate of violent victimization,
11:51
SPEAKER_00: excluding simple assault, declined by a staggering 75%.
11:55
SPEAKER_00: 75%?
11:55
SPEAKER_00: That is a huge drop.
11:55
SPEAKER_00: Why did that happen?
12:00
SPEAKER_00: There has been a massive increase in education,
12:03
SPEAKER_00: community resources,
12:05
SPEAKER_00: domestic violence shelters and preventative measures that have genuinely moved
12:09
SPEAKER_00: the needle over the last two decades.
12:10
SPEAKER_00: So interventions do work.
12:12
SPEAKER_01: That is genuinely encouraging.
12:14
SPEAKER_01: But I want to go back to what you said earlier about fixed risk factors.
12:18
SPEAKER_01: When we break down that 5.8 million, who is carrying the heaviest burden?
12:23
SPEAKER_01: Because we already established that violence isn't distributed evenly across the population.
12:27
SPEAKER_00: No, it certainly isn't.
12:28
SPEAKER_00: Generally speaking, males are more likely to experience violent crime overall than females.
12:33
SPEAKER_01: Really?
12:34
SPEAKER_01: Overall violent crime is higher for men?
12:36
SPEAKER_00: Yes.
12:37
SPEAKER_00: Mostly driven by stranger assaults and gang-related violence.
12:40
SPEAKER_00: However, when we look at specific intersections of identity, the disparities become glaring.
12:45
SPEAKER_01: What kind of intersections?
12:46
SPEAKER_00: For instance,
12:47
SPEAKER_00: LGBTQ individuals are nearly four times more likely to be victims
12:51
SPEAKER_00: of violent crime compared to the general population.
12:54
SPEAKER_00: They experience higher rates in almost all types of violent crimes.
12:57
SPEAKER_01: Four times higher.
12:59
SPEAKER_01: That is a massive structural vulnerability.
13:01
SPEAKER_01: What about age?
13:03
SPEAKER_00: Age is a massive factor.
13:04
SPEAKER_00: Those younger than 25 are at the absolute highest risk.
13:08
SPEAKER_01: And what about racial and ethnic demographics?
13:11
SPEAKER_01: Because systemic vulnerabilities usually show up very clearly in these particular statistics.
13:16
SPEAKER_00: They do.
13:16
SPEAKER_00: The data shows that persons of two or more races,
13:19
SPEAKER_00: as well as American Indians and Alaska Natives,
13:22
SPEAKER_00: are the demographic groups most at risk for experiencing violent crime overall.
13:26
SPEAKER_01: Okay, so multiracial and indigenous populations carry the highest overall risk.
13:30
SPEAKER_00: Yes.
13:31
SPEAKER_00: Black and Hispanic groups have higher rates than white groups,
13:34
SPEAKER_00: while Asians generally have the lowest rate of any group in the U.S. data.
13:39
SPEAKER_01: And I imagine wealth or income plays a part in this?
13:42
SPEAKER_00: A huge part.
13:43
SPEAKER_00: Socioeconomic status is deeply entwined with risk.
13:47
SPEAKER_00: Lower income households are vastly more likely to be burglarized.
13:50
SPEAKER_00: Homelessness is a major driving factor in increased physical assaults.
13:54
SPEAKER_00: And substance abuse consistently increases the risk of victimization across multiple studies.
13:59
SPEAKER_01: It really is a perfect storm of vulnerability, isn't it?
14:03
SPEAKER_01: If you lack financial resources,
14:05
SPEAKER_01: housing security or social capital, you basically become a magnet for victimization.
14:11
SPEAKER_00: Unfortunately, yes.
14:13
SPEAKER_00: The system fails those who need it most.
14:16
SPEAKER_01: I want to pivot now to a topic
14:18
SPEAKER_01: that requires incredibly nuanced clinical understanding,
14:22
SPEAKER_01: and that is rape and sexual assault.
14:25
SPEAKER_01: Because the disparity between what actually happens,
14:28
SPEAKER_01: what is reported to the police, and how society perceives it is just jarring.
14:34
SPEAKER_00: It is one of the most misunderstood areas in medicine and law.
14:38
SPEAKER_01: Let's start with the definitions.
14:40
SPEAKER_01: How does the medical and legal establishment actually define this?
14:44
SPEAKER_00: Well, the exact legal definition varies by jurisdiction,
14:47
SPEAKER_00: obviously,
14:47
SPEAKER_00: but the UCR standardizes it for reporting purposes as, quote,
14:51
SPEAKER_00: penetration,
14:52
SPEAKER_00: no matter how slight,
14:53
SPEAKER_00: of the vagina or anus with any body part or object or oral penetration by
14:58
SPEAKER_00: a sex organ of another person without the consent of the victim.
15:02
SPEAKER_01: OK, so that is the strict legal threshold for rape.
15:06
SPEAKER_00: Right.
15:07
SPEAKER_00: Clinically,
15:08
SPEAKER_00: rape refers to forced oral,
15:10
SPEAKER_00: vaginal,
15:10
SPEAKER_00: or anal penetration,
15:11
SPEAKER_00: while sexual assault is a much broader umbrella term referring
15:15
SPEAKER_00: to any forced sexual contact whatsoever.
15:18
SPEAKER_01: And the prevalence of this is notoriously difficult to track, right?
15:21
SPEAKER_00: Extremely difficult.
15:23
SPEAKER_00: And that is primarily due to immense underreporting.
15:27
SPEAKER_01: How immense are we talking?
15:28
SPEAKER_00: The Rape, Abuse,
15:29
SPEAKER_00: and Incest National Network, RAINN,
15:31
SPEAKER_00: and the NCVS estimate that nearly 70% of sexual assaults go completely unreported
15:37
SPEAKER_00: to law
15:37
SPEAKER_01: enforcement.
15:39
SPEAKER_01: 70%.
15:40
SPEAKER_00: So the police only even hear about 30% of cases?
15:43
SPEAKER_01: Exactly.
15:44
SPEAKER_00: Over a recent five-year period, there were over 460,000 victims aged 12 or older each year.
15:50
SPEAKER_00: But in 2019, for example, only about 139,000 rapes were actually reported to law enforcement.
15:57
SPEAKER_01: So the vast majority of survivors are just suffering in total silence.
16:00
SPEAKER_00: Yes.
16:01
SPEAKER_00: But this is where we really need to look deeper into the psychology of trauma
16:05
SPEAKER_00: because there is a concept here
16:06
SPEAKER_00: that clinicians absolutely must understand called unacknowledged assault.
16:11
SPEAKER_01: Unacknowledged assault.
16:13
SPEAKER_00: Yeah.
16:13
SPEAKER_01: Okay.
16:14
SPEAKER_01: Can you explain what that means?
16:15
SPEAKER_01: Because on its face, it sounds almost contradictory.
16:18
SPEAKER_01: How can an assault be unacknowledged by the very person who experienced it?
16:22
SPEAKER_00: This is perhaps one of the most vital concepts for any clinician,
16:25
SPEAKER_00: you know, interacting with trauma survivors to grasp.
16:28
SPEAKER_00: In addition to being underreported to the authorities,
16:31
SPEAKER_00: research shows that more than 50% of sexual assaults are not even acknowledged
16:36
SPEAKER_00: as such by the victims themselves.
16:38
SPEAKER_01: Over 50%.
16:39
SPEAKER_01: Wait, I need us to really impact this.
16:42
SPEAKER_01: You are saying that more than half of the people who experience an event
16:45
SPEAKER_01: that strictly meets the legal and clinical criteria
16:49
SPEAKER_01: for rape do not believe they were raped.
16:52
SPEAKER_00: That is exactly what the data shows.
16:54
SPEAKER_00: When they are surveyed or interviewed by clinicians,
16:57
SPEAKER_00: they will describe a sequence of events that is definitively,
17:01
SPEAKER_00: legally a sexual assault.
17:04
SPEAKER_00: But they will refer to it using very benign terms.
17:07
SPEAKER_01: Like what?
17:08
SPEAKER_01: What do they call it?
17:09
SPEAKER_00: They will call it a misunderstanding.
17:12
SPEAKER_00: Or they will say it was just a bad night or poor communication.
17:15
SPEAKER_00: Often they will say, well, things just went too far.
17:18
SPEAKER_00: They cognitively reframe the trauma to avoid using the label of rape.
17:23
SPEAKER_01: Why does the human mind do that?
17:24
SPEAKER_01: Why minimize its own trauma so drastically?
17:28
SPEAKER_01: Is it a conscious lie or is it some sort of subconscious survival mechanism?
17:33
SPEAKER_00: It is a profound,
17:34
SPEAKER_00: largely subconscious psychological defense mechanism,
17:37
SPEAKER_00: and it is heavily, heavily driven by societal conditioning.
17:41
SPEAKER_01: What do you mean by societal conditioning?
17:44
SPEAKER_00: We are all raised with a very specific, almost cinematic script of what rape looks like.
17:49
SPEAKER_00: Society teaches us that true rape involves a stranger,
17:52
SPEAKER_00: a dark alley,
17:54
SPEAKER_00: a weapon,
17:55
SPEAKER_00: and a high degree of physical force where the victim fights back violently.
17:58
SPEAKER_01: Right, the classic stranger danger myth that we are taught as kids.
18:02
SPEAKER_00: Exactly.
18:03
SPEAKER_00: And because their actual lived experience doesn't match
18:05
SPEAKER_00: that rigid cinematic stereotype,
18:08
SPEAKER_00: their brain resolves the cognitive dissonance by assuming...
18:11
SPEAKER_00: Well, I wasn't dragged into an alley by a stranger with a knife,
18:14
SPEAKER_00: so what happened to me must not have been rape.
18:17
SPEAKER_01: It is a way to make the event less terrifying.
18:19
SPEAKER_00: Yes, but there is an even deeper psychological layer here,
18:23
SPEAKER_00: which is known clinically as betrayal trauma.
18:26
SPEAKER_01: Betrayal trauma.
18:27
SPEAKER_00: Mm hmm.
18:27
SPEAKER_01: OK, how does that fit in?
18:29
SPEAKER_00: Well, think about it.
18:30
SPEAKER_00: If you acknowledge that you were assaulted by someone,
18:32
SPEAKER_00: you know,
18:32
SPEAKER_00: perhaps someone you deeply care about,
18:35
SPEAKER_00: someone you financially depend on or someone you have to see
18:38
SPEAKER_00: at university every single day.
18:40
SPEAKER_00: That is an ego shattering realization.
18:43
SPEAKER_01: Because it destroys your entire support system.
18:45
SPEAKER_00: Exactly.
18:46
SPEAKER_00: It requires you to entirely rebuild your fundamental understanding of safety
18:50
SPEAKER_00: and trust in the world.
18:51
SPEAKER_00: It is often psychologically much easier for the brain to minimize the event as just
18:56
SPEAKER_00: a bad night than to face the terrifying reality that someone you trusted is actually
19:00
SPEAKER_00: a predator.
19:01
SPEAKER_01: That makes a tragic kind of sense, really.
19:06
SPEAKER_01: If you acknowledge it, you essentially have to burn your whole world down.
19:10
SPEAKER_01: You have to report it, face the social fallout, reevaluate every relationship you have.
19:15
SPEAKER_00: It is an immense burden.
19:18
SPEAKER_01: So the brain builds a protective partition, which brings us right to the perpetrators.
19:25
SPEAKER_01: We just mentioned the stranger myth.
19:27
SPEAKER_01: How often is a sexual assault actually committed by a stranger?
19:31
SPEAKER_01: Let's look at the numbers.
19:33
SPEAKER_00: The data thoroughly dismantles the stranger myth.
19:36
SPEAKER_00: Rarely is it a stranger.
19:38
SPEAKER_00: Nearly two thirds of all sexual assaults are committed by someone known to the victim.
19:43
SPEAKER_01: Two thirds.
19:43
SPEAKER_00: Yes.
19:45
SPEAKER_00: Non-strangers commit approximately 73 percent of all sexual assaults and 66 percent
19:50
SPEAKER_00: of completed rapes.
19:51
SPEAKER_00: The perpetrator is usually a friend, an acquaintance, a colleague or an intimate partner.
19:57
SPEAKER_01: So the betrayal of trust isn't just a byproduct.
20:00
SPEAKER_01: It is central to the trauma.
20:02
SPEAKER_00: It is the defining characteristic for the vast majority of survivors.
20:06
SPEAKER_01: Let's look at the demographics of the victims here.
20:08
SPEAKER_01: Who is carrying this specific risk for sexual assault?
20:12
SPEAKER_00: While females are overwhelmingly the primary victims,
20:15
SPEAKER_00: it is critical for clinicians to note that greater than 10% of victims are estimated
20:19
SPEAKER_00: to be male.
20:20
SPEAKER_01: 10%?
20:21
SPEAKER_01: 10%.
20:22
SPEAKER_01: That is higher than society generally acknowledges.
20:25
SPEAKER_00: It is.
20:26
SPEAKER_00: And most experts agree that males underreport at vastly higher rates
20:29
SPEAKER_00: than females do,
20:30
SPEAKER_00: often due to toxic masculine stigmas regarding victimization and perceived weakness.
20:35
SPEAKER_01: Right.
20:36
SPEAKER_01: The societal shame is a massive barrier.
20:39
SPEAKER_01: What about the highest risk groups overall?
20:41
SPEAKER_00: Looking at the highest risk groups,
20:43
SPEAKER_00: females between 16 and 19 years of age have four times the risk
20:47
SPEAKER_00: of any other demographic group.
20:49
SPEAKER_01: 16 to 19.
20:50
SPEAKER_01: That
20:50
SPEAKER_00: is so young.
20:51
SPEAKER_01: That's so young.
20:52
SPEAKER_00: 80% of all rape victims are younger than 30.
20:55
SPEAKER_00: Furthermore, Native Americans remain at a massive disproportionate risk of sexual violence.
21:01
SPEAKER_01: And what about in educational settings?
21:04
SPEAKER_01: Like universities?
21:05
SPEAKER_00: Looking at university populations specifically,
21:08
SPEAKER_00: an estimated 21% of TGQN,
21:11
SPEAKER_00: that stands for transgender,
21:13
SPEAKER_00: genderqueer, or nonconforming college students, have been sexually assaulted.
21:17
SPEAKER_01: 21%?
21:17
SPEAKER_01: Over one in five?
21:20
SPEAKER_00: Yes, compared to 18% of non-TGQN females and 4% of non-TGQN males.
21:26
SPEAKER_01: That highlights exactly what we discussed earlier,
21:29
SPEAKER_01: the intersection of systemic vulnerability, identity, and violence.
21:33
SPEAKER_01: And presumably a history of childhood abuse or previous assault acts as a multiplier here?
21:38
SPEAKER_00: Absolutely.
21:40
SPEAKER_00: A history of childhood sexual abuse
21:41
SPEAKER_00: or previous physical assault significantly increases the statistical likelihood
21:46
SPEAKER_00: of further assault in adulthood.
21:47
SPEAKER_01: Why is that?
21:49
SPEAKER_01: Why does trauma attract trauma?
21:51
SPEAKER_00: Often because the early developmental trauma fundamentally disrupts the development
21:56
SPEAKER_00: of boundaries,
21:57
SPEAKER_00: self-worth, and the cognitive ability to detect predatory behavior early on.
22:02
SPEAKER_00: The radar is essentially broken.
22:04
SPEAKER_01: Okay, so we have established that the perpetrator is most often someone known to the victim.
22:09
SPEAKER_01: I want to shift our focus now to the environment where that familiarity is
22:12
SPEAKER_01: at its absolute highest, which is domestic violence and intimate partner violence.
22:18
SPEAKER_00: A vital area for psychiatrists.
22:20
SPEAKER_01: Let's really dissect the mechanics of how this works.
22:23
SPEAKER_01: How is domestic violence defined clinically,
22:26
SPEAKER_01: separate from just a random physical assault by an acquaintance?
22:29
SPEAKER_00: The defining characteristic of domestic violence is intent.
22:33
SPEAKER_00: It is defined clinically as a pattern of abusive behavior in any relationship with
22:38
SPEAKER_00: the specific intent to gain power or control.
22:41
SPEAKER_01: Power and control.
22:43
SPEAKER_00: Not just anger.
22:44
SPEAKER_01: Exactly.
22:45
SPEAKER_00: That is the engine driving the entire dynamic.
22:48
SPEAKER_00: Power and control over another human being.
22:51
SPEAKER_00: It is not simply a sudden loss of temper.
22:53
SPEAKER_00: It is a systematic, calculated subjugation.
22:57
SPEAKER_01: And it isn't always physical, right?
22:59
SPEAKER_00: No.
23:00
SPEAKER_00: It can be physical, sexual, emotional, economic, or psychological.
23:05
SPEAKER_00: And it can be directed toward children, elders, or partners.
23:08
SPEAKER_00: Intimate partner violence or IPV is domestic violence specifically perpetrated by
23:14
SPEAKER_00: a current or former partner or spouse.
23:16
SPEAKER_01: And the CDC breaks IPV down into specific subtypes, right?
23:20
SPEAKER_01: I think I've seen a framework for this.
23:22
SPEAKER_00: Yes, they outline four main subtypes.
23:24
SPEAKER_00: You have physical violence, sexual violence, stalking, and psychological aggression.
23:29
SPEAKER_01: Okay.
23:30
SPEAKER_00: In clinical settings, you will also frequently hear it categorized by severity.
23:34
SPEAKER_00: So high severity abuse involves weapons, burning, choking, or broken bones.
23:40
SPEAKER_01: And low severity?
23:42
SPEAKER_00: Low severity abuse involves acts like slapping,
23:44
SPEAKER_00: hitting, or kicking without major injury, but resulting in bruising or minor cuts.
23:50
SPEAKER_01: I'd have to say calling being slapped or kicked
23:52
SPEAKER_01: by your partner low severity feels like a total oxymoron.
23:56
SPEAKER_00: It is a controversial clinical term.
23:58
SPEAKER_01: Right, because the psychological terror of being hit by the person you sleep next
24:01
SPEAKER_01: to is profound, regardless of whether a bone actually breaks.
24:06
SPEAKER_01: What are the numbers here?
24:07
SPEAKER_01: How common is IPV?
24:09
SPEAKER_00: The statistics are sobering.
24:11
SPEAKER_00: One consistent finding across multiple epidemiological studies is
24:14
SPEAKER_00: that nearly 30 percent of women and 10 percent of men in
24:18
SPEAKER_00: the United States have experienced some form of physical or sexual abuse from
24:22
SPEAKER_00: an intimate partner in their lifetime.
24:24
SPEAKER_01: Nearly one in three women.
24:27
SPEAKER_01: I mean, think about that.
24:28
SPEAKER_01: That means any clinician in literally any specialty is seeing survivors
24:32
SPEAKER_01: of IPV every single day, whether they realize it or not.
24:35
SPEAKER_00: Absolutely.
24:37
SPEAKER_00: They are in the waiting room right now.
24:39
SPEAKER_01: So if I am a doctor trying to identify who might be a risk, how do I conceptualize that?
24:44
SPEAKER_01: I can't just guess.
24:45
SPEAKER_00: The most effective way to conceptualize IPV risk is through an ecological model.
24:50
SPEAKER_00: You basically map the risk factors across three distinct overlapping levels,
24:55
SPEAKER_00: individual, relationship, and community.
24:58
SPEAKER_01: Okay.
24:59
SPEAKER_01: Walk me through that ecological model.
25:01
SPEAKER_01: What am I looking for at the individual level?
25:04
SPEAKER_00: At the individual level,
25:05
SPEAKER_00: risk factors include being of younger age,
25:08
SPEAKER_00: having a low income,
25:09
SPEAKER_00: substance use,
25:11
SPEAKER_00: history of exposure to violence as a child,
25:14
SPEAKER_00: and notably having traits of borderline or antisocial personality disorder.
25:18
SPEAKER_01: Okay, that makes sense.
25:20
SPEAKER_00: But one of the most critical
25:21
SPEAKER_00: and honestly most often overlooked individual risk factors is pregnancy.
25:26
SPEAKER_01: Wait, pregnancy?
25:28
SPEAKER_01: Pregnancy actively increases the risk of being abused?
25:32
SPEAKER_00: Yes.
25:33
SPEAKER_01: That is horrific.
25:34
SPEAKER_01: Why would a vulnerable state like pregnancy trigger violence?
25:37
SPEAKER_00: It is deeply distressing.
25:39
SPEAKER_00: The prevailing clinical theory is that pregnancy fundamentally shifts the focus,
25:44
SPEAKER_00: the attention, and the resources away from the abuser.
25:46
SPEAKER_01: Oh, I see.
25:48
SPEAKER_00: The abuser's need for absolute undivided control is threatened by
25:52
SPEAKER_00: the impending arrival of a child.
25:54
SPEAKER_00: And their pathological jealousy can manifest
25:57
SPEAKER_00: as physical violence directed specifically at the pregnant partner.
26:01
SPEAKER_00: It is a vital red flag for obstetricians and general practitioners to be hyper aware of.
26:07
SPEAKER_01: That is vital context.
26:09
SPEAKER_01: Okay, what about the second level, the relationship level?
26:12
SPEAKER_00: Relationship risk factors include severe marital discord and instability,
26:16
SPEAKER_00: extreme economic stressors,
26:18
SPEAKER_00: a male partner having multiple partners,
26:20
SPEAKER_00: and strict, rigid male dominance within the family structure.
26:24
SPEAKER_01: Where the balance of power is inherently skewed from the start.
26:26
SPEAKER_00: Exactly.
26:27
SPEAKER_01: And if we zoom out to the final level, the community or societal level.
26:32
SPEAKER_00: There we see environmental pressures acting as massive catalysts.
26:36
SPEAKER_00: Poverty,
26:37
SPEAKER_00: chronic overcrowding,
26:38
SPEAKER_00: a cultural or local acceptance of IPV,
26:41
SPEAKER_00: a lack of legal and social sanctions against abusers,
26:44
SPEAKER_00: and rigid traditional gender norms.
26:46
SPEAKER_00: They all play significant roles in fostering an environment
26:49
SPEAKER_00: where domestic violence can basically thrive unchecked.
26:53
SPEAKER_01: This brings us to a really crucial clinical insight.
26:56
SPEAKER_01: We know what drives the violence, that need for power and control.
27:00
SPEAKER_01: But who are the people actually committing these acts?
27:04
SPEAKER_00: It is a really important question.
27:06
SPEAKER_01: Because the clinical literature outlines two very distinct typologies of the abuser.
27:11
SPEAKER_01: And I think this is absolutely critical for understanding how perpetrators operate,
27:15
SPEAKER_01: especially when they can present so differently in public versus private.
27:20
SPEAKER_01: Can you break those two typologies down?
27:22
SPEAKER_00: Yes, understanding the typology of the abuser is essential for accurate risk assessment.
27:27
SPEAKER_00: While human behavior is always a spectrum, perpetrators generally fall into two main typologies.
27:33
SPEAKER_00: The first is described clinically as the emotionally dependent abuser.
27:38
SPEAKER_01: Emotionally dependent.
27:39
SPEAKER_01: I mean, that almost sounds sympathetic.
27:40
SPEAKER_01: What does that actually mean in practice?
27:43
SPEAKER_00: Do not let the term fool you.
27:44
SPEAKER_00: They are incredibly dangerous.
27:46
SPEAKER_01: Right.
27:46
SPEAKER_01: Noted.
27:47
SPEAKER_00: This individual exhibits a high level of jealousy,
27:50
SPEAKER_00: profound interpersonal dependency, pervasive anger, and very low self-esteem.
27:55
SPEAKER_00: They are highly prone to interpreting their partner's normal,
27:57
SPEAKER_00: everyday behavior as a profound betrayal.
28:00
SPEAKER_01: Normal behavior like what?
28:02
SPEAKER_00: Like talking to a male friend at a party or just being 10 minutes late coming home from work.
28:07
SPEAKER_00: They perceive it as an impending abandonment.
28:10
SPEAKER_00: That intense internal anxiety and fear of abandonment rapidly explodes
28:14
SPEAKER_00: into outward physical violence.
28:17
SPEAKER_01: So to use an analogy,
28:18
SPEAKER_01: the emotionally dependent type is essentially like a pressure cooker, right?
28:22
SPEAKER_01: They are boiling over from internal anxiety,
28:25
SPEAKER_01: perceived slights,
28:26
SPEAKER_01: and this pathological jealousy until the valve finally blows and they strike out.
28:31
SPEAKER_00: That is a very accurate analogy.
28:33
SPEAKER_00: They are highly, highly reactive.
28:36
SPEAKER_01: Okay, what is the second type?
28:38
SPEAKER_00: Now the second type is entirely different.
28:40
SPEAKER_00: This is the antisocial or narcissistic individual.
28:43
SPEAKER_00: This profile is characterized by an absolute lack of empathy
28:47
SPEAKER_00: and deeply ingrained hostile attitudes towards women.
28:50
SPEAKER_01: Okay, so less about anxiety and more about hostility?
28:54
SPEAKER_00: Yes.
28:54
SPEAKER_00: And here is the most chilling physiological difference that clinicians must understand.
28:59
SPEAKER_00: Unlike the pressure cooker,
29:00
SPEAKER_00: these abusers actually become less physiologically aroused
29:04
SPEAKER_00: as their violence escalates.
29:05
SPEAKER_01: That is utterly terrifying.
29:07
SPEAKER_00: It is.
29:07
SPEAKER_01: So if the first type is a pressure cooker, the second type is an ice storm.
29:12
SPEAKER_01: As they start hitting, manipulating or strangling their partner, the heart rate actually drops.
29:17
SPEAKER_01: They get colder and calmer the more violent they become.
29:20
SPEAKER_00: Precisely.
29:21
SPEAKER_00: It is a predatory, highly calculated violence.
29:24
SPEAKER_00: The autonomic nervous system response is essentially blunted.
29:28
SPEAKER_00: Clinically,
29:28
SPEAKER_00: it is also worth noting that this second group,
29:30
SPEAKER_00: the antisocial narcissistic type,
29:33
SPEAKER_00: has the absolute highest rates of comorbid alcohol dependence.
29:36
SPEAKER_01: That makes sense.
29:37
SPEAKER_00: But despite these differing internal mechanisms,
29:39
SPEAKER_00: both typologies share very specific, overt behavioral traits.
29:44
SPEAKER_01: And what are the common denominators between the two?
29:46
SPEAKER_01: Because they seem so different internally.
29:48
SPEAKER_00: Both types exhibit severe verbal abuse.
29:50
SPEAKER_01: Right.
29:51
SPEAKER_00: Both project blame entirely onto the victim.
29:54
SPEAKER_01: Right.
29:54
SPEAKER_01: Look what you made me do.
29:55
SPEAKER_00: Exactly.
29:56
SPEAKER_00: It is never the abuser's fault they lost control.
29:59
SPEAKER_00: It is the victim's fault for provoking them.
30:01
SPEAKER_00: Both objectify the victim,
30:03
SPEAKER_00: viewing them as property rather than an autonomous person,
30:06
SPEAKER_00: and both strategically and systematically isolate the victim
30:09
SPEAKER_00: from their social support networks.
30:11
SPEAKER_01: Cutting off friends and family to ensure total dependence.
30:14
SPEAKER_00: Yes.
30:15
SPEAKER_00: Isolation is key to control.
30:17
SPEAKER_01: And crucially,
30:18
SPEAKER_01: as we saw with the husband in the emergency department at the start of the show,
30:22
SPEAKER_01: both types can be incredibly charming to outsiders.
30:24
SPEAKER_00: Yes.
30:25
SPEAKER_00: Abusers in both categories are frequently noted to possess highly manipulative personalities.
30:30
SPEAKER_00: They can be charismatic,
30:32
SPEAKER_00: exceptionally helpful,
30:33
SPEAKER_00: and perfectly polite in public whilst being profoundly cruel,
30:37
SPEAKER_00: controlling, and hostile in private.
30:39
SPEAKER_01: Which is exactly why clinicians cannot just rely on their gut feeling about
30:43
SPEAKER_01: an accompanying partner in the waiting room.
30:45
SPEAKER_00: Never trust the gut feeling over the clinical signs.
30:47
SPEAKER_00: You have to look at the power dynamics actually playing out in the room.
30:51
SPEAKER_01: Absolutely.
30:53
SPEAKER_01: Okay, I want to pivot now to a completely different environment, and that is the workplace.
30:58
SPEAKER_01: Because everything we have just discussed regarding sexual assault
31:01
SPEAKER_01: and domestic violence centers heavily on the perpetrator being known to the victim.
31:06
SPEAKER_01: But workplace violence seems to be a massive statistical anomaly in the data.
31:10
SPEAKER_00: It is a striking contrast.
31:12
SPEAKER_00: Workplace violence encompasses simple assault,
31:15
SPEAKER_00: aggravated assault, robbery, rape, and homicide occurring at work or whilst on duty.
31:21
SPEAKER_00: Between 2007 and 2015,
31:23
SPEAKER_00: there were an estimated 10.3 million acts of workplace violence,
31:27
SPEAKER_00: accounting for about 22% of all non-fatal violent crimes.
31:31
SPEAKER_01: 22%.
31:32
SPEAKER_01: That is a huge slice of the pie.
31:34
SPEAKER_01: But the profile of the perpetrator and the victim is entirely different here, isn't it?
31:40
SPEAKER_00: Completely different.
31:41
SPEAKER_00: Unlike other violent crimes where minority groups often face higher risks,
31:45
SPEAKER_00: workplace crime victimization rates are actually higher among whites
31:48
SPEAKER_00: than other races.
31:49
SPEAKER_01: Okay, that is a shift.
31:50
SPEAKER_01: And the perpetrators?
31:52
SPEAKER_00: When we look at perpetrators, gender remains consistent.
31:55
SPEAKER_00: Four-fifths of all violent workplace crimes are committed by men.
31:58
SPEAKER_00: The offender's race is most often white at 55%, followed by black at 30%.
32:03
SPEAKER_00: But the most glaring fundamental difference is the relationship between the attacker
32:07
SPEAKER_00: and the victim.
32:08
SPEAKER_01: Right.
32:09
SPEAKER_01: Because in IPV and sexual assault,
32:12
SPEAKER_01: we established that the stranger is the myth, but in the workplace...
32:16
SPEAKER_00: In the workplace, the stranger is the reality.
32:19
SPEAKER_00: Violence is most often perpetrated by complete strangers, about 53% of the time.
32:24
SPEAKER_00: Only 12% is committed by casual acquaintances and a mere 1% by known intimates.
32:29
SPEAKER_01: So stranger danger is actually a valid concept, but really only if you are at work.
32:35
SPEAKER_01: Why is that?
32:36
SPEAKER_00: Because workplace violence is often secondary to another crime.
32:39
SPEAKER_01: Like what?
32:40
SPEAKER_00: Like a robbery at a retail store or a petrol station.
32:43
SPEAKER_00: Or it is related to the specific duties of interacting with a highly unpredictable public.
32:49
SPEAKER_00: The risk is highly, highly correlated with your specific occupation.
32:53
SPEAKER_00: Law enforcement, predictably, is at high risk, constituting 19% of all workplace assaults.
32:59
SPEAKER_00: Bartenders have an exceedingly high rate.
33:02
SPEAKER_01: Dealing with intoxicated strangers.
33:04
SPEAKER_00: Exactly.
33:04
SPEAKER_00: But there are two specific fields that stand out as glaring exceptions to this stranger rule.
33:10
SPEAKER_01: Let me guess.
33:11
SPEAKER_01: Fields where you are required to have prolonged, emotionally volatile contact with people.
33:17
SPEAKER_01: Mental health and education.
33:19
SPEAKER_00: You are spot on.
33:20
SPEAKER_00: Mental health fields have a very high victimization rate of 20.5 per 1,000 workers.
33:25
SPEAKER_00: High school teachers are at 13.5 per 1,000.
33:28
SPEAKER_01: And the exception is who is attacking them, right?
33:31
SPEAKER_00: Yes.
33:32
SPEAKER_00: These two fields are the only occupations in which attacks occur more often at
33:35
SPEAKER_00: the hands of a known perpetrator,
33:37
SPEAKER_00: usually a patient or a student, rather than a random stranger.
33:40
SPEAKER_01: That makes perfect clinical sense.
33:42
SPEAKER_01: If you are a psychiatric nurse on an inpatient ward or a teacher dealing
33:46
SPEAKER_01: with severe behavioral issues, the violence isn't a random robbery.
33:50
SPEAKER_01: It is an escalation of a known complex relationship.
33:54
SPEAKER_00: Precisely.
33:55
SPEAKER_01: Okay, so we have established the scope of violence,
33:58
SPEAKER_01: the data loopholes, and the mechanisms of the perpetrators.
34:01
SPEAKER_01: Now, I want to return to the patient sitting in the room.
34:05
SPEAKER_01: We are looking beyond the fractured wrist.
34:08
SPEAKER_01: If 30% of women are experiencing physical or sexual abuse,
34:12
SPEAKER_01: why aren't A&E departments overflowing with visible black eyes and broken bones?
34:16
SPEAKER_00: Psychiatric and somatic, meaning mind and body.
34:18
SPEAKER_00: Yes.
34:31
SPEAKER_00: Survivors of violence have varied reactions,
34:34
SPEAKER_00: but they closely mirror those exposed to other types of severe trauma,
34:37
SPEAKER_00: like combat veterans.
34:39
SPEAKER_00: The overarching theme is deeply diminished physical and mental health,
34:43
SPEAKER_00: which leads to a much higher utilization of health care services
34:46
SPEAKER_00: over their lifespan.
34:48
SPEAKER_01: So what are the specific psychiatric footprints we are looking for?
34:51
SPEAKER_01: If they don't have a bruise, what do they have?
34:54
SPEAKER_00: For women following a sexual assault or IPV,
34:57
SPEAKER_00: the most commonly reported psychiatric sequelae are Post-traumatic stress disorder,
35:02
SPEAKER_00: or PTSD,
35:03
SPEAKER_00: affective disorders like major depression,
35:06
SPEAKER_00: severe anxiety,
35:07
SPEAKER_00: substance misuse used as a coping mechanism,
35:10
SPEAKER_00: disordered eating, and sexual disorders.
35:13
SPEAKER_01: And does the nature of the attack change the outcome?
35:16
SPEAKER_00: Yes, the severity of the assault dictates the psychiatric outcome.
35:21
SPEAKER_00: If the victim perceived a direct imminent threat to their life,
35:24
SPEAKER_00: or if they sustained physical injury during the assault,
35:27
SPEAKER_00: that is strongly linked to a subsequent diagnosis of persistent,
35:31
SPEAKER_00: treatment-resistant PTSD.
35:33
SPEAKER_01: But the trauma doesn't just stay confined to the mind, does it?
35:37
SPEAKER_01: There is a famous concept in trauma literature, the body keeps the score.
35:42
SPEAKER_00: It absolutely does.
35:43
SPEAKER_01: The clinical text outlines a massive somatic burden.
35:46
SPEAKER_01: Let me just read this astonishing list of physical signs and symptoms associated
35:51
SPEAKER_01: with current abuse.
35:52
SPEAKER_01: It includes loss of appetite,
35:55
SPEAKER_01: frequent bruises,
35:56
SPEAKER_01: nightmares,
35:57
SPEAKER_01: vaginal discharge,
35:59
SPEAKER_01: eating binges,
36:00
SPEAKER_01: diarrhea,
36:01
SPEAKER_01: Fractures,
36:02
SPEAKER_01: Sprains,
36:03
SPEAKER_01: Pelvic Pain,
36:04
SPEAKER_01: Fainting,
36:04
SPEAKER_01: Abdominal Pain,
36:06
SPEAKER_01: Breast Pain,
36:07
SPEAKER_01: Frequent Headaches,
36:08
SPEAKER_01: Difficulty Passing Urine,
36:09
SPEAKER_01: Chest Pain, Sleep Problems, Shortness of Breath, and Constipation.
36:14
SPEAKER_00: It is extensive.
36:15
SPEAKER_01: That is essentially every major system in the human body malfunctioning.
36:19
SPEAKER_01: How does a psychological trauma or a pattern of intimidation literally become
36:24
SPEAKER_01: a gastrointestinal disorder or chronic pelvic pain?
36:27
SPEAKER_00: This is where we see the really profound intersection of neuroscience,
36:31
SPEAKER_00: endocrinology, and psychiatry.
36:33
SPEAKER_00: Chronic fear and stress fundamentally alter the body's neurobiology.
36:37
SPEAKER_01: How so?
36:38
SPEAKER_01: Walk me through the mechanism.
36:40
SPEAKER_00: When a person lives in a state of constant hyperarousal,
36:43
SPEAKER_00: waiting for the next attack from their emotionally dependent or antisocial partner,
36:47
SPEAKER_00: their hypothalamic pituitary adrenal axis, the HPA axis, is constantly firing.
36:53
SPEAKER_01: So they are just flooded with stress hormones.
36:54
SPEAKER_00: Exactly.
36:55
SPEAKER_00: They are continuously flooded with cortisol and adrenaline.
36:59
SPEAKER_00: Over time,
37:00
SPEAKER_00: this chronic stress leads to systemic inflammation,
37:03
SPEAKER_00: altered pain pathways in the brain and deep dysregulation of
37:06
SPEAKER_00: the autonomic nervous system.
37:08
SPEAKER_01: So their body is essentially stuck in fight or flight mode indefinitely.
37:11
SPEAKER_00: Yes.
37:12
SPEAKER_01: And that physiological exhaustion manifests as actual physical illness.
37:17
SPEAKER_00: Exactly.
37:18
SPEAKER_00: The gut brain axis is particularly sensitive to this chronic inflammation,
37:21
SPEAKER_00: which is why Functional gastrointestinal disorders like irritable bowel syndrome are
37:26
SPEAKER_00: so incredibly common in trauma survivors.
37:29
SPEAKER_00: And research has demonstrated a very clear, measurable dose effect here.
37:33
SPEAKER_01: Meaning what exactly?
37:35
SPEAKER_01: What is the dose effect?
37:37
SPEAKER_00: Meaning that as the severity,
37:38
SPEAKER_00: frequency,
37:39
SPEAKER_00: and duration of the violence escalate,
37:41
SPEAKER_00: that is the dose,
37:43
SPEAKER_00: the number and intensity of these physical complaints multiply in direct proportion.
37:47
SPEAKER_00: That is the effect.
37:48
SPEAKER_01: Right.
37:49
SPEAKER_01: So a higher dose of violence equals a higher volume of physical symptoms.
37:53
SPEAKER_00: Correct.
37:54
SPEAKER_00: For psychiatrists and general physicians,
37:56
SPEAKER_00: a patient presenting with a cluster
37:58
SPEAKER_00: of unexplained functional gastrointestinal disorders,
38:01
SPEAKER_00: chronic daily headaches,
38:02
SPEAKER_00: and chronic pelvic pain might be displaying the only visible footprints
38:07
SPEAKER_00: of hidden violence.
38:09
SPEAKER_01: The body is manifesting the trauma that the mind cannot safely speak of.
38:14
SPEAKER_00: That is a beautiful way to phrase it.
38:15
SPEAKER_00: It is exactly that.
38:17
SPEAKER_01: That changes the entire paradigm of how a doctor should view
38:20
SPEAKER_01: a quote-unquote difficult patient with unexplained chronic pain.
38:24
SPEAKER_01: It isn't in their head.
38:26
SPEAKER_01: It is in their environment.
38:27
SPEAKER_00: Exactly.
38:28
SPEAKER_01: But the text also points out that the past plays a massive role in this manifestation.
38:34
SPEAKER_01: How does childhood abuse factor into this dose effect?
38:38
SPEAKER_00: It is a devastatingly complex etiology.
38:41
SPEAKER_00: Childhood abuse acts as both a primary risk factor for experiencing abuse as
38:45
SPEAKER_00: an adult and A multiplier.
38:49
SPEAKER_00: So it
38:53
SPEAKER_01: makes everything worse.
38:55
SPEAKER_00: Yes.
38:55
SPEAKER_00: Childhood abuse essentially primes the developing nervous system for dysregulation.
39:00
SPEAKER_00: It increases both the physical and mental health sequelae of adult trauma.
39:04
SPEAKER_01: And if they don't have that history?
39:06
SPEAKER_00: Conversely,
39:07
SPEAKER_00: survivors of sexual assault or domestic violence who are older and do not have
39:11
SPEAKER_00: a history of childhood abuse generally present with fewer severe somatic
39:15
SPEAKER_00: and psychiatric symptoms.
39:17
SPEAKER_01: It's as if an old poorly healed fracture guarantees that a new break in
39:21
SPEAKER_01: the exact same place will be infinitely worse,
39:23
SPEAKER_01: more complicated and harder to heal because the structural integrity of the bone,
39:29
SPEAKER_01: or in this case, the nervous system, was already compromised from the start.
39:33
SPEAKER_00: That is exactly the mechanism at play.
39:35
SPEAKER_01: But there is one more variable regarding recovery that I want to explore.
39:39
SPEAKER_01: And it might be the most crucial one of all, the social response.
39:43
SPEAKER_00: Oh, this cannot be overstated.
39:46
SPEAKER_00: One of the most protective factors in ameliorating the development
39:49
SPEAKER_00: of trauma related symptoms is social support.
39:52
SPEAKER_00: The flip side is equally true and highly dangerous.
39:56
SPEAKER_01: What happens when the support isn't there?
39:58
SPEAKER_00: The lack of social support or the survivor's perception
40:00
SPEAKER_00: of being treated differently,
40:02
SPEAKER_00: disbelieved or blamed by their community,
40:04
SPEAKER_00: their family,
40:06
SPEAKER_00: or by professionals can be incredibly detrimental to their psychiatric outcome.
40:10
SPEAKER_01: So the social response,
40:12
SPEAKER_01: the way the doctor or the police officer or even their mother reacts when
40:16
SPEAKER_01: the survivor finally speaks, essentially acts as a secondary trauma.
40:20
SPEAKER_01: It becomes an active part of either the injury or the healing.
40:24
SPEAKER_00: Precisely.
40:26
SPEAKER_00: Think about it.
40:27
SPEAKER_00: If a survivor finally bridges that immense gap of betrayal trauma,
40:31
SPEAKER_00: speaks up,
40:32
SPEAKER_00: and is met with skepticism or victim blaming,
40:35
SPEAKER_00: it exacerbates the PTSD symptoms exponentially.
40:39
SPEAKER_01: Right.
40:39
SPEAKER_01: Because the world just proved to them that it isn't safe.
40:42
SPEAKER_00: Exactly.
40:43
SPEAKER_00: The injury isn't just the physical assault anymore.
40:46
SPEAKER_00: It is the profound isolation and societal rejection that follows.
40:50
SPEAKER_01: Which leads us perfectly,
40:52
SPEAKER_01: and perhaps urgently, into the actual clinical application of all this.
40:57
SPEAKER_01: Let's put ourselves back in the shoes of that clinician in the busy emergency department.
41:01
SPEAKER_01: Okay, let's do it.
41:01
SPEAKER_01: They have a patient presenting with injuries that look suspicious.
41:05
SPEAKER_01: The clinician means well, right?
41:06
SPEAKER_01: They are trained to be efficient.
41:08
SPEAKER_01: They want to get to the bottom of it, document it, and treat it.
41:11
SPEAKER_01: So they start rapid firing questions.
41:13
SPEAKER_01: Who did this?
41:14
SPEAKER_01: Where did it happen?
41:15
SPEAKER_01: Did he use a weapon?
41:17
SPEAKER_01: We need to take photos right now.
41:18
SPEAKER_01: Take off your shirt.
41:19
SPEAKER_00: Right.
41:20
SPEAKER_01: And the patient just completely shuts down, dissociates, or simply walks out of the ward.
41:25
SPEAKER_01: What went wrong there?
41:26
SPEAKER_00: What went wrong is a fundamental failure to understand the psychological mechanics of assault.
41:32
SPEAKER_01: How so?
41:33
SPEAKER_00: Think about what the crime of sexual assault or domestic violence actually is.
41:37
SPEAKER_00: It represents a moment of absolute terrifying powerlessness for the victim.
41:42
SPEAKER_00: Their autonomy, their bodily integrity, and their choices were violently stripped away.
41:47
SPEAKER_01: Okay.
41:48
SPEAKER_00: Now look at the medical evaluation.
41:50
SPEAKER_00: Procedures like forensic rape kits,
41:53
SPEAKER_00: photo documentation,
41:54
SPEAKER_00: and police reporting required the patient to vividly describe and essentially relive
41:59
SPEAKER_00: that exact trauma.
42:01
SPEAKER_01: I see where this is going.
42:02
SPEAKER_00: If a well-meaning doctor takes total control of the interview,
42:05
SPEAKER_00: rapid fires intrusive questions,
42:08
SPEAKER_00: and removes the patient's agency in the name of medical efficiency,
42:11
SPEAKER_00: they are inadvertently recreating the exact dynamics of the assault.
42:15
SPEAKER_01: That is a brilliant and terrifying insight.
42:19
SPEAKER_01: The clinician,
42:19
SPEAKER_01: by being authoritarian and rushed,
42:22
SPEAKER_01: becomes a mirror of the perpetrator's demand for absolute compliance.
42:26
SPEAKER_01: They are stripping the patient of control all over again.
42:30
SPEAKER_00: The patient isn't shutting down because they are being difficult.
42:33
SPEAKER_00: They are shutting down because their nervous system actively recognizes
42:36
SPEAKER_00: the environment as a threat to their autonomy.
42:39
SPEAKER_01: I want to push back on this a little bit, though.
42:41
SPEAKER_01: In a busy,
42:42
SPEAKER_01: underfunded ED where you have a waiting room full of trauma,
42:45
SPEAKER_01: cardiac arrests,
42:46
SPEAKER_01: and psychiatric crises,
42:48
SPEAKER_01: does a clinician really have the time to sit down and let the patient dictate
42:52
SPEAKER_01: the pace of a multi-hour trauma interview?
42:54
SPEAKER_01: It sounds great in theory, but is it actually practical?
42:58
SPEAKER_00: It is not just practical, it is medically necessary.
43:01
SPEAKER_01: Really?
43:02
SPEAKER_00: Yes.
43:02
SPEAKER_01: Even with the time constraints?
43:04
SPEAKER_00: Yes.
43:05
SPEAKER_00: A botched, coercive interview yields highly inaccurate medical histories.
43:09
SPEAKER_00: It causes the patient to abscond before treatment,
43:12
SPEAKER_00: and it guarantees they will never return to the healthcare system when
43:15
SPEAKER_00: the violence escalates.
43:16
SPEAKER_00: Investing the time up front saves lives.
43:19
SPEAKER_01: Okay.
43:20
SPEAKER_01: So what is the alternative to the authoritarian approach?
43:23
SPEAKER_00: The alternative is the trauma-informed assessment model.
43:27
SPEAKER_00: The clinical consensus provides a very clear sequence, a mantra for clinicians.
43:32
SPEAKER_01: What is the mantra?
43:33
SPEAKER_00: Safety, then trust, then choice, then assessment, then recovery.
43:38
SPEAKER_01: Safety, trust, choice, assessment, recovery.
43:42
SPEAKER_01: Okay, translate that into actual clinical dialogue.
43:45
SPEAKER_01: How does a doctor establish trust and choice when they physically need to do an exam?
43:49
SPEAKER_00: It starts with rapport and pacing.
43:52
SPEAKER_00: The physician must not let the institutional need for documentation override
43:56
SPEAKER_00: the patient's emotional pace.
43:58
SPEAKER_00: Before initiating any evaluation or physical exam,
44:00
SPEAKER_00: the process must be thoroughly explained to the patient.
44:03
SPEAKER_00: You do not just approach with a stethoscope or a camera.
44:06
SPEAKER_01: Right.
44:07
SPEAKER_01: No surprises.
44:08
SPEAKER_00: You allow the patient to direct the pace.
44:11
SPEAKER_00: You give them choices.
44:12
SPEAKER_00: You ask permission continuously.
44:15
SPEAKER_01: So instead of saying,
44:16
SPEAKER_01: I need to examine your arm now,
44:17
SPEAKER_01: you ask, is it all right if I examine your arm now or would you like a moment?
44:22
SPEAKER_00: Yes.
44:23
SPEAKER_00: You might say, would you like the door open or closed?
44:26
SPEAKER_00: Would you like your partner to step out to get you a glass of water?
44:29
SPEAKER_01: That is a clever way to separate them safely.
44:32
SPEAKER_01: You are systematically handing the power back to the patient.
44:35
SPEAKER_00: Exactly.
44:36
SPEAKER_00: Furthermore, the physician must remain hyper-attuned to nonverbal responses.
44:41
SPEAKER_00: If the patient flinches, looks away, or starts breathing rapidly, you stop.
44:46
SPEAKER_00: You adjust the interview immediately.
44:48
SPEAKER_00: This early,
44:49
SPEAKER_00: respectful therapeutic contact can literally influence their long-term psychiatric
44:53
SPEAKER_00: prognosis.
44:55
SPEAKER_01: And what if the patient does disclose domestic violence?
44:57
SPEAKER_01: What if they say, yes, my husband hit me, but please don't do anything.
45:01
SPEAKER_01: I'm not ready to leave him.
45:02
SPEAKER_01: He will kill me if I do.
45:05
SPEAKER_01: What does the clinician do with that?
45:06
SPEAKER_01: Do you force the issue to protect them?
45:09
SPEAKER_00: No.
45:09
SPEAKER_00: You respect their timeline for action, but you document it meticulously.
45:14
SPEAKER_01: Why is documentation so important if you aren't acting on it immediately?
45:17
SPEAKER_00: Because if a patient discloses IPV,
45:20
SPEAKER_00: you record it clearly,
45:21
SPEAKER_00: objectively, and comprehensively in the medical chart for the future.
45:25
SPEAKER_00: You use direct quotes.
45:26
SPEAKER_00: You describe the injuries precisely.
45:28
SPEAKER_00: This provides vital medical and potentially legal documentation for the future when
45:33
SPEAKER_00: and if the patient chooses to use it.
45:35
SPEAKER_01: So you build the safety net so that it's fully constructed and waiting for them
45:39
SPEAKER_01: when they are finally ready to jump.
45:42
SPEAKER_00: That is the absolute essence of choice.
45:44
SPEAKER_00: You provide the tools, but not the timeline.
45:47
SPEAKER_01: But this brings up the most pressing clinical question, which is safety.
45:50
SPEAKER_01: We have conducted a trauma informed interview.
45:53
SPEAKER_01: We've established trust.
45:55
SPEAKER_01: Now we must engage in rigorous clinical reasoning regarding immediate risk.
45:59
SPEAKER_00: Right.
46:00
SPEAKER_00: Evaluating assault victims requires a multilayered approach.
46:04
SPEAKER_00: Obviously,
46:04
SPEAKER_00: treating acute medical issues,
46:06
SPEAKER_00: sutures, casting fractures, providing post-exposure prophylaxis is step one.
46:11
SPEAKER_01: The physical triage.
46:13
SPEAKER_00: Yes, but once the patient is medically stable,
46:16
SPEAKER_00: the psychiatrist or physician's primary focus shifts entirely.
46:20
SPEAKER_00: Is this patient psychologically and environmentally safe to leave this hospital?
46:25
SPEAKER_01: How do you assess that?
46:26
SPEAKER_01: What are the red flags that say this person cannot go home?
46:30
SPEAKER_00: You must screen for severe psychological symptoms that would cause difficulty
46:34
SPEAKER_00: in self-care or present an imminent danger.
46:37
SPEAKER_00: This includes assessing for acute mood deterioration or affective instability.
46:42
SPEAKER_00: Suicidal ideation,
46:44
SPEAKER_00: homicidal ideation pertaining to the assault or the perpetrator,
46:48
SPEAKER_00: severe self-destructive behaviors, dissociative symptoms, and frank psychosis.
46:53
SPEAKER_01: And what about their living situation?
46:56
SPEAKER_00: You have to assess environmental safety.
46:58
SPEAKER_00: If the perpetrator was an intimate partner who is currently sitting
47:01
SPEAKER_00: in your waiting room,
47:02
SPEAKER_00: you have to ask yourself,
47:03
SPEAKER_00: does this patient actually have a physically safe space to sleep,
47:07
SPEAKER_00: eat, and recuperate upon discharge?
47:09
SPEAKER_01: Right.
47:10
SPEAKER_01: To use another analogy,
47:11
SPEAKER_01: if we treated a patient for severe smoke inhalation and third degree burns,
47:15
SPEAKER_01: we wouldn't discharge them directly back into a burning building.
47:19
SPEAKER_01: Why would we stitch up a psychologically destabilized patient
47:22
SPEAKER_01: and discharge them back to the person who caused the injuries?
47:25
SPEAKER_00: We shouldn't.
47:27
SPEAKER_00: If the evaluation indicates that safety is inadequate,
47:30
SPEAKER_00: a comprehensive safety plan must be developed,
47:33
SPEAKER_00: often involving social workers and community shelters.
47:35
SPEAKER_00: And if safety simply cannot be guaranteed in the community,
47:38
SPEAKER_00: or if the psychological sequelae are too severe,
47:42
SPEAKER_00: inpatient hospitalization may be necessary.
47:45
SPEAKER_01: What are the specific clinical indications for hospitalization according to the literature?
47:50
SPEAKER_01: When does the doctor actually make that call to admit them to a psych ward?
47:54
SPEAKER_00: There are six primary indications for psychiatric admission following violence.
47:58
SPEAKER_01: Okay, list them for us.
47:59
SPEAKER_00: One, severe medical injuries requiring inpatient care where
48:03
SPEAKER_00: the patient also needs psychiatric oversight.
48:06
SPEAKER_00: Two, active suicidality or homicidality.
48:10
SPEAKER_00: Three, the presence of profound dissociative or psychotic symptoms.
48:14
SPEAKER_00: Four, severe mood instability or effective dysregulation that severely impairs functioning.
48:20
SPEAKER_00: Five, escalating self-destructive behaviors.
48:23
SPEAKER_00: And six,
48:24
SPEAKER_00: a continued serious and imminent threat to the patient's life or well-being from
48:29
SPEAKER_00: the perpetrator where absolutely no other safe harbor exists.
48:33
SPEAKER_01: Okay, so six very clear criteria.
48:35
SPEAKER_00: Yes.
48:36
SPEAKER_00: And if admitted,
48:37
SPEAKER_00: the inpatient stay focuses on milieu therapy,
48:40
SPEAKER_00: mood stabilization, and coordinating a safe transition back to the community.
48:44
SPEAKER_01: Now, what about the legal nuances?
48:47
SPEAKER_01: Now, what about the legal nuances?
48:49
SPEAKER_01: Because this is a minefield for clinicians, and it often creates a massive barrier to trust.
48:55
SPEAKER_01: Let's talk about mandatory reporting.
48:57
SPEAKER_01: Do doctors have to call the police every time someone discloses an assault?
49:02
SPEAKER_00: This is a highly nuanced area,
49:03
SPEAKER_00: and it is dictated heavily by specific state or regional laws,
49:07
SPEAKER_00: so it does vary geographically.
49:09
SPEAKER_00: However, there are universal baselines.
49:12
SPEAKER_01: What are the baselines everyone agrees on?
49:14
SPEAKER_00: Mandated reporting of child abuse,
49:17
SPEAKER_00: elder abuse and abuse of developmentally disabled individuals exists universally.
49:22
SPEAKER_00: If an inherently vulnerable person is abused, the clinician must report it.
49:26
SPEAKER_01: Right.
49:27
SPEAKER_01: Society agrees on protecting those groups.
49:29
SPEAKER_01: But what about a competent 30 year old adult disclosing intimate partner violence?
49:34
SPEAKER_01: If a woman tells me her husband is beating her but begs me not to call the police
49:38
SPEAKER_01: because it will escalate the violence, what is my legal and ethical obligation?
49:42
SPEAKER_00: In cases of assault secondary to domestic violence against a competent adult,
49:46
SPEAKER_00: states do not generally require mandatory reporting against the patient's wishes.
49:51
SPEAKER_00: Overriding a competent adult patient's autonomy without
49:54
SPEAKER_00: a strict legal mandate destroys the therapeutic trust and,
49:58
SPEAKER_00: as you noted, can significantly escalate their immediate danger.
50:01
SPEAKER_01: Okay, so the patient's choice remains paramount.
50:04
SPEAKER_00: Usually.
50:05
SPEAKER_00: However...
50:07
SPEAKER_00: And this is a massive however that clinicians must be aware of.
50:11
SPEAKER_00: Many states do require physicians to report severe injuries that are clearly due
50:16
SPEAKER_00: to acts of criminal violence such as gunshot wounds or severe knife wounds.
50:21
SPEAKER_01: I see.
50:22
SPEAKER_01: So the law isn't targeting the domestic violence itself.
50:26
SPEAKER_01: It is targeting the weapon.
50:27
SPEAKER_00: Exactly.
50:28
SPEAKER_00: So in the setting of severe physical injury secondary to domestic violence,
50:32
SPEAKER_00: it often becomes a de facto mandatory reporting situation,
50:36
SPEAKER_00: regardless of the underlying cause being IPV.
50:39
SPEAKER_00: The clinician is legally reporting the gunshot wound,
50:41
SPEAKER_00: which inadvertently brings law enforcement into the IPV dynamic.
50:46
SPEAKER_01: That is a highly critical distinction for legal protection and patient trust.
50:51
SPEAKER_01: You have to explain to the patient,
50:52
SPEAKER_01: I am legally required to report this stab wound,
50:55
SPEAKER_01: rather than saying, I am reporting your husband.
50:58
SPEAKER_01: It shifts the blame to the law, not the doctor.
51:01
SPEAKER_00: Exactly.
51:03
SPEAKER_00: It preserves the therapeutic alliance.
51:05
SPEAKER_01: Finally, let's talk about post-assault treatment.
51:08
SPEAKER_01: The patient is safe.
51:09
SPEAKER_01: The police are either involved or not based on the patient's choice.
51:13
SPEAKER_01: And the medical wounds are dressed.
51:15
SPEAKER_01: The patient is sitting on the bed, highly anxious, shaking, and hyperventilating.
51:20
SPEAKER_01: The instinctive reaction for a doctor might be,
51:22
SPEAKER_01: let's give them an anti-anxiety pill,
51:24
SPEAKER_01: maybe a benzodiazepine, to calm them down and send them home to rest.
51:29
SPEAKER_01: Is that the right move?
51:30
SPEAKER_00: The clinical consensus is very explicit about pushing back against that instinct.
51:34
SPEAKER_00: While it might seem profoundly compassionate to sedate a highly distressed patient,
51:39
SPEAKER_00: acute pharmacotherapy,
51:41
SPEAKER_00: meaning giving medications immediately in the aftermath of the assault,
51:45
SPEAKER_00: is not generally recommended for assault victims.
51:47
SPEAKER_01: Why not?
51:48
SPEAKER_01: I mean, if they were suffering visibly, why withhold relief?
51:51
SPEAKER_00: Because of how memory and trauma consolidation work in the brain.
51:55
SPEAKER_00: The brain actually needs to process the trauma.
51:58
SPEAKER_00: When a person is assaulted, fear conditioning occurs in the amygdala.
52:02
SPEAKER_00: Inappropriately masking the acute stress response
52:04
SPEAKER_00: with sedatives can sometimes interfere with that natural processing
52:08
SPEAKER_00: and memory consolidation.
52:10
SPEAKER_01: So sedating them stops the brain from doing its job?
52:13
SPEAKER_00: Yes.
52:14
SPEAKER_00: It can prevent the brain from naturally habituating to the memory.
52:18
SPEAKER_00: Or worse,
52:18
SPEAKER_00: it creates a chemical dependency without resolving
52:21
SPEAKER_00: the underlying psychological wound.
52:23
SPEAKER_00: You are essentially putting a chemical band-aid over a deeply infected wound.
52:27
SPEAKER_01: So you are saying that if we blunt the immediate anxiety with a pill,
52:31
SPEAKER_01: we might actually be increasing their risk of developing long-term PTSD
52:35
SPEAKER_01: because they never consciously processed the fear.
52:38
SPEAKER_00: That is exactly the risk we are trying to avoid.
52:41
SPEAKER_01: So when are medications indicated in the acute phase?
52:44
SPEAKER_01: Ever?
52:44
SPEAKER_00: Only in specific severe circumstances.
52:48
SPEAKER_00: A clinician might decide to medicate if
52:50
SPEAKER_00: the patient is experiencing truly incapacitating anxiety
52:54
SPEAKER_00: that prevents basic functioning,
52:56
SPEAKER_00: extreme aggression toward themselves or others,
52:59
SPEAKER_00: severe dissociation, or frank psychosis.
53:01
SPEAKER_00: But for the vast majority of patients, medications come much later.
53:05
SPEAKER_01: When do they come in?
53:07
SPEAKER_00: They are used for symptom management as things like chronic PTSD,
53:10
SPEAKER_00: depression, or OCD develop over time.
53:13
SPEAKER_00: And crucially,
53:14
SPEAKER_00: medications should never be viewed as a replacement for psychotherapy aimed
53:17
SPEAKER_00: at trauma symptom resolution.
53:19
SPEAKER_01: Okay, so if pills aren't the frontline treatment,
53:22
SPEAKER_01: what is the gold standard for emotional processing?
53:24
SPEAKER_01: How do we actually heal the invisible injury?
53:27
SPEAKER_00: Psychotherapy, specifically trauma-focused cognitive behavioral therapy or CBT.
53:32
SPEAKER_01: CBT.
53:33
SPEAKER_00: Yes, cognitive behavioral approaches are the most researched and demonstrate
53:37
SPEAKER_00: the absolute highest efficacy in trauma survivors.
53:40
SPEAKER_00: Exposure therapy,
53:41
SPEAKER_00: which is a specific variant of CBT,
53:43
SPEAKER_00: helps victims process the assault by safely
53:46
SPEAKER_00: and gradually decreasing their physiological fear response to the memories or cues
53:50
SPEAKER_00: of the event.
53:51
SPEAKER_01: So exposing him to the memory in a safe environment.
53:54
SPEAKER_00: Exactly.
53:54
SPEAKER_00: Brief trauma focused CBT has actually been shown to accelerate recovery
53:58
SPEAKER_00: in victims manifesting acute PTSD symptoms,
54:01
SPEAKER_00: and it is vastly superior to just general unstructured supportive therapy.
54:06
SPEAKER_01: Are there other modalities?
54:08
SPEAKER_00: Yes.
54:08
SPEAKER_00: Additionally,
54:09
SPEAKER_00: eye movement desensitization and reprocessing,
54:11
SPEAKER_00: or EMDR,
54:13
SPEAKER_00: is highlighted clinically as highly effective
54:15
SPEAKER_00: in helping patients process upsetting memories,
54:18
SPEAKER_00: thoughts and feelings by engaging bilateral brain stimulation.
54:21
SPEAKER_01: It really is about actively rewiring the brain to process the trauma,
54:25
SPEAKER_01: not just sedating the symptoms away.
54:27
SPEAKER_00: Exactly.
54:29
SPEAKER_01: Okay, we have covered a massive amount of ground today.
54:32
SPEAKER_01: To really synthesize everything we've discussed,
54:35
SPEAKER_01: the mechanisms,
54:35
SPEAKER_01: the manifestations,
54:36
SPEAKER_01: and the clinical reasoning,
54:38
SPEAKER_01: let's put this all together in a quick conversational case study.
54:41
SPEAKER_01: Sounds brilliant.
54:42
SPEAKER_01: Imagine a 24-year-old female high school teacher presents to your clinic.
54:46
SPEAKER_01: She complains of chronic,
54:47
SPEAKER_01: severe abdominal pain,
54:49
SPEAKER_01: frequent headaches, and chronic diarrhea that has worsened over the last six months.
54:53
SPEAKER_00: Okay, noting the somatic symptoms.
54:55
SPEAKER_01: She also has a sprained ankle today.
54:57
SPEAKER_01: She says she tripped over the dog.
54:59
SPEAKER_01: Her boyfriend is in the waiting room.
55:01
SPEAKER_01: He insisted on coming, but she asked him to stay outside and make a phone call.
55:05
SPEAKER_01: And looking at her intake form, she notes a history of childhood abuse.
55:09
SPEAKER_01: As a clinician,
55:10
SPEAKER_01: how are you integrating the frameworks we discussed today
55:12
SPEAKER_01: to approach this specific patient?
55:14
SPEAKER_00: Well, the first thing I am doing is recognizing the massive somatic burden.
55:19
SPEAKER_00: I am looking at the chronic abdominal pain,
55:21
SPEAKER_00: headaches,
55:21
SPEAKER_00: and diarrhea,
55:22
SPEAKER_00: not as isolated gastroenterological or neurological issues,
55:26
SPEAKER_00: but as potential manifestations of the dose effect of chronic stress and trauma.
55:31
SPEAKER_00: The body is keeping the score here.
55:33
SPEAKER_01: Spot on.
55:34
SPEAKER_01: What all stands out?
55:35
SPEAKER_00: I also note her occupation, education.
55:38
SPEAKER_00: Which we know is a high risk field for violence from known perpetrators,
55:42
SPEAKER_00: though the boyfriend hovering in the waiting room raises the immediate index
55:45
SPEAKER_00: of suspicion for intimate partner violence.
55:48
SPEAKER_01: And what about her history of childhood abuse?
55:50
SPEAKER_01: Does that change your approach?
55:51
SPEAKER_00: It is a critical multiplier.
55:53
SPEAKER_00: It tells me her nervous system is already primed for dysregulation.
55:57
SPEAKER_00: It increases both her risk of being targeted for IPV as an adult
56:01
SPEAKER_00: and it actively exacerbates the severity of her current physical symptoms.
56:06
SPEAKER_01: So she is alone in the room with you now.
56:08
SPEAKER_01: How do you initiate the assessment?
56:10
SPEAKER_01: Do you just ask about the boyfriend straight away?
56:12
SPEAKER_00: No, absolutely not.
56:14
SPEAKER_00: I apply the trauma-informed assessment model immediately.
56:17
SPEAKER_00: Safety, trust, choice.
56:20
SPEAKER_00: I do not confront her with accusations about her boyfriend.
56:23
SPEAKER_00: I establish rapport.
56:24
SPEAKER_00: I explain every single step of the physical exam for her ankle.
56:27
SPEAKER_00: I give her choices.
56:29
SPEAKER_01: So you might say, would you like to take your shoe off yourself?
56:31
SPEAKER_00: Exactly.
56:32
SPEAKER_00: Exactly.
56:33
SPEAKER_01: Once trust is firmly established,
56:35
SPEAKER_01: I might gently inquire about her safety at home, validating her symptoms.
56:39
SPEAKER_01: I might say,
56:41
SPEAKER_01: often when I see chronic stomach pain and headaches together like this,
56:44
SPEAKER_01: it can be a sign that the body is under an immense amount of chronic stress or fear.
56:49
SPEAKER_01: Is there anything happening at home or at work that is making you feel unsafe?
56:53
SPEAKER_00: That is a great way to open the door without forcing her through it.
56:57
SPEAKER_00: Let's say she breaks down and discloses that her boyfriend has been emotionally
57:01
SPEAKER_00: and physically abusive for a year.
57:04
SPEAKER_00: He controls her finances, isolates her from friends, and recently started choking her.
57:10
SPEAKER_00: She says she can't leave because he told her it was her fault for provoking him.
57:15
SPEAKER_00: What typology are we likely looking at and what is your immediate clinical priority?
57:20
SPEAKER_01: The choking,
57:21
SPEAKER_01: which is high-severity abuse,
57:23
SPEAKER_01: combined with the isolation and projecting blame,
57:26
SPEAKER_01: strongly points to an incredibly dangerous dynamic.
57:29
SPEAKER_01: Without knowing his physiological arousal state during the violence,
57:32
SPEAKER_01: his controlling and hostile behavior could fit either the emotionally dependent
57:37
SPEAKER_01: or antisocial narcissistic typology.
57:40
SPEAKER_01: But the lethality risk of choking is astronomical.
57:43
SPEAKER_01: My immediate clinical priority shifts entirely from her ankle to her environmental safety.
57:49
SPEAKER_01: Do you admit her to the psychiatric ward then, or do you call the police?
57:52
SPEAKER_00: And legally?
58:13
SPEAKER_00: Legally,
58:14
SPEAKER_00: because she is a competent adult and there is no gunshot or stab wound triggering
58:17
SPEAKER_00: a de facto mandate, I do not report this to the police against her wishes.
58:22
SPEAKER_00: Doing so would violate her trust and potentially escalate his violence when she goes home.
58:26
SPEAKER_00: I document everything meticulously in her chart.
58:29
SPEAKER_00: The exact quotes,
58:30
SPEAKER_00: the timeline of the choking,
58:32
SPEAKER_00: the physical presentation of the sprain,
58:34
SPEAKER_00: building that legal safety net for whenever she is ready to use it.
58:37
SPEAKER_01: And what about a prescription?
58:39
SPEAKER_00: And finally, I absolutely do not prescribe her a benzodiazepine for her anxiety.
58:44
SPEAKER_00: I validate her fear, ensure her immediate safety, and refer her to trauma-focused CBT or EMDR.
58:50
SPEAKER_01: That is a master class in clinical integration.
58:53
SPEAKER_01: Treating the invisible danger, not just the fractured ankle.
58:57
SPEAKER_01: Now, to reinforce this learning, we are going to do six rapid-fire single best answer questions.
59:03
SPEAKER_00: I'm ready.
59:04
SPEAKER_01: I will ask the question, pause, and then our expert will provide the answer and the reasoning.
59:09
SPEAKER_01: Question one.
59:11
SPEAKER_01: Which data collection system is best equipped to capture rates of simple assault
59:15
SPEAKER_01: and unacknowledged victimization, but struggles to accurately define the offender?
59:19
SPEAKER_00: The answer is the National Crime Victimization Survey, or NCVS.
59:24
SPEAKER_00: It pulls households directly,
59:25
SPEAKER_00: catching unreported assaults, but it cannot accurately track the perpetrators.
59:29
SPEAKER_01: Spot on.
59:30
SPEAKER_01: Question two.
59:32
SPEAKER_01: Which demographic group carries the statistically highest risk
59:36
SPEAKER_01: for experiencing violent crime overall?
59:39
SPEAKER_00: That would be persons of two or more races, as well as American Indians and Alaska Natives.
59:45
SPEAKER_01: Question three.
59:46
SPEAKER_01: A perpetrator of domestic violence exhibits low empathy,
59:50
SPEAKER_01: hostile attitudes towards women,
59:52
SPEAKER_01: and actually experiences decreased physiological arousal as violence escalates.
59:58
SPEAKER_01: Which typology does this describe?
1:00:00
SPEAKER_00: This describes the antisocial or narcissistic abuser.
1:00:04
SPEAKER_00: Their heart rate literally drops as they become more violent.
1:00:08
SPEAKER_01: Terrifying, but correct.
1:00:10
SPEAKER_01: Question four.
1:00:12
SPEAKER_01: A patient presents with frequent headaches,
1:00:14
SPEAKER_01: pelvic pain, shortness of breath, and functional gastrointestinal disorders.
1:00:19
SPEAKER_01: They have a history of IPV.
1:00:22
SPEAKER_01: What phenomenon describes the relationship between the severity of their abuse
1:00:26
SPEAKER_01: and their physical symptoms?
1:00:28
SPEAKER_00: That is the dose effect.
1:00:31
SPEAKER_00: As the severity or dose of the trauma increases, the physical symptoms multiply.
1:00:37
SPEAKER_01: Brilliant.
1:00:38
SPEAKER_01: Question 5.
1:00:40
SPEAKER_01: An adult patient discloses ongoing intimate partner violence but has no severe,
1:00:45
SPEAKER_01: life-threatening injuries like a gunshot wound and is not developmentally disabled.
1:00:50
SPEAKER_01: Under general state laws,
1:00:52
SPEAKER_01: is the physician legally mandated to report this to law enforcement against
1:00:56
SPEAKER_01: the patient's wishes?
1:00:58
SPEAKER_00: No.
1:00:59
SPEAKER_00: Mandatory reporting typically applies to children, elders,
1:01:02
SPEAKER_00: and the developmentally disabled,
1:01:04
SPEAKER_00: unless serious criminal injury occurs that triggers a de facto mandate.
1:01:08
SPEAKER_01: Exactly.
1:01:09
SPEAKER_01: And the final question, question six.
1:01:11
SPEAKER_01: What is the recommended immediate pharmacological intervention for
1:01:15
SPEAKER_01: a medically stable assault victim presenting without psychosis,
1:01:18
SPEAKER_01: severe aggression, or incapacitating anxiety?
1:01:21
SPEAKER_00: The answer is none.
1:01:23
SPEAKER_00: Acute pharmacotherapy like benzodiazepines is not recommended.
1:01:27
SPEAKER_00: The focus should be on safety, support, and subsequent trauma-focused psychotherapy.
1:01:32
SPEAKER_01: Fantastic.
1:01:33
SPEAKER_01: That brings us to the end of our deep dive into the realities of physical violence on adults.
1:01:38
SPEAKER_01: But before we sign off, I want to leave you with one final provocative thought to mull over.
1:01:44
SPEAKER_00: Let's hear it.
1:01:45
SPEAKER_01: We established today...
1:01:46
SPEAKER_01: It leaves a profound lasting mark.
1:01:48
SPEAKER_01: It does.
1:02:12
SPEAKER_01: And if violence acts like this,
1:02:14
SPEAKER_01: if it spreads through households,
1:02:16
SPEAKER_01: if it lies dormant and then manifests as chronic systemic illness,
1:02:20
SPEAKER_01: if it reshapes the behavior of entire populations,
1:02:24
SPEAKER_01: perhaps we need to fundamentally shift our paradigm.
1:02:27
SPEAKER_01: Perhaps we need to stop viewing violence solely as a matter of criminal justice
1:02:31
SPEAKER_01: and start treating it clinically as an environmental infectious pathogen.
1:02:37
SPEAKER_01: A pathogen that requires just as much rigorous epidemiological tracking,
1:02:41
SPEAKER_01: community quarantine,
1:02:42
SPEAKER_01: and aggressive preventative medicine as any virus we have ever faced.
1:02:47
SPEAKER_00: It is a profound paradigm shift.
1:02:50
SPEAKER_00: But if you look at the morbidity data and the multi-generational toll it takes on
1:02:54
SPEAKER_00: the human body and mind,
1:02:56
SPEAKER_00: Treating violence as an infectious disease might honestly be
1:02:59
SPEAKER_00: the only logical way forward for public health.
1:03:02
SPEAKER_01: Remember that scene in the emergency department.
1:03:05
SPEAKER_01: Look past the fractured wrist,
1:03:07
SPEAKER_01: listen for what isn't being said, and always look for the invisible danger.
1:03:12
SPEAKER_01: We encourage you to review Chapter 30.3 of Kaplan and Sadok on your own.
1:03:16
SPEAKER_01: Thank you for joining us on this deep dive.
1:03:19
SPEAKER_01: Take care of yourselves, and we will see you next time.