Latest / Bloomberg Intelligence / Peter Rutledge on Banking Regulation (Audio)
Transcript
- 0:00Speaker 1: You're listening to Taking Stock with pim Box and Kathleen
- 0:04Speaker 1: as a long Blueberg Radio. We are at the fourth
- 0:07Speaker 1: annual Canadian Fixed Income Conference. It is sponsored by National
- 0:11Speaker 1: Bank of Canada Financial Markets. National Bank of Canada Financial
- 0:15Speaker 1: Markets is the soul bank whose primary focus is the
- 0:18Speaker 1: Canadian marketplace. And here to tell us more about banking
- 0:22Speaker 1: in Canada is Peter Rutledge. He is Managing Director Financial
- 0:26Speaker 1: Services Research at National Bank Financial Peter Runtlings, thank you
- 0:30Speaker 1: very much for being with us. Thanks for for having
- 0:32Speaker 1: me explain to our listeners some of the major differences
- 0:38Speaker 1: about the composition and structure of the Canadian banking system
- 0:43Speaker 1: versus let's say, what we may be familiar with here
- 0:45Speaker 1: in the United States. Well, I mean, the most important
- 0:48Speaker 1: thing to understand about the difference in the system is
- 0:50Speaker 1: how they developed over time. Canada, going back to the
- 0:53Speaker 1: start of the country, has always had a branch banking system,
- 0:56Speaker 1: so a few large banks located in the center of
- 0:58Speaker 1: the country who have branches all across the country. We've
- 1:01Speaker 1: had the equivalent of interstate banking since the country was formed,
- 1:04Speaker 1: whereas in the United States you have a state based,
- 1:08Speaker 1: unit based banking system that only recently became UH nationwide.
- 1:13Speaker 1: And so as a result, we've long had very large,
- 1:16Speaker 1: systemically important financial institutions control our banking system and as
- 1:22Speaker 1: and those institutions have been quite profitable, and that profitability
- 1:28Speaker 1: has acted to stabilize the system. And they and we've
- 1:30Speaker 1: had generally UH much fewer banking crises and bank failure.
- 1:35Speaker 1: So since about UH nineteen sixty seven, when our deposit
- 1:39Speaker 1: insure came into force, there's only been about thirty five
- 1:43Speaker 1: to forty bank failures. It's amazing. And in fact, during
- 1:45Speaker 1: the financial crisis, many people pointed to Canada to say,
- 1:50Speaker 1: you don't need lots of banks to have a stable
- 1:52Speaker 1: banking system. How are the are the rules different? Are
- 1:56Speaker 1: the Canadian banks regulated differently? Have you eminated the problem
- 2:00Speaker 1: of too big to fail? Or is the government just
- 2:03Speaker 1: always ready to step in and so you're you you
- 2:05Speaker 1: keep them on a tighter leash? How do you make
- 2:07Speaker 1: it work in Canada? Right? Well, I think there's general
- 2:09Speaker 1: acceptance that we have six systemically important institutions. They've long
- 2:14Speaker 1: been systemically important, and they have long been too important
- 2:18Speaker 1: to fail. UH. Since up until the financial crisis, the
- 2:23Speaker 1: authorities sort of accepted a public backstop, So the sovereign
- 2:26Speaker 1: in effect was always there as a last resort backstop
- 2:30Speaker 1: to the banking system. Since the crisis came and went, UH,
- 2:35Speaker 1: the Canadian regulatory system has adopted or is in the
- 2:39Speaker 1: process of adopting UH global banking regulatory rules around too
- 2:45Speaker 1: Important to Fail. And now they're trying to bring in
- 2:48Speaker 1: a private sector backstop to the banking system to replace
- 2:51Speaker 1: the public sector. What is the trade off if you
- 2:54Speaker 1: have a government that is implicitly and almost explicitly being
- 2:59Speaker 1: the backstop, what are the banks trading off in order
- 3:03Speaker 1: to live under that umbrella? Um? Establishing a private system
- 3:09Speaker 1: brings in private actors who UH will be acting in
- 3:13Speaker 1: their own coninecial self interest and they may be they
- 3:15Speaker 1: may behave unpredictably and so that it introduces an element
- 3:20Speaker 1: of risk into the system now and that didn't exist
- 3:24Speaker 1: when the public sector was the backstop. So that's you know,
- 3:29Speaker 1: what the public sector will have to adapt and they're
- 3:31Speaker 1: they're adapting the regulatory system for that reality. The benefit
- 3:35Speaker 1: of it though, is, you know, if the public sector
- 3:39Speaker 1: is the backstop, typically the public isn't really aware of that,
- 3:43Speaker 1: and so when you have the public sector enter in
- 3:46Speaker 1: to protect the payment system that becomes UH. You know
- 3:50Speaker 1: that that that UH annoys people, annoys the general public
- 3:55Speaker 1: for understandable reasons because they don't understand they have that
- 3:58Speaker 1: contingent risk. What this STEM does is it says to
- 4:01Speaker 1: private sector investors in advance x ANTI before there's a
- 4:04Speaker 1: banking system crisis, you know you're taking that risk, and
- 4:08Speaker 1: you can ask to be compensated by the banking systems
- 4:10Speaker 1: for taking that backstop risk. And that is a better,
- 4:14Speaker 1: a better way to do it. Couple things I hope
- 4:17Speaker 1: we can touch on in the couple of minutes we
- 4:18Speaker 1: have left. The first one would be capital, contingent capital.
- 4:22Speaker 1: How Canadas deal that? In a in a nutshell, what
- 4:25Speaker 1: is different about Canada right now? That is so important
- 4:27Speaker 1: for investors to understand. US banks have a holding company
- 4:31Speaker 1: company model, and there they're issuing contingent capital through their
- 4:34Speaker 1: holding company structures and and moving it into the operating company.
- 4:38Speaker 1: Canadian banking system is structured on an operating company model only,
- 4:41Speaker 1: so we're having to design contingent capital within the operating company.
- 4:45Speaker 1: And it just means the conversion mechanism, the recapitalization mechanism
- 4:49Speaker 1: is different. Housing and we've been speaking to people throughout
- 4:53Speaker 1: the conference about the housing market in Canada, and there
- 4:56Speaker 1: are some surprising differences between let's say, take out a
- 5:00Speaker 1: mortgage in Canada and taking out a mortgage in the
- 5:02Speaker 1: United States ext pin UH. Some of the differences are
- 5:05Speaker 1: the longest amortization term is now twenty five years. You
- 5:10Speaker 1: can get thirty year mortgages, but basically the standard for
- 5:13Speaker 1: higher risk mortgages it's twenty five years. UH. Second, there's
- 5:17Speaker 1: no tax deductibility for mortgage interest payments. People are incentive
- 5:20Speaker 1: financially always to pay down their mortgage and that does
- 5:23Speaker 1: make a difference. Finally, the Canadian sovereign through UH a
- 5:28Speaker 1: mortgage insurance subsidiary UH, basically absorbs or takes on the
- 5:33Speaker 1: credit risk in the mortgage system. So if we had
- 5:35Speaker 1: a big housing price correction and there are a lot
- 5:37Speaker 1: of losses around mortgages, it would flow through to the
- 5:40Speaker 1: mortgage insure that is a sovereign ntity, and so there
- 5:43Speaker 1: would not be any uh you know, risk around capital
- 5:47Speaker 1: in the banking system tied to only a house of
- 5:49Speaker 1: price correction. Well, so thank you for walking us through
- 5:53Speaker 1: the Canadian banking industry. Some of the key regulations, how
- 5:56Speaker 1: they're changing how they're working. Peter Rtgage, thank you so
- 5:58Speaker 1: very much for joining us. He's Managing director for Financial
- 6:01Speaker 1: Services Research at National Bank of Financial We're live at
- 6:05Speaker 1: the National Bank of Canada Financial Markets Canadian Fixed Income Conference.
- 6:10Speaker 1: I'm Kathleen Hayes along with Pen Fox. This is Limberg