Latest / INSIGHT TODAY / Why the Trump administration is clashing with AI-firm Anthropic
Transcript
- 0:00Speaker 1: This standoff between the artificial intelligence firm Anthropic and the
- 0:04Speaker 1: US government escalated sharply today. President Trump lashed out at
- 0:08Speaker 1: the company's leadership and directed all federal agencies to stop
- 0:12Speaker 1: using Anthropics products, and the Pentagon designated the company a
- 0:16Speaker 1: supply chain risk to national security. William Brangham joins us
- 0:21Speaker 1: now with more William.
- 0:22Speaker 2: That's right, Jeff. Anthropic had long said that it didn't
- 0:26Speaker 2: want the US military using one of its programs for
- 0:30Speaker 2: any fully autonomous weapons systems or for any mass surveillance
- 0:34Speaker 2: of American citizens. Negotiations were ongoing this week, but the
- 0:38Speaker 2: president's order seems to have brought them to an end.
- 0:41Speaker 2: The Pentagon's designation would bar any company that does business
- 0:45Speaker 2: with the Department of War from doing any commercial business
- 0:48Speaker 2: with Anthropic. For more on what this could mean, we
- 0:51Speaker 2: are joined by the University of Pennsylvania as Michael Horowitz.
- 0:55Speaker 2: He previously worked in the Defense Department, where he wrote
- 0:58Speaker 2: the Pentagon's policy on artificial intelligence weapons systems. Michael Horwitz's
- 1:03Speaker 2: so good to have you here. I wonder if you
- 1:05Speaker 2: could just give me your first your reaction to this
- 1:07Speaker 2: to the President saying we are wiping Anthropic completely out
- 1:11Speaker 2: of the federal government, and that any Pentagon contractor that
- 1:16Speaker 2: also has dealings with Anthropic has to stop those as well.
- 1:22Speaker 3: What a day. I think that my initial thought, frankly,
- 1:26Speaker 3: is that that escalated quickly and that what seemed like
- 1:30Speaker 3: a needless dispute between Anthropic in the Pentagon has hit
- 1:36Speaker 3: crisis proportions. I say needless dispute because Anthropic was the
- 1:41Speaker 3: first of the frontier AI labs willing to work with
- 1:44Speaker 3: the Defense, willing to work with the Pentagon in a
- 1:47Speaker 3: classified environment, and all of the projects that the Pentagon
- 1:52Speaker 3: has asked Anthropic to work on, Anthropic was happy to
- 1:54Speaker 3: work on. This was a theoretical dispute about future possibilities
- 2:00Speaker 3: that between Anthropic and the Pentagon that is now really escalated.
- 2:05Speaker 3: The President's order, in combination with the order from Secretary Hegseth,
- 2:09Speaker 3: could not just be devastating to the Pentagon's ability to
- 2:13Speaker 3: use Anthropics technology, but could be devastating to entthropics core business,
- 2:17Speaker 3: depending on how it's interpreted by the markets and whether
- 2:21Speaker 3: Anthropic is able to get I'm not a lawyer, but
- 2:24Speaker 3: Anthropic is able to get a stay of the supply
- 2:27Speaker 3: chain designation.
- 2:28Speaker 2: What does this do to America's ability to keep up
- 2:32Speaker 2: a robust defense. I mean, Anthropic was already being used
- 2:35Speaker 2: in many parts of the Pentagon according to reports. So
- 2:38Speaker 2: now if the President is saying, get it all out
- 2:40Speaker 2: of there, what does that do to our ability to
- 2:43Speaker 2: maintain a defense.
- 2:46Speaker 3: Anthropics technology wasn't just being used in parts of the Pentagon,
- 2:49Speaker 3: it was being used in other parts of the government
- 2:51Speaker 3: as well, So this could be pretty devastating in some ways.
- 2:56Speaker 3: The only thing that mediates that is the six month,
- 3:00Speaker 3: a time period that appears both in the President's announcement
- 3:04Speaker 3: and in the supply chain designation by Secretary Hegseeth. If
- 3:08Speaker 3: you wanted to be an optimist about the chances that
- 3:12Speaker 3: the two sides will come to a deal, the optimistic
- 3:14Speaker 3: read would be in some ways this sets a six
- 3:17Speaker 3: month clock for negotiations between Anthropic and the government. But
- 3:22Speaker 3: that you had to squint real hard in some ways
- 3:25Speaker 3: to see that to see that optimistic read and the
- 3:29Speaker 3: winner in some ways, if Anthropic in the Pentagon can't
- 3:32Speaker 3: make it work, frankly as China, because in a world
- 3:37Speaker 3: where there's been intense AI competition between the United States
- 3:40Speaker 3: and China, and that includes the military realm it should
- 3:44Speaker 3: be all hands on deck for the American frontier AI
- 3:47Speaker 3: labs to work with the Pentagon to improve American national defense,
- 3:52Speaker 3: and Nthropic has been willing to and Thropic's been willing
- 3:54Speaker 3: to do that over a six to nine month period.
- 3:57Speaker 3: Then you would imagine some of the other AI labs
- 4:00Speaker 3: will try to cycle in and pick up some of
- 4:03Speaker 3: that business if nothing can be done. Note that Elon
- 4:07Speaker 3: Musk's XAI has already stepped up to the plate, and
- 4:10Speaker 3: you know said last week that they were willing to
- 4:13Speaker 3: now work in the classified environment with the Pentagon on
- 4:17Speaker 3: defense challenges.
- 4:18Speaker 2: It's hard to imagine that there's not a whole slew
- 4:20Speaker 2: of other companies willing to step into the breach there.
- 4:23Speaker 2: I want to ask you about this request though, that
- 4:25Speaker 2: Anthropic was making. They were saying, we're happy for you
- 4:28Speaker 2: to use our product except in these two instances. And
- 4:31Speaker 2: I wonder what you make of that request. It's hard
- 4:34Speaker 2: to think of another defense contractor a Northrop Grumman saying
- 4:37Speaker 2: we'll sell you jets, but you can only use them
- 4:39Speaker 2: in certain ways.
- 4:43Speaker 3: Absolutely, I mean this was what this was what really
- 4:45Speaker 3: escalated the dispute between Anthropic and the government was anthropics
- 4:49Speaker 3: insistence that their technology not be used for mass surveillance
- 4:54Speaker 3: or autonomous weapon systems, although to be clear, this did
- 4:58Speaker 3: not bother the Pentagon Nanthropic when they signed the original
- 5:02Speaker 3: contract with Anthropic less than a year ago. This is
- 5:05Speaker 3: something that really escalated after Anthropic asked a Palenteer actually
- 5:11Speaker 3: another leading technology company, about whether Anthropics technology was used
- 5:16Speaker 3: in the Maduro raid in January, where somewhere Palenteers made
- 5:20Speaker 3: even smart system technology was used and that platform incorporates
- 5:26Speaker 3: some of Anthropics technology, and so we were off to
- 5:28Speaker 3: the races from there. In some ways, this is a
- 5:32Speaker 3: dispute about personalities and about the role of government masquerading
- 5:36Speaker 3: as a policy dispute, because in a normal atmosphere, Anthropic
- 5:41Speaker 3: would decide they want to work on some issues for
- 5:44Speaker 3: the Pentagon but not other issues, and the Pentagon would
- 5:47Speaker 3: would hire Anthropic to work on some things but not
- 5:50Speaker 3: other things, would find other vendors. But this escalated to
- 5:54Speaker 3: the point where the Department was threatening to either compel
- 5:59Speaker 3: them with the Defense Production Act or impose that supply
- 6:03Speaker 3: chain designation.
- 6:04Speaker 2: As you said, what a day. Michael Horowitz from the
- 6:07Speaker 2: University of Pennsylvania. Thank you.
- 6:08Speaker 3: So much for being here, Thanks for having me.
- 6:22Speaker 1: Support journalism you trust. Support PBS News.
- 6:27Speaker 3: Donate now, or even better, start a monthly contribution today