Latest / Reformed Thinking / Holy Children Before the Impartial Father (1 Peter 1:14-17)

Transcript

Holy Children Before the Impartial Father (1 Peter 1:14-17) · Reformed Thinking

0:00
Welcome to Reformed thinking. So I want you to picture
0:03
something for a second. You know you are sitting in your
0:05
own living room. The doors are locked, the
0:07
familiar pictures are hanging on the walls, and your favorite mug
0:10
is resting on the coffee table. Yeah, it feels like home.
0:13
Right. By all external, measurable
0:15
standards, you are home. But internally there is this
0:19
undeniable creeping tension. Yeah, you look at the news feed
0:23
on the screen in front of you. You listen to the conversations
0:25
happening at the neighborhood BBQ.
0:26
And you watch the entertainment your culture produces.
0:29
Yeah, and a sudden realization how you you do not actually
0:33
belong here. You are completely out of place
0:35
in your own society. That is a wild feeling.
0:38
It really is. So what does it mean to be a
0:40
total exile while sitting comfortably on your own couch?
0:43
Well, the friction you are describing is the actual
0:48
psychological and spiritual reality that faced the early
0:52
Christian Church. Feeling like a resident alien is
0:55
not some historical accident or a temporary political set back.
1:00
According to the text we are examining today, it is an
1:03
absolute theological necessity. When a person is brought into
1:06
the Kingdom of God, their citizenship changes in a split
1:10
second, but their physical address stays the exact same.
1:13
Wow. Yeah, they are living under a
1:15
totally new set of laws governed by a different king, yet they
1:18
are surrounded by an environment that is actively and sometimes
1:22
violently hostile to those new loyalties.
1:25
That creates a massive dissonance in daily life.
1:28
Today we are taking a deep dive into two rigorous, highly
1:32
detailed theological expositions of First Peter chapter 1.
1:35
Specifically, we are looking at verses 14 through 17.
1:39
Our mission is to analyze the biblical mandate for
1:41
comprehensive holiness. And unpack how these specific
1:45
commentaries apply 1st century commands to the modern church.
1:48
Spot on. But before we jump into the
1:50
text, we need to set some ground rules for this discussion.
1:53
The sources we are working with today contain strong theological
1:56
and political critiques. Very strong.
1:58
Yeah, the authors explicitly call out several modern social
2:02
and religious movements by name. We're going to map out the
2:05
architecture of those arguments so you can understand the
2:07
author's logic and reasoning. But we will maintain a strict,
2:10
objective stance on the politically charged material.
2:13
Yes, we are acting as impartial guides to the text, showing you
2:18
the theological blueprints without taking a political side.
2:21
What is fascinating here is how these authors establish the
2:24
historical context, because if we ignore the 1st century
2:27
reality, the commands in First Peter sound like detached ivory
2:31
tower philosophy. I agree completely.
2:33
The Apostle Peter wrote this letter around AD 62 to 64.
2:37
He notes that he is writing from Babylon, which is almost
2:40
universally recognized by historical scholars as a
2:43
cryptogram for Rome. So who is he actually writing
2:46
to? He is addressing believers who
2:47
are scattered across Asia Minor. That is the region we know today
2:50
as modern Turkey. We are talking about areas like
2:52
Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia and Bithynia.
2:57
And these were mostly Gentile converts, right?
2:59
That is correct. Prior to their conversion, they
3:01
were living in a Greco Roman culture saturated with temple
3:05
prostitution, gladiatorial blood sport, polytheistic worship and
3:10
highly hedonistic philosophy. So their whole world was tied to
3:13
that. Right, the very fabric of their
3:15
local economies and their daily social routines were previously
3:19
governed by these Pagan practices.
3:21
OK, let's unpack this, because we cannot gloss over what that
3:25
specific pressure cooker actually felt like.
3:28
If you were a Christian living in Asia Minor in 8062, your
3:32
conversion was not a private internal matter.
3:36
No, it was a massive public offense.
3:38
Right. Refusing to participate in civic
3:40
Pagan rituals meant you were effectively shutting yourself
3:43
out of the local economy. You could not join the trade
3:46
Guild, which means you could not sell your goods.
3:47
And you invited severe social ostracism and brutal slander
3:50
from your own neighbors. And on a macro level, you have,
3:53
you know, Emperor Nero looming on the horizon.
3:55
Within a very short window from when this letter is circulated,
3:58
Nero is going to launch a horrific, fiery persecution
4:02
against S Christians in Rome. Blaming them for the great fire,
4:04
right? Yeah, reading this letter from
4:07
Peter is like receiving a field manual from a seasoned, battle
4:10
scarred general just hours before enemy forces breached the
4:14
city walls. That military analogy perfectly
4:17
captures the urgency of the text.
4:19
This letter is absolute preparation for a fiery ordeal.
4:23
To understand how Peter equips these believers to survive, we
4:26
have to examine the grammatical architecture surrounding verses
4:29
14 through 17. Because the commands do not just
4:32
drop out of nowhere. Precisely if you read the
4:34
preceding verses, 3 through 12, Peter delivers a massive,
4:38
soaring doxology. He praises God for electing
4:42
grace. What else does he cover there?
4:43
Well, he details how believers have been born again to a living
4:46
hope, how they have an imperishable inheritance waiting
4:49
in heaven, and how they are currently being guarded by
4:52
divine strength. Is huge.
4:54
It is then immediately following our target passage in verses 18
4:58
through 21, Peter grounds every single behavioral command in the
5:02
bloody reality of being ransomed by Christ.
5:05
Wait, So what happens if you strip away this surrounding
5:07
context? Like if I read verses 14 through
5:10
17 completely by themselves. Then it just sounds like a
5:13
terrifying list of impossible demands.
5:16
You know, be perfect. Do not mess up.
5:18
Judge your actions. Yeah, if we strip away the
5:20
doxology of grace at the beginning and the ransom at the
5:23
end, the whole thing feels like drowning.
5:26
The command just becomes a crushing legalistic burden
5:29
rather than anything resembling good news.
5:32
You hit the nail on the head. That is the central danger of
5:35
reading biblical imperatives. Without the preceding
5:38
indicatives, without the doxology of sovereign grace, the
5:41
command is just terrifying moralism.
5:44
It makes it sound like you have to earn it.
5:45
Right. It suggests that a person must
5:47
achieve flawless purity in order to earn God's favor.
5:51
But Peter structures his letter to demonstrate the classic
5:54
unchanging biblical order. God has acted sovereignly to
5:58
save you. God has secured your future
6:00
inheritance and therefore the redeemed individual must live in
6:04
consecrated obedience. So it is about a response, not a
6:07
requirement for entry. That is right, You are not holy
6:10
in order to be saved. You are commanded to be holy
6:13
because you have already been saved by grace alone.
6:15
The engine driving the behavior is gratitude for a salvation
6:19
already accomplished. Absolutely.
6:20
That distinction changes everything, and it brings us
6:24
right to the first specific mandate in the text found in
6:27
verse 14. Peter starts by addressing the
6:30
readers as obedient children. Or, as the commentaries point
6:34
out, the literal Hebraic idiom is children of obedience.
6:37
Right. The text is demanding that we
6:39
identify who the believer actually is before looking at
6:42
what they should do. How does this framing shift the
6:45
motivation for behavior? Well, it shifts the motivation
6:48
from cold institutional compliance to organic familial
6:52
resemblance. The phrase children of obedience
6:55
indicates that obedience now characterizes the very nature of
6:58
the believer. Because they have been born
7:00
again. Yes, meaning they have been
7:01
brought into a new household. They are no longer defined by
7:05
autonomy, rebellion, or self worship.
7:07
Because they are legally and spiritually adopted by God, they
7:11
are expected to display the likeness and the honor of their
7:14
new Father. So it is not about fear anymore.
7:17
Right. The motivation operating here is
7:18
no longer the terror of a slave trying to appease an
7:21
unpredictable tyrant. It is the natural desire of a
7:25
child wanting to reflect the character of a loving, Holy
7:28
Father. If being a child of obedience is
7:31
the new internal reality, the text tells us what the external
7:35
reaction should be. It commands the reader to not be
7:38
conformed to the former lusts of their ignorance.
7:41
Yes, the Greek concept there is really interesting.
7:44
I want to look closely at that word conformed.
7:46
It's such a specific mechanical concept.
7:49
What is the text actually trying to describe here?
7:51
The Greek word Peter uses is sicometisomenoy.
7:55
It is a brilliant lexical choice.
7:57
This word refers to an outward fleeting shape.
8:00
Like a mask. Yes, it is a temporary mask or
8:03
an external pattern that constantly fluctuates.
8:05
In both biblical and broader Greco Roman literature.
8:08
This word stands in sharp, deliberate contrast to the word
8:11
morphit, which refers to a permanent internal reality.
8:15
Yeah, Peter is asserting that worldliness.
8:17
Cultural trends and fleshly desires are a superficial, cheap
8:22
mold pressed upon us by a fallen society.
8:25
To be conformed to the world is to wear a mask that blatantly
8:28
contradicts the believers new eternal nature.
8:31
I like to think about it like pouring water into a novelty ice
8:34
cube tray. You know the liquid is forced
8:37
into an unnatural shape from the outside and it only holds that
8:41
shape temporarily. That is a perfect analogy for
8:43
you, the listener, to visualize. Right.
8:45
The text is demanding that believers refuse to be poured
8:48
into the mold of their surrounding culture.
8:51
They have to actively push back against that external societal
8:54
pressure. And notice how the text
8:56
describes their past desires as belonging to their ignorance.
8:59
The commentaries make a very strong point about how the
9:01
biblical writers use the concept of ignorance.
9:04
What is the actual definition of ignorance here?
9:06
The biblical definition of ignorance, particularly the
9:08
Greek word agnoia, is not an innocent lack of data.
9:12
The text is not suggesting that these people simply lacked the
9:15
correct geographic or philosophical information about
9:18
the universe. So it is not just being
9:20
uneducated. No, it is a willful moral
9:22
blindness toward the true God. The Pagan world actively
9:26
suppresses the truth in unrighteousness.
9:29
That is heavy. It is therefore the desires, the
9:32
lusts and the ambitions born from that state of find are
9:35
rooted in vast spiritual darkness.
9:37
They are the products of a deliberate rebellion against the
9:40
Creator. I want you to consider how
9:42
modern society often views its own desires.
9:45
We tend to view our appetites, our career ambitions, and our
9:48
sexual ethics as highly enlightened and authentic.
9:52
Oh, definitely. The overwhelming message today
9:54
is that following your internal desires is the absolute highest
9:58
form of self actualization. But the text looks at those
10:01
exact same desires and labels them as the grave close of the
10:05
past. Rooted in willful moral
10:07
blindness, it is a total reversal of modern psychology.
10:10
And this verse aggressively confronts a specific theological
10:13
issue too, right? Yes, the authors of our sources
10:15
insists that verse 14 aggressively confronts
10:18
antinomianism. Can you define that for the
10:20
listener? Antinomianism is the theological
10:23
error claiming that grace gives a person permission to continue
10:26
sinning. It is the idea that you can
10:28
claim Christ as Savior while remaining completely under the
10:32
dominion of your old carnal lusts.
10:34
But the text says otherwise. Right.
10:36
The text insists that salvation causes a violent, definitive
10:40
break from past lusts. A justification that does not
10:43
produce a progressive, visible sanctification is completely
10:47
foreign to the biblical writers. So grace changes you.
10:50
Completely. The grace that saves a person
10:53
fundamentally and permanently severs them from the willful
10:57
ignorance of their worldly past. Taking off that cultural mask
11:00
and refusing to be conformed to the world leaves a massive void.
11:03
You cannot just exist in a permanent state of not doing
11:06
something, no. Nature abhors a vacuum.
11:08
Right. That void has to be filled with
11:10
a new standard, bringing us to the core positive command of the
11:13
passage in verses 15 and 16. The command is to be holy in all
11:17
conduct. The Greek words there are Hajj,
11:19
estate for holy and anastrophy for conduct.
11:22
And Anastrophy covers literally everything Commerce, marriage,
11:26
media consumption, and secret thoughts.
11:28
The sheer comprehensiveness of the behavior demanded is
11:31
staggering. An extra biblical papyri from
11:34
the ancient world, anastrophy described the way citizens
11:37
conducted their entire public and private affairs.
11:40
So it is not just Sunday morning.
11:42
Not at all. The God of the Bible is not
11:44
interested in a couple of hours of Sunday morning worship while
11:47
the rest of the week remains untouched.
11:49
The standard of holiness extends into every single sphere of
11:53
human existence. And to back up this absolute
11:56
demand, Peter quotes the Old Testament warrant.
11:59
Yes, he directly quotes Leviticus 11.44.
12:03
You shall be holy, for I am holy.
12:05
A lot of modern listeners might hear a quote from Leviticus and
12:08
immediately throw up their hands.
12:09
Wait, I thought we were under the new covenant.
12:11
It is a common reaction, yeah. Why are we pulling behavioral
12:14
commands from an ancient book filled with dietary restrictions
12:17
and rules about fabric? This raises an excellent
12:19
question regarding biblical continuity and how the early
12:22
church viewed the Old Testament. The commentaries clarify how the
12:26
moral law from the Old Covenant is carried over directly into
12:29
the New Covenant. But what about the other laws?
12:32
The ceremonial and civil laws are gone, like the dietary
12:35
restrictions prohibiting shellfish or the specific
12:38
clothing mandates originally designed to separate the nation
12:41
of Israel physically from the surrounding Canaanite tribes.
12:44
If those are fulfilled and abrogated.
12:45
Yes. However, the moral character of
12:48
the law giver remains static. God's intrinsic purity does not
12:52
alter overtime. Therefore, the moral principle
12:56
extracted from Leviticus stands forever, which is the covenant.
13:00
People must reflect the unchanging purity of the God who
13:03
called them. One of the commentaries connects
13:06
this directly to a specific theological framework
13:09
referencing the Westminster Confession, Chapter 19.
13:12
This is known as the third use of the law.
13:14
Yeah, the Tertius Usislegus. Think of the moral law like the
13:17
heavy metal guardrails on a dangerous, winding mountain
13:21
highway. For the unbeliever, that
13:23
guardrail is a terrifying reminder of the cliffs they're
13:26
speeding toward. It exposes their danger.
13:28
That is the first use of the law.
13:30
Right. But for the justified believer
13:32
who is driving safely in the car, the guardrail is not a
13:35
threat. It is a helpful, necessary guide
13:38
keeping them on the path. The law no longer condemns the
13:42
justified believer, but it remains a perfect rule of
13:45
obedience. That guardrail analogy
13:47
effectively illustrates the third use.
13:50
The moral law is the guide for the believer's gratitude.
13:53
It shows the adopted child what pleases the father.
13:56
Here's where it gets really interesting.
13:58
One of our sources points out a sharp critique from the second
14:00
source regarding a domesticated God.
14:03
It is a blistering critique of modern church culture.
14:07
The source argues that modern seeker sensitive churches have
14:09
completely domesticated God. They accuse these contemporary
14:13
movements of turning the Almighty into a cosmic therapist
14:16
to appease attendees. It is essentially moralistic
14:19
therapeutic deism. How does the biblical vision of
14:22
God as a consuming fire disrupt this modern therapeutic model?
14:26
The disruption is absolute and unyielding.
14:28
The commentary argues that presenting God as a casual buddy
14:30
or a life coach is a damning form of idolatry.
14:33
If God is intrinsically and infinitely holy, as the text
14:37
declares, then he dwells in unapproachable light.
14:40
The standard is his own flawless, blinding character.
14:44
So it incinerates the therapeutic trivialities.
14:46
Precisely. Holiness is the specific
14:49
attribute that gives glory to all of God's other perfections.
14:53
Without infinite holiness, His omnipotence would just be
14:56
terrifying tyranny. That is a stunning thought.
14:59
The biblical vision demands a worship that is marked by
15:02
reverence, awe, and a trembling recognition of the staggering
15:05
gap between God's purity and human KLT.
15:08
If God is a consuming fire, how does a believer approach him?
15:12
This leads directly into the tension of verse 17, calling on
15:16
the judge as Father. It is a breathtaking dual
15:18
reality. Can you explain this paradox?
15:21
Because calling the judge Father feels like a massive
15:23
psychological contradiction. How can a Christian hold both
15:26
extreme intimacy and trembling reverence at the exact same
15:29
time? It requires a mature theological
15:31
mind to hold both truths intention.
15:33
The intimacy is secured by adoption through Christ,
15:36
allowing believers to use the incredibly familiar familial
15:39
term father. But.
15:41
He is also a judge. Yes, this specific father
15:44
evaluates the actions of his household with piercing
15:46
scrutiny. The text uses the Greek adverb
15:49
aprosable lip juice, which translates to impartially.
15:54
What is the ancient context for that word?
15:56
To understand the weight of this specific word, we must look at
15:59
the ancient Near Eastern legal context.
16:03
In those ancient courts, corrupt judges would literally lift the
16:06
face of a wealthy or powerful defendant to show favoritism.
16:10
So not lifting the face means being impartial.
16:13
Yes, God is completely impervious to human status,
16:16
wealth, racial background, or religious pedigree.
16:19
He does not lift the face of anyone.
16:21
So if God is judging all of our works impartially, does that
16:25
mean salvation is somehow at risk if the believers works do
16:27
not measure up? The commentaries are incredibly
16:30
careful to clarify this point to avoid sliding back into
16:33
illegalism. What kind of judgement is it
16:34
then? For the believer, this
16:36
evaluation is not the Great White Throne judgement of
16:38
condemnation. The believer's sins have been
16:40
fully and finally judged on the cross.
16:42
Rather, this is the Bema seat judgement.
16:45
Like the Athletic Games? Spot on.
16:47
I mean you are right on the money.
16:49
Think of the Corinthian Bhima, where athletes were evaluated
16:52
and given wreaths for their performance.
16:54
Here, works are evaluated as evidence of faith and for
16:57
eternal reward. The Father is evaluating the
17:00
fruit of the grace He has already provided.
17:03
Yes, knowing that our impartial Father searches the hearts and
17:07
minds of his children should eradicate any casual or flippant
17:11
approach to the Christian life. The text adds a specific
17:14
temporal boundary to this, mentioning the time of your stay
17:17
on Earth for the time of sojourning.
17:20
That exile mentality is crucial. I want you to think about how
17:23
living with an exile mentality changes your daily priorities.
17:27
If you know you are just living in a hotel on a short business
17:30
trip, you are not going to start buying expensive custom drapes
17:33
for the hotel room. No, you know, you're leaving an
17:36
exile. Mentality alters the baseline of
17:38
everything. The commentary stressed that
17:40
believers are not supposed to lay down permanent roots.
17:43
Or seek political utopias. Right.
17:45
They are not called to build a permanent Christian utopia in a
17:47
decaying world. Their true citizenship is in
17:50
heaven. So their daily behavior and
17:52
investments should reflect the coming Kingdom, yes?
17:55
Not the fading corrupt culture of the present evil age.
17:59
They are vigilant pilgrims marching through a hostile
18:02
wilderness. So what does this all mean?
18:07
We have spent all this time laying out these massive,
18:10
crushing demands for perfection and impartial judgement.
18:13
It is a lot to take in. The listeners left asking how
18:16
can anyone survive this? Is this just a list of
18:19
impossible rules? Because if I look closely at
18:22
verses 14 through 17, the specific name of Jesus is
18:25
completely absent. Where is Jesus in the text?
18:28
That is a crucial observation. If the sermon stopped right here
18:32
at verse 17, it would leave the listener in absolute despair.
18:35
Crushed under the weight of an impossible divine standard.
18:37
Yes, but the Christological fulfillment is the core of this
18:41
passage. We have to look at the broader
18:43
Trinitarian revelation. For instance, the command to be
18:46
holy points directly to Christ. Where do we see that connection?
18:50
In John 6.69, Peter himself looks at Jesus and calls him the
18:53
Holy One of God. Oh, that makes sense.
18:56
Jesus is the Incarnate breathing manifestation of the divine
18:59
purity demanded in verse 15. To imitate God's holiness is by
19:03
definition to conform to the image of the sun.
19:06
Because humanity on its own has a flawless, unbroken record of
19:11
disobedience. No human being has ever
19:14
perfectly obeyed the mandate from Leviticus.
19:16
Precisely that is why the concept of being obedient
19:19
children finds its supreme, perfect fulfillment exclusively
19:23
in Christ. He is the only truly obedient
19:26
child the Father has ever had. The commentaries talk about both
19:29
his active and passive obedience.
19:31
Right. Yes, they do.
19:32
In his act of obedience, Jesus fulfilled the moral law
19:34
perfectly. He lived a flawless life without
19:37
ever once succumbing to the lust of the world.
19:39
And his passive obedience. He willingly submitted to and
19:42
absorb the righteous infinite wrath of the Father on the
19:45
cross. This perfect record of active
19:47
and passive obedience is imputed or legally credited to the
19:50
believer by faith alone. This brings the context of
19:53
verses 18 and 19 rushing back into view the bloody ransom.
19:57
It is the basis of it. The awe and the fear mentioned
20:00
in verse 17 are not the cowering, hopeless terror of a
20:03
slave. It is the breathtaking reverence
20:06
of someone who knows they are bought at an infinite price.
20:09
The spotless blood of the lamb, yes.
20:12
The God who sits as the impartial, terrifying judge is
20:15
the exact same God who provided the bloody ransom to save the
20:19
guilty defendant. The cross of Christ is the
20:21
ultimate historical display of both God's impartial justice
20:25
against sin and His unfathomable grace towards sinners.
20:29
Having analyzed the theology, the discussion must turn to how
20:33
the provided commentaries apply these ancient commands to the
20:36
immediate cultural battles of the modern church.
20:38
The application in the sources is fierce and uncompromising.
20:42
To clearly restate our rule here, the second source contains
20:45
intense specific call outs regarding modern social and
20:48
theological movement. Very specific ones, right?
20:50
I want to state clearly to you, the listener, that we are
20:52
outlining these points impartially to demonstrate the
20:55
authors argument. We are not endorsing a specific
20:57
political side. We are just delivering the
21:00
authors message. The author details several
21:03
movements they explicitly reject as molds of the present age.
21:07
Who are the author's targets? They target the prosperity
21:09
gospel, arguing that it literally feeds the former lusts
21:12
by promising earthly wealth. They also reject Roman
21:16
Catholicism, arguing it perverts grace into a system of
21:19
Sacramento works. And they call out Arminianism
21:22
too. Yes, they critique Arminianism
21:24
because they argue it elevates human will above God's sovereign
21:28
decree. The commentary's critique moves
21:31
directly into modern sociological and political
21:33
movements as well. The text explicitly calls out
21:36
critical race theory, the broader social justice movement
21:39
and egalitarian feminism. That is correct.
21:42
I have to ask, what is the author's underlying theological
21:45
rationale for issuing these specific critiques?
21:48
Well, the author views these specific movements as deliberate
21:51
attempts to assimilate the Church into Marxist, secular, or
21:55
pragmatic frameworks. Which violates the command we
21:57
discussed earlier. Yes, it violates the command to
22:00
maintain Pilgrim purity. It erases the stark
22:03
distinctiveness of the Church from Babylon.
22:06
The author's demand for distinction trickles down into
22:08
very specific household and church practices mentioned in
22:13
the sources as well. Yes, the source heavily defends
22:16
complementarianism in the home. Also, the author argues that
22:19
husbands must lead their families in the fear of God,
22:22
while wives are called to submit in holy purity.
22:25
And in the church. The text strongly advocates for
22:29
believers baptism over infant baptism.
22:32
The author's logic is that believers baptism is the initial
22:35
public break from the world. It is the moment they declare
22:38
death to their former lusts. There is also a call for
22:41
gravity. The author makes a pointed
22:43
critique regarding the tone of modern church leadership.
22:46
They call out pastors who preach like stand up comedians.
22:49
I can see how that connects. If a modern worship service
22:52
feels more like a comedy show, it undercuts the reality of an
22:55
impartial judge. The text demands a recovery of
22:58
gravity, trembling, awe and seriousness in the pulpit.
23:01
The core of the argument is that you simply cannot be seeker
23:04
sensitive when you are preaching the consuming, terrifying
23:08
holiness of Almighty God. That brings all of these massive
23:11
concepts into one final synthesis.
23:14
The Christian life is an exiled existence.
23:17
Live before an impartial Holy Father.
23:20
It requires A definitive break from the ignorant desires of the
23:23
past. And a joyful, reverent
23:26
submission to the standard of God's own character, all made
23:29
possible by the blood of Christ to.
23:31
Tie all these threads together, I want to leave you with a final
23:34
provocative thought to Mull over.
23:36
Please do. If your daily habits, your
23:38
entertainment, and your ambitions are completely
23:40
indistinguishable from those of your unbelieving neighbors, what
23:43
evidence is there that you are actually in exile, rather than a
23:47
permanent citizen of a passing world?
23:49
That is a hard question. Thank you for joining us on this
23:52
deep dive into reformed thinking.
23:54
Keep examining your heart, keep looking at the text, and keep
23:57
asking the hard questions. Until next time.