Latest / The Kevin Stone Podcast / Episode #21 - "The Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope"
Transcript
- 0:00Speaker 1: The content of this program is for entertainment purposes only,
- 0:02Speaker 1: mainly the entertainment of the program creator. If at any
- 0:03Speaker 1: time you find any of this program to be offensive,
- 0:05Speaker 1: you should immediately rewind the program to the beginning and
- 0:07Speaker 1: listen to it again. The sarcasm presented by the content
- 0:09Speaker 1: creator is so accurate it is illegal in 14 states.
- 0:12Speaker 1: You are listening to the Kevin Stone Podcast, broadcasting to
- 0:15Speaker 1: you from an unknown location.
- 0:20Speaker 2: Customized listening. Let's begin by cleaning those ears. Who am I?
- 0:27Speaker 2: I'm a nobody. I just happen to have a camera
- 0:29Speaker 2: and a microphone and an internet connection, which makes me
- 0:32Speaker 2: a superstar. There's vulnerable, there's vulnerable, there's vulnerable, there's vulnerable.
- 0:39Speaker 2: Spit it out! I have beef enchiladas in the oven. What? Yes.
- 0:46Speaker 2: And you made them or are they frozen? Um, well
- 0:49Speaker 2: they won't be frozen in about 35 minutes. Ha ha
- 0:51Speaker 2: ha ha ha ha ha. Sunday morning, NASA launched a
- 0:58Speaker 2: brand new space telescope worth approximately $ 4. 3 billion. And I
- 1:04Speaker 2: watched it happen live. Well, I actually watched the final
- 1:07Speaker 2: five seconds happen live. I turned on NASA TV just
- 1:10Speaker 2: as the countdown reached five. Four, three, two, one, ignition.
- 1:15Speaker 2: I had no time to prepare emotionally. I barely had
- 1:18Speaker 2: time to realize I'd found the right channel. And suddenly,
- 1:20Speaker 2: a SpaceX Falcon Heavy rocket was lifting NASA's Nancy Grace
- 1:24Speaker 2: Roman Space Telescope off the launch pad and carrying it
- 1:28Speaker 2: towards space. So technically, I watched the entire launch. As
- 1:32Speaker 2: long as we define entire launch as the part where
- 1:35Speaker 2: the rocket actually launched. Charlie says arriving with five seconds
- 1:38Speaker 2: left doesn't make me a dedicated space correspondent. I disagree.
- 1:42Speaker 2: I say it makes me an extremely efficient space correspondent.
- 1:45Speaker 2: I have always loved this space stuff. I grew up
- 1:48Speaker 2: in a time when NASA missions still felt like major
- 1:51Speaker 2: national events. When there was a launch, people stopped and watched.
- 1:55Speaker 2: And even now, after all the launches we've seen and
- 1:58Speaker 2: all the technology we carry around in our pockets, there
- 2:01Speaker 2: is still something incredible about watching a rocket leave Earth.
- 2:04Speaker 2: You're watching years of planning. Billions of dollars, thousands of
- 2:08Speaker 2: people's work, and an unbelievable amount of engineering sitting on
- 2:11Speaker 2: top of what is essentially a controlled explosion. Everybody involved
- 2:16Speaker 2: has checked everything they can possibly check. Somebody eventually has
- 2:20Speaker 2: to say, alright, light it up. Sunday morning, the Falcon
- 2:23Speaker 2: Heavy lifted off from Launch Complex 39A at Kennedy Space
- 2:27Speaker 2: Center in Florida. That's the same historic launch complex used
- 2:31Speaker 2: for Apollo missions, space shuttle missions, and now some of
- 2:35Speaker 2: the most important launches of the modern space program. The
- 2:38Speaker 2: two-sided boosters separated and returned to the Earth. The upper
- 2:42Speaker 2: stage continued carrying Roman into space. A little over half
- 2:46Speaker 2: an hour after liftoff, the telescope separated from the rocket
- 2:50Speaker 2: and began flying on its own. That's an important distinction,
- 2:53Speaker 2: because the launch wasn't just the rocket went up and
- 2:55Speaker 2: didn't immediately come back down. Roman successfully separated from the
- 2:59Speaker 2: Falcon Heavy and began its journey toward its new home
- 3:02Speaker 2: approximately one million miles from Earth. And somewhere at NASA,
- 3:06Speaker 2: I assume at least one person started breathing again. Before
- 3:09Speaker 2: we talk about the telescope, we should probably talk about
- 3:11Speaker 2: the woman whose name is on it, Dr. Nancy Grace Roman.
- 3:15Speaker 2: She was NASA's first chief of astronomy. She joined NASA
- 3:18Speaker 2: in 1959, during the agency's earliest years, and became one
- 3:23Speaker 2: of the major driving forces behind putting powerful observatories in space.
- 3:27Speaker 2: She's often called the Mother of Hubble because she helped
- 3:30Speaker 2: make the Hubble Space Telescope possible long before it was
- 3:34Speaker 2: ever launched. She understood that the Earth's atmosphere, while extremely
- 3:38Speaker 2: useful for things like breathing and keeping us alive, interferes
- 3:42Speaker 2: with our view of the universe. Apparently, the atmosphere can't
- 3:45Speaker 2: do everything. Roman pushed for telescopes that could operate above
- 3:48Speaker 2: that interference and make the discoveries available to scientists throughout
- 3:52Speaker 2: the world. She died in 2018. But the telescope carrying
- 3:55Speaker 2: her name will continue her work for the next decade.
- 3:58Speaker 2: NASA has given us a space telescope named for a
- 4:01Speaker 2: person who helped give us space telescopes. That seems appropriate.
- 4:05Speaker 2: It's also the first major NASA observatory named in honor
- 4:09Speaker 2: of a woman. Now we come to the number that
- 4:11Speaker 2: always gets everybody's attention. The total estimated life cycle cost
- 4:16Speaker 2: of the Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope is approximately $ 4. 3 billion. Charlie,
- 4:23Speaker 2: put that number on an imaginary control room calculator and
- 4:26Speaker 2: make sure I didn't accidentally add a decimal point. Yep, $ 4. 3 billion.
- 4:31Speaker 2: But that number isn't simply the price of the telescope
- 4:34Speaker 2: sitting on top of the rocket. NASA's life cycle estimate
- 4:37Speaker 2: includes developing it, building it, testing it, launching it, and
- 4:41Speaker 2: operating it during the mission. That doesn't mean that $ 4. 3
- 4:45Speaker 2: billion is pocket change. It's still an enormous investment of
- 4:49Speaker 2: public money. And the public has every right to ask,
- 4:52Speaker 2: what are we receiving in return? What we are receiving
- 4:55Speaker 2: is one of the most powerful survey telescopes ever constructed.
- 4:59Speaker 2: Roman's primary mission is expected to last five years, but
- 5:02Speaker 2: the observatory was designed to support another five-year extended mission.
- 5:07Speaker 2: If Roman completes 10 productive years in space, that works
- 5:11Speaker 2: out to about $ 430 million per year when the entire
- 5:15Speaker 2: life cycle cost is spread across the missions. That's still expensive.
- 5:19Speaker 2: But we have spent enormous amounts of money on things
- 5:22Speaker 2: that didn't produce a three-dimensional map of the universe. Heck,
- 5:25Speaker 2: some of them didn't even produce a usable website. Roman
- 5:29Speaker 2: is traveling toward the second Sun-Earth Lagrange point, commonly called L2.
- 5:34Speaker 2: Now this is something extremely interesting because I had no
- 5:37Speaker 2: earthly idea about this. L2 is approximately 930,000 miles or
- 5:43Speaker 2: roughly 1 million miles from Earth. That's about four times
- 5:46Speaker 2: farther away than the moon. This doesn't mean Roman will
- 5:49Speaker 2: fly to an invisible platform in space, put the transmission
- 5:53Speaker 2: in park, and sit there. A Lagrange point is an
- 5:55Speaker 2: area where the gravity of the Sun and Earth work
- 5:58Speaker 2: together with a spacecraft's motion to help it maintain a
- 6:02Speaker 2: relatively stable position. Roman will travel in a large orbit
- 6:05Speaker 2: around the L2 region, similar to the James Webb Space Telescope.
- 6:10Speaker 2: It won't be right next to the James Webb Telescope.
- 6:12Speaker 2: Space is fairly large. NASA should be able to keep
- 6:16Speaker 2: the two telescopes from backing into each other. Roman's distant
- 6:19Speaker 2: location will give it a steady, unobstructed view of the
- 6:22Speaker 2: universe while helping to keep its instruments cool. It can
- 6:25Speaker 2: also maintain that orbit without using a large amount of fuel. However,
- 6:29Speaker 2: being a million miles away creates one obvious problem. If
- 6:33Speaker 2: something goes wrong, a NASA technician can't drive out there
- 6:36Speaker 2: with a toolbox. NASA currently has no way to service
- 6:39Speaker 2: a telescope at L2. Roman was designed so it could
- 6:42Speaker 2: potentially be refueled someday, but we don't presently have a
- 6:45Speaker 2: mission capable of doing that. Once Roman reaches L2, it
- 6:49Speaker 2: needs to work. No pressure, only a $ 4. 3 billion telescope
- 6:53Speaker 2: sitting 1 million miles away. Roman has a 7.9 foot
- 6:56Speaker 2: primary mirror. The same basic diameter as Hubble's primary mirror.
- 7:01Speaker 2: But Roman is not simply Hubble 2.0. Hubble is very
- 7:05Speaker 2: good at looking deeply and sharply at relatively small sections
- 7:08Speaker 2: of the sky. Roman was built to capture much larger
- 7:11Speaker 2: areas while maintaining Hubble-like sharpness. Its field of view is
- 7:15Speaker 2: at least 100 times larger than the Hubble. Imagine Hubble
- 7:18Speaker 2: looking through a narrow window and seeing something with extraordinary detail.
- 7:22Speaker 2: Roman can see that same level of detail through something
- 7:25Speaker 2: closer to a panoramic windshield. Each Roman image will cover
- 7:28Speaker 2: an area of the sky approximately 1.5 times larger than
- 7:32Speaker 2: the apparent size of a full moon. And packed inside
- 7:35Speaker 2: the telescope is a roughly 300 megapixel wide field instrument.
- 7:39Speaker 2: For comparison, my phone has enough megapixels to document every scratch, wrinkle,
- 7:47Speaker 2: and bad decision on my face. Roman's camera is designed
- 7:50Speaker 2: to photograph billions of galaxies. Slightly different purpose. Roman will
- 7:54Speaker 2: be able to survey the sky up to 1,000 times
- 7:58Speaker 2: faster than Hubble while maintaining similar infrared sensitivity and resolution.
- 8:03Speaker 2: It will collect about 1.4 terabytes of raw scientific data
- 8:07Speaker 2: every day. Over its five-year primary mission, the processed information
- 8:11Speaker 2: could total approximately 20 petabytes. That's 20,000 terabytes. I would
- 8:17Speaker 2: not want to have the job of coming up with
- 8:19Speaker 2: names for all this stuff. Charlie has informed me that
- 8:22Speaker 2: my current computer may not have enough room. I might
- 8:25Speaker 2: have to delete a few podcast thumbnails. Roman will primarily
- 8:28Speaker 2: study the universe in infrared light. That's light that our
- 8:32Speaker 2: eyes can't see. Infrared observations allow astronomers to look through
- 8:36Speaker 2: clouds of dust that can block visible light. They also
- 8:39Speaker 2: allow Roman to detect extremely distant objects whose light has
- 8:43Speaker 2: been stretched toward infrared wavelengths as the universe expanded. The
- 8:48Speaker 2: mission has three major areas of investigation. Dark energy, dark matter,
- 8:53Speaker 2: and planets outside our solar system. Dark matter appears to
- 8:56Speaker 2: have gravity, but it doesn't give off or reflect light
- 9:00Speaker 2: in a way we can directly observe. Scientists know something
- 9:03Speaker 2: is there because galaxies and galaxy clusters behave as if
- 9:07Speaker 2: much more matter is present than we can see. It's
- 9:10Speaker 2: like discovering Charlie has been moving things around the control
- 9:13Speaker 2: room overnight. I may not see Charlie doing it, but
- 9:16Speaker 2: the evidence is everywhere. Roman will study how the gravity
- 9:20Speaker 2: of dark matter bends light traveling across the universe. Scientists
- 9:24Speaker 2: can use those tiny distortions to map where the dark
- 9:27Speaker 2: matter is located. The telescope is expected to help produce
- 9:30Speaker 2: one of the most detailed three-dimensional maps ever made of
- 9:34Speaker 2: the universe. Then we have dark energy. Scientists expected the
- 9:37Speaker 2: expansion of the universe to slow down over time because
- 9:41Speaker 2: gravity would pull matter together. Instead, the expansion is accelerating.
- 9:45Speaker 2: Whatever is causing that acceleration has been given the name
- 9:48Speaker 2: dark energy, which is a scientific way of saying we
- 9:52Speaker 2: know something is happening, we don't know what it is,
- 9:54Speaker 2: but the grant application needs a name. Roman will measure
- 9:57Speaker 2: enormous numbers of galaxies and absorb them. thousands of exploding
- 10:01Speaker 2: stars called supernovae. By measuring their distances and how quickly
- 10:05Speaker 2: they are moving away, scientists can study how the universe's
- 10:09Speaker 2: expansion has changed throughout cosmic history. Some of the galaxies
- 10:13Speaker 2: Roman observes will be so distant that their light has
- 10:16Speaker 2: traveled for more than 11 billion years before reaching the telescope.
- 10:21Speaker 2: In that sense, Roman acts like a time machine, because
- 10:24Speaker 2: light takes time to travel. Looking far enough into space
- 10:27Speaker 2: means seeing objects as they existed billions of years ago.
- 10:31Speaker 2: The further away Roman looks, the further back in time
- 10:34Speaker 2: it sees. Roman will also conduct an enormous search for exoplanets,
- 10:38Speaker 2: planets orbiting stars beyond our solar system. NASA expects the
- 10:42Speaker 2: mission's data to reveal about 100,000 new planets, primarily through
- 10:47Speaker 2: the transit method. It could also discover more than 1,000
- 10:50Speaker 2: planets using gravitational microlensing. Microlensing happens when the gravity of
- 10:56Speaker 2: one object bends and magnifies the light of another object.
- 10:59Speaker 2: If a planet is orbiting in front of a star,
- 11:02Speaker 2: the planet can produce its own smaller change in the light.
- 11:05Speaker 2: That little change may reveal a world we couldn't otherwise see.
- 11:09Speaker 2: This method will allow Roman to detect planets that have
- 11:12Speaker 2: been difficult to find, including worlds farther away from their stars,
- 11:16Speaker 2: planets as small as Mars, and possibly rogue planets wandering
- 11:19Speaker 2: through the galaxy without orbiting any star. Imagine an entire
- 11:23Speaker 2: planet drifting through space with no sun, no sunrise, no sunset,
- 11:28Speaker 2: no summer vacation, just cold darkness and apparently no property taxes.
- 11:33Speaker 2: Roman also carries a coronagraph instrument. A coronagraph blocks the
- 11:37Speaker 2: overwhelming glare of a star so the telescope can attempt
- 11:40Speaker 2: to see the much fainter planets orbiting around it. It's
- 11:43Speaker 2: similar to holding your hand in front of the sun
- 11:46Speaker 2: so you can see something nearby, except Roman's version is
- 11:49Speaker 2: considerably more precise than holding up your hand and squinting.
- 11:52Speaker 2: The coronagraph is primarily a technology demonstration. It is intended
- 11:57Speaker 2: to prove techniques that future telescopes may use to directly
- 12:01Speaker 2: photograph smaller, more Earth-like planets. Roman probably will not answer
- 12:05Speaker 2: the question of whether life exists elsewhere, but it could
- 12:08Speaker 2: help develop the tools that eventually do. Roman is not
- 12:12Speaker 2: replacing Hubble or the James Webb Space Telescope. The three
- 12:15Speaker 2: observatories have different strengths. Hubble gives us incredible sharp observations
- 12:21Speaker 2: in visible, ultraviolet, and some infrared light. Webb specializes in
- 12:25Speaker 2: extremely detailed infrared observations and can study faint objects from
- 12:30Speaker 2: the early universe. Roman will provide a wide view. Roman
- 12:33Speaker 2: may survey a huge region and discover millions of interesting objects.
- 12:37Speaker 2: Hubble or Webb can then take a closer look at
- 12:40Speaker 2: selected targets. Roman finds a neighborhood. Webb looks through the window.
- 12:44Speaker 2: Hubble takes the family picture. Charlie calls the police because
- 12:47Speaker 2: apparently we're now spying on the universe. The important point
- 12:51Speaker 2: is that these telescopes complement one another. Roman's enormous surveys
- 12:55Speaker 2: will give astronomers context, showing how individual stars, galaxies, planets,
- 13:00Speaker 2: and black holes fit into the larger cosmic picture. Roman
- 13:03Speaker 2: is now on its way, but we shouldn't expect pictures
- 13:06Speaker 2: tomorrow morning. NASA plans to spend approximately three months deploying equipment,
- 13:11Speaker 2: checking every system, calibrating the instruments, and guiding Roman into
- 13:15Speaker 2: its final orbit around L2. That commissioning period is necessary
- 13:19Speaker 2: because NASA has to be certain that the telescope is
- 13:22Speaker 2: performing exactly as expected before beginning the main scientific mission.
- 13:26Speaker 2: NASA expects to release Roman's first science images in early 2027.
- 13:32Speaker 2: The good news is that Roman scientific data will be
- 13:34Speaker 2: made public as soon as it is processed. There won't
- 13:37Speaker 2: be an exclusion period where one research team keeps the
- 13:40Speaker 2: information to itself. Scientists throughout the world will be able
- 13:44Speaker 2: to examine it. With the amount of information Roman will produce,
- 13:48Speaker 2: discoveries may continue for decades. The telescope could record something
- 13:51Speaker 2: important that nobody notices immediately. Years later, a scientist may
- 13:56Speaker 2: search through the archives, recognize an unusual pattern, and discover
- 14:00Speaker 2: something that changes our understanding of the universe. That has
- 14:03Speaker 2: happened with other observatories. Sometimes we build an instrument to
- 14:07Speaker 2: answer one set of questions and discover questions we never
- 14:10Speaker 2: thought to ask. Sunday morning, I got up, turned on
- 14:13Speaker 2: NASA TV, and caught the countdown with five seconds remaining.
- 14:16Speaker 2: I had almost missed it, but I didn't. I watched
- 14:19Speaker 2: that Falcon Heavy rise from the launch pad carrying a
- 14:22Speaker 2: telescope that may help us understand the invisible structure of
- 14:25Speaker 2: the universe, discover thousands upon thousands of distant worlds, and
- 14:29Speaker 2: show us parts of creation we've never seen before. There's
- 14:32Speaker 2: something humbling about that. Here we are on one small
- 14:35Speaker 2: planet orbiting one ordinary star inside one galaxy among billions.
- 14:40Speaker 2: But we still have problems down here. We still argue
- 14:43Speaker 2: over politics, property lines, lawn height, and whether somebody is
- 14:47Speaker 2: trying to sneak 12 items through the 10 items or
- 14:50Speaker 2: less checkout lane. But every once in a while, we
- 14:52Speaker 2: look up. We build something extraordinary. We place it on
- 14:55Speaker 2: top of a rocket, and we send it a million
- 14:57Speaker 2: miles into space because we want to know what's out there.
- 15:00Speaker 2: The Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope represents years of work
- 15:04Speaker 2: and a tremendous amount of money. We should expect NASA
- 15:07Speaker 2: to use it responsibly, operate it transparently, and produce science
- 15:11Speaker 2: worthy of that investment. But today, I'm also willing to
- 15:14Speaker 2: appreciate what just happened. Human beings built a machine capable
- 15:18Speaker 2: of seeing billions of galaxies. Sunday morning, that machine left Earth,
- 15:22Speaker 2: and I was there for all five seconds of it. Charlie,
- 15:25Speaker 2: put that in the official record. I didn't nearly miss
- 15:28Speaker 2: the launch. I arrived precisely when the exciting part started.
- 15:31Speaker 2: And now, like everything else, I'll be waiting for early
- 15:34Speaker 2: 2027 when Roman opens its eyes and begins showing us
- 15:39Speaker 2: the bigger picture. Until next time, keep looking up. And
- 15:42Speaker 2: if NASA is counting down from 10, try to arrive
- 15:44Speaker 2: before they reach 5. Now, this has been a very
- 15:47Speaker 2: fun episode for me to do because I learned a lot.
- 15:51Speaker 2: And that's the whole purpose of this podcast. Come up
- 15:54Speaker 2: with ideas, do the research, learn, and then share. 95%
- 15:58Speaker 2: of the information that came out on this episode, I
- 16:02Speaker 2: had no earthly idea about. But through the research, thanks
- 16:06Speaker 2: to Charlie, I learned a little bit. And I hope
- 16:08Speaker 2: maybe you did too. For some, it may have been boring.
- 16:10Speaker 2: But for a few of you, there might have been
- 16:12Speaker 2: some interest. And the articles that were used in the
- 16:14Speaker 2: research for making this podcast episode have been shared down
- 16:18Speaker 2: in the description. So feel free to go check it
- 16:21Speaker 2: out for yourself. I'm Kevin Stone. This has been the
- 16:23Speaker 2: Kevin Stone Podcast, and I'll talk to you next time.
- 16:27Speaker 2: This concludes our broadcast day. Good night, and God bless America.