Latest / Honey Badger Radio / Under the Humanitarian Initiative Veil | HBR Talk 380

Transcript

Under the Humanitarian Initiative Veil | HBR Talk 380 · Honey Badger Radio

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: Hello, and welcome to HBr Talk three point eight under
• 0:06
  Speaker 1: the Humanitarian Initiative VEIL. I'm your host Hannah Wallant here
• 0:12
  Speaker 1: with Nonsense Annilator Lauren Brooks and the Personification of Perceptivity
• 0:17
  Speaker 1: Mike Stevenson, and we all, as always, we have the
• 0:20
  Speaker 1: DOSEE in charge working in the background to uh make
• 0:23
  Speaker 1: sure everything goes the way it should be. And tonight
• 0:28
  Speaker 1: we're still taking a break from you and women because
• 0:30
  Speaker 1: you can only put up with those bitches so much
• 0:32
  Speaker 1: for so long at a time. Uh. Really, it's because
• 0:36
  Speaker 1: US AIDS infections are scarier than un women.
• 0:43
  Speaker 2: But I I hear you can I hear you can
• 0:47
  Speaker 2: cure AIDS by wearing condoms.
• 0:50
  Speaker 1: Yes, yes, we need a US condom to prevent the
• 0:55
  Speaker 1: USAID's infection from spreading any further throughout the world. It
• 0:59
  Speaker 1: is is becoming a massive epidemic and unfortunately so many
• 1:05
  Speaker 1: people now have been affected by it that it's uh,
• 1:08
  Speaker 1: it's it's definitely much much more of an issue than
• 1:13
  Speaker 1: any other pandemic ever.
• 1:15
  Speaker 3: Was we need a U s I U D. Is
• 1:20
  Speaker 3: that the right thing?
• 1:21
  Speaker 1: Yes, yes, we need a U s I U D.
• 1:24
  Speaker 1: Yes we will. We will definitely not use I.
• 1:28
  Speaker 4: E d here.
• 1:30
  Speaker 1: It's worse.
• 1:31
  Speaker 2: It's it's not an epidemic, it's an epic.
• 1:36
  Speaker 1: Dumbass, there we go. It's an epidemic. It's it's worse
• 1:42
  Speaker 1: than the dip shit epidemic. It's the dip ship pandemic.
• 1:47
  Speaker 1: But this actually is more serious than that. And and
• 1:50
  Speaker 1: and you'll you'll see why as I get into it.
• 1:52
  Speaker 1: But before we get into that, as always, we gotta
• 1:56
  Speaker 1: do what we gotta do. And I got to remind
• 1:58
  Speaker 1: you that Honey Badger Radio dishes out Ace morgas board
• 2:02
  Speaker 1: of thought provoking discussions, including the the Bear We're poking
• 2:07
  Speaker 1: tonight and as experiences both recent long pass have demonstrated
• 2:13
  Speaker 1: the provoked thoughts are fighting back. They've made it clear
• 2:17
  Speaker 1: that for people like us, relying on third party platforms
• 2:20
  Speaker 1: like Patreon to fund our work is treading on thin
• 2:22
  Speaker 1: ice or building our house in the path of a
• 2:25
  Speaker 1: rapidly growing wildfire. In light of this, we strongly encourage
• 2:30
  Speaker 1: our supporters to switch at least their support for us
• 2:34
  Speaker 1: to Feed the Badger dot Com the most stable way
• 2:36
  Speaker 1: to help us out, And if you want to tip
• 2:40
  Speaker 1: us directly instead of relying on any social media platforms,
• 2:44
  Speaker 1: tip jar The link for that is feed the Badger
• 2:47
  Speaker 1: dot com splash just the tip, and here we go.
• 2:57
  Speaker 1: Uh oh oh, I see, I thought I had a
• 3:01
  Speaker 1: super chat, but I actually just posted something for the
• 3:04
  Speaker 1: live show in the super chat channel that was brilliant anyway,
• 3:11
  Speaker 1: So here you go, feed Thebadgery dot Com slashes the
• 3:14
  Speaker 1: tip and as always, the same risk applies to our
• 3:16
  Speaker 1: social media platforms, which is why you should further provoke
• 3:19
  Speaker 1: the thought police by tracking our thought provoking discussions on
• 3:23
  Speaker 1: Honey Badger Brigade dot com, where you can find your
• 3:26
  Speaker 1: way to all of our content, as well as a
• 3:27
  Speaker 1: link to feed the Badger dot Com in the drop
• 3:29
  Speaker 1: down menu at the top of the page. Interestingly, the
• 3:34
  Speaker 1: last actual superchat in our superchat channel on our discord
• 3:38
  Speaker 1: where we see the superchats or superchows, I should say
• 3:43
  Speaker 1: that you send through feed the Badger dot Com slashes
• 3:46
  Speaker 1: the tip. Is about men being protectors of the family
• 3:49
  Speaker 1: and how evil it is to undermine that, and this
• 3:54
  Speaker 1: show tonight tonight is going to be an sort of
• 4:00
  Speaker 1: a discussion about the undermining as of men as social
• 4:07
  Speaker 1: protectors of the country. Men. You know, they get sent
• 4:13
  Speaker 1: to war, they get sent out to fix the power lines,
• 4:17
  Speaker 1: they get sent out to build new homes. After a disaster,
• 4:22
  Speaker 1: they get sent out to rescue people. And flood and
• 4:25
  Speaker 1: fire and blizzard and drought, you know, any disaster that
• 4:33
  Speaker 1: that traps people in a very dangerous situation, threatens people's lives,
• 4:38
  Speaker 1: kills people, puts people in a situation where they've lost
• 4:43
  Speaker 1: everything and they need shelter. Men are the ones that
• 4:46
  Speaker 1: get sent out to do that. But as we had discussed,
• 4:53
  Speaker 1: you know, over and over again during HBr talks, discussions
• 4:58
  Speaker 1: on suffrage, history of an evolution of suffrage, not just
• 5:03
  Speaker 1: women's suffrage, but voting rights all together, and how voting
• 5:10
  Speaker 1: rights evolved out of men's service to their country. So
• 5:16
  Speaker 1: they're intrinsically connected. It's it's important for us to understand
• 5:24
  Speaker 1: that the stewards of government, the people who are citizens,
• 5:30
  Speaker 1: who are the stewards of what government may or may
• 5:32
  Speaker 1: not do, you know, to the citizens and for the
• 5:35
  Speaker 1: citizens and so on, are men. It's it's when men
• 5:40
  Speaker 1: get that up with women trying to exploit government to
• 5:44
  Speaker 1: do things that it shouldn't be doing, men have to
• 5:47
  Speaker 1: put their foot down. And that's what they did in
• 5:50
  Speaker 1: this last election. They said no to a lot of things,
• 5:54
  Speaker 1: and they said, we need to tear down a bunch
• 5:58
  Speaker 1: of essentially ship agencies and departments and build things back
• 6:08
  Speaker 1: up the way that they should be, or you know,
• 6:12
  Speaker 1: if there are things that just shouldn't be, not build
• 6:16
  Speaker 1: them back up, just not have them. And one of
• 6:20
  Speaker 1: those things was the giant money laundering system known as USAID.
• 6:29
  Speaker 1: And this is something that we knew about, like prior
• 6:36
  Speaker 1: to to the election, to a degree, we knew about,
• 6:42
  Speaker 1: you know, the fact that there were government agencies and
• 6:46
  Speaker 1: government departments that were essentially just there to launder money
• 6:52
  Speaker 1: for politicians and non government organizations in the the non
• 6:58
  Speaker 1: government organizations that police since had invested in, the companies
• 7:03
  Speaker 1: involved in the military industrial complex, companies involved in what
• 7:08
  Speaker 1: I would call the charity industrial complex, where they have
• 7:14
  Speaker 1: this entire organized system that involves government contractors, government employees,
• 7:25
  Speaker 1: non government organizations, networking between agencies and departments within the
• 7:31
  Speaker 1: government and networking with other governments in order to move
• 7:36
  Speaker 1: American taxpayer dollars and money borrowed in the name of
• 7:41
  Speaker 1: American taxpayers and future American taxpayers from middle class people
• 7:49
  Speaker 1: and producers of wealth in the United States to organizations
• 7:57
  Speaker 1: outside the United States and mostly to administrators of these
• 8:03
  Speaker 1: these organizations, not really to poor people in other countries,
• 8:07
  Speaker 1: they're not really. They'll they'll provide some services, but the
• 8:11
  Speaker 1: majority of the funding instead of going to help people
• 8:16
  Speaker 1: who need food, need to learn how to farm, need
• 8:22
  Speaker 1: assistance in obtaining things like maybe they need to have
• 8:26
  Speaker 1: animals in order to be able to have a food
• 8:30
  Speaker 1: supply or something like that. Then instead of doing that,
• 8:35
  Speaker 1: they're over there promoting abortion and gendered law and policy
• 8:42
  Speaker 1: on an intimate partner and sexual violence, with holding food
• 8:47
  Speaker 1: from men by redirecting existing national systems that provide for
• 8:54
  Speaker 1: the poor so that only women can access them, and
• 8:58
  Speaker 1: then it's up to the women to distribute the food.
• 9:02
  Speaker 1: Promoting circumcision. You know, there's like stuff that I don't
• 9:07
  Speaker 1: I don't think any poor person has ever gotten an
• 9:11
  Speaker 1: extra meal put into their belly by getting circumcised. Yeah,
• 9:16
  Speaker 1: you don't work that way.
• 9:19
  Speaker 3: One of the most Orwellian misnomers in the English language
• 9:23
  Speaker 3: is non government organization. It's like nonprofit organization. There's nothing
• 9:29
  Speaker 3: more driven by the profit to its head on shows
• 9:33
  Speaker 3: than a nonprofit organization. And there's nothing more driven by
• 9:36
  Speaker 3: government influence than a non government organization.
• 9:41
  Speaker 1: Yeah, well, one of the worst things is they have
• 9:46
  Speaker 1: influence in the government. And so, for instance, Planned Parenthood
• 9:53
  Speaker 1: is an NGO, right, they're supposed to be they're not.
• 9:57
  Speaker 1: They're funded by the government, but they're not supposed to
• 9:59
  Speaker 1: be part of the government. But policy gets dictated by
• 10:05
  Speaker 1: the interests or has been dictated by the interests of
• 10:07
  Speaker 1: Planned Parenthood. The National Education Association is a union, it
• 10:13
  Speaker 1: is a non government organization, but policy and government has
• 10:18
  Speaker 1: been dictated by the National Education Association for decades in
• 10:23
  Speaker 1: any education department, and you know, USA, it is supposed
• 10:31
  Speaker 1: to be funding a whole shitload a slew of non
• 10:35
  Speaker 1: government organizations that go out into other countries and they're
• 10:38
  Speaker 1: supposed to be doing charity work in these other countries,
• 10:42
  Speaker 1: and they have had a huge effect on government policy
• 10:49
  Speaker 1: with regard to like how we deal with these other countries.
• 10:53
  Speaker 1: And it's been it's been quite a scam for a
• 10:59
  Speaker 1: long time. So last week what we were looking at
• 11:02
  Speaker 1: is these people are panicking because their DEI hiring is
• 11:06
  Speaker 1: being taken away. And I'm going to go over that
• 11:08
  Speaker 1: again really quick. We'll listen to I think I need
• 11:12
  Speaker 1: to back this up a couple of seconds, because we
• 11:14
  Speaker 1: were listening to it for a little bit before the show,
• 11:17
  Speaker 1: but I want you to rehear one thing we played
• 11:19
  Speaker 1: last week. Oops, I guess I can't just hit the
• 11:22
  Speaker 1: space bar because it's not YouTube.
• 11:25
  Speaker 5: A large number of our awards immediately. So in that
• 11:30
  Speaker 5: first week, we experienced a lot of threatening emails across
• 11:37
  Speaker 5: the staff, a takeover of what it was it deia
• 11:45
  Speaker 5: truth at opm dot gov, which was unusual to have
• 11:48
  Speaker 5: centralized emails sent to all government staff. And then many
• 11:55
  Speaker 5: staff who are under a particular hiring mechanism in that
• 11:59
  Speaker 5: first week were immediately put on furlough or laid off.
• 12:05
  Speaker 5: I am a part of that hiring mechanism.
• 12:08
  Speaker 1: Then, so there she goes, she's talking about the overseers
• 12:16
  Speaker 1: of DEI, like human resources, the human resources workers that
• 12:20
  Speaker 1: were dedicated to ensuring that hiring was done through the diversity,
• 12:27
  Speaker 1: Equity and Inclusion model or uh DEI, which I like
• 12:32
  Speaker 1: to refer to as d I E instead, because when
• 12:36
  Speaker 1: a business does it, and you know, I've I've explained
• 12:41
  Speaker 1: before that every nation is a corporation and there is
• 12:46
  Speaker 1: a degree to which it is important to recognize it
• 12:50
  Speaker 1: as a business. So when when a privately owned business
• 12:56
  Speaker 1: from the private sector does this, it does result in
• 13:02
  Speaker 1: problems due to not not making talent, initiative, skill, and
• 13:15
  Speaker 1: character their primary focus when they're hiring somebody, but instead
• 13:20
  Speaker 1: making race, effects and religion their primary focus. And that's
• 13:27
  Speaker 1: really dangerous when you forget about those other things and
• 13:30
  Speaker 1: you make these characteristics that don't really have anything to
• 13:35
  Speaker 1: do with how well somebody does their job the primary focus.
• 13:40
  Speaker 1: You promote people who are not necessarily the best fit
• 13:45
  Speaker 1: for the job. You ignore if somebody else is more talented,
• 13:50
  Speaker 1: more diligent, better worker, has more skill that's particularly needed
• 13:58
  Speaker 1: in that area, and so on. If that individual is
• 14:02
  Speaker 1: the wrong sex, race, religion, what have you, and you
• 14:09
  Speaker 1: hire the person who is preferred in order to promote
• 14:13
  Speaker 1: supposed diversity, which really means everyone but white men, everyone
• 14:20
  Speaker 1: but straight white male Christians in particular.
• 14:25
  Speaker 3: It's another euphemism. Well, I was about to say it's
• 14:27
  Speaker 3: another euphemism for communism, But every couple of years they
• 14:31
  Speaker 3: find another euphemism for the same original thing for which
• 14:37
  Speaker 3: communism was already a euphemism for. And it's pathetic, useless
• 14:42
  Speaker 3: mutant pig people trying to drag all the successful people
• 14:45
  Speaker 3: down into their swamp with them.
• 14:47
  Speaker 1: Yeah, so it's we need to combat oikophobia with oinkophobia. Indeed,
• 14:57
  Speaker 1: that's that's my take on it. Get rid of that
• 15:01
  Speaker 1: real fast. But what that was, what she was The
• 15:05
  Speaker 1: thing she was whining about was that she lost her
• 15:08
  Speaker 1: DEI position, this DEI hire, lost her DEI position, and
• 15:15
  Speaker 1: she lost control over part of the company because of that,
• 15:19
  Speaker 1: Because she had control over part of the company not
• 15:23
  Speaker 1: only as a DEI hire, but as a person influential
• 15:28
  Speaker 1: in bringing in more DEI hires. It's it's almost like
• 15:34
  Speaker 1: bringing a virus into what it is, because it's the
• 15:38
  Speaker 1: woke mind virus uh into your corporation. And well, you know,
• 15:45
  Speaker 1: Jillette may have the choice to do that if they
• 15:48
  Speaker 1: want to because of their company. Uh, the federal government
• 15:53
  Speaker 1: is our company. We the people, and we didn't want that,
• 15:57
  Speaker 1: and and we voted against it. Primarily men voted against it.
• 16:02
  Speaker 1: If if women had been the only people to vote
• 16:04
  Speaker 1: in the last election, we'd be we'd be dealing with president.
• 16:12
  Speaker 4: Cackle.
• 16:12
  Speaker 1: But I can't take the woman seriously. Thank god she
• 16:18
  Speaker 1: didn't become president, because then then we would have to
• 16:21
  Speaker 1: take her seriously. But yeah, we would have been uh
• 16:26
  Speaker 1: dealing with the wicked witch of the East, like, I'll
• 16:32
  Speaker 1: get you my pretty jeez. But if only men had voted,
• 16:39
  Speaker 1: we would have had exactly the same result that we had.
• 16:43
  Speaker 1: So that tells you something, and I think it's important
• 16:47
  Speaker 1: for people to understand that what has gone on here.
• 16:51
  Speaker 1: Every every politician that gets elected makes changes in the government.
• 16:55
  Speaker 1: They come up with new policy, They add, they subtract,
• 16:59
  Speaker 1: they decide things should go a particular way. They they
• 17:05
  Speaker 1: work with Congress to pass new laws. They all the
• 17:09
  Speaker 1: things that Trump has done. Every administrator that we have
• 17:14
  Speaker 1: hired to be the CEO of our country as as
• 17:18
  Speaker 1: a people has done the same processes and procedures. So
• 17:24
  Speaker 1: people who work in government have to be accustomed to
• 17:27
  Speaker 1: the fact that every four to eight years, anybody can
• 17:32
  Speaker 1: come in and say, you know, from now on, all
• 17:35
  Speaker 1: this stuff that you've been putting on pink slips of paper,
• 17:37
  Speaker 1: we're gonna put them on green slips of paper for
• 17:39
  Speaker 1: no particular reason, and I want it to start yesterday.
• 17:43
  Speaker 1: They got to be ready for that. They got to
• 17:44
  Speaker 1: be ready for you know, you're gonna we're gonna update
• 17:48
  Speaker 1: all your computers, You're gonna have to transfer your stuff,
• 17:50
  Speaker 1: and we want it done within a week, and they
• 17:52
  Speaker 1: got to be ready for this policy that the last
• 17:55
  Speaker 1: administration said was vital to our country. We think actually
• 18:00
  Speaker 1: it was damaging, and we're going to stop the policy
• 18:03
  Speaker 1: and we're going to do the reverse of it. Because
• 18:07
  Speaker 1: that happens every time you go from Democrat to Republican
• 18:10
  Speaker 1: and back in all positions all over the government. Not
• 18:15
  Speaker 1: with everything, but with a lot of things right. And
• 18:20
  Speaker 1: so they this isn't new that somebody comes in and
• 18:24
  Speaker 1: shakes up their tree. But this time, this time when
• 18:31
  Speaker 1: the people whose influence on you know, who became the
• 18:37
  Speaker 1: president that outweighed the opposite sex's influence were men instead
• 18:43
  Speaker 1: of women. Now everyone in government is panicking and they're
• 18:49
  Speaker 1: creating these alternative systems to talk about how they're going
• 18:53
  Speaker 1: to undermine the current administration. If you ran a company,
• 19:00
  Speaker 1: let's say you make three pronged widgets and your your
• 19:06
  Speaker 1: new CEO comes in and discovers that three pronged widget
• 19:11
  Speaker 1: widgets are no longer useful, your company is like going
• 19:15
  Speaker 1: to shit. You have your sales are tanked, your consumers
• 19:21
  Speaker 1: are very dissatisfied, and they're kind of threatening to abandon you,
• 19:28
  Speaker 1: and and you're you're going to end up losing the company.
• 19:32
  Speaker 1: So new CEO says, all right, let's start by looking
• 19:37
  Speaker 1: into what we should be doing for our consumers, since
• 19:43
  Speaker 1: they are the whole reason we exist.
• 19:45
  Speaker 5: Uh.
• 19:45
  Speaker 1: And you discover that actually what consumers need is UH
• 19:52
  Speaker 1: four pronged widget. Not a huge change, but it is
• 19:57
  Speaker 1: a change. So we decide he's going to revamp everything.
• 20:02
  Speaker 1: Your machines are going to be updated, the manufacturing process
• 20:05
  Speaker 1: is going to be updated, and the company is going
• 20:08
  Speaker 1: to become three or four pronged widget sellers. And of
• 20:14
  Speaker 1: course your employees all go into a panic. We can't
• 20:17
  Speaker 1: sell four pronged widgets. That's morallyer on. We don't like
• 20:20
  Speaker 1: four prongs. We want three prongs. Three prongs is what
• 20:22
  Speaker 1: we've always done and it's the way things ought to be.
• 20:25
  Speaker 1: So they create an extracurricular chat that's not part of
• 20:31
  Speaker 1: the company chat system and talk about how they're going
• 20:35
  Speaker 1: to work with another bunch of three pronged widget companies
• 20:41
  Speaker 1: to secretly undermine all of the changes your CEO is making,
• 20:49
  Speaker 1: so that after your CEO has spent all of the
• 20:54
  Speaker 1: money and I'm needed to update the machines and everything,
• 20:59
  Speaker 1: they will they'll produced three pronged widgets, and they will
• 21:03
  Speaker 1: be sold as three pronged widgets, and it'll look to
• 21:06
  Speaker 1: the CEO like the company has been updated. Those are
• 21:11
  Speaker 1: get fired, maybe prosecute.
• 21:15
  Speaker 3: I know this is a metaphor, but it's been so
• 21:18
  Speaker 3: long since the sort of three pronged fork. At some
• 21:21
  Speaker 3: point in history, fox all got changed to four prongs.
• 21:25
  Speaker 3: All forks are four pronged now. I do remember three
• 21:29
  Speaker 3: pronged folks. They were a thing in the twentieth century,
• 21:32
  Speaker 3: but now they're all sorry. Yeah, like I say, I
• 21:35
  Speaker 3: know it's a metaphor, but burned my brain off into
• 21:39
  Speaker 3: a literal thing. I wonder if I wonder if the
• 21:42
  Speaker 3: thing you just described really did happen in Fork Manufacturing.
• 21:49
  Speaker 1: Yeah. Well, and the employees of the USA System, the
• 21:59
  Speaker 1: USA as Infection Corporation, have done exactly that. They have
• 22:06
  Speaker 1: forked the company, and they've gone behind the company's back
• 22:13
  Speaker 1: to fork the company. They went and formed protests. I
• 22:18
  Speaker 1: believe we were right about somewhere in here, real close
• 22:25
  Speaker 1: to like just having a minute left and I'll play it.
• 22:30
  Speaker 1: But they organized protests. They organized an international communications network
• 22:38
  Speaker 1: with people who make it their business to undermine governments.
• 22:44
  Speaker 1: When they don't like the outcome of free elections. So
• 22:48
  Speaker 1: these people are literally talking about undermining the results of
• 22:54
  Speaker 1: a democratic election in the United States. What can they
• 23:00
  Speaker 1: do to undermine your vote, to take away the result
• 23:09
  Speaker 1: that you voted for? I like, just think about that.
• 23:15
  Speaker 1: That is a soft coup. Even if they're just looking
• 23:19
  Speaker 1: at how can they do this in their little area,
• 23:22
  Speaker 1: which they may not be, that is a soft coup.
• 23:28
  Speaker 5: There are more signal groups stood up. Like I said,
• 23:33
  Speaker 5: this is an agency of about ten to fourteen thousand
• 23:35
  Speaker 5: people within the US. We have about fifty thousand people
• 23:39
  Speaker 5: who are hired into the ecosystem of awards and grants
• 23:43
  Speaker 5: that are contracted by USA.
• 23:45
  Speaker 1: Fifty thousand people in that system, and the system is
• 23:52
  Speaker 1: focused on undermining the federal government. So this isn't a
• 23:58
  Speaker 1: small conspiracy. We don't know how many of those fifty
• 24:02
  Speaker 1: thousand people are involved in this.
• 24:05
  Speaker 5: And so this community started really gathering in signal, especially
• 24:12
  Speaker 5: as we saw the disinformation about USAID coming out of
• 24:17
  Speaker 5: x as Elon Musk escalated attacks. In that second week
• 24:25
  Speaker 5: after the administration, the all almost all of USAID staff
• 24:31
  Speaker 5: was put on administrative lead, including our ethics lawyers, our
• 24:35
  Speaker 5: HR security. So This was really when DOES took over
• 24:39
  Speaker 5: closed our buildings. In that February fifth, we had our
• 24:43
  Speaker 5: first large scale protest organized in which subtle congressional leaders
• 24:47
  Speaker 5: stood up with us along with agency leadership.
• 24:53
  Speaker 1: This is this is a permanency, all right, that that
• 25:03
  Speaker 1: tested against an executive decision by the president who has
• 25:09
  Speaker 1: legal authority to meet those decisions. And when was the
• 25:14
  Speaker 1: last time you heard about this a protest during any
• 25:19
  Speaker 1: other president rule that that a government agency, the people
• 25:24
  Speaker 1: government agency protested uh In in public, in front of buildings,
• 25:30
  Speaker 1: in front of news media and said you can't do this.
• 25:35
  Speaker 1: We're in charge, and we say you're wrong. Go ahead, Mike.
• 25:41
  Speaker 3: Yeah, she said the words I don't want to hear
• 25:44
  Speaker 3: us say. The word is a pee Wee's Playhouse wrote.
• 25:46
  Speaker 3: She said it disinformation. Yeah, you know what that means,
• 25:50
  Speaker 3: don't We Those told the truth And we can't be
• 25:55
  Speaker 3: calling those truth lies because we know they're not lies.
• 25:58
  Speaker 3: We know they're the truth. We have to break out
• 26:01
  Speaker 3: the magic word to the information. Yeah. I can't believe
• 26:07
  Speaker 3: there's they're still doing it. You fucking wore that word
• 26:10
  Speaker 3: all the way out.
• 26:12
  Speaker 1: Yeah, but they believe in it. They'll use it with
• 26:17
  Speaker 1: each other because they believe in it and they don't
• 26:19
  Speaker 1: understand that we don't, so they'll continue to use it
• 26:24
  Speaker 1: because they think that it makes them sound right. But
• 26:32
  Speaker 1: but yeah, we'll finish the last five seconds here. But
• 26:35
  Speaker 1: I think this is that was basically what I wanted
• 26:37
  Speaker 1: to show you on this one.
• 26:39
  Speaker 5: Many many things have happened. I'll talk about that next,
• 26:42
  Speaker 5: but we do.
• 26:45
  Speaker 1: Yeah, so they they ended that that's what I was thinking.
• 26:49
  Speaker 1: But even that a Republican you know, had to actually
• 26:53
  Speaker 1: say point out and not just leave it for you
• 26:56
  Speaker 1: to notice. She's talking about or organizing. George Soros backed
• 27:02
  Speaker 1: groups five h five oh one and Individual Indivisible organize
• 27:07
  Speaker 1: these protests. So this is again someone who doesn't really
• 27:13
  Speaker 1: have a right to tell the people what to vote for,
• 27:17
  Speaker 1: that doesn't have a right to control, just just is
• 27:21
  Speaker 1: maybe entitled to contribute along with other citizens and this
• 27:27
  Speaker 1: is his opinion, and that's their opinion. And so on,
• 27:31
  Speaker 1: organized funded bust people in for a protest by employees
• 27:39
  Speaker 1: of a government agency against the executive authority of the
• 27:47
  Speaker 1: the UH of the administrative branch of the United States
• 27:55
  Speaker 1: federal government for exercising his authority and running the country
• 28:02
  Speaker 1: as he was voted in.
• 28:03
  Speaker 6: To do.
• 28:08
  Speaker 1: Because men voted for him, because men put him in office.
• 28:12
  Speaker 1: They're mad, They're not mad just because things are being
• 28:17
  Speaker 1: shaken up. The entire federal government bureaucracy, every organization has,
• 28:25
  Speaker 1: or every department, every agency, every sub agency has some
• 28:33
  Speaker 1: part of it that is like USAYED, where it's got
• 28:40
  Speaker 1: funding but not enough accountability for how that funding is used,
• 28:47
  Speaker 1: and a lot of the funding goes to some industrial complex.
• 28:53
  Speaker 1: I think you've heard of the military industrial complex. This
• 28:57
  Speaker 1: is the charitable organization, the human Inness, a humanitarian initiative,
• 29:02
  Speaker 1: VEIL industrial complex, the HIV industrial complex that they're organized
• 29:11
  Speaker 1: around creating businesses and non so called nonprofit organizations to
• 29:17
  Speaker 1: use government funding in other countries for the appearance at
• 29:24
  Speaker 1: least of helping people. And they move quite a bit
• 29:29
  Speaker 1: of money every year, huge amounts of money, more money
• 29:34
  Speaker 1: than you can picture in your mind, annually, without really
• 29:40
  Speaker 1: accounting for any of it to the public. We don't
• 29:45
  Speaker 1: get to hear this group, this company, this nonprofit organization
• 29:54
  Speaker 1: did this much work in this country in Africa to
• 29:59
  Speaker 1: make sure this so many people got housing or food
• 30:02
  Speaker 1: or whatever, that this money came from USAID. You never
• 30:07
  Speaker 1: see that there's not some publication that gets sent to
• 30:11
  Speaker 1: your house. It's not on the news, it's not talked
• 30:16
  Speaker 1: about very much at all. And instead, you know, you're
• 30:20
  Speaker 1: you're constantly seeing you don't ask questions about this. You
• 30:24
  Speaker 1: ask questions about this it's because you hate poor people,
• 30:26
  Speaker 1: or you hate black people, or you hate Muslims, or
• 30:29
  Speaker 1: you hate this group or that group. Uh that you're
• 30:32
  Speaker 1: you are infected with the isms and the phobias. In
• 30:38
  Speaker 1: the meantime, they're laundering money and ensuring that a bunch
• 30:44
  Speaker 1: of people who aren't doing anything for anybody get very rich.
• 30:49
  Speaker 3: Yeah, the military industrial complex is in danger of eventually
• 30:54
  Speaker 3: realizing that they are the baddies because they essentially have
• 30:59
  Speaker 3: skulls on their hat, or you know the equivalent of it,
• 31:01
  Speaker 3: because they're called the military industrial complex, but the charity
• 31:06
  Speaker 3: industrial complex they wear rainbows. Do you see, we can't
• 31:10
  Speaker 3: possibly be the bad guys if we're wearing rainbows and
• 31:13
  Speaker 3: we call ourselves the good guys. Problem solves. They're not
• 31:17
  Speaker 3: the baddies. We can never be the baddies. No one's
• 31:19
  Speaker 3: ever going to see us as the baddies. So we
• 31:21
  Speaker 3: can keep on acting exactly like the baddies and't doing
• 31:25
  Speaker 3: exactly what the baddies would do, and we'll never have
• 31:29
  Speaker 3: that revelation looking over the guard tower that the people
• 31:36
  Speaker 3: were totally not oppressing. It's fine, don't worry about it.
• 31:40
  Speaker 3: And yeah, they're the moral busy bodies who will forever
• 31:45
  Speaker 3: rule over people with their conscience intact good times.
• 31:50
  Speaker 4: Well see, I take a little bit of a different stance.
• 31:53
  Speaker 2: I think that not only the military industrial complex, not
• 31:58
  Speaker 2: only do they know that they are the baddies, they
• 32:03
  Speaker 2: thrive off of being the baddies.
• 32:06
  Speaker 4: They know what they're doing, and uh, you know.
• 32:10
  Speaker 2: It's it's it's the world that they're trying to pull
• 32:13
  Speaker 2: over our eyes, not their own. They know what they're doing.
• 32:18
  Speaker 2: And I think the same exact phenomena is happening with this,
• 32:23
  Speaker 2: you know, charity industry. You know, because if they wanted reform,
• 32:30
  Speaker 2: if anyone who actually worked in that that type of business,
• 32:36
  Speaker 2: that lane of business, if they actually wanted change, then
• 32:41
  Speaker 2: change would happen. And it's just like what happens with us,
• 32:44
  Speaker 2: right like we want to see the change happen.
• 32:47
  Speaker 4: Once the change happens.
• 32:49
  Speaker 2: The need for us to exist goes away. And I
• 32:53
  Speaker 2: think all of us here are fine with that. That's
• 32:56
  Speaker 2: that's exactly what we want, right which is why we
• 32:59
  Speaker 2: are so in opposition to these people because they have
• 33:05
  Speaker 2: no intention on actually changing anything. They just want to
• 33:10
  Speaker 2: exist so they can continue to get the money grab.
• 33:15
  Speaker 1: Yep, yep. And in fact, it's if I were to
• 33:20
  Speaker 1: look at you know, what would I be doing right
• 33:23
  Speaker 1: now if I was not an MRA my regular job,
• 33:29
  Speaker 1: I'm a direct support professional for intellectually disabled adults, would
• 33:33
  Speaker 1: probably I would probably be focusing about forty to sixty
• 33:37
  Speaker 1: more hours a week on that job, on what can
• 33:42
  Speaker 1: I do in that industry, both as an employee and
• 33:47
  Speaker 1: a volunteer that I'm not already doing. And it's not
• 33:55
  Speaker 1: that this takes away from that and it's bad. This
• 33:58
  Speaker 1: is very necessary, But if this stopped being necessary, I
• 34:02
  Speaker 1: would just pivot to that because there's always going to
• 34:05
  Speaker 1: be people who are in need in that area. It's
• 34:09
  Speaker 1: something more biological, not social necessarily, So you know, I
• 34:14
  Speaker 1: think a lot of us have something like that in
• 34:16
  Speaker 1: our lives.
• 34:19
  Speaker 4: I would hope.
• 34:20
  Speaker 3: So I don't think anyone knows they're the bad guys.
• 34:25
  Speaker 3: I don't think anyone thinks they're the bad guys except
• 34:28
  Speaker 3: the occasional like total psychopath that is so out there
• 34:35
  Speaker 3: that they eventually get arrested and then they go to
• 34:38
  Speaker 3: trial and they just they stand up in front of
• 34:40
  Speaker 3: the court and say, yeah, fuck it, I'm glad those
• 34:44
  Speaker 3: children are dead. I would do it again.
• 34:47
  Speaker 2: Though.
• 34:48
  Speaker 3: They tend to be very isolated, and they go to
• 34:50
  Speaker 3: prison for their whole lives, and they are the only
• 34:53
  Speaker 3: people who will even entertain the notion that they're the
• 34:58
  Speaker 3: bad guys. I think this is the most sinister thing
• 35:01
  Speaker 3: about humanity, that that we are driven by morality, and
• 35:07
  Speaker 3: that is what drives people to be so evil. Evil
• 35:12
  Speaker 3: people don't know they're evil for the for the for
• 35:15
  Speaker 3: the most part, for the largest possible part. I mean,
• 35:17
  Speaker 3: even the people with skulls on there, you know, just
• 35:21
  Speaker 3: despite the despite the meme, despite the scars we've all seen,
• 35:26
  Speaker 3: they they never realized they were the bad guys. The
• 35:29
  Speaker 3: fucking communists has never realized they were the bad guys.
• 35:32
  Speaker 3: The Nazis never realized that they were the bad guys.
• 35:35
  Speaker 3: They did everything they did because they thought they were
• 35:38
  Speaker 3: doing the right thing, and they were ruthless in their
• 35:44
  Speaker 3: attempts to do what they thought was the right thing.
• 35:49
  Speaker 3: But this is this is what's so counterintuitive that evil
• 35:54
  Speaker 3: is almost always born from people who think they're doing good.
• 35:58
  Speaker 3: And this is why everything gets so fucked up because
• 36:01
  Speaker 3: people because when people think they have morality on their side,
• 36:06
  Speaker 3: they have no reverse gear. And the further they get
• 36:12
  Speaker 3: into that quagmire, the further they get into the the
• 36:18
  Speaker 3: sunken cost fallacy. It's it's much like the circumcision. When
• 36:23
  Speaker 3: you've when you've mutilated your childs genitals, you can never
• 36:26
  Speaker 3: go back on it. You can never admit that what
• 36:29
  Speaker 3: you've done is the most evil thing you could possibly do.
• 36:31
  Speaker 3: When you when you've attempted to subvert a nation by
• 36:35
  Speaker 3: turning everyone gay, you were like, well, of course it's
• 36:38
  Speaker 3: a good thing to turn an entire nation gay. You
• 36:41
  Speaker 3: can't possibly have negative consequences because if you, if you
• 36:44
  Speaker 3: really could, you know, stand outside yourself and look at
• 36:47
  Speaker 3: things objectively, you would have to admit, oh, ship, yeah,
• 36:51
  Speaker 3: I destroyed a nation by by subverting it. And it's
• 36:57
  Speaker 3: it's never been more manifest than in this fast we
• 37:05
  Speaker 3: call progressivism. That's why it's called progressivism. That's why we
• 37:08
  Speaker 3: have to call it by That's why they have to
• 37:10
  Speaker 3: call it by a euphemism. Evil people always have to
• 37:15
  Speaker 3: call it good. Like every every dysfemism, every cacophonism, has
• 37:20
  Speaker 3: to be called a euphemism. Otherwise they could they can't
• 37:24
  Speaker 3: get people behind it, and like I said, they would
• 37:26
  Speaker 3: just be left as isolated psychopaths doing their own thing
• 37:29
  Speaker 3: and individually. To get evil to be exacted by collective,
• 37:38
  Speaker 3: it has to be disguised as a good thing. And
• 37:44
  Speaker 3: this is what's so hard to get across to people,
• 37:46
  Speaker 3: And this is why we're working so hard to get
• 37:49
  Speaker 3: across to people, and this is why we're fighting such
• 37:51
  Speaker 3: an uphill battle because we're always fighting against people who
• 37:57
  Speaker 3: will do this evil with their conscience.
• 37:59
  Speaker 1: In tact, there's a mechanism actually in the human brain
• 38:03
  Speaker 1: that does this right where if you want a reason
• 38:11
  Speaker 1: to do something, because you personally have some desire to
• 38:17
  Speaker 1: do that thing, you rationalize and compartmentalize in order to
• 38:23
  Speaker 1: reframe it as good. So, for instance, with the military
• 38:28
  Speaker 1: industrial complex, if they couldn't reframe what they're doing, then
• 38:35
  Speaker 1: they would have to acknowledge that they are literally sacrificing
• 38:39
  Speaker 1: the lives of young men, mostly men, young men all
• 38:45
  Speaker 1: over the world, starting with our own country, but also
• 38:51
  Speaker 1: anybody that we're battling against for money, like they're essentially
• 38:57
  Speaker 1: creating a a human sausage factory into which young men
• 39:06
  Speaker 1: are put at one end like in a slaughterhouse, and
• 39:10
  Speaker 1: at the other end dollar bills are printed out. That
• 39:14
  Speaker 1: is the essential nature of the military industrial complex. If
• 39:20
  Speaker 1: there isn't a military conflict in which young men's lives
• 39:25
  Speaker 1: have to be sacrificed, either on our side or the
• 39:29
  Speaker 1: other side, or both, these people don't make money. If
• 39:35
  Speaker 1: we have a stockpile of defensive tools and our stockpile
• 39:44
  Speaker 1: is good enough because other nations are so afraid of
• 39:47
  Speaker 1: it that they negotiate with us, or we have such
• 39:51
  Speaker 1: a good relationship with other nations that they negotiate with us.
• 39:54
  Speaker 1: Either way doesn't matter. We already have these things, and
• 39:59
  Speaker 1: we don't need to purchase more, and we don't need
• 40:04
  Speaker 1: to pay for infrastructure to be transported to some other
• 40:09
  Speaker 1: country and run around our military presence there in order
• 40:16
  Speaker 1: to serve the needs of the soldiers that are there.
• 40:22
  Speaker 1: Then these people don't make money. They lose their profit.
• 40:28
  Speaker 1: And yeah, at least some people are old enough to
• 40:32
  Speaker 1: recognize the reference. Thank you, Murder of Crows, Pink Floyd's
• 40:38
  Speaker 1: the Wall. Yes, that is probably the most accurate description
• 40:45
  Speaker 1: I've ever seen of how the military industrial complex works.
• 40:49
  Speaker 1: It grinds up the lives of young men and some
• 40:54
  Speaker 1: young women, but mostly young men, and spits out money.
• 41:00
  Speaker 1: And there isn't something else. There's not a valid other excuse.
• 41:05
  Speaker 1: They will say that it's for humanitarian reasons, it's under
• 41:09
  Speaker 1: the humanitarian initiative veil to but it's still grinding up
• 41:16
  Speaker 1: young men, grinding them to death, or worse, grinding them
• 41:22
  Speaker 1: into this situation of perpetual undeath, wherein they're forever psychologically changed.
• 41:29
  Speaker 1: They're not the same person anymore, but they still occupy
• 41:33
  Speaker 1: the same body, and everyone around them expects them to
• 41:37
  Speaker 1: be the person that went off to war and not
• 41:40
  Speaker 1: the person who came back, and doesn't understand how to
• 41:45
  Speaker 1: relate to the new person that came back with all
• 41:48
  Speaker 1: of that set of experiences that changed him so much,
• 41:53
  Speaker 1: and that for the rest of his life. Then he
• 41:56
  Speaker 1: has to remember those experiences and he has to deal
• 41:59
  Speaker 1: with that, and you know, that's that's essentially all it is.
• 42:08
  Speaker 1: Final Midnight points out the cigarette industry and was making
• 42:11
  Speaker 1: a scent or two per cigarette. At some point they
• 42:13
  Speaker 1: knew it was killing people, and they just wouldn't stop. Yeah,
• 42:17
  Speaker 1: they had a wealth of evidence that what their product
• 42:22
  Speaker 1: does is very unhealthy. There's a parallel though, the sugar
• 42:26
  Speaker 1: industry does the same thing, and and to we demonize
• 42:30
  Speaker 1: the cigarette industry, which now I'm allergic to cigarettes, so
• 42:34
  Speaker 1: I don't have any reason to like them.
• 42:36
  Speaker 4: But the fact is.
• 42:39
  Speaker 1: The the processed sugar industry, both processed cane sugar and
• 42:48
  Speaker 1: processed vegetable sugars, corn sugar and beet sugar. Uh, you know,
• 42:53
  Speaker 1: corn syrup and beat sugar, like all of those things
• 42:59
  Speaker 1: do damage to the body and the brain. Sugar is
• 43:03
  Speaker 1: bad for your brain, and they we don't demonize that
• 43:09
  Speaker 1: industry even though there are different ways that it is
• 43:16
  Speaker 1: exactly as bad as cigarettes. They cause health problems that
• 43:21
  Speaker 1: lead to heart attacks and strokes where Alzheimer and Alzheimer's Yeah,
• 43:27
  Speaker 1: you might, you might survive, but just like that individual
• 43:33
  Speaker 1: that comes back from war an entirely different person, you
• 43:36
  Speaker 1: might lose part of who you are. Instead of developing
• 43:41
  Speaker 1: new aspects to who you are that that completely change you,
• 43:46
  Speaker 1: you lose big chunks of who you are and you
• 43:49
  Speaker 1: never get them back. And having had a family member
• 43:55
  Speaker 1: who went through that with with many strokes. You know
• 43:59
  Speaker 1: it's happen. It's a horrifying experience, and there's nothing you
• 44:06
  Speaker 1: can do about it. Once it starts, you might be
• 44:10
  Speaker 1: able to slow it down, but it'll continue to happen.
• 44:13
  Speaker 1: There's not a cure. There's only treatments, and those treatments
• 44:18
  Speaker 1: are only necessary because the American public is addicted to sugar,
• 44:25
  Speaker 1: and sugar is harder to quit than cigarettes.
• 44:31
  Speaker 3: How many seconds does a twinkie take off your life?
• 44:34
  Speaker 3: Is it more or less than seven? How many seconds
• 44:38
  Speaker 3: off your life does one day in the education system
• 44:40
  Speaker 3: take off your life?
• 44:42
  Speaker 1: Hey, I know a guy whose first heart attack was
• 44:46
  Speaker 1: at the age of thirty four. Jesus all right. And
• 44:52
  Speaker 1: I used to know a guy whose first heart attack
• 44:54
  Speaker 1: was at the age of thirty five. And I lost
• 44:57
  Speaker 1: a brother in law to a heart attack at the
• 45:01
  Speaker 1: age of thirty five. Like we're talking We're not talking seconds, Okay,
• 45:09
  Speaker 1: We're talking years now. Granted, I don't know how much
• 45:14
  Speaker 1: each twinkie might contribute or or other factors might be
• 45:19
  Speaker 1: involved there, But you know, I don't know very many
• 45:25
  Speaker 1: people who died just because they smoked cigarettes at the
• 45:30
  Speaker 1: age of thirty five or thirty four. Suddenly right, There's
• 45:37
  Speaker 1: only one one other ingestible substance that is legal that
• 45:44
  Speaker 1: I know that has done that to people, and it
• 45:48
  Speaker 1: was encouraged by the medical field.
• 45:52
  Speaker 3: So but.
• 45:55
  Speaker 1: Now, granted I do know I do have family members
• 45:58
  Speaker 1: that have gotten cancer when they were very young, but
• 46:02
  Speaker 1: we have a genetic predisposition in my family. I don't
• 46:07
  Speaker 1: think you can entirely blame that on cigarettes. Some people
• 46:10
  Speaker 1: who don't smoke in my family still get that cancer.
• 46:14
  Speaker 1: Everybody who smokes in my family gets that cancer, but
• 46:19
  Speaker 1: it doesn't There's no group of people in my family
• 46:22
  Speaker 1: that has a magic bullet to not get it. So
• 46:25
  Speaker 1: clearly smoking is not the main factor. It's the gene
• 46:29
  Speaker 1: whereas with sugar that affects the body pretty much regardless
• 46:35
  Speaker 1: of your genes. It's unhealthy for everybody regardless. And on
• 46:41
  Speaker 1: the other side of my family, my grandfather smoked for
• 46:43
  Speaker 1: forty years and he was over ninety years old before
• 46:48
  Speaker 1: he finally got the one little.
• 46:51
  Speaker 4: Grain of.
• 46:53
  Speaker 1: Rice sized tumor that eventually affects men if they get
• 46:59
  Speaker 1: very old, and that was he had a grain of
• 47:02
  Speaker 1: rice size tumor in his prostate that was very treatable
• 47:07
  Speaker 1: and he went through very minor treatment and it was gone, right,
• 47:17
  Speaker 1: And yeah, alcohol can be really really bad as well,
• 47:24
  Speaker 1: But I think more people overdo sugar than alcohol. And
• 47:30
  Speaker 1: there's a genetic component to alcohol too, like alcoholism, that
• 47:35
  Speaker 1: certain types of addiction do run in families. And I
• 47:39
  Speaker 1: know that there is a gene for alcoholism, and I
• 47:42
  Speaker 1: know at least at least two people that I have
• 47:48
  Speaker 1: found out have those that gene. So that's a it's
• 47:54
  Speaker 1: a rough situation, but you don't have to have a
• 47:58
  Speaker 1: gene to be vulnerable to the effects of sugar, right that.
• 48:01
  Speaker 1: It's another one. An industrial complex in the United States,
• 48:05
  Speaker 1: government propped up the sugar industry. I don't know if
• 48:09
  Speaker 1: people know that.
• 48:10
  Speaker 7: Oh absolutely, I mean shit, if you go back for enough,
• 48:15
  Speaker 7: doctors were fucking giving maybe not advertisements, but saying that
• 48:22
  Speaker 7: cigarettes were.
• 48:22
  Speaker 1: Okay, there's nothing wrong with them. You know, they used
• 48:27
  Speaker 1: to four out of five doctors prefer this one particular
• 48:31
  Speaker 1: rand of cigarettes. Yeah, you know, and they do the
• 48:34
  Speaker 1: same thing with this many dentists prefer. It's always one
• 48:37
  Speaker 1: less than out of total one less than the total
• 48:40
  Speaker 1: out of total number of dentists. Yeah, and then this
• 48:44
  Speaker 1: or that, right, like in what what a study or
• 48:48
  Speaker 1: is this something that you use. You just pulled those
• 48:50
  Speaker 1: numbers out of your ass, didn't. You don't touch me
• 48:52
  Speaker 1: with those numbers. That's nasty. But but yeah, so these
• 48:58
  Speaker 1: complexes do exist. There are numerous industrial there's an education
• 49:02
  Speaker 1: industrial complex where, you know, if if you don't need
• 49:06
  Speaker 1: new school books periodically, including history books, even even books
• 49:12
  Speaker 1: that are specialized, like obviously you need new history books
• 49:16
  Speaker 1: because history is being made every day, all right, yesterday
• 49:21
  Speaker 1: is history starts yesterday, and the future starts in five minutes,
• 49:27
  Speaker 1: and and so you know, you do need those. But
• 49:30
  Speaker 1: there's history courses that are just about the Civil War,
• 49:33
  Speaker 1: or that are just about World War two, or that
• 49:36
  Speaker 1: are just about the history of medicine up to the
• 49:40
  Speaker 1: creation of of uh this or that event, you know,
• 49:45
  Speaker 1: and and so on and that. Why would you need
• 49:50
  Speaker 1: new books once the information is known? But but they
• 49:55
  Speaker 1: they reprint those, They reprint new math books, new books
• 50:01
  Speaker 1: on grammar, new literature books, so on. And if you
• 50:08
  Speaker 1: don't need those, if you're if your school doesn't need
• 50:16
  Speaker 1: the new curriculum because the curriculum has not changed, and
• 50:23
  Speaker 1: they don't need books with the updated version of this
• 50:27
  Speaker 1: particular process or that particular grammar rule and so on.
• 50:32
  Speaker 1: Then they don't make money then, and uh, everybody thinks
• 50:39
  Speaker 1: that for instance, the god, I can't think what it's
• 50:44
  Speaker 1: called now, not the the way that they're teaching now
• 50:48
  Speaker 1: has a particular name for it. And it's essentially just
• 50:52
  Speaker 1: this is the formula for how you create your your
• 50:54
  Speaker 1: rubric uh and and how you organize what you're teaching
• 50:59
  Speaker 1: the classroom. And it allows teachers a certain degree of
• 51:04
  Speaker 1: freedom in what they put in their lesson plans and
• 51:06
  Speaker 1: so on, but it makes them more difficult for parents
• 51:12
  Speaker 1: to understand what's being taught.
• 51:15
  Speaker 3: And it's called it's called bullshit.
• 51:18
  Speaker 1: No, there's a it starts with the sea, and I
• 51:20
  Speaker 1: can't think of the name for it. And there was
• 51:23
  Speaker 1: a whole braig hullabaloo over it or uh, common core
• 51:31
  Speaker 1: they call it common core. There's a whole big a
• 51:33
  Speaker 1: hullabloo over common core. Thank you zer Ins for for
• 51:38
  Speaker 1: getting that into the chat. Uh and uh. And actually,
• 51:42
  Speaker 1: by the way, the comment about men protecting the family
• 51:45
  Speaker 1: was also from Zerank, so thank you for that too.
• 51:48
  Speaker 1: Even though it was a previous show's chat, it was
• 51:50
  Speaker 1: a neat way to introduce the talking and yeah, social
• 51:54
  Speaker 1: emotional learning is another thing. Social emotional uh, the understanding
• 51:59
  Speaker 1: of one's social emotional experience, like they're that side of
• 52:06
  Speaker 1: what's going on with them. That's something that you use in, say,
• 52:13
  Speaker 1: dealing with people with mental health conditions or intellectual disabilities.
• 52:17
  Speaker 1: In a medical situation, you may have somebody who has
• 52:22
  Speaker 1: difficulty communicating. And so when when they want to say,
• 52:28
  Speaker 1: I don't want gravy on my mashed potatoes, I want butter,
• 52:32
  Speaker 1: and you're putting gravy on their mashed potatoes instead of
• 52:36
  Speaker 1: saying no or stop or you know, giving you the
• 52:41
  Speaker 1: hand signals for no and stop, the sign language for
• 52:45
  Speaker 1: no or stop or anything like that. They pound on
• 52:47
  Speaker 1: the table and yell. And if you are trying to
• 52:53
  Speaker 1: encourage them to use their words and to communicate with
• 52:57
  Speaker 1: hand signals, and you recognize that you can get them
• 53:02
  Speaker 1: a different serving of mashed potatoes and give them their
• 53:04
  Speaker 1: butter and just you don't have to worry about the
• 53:06
  Speaker 1: other ones. That's social emotional learning, and it's supposed to
• 53:13
  Speaker 1: be done in a therapeutic setting. When they start doing
• 53:16
  Speaker 1: that in the classroom, what they're doing is trying to
• 53:19
  Speaker 1: teach your child that they should doubt their identity it's
• 53:25
  Speaker 1: about changing behavior, and it's about changing behavior. It's supposed
• 53:31
  Speaker 1: to be about changing behavior to help the person fit
• 53:36
  Speaker 1: into their environment and interact functionally with their environment instead
• 53:43
  Speaker 1: of being at odds with it and having emotional outbursts
• 53:48
  Speaker 1: and getting themselves into trouble. Well, when the teacher creates
• 53:53
  Speaker 1: an environment in which you're not allowed to be yourself
• 53:58
  Speaker 1: and your what's normal for you, and what's normal as
• 54:06
  Speaker 1: part of being a member of the human race is
• 54:09
  Speaker 1: the rejected way of being, and you have to fit
• 54:13
  Speaker 1: in by adopting a false personality disorder or a false
• 54:19
  Speaker 1: gender identity or any other such thing. Social emotional learning
• 54:24
  Speaker 1: becomes a way of manipulating people instead of a way
• 54:27
  Speaker 1: of helping people, because you're being forced to fit into
• 54:30
  Speaker 1: a box, instead of being encouraged to communicate your wants
• 54:36
  Speaker 1: and needs in a way that people can understand and
• 54:40
  Speaker 1: doesn't result in conflict.
• 54:43
  Speaker 3: When male teachers want to discipline students, they can do
• 54:46
  Speaker 3: it in the same way fathers do. Is given the
• 54:49
  Speaker 3: stink and raise their voice ever so slightly so that
• 54:52
  Speaker 3: that deep sound resonates around the room. But then they
• 54:57
  Speaker 3: got rid of male teachers and for the most part,
• 55:00
  Speaker 3: male parents and the leftover female teachers were like, well, ship,
• 55:04
  Speaker 3: what do we do. We've got to bang on the
• 55:05
  Speaker 3: fucking desk and and maybe kick them a bit and
• 55:09
  Speaker 3: maybe rape a few of them. That's the only way
• 55:10
  Speaker 3: we can really discipline them and you know, completely unravel
• 55:14
  Speaker 3: their identity in the same way the military industrial complex
• 55:20
  Speaker 3: does two soldiers. Funny, isn't it. Yep.
• 55:26
  Speaker 1: So what we're what we're dealing with here is one
• 55:29
  Speaker 1: of many of these types of conflicts, and so it's
• 55:32
  Speaker 1: or complexes. It's it's not just the military, it's not
• 55:36
  Speaker 1: just the education system, it's not just the environmental system.
• 55:43
  Speaker 1: I think I once told the story of how the
• 55:46
  Speaker 1: e PA showed up on a farm in Ohio and
• 55:50
  Speaker 1: protected stray lamb to death or not lamb, but a
• 55:53
  Speaker 1: stray fallen to death, Like literally, they protected it to death.
• 55:59
  Speaker 1: The farmer had this fawn that was invading his feed.
• 56:04
  Speaker 1: So his cows were eating, and this fawn kept coming
• 56:08
  Speaker 1: up and getting into the feed, and he couldn't stop
• 56:11
  Speaker 1: it without hurting it. So he just gave up, and
• 56:16
  Speaker 1: somebody called the EPA and they showed up, and I
• 56:20
  Speaker 1: guess the wildlife people showed up as well, and they
• 56:26
  Speaker 1: ordered him to stop keeping this animal as a pet,
• 56:29
  Speaker 1: which he was not doing. So he couldn't stop. You
• 56:31
  Speaker 1: can't stop doing something that you're not doing, and you know,
• 56:35
  Speaker 1: and he explained the situation to them. They didn't believe him,
• 56:38
  Speaker 1: so they decided to take the fawn away from him
• 56:41
  Speaker 1: and relocated where it would be safe from him. And
• 56:45
  Speaker 1: they chased it around all day, terrified the shit out
• 56:49
  Speaker 1: of it, and when they finally caught it, they put
• 56:52
  Speaker 1: it in a truck, got it loaded up, got ready
• 56:54
  Speaker 1: to take it to someplace else. It had a heart
• 56:56
  Speaker 1: attack and died. Literally protected it to death. Brilliant government.
• 57:03
  Speaker 1: But like these agencies and organizations they all, their purpose
• 57:09
  Speaker 1: is really primarily to make money for administrators of the
• 57:17
  Speaker 1: industries like the businesses and non profit organizations and so
• 57:25
  Speaker 1: on that they fund to do jobs for them, and
• 57:32
  Speaker 1: the administrators of the agencies and departments. That's that's pretty
• 57:37
  Speaker 1: much it. They provide a way for politicians to get
• 57:42
  Speaker 1: around the spoil system, which it used to be every
• 57:46
  Speaker 1: time you got a new administration, you got a new
• 57:51
  Speaker 1: bureaucracy that would flip back and forth left and right
• 57:55
  Speaker 1: because they'd fire all the old employees. Employees and replace
• 57:59
  Speaker 1: them with their supporters each time, and now they don't
• 58:05
  Speaker 1: fire the old employees, they just grow the government bigger.
• 58:10
  Speaker 1: And that's what we're dealing with here. So Data Republican
• 58:15
  Speaker 1: goes on. Rotucci herself goes on to talk about bringing
• 58:19
  Speaker 1: in international actors to assist with the Color Revolution right
• 58:27
  Speaker 1: against her own country, of which she's an employee. Through
• 58:34
  Speaker 1: being an employee of the federal government, being part of
• 58:37
  Speaker 1: the bureaucracy. She is literally talking about bringing foreign individuals
• 58:44
  Speaker 1: into this discussion, into this organization to undermine the federal
• 58:56
  Speaker 1: executive branch of the government.
• 59:01
  Speaker 6: Is happening.
• 59:01
  Speaker 8: I think we're still in the like figuring that out phase,
• 59:04
  Speaker 8: but I do think, yeah, twenty second century will be
• 59:07
  Speaker 8: a great place to build those connections. I know John
• 59:10
  Speaker 8: Hopkins is also working to bridge international domestic democracy complict
• 59:16
  Speaker 8: mitigation spaces.
• 59:18
  Speaker 1: And to Hotel's point, just just a reminder, she just
• 59:23
  Speaker 1: mentioned like a respected institution there, John Hopkins, So like,
• 59:31
  Speaker 1: unless she's talking about a guy who just coincidentally has
• 59:34
  Speaker 1: the same name, that's bizarre to me in and of itself.
• 59:39
  Speaker 8: Yeah, actually, just bringing in like we don't have to
• 59:41
  Speaker 8: be intermediaries either, we can bring in actors or colleagues
• 59:46
  Speaker 8: from around the world. We've dealt with this directly, a
• 59:48
  Speaker 8: very specific specific issue sets.
• 59:52
  Speaker 1: So there she goes she's talking about bringing in foreign
• 59:56
  Speaker 1: actors with experience as part of color evolutions in their nations,
• 1:00:03
  Speaker 1: in other words, overthrowing their governments to help with this.
• 1:00:11
  Speaker 2: This is it's it's blowing my mind a little bit
• 1:00:15
  Speaker 2: because you know, when you brought up Data Republican a
• 1:00:19
  Speaker 2: couple episodes ago, you know, I was trying to remember
• 1:00:22
  Speaker 2: where I remembered that name from, and the first instance
• 1:00:29
  Speaker 2: was when Doge happened. And you know, as we all know,
• 1:00:35
  Speaker 2: DOGE was supposed to be the Department of Governmental Efficiency,
• 1:00:40
  Speaker 2: right breaking down the bullshit that's going on in the
• 1:00:44
  Speaker 2: government so that we can, you know, more effectively use
• 1:00:48
  Speaker 2: the tax dollars that are being stolen from us. And she,
• 1:00:56
  Speaker 2: now that we know that she's she's a she uh
• 1:01:00
  Speaker 2: seem to be very much on that side. So this
• 1:01:05
  Speaker 2: feels very much like a flip. His switch has been flipped.
• 1:01:10
  Speaker 4: What is this? What are you talking to?
• 1:01:12
  Speaker 1: Somebody have in their eyes open. Yeah, this is somebody
• 1:01:16
  Speaker 1: like going, whoa, holy fuck, what's going on with our government?
• 1:01:19
  Speaker 1: This is insane? Yeah, but yeah, I think it's almost impossible.
• 1:01:30
  Speaker 1: Uh two, investigate like what the the federal government does,
• 1:01:41
  Speaker 1: what the bureaucracy of the federal government does, not, what
• 1:01:44
  Speaker 1: the Congress and President do, But what all the various
• 1:01:49
  Speaker 1: departments and agencies do, you know, without noticing a few things,
• 1:01:53
  Speaker 1: like especially if you start getting into how money is
• 1:01:55
  Speaker 1: spent and what it's being spent on, and how many departments, agencies, bureaus, subagencies,
• 1:02:06
  Speaker 1: sub departments and so on there actually are in the
• 1:02:11
  Speaker 1: federal government, and how many divisions each of those have,
• 1:02:16
  Speaker 1: and and so on. Just get on the the the
• 1:02:21
  Speaker 1: website a USA spending dot gov once and do a
• 1:02:29
  Speaker 1: search through all departments, all right for spending on this
• 1:02:36
  Speaker 1: spell this is spelled r H E s U s
• 1:02:43
  Speaker 1: U A. Reesei's monkeys esis monkeys. Yeah, they are used
• 1:02:47
  Speaker 1: for research. They are used for scientific research. You will
• 1:02:50
  Speaker 1: discover a rabbit hole of epic proportions and that I
• 1:02:57
  Speaker 1: went through this. The military buys a lot of them,
• 1:03:01
  Speaker 1: but so do several other government agencies, none of which
• 1:03:05
  Speaker 1: I would have expected to need to be doing research. Uh,
• 1:03:10
  Speaker 1: They're they're used in research done on how chemical substances
• 1:03:18
  Speaker 1: and microbes affect the human body. Right, So you have
• 1:03:31
  Speaker 1: the military doing that kind of research well and again,
• 1:03:35
  Speaker 1: and then you you have other agencies also doing that
• 1:03:39
  Speaker 1: kind of research.
• 1:03:41
  Speaker 4: Yeah.
• 1:03:41
  Speaker 2: Now the military industrial complex has been completely corrupted and
• 1:03:50
  Speaker 2: uh turned inwards on itself towards the American people. Yeah,
• 1:03:56
  Speaker 2: they are conducting experiments on us. Do you remember during
• 1:04:01
  Speaker 2: COVID when there was that truck that got turned over
• 1:04:05
  Speaker 2: and there were a bunch of monkeys that got loose?
• 1:04:09
  Speaker 1: Yep, yep, there was. There's been a one recently too,
• 1:04:12
  Speaker 1: and I mean there's been several instances that actually look
• 1:04:16
  Speaker 1: like the start of the movie Twelve Monkeys, yeah, you know.
• 1:04:20
  Speaker 1: Or contagion, there's another one. And the reason they use
• 1:04:25
  Speaker 1: monkeys in those movies is because of that's that's if
• 1:04:29
  Speaker 1: they're going to test a virus or a cure for
• 1:04:32
  Speaker 1: a virus, uh you know, or a bacterial infection or
• 1:04:35
  Speaker 1: a fungus or any anything uh like that, this is
• 1:04:40
  Speaker 1: what they use. But if you do a search in
• 1:04:44
  Speaker 1: USA spinning doc go for just that that just that
• 1:04:49
  Speaker 1: word r R H E s U s ESUS monkeys
• 1:04:55
  Speaker 1: that that will, like I said, you will be amazed
• 1:05:00
  Speaker 1: how many different organizations within the government within the bureaucracy
• 1:05:05
  Speaker 1: are spending on them. Outbreak, Yeah, Outbreaks another one that
• 1:05:09
  Speaker 1: was very much like every movie like that. Yeah, twenty
• 1:05:16
  Speaker 1: eight Days like yep, yep, all of them you'll find.
• 1:05:25
  Speaker 1: And I believe it was monkeys in the stand too.
• 1:05:31
  Speaker 1: They weren't released the the but the the experimentation was
• 1:05:37
  Speaker 1: being done on monkeys there as well. So yeah, and
• 1:05:44
  Speaker 1: do you remember the theory on how HIV got started.
• 1:05:51
  Speaker 3: Yeah, we're told it happened in the wild because chimp
• 1:05:54
  Speaker 3: started eating monkeys or fucking monkeys maybe, but yeah, in
• 1:05:59
  Speaker 3: the wild, sure, guys. Definitely poetry experiments ship yep.
• 1:06:08
  Speaker 2: And and and that that begs the question of why
• 1:06:12
  Speaker 2: Fauci was so involved with AIDS and HIV way back
• 1:06:16
  Speaker 2: in the eighties.
• 1:06:17
  Speaker 4: Yep. And uh it hasn't.
• 1:06:21
  Speaker 2: History just repeated itself and here we are again. You know,
• 1:06:26
  Speaker 2: I'm telling you, any a conspiracy theory is only a
• 1:06:32
  Speaker 2: conspiracy until it's proven true. And I I, you know,
• 1:06:38
  Speaker 2: I can't. I am losing fingers counting how many times
• 1:06:42
  Speaker 2: that the things that I thought were you know, just
• 1:06:47
  Speaker 2: I don't know, it can't be Oh no, that's that's nope, Nope,
• 1:06:51
  Speaker 2: it's actually true. These people do not want you around,
• 1:06:56
  Speaker 2: They don't want us around.
• 1:06:58
  Speaker 4: They are.
• 1:07:01
  Speaker 1: It's not not a conspiracy theory anymore. It's just a conspiracy.
• 1:07:05
  Speaker 4: Yeah, it's it's it's a conspiracy fact.
• 1:07:09
  Speaker 6: Yep.
• 1:07:10
  Speaker 1: Oh yeah, just just that's that's like I said, you know,
• 1:07:13
  Speaker 1: go down that rabbit hole sometime you'll you'll be shocked.
• 1:07:18
  Speaker 1: But yeah, So they're bringing in foreign actors to undermine
• 1:07:23
  Speaker 1: your vote.
• 1:07:25
  Speaker 8: Whether that's on tackling corruption or how to respond to corruption,
• 1:07:29
  Speaker 8: mobilizing around corruption.
• 1:07:31
  Speaker 1: Notice, if you label a democratic election result corruption, it
• 1:07:39
  Speaker 1: suddenly becomes okay to undermine our democracy. Our democracy is
• 1:07:48
  Speaker 1: not as important as their goals, guys, like their democracy
• 1:07:54
  Speaker 1: is important, Your democracy is not. You see how that works.
• 1:08:00
  Speaker 2: I'm losing count of how many times I have to
• 1:08:05
  Speaker 2: remind people that we live in a republic and not
• 1:08:08
  Speaker 2: a democracy.
• 1:08:10
  Speaker 1: Yeah.
• 1:08:10
  Speaker 2: Yeah, And what the difference is between the two, because
• 1:08:14
  Speaker 2: they people just do not understand difference, and it's.
• 1:08:19
  Speaker 1: Oh it just What people should understand, though, is that
• 1:08:24
  Speaker 1: there was an election, we got a president elected. There
• 1:08:31
  Speaker 1: was you know, this this was actually a really safe
• 1:08:37
  Speaker 1: election as opposed to the previous election that they told
• 1:08:41
  Speaker 1: us was safe. This election involved actual ensuring that people
• 1:08:47
  Speaker 1: who were whose votes were cast actually existed, were alive
• 1:08:51
  Speaker 1: and were citizens that were supposed to be voting. Uh.
• 1:08:55
  Speaker 1: And so the president that we got was a result
• 1:09:00
  Speaker 1: of the process acting the way that it was intended
• 1:09:03
  Speaker 1: to act, the process playing out the way it was
• 1:09:05
  Speaker 1: intended to play out. And these people are mad because
• 1:09:13
  Speaker 1: you didn't give them the result that they wanted. When
• 1:09:16
  Speaker 1: they say our democracy, that is their dog whistle for
• 1:09:23
  Speaker 1: our control over the election process, not for democracy. They
• 1:09:31
  Speaker 1: are not talking about democracy.
• 1:09:36
  Speaker 3: Yeah, it's not a democracy or a republic. Democracy means
• 1:09:39
  Speaker 3: rule by the people. Republic means rule by law. We
• 1:09:43
  Speaker 3: are ruled by people who do not have to follow
• 1:09:46
  Speaker 3: the law and do not give a flying fuck.
• 1:09:49
  Speaker 1: The supposed to be a democratic republic, but they've removed
• 1:09:55
  Speaker 1: both of those factors.
• 1:09:57
  Speaker 3: Yeah, I guess it's an oligarchy, but which means ruled
• 1:10:01
  Speaker 3: by a small group of people. But nobody knows who
• 1:10:04
  Speaker 3: that small group of people is. They are necessarily behind
• 1:10:08
  Speaker 3: the scenes. And I know that sounds like a conspiracy theory,
• 1:10:11
  Speaker 3: but I mean, what else is that it's clearly not
• 1:10:13
  Speaker 3: a monarchy.
• 1:10:15
  Speaker 1: I don't know. They have a meeting every year and
• 1:10:17
  Speaker 1: they televise it, and they all dress like space aliens. Like,
• 1:10:23
  Speaker 1: I'm serious. The World Economic Have you seen the way
• 1:10:26
  Speaker 1: some of those people dress go into the World Economic
• 1:10:28
  Speaker 1: Forum meetings, you know, and those guys do run the
• 1:10:32
  Speaker 1: world unless there's somebody pulling their strings.
• 1:10:36
  Speaker 3: Yeah, there's a cabal behind the care always is.
• 1:10:38
  Speaker 1: There's somebody pulling their strings. That somebody isn't from this planet,
• 1:10:43
  Speaker 1: you know. Like, I hate say that, but these are
• 1:10:45
  Speaker 1: the richest people in the world, the people with the
• 1:10:48
  Speaker 1: most money, the people with the most strings that that
• 1:10:51
  Speaker 1: they're holding. The ends of that are attached to institutions
• 1:10:56
  Speaker 1: like banks and governments and military and uh, you know,
• 1:11:02
  Speaker 1: the businesses that control things like travel and having a
• 1:11:06
  Speaker 1: place to live and stuff like that. These are the
• 1:11:09
  Speaker 1: people who's you know, the strings that that have the
• 1:11:13
  Speaker 1: most pull on those agencies and organizations and institutions are
• 1:11:19
  Speaker 1: in the hands of the people that attend the World
• 1:11:22
  Speaker 1: Economic Forum. Yep, those are that's who's running the world.
• 1:11:27
  Speaker 1: They're not secret. They not only are not secret, but
• 1:11:32
  Speaker 1: they are comically tone deaf and make themselves look as
• 1:11:37
  Speaker 1: much like Doctor Evil came from the planet Mars as
• 1:11:40
  Speaker 1: humanly possible. While discussing how they're going to force you
• 1:11:44
  Speaker 1: to change everything about your life so they can make
• 1:11:47
  Speaker 1: more money, harvest more money from from your existence.
• 1:11:53
  Speaker 4: Yeah.
• 1:11:53
  Speaker 2: Now, when you ask that question, the World Economic Forum
• 1:11:59
  Speaker 2: was not the first thing that came to my mind.
• 1:12:02
  Speaker 2: The first thing that came to my mind was the
• 1:12:03
  Speaker 2: build a Berg group. So yeah, no, if I'm thinking differently,
• 1:12:07
  Speaker 2: I mean, obviously there are the same people one and
• 1:12:10
  Speaker 2: the same Yeah, So yeah.
• 1:12:13
  Speaker 1: Yeah, they are the same people. And there's there's all
• 1:12:18
  Speaker 1: kinds of videos you can you can watch on on
• 1:12:23
  Speaker 1: YouTube and on rumble where people and and actually even
• 1:12:27
  Speaker 1: on TikTok where people just go through and draw the
• 1:12:30
  Speaker 1: connections between UH companies like Blackrock and individuals within the
• 1:12:39
  Speaker 1: World Economic Forum, the various banks in the world, UH,
• 1:12:43
  Speaker 1: and the various governments in the world, and and how
• 1:12:47
  Speaker 1: much of everything is owned by these companies in certain families.
• 1:12:54
  Speaker 1: And when you when it really comes down to it,
• 1:12:57
  Speaker 1: it is a tiny handful of individuals with a lot
• 1:13:02
  Speaker 1: of money who have made it their multi generational mission
• 1:13:09
  Speaker 1: to retain that level of influence in the world and
• 1:13:15
  Speaker 1: and to make sort of royalty of themselves. So you know,
• 1:13:20
  Speaker 1: it's it's not like people will call it a conspiracy theory,
• 1:13:25
  Speaker 1: but they're doing it in public. It's not a secret,
• 1:13:28
  Speaker 1: it's not a conspiracy. It's it's just them engaging in
• 1:13:32
  Speaker 1: business in public where you can see them, and you
• 1:13:36
  Speaker 1: just haven't been paying attention public wise, you know, like
• 1:13:39
  Speaker 1: people just haven't been paying attention. It's like living, I
• 1:13:45
  Speaker 1: don't know, uh, living living in a world where there's
• 1:13:52
  Speaker 1: a laser beam that goes out to to everybody's everybody's
• 1:13:59
  Speaker 1: minds and controls everything they do and say, and you're
• 1:14:03
  Speaker 1: conscious of it. You know the laser is there, you
• 1:14:06
  Speaker 1: can see it, but since it's everywhere, you tune it
• 1:14:10
  Speaker 1: out and you forget that it exists. And so when
• 1:14:14
  Speaker 1: you're making your choices and you wonder why you can't
• 1:14:17
  Speaker 1: make your own decisions, it never occurs to you that
• 1:14:20
  Speaker 1: that laser beam is that's beaming control into your head
• 1:14:26
  Speaker 1: is responsible. Except instead of a laser beam, it's money,
• 1:14:32
  Speaker 1: it's currency and credit, and it's controlled those strings. That
• 1:14:38
  Speaker 1: laser beam is controlled by that tiny little group of people.
• 1:14:42
  Speaker 1: It doesn't come from a tower. It comes from a
• 1:14:46
  Speaker 1: dynasty that's been that's existed for a long time, and
• 1:14:51
  Speaker 1: it's not even you can't even really associate it with
• 1:14:58
  Speaker 1: a demographic, the widespread spread demographic of people, because they
• 1:15:03
  Speaker 1: don't give a fuck about their own demographic either, just
• 1:15:07
  Speaker 1: their individual family. So but yeah, going on with this,
• 1:15:19
  Speaker 1: we will see the rest of what she's got to
• 1:15:21
  Speaker 1: say here. But it's just that reframing. Like I was
• 1:15:24
  Speaker 1: talking about, that compartmentalization. We don't like what they're doing.
• 1:15:29
  Speaker 1: So even though it's not illegal, it's not unethical, it's
• 1:15:34
  Speaker 1: not immoral. They've identified money laundering taking place and the
• 1:15:39
  Speaker 1: exploitation of specifically this government agency as a means of
• 1:15:46
  Speaker 1: laundering money instead of helping people. But they label it
• 1:15:50
  Speaker 1: corruption to put a stop to it, like that you
• 1:15:56
  Speaker 1: stop stopping you from stealing from the American people in
• 1:16:00
  Speaker 1: order to line your own pockets is corruption if you're
• 1:16:05
  Speaker 1: the one lining your pockets your own pockets. Yeah, that's
• 1:16:11
  Speaker 1: the type of framing. And it's like I said, people
• 1:16:15
  Speaker 1: do this naturally. When I was in my twenties, now
• 1:16:21
  Speaker 1: I was about thirty.
• 1:16:23
  Speaker 3: My.
• 1:16:25
  Speaker 1: Mom was watching my son and I was at work,
• 1:16:28
  Speaker 1: and I get this phone call at work, Please tell
• 1:16:31
  Speaker 1: your son that he has to have other nutrition besides
• 1:16:35
  Speaker 1: the antioxidants that are in chocolate. Had overheard I had
• 1:16:43
  Speaker 1: this conversation with my mom. I hate wine. I don't
• 1:16:47
  Speaker 1: like to drink it. It tastes nasty to me. It doesn't.
• 1:16:49
  Speaker 1: It tastes like grape juice that went bad or whatever
• 1:16:53
  Speaker 1: flavor of juice, right, So I don't drink what it is.
• 1:16:57
  Speaker 1: But my doctor was like, well, it's good for your
• 1:16:59
  Speaker 1: heart to get it's something in wine, And so I
• 1:17:04
  Speaker 1: started like researching, like do I really have to drink
• 1:17:08
  Speaker 1: wine to get this? Can I get this from somewhere else?
• 1:17:11
  Speaker 1: Turns out you can just eat grapes and get it.
• 1:17:15
  Speaker 1: You don't or drink grape juice the no sugar added
• 1:17:19
  Speaker 1: variety and get it. And it's also in dark chocolate.
• 1:17:22
  Speaker 1: So if you eat unsweet dark chocolate, which I like,
• 1:17:25
  Speaker 1: not very many people do because it's not it's kind
• 1:17:27
  Speaker 1: of bitter. It's like drinking black coffee, but it's black
• 1:17:30
  Speaker 1: chocolate basically. So I was talking to mom about that.
• 1:17:34
  Speaker 1: I'm like, here's the other sources for this. I can
• 1:17:36
  Speaker 1: get this from these sources. I don't have to buy wine.
• 1:17:38
  Speaker 1: I don't have to drink wine. I'm good. And I
• 1:17:42
  Speaker 1: didn't even think about a five year old picking up
• 1:17:45
  Speaker 1: on that conversation. A few days later, he argued with
• 1:17:49
  Speaker 1: his grandmother that he should eat his rees's cups before
• 1:17:53
  Speaker 1: before he eats his lunch because they're good for his
• 1:17:55
  Speaker 1: heart and he might not have room for them if
• 1:17:58
  Speaker 1: he ate his lunch first.
• 1:18:00
  Speaker 3: Did you? Says yeah, no, but I'm starting to wonder
• 1:18:08
  Speaker 3: now how they.
• 1:18:08
  Speaker 1: Make Well, it's a last name, are e e s
• 1:18:13
  Speaker 1: e is a last name. You say that now, Hey,
• 1:18:18
  Speaker 1: I'm in I'm in America. Nutter is a last name.
• 1:18:21
  Speaker 1: I drive past uh a an arena here in in
• 1:18:27
  Speaker 1: my part of Dayton, going to and from between my
• 1:18:32
  Speaker 1: place and my daughter's place on a regular basis. That
• 1:18:35
  Speaker 1: is literally called the Nutter Center. Jesus, everybody from the UK,
• 1:18:42
  Speaker 1: have a good laugh for a minute. The that's called
• 1:18:44
  Speaker 1: that because the the individuals with the last name Nutter
• 1:18:47
  Speaker 1: donated quite a bit of money. To believe, that's Wright
• 1:18:52
  Speaker 1: State University that owns a Nutter Center. So it's still
• 1:18:57
  Speaker 1: funny because I know that that where we would call
• 1:19:01
  Speaker 1: someone a nutcase and in the UK they'd be called
• 1:19:05
  Speaker 1: a Nutter. So if you ever come to Dayton, I'll
• 1:19:11
  Speaker 1: have to show you then where the Nutter Center is.
• 1:19:13
  Speaker 1: It's huge, uh for for being clearly not a mental
• 1:19:18
  Speaker 1: health facility, but you can go there, like it's big
• 1:19:23
  Speaker 1: enough that inside the arena there I've I've actually watched
• 1:19:29
  Speaker 1: I want to say it was in there. It might
• 1:19:31
  Speaker 1: have been another one of the we've got a few
• 1:19:33
  Speaker 1: around here. It might have been Hobart, which is I
• 1:19:35
  Speaker 1: think gone. But uh, monster monster trucks. We watched monster
• 1:19:43
  Speaker 1: trucks inside the arena. So but but yeah, so this
• 1:19:51
  Speaker 1: this individual, this group of people, uh, that has reframed
• 1:19:59
  Speaker 1: this stuff in there mind just like my son, you know,
• 1:20:02
  Speaker 1: I want to eat the candy first. Well, it's healthy,
• 1:20:05
  Speaker 1: so I should eat it first, right, We do that naturally.
• 1:20:09
  Speaker 1: That's a natural human behavior that you know, as you
• 1:20:13
  Speaker 1: mature into adulthood you learn to go Now, wait a minute,
• 1:20:17
  Speaker 1: am I Am I really being wise when I say
• 1:20:22
  Speaker 1: I should eat my candy first just because it has
• 1:20:25
  Speaker 1: this one nutrient and not my vegetables or my you
• 1:20:30
  Speaker 1: know meat. I'm sure I'm going to have room for
• 1:20:34
  Speaker 1: dessert after. But even if I don't, I can always
• 1:20:38
  Speaker 1: have it later for a snack. Not really being rational
• 1:20:41
  Speaker 1: about this. You know you could check yourself a little bit,
• 1:20:44
  Speaker 1: or if somebody else checks you, you know you have
• 1:20:48
  Speaker 1: this capability of going, well, okay, that's a good argument,
• 1:20:52
  Speaker 1: I'll rethink that. But when you wallow, when you isolate
• 1:20:59
  Speaker 1: yourself and instantly at yourself within a community of people
• 1:21:02
  Speaker 1: that you all speak the same false framing language, and
• 1:21:09
  Speaker 1: you all have these ideas that you know when you
• 1:21:15
  Speaker 1: take what's normally ethical versus unethical, such as telling people
• 1:21:21
  Speaker 1: that you are using the money that you have taken
• 1:21:25
  Speaker 1: from them through through threat of force, that that it's
• 1:21:30
  Speaker 1: going for something serving their interests and therefore they should
• 1:21:36
  Speaker 1: they should be okay with that, and then you use
• 1:21:38
  Speaker 1: it for something else instead, right, doubt that's unethical. Anybody
• 1:21:43
  Speaker 1: could normally recognize that that's unethical. But if you spend
• 1:21:49
  Speaker 1: your whole life reframing in your mind that, well, it's
• 1:21:52
  Speaker 1: for the it's for the greater good, it's important that
• 1:21:56
  Speaker 1: we do these things. We're the good guys, you can
• 1:22:03
  Speaker 1: create a mentality where you can justify just about anything.
• 1:22:08
  Speaker 1: And that's that's how they end up in this situation
• 1:22:12
  Speaker 1: where they call oversight to end misappropriation of funds and
• 1:22:22
  Speaker 1: uh money laundering corruption, but they don't consider the misappropriation
• 1:22:34
  Speaker 1: and the money laundering to be corruption because it makes
• 1:22:38
  Speaker 1: them money.
• 1:22:42
  Speaker 8: We can bring those folks in and kind of be
• 1:22:44
  Speaker 8: those facilitators. And so again, I think those coordination structures
• 1:22:50
  Speaker 8: are just starting to take place, and you know, while
• 1:22:53
  Speaker 8: they think it should is happening. I think we're still
• 1:22:56
  Speaker 8: in the like figuring.
• 1:22:57
  Speaker 6: That out phase.
• 1:22:58
  Speaker 8: But I do think, yes, twenty second century will be
• 1:23:01
  Speaker 8: a great place to build those connections. I know John
• 1:23:04
  Speaker 8: Hopkins is also working to bridge international domestic democracy complict
• 1:23:10
  Speaker 8: mitigation spaces, and to Hotel's point, yeah, actually just bringing
• 1:23:15
  Speaker 8: in like we don't have to be intermediaries either, we
• 1:23:18
  Speaker 8: can bring in actors or or colleagues from around the
• 1:23:21
  Speaker 8: world who have dealt with this directly, very specific specific
• 1:23:25
  Speaker 8: issue sets.
• 1:23:27
  Speaker 1: It hits differently after you know, you hear all that
• 1:23:30
  Speaker 1: and then you hear that again, doesn't it. Yeah, like
• 1:23:35
  Speaker 1: that's that it becomes a little scary. Like they're organizing
• 1:23:42
  Speaker 1: internationally to undermine oversight of their agency because they consider
• 1:23:50
  Speaker 1: ending their money laundering and their misappropriation of funds to
• 1:23:55
  Speaker 1: be corruption and authoritarianism. So men voted for a man
• 1:24:07
  Speaker 1: to go in and clean up the government, to clean
• 1:24:13
  Speaker 1: the misappropriation, the money laundering, the use of your money
• 1:24:20
  Speaker 1: against you in various ways out of the federal government,
• 1:24:27
  Speaker 1: and these people organized internationally with communist organizations around the world,
• 1:24:39
  Speaker 1: and in particular with George Sorow's money, to undermine that oversight,
• 1:24:48
  Speaker 1: to create a soft coup against the servant that you
• 1:24:56
  Speaker 1: voted for, to go in and clean up their mess.
• 1:25:05
  Speaker 1: They justify the international aspect by claiming that the authoritarians
• 1:25:10
  Speaker 1: are already globally networked. Says that a republican.
• 1:25:15
  Speaker 9: International side certainly are you in the said community has
• 1:25:21
  Speaker 9: very close relationships with locals across the entire world, and
• 1:25:26
  Speaker 9: have worked globally on globals global authoritarianism. This movement right now,
• 1:25:32
  Speaker 9: we're very much framing it as an anti authoritarian movement
• 1:25:35
  Speaker 9: in the US.
• 1:25:36
  Speaker 1: But notice that she admitted that they're framing it as
• 1:25:40
  Speaker 1: anti authoritarian in the US. So just you know, for
• 1:25:48
  Speaker 1: the listeners, I want you to think about something. What
• 1:25:51
  Speaker 1: is more authoritarian?
• 1:25:54
  Speaker 3: Right?
• 1:25:55
  Speaker 1: If there's an agency that comes along and, against your will,
• 1:26:00
  Speaker 1: under threat of force, takes money, skims money off of
• 1:26:06
  Speaker 1: every paycheck you earn, and sends it to people in
• 1:26:13
  Speaker 1: foreign countries under the pretense of helping starving children that
• 1:26:18
  Speaker 1: they're not actually helping, and then they do things that
• 1:26:24
  Speaker 1: you maybe don't approve and things that the people in
• 1:26:29
  Speaker 1: those countries don't want, like promoting gender critical feminism or
• 1:26:38
  Speaker 1: intersectional feminism, or if you retain the right to keep
• 1:26:47
  Speaker 1: that money and decide to look at organizations that you
• 1:26:51
  Speaker 1: might think deserves some funding and give it to those
• 1:26:56
  Speaker 1: that have a good track record for serving the purpose
• 1:27:00
  Speaker 1: that you would want them to serve if you're funding them,
• 1:27:04
  Speaker 1: like maybe purchasing canned goods for a food bank, or
• 1:27:10
  Speaker 1: giving money to an organization that funds prostate cancer research,
• 1:27:17
  Speaker 1: or giving it to an organization that has been subject
• 1:27:25
  Speaker 1: to international oversight and is proven to actually give food
• 1:27:32
  Speaker 1: to starving people or assist starving people in growing their
• 1:27:37
  Speaker 1: own food in foreign countries, Like which is more authoritarian
• 1:27:41
  Speaker 1: if you have the power to decide what you're going
• 1:27:43
  Speaker 1: to do, or these people decide what you're going to do.
• 1:27:48
  Speaker 3: I think we need to fuck around with the fruity
• 1:27:50
  Speaker 3: Latin words like authoritarian. These people are thieves and liars
• 1:27:54
  Speaker 3: and frauds and traitors. Good strong Germanic words that we
• 1:28:00
  Speaker 3: already have for these fucking Charlatans. Well's a's a Latin
• 1:28:05
  Speaker 3: root word as well. But whatever, there's all kinds of
• 1:28:10
  Speaker 3: words we can use for such people, but authoritarian is
• 1:28:16
  Speaker 3: fine as well. They're bostards. I mean, I don't know
• 1:28:19
  Speaker 3: why we would stare away from the swear words, the unts,
• 1:28:23
  Speaker 3: they're shits and all that.
• 1:28:27
  Speaker 1: It's quite interesting. They're literally reframing by projection, these people
• 1:28:37
  Speaker 1: that want to engage in oversight and and tell us no,
• 1:28:40
  Speaker 1: we can't just engage in authoritarian money grabbing. Uh, they're
• 1:28:45
  Speaker 1: the authoritarians. It blows your mind when you really think
• 1:28:50
  Speaker 1: about whether they're false framing. But you're right. They are thieves.
• 1:28:55
  Speaker 1: They are fraudsters, and they are using. They're not just
• 1:29:00
  Speaker 1: thieves that like sneak into your house when you're not
• 1:29:04
  Speaker 1: home and take money out of your your sock drawer
• 1:29:07
  Speaker 1: or wherever you know you keep it. And I don't
• 1:29:10
  Speaker 1: even have a sock drawer actually, but that's okay because
• 1:29:15
  Speaker 1: I don't have any money to put in it either. Uh.
• 1:29:17
  Speaker 1: But but yeah, they take take something and then leave
• 1:29:20
  Speaker 1: when you're when you're not there and you're not any
• 1:29:24
  Speaker 1: These are highway robbers, right. These are the people holding
• 1:29:28
  Speaker 1: up your your vehicle at gunpoint, hijacking the vehicle, throwing
• 1:29:32
  Speaker 1: your child out at fifty miles an hour and taking
• 1:29:37
  Speaker 1: your wallet in the process, and they're calling it authoritarian
• 1:29:43
  Speaker 1: that as a nation, we voted for a cleanup guy
• 1:29:48
  Speaker 1: to go in and engage in some oversight and put
• 1:29:51
  Speaker 1: the cabash to their thief y. And this is how
• 1:29:57
  Speaker 1: they're reframing it. Oh, he's the authoritarian. He's stopping us
• 1:30:02
  Speaker 1: from stealing from the people.
• 1:30:08
  Speaker 9: But depending, you know, the authoritarians are network globally, and
• 1:30:12
  Speaker 9: this is our movement, our very movement we're talking about
• 1:30:14
  Speaker 9: right now as the potential to make the global anti
• 1:30:19
  Speaker 9: authoritarian movement given our networks. I also want to talk
• 1:30:24
  Speaker 9: to the international side. Certainly are usc.
• 1:30:30
  Speaker 1: And that was the that was the into it. So
• 1:30:31
  Speaker 1: they're basically their excuse right like like like she said,
• 1:30:37
  Speaker 1: is that the authoritarians are global, so we have to
• 1:30:41
  Speaker 1: be global too. This is like, this is literally a
• 1:30:50
  Speaker 1: a false framing of epic proportions. We the thieves are
• 1:30:56
  Speaker 1: anti authoritarians, and the authoritarians that are stopping us from
• 1:31:02
  Speaker 1: taxing the people to line our own pockets. They're calling
• 1:31:09
  Speaker 1: Robin Hood an authoritarian. This is this is the Sheriff
• 1:31:17
  Speaker 1: of Nottingham calling Robin Hood an authoritarian, reframing Robin Hood
• 1:31:24
  Speaker 1: as an authoritarian in order to enact a soft coup
• 1:31:31
  Speaker 1: because we elected Robin Hood president. Essentially, I mean, I I.
• 1:31:40
  Speaker 3: Resent that metaphor. Robin Hood was a communist. Robin Hood
• 1:31:43
  Speaker 3: was a proto communist.
• 1:31:45
  Speaker 1: You might have you might have been, but he didn't
• 1:31:49
  Speaker 1: steal from the rich. He stole from the king. And
• 1:31:52
  Speaker 1: what he stole from the king was taxes that were
• 1:31:55
  Speaker 1: taken from the people.
• 1:31:57
  Speaker 3: Should have just abolished taxes.
• 1:32:04
  Speaker 1: That legendary hero is uh that princess for president because
• 1:32:12
  Speaker 1: people are never going to be okay with the idea
• 1:32:15
  Speaker 1: that they can't take out of their neighbor's pocket to
• 1:32:18
  Speaker 1: get their goals. Met I wish I could I have
• 1:32:22
  Speaker 1: some optimism there, because if if somebody came along and
• 1:32:27
  Speaker 1: I knew for an undeniable fact that they were going
• 1:32:30
  Speaker 1: to completely eliminate the income tax, like Trump has said
• 1:32:34
  Speaker 1: he wants to do that, I'm not holding my breath, right,
• 1:32:39
  Speaker 1: But if I knew for an absolute fact that if
• 1:32:42
  Speaker 1: candidate x uh you know, Joe the Joe.
• 1:32:48
  Speaker 4: The uh.
• 1:32:51
  Speaker 1: Uh anti authoritarian, Joe Joe the the I R S Hater, Right,
• 1:32:57
  Speaker 1: if I knew that guy running for off was going
• 1:33:01
  Speaker 1: to successfully eliminate the entire income tax system at the
• 1:33:07
  Speaker 1: federal level in the United States. I would vote for
• 1:33:10
  Speaker 1: him no matter what other policies he wanted to enact. Yeah,
• 1:33:15
  Speaker 1: just to get rid of that, because it would be
• 1:33:16
  Speaker 1: so yeah and cap show there you go, Joe the NDCAP. Well,
• 1:33:20
  Speaker 1: Joe the ancap might eliminate the entire government. I wouldn't
• 1:33:23
  Speaker 1: be opposed to that either, though, But you know, let
• 1:33:28
  Speaker 1: the states each have their own military and they communicate
• 1:33:31
  Speaker 1: through like a central hub that you don't even really
• 1:33:34
  Speaker 1: need a government for that now because we have internet capability.
• 1:33:39
  Speaker 1: So yeah, that I'd be all for it. But of course,
• 1:33:47
  Speaker 1: you know that's most people would not.
• 1:33:51
  Speaker 5: Like.
• 1:33:51
  Speaker 1: That'd be the last time you get to vote, too,
• 1:33:53
  Speaker 1: because once they dismantled the government, there'd be nothing to
• 1:33:56
  Speaker 1: vote for. Then again, you know, some some some people
• 1:34:03
  Speaker 1: might there might be enough people that we go for it.
• 1:34:08
  Speaker 1: But yeah, here's here's part of the pay dirt.
• 1:34:15
  Speaker 3: Here.
• 1:34:18
  Speaker 6: The foment of the current constitutional crisis is our opportunity
• 1:34:22
  Speaker 6: to catalyze and synergize a dynamic change, making a dynamic change,
• 1:34:29
  Speaker 6: making fractal ecosystems capable of co generating the emergence of
• 1:34:34
  Speaker 6: the new thriving together.
• 1:34:36
  Speaker 1: They so in their language what she just said. Let
• 1:34:43
  Speaker 1: me go back over that again, all right, because that
• 1:34:46
  Speaker 1: that was I know, it sounded like a bunch of
• 1:34:49
  Speaker 1: buzzword gobbledegook, right that was.
• 1:34:52
  Speaker 2: I was going to say, this motherfucker has given me
• 1:34:54
  Speaker 2: Michael Es and.
• 1:34:57
  Speaker 1: At least give us some buzzword garlic bread to go
• 1:34:59
  Speaker 1: in that, right, That's right, Yes, mister three oh three
• 1:35:02
  Speaker 1: said it. Obfuse skating language. When I wanted to cuss
• 1:35:06
  Speaker 1: a guy out in the hallway at school because some
• 1:35:09
  Speaker 1: dumb shit he said to me. And I knew my
• 1:35:12
  Speaker 1: dad worked at that school. He was a teacher at
• 1:35:15
  Speaker 1: that school, and I knew that I would get in
• 1:35:17
  Speaker 1: trouble first at school and then at home, and then
• 1:35:20
  Speaker 1: I'd have to hear about it at the family Christmas
• 1:35:23
  Speaker 1: because two of my aunts were teachers and my uncle
• 1:35:27
  Speaker 1: was a principal retired. At that point, instead of saying
• 1:35:33
  Speaker 1: fuck you and the horse you rode in on you,
• 1:35:37
  Speaker 1: you bleeding hemorrhoid, I said, fornication upon you and upon
• 1:35:43
  Speaker 1: your equying transportation to this location, you bleeding and inflammatory
• 1:35:48
  Speaker 1: wound upon the fundament. And he looked at me, and
• 1:35:53
  Speaker 1: he looked around, and one guy laughed, he understood exactly
• 1:35:58
  Speaker 1: what I said, and everybody else was kind of like
• 1:35:59
  Speaker 1: blame blink blink blinkety blink blink. Oh, except only one
• 1:36:07
  Speaker 1: person knew what the fundament was, and that that's an
• 1:36:10
  Speaker 1: old archaic medical term for the anal sphincter, which is
• 1:36:16
  Speaker 1: why a bleeding inflammatory wound upon the fundament is a hemorrhoid.
• 1:36:21
  Speaker 1: Obfuscating language, So their obfuscating language here basically says that
• 1:36:30
  Speaker 1: they are going to use the situation to undermine how
• 1:36:36
  Speaker 1: the government works by creating little sub economies that can
• 1:36:43
  Speaker 1: act independently of the government and force people's behavioral decisions
• 1:36:53
  Speaker 1: on the basis of not having access to that little
• 1:36:56
  Speaker 1: sub economy. In other words, kind of like back in
• 1:37:03
  Speaker 1: the day when a group from a particular country, an
• 1:37:09
  Speaker 1: ethnic group from a particular country, would all run Even
• 1:37:13
  Speaker 1: now that still happens. But for instance, and this is
• 1:37:18
  Speaker 1: a story that a guy I dated in college told
• 1:37:22
  Speaker 1: me he had a colleague in the military who somebody
• 1:37:33
  Speaker 1: played a prank on him. You had to have your uniform,
• 1:37:38
  Speaker 1: you know, steam pressed periodically and locally. All of the
• 1:37:47
  Speaker 1: laundries that did that service were owned by people of
• 1:37:52
  Speaker 1: the same ethnicity, and they all knew each other. They
• 1:37:57
  Speaker 1: probably all lived in the same general area because there
• 1:38:01
  Speaker 1: used to be it used to be very common for
• 1:38:05
  Speaker 1: entire neighborhoods to just all be one minority ethnicity. That's
• 1:38:10
  Speaker 1: where they could get houses. And somewhat that was manipulated
• 1:38:15
  Speaker 1: by banks. They wouldn't loan you money to buy house
• 1:38:18
  Speaker 1: in a neighborhood where it wasn't your cultural center, but
• 1:38:25
  Speaker 1: they would in this or that particular area. And but
• 1:38:30
  Speaker 1: part of it was people are just more comfortable around
• 1:38:35
  Speaker 1: people who have the same cultural traditions and understand like
• 1:38:42
  Speaker 1: the same religious belief systems and the same practices and
• 1:38:52
  Speaker 1: the same festivals and so on. Right, So there's a
• 1:38:56
  Speaker 1: there's like a two pronged this is how people were
• 1:38:59
  Speaker 1: kept in groups. So this guy is told to say
• 1:39:04
  Speaker 1: something to them in their language, and he doesn't find
• 1:39:07
  Speaker 1: out what it means before he says it, and it's
• 1:39:09
  Speaker 1: a horrible insult that hearkens back to some incident that
• 1:39:15
  Speaker 1: or practice actually that was done against them in a
• 1:39:19
  Speaker 1: war that was it was particularly hated practice, and so
• 1:39:26
  Speaker 1: the insult was it was really compounded and the guy
• 1:39:31
  Speaker 1: ended up having to go outside of his community after that,
• 1:39:34
  Speaker 1: get his uniform pressed, because none of them would serve him.
• 1:39:38
  Speaker 1: And so, in other words, you can, by creating a
• 1:39:42
  Speaker 1: little sub economy, control what people can buy in certain areas. Right,
• 1:39:48
  Speaker 1: And you can do this this was this is social
• 1:39:52
  Speaker 1: credit back in the day. You can do this with groceries,
• 1:39:59
  Speaker 1: you can do this with cars. You can do this
• 1:40:02
  Speaker 1: with farm equipment. Heck, farmers, you don't. If you look
• 1:40:10
  Speaker 1: at family farms, they don't all own a combine and
• 1:40:16
  Speaker 1: a harvester, and you know, a wheel rake and every
• 1:40:20
  Speaker 1: every little thing that every giant thing really, because a
• 1:40:24
  Speaker 1: lot of that equipment is huge. But every machine costs
• 1:40:28
  Speaker 1: as much as a house. Not every single one, but
• 1:40:31
  Speaker 1: many of them do. And so one farmer in a
• 1:40:35
  Speaker 1: co op might buy one of those machines, and he's
• 1:40:40
  Speaker 1: got he's paying on a loan that's similar to a mortgage,
• 1:40:44
  Speaker 1: and another one has a different one, and they contract
• 1:40:48
  Speaker 1: with each other to rent out those machines to each other,
• 1:40:53
  Speaker 1: and and that way they can they can all do
• 1:40:58
  Speaker 1: their work. And similarly they will do the same thing
• 1:41:01
  Speaker 1: with breeding animals and so on. So these sub economies,
• 1:41:05
  Speaker 1: if you get excluded from that, you can't make money
• 1:41:10
  Speaker 1: or even buy goods in that particular subeconomy in that area,
• 1:41:18
  Speaker 1: you can. If you get excluded from a sub economy
• 1:41:22
  Speaker 1: that is essential to your well being, you might as
• 1:41:25
  Speaker 1: well pack up and leave where you are because you
• 1:41:28
  Speaker 1: can't survive there. So what they're talking about creating is
• 1:41:34
  Speaker 1: essentially ways of forcing people to comply with their their
• 1:41:43
  Speaker 1: interests by controlling what they have access to if they
• 1:41:49
  Speaker 1: don't comply. And yeah, mister three or three, that was
• 1:41:52
  Speaker 1: a really malicious prank that the guy played. Some people
• 1:41:56
  Speaker 1: don't understand the difference between funny and you know, being
• 1:42:01
  Speaker 1: an absolute dick to someone. And so, you know, you
• 1:42:06
  Speaker 1: get when you get into jobs that just use people
• 1:42:11
  Speaker 1: for cannon fodder and you don't have to be a
• 1:42:13
  Speaker 1: genius to be cannon fodder, then you run into more
• 1:42:18
  Speaker 1: of those people to play those types of pranks.
• 1:42:22
  Speaker 6: The foment of the current constitutional crisis is our.
• 1:42:26
  Speaker 1: So the foement of the current constitutional crisis. What she's
• 1:42:29
  Speaker 1: saying there is we don't like the current administration, so
• 1:42:34
  Speaker 1: we're going to label it as if it's an emergency,
• 1:42:40
  Speaker 1: that this is something terrible that has happened to us.
• 1:42:44
  Speaker 1: Someone with different ideas than we believe in is in
• 1:42:47
  Speaker 1: charge right now? Constitutional crisis.
• 1:42:50
  Speaker 3: Oh my god, it's a crisis. But it is constitutional.
• 1:42:56
  Speaker 1: Yes, it is constitutional. The people have spoken, how dore they?
• 1:43:04
  Speaker 3: So we have to somehow undo the constitution like we
• 1:43:07
  Speaker 3: do all the fucking time. Rip the first Amendment.
• 1:43:14
  Speaker 6: Yeah, is our opportunity to catalyze and synergize a dynamic
• 1:43:21
  Speaker 6: change makes so.
• 1:43:23
  Speaker 1: It's our opportunity, because everything's an opportunity, right, So the
• 1:43:30
  Speaker 1: the the people have spoken, how doare they? This is
• 1:43:34
  Speaker 1: our opportunity to uh make changes that will allow us
• 1:43:39
  Speaker 1: to more easily clamp down on.
• 1:43:40
  Speaker 6: Them a dynamic change making fractal ecosystems.
• 1:43:47
  Speaker 1: Fractal ecosystems would be those little sub economies right where
• 1:43:53
  Speaker 1: if you say the wrong sentence in a particular language,
• 1:43:59
  Speaker 1: you can't get your uniform pressed unless you go to
• 1:44:02
  Speaker 1: the next county over.
• 1:44:06
  Speaker 6: Capable of co generating the emergence of the new thriving together.
• 1:44:11
  Speaker 1: In other words, we are going to force people to comply.
• 1:44:18
  Speaker 1: That's what she said.
• 1:44:19
  Speaker 6: There based socio political economic governance systems.
• 1:44:26
  Speaker 1: So show political economic government systems subeconomies that can be
• 1:44:31
  Speaker 1: used through policies of exclusion to manipulate people into compliance
• 1:44:40
  Speaker 1: into doing what we want. That's what she's saying.
• 1:44:44
  Speaker 3: Go on, it's not based. It's cringe.
• 1:44:48
  Speaker 1: It is incredibly cringe.
• 1:44:51
  Speaker 6: That is a long sentence.
• 1:44:54
  Speaker 1: No shit, Sherlock. What the fuck? It's bad when they
• 1:45:00
  Speaker 1: recognize that their own gobbledegook is gobbledegook?
• 1:45:06
  Speaker 3: Right.
• 1:45:07
  Speaker 1: And so what she just described is what happens when
• 1:45:12
  Speaker 1: feminine relational aggression meets government policy, also known as social credit.
• 1:45:21
  Speaker 1: And you know, to me, like there's two layers to
• 1:45:28
  Speaker 1: the whole social credit thing. I look at it from
• 1:45:34
  Speaker 1: the perspective of an an cap who doesn't want to
• 1:45:40
  Speaker 1: be micromanaged, because I don't think that anybody has the
• 1:45:44
  Speaker 1: right to do that. And the social credit system, when
• 1:45:49
  Speaker 1: they combine it with a digital ID, will make it
• 1:45:51
  Speaker 1: so that you have to comply with a social credit
• 1:45:53
  Speaker 1: system because they will be able to use something akin
• 1:45:56
  Speaker 1: to the sub economy system to cut off your food supply.
• 1:46:02
  Speaker 1: You don't buy the right thing, you say the wrong thing,
• 1:46:06
  Speaker 1: you live in the wrong place, you associate with the
• 1:46:07
  Speaker 1: wrong people. You suggest, for instance, that if something is
• 1:46:11
  Speaker 1: a human right that's everybody's right, not just for women,
• 1:46:15
  Speaker 1: Then suddenly you can't buy tomatoes or go to the doctor.
• 1:46:22
  Speaker 1: Your car will be remotely shut off because they can
• 1:46:25
  Speaker 1: do that now, especially if you've got a much newer model,
• 1:46:32
  Speaker 1: they can just remotely shut off your car. Everybody who's
• 1:46:37
  Speaker 1: not driving old junkers that don't have that system installed
• 1:46:40
  Speaker 1: in it. You can't get on the bus, you can't
• 1:46:48
  Speaker 1: pay your rent, you can't get electricity to run your
• 1:46:53
  Speaker 1: heater or gas to run your heater. You said the
• 1:46:57
  Speaker 1: wrong thing, You said that men are human? How dare you?
• 1:47:02
  Speaker 1: That's a social credit system. The other end of it is,
• 1:47:07
  Speaker 1: there's a prediction that I've known about since I was
• 1:47:10
  Speaker 1: a little kid, because I was fascinated with the book
• 1:47:13
  Speaker 1: in which it was written, that someday and edity will
• 1:47:17
  Speaker 1: come along and create a system wherein if you do
• 1:47:23
  Speaker 1: not comply with that system, with the requirements of that system,
• 1:47:29
  Speaker 1: you cannot buy and sell anywhere, you can't do business
• 1:47:34
  Speaker 1: at all. It's in the Book of Revelations. So that's
• 1:47:42
  Speaker 1: a scary thing at the other end, not the earthly end,
• 1:47:48
  Speaker 1: definitely something that creeps me the fuck out right. But
• 1:47:53
  Speaker 1: that's what these people are talking about, is finding a
• 1:47:56
  Speaker 1: way to install from the bottom up a social credit
• 1:48:01
  Speaker 1: system that they can use to force you to comply
• 1:48:03
  Speaker 1: because they don't like that you voted for somebody to
• 1:48:07
  Speaker 1: come in and clean up their corrupt mess. They don't
• 1:48:12
  Speaker 1: like facing the oversight.
• 1:48:16
  Speaker 3: These people have killed a lot of words through over
• 1:48:20
  Speaker 3: use and through association with the process of allowing pathetic, useless,
• 1:48:26
  Speaker 3: mutant big people to drag successful people into their swamp.
• 1:48:31
  Speaker 3: They killed the word woke fairly recently. Before that, they
• 1:48:35
  Speaker 3: killed the word progressive, like these are usable words that
• 1:48:40
  Speaker 3: can refer to things, but now they're just impossibly corrupted.
• 1:48:45
  Speaker 3: And they've even done it with the word social, Like,
• 1:48:48
  Speaker 3: if we ever do pull ourselves out of the other
• 1:48:51
  Speaker 3: end of this black hole, having finally somehow escaped it,
• 1:48:57
  Speaker 3: I don't know if we're ever going to be able
• 1:48:59
  Speaker 3: to use the word social all ever again, given its
• 1:49:04
  Speaker 3: association with socialism and social justice warrior and all and
• 1:49:08
  Speaker 3: all this bullshit. It is applicable, and so you can
• 1:49:12
  Speaker 3: socialize with people, but we might have to just revert
• 1:49:16
  Speaker 3: back to calling it familiarized. You can familiarize yourself with people.
• 1:49:22
  Speaker 3: That's almost a synonym of of of of socializing, but
• 1:49:27
  Speaker 3: it works better because because it's anathema to everything that
• 1:49:34
  Speaker 3: socialists stand for. Because you may have noticed that socialists
• 1:49:39
  Speaker 3: hate the family, and yes, family familiar the same word.
• 1:49:46
  Speaker 3: There's nothing socialists hate more than the familiar. They want
• 1:49:50
  Speaker 3: to abolish the familiar in favor of the zeno of
• 1:49:55
  Speaker 3: the stranger, of bringing in that which was not there
• 1:49:59
  Speaker 3: for the it being new. It's it's novelty for the
• 1:50:03
  Speaker 3: sake of novelty, different for the sake of different. And
• 1:50:07
  Speaker 3: and I don't know if we're ever going to be
• 1:50:09
  Speaker 3: able to get that stink off of the word social,
• 1:50:12
  Speaker 3: but I we we might have to do that. I'm
• 1:50:15
  Speaker 3: a word nerd, so I see everything in terms of
• 1:50:18
  Speaker 3: of of how we phrase things. But it really does,
• 1:50:22
  Speaker 3: it really does start with that sort of ship and
• 1:50:24
  Speaker 3: maybe even end with that sort of ship. I just
• 1:50:30
  Speaker 3: it's and it's so ironic because the most again this
• 1:50:34
  Speaker 3: is this is one of those uh or welly and ironies.
• 1:50:37
  Speaker 3: There's nothing more anti social than socialism. This it's it's
• 1:50:46
  Speaker 3: nothing breaks up society more than socialist. And I'm like this,
• 1:50:52
  Speaker 3: it's become so muddy and so unusable that I can
• 1:50:58
  Speaker 3: only see a future in which we just essue this
• 1:51:02
  Speaker 3: whole concept of social from our language, because we have,
• 1:51:06
  Speaker 3: like I said, we have other words. We can use
• 1:51:08
  Speaker 3: more appropriate words, and like, I don't see how we
• 1:51:13
  Speaker 3: come back from this other than turning social into a
• 1:51:19
  Speaker 3: fucking curse word.
• 1:51:21
  Speaker 1: Frankly, well, honestly, it's more about concepts than words, and yeah,
• 1:51:28
  Speaker 1: you know, the most important concepts are the boundaries between
• 1:51:34
  Speaker 1: things like government authority, which it, like I said, in
• 1:51:38
  Speaker 1: my opinion, it shouldn't exist at all, but if it's
• 1:51:41
  Speaker 1: going to exist, there needs to be set boundaries between
• 1:51:44
  Speaker 1: that authority and your bodily autonomy, your your human rights.
• 1:51:49
  Speaker 1: And we did a show years ago, like two or
• 1:51:52
  Speaker 1: three years ago, maybe longer actually it might have been
• 1:51:56
  Speaker 1: during the first Trump administration, and it was in response
• 1:52:02
  Speaker 1: to the Women's March. We did a whole series on
• 1:52:04
  Speaker 1: their manifesto on their on their page, and one of
• 1:52:09
  Speaker 1: the things that they had gone on about was civic involvement.
• 1:52:18
  Speaker 1: And I explained what human rights are and what civil
• 1:52:25
  Speaker 1: rights are in terms of like what does that mean
• 1:52:29
  Speaker 1: the government has to respect or or what what does
• 1:52:33
  Speaker 1: that mean kind of legally and what does what does
• 1:52:37
  Speaker 1: it define a human what is a human right and
• 1:52:41
  Speaker 1: what is a civil right? And you know, human rights
• 1:52:46
  Speaker 1: essentially draw the line between your autonomy and that of
• 1:52:53
  Speaker 1: the next person, your your ability to act, and you
• 1:53:00
  Speaker 1: know what happens to the next person and their ability
• 1:53:03
  Speaker 1: to act and what happens to you. And in terms
• 1:53:05
  Speaker 1: of government, what the government may or may not do
• 1:53:07
  Speaker 1: to you, and your civil rights are essentially how that's
• 1:53:14
  Speaker 1: laid out in law. How the law of your land
• 1:53:19
  Speaker 1: describes the boundaries that the government has between itself and
• 1:53:24
  Speaker 1: your human rights. Our government in the United States and
• 1:53:29
  Speaker 1: the Canadian government as well have been inching over people's
• 1:53:35
  Speaker 1: human rights a little bit at a time for the
• 1:53:37
  Speaker 1: last one hundred and fifty years in the name of
• 1:53:41
  Speaker 1: the greater good. People think that well, you can, you
• 1:53:46
  Speaker 1: can just be above the all this if you homestead,
• 1:53:49
  Speaker 1: for instance, or you know, you go out west and
• 1:53:53
  Speaker 1: live in Arizona and Adobe hut, have some of your
• 1:53:57
  Speaker 1: own animals, hunt fish whatever, like. I don't know, fishing
• 1:54:01
  Speaker 1: in Arizona's probably not going to be very easy. But
• 1:54:04
  Speaker 1: you know, someplace where there's wildlife, someplace where there's water,
• 1:54:10
  Speaker 1: collect your own water instead of getting it from the city. Create,
• 1:54:15
  Speaker 1: you know, create devices to to make your own electricity
• 1:54:18
  Speaker 1: and all that. There have been I've read news stories
• 1:54:22
  Speaker 1: where the federal government has gone in and eliminated entire
• 1:54:27
  Speaker 1: chicken farms because they think the chickens might have bird flu.
• 1:54:34
  Speaker 1: They don't test them for it, they just go in
• 1:54:38
  Speaker 1: and kill them. And there was an ostrich farm that
• 1:54:43
  Speaker 1: made news a while back in Canada that that happened
• 1:54:46
  Speaker 1: with then, and it's it doesn't matter what state you
• 1:54:51
  Speaker 1: live in or what province you live in. If your
• 1:54:53
  Speaker 1: federal government is doing it, they go. They go into
• 1:54:57
  Speaker 1: every state, they go into every province. There's been situations
• 1:55:02
  Speaker 1: where there's various ailments that you know, they want to
• 1:55:08
  Speaker 1: be careful your cattle don't have this ailment or that,
• 1:55:13
  Speaker 1: because it's dangerous for people to eat it if they
• 1:55:16
  Speaker 1: have it right, And there was a hearing the government
• 1:55:22
  Speaker 1: literally stopped a woman from testing her cattle to make
• 1:55:26
  Speaker 1: sure that they were healthy, because if she was testing
• 1:55:29
  Speaker 1: her cattle to make sure that they were healthy, then
• 1:55:34
  Speaker 1: you know, other ranchers that weren't would look bad because
• 1:55:39
  Speaker 1: they weren't doing it. And then also she would have
• 1:55:42
  Speaker 1: evidence against an authoritarian push to get rid of her
• 1:55:46
  Speaker 1: cattle on the basis of, you know, we think they
• 1:55:48
  Speaker 1: might have this ailment, but we're not going to test them,
• 1:55:51
  Speaker 1: just to be on the safe side. We're going to
• 1:55:53
  Speaker 1: kill them all. We're not going to reimburse you. And
• 1:55:57
  Speaker 1: they've done that to numerous farmers, ranchers, homesteaders. They have
• 1:56:03
  Speaker 1: used imminent domain to take land and then not do
• 1:56:07
  Speaker 1: anything with it. They've used imminent domain to take land
• 1:56:11
  Speaker 1: and give it to private corporations. They've gone after people
• 1:56:18
  Speaker 1: for collecting, cleaning, and using their own water for even
• 1:56:22
  Speaker 1: just for graywater, like you know, doing your dishes and
• 1:56:25
  Speaker 1: cleaning your laundry. They have gone after people for having
• 1:56:31
  Speaker 1: off grid electricity and not using electricity. And so if
• 1:56:40
  Speaker 1: if you think you can go off grid and avoid this,
• 1:56:48
  Speaker 1: the answer is you can't, because they will come and
• 1:56:51
  Speaker 1: they will take your shit and force you to be
• 1:56:54
  Speaker 1: on grid until you become homeless from non compliance, which
• 1:57:00
  Speaker 1: in China has happened to a huge portion of their population.
• 1:57:03
  Speaker 1: They have the same homeless problem in China that they
• 1:57:07
  Speaker 1: have in California, where there's people just living on the
• 1:57:11
  Speaker 1: street ten cities and such. Not because they're not doing
• 1:57:17
  Speaker 1: anything about it, but because they have made so many
• 1:57:21
  Speaker 1: people homeless through their social credit system that there's no
• 1:57:27
  Speaker 1: place else for these people to go. They can't displace
• 1:57:31
  Speaker 1: them without doing something like putting them in camps, which
• 1:57:35
  Speaker 1: may be the next step. They do have those. There's
• 1:57:40
  Speaker 1: in fact, you should look into how the products that
• 1:57:46
  Speaker 1: they sell on Timu get made.
• 1:57:51
  Speaker 3: This is why, as much as I support migtao, it
• 1:57:54
  Speaker 3: is not the be all and end all. It is
• 1:57:56
  Speaker 3: not the only answer. You may think you can go
• 1:57:59
  Speaker 3: your own way and get off the grid, but we're
• 1:58:02
  Speaker 3: far too far gone for that.
• 1:58:07
  Speaker 1: We're in a system at this point where government authority
• 1:58:09
  Speaker 1: and government overreach are so all encompassing that if you
• 1:58:16
  Speaker 1: go off the grid, the grid will come after you.
• 1:58:18
  Speaker 3: You know why men can't go their own way because
• 1:58:21
  Speaker 3: they don't have any rights. And that's why Magdao and
• 1:58:26
  Speaker 3: men's rights advocates need each other as as as different
• 1:58:31
  Speaker 3: elements in the same movement. Dare I say? I know
• 1:58:37
  Speaker 3: they say magtais not a movement, but the active verb
• 1:58:41
  Speaker 3: is go, so I would hope it is a movement
• 1:58:45
  Speaker 3: at least it's part of the movement. We need to
• 1:58:49
  Speaker 3: go our own way and advocate for our own rights
• 1:58:52
  Speaker 3: at the same time, because only with this pincer movement
• 1:58:57
  Speaker 3: can we actually undo this fucking nightmare. Best of luck everyone.
• 1:59:06
  Speaker 1: Yeah, that's the other thing, Like we are able to
• 1:59:11
  Speaker 1: do what we can do right now because it hasn't
• 1:59:16
  Speaker 1: gone too far and just yet. But if the government
• 1:59:23
  Speaker 1: decided that they were going to stop us, we don't
• 1:59:28
  Speaker 1: have the power to keep them from doing that. At
• 1:59:35
  Speaker 1: case in point, the the Bundy bunch, all right, ZERANX
• 1:59:44
  Speaker 1: springs up, what would Clive and Bundy do? And it's
• 1:59:48
  Speaker 1: the question isn't what would Clive and Bundy do? The
• 1:59:52
  Speaker 1: question is why did it work when it worked, and
• 1:59:55
  Speaker 1: why won't it work in the future if it is
• 1:59:58
  Speaker 1: decided that they're going to for you into fifteen minute
• 2:00:01
  Speaker 1: cities and so on. And the answer is this, in
• 2:00:06
  Speaker 1: order for them to be able to force you into that,
• 2:00:08
  Speaker 1: they have to have enough power over enough people that
• 2:00:11
  Speaker 1: they can't protest against it. They can't march in the streets.
• 2:00:15
  Speaker 1: They can't take their weapons and go attack the capital.
• 2:00:21
  Speaker 1: You know, they can't do what people were accused of
• 2:00:24
  Speaker 1: in twenty twenty, much less put the absolute cabage to it. Right,
• 2:00:32
  Speaker 1: they can't even do what people did in twenty twenty,
• 2:00:35
  Speaker 1: which was pretty much ineffectual protesting. It achieved very little.
• 2:00:41
  Speaker 1: And so when it gets to that point, the thing
• 2:00:45
  Speaker 1: that stopped the government from just wholesale running over the
• 2:00:52
  Speaker 1: Bundy bunch at the Bundy Ranch was they cared enough
• 2:00:57
  Speaker 1: about optics to not perpetrate another Ruby ridge. But they'll
• 2:01:07
  Speaker 1: get to the point where they don't give a flying
• 2:01:10
  Speaker 1: fuck about optics because there's nothing that you can do
• 2:01:15
  Speaker 1: in response to it. When they get to that point,
• 2:01:21
  Speaker 1: someone like Clive and Bundy stands up to them, they
• 2:01:25
  Speaker 1: will just mow down every living person on that land
• 2:01:30
  Speaker 1: and do what they want with it anyway. And that
• 2:01:37
  Speaker 1: is why we are needed. That is why this is
• 2:01:41
  Speaker 1: so insidious. What we're looking at that a government agency,
• 2:01:48
  Speaker 1: the people that work for that agency, rather than following
• 2:01:53
  Speaker 1: policy that is oversight, rather than obeying the will of
• 2:02:01
  Speaker 1: the people, ceasing to steal from us to line their
• 2:02:07
  Speaker 1: own pockets. They're organizing with militant groups, militant communist groups
• 2:02:17
  Speaker 1: around the world to try to undermine the cleanup of
• 2:02:23
  Speaker 1: our government, the prevention of what I'm warning about. They're
• 2:02:29
  Speaker 1: afraid they won't be able to achieve it. When men
• 2:02:35
  Speaker 1: put their minds to it, and they decide to support
• 2:02:38
  Speaker 1: somebody in tearing down the scaffolding underneath that exploitative system.
• 2:02:48
  Speaker 1: They scare the fuck out of the women who are
• 2:02:51
  Speaker 1: stealing from them. And that's why you know, like this,
• 2:02:59
  Speaker 1: there are you can see men in the call, right,
• 2:03:03
  Speaker 1: but the people doing the talking. Did you notice I
• 2:03:07
  Speaker 1: didn't hear a man's voice the whole time, did you Nope?
• 2:03:16
  Speaker 6: And it now we have one guy here of the
• 2:03:19
  Speaker 6: current constitutional still hurts our opportunity.
• 2:03:23
  Speaker 1: Yeah, So this is what we're dealing with right this,
• 2:03:31
  Speaker 1: and this is here. She wants us to watch a video.
• 2:03:34
  Speaker 1: I'm not going over this. This is six minutes long,
• 2:03:36
  Speaker 1: and it's time for us to end the show tonight.
• 2:03:39
  Speaker 1: But if you're not, if you're on X and you're
• 2:03:44
  Speaker 1: not following Data Republican, you should start following Data Republican
• 2:03:50
  Speaker 1: because this is something you should be keeping track of.
• 2:03:53
  Speaker 1: It may not seem like a men's issue, but it
• 2:03:55
  Speaker 1: is a men's issue in the same way that the
• 2:03:59
  Speaker 1: evolution of the parliamentary system and voting rights was a
• 2:04:04
  Speaker 1: men's issue. It's men who step up and put the
• 2:04:07
  Speaker 1: stop to this. It's men who voted a man into
• 2:04:11
  Speaker 1: office to clean up the government after decades of women
• 2:04:16
  Speaker 1: voting men into office to give them gibbs so that
• 2:04:22
  Speaker 1: they could exploit the government. This is the situation where
• 2:04:30
  Speaker 1: women aren't going to step up and fight against this,
• 2:04:34
  Speaker 1: even though you're hearing about it from one Most women
• 2:04:40
  Speaker 1: won't even fully understand what's wrong with it. They'll be
• 2:04:45
  Speaker 1: going along with it. So men, it's up to you
• 2:04:52
  Speaker 1: stay abreast of this, no pun intended, and you know
• 2:04:58
  Speaker 1: what's what they're doing, and make sure that you alter
• 2:05:06
  Speaker 1: what you're doing accordingly. Especially when you go to the
• 2:05:09
  Speaker 1: pulling booth. You pay attention to everything these people say
• 2:05:13
  Speaker 1: and what politicians say about them and about what they're doing.
• 2:05:18
  Speaker 1: Who's willing to stand up and actually do something about
• 2:05:23
  Speaker 1: this behavior, who's willing to hold them accountable versus who
• 2:05:28
  Speaker 1: says it's a distraction, Because you want to know who's
• 2:05:32
  Speaker 1: going to fight in your corner to put a stop
• 2:05:35
  Speaker 1: to this and who is just going to ignore it
• 2:05:40
  Speaker 1: because they're doing the same thing some other way. But
• 2:05:45
  Speaker 1: with that, I will thank you all for listening, and
• 2:05:49
  Speaker 1: I would encourage you to find this thread and continue
• 2:05:53
  Speaker 1: because there is quite a lot here, and I'm not
• 2:05:57
  Speaker 1: going to go over every tweet in this thread, but
• 2:06:01
  Speaker 1: I do think that it is very important that you're
• 2:06:05
  Speaker 1: aware of it, and that that you follow up on
• 2:06:10
  Speaker 1: it and recognize that your your government the bureaucracy underneath
• 2:06:17
  Speaker 1: your government is fighting against the the authority of the
• 2:06:24
  Speaker 1: public over the government. In doing this, your authority is
• 2:06:30
  Speaker 1: being undermined. And uh, you definitely need to be active
• 2:06:39
  Speaker 1: in fighting back against that. And in terms of if
• 2:06:44
  Speaker 1: you want to see changes in in uh, federal governments
• 2:06:50
  Speaker 1: and world governments, I know you're gonna have to start locally,
• 2:06:56
  Speaker 1: but I would encourage men in the men's rights movement
• 2:07:01
  Speaker 1: to start getting involved on the civic level. You know,
• 2:07:05
  Speaker 1: in your community. Run for city council, run for dog catcher,
• 2:07:09
  Speaker 1: if you have to county commissioner, school board. You know,
• 2:07:15
  Speaker 1: if you are the least bit inclined to get involved
• 2:07:19
  Speaker 1: like that, do it. Get involved and start being one
• 2:07:27
  Speaker 1: of the people who influences where your political party goes locally.
• 2:07:33
  Speaker 1: The more men in the men's rights movement that do that,
• 2:07:38
  Speaker 1: you know, the more you're able to influence state level
• 2:07:42
  Speaker 1: elections and federal level elections. And and yeah, I mister
• 2:07:48
  Speaker 1: three or three pointed out ice ICE is hiring. Mm hmmm,
• 2:07:53
  Speaker 1: so it's not. It's another one of those dangerous jobs though, But.
• 2:08:01
  Speaker 3: Yeah, uh uh teach women. I know that's a weird
• 2:08:06
  Speaker 3: couple of words that we don't hear very often because
• 2:08:09
  Speaker 3: men don't get to be teachers or parents. But in
• 2:08:12
  Speaker 3: the event that you do teach women, you don't need
• 2:08:15
  Speaker 3: to program them into anything. If anything, you need to
• 2:08:19
  Speaker 3: deprogram them, but you probably you'll have a hard time
• 2:08:23
  Speaker 3: deprogramming them because there's so many of them have been
• 2:08:27
  Speaker 3: so programmed that they can't be deprogrammed. But there's another
• 2:08:32
  Speaker 3: generation coming up, like and see if that generation can
• 2:08:37
  Speaker 3: be raised without the programming that has so corrupted the
• 2:08:42
  Speaker 3: last fucking five generations of them. Help help help to
• 2:08:50
  Speaker 3: teach women, ah, to just be fucking normal, to to
• 2:08:57
  Speaker 3: not be programmed in the first place into this insane cult.
• 2:09:04
  Speaker 3: And you can do that by being a parent, or
• 2:09:06
  Speaker 3: by being a teacher, or by being an internet influencer,
• 2:09:11
  Speaker 3: whatever the fucking word is for for whatever it is
• 2:09:13
  Speaker 3: we're doing here.
• 2:09:16
  Speaker 1: I don't know if that's I don't I don't like
• 2:09:21
  Speaker 1: the label.
• 2:09:22
  Speaker 3: No word, but you know, just just just fucking talk
• 2:09:28
  Speaker 3: to women.
• 2:09:31
  Speaker 1: Well, be careful how you talk to women, because you
• 2:09:33
  Speaker 1: don't want to get you don't want to give the
• 2:09:35
  Speaker 1: woman a power to cost you your job. But for
• 2:09:39
  Speaker 1: men getting involved, I you know, I it's hard to
• 2:09:44
  Speaker 1: put this on men to teach women to adult women have.
• 2:09:51
  Speaker 1: They've got a bubble wrap kind of shield around them
• 2:09:55
  Speaker 1: that they can use to stop you from teaching them.
• 2:09:59
  Speaker 2: They can.
• 2:10:00
  Speaker 1: They don't even have to work at your job to
• 2:10:02
  Speaker 1: go after you. Just don't. Don't forget donglegate.
• 2:10:07
  Speaker 4: You know.
• 2:10:07
  Speaker 1: All they have to do is get mad at you
• 2:10:10
  Speaker 1: and say that you did something misogynistic. And even if
• 2:10:16
  Speaker 1: you're not their colleague, you know, not their coworker, they
• 2:10:20
  Speaker 1: can still get you fired. All they have to do
• 2:10:25
  Speaker 1: is get an outrage mob going or contact your employer
• 2:10:28
  Speaker 1: and say, you know your employee did X y Z
• 2:10:31
  Speaker 1: and I'm deeply offended. So guys need to take control
• 2:10:38
  Speaker 1: of their local governments. Really, it's this is why I
• 2:10:42
  Speaker 1: say I want to see more men in the men's
• 2:10:44
  Speaker 1: rights movement getting involved in civics, not because uh, it's
• 2:10:52
  Speaker 1: not just because it's a duty of American citizens, but
• 2:10:55
  Speaker 1: because we need to put masculinity back and into this.
• 2:11:01
  Speaker 1: And because you can't change women, you can only change
• 2:11:08
  Speaker 1: what what authority is doing. Women are going to have
• 2:11:11
  Speaker 1: to change themselves. And I'm sorry, but you can't. You
• 2:11:18
  Speaker 1: can't trust that that you're going to be able to
• 2:11:21
  Speaker 1: change them now your daughters. Fathers out there, definitely teach
• 2:11:27
  Speaker 1: your daughters to be better than the generation of women
• 2:11:30
  Speaker 1: to change, That's what i mean. But not adults. Don't try.
• 2:11:36
  Speaker 1: You like not saying that you don't try to talk
• 2:11:39
  Speaker 1: to your friends about this stuff. But you can't trust
• 2:11:44
  Speaker 1: that you can talk to adult women that you don't
• 2:11:47
  Speaker 1: have a really good close relationship with about this stuff.
• 2:11:52
  Speaker 3: Don't don't know, don't bother with the ones who are
• 2:11:55
  Speaker 3: already broken. I'm just I'm just trying to push back
• 2:11:57
  Speaker 3: on because from the left and the right, I hear
• 2:12:00
  Speaker 3: all we can do is tell men what to do
• 2:12:03
  Speaker 3: and teach men to be more and all that shit.
• 2:12:08
  Speaker 3: Yeah all right, yeah, maybe, but I'm here to say,
• 2:12:15
  Speaker 3: you know, women can be teachable, maybe from an early age. Yeah,
• 2:12:24
  Speaker 3: maybe from a certain angle, but we're not going to
• 2:12:27
  Speaker 3: change anything if all we do is keep nagging men
• 2:12:31
  Speaker 3: to do ship fucking well.
• 2:12:34
  Speaker 1: The biggest thing is that women and particularly young women
• 2:12:39
  Speaker 1: and uh you know, like teenage girls need not necessarily
• 2:12:44
  Speaker 1: a female version of Jordan Peterson, but a female version
• 2:12:47
  Speaker 1: of what Jordan Peter Peterson started out to be. They
• 2:12:51
  Speaker 1: need somebody to get through to them that they can
• 2:12:55
  Speaker 1: be happier and healthier if they make wiser decisions and
• 2:13:02
  Speaker 1: rather than taking the easy road or the emotionally uncontrolled
• 2:13:12
  Speaker 1: road and the intellectually lazy road, that if they challenge
• 2:13:18
  Speaker 1: themselves to consider all of the potential consequences of their
• 2:13:23
  Speaker 1: choices before doing things like screwing around like a three
• 2:13:27
  Speaker 1: dollars hope, for instance, that their lives, the trajectory of
• 2:13:33
  Speaker 1: their lives will be at a higher level of ease,
• 2:13:38
  Speaker 1: and not just leisure, but just not having to deal
• 2:13:43
  Speaker 1: with stupid shit happening to them because they did stupid shit.
• 2:13:46
  Speaker 1: They won't get the stupid prizes because they won't play
• 2:13:49
  Speaker 1: the stupid games. And right now we have population wide
• 2:13:57
  Speaker 1: a female mentality of I have the right to play
• 2:14:02
  Speaker 1: stupid games and you have to deal with the stupid prizes.
• 2:14:07
  Speaker 1: It's not my fault the prize is stupid. It's your fault.
• 2:14:09
  Speaker 1: The prize is stupid. I don't have to deal with that.
• 2:14:13
  Speaker 1: That needs women talking to women to change that, because
• 2:14:20
  Speaker 1: if the people that they are trying to dump the
• 2:14:22
  Speaker 1: stupid prizes on are the ones that are objecting, the
• 2:14:27
  Speaker 1: result is just going to be women saying, well, you
• 2:14:31
  Speaker 1: just don't want to take responsibility, and you don't want
• 2:14:35
  Speaker 1: to take responsibility because it's responsibility for their choices. But
• 2:14:40
  Speaker 1: they won't see it that way. They'll see it as
• 2:14:44
  Speaker 1: I got to talk to this guy's boss and get
• 2:14:46
  Speaker 1: him fired so he knows that he can't do that.
• 2:14:50
  Speaker 1: I hate to say it, but that's unfortunately true of
• 2:14:55
  Speaker 1: women as a population, left a and right, up and down,
• 2:15:04
  Speaker 1: traditionalist and feminist, and even some in the men's rights movement.
• 2:15:13
  Speaker 1: I've run into them, had knockdown, drag out fights with
• 2:15:15
  Speaker 1: them and been unfollowed, blocked, even had them leverage their
• 2:15:23
  Speaker 1: social pull against me by turning some other guys in
• 2:15:29
  Speaker 1: the men's rights movement against me for criticizing another woman
• 2:15:34
  Speaker 1: in the movement. Oh, you're gonna scare her away. If
• 2:15:37
  Speaker 1: accountability scares her away, she was never really here to
• 2:15:42
  Speaker 1: begin with. But yeah, you can teach your daughters because
• 2:15:48
  Speaker 1: you are their fathers, right, but you can't teach your neighbors.
• 2:15:53
  Speaker 1: You need you need to shield yourself from the consequences
• 2:16:00
  Speaker 1: of their outrage. The only way to do that is
• 2:16:03
  Speaker 1: to kind of do the same thing that you do
• 2:16:05
  Speaker 1: with You can't stop your neighbor from committing, you know,
• 2:16:11
  Speaker 1: stupid crimes and stuff like that. Either you can't really
• 2:16:15
  Speaker 1: engage in violence to protect your neighbors from your other neighbors,
• 2:16:19
  Speaker 1: you have to call the cops. So I guess you
• 2:16:22
  Speaker 1: can think of the women of the movements as the equivalent.
• 2:16:27
  Speaker 1: It's gonna be up to us. And I hate to
• 2:16:32
  Speaker 1: make people helpless in any way, shape or form on
• 2:16:35
  Speaker 1: any level for any reason, but the reality is that's
• 2:16:40
  Speaker 1: that's the way this situation is.
• 2:16:43
  Speaker 3: Create strong men. Strong men create good times, and weak
• 2:16:48
  Speaker 3: women create bad times. I'm I'm sticking to that axiom
• 2:16:53
  Speaker 3: because I sincerely so all the energy that you'll have
• 2:16:57
  Speaker 3: been putting into creating weak women over the last century,
• 2:17:01
  Speaker 3: at least take that energy and put it into creating
• 2:17:04
  Speaker 3: strong men. One way or another's.
• 2:17:07
  Speaker 1: Strong men and strong women and strong women too.
• 2:17:10
  Speaker 3: But you know, strong strong women support the strong men
• 2:17:14
  Speaker 3: who create good times. I think that's right.
• 2:17:17
  Speaker 1: Strong women support strong men. Weak women seek to exploit them.
• 2:17:22
  Speaker 3: Indeed.
• 2:17:24
  Speaker 1: So with that though, I am going to end the show.
• 2:17:29
  Speaker 1: Thank you all for for listening. Thanks Mike and Lauren
• 2:17:34
  Speaker 1: for going through this with This has been some disturbing content,
• 2:17:40
  Speaker 1: but I feel like we really had to cover it,
• 2:17:43
  Speaker 1: and starting next week we're going to get into some
• 2:17:45
  Speaker 1: more disturbing content that has nothing to do with you
• 2:17:48
  Speaker 1: and women. We're taking a break from that because we
• 2:17:52
  Speaker 1: really have to look at this and it's a yay,
• 2:17:55
  Speaker 1: but when you see it, it's not gonna be it's
• 2:17:57
  Speaker 1: gonna upset you. And I'm sorry an event, but we
• 2:18:01
  Speaker 1: have to talk about this and it's it's a serious issue.
• 2:18:06
  Speaker 1: People who both on both sides of the fight again about,
• 2:18:12
  Speaker 1: you know, whether the United States should be involved in
• 2:18:15
  Speaker 1: the Ukraine Russia conflict, need to see this. It was
• 2:18:21
  Speaker 1: my attention was drawn to it by one of my
• 2:18:23
  Speaker 1: mutuals on X and I'm still I watched it a
• 2:18:30
  Speaker 1: few days ago and just thinking about it, I'm enraged,
• 2:18:35
  Speaker 1: and so I want you all to be enraged too.
• 2:18:37
  Speaker 1: So that's what we're going to do next week and
• 2:18:41
  Speaker 1: with that I will close us out. Thanks guys. Word