Latest / How Canadian Markets Work / The Life of an Order Explained: What Happens After You Hit Buy? | Canadian Investing

Transcript

The Life of an Order Explained: What Happens After You Hit Buy? | Canadian Investing · How Canadian Markets Work

0:00
Have you ever hit buy on a stock quoted on your
0:04
screen at exactly $80? Right. Right. You just
0:07
see that clean, even number. Exactly. OK. But
0:10
then you check your trade confirmation a moment
0:12
later, and well, you see you actually paid $80
0:16
.04. It is such a wonderfully common annoyance.
0:19
Oh, absolutely. I mean, just sit with that for
0:21
a second. Yeah. You were looking directly at
0:23
the price. You deliberately press the button,
0:26
and yet the system somehow charged you slightly
0:28
more. And it feels completely wrong, almost like
0:31
a glitch. It does. But those four cents aren't
0:34
a mistake at all. They aren't a glitch. They
0:36
are actually a window into this massive, completely
0:40
hidden web of market mechanics. A web that functions
0:43
in absolute fractions of a second. Yeah. So today
0:46
on The Deep Dive, we are tracking the actual
0:48
life of an order to see exactly what happens
0:50
in that tiny microscopic sliver of time between
0:53
clicking buy and getting your confirmation. Which
0:57
is a brilliant topic. It really is. We are pulling
1:00
insights from episode six of the incredible podcast,
1:03
How Canadian Markets Work. The show is hosted
1:05
by John and Jane, and this specific episode is
1:08
titled The Life of an Order. It is entirely dedicated
1:11
to unpacking this exact journey. It is a journey
1:15
that happens in the literal blink of an eye,
1:17
yet it involves this highly complex, just beautifully
1:21
intricate architecture. Which we totally take
1:24
for granted. We do. Most of us interact with
1:27
financial markets through a pane of glass, like
1:29
a phone screen or a monitor. We see numbers flashing,
1:33
we see a green button, and we assume a level
1:35
of simplicity that, well, it simply does not
1:37
exist. Right. We assume the number we see is
1:39
a fixed reality, just waiting for us to claim
1:41
it. Precisely, but the truth of what happens
1:44
in the dark in that fraction of a second after
1:46
you send your instruction out into the world
1:48
is entirely different from what that simple interface
1:50
suggests. Okay, let's unpack this by stepping
1:53
back before the button is even clicked because
1:55
we really need to completely shatter the illusion
1:57
of the price on your screen. That is the perfect
1:59
place to start. The fundamental takeaway from
2:02
John and Jane's breakdown is that the price you
2:04
are looking at is not a reservation. It is just
2:09
a quote. Just a fleeting quote. Right. To make
2:11
this feel a bit more grounded, think about booking
2:15
a family vacation online. You look at a hotel
2:18
website and it advertises rooms at $80 a night.
2:21
Which looks like a fixed, reliable fact. Exactly.
2:25
It feels guaranteed. But you need to book a block
2:27
of five rooms for the whole family. When you
2:30
reach the checkout, you discover that actually
2:32
only the first two rooms were available at that
2:35
$80 rate. Ah, and the rest are more expensive.
2:37
Yeah, the remaining three rooms are actually
2:39
$90. The website wasn't lying to you, but the
2:42
$80 quote was only true for a very specific...
2:44
you know, limited quantity. What's fascinating
2:47
here is that the stock market operates on exactly
2:49
that same logic just at late speed. The market
2:52
is fundamentally an ongoing auction. An auction
2:55
that never really stops. Exactly. At any given
2:58
moment, you have the bid, which is the highest
3:00
price a buyer is willing to pay, and the ask,
3:03
which is the lowest price a seller is willing
3:05
to accept. So the quote on your screen is just
3:07
reflecting those numbers. Right. It is a historical
3:10
snapshot of those two numbers. But crucially,
3:13
Most retail trading screens only show you what
3:16
we call the top of the book. The top of the book?
3:19
Yes. They show you the best available price,
3:22
but they completely hide how many shares are
3:26
actually sitting there waiting for you. Right.
3:28
So you are seeing the price of that first hotel
3:30
room, but you are completely blind to the price
3:33
of the rest of the billing. That is exactly it.
3:35
And by the time you actually decide to buy, I
3:37
mean, that information is already in the past
3:39
anyway. Precisely. The quote is essentially a
3:42
ghost. It is a historical echo of what was available
3:45
right then at the very top of the pile. Because
3:48
the market doesn't know you want those shares
3:49
yet. Exactly. It doesn't know how many shares
3:52
you are about to ask for until you actually ask
3:54
for them. And even at the speed of light, data
3:57
takes time to travel from the exchanges servers
3:59
to your broker, and then finally to your phone
4:02
screen. Which introduces latency. Right. If your
4:05
data feed is even slightly delayed, or if it
4:08
only shows that top layer of the book, You are
4:11
making a financial decision based on a beautifully
4:13
simplified, but ultimately incomplete picture
4:16
of reality. So you are looking at this ghost
4:20
of a price and you tap buy. What actually happens
4:24
in the millisecond? We move into the automated
4:26
journey here. This is where the machinery wakes
4:28
up. Right. The very first step is validation
4:30
in the literal blink of an eye. your broker system
4:34
acts as a gatekeeper. It checks your buying power
4:37
to ensure you actually have the cash. A crucial
4:39
step, obviously. Yeah, quite necessary. It ensures
4:42
the ticker symbol is valid, and it checks to
4:44
make sure there are no trading restrictions on
4:46
your specific account. It is just a quiet, instant
4:49
security check. Just a digital bouncer at the
4:51
door. Exactly. But then comes step two, which
4:54
is routing. And this is where the plot really
4:56
thickens because Canada has multiple marketplaces
4:59
trading the exact same securities. Yes, it is
5:02
a highly fragmented landscape. So your broker
5:04
has to make a choice right then and there about
5:07
where to send your order. And that is where the
5:09
underlying structure becomes highly strategic.
5:12
A broker has a strict regulatory obligation to
5:15
seek what is called best execution. Best execution,
5:18
okay. Now, best execution does not just mean
5:20
finding the absolute lowest price. It requires
5:23
a delicate balance. They have to weigh the price,
5:27
the speed of the execution, the certainty that
5:29
the trade will actually be completed, and the
5:31
overall cost. And that last part, the overall
5:34
cost, that introduces a very real tension, doesn't
5:37
it? It absolutely does because different trading
5:39
venues charge completely different fees to the
5:41
broker to execute a trade. And some venues actually
5:44
pay the brokers, right? I really want to push
5:47
back on this routing tension because honestly
5:50
it sounds incredibly questionable. It definitely
5:52
raises eyebrows. Right. The industry calls it
5:55
the maker -taker model. Wait, so my broker might
5:58
have an incentive to send my trades somewhere
6:00
that is cheaper for them or even pays them a
6:02
rebate, even if it requires balancing what is
6:04
best for me? How is that not a massive conflict
6:07
of interest? It is entirely rational to be skeptical
6:10
of that dynamic. It really is. Let's look at
6:13
how that maker -taker system actually works under
6:15
the hood. Please, because it sounds wild. Well,
6:18
exchanges are businesses. They need people buying
6:21
and selling on their platform to generate volume.
6:23
So if a trader makes liquidity, meaning they
6:26
place an order that sits on the books and waits,
6:29
the exchange might pay them a tiny rebate for
6:31
attracting traffic. Okay, that makes sense. They
6:33
are rewarding the people stocking the shelves.
6:36
Exactly. But if a trader takes liquidity like,
6:39
when you place a market order that immediately
6:41
executes, the exchange charges a fee. Because
6:44
you're emptying the shelves. Right. So because
6:46
brokers are navigating these fees and rebates,
6:49
their own operating costs change completely depending
6:52
on which path they choose for your specific order.
6:56
Which brings us right back to that glaring conflict
6:58
of interest. It does. But this is precisely why
7:01
the regulatory framework around best execution
7:03
is so rigorous. Authorities deeply, deeply monitor
7:08
how brokers wrote orders. So they can't just
7:10
pocket the rebates and ignore my price. Exactly.
7:13
A broker cannot simply default to the venue that
7:16
pays the highest rebate if it means you get a
7:18
worse price or failed trade. However, because
7:22
best execution requires weighing price against
7:24
speed and certainty, it inherently requires judgment.
7:28
It's subjective, in a way. Yes. It is not just
7:31
a simple, rigid mathematical formula. And because
7:34
of that judgment, the routing outcomes are not
7:37
going to be identical across every single broker.
7:39
Oh, wow. I never realized that. It is one of
7:42
the most hotly debated topics in market structure
7:44
today. But essentially, your broker is trying
7:47
to navigate a highly complex map of venues to
7:50
find the optimal intersection of price, speed,
7:52
and cost, all within a single millisecond. Okay,
7:55
so the broker has validated the order, they have
7:58
navigated the map, and now your order actually
8:00
arrives at the marketplace. It meets the matching
8:02
engine. The heart of the exchange. Right. And
8:05
this is exactly where we solve the mystery of
8:07
that 4 -cent gap from the very beginning of our
8:09
deep dive. John and Jane walk through a brilliant
8:11
example in the source material to illustrate
8:13
this. Using a standard retail trade size? Yeah,
8:16
a 500 -share trade. Let's break it down mechanically.
8:19
Think of the order book like shelves in a grocery
8:21
store. You want to buy 500 shares. The screen
8:25
told you the price was $80. The ghost quote we
8:28
mentioned earlier. Exactly. But the reality is
8:31
there are only 200 shares sitting on that bottom
8:33
shelf offered at $80. And because you placed
8:36
a market order, which tells the system, you know,
8:39
buy this right now at whatever the best available
8:41
price is, your order starts clearing those shelves.
8:44
Right. It just grabs what's there. It eats those
8:47
200 shares on the bottom shelf. But it is still
8:50
hungry. It still needs 300 more shares to fulfill
8:54
your command. So it has to reach up. Exactly.
8:57
It has no choice but to reach up to the next
8:59
shelf, where let's say the next 300 shares happen
9:01
to be priced at $80 .05 or maybe slightly higher
9:05
to make the math work. But basically, when you
9:08
average out the total cost of the cheaper shares
9:11
and the more expensive shares, your final full
9:12
price comes out to $80 .03. Which perfectly explains
9:16
that mysterious few cents gap we talked about.
9:18
It does. You paid more than the quote because
9:21
your own order consumed what was available. But
9:25
I have to push back on the scale of this. I totally
9:29
get how this shelf -clearing mechanic works for
9:31
a massive pension fund trying to buy a million
9:33
shares of a company. But how on earth can my
9:36
tiny, ordinary 500 -share retail order actually
9:40
move an entire market against me? If we connect
9:44
this to the bigger picture, we have to recognize
9:46
a fundamental concept called market impact. Market
9:49
impact. Yes. It is one of the most profoundly
9:52
misunderstood realities of investing. Market
9:55
impact is the footprint you leave just by trading.
9:58
So even a small foot leaves a print. Exactly.
10:00
You are taking the available shares off the shelf.
10:03
When those shares are gone, the next person in
10:05
line, which in the case of a market order is
10:07
actually still you, fulfilling the remainder
10:09
of your own order, has to pay the new, slightly
10:11
higher price. So it is entirely dependent on
10:14
the depth of the shelves in that specific store.
10:17
Precisely. We call that depth liquidity. On a
10:21
massive, highly liquid stock, say a major national
10:24
bank or a global tech giant, there might be 50
10:28
,000 shares sitting on that bottom $80 shelf.
10:32
Oh, wow. So you wouldn't even make a dent. Right,
10:34
in that room your 500 share footprint is completely
10:37
microscopic. You get your 500 shares at $80 and
10:41
the price doesn't budge at all. The order book
10:43
is deep enough to absorb you without a single
10:45
ripple. But if you step into an illiquid stock
10:48
where the shelves are mostly empty, your footprint
10:51
is suddenly enormous relative to the size of
10:53
the room. That is exactly the danger. Here's
10:55
where it gets really interesting, because John
10:58
and Jane explicitly escalate the stakes here
11:01
to show us the true danger of what happens when
11:03
market impact collides with a thin market, like
11:06
the venture exchange. The stakes get much, much
11:08
higher. They really do. Let's look at the nightmare
11:11
scenario they present. Imagine you put in a market
11:13
order for 500 shares of a small mining company.
11:16
The screen flashes a very comforting quote of
11:19
$4. Looks like a great deal. Right. But the reality
11:22
of this thin order book is terrifying. There
11:26
are only 50 shares available at $4. Barely anything.
11:30
Exactly. The next 100 shares are up at $4 .10.
11:33
The next 200 are at $4 .50. And then there is
11:37
absolutely nothing else available until $5. And
11:40
your market order just blindly marches through
11:43
all of those shelves. It marches right through
11:45
them. By the time it finishes gathering your
11:47
500 shares, you end up paying an average of $4
11:50
.40 per share. Which is drastic. It's a full
11:53
10 % worse than the quote you saw on your screen.
11:57
10 % of your investment capital just vanished
11:59
into thin air simply because of the hidden mechanics
12:02
of the order book. That is why Jane's advice
12:04
in the episode is incredibly firm here. Yes.
12:07
What does she suggest? She says, in thin markets,
12:10
you must always, always use a limit order. Right.
12:13
A limit order. Yes. A limit order acts like a
12:16
strict instruction. It tells the market, fill
12:19
me at this specific price or do not fill me at
12:22
all. I see the logic. I really do. But honestly,
12:25
in practice, it still takes a lot of discipline
12:27
not to panic. when you use a limit order. It
12:30
is an emotional challenge for sure. Right. Isn't
12:33
it incredibly frustrating to set a limit and
12:36
then just sit there and watch the stock slowly
12:38
tick upward, running away from you without your
12:41
order ever actually filling? It feels like you
12:43
completely missed the boat because you were just
12:45
being too rigid. It can certainly trigger a deep
12:48
fear of missing out in the moment. It requires
12:51
a very disciplined mindset to watch a price move
12:54
away from you. It really does. But the way Jane
12:56
and other market experts reframe that exact emotional
13:00
response is incredibly powerful. You have to
13:03
remember that an unfilled limit order is not
13:06
a failure. It's not. No, it is not a mistake
13:08
at all. It is the exact outcome that you explicitly
13:11
chose. You drew a line in the sand and told the
13:14
system, I am only comfortable paying up to this
13:17
specific boundary. And the system just respected
13:19
your boundary. Exactly. If the stock runs away,
13:22
you always have the quiet power to change your
13:24
mind. You can deliberately go in and raise your
13:26
limit if you decide the new price is worth the
13:28
risk. So you maintain control of the decision
13:30
the whole time. Yes. You can always buy it later
13:34
at a higher price if you actively choose to.
13:36
But you absolutely cannot unbuy a stock that
13:39
you accidentally purchased at $5 when you thought
13:42
you were paying for. That is a very sobering
13:44
thought. A market order trades the certainty
13:47
of execution for a complete lack of certainty
13:49
regarding the price. In a deeply liquid market
13:53
where the shelves are completely packed, that
13:55
is a perfectly fine trade -off to make. Because
13:58
the price won't move much anyway. Right. But
14:00
in a thin market, it is a very dangerous gamble.
14:04
The limit order is your protective shield. It
14:06
guarantees your price, even if it cannot guarantee
14:09
your fill. OK, so if limit orders are my shield
14:12
against thin markets, does the Canadian market
14:15
structure itself offer any systemic safety nets?
14:18
Or am I entirely on my own out there navigating
14:20
these dark shelves? You are definitely not on
14:23
your own. There are brilliant systemic protections
14:25
built directly into the architecture. First,
14:28
Canada has something called the Order Protection
14:30
Rule. The Order Protection Rule? Yes. This is
14:33
a very elegant piece of regulation designed to
14:35
protect investors across all those different
14:38
routing venues we talked about earlier. It essentially
14:41
prevents your order from trading through a better
14:43
visible price on another marketplace. Wait, how
14:46
does that work in practice? Like, functionally?
14:49
Well, let's say venue A has shares sitting on
14:52
the shelf at $80, but venue B only has shares
14:55
at $80 .05. Okay. If your broker routes your
14:59
buy order to venue B, the order protection rule
15:02
prevents venue B from filling your order at their
15:05
higher price while ignoring the cheaper shares
15:07
over at venue A. Oh, wow. So they can't just
15:10
ignore the better deal. Exactly. The system absolutely
15:13
forces the trade to respect the best visible
15:16
price across the entire landscape. It ensures
15:19
you don't get penalized simply because of where
15:21
your order happened to be routed. That is a really
15:24
brilliant safety net. It is. And secondly, there
15:27
is a fascinating practice called internalization.
15:29
Internalization. Yeah. Sometimes your order doesn't
15:32
even travel all the way to the public order book.
15:34
Think about the exchange fees we discussed with
15:36
the maker taker model. Right. The fees, the broker.
15:38
has to navigate. Exactly. If your broker sends
15:41
your order to the public exchange they pay a
15:44
fee. But what if your broker has another client?
15:47
who wants to sell the exact same stock you want
15:50
to buy. Oh, I see where this is going. Instead
15:52
of sending both of you out to the public market
15:55
and paying those external fees, the broker simply
15:58
matches your buy order with their sell order
16:00
internally. They just cross the trades within
16:02
their own house. Exactly. They save on exchange
16:05
fees. And because they save that money, they
16:08
can often offer you both a slightly better price
16:11
than what is currently flashing on the public
16:13
tape. So it's a win -win. It is. It provides
16:16
a smoother outcome, slight price improvement,
16:19
and absolutely zero market impact because you
16:21
never hit the public shelves. That is fascinating.
16:24
I want to touch on one final piece of structural
16:26
advice from John and Jane regarding the 930 a
16:30
.m. market open. Ah, the opening bell. Yes. They
16:33
note that the first few minutes of the trading
16:35
day are inherently volatile. Yeah. The gap between
16:38
the bid and the ask, what we call the spread,
16:41
is extremely wide. And there is a massive backlog
16:44
of overnight news, all trying to squeeze through
16:47
the door at the exact same second. It is pure
16:49
chaos. So their advice is incredibly simple.
16:52
Just wait an hour before placing a trade. But
16:55
I always wonder. Isn't the opening bell when
16:57
all the exciting action happens? It is certainly
16:59
when the most noise happens. Right. But if there
17:02
is overnight news, shouldn't a long -term investor
17:05
want to get in there and capture the momentum
17:07
right as the market wakes up? Why sit on the
17:09
sidelines? This raises an important question
17:11
about what your actual goal is as an investor.
17:14
If your horizon is 10 or 20 or 30 years, the
17:18
momentary adrenaline of the 930 AM opening bell
17:21
is completely irrelevant to your success. Because
17:23
it's just noise. Exactly. What happens at the
17:26
open is a chaotic untangling process. All night
17:29
long, while the public market was closed, the
17:31
real world kept turning. Earnings reports were
17:34
released, global events occurred, geopolitical
17:37
shifts happened. And people were placing orders
17:40
based on all of that. Yes. All of those events
17:42
generated a massive queue of orders that simply
17:45
piled up in the dark waiting for the bell. So
17:47
when the bell finally rings, all of that conflicting
17:50
information hits the floor simultaneously. Yes.
17:54
And we need to think about the market makers
17:56
here. the institutions whose actual job it is
17:59
to facilitate trades by constantly offering to
18:02
buy and sell. The people stocking the shelves.
18:04
Exactly. Overnight, they have absolutely no idea
18:08
how all this new information will ultimately
18:10
be priced by the broader market. Because they're
18:13
taking on massive risk by offering to buy or
18:15
sell in the middle of this morning chaos, they
18:18
protect themselves. They do that. They widen
18:21
the gap between their bid and their ask. They
18:24
lower the price they are willing to pay and sharply
18:27
raise the price they're willing to sell for until
18:29
the dust finally settles. So the widespread aren't
18:32
a glitch either. They are a deliberate defensive
18:34
mechanism by the market makers. Precisely. By
18:37
placing a market order right at the open, you
18:40
are volunteering to walk into a storm where the
18:42
market makers have raised all the prices just
18:45
to protect themselves. You are paying a premium.
18:47
for the chaos. You are. You are once again trading
18:50
the certainty of getting the trade done immediately
18:53
for the extreme uncertainty of what price the
18:56
storm will spit out at you. Which is exactly
18:58
why Jane says to wait. Exactly. Waiting just
19:01
one hour costs you absolutely nothing. It allows
19:05
the professionals, the algorithms, and the market
19:07
makers to fully digest the overnight backlog.
19:10
To let the dust settle. Right. It allows those
19:12
defensive spreads to narrow back down and the
19:15
prices to smooth out into a rational reflection
19:17
of the day's reality. Patience, in this specific
19:20
case, is not just a virtue. It is a mathematical
19:23
advantage. So what does this all mean? If we
19:25
gather up all these invisible threads, the core
19:28
takeaways for you are quite profound. The screen
19:31
price you see is not a promise. It is just a
19:33
historical quote, a fleeting glimpse of the top
19:36
layer of the market. A ghost. Exactly. When you
19:39
step into the market, your very presence alters
19:42
it. Your own order eats through the available
19:45
liquidity and causes market impact. which is
19:48
exactly where that mysterious four cent difference
19:50
comes from. Because you cleared the shelf. Right.
19:53
We learned that using market orders means you
19:54
are prioritizing certainty of execution while
19:57
completely surrendering certainty of price. And
20:00
finally, in thin illiquid markets or during the
20:03
chaotic opening minutes of the day, limit orders
20:06
and a little bit of patience are your absolute
20:08
best friends. And understanding all of this deeply
20:11
hidden plumbing matters immensely. It matters
20:15
because a few pennies here and a 10 % slippage
20:17
there might not seem like a crisis in isolation,
20:20
but over a lifetime of investing, it is a silent,
20:23
massive drain on your wealth. It really adds
20:26
up. It does. By pulling back the curtain on these
20:28
mechanics, you are no longer at the mercy of
20:31
invisible forces when you decide to interact
20:33
with the financial system. You are now an informed
20:36
strategic participant. Which changes everything.
20:38
It does. You know exactly what you're paying
20:40
for. You understand the tension of how your order
20:44
navigates the dark. And you know exactly how
20:47
to protect yourself. Next time you look at a
20:49
screen and see a flashing price, ask yourself,
20:51
how much of that price is a reliable reality?
20:54
And how much of it will vanish the exact millisecond
20:56
you reach out to take it?