Latest / Scary Paranormal Stories / The Divorce House: He Forgot Everything But The Hammer

Transcript

The Divorce House: He Forgot Everything But The Hammer · Scary Paranormal Stories

• 0:03
  Speaker 1: There is a specific kind of silence that settles over
• 0:06
  Speaker 1: a house after something irreversible has happened. Not quiet, not peaceful,
• 0:12
  Speaker 1: something thicker than that. This story is one that kept
• 0:16
  Speaker 1: circling back. The details refused to sit still, because every
• 0:20
  Speaker 1: time one thing seemed to make sense, something else stopped
• 0:24
  Speaker 1: making sense entirely. On the morning of December nineteenth, two
• 0:28
  Speaker 1: thousand nineteen, a family drove to a house in Pillar,
• 0:32
  Speaker 1: Buenos Aires because no one had answered the phone. Both
• 0:36
  Speaker 1: sides of the family had been calling her relatives, his relatives,
• 0:41
  Speaker 1: and the silence from inside that house had gone on
• 0:44
  Speaker 1: just long enough to feel wrong. When they reached the door,
• 0:49
  Speaker 1: they found Maria Laura Sera face down on the floor,
• 0:53
  Speaker 1: her skull bearing eighteen separate impacts. Forty kilometers away, a
• 0:59
  Speaker 1: ford sat on the shoulder of a road with the
• 1:02
  Speaker 1: engine off inside it, a man with a self inflicted
• 1:06
  Speaker 1: cut across his neck, a hammer with damp blood stains,
• 1:10
  Speaker 1: large rocks covered in blood of unknown origin, and divorce
• 1:14
  Speaker 1: papers that had made it back into the house. The
• 1:18
  Speaker 1: man was Mattias Bernald von Fritch, thirty seven years old,
• 1:23
  Speaker 1: her husband. He survived long enough to be questioned when
• 1:27
  Speaker 1: investigators asked him what had happened inside that house. He
• 1:31
  Speaker 1: wrote back that he did not remember. He was the
• 1:34
  Speaker 1: only person who had been there. He died twenty eight
• 1:38
  Speaker 1: days later, taking every answer with him. Maria Laura Serreira
• 1:43
  Speaker 1: had spent eleven years as a practicing attorney in Argentina,
• 1:47
  Speaker 1: and her specialty was family law. She built her professional
• 1:51
  Speaker 1: life around the legal protections that governed separation, custody, and
• 1:57
  Speaker 1: the dissolution of marriages. She understood those frameworks from the inside,
• 2:03
  Speaker 1: their limits, their mechanisms, the specific language people use when
• 2:08
  Speaker 1: a family breaks apart. By December two, thy nineteen, she
• 2:12
  Speaker 1: was living through the exact process she had spent over
• 2:15
  Speaker 1: a decade navigating for others. She and Matthias were separating.
• 2:20
  Speaker 1: The divorce was active and ongoing. To protect their two sons,
• 2:25
  Speaker 1: six and eight years old. Both parrots had agreed to
• 2:29
  Speaker 1: an alternating arrangement inside the family home in Pillar. They
• 2:34
  Speaker 1: did not sleep in the same room, they did not
• 2:37
  Speaker 1: share the house at the same time. They rotated through it,
• 2:40
  Speaker 1: so the children's world stayed intact, or as intact as
• 2:45
  Speaker 1: a world can be when the ground underneath it is
• 2:49
  Speaker 1: shifting from the outside from a neighbour's vantage point. From
• 2:54
  Speaker 1: a school pick up line, it probably looked almost normal.
• 2:57
  Speaker 1: It was not normal. It was an arrangement built out
• 3:00
  Speaker 1: of care and maintained by tension. The house itself was unremarkable,
• 3:05
  Speaker 1: a family home in a residential area outside Buenos Arius,
• 3:10
  Speaker 1: the kind of neighbourhood where people know each other's cars,
• 3:14
  Speaker 1: where security cameras on exterior walls are ordinary enough to
• 3:18
  Speaker 1: go unnoticed. Those cameras would later matter enormously. On the
• 3:23
  Speaker 1: night of December eighteenth, the boys were not home. They
• 3:27
  Speaker 1: were sleeping at their maternal grandparents house. That detail, that
• 3:32
  Speaker 1: single scheduling detail, is the reason two children did not
• 3:37
  Speaker 1: witness what happened to their mother. Mattias, at thirty seven,
• 3:42
  Speaker 1: had built his own identity around community and political involvement.
• 3:47
  Speaker 1: He had served as a school board member in Pilar
• 3:50
  Speaker 1: and was active in Piranist circles. He worked as a
• 3:54
  Speaker 1: distributor for a food company. People who knew him described
• 3:59
  Speaker 1: a man who was struggling with the separation, not violently,
• 4:04
  Speaker 1: not in any way that raised formal alarms, but emotionally
• 4:08
  Speaker 1: undone by the prospect of losing the life. He had
• 4:10
  Speaker 1: known no prior domestic violence. Complaints existed on record, Neither
• 4:17
  Speaker 1: family had reported anything that might have predicted what December
• 4:21
  Speaker 1: nineteenth would bring. There is a particular cruelty in that
• 4:24
  Speaker 1: kind of invisibility. The violence that leaves no paper trail
• 4:28
  Speaker 1: before it happens is the hardest kind to account for. Afterward,
• 4:33
  Speaker 1: Maria Laura, beyond her legal work, had moved into the
• 4:37
  Speaker 1: political arena. In Pillar she had run as a candidate
• 4:41
  Speaker 1: for city council, finishing ninth on the list, not elected,
• 4:46
  Speaker 1: but positioned as a potential replacement if a seated council
• 4:49
  Speaker 1: member stepped down. She was building something. Her law practice,
• 4:54
  Speaker 1: her political presence, her life after the marriage, All of
• 4:59
  Speaker 1: it was in motion, accelerating toward a future that had
• 5:02
  Speaker 1: been difficult to imagine at the start of the year
• 5:06
  Speaker 1: and was becoming concrete by the end of it. On
• 5:09
  Speaker 1: December eighteenth, her sons kissed her good bye and went
• 5:13
  Speaker 1: to sleep somewhere safe. Whatever she was doing in the
• 5:16
  Speaker 1: hours that followed, whether she returned to the house to
• 5:19
  Speaker 1: collect something she had forgotten, whether she see and Mattiars
• 5:24
  Speaker 1: had agreed to meet, whether the encounter was expected or not,
• 5:28
  Speaker 1: is a question the investigation would never fully close. What
• 5:31
  Speaker 1: is documented is this. Her bag, her phone, and her
• 5:35
  Speaker 1: identification were found inside her own car, parked close to
• 5:39
  Speaker 1: the house. She had not gone far. She had not left.
• 5:44
  Speaker 1: The morning of December nineteenth started with silence, not the
• 5:50
  Speaker 1: comfortable kind, the kind that fills a house when someone
• 5:54
  Speaker 1: should have answered the phone. By now, relatives from both
• 5:57
  Speaker 1: sides had been calling since early morning, Laura's family Mattias's family,
• 6:04
  Speaker 1: neither one picking up. By the time they drove to
• 6:06
  Speaker 1: the house in Pillar, the silence had already become something else.
• 6:11
  Speaker 1: They found her, face down. The back of her skull
• 6:14
  Speaker 1: had been struck eighteen times. The carpenter's hammer was in
• 6:18
  Speaker 1: the kitchen, resting against the counter, still damp. The divorce
• 6:23
  Speaker 1: paper's documents she had been fighting to finalize were scattered
• 6:27
  Speaker 1: across the floor around her. Her bag, her poone, and
• 6:31
  Speaker 1: her identification were locked inside her own car parked just outside.
• 6:37
  Speaker 1: She had come back to get something. She forgot that
• 6:40
  Speaker 1: detail matters. She was not supposed to be there long
• 6:44
  Speaker 1: Mattias was gone. Police began searching immediately. A neighbor found
• 6:49
  Speaker 1: the ford about ten kilometers away, pulled to the side
• 6:53
  Speaker 1: of a road that led nowhere in particular. Mattias was
• 6:56
  Speaker 1: slumped in the driver's seat, a kitchen knife in the
• 6:59
  Speaker 1: car with him, a cut across his throat. He was alive, barely.
• 7:04
  Speaker 1: Officers transported him to intensive care under police custody and
• 7:10
  Speaker 1: in the back seat of that ford. This is the
• 7:12
  Speaker 1: detail that the prosecution could never fully account for. There
• 7:16
  Speaker 1: were large rocks, heavy ones blood on their surface, blood
• 7:21
  Speaker 1: that matched Maria Laura. The rational explonation offered early was
• 7:26
  Speaker 1: that Mattias must have grabbed them from somewhere in or
• 7:29
  Speaker 1: around the house, a garden, a pathway, a construction pile nearby,
• 7:34
  Speaker 1: but no one could identify the source. Investigators combed the property,
• 7:40
  Speaker 1: nothing missing, no disturbed soil, no gap in any border
• 7:46
  Speaker 1: or wall where stones of that size would have been.
• 7:52
  Speaker 1: The prosecution concluded that Mattias had carried them in the
• 7:55
  Speaker 1: attack and then taken them with him. Why a person
• 7:59
  Speaker 1: would do that, why anyone would take the weapon and
• 8:03
  Speaker 1: drive it ten kilometers away, is a question. The case
• 8:06
  Speaker 1: file acknowledges without answering the hammer stayed the rocks left.
• 8:13
  Speaker 1: That asymmetry has no clean explanation. The cameras on neighboring
• 8:18
  Speaker 1: properties recorded the street in front of the house that night,
• 8:22
  Speaker 1: investigators reviewed the footage with a specific question, was anyone
• 8:27
  Speaker 1: else there? The answer was unambiguous. No one else entered,
• 8:32
  Speaker 1: no one else left. Every frame accounted for the possibility
• 8:37
  Speaker 1: of a third party, however briefly considered, was eliminated by
• 8:41
  Speaker 1: the footage itself. The prosecution moved forward with Mattias as
• 8:45
  Speaker 1: the only person who could have been inside. What the
• 8:48
  Speaker 1: cameras could not record was the argument. Families later described
• 8:53
  Speaker 1: the separation as something Mattias had struggled to accept in
• 8:56
  Speaker 1: a way that had grown heavier over time. He was
• 8:59
  Speaker 1: not violent in any documented sense. No prior complaints, no
• 9:03
  Speaker 1: restraining orders, nothing in the system, but those who knew
• 9:06
  Speaker 1: him set the weight of losing. The marriage had not lifted.
• 9:10
  Speaker 1: It had settled into something no one named while it
• 9:15
  Speaker 1: was happening. The divorce papers on the floor were not
• 9:18
  Speaker 1: a random detail. Maria Laura had been building toward that
• 9:23
  Speaker 1: filing for months. She knew family law the way most
• 9:27
  Speaker 1: people know the layout of their own home. Eleven years
• 9:31
  Speaker 1: of practice cases that looked exactly like hers. She understood
• 9:35
  Speaker 1: what the process required, what it protected, what it could not,
• 9:39
  Speaker 1: And on the night of December eighteenth, the papers were
• 9:42
  Speaker 1: there in that house between them. Here is the moment
• 9:47
  Speaker 1: the case stops being a reconstruction and becomes something that
• 9:50
  Speaker 1: doesn't move. Mateirs was stabilized in intensive care. He had
• 9:55
  Speaker 1: lost significant blood. He could not speak. In the early
• 9:59
  Speaker 1: weeks of two twenty twenty, as his condition improved slightly,
• 10:03
  Speaker 1: the prosecutor found a way to question him. In writing.
• 10:07
  Speaker 1: She submitted questions he answered on paper from a hospital
• 10:11
  Speaker 1: bed under police custody. He wrote that he did not
• 10:15
  Speaker 1: remember what happened after the argument. He wrote that he
• 10:18
  Speaker 1: had learned about Maria Laura's death only at that moment.
• 10:23
  Speaker 1: Reading the prosecutor's questions, read that again, the only person
• 10:27
  Speaker 1: who was inside that house, confirmed by camera footage, confirmed
• 10:32
  Speaker 1: by physical evidence, confirmed by his own presence in that
• 10:36
  Speaker 1: car with those rocks and that knife. Wrote that he
• 10:40
  Speaker 1: did not know she was dead until a prosecutor told
• 10:44
  Speaker 1: him weeks later. This is not a legal loophole. This
• 10:49
  Speaker 1: is not a technicality about what constitutes a confession. This
• 10:54
  Speaker 1: is a man surrounded by evidence that places him at
• 10:58
  Speaker 1: the scene of eighteen strikes to his wife's skull, writing
• 11:02
  Speaker 1: the words I don't remember, I didn't know. The prosecution
• 11:08
  Speaker 1: did not accept it. As exoneration. But they also could
• 11:12
  Speaker 1: not cross examine it, could not call him to the stand,
• 11:15
  Speaker 1: could not push the contradiction until something broke open, Because
• 11:20
  Speaker 1: on January sixteenth, twenty twenty, Mattears died a hospital infection
• 11:26
  Speaker 1: had spread, it led to a stroke. By the time
• 11:30
  Speaker 1: anyone understood what was happening, he was gone. The only
• 11:34
  Speaker 1: person who knew the sequence of that night, what was said,
• 11:38
  Speaker 1: what was reached for first first, whether the rocks were
• 11:42
  Speaker 1: already in the car or gathered in a moment of
• 11:45
  Speaker 1: something else, entirely died in a hospital bed twenty eight
• 11:50
  Speaker 1: days after Maria Laura was buried. No trial, no sentence,
• 11:55
  Speaker 1: no moment in a court room where the full weight
• 11:58
  Speaker 1: of what happened could be placed in front of someone
• 12:02
  Speaker 1: who had to answer for it. Her boys, six and
• 12:06
  Speaker 1: eight were already with her parents. They had been there
• 12:09
  Speaker 1: since the night before because of a normal, unremarkable arrangement,
• 12:14
  Speaker 1: because it was simply their turn to sleep at the
• 12:17
  Speaker 1: grandparents house. That is the only reason they were not
• 12:21
  Speaker 1: inside when it happened. One small rotation in a system
• 12:25
  Speaker 1: designed to protect them, and it did in the most
• 12:28
  Speaker 1: terrible way imaginable. The prosecution closed the case with Mattias
• 12:33
  Speaker 1: as the sole suspect. There was no second theory to develop,
• 12:36
  Speaker 1: no alternative timeline, no evidence pointing anywhere else. The cameras
• 12:41
  Speaker 1: had made certain of that. What remained open was not
• 12:44
  Speaker 1: the question of who. It was the question of everything
• 12:49
  Speaker 1: that comes before and after who. The rocks are the
• 12:54
  Speaker 1: clearest unresolved thread eighteen strikes with a hammer found at
• 12:59
  Speaker 1: the scene, But the rocks also carried her blood, and
• 13:03
  Speaker 1: no one could explain where they originated. The prosecution's position
• 13:08
  Speaker 1: was that Matius used them and transported them, but the
• 13:12
  Speaker 1: impulse behind that taking them, keeping them driving with them
• 13:17
  Speaker 1: does not map cleanly onto any behavior or pattern investigators
• 13:22
  Speaker 1: could name. It suggests something that happened in that car
• 13:26
  Speaker 1: between the house and the road where he was found
• 13:29
  Speaker 1: that no living person witnessed. Then there is the question
• 13:33
  Speaker 1: of what Matias knew and when. His written statement that
• 13:37
  Speaker 1: he learned of the death from the prosecutor is either
• 13:40
  Speaker 1: a dissociation so completed borders on the clinical, or it
• 13:45
  Speaker 1: is something calculated. Both possibilities carry a weight. The forensic
• 13:50
  Speaker 1: psychology alone cannot resolve he had a self inflicted wound
• 13:54
  Speaker 1: on his throat, He had blood on those rocks. He
• 13:57
  Speaker 1: had driven ten kilometers and stopped. Whatever his internal state
• 14:02
  Speaker 1: was in those hours, it left no record other than
• 14:05
  Speaker 1: the car, the knife, and those stones. What no theory
• 14:08
  Speaker 1: accounts for is the hammer left behind. If a person
• 14:12
  Speaker 1: intends to disappear, to flee, to obscure, why leave the hammer.
• 14:19
  Speaker 1: Why take the rocks and leave the hammer? Why take
• 14:23
  Speaker 1: the rocks and leave the hammer. The two things are
• 14:26
  Speaker 1: inconsistent with each other in a way that suggests the
• 14:29
  Speaker 1: decisions made in those minutes were not made from a
• 14:32
  Speaker 1: position of clear intent. Something broke down between the moments
• 14:38
  Speaker 1: she fell and the moment he drove away. Something happened
• 14:42
  Speaker 1: in that house, in that kitchen that no reconstruction has
• 14:46
  Speaker 1: been able to fill in completely. Sergio Bernard Mattius's own brother,
• 14:54
  Speaker 1: the man who had called emergency services that morning, later
• 14:57
  Speaker 1: wrote publicly about what he had come to belie. He
• 15:01
  Speaker 1: did not use legal language, He did not invoke the
• 15:06
  Speaker 1: evidence or the prosecution's findings. He wrote that the machismo
• 15:11
  Speaker 1: had been inside his brother all along, that no one
• 15:14
  Speaker 1: saw it, that it was there anyway. That sentence written
• 15:19
  Speaker 1: by the man who loved Mattias and also loved Maria
• 15:22
  Speaker 1: Laura is the closest thing to a reckoning this case
• 15:26
  Speaker 1: ever produced, not a verdict, not a sentence, a brother
• 15:31
  Speaker 1: writing in the past, tense about something he wishes he
• 15:34
  Speaker 1: had named while it was still present, tense. The case
• 15:38
  Speaker 1: file is closed, The rocks have no origin, The last
• 15:43
  Speaker 1: conversation in that house has no surviving witness, And two
• 15:47
  Speaker 1: boys now years older are growing up in a house
• 15:51
  Speaker 1: where their grandfather answers when someone asks how they are
• 15:55
  Speaker 1: doing dotteuch and says they are managing with all the
• 16:01
  Speaker 1: love in the world and the weight of everything. He
• 16:04
  Speaker 1: does not understand. The case was closed before January ended,
• 16:10
  Speaker 1: no trial, no cross examination, no sentence. The prosecution named
• 16:16
  Speaker 1: Matiirs Bernald von Fritch as the sole responsible party and
• 16:21
  Speaker 1: had no legal mechanism to pursue the matter further. Because
• 16:24
  Speaker 1: Mattiirs died on the sixteenth of January twenty twenty from
• 16:29
  Speaker 1: a hospital infection that spread until it caused a stroke.
• 16:33
  Speaker 1: The only person who had been inside that house when
• 16:36
  Speaker 1: Maria Lara was killed took every version of what happened
• 16:39
  Speaker 1: with him. What remained was a file, a closed case number,
• 16:45
  Speaker 1: and two boys six and eight years old who had
• 16:49
  Speaker 1: spent that December night at their grandparents house by the
• 16:52
  Speaker 1: ordinary chance of a custody arrangement. The maternal grandfather, in
• 16:57
  Speaker 1: the days after, made a single public statement. He said
• 17:01
  Speaker 1: that he and his family would raise the boys with
• 17:04
  Speaker 1: all the love in the world. The sentence was simple,
• 17:08
  Speaker 1: but the weight behind it was not. Because he was
• 17:11
  Speaker 1: a man who had just lost his daughter to violence
• 17:14
  Speaker 1: he had never seen coming, and now he was being
• 17:17
  Speaker 1: asked to raise children who would some day ask questions
• 17:21
  Speaker 1: he could not fully answer. The love was real. The
• 17:26
  Speaker 1: incomprehension behind it was also real. Both things existed at
• 17:31
  Speaker 1: the same time. That incomprehension extended outward from the family
• 17:36
  Speaker 1: in a particular direction. The evidence said Mattias was the
• 17:40
  Speaker 1: only person who entered and exited the house that night.
• 17:45
  Speaker 1: The cameras on neighboring properties confirmed it. The physical evidence
• 17:49
  Speaker 1: inside the house and inside his vehicle pointed consistently in
• 17:53
  Speaker 1: one direction. And yet no one who had known Mattias,
• 17:58
  Speaker 1: not friends, not colleagues from his years as a school
• 18:02
  Speaker 1: board member in Pilla, not neighbors, not family, reported having
• 18:07
  Speaker 1: seen any sign of what was building inside him. That
• 18:10
  Speaker 1: absence of prior visibility became its own kind of haunting.
• 18:14
  Speaker 1: There is a specific kind of fear that comes not
• 18:17
  Speaker 1: from something monstrous and obvious, but from something that gave
• 18:21
  Speaker 1: no warning at all. Sergio Bernal was Mattius's brother. He
• 18:28
  Speaker 1: was also the man who had called emergency services the
• 18:31
  Speaker 1: mourning Marie Laura's body was found. He had been part
• 18:35
  Speaker 1: of the search. He had known his brother for thirty
• 18:38
  Speaker 1: seven years. After Martius died, Sergio published a written statement.
• 18:43
  Speaker 1: He did not defend his brother. He did not deny
• 18:46
  Speaker 1: what the evidence showed. What he wrote was this, that
• 18:50
  Speaker 1: the machismo had been inside Mattius all along, that nobody
• 18:54
  Speaker 1: had seen it, but that it had been there a
• 18:58
  Speaker 1: man writing that sentence about his brother. That is not
• 19:01
  Speaker 1: a small thing. The word Sergio chose matters not rage,
• 19:07
  Speaker 1: not illness, not instability. Machismo a structural disposition that had
• 19:13
  Speaker 1: existed beneath the surface of a recognizable life, undetected until
• 19:19
  Speaker 1: the moment it wasn't. His brother had been a political militant,
• 19:24
  Speaker 1: a community figure, a man within shared institutions, and something
• 19:29
  Speaker 1: inside him had remained invisible to everyone who shared those spaces,
• 19:34
  Speaker 1: including the person who grew up with him. Two things
• 19:38
  Speaker 1: about this case have stayed unresolved, and will remain that way.
• 19:43
  Speaker 1: The first is the rocks. Large stones were found in
• 19:47
  Speaker 1: Mattius's ford, stained with blood. The prosecution linked them to
• 19:52
  Speaker 1: the attack, but no source for those rocks was ever
• 19:56
  Speaker 1: identified on the property. The hammer was left behind in
• 19:59
  Speaker 1: the house, the rocks were carried away. No investigator was
• 20:04
  Speaker 1: ever able to say with certainty whether he brought them
• 20:09
  Speaker 1: or found them. That behavioral detail, taking one thing leaving
• 20:13
  Speaker 1: another suggests either forethought or a sequence of decisions made
• 20:18
  Speaker 1: inside the house that no one can reconstruct. Both possibilities
• 20:23
  Speaker 1: are troubling in different ways, and neither can now be confirmed.
• 20:28
  Speaker 1: The second unresolved thing is Maria Laura's own account. She
• 20:32
  Speaker 1: was an attorney with eleven years of practice in family law.
• 20:36
  Speaker 1: She had spent her career helping people navigate the legal
• 20:40
  Speaker 1: dissolution of relationships. She was living the process herself, the
• 20:45
  Speaker 1: alternating schedule, the shared house held together for the sake
• 20:49
  Speaker 1: of two children, the divorce papers that were found scattered
• 20:53
  Speaker 1: across the floor of that house on December nineteenth. She
• 20:58
  Speaker 1: had built professional expertise round exactly this kind of transition,
• 21:02
  Speaker 1: and she was killed inside it. There is no clean
• 21:05
  Speaker 1: way to hold that fact. It does not mean her
• 21:08
  Speaker 1: knowledge failed her. It means the violence found her anyway.
• 21:13
  Speaker 1: Mattius had asked from his hospital bed to see his sons.
• 21:18
  Speaker 1: The request was denied. He died without seeing them. He
• 21:22
  Speaker 1: left behind a written statement saying he did not remember
• 21:26
  Speaker 1: what had happened after the argument, and that he had
• 21:29
  Speaker 1: learned of Maria Lara's death in that moment of questioning.
• 21:34
  Speaker 1: Whether that was true, whether it was protective, whether it
• 21:37
  Speaker 1: was the last functional capacity of someone who could not
• 21:40
  Speaker 1: face what he had done. No one can know. The
• 21:44
  Speaker 1: interrogation happened once in writing in a hospital room. There
• 21:49
  Speaker 1: was no follow up. There was no trial in which
• 21:52
  Speaker 1: that statement could be challenged. It stands in the record,
• 21:55
  Speaker 1: unchanged and unchallengeable. The boys are growing up in pill
• 22:00
  Speaker 1: Are with their maternal grandparents. They are older now. They
• 22:04
  Speaker 1: will reach the age where they ask directly, and the
• 22:08
  Speaker 1: adults around them will have to find language for a
• 22:12
  Speaker 1: case that has no sentence, no confession, and a question
• 22:16
  Speaker 1: about a set of rocks that no investigation ever answered.
• 22:20
  Speaker 1: Sergio Bernard's sentence does not answer those questions, but it
• 22:25
  Speaker 1: may be the most honest thing written about this case,
• 22:29
  Speaker 1: not by a prosecutor, not by a judge by the
• 22:33
  Speaker 1: brother of the man who did this, who sat down
• 22:36
  Speaker 1: and wrote that the violence had been there all along,
• 22:40
  Speaker 1: that no one had seen it, and that this did
• 22:43
  Speaker 1: not make it less real. Mari Alara Serera was thirty
• 22:48
  Speaker 1: five years old. She had spent eleven years building a
• 22:52
  Speaker 1: practice around the belief that the law could protect people
• 22:55
  Speaker 1: in the most vulnerable moments of their lives. On the
• 22:59
  Speaker 1: nineteenth of December twenty nineteen, she returned to her own
• 23:03
  Speaker 1: house to retrieve something she had forgotten. She did not leave.
• 23:08
  Speaker 1: This show is made by Obermedia.