Latest / Man in America Podcast / SHOCKING: Here’s Proof Pfizer Put Cancer-Causing Agents in Vaccines — Naomi Wolf Interview

Transcript

SHOCKING: Here’s Proof Pfizer Put Cancer-Causing Agents in Vaccines — Naomi Wolf Interview · Man in America Podcast

• 1:33
  Seth Holehouse: Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to Man in America. I'm your host, Seth Holehouse. We've witnessed as much as people called us the crazy conspiracy theories as we warn people, our friends, our family, we've witnessed the effects of the vaccine. We have friends and family that have blood clots, heart attacks, cancers. They're dying.
• 1:55
  You're seeing it everywhere. I mean, I know personally within my own immediate family of, you know, aunts, uncles, cousins, and the next step out, I'm seeing these absolutely. And it's shocking. But according to my guest today, that's doctor Naomi Wolf, who's been on the front lines of exposing this and getting through Freedom of Information Act, getting information and and tapping into understanding what was going on behind the scenes amidst the production and rollout of these vaccines, what she's saying now is that they've basically got proof that Pfizer and Moderna knowingly put carcinogenic substances into these vaccines. So there's a substance called s v forty, which she's gonna explain to us that they found that was actually rolled out in the batch of vaccines, which is a known carcinogen, and that's just the tip of the iceberg.
• 2:52
  So this is unfortunately, I I I hate to be focusing on these subjects. I'd rather be focusing on, you know, bright and beautiful things about the human world. But, unfortunately, we've got a massive corporate corporatocracy, which has been heavily influenced and infiltrated by our enemies and our government and, you know, people that just wanna depopulate the Earth. And we now have proof that through the rollout of this vaccine, much like we warn people about, that they knew that it would cause massive cancer and many other side effects. So, folks, please enjoy this interview with Naomi Wolf.
• 3:29
  Naomi, as usual, it's such a pleasure to have you on the show. Thank you so much for being here today.
• 3:34
  Speaker 2: Thank you so much. Thank you so much for having me back. It's always a delight to talk to you.
• 3:39
  Seth Holehouse: Oh, thank you. So from what I've gathered, and I'm I'm I'm very elementary in my understanding of the vaccines and the side effects and the the contaminants and everything, but I know that with Daily Clout and your team that you've broken a pretty significant story. Is that do you wanna I'll I'll pull up the article you've gotten on Daily Clout, but this just seems like absolutely shocking information here.
• 4:04
  Speaker 2: Yeah. It's it's it's all unbelievable. Where do I even begin? Well, your audience may know that I'm overseeing this extraordinary effort of 3,250 doctors and scientists and nurses and biological scientists and medical fraud investigators and biostatisticians and a whole range of experts who have convened under the leadership of my COO Amy Kelly to read through the 450,000 pages documents that the FDA was forced by a court order to release. These are internal Pfizer documents that led up to the emergency use authorization that got this injection into so many millions of Americans and worldwide people's deltoids and bodies.
• 4:55
  So to recap, you know, the preamble, our team has issued 89 reports. They're all right there on the upper right hand corner of Daily Clout, or you can order them in book form. And they basically have documented the greatest crime against humanity in recorded history, including a special focus in the Pfizer documents on destroying the reproductive capabilities of the next generation of women in particular. But more recently, there have been sort of five bombshells and I'll go through them super fast. They all relate to each other.
• 5:34
  One bombshell was that FOIA emails that a lawyer of ours, Ed Berkovich FOIA from the CDC showed actually a whistleblower at the CDC added 46 pages we didn't ask for. And it showed the White House driving a cover up in May of twenty twenty one when they and Doctor. Walensky and Doctor. Fauci and Doctor. Collins, all of whom are part of this discussion, that it was 15 communication staffers at the White House driving this emergency freak out meeting reacting to their having been presented with evidence of blood clots and myocarditis, pericarditis, heart damage subsequent to mRNA injection.
• 6:15
  So at that point, instead of calling a press conference, drawing this off the market, saying leads to heart damage and blood clots, they created a script which is 100 redacted to lie about how mild and transient myocarditis was. To my knowledge in 2021, they didn't even mention blood clots as a side effect. So that's pretty gross. And another tranche of emails, second bombshell, showed that POTUS, meaning the president of The United States, was, included via a template on the the key insights of this discussion among these leaders of all these agencies. So he knew that teen, and this was a discussion specifically about heart damage to teenagers and the American Association of Pediatrics was telling all these people that myocarditis was not transient in teens.
• 7:10
  It was not minor. It did not generally resolve and that it would take the whole family with a whole team of doctors managing this poor kid if a child's heart was damaged with myocarditis. In the middle of these discussions, to me as a mother, this is unforgettable. In the middle of these discussions about minors' hearts being damaged, a colleague mentioned to doctor Walensky that they were seeking doctor Paul Offit, who's kind of cute to join the communications effort. And she said, well, I don't know him personally, but I'm, you know, I'm a big fan dot dot dot blushy emoticon.
• 7:47
  So on our tax dollars, while they're talking about kids dying or being sick to death, she takes time to flirt with someone who's coming on board to work with her. That seems may seem trivial, but, you know, in the annals of tyranny, it it really haunts me, because that's just monstrous. They're talking about the most serious things. And she's a mom. More related to your, question about the latest bombshell, in the last week and a half, multiple independent sources, including doctor Philip Burkhalts of South Carolina, who testified to the South Carolina legislature and independently Kevin McKernan, who's a friend of ours and whose lab I visited with Brian O'Shea, my husband, as cameraman nearby in Beverly, Massachusetts, Medicinal Genomics, they both independently found very serious contamination in both the Pfizer and the Moderna injections.
• 8:56
  And I'll get to that in a minute. What our team of volunteers found is that the contamination took place kind of with a secret trial inside the trial that process one, which is not contaminated, was shown to the FDA. The FDA said fine, you get the EUA. At the very end of the process, Pfizer substituted secretly without disclosing it because we searched the Pfizer documents. There's no mention of these contaminants, at least not SV40, but they substituted another process which involved fragments of DNA adulterating the liquid, plasmids which can enter your nucleus generated in E.
• 9:43
  Coli, which is in feces, SV40 and that's simian virus forty, which is a well known carcinogen. So all of these were substituted in process two, and our team helped built on the work of other researchers to find that 200 people were given process two and they had like 2.5 times the adverse events right away as the ones given a placebo. Then what you just showed so so what's happening, which is pretty exciting, even though it's tragic and shocking, is that citizen journalists who are scientists and, you know, like Steve or, you know, just investors like Steve Kirsch or scientists like Burkhalts and McKernan have broken this gigantic story about the contamination. Well, the next question is, did Pfizer or Moderna, because the contamination is in both brands, disclosed to the agencies that issued the okay to roll it out into human bodies that these contaminants were in there. Health Canada, which is Canada's CDC, has stepped forward and said they did not disclose it.
• 10:57
  So, oh, we were tricked, we were fooled. FDA is really not answering. They're still saying we believe it's safe and effective. So our team under the leadership of the amazing Amy Kelly, she actually searched the Pfizer documents for the manufacturing process and she has a source who's highly informed who has confirmed to her that 800 pages of the manufacturing process have been redacted. Amy found only two documents out of all these 450,000 documents that are very trivial related to the manufacturing process.
• 11:44
  So the bear with me, this gets a little nerdy, but it's I promise it'll all be germane. The the loophole that the FDA gave Pfizer essentially to use to conceal documentation of their manufacturing process is called B4. So B4 is supposed to be used in a very limited way to protect trade secrets. Well Pfizer used it in a sweeping way to, redact things like manufacturing process, quality controls, and contamination.
• 12:21
  Seth Holehouse: So, basically, if if I understand it in a simple way, fundamentally, right, from the outset, there's this process one. They went and got approval. They said, look. Here's process one. You approve it.
• 12:34
  FDA looks at that. They say, yes. We'll grant you EUA. Right. Emergency use authorization.
• 12:41
  Then they swap out process one for process two, which is like it's it's like any any number of scenarios you can imagine. You get something approved. It's, like, stamped off on, then you just put something else in its place. They could have put motor oil in its place and have been injecting people with that and saying that it's FDA approved. Right?
• 13:01
  Because they just like, the original thing wasn't even there. So you found out this process too had all these contaminants such as DNA, which is obviously not good be injecting foreign DNA into your body, but also this s v 40, which is a cancer causing substance. Right? When I've interviewed people like doctor William Macus, who's or at Flowers talking about the massive increase in cancer, especially these new aggressive forms of cancers. And so from your research and understanding, is it that these basically, that they they knew, but they hid the fact from the FDA that there was a a very carcinogenic substance within these vaccines they continue to give them, And now we're seeing just an explosion of cancer, especially among young people.
• 13:53
  Right?
• 13:56
  Speaker 2: So I just googled is SV48 carcinogen and got an NIH dot gov peer reviewed paper, Emergent Human Pathogen Seminovirus forty and its Role in Cancer. This is NIH. And it says SV40 is a known oncogenic, meaning cancer causing, DNA virus which induces primary brain and bone cancers, malignant mesothelioma and lymphomas in laboratory animals. So they knew. So Pfizer knew they were putting a carcinogen in process two.
• 14:29
  And I have to assume that that's why Pfizer has redacted 800 pages of the manufacturing process citing trade secrets. And we don't know when they redacted it. Right? I mean, these questions, this story broke in the last two weeks. So currently the whole manufacturing process is redacted.
• 14:49
  And you can see on Amy Kelly's article that you showed on your site, you can click through and see the table of contents. And we lift out from the table contents the various things they've redacted, including contaminants, right? You know, quality control, like how did they know it was pure? They've sealed that away from the eyes of Americans. And I just want to remind everyone that these documents belong legally to Americans.
• 15:17
  They're our IP. They Pfizer doesn't have the right and the FDA doesn't have the right to withhold this information from us because we own every public record. This is a public record. It went to the FDA. It's in the custody of the FDA.
• 15:33
  That's why Aaron Siri sued the FDA rather than Pfizer. Right? It's in, it's their it's their content, meaning it's our content. So a, Pfizer knew clearly that they were putting a carcinogen among other disgusting, gross, bad things into this injection, and they certainly didn't tell us. So there was no informed consent.
• 15:58
  Right? Which is fraud and battery and trafficking and a bunch of other crimes and civil torts. But it looks like the FDA also knew, know, and we don't know that definitively because we can't un redact yet, though our wonderful lawyer Ed Berkovich is appealing the redactions. But why would if the FDA was confident in the purity of this product and their oversight, which is their job of these documents, why would they redact the manufacturing process? Yeah.
• 16:34
  And not, I mean, just to add, because I know it's a bit of a complicated story, but the key point of this gigantic crime and that you can't write it off to like greed or carelessness is Pfizer did a process to trial that's documented in which they injected people with something that people did not sign up to have injected in them. Right? It's literally Mengele type Nazi doctor type experimentation on human subjects. And then there was a 2.4 times adverse event rate in those people. And that's the one, that's the formula they rolled out to put in our arms.
• 17:13
  The one with more than double the number of adverse events, including involving a carcinogen.
• 17:19
  Seth Holehouse: My goodness. Have you It's a I know that you're a a deep thinker in in how you approach these things. And when you look at what you just mentioned that it's it's beyond just a financial incentive. Right? Because you'd think that, well, the financial incentive would be to make this thing actually work and not kill people.
• 17:40
  Like, that would probably make the most money. Right? As if it had, you know, actual was was actually effective, but it seems like it was the opposite. So have you come to any conclusions or understanding as to what you believe the motive to be behind this, because it's hard for me to understand why. It's like if I was a restaurant owner, and I was knowingly putting poison rat poison in my food.
• 18:07
  Like, there's only one intention that is my is there's only one reasons why I do it. It's because I wanna harm people. Right?
• 18:13
  Speaker 2: Yeah. Well, what if you were what if your restaurant was bought or infiltrated by a what if your restaurant was a mafia restaurant and it was infiltrated by a rival mafia gang that poisoned the food of the head mafiosos in order to acquire territory? It's not a perfect analogy because I don't wanna think that America is a mafia gang. But you know my husband, you've spoken with him, Brian O'Shea. He's very influential in my thinking on the geopolitics of this.
• 18:47
  And he has persuaded me through primary source documentation because I don't do I don't change my beliefs just out of love that, that we're under attack and that this is a form of warfare. And, you know, China in alliance with the World Economic Forum, in alliance with the World Health Organization, in alliance with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, all of whom had to be in lockstep to roll this out around the world. Right? But China manufacturers this injection. My independent reporting found that.
• 19:18
  That they they manufacture it, they distribute it, and that in 2021, the IP, according to the SEC filing for BioNTech, the subsidiary of Pfizer that makes these, went to China. So they own they own the manufacturing process. They own the formula. They own the ingredients. Right?
• 19:36
  It's China, our worst enemy. So it's clear to me, like I've given this a great deal of thought, And the only way this makes sense is as an act of war in the sense that why would the World Economic Forum with its globalist intentions Western Europe and The United States are just trouble for them. Right? All these people who remember what a constitution is, remember what the Magna Carta is, remember what freedom of speech is, all these lawyers, all these guns in The United States, why would they not just get rid of Western European populations and North American populations? It's very laborious to keep people enslaved.
• 20:19
  Right? But the genocide is pretty easy, especially when you've co opted the pharmaceutical stream as a bioweapons delivery system. So that's what I believe is happening. As Brian has said to me very memorably, China, you know, wants our land, they want our water resources, they want the real estate around our ports. They want our infrastructure.
• 20:45
  They want our grid, our energy grid. You know, they want our institute they want our, cultural institutions. They don't want our population. And that's what I'm seeing. Like in five years, I Ed Dowd and I had this conversation.
• 20:59
  Inject everyone, poor people who don't remember what a free society is in over the border and wait five years. You'll have a completely different population in in America and Western Europe.
• 21:11
  Seth Holehouse: Hey, folks. I've got a quick message for you. So I'm sure you've heard a lot of people, myself included, talking about the importance of buying precious metals, gold and silver. But what's really behind that? Is it just a thing of, hey.
• 21:24
  Buy this gold. Buy this silver. Right? Or is there something deeper that we should be looking at? So I recently came across some figures about house prices.
• 21:31
  So in 1930, the average family home was approximately $4,000. Fast forward to 02/2023, the average family home is just over $400,000. So you have to ask yourself, why is that? Is it because things have just gotten more expensive? No.
• 21:47
  It's actually because the dollar has lost 99% of its value since 1930. Right? When people talk about the collapse of the dollar or inflation, this is what it means. Now let's take a look at gold. So in 1930, if you wanted to purchase your home in gold, it would take approximately 200 gold coins.
• 22:06
  So 200 gold coins would purchase the average family home in 1930, about $4,000. Now if you instead of buying a home with that gold or cash, you set those aside. If you set aside $4,000 in cash in 1930, it would be worth $4,000 today. What can you buy with $4,000? Can you buy a family home?
• 22:26
  No. You can't even buy a a crappy used car. But if you set aside $4,000 worth of gold coins in 1930, which is 200 gold coins, 1 ounce coins, that would be worth approximately $400,000 today. And this is the key lesson about precious metals. It's not about getting rich.
• 22:47
  It's about putting your money into an asset that protects you against inflation and against the destruction of the currency, which is what happens to all fiat currencies, especially now. We're in the end days of the dollar. And so that's why it's important, maybe not all of your money, but a portion of your money, a portion of what you have, I highly recommend putting it into precious metals of gold and silver, because what it's doing is it's protecting you. This is an asset that has stood the test of time, not just stood the test of time since the nineteen thirties. We're talking about the rise and fall of civilizations.
• 23:22
  Gold was used to buy houses back in ancient Rome. It's still around. It's an asset that will forever have its value. So folks, if you want to do this and you need someone you can trust, there's no person I can recommend more than doctor Kirk Elliott. He's a very good friend of mine.
• 23:37
  He's a strong Christian patriot, and he's out to really help people to protect their savings and what you've worked for against the destruction of the dollar, not to mention also protecting it against the dangers of a central bank digital currencies. So to learn more about this, go to goldwithseth.com or call (720) 605-3900. Again, that's goldwithseth.com or (720) 605-3900. Both those places will allow you to set up a quick appointment where you can talk to a wealth adviser that will help get you started on this path. Again, goldwithseth.com, 7 2 0 6 0 5 3 9 0 zero.
• 24:19
  Yeah. It's the more you dig into it, I I came to similar conclusions, and I couldn't rationally think of a different reason why this would be done. Now is there okay. Obviously, we know that a large portion of population got these vaccines. And then many got the boosters, and we now know the uptake is is dismal, which is good.
• 24:44
  But the damage is is, you know, you could say in some in certain senses is already done. Right? It's already inside of people. Do you think that there is any potential legal action that they can be taken against these companies? Or are they just are they so big and so powerful and so tied into the governments and the court systems and and everything that it's just there's almost no way that we can bring down this evil empire?
• 25:13
  Speaker 2: I mean, that's such a critical question. I I wouldn't just go I mean, these are these are crimes. Right? These are criminal offenses, so it's not just lawsuits that are required. It's, arrests.
• 25:27
  And I mean, by sheriffs and attorneys general, taking action against them. But, you know, we're working really hard on that, and we're kind of at an inflection point with these new revelations. We have two lawsuits underway right now. One out of Ohio with George Smith, and that's for reckless endangerment. And also he's suing the ad council and others for false advertising.
• 25:55
  And those those are legitimate causes of action. This was before these revelations. We're also suing Pfizer and through a team in LA and the justice department is in communication with our lawyers. They want them to open an investigation. You know, it's very unlikely because this justice department is the criminal's justice department.
• 26:16
  But now that we see adulteration and Doctor. Robert Malone and other people on our team who are like regulation specialists have said adulteration is like the gold standard for pulling a product off the market. It's, know, It's not what you say it is if it's adulterated. I mean, it's back to the jungle, right? Face Can
• 26:39
  Seth Holehouse: you explain what adulteration is?
• 26:41
  Speaker 2: Sure. I'm sorry. Yeah. In the jungle, which we all in my generation used to read in high school, It's the story of how before there was a pure food and drug act, as I recall, milk was mixed or contaminated with other substances like water or chalk and bread was mixed or contaminated with like sawdust and meat. And it focused on meat was spoiled and the spoilage was covered up and it was sold as if it was fresh.
• 27:17
  So adulteration is literally to mix something in, see, is adultery.
• 27:22
  Seth Holehouse: It's kind of like the product is not what you say that it is.
• 27:25
  Speaker 2: Right. And it's not pure. There's there's admixtures that are not disclosed. So. And contamination is a little bit different, you know, you can, I guess you could have adulteration with a contaminated substance, but like when meat that was contaminated with bacteria was sold, it's not adulterated exactly with another substance, but it's contaminated, so it shouldn't be sold?
• 27:52
  Right? So these injections were both adulterated and contaminated are right. So, you know, the specialists like Doctor. Malone and our experts on regulations say that once something is adulterated, like remember you're probably too young, but when I was a teenager, you know, there were baby aspirins that had had poison in them. They were all recalled.
• 28:15
  Right. But like the minute something is adulterated, it's something like the FDA closed a baby food. What is that called? Baby formula factory because there was adulteration or contamination. None, you're not in America.
• 28:31
  The whole point of the FDA is that you pull products off the market if they're adulterated or contaminated. So this is like the gold standard for like, could talk all day about the side effects that we're finding from the disclosed ingredients, but if there's an undisclosed ingredient, that's like supposed to stop everything and legally, certainly it's fraud because you're selling something that people would not have accepted or bought or, you know, took it taken into their body if it was accurately described. I mean, that's why, you know, when you pick up a, this, right, it discloses what the ingredients are. That's part of our legal environment and regulatory environment. It keeps things a lot less dangerous in America than in a lot of developing countries where anything could be in this stuff.
• 29:25
  Right? So that is completely gone by the wayside if if there are undisclosed ingredients in this injection, which there which there are now we know.
• 29:36
  Seth Holehouse: And you also, from what I understand, the the FOIA and the information you've that there's now basically proof that they knowingly put these substances, s v forty, etcetera, into these vaccines and hid it from the FDA, and there's most likely gonna be proof
• 29:54
  Speaker 2: in terms of the vaccine. Don't know they hid it from the FDA. The redactions could show that they disclosed it to
• 29:59
  Seth Holehouse: the FDA,
• 29:59
  Speaker 2: which means the FDA are criminally complicit
• 30:02
  Seth Holehouse: as well. Knowingly put it in and shipped these off to be injected around the world.
• 30:07
  Speaker 2: Totally. Pfizer knew. No question. Pfizer knew.
• 30:10
  Seth Holehouse: My goodness. Well, Naomi, I know that we have to wrap up soon. I know that you're very busy, but I just I know that you have a book coming out soon, and I I would be remiss if we didn't spend just a few minutes talking about that because your story is very important. So facing the beast, courage, faith, and resistance in a new dark age. So what can people expect with this?
• 30:31
  What's behind this?
• 30:33
  Speaker 2: Thank you. So this is, kind of tells the story of the last two and a half years of my life. A lot of people are kind of interested in my journey. I think my journey is kind of interesting too because until June of twenty twenty one, I was a fixture in the liberal legacy media for thirty five years. And on one day by posting an accurate tweet about menstrual harms that women really were experiencing, I was dumped off of Twitter and Facebook and YouTube, and also a global smear campaign unfolded that now we know through two lawsuits by two attorneys general was driven by the White House and the CDC, all these same bad actors, right?
• 31:14
  Actually a month after they all conspired together to cover up the harms to kids' hearts, very interesting. And so it's about how my own people would no longer speak with me. And that turned out to be kind of a blessing in disguise though, very painful because the only people who had talked to me now were conservatives and libertarians and a lot of ministers and pastors and Orthodox rabbis, which is very interesting. And Steve Bannon. And as a result of my ostracism by my own tribe, I got to have a lot of really interesting conversations that led me to reexamine a lot of things I had taken as true.
• 32:00
  And the book goes into that ranging from the Steele dossier to the Russia hoax to January 6 to the second amendment. Right? I reexamined all of those and found out I've been lied to a lot, you know, as being inside that liberal media bubble. And it also tells the story of these amazing volunteers and how they stepped up to save humanity. And lastly, it describes my conclusion.
• 32:26
  You you asked me kind of how do I deal with looking at all of this? It describes how I became persuaded that there was no way to understand our time in purely material or political terms and that something metaphysical was happening that, you know, the the politics and the material, conflicts and issues were just a symptom of this, like, metaphysical battle between good and evil, where I believe we stand now.
• 32:50
  Seth Holehouse: Yeah. It sounds like a good book to buy anybody that's questioning their their political identity right now, whether they they were, you know, a a strong, you know, liberal feminist, and now things aren't making sense to them, and maybe you were a hero. And now they're like, how is it that she's talking kindly about Donald Trump? Or you know, because I think that that journey is important. Now I remember right after our first video went viral, I made this video, and the thumbnail was an arrow saying he voted for Hillary.
• 33:20
  Because I voted for Hillary in 2016. Like, I didn't know I I I couldn't care less about politics. I hated politics. It was like, okay.
• 33:25
  Speaker 2: Well Right.
• 33:26
  Seth Holehouse: Trump's kinda, like, hit the nuke button, and she seems like she's pretty bad too. But, you know, okay. I guess it's the worst of two evils, and it it breaks the narrative. Like, they
• 33:34
  Speaker 2: Slip lesser of two evils. Yeah.
• 33:36
  Seth Holehouse: Exactly. I was like, yeah, that time. Right? So Right. Anyway, I so I'll pull it back up again.
• 33:41
  I'll put the link in the descriptions. Facing the beast, courage, faith, and resistance in the new dark age. And I imagine it's really good if people can preorder it, right, because that really helps you. Because we need we need to try to make your Thank you. This book hit that bestseller list, which I know has calculations of how many copies it sells in the first week, first month, etcetera.
• 33:58
  So if we can do that and we can get a book like this at the top of the Amazon bestseller list, it's gonna be good. So let let's make that our goal.
• 34:06
  Speaker 2: Everything you said is, you know, manna to the ears of my publisher and to me. So that is true. It really matters if you preorder. So thank you.
• 34:14
  Seth Holehouse: Yeah. Absolutely. Well, Naomi, thank you again for for coming on. I know you're busy, and I appreciate you giving our audience the time.
• 34:22
  Speaker 2: Thank you all so much. Take care. Thank you.
• 34:24
  Seth Holehouse: You too. Bye bye. Alright, folks. I've got a quick message for you. I have one simple question.
• 34:31
  If today you could no longer go purchase more food for your family, with the food stores that you have in your home, how long would you be able to feed your family? Would it be a week, three weeks, a month, two months, a year? This is a really important question folks that we have to be very realistic about because the elites are proactively trying to put us into a state of food crisis and a state of famine. I'm sure you've seen all of the different food processing plants and farms that are blowing up. You've got cattle dying by the tens of thousands.
• 35:04
  They're proactively trying to collapse our food system because they know if they can control our food, they can control us. And so one of the best ways to be outside of their control is to be able to have our own stores of food and to be able to produce our own food. So there's really two things I would recommend. One is having heirloom seeds that you can grow your own food with, making sure that they're non GMO heirloom seeds. That that way you can harvest your seeds this year, use them next year.
• 35:31
  You can use these seeds for generations. Literally, it's how it will work. The other thing though is this high quality storable food. This is food that sitting somewhere. It's hidden in your basement, buried in your backyard, whatever it ever it is.
• 35:43
  So that way, if there is a crisis, if there is an emergency, you might have three months set aside to get through that time period. And so for this, I would highly recommend a company called Heaven's Harvest. This is an amazing Christian owned patriot company, and what they're doing is they're making high quality storable food. Again, a lot of the food companies, they say these food buckets, they're all about maximizing calories per dollar. They're filling the buckets with a bunch of filler and junk, like sweet beverages, etcetera.
• 36:13
  But Heaven's Harvest, they focus on very high quality food that will last up to twenty five years on the shelf. They also sell heirloom seeds. You can buy all of your seeds. You can buy all of your restorable food. And look, folks, personally, I would recommend having at least three months per person in your household, if not six months or even a year.
• 36:33
  Again, depends on your budget, but definitely make sure you have some seeds because that seed those seeds could be worth their weight in gold, if not more in the future. So to go ahead and do this right now, go put up a new tab and go to heavensharvest.com. And if you use the promo code Seth, that's s e t h, promo code Seth, you'll save 15% off of your entire order. So again, folks, the time is running out, and you'd rather be three months or one year early than one day late. Again, heavensharvest.com and use promo code Seth to save 15% today.