Latest / Beyond Labels Premium / Episode #88: Contaminants Found In Organic & Conventional Meat & Milk

Transcript

Episode #88: Contaminants Found In Organic & Conventional Meat & Milk · Beyond Labels Premium

• 0:00
  SPEAKER_01: What this new research is showing, where they took the meats, conventional and organic, from US and Australian major grocery stores, what they saw was this hydrogelographene contaminant in brass-fed Angus beef, organic ground beef, conventional ground beef, conventional pork, and actually conventional half and half.
• 0:22
  SPEAKER_01: So they tested the milk because we know from previous reports that the mRNA can be transported into breast milk in humans.
• 0:29
  SPEAKER_01: So the scientists wanted to check well, is it showing up in the cow milk?
• 0:33
  SPEAKER_01: And again, she did see a hydrogel in the cow milk.
• 0:37
  SPEAKER_01: Sometimes they are finding as much as 50 of these hydrogel structures in one drop of blood.
• 0:46
  SPEAKER_01: Hello, welcome to Beyond Labels.
• 0:48
  SPEAKER_01: I'm Dr.
• 0:49
  SPEAKER_01: Sena McCullough, and I'm here with Joel Salatin, our favorite farmer.
• 0:54
  SPEAKER_01: Hi, Joel.
• 0:56
  SPEAKER_00: Hi, Sina.
• 0:57
  SPEAKER_01: Okay, so Joel, we just aired that three-part series on an update about what's happening with vaccines in our food supply.
• 1:06
  SPEAKER_01: Now, what I want to cover is a story that I found out about from Z Media.
• 1:12
  SPEAKER_01: And it's it could be related to that three-part series that we just filmed.
• 1:18
  SPEAKER_01: So on Z Media, um, they aired a recent segment about an alleged hydrogel structure that's been found in meat.
• 1:27
  SPEAKER_01: Okay, so Dr.
• 1:29
  SPEAKER_01: David Nixon and Dr.
• 1:30
  SPEAKER_01: Anna Mahalchi, I'm not sure how to pronounce it, um, they purchased different meats from um main major grocery store chains in the United States and in Australia.
• 1:43
  SPEAKER_01: They purchased both conventional meat and organic meat.
• 1:47
  SPEAKER_01: And what they did was looked at the meat blood using different types of microscopes.
• 1:53
  SPEAKER_01: And they're saying that they found a contaminant, all right, some anomaly that's not supposed to be there.
• 1:59
  SPEAKER_01: They say it's a synthetic contaminant, it's likely a hydrogel structure, which is basically a plastic that can self-assemble, which already in and of itself sounds really kind of sci-fi spooky, right?
• 2:13
  SPEAKER_01: Some plastic that can self-assemble.
• 2:15
  SPEAKER_01: Um, it's also known as graphene.
• 2:18
  SPEAKER_01: Okay, and we'll get into that in a minute.
• 2:20
  SPEAKER_01: But they showed slides.
• 2:22
  SPEAKER_01: These are slides that they looked at under the microscope.
• 2:25
  SPEAKER_01: They showed them side by side.
• 2:27
  SPEAKER_01: There'd be slides of blood from the from meat, um, conventionally grown meat, for instance, versus slide from the blood of a person who was vaccinated with the mRNA injection.
• 2:40
  SPEAKER_01: And they both contained the contaminant, and the contaminant looked identical.
• 2:46
  SPEAKER_01: All right.
• 2:47
  SPEAKER_01: And now, if you recall, there were people who were reporting on possible contaminants in the mRNA vaccine a while ago.
• 3:00
  SPEAKER_01: So there was, for instance, um, like Mike Adams, he reported he saw something in the in the vaccine itself.
• 3:07
  SPEAKER_01: There was an investigation by Dr.
• 3:09
  SPEAKER_01: Ricardo Um Delgado Martin, um, followed by a technical report by Dr.
• 3:15
  SPEAKER_01: Campra.
• 3:16
  SPEAKER_01: And the report was called Detection of Graphene in COVID vaccines by microramin spectroscopy.
• 3:23
  SPEAKER_01: They claim that some, not all, some of the COVID-19 injections contained graphene.
• 3:29
  SPEAKER_01: That report was published in November of 2021.
• 3:32
  SPEAKER_01: Basically, what they did, uh, Dr.
• 3:34
  SPEAKER_01: Campra, he examined 28 samples, right?
• 3:38
  SPEAKER_01: 28 COVID vaccine samples that were selected at random from four different companies.
• 3:44
  SPEAKER_01: The identification of the graphene oxide structure was, quote, conclusive in eight of those 28 samples.
• 3:51
  SPEAKER_01: In the remaining 20 samples, the report says there was a quote, very high level of compatibility with undetermined graphene structures.
• 4:00
  SPEAKER_01: But it was different than the standard that they were using for this analysis.
• 4:05
  SPEAKER_01: So they couldn't say it was exactly the same.
• 4:07
  SPEAKER_01: So conclusively, they said they found this contaminant in eight of the 28 samples.
• 4:13
  SPEAKER_01: After that happened, if you recall, people asked the European Parliament to conduct an independent lab investigation to analyze these samples for graphene.
• 4:24
  SPEAKER_01: And um, and I'll put the links for all of these in the show notes.
• 4:27
  SPEAKER_01: But basically, the parliament said, no, we're not, we're not gonna do that.
• 4:32
  SPEAKER_01: It's already safe.
• 4:33
  SPEAKER_01: There's nothing in it, we're not gonna look into it any further.
• 4:36
  SPEAKER_01: So my point is this has not been confirmed, right?
• 4:42
  SPEAKER_01: Um, there's been some scientists here and there that have been studying this, um, looking under microscopes and whatnot, and they are seeing some kind of contaminant, but it's not conclusive, in my opinion.
• 4:55
  SPEAKER_01: Okay, now research is showing the one that was aired on Z Media, where they took the meats, conventional and organic, from US and Australian major grocery stores, what they saw was this hydrogelographene contaminant in brass-fed Angus beef, organic ground beef, conventional ground beef, conventional pork, and actually conventional half and half.
• 5:25
  SPEAKER_01: So they tested the milk because we know from previous reports that the mRNA can be transported into breast milk in humans.
• 5:32
  SPEAKER_01: So the scientists wanted to check well, is it showing up in the cow milk?
• 5:37
  SPEAKER_01: And again, she did see a hydrogel in the cow milk.
• 5:40
  SPEAKER_01: Sometimes they are finding as much as 50 of these hydrogel structures in one drop of blood.
• 5:48
  SPEAKER_01: So they concluded that potentially there could be many of these structures in the human body.
• 5:54
  SPEAKER_01: Um, if the humans are eating this contaminated meat and it's actually getting into the body.
• 6:01
  SPEAKER_01: Okay.
• 6:02
  SPEAKER_01: They did say that it used to be that you could find this contaminant in the co in some of the COVID vaccines, and you can find it in the blood from a person who was vaccinated with that vaccine.
• 6:16
  SPEAKER_01: Now it's alarming because what they're saying is when now they're looking at blood from some unvaccinated people, in some of those people, they're seeing this same contaminant.
• 6:28
  SPEAKER_01: It wasn't there when they were testing the vaccinated people just a few months ago, according to those two scientists, and now they are seeing it.
• 6:35
  SPEAKER_01: So, what they're trying to do is figure out first of all, let's confirm that this contaminant is a hydrogel.
• 6:42
  SPEAKER_01: It is graphene, right?
• 6:44
  SPEAKER_01: That's not conclusive.
• 6:45
  SPEAKER_01: We need to confirm that.
• 6:46
  SPEAKER_01: And then we need to find out where is this coming from?
• 6:50
  SPEAKER_01: Okay, what they're saying is the hydrogel has a ribbon-like structure.
• 6:55
  SPEAKER_01: And from their experience in the lab, it's unlike any other contaminant.
• 7:00
  SPEAKER_01: So it's not a hair, it's not a cotton fiber, it's not worms.
• 7:04
  SPEAKER_01: They've stated that it's synthetic biology, or it's a hydrogel that looks like a fiber optic cable.
• 7:12
  SPEAKER_01: It will actually fold on itself.
• 7:14
  SPEAKER_01: Um, another scientist reported that when they were looking at these, you know, hydrogel structures, they actually left it overnight on the slide, and the ribbon structure grew.
• 7:27
  SPEAKER_01: It's self-assembled, right?
• 7:29
  SPEAKER_01: Um, and it grew even faster when it was near a Wi-Fi router.
• 7:36
  SPEAKER_01: And that means that um if it is graphene, right?
• 7:40
  SPEAKER_01: We know graphene can absorb radiation.
• 7:43
  SPEAKER_01: Um, both of these scientists are saying that this looks like graphene.
• 7:48
  SPEAKER_01: Okay, and so now just a little note on graphene to say why, why would we care?
• 7:54
  SPEAKER_01: Okay, so there's a contaminant in there.
• 7:57
  SPEAKER_01: Um, why is it a big deal if it is graphene?
• 7:59
  SPEAKER_01: Why are they spending so much time, effort, and money trying to figure this out?
• 8:02
  SPEAKER_01: Okay, so graphene oxide, this is published in the scientific literature.
• 8:08
  SPEAKER_01: Graphene oxide is widely used for delivery of biomolecules because it excels in loading and delivering an antigen.
• 8:16
  SPEAKER_01: Okay, we talked about antigens in the three-part series.
• 8:20
  SPEAKER_01: Um, how you the antigen is pretty much the heart of the vaccine, right?
• 8:25
  SPEAKER_01: It's what the body is going to trigger an immune response against so it can develop immunity to a given pathogen.
• 8:33
  SPEAKER_01: So the graphene oxide is very good at delivering an antigen and it shows potential for activating the immune system.
• 8:42
  SPEAKER_01: Okay, it's also used in photothermal treatments of like cancer for drug delivery, antibacterial therapy, um in medical imaging.
• 8:52
  SPEAKER_01: Why?
• 8:53
  SPEAKER_01: Because graphene oxide is good at absorbing radiation.
• 8:57
  SPEAKER_01: So the concern is if it is in the vaccines or if it is in the food that they have found with contaminants, and we eat it and it does get into our bodies, it could be highly toxic because it's really good at absorbing radiation.
• 9:14
  SPEAKER_01: It also aggregates in biological liquids and it also induces cell deaths.
• 9:22
  SPEAKER_01: All right.
• 9:23
  SPEAKER_01: So we're hoping that obviously it's not in there, but hopefully they're wrong.
• 9:29
  SPEAKER_01: Hopefully, this is something else.
• 9:30
  SPEAKER_01: Okay.
• 9:31
  SPEAKER_01: Now, Pfizer has denied that graphene is used to make the vaccines.
• 9:36
  SPEAKER_01: In a Pfizer document, they acknowledge, though, that graphene is used during testing of the vaccine in the validation process.
• 9:45
  SPEAKER_01: It's used to test if the mRNA of the vaccine can lead to the production of the spike protein.
• 9:50
  SPEAKER_01: But they claim the validation process is completely separate from the manufacturing of the vaccine.
• 9:56
  SPEAKER_01: Um, there was a study, though, published in June of 2020, that said the following: In the future, it is expected that the this graphene oxide is expected to be introduced into vaccine research to improve the efficacy of vaccines.
• 10:11
  SPEAKER_01: So there, I'm not saying those two, uh, I'm not saying that Pfizer's lying.
• 10:16
  SPEAKER_01: I'm saying that there is already work being done to introduce graphene oxide into vaccines.
• 10:22
  SPEAKER_01: I'm saying that Pfizer did use graphene in the validation process.
• 10:26
  SPEAKER_01: They're denying using it in the manufacturing process.
• 10:29
  SPEAKER_00: Okay.
• 10:30
  SPEAKER_00: So unfortunately, fortunately, Selena, uh, whenever Pfizer Pfizer speaks, we can trust them.
• 10:37
  SPEAKER_00: Yeah, but that's one thing.
• 10:39
  SPEAKER_00: That's one thing we can all agree on that when Pfizer speaks, we listen, we bow, and we believe.
• 10:47
  SPEAKER_01: I'm right there with you.
• 10:48
  SPEAKER_01: But Joel, in this podcast, I'm wearing my science cap.
• 10:52
  SPEAKER_01: So I'm trying to be unbiased to take them at their word that they did not contaminate it, because I can't prove it, right?
• 11:01
  SPEAKER_01: I totally agree with you.
• 11:03
  SPEAKER_01: I don't trust them farther than I can throw them.
• 11:06
  SPEAKER_01: But yes, but I can't prove that.
• 11:08
  SPEAKER_00: Right.
• 11:08
  SPEAKER_00: But I I I get it.
• 11:09
  SPEAKER_00: I get it.
• 11:10
  SPEAKER_00: So so um so we're kind of in this murky, in this murky, uh, whatever, you know, murky area uh that we can't really see through.
• 11:21
  SPEAKER_00: So uh in in during the uh the three-part uh mRNA podcast that we did.
• 11:27
  SPEAKER_00: Um you mentioned that the research is indicating numerous uh uh uh possibilities of of allergens.
• 11:35
  SPEAKER_00: I know that during the GMO, the genetically modified organism uh fights that we had, you know, back 20 years ago, there was uh uh a a plethora of uh of of allergies, of new food allergies because uh because you know when when they're when they're uh combining genetic structure in plants and animals, um and not only do you have a religious thing, you know, you put you put pork DNA in potatoes and then feed it to a Moslem, well, you know, they're not happy to be eating pork DNA in their potatoes.
• 12:12
  SPEAKER_00: You know, you had all that gnarly stuff.
• 12:14
  SPEAKER_00: Plus then you had you know you had uh uh allergens being developed you know, mixing mixing plants and plants.
• 12:22
  SPEAKER_00: And so we we mentioned that.
• 12:25
  SPEAKER_00: So I was just uh in in Texas speaking at a conference, and two um different, you know, functional medicine doctors came up to me and said, have you heard about all the new sudden allergies to beef?
• 12:38
  SPEAKER_00: And uh I I had heard from a couple of people here, but it wasn't like well, they said, Well, we're in the epicenter of it, you know, it's it's really happening here in in Texas.
• 12:49
  SPEAKER_00: And um and so it got me to it got me to wondering about about the you know the paths.
• 12:56
  SPEAKER_00: You know, where are we in this and where are the paths uh crossing in all this because normally almost nobody's actually allergic to red meat?
• 13:07
  SPEAKER_00: I mean that just uh doesn't make sense.
• 13:09
  SPEAKER_00: Um and of course I you know I told them to to to get some from us and send it down and see if see if people had a had a allergic reaction for it.
• 13:19
  SPEAKER_00: I I'm I'm certainly hoping not.
• 13:21
  SPEAKER_00: Uh but i is there any relation here?
• 13:24
  SPEAKER_00: Is is that is that uh entering into the picture?
• 13:28
  SPEAKER_01: Um yeah, so it could be.
• 13:31
  SPEAKER_01: And I think what you might be talking about is the Alpha Gal syndrome.
• 13:35
  SPEAKER_01: Um, and so before, um, so that's Alpha Gal is a food allergy to red meat.
• 13:42
  SPEAKER_01: It um has been claimed to be caused by certain types of ticks.
• 13:48
  SPEAKER_01: All right.
• 13:49
  SPEAKER_01: So, and now we're these um practitioners are saying that we're seeing more and more of these red meat allergies.
• 13:58
  SPEAKER_01: So it it is possible that there is some kind of contaminant in the food that is now causing an allergy or a sensitivity to said food, right?
• 14:10
  SPEAKER_01: Or to foods that you're consuming along with that food that has the contaminant.
• 14:15
  SPEAKER_01: Um, because if you think about it, you know, the gastrointestinal lining, much of it is like one cell thin, right?
• 14:23
  SPEAKER_01: It's just one layer of cells.
• 14:25
  SPEAKER_01: And so it's not that difficult to ingest something like a man-made chemical that could harm that layer of cell and cause what we call, you know, in layman's terms, leaky gut.
• 14:38
  SPEAKER_01: And so anytime you develop a situation like that, where you're consuming something that is causing leaky gut, it you're not digesting the food properly.
• 14:47
  SPEAKER_01: And some of those proteins from that food, for instance, if not digested properly, can just travel right through those open tight junctions and initiate an inflammatory immune response that could lead to a sensitivity or an allergy.
• 15:05
  SPEAKER_01: So it is quite possible that um consuming that this is a correlation.
• 15:11
  SPEAKER_01: Of course, I don't, I don't, again, I don't have the data, no one's done has the data to show this, but it is a possibility, um, as we outlined in part three, that allergies could be developed from these foods.
• 15:22
  SPEAKER_01: Now, I should say that let's say, let's say that these researchers are correct and there is this contaminant in the meat and the milk.
• 15:33
  SPEAKER_01: We still wouldn't know exactly where it's coming from, right?
• 15:36
  SPEAKER_01: We're saying it looks similar to the contaminant they found in those vaccine vials, right?
• 15:42
  SPEAKER_01: In some of the vaccine vials.
• 15:43
  SPEAKER_01: Okay, but that's not, as a scientist, that's not conclusive evidence.
• 15:47
  SPEAKER_01: Okay, it could be coming from if if these animals have been injected with some kind of mRNA injection.
• 15:54
  SPEAKER_01: But what I also found out is that some water treatment facilities, they sometimes now are using hydrogels as a filter, right?
• 16:03
  SPEAKER_01: So they're using this graphene compound as a filter.
• 16:07
  SPEAKER_01: So it could even be from water that we're that some of us or some animals are drinking from water treatment facilities, right?
• 16:15
  SPEAKER_01: Um, it could be shedding.
• 16:17
  SPEAKER_01: It could be um, we haven't talked about this much on this program, but it could be bioengineering and the animals are feeding and inhaling and uh you know, drinking um this graphene.
• 16:28
  SPEAKER_01: Um, and if that's the case, it would be everywhere in the in the atmosphere, right?
• 16:33
  SPEAKER_01: So we're not actually sure of how it's getting into the meat and into the milk.
• 16:39
  SPEAKER_01: We're not sure how it's getting into the vaccinated or unvaccinated people.
• 16:43
  SPEAKER_01: It seems likely that if they found it in the vials of the vaccines, that's how it got into some of the vaccinated people.
• 16:48
  SPEAKER_01: But in terms of how did it get into the unvaccinated people, again, it could be we're eating it because the animals were injected, it could be shedding, it could be we're drinking it from the hydrogel that they're using at the filters, and it could be, you know, bioengineering.
• 17:02
  SPEAKER_01: So we don't really know.
• 17:04
  SPEAKER_01: It is um it is concerning, right?
• 17:07
  SPEAKER_01: It's something it's a story that we should probably continue to follow because I'll conclude with this.
• 17:13
  SPEAKER_01: Um, it's harder to remove these man-made compounds.
• 17:17
  SPEAKER_01: Now, we do know from some preliminary studies that there has been success at removing it from the blood using EDTA, which is the key later.
• 17:29
  SPEAKER_01: So there is some hope there that even if this does get into your body, um, you can use something like an EDTA to get rid of it.
• 17:38
  SPEAKER_01: That's the only thing.
• 17:40
  SPEAKER_01: Um, oh, and one reason why actually the scientist said another supporting evidence that these um contaminants in the meat and milk are not a parasite is because people, if you take ivermectin, which is an antiparasitic, it doesn't clear the ribbons.
• 17:56
  SPEAKER_01: Like it doesn't get rid of this contaminant in the blood.
• 17:59
  SPEAKER_01: So that's just more evidence that it's probably not a parasite in the body, but EDGA key later can get out, can get it out of the body.
• 18:08
  SPEAKER_00: All right, just so so all of us peasants are know we're on the same page with you.
• 18:13
  SPEAKER_00: Um, how do you spell, make sure we got the spelling of graphene correctly?
• 18:18
  SPEAKER_01: Oh, you know what?
• 18:20
  SPEAKER_01: I I had to look it up myself.
• 18:22
  SPEAKER_01: Like, right, like I'm not a chemical engineer.
• 18:25
  SPEAKER_01: That's my husband.
• 18:26
  SPEAKER_01: So I I heard the news report and I was like, graphene?
• 18:30
  SPEAKER_01: Like, is it G-R-A-P-H-I-N-E?
• 18:32
  SPEAKER_01: And he was like, no, honey.
• 18:34
  SPEAKER_01: Like it's not supposed to know all these things, right?
• 18:38
  SPEAKER_01: Okay, so graphene is G-R-A-P-H-E-N-E.
• 18:43
  SPEAKER_01: And it's graphene oxide.
• 18:46
  SPEAKER_01: And it and it's so it's like a hydrogel structure.
• 18:49
  SPEAKER_01: It's a plastic that's self-assembled and that can absorb radiation.
• 18:57
  SPEAKER_00: So this is this is a man-made, it's a man-made substance.
• 19:01
  SPEAKER_01: Yes.
• 19:02
  SPEAKER_00: It doesn't, in other words, it it doesn't occur in nature.
• 19:05
  SPEAKER_01: This would not it would not exist in nature.
• 19:08
  SPEAKER_01: And that's one thing that all of these scientists who are finding these um these contaminants, as we'll call them, in the meat, in the milk, in the blood, and in the vaccines, they're all concluding that it is something synthetic.
• 19:22
  SPEAKER_01: Like they all seem 100% certain they can make that conclusion that it is synthetic.
• 19:27
  SPEAKER_00: It is synthetic, but but just so everybody, so everybody follows this here.
• 19:33
  SPEAKER_00: This is a synthetic this is sci-fi, man.
• 19:36
  SPEAKER_00: This is sci this is like whoa.
• 19:40
  SPEAKER_00: So this is a synthetic substance that when left on a slide under a microscope overnight, they came back the next morning and it grew.
• 19:50
  SPEAKER_01: And it grew, yes.
• 19:52
  SPEAKER_00: Now that's that's weird, man.
• 19:55
  SPEAKER_00: That's weird.
• 19:57
  SPEAKER_01: It's really weird, it's so weird, and out of it, I kind of out of my comfort zone that I didn't even want to record this podcast because you know, I'm very much like scientists where I'm like, you show me the data, I'm not gonna report on anything that I can, but but this one it's it makes logical sense, especially after what we reported on the three-part series.
• 20:17
  SPEAKER_01: I don't know what's happening, as I'm clearly stating.
• 20:20
  SPEAKER_01: I don't know what's happening.
• 20:21
  SPEAKER_01: I can make my own logical conclusions, but that would be speculating, but something is happening, right?
• 20:28
  SPEAKER_01: If these if all of these different scientists in these different countries are coming forward and what they're saying is true, right?
• 20:35
  SPEAKER_01: If they're actually making these true statements, and I would imagine some of them are because one of them already published an article about it and asked parliament to look into it.
• 20:45
  SPEAKER_01: If we're gonna say that those scientists are 100% accurate in their truth telling of what they're seeing, then something definitely is going on here and it's not good.
• 20:56
  SPEAKER_01: These things can self-assemble, they they self-assemble more quickly when exposed to electromagnetic fields, right?
• 21:06
  SPEAKER_01: So if you think of all the 5G that's going up all around us, right?
• 21:09
  SPEAKER_01: It's really hard to escape electromagnetic fields now.
• 21:12
  SPEAKER_01: If this gets in your body, um, we don't know what's going to happen, but from the data we have at our fingertips, it can grow in the body.
• 21:21
  SPEAKER_01: And some are speculating that this may be uh a contributing factor towards like blood clots and strokes and things like that.
• 21:28
  SPEAKER_00: Yeah, so we don't really know what kind of um uh whatever uh deleterious physical effects that this stuff does in you.
• 21:38
  SPEAKER_00: We know that it's new, we know that it wasn't there a couple of years ago.
• 21:42
  SPEAKER_00: Now suddenly it's here.
• 21:44
  SPEAKER_00: You can see it, it's artificial, it self organizes.
• 21:50
  SPEAKER_00: It's uh wow, it's like um yeah, it's like something from another world.
• 21:56
  SPEAKER_00: So so uh all we're doing here.
• 22:00
  SPEAKER_00: uh we're not trying to scare everybody we're trying to inform folks that there is a uh uh a definitely um uh a for a foreign man-made substance that is uh that is uh starting to pervade starting to pervade within the food system um and and especially this is uh uh uh critical uh in meats and which which have you know um generally meats have been uh especially if you uh uh you know don't have them in a factory confinement house uh you can kind of view animals as kind of a last bastion of you know of of of nutrient density and uh so the fact that this material this um you know this this graphene ixide oxide is actually moving through the system um is certainly cause for alarm yeah i think that what we need to get a little more a grasp on what's happening um because as i reported here they're showing contamination in both organic and conventional meat and both vaccinated un and unvaccinated people and so i would say we need a couple at least a couple things we need plant samples right test the plants and see do they also have this um this supposed contaminant that would also help you to determine could it possibly be coming from the water okay and then I would get water samples from these water treatment facilities that are using the hydrogels as their filters get some of those water samples and see are there um hydrogels in that water um because I you know I was talking to my husband about it since you know he's the chemical engineer not me and I was like well what's the likelihood if they're using this as a filter what's the likelihood that you're gonna see some of the hydrogels and he was talking about how they they are so small like the hydrogel structures themselves are so so tiny.
• 24:12
  SPEAKER_00: That's why you have to use the special microscopes to actually even see them in the meat and the milk of humans and the vaccines um but he said they're so small and the water so much water passes through there um and you know at quite a speed sometimes that according to him he said he doesn't think that it could be a hundred percent that no hydrogels would get into the water you know again we're speculating but from a logical standpoint nothing nothing scientific is a hundred percent so I would say let's uh if any scientist out there who has a lab is listening let's get the water samples from these water treatment facilities and test that let's test some plants right so we can start using deductive reasoning to figure out where in fact is this are these contaminants coming from yeah and and and then then of course the next um the next question is how um what what breaks them down um how does for example for example uh are they contained in are they contained in rain let's say let's say we find them in the water well are they are they contained in raindrops does does evapotranspiration uh destroy them you know in that process in which case uh a farm like ours now i'm i'm i'm putting my very personal hat on here a farm like ours where we are we are own we're watering our livestock from uh from rainwater ponds from ponds that that trap rainwater uh so we have a much more protected water source than if we were using uh a a public source or even a well next to a city uh you know there there is there is there is a process to decontaminate you know one of the beautiful things of nature um is that that nature has a wonderful capacity and our bodies do too to decontaminate uh I mean we're we're being assaulted by you know we're being assaulted by stuff all the time and so the whole landscape I mean I I'm I'm reminded I'm reminded of the uh the the Valdez the big uh oil spill up in Alaska and um and all that uh that that that they went out with steam you know steam hoses and steamed off those beaches and of course they couldn't do them all and as it turned out the beaches that they didn't go in and steam cleaned actually came back with life way earlier than the ones that they steam cleaned you know there there there's stuff that eats oil there you know there's fungi there's protozoa there life life just has a way of um of of kind of you know cleansing itself and um and so that's our hopeful note I think seeing that we can live live with this we're we're you know this this is a brand new thing uh it's cause for great concern but we can take heart in the fact that nature has a wonderful capacity to we talked about this in one of the previous you know we can sweat we can sneeze we can have diarrhea you know we we can uh we can cry we have tears um there there's there's there are wonderful mechanisms throughout nature i mean including organic matter you know which which um uh decomposed the Chernobyl um nuclear radiation in in the Lufki farm in Austria uh because they were using compost instead of chemical fertilizer so there's all sorts of capacity for nature to decontaminate and so I I I think um I think that that hope that whatever that optimistic note is a good way we've had some pretty hard hitting some heavy heavy discussions here and it's it's good to to have people encouraged that there's a great capacity to forgive to forgive throughout nature and that's a good thing.
• 28:13
  SPEAKER_01: Closing thoughts Eena yes I would I love your list of um you know how nature always wins nature finds a way according to Malcolm in Jurassic Park but um what I would add to your list of ways that God gave us to detoxify and to protect ourselves is the power of prayer right what you what you believe creates your own reality.
• 28:38
  SPEAKER_01: I mean we know that to be true um that's actually biblically based and so for me as I'm going through and I'm learning you know all these hard hitting topics that can be quite negative if you let them be um I make sure to start and end my day with a prayer uh pray over my food pray that God will protect me and my family and so if I happen to run across some food that has one of these contaminants I have already prayed that God is going to protect us from anything harmful in the food.
• 29:09
  SPEAKER_01: And I ask for his um loving and healing light um and that he delivers all of the healing nutrients that we need from that food and he protects us from the unwanted or undesired.
• 29:22
  SPEAKER_01: And for me that's one way to walk through these all of these heavy situations and to stay hopeful because in the end he's the one that's going to protect us from he created nature, right?
• 29:34
  SPEAKER_01: So he created the ability for nature to come back.
• 29:36
  SPEAKER_01: He created us he created many ways for us to come back.
• 29:40
  SPEAKER_01: So I this is one of those times that I just hand it over to God and ask him for his divine protection and moving forward.
• 29:47
  SPEAKER_01: And I think if we all do that it amplifies that energetic kind of protection that we have because there's power in numbers which is also biblical.
• 29:58
  SPEAKER_01: And I think that we can move forward in this tribe knowing that we're going to be guided divinely and we're gonna be protected no matter what comes our way even if it's unidentified synthetic compounds that grow by themselves like that's got not on God, right?
• 30:14
  SPEAKER_00: Yeah yeah he he he he made it all ex knee hello anyway so it's it's fine.
• 30:19
  SPEAKER_00: So yeah that that's a that's a great that's a great way uh a message I think to um to leave on uh Cena and and ultimately we walk forward uh we we want we want to be educated we want to be um we want to be um intellectually aware of what's going on so we can make we can be discerning discerning in the way we interact with each other and with the world but but in in the final analysis we take all that information and we move forward in faith not in fear and that's the way we walk on the Beyond Labels podcast.
• 30:56
  SPEAKER_00: Thank you all for joining us on another Beyond Labels podcast.
• 30:59
  SPEAKER_00: We look forward to visiting with you again next week