Latest / The Vault: The Epstein Files / Wexner, Indyke, Kahn, Epstein — The Congressional Subpoenas Years in the Making (5/8/26)

Transcript

Wexner, Indyke, Kahn, Epstein — The Congressional Subpoenas Years in the Making (5/8/26) · The Vault: The Epstein Files

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: What's up, everyone, and welcome to another episode of the
• 0:03
  Epstein Chronicles. When we talk about Jeffrey Epstein and about
• 0:09
  the crimes that he committed over the decades, you can't
• 0:12
  tell that complete story without talking about Les Wexner and
• 0:16
  Darren Endyke and Richard Kahn. Now, for those of you
• 0:20
  who might not be aware, les Wexner was the man
• 0:23
  who started L brands, which included Victoria's secret Abercrombie and
• 0:28
  Fitch and Bath and body Works. And he was also
• 0:32
  Jeffrey Epstein's first known benefactor, and that relationship between the
• 0:37
  two of them is still unexplained. Nobody's ever really filled
• 0:41
  in the blanks. For whatever reason, Les Wexner has always
• 0:45
  been kind of a side story here when he should
• 0:47
  have been a main event. And that's because without Les
• 0:52
  Wexner and the legitimacy he gave Jeffrey Epstein when this
• 0:56
  all first started, Epstein would have never been as successful
• 0:59
  as he was. And that's not even taking into account
• 1:02
  all the other allegations made against les Wexner himself. I mean,
• 1:05
  Virginia accused les Wexner of assaulting her, and not only that,
• 1:12
  but we heard from Maria Farmer how she was held
• 1:14
  captive by less Wexner's people, his security team, on his mansion,
• 1:19
  his gigantic property out there in New Aubany, Ohio. So
• 1:23
  it's not like Les Wexner is some background figure here.
• 1:26
  He's a key component. And when we talk about enablers
• 1:29
  and people that made Jeffrey Epstein viable when it comes
• 1:33
  to this sort of dastardly, draconian bullshit, one of the
• 1:37
  first people you need to look at is Les Wexner.
• 1:40
  And that's why when the Committee first started handing out subpoenas,
• 1:43
  I was so critical. How are you going to have
• 1:46
  a process where you say you're looking to get to
• 1:49
  the bottom of what Epstein was up to, but you're
• 1:51
  not gonna hit Les Wexner with a subpoena. That is
• 1:55
  just absurd. So finally, now the House Committee has approved
• 1:59
  this pen to be sent to Les Wexner, and boy
• 2:03
  oh boy, it's about time. But it doesn't stop there,
• 2:08
  because the Committee has also located subpoenas for Darren Endyke
• 2:13
  and Richard Kahn, who are the executors of Jeffrey Epstein's
• 2:16
  estate and in my opinion, co conspirators. And I think
• 2:20
  that the records and the testimony bears that out. And
• 2:23
  if anybody should have the spotlight shine on them, it's
• 2:26
  in Dyke and Khan. How about some questions about the
• 2:29
  videos and the hard drives that were removed from Jeffrey
• 2:32
  Epstein's house after the raid. Anybody going to ask in
• 2:35
  Dyke and con about that. Anybody got to ask them
• 2:38
  about the sham marriages they were putting together, or the
• 2:41
  documents they were involved in getting illegally when it comes
• 2:45
  to immigration, we canna have any of those conversations. Or
• 2:49
  how about the fact that Darren Endyke was structuring when
• 2:52
  it comes to taking money out of the bank. And
• 2:55
  those are just the surface level issues without even diving
• 2:58
  into the financials or getting down into the nuance. And
• 3:01
  what's really wild is that the House Committee thought that
• 3:04
  they could get away without subpoenating people like this. Sure,
• 3:08
  Bill Barr was a very interesting listen, so was a Costa.
• 3:12
  But there's a lot more to this, And if we
• 3:14
  want to unwrap the whole entire thing, we have to
• 3:17
  have all the people that were playing key roles come
• 3:20
  in and speak under oath. And it looks like the
• 3:23
  Committee is finally moving that way. And in my opinion,
• 3:26
  it's long overdue because these are the people that were
• 3:30
  the movers and shakers. These were the people that were
• 3:33
  in the rooms when the deals were being made and
• 3:35
  certainly when the payoffs were happening. So today we have
• 3:39
  an article from NBC News and the headline House Committee
• 3:43
  votes to issue more subpoenas related to Jeffrey Epstein. The
• 3:49
  author of this article or authors, i should say, are
• 3:52
  Fiona Gilson and Dara Gregorian. The House Oversight Committee on
• 3:56
  Wednesday approve more subpoenas related to the late sex defender
• 4:00
  Jeffrey Epstein. The paddle voted to subpoena billionaire Les Wexner
• 4:06
  over his ties to Epstein, and approved subpoenas for the
• 4:09
  co executors of Epstein's estate, attorney Darren Endyke and accountant
• 4:13
  Richard Kahan. Long overdue. In my opinion, Richard Kahn and
• 4:18
  Darren Endyke and Les Wexner and Sarah Kellen Vickers, an
• 4:22
  Leslie Groff and Adriana Ross and maybe Nadia Marson Covid
• 4:26
  depending should all be charged as co conspirators. You want
• 4:32
  to rico case folks here it is, I mean, you
• 4:34
  don't have to be fucking Rudy Giuliani in his prime
• 4:37
  here to understand that RICO is the right way to go.
• 4:40
  And still to this day, I haven't heard one single
• 4:43
  excuse that is legitimate defending the position that RICO was
• 4:48
  not used when it comes to Jeffrey Epstein. I mean,
• 4:53
  when they wrote the RICO laws, people like Epstein were
• 4:56
  the ones they hadn't mind. People that were insulated, people
• 4:59
  that were powerful, and people that were able to avoid
• 5:02
  the spotlight by using intermediaries. But sure, let's just have
• 5:07
  a narrow charge and go after Maxwell herself. Wexner, the
• 5:12
  former CEO of Victoria's Secret, had a lengthy relationship with
• 5:15
  Epstein dating to the nineteen eighties and hired him to
• 5:19
  manage his personal finances. A guy with a high school diploma,
• 5:24
  that's it. No fancy lad school, no working on you know,
• 5:29
  gigantic projects in the financial sector, none of it. So
• 5:35
  how does the guy like that end up in the
• 5:38
  inner circle of a guy like Wes Wexner. And not
• 5:41
  only that, but given the keys to the kingdom, I mean,
• 5:45
  this guy had power of attorney, He had power over
• 5:48
  the corporations, power over the money, you name it, and
• 5:53
  for what reason? Is there any logical reason, especially considering
• 5:57
  who Les Wexner was. He could have went to anybody
• 6:00
  to get advice. He could have hired any advisor, He
• 6:03
  could have brought on any financial expert he wanted, But
• 6:07
  he chose Jeffrey Epstein. So the question is why. And finally,
• 6:11
  this dude's going to be put under oath, or at
• 6:13
  least that's the plan. Remember, when we're dealing with people
• 6:16
  like Les Wexner, they always have an out, they always
• 6:19
  have an escape patch, and they always have a way
• 6:22
  to beat the system. In a twenty nineteen letter to
• 6:26
  his Wexner Foundation, Wexner said he cut ties with Epstein
• 6:30
  after Epstein was accused of sexually abusing miners in Florida.
• 6:34
  After they parted ways, we discovered that he had misappropriated
• 6:38
  vast sums of money from me and my family, Wexner said,
• 6:42
  I deeply regret having ever crossed his path. He added,
• 6:46
  how come there was never an investigation about that money? Oh,
• 6:49
  that's right. He didn't want to give the investigator his
• 6:52
  access to his finances. And I've said it once and
• 6:55
  I'll say it again, I don't believe that story from
• 6:57
  Les Wexner. I don't believe that Epstein stole any money
• 7:00
  from him. I believe that that was the poison pill
• 7:03
  that they had inserted in their relationship, and Epstein understood
• 7:06
  that if things ever went south, that people like Wexner
• 7:09
  couldn't stand up publicly behind them, so they insert this bullshit,
• 7:13
  a nice little cover story for Les Wexner. Oh, I
• 7:16
  was a victim too, No, you weren't. You were a victimizer.
• 7:20
  You played a gigantic part in all these women getting abused,
• 7:24
  in my opinion, and now it's time to pay the piper.
• 7:28
  A representative for Wexner could not immediately be reached for
• 7:31
  comment on the subpoena. Wexner's name was mentioned in a
• 7:35
  twenty nineteen email about possible co conspirators that was made
• 7:39
  public as part of the ongoing release of the Epstein
• 7:43
  files by the Justice Department. A representative for Wexner previously
• 7:47
  told the Columbus Dispatch newspaper in Ohio that prosecutors informed
• 7:51
  Wesner's attorney at the time that he was neither a
• 7:53
  co conspirator nor target in any respect to the investigation.
• 7:58
  And that's the problem right there. So what you'll have
• 8:01
  is people pointing to that and saying, look, he wasn't
• 8:03
  even a target. He wasn't even under investigation. What are
• 8:06
  you even talking about? Hey, stupid? That's the issue, Okay.
• 8:11
  The problem is that he was never under investigation in
• 8:14
  the first place. Plenty of circumstantial evidence and in my opinion,
• 8:19
  more than enough to open an investigation. We've seen them
• 8:23
  open investigations into people with way less. The House Oversight
• 8:28
  Committee has already received thousands of records from the Epsteina
• 8:31
  state under a congressional subpoena as part of its own investigation.
• 8:36
  It also subpoenaed former President Bill Clinton and former Secretary
• 8:40
  of State Hillary Clinton, in addition to former Justice Department officials.
• 8:44
  Daniel Wiener, an attorney for the Epstein estate perfectly named
• 8:48
  by the Way, as well as Zindike and Khan, said
• 8:51
  in an email on Wednesday evening that the co executors
• 8:54
  complied with the previous subpoena to provide records and fully
• 8:57
  intend to continue their cooperation with the commit including in
• 9:01
  its efforts to investigate potential government wrongdoing regarding mister Epstein,
• 9:06
  and look forward to setting the record straight as to
• 9:08
  their lack of involvement in mister Epstein's misconduct. Oh, I
• 9:13
  look forward to it as well, because if we had
• 9:17
  a committee with any sort of sense, with any sort
• 9:20
  of teeth, they would hit these dudes with perjury because
• 9:24
  I'm telling you right now, they're gonna bullshit, They're gonna
• 9:27
  tell stories, and in my opinion, they're gonna lie. But
• 9:31
  the documents are there for anyone to see. Just go
• 9:33
  and take a look at what the USVII said about
• 9:35
  the estate. Just go and take a look at what
• 9:38
  the survivors have said about the estate and how the
• 9:41
  estate has conducted itself. And that's not even going back
• 9:45
  to the conduct of Khn and Indyke and what they
• 9:49
  were up to while Jeffrey Epstein was alive and active.
• 9:53
  He added that Indike and Cohn did not socialize with
• 9:56
  mister Epstein, and they have always rejected as categorically false
• 9:59
  any segu yes that they knowingly facilitated or assisted mister
• 10:03
  Epstein in his sexual abuse or trafficking of women, or
• 10:06
  that they were aware of mister Epstein's actions while they
• 10:10
  provided legal and accounting services to mister Epstein. They think
• 10:13
  you're stupid, They think you're dumb. That's exactly what it means.
• 10:18
  Does anyone out there who knows this story really believe
• 10:21
  that Indike and Cohn are blameless here? Like they did nothing,
• 10:25
  Like they were just you know, passengers along for the ride.
• 10:28
  And they went kicking and screaming. How rich did Indike
• 10:32
  and Con become? And did Endyke stop working for Epstein
• 10:36
  after the first time around? Did Con? No? Of course
• 10:39
  they didn't, because, in my opinion, they knew exactly what
• 10:42
  was going on, and like everybody else around Epstein, they
• 10:46
  decided to look the other way. And now that they're
• 10:48
  being called out on their bullshit, they want to rewrite history. Oh,
• 10:51
  we had no idea, we weren't involved, We weren't there. Yes,
• 10:55
  you were, and the records prove it. The subpoenas approved
• 11:00
  Wednesday still need to be drawn up, typically with a
• 11:03
  proposed date for testimony, and be signed by Committee Chair
• 11:06
  James Comer before they can be sent. Well, that seems
• 11:10
  like a project worth getting busy on, huh, Because I'll
• 11:13
  tell you right now, it's been a long time coming
• 11:16
  to get Indike, Kan and Wexner under oath. But like usual,
• 11:20
  I remain cautious and cynical until We actually have Wexner in,
• 11:26
  Dike and Khan up there for the depositions, because it's
• 11:30
  one thing to say you're going to bring people in
• 11:31
  and depose them, and it's a whole lass other thing
• 11:34
  to go through with it. Look at what's going on
• 11:36
  with the Clintons. They've been able to talk their way
• 11:38
  out of the subpoena. They've been able to talk their
• 11:40
  way out of the deposition. And if you don't think less,
• 11:43
  Wexner and Indike and Khan are going to try and
• 11:46
  do the same thing. You have not been paying attention.
• 11:50
  But like usual, we'll stay on top of it and
• 11:52
  we'll see where it all goes. But until then, that's
• 11:55
  going to do it for this one. All of the
• 11:57
  information that goes with this episode can be found in
• 12:00
  the description box.