Latest / Bloomberg Intelligence / Bill Poole on Fed Meetings (Audio)

Transcript

Bill Poole on Fed Meetings (Audio) · Bloomberg Intelligence

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: Room were taking stock the Fed in Focus. There's certainly
• 0:03
  Speaker 1: a lot of discussion about whether or not the FED
• 0:05
  Speaker 1: is going to try to hike rate again this year.
• 0:08
  Speaker 1: We think the Fed by December will be ready to
• 0:10
  Speaker 1: do another hike. That sounds like a big difference from
• 0:12
  Speaker 1: the markets, but it's not that big a difference. I
• 0:15
  Speaker 1: think at this point the Fed is going to remain
• 0:17
  Speaker 1: on the sideline through and most likely the better part
• 0:21
  Speaker 1: of because they have a huge communication problem with the
• 0:25
  Speaker 1: public about what's driving their policy decisions. They basically have
• 0:29
  Speaker 1: no strategy. The Fed in Focus on Bloomberg Radio. The
• 0:34
  Speaker 1: Fed in Focus on Taking Stock is brought to you
• 0:36
  Speaker 1: by a Commonwealth financial network. When it's time to change
• 0:39
  Speaker 1: the conversation, talk with a broker dealer. Are I a
• 0:41
  Speaker 1: that's ready to listen? Call A six six or six
• 0:44
  Speaker 1: two three six three eight or visit Commonwealth dot com
• 0:47
  Speaker 1: to learn more. And when we want to learn more
• 0:49
  Speaker 1: about the Fed, where they are and where they are heading,
• 0:51
  Speaker 1: we often call on William Pool. Bill Pool is former
• 0:55
  Speaker 1: feder Reserve, a Bank of St. Louis president and senior
• 0:59
  Speaker 1: fellow at the Cato Institute and very busy traveling around
• 1:03
  Speaker 1: the world to talk to people about so many things
• 1:05
  Speaker 1: that have to do with the FED and the economy. Bill,
• 1:06
  Speaker 1: welcome back to the show. Hey, Kathleen, how are you
• 1:09
  Speaker 1: just great? You know um coincidentally to you coming on
• 1:13
  Speaker 1: the show today. Our our team of FED reporters from
• 1:16
  Speaker 1: around the world, led by Craig Torres in Washington, did
• 1:19
  Speaker 1: it a story with a triffic headline and a great
• 1:23
  Speaker 1: of content. FED deluge of dots and discord leaves global
• 1:27
  Speaker 1: markets baffled. Is this a fair charge? Uh? Probably? I
• 1:33
  Speaker 1: think he also leaves the FED itself baffled. Why and
• 1:38
  Speaker 1: in what way? Well, I think the f O m
• 1:41
  Speaker 1: c IS is really sort of uh screwed up in
• 1:45
  Speaker 1: its communications approach. Uh. You may remember last year, at
• 1:53
  Speaker 1: this time we got past the September meeting, there was
• 1:57
  Speaker 1: all this speculation about liftoff, and the FED had promised
• 2:02
  Speaker 1: lift off, seemed to promise lift off with the dot
• 2:04
  Speaker 1: diagram in and eventually in December meeting last year they
• 2:13
  Speaker 1: did it. Uh. It didn't make very much difference, and
• 2:17
  Speaker 1: as one could reasonably expect basis points, there's not much
• 2:21
  Speaker 1: of a move. And I think it's true that the
• 2:25
  Speaker 1: UH long bond long long bonds in the US are
• 2:29
  Speaker 1: actually lower than they were a year ago, so it
• 2:32
  Speaker 1: didn't lift off long treasuries. So now they're doing exactly
• 2:39
  Speaker 1: the same thing. It appears. If assuming that at the meeting,
• 2:45
  Speaker 1: our September meeting next week, when I say our, there's
• 2:50
  Speaker 1: UH that they passed again, which is the market betting,
• 2:54
  Speaker 1: then they're going to come up to December, and depending
• 2:59
  Speaker 1: on what they say in September, UH, if they leave
• 3:05
  Speaker 1: some guidance in effect, that they're going to have another
• 3:09
  Speaker 1: rate increase in six and then we'll play the game
• 3:14
  Speaker 1: all over again. Uh. So the problem is that this
• 3:20
  Speaker 1: this whole communications strategy of the forward guidance is deeply,
• 3:27
  Speaker 1: deeply flawed. It's not as if we haven't been here.
• 3:32
  Speaker 1: When I was on the f O m C, we
• 3:35
  Speaker 1: went around and about over exactly the same issue back
• 3:40
  Speaker 1: in the early part I guess we would say the
• 3:43
  Speaker 1: early part of the century. At that time, it had
• 3:46
  Speaker 1: to do with the so called tilt language, or the
• 3:49
  Speaker 1: bias of the bias language, or the balance of risks language.
• 3:56
  Speaker 1: And I eventually came to the view that this whole
• 4:00
  Speaker 1: approach of trying to provide market guidance was ill advised
• 4:06
  Speaker 1: and the reason is very simple that at the time
• 4:09
  Speaker 1: that we've tried to provide any such advice, things change,
• 4:14
  Speaker 1: and in that case, we will have been in a
• 4:17
  Speaker 1: place where we've provided this advice. But then the world
• 4:22
  Speaker 1: has changed, it didn't come out exactly the way we
• 4:24
  Speaker 1: thought it was going to come out, and then the
• 4:27
  Speaker 1: forward guidance doesn't look so sensible anymore. Never does work
• 4:33
  Speaker 1: out the way you think it's going to. There are
• 4:34
  Speaker 1: always things that you don't understand, and one of the
• 4:37
  Speaker 1: things I don't understand, Billpool, is that asset prices are
• 4:40
  Speaker 1: high while consumer price the CPI, the Consumer Price index
• 4:45
  Speaker 1: is not accelerating. What's up with that? Well, what's up
• 4:49
  Speaker 1: with that is that the obviously the economies growth is low.
• 4:59
  Speaker 1: G d P growth has been low. It's the weakest
• 5:02
  Speaker 1: recovery um since World War Two. And I believe that
• 5:07
  Speaker 1: the reason for that is that there have been uh
• 5:12
  Speaker 1: two major depressants, if you will. One is the budgetary
• 5:19
  Speaker 1: uncertainty and the possibility of tax increases in the future,
• 5:27
  Speaker 1: and that's really staring us in the face now with
• 5:30
  Speaker 1: the demographics changes that we have known about for a
• 5:34
  Speaker 1: long time UH coming. And then the other the the
• 5:39
  Speaker 1: regulatory constraints on economic activity. We're going through this again
• 5:46
  Speaker 1: in the news. We've got this Dakota pipeline situation, and
• 5:51
  Speaker 1: to me, it's just crazy because pipelines are clearly both
• 5:57
  Speaker 1: more efficient, that is, lower costs and safer than transporting
• 6:01
  Speaker 1: oil by rail or by truck, and it takes the
• 6:06
  Speaker 1: pressure off the rail and the highway infrastructure. Uh, it's
• 6:11
  Speaker 1: just nutty. It just doesn't make any sense. And yet
• 6:14
  Speaker 1: that there's there's where we are. This Dakota pipeline is
• 6:17
  Speaker 1: now tied up in the courts. Uh. We had another
• 6:21
  Speaker 1: situation that I've looked at rather closely. He's taking stock
• 6:26
  Speaker 1: the FED in Focus on bloom Word Radio, The FED
• 6:30
  Speaker 1: in Focus with William Pool. Bill Pool is senior fellow
• 6:34
  Speaker 1: at the Cato Institute, former president of the St. Louis
• 6:37
  Speaker 1: Federal Reserve. He joins us, Now, Bill Pool, I beg
• 6:41
  Speaker 1: your pardon. You were concluding your thoughts and adding some
• 6:44
  Speaker 1: more and just wanted to focus on asset prices, high
• 6:47
  Speaker 1: inflation constrained. Go ahead, tell us more. Okay, the the
• 6:54
  Speaker 1: feed is always made clear, and it's especially clear when
• 6:59
  Speaker 1: they started this to the statements of policy intentions, uh, strategy,
• 7:05
  Speaker 1: where they had the inflation target. That there is UH
• 7:12
  Speaker 1: no way that the FED can control real conditions, real
• 7:16
  Speaker 1: economic conditions, such as the long run rate of unemployment.
• 7:21
  Speaker 1: So the same thing is true of the rate of
• 7:24
  Speaker 1: productivity growth. Federal reserve has nothing to do with that,
• 7:28
  Speaker 1: And the same thing is true of the real rate
• 7:31
  Speaker 1: of interest. So it looks as though the FED has
• 7:36
  Speaker 1: influenced over the rate of interest because it sets the
• 7:39
  Speaker 1: federal funds rate, but that's only the short rate in
• 7:43
  Speaker 1: the short run, and it is fundamentally constrained by the
• 7:48
  Speaker 1: productivity of the economy. The demand, the underlying demand for
• 7:53
  Speaker 1: funds to finance investment. Investment has been slow to recover
• 7:58
  Speaker 1: in this recovery period, and that's an essential feature of
• 8:04
  Speaker 1: this recovery. So I think that the UH that the
• 8:10
  Speaker 1: market analysts have generally underplayed the importance of various environmental
• 8:19
  Speaker 1: especially constraints on expansion of infrastructure such as pipelines. And
• 8:29
  Speaker 1: the reason that companies aren't building this stuff is that
• 8:33
  Speaker 1: they're not allowed to. It's just very simple. And so
• 8:37
  Speaker 1: if you go to great lengths, as the Jordan's cove
• 8:42
  Speaker 1: case for the Federal Regulator, the UH that case that
• 8:50
  Speaker 1: came to ahead last March, the Energy Regulatory Commission denied
• 8:56
  Speaker 1: permission to go ahead to build an export terminal and
• 9:00
  Speaker 1: that was the end of it. So why should companies
• 9:03
  Speaker 1: go to the expense of preparing an environmental impact statement
• 9:07
  Speaker 1: when they're going to get chopped off by this vague
• 9:12
  Speaker 1: standard of public bill. Here's one thing, though, I don't understand.
• 9:15
  Speaker 1: I know you could argue that the amount of regulation
• 9:19
  Speaker 1: and the kind of constraints on various kinds of investments
• 9:22
  Speaker 1: have increased over the years, but that's been in a
• 9:23
  Speaker 1: place for a while. And what hasn't been in place
• 9:26
  Speaker 1: for a while is this current zero interest rate policy
• 9:29
  Speaker 1: and in fact, in some cases negative rates in other countries.
• 9:33
  Speaker 1: And we've seen this and very low bond yields, and
• 9:35
  Speaker 1: I do I am curious what you would say in
• 9:38
  Speaker 1: response to Jim Low, who's this It's just me Jim Tiss,
• 9:42
  Speaker 1: who's the CEO of Lows, speaking to a Bloomberg event today. Uh.
• 9:47
  Speaker 1: He says that this policy hasn't worked. Uh. He says
• 9:51
  Speaker 1: the Fed has gotten itself into a hole of zero
• 9:54
  Speaker 1: interest rates and they don't know how to get out,
• 9:56
  Speaker 1: and in fact that the keeping the yield suppression is
• 10:01
  Speaker 1: hurting investors, right, it's harder to get yield. How do
• 10:04
  Speaker 1: you respond to that? Is the Fed a fault there?
• 10:05
  Speaker 1: And should they start raising rates as a result? The
• 10:08
  Speaker 1: Federal Reserve cannot raise rates above what the market will support.
• 10:14
  Speaker 1: The demand for funds around the world is weak because
• 10:21
  Speaker 1: of the demand for investment, physical investment, which is financed
• 10:28
  Speaker 1: through the bond markets. So the Federal Reserve can no
• 10:32
  Speaker 1: more raise the rate of interest than the Department of
• 10:37
  Speaker 1: Agriculture can simply double the price of wheat. It's just
• 10:42
  Speaker 1: that simple bill pool. If there is an inflation target
• 10:48
  Speaker 1: of let's say this coming from a speech by San
• 10:52
  Speaker 1: Francisco FED President John Williams earlier in the month, Uh,
• 10:58
  Speaker 1: what would you think that would do to asset prices?
• 11:00
  Speaker 1: Do you think that he doesn't care what it does
• 11:02
  Speaker 1: two asset prices? And you think that he reflects the
• 11:05
  Speaker 1: thinking of Janet Yellen share the feeder reserve? Well, I
• 11:09
  Speaker 1: have no idea about Janet Yellen's views on that, although
• 11:12
  Speaker 1: I think that she has reinforced the view that the
• 11:15
  Speaker 1: two percent target will be retained. What I find strange
• 11:20
  Speaker 1: about the argument of changing the target to four percent
• 11:24
  Speaker 1: is that the Fed can't even get up to two percent,
• 11:26
  Speaker 1: and what instruments does it are available to even get
• 11:31
  Speaker 1: the two percent? The Feed has been struggling to get
• 11:34
  Speaker 1: even to two percent. So the argument that joined the
• 11:37
  Speaker 1: four would be helpful is one that I just don't understand.
• 11:41
  Speaker 1: If I'm going to raise the key rate this year,
• 11:43
  Speaker 1: is it not gonna happen. I don't know what the
• 11:48
  Speaker 1: Fed is going to do. That's part of the problem.
• 11:49
  Speaker 1: The Fed itself doesn't know what it's gonna do. Alright, Well,
• 11:55
  Speaker 1: we're gonna leave it there. Bill Poll always always, i'd
• 11:57
  Speaker 1: like to talk to you. Thank you so very much
• 11:59
  Speaker 1: for joining us. Bill is former president of the Federals
• 12:01
  Speaker 1: at Bank of St. Louis, so he's been there and
• 12:04
  Speaker 1: done that. Though we've got a kind of a a brave
• 12:05
  Speaker 1: new world of zero rates since Bill took over that
• 12:09
  Speaker 1: office and then left. I'm Kathleen Hayes along with Pim Fox.
• 12:13
  Speaker 1: This is taking Stock. Got a lot more coming up
• 12:16
  Speaker 1: on the show. Keep it right here. This is Bloomberg