Latest / THINK BEFORE YOU SLEEP / How They Got People To Support Murder

Transcript

How They Got People To Support Murder · THINK BEFORE YOU SLEEP

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: This is the story of a boy and a girl.
• 0:03
  Speaker 1: It's a universal story. This is the biggest story behind
• 0:07
  Speaker 1: violence against women. This story doesn't have a happy ending
• 0:12
  Speaker 1: because this is the story of how gender inequality contributes
• 0:16
  Speaker 1: to the murder of one Australian woman almost every week.
• 0:20
  Speaker 2: Almost one a week? So that's like 40, maybe 45
• 0:23
  Speaker 2: per year. I mean, that's not very many. If America
• 0:25
  Speaker 2: had those numbers, we'd be one of the safest places
• 0:27
  Speaker 2: in the world.
• 0:28
  Speaker 1: Here's the story of a regular woman. As a girl,
• 0:30
  Speaker 1: she gets told how pretty she is, never how clever
• 0:33
  Speaker 1: she is, that if she wears a short dress, she's
• 0:36
  Speaker 1: asking for it.
• 0:37
  Speaker 2: Why don't you ask the audience which religious group of
• 0:40
  Speaker 2: men are regularly saying that sexual assault is okay if
• 0:43
  Speaker 2: the girl is wearing certain clothes? Alright, so obviously if
• 0:46
  Speaker 2: you're older than like 15, videos like this are ancient history,
• 0:49
  Speaker 2: and the information in them has long been since debunked
• 0:52
  Speaker 2: or elaborated on, such as, you know, initiating domestic violence
• 0:55
  Speaker 2: occurs pretty equally between men and women. But the reason
• 0:58
  Speaker 2: we're getting a blast from the past here is because
• 1:00
  Speaker 2: a follower of mine sent me a message request saying
• 1:02
  Speaker 2: that they're still teaching this material for freshmen in high school.
• 1:05
  Speaker 1: They have the same education and do similar work. Yet
• 1:08
  Speaker 1: he earns more money. He's quickly promoted, like other men
• 1:11
  Speaker 1: in the company, while she gets overlooked.
• 1:14
  Speaker 2: Oh my god, the wage gap! What a throwback! I'm
• 1:17
  Speaker 2: getting nostalgic over old grifts that were obvious lies. However, unfortunately,
• 1:21
  Speaker 2: they still worked when it comes to their intended purpose,
• 1:23
  Speaker 2: which was not to tell people something truthful. It was
• 1:26
  Speaker 2: to convert them into a certain political team and then
• 1:28
  Speaker 2: eventually into radicalism, and it was very effective at doing
• 1:32
  Speaker 2: that as we have gone from a relatively peaceful society
• 1:34
  Speaker 2: domestically into almost complete depravity for large segments of the population.
• 1:39
  Speaker 2: In a short 10-20 year period, we've become a place
• 1:42
  Speaker 2: where an uncomfortably large percentage of the population supports terrorist attacks, murderers,
• 1:47
  Speaker 2: and the willful harm of children. Let's talk about how
• 1:50
  Speaker 2: that happened, but first, one of the best ways to
• 1:52
  Speaker 2: save money on your auto insurance is to check out
• 1:55
  Speaker 2: multiple different companies at the same time and see which
• 1:58
  Speaker 2: one's willing to give you the best deal. That's where
• 2:00
  Speaker 2: Smarter Auto comes in. Smarter Auto allows you to compare
• 2:03
  Speaker 2: rates with different home and auto insurance companies so that
• 2:07
  Speaker 2: you can decide which one's the best for your budget.
• 2:09
  Speaker 2: If you want to see if you can save money
• 2:11
  Speaker 2: on your insurance, then all you have to do is
• 2:13
  Speaker 2: answer a couple of questions, and in as little as
• 2:16
  Speaker 2: two minutes, you might be able to find a better
• 2:18
  Speaker 2: company that will give you a more affordable deal. A
• 2:20
  Speaker 2: little while back, I felt like I was overpaying for insurance,
• 2:23
  Speaker 2: and I was able to drop my premiums by almost
• 2:26
  Speaker 2: 20% and still get the same coverage, just by checking
• 2:29
  Speaker 2: out what other companies were offering, so I would say
• 2:31
  Speaker 2: it's worth it to check out SmarterAuto to see if
• 2:33
  Speaker 2: you're being overcharged. Just scan the QR code on screen,
• 2:37
  Speaker 2: or click on the first link in the description. Alright,
• 2:39
  Speaker 2: so many people are kind of shocked and surprised at
• 2:42
  Speaker 2: all the morally repulsive behavior that we've seen over the
• 2:45
  Speaker 2: past few years, and don't really understand how we got here.
• 2:48
  Speaker 2: People are asking questions like, how do we go from
• 2:50
  Speaker 2: wearing pink to protest a president that we don't like,
• 2:53
  Speaker 2: to wearing pink to show love and support for a
• 2:55
  Speaker 2: woman who admitted to brutally murdering her three children? Now,
• 2:59
  Speaker 2: when it comes to how people were convinced to go
• 3:01
  Speaker 2: to that extreme, well, the psychological conditioning for it started
• 3:04
  Speaker 2: decades ago. However, I think the origin of this most
• 3:07
  Speaker 2: recent segment of radicalism started with what people are now
• 3:10
  Speaker 2: calling woke one, which is an ideology that has the
• 3:13
  Speaker 2: internet littered with many old tweets that many supporters of
• 3:16
  Speaker 2: woke one are trying to distance themselves from.
• 3:19
  Speaker 3: I have a local city councilman that has this saying,
• 3:25
  Speaker 3: woke one was crazy.
• 3:26
  Speaker 4: Woke one was crazy.
• 3:29
  Speaker 2: Yeah, but what was crazy about it? Because like 10
• 3:31
  Speaker 2: seconds later, she goes on to essentially agree with the
• 3:34
  Speaker 2: woke one take.
• 3:35
  Speaker 5: You briefly supported the idea of defunding the police.
• 3:38
  Speaker 3: Well, you know, I think the doors were really open
• 3:42
  Speaker 3: in trying to entertain any and every policy that was
• 3:46
  Speaker 3: going to get us to a better place. And I
• 3:48
  Speaker 3: actually think that the discussions that were had in that
• 3:52
  Speaker 3: time were quite fruitful. I think that when we talk
• 3:57
  Speaker 3: about crime today, it's fundamentally different than the way that
• 4:00
  Speaker 3: we talked about crime. You know, during lockdown, Of course,
• 4:04
  Speaker 3: rhetoric in that time is not rhetoric that we would
• 4:06
  Speaker 3: use today.
• 4:07
  Speaker 2: So it wasn't crazy then because you haven't changed your opinion.
• 4:10
  Speaker 2: You're just saying it differently in the hopes that it'll
• 4:12
  Speaker 2: trick more people into being on your side. These DSA
• 4:15
  Speaker 2: party members are trying to lie and rewrite the actual
• 4:17
  Speaker 2: history by saying, oh, it's only been a couple of years.
• 4:21
  Speaker 2: Woke one was COVID. Gee, that's very, we've always been
• 4:24
  Speaker 2: at war with East Asia of you. Woke one was
• 4:27
  Speaker 2: not five years ago. Woke one was around 12 to
• 4:29
  Speaker 2: 14 years ago.
• 4:31
  Speaker 6: Woke 1.0 started long ago. Long ago when being woke
• 4:35
  Speaker 6: was called being an SJW. Back when Anita Sarkeesian was
• 4:39
  Speaker 6: public enemy number one. And I identify as an attack helicopter,
• 4:43
  Speaker 6: believe it or not, was a joke young people told.
• 4:45
  Speaker 6: And not your 65-year-old.
• 4:47
  Speaker 7: Uncle on Facebook.
• 4:48
  Speaker 6: This was Woke 1.0. Learn what mansplaining is, and then
• 4:53
  Speaker 6: stop doing it.
• 4:54
  Speaker 2: Oh my god, would someone go tell that Foy to
• 4:56
  Speaker 2: go back to the kitchen? There were so many nonsense
• 4:59
  Speaker 2: arguments like that back in the day that were kind
• 5:01
  Speaker 2: of a risk to talk about, because after Anita Sarkeesian
• 5:04
  Speaker 2: and Zoe Quinn got brutally destroyed by every critic who
• 5:07
  Speaker 2: was allowed to speak freely, people started getting censored and
• 5:10
  Speaker 2: deplatformed on multiple social media websites at the same time.
• 5:14
  Speaker 2: Woke One primarily became about cancel culture when the Gamergate
• 5:17
  Speaker 2: drama died down, and after 2016, if you criticized a
• 5:21
  Speaker 2: stupid BuzzFeed video, you could lose your entire livelihood if
• 5:25
  Speaker 2: you didn't word your criticisms correctly. which is a problem
• 5:28
  Speaker 2: because one of the most effective initial tactics that were
• 5:31
  Speaker 2: used in that era to convert people into radicalism was
• 5:34
  Speaker 2: just making shit up.
• 5:35
  Speaker 1: This story isn't a one-off. It's a story shared by
• 5:38
  Speaker 1: one in four Australian women who have experienced physical or
• 5:41
  Speaker 1: sexual violence from a current or former partner. And it's
• 5:44
  Speaker 1: a story of one in five women since the age
• 5:47
  Speaker 1: of 15 who experienced sexual violence, including rape, one in
• 5:51
  Speaker 1: four emotional violence, and one in three women physical violence.
• 5:56
  Speaker 1: But it's also a story that affects children. More than
• 5:59
  Speaker 1: half of the women who experienced violence had children in
• 6:03
  Speaker 1: their care when the violence occurred.
• 6:04
  Speaker 2: Now, you would think that if you had all these numbers,
• 6:07
  Speaker 2: then you would list source citations for them so people
• 6:09
  Speaker 2: could verify if they were true or not. No, of
• 6:12
  Speaker 2: course not. Woke One was full of college graduates doing
• 6:15
  Speaker 2: the one thing that will get you expelled from college,
• 6:18
  Speaker 2: which is not citing resources for these statistical claims that
• 6:21
  Speaker 2: you make. When I was in college, not citing your
• 6:23
  Speaker 2: sources was basically considered to be a crime. But like
• 6:27
  Speaker 2: I said, all of the fake statistics worked. It got
• 6:29
  Speaker 2: tons of people to believe that domestic violence was a
• 6:32
  Speaker 2: one-sided issue. It got people to believe all women.
• 6:35
  Speaker 8: First and foremost, this TikTok account, under the name of Emily,
• 6:38
  Speaker 8: accused me of rape. Even in light of the fact
• 6:40
  Speaker 8: that this allegation is obviously.
• 6:42
  Speaker 2: Fake, Uh, well, not those women. And we had to
• 6:45
  Speaker 2: deal with years of people saying that women get paid
• 6:47
  Speaker 2: less than men for doing the same work, which wasn't
• 6:50
  Speaker 2: true because that had been very illegal for decades. So
• 6:54
  Speaker 2: Woke One wasn't COVID. Woke One was this.
• 6:57
  Speaker 9: Check out this ship, right?
• 6:59
  Speaker 10: Right?
• 6:59
  Speaker 8: It's so gay.
• 7:00
  Speaker 11: It's really gay.
• 7:01
  Speaker 12: Dude, look at those pants.
• 7:03
  Speaker 13: Please don't say that.
• 7:05
  Speaker 14: What?
• 7:06
  Speaker 12: Don't say that something is gay when you mean that
• 7:08
  Speaker 12: something is dumb or stupid.
• 7:10
  Speaker 13: It's insulting.
• 7:11
  Speaker 10: When you say that's so gay, do you realize what
• 7:13
  Speaker 10: you say?
• 7:14
  Speaker 15: Knock it off.
• 7:15
  Speaker 2: God, she is so bossy. But I remember when this
• 7:18
  Speaker 2: commercial came out, literally everyone was saying it was gay.
• 7:21
  Speaker 9: What is dark woke?
• 7:23
  Speaker 16: Dark woke is just Democrats are just as woke as
• 7:27
  Speaker 16: we were in woke 1.0.
• 7:29
  Speaker 9: The messaging is what's important.
• 7:31
  Speaker 17: It is aggressive.
• 7:32
  Speaker 2: Like, I have been Dark Woke before Dark Woke was invented.
• 7:36
  Speaker 2: You know what I mean? Like, this is the headquarters
• 7:39
  Speaker 2: of Dark Woke. That quite possibly is the gayest name
• 7:42
  Speaker 2: they could have given that.
• 7:43
  Speaker 6: Dark Woke, get it? It's like woke, but we're mean.
• 7:46
  Speaker 13: You already are mean! That's why people hated you!
• 7:49
  Speaker 2: Yeah, did we forget the whole it's not sir, it's
• 7:51
  Speaker 2: ma'am period where all the Wokeys thought it was okay
• 7:54
  Speaker 2: to physically assault people and cause property damage? Not because
• 7:57
  Speaker 2: someone was intentionally using the wrong pronouns. but because it was, like,
• 8:01
  Speaker 2: 2016 and nobody knew what the hell you were talking about.
• 8:04
  Speaker 2: Not to mention that the constant virtue signaling from these
• 8:06
  Speaker 2: people was so performative and annoying.
• 8:09
  Speaker 18: Do people, like, come up to you after the show,
• 8:11
  Speaker 18: for example, and, like, you know, be like, oh, hey,
• 8:13
  Speaker 18: you know, I really liked your show, but, like, this
• 8:15
  Speaker 18: joke was kind of weird. Because you hear about, like,
• 8:17
  Speaker 18: comedians doing that, right? Like, after the show, they'd, like,
• 8:20
  Speaker 18: go into the crowd and be like, meet the fans.
• 8:22
  Speaker 15: Or, like, you know.
• 8:23
  Speaker 19: It turns out it's really easy when you're not transphobic.
• 8:28
  Speaker 19: if you're not saying racist shit transphobic shit homophobic shit
• 8:32
  Speaker 19: it's real easy to like put on a show without
• 8:34
  Speaker 19: those jokes in there it's really easy not to punch down.
• 8:36
  Speaker 20: On yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah guys it's easy just
• 8:40
  Speaker 20: say the popular thing and no one will hate you
• 8:43
  Speaker 20: it's funny because immediately before this he was talking about
• 8:46
  Speaker 20: going on stage and calling christians pedos But I guess
• 8:48
  Speaker 20: jokes like that are fine as long as they aren't
• 8:50
  Speaker 20: about LGBT people.
• 8:51
  Speaker 19: I had a joke about being an altar boy and
• 8:53
  Speaker 19: then I was saying like teenage years got dark or
• 8:56
  Speaker 19: whatever and it was like a joke about Basically hinting
• 8:59
  Speaker 19: at like.
• 9:00
  Speaker 9: Priest versus altar boy culture.
• 9:01
  Speaker 2: Right, right, right.
• 9:02
  Speaker 19: But not saying anything about it, obviously, just letting the
• 9:04
  Speaker 19: audience like make that interpretation. And then I was like, no,
• 9:07
  Speaker 19: not that kind of show. And people would laugh, but
• 9:09
  Speaker 19: Salt Lake City did not.
• 9:11
  Speaker 2: Jeez, this guy is annoying. And the impulse to do
• 9:13
  Speaker 2: the popular thing is really one of the primary ways
• 9:16
  Speaker 2: that people have been convinced to absorb stupid ideology. You
• 9:19
  Speaker 2: just find some super agreeable people and show them ads
• 9:22
  Speaker 2: like this. Right, so we have the white lady with
• 9:33
  Speaker 2: a very slightly taller Asian man who are being married
• 9:35
  Speaker 2: by a black woman. I'm guessing this is some sort
• 9:37
  Speaker 2: of dunk on Christianity as they promote Islam, who, you know,
• 9:40
  Speaker 2: would be very actively hostile to all the gay couples
• 9:43
  Speaker 2: that are shown in this ad. It's an ad for
• 9:45
  Speaker 2: a bank, by the way. A lot of these super
• 9:47
  Speaker 2: woke ads are made by banks because they want to
• 9:50
  Speaker 2: make sure they promote that ESG narrative. So between stuff
• 9:53
  Speaker 2: like that and every old movie being rewritten for modern audiences,
• 9:57
  Speaker 2: you get what's called social proof. That's why they're doing it. it,
• 10:00
  Speaker 2: by the way. Seeing these things in media creates social
• 10:02
  Speaker 2: acceptance of them because we build our moral framework off
• 10:05
  Speaker 2: of what we see in our local environment and through
• 10:08
  Speaker 2: the stories that are told to us, which is why
• 10:10
  Speaker 2: all of our favorite movies and favorite TV shows and
• 10:12
  Speaker 2: favorite video games are being remade and retold. It's to
• 10:15
  Speaker 2: change people's morals, and I think these remakes are being
• 10:18
  Speaker 2: made to be trash on purpose. to take the good
• 10:20
  Speaker 2: morals that the originals taught us and replace them with
• 10:23
  Speaker 2: more modern ways of thinking. I know I say this
• 10:26
  Speaker 2: a lot in videos, but I cannot understate how important
• 10:28
  Speaker 2: these movies and media IPs are when it comes to
• 10:31
  Speaker 2: affecting our behaviors. Also, there's a reason why they parasite
• 10:35
  Speaker 2: off of properties that are already popular instead of making
• 10:37
  Speaker 2: original works. It's because the values they're promoting are so
• 10:41
  Speaker 2: uncompelling from a natural perspective that they wouldn't do well
• 10:44
  Speaker 2: in a new IP, often because they're taking villains or
• 10:47
  Speaker 2: very selfish people and tried to make them look like heroes.
• 10:50
  Speaker 2: It's incredibly difficult to write stories like that and have
• 10:53
  Speaker 2: them be popular, because people typically aren't compelled by selfish characters.
• 10:57
  Speaker 2: Case in point, remember the Snow White remake where they
• 11:00
  Speaker 2: took Snow White and made her Snow Brown? Well, the
• 11:03
  Speaker 2: reason that movie had to be remade is because Snow
• 11:05
  Speaker 2: White is a landmark film in America's history because it
• 11:08
  Speaker 2: was the first feature-length animated film in a time where
• 11:10
  Speaker 2: there was very little respect for animation. A lot of
• 11:13
  Speaker 2: the really old animations weren't that good because there was
• 11:16
  Speaker 2: no real narrative to them, And Disney is a massive
• 11:19
  Speaker 2: company because they were the first ones to do a
• 11:21
  Speaker 2: good job at storytelling in that market. They were so
• 11:24
  Speaker 2: on the cutting edge of technology that almost a hundred
• 11:26
  Speaker 2: years later, Snow White is still watchable. So of course,
• 11:29
  Speaker 2: now that Disney is dead and can't protect his IP,
• 11:32
  Speaker 2: it's time to defile it to push a propaganda narrative
• 11:35
  Speaker 2: for modern audiences. And I have to say that what
• 11:37
  Speaker 2: they did to Snow White in the remake is downright offensive.
• 11:41
  Speaker 2: Walt Disney would have been pissed. You know how we
• 11:43
  Speaker 2: had this cover of a kind-looking woman? Yeah, well now
• 11:46
  Speaker 2: we're going to make her look like a bitch. I mean, seriously,
• 11:48
  Speaker 2: who did the art direction on this? If I knew
• 11:51
  Speaker 2: nothing about this movie and just looked at the poster,
• 11:53
  Speaker 2: I would have said that Snow White was a villain. Oh,
• 11:56
  Speaker 2: and don't forget to make sure to rewrite major plot
• 11:58
  Speaker 2: points to fit the social narrative that we want. She's
• 12:01
  Speaker 2: not going to be saved.
• 12:02
  Speaker 15: By the prince.
• 12:02
  Speaker 21: She's not going to be saved by the prince, and
• 12:04
  Speaker 21: she's not going to be dreaming about true love. She's
• 12:06
  Speaker 21: dreaming about becoming the leader she knows she can be,
• 12:09
  Speaker 21: and the leader that her late father told her that
• 12:11
  Speaker 21: she could be if she was fearless, fair, brave, and true.
• 12:14
  Speaker 2: Okay, so she's going to become a girl boss instead
• 12:16
  Speaker 2: of a wife. I've never seen that one before. However,
• 12:19
  Speaker 2: I think the most offensive change is the context in
• 12:21
  Speaker 2: which Snow White and the dwarves meet. I find it
• 12:24
  Speaker 2: offensive because it seems to me like the change was
• 12:26
  Speaker 2: made to teach women to be selfish. In the original,
• 12:29
  Speaker 2: Snow White escapes into the forest after the huntsman warns
• 12:32
  Speaker 2: her that the queen is trying to kill her. She
• 12:34
  Speaker 2: then sees an empty house, assumes that orphaned children live there,
• 12:38
  Speaker 2: and starts cooking and cleaning because she doesn't think they
• 12:40
  Speaker 2: have anyone to take care of them.
• 12:42
  Speaker 22: What a cute little chair. Why, there's seven little chairs.
• 12:46
  Speaker 22: Must be seven little children. And from the look of
• 12:49
  Speaker 22: this table, seven untidy little children. You'd think their mother would...
• 12:56
  Speaker 22: Maybe they have no mother. Then they're orphans. We'll clean
• 13:00
  Speaker 22: the house and surprise them. Then maybe they'll let me stay.
• 13:03
  Speaker 2: Yeah, none of this conversation is in the remake, because
• 13:05
  Speaker 2: certainly they can't include the parts where Snow White shows
• 13:07
  Speaker 2: that she is delighted by the idea of children like
• 13:10
  Speaker 2: that last clip. and they definitely aren't going to show
• 13:12
  Speaker 2: the part where she prays.
• 13:13
  Speaker 22: Bless the seven little men who have been so kind
• 13:16
  Speaker 22: to me, and may my dreams come true.
• 13:20
  Speaker 14: Amen.
• 13:21
  Speaker 2: Now, keep in mind that Snow White is royalty, and
• 13:24
  Speaker 2: she's still cooking and cleaning and doing her part to
• 13:26
  Speaker 2: help the household. In the remake, though, instead of helping out,
• 13:30
  Speaker 2: Snow Brown enters the house and immediately goes to bed,
• 13:33
  Speaker 2: really only thinking of herself.
• 13:35
  Speaker 21: She's dreaming about becoming the leader she knows she can be.
• 13:38
  Speaker 21: And the leader that her late father told her that
• 13:40
  Speaker 21: she could be if she was fearless, fair, brave, and true.
• 13:42
  Speaker 2: I don't know, does freeloading sound fair to the dwarves?
• 13:45
  Speaker 2: I mean, they definitely aren't breaking any negative stereotypes against
• 13:48
  Speaker 2: Latinos in this movie. Which kind of begs the question,
• 13:51
  Speaker 2: why would the dwarves help Snow Brown? She broke into
• 13:54
  Speaker 2: their house, started using their stuff without permission, and then
• 13:57
  Speaker 2: she says, Yeah, so also a queen is trying to
• 14:00
  Speaker 2: kill me, so my presence here puts you in danger.
• 14:03
  Speaker 2: At least when Snow White breaks into their house in
• 14:05
  Speaker 2: the original, she cleans it and makes food, and that's
• 14:07
  Speaker 2: how she convinces the dwarves to let her stay. Snow
• 14:10
  Speaker 2: Brown offers nothing in return for the cost the dwarves
• 14:12
  Speaker 2: are taking on by housing her, but I guess that's
• 14:15
  Speaker 2: fine because we need to accept all the refugees. I mean,
• 14:18
  Speaker 2: this movie is so obvious about the politics that it's
• 14:20
  Speaker 2: trying to spread that I almost mistook it for Elysium.
• 14:23
  Speaker 2: Just look at the difference between how they carry out
• 14:25
  Speaker 2: the cleaning scenes.
• 14:26
  Speaker 22: Now you wash the dishes, you tidy up the room,
• 14:29
  Speaker 22: you clean the fireplace... And I'll use the broom.
• 14:33
  Speaker 2: In the original, you can see Snow White contributing. On
• 14:36
  Speaker 2: the other hand, this is what happens in the remake.
• 14:38
  Speaker 2: For context, this scene takes place the day after she
• 14:41
  Speaker 2: meets the dwarves.
• 14:42
  Speaker 23: Now you wash the dishes. You tidy up the room.
• 14:48
  Speaker 23: Come on! You clean those cobwebs. And he'll use the broom. Me?
• 14:57
  Speaker 2: I like how they put extra emphasis on the fact
• 14:59
  Speaker 2: that Snow Brown would not be using the broom. so
• 15:01
  Speaker 2: they risk their lives to let her live there, and
• 15:03
  Speaker 2: she orders them to clean their house without really helping them.
• 15:06
  Speaker 2: A man could literally be saving your life and a
• 15:09
  Speaker 2: modern feminist will still see cleaning as an insult, which
• 15:12
  Speaker 2: is a real testament to how much these assholes have
• 15:14
  Speaker 2: eroded our culture, because during the time that Snow White
• 15:16
  Speaker 2: came out, the insult to women would be suggesting that
• 15:19
  Speaker 2: they can't clean or cook. Back in the day, they
• 15:22
  Speaker 2: got offended by instant cake mix because it was too
• 15:24
  Speaker 2: easy and made women look incapable, whereas modern women see
• 15:28
  Speaker 2: instant cake mix as an expert-level challenge.
• 15:31
  Speaker 9: Should I use my hands?
• 15:32
  Speaker 24: Wait, so it actually means use hands?
• 15:35
  Speaker 25: Because the box says mix and blend by hand until
• 15:39
  Speaker 25: there are no large clumps.
• 15:41
  Speaker 2: Geez, no wonder people didn't buy her cookies. The last
• 15:44
  Speaker 2: noticeable difference in these two versions is the way Snow
• 15:47
  Speaker 2: White acts versus Snow Brown. When Snow White wants to
• 15:50
  Speaker 2: correct someone's behavior, she's kind and gentle.
• 15:53
  Speaker 11: Oh!
• 15:54
  Speaker 22: No, no, no, no! Put them in the tub!
• 15:57
  Speaker 2: However, when Snow Brown wants to correct behavior... She says
• 16:00
  Speaker 2: it like some Karen from HR who is constantly staring
• 16:03
  Speaker 2: over your shoulder. When Snow White gives feedback, it comes
• 16:10
  Speaker 2: off as a helpful suggestion. When Snow Brown does it,
• 16:13
  Speaker 2: it looks like an order. She's quite bossy. Pay attention
• 16:17
  Speaker 2: to this, because these remakes are made for kids, and
• 16:19
  Speaker 2: they will subconsciously model the behaviors that they see from
• 16:22
  Speaker 2: the hero figures. The original Snow White uses charm to
• 16:25
  Speaker 2: get people to listen to her, whereas Snow Brown says
• 16:28
  Speaker 2: things in a way that makes you think every sentence
• 16:30
  Speaker 2: should be followed with or else. I mean, look at
• 16:32
  Speaker 2: this face that she makes at the end of the song. Again,
• 16:35
  Speaker 2: she looks like a villain, and it's important to point
• 16:37
  Speaker 2: this out because one of the most effective ways to
• 16:40
  Speaker 2: radicalize people is to teach them bad values that they
• 16:43
  Speaker 2: think will work, and then as those people get older
• 16:46
  Speaker 2: and don't get what they want after years of trying,
• 16:48
  Speaker 2: they'll become bitter and far easier to manipulate into saying,
• 16:52
  Speaker 2: well guys, is someone gonna do it? One of you
• 16:55
  Speaker 2: has to be brave and just do it. Snow White
• 16:57
  Speaker 2: from 1937 is like an 80-minute long handbook on how
• 17:00
  Speaker 2: to be feminine, so of course a bunch of Marxist
• 17:03
  Speaker 2: DEI flunkies want to destroy that.
• 17:06
  Speaker 26: Once upon a time, there was a peaceful kingdom governed
• 17:09
  Speaker 26: by a virtuous queen who believed that the true beauty
• 17:13
  Speaker 26: of her land was not to be measured in gems
• 17:16
  Speaker 26: or jewels, but in its people.
• 17:19
  Speaker 2: Right, you gotta make sure you have an anti-capitalist sentiment
• 17:22
  Speaker 2: in there at the end. Walt Disney was very famously
• 17:25
  Speaker 2: against communism. he would be disgusted to see all of
• 17:28
  Speaker 2: the communist dog whistles that were in this film.
• 17:31
  Speaker 27: Paul, you were a farmer. You had a grove of
• 17:34
  Speaker 27: cherry trees, and when they would blossom, you would invite
• 17:37
  Speaker 27: the village to come and pick them, to share them.
• 17:40
  Speaker 23: Matthew, you were a baker.
• 17:42
  Speaker 27: You never turned anyone away if they were hungry, even
• 17:45
  Speaker 27: if they didn't have a coin left in their pocket.
• 17:48
  Speaker 2: Yeah, just give everything away for free. Morality is when
• 17:51
  Speaker 2: the ruling class tells farmers and bakers that they shouldn't
• 17:54
  Speaker 2: expect to be compensated for their services. Well, most of
• 17:57
  Speaker 2: us would just call that slavery. Now, if you think
• 18:00
  Speaker 2: that this stuff doesn't work because Snow Brown bombed in
• 18:02
  Speaker 2: the box office, then allow me to point out that
• 18:04
  Speaker 2: the remake of the cleaning song is pretty well received,
• 18:07
  Speaker 2: even by people who didn't like the movie. Great, so
• 18:10
  Speaker 2: play it for your kids a bunch of times so
• 18:11
  Speaker 2: they'll start acting like Rachel Zegler does in the song.
• 18:14
  Speaker 2: Kids don't pick up on the logic of the movie.
• 18:16
  Speaker 2: They just copy whatever actions the adults around them are doing.
• 18:20
  Speaker 2: And because kids don't know differently, to them, this is
• 18:23
  Speaker 2: Snow White. They probably aren't even aware that it's a remake.
• 18:26
  Speaker 2: I mean, Disney's own daughter didn't know that he was
• 18:28
  Speaker 2: the Walt Disney until she was six. As well as
• 18:31
  Speaker 2: other stuff like Star Wars, the sequel trilogy is Star
• 18:34
  Speaker 2: Wars to a lot of kids. Remember, The Force Awakens
• 18:37
  Speaker 2: did quite well. And even if younger people eventually do
• 18:41
  Speaker 2: see the original trilogy when they're older, it doesn't matter
• 18:43
  Speaker 2: because their first moral experience was with the bad Star
• 18:46
  Speaker 2: Wars movies with the Mary Sue character. Not every parent
• 18:49
  Speaker 2: is an avid fan who will make sure their kids
• 18:51
  Speaker 2: see the movies in the correct order. This stuff is
• 18:53
  Speaker 2: targeted at normies who are far easier to influence. And
• 18:57
  Speaker 2: by the way, if you don't think that these are
• 18:58
  Speaker 2: intentional choices that modern writers are making, then allow me
• 19:02
  Speaker 2: to say that all the stuff that I'm talking about
• 19:04
  Speaker 2: here is storytelling 101. It's very apparent to writers. And
• 19:08
  Speaker 2: if you pay close attention, you'll see them doing this
• 19:11
  Speaker 2: stuff in modern media all the time. For example, I'm
• 19:14
  Speaker 2: a little late to this show, but I just started
• 19:15
  Speaker 2: watching Arcane, and the message is all over it. We
• 19:19
  Speaker 2: have little girls who can beat up fully grown adult men.
• 19:22
  Speaker 2: you have African-American girl bosses, and white men are constantly
• 19:26
  Speaker 2: getting emasculated or embarrassed.
• 19:28
  Speaker 14: Do I look afraid?
• 19:30
  Speaker 15: No, you look weak.
• 19:33
  Speaker 28: For your birthday, counselor.
• 19:35
  Speaker 29: Oh, Mel, this is too kind.
• 19:38
  Speaker 1: And I bought you some ginkgo nuts.
• 19:42
  Speaker 2: Don't you know I'm allergic?
• 19:43
  Speaker 30: You hurt him.
• 19:44
  Speaker 23: They won't stop.
• 19:45
  Speaker 15: We need to fight back.
• 19:48
  Speaker 23: And if you won't.
• 19:42
  Speaker 31: The scary part of Arcane is that the writing is
• 19:54
  Speaker 31: actually pretty good, unlike the typical DEI slop, though I've
• 19:57
  Speaker 31: only seen three episodes, so that could change.
• 19:59
  Speaker 2: The point is that I think it's a mistake to
• 20:01
  Speaker 2: only focus on the failures that are promoting the message,
• 20:04
  Speaker 2: because there are many of these DEI propaganda stories like Arcane,
• 20:07
  Speaker 2: or even slop like The Force Awakens, that are huge
• 20:10
  Speaker 2: hits in terms of audience size. But wouldn't it be
• 20:13
  Speaker 2: nice if I could just watch a show without having
• 20:15
  Speaker 2: to check if there's subversive propaganda in it? And wouldn't
• 20:18
  Speaker 2: it be nice as well if activists at schools weren't
• 20:20
  Speaker 2: trying to subversively propagandize students without their knowledge?
• 20:24
  Speaker 8: Many people assume if they attend a private institution like
• 20:27
  Speaker 8: Southern Methodist University that they'll be able to avoid radically
• 20:31
  Speaker 8: divisive DEI. Unfortunately, they're wrong.
• 20:35
  Speaker 16: I was hoping to see.
• 20:36
  Speaker 11: If y'all had any existing equity trainings that maybe y'all
• 20:41
  Speaker 11: provide for staff, faculty.
• 20:45
  Speaker 30: So all of that is held through our Office of
• 20:47
  Speaker 30: Cultural Intelligence.
• 20:49
  Speaker 24: As you can probably imagine, we've had.
• 20:51
  Speaker 32: To do a lot of maneuvering in order to remain
• 20:55
  Speaker 32: kind of hidden.
• 20:56
  Speaker 8: Much like the public universities, they just rename the programs
• 20:59
  Speaker 8: and keep doing the same work.
• 21:01
  Speaker 33: So it was the Office of Diversity and Inclusion, which
• 21:04
  Speaker 33: is now the Office of Cultural Encouragement.
• 21:06
  Speaker 2: If you think any of this is new, then I
• 21:07
  Speaker 2: must say that they've been secretly inserting DEI messaging into
• 21:10
  Speaker 2: everything at least since the 80s. Around that time, they
• 21:13
  Speaker 2: changed the symbolic meaning of the Rosie the Riveter poster
• 21:16
  Speaker 2: from the 1940s to propagandize everyone into thinking that women
• 21:19
  Speaker 2: can do manual labor jobs just as well as men can.
• 21:22
  Speaker 2: Then you put the we-can-do-it-too messaging into lots of media,
• 21:26
  Speaker 2: and people will accept that because it will lead to
• 21:28
  Speaker 2: good movies like Aliens or Mulan, or shows like the
• 21:31
  Speaker 2: Avatar series if you pretend that Korra is non-canon. But
• 21:34
  Speaker 2: what you'll also get is a bunch of unrealistic nonsense
• 21:37
  Speaker 2: where female action heroes are beating up hordes of men.
• 21:40
  Speaker 2: And if you don't think this is affecting people's ideas,
• 21:43
  Speaker 2: then allow me to polarize this video a bit by
• 21:45
  Speaker 2: talking about guns. To all the people who I've used
• 21:48
  Speaker 2: a firearm before, How many people have you seen turn
• 21:51
  Speaker 2: their pistols to the side because they saw it in
• 21:53
  Speaker 2: a movie? How many people don't know a bullet will
• 21:55
  Speaker 2: go right through most tables in most sections of a car?
• 21:58
  Speaker 2: How many times have you watched people stand in the
• 22:00
  Speaker 2: danger zone of a firearm because they see people doing
• 22:03
  Speaker 2: that in movies or on TV shows? By the way,
• 22:06
  Speaker 2: it's not just the camera guy who is standing directly
• 22:08
  Speaker 2: in the line of fire of those officers' guns. There's
• 22:10
  Speaker 2: like 20 people behind him, and there are tons of
• 22:12
  Speaker 2: other people circled around the cops while they had guns drawn.
• 22:16
  Speaker 2: It is a miracle that no innocent bystanders were hit.
• 22:19
  Speaker 2: So you just put like a ton of unrealistic shit
• 22:21
  Speaker 2: in movies and like every other piece of media, and
• 22:24
  Speaker 2: then a bunch of people who are ignorant will start
• 22:26
  Speaker 2: to believe the falsehood that you told them and act accordingly.
• 22:29
  Speaker 2: And this is phenomenally effective. How many people think they're
• 22:32
  Speaker 2: lawyers because they watch crime shows? Those shows constantly get
• 22:36
  Speaker 2: stuff wrong and quite honestly, frequently show cops that are
• 22:39
  Speaker 2: doing things that are illegal and then portraying them as
• 22:42
  Speaker 2: morally justified. How many times have you watched a cop
• 22:45
  Speaker 2: enter someone's house without a warrant or permission on a
• 22:47
  Speaker 2: TV show? Or when it comes to propaganda, they'll promote
• 22:50
  Speaker 2: mass surveillance in the new Spider-Man movie during the time
• 22:53
  Speaker 2: that they're trying to get people to accept flock cameras.
• 22:55
  Speaker 2: Spider-Man Brand New Day is yet another movie where multiple
• 22:59
  Speaker 2: heroes are doing some pretty bad stuff, yet the writers
• 23:01
  Speaker 2: try to portray those actions as morally justified. One more example.
• 23:05
  Speaker 2: CPR is so bad on TV shows that they will
• 23:08
  Speaker 2: tell you in CPR classes to not do what you
• 23:10
  Speaker 2: see on television. So the point is that if you
• 23:13
  Speaker 2: show a bunch of movies for decades with girl bosses
• 23:16
  Speaker 2: beating up fully grown men... and then mix that with
• 23:18
  Speaker 2: ironically sexist DEI campaigns, then eventually you'll convince enough people
• 23:23
  Speaker 2: that it's a good idea to make tons of officers female.
• 23:53
  Speaker 2: The guy who drove is just laughing at them. But
• 23:56
  Speaker 2: does anyone want to take guesses on how we get
• 23:57
  Speaker 2: to the point where we have two obese female cops
• 24:00
  Speaker 2: who can't catch a male suspect? And believe it or not,
• 24:02
  Speaker 2: this is not the only time that this has happened
• 24:04
  Speaker 2: in Texas. A bunch of we-can-do-it-too propaganda in movies for
• 24:08
  Speaker 2: jobs that women are definitely not strong enough to do
• 24:10
  Speaker 2: It's how you get a situation like this where a
• 24:12
  Speaker 2: possible criminal gets away because the officers are too physically
• 24:15
  Speaker 2: incompetent to catch him. Also, in what world are you
• 24:18
  Speaker 2: allowed to be fat at a job that requires you
• 24:21
  Speaker 2: to run? Oh right, it's the world where we had
• 24:23
  Speaker 2: 10 years of media saying that being 400 pounds is healthy.
• 24:27
  Speaker 2: And like I said before, it doesn't matter if it's
• 24:30
  Speaker 2: not true and it's been well debunked. They still won
• 24:32
  Speaker 2: because people still think it's acceptable to have fat cops,
• 24:36
  Speaker 2: fat firefighters, and fat soldiers. So with all that said,
• 24:39
  Speaker 2: stuff like the Karen behavior from Snow Brown is making
• 24:42
  Speaker 2: women more hostile towards men.
• 24:44
  Speaker 21: We have a different approach to what I'm sure a
• 24:46
  Speaker 21: lot of people will assume is a love story just because, like,
• 24:49
  Speaker 21: we cast a guy in the movie. Andrew Burnap, great dude.
• 24:53
  Speaker 21: It's really not about the love story at all. All
• 24:56
  Speaker 21: of Andrew's scenes could get cut.
• 24:57
  Speaker 23: Who knows?
• 24:58
  Speaker 6: It's Hollywood, baby.
• 24:59
  Speaker 2: The idea here is that you target people who are
• 25:01
  Speaker 2: on the fringes of radicalization against men, you bring them
• 25:04
  Speaker 2: into your worldview, and then over time, They will do
• 25:07
  Speaker 2: your work for you to convince less radicalized people over
• 25:10
  Speaker 2: to their way of thinking. And if you do that enough,
• 25:12
  Speaker 2: eventually you'll have numerous women who have no problem saying
• 25:16
  Speaker 2: stuff like this.
• 25:17
  Speaker 30: If I was ever elected president, my first law would
• 25:19
  Speaker 30: be that women are allowed to kill one man a year,
• 25:22
  Speaker 30: no consequence, right? And everyone's like, oh my gosh, that's crazy.
• 25:25
  Speaker 30: That's so violent.
• 25:26
  Speaker 14: Not really.
• 25:26
  Speaker 30: Women kill with purpose. We don't kill for no reason.
• 25:29
  Speaker 30: I think that's the code. Like, we just gotta do that.
• 25:32
  Speaker 2: First of all, presidents can't make laws. That's Congress. Never
• 25:36
  Speaker 2: be shocked when these people don't even know the basics
• 25:38
  Speaker 2: of how our government works. Second, of course there's a
• 25:41
  Speaker 2: child in the background while she's saying all this.
• 25:43
  Speaker 30: Two, because women kill for a three, because women kill
• 25:46
  Speaker 30: a purpose, we would finally weed out all those bad
• 25:49
  Speaker 30: apples you guys talk about when you guys get so
• 25:51
  Speaker 30: offended by why women would choose the bear, we would
• 25:53
  Speaker 30: actually take care of the bad ones, and then I
• 25:56
  Speaker 30: feel like crime.
• 25:56
  Speaker 34: Would go down.
• 25:57
  Speaker 2: Yeah, I bet she'll hold that last opinion right up
• 25:59
  Speaker 2: until she finds out what cultures and or religious practices...
• 26:02
  Speaker 2: are more likely to lead to the bad ones.
• 26:05
  Speaker 35: If I could press a button and kill all the men,
• 26:06
  Speaker 35: I would fucking do it. And yeah, I know we're
• 26:08
  Speaker 35: going to lose a couple good men, but like, this
• 26:09
  Speaker 35: is war. Women have been under attack fucking forever, and
• 26:13
  Speaker 35: we need to go to war with the men. And yeah,
• 26:15
  Speaker 35: in war, sometimes you lose good men. But it's definitely
• 26:18
  Speaker 35: a sacrifice we should be willing to make. Okay, I
• 26:21
  Speaker 35: know we need to kill the men. That's like very dramatic. Okay,
• 26:23
  Speaker 35: but it's not dramatic. I'm being 100% fucking serious. We
• 26:26
  Speaker 35: need to kill the fucking men because an abuser doesn't
• 26:29
  Speaker 35: stop abusing.
• 26:30
  Speaker 2: Wait, she might have been right about that last part
• 26:32
  Speaker 2: if we apply it to certain people who commit certain crimes.
• 26:35
  Speaker 2: But the fact that she thinks that she would be
• 26:36
  Speaker 2: able to get anywhere close to winning that war shows
• 26:39
  Speaker 2: how effective the we-can-do-it-too propaganda has been. Remember that teenage
• 26:43
  Speaker 2: boys can defeat an Olympic-level women's soccer team. And outside
• 26:47
  Speaker 2: of nonsense like that, and while it was fun to
• 26:49
  Speaker 2: make fun of these people back in 2016... It's starting
• 26:52
  Speaker 2: to get a lot less fun when their rhetoric is
• 26:54
  Speaker 2: turning into actual terrorist attacks.
• 26:56
  Speaker 36: This is a 20-minute video of Hasan calling for political
• 27:00
  Speaker 36: violence and extremism. This is the person who now has
• 27:03
  Speaker 36: had three or four instances of his fans being arrested
• 27:09
  Speaker 36: for domestic terrorism.
• 27:11
  Speaker 2: And convicted, too. You can go look up the tweet
• 27:14
  Speaker 2: if you want to see the 20 minutes of encouraging
• 27:16
  Speaker 2: terrorism and Twitch allowing it despite it being a violation
• 27:19
  Speaker 2: of their TOS. But this is being brought up because
• 27:21
  Speaker 2: recently body cam footage of an organized terrorist attack on
• 27:25
  Speaker 2: an ICE facility in Texas where they shot a cop
• 27:27
  Speaker 2: was released.
• 27:28
  Speaker 37: On Independence Day, 2025, a group of anti-ice activists were
• 27:32
  Speaker 37: dropped off at the Prairieland Ice Detention Center in Alvarado, Texas.
• 27:36
  Speaker 37: Most walked along the western side of the facility and
• 27:38
  Speaker 37: shot fireworks, while another individual split off and engaged in
• 27:42
  Speaker 37: apparent acts of vandalism, tagging buildings and ice vehicles, kicking
• 27:45
  Speaker 37: out taillights. As local responding officers arrive, all the demonstrators
• 27:49
  Speaker 37: begin fleeing the scene except for Benjamin Song, who's armed
• 27:52
  Speaker 37: with a rifle and intends to use it.
• 27:53
  Speaker 15: I'm hit!
• 28:07
  Speaker 2: The officer lived, by the way. And no, guys, this
• 28:10
  Speaker 2: is not a traffic stop. You were caught at a
• 28:11
  Speaker 2: crime scene. They had probable cause to search you. You
• 28:14
  Speaker 2: think they weren't going to search you when a guy
• 28:16
  Speaker 2: just opened fire on them?
• 28:17
  Speaker 15: Is there any other guns in the car? There's some
• 28:19
  Speaker 15: in the backseat.
• 28:20
  Speaker 38: In the backseat?
• 28:21
  Speaker 36: This is just like a straight coordinated terror attack.
• 28:27
  Speaker 15: We got like six people, trauma kits, plates, ARs, all.
• 28:31
  Speaker 14: Sorts of stuff.
• 28:32
  Speaker 39: What's up on the car?
• 28:34
  Speaker 15: My friends asked me to watch them when they went
• 28:35
  Speaker 15: to the car. Who are those friends?
• 28:37
  Speaker 8: I don't remember their names.
• 28:39
  Speaker 15: Where'd you find them?
• 28:40
  Speaker 40: You wouldn't tell me that this guy just met people
• 28:44
  Speaker 40: online and drove him and didn't notice that they put.
• 28:46
  Speaker 35: A bunch of shit in his car. Riley, how many
• 28:48
  Speaker 35: people did.
• 28:49
  Speaker 15: He have in his car?
• 28:50
  Speaker 2: Officer, please don't misgender the terrorist. It's how many people
• 28:53
  Speaker 2: did she have in her car? So they have water bags,
• 28:56
  Speaker 2: trauma kits, a whole load of guns at 11 p.m.
• 28:59
  Speaker 2: at night, and they want you to believe that this
• 29:01
  Speaker 2: is a peaceful protest.
• 29:02
  Speaker 15: What are you doing out here?
• 29:03
  Speaker 41: I was a peacefully protesting officer, and then I saw y'all.
• 29:06
  Speaker 41: I got scared.
• 29:07
  Speaker 42: I ran away.
• 29:07
  Speaker 15: I'm so sorry.
• 29:08
  Speaker 8: I let off some Roman candles and stuff like that.
• 29:11
  Speaker 15: I just got, I'm so sorry.
• 29:13
  Speaker 43: I got PTSD.
• 29:15
  Speaker 44: Watch the crossfire.
• 29:19
  Speaker 22: He's part of the group.
• 29:21
  Speaker 15: I thought it was a peaceful protest, joined a group.
• 29:24
  Speaker 8: I thought that would be tame and then it just
• 29:26
  Speaker 8: went to shit.
• 29:27
  Speaker 15: People started smashing shit, spray painting shit.
• 29:30
  Speaker 14: I got a can of spray paint thinking, oh, I'm
• 29:33
  Speaker 14: going to make a sign and stuff like that.
• 29:35
  Speaker 15: That's just my protest bag, so I got everything to
• 29:37
  Speaker 15: make signs and stuff like that. I just thought it
• 29:38
  Speaker 15: would be tame.
• 29:40
  Speaker 2: Was a peaceful protest. Yeah, you're full of shit. I
• 29:43
  Speaker 2: want you to notice how many criminals will play victim
• 29:45
  Speaker 2: and try to get sympathy from you the second that
• 29:47
  Speaker 2: they're caught. It's one of the most commonly used tactics
• 29:49
  Speaker 2: from criminals, so just ignore all the crying and pay
• 29:52
  Speaker 2: attention to the facts. Like the fact that he admits
• 29:54
  Speaker 2: to firing explosives, which is something that these Antifa idiots
• 29:57
  Speaker 2: love doing in crowds of people, and he had spray
• 30:00
  Speaker 2: paint on him, and even though everyone else was using
• 30:03
  Speaker 2: the spray paint for vandalism, which is not peaceful, he
• 30:06
  Speaker 2: was the only guy who didn't. He was just making signs. Yeah, bullshit.
• 30:11
  Speaker 2: So anyway, everyone who got caught got sentences that were
• 30:13
  Speaker 2: over a decade. Here's the best part. You see this guy,
• 30:17
  Speaker 2: the one who shot the officer? He was the leader
• 30:19
  Speaker 2: of the group, and well, if you do a little search,
• 30:21
  Speaker 2: you can find him on Twitter asking Hasan Piker to
• 30:23
  Speaker 2: buy him a rifle so he can go do terrorism.
• 30:26
  Speaker 36: This is not the first time a terrorist has been
• 30:29
  Speaker 36: a fan of Hasan.
• 30:31
  Speaker 9: Twitch is a terrorist platform.
• 30:32
  Speaker 2: The great thing is that this guy can't delete the
• 30:34
  Speaker 2: tweet after it went viral because he's in jail. Nor
• 30:37
  Speaker 2: can he scrub his account where he's calling Gavin Newsom,
• 30:40
  Speaker 2: of all people, a Nazi for the one time that
• 30:42
  Speaker 2: he had a good take, which is that we should
• 30:43
  Speaker 2: arrest criminals. Now, as a creator, I must say that
• 30:46
  Speaker 2: if a random crazy person in your audience does something bad,
• 30:50
  Speaker 2: I don't think you're responsible for that. There was that
• 30:52
  Speaker 2: guy who shot some Republicans in the name of Bernie Sanders.
• 30:55
  Speaker 2: I don't think Bernie is responsible for that. However, if
• 30:58
  Speaker 2: you're an influencer and we have 20 minutes of you
• 31:00
  Speaker 2: encouraging terrorism on multiple occasions... and people in your audience
• 31:04
  Speaker 2: start committing terrorist attacks, then I do think you're responsible,
• 31:07
  Speaker 2: especially if you defend the terrorists.
• 31:09
  Speaker 45: It's not reasonable that Song got 100 years to literally
• 31:13
  Speaker 45: save someone's life. Guys, I'm not talking about how long
• 31:17
  Speaker 45: his sentence is, okay? I'm not discussing how long his
• 31:20
  Speaker 45: sentence is. I'm saying, of course, there's going to be
• 31:22
  Speaker 45: people that are prosecuted if a cop gets shot, even
• 31:26
  Speaker 45: if it's an act of self-defense by the person who
• 31:28
  Speaker 45: shot the cop, okay?
• 31:29
  Speaker 2: Yeah, it was definitely not self-defense. You can easily see
• 31:32
  Speaker 2: that in the footage. So the context is that they're
• 31:42
  Speaker 2: engaged in a terrorist attack. Ben has a weapon drawn.
• 31:45
  Speaker 2: You can hear one of the cops say that, by
• 31:46
  Speaker 2: the way. He was given a lawful order to stop,
• 31:49
  Speaker 2: and then he fires after the order. That is not self-defense.
• 31:53
  Speaker 2: That's a burglar entering your house. You tell him to leave,
• 31:56
  Speaker 2: and then he shoots you.
• 31:57
  Speaker 9: I'm saying.
• 31:58
  Speaker 45: it's understandable that there was a prosecution that took place
• 32:00
  Speaker 45: in that instance, okay? What's not appropriate in any way, shape,
• 32:04
  Speaker 45: or form is not only the long sentences that they got,
• 32:07
  Speaker 45: but also the fact that there are people who were
• 32:09
  Speaker 45: not even there.
• 32:10
  Speaker 2: What are you talking about? If you assist in a
• 32:13
  Speaker 2: terrorist attack by like, I don't know, trying to destroy evidence,
• 32:16
  Speaker 2: then you definitely should be prosecuted for that, even if
• 32:19
  Speaker 2: you weren't at the event. And just like the movies
• 32:21
  Speaker 2: are influencing people into certain behaviors, this kind of rhetoric
• 32:25
  Speaker 2: is convincing people to commit terrorist attacks. And more importantly,
• 32:28
  Speaker 2: Hasan isn't beating around the bush or making his standpoints unclear.
• 32:32
  Speaker 2: He is directly supporting it and encouraging it. So at
• 32:34
  Speaker 2: what point is he legally responsible for when his fans
• 32:37
  Speaker 2: shoot innocent people?
• 32:38
  Speaker 9: Why does this happen?
• 32:40
  Speaker 36: It happens because Twitch is run by a bunch of
• 32:42
  Speaker 36: people that support terrorism. Like, Twitch is basically running a
• 32:46
  Speaker 36: terror cell, right? I think that people should report Twitch
• 32:49
  Speaker 36: to the government. They should be like, listen, you know,
• 32:52
  Speaker 36: there are multiple accounts here in communities on this website.
• 32:56
  Speaker 36: that are like openly advocating for terrorism. There's been instances
• 33:00
  Speaker 36: of the people that are from these communities committing terrorist acts.
• 33:04
  Speaker 36: You know, you probably should look into this and see
• 33:06
  Speaker 36: why it's happening, right? As a matter of national security.
• 33:10
  Speaker 2: Yeah, I agree. It's a national security threat because it's
• 33:12
  Speaker 2: not like Twitch is ignorant of this stuff. I mean,
• 33:14
  Speaker 2: if Twitch's most popular streamers were streaming child sexual abuse
• 33:18
  Speaker 2: material and Twitch didn't take it down or ban the accounts,
• 33:21
  Speaker 2: they would get in trouble from the government. So at
• 33:23
  Speaker 2: what point should Twitch be held accountable for allowing their
• 33:26
  Speaker 2: streamers to openly call for terrorist attacks or violence against individuals?
• 33:30
  Speaker 2: This is not a new thing. Hassan has been calling
• 33:33
  Speaker 2: for the murder of innocent people for years. What about
• 33:35
  Speaker 2: democratic mayors?
• 33:37
  Speaker 15: It's like, what the fuck are you talking about, dude?
• 33:39
  Speaker 45: We're fucking talking about socialized medicine and you can turn
• 33:43
  Speaker 45: around and you and you can ask a question about
• 33:46
  Speaker 45: murderous cities and their democratic mayors.
• 33:49
  Speaker 17: I will fuck.
• 33:50
  Speaker 18: I want to kill him, dude.
• 33:52
  Speaker 2: Oh, my God. He did the we just want free
• 33:54
  Speaker 2: health care meme like eight years early. Maybe he is
• 33:56
  Speaker 2: the original dark woke. Now, you could say that, well,
• 33:59
  Speaker 2: this was a long time ago, he wasn't that serious,
• 34:02
  Speaker 2: and we all say messed up things sometimes. Except, when
• 34:05
  Speaker 2: Charlie was murdered, Hassan had zero emotions about it, he
• 34:08
  Speaker 2: went on to immediately attack him, and about a year later,
• 34:11
  Speaker 2: he goes on stage to make fun of Charlie getting shot.
• 34:13
  Speaker 28: We all know Charlie Kerr is not a rich.
• 34:17
  Speaker 15: Old boy.
• 34:22
  Speaker 17: So this is him on the live show celebrating the
• 34:24
  Speaker 17: murder of Charlie Kirk. This is Hasan Piker with like
• 34:26
  Speaker 17: generic streamer guys.
• 34:28
  Speaker 2: All right.
• 34:29
  Speaker 17: These aren't like political streamers. These are generic streamer bros
• 34:32
  Speaker 17: that they all get together to celebrate the assassination of
• 34:35
  Speaker 17: a good man, a father and a husband. Carried the
• 34:37
  Speaker 17: flame tonight.
• 34:38
  Speaker 14: All right.
• 34:39
  Speaker 2: Him in his Mao suit.
• 34:41
  Speaker 15: Right.
• 34:41
  Speaker 2: Outside of Hasan, these are streamers that appeal to lots
• 34:43
  Speaker 2: of normies and they're promoting super radical shit like you
• 34:46
  Speaker 2: should get to kill people for debating college students. And
• 34:49
  Speaker 2: they aren't the only ones, as more and more we're
• 34:51
  Speaker 2: seeing how many of these happy-go-lucky social media influencers have
• 34:55
  Speaker 2: some very messed up beliefs.
• 34:56
  Speaker 19: Yo, what's up?
• 34:58
  Speaker 23: You look hungry.
• 35:00
  Speaker 46: You look like Charlie Kirk.
• 35:02
  Speaker 9: You want to get Kirk'd?
• 35:04
  Speaker 2: Was this not the same guy who said that we
• 35:05
  Speaker 2: can't make jokes about trans people because it might offend
• 35:08
  Speaker 2: them and cause them to end their own lives, which,
• 35:10
  Speaker 2: by the way, is statistically untrue? This was another false
• 35:13
  Speaker 2: narrative that these people have just relentlessly repeated without showing
• 35:16
  Speaker 2: relevant data. like how many of them were homeless or
• 35:19
  Speaker 2: drug abusers or victims of childhood trauma, which are far
• 35:22
  Speaker 2: more likely to cause suicidality than being misgendered. So this
• 35:25
  Speaker 2: guy is going to say that we can't make a
• 35:27
  Speaker 2: joke based on someone's sexuality, but you can make a
• 35:29
  Speaker 2: joke about the victim of a murder? Considering his point, though, ironically,
• 35:33
  Speaker 2: Charlie Kirk was killed by a gay guy. Wait, I
• 35:35
  Speaker 2: can't say that because I wouldn't want to punch down
• 35:37
  Speaker 2: on the murderer. However, what exactly did Charlie Kirk even
• 35:40
  Speaker 2: say that was so bad? He was just like, hey,
• 35:43
  Speaker 2: I just got back from Japan. I like how there's
• 35:45
  Speaker 2: barely any crime there. And then three days later, he
• 35:47
  Speaker 2: was dead. Again, what did he say that was so bad?
• 35:50
  Speaker 2: Was it because he was against abortion?
• 35:53
  Speaker 24: If Jesus were giving his sermon today, he might also
• 35:57
  Speaker 24: have said, Blessed are those who end pregnancies, for they
• 36:03
  Speaker 24: will be known for their loving kindness. I have been
• 36:09
  Speaker 24: pregnant four times. I have had two abortions, and I
• 36:13
  Speaker 24: have two amazing children.
• 36:15
  Speaker 2: Okay, so what you actually mean is that you have
• 36:17
  Speaker 2: two dead kids and two kids who got lucky that
• 36:19
  Speaker 2: you chose not to kill.
• 36:21
  Speaker 24: Each of my reproductive decisions, to have children and not
• 36:26
  Speaker 24: to have children, were sacred decisions. Because they reflect the
• 36:31
  Speaker 24: moral responsibility of reproductive power that is part of our
• 36:36
  Speaker 24: inheritance as human creatures. Reimagining our theological understanding of abortion
• 36:42
  Speaker 24: is essential... to addressing the violence that is being done
• 36:47
  Speaker 24: to people across the country in the name of Christianity.
• 36:51
  Speaker 2: They're going to reimagine the Bible for modern audiences. Yeah,
• 36:55
  Speaker 2: that's called going to hell. But outside of that, I
• 36:57
  Speaker 2: looked at every argument that Charlie Kirk made that his
• 37:00
  Speaker 2: critics have used to call him evil, and the scary
• 37:02
  Speaker 2: part is that he was just saying things that most
• 37:05
  Speaker 2: people would agree with. Meanwhile, his opposition says shit like this.
• 37:09
  Speaker 40: When a gender reveal happens, and I find out, Remember.
• 37:28
  Speaker 2: That thing where it was like, going to get an
• 37:30
  Speaker 2: ultrasound to see if I'm having a girl or an abortion?
• 37:33
  Speaker 2: There's a reason why people are mad about the abortion issue,
• 37:36
  Speaker 2: because as time goes on, more and more, it's become
• 37:38
  Speaker 2: very apparent that politically, this issue was never about safe, legal,
• 37:42
  Speaker 2: and rare. The original political intent was always to use
• 37:46
  Speaker 2: it as a common form of birth control.
• 37:47
  Speaker 5: I really hate the argument about abortion where people say, well,
• 37:50
  Speaker 5: I don't care if they get an abortion as long
• 37:52
  Speaker 5: as they're not using it as birth control.
• 37:54
  Speaker 4: Because honestly, I don't care if somebody's using it as
• 37:56
  Speaker 4: birth control.
• 37:57
  Speaker 6: I really don't.
• 37:58
  Speaker 5: I would 100% rather somebody use abortion as birth control
• 38:02
  Speaker 5: than raising a kid that they cannot take care of.
• 38:06
  Speaker 13: Any fucking reason. Financially unstable. Mentally unstable.
• 38:09
  Speaker 28: Inactive addiction.
• 38:10
  Speaker 4: Working too much. Can't properly love the child.
• 38:12
  Speaker 13: You just don't fucking want one. Whatever your reasoning is.
• 38:15
  Speaker 30: Protect the fucking kids at all costs.
• 38:17
  Speaker 5: People get so mad at that, right?
• 38:18
  Speaker 13: Like, hearing that, like, that's so disgusting. How could you
• 38:21
  Speaker 13: think that? Because I actually care about kids.
• 38:23
  Speaker 30: Because I'm not fucking performative.
• 38:24
  Speaker 13: And I actually care that they get a better life.
• 38:27
  Speaker 2: I care about the kids. Doesn't recommend adoption as an alternative.
• 38:31
  Speaker 2: Real empathetic of you. Why do we need it as
• 38:33
  Speaker 2: birth control in the first place? We already have birth control. Now,
• 38:36
  Speaker 2: to clarify, almost all abortions are purely for birth control reasons.
• 38:41
  Speaker 2: Why should we be giving any respect to people who
• 38:43
  Speaker 2: are not only too irresponsible to use a condom, but
• 38:46
  Speaker 2: also so immoral that they would end a child's life
• 38:49
  Speaker 2: because they don't want to be inconvenienced by taking the
• 38:51
  Speaker 2: pregnancy to term so the baby can be adopted? On
• 38:53
  Speaker 2: top of that, the whole idea of, all it takes
• 38:56
  Speaker 2: is having sex one time is not really the reality
• 38:58
  Speaker 2: of what actually happens. The reality is that it typically
• 39:01
  Speaker 2: takes months to get pregnant when people are trying, so
• 39:04
  Speaker 2: most of the time, it's not just a one-time oopsie,
• 39:07
  Speaker 2: it's months of being irresponsible. Now, just to virtue signal
• 39:10
  Speaker 2: so people are clear on where I stand, I believe
• 39:12
  Speaker 2: that abortion is murder. And I think the suspicious part
• 39:15
  Speaker 2: is that abortion advocates never talk about adoption as an alternative,
• 39:19
  Speaker 2: nor do they talk about the morning-after pill in cases
• 39:21
  Speaker 2: of a rape, which makes me think that they're all
• 39:22
  Speaker 2: just antinatalists who are hostile towards children and are using
• 39:26
  Speaker 2: the words pro-choice and women's rights as a shield.
• 39:29
  Speaker 4: I really do believe that a woman actively choosing not
• 39:32
  Speaker 4: to become a mother is one of the most revolutionary
• 39:35
  Speaker 4: acts she can do because obviously the expectation is that
• 39:38
  Speaker 4: a woman is going to have children.
• 39:40
  Speaker 7: She's going to become a mom.
• 39:42
  Speaker 4: She's going to birth more workers for this capitalistic society.
• 39:45
  Speaker 4: And I think the person who says, no, I'm not
• 39:47
  Speaker 4: going to actually do that That's pretty profound to me.
• 39:51
  Speaker 2: Yeah, all these Marxist and weirdo environmental activists who will
• 39:54
  Speaker 2: tell people they're killing the planet by having kids are
• 39:56
  Speaker 2: really just wonderful for society. Honestly, it's my opinion that
• 40:00
  Speaker 2: many of these antinatalists actually want to make murder legal,
• 40:03
  Speaker 2: which is why we've gone from safe, legal, and rare to, hey,
• 40:06
  Speaker 2: did you know if you fly to a certain state,
• 40:08
  Speaker 2: you can abort your kid up to birth? I remember
• 40:11
  Speaker 2: just a few years ago, people would call you all
• 40:13
  Speaker 2: kinds of horrendous names for suggesting that there would be
• 40:15
  Speaker 2: up-to-birth abortions, but yet here you have a bunch of
• 40:18
  Speaker 2: liberal white women clapping as they blur the lines on
• 40:21
  Speaker 2: child murder.
• 40:22
  Speaker 42: People acting like Katie is Trump herself. I would like
• 40:23
  Speaker 42: to make it very clear. I feel like I've been very,
• 40:26
  Speaker 42: I have voted blue every year since I've got the
• 40:30
  Speaker 42: right to vote. And I've done so much advocacy work
• 40:33
  Speaker 42: for everything I believe in, you know, pro abortions, pro
• 40:36
  Speaker 42: gay rights, pro trans rights, pro freaking immigrants, pro like
• 40:41
  Speaker 42: I'm fucking like, I don't know.
• 40:42
  Speaker 8: I'm pro love.
• 40:44
  Speaker 2: I'm pro kindness.
• 40:44
  Speaker 42: I'm pro bringing people together. That's all I've ever stood for.
• 40:47
  Speaker 42: And it's just like so... devastating to hear that i'm
• 40:50
  Speaker 42: just not seen as those things anymore even though years
• 40:53
  Speaker 42: and years of years i've like been such a vocal
• 40:55
  Speaker 42: advocate that it's just like ah it's just depressing but
• 40:58
  Speaker 42: what can you.
• 40:58
  Speaker 2: Do another no guys we just want free health care
• 41:02
  Speaker 2: love and peace was this girl not in the crowd
• 41:04
  Speaker 2: that was making fun of charlie kirk's murder did she
• 41:07
  Speaker 2: not run positive pr for a guy who tortures animals
• 41:10
  Speaker 2: and has said numerous times that his fans should kill
• 41:12
  Speaker 2: people and commit terrorist acts you're an evil bitch though
• 41:16
  Speaker 2: understand i say that with love and kindness I'm so
• 41:19
  Speaker 2: tired of these idiots pretending that their hedonistic activities are
• 41:22
  Speaker 2: moral and good. And how did they come to these opinions?
• 41:25
  Speaker 2: You guessed it, TV shows.
• 41:27
  Speaker 24: You can't have a boy in your bed.
• 41:29
  Speaker 2: Why not?
• 41:30
  Speaker 23: You do.
• 41:31
  Speaker 15: I'm a grown-up.
• 41:32
  Speaker 13: I'm pregnant.
• 41:33
  Speaker 27: Are you sure?
• 41:33
  Speaker 22: Maybe.
• 41:35
  Speaker 15: Well, you're getting an abortion tomorrow.
• 41:37
  Speaker 13: No.
• 41:37
  Speaker 11: Yes.
• 41:38
  Speaker 6: We're gonna get married.
• 41:38
  Speaker 24: What are you talking about?
• 41:40
  Speaker 15: I love him!
• 41:41
  Speaker 6: And we're gonna get married, and we're gonna have a
• 41:42
  Speaker 6: lot of.
• 41:43
  Speaker 23: Babies, and we're gonna be happy!
• 41:44
  Speaker 15: Oh, for fuck's sake, Deb.
• 41:46
  Speaker 23: Why won't you ever.
• 41:47
  Speaker 25: Let me be happy?
• 41:48
  Speaker 15: I know what I want and what I don't want.
• 41:50
  Speaker 44: No, you don't.
• 41:51
  Speaker 6: You're just a kid.
• 41:52
  Speaker 43: I'm not a kid.
• 41:53
  Speaker 9: Yes, you are.
• 41:54
  Speaker 24: It's my body, my decision. You're just a kid if
• 41:57
  Speaker 24: you're willing to make a decision that could ruin the
• 41:59
  Speaker 24: rest of your life with a.
• 42:00
  Speaker 15: Boy you barely know!
• 42:01
  Speaker 2: The mom is ordering her daughter to kill the baby.
• 42:04
  Speaker 2: What about adoption? What about the baby's life? So I
• 42:07
  Speaker 2: posted this on Twitter a while back and some people said, yeah,
• 42:10
  Speaker 2: but that girl turns out to be the worst person
• 42:13
  Speaker 2: later in the show. Yes, that's the point. Her character
• 42:16
  Speaker 2: sucks because the writers are trying to convince you that
• 42:18
  Speaker 2: abortion is the right choice. And yes, they will allow
• 42:21
  Speaker 2: it to take multiple seasons of a show to convey
• 42:23
  Speaker 2: that point. If they weren't antinatalist, why can't they just
• 42:27
  Speaker 2: have an adoption arc? Maybe a conversation on contraceptives. Adoption
• 42:31
  Speaker 2: is basically never talked about on these shows, and that's
• 42:33
  Speaker 2: why it's suspicious. It's also suspicious how the morning-after pill
• 42:36
  Speaker 2: is basically never brought up when it comes to preventing
• 42:39
  Speaker 2: a pregnancy from rape. And so the reason why you
• 42:41
  Speaker 2: say that life starts at conception is because if you
• 42:44
  Speaker 2: don't say that, then crazy antinatalists will say, it's just
• 42:47
  Speaker 2: six weeks, it doesn't even have fingers yet. Oh, it's
• 42:50
  Speaker 2: only three months, it's not even a viable pregnancy. And
• 42:53
  Speaker 2: so on and so forth. But the fun part is
• 42:55
  Speaker 2: that we all thought that certainly up-to-birth abortions would be
• 42:58
  Speaker 2: as extreme as it would get. Surely once the baby
• 43:01
  Speaker 2: has taken its first breath, no one in their right
• 43:03
  Speaker 2: mind would say that you should get to end the
• 43:05
  Speaker 2: life of a child. Until Lindsay Clancy happened.
• 43:08
  Speaker 6: Women are rising up to defend Lindsay Clancy, a woman
• 43:12
  Speaker 6: who brutally took out her own three children. If you
• 43:15
  Speaker 6: are not familiar with this trial or what is going on,
• 43:17
  Speaker 6: here is a quick rundown. In January 2023, Lindsay Clancy,
• 43:21
  Speaker 6: a former labor and delivery nurse and mother of three,
• 43:24
  Speaker 6: murdered her three children, five-year-old Cora, three-year-old Dawson, and eight-month-old Callan.
• 43:30
  Speaker 6: On the evening of January 24th, Lindsay Clancy purposely sent
• 43:33
  Speaker 6: her husband, Patrick Clancy, out on a long errand. She
• 43:37
  Speaker 6: told him to pick up medication at CVS and pick
• 43:39
  Speaker 6: up food from a restaurant far away. And while he
• 43:42
  Speaker 6: was gone, she took each of her children, one by one,
• 43:45
  Speaker 6: down to the basement and strangled them to death with
• 43:48
  Speaker 6: exercise ropes. She then tried to take the coward's way
• 43:51
  Speaker 6: out by jumping out a two-story window.
• 43:54
  Speaker 15: And she's now.
• 43:54
  Speaker 6: Paralyzed in a wheelchair. The defense argues that Lindsay was
• 43:57
  Speaker 6: suffering from postpartum psychosis, and that she wasn't receiving the
• 44:02
  Speaker 6: help she needed.
• 44:03
  Speaker 2: That's the basic summary of the event, and everyone in
• 44:06
  Speaker 2: the courtroom agrees that Lindsay killed her kids. The prosecutor agrees,
• 44:10
  Speaker 2: the judge agrees, Lindsay agrees, but do you know who
• 44:13
  Speaker 2: doesn't agree? Women who watch TikTok.
• 44:16
  Speaker 15: All right, he did it.
• 44:17
  Speaker 47: Patrick did it.
• 44:18
  Speaker 15: Patrick's the one who did it.
• 44:20
  Speaker 13: Not Lindsay.
• 44:20
  Speaker 47: Because, you know, women typically don't strangle. That isn't what
• 44:25
  Speaker 47: a woman would do. I was actually in therapy today
• 44:28
  Speaker 47: and my therapist and I were talking about it. And
• 44:30
  Speaker 47: she said, I said, well, what do they do? She said, well,
• 44:32
  Speaker 47: they poison. We literally had that conversation today. And she
• 44:35
  Speaker 47: looks at me and she goes, he did it.
• 44:37
  Speaker 2: I'm not a lawyer, but you know, legally, this probably
• 44:39
  Speaker 2: qualifies as defamation on grounds of reckless disregard for the truth.
• 44:43
  Speaker 46: Do you have any opinions on what happened with Lindsay Clancy?
• 44:47
  Speaker 15: Lindsay Clancy?
• 44:49
  Speaker 40: I think the husband did it.
• 44:50
  Speaker 44: Why do you feel like Patrick did it?
• 44:52
  Speaker 15: Because the evidence points to him.
• 44:53
  Speaker 9: And where do you get a lot of your news?
• 44:56
  Speaker 38: TikTok.
• 44:56
  Speaker 2: I have to say that the fact that her husband testified,
• 44:59
  Speaker 2: but she didn't, does not work in favor of your
• 45:01
  Speaker 2: point that she's innocent. I'm not saying that defendants have
• 45:04
  Speaker 2: to testify because they often don't, but it does make
• 45:07
  Speaker 2: Patrick Clancy look like he's the one who has nothing
• 45:09
  Speaker 2: to hide. However, the trial is not about whether Lindsay
• 45:12
  Speaker 2: did it or not. The trial is about which punishment
• 45:15
  Speaker 2: she's going to receive. Lindsay is pleading insanity and you
• 45:18
  Speaker 2: have to plead guilty to do that. The argument is
• 45:21
  Speaker 2: that she wasn't in her right mind at the time
• 45:23
  Speaker 2: of the murders because of postpartum hormones and therefore could
• 45:26
  Speaker 2: not control her behavior and So she wants a lighter sentence.
• 45:29
  Speaker 6: Many Republican women and mostly Democrat women are finally coming together.
• 45:34
  Speaker 6: They're putting their differences aside. Over what, you may ask?
• 45:38
  Speaker 13: You are never going to make me hate Lindsay Clancy.
• 45:40
  Speaker 6: If you're a man dating a woman, ask her about
• 45:43
  Speaker 6: the Lindsay Clancy trial. And if she says she feels
• 45:47
  Speaker 6: bad for her, or even worse, the husband did it, run.
• 45:51
  Speaker 2: Yeah, that's the scary part. It's not just the libtards
• 45:53
  Speaker 2: this time. Lindsay Clancy is getting support from women on
• 45:56
  Speaker 2: both sides. Now, in my opinion, pleas for insanity should
• 45:59
  Speaker 2: not be allowed for serious crimes like murder or child
• 46:01
  Speaker 2: sexual abuse. You should just get the death penalty for those. Now,
• 46:05
  Speaker 2: I am willing to hear out nuance for insanity pleas,
• 46:07
  Speaker 2: like if you caused a bar fight and no one died.
• 46:10
  Speaker 2: I think that maybe an argument of I had a
• 46:12
  Speaker 2: mental breakdown could be appropriate. But if you're found guilty
• 46:15
  Speaker 2: of ending the lives of three children, you should go
• 46:17
  Speaker 2: directly to the gallows. The judge should not be trying
• 46:20
  Speaker 2: to reduce the charge from first-degree murder to manslaughter.
• 46:22
  Speaker 48: I am going to give... A manslaughter instruction in line with.
• 46:28
  Speaker 13: Basically what's on page eight.
• 46:30
  Speaker 48: If you find that the Commonwealth has not proven the
• 46:32
  Speaker 48: charges of first degree or second degree murder, you shall
• 46:36
  Speaker 48: consider the lesser offense of manslaughter. Now, manslaughter is an
• 46:42
  Speaker 48: unlawful killing unintentionally caused by wanton or reckless conduct.
• 46:47
  Speaker 2: I don't see why that would be allowed. Manslaughter can't
• 46:49
  Speaker 2: be premeditated. And it sure as hell looks like this
• 46:51
  Speaker 2: was premeditated. considering that she made sure her husband was
• 46:54
  Speaker 2: out of the home when she did it. Now, what's
• 46:56
  Speaker 2: the difference here among these charges? Well, because Massachusetts doesn't
• 47:01
  Speaker 2: have the death penalty, the maximum sentence Lindsay can get
• 47:04
  Speaker 2: is life in prison for first-degree murder. Reducing the charge
• 47:07
  Speaker 2: to manslaughter would, I believe, give her a maximum of
• 47:10
  Speaker 2: 20 years in jail per child. I stress that this
• 47:13
  Speaker 2: is a maximum sentence, meaning that she might not get
• 47:15
  Speaker 2: the full 20 years per kid, and I believe that
• 47:18
  Speaker 2: also her sentencing could get reduced at some point in
• 47:20
  Speaker 2: the future for good behavior. so I don't think she
• 47:23
  Speaker 2: would get the entire 60 years that would effectively make
• 47:25
  Speaker 2: manslaughter charges a life sentence. She very well could get
• 47:28
  Speaker 2: out before her life is over, and if Neuralink becomes
• 47:31
  Speaker 2: a viable technology by then, she could walk free after
• 47:34
  Speaker 2: strangling three kids. That's not even the worst part. It's
• 47:37
  Speaker 2: much worse than that because they're pleading insanity, and the
• 47:40
  Speaker 2: punishment for that is indefinite commitment to a mental hospital. Now,
• 47:44
  Speaker 2: that sounds harsh, but when I explain it, you're going
• 47:46
  Speaker 2: to see why I think pleas for insanity should not
• 47:48
  Speaker 2: be allowed in the case of murder. What indefinite means
• 47:51
  Speaker 2: is that she could go to a mental hospital for
• 47:53
  Speaker 2: six months, have a doctor say she's recovered, and then
• 47:57
  Speaker 2: be let out of that hospital. I was so shocked
• 47:59
  Speaker 2: to hear that this was possible during my research that
• 48:02
  Speaker 2: I contacted a lawyer and he said, yep, that's how
• 48:05
  Speaker 2: that works. So basically, this is like a potential life
• 48:08
  Speaker 2: hack for getting away with murder. And there are tons
• 48:10
  Speaker 2: of women out there who are trying to justify it
• 48:13
  Speaker 2: as morally acceptable.
• 48:14
  Speaker 32: Stop thinking about these kids as people and think about
• 48:16
  Speaker 32: them as ceramic vases for just one second for me, okay?
• 48:20
  Speaker 2: What? Yeah, don't think of these children as people. Think
• 48:24
  Speaker 2: of them as objects that you can have an oopsie with.
• 48:26
  Speaker 2: What's going on in this person's head where she thinks
• 48:28
  Speaker 2: it's appropriate to remove the context that this happened to
• 48:31
  Speaker 2: human beings? That is the context that matters, and it's
• 48:34
  Speaker 2: why people are saying that she should not be able
• 48:36
  Speaker 2: to get away with the argument of, I just had
• 48:39
  Speaker 2: a little accident.
• 48:40
  Speaker 32: I'm a forensic scientist and a former CSI. There was
• 48:42
  Speaker 32: a lot of confusion about the actual issue in the
• 48:45
  Speaker 32: Lindsay Clancy case. The issue is whether she was in
• 48:48
  Speaker 32: psychosis at the moment that she killed her children, which
• 48:50
  Speaker 32: would make her not criminally responsible. To help me make
• 48:53
  Speaker 32: this point, I want you to think of these kids
• 48:55
  Speaker 32: as if they were very expensive ceramic vases in a museum.
• 49:00
  Speaker 32: And instead of thinking about psychosis, we're going to think
• 49:03
  Speaker 32: about epilepsy. So imagine that Lindsay is in a museum
• 49:07
  Speaker 32: and she is a person with epilepsy. Epileptic Lindsay is
• 49:10
  Speaker 32: walking through this museum and there are these three priceless
• 49:14
  Speaker 32: ceramic vases there, each sitting on a little stoop. And
• 49:18
  Speaker 32: what we know happens next for a fact is that
• 49:20
  Speaker 32: Lindsay breaks those priceless They are damaged beyond repair. They
• 49:25
  Speaker 32: cannot be fixed. Everybody knows that Lindsay did it. And
• 49:29
  Speaker 32: she herself said, oh my God, I broke those vases.
• 49:31
  Speaker 32: I can't believe I did that. And the museum curator
• 49:34
  Speaker 32: is saying, you did that on purpose. And I'm going
• 49:37
  Speaker 32: to prosecute you for damaging my vases. And she's saying, no,
• 49:41
  Speaker 32: I had a seizure. I couldn't control what was happening.
• 49:44
  Speaker 32: My body was acting without me.
• 49:46
  Speaker 6: It's not my fault.
• 49:47
  Speaker 32: I had a seizure. That is what is happening in
• 49:50
  Speaker 32: this case.
• 49:50
  Speaker 2: Okay, so don't stand around a bunch of expensive stuff
• 49:53
  Speaker 2: if you know you have epilepsy. Pick a different activity
• 49:56
  Speaker 2: that's not going to a museum or like a china shop.
• 49:59
  Speaker 2: The argument against Lindsay is not just about the event.
• 50:01
  Speaker 2: It's about the numerous obvious choices that Lindsay could have
• 50:04
  Speaker 2: made to prevent this from happening. And again, I can't
• 50:07
  Speaker 2: fathom how this person finds it so easy to dehumanize
• 50:10
  Speaker 2: the victims. These were three living, breathing human children who
• 50:14
  Speaker 2: deserved a chance at life. This was not a quick
• 50:16
  Speaker 2: accident where you knock over some pottery that was expensive.
• 50:19
  Speaker 2: Not to mention, she told her husband to leave the
• 50:22
  Speaker 2: house and did it while he was away, so it
• 50:24
  Speaker 2: was not spontaneous. And then, Lindsay had to have quite
• 50:27
  Speaker 2: possibly chosen one of the least effective, most time-consuming weapons
• 50:31
  Speaker 2: for the occasion, so each child had to suffer intensely
• 50:34
  Speaker 2: for a while, as they probably were incredibly confused about
• 50:38
  Speaker 2: their mother betraying them.
• 50:39
  Speaker 13: And defense calls Dr.
• 50:41
  Speaker 25: La Pasada to say, no, it wasn't 20 or 30 seconds,
• 50:44
  Speaker 25: it was only 5 or 10 seconds until he went unconscious.
• 50:49
  Speaker 15: I'm sorry, how.
• 50:50
  Speaker 25: Many seconds is it okay for them to have been
• 50:53
  Speaker 25: in pain and panic and confusion? How about it wasn't
• 50:58
  Speaker 25: okay for one second for any of those children to
• 51:00
  Speaker 25: feel that, and they all felt it, all for up
• 51:03
  Speaker 25: to 30 seconds. Think of that, the being strangled and
• 51:08
  Speaker 25: the pain and the confusion that they're going through, and
• 51:12
  Speaker 25: it's being done by their mom. Their mom is the
• 51:16
  Speaker 25: one that's hurting them.
• 51:17
  Speaker 2: Only an incredibly evil person could do that to children
• 51:20
  Speaker 2: three times. That is torture. This person should never be
• 51:24
  Speaker 2: allowed to walk free. It is already too generous to
• 51:27
  Speaker 2: not give her the death penalty. I also think all
• 51:29
  Speaker 2: the people who want to give Lindsay a chance to
• 51:31
  Speaker 2: go free at the discretion of a doctor are straight
• 51:33
  Speaker 2: up evil too. And really, I think the point where
• 51:35
  Speaker 2: little kids are now being dehumanized and objectified started when
• 51:39
  Speaker 2: we allowed people to be convinced that life does not
• 51:41
  Speaker 2: start at conception in the conversation about abortion. Look at
• 51:45
  Speaker 2: what they do to argue that. They objectified the developing child. Oh,
• 51:49
  Speaker 2: it's just a clump of cells.
• 51:50
  Speaker 36: You want to have as much sex as possible, but
• 51:52
  Speaker 36: then I say if I get pregnant, I can kill
• 51:54
  Speaker 36: the baby.
• 51:56
  Speaker 2: That's really dark.
• 51:57
  Speaker 15: It's not killing the baby.
• 51:59
  Speaker 2: Killing what?
• 52:00
  Speaker 29: It's a clump of cells.
• 52:01
  Speaker 2: You're a clump of cells. I'm a clump of cells.
• 52:04
  Speaker 15: We're all clumps of cells.
• 52:06
  Speaker 2: Can you see why I'm upset and how dangerous it
• 52:08
  Speaker 2: is for children in the future that so many people
• 52:11
  Speaker 2: are worshipping a literal devil?
• 52:12
  Speaker 49: Every one of us that have roots that go back
• 52:15
  Speaker 49: to the Salem witch trials, we are freeing our ancestral
• 52:19
  Speaker 49: bloodline by coming together for Lindsay Clancy. That's why that
• 52:23
  Speaker 49: shit is happening in Massachusetts. It's happening right near Salem.
• 52:26
  Speaker 49: The rise of the matriarchy is here. The patriarchy's fucking dead.
• 52:32
  Speaker 49: We will burn it at the stake.
• 52:34
  Speaker 2: This is unironic devil worship. There's a reason why Christians
• 52:37
  Speaker 2: treated people like shit for believing in witchcraft. And also,
• 52:40
  Speaker 2: you have to understand that around the world, there are
• 52:43
  Speaker 2: many people who are still willing to do very messed
• 52:46
  Speaker 2: up things, like sell their kids into slavery in the
• 52:49
  Speaker 2: modern day. Children have routinely been treated like shit throughout
• 52:53
  Speaker 2: history because they're weak and defenseless, and countries like America
• 52:57
  Speaker 2: are not above removing the protections that have been given
• 53:00
  Speaker 2: to children in Western society if we allow demons to
• 53:03
  Speaker 2: take over. The reality is that an uncomfortable number of
• 53:06
  Speaker 2: Americans could be convinced into allowing child murder. We are
• 53:10
  Speaker 2: already seeing effective arguments for it that are convincing people
• 53:13
  Speaker 2: in the current day on TikTok. Now, going back to
• 53:16
  Speaker 2: the mental hospital thing, for nuance, is it likely that
• 53:19
  Speaker 2: Lindsay will be let out after six months? No, it's not.
• 53:23
  Speaker 2: The most likely thing is that she would be there
• 53:25
  Speaker 2: for life. Personally, I don't think she should get to
• 53:27
  Speaker 2: live at all, but I'm not in charge of the
• 53:29
  Speaker 2: law in Massachusetts. However, on that note, there is a
• 53:32
  Speaker 2: difference between what's likely and what's allowed, because if it's
• 53:35
  Speaker 2: unlikely but it's still allowed, and it's a hot political issue,
• 53:39
  Speaker 2: then eventually it'll become likely. Remember, abortions used to be safe, legal,
• 53:44
  Speaker 2: and rare. You used to be called a crazy conspiracy
• 53:46
  Speaker 2: theorist if you said that up-to-birth abortions would be allowed.
• 53:50
  Speaker 2: Guess what's allowed now? All that has to happen to
• 53:52
  Speaker 2: start significantly reducing the sentencing of these insanity pleas... is
• 53:56
  Speaker 2: you get a couple of activist doctors in those mental hospitals.
• 53:59
  Speaker 2: Do you know how many people there are with medical
• 54:01
  Speaker 2: degrees who are also batshit insane? I mean, think of
• 54:04
  Speaker 2: all the doctors who are okay with transitioning children.
• 54:07
  Speaker 41: Hi, Lindsay.
• 54:08
  Speaker 38: I'm Dr.
• 54:08
  Speaker 22: Sterling.
• 54:09
  Speaker 28: I want you to know that I believe you. From
• 54:11
  Speaker 28: my perspective as an OBGYN, I believe that you were
• 54:16
  Speaker 28: over-functioning throughout your entire postpartum period. I am blown away
• 54:20
  Speaker 28: by how hard.
• 54:22
  Speaker 34: You were working.
• 54:23
  Speaker 50: To get better.
• 54:24
  Speaker 2: What? How about if you're having intrusive thoughts of murder,
• 54:27
  Speaker 2: you separate yourself from your kids? How about you commit
• 54:30
  Speaker 2: yourself for more than a few days? Maybe don't avoid
• 54:33
  Speaker 2: telling mandatory reporters that you're having these thoughts.
• 54:35
  Speaker 25: And not only did she not tell them, she lied
• 54:38
  Speaker 25: to them. They asked her, are you having thoughts of
• 54:42
  Speaker 25: harming others? Do you have homicidal ideation? She told Tufts no.
• 54:47
  Speaker 25: She told Gelada no. She told Dukes no. She told
• 54:50
  Speaker 25: Goodheart no. Every day at McLean, she said no. At MGH,
• 54:54
  Speaker 25: she said no. So not only is she hiding it,
• 54:59
  Speaker 25: she's lying about it.
• 55:00
  Speaker 2: Maybe don't send your husband away or put yourself in
• 55:03
  Speaker 2: any position where you're with the kids by yourself. There
• 55:06
  Speaker 2: are so many obvious boundaries that could have been set
• 55:08
  Speaker 2: up to make sure this didn't happen.
• 55:10
  Speaker 28: While also working as a mom, I've got three kids.
• 55:13
  Speaker 28: I know how much work it is. Even when you
• 55:16
  Speaker 28: are mentally well, it's so hard to take care of
• 55:20
  Speaker 28: three kids. Obviously hindsight's 20-20, but I don't know what
• 55:24
  Speaker 28: else you could have done. You were far beyond what
• 55:28
  Speaker 28: should be expected of a single individual.
• 55:30
  Speaker 2: What are you talking about? Lindsay was incredibly privileged.
• 55:33
  Speaker 13: She had more.
• 55:34
  Speaker 25: Access to treatment and care and support than a lot
• 55:38
  Speaker 25: of people do. She had health insurance that covered multiple doctors,
• 55:43
  Speaker 25: multiple specialty programs, treatment at South Shore, at Mass General,
• 55:49
  Speaker 25: her stay at McLean. She had prescription coverage to cover
• 55:53
  Speaker 25: the different trials she went through.
• 55:55
  Speaker 28: She had support at home.
• 55:58
  Speaker 25: She had 18 weeks of maternity leave with the opportunity
• 56:01
  Speaker 25: to extend that as much as she needed. She had
• 56:04
  Speaker 25: support from both sides of her family, hers and Patrick's.
• 56:09
  Speaker 25: The two older kids, Cora and Dawson, were in preschool
• 56:12
  Speaker 25: three and a half days a week. And she had
• 56:14
  Speaker 25: the nanny, Elaine, who helped with Callen three mornings a week.
• 56:20
  Speaker 25: And she also helped her with housework and with food prep.
• 56:24
  Speaker 25: This wasn't a woman suffering from a lack of care,
• 56:27
  Speaker 25: a lack of resources. She had an abundance of help,
• 56:31
  Speaker 25: an abundance of care.
• 56:33
  Speaker 2: How do you hear this stuff and think, Patrick did
• 56:35
  Speaker 2: it because her body temperature was too low and it
• 56:37
  Speaker 2: couldn't have gotten low that fast?
• 56:38
  Speaker 49: We are coming together and not letting our sister go
• 56:44
  Speaker 49: down for a crime she didn't commit. And if somehow
• 56:47
  Speaker 49: it was possible, which it's not. It is literally not possible,
• 56:51
  Speaker 49: the timeline isn't possible, to create hypothermia.
• 56:54
  Speaker 2: Blood loss could have caused that, and she had a
• 56:56
  Speaker 2: spinal injury that prevented half of her body from shivering.
• 57:00
  Speaker 2: This happened during winter, by the way. I've spent a
• 57:02
  Speaker 2: little time going over the Patrick was the real killer
• 57:05
  Speaker 2: conspiracy theories, and they're just a pure headache because every
• 57:08
  Speaker 2: single one of them is either complete nonsense or could
• 57:11
  Speaker 2: easily be explained away with reasonable doubt.
• 57:14
  Speaker 24: So why don't you explain a little bit of what
• 57:15
  Speaker 24: you were thinking, Dan, because I... I've written on TV
• 57:18
  Speaker 24: shows too and I'm always thinking of movie ideas and
• 57:20
  Speaker 24: things like that.
• 57:21
  Speaker 9: And I was like, could this ever happen in real life?
• 57:24
  Speaker 38: Right.
• 57:24
  Speaker 27: Okay.
• 57:24
  Speaker 7: So this is the thing. As a TV writer, to me,
• 57:27
  Speaker 7: the first thing that stood out was I only got
• 57:30
  Speaker 7: interested because of the detail that Patrick didn't immediately run
• 57:35
  Speaker 7: to see where the kids were. So because he testified
• 57:39
  Speaker 7: that he arrived at the house– He saw that she
• 57:44
  Speaker 7: was incapacitated on the ground. He asked her what happened.
• 57:48
  Speaker 7: She said, I tried to kill myself. He said, where
• 57:51
  Speaker 7: are the kids? She said, in the basement. And then
• 57:55
  Speaker 7: for 10 minutes, he didn't go down to the basement
• 57:58
  Speaker 7: until police arrived. That to me as a parent, I
• 58:02
  Speaker 7: was like, oh, there's something fishy there.
• 58:04
  Speaker 2: This is like the biggest case of armchair quarterbacking that
• 58:07
  Speaker 2: I've ever seen. Isn't it great when your kids get
• 58:09
  Speaker 2: murdered and your life has been destroyed? And then three
• 58:12
  Speaker 2: years later, you have a bunch of TikTok addicts gleefully
• 58:15
  Speaker 2: masturbating to conspiracy theories about a trauma that you suffered
• 58:18
  Speaker 2: and how you, the victim, were the real killer. Just
• 58:21
  Speaker 2: look at the facial expressions these wine moms are making
• 58:24
  Speaker 2: as they blame the victim, not realizing that they're saying,
• 58:27
  Speaker 2: why didn't he do this obvious thing based on information
• 58:31
  Speaker 2: that Patrick does not have? Movies do this all the time,
• 58:34
  Speaker 2: by the way. They give the audience information that the
• 58:36
  Speaker 2: main characters don't have to add suspense. This is a
• 58:39
  Speaker 2: major self-awareness fail from two writers who should know better.
• 58:43
  Speaker 7: In my opinion, the best TV writers are in some
• 58:46
  Speaker 7: way conspiracy theorists. And I think that that can be
• 58:48
  Speaker 7: really helpful for like analyzing stories that are happening in
• 58:52
  Speaker 7: real life. And that is basically what I bring to,
• 58:55
  Speaker 7: you know, my analysis of this case.
• 58:57
  Speaker 2: Yeah, I'm sure the part where you ignore key evidence
• 58:59
  Speaker 2: and admissions of guilt so you can craft a conspiracy
• 59:02
  Speaker 2: theory is a valuable contribution to society. I'd just like
• 59:05
  Speaker 2: to point out that movie and TV writers, especially bad ones,
• 59:09
  Speaker 2: Love to ignore how people would actually behave under stress
• 59:11
  Speaker 2: for the purpose of narrative or for the purpose of
• 59:13
  Speaker 2: moving the story forward. Anyway, let's think of this realistically.
• 59:17
  Speaker 2: In this case, Patrick sees his wife dying in front
• 59:20
  Speaker 2: of him. He has no information that suggests that his
• 59:22
  Speaker 2: kids are unsafe. She might need to be watched until
• 59:25
  Speaker 2: EMS gets there. This might be the last time he
• 59:28
  Speaker 2: ever talks to her. Why would he think to abandon
• 59:30
  Speaker 2: his wife to check the basement? The kids can survive
• 59:33
  Speaker 2: for a few minutes on their own, especially when there's
• 59:35
  Speaker 2: an immediate problem that would easily give him tunnel vision.
• 59:39
  Speaker 7: Who, what parent, even if the other parent is in
• 59:43
  Speaker 7: a fragile state, you call emergency services and then you
• 59:48
  Speaker 7: go immediately and you find the kids. I was like, wait,
• 59:50
  Speaker 7: from a storytelling perspective, that makes absolutely zero sense. And
• 59:54
  Speaker 7: that's how I sort of interrogate The stories that people tell,
• 59:59
  Speaker 7: you know, because if I were writing this on an
• 1:00:01
  Speaker 7: episode of something, I would make sure that his story
• 1:00:04
  Speaker 7: is that he immediately checks on the kids. Because that
• 1:00:08
  Speaker 7: would be the way to paint him as a caring,
• 1:00:11
  Speaker 7: loving father. The idea that a dad is going to
• 1:00:14
  Speaker 7: stand there for 10 or plus, 10 plus minutes, not
• 1:00:20
  Speaker 7: knowing what state his children are in, just knowing that
• 1:00:23
  Speaker 7: they're in the basement, which is literally right there. Which,
• 1:00:26
  Speaker 7: by the way, I think he could see into the window.
• 1:00:29
  Speaker 2: You mean these windows that you can't see into unless
• 1:00:31
  Speaker 2: you're standing? See what I mean by shit writer? If
• 1:00:34
  Speaker 2: people don't do things how she would do them, then
• 1:00:36
  Speaker 2: there must be something wrong. Would it shock you if
• 1:00:39
  Speaker 2: I said that her main writing credits are for Netflix
• 1:00:41
  Speaker 2: and a transgender propaganda show for kids on Disney Plus? Also,
• 1:00:46
  Speaker 2: if you look at the layout of the basement, there
• 1:00:47
  Speaker 2: are multiple things that could obstruct your view of the
• 1:00:50
  Speaker 2: kids if you're looking through the window, so it could
• 1:00:52
  Speaker 2: take a while and a lot of effort to check
• 1:00:54
  Speaker 2: on them. A lot of effort that, as far as
• 1:00:56
  Speaker 2: he knows, should be dedicated to his wife until someone
• 1:00:59
  Speaker 2: else can take over. And also, I think him checking
• 1:01:02
  Speaker 2: on the kids before EMS got there to witness his
• 1:01:04
  Speaker 2: actions would arguably make it look more like he was
• 1:01:07
  Speaker 2: the one who did it. TikTok addicts would just say
• 1:01:09
  Speaker 2: that he left his dying wife alone so he could
• 1:01:11
  Speaker 2: go to the basement and finish the job. I mean,
• 1:01:14
  Speaker 2: you have to understand the stupidity of these people, because
• 1:01:16
  Speaker 2: Patrick is on video twice outside of the house while
• 1:01:20
  Speaker 2: the murders are going on, picking up a food order
• 1:01:22
  Speaker 2: that Lindsay made.
• 1:01:23
  Speaker 13: Where do you work?
• 1:01:24
  Speaker 10: I work at a doctor's office and I also work
• 1:01:26
  Speaker 10: at 3V. It's a restaurant in Plymouth.
• 1:01:28
  Speaker 43: In January of 2023, what was your role at 3V restaurant?
• 1:01:33
  Speaker 13: I was a hostess then.
• 1:01:34
  Speaker 43: Are you depicted in the video here?
• 1:01:37
  Speaker 5: Yes.
• 1:01:37
  Speaker 13: And where are you?
• 1:01:38
  Speaker 10: I'm standing behind the host stand.
• 1:01:40
  Speaker 43: And directing your attention to 5, 10 p.m., did you
• 1:01:43
  Speaker 43: receive a call for a takeout order?
• 1:01:45
  Speaker 5: Yes.
• 1:01:46
  Speaker 13: And was that a male or a female?
• 1:01:47
  Speaker 10: It was a female.
• 1:01:49
  Speaker 2: So again, he has no information to suggest that his
• 1:01:51
  Speaker 2: kids are in danger. And his wife, who he spent
• 1:01:54
  Speaker 2: over a decade with, a wife who he's had three
• 1:01:56
  Speaker 2: kids with, a wife who he spent at least the
• 1:01:58
  Speaker 2: past year or so trying to save from mental health issues,
• 1:02:02
  Speaker 2: might die right then and there. This could be it.
• 1:02:05
  Speaker 2: This could be the last time he talks to her. Honestly,
• 1:02:07
  Speaker 2: if I were in this situation, I don't know if
• 1:02:09
  Speaker 2: I'd even be able to see three feet in front
• 1:02:11
  Speaker 2: of me. This would be traumatic.
• 1:02:13
  Speaker 43: Were there any insurance issues in terms of insurance refusing
• 1:02:16
  Speaker 43: to pay for her stay at McLean Hospital?
• 1:02:18
  Speaker 41: We didn't really get to that point.
• 1:02:21
  Speaker 43: You weren't advised by the social worker or any staff
• 1:02:24
  Speaker 43: there that there were any issues with your insurance.
• 1:02:26
  Speaker 13: Is that correct? Yeah, that's correct.
• 1:02:30
  Speaker 41: But I wouldn't have cared either.
• 1:02:32
  Speaker 13: Would you have just paid for it if needed? I
• 1:02:33
  Speaker 13: would have paid anything.
• 1:02:35
  Speaker 34: Yeah.
• 1:02:35
  Speaker 2: I mean, holy shit. For how many of these women
• 1:02:38
  Speaker 2: go on and on about empathy and being able to
• 1:02:40
  Speaker 2: understand people's pain and suffering? It is shocking to see
• 1:02:43
  Speaker 2: how few of them can understand how traumatic it can
• 1:02:45
  Speaker 2: be to watch someone you are close to die. Good God,
• 1:02:48
  Speaker 2: these women are fucking psychos. And if that wasn't bad enough,
• 1:02:52
  Speaker 2: the ones who aren't saying that Patrick was the real
• 1:02:55
  Speaker 2: killer are using hormones to excuse a triple homicide.
• 1:02:58
  Speaker 5: You cannot blame hormones for murdering your children. That's like
• 1:03:03
  Speaker 5: blaming testosterone, right, for R.A.P.E. And that opens up a
• 1:03:09
  Speaker 5: whole new world of messiness. Because if we open up
• 1:03:12
  Speaker 5: that can of worms, nobody's going to be guilty anymore
• 1:03:15
  Speaker 5: and everything's going to be basically legal.
• 1:03:17
  Speaker 2: Yeah, I think that's the point. And going back to
• 1:03:20
  Speaker 2: the activist medical professional claims, not to scare everyone, but
• 1:03:23
  Speaker 2: I've known people who have applied for medical school, and
• 1:03:26
  Speaker 2: you are required to read tons of DEI shit to
• 1:03:29
  Speaker 2: pass the exam to get into med school. This has
• 1:03:31
  Speaker 2: been going on for at least 10 years now. So personally,
• 1:03:34
  Speaker 2: I would be shocked if criminals who pled insanity weren't
• 1:03:37
  Speaker 2: already getting significantly reduced sentences at certain mental hospitals because
• 1:03:42
  Speaker 2: of doctors who were propagandized with DEI when they were
• 1:03:44
  Speaker 2: pre-med or in med school.
• 1:03:46
  Speaker 51: Both Ted Bundy and Jeffrey Dahmer during their legal defenses
• 1:03:51
  Speaker 51: entered pleas of not guilty by reason of insanity. No
• 1:03:55
  Speaker 51: one in their right mind in polite society would ever
• 1:03:58
  Speaker 51: suggest that Jeffrey Dahmer who ate his victims and Ted
• 1:04:03
  Speaker 51: Bundy should just, it was their hormones.
• 1:04:05
  Speaker 30: You know what I mean?
• 1:04:07
  Speaker 51: So why should this case be any different?
• 1:04:10
  Speaker 2: Also, I have family in the medical industry. I used
• 1:04:13
  Speaker 2: to clean hospitals when I was younger. and I have
• 1:04:15
  Speaker 2: to say that hospitals are woke as fuck. Here's the
• 1:04:18
  Speaker 2: dangerous part. Many women are saying that Lindsay strangled her
• 1:04:21
  Speaker 2: kids because of a commonly occurring phenomenon called postpartum depression.
• 1:04:25
  Speaker 2: Postpartum depression is caused by a temporary hormonal state that
• 1:04:28
  Speaker 2: women go through after giving birth. Because of that, it
• 1:04:31
  Speaker 2: could be argued that if Lindsay wins her insanity plea
• 1:04:34
  Speaker 2: and goes to a mental hospital, she could be allowed
• 1:04:37
  Speaker 2: out with a significantly reduced sentence because if you aren't
• 1:04:39
  Speaker 2: postpartum anymore, An activist doctor could argue that you're mentally
• 1:04:43
  Speaker 2: well and let you free. Again, you don't think these
• 1:04:46
  Speaker 2: doctors already exist?
• 1:04:47
  Speaker 28: You have galvanized us women in a really powerful way.
• 1:04:52
  Speaker 28: And I'm not quite ready to tell my story yet.
• 1:04:56
  Speaker 28: But when I eventually do, it's going to be because
• 1:04:59
  Speaker 28: you came first. And you showed all of us that
• 1:05:05
  Speaker 28: we can be honest and we can be real about
• 1:05:07
  Speaker 28: what we experience as mothers.
• 1:05:10
  Speaker 2: What exactly is your story? What, you learned a life
• 1:05:13
  Speaker 2: lesson from a devil and now you're thanking her? What
• 1:05:15
  Speaker 2: have you done exactly?
• 1:05:17
  Speaker 28: So thank you and, you know, I hope that you're
• 1:05:22
  Speaker 28: seeing our support because we believe you and we are
• 1:05:27
  Speaker 28: proud of how hard you advocated and how hard you
• 1:05:30
  Speaker 28: tried for yourself. And we know you miss those babies
• 1:05:33
  Speaker 28: every day.
• 1:05:34
  Speaker 2: Remember, this is a doctor. A doctor who is saying,
• 1:05:37
  Speaker 2: I know you miss your kids, Lindsay. sympathizing with her
• 1:05:40
  Speaker 2: over the children who are the actual victims. Granted, this
• 1:05:44
  Speaker 2: woman's not a mental health doctor, but close enough. The
• 1:05:47
  Speaker 2: only difference between her and a psychiatrist is that she
• 1:05:50
  Speaker 2: did a different residency program after medical school. So with
• 1:05:53
  Speaker 2: that in context, do you guys understand that if an
• 1:05:56
  Speaker 2: insanity plea is allowed by a jury and it sets
• 1:05:58
  Speaker 2: a precedent on a case as famous as this one,
• 1:06:01
  Speaker 2: then in 20 years or so of activists boiling the
• 1:06:03
  Speaker 2: frog on this issue like they did with abortion... We
• 1:06:06
  Speaker 2: could live in a country where effectively murder is legal
• 1:06:09
  Speaker 2: if you claim postpartum depression. You just have to spend
• 1:06:12
  Speaker 2: a few months in a mental hospital. That is the
• 1:06:14
  Speaker 2: seriousness of this case and why it's a big deal.
• 1:06:17
  Speaker 2: And if you think I'm crazy for saying that this
• 1:06:19
  Speaker 2: is a very possible future, then allow me to show
• 1:06:22
  Speaker 2: you just how much support Lindsay is getting.
• 1:06:24
  Speaker 15: Oh, and there's more.
• 1:06:37
  Speaker 2: I gotta say, I thought people were evil when they
• 1:06:39
  Speaker 2: cheered on Charlie Kirk dying, but I never imagined that
• 1:06:42
  Speaker 2: less than a year later, we would see women throwing
• 1:06:44
  Speaker 2: a pep rally for a child killer. I believe that
• 1:07:03
  Speaker 2: was Lindsay arriving to the courtroom for the trial, and
• 1:07:05
  Speaker 2: I gotta say that I think after seeing shit like this,
• 1:07:08
  Speaker 2: everyone's respect for women has plummeted.
• 1:07:10
  Speaker 46: Women are coming on here and saying, oh, well, yeah,
• 1:07:13
  Speaker 46: Lindsay Clancy just murdered her kids because of postpartum and
• 1:07:16
  Speaker 46: her hormones. Do you know how bad That makes women look.
• 1:07:19
  Speaker 46: And do you know how bad a thousand, a million
• 1:07:23
  Speaker 46: women coming on here defending Lindsay Clancy saying, I am
• 1:07:26
  Speaker 46: Lindsay Clancy. We've literally been trying to prove to men
• 1:07:30
  Speaker 46: for years that our hormones do not affect our capacity
• 1:07:36
  Speaker 46: to make decisions or whatever else. But now you guys
• 1:07:39
  Speaker 46: are all coming on here saying, oh, well, actually, it
• 1:07:41
  Speaker 46: might make you.
• 1:07:41
  Speaker 28: Kill your kids, though.
• 1:07:43
  Speaker 2: And on that day, a female misogynist was born. Again,
• 1:07:46
  Speaker 2: literally no one supports this shit when men do it.
• 1:07:49
  Speaker 2: That's the difference. And also, I don't think people in
• 1:07:52
  Speaker 2: general expected Lindsay to get ridiculous amounts of followers praising
• 1:07:55
  Speaker 2: her name. But if you understand human psychology, then you
• 1:07:58
  Speaker 2: can easily see how this would happen. On average, women
• 1:08:01
  Speaker 2: are more agreeable than men, which means, on average, it's
• 1:08:04
  Speaker 2: easier to get a woman to agree with you than
• 1:08:06
  Speaker 2: a man. I don't think this is really contested, especially
• 1:08:09
  Speaker 2: for people who work in sales, because it's obvious. Generally,
• 1:08:12
  Speaker 2: if you're in front of a couple, you're going to
• 1:08:14
  Speaker 2: want to sell to the woman... and get her to
• 1:08:16
  Speaker 2: convince her husband instead of you trying to convince the husband.
• 1:08:19
  Speaker 2: Agreeing with the group is a survival tactic for women,
• 1:08:22
  Speaker 2: and if you're aware of that, you can abuse the
• 1:08:24
  Speaker 2: hell out of it. And politicians and activists do that regularly. Also,
• 1:08:28
  Speaker 2: because of their agreeableness, women are very vulnerable to social contagions,
• 1:08:32
  Speaker 2: especially the women who are on the fringes. Which is
• 1:08:35
  Speaker 2: why when they started doing things like Pride Month and
• 1:08:37
  Speaker 2: making everything about LGBT acceptance, Women started identifying as LGBT
• 1:08:42
  Speaker 2: like crazy. That being said, you don't want to make
• 1:08:45
  Speaker 2: mental illness and murder a social contagion that triple of
• 1:08:48
  Speaker 2: the number of women now agree with because they heard
• 1:08:50
  Speaker 2: lots of other women saying it. The number of videos saying,
• 1:08:54
  Speaker 2: same Lindsay, should be disturbing because TikTok is certainly one
• 1:08:57
  Speaker 2: hell of a place to get social acceptance and validation.
• 1:09:00
  Speaker 2: for your mental health problems, as many women are now
• 1:09:03
  Speaker 2: filming their mental breakdowns. Mom rage is no joke. I
• 1:09:34
  Speaker 2: gotta say that I'm starting to think that Trump saving
• 1:09:36
  Speaker 2: TikTok was one of the worst things he's done as president.
• 1:09:39
  Speaker 2: What happened to doing breathing exercises to calm yourself down?
• 1:09:42
  Speaker 2: This activity is not even non-destructive as kicking a door
• 1:09:45
  Speaker 2: through a pillow can still break it. Someone go tell
• 1:09:47
  Speaker 2: that to Miskif just in case. Postpartum rage got the
• 1:10:04
  Speaker 2: best of me today. I saw another mom throw ice
• 1:10:06
  Speaker 2: in a bathtub. See what I mean by social contagion?
• 1:10:10
  Speaker 2: Not just that, but TikTok is giving women a place
• 1:10:12
  Speaker 2: to have their rage at their children validated by other
• 1:10:14
  Speaker 2: crazy women, instead of shamed like it should be. This
• 1:10:18
  Speaker 2: is not good, as positive reinforcement from these social acceptance
• 1:10:21
  Speaker 2: will encourage more of the behavior. And there are tons
• 1:10:24
  Speaker 2: of videos like this next one.
• 1:10:25
  Speaker 10: I am officially over it.
• 1:10:28
  Speaker 15: We just got home.
• 1:10:30
  Speaker 41: Just got home from the playing cafe.
• 1:10:31
  Speaker 33: My daughter just had a full-blown meltdown trying to leave
• 1:10:35
  Speaker 33: this damn place. Throw her in time out because she
• 1:10:38
  Speaker 33: won't chill out. It smells like shh. It smells like shh.
• 1:10:42
  Speaker 33: Now I have a fucking unhinged toddler, and.
• 1:10:46
  Speaker 15: I gotta clean up. Diarrhea!
• 1:10:49
  Speaker 27: Diarrhea!
• 1:10:50
  Speaker 24: Because it smells like a literal, literal butthole.
• 1:10:55
  Speaker 5: Oh my god.
• 1:11:01
  Speaker 2: Hey, would someone tell that nose ring that the longer
• 1:11:03
  Speaker 2: she stares at her camera and complains about the shit smell,
• 1:11:06
  Speaker 2: the longer she'll have to smell it?
• 1:11:07
  Speaker 30: Is this on?
• 1:11:09
  Speaker 10: Oh.
• 1:11:19
  Speaker 27: Oh, God, the filter is off.
• 1:11:20
  Speaker 2: POV, you're a three-month-old whose mom is about to start
• 1:11:23
  Speaker 2: crying and saying how much she hates you. That's so accurate.
• 1:11:26
  Speaker 2: Not to mention that there's already a copycat murder from
• 1:11:29
  Speaker 2: a Lindsay Clancy fan that quite possibly was pushed over
• 1:11:31
  Speaker 2: the edge by the trial and all the women showing
• 1:11:34
  Speaker 2: support for a woman who strangled three kids. And there's
• 1:11:37
  Speaker 2: already another case in Massachusetts going on right now with
• 1:11:40
  Speaker 2: a woman who killed two kids who is trying to
• 1:11:42
  Speaker 2: plead insanity just like Lindsay.
• 1:11:44
  Speaker 29: This is not.
• 1:11:44
  Speaker 52: Lindsay Clancy 2.0. Jeanette McLaughlin is her own woman, but
• 1:11:49
  Speaker 52: there's been a discussion, a discourse that's opened up in
• 1:11:53
  Speaker 52: this country about whether or not we want to criminalize
• 1:11:57
  Speaker 52: mental illness. And I'm hoping that this district attorney's office
• 1:12:01
  Speaker 52: and the new district attorney-elect takes a look at this
• 1:12:05
  Speaker 52: and takes a different approach in how we prosecute women
• 1:12:10
  Speaker 52: suffering from profound mental health problems.
• 1:12:13
  Speaker 2: Holy shit, her and her lawyer need capital punishment. Why
• 1:12:16
  Speaker 2: would we ever allow this? We should absolutely punish people
• 1:12:19
  Speaker 2: who are mentally ill when they do bad stuff. I
• 1:12:21
  Speaker 2: cannot believe they're trying to legalize child abuse by saying
• 1:12:24
  Speaker 2: it's fine if you're crazy. What sane person abuses their kids?
• 1:12:28
  Speaker 2: And with that said, let's get more into Lindsay Clancy's trial.
• 1:12:32
  Speaker 2: After watching this play out, it's hard for me to
• 1:12:33
  Speaker 2: tell who is more evil, Lindsay or her lawyer. This
• 1:12:36
  Speaker 2: next moment is from his closing arguments.
• 1:12:39
  Speaker 38: This is a prosecution that has ripped the soul out
• 1:12:42
  Speaker 38: of this girl This young lady did nothing wrong in
• 1:12:48
  Speaker 38: her life. She was a nurse, a daughter, a wife,
• 1:12:56
  Speaker 38: and a darn good mother.
• 1:12:58
  Speaker 2: She didn't do nothing. Right, a good mother ends the
• 1:13:01
  Speaker 2: lives of three of her children in probably one of
• 1:13:03
  Speaker 2: the most gruesome ways possible. Great argument.
• 1:13:05
  Speaker 18: And how did you kill your kids?
• 1:13:06
  Speaker 2: In the most aggressive way possible.
• 1:13:08
  Speaker 34: Strangulation.
• 1:13:09
  Speaker 9: And that's three of them.
• 1:13:10
  Speaker 17: I strangled one and then didn't have that motherly voice going,
• 1:13:12
  Speaker 17: oh my god, what have I done?
• 1:13:13
  Speaker 2: I then did it two more times.
• 1:13:14
  Speaker 15: So you're crazy.
• 1:13:15
  Speaker 2: That's what I'm saying.
• 1:13:17
  Speaker 17: And I'm so crazy that even after I killed them,
• 1:13:18
  Speaker 17: I tried to kill myself.
• 1:13:20
  Speaker 26: In the most life-preserving way possible.
• 1:13:22
  Speaker 2: Yeah, I jumped out of a one-story building.
• 1:13:23
  Speaker 4: Really messed up my ankle.
• 1:13:25
  Speaker 2: Yeah, I'm glad I'm not the only one who noticed that.
• 1:13:27
  Speaker 2: The second story of a building is not very high.
• 1:13:30
  Speaker 2: And as a nurse, she didn't know where the arteries were?
• 1:13:32
  Speaker 2: As in, basic information that you have to know for CPR?
• 1:13:35
  Speaker 2: That's a little suspicious, because if there's one thing that
• 1:13:38
  Speaker 2: I know that nurses know, it's how to do this effectively,
• 1:13:40
  Speaker 2: because they see all the people who fail. I don't know,
• 1:13:43
  Speaker 2: maybe she's never worked in the ICU or the ER before.
• 1:13:46
  Speaker 2: Though I'm sure the TikTok true crime conspiracy girlies will
• 1:13:49
  Speaker 2: say that this proves that Patrick did it because he
• 1:13:51
  Speaker 2: wouldn't know that stuff as a software engineer or whatever.
• 1:13:54
  Speaker 2: But Patrick also knew CPR, and remember, she admitted she
• 1:13:58
  Speaker 2: did it. Oh, well that's just because, you see, Patrick
• 1:14:00
  Speaker 2: has these magical spell powers that he used to convince
• 1:14:03
  Speaker 2: her that she did it.
• 1:14:04
  Speaker 14: What?
• 1:14:05
  Speaker 2: How does that work? We can just super effectively mind
• 1:14:08
  Speaker 2: control people now to the point where they'll admit to
• 1:14:10
  Speaker 2: heinous crimes they didn't actually do? I'm sure the government
• 1:14:13
  Speaker 2: would love access to that kind of witchcraft. What was
• 1:14:16
  Speaker 2: even Patrick's motive for doing it in the first place?
• 1:14:18
  Speaker 2: Lindsay had a motive. She was crazy and had intrusive
• 1:14:21
  Speaker 2: thoughts that she told other people about.
• 1:14:22
  Speaker 38: Do you recall the time that you were in the kitchen...
• 1:14:26
  Speaker 38: With Lindsay and Patrick, and she made a statement about
• 1:14:30
  Speaker 38: her state of mind to her husband, Pat, and you
• 1:14:33
  Speaker 38: were there.
• 1:14:34
  Speaker 53: Yes.
• 1:14:35
  Speaker 13: I remember her being very nervous.
• 1:14:38
  Speaker 3: I remember her saying, I just have to tell you
• 1:14:40
  Speaker 3: guys something.
• 1:14:42
  Speaker 13: And then she told us.
• 1:14:44
  Speaker 38: What did she tell you?
• 1:14:45
  Speaker 13: She told us that she had thoughts of harming the children.
• 1:14:49
  Speaker 2: Where was Patrick's motive? Oh, well, maybe he was cheating
• 1:14:52
  Speaker 2: on his wife because he got with someone else that
• 1:14:54
  Speaker 2: looks sort of like Lindsay super quickly. You do know
• 1:14:57
  Speaker 2: that it's possible to cheat on your wife without killing
• 1:14:59
  Speaker 2: your whole family, right? Like they're expecting some sort of crazy,
• 1:15:02
  Speaker 2: elaborate plan where Patrick hires a body double to go
• 1:15:05
  Speaker 2: to the store for him while he's at home casting
• 1:15:07
  Speaker 2: a mind control spell on Lindsay so she won't talk.
• 1:15:10
  Speaker 7: I felt like this is like a movie.
• 1:15:14
  Speaker 2: He had to have a body double there because otherwise
• 1:15:16
  Speaker 2: there wouldn't have been enough time to execute every action
• 1:15:18
  Speaker 2: before EMS got there. So they're expecting normal people to
• 1:15:22
  Speaker 2: come up with insanely complex plans because that's what they
• 1:15:24
  Speaker 2: see on TV. Are you guys starting to understand how
• 1:15:27
  Speaker 2: effective movies are at influencing the way that people think?
• 1:15:30
  Speaker 2: They've been propagandized by TV, so they miss details like, well,
• 1:15:34
  Speaker 2: I've watched enough clavicular clips on Twitter to notice that
• 1:15:36
  Speaker 2: Patrick has a receding hairline. His body double doesn't, and
• 1:15:40
  Speaker 2: you can see the receding hairline in the footage. Also,
• 1:15:43
  Speaker 2: you mean to tell me that Patrick's friend slash body
• 1:15:45
  Speaker 2: double is willing to assist in a quadruple homicide that
• 1:15:48
  Speaker 2: includes three little kids so he can help his friend
• 1:15:51
  Speaker 2: cheat on his wife? What drugs are these TikTok watchers on?
• 1:15:55
  Speaker 2: I mean, saying that Patrick was the real killer the
• 1:15:57
  Speaker 2: whole time is such a bad take that even Hasan
• 1:15:59
  Speaker 2: Piker won't support it.
• 1:16:01
  Speaker 45: I haven't kept up with the case, but all my
• 1:16:02
  Speaker 45: co-workers believe the husband killed him story. OK, so here's
• 1:16:05
  Speaker 45: the problem that I have with this theory. It's not
• 1:16:07
  Speaker 45: what the defense was presenting as a counter narrative, as
• 1:16:10
  Speaker 45: an argument. And it's not what the like no one
• 1:16:13
  Speaker 45: was presenting this as an option. No one actually involved
• 1:16:16
  Speaker 45: with this case is saying the husband did it. The
• 1:16:19
  Speaker 45: judge doesn't believe the husband did it. The cops don't
• 1:16:21
  Speaker 45: believe the husband did it. Lindsay Clancy doesn't believe the
• 1:16:24
  Speaker 45: husband did it. Lindsay Clancy's attorneys don't believe the husband
• 1:16:27
  Speaker 45: did it. It's just people on the internet who are like, no,
• 1:16:30
  Speaker 45: we've taken this up ourselves. Actually, it's the husband.
• 1:16:32
  Speaker 2: I guess a broken clock is right twice a day. Though,
• 1:16:35
  Speaker 2: of course, Hassan still thinks Lindsay shouldn't get punished for this.
• 1:16:39
  Speaker 2: The point is that outside of all the conspiracy theories,
• 1:16:41
  Speaker 2: a good mother would have stepped outside of the house
• 1:16:43
  Speaker 2: if she was having thoughts of harming her children and
• 1:16:46
  Speaker 2: waited for Patrick to get back. Of course, it's not
• 1:16:48
  Speaker 2: ideal to leave your kids alone like that, but also
• 1:16:50
  Speaker 2: I think it's highly unlikely that young kids going unsupervised
• 1:16:53
  Speaker 2: for 30 minutes would result in something worse than what
• 1:16:56
  Speaker 2: actually ended up happening. Though, like I said, it's hard
• 1:16:59
  Speaker 2: for me to decide who is more evil in this case,
• 1:17:02
  Speaker 2: Lindsay or her lawyer. because at least Lindsay only hurt
• 1:17:05
  Speaker 2: three kids, but if her lawyer figures out an effective
• 1:17:08
  Speaker 2: argument that grants her an insanity plea, then a lot
• 1:17:11
  Speaker 2: more kids than that are going to be harmed. But
• 1:17:13
  Speaker 2: you might be wondering why he's making so many emotional
• 1:17:16
  Speaker 2: arguments here instead of relying more so on the facts
• 1:17:18
  Speaker 2: of the case. As he's making closing statements, he shows
• 1:17:21
  Speaker 2: this picture of the kids and how they're alive and happy,
• 1:17:24
  Speaker 2: and then he shows Lindsay at the hospital. Why don't
• 1:17:26
  Speaker 2: you show people the dead bodies as you call her
• 1:17:28
  Speaker 2: a good mom, instead of her in the hospital? Well,
• 1:17:31
  Speaker 2: there's a reason for that, and that's because there are
• 1:17:33
  Speaker 2: nine women on the jury. Two of them showed up
• 1:17:35
  Speaker 2: in pink like the activists, so you can guess which
• 1:17:37
  Speaker 2: ones are the demons. Like, it's just crazy how much
• 1:17:40
  Speaker 2: they're trying to shift focus away from the kids and
• 1:17:42
  Speaker 2: towards the mother and how sad she was and how
• 1:17:44
  Speaker 2: bad she was feeling. She was fake crying so much
• 1:17:47
  Speaker 2: during that trial that I feel like her lawyer must
• 1:17:49
  Speaker 2: have said, Hey, Lindsay, can you just, like, cry all
• 1:17:51
  Speaker 2: day for five weeks straight so we can put a
• 1:17:54
  Speaker 2: tissue box in front of you and make people feel
• 1:17:55
  Speaker 2: sorry for you? What about the emotions of the father
• 1:17:58
  Speaker 2: who came home to find all of his children dead?
• 1:18:00
  Speaker 43: I'm going to ask you to look at a video
• 1:18:02
  Speaker 43: and just tell me if you recognize this as a
• 1:18:04
  Speaker 43: video from the party.
• 1:18:06
  Speaker 40: Was that from the party?
• 1:18:13
  Speaker 14: Yeah.
• 1:18:14
  Speaker 43: And was that Cora seated in front of Lindsay while
• 1:18:17
  Speaker 43: singing happy birthday?
• 1:18:19
  Speaker 5: Yeah.
• 1:18:19
  Speaker 13: If you could just tell us a little bit about
• 1:18:21
  Speaker 13: Cora's interest at that time.
• 1:18:24
  Speaker 41: Um, Cora was into princesses and, um, she had a
• 1:18:33
  Speaker 41: lot of friends and, um, she just liked taking care
• 1:18:41
  Speaker 41: of people.
• 1:18:41
  Speaker 13: Yes.
• 1:18:49
  Speaker 11: Yes.
• 1:18:56
  Speaker 41: Using the firefighters and trucks.
• 1:18:58
  Speaker 2: I think a core mistake of the prosecutor is that
• 1:19:01
  Speaker 2: she held on too tightly to the facts and did
• 1:19:03
  Speaker 2: not talk enough about emotion or ask Patrick enough about
• 1:19:05
  Speaker 2: his feelings. a mistake that the defense did not make,
• 1:19:08
  Speaker 2: and this mistake was horrendous considering that most of the
• 1:19:11
  Speaker 2: jurors were women. I understand that this may not be
• 1:19:14
  Speaker 2: people's ideal on how a courtroom should work or how
• 1:19:16
  Speaker 2: society should work, but the reality is that very few
• 1:19:19
  Speaker 2: people argue on pure logic, and if you fail to
• 1:19:22
  Speaker 2: speak to them emotionally, you will lose to better influencers
• 1:19:25
  Speaker 2: who are willing to do that. So watch a couple
• 1:19:27
  Speaker 2: of Hallmark movies and you'll understand how to speak to
• 1:19:29
  Speaker 2: women emotionally, because being effective at adding in emotional context
• 1:19:34
  Speaker 2: is how they have gotten women to support Lindsay over
• 1:19:36
  Speaker 2: the actual victims. What they don't want is you to
• 1:19:39
  Speaker 2: focus on the emotional context of how the kids felt
• 1:19:41
  Speaker 2: or how Patrick feels. I think it works in the
• 1:19:44
  Speaker 2: defense's favor that the audio of Patrick's 911 call and
• 1:19:47
  Speaker 2: how he sounded when he discovered what happened to his
• 1:19:49
  Speaker 2: kids was not released to the public. Reading the transcript
• 1:19:52
  Speaker 2: of that call is not going to have the same
• 1:19:54
  Speaker 2: effect as hearing it. I can only imagine how horrific
• 1:19:56
  Speaker 2: that audio sounded. So instead of that, you know, how
• 1:19:59
  Speaker 2: about we get a bunch of TikTokers to dehumanize Patrick
• 1:20:02
  Speaker 2: by calling him a cheater instead of a victim? There's
• 1:20:05
  Speaker 2: no proof of him cheating, by the way. Imagine being
• 1:20:08
  Speaker 2: the victim of a crime and never getting to see
• 1:20:10
  Speaker 2: your kids grow up, and then a bunch of people
• 1:20:12
  Speaker 2: throw false accusations at you instead of trying to get
• 1:20:14
  Speaker 2: justice for the kids. And as bad as it is
• 1:20:17
  Speaker 2: to see all that play out among the people watching
• 1:20:19
  Speaker 2: the trial, what I think is worse is watching the
• 1:20:22
  Speaker 2: deliberation for this case, because in my mind, we still
• 1:20:25
  Speaker 2: live in a reasonable society where it's not that hard
• 1:20:27
  Speaker 2: to punish someone for a triple homicide. But in this courtroom...
• 1:20:31
  Speaker 2: It was like an impossible feat. I remember setting aside
• 1:20:34
  Speaker 2: my focus on Lindsay Clancy for a bit so I
• 1:20:36
  Speaker 2: could work on a different video, and after a few
• 1:20:38
  Speaker 2: days I thought, surely the trial must be done by now,
• 1:20:41
  Speaker 2: so let's see what happened. I Google it, and all
• 1:20:43
  Speaker 2: I see are a bunch of articles saying, it's the
• 1:20:46
  Speaker 2: end of the third day, and the jury cannot come
• 1:20:48
  Speaker 2: to a decision. Three days to deliberate for a woman
• 1:20:51
  Speaker 2: who admitted to doing it.
• 1:20:52
  Speaker 48: Members of the jury, I... I've got your question, and
• 1:20:56
  Speaker 48: the question is, after many hours of deliberation, we are
• 1:21:00
  Speaker 48: unable to come to a unanimous decision.
• 1:21:03
  Speaker 13: I brought you.
• 1:21:03
  Speaker 48: Back out because I'm going to ask you to go
• 1:21:06
  Speaker 48: back out, keeping in mind all the instructions that I
• 1:21:09
  Speaker 48: gave you, to go out and to continue your deliberations
• 1:21:14
  Speaker 48: at this time.
• 1:21:15
  Speaker 2: Day four goes by, no decision. Day five, no decision either.
• 1:21:20
  Speaker 2: So at this point, a clip circulates on Twitter where
• 1:21:23
  Speaker 2: Lindsay's lawyer says this.
• 1:21:24
  Speaker 50: The court has an instruction from the foreperson of that
• 1:21:28
  Speaker 50: juror that's been working for a week now saying that
• 1:21:30
  Speaker 50: there's one juror who refuses to listen to the law
• 1:21:34
  Speaker 50: that you've given him or her on reasonable doubt. And
• 1:21:38
  Speaker 50: if we come back here in a half an hour
• 1:21:40
  Speaker 50: with a mistrial because of a juror that has just
• 1:21:45
  Speaker 50: spurned the instructions of this court, it's a shame.
• 1:21:48
  Speaker 38: It's a real shame.
• 1:21:49
  Speaker 2: Once I heard this, I thought, oh my god, this
• 1:21:51
  Speaker 2: is the most white-pilling moment I've ever seen. Eleven demons
• 1:21:55
  Speaker 2: want to let a woman walk free for a murder,
• 1:21:57
  Speaker 2: and one hero is preventing them from doing that.
• 1:22:00
  Speaker 13: Who's willing to bet that men are the problem?
• 1:22:02
  Speaker 40: Men.
• 1:22:03
  Speaker 43: Who's willing to bet that the men on the jury
• 1:22:07
  Speaker 43: are the ones causing this issue?
• 1:22:08
  Speaker 54: I'll put my money on it.
• 1:22:11
  Speaker 2: I gotta say that this whole event has made me
• 1:22:13
  Speaker 2: misogynistic enough to agree with this person without question. I
• 1:22:17
  Speaker 2: definitely think it's one of the men who is not
• 1:22:19
  Speaker 2: letting this woman get away with murder. And also, as
• 1:22:21
  Speaker 2: someone who has made a lot of videos covering toxic women,
• 1:22:24
  Speaker 2: I had no idea that large populations of them could
• 1:22:27
  Speaker 2: be this evil until Lindsay Clancy. Because make no mistake,
• 1:22:31
  Speaker 2: a ton of TikTok women want her to get away
• 1:22:33
  Speaker 2: with it.
• 1:22:33
  Speaker 53: They should be commended.
• 1:22:34
  Speaker 34: Be quiet, please.
• 1:22:35
  Speaker 13: I've had it with you.
• 1:22:37
  Speaker 9: Oh my God.
• 1:22:37
  Speaker 53: And your sexism and misogyny.
• 1:22:40
  Speaker 9: She's a murderer. I can't.
• 1:22:43
  Speaker 53: These are man-hating women that are standing outside.
• 1:22:46
  Speaker 9: This is what it's about. They think the husband did it.
• 1:22:48
  Speaker 9: They're crazy.
• 1:22:49
  Speaker 13: They've lost their mind.
• 1:22:50
  Speaker 9: They're waving for a murderer.
• 1:22:52
  Speaker 53: Do you know why the woman is in a wheelchair?
• 1:22:53
  Speaker 53: Did you even notice that she's in a wheelchair?
• 1:22:54
  Speaker 15: I couldn't care less.
• 1:22:55
  Speaker 55: She's a murderer.
• 1:22:56
  Speaker 2: Oh great, you can see that she's practicing those breathing
• 1:22:58
  Speaker 2: techniques that we discussed earlier to hold back her anger,
• 1:23:01
  Speaker 2: instead of throwing ice like a crazy person. But why
• 1:23:04
  Speaker 2: exactly is she mad?
• 1:23:05
  Speaker 53: They say that Lindsay was in psychosis. I think these
• 1:23:08
  Speaker 53: women are suffering some from psychosis. They've been watching too
• 1:23:11
  Speaker 53: many true crime Netflix dramas. You know, this was an
• 1:23:15
  Speaker 53: incredibly privileged woman, incredibly wealthy. She had a nanny and
• 1:23:19
  Speaker 53: she's still complaining that she needed help.
• 1:23:21
  Speaker 9: She could not have.
• 1:23:22
  Speaker 53: Got more help from the system that she already had received.
• 1:23:25
  Speaker 53: This is a murderer who strangled her children one by one.
• 1:23:28
  Speaker 10: What you just said was absolutely disgusting.
• 1:23:31
  Speaker 42: Thank you.
• 1:23:31
  Speaker 13: You should be ashamed.
• 1:23:32
  Speaker 56: Of yourself and you can hear that he's not okay this.
• 1:23:36
  Speaker 30: Is true you clearly don't care so pipe.
• 1:23:37
  Speaker 53: Down by the way men watching this if you have
• 1:23:40
  Speaker 53: a woman sat next to you on the sofa who
• 1:23:41
  Speaker 53: is defending this murderer you got to think deeply about
• 1:23:45
  Speaker 53: this i've seen weddings talk to your women and find
• 1:23:49
  Speaker 53: out what are they thinking they're defending this woman it's
• 1:23:52
  Speaker 53: i don't think anybody's defending what she did but you
• 1:23:55
  Speaker 53: can have empathy for what she.
• 1:23:56
  Speaker 13: Went through and how she she ended up here have empathy.
• 1:23:58
  Speaker 9: What in the hell.
• 1:24:02
  Speaker 2: I'm not kidding when I say unironically that tons of
• 1:24:05
  Speaker 2: these women do not want Lindsay to receive actual punishment
• 1:24:08
  Speaker 2: for this.
• 1:24:08
  Speaker 57: And the other thing that I would just be remiss
• 1:24:11
  Speaker 57: to not say is I hope this never happens again.
• 1:24:14
  Speaker 57: We know statistically it really will.
• 1:24:17
  Speaker 12: It will.
• 1:24:18
  Speaker 57: I want us to have the same passion for people
• 1:24:22
  Speaker 57: who don't look like Lindsay, who don't have her same
• 1:24:25
  Speaker 57: access and education, her melanin, her privilege. There are women
• 1:24:33
  Speaker 57: of color sitting around this country in prisons for this
• 1:24:36
  Speaker 57: same thing that we've never heard of. And I just
• 1:24:38
  Speaker 57: want to remind us to have the pink shirts and
• 1:24:41
  Speaker 57: the energy for them as well.
• 1:24:46
  Speaker 2: Do any of you give a shit about the kids?
• 1:24:48
  Speaker 2: You're all literally demons. I mean, I knew Oprah was
• 1:24:51
  Speaker 2: evil because of her promoting bullshit like The Secret, but
• 1:24:54
  Speaker 2: even I didn't think that I would see Oprah holding
• 1:24:56
  Speaker 2: a space for women to make child murder socially acceptable.
• 1:24:59
  Speaker 2: It's already bad enough that it's acceptable to abort kids,
• 1:25:01
  Speaker 2: but who the fuck cries for the murderer instead of
• 1:25:04
  Speaker 2: the kids?
• 1:25:05
  Speaker 15: No, seriously, because of.
• 1:25:06
  Speaker 6: This, repeal the 19th was trending on Twitter for like
• 1:25:09
  Speaker 6: multiple days. Honestly, at this point, if I have to
• 1:25:11
  Speaker 6: give up my vote so Pitbullmama78 also loses her vote,
• 1:25:15
  Speaker 6: that is a sacrifice I am willing to make.
• 1:25:18
  Speaker 2: Yeah, these TikTok feminists are certainly making that argument look
• 1:25:21
  Speaker 2: very attractive. So anyway, a single male juror against nine
• 1:25:24
  Speaker 2: women and two beta males is holding up deliberations, and
• 1:25:28
  Speaker 2: because of that, The defense lawyer says this.
• 1:25:31
  Speaker 38: I request that we have further inquiry.
• 1:25:33
  Speaker 13: I request that.
• 1:25:34
  Speaker 38: My motion is to remove this juror that refuses to
• 1:25:37
  Speaker 38: listen to your instruction on reasonable doubt.
• 1:25:40
  Speaker 14: What?
• 1:25:40
  Speaker 2: You can just do that? If a juror has an
• 1:25:42
  Speaker 2: opinion that you don't like, you can remove them from
• 1:25:44
  Speaker 2: the jury to get the decision that you want? Apparently,
• 1:25:47
  Speaker 2: this is a legal request, but it's to rule out
• 1:25:49
  Speaker 2: jurors from stopping a decision because they refuse to apply
• 1:25:52
  Speaker 2: the law appropriately to the case. So it's almost certain
• 1:25:55
  Speaker 2: that Lindsay's lawyer is misusing this to try to get
• 1:25:57
  Speaker 2: the outcome that he wants, because I've literally seen no
• 1:26:00
  Speaker 2: reason to doubt the prosecution's argument that the murders were premeditated. Anyway,
• 1:26:05
  Speaker 2: the judge refuses to remove the juror, and what a Chad.
• 1:26:08
  Speaker 2: He stood up to nine harpies and two white knight
• 1:26:11
  Speaker 2: simps who went on and on with their nonsense for
• 1:26:13
  Speaker 2: a week about how Lindsay should not be held responsible,
• 1:26:16
  Speaker 2: and he didn't cave.
• 1:26:18
  Speaker 13: I'm going to declare a mistrial at this point.
• 1:26:21
  Speaker 48: All right, if we bring the jury in.
• 1:26:23
  Speaker 2: What a legend.
• 1:26:25
  Speaker 38: They know that they were robbed by one man for
• 1:26:29
  Speaker 38: whatever his agenda was, who stole seven weeks of the
• 1:26:35
  Speaker 38: life of these other jurors that were so attentive, so beautiful,
• 1:26:40
  Speaker 38: so wonderful. And listen to this evidence. And you could
• 1:26:45
  Speaker 38: see how defeated they were sitting there. And I got
• 1:26:48
  Speaker 38: a funny feeling that they would have gone on for
• 1:26:50
  Speaker 38: another week if they had to. So I hope that
• 1:26:53
  Speaker 38: guy can sleep.
• 1:26:54
  Speaker 53: Well at night.
• 1:26:54
  Speaker 2: Just in. Female jurors in Lindsay Clancy trial appear visibly
• 1:26:58
  Speaker 2: emotional with one clenching her fist as the judge declares
• 1:27:02
  Speaker 2: a mistrial. Aw, the women were sad that they couldn't
• 1:27:05
  Speaker 2: acquit a child killer. Make no mistake, they're trying to
• 1:27:08
  Speaker 2: use the insanity plea to acquit her for a murder
• 1:27:11
  Speaker 2: that was without a reasonable doubt premeditated. I have watched
• 1:27:14
  Speaker 2: hours and hours of this trial and the defense was
• 1:27:16
  Speaker 2: not able to make me doubt the prosecution's case that
• 1:27:19
  Speaker 2: Lindsay was in control of her behaviors and chose to
• 1:27:22
  Speaker 2: do what she did of her own volition. I really
• 1:27:24
  Speaker 2: don't think the defense had any strong arguments against the
• 1:27:27
  Speaker 2: premeditation charges, and I think Lindsay's lawyer heavily relied on
• 1:27:31
  Speaker 2: emotional manipulation to convince jurors of his viewpoints. I mean,
• 1:27:35
  Speaker 2: was there any backhanded tactic that Lindsay's lawyer was not
• 1:27:37
  Speaker 2: willing to try? I remember that one of the first
• 1:27:40
  Speaker 2: things that he does when he cross-examines Patrick, which is
• 1:27:42
  Speaker 2: like day two or day three, is that he shows
• 1:27:45
  Speaker 2: cute baby photos that Lindsay posted on Facebook. And then, aw,
• 1:27:48
  Speaker 2: he shows the back-to-school photos to the jury too. Very
• 1:27:52
  Speaker 2: woman-coded and very Hallmark-coded. But I guess that didn't work,
• 1:27:55
  Speaker 2: so he tries this.
• 1:27:57
  Speaker 38: What's next for Lindsey? I'd like to say that perhaps
• 1:28:02
  Speaker 38: Donald Trump, who felt compelled to speak out about this case,
• 1:28:05
  Speaker 38: may very well, Mr. President, I would hope that you
• 1:28:08
  Speaker 38: would consider this young lady, the type of person she is,
• 1:28:12
  Speaker 38: what she's been through, and consider a pardon.
• 1:28:16
  Speaker 2: A bold ask. He's a real practitioner of the art
• 1:28:18
  Speaker 2: of the deal. Though I'm not sure where he was
• 1:28:20
  Speaker 2: going with this one, because as a lawyer... he must
• 1:28:23
  Speaker 2: know that Trump is not allowed to pardon state crimes.
• 1:28:26
  Speaker 2: Though just in case you didn't think there was enough
• 1:28:27
  Speaker 2: drama coming out of this event, right after the trial ended,
• 1:28:31
  Speaker 2: some of the jurors did interviews.
• 1:28:33
  Speaker 56: He was very arrogant. He really did not take anything.
• 1:28:38
  Speaker 9: That anybody said.
• 1:28:39
  Speaker 56: The nurses, he tried to ask a question about the medications,
• 1:28:46
  Speaker 56: and we went back to... the report from South Shore Hospital.
• 1:28:50
  Speaker 56: We had the toxicology report. We could see exactly the amounts.
• 1:28:55
  Speaker 56: The nurses in the room spoke to that.
• 1:28:58
  Speaker 54: There were nurses on the jury.
• 1:29:01
  Speaker 2: Correct me if I'm wrong, but did that chick just
• 1:29:03
  Speaker 2: suggest that a nurse is a qualified expert on psychiatric medicine?
• 1:29:07
  Speaker 2: I understand that nurses can learn some things about medication
• 1:29:10
  Speaker 2: through osmosis because they do it in their daily work life.
• 1:29:13
  Speaker 2: But we're talking about psych meds, specific dosings, and complex
• 1:29:16
  Speaker 2: drug interactions because she was on multiple meds. This is
• 1:29:19
  Speaker 2: a major scope of practice fail for these nurses to
• 1:29:22
  Speaker 2: imply that their opinion counts as expert opinion during deliberation. Also,
• 1:29:27
  Speaker 2: I don't know if the prosecuting lawyer tried this, but
• 1:29:29
  Speaker 2: because of in-group preference, I would have done everything in
• 1:29:32
  Speaker 2: my power to dismiss the female jurors who were nurses.
• 1:29:36
  Speaker 58: Look, they talked about the defense and how one of
• 1:29:38
  Speaker 58: them said they were so impressed that if they needed representation,
• 1:29:41
  Speaker 58: they would hire Kevin Reddington. They said they thought the
• 1:29:44
  Speaker 58: prosecution showed no compassion during the trial.
• 1:29:47
  Speaker 2: See what I mean about human psychology? By the way,
• 1:29:50
  Speaker 2: I wrote that stuff about the importance of speaking emotionally
• 1:29:53
  Speaker 2: to women about a week before I saw that news clip.
• 1:29:56
  Speaker 2: And as much as you might say, well, the law
• 1:29:58
  Speaker 2: should be different or people shouldn't behave that way, This
• 1:30:01
  Speaker 2: is the system that we're working with right now, and
• 1:30:03
  Speaker 2: if you don't respect that, you will lose and fail
• 1:30:05
  Speaker 2: to change it into something better.
• 1:30:07
  Speaker 11: He admitted he had reasonable doubt, and I started filling
• 1:30:11
  Speaker 11: out the forms.
• 1:30:11
  Speaker 9: I was so excited. I wrote my.
• 1:30:14
  Speaker 11: Signature on each one, and then he said, but I'm
• 1:30:17
  Speaker 11: still not going to say that she's not guilty by.
• 1:30:20
  Speaker 13: Reason of insanity.
• 1:30:22
  Speaker 22: Nice.
• 1:30:22
  Speaker 2: He's literally the only person in the room who wasn't
• 1:30:25
  Speaker 2: a nutjob.
• 1:30:25
  Speaker 58: They said they argued so much that the alternate jurors
• 1:30:28
  Speaker 58: could actually hear them and thought they were fighting a
• 1:30:31
  Speaker 58: lot and that they called each other some names that
• 1:30:34
  Speaker 58: they can't say on television.
• 1:30:36
  Speaker 2: This guy's a hero. He's holding the line like crazy.
• 1:30:39
  Speaker 2: Keep in mind that he put up with this for
• 1:30:40
  Speaker 2: hours a day for a week. Even the guy from
• 1:30:43
  Speaker 2: 12 Angry Men didn't have to put up with that
• 1:30:45
  Speaker 2: much bullshit.
• 1:30:46
  Speaker 14: He would not interact with us. We read to him
• 1:30:49
  Speaker 14: on numerous occasions the definition of reasonable doubt from Judge
• 1:30:55
  Speaker 14: Sullivan's instruction. He actually said one day in the end, well,
• 1:31:00
  Speaker 14: why don't we have the judge come in and read
• 1:31:01
  Speaker 14: it again? And we were like, no, we have it
• 1:31:04
  Speaker 14: in front of us. We don't need that. And we
• 1:31:08
  Speaker 14: would highlight it. And, you know, so-and-so, this is the
• 1:31:13
  Speaker 14: definition of reasonable. But he had the hardest time getting
• 1:31:17
  Speaker 14: off the fact that Lindsay viciously killed her children.
• 1:31:20
  Speaker 2: I think what's shocking is that you were able to
• 1:31:22
  Speaker 2: dissociate from that because that's the thing that matters. This
• 1:31:26
  Speaker 2: whole situation was so bad that people started memeing He-Man
• 1:31:29
  Speaker 2: on Twitter to display how evil Lindsay is.
• 1:31:31
  Speaker 15: A snow beast!
• 1:31:35
  Speaker 13: Quick, get behind me!
• 1:31:47
  Speaker 2: So much for the snow beast.
• 1:31:50
  Speaker 44: Oh, thank you, Mr.
• 1:31:52
  Speaker 12: Skeletor.
• 1:31:53
  Speaker 23: You saved us!
• 1:31:54
  Speaker 2: Even Skeletor, a cartoon supervillain who enjoys being evil, is
• 1:31:59
  Speaker 2: not as bad as Lindsay Clancy. And the reality is
• 1:32:02
  Speaker 2: that we should be punishing these people so intensely that
• 1:32:05
  Speaker 2: anyone who is on the edge will think twice before
• 1:32:07
  Speaker 2: crossing the line.
• 1:32:08
  Speaker 44: A lot of our mothers are Lindsay Clancy. We grew
• 1:32:12
  Speaker 44: up with a Lindsay Clancy. The only difference is your
• 1:32:15
  Speaker 44: mama was too scared to get locked up. But if
• 1:32:19
  Speaker 44: your mama could, she unalive your ass. My mother is
• 1:32:23
  Speaker 44: Lindsay Clancy. There's millions of women like Lindsay Clancy. They're
• 1:32:27
  Speaker 44: called narcissists and sociopaths and psychopaths. A lot of them
• 1:32:32
  Speaker 44: have good jobs. A lot of them are school teachers.
• 1:32:35
  Speaker 44: A lot of them are nurses. A lot of them
• 1:32:37
  Speaker 44: are in the military pretending to be good mothers whole time.
• 1:32:41
  Speaker 44: They are torturing their children behind closed doors. And they're
• 1:32:44
  Speaker 44: one inch away from unaliving their children, but they're too
• 1:32:47
  Speaker 44: scared to go to prison.
• 1:32:49
  Speaker 2: She's right. There are tons of abusers who have good
• 1:32:52
  Speaker 2: jobs and act perfectly normal out in public, and then
• 1:32:55
  Speaker 2: they flip the switch when no one's watching. And so
• 1:32:57
  Speaker 2: there are tons of moms out there who are just
• 1:32:59
  Speaker 2: like Lindsay who are about to do something really bad,
• 1:33:02
  Speaker 2: and the only thing stopping them is the negative consequences.
• 1:33:05
  Speaker 2: How does this sound to you? If you end the
• 1:33:07
  Speaker 2: lives of your children, you'll get the death penalty, versus
• 1:33:11
  Speaker 2: if you end the lives of your kids, we'll put
• 1:33:13
  Speaker 2: you in a mental hospital maybe for six months and
• 1:33:15
  Speaker 2: then we'll let you go. Can you see how one
• 1:33:17
  Speaker 2: of those might enable the bad behavior? A lot of
• 1:33:20
  Speaker 2: people underestimate just how much power the fear of consequences
• 1:33:23
  Speaker 2: has over people when it comes to their decision to
• 1:33:26
  Speaker 2: do something bad or not do something bad. Removing those
• 1:33:30
  Speaker 2: consequences will result in more children getting hurt, and we
• 1:33:33
  Speaker 2: certainly don't want to start okaying light punishments mixed in
• 1:33:36
  Speaker 2: with the numerous videos that are like this that are
• 1:33:38
  Speaker 2: going viral on TikTok right now.
• 1:33:40
  Speaker 10: You know the postpartum intrusive thoughts are getting bad when
• 1:33:43
  Speaker 10: you're baby wearing and you walk past one of these
• 1:33:46
  Speaker 10: tree chopping terrifying devices and you imagine yourself like tripping
• 1:33:51
  Speaker 10: and the baby shooting out of my carrier and flying
• 1:33:54
  Speaker 10: into the tree chopper when it's on. Trust me or
• 1:33:59
  Speaker 10: anyone else.
• 1:34:00
  Speaker 2: Aww, how innocent. What a funny joke she made about
• 1:34:03
  Speaker 2: her silly thoughts about her kids. What about these videos
• 1:34:06
  Speaker 2: where women are showing that they can empathize with those
• 1:34:08
  Speaker 2: thoughts and are dramatizing them for views? You know what's crazy?
• 1:34:12
  Speaker 2: Guess who reported having similar ideations?
• 1:34:14
  Speaker 43: Did she also tell you at that time, at the
• 1:34:17
  Speaker 43: beginning of December, that she was having some other intrusive thoughts?
• 1:34:21
  Speaker 22: Yeah.
• 1:34:22
  Speaker 41: She described thoughts of hurting the kids or them having
• 1:34:27
  Speaker 41: some sort of ailment. So, like, she was very worried
• 1:34:30
  Speaker 41: that Cora had, whenever she had a stomachache, she became
• 1:34:32
  Speaker 41: overly worried that she was, you know, like, had, like,
• 1:34:37
  Speaker 41: a liver problem or something much more dramatic than it was.
• 1:34:40
  Speaker 2: What a coincidence. Now, not to say that these specific
• 1:34:43
  Speaker 2: TikTok ladies will do anything, but this is a numbers game,
• 1:34:46
  Speaker 2: and if we don't address events like this properly, and
• 1:34:49
  Speaker 2: because of that, the number of kids getting harmed goes
• 1:34:52
  Speaker 2: from 1% to 2%, then double the number of kids
• 1:34:55
  Speaker 2: get harmed. And what that could mean is that thousands
• 1:34:57
  Speaker 2: of additional kids will have to go through what Cora, Dawson,
• 1:35:00
  Speaker 2: and Callan went through. Oh, hey, look, one of the
• 1:35:03
  Speaker 2: beta male jurors did an interview.
• 1:35:04
  Speaker 34: This is the first time we're hearing from one of
• 1:35:06
  Speaker 34: the three men on the jury.
• 1:35:09
  Speaker 9: He is haunted by the case.
• 1:35:10
  Speaker 16: I think we felt defeated.
• 1:35:12
  Speaker 26: You wanted to come to a conclusion.
• 1:35:14
  Speaker 27: Right.
• 1:35:14
  Speaker 16: I mean, we spent seven weeks, you know, definitely frustrating.
• 1:35:18
  Speaker 9: But he wouldn't engage or couldn't find something to support
• 1:35:22
  Speaker 9: his view.
• 1:35:23
  Speaker 16: There was times he wouldn't engage. Like, he'd be scrolling
• 1:35:26
  Speaker 16: on his phone while people were talking to him.
• 1:35:29
  Speaker 2: So part of that is really funny. And the other
• 1:35:31
  Speaker 2: part of it is like, wait, they were allowed to
• 1:35:33
  Speaker 2: use their phones for a trial that literally everyone is
• 1:35:36
  Speaker 2: commenting on publicly? How do you get an impartial jury
• 1:35:39
  Speaker 2: if they can scroll Twitter or TikTok or Facebook with
• 1:35:42
  Speaker 2: every crazy person in the world telling them how they
• 1:35:44
  Speaker 2: think they should deliberate? How many of these women were
• 1:35:47
  Speaker 2: swayed by what people were saying on the internet?
• 1:35:50
  Speaker 15: Even though we.
• 1:35:50
  Speaker 56: Didn't know what was going on outside of our little
• 1:35:54
  Speaker 56: bubble that we were in, we knew that this was
• 1:35:59
  Speaker 56: a turning point. And this would be something that could
• 1:36:04
  Speaker 56: change something to make it better for other women in
• 1:36:08
  Speaker 56: the future, for other families.
• 1:36:10
  Speaker 2: Okay, so she straight up is admitting that she was
• 1:36:12
  Speaker 2: an activist. Also, this woman, Paula Devlin, what an ironic name.
• 1:36:16
  Speaker 2: But this woman is outright lying. She says they didn't
• 1:36:19
  Speaker 2: know about the conversations that people were having about the trial,
• 1:36:22
  Speaker 2: but one of the male jurors said they had access
• 1:36:24
  Speaker 2: to their phones. You expect me to believe that 11
• 1:36:27
  Speaker 2: women had access to their cell phones? and none of
• 1:36:30
  Speaker 2: them checked the news for five weeks. What do you think,
• 1:36:32
  Speaker 2: we're idiots? This was one of the most publicized trials
• 1:36:35
  Speaker 2: in years. Bullshit, she didn't see any of the coverage.
• 1:36:37
  Speaker 56: We all felt the enormity of our decision. We didn't
• 1:36:41
  Speaker 56: know what was going on outside of that room, but
• 1:36:45
  Speaker 56: we knew that we had a chance to get a
• 1:36:49
  Speaker 56: conversation started that could change something.
• 1:36:54
  Speaker 2: Yeah, no way. So she said this line multiple interviews. Also,
• 1:36:58
  Speaker 2: if you weren't aware of all the publicity, then why
• 1:37:00
  Speaker 2: did you get such grand ideals about how you're going
• 1:37:03
  Speaker 2: to change things? This is just a standard murder trial.
• 1:37:06
  Speaker 2: Multiple cases of this happen per year. Why would this
• 1:37:09
  Speaker 2: specific one be so important? If you didn't know it
• 1:37:12
  Speaker 2: was getting massive coverage, I mean. I think I've only
• 1:37:15
  Speaker 2: spoken to one person in my life who did not
• 1:37:17
  Speaker 2: know about this event. So you're going to tell me
• 1:37:20
  Speaker 2: that zero of the jurors googled the trial that they
• 1:37:22
  Speaker 2: were a part of?
• 1:37:23
  Speaker 56: How can you have biased if Only women can go
• 1:37:27
  Speaker 56: through postpartum depression. Only women can go through postpartum psychosis.
• 1:37:33
  Speaker 56: It's hard not to feel like we failed. I mean,
• 1:37:38
  Speaker 56: everybody says we didn't fail, but it's hard not to
• 1:37:41
  Speaker 56: feel that when you're given a task and you don't
• 1:37:45
  Speaker 56: accomplish it.
• 1:37:46
  Speaker 2: You did fail. You failed those three kids and you
• 1:37:48
  Speaker 2: tried to create a space for them to not get
• 1:37:50
  Speaker 2: justice for what they had to experience. The holdout juror
• 1:37:53
  Speaker 2: was the only one who wasn't a failure. And speaking of,
• 1:37:56
  Speaker 2: while we're on the topic, the holdout juror is the
• 1:37:59
  Speaker 2: one I want to hear from the most. So do
• 1:38:01
  Speaker 2: we have any information on him?
• 1:38:02
  Speaker 59: I'm curious about the jurors themselves because we know it
• 1:38:05
  Speaker 59: was nine women, three men.
• 1:38:07
  Speaker 9: What was the age range?
• 1:38:09
  Speaker 13: What was the racial makeup?
• 1:38:10
  Speaker 15: I haven't heard any of that. What was it?
• 1:38:13
  Speaker 56: 70-ish to 22. And one person of color and then
• 1:38:20
  Speaker 56: everybody else was white. A lot of the jurors had children.
• 1:38:27
  Speaker 54: Uh-huh.
• 1:38:28
  Speaker 11: And.
• 1:38:30
  Speaker 59: a person of color a woman or a man a
• 1:38:32
  Speaker 59: man a man is a holdout juror a person a
• 1:38:37
  Speaker 59: black man yes a black man is a holdout juror
• 1:38:41
  Speaker 59: yes well i have to sit with that for just
• 1:38:45
  Speaker 59: a second.
• 1:38:46
  Speaker 2: Oh no, this is totally the first time I'm hearing
• 1:38:49
  Speaker 2: that he was black after we discussed it before the show.
• 1:38:52
  Speaker 2: This newscaster's gonna act like she didn't ask all those
• 1:38:54
  Speaker 2: questions to specifically reveal information about the holdout juror that
• 1:38:58
  Speaker 2: she already knew. She's a terrible actor, and Paula is
• 1:39:01
  Speaker 2: a horrendous liar, too. They're definitely doing these interviews to
• 1:39:05
  Speaker 2: reveal information about the holdout juror because they're mad. But
• 1:39:09
  Speaker 2: you know, what a plot twist, because literally everyone assumed
• 1:39:12
  Speaker 2: that he was white.
• 1:39:13
  Speaker 13: The holdout during the Lindsay Clancy trial was a black man.
• 1:39:15
  Speaker 24: And I'm not going to share any opinions because I'm
• 1:39:19
  Speaker 24: not a person of color.
• 1:39:20
  Speaker 7: I am a non-practicing white. I'm surprised.
• 1:39:23
  Speaker 13: It changes the landscape of the conversation.
• 1:39:25
  Speaker 40: A little bit.
• 1:39:26
  Speaker 7: And I think a lot of us were assuming that
• 1:39:28
  Speaker 7: it was a white man.
• 1:39:29
  Speaker 2: I swear no one is more passive aggressively racist towards
• 1:39:32
  Speaker 2: black people. than liberal white women.
• 1:39:35
  Speaker 36: I found out who the holdout juror was in the
• 1:39:37
  Speaker 36: Lindsay Clancy trial.
• 1:39:39
  Speaker 30: Guilty!
• 1:39:39
  Speaker 22: That n * * * a is guilty!
• 1:39:41
  Speaker 2: I don't need to deliberate.
• 1:39:43
  Speaker 15: Hang that n * * * a now!
• 1:39:45
  Speaker 2: I got the rope right here.
• 1:39:47
  Speaker 9: It became real.
• 1:39:49
  Speaker 2: It's real.
• 1:39:50
  Speaker 36: Now go back and listen to the way they talk
• 1:39:51
  Speaker 36: about the black man in their other interviews. He wouldn't
• 1:39:54
  Speaker 36: hang out with us. He couldn't explain his reasoning to us.
• 1:39:57
  Speaker 36: He wanted more explanation of reasonable doubt. And we had
• 1:40:00
  Speaker 36: to highlight it on paper and explain it to him.
• 1:40:02
  Speaker 36: He just didn't understand the process. In essence, poor dumb
• 1:40:06
  Speaker 36: black guy.
• 1:40:07
  Speaker 9: Just wouldn't do what he was told by us white liberals.
• 1:40:10
  Speaker 2: I mean, yeah, if you pay close attention, you'll see
• 1:40:12
  Speaker 2: liberal white women constantly talking down to black people. Like
• 1:40:16
  Speaker 2: it's uncanny when you start noticing it.
• 1:40:18
  Speaker 12: Finding out that the one person on that jury that said, nah,
• 1:40:22
  Speaker 12: she sure as ain't getting away with this shit, was
• 1:40:25
  Speaker 12: a black man is by far the best plot twist
• 1:40:32
  Speaker 12: of this whole circus. He was sitting in there like,
• 1:40:35
  Speaker 12: you guys are a bunch of nuts.
• 1:40:37
  Speaker 15: She's guilty.
• 1:40:38
  Speaker 12: You guys are a bunch of fans and we're finding
• 1:40:40
  Speaker 12: out these jurors are true crime junkies. Some of them
• 1:40:43
  Speaker 12: were on the whole Karen Reid wave. Like, we are
• 1:40:47
  Speaker 12: finding out so much. He probably was sitting in there to.
• 1:40:49
  Speaker 15: One black man like, these fucking idiots. No, she's not getting.
• 1:40:53
  Speaker 2: Away with it. And of course, the media is evil.
• 1:40:55
  Speaker 2: So despite the fact that this juror's name is sealed
• 1:40:58
  Speaker 2: and is being sealed indefinitely at this point, the media
• 1:41:01
  Speaker 2: has done nothing but try to leak his information and
• 1:41:04
  Speaker 2: and then sling mud at him to destroy his reputation.
• 1:41:06
  Speaker 17: With the order that you stay away from and have
• 1:41:09
  Speaker 17: no contact directly or indirectly with the alleged victim in
• 1:41:12
  Speaker 17: this case, and also that you not abuse this person.
• 1:41:14
  Speaker 39: You're listening to audio the NBC10 investigators obtained from Brockton
• 1:41:18
  Speaker 39: District Court in September 2021. That's when the holdout juror
• 1:41:22
  Speaker 39: in the Lindsay Clancy case faced a criminal charge for
• 1:41:25
  Speaker 39: assaulting his wife.
• 1:41:26
  Speaker 2: Look, I'm not going to say what he did was right,
• 1:41:28
  Speaker 2: but what I am going to say is that they
• 1:41:30
  Speaker 2: found the right man for the job. They found the
• 1:41:32
  Speaker 2: guy who's not going to take shit from women. Jokes aside, though,
• 1:41:35
  Speaker 2: these are just allegations of domestic violence, and since these
• 1:41:38
  Speaker 2: charges were dropped, and because people lie about these things
• 1:41:41
  Speaker 2: a lot, I'm going to say innocent until proven guilty.
• 1:41:45
  Speaker 2: And to that, I will note that the holdout juror
• 1:41:47
  Speaker 2: has responded to these allegations, saying they were made after
• 1:41:50
  Speaker 2: he filed for divorce from his wife, who he then
• 1:41:52
  Speaker 2: found out wasn't illegal. The juror denies allegations that he
• 1:41:55
  Speaker 2: was violent, and let me just say that when it
• 1:41:57
  Speaker 2: comes to restraining orders, you can get them without proof.
• 1:42:00
  Speaker 2: So just because someone has a protective order or a
• 1:42:02
  Speaker 2: restraining order filed against them doesn't mean they actually did anything.
• 1:42:06
  Speaker 2: People file those things maliciously all the time. Hell, stalkers
• 1:42:09
  Speaker 2: will file them against their victims as a way of
• 1:42:11
  Speaker 2: harassing them. Anyway, let's continue.
• 1:42:14
  Speaker 39: The NBC10 investigators also learned the juror hasn't paid the
• 1:42:17
  Speaker 39: monthly rent at his Plymouth County home since last March,
• 1:42:20
  Speaker 39: according to housing court records.
• 1:42:22
  Speaker 9: As jurors deliberated last week.
• 1:42:24
  Speaker 39: The landlord secured a judgment of more than $ 12, 000 in
• 1:42:27
  Speaker 39: unpaid rent and is moving forward with an eviction.
• 1:42:30
  Speaker 2: Did they do this thorough of an investigation on the
• 1:42:32
  Speaker 2: jurors who wanted to effectively acquit Lindsay? These news people
• 1:42:36
  Speaker 2: are trying to expose any piece of information that will
• 1:42:38
  Speaker 2: make the holdout look bad. They're like, um, did you
• 1:42:41
  Speaker 2: know that the holdout juror doesn't change the batteries in
• 1:42:44
  Speaker 2: his smoke detector? I really don't care about any of
• 1:42:47
  Speaker 2: this because it's irrelevant to the case and it just
• 1:42:49
  Speaker 2: seems spiteful.
• 1:42:50
  Speaker 16: He took the exercise band out of the bag, grabbed
• 1:42:54
  Speaker 16: an empty water bottle, and tied the band around the water.
• 1:43:00
  Speaker 28: Bottle and pulled it.
• 1:43:01
  Speaker 13: What did you think when he did that?
• 1:43:03
  Speaker 16: I was shocked. It didn't make any sense to me.
• 1:43:05
  Speaker 16: We're not in here to play detective or anything. It's
• 1:43:09
  Speaker 16: not a game of Clue. Like, this is serious. I
• 1:43:12
  Speaker 16: asked him, why are you doing that?
• 1:43:15
  Speaker 34: That's a band that was used to strangle a child.
• 1:43:17
  Speaker 14: It's disgusting.
• 1:43:19
  Speaker 2: Oh, that poor water bottle. Disgusting. How will it ever recover?
• 1:43:23
  Speaker 2: But I can't help but feel like the jurors who
• 1:43:25
  Speaker 2: voted not guilty are just terrible people, and all these
• 1:43:28
  Speaker 2: interviews are scripted slop to attack the holdout juror who
• 1:43:31
  Speaker 2: did the right thing. Think about it this way. They're
• 1:43:34
  Speaker 2: treating him worse than Lindsay. With Lindsay, they said things like, well,
• 1:43:38
  Speaker 2: I hope she gets the treatment that she needs. And
• 1:43:40
  Speaker 2: with the holdout juror, Michael, well, might as well say
• 1:43:43
  Speaker 2: his name now. It's already everywhere anyway. But when it
• 1:43:45
  Speaker 2: comes to Michael, they paint him as the worst person
• 1:43:48
  Speaker 2: in the world, and then they dox him, I'm sure
• 1:43:50
  Speaker 2: knowing that it'll put him in danger because of how
• 1:43:52
  Speaker 2: they framed him, and because of all the crazy people
• 1:43:55
  Speaker 2: who are following the case. So honestly, fuck all of you.
• 1:43:58
  Speaker 2: Despite all of you pretending to not know any better
• 1:44:01
  Speaker 2: during the interviews, none of you are innocent. If any
• 1:44:04
  Speaker 2: of the jurors deserve negative consequences for their actions, it's
• 1:44:07
  Speaker 2: the four of you, not the holdout. Obviously, all of
• 1:44:10
  Speaker 2: this is to attack Michael because it didn't reveal anyone
• 1:44:13
  Speaker 2: else's information against their will, only the one who disagreed
• 1:44:16
  Speaker 2: with them. And what a shock, he's a conservative Catholic.
• 1:44:19
  Speaker 2: Of course they hate him.
• 1:44:20
  Speaker 60: Okay, this is actually wild. So the Lindsay Clancy holdout juror,
• 1:44:25
  Speaker 60: is now being... I mean, I don't know how you
• 1:44:26
  Speaker 60: not consider this a form of retaliation. NBC10 Boston did
• 1:44:30
  Speaker 60: a full investigation into him, who has not come out publicly, right?
• 1:44:34
  Speaker 60: This juror has not... His name has not been released publicly.
• 1:44:38
  Speaker 60: He has not chosen to do any interviews. He has
• 1:44:40
  Speaker 60: not made himself public in any way. But this guy,
• 1:44:43
  Speaker 60: Ryan Kath of NBC10 Boston, decided to somehow dig up
• 1:44:48
  Speaker 60: his information and now do an investigative piece.
• 1:44:51
  Speaker 41: And essentially.
• 1:44:53
  Speaker 60: like slander this guy's name, drag his name through the mud.
• 1:44:56
  Speaker 60: And again, how is this not a form of retaliation?
• 1:44:59
  Speaker 60: This is a private citizen who is doing his civic duty,
• 1:45:03
  Speaker 60: serving on a jury. Like this is a whole new
• 1:45:05
  Speaker 60: level of retaliation, intimidation. Like in my opinion, this should
• 1:45:10
  Speaker 60: not be okay. And we should have legal protections.
• 1:45:12
  Speaker 2: Now I've spoken to a lawyer on this and I
• 1:45:14
  Speaker 2: don't believe it legally qualifies as juror retaliation or intimidation,
• 1:45:19
  Speaker 2: but that's certainly what these organizations are trying to do.
• 1:45:22
  Speaker 2: Even when it came to that witch Paula Devlin covertly
• 1:45:25
  Speaker 2: trying to reveal small pieces of information about the holdout,
• 1:45:28
  Speaker 2: quite honestly, I think in the hopes that people would
• 1:45:30
  Speaker 2: dox him, And like I said, that's what ended up happening.
• 1:45:33
  Speaker 34: As you mentioned, the breaking report here is from the
• 1:45:35
  Speaker 34: New York Post. The brother said the family's life has
• 1:45:37
  Speaker 34: been turned upside down, saying that they're getting hounded by
• 1:45:41
  Speaker 34: reporters and true crime fanatics. My family cannot leave the house.
• 1:45:45
  Speaker 34: They are leaving notes at my mother's house. They won't
• 1:45:47
  Speaker 34: leave us alone. And we don't know anything. People have
• 1:45:50
  Speaker 34: been calling me like crazy. It's crazy. The brother also
• 1:45:54
  Speaker 34: says that the family didn't even know that he was
• 1:45:56
  Speaker 34: serving on the jury.
• 1:45:58
  Speaker 9: So it was all a surprise to them.
• 1:46:00
  Speaker 34: As for where we go from here, Clancy is due
• 1:46:02
  Speaker 34: back in court two weeks from today on September 29th
• 1:46:06
  Speaker 34: for a status hearing.
• 1:46:07
  Speaker 9: And again, we are.
• 1:46:08
  Speaker 34: Still waiting on the plans from the Plymouth County DA
• 1:46:11
  Speaker 34: to retry the case.
• 1:46:12
  Speaker 50: Right.
• 1:46:13
  Speaker 2: So they give out a bunch of information about him
• 1:46:15
  Speaker 2: that makes him really easy to find. And then they say,
• 1:46:18
  Speaker 2: by the way, he had charges of domestic abuse in
• 1:46:21
  Speaker 2: the hopes that maybe a lynch mob would go after him.
• 1:46:23
  Speaker 2: Here's something strange, though. You know who else had assault charges?
• 1:46:27
  Speaker 14: But he had the hardest time getting off the fact
• 1:46:29
  Speaker 14: that Lindsay viciously killed her children.
• 1:46:33
  Speaker 2: Yep, the lady who said this, Kelly Farina, had charges
• 1:46:36
  Speaker 2: of assault. They were dismissed, of course, but also so
• 1:46:38
  Speaker 2: were the holdout jurors. Where's the hate mob for her?
• 1:46:42
  Speaker 2: Though we'll see how this take ages, but I'm guessing
• 1:46:44
  Speaker 2: the hope for all of this is that the drama
• 1:46:46
  Speaker 2: around this case will make a retrial incredibly difficult. And
• 1:46:49
  Speaker 2: that's why the news is stirring all this up and
• 1:46:51
  Speaker 2: retaliating against the holdout juror. Because again, make no mistake,
• 1:46:55
  Speaker 2: They are 100% trying to get Lindsay Clancy completely acquitted.
• 1:46:59
  Speaker 59: Clancy's attorney, Kevin Reddington, filed a motion asking for the
• 1:47:02
  Speaker 59: judge to acquit her and throw out the case.
• 1:47:05
  Speaker 2: Whether that request will get accepted or not is up
• 1:47:07
  Speaker 2: to the court, but like I said, the plan has
• 1:47:09
  Speaker 2: always been to get Lindsay acquitted. The insanity plea is
• 1:47:12
  Speaker 2: just the tactic that they're using for it. This has
• 1:47:15
  Speaker 2: always been the goal for a certain group of radicals.
• 1:47:18
  Speaker 2: Remember how Zoram Amdani or Hassan Piker or Francesca Hong
• 1:47:22
  Speaker 2: have all said they want to get rid of prisons?
• 1:47:24
  Speaker 2: This is just another way of doing that. I think
• 1:47:26
  Speaker 2: it's a mistake to fail to see how radicalized and
• 1:47:29
  Speaker 2: crazy the people involved in this case are, because if
• 1:47:32
  Speaker 2: you listen to the full interviews, the three women who
• 1:47:34
  Speaker 2: made themselves public do not believe that Lindsay killed her kids.
• 1:47:39
  Speaker 2: They believe the medical establishment did.
• 1:47:41
  Speaker 14: I believe that Lindsay was wronged by the medical system,
• 1:47:47
  Speaker 14: and I hope this changes things in this country for
• 1:47:52
  Speaker 14: women and all people, really. stop forgetting about Lindsay killing
• 1:47:56
  Speaker 14: her kids. Everybody knows it. The world knows it. But
• 1:48:00
  Speaker 14: look at the doubt. That's all we need to do
• 1:48:04
  Speaker 14: to get this woman the help she deserves.
• 1:48:07
  Speaker 2: You've got to be kidding me. What help is that exactly?
• 1:48:10
  Speaker 2: Are you saying that she goes to get treatment and
• 1:48:12
  Speaker 2: then she is just let out when she is deemed
• 1:48:14
  Speaker 2: better with no real punishments? That sounds like you're confirming
• 1:48:17
  Speaker 2: every conspiracy theory the critics of Lindsay's supporters have had,
• 1:48:21
  Speaker 2: which is that activist jurors and an immoral lawyer were
• 1:48:25
  Speaker 2: 100% trying to make this a pathway to getting away
• 1:48:27
  Speaker 2: with homicide.
• 1:48:28
  Speaker 11: Hopefully this can bring about some change.
• 1:48:32
  Speaker 13: I wish we could have come through differently.
• 1:48:34
  Speaker 15: For Lindsay.
• 1:48:35
  Speaker 11: I feel very sad that we couldn't.
• 1:48:38
  Speaker 56: I think the biggest thing that kept coming back to
• 1:48:40
  Speaker 56: me was how many times she asked for help and
• 1:48:45
  Speaker 56: how many times no one would help her because.
• 1:48:48
  Speaker 15: She said she didn't have a plan.
• 1:48:49
  Speaker 56: I'm asking my family, my friends, the medical community that
• 1:48:57
  Speaker 56: is supposed to help me and no one could seem
• 1:49:00
  Speaker 56: to do that. It was very difficult to separate wanting
• 1:49:05
  Speaker 56: justice for the children from the evidence that we were
• 1:49:10
  Speaker 56: presented with.
• 1:49:11
  Speaker 2: What the fuck? Who's the victim here? Do they care
• 1:49:14
  Speaker 2: at all about the kids? I mean, literally, they're blaming
• 1:49:17
  Speaker 2: everybody but the person who committed the crime. Oh, it's
• 1:49:20
  Speaker 2: Patrick's fault or it's the family's fault because they didn't
• 1:49:23
  Speaker 2: listen hard enough. Fuck you. I thought it was bad
• 1:49:26
  Speaker 2: when this devil passive-aggressively helped dox the holdout juror, but
• 1:49:30
  Speaker 2: this is a whole new level of evil.
• 1:49:32
  Speaker 22: She's a female, and all females is prison. They're full
• 1:49:36
  Speaker 22: of wicked wiles.
• 1:49:37
  Speaker 2: There were many things that Lindsay herself could have done
• 1:49:39
  Speaker 2: to stop this, even if she was out of control
• 1:49:42
  Speaker 2: at the exact moment when she committed the crime, which
• 1:49:44
  Speaker 2: I don't believe. Where was Lindsay's agency in not allowing
• 1:49:48
  Speaker 2: herself to be alone with the kids? Only she actually
• 1:49:51
  Speaker 2: knows how she's feeling at any given moment. So if
• 1:49:53
  Speaker 2: she felt not well that day, then she shouldn't have
• 1:49:55
  Speaker 2: been by herself with the kids. Why did she let
• 1:49:58
  Speaker 2: her husband leave? Why did she answer a phone call
• 1:50:01
  Speaker 2: in the middle of all of it and not say, hey,
• 1:50:03
  Speaker 2: come home right now. I think I've done something bad
• 1:50:06
  Speaker 2: or I'm about to do something bad. You guys understand
• 1:50:08
  Speaker 2: that she had a fucking phone call with Patrick in
• 1:50:11
  Speaker 2: the middle of the murders, right? You're just going to
• 1:50:13
  Speaker 2: ignore that?
• 1:50:14
  Speaker 7: And while you're in.
• 1:50:15
  Speaker 43: That section looking for the medication, do you do something?
• 1:50:19
  Speaker 41: I called Lindsay.
• 1:50:22
  Speaker 13: And why did you call Lindsay?
• 1:50:23
  Speaker 41: Because what we were looking for wasn't there.
• 1:50:26
  Speaker 13: Did she answer the call?
• 1:50:28
  Speaker 41: Actually, I think she didn't at first.
• 1:50:30
  Speaker 13: She called back.
• 1:50:31
  Speaker 14: Okay.
• 1:50:32
  Speaker 43: And did you receive a call back from her about
• 1:50:33
  Speaker 43: a minute later at 5.34 p.m.? Yeah, that's correct.
• 1:50:36
  Speaker 13: Can you describe that phone call for us?
• 1:50:39
  Speaker 41: It was very brief. I just said, I think there
• 1:50:41
  Speaker 41: was a generic brand. And I said, is this one okay?
• 1:50:44
  Speaker 41: And she said, yeah, that's fine.
• 1:50:46
  Speaker 13: And what was her demeanor during the call?
• 1:50:49
  Speaker 7: She was pretty quiet.
• 1:50:50
  Speaker 41: It sounded like she was busy. I remember hanging up
• 1:50:53
  Speaker 41: thinking she's probably in the middle of giving baths or
• 1:50:55
  Speaker 41: something like that.
• 1:50:57
  Speaker 13: So it sounded to you like she was in the
• 1:50:58
  Speaker 13: middle of something? Yeah. Were you able to understand her
• 1:51:00
  Speaker 13: when she spoke to you?
• 1:51:02
  Speaker 14: Yeah.
• 1:51:03
  Speaker 13: And did she seem to understand what you were saying?
• 1:51:06
  Speaker 11: Yes.
• 1:51:06
  Speaker 13: And she didn't seem to.
• 1:51:07
  Speaker 43: Have any trouble recalling why you were at CVS or
• 1:51:11
  Speaker 43: what you were looking for?
• 1:51:12
  Speaker 41: That's correct.
• 1:51:14
  Speaker 2: Now, it's hard for me to get the exact timeline
• 1:51:16
  Speaker 2: of who died when because there are just so many
• 1:51:17
  Speaker 2: videos on this. But one of the kids almost lived.
• 1:51:21
  Speaker 2: Even if the job was already done or well underway,
• 1:51:24
  Speaker 2: if she had just said, hey, come home right now,
• 1:51:26
  Speaker 2: they might have been able to save their youngest son.
• 1:51:29
  Speaker 2: How in the fuck does she bear zero responsibility for this?
• 1:51:32
  Speaker 29: Lindsay was always innocent in their eyes. And this was
• 1:51:35
  Speaker 29: a message, right? We got to send a message. She
• 1:51:37
  Speaker 29: was going in there determining whether the system should be
• 1:51:41
  Speaker 29: found guilty or not guilty. This was always a trial
• 1:51:44
  Speaker 29: of whether the medical professionals... We're responsible for the children.
• 1:51:49
  Speaker 29: And it's a great tactic by the defense attorney. You
• 1:51:52
  Speaker 29: got to give the defense attorney credit. He fed them
• 1:51:54
  Speaker 29: this information. He fed them these arguments. And they bought
• 1:51:57
  Speaker 29: a hook, line, and sinker and went there and were
• 1:51:59
  Speaker 29: advocates for Lindsey.
• 1:52:00
  Speaker 15: Right.
• 1:52:00
  Speaker 2: Like I said, the lawyer is evil. He's very effective
• 1:52:03
  Speaker 2: at it, too. He's very effective at creating an argument
• 1:52:06
  Speaker 2: that will get people to support horrendous things. And I
• 1:52:09
  Speaker 2: think it's important to respect when people are effective at
• 1:52:11
  Speaker 2: what they do so we don't discount the impact of
• 1:52:13
  Speaker 2: their actions simply because we think they're immoral. By the way,
• 1:52:17
  Speaker 2: I'm not just calling him evil for defending his client.
• 1:52:19
  Speaker 2: That's what he's supposed to do as a criminal defense lawyer.
• 1:52:22
  Speaker 2: I'm calling him evil because of things like initiating the
• 1:52:25
  Speaker 2: smear campaign against the holdout juror or asking the president
• 1:52:28
  Speaker 2: for an illegal pardon. And on that note, it's not
• 1:52:31
  Speaker 2: just him. It's entirely possible that all of the interviews
• 1:52:35
  Speaker 2: with the female jurors contain completely scripted answers that were
• 1:52:38
  Speaker 2: planned out with the media outlets before they were recorded.
• 1:52:42
  Speaker 2: I mean, this interview with Paula Devlin and the Black
• 1:52:44
  Speaker 2: Lady was almost certainly scripted to help dox the holdout juror, Michael.
• 1:52:48
  Speaker 2: Not only that, but during the interview that I just showed,
• 1:52:51
  Speaker 2: they forgot to make an important cut where the interviewer
• 1:52:54
  Speaker 2: asks Kelly Farina a question, Kelly gives the wrong answer,
• 1:52:57
  Speaker 2: and then they have her do a do-over where she
• 1:52:59
  Speaker 2: gives the opposite answer. It's real quick, so pay close attention.
• 1:53:03
  Speaker 58: Do you think that she should be retried?
• 1:53:05
  Speaker 14: I would like to see her be retried, absolutely.
• 1:53:08
  Speaker 58: Do you think she should be retried?
• 1:53:11
  Speaker 14: I would like him not to retry her, but if
• 1:53:14
  Speaker 14: he chooses to, I will be in that courtroom, and
• 1:53:17
  Speaker 14: I will support Lindsay to the end here. So I
• 1:53:20
  Speaker 14: hope not, but I don't know.
• 1:53:23
  Speaker 2: Were they talking to these news outlets during the trial?
• 1:53:26
  Speaker 2: Kelly was basically just given an order, and she obeyed
• 1:53:29
  Speaker 2: the news reporter in saying that Lindsay should not be retried.
• 1:53:32
  Speaker 2: which means that Lindsay would not be punished. Also, adding
• 1:53:35
  Speaker 2: in further context, just as a reminder, this court case
• 1:53:38
  Speaker 2: took place in Massachusetts, which is the very same place
• 1:53:42
  Speaker 2: that just went viral for legalizing up-to-birth abortions. Now, when
• 1:53:46
  Speaker 2: it comes to the news obviously acting in bad faith
• 1:53:49
  Speaker 2: to retaliate against the holdout juror, don't hold your breath
• 1:53:52
  Speaker 2: on the government serving them negative consequences. These villains are
• 1:53:55
  Speaker 2: only going to get consequences if we ourselves provide them.
• 1:53:59
  Speaker 2: And just like how they walked the legal line here
• 1:54:02
  Speaker 2: when it came to retaliating against the holdout juror, you
• 1:54:05
  Speaker 2: need to be creative when going against these people. and
• 1:54:07
  Speaker 2: you need to push back. Patrick certainly is.
• 1:54:10
  Speaker 61: I got a letter demanding a retraction of a YouTube short.
• 1:54:13
  Speaker 61: They wrote to me, Mr. Bush, the office represents Patrick
• 1:54:16
  Speaker 61: and his wife. So they write, without limitation, you, on
• 1:54:21
  Speaker 61: a certain date, you posted a shorts video to YouTube.
• 1:54:24
  Speaker 61: In your video, you falsely published as unqualified fact that Mr. Clancy, quote,
• 1:54:30
  Speaker 61: whether he physically did it or not, he was very
• 1:54:34
  Speaker 61: much involved. By involved, When I say involved, I very
• 1:54:41
  Speaker 61: clearly mean emotionally or circumstantially involved.
• 1:54:45
  Speaker 55: Not that Patrick Clancy murdered his kids.
• 1:54:48
  Speaker 2: Yeah, bullshit. It's just like the terrorists at the ICE
• 1:54:51
  Speaker 2: facility playing victim. We didn't know. We were just peacefully
• 1:54:55
  Speaker 2: protesting with explosives and bullets and spray paint at 11 p.m. Again,
• 1:55:01
  Speaker 2: this is the most common strategy that criminals use to
• 1:55:03
  Speaker 2: try to not face consequences when they do shit that's evil.
• 1:55:06
  Speaker 55: Clancy trial is all over my feed, and I appreciate
• 1:55:09
  Speaker 55: the sleuths and the connection of the Apple Watch.
• 1:55:13
  Speaker 54: You shouldn't, by the way, because the connection with the
• 1:55:14
  Speaker 54: Apple Watch and the shoes and all that stuff they
• 1:55:16
  Speaker 54: were looking at, not a thing. They were wrong.
• 1:55:19
  Speaker 55: In the sneakers, in every little misstep, this weasel of
• 1:55:24
  Speaker 55: a man, and if he didn't do it, He definitely
• 1:55:28
  Speaker 55: did something. His dereliction of duty as a husband is
• 1:55:32
  Speaker 55: over the top. His emotional abuse of her while his
• 1:55:35
  Speaker 55: wife suffered terribly.
• 1:55:36
  Speaker 7: Emotional abuse?
• 1:55:38
  Speaker 54: If you call someone an abuser, having very limited information
• 1:55:42
  Speaker 54: like that, I can't. That is one of the worst
• 1:55:46
  Speaker 54: things I think you can do.
• 1:55:47
  Speaker 13: It's irresponsible and it's infuriating.
• 1:55:50
  Speaker 55: He is despicable, whether he... physically did it or not
• 1:55:54
  Speaker 55: he is very much involved and then the marathon badges
• 1:55:58
  Speaker 55: and is you know going for a run you're fine
• 1:56:01
  Speaker 55: while she suffers like great set her free set her
• 1:56:05
  Speaker 55: free she has suffered enough and somebody go love her jesus.
• 1:56:09
  Speaker 2: Gee it sure as hell sounds like you're saying that
• 1:56:11
  Speaker 2: patrick did it here and again even the jurors are
• 1:56:15
  Speaker 2: saying publicly that patrick didn't.
• 1:56:16
  Speaker 37: Do it patrick clancy right You know now the internet
• 1:56:20
  Speaker 37: is awash in theories that he had something to do
• 1:56:22
  Speaker 37: with the deaths of his kids.
• 1:56:25
  Speaker 16: I don't believe in that conspiracy theory that he was
• 1:56:28
  Speaker 16: the one who did it. I think if everyone heard
• 1:56:30
  Speaker 16: that 911 call, they would.
• 1:56:32
  Speaker 13: Change their mind.
• 1:56:33
  Speaker 58: It's safe to say that none of you think that
• 1:56:35
  Speaker 58: Patrick Clancy had anything to do with this.
• 1:56:39
  Speaker 14: I never allowed Patrick to be part of our deliberations
• 1:56:43
  Speaker 14: or any of this experience. We just said, this is
• 1:56:47
  Speaker 14: not about Patrick.
• 1:56:48
  Speaker 2: I hope he sues the fuck out of all these
• 1:56:50
  Speaker 2: people who are slandering him. Patrick, if you're listening and
• 1:56:53
  Speaker 2: you want to do the world a public service, then
• 1:56:55
  Speaker 2: destroy these people's lives. All of the people who are
• 1:56:58
  Speaker 2: saying that you're the real killer are trying to create
• 1:57:00
  Speaker 2: an environment where what happened to you happens to even
• 1:57:03
  Speaker 2: more kids. Making them afraid to defame people will make
• 1:57:06
  Speaker 2: everyone's kids safer. Who knows, maybe he'll start a GoFundMe
• 1:57:10
  Speaker 2: so we can all financially support him dealing out consequences
• 1:57:13
  Speaker 2: to people who think defamation's okay. The moral of the
• 1:57:16
  Speaker 2: story here is that for all of you who are
• 1:57:17
  Speaker 2: dissatisfied with the way things are going and want things
• 1:57:20
  Speaker 2: to be different, I have to say, stop playing defense.
• 1:57:23
  Speaker 2: Defense is the losing strategy. Stop waiting for someone else
• 1:57:26
  Speaker 2: to change things and start changing things yourself. And there
• 1:57:29
  Speaker 2: are many creative ways of doing that. Like, for example,
• 1:57:32
  Speaker 2: if you see someone publicly celebrating Charlie Kirk's murder... and
• 1:57:36
  Speaker 2: you know who their employer is, then send the employer
• 1:57:38
  Speaker 2: the video. Let those people know that they're actually going
• 1:57:41
  Speaker 2: to suffer social consequences for supporting political assassinations. And in
• 1:57:45
  Speaker 2: addition to that, what's actually going to fix this place
• 1:57:48
  Speaker 2: is all of us coming together and collectively dealing out
• 1:57:51
  Speaker 2: negative consequences to those who do bad stuff. If you
• 1:57:54
  Speaker 2: pay attention, I think you'll find some way that you
• 1:57:57
  Speaker 2: can make a contribution. Here's another example. Kick these radicals
• 1:58:01
  Speaker 2: out of your school. If there are people trying to
• 1:58:03
  Speaker 2: install secret DEI programs in your college, tell everyone about them.
• 1:58:08
  Speaker 2: If you're a parent with kids in school, show up
• 1:58:10
  Speaker 2: to PTA meetings and be a huge pain in the ass.
• 1:58:13
  Speaker 2: Just take over. That's what the libtards did. Just do
• 1:58:15
  Speaker 2: it back. It's simple. In fact, there are probably a
• 1:58:18
  Speaker 2: lot of their tactics that you can just blatantly copy. Now,
• 1:58:22
  Speaker 2: I can't give you a solution to every problem here,
• 1:58:24
  Speaker 2: but what I can do is say that if you
• 1:58:26
  Speaker 2: see someone doing harm to your community, Don't just sit
• 1:58:29
  Speaker 2: there and let them do it. Fight back. Make their
• 1:58:32
  Speaker 2: lives hell, and like I said, be creative. Now, I
• 1:58:36
  Speaker 2: can understand that some people might be quite squeamish when
• 1:58:38
  Speaker 2: it comes to dealing out punishments to wrongdoers. Actually, there's
• 1:58:42
  Speaker 2: an abundance of that in Western society, and to that,
• 1:58:45
  Speaker 2: I will say this. If you want to become someone
• 1:58:47
  Speaker 2: who can stand up to these people, you have to
• 1:58:49
  Speaker 2: learn to enjoy it when evil people suffer. My recommendation
• 1:58:53
  Speaker 2: is to go on Twitter. There are endless videos of
• 1:58:55
  Speaker 2: people finding out on that website. In fact, speaking of
• 1:58:58
  Speaker 2: Charlie Kirk, let's watch a situation where someone finds out.
• 1:59:01
  Speaker 30: You enjoyed watching Charlie Kirk lose his life, so now
• 1:59:03
  Speaker 30: we're all going to enjoy you not being.
• 1:59:04
  Speaker 55: Able to pay rent.
• 1:59:24
  Speaker 2: Now, if it's someone who has been genuinely victimized and
• 1:59:27
  Speaker 2: is suffering, then of course you give them sympathy and
• 1:59:29
  Speaker 2: try to help them. But you don't sympathize with evil,
• 1:59:32
  Speaker 2: because if you do that, what will happen is that
• 1:59:34
  Speaker 2: these people will use the strategy that evildoers always use,
• 1:59:37
  Speaker 2: which is to prey on your sympathy to get out
• 1:59:39
  Speaker 2: of consequences. I was just peaceful protesting. I don't care.
• 1:59:43
  Speaker 2: Have fun with that decade in jail, you terrorist. Your
• 1:59:46
  Speaker 2: life is over, buddy. I know it sounds kind of sick,
• 1:59:49
  Speaker 2: and I know it sounds messed up, but acquiring this
• 1:59:51
  Speaker 2: mentality is essential for keeping all of the good people
• 1:59:54
  Speaker 2: and all of the innocent people safe.
• 1:59:56
  Speaker 9: Niceness is not morality.
• 1:59:58
  Speaker 2: Correct. Being nice is not virtuous. You have a moral
• 2:00:02
  Speaker 2: duty to make evil people pay for their actions so
• 2:00:05
  Speaker 2: that they don't feel empowered to hurt others, and that's
• 2:00:07
  Speaker 2: going to require that you have the capacity to be
• 2:00:10
  Speaker 2: cruel to wrongdoers. The threat of consequences is how you
• 2:00:13
  Speaker 2: keep everyone safe, because if people aren't afraid of you
• 2:00:16
  Speaker 2: giving them negative consequences, they will step all over you
• 2:00:19
  Speaker 2: and everyone else. And last, because a lot of this
• 2:00:22
  Speaker 2: fighting back is going to require that you're effective at
• 2:00:24
  Speaker 2: influencing people, I will say that your ability to tell
• 2:00:27
  Speaker 2: stories matters. There's a reason why I break down stories
• 2:00:30
  Speaker 2: and storytelling skills in a lot of my videos. Now,
• 2:00:33
  Speaker 2: there are plenty of books out there about storytelling that
• 2:00:35
  Speaker 2: I've recommended in other videos, but I will say that
• 2:00:38
  Speaker 2: probably the easiest hack is just to watch channels like
• 2:00:41
  Speaker 2: Totally Not Mark that review shows and tell you why
• 2:00:44
  Speaker 2: people like them. You'll pick up a lot of ideas
• 2:00:46
  Speaker 2: that way, and then you just have to practice them
• 2:00:48
  Speaker 2: anytime you talk to people. Anyway, thanks for watching, follow
• 2:00:51
  Speaker 2: me on Twitter, and I'll see you in the next video.