Latest / Prophecy Watchers / Smithsonian Coverup of Giant Skeletons | Mondo Gonzales

Transcript

Smithsonian Coverup of Giant Skeletons | Mondo Gonzales · Prophecy Watchers

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: Well, some of the things that we've been researching and
• 0:03
  Speaker 1: we've been investigating here is the mounds, like the mound sites.
• 0:07
  Speaker 1: These would be not so much megalithic because they're not
• 0:10
  Speaker 1: built of stone, but they're earthworks, right? So these are
• 0:14
  Speaker 1: phenomenal places like Cahokia in Illinois. We've actually done investigations
• 0:20
  Speaker 1: where we've excavated into mounds because we know historically, and
• 0:23
  Speaker 1: I'm working on a project going through all the Smithsonian
• 0:26
  Speaker 1: reports because the Smithsonian reports, their public information today, they.
• 0:31
  Speaker 2: Deny there's no giants, there's no giants, there's no giants,
• 0:33
  Speaker 2: nothing to see here.
• 0:34
  Speaker 3: Where did all those giants that you found go?
• 0:36
  Speaker 1: Yeah, I'm like, well, in report number five, the fifth
• 0:39
  Speaker 1: annual report of the Bureau of Nethology, it says right
• 0:42
  Speaker 1: here that the agents discovered a seven and a half footer.
• 0:45
  Speaker 2: You know, I mean, and then, Others, eight feet.
• 0:48
  Speaker 1: So you think, well, we know that the average size
• 0:50
  Speaker 1: of a Native American is like five foot five.
• 0:53
  Speaker 2: So this is in your own writings.
• 0:56
  Speaker 1: So, again, I'm working going through all that because eventually
• 0:59
  Speaker 1: I'd like to put it together.
• 1:00
  Speaker 2: And I just want to tell the giants of the
• 1:02
  Speaker 2: Smithsonian in their own words.
• 1:04
  Speaker 3: That's your next book, yeah.
• 1:06
  Speaker 1: That's my next book. I'm working on it right now,
• 1:07
  Speaker 1: and it's taking some time. Because it's methodical. You've got
• 1:11
  Speaker 1: to go through all of these 800 pages of documents
• 1:14
  Speaker 1: and try to find the things.
• 1:16
  Speaker 2: It's laborious, but I think it'll be worth it.
• 1:19
  Speaker 3: Well, you notice, I've studied the Smithsonian documents, too. All
• 1:24
  Speaker 3: of these news stories. Back in the 1800s, they found
• 1:28
  Speaker 3: this giant here, this giant here, this giant here. And
• 1:32
  Speaker 3: you notice around the time that someone's theory of evolution got,
• 1:37
  Speaker 3: you know, mainstream and was accepted as science into academia.
• 1:42
  Speaker 3: And suddenly all those articles, all the.
• 1:46
  Speaker 4: Evidence, hey, where'd your giant skeletons go?
• 1:48
  Speaker 3: What giant skeletons? You know, they're sweeping.
• 1:50
  Speaker 4: Suddenly they all disappear.
• 1:51
  Speaker 2: What's up with that?
• 1:52
  Speaker 3: I mean, you found the same information too, correct?
• 1:55
  Speaker 1: What you'll find is it comes back to one guy,
• 1:59
  Speaker 1: John Wesley Powell. And he was the guy that became,
• 2:03
  Speaker 1: in 1879, he became the director of the Bureau of Ethnology,
• 2:06
  Speaker 1: which was a new department under the Smithsonian, specifically talking
• 2:10
  Speaker 1: about American ethnology, right? And he was the guy that
• 2:13
  Speaker 1: explored the Grand Canyon along the Colorado River.
• 2:16
  Speaker 2: So not a dumb guy, but he was an ardent evolutionist.
• 2:20
  Speaker 2: I mean, he loved.
• 2:22
  Speaker 1: And so when he came on, you see a shift
• 2:26
  Speaker 1: between Some of the language that was very free talking
• 2:30
  Speaker 1: about mound builders, even Abraham Lincoln, there's a big good
• 2:35
  Speaker 1: quote for him.
• 2:35
  Speaker 2: He's overlooking Niagara.
• 2:38
  Speaker 1: Our ancestors and even the giants of the mounds, we're
• 2:44
  Speaker 1: looking on Niagara Falls just like we do today. And
• 2:47
  Speaker 1: so that has totally been erased. Uh, after he came on,
• 2:50
  Speaker 1: they were like, Oh no, that's old archeology. We know
• 2:52
  Speaker 1: more now. We don't, we don't believe any of that.
• 2:54
  Speaker 2: But it's interesting that when you look at the, the, uh,
• 2:59
  Speaker 2: the language.
• 2:59
  Speaker 1: For example, as you mentioned, all the, the newspaper articles, thousands, thousands,
• 3:04
  Speaker 1: because everybody and their mother were out digging up the
• 3:08
  Speaker 1: mounds because they thought they were going to find gold.
• 3:12
  Speaker 1: So they would say, oh, an eight foot giant or
• 3:14
  Speaker 1: a nine foot giant was taken from this mound over here, Kentucky,
• 3:18
  Speaker 1: you name it. There's over 200,000 mounds, at least some
• 3:23
  Speaker 1: say a million mounds east of the Mississippi. So you
• 3:26
  Speaker 1: have this entire mound culture. But this is academia at
• 3:31
  Speaker 1: its finest. Well, we don't base our understanding on a
• 3:36
  Speaker 1: newspaper article that was written in the Pittsburgh Gazette in 1895.
• 3:42
  Speaker 1: And so they dismiss out of hand all of those articles,
• 3:46
  Speaker 1: not peer reviewed. Sorry, nothing to see here. That's why
• 3:49
  Speaker 1: my goal is to say, well, the Smithsonian reports are
• 3:55
  Speaker 1: peer reviewed.
• 3:56
  Speaker 2: Yes, we are.
• 3:58
  Speaker 1: One of them talks about a skull that is 36
• 4:01
  Speaker 1: inches in circumference.
• 4:03
  Speaker 2: Well, a normal skull is 23 inches. So 50% bigger.
• 4:09
  Speaker 2: Can you imagine? And this is in their reports. Again,
• 4:13
  Speaker 2: eight footers and stuff like that.
• 4:14
  Speaker 1: So to me, the fact that they dismiss all these
• 4:18
  Speaker 1: newspaper articles is just a, it's very deliberate.
• 4:23
  Speaker 2: I guess obfuscation. We know that. It's a good word.
• 4:27
  Speaker 2: Hiding things.
• 4:28
  Speaker 4: There's an even better word, a scientific word. It's called nuh-uh.
• 4:31
  Speaker 1: Exactly.
• 4:32
  Speaker 4: All you have to do. But you found this nuh-uh.
• 4:35
  Speaker 4: What about this article?
• 4:35
  Speaker 1: Nuh-uh.
• 4:38
  Speaker 2: It's tabloids. Those are the tabloids. Okay.
• 4:41
  Speaker 4: Yeah, no, that's just the bat boy you used to
• 4:44
  Speaker 4: always see when you were checking out in the star
• 4:47
  Speaker 4: or whatever that was. It's just, it's so insane to me.
• 4:51
  Speaker 4: I think we get discouraged often in life. I'm the
• 4:54
  Speaker 4: only guy. The power of one guy is pretty strong.
• 4:57
  Speaker 4: You know, you look in history, you're talking about this guy,
• 4:58
  Speaker 4: one ardent evolutionist who decided to change the course of
• 5:02
  Speaker 4: what we understood. Now you pair that with the laziness
• 5:05
  Speaker 4: of today, right? So we have people that are lazy
• 5:07
  Speaker 4: today who are only going to investigate what's existed in
• 5:11
  Speaker 4: the last two weeks of their lifetime. So they never
• 5:13
  Speaker 4: look past anything. And then you have people back then
• 5:16
  Speaker 4: who hit everything. It's very easy for the truth to disappear.
• 5:19
  Speaker 4: But then you see 2026 roll around and you have
• 5:23
  Speaker 4: the opposite thing happen. All of a sudden, everything that
• 5:26
  Speaker 4: was once complete nonsense, right? Aliens, nonsense. UFOs, nonsense. Nephilim, nonsense. Oh,
• 5:33
  Speaker 4: never mind. Our bad. There really are aliens. There really
• 5:36
  Speaker 4: are UFOs. They're really all, they're rewriting the narrative. And
• 5:39
  Speaker 4: then we're just sitting here like in a movie, eating
• 5:41
  Speaker 4: that up, you know, oh man, Spielberg's so good eating
• 5:43
  Speaker 4: that popcorn. So here's a great question for you then.
• 5:46
  Speaker 4: If this is the year of disclosures, Caleb keeps calling it,
• 5:49
  Speaker 4: where all of these governments are saying all this stuff
• 5:51
  Speaker 4: is real after all, how's the Nephilim connected to UFOs
• 5:55
  Speaker 4: or aliens or any of this stuff in your opinion? Yeah.
• 5:57
  Speaker 2: Okay. That's, that's it. That's let's see. How can we,
• 5:59
  Speaker 2: how can we do that? Um, I don't know if
• 6:04
  Speaker 2: there is a.
• 6:05
  Speaker 1: You know the world I live in, right? So the
• 6:08
  Speaker 1: world I live in. So I think there's a lot
• 6:11
  Speaker 1: of connection or a lot of alleged connection between Nephilim
• 6:15
  Speaker 1: and UFOs. Well, actually, again, my brain works like a
• 6:20
  Speaker 1: scientist in that sense. I have a little bit of
• 6:24
  Speaker 1: skepticism on that. Not that I deny the Nephilim, for sure.
• 6:28
  Speaker 1: But when it comes to UFOs or other things like that,
• 6:31
  Speaker 1: what you can see, though... is there's something dark here.
• 6:37
  Speaker 1: If you study, again, ufology or even the whole abduction phenomenon,
• 6:43
  Speaker 1: what do you have?
• 6:43
  Speaker 2: What's the similarity? Again, there is a similarity.
• 6:46
  Speaker 1: The similarity is you have an outside non-human intelligence that
• 6:52
  Speaker 1: is seeking to modify or disrupt or contribute something to
• 6:55
  Speaker 1: the human genome. And so this is where you have,
• 6:58
  Speaker 1: I mean, this is very, again, very scientific. You have
• 7:02
  Speaker 1: John Mack, you have You have David Jacobs. You have
• 7:05
  Speaker 1: others that are these scientifically minded people that have researched this,
• 7:09
  Speaker 1: you know, from Harvard, et cetera. And what they have
• 7:12
  Speaker 1: found is that these people who have been abducted and
• 7:14
  Speaker 1: they've had these reproduction experiments on them or other things,
• 7:20
  Speaker 1: it is actually very legitimate. And you have others that
• 7:24
  Speaker 1: somehow it has to do with reproduction. It has to
• 7:26
  Speaker 1: do with genetics. It has to do with eggs from
• 7:29
  Speaker 1: women being taken or even male sperm. And you think,
• 7:33
  Speaker 1: what is going on here? And then you think about
• 7:37
  Speaker 1: the evidence that you have for biologics. I mean, this
• 7:39
  Speaker 1: is in Congress. David Grush, you know, asked by Nancy Mace,
• 7:43
  Speaker 1: what was the life form? Is it human?
• 7:45
  Speaker 2: No, ma'am. It was non-human. Non-human. Yeah, we had biologics.
• 7:49
  Speaker 1: And so you have biologics, these non-human, what you would
• 7:54
  Speaker 1: be considered humanoid type figures. Well, that has Nephilim type
• 7:59
  Speaker 1: ideas written all over it in that you have hybrids.
• 8:03
  Speaker 1: And so in that sense, this is where I don't
• 8:06
  Speaker 1: think necessarily it's angels or sons of God having mating
• 8:11
  Speaker 1: with human women. But what they are doing is they're
• 8:13
  Speaker 1: coming down instead of mating with them, they're taking their material.
• 8:17
  Speaker 2: And then they're contributing other things.
• 8:18
  Speaker 1: And now they're producing these hybrid offspring or these biologics
• 8:23
  Speaker 1: that are physical. This isn't just demons, you know, spiritual things.
• 8:26
  Speaker 1: These are physical beings just like the Nephilim were. So
• 8:31
  Speaker 1: in that sense, there is an absolute connection. And I
• 8:33
  Speaker 1: don't think when you think about the grays, you know,
• 8:35
  Speaker 1: the typical big eyes.
• 8:37
  Speaker 2: Well, that's interesting. Where have you seen that before? Big eyes,
• 8:40
  Speaker 2: big eyes and big heads.
• 8:42
  Speaker 3: Yeah.
• 8:42
  Speaker 1: Well, we just talked about it, right? See, so there
• 8:45
  Speaker 1: is a genetic similarity to, if you were to see,
• 8:49
  Speaker 1: I have some pictures. It's not with me, but if
• 8:52
  Speaker 1: you were to look at some of these Paracas people,
• 8:56
  Speaker 1: their heads are a little bit more narrow. But if
• 8:57
  Speaker 1: you broaden that out to a little bit more bulbous
• 9:00
  Speaker 1: with the big eyes, you'd say, that looks like a gray.
• 9:03
  Speaker 1: And they're also shorter, right? So when you look at
• 9:06
  Speaker 1: some of the connections, you see it under, I would say,
• 9:10
  Speaker 1: the big umbrella. And when you ask anybody today, what
• 9:14
  Speaker 1: is a gray? People are like, I don't know. We
• 9:18
  Speaker 1: haven't been given, I know I haven't, or anybody else,
• 9:22
  Speaker 1: access to the biological material to do a DNA test.
• 9:25
  Speaker 2: Wouldn't that be awesome?