Latest / Honey Badger Radio / Susan Wojcicki passes on, Olympic breakdancing! | HBR News 467

Transcript

Susan Wojcicki passes on, Olympic breakdancing! | HBR News 467 · Honey Badger Radio

• 1:15
  Speaker 1: Okay, here we go.
• 1:19
  Speaker 2: This is HBI News number four sixty seven. Susan Wojiskei
• 1:25
  Speaker 2: passes on Olympic break dancing, where we discussed the news
• 1:27
  Speaker 2: of the week and give it the Badger treatment with
• 1:30
  Speaker 2: a B boy style.
• 1:36
  Speaker 1: All Right, hello everybody, and welcome to Honey Badger Radio.
• 1:38
  Speaker 2: Hope you guys doing well this week and you're laughing
• 1:40
  Speaker 2: at all of this absurdity, insanity, monotony so that you
• 1:45
  Speaker 2: are not consumed by it. I am your host, Brian Martinez,
• 1:49
  Speaker 2: and I'm joined by, as always, my lovely co host
• 1:52
  Speaker 2: Hannah Wallen and doctor Randa mcam.
• 1:55
  Speaker 1: We have a great show. Light it for you guys.
• 1:57
  Speaker 1: To let me start over.
• 1:59
  Speaker 2: We have a great show, oh lined up for you
• 2:00
  Speaker 2: guys today, so please be sure to continue the conversations
• 2:04
  Speaker 2: both in the chat as well as the comment section
• 2:07
  Speaker 2: on this week. You know, it's a little bit of
• 2:09
  Speaker 2: a lighter newsweek, or.
• 2:10
  Speaker 1: At least that's what I was trying to do.
• 2:11
  Speaker 2: We're gonna be talking about the recent passing of former
• 2:15
  Speaker 2: YouTube CEO Susan Wijiski, more developments under the Starmer government
• 2:22
  Speaker 2: in the UK, the end of tech Mannals which I
• 2:26
  Speaker 2: heard about this the other day and I had to
• 2:28
  Speaker 2: share and more so, stick around. It's going to be
• 2:31
  Speaker 2: a good time and be sure to join us afterwards
• 2:34
  Speaker 2: for the patron only show. So I am displaying this
• 2:36
  Speaker 2: on the screen right now. We try to, like, you know,
• 2:39
  Speaker 2: make the after shows of the Patron shows a little
• 2:42
  Speaker 2: bit lighter and a little bit more sort of like
• 2:45
  Speaker 2: cultural because people like to talk about things in the
• 2:47
  Speaker 2: culture and such.
• 2:48
  Speaker 1: And yeah, they're coming for your anime.
• 2:50
  Speaker 2: And I knew you guys knew that if anybody who
• 2:52
  Speaker 2: was paying attention would know that they were coming for
• 2:56
  Speaker 2: your anime. So this article comes from Bounding into Com
• 3:00
  Speaker 2: and it reads Japanese conglomerates promoting DEI and ESG initiatives
• 3:05
  Speaker 2: invest in anime and manga industry, Free errand publisher Shogakukon
• 3:11
  Speaker 2: among partners. There's lots of other world I don't know,
• 3:14
  Speaker 2: this is a this fear of Free Aerin is a
• 3:16
  Speaker 2: very popular.
• 3:17
  Speaker 1: Anime right now. I don't I don't.
• 3:19
  Speaker 2: Watch really anything except for Jojo, so I'm not I'm
• 3:23
  Speaker 2: not fully aware of it. But yes, they are coming
• 3:25
  Speaker 2: for your anime and you all probably predicted it just
• 3:28
  Speaker 2: as we did. And we'll be talking about it in
• 3:31
  Speaker 2: the Patron Show as we read through this article, And
• 3:33
  Speaker 2: if you want to join us on that, you have
• 3:35
  Speaker 2: to become a Badger yourself by going to feed the
• 3:37
  Speaker 2: Badger dot com and setting up a monthly subscription Feed
• 3:40
  Speaker 2: the Badger dot com forward slash subscribe five bucks a
• 3:43
  Speaker 2: month will get you into our discord where you'll be
• 3:45
  Speaker 2: able to watch all of this additional content as well
• 3:49
  Speaker 2: as exclusive content. I think Allison just uploaded like an
• 3:51
  Speaker 2: interview that she did with another podcast as an example.
• 3:56
  Speaker 2: And we always have events going on game nights, movie
• 3:59
  Speaker 2: Nights at Sea, so you might want to check that out.
• 4:02
  Speaker 1: And if you don't want to.
• 4:03
  Speaker 2: Wake up one morning to find that we've been yeeded
• 4:05
  Speaker 2: from the internet, please go to Beet Badger Feed. Sorry
• 4:11
  Speaker 2: I'm turning into trump bet. Go to Badger Feed, to
• 4:14
  Speaker 2: the best feed badgerfeed dot com or Honeybadger Radio dot
• 4:19
  Speaker 2: com to find where all of our content lives. Now,
• 4:22
  Speaker 2: without all that out of the way, let us get
• 4:24
  Speaker 2: into today's story.
• 4:25
  Speaker 1: So first we have a bit of a what do
• 4:28
  Speaker 1: you call it?
• 4:29
  Speaker 2: In memoriam for Susan Woodjicky. Susan Woodgicky, the former YouTube
• 4:36
  Speaker 2: chief executive officer and longtime Google executive has passed away,
• 4:40
  Speaker 2: according to her husband, at fifty six, Dennis Troper said
• 4:45
  Speaker 2: in a social media post late on Friday, the following quote,
• 4:49
  Speaker 2: my beloved wife of twenty six years and mother to
• 4:52
  Speaker 2: our five children left us today after two years of
• 4:54
  Speaker 2: living with non small cell lung cancer and quote turbo cancer.
• 5:01
  Speaker 3: Yes, Susan, people aren't calling it turbo cancer. It's not mean.
• 5:04
  Speaker 3: Some peoples is calling it that. It's bigly, it's tremendous.
• 5:09
  Speaker 1: It's terrible.
• 5:10
  Speaker 2: Susan was not just my best friend and partner in life,
• 5:13
  Speaker 2: but a brilliant mind, a loving mother, and a dear
• 5:16
  Speaker 2: friend to many.
• 5:16
  Speaker 1: Troper said.
• 5:17
  Speaker 2: No other details of her death were immediately provided. Wjiski,
• 5:21
  Speaker 2: who played a key role in Google's creation, stepped down
• 5:24
  Speaker 2: as YouTube CEO in twenty twenty three after spending nine
• 5:27
  Speaker 2: years running the video sharing service that reshaped entertainment, culture
• 5:31
  Speaker 2: and politics. Shortly after Google co founders Larry Page and
• 5:37
  Speaker 2: Sergey Brinn incorporated their search engine into a business in
• 5:40
  Speaker 2: nineteen ninety eight, Wijiske rented the garage of her Menlo Park,
• 5:44
  Speaker 2: California home to them for seventeen hundred dollars a month.
• 5:48
  Speaker 2: Wajiskei and Troper's nineteen year old son, Marco Troper, died
• 5:51
  Speaker 2: in February at the UC Berkeley campus, where he resided
• 5:54
  Speaker 2: as a freshman student.
• 5:57
  Speaker 1: So they both died, I.
• 6:01
  Speaker 3: Guess, and I'm reminded of it was only four weeks
• 6:06
  Speaker 3: ago when when people were I'll go ahead and say,
• 6:11
  Speaker 3: celebrating the death of a fireman, Corey Compartori for the
• 6:17
  Speaker 3: crime of chext notes, supporting a presidential candidate who some
• 6:28
  Speaker 3: believe is responsible for some kind of insurrection against the
• 6:32
  Speaker 3: United States, and all that bullshit, which is why not
• 6:35
  Speaker 3: only should you not care if Trump gets shot, you
• 6:39
  Speaker 3: should not care if one of his supporters gets shot
• 6:42
  Speaker 3: and killed because of what Donald Trump took away from you.
• 6:49
  Speaker 3: And it's it's never quite made clear what it is
• 6:53
  Speaker 3: that Donald Trump took away from you. It certainly wasn't
• 6:57
  Speaker 3: gas prices or grocery bryce or is there It's it
• 7:03
  Speaker 3: is quite difficult to pin down to do the meme.
• 7:08
  Speaker 3: How have you been personally affected? Bye bye by this,
• 7:15
  Speaker 3: by this situation, and and I and I'm left to
• 7:21
  Speaker 3: reflect on on on your girl, Susan Bajiskey, and exactly
• 7:27
  Speaker 3: what she cost me, and that's unknown, that's going to
• 7:32
  Speaker 3: remain unknown for a while. But a lot of my
• 7:36
  Speaker 3: peers can't help but but reflect on how much wealth
• 7:45
  Speaker 3: she cost so many of us, it's arguable that I
• 7:50
  Speaker 3: would be rich right now were it not for Susan Bijiskey. Now,
• 7:55
  Speaker 3: I know that's somewhat of a capitalist complaint that I'm yeah,
• 8:04
  Speaker 3: I'm living below the wage of a postman right now,
• 8:08
  Speaker 3: even though I could very well be on the wage
• 8:12
  Speaker 3: of a YouTuber. And lord knows, there's a shipload of
• 8:17
  Speaker 3: money in YouTube, and uh and and all of us
• 8:22
  Speaker 3: could have could have could have had the benefit of
• 8:25
  Speaker 3: that sunshine were it not for the leadership that took
• 8:31
  Speaker 3: over YouTube in I forget where it was, but it was.
• 8:36
  Speaker 3: It was. It was even before these various layers of
• 8:41
  Speaker 3: of censorship and demonetization too. I don't know if it
• 8:45
  Speaker 3: was Susan's fault, but YouTube under her rules, under her guidelines,
• 8:56
  Speaker 3: I mean, they didn't steal from us, because you know,
• 8:59
  Speaker 3: I guess it's that they are the platform there. They
• 9:02
  Speaker 3: are effectively our employers. But if if the whole thing
• 9:09
  Speaker 3: was left to the devices of the free market, then yeah,
• 9:12
  Speaker 3: it's I might be a millionaire by now, or at
• 9:16
  Speaker 3: least a thousand air I'll take. I would take being
• 9:20
  Speaker 3: a thousand day. I was on my way to becoming
• 9:23
  Speaker 3: a thousand air back in the good old days before
• 9:28
  Speaker 3: Susan took over and something happened under her watch. I
• 9:37
  Speaker 3: don't know. I don't know if we'll ever particularly discover
• 9:39
  Speaker 3: who it was who added all those changes to the algorithms,
• 9:44
  Speaker 3: or who was responsible for those changes to the algorithms.
• 9:48
  Speaker 3: But the point is, it's it's it's it's reasonably ascertainable
• 9:53
  Speaker 3: that Susan mcgiske personally cost me a small fortune and
• 10:00
  Speaker 3: personally cost countless people a small fortune. And this isn't
• 10:04
  Speaker 3: a small fortune that would have gone to some other
• 10:07
  Speaker 3: poor family. This is a small fortune that went to
• 10:12
  Speaker 3: fucking ContraPoints and mister Peastall. Now, we don't want to
• 10:15
  Speaker 3: give we don't want to give any of you reprobates
• 10:17
  Speaker 3: this money. We want to give it. We want to
• 10:18
  Speaker 3: give it to these these fucking degenerates.
• 10:21
  Speaker 2: Upstanding, upstanding citizens, is what you mean to say.
• 10:25
  Speaker 3: And I'm like, if if there's anyone I can point
• 10:29
  Speaker 3: to who who changed the course of my life from
• 10:33
  Speaker 3: rich to I mean, not even wealthy too, you know,
• 10:41
  Speaker 3: working class line. It's it's, it's it's isn't a jisky
• 10:46
  Speaker 3: So I have every reason to to have some resentment
• 10:50
  Speaker 3: of her. But when I search my soul, I'm still
• 10:54
  Speaker 3: not glad she's dead. I'm I'm still not going to
• 10:58
  Speaker 3: celebrate her death, even though she hasn't been YouTube CEO
• 11:03
  Speaker 3: for a couple of years, probably because of her battle
• 11:05
  Speaker 3: with cancer. It's been taken over by Neil what's his
• 11:10
  Speaker 3: name all had Car, I think yeah, and and and
• 11:16
  Speaker 3: in the light of all those people who were saying, yeah,
• 11:18
  Speaker 3: that fireman deserved to die because he was sat there
• 11:24
  Speaker 3: innocently in support of a man who actually helped my life.
• 11:35
  Speaker 3: And and and they were there going, yeah, no, I'm
• 11:37
  Speaker 3: glad he's dead. I hoped, I hoped. I'm glad. It
• 11:42
  Speaker 3: sucks that Trump didn't die. It sucks that more of
• 11:45
  Speaker 3: his supporters didn't die because I don't know because he's orange,
• 11:51
  Speaker 3: and and and they're going, yeah, well I want you dead.
• 11:54
  Speaker 3: I want you all dead. I want anyone who crowds
• 11:57
  Speaker 3: around this man dead. And I don't give a fuck
• 11:59
  Speaker 3: what you think. I don't even give a fuck what
• 12:02
  Speaker 3: can be ascertained that you might have thought. But here's me, like,
• 12:07
  Speaker 3: possibly several million dollars worse off because of the existence
• 12:11
  Speaker 3: of of Susan Magiskei. And I'm like, no, I'm I'm
• 12:16
  Speaker 3: I'm still not going to celebrate the fact that she
• 12:18
  Speaker 3: died from turbo cancer that may have been caused by
• 12:22
  Speaker 3: a certain medical procedure that she presided over the administration
• 12:30
  Speaker 3: of two millions of people, billions of people. Maybe she
• 12:35
  Speaker 3: was she was in charge when that entire platform a
• 12:41
  Speaker 3: censored anyone who was saying, maybe you might die from
• 12:45
  Speaker 3: turbo cancer, while she pushed forward every incentive to to
• 12:53
  Speaker 3: receive this chemical that might just give you turbo cancer,
• 12:57
  Speaker 3: and that all of that, and I'm I'm still not
• 13:00
  Speaker 3: glad she's dead. I'm still not going to celebrate her
• 13:04
  Speaker 3: death because tobo cancer is horrible and no one deserves
• 13:08
  Speaker 3: turbo cancer, not even people who've presided over the administration
• 13:14
  Speaker 3: of tobo cancer to billions of people. And I'm like,
• 13:19
  Speaker 3: are we the same. You'll wish death on a random
• 13:23
  Speaker 3: fireman because he was randomly there, but but I'm here
• 13:28
  Speaker 3: not wishing death over someone who may have cost me
• 13:31
  Speaker 3: millions of dollars, Like yeah, we're not the same. None
• 13:34
  Speaker 3: of us are the same. It's I yeah, I'm done.
• 13:38
  Speaker 3: I can't. Yeah, I'll do.
• 13:42
  Speaker 4: So, I'm not going to talk about Susan I am.
• 13:49
  Speaker 4: Their last line kind of just struck me. This is
• 13:53
  Speaker 4: a nineteen year old. I gotta look up whether there's
• 13:57
  Speaker 4: any information on this death or not. So the the
• 14:03
  Speaker 4: USA Today, not the Washington Post. USA Today reported that
• 14:11
  Speaker 4: he his autopsy, UH found high concentrations of cocaine, amphetamine,
• 14:21
  Speaker 4: and xanax. Xenax has prescribed to manage panic and anxiety.
• 14:30
  Speaker 4: So he had two drugs that caused panic and anxiety
• 14:33
  Speaker 4: and one that manages panic and anxiety. And then he
• 14:39
  Speaker 4: also had an antai histamine used to treat allergies and
• 14:45
  Speaker 4: anxiety in his system. So you have kind of this
• 14:49
  Speaker 4: weird mix of upperson I guess downers in his system
• 14:57
  Speaker 4: and and and histamine might have just been for allergies.
• 15:00
  Speaker 4: But this is obviously a young man who had problems,
• 15:09
  Speaker 4: and I'm I'm guessing that his his mom's fame in
• 15:17
  Speaker 4: her dealing with her health problems didn't help. But that's
• 15:27
  Speaker 4: just sad.
• 15:30
  Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, I mean it's uh, it is.
• 15:35
  Speaker 2: It is always a shame and I will echo yours
• 15:40
  Speaker 2: and Mike statements that I don't. I don't celebrate anyone's passing,
• 15:45
  Speaker 2: especially when it is some something like cancer. I'm pretty
• 15:48
  Speaker 2: familiar with cancer and chemo and all the stuff that
• 15:51
  Speaker 2: comes with I think she was doing chemo and radiation
• 15:55
  Speaker 2: and that sucks. It's like, you know, it sucks a lot,
• 16:00
  Speaker 2: But I will yeah, But there is something aside from this.
• 16:04
  Speaker 2: There is something that I was thinking about has more
• 16:09
  Speaker 2: to do with YouTube. And I agree that that YouTube
• 16:13
  Speaker 2: the way that would just keep was running it. It
• 16:17
  Speaker 2: was limiting people's ability to grow their platform, to grow there,
• 16:25
  Speaker 2: and but more importantly, to like reach out and share
• 16:29
  Speaker 2: their ideas and have those ideas be you know, shared
• 16:33
  Speaker 2: on on the YouTube platform. And I think that what
• 16:38
  Speaker 2: this is is something that I've been talking about a lot,
• 16:42
  Speaker 2: is how in the world. I think that YouTube content
• 16:45
  Speaker 2: is essentially art. Now anybody can make it. Not all
• 16:49
  Speaker 2: of it is equal, but it is people creating something.
• 16:53
  Speaker 2: Sometimes they're playing music, sometimes they're putting on little skits.
• 16:58
  Speaker 1: Maybe they will do a.
• 16:59
  Speaker 2: Comment your team, maybe they'll do impressions. But also sometimes
• 17:02
  Speaker 2: they'll just share ideas. A lot of times they're just
• 17:04
  Speaker 2: sharing ideas they're just communicating things, you know, they're beliefs whatever,
• 17:10
  Speaker 2: reading scripture, it doesn't matter. There's a number of ways
• 17:12
  Speaker 2: that people express themselves on YouTube, and I think that
• 17:16
  Speaker 2: it's like like other.
• 17:17
  Speaker 1: Art, there is a very powerful class of.
• 17:23
  Speaker 2: People that engage in extremely strict gatekeeping where they curate
• 17:30
  Speaker 2: the space and so like in the regular art world,
• 17:33
  Speaker 2: there is a tremendous amount of curation that happens through
• 17:36
  Speaker 2: the academics in the field, the people who own museums,
• 17:40
  Speaker 2: the people who trade in art, the people who curate it,
• 17:43
  Speaker 2: the people who own galleries. They all people who own museums.
• 17:48
  Speaker 2: They all engage in this kind of like curation where
• 17:52
  Speaker 2: they say they pick winners and losers, essentially say this
• 17:56
  Speaker 2: is good art, this is not. Now it used to
• 17:58
  Speaker 2: be the case that this was something we could measure,
• 18:00
  Speaker 2: you know, maybe in some like free market way where
• 18:03
  Speaker 2: people will say I like this piece, I don't like
• 18:05
  Speaker 2: this piece, and it sells right, And for a long
• 18:09
  Speaker 2: time we had that. But this kind of curated approach,
• 18:15
  Speaker 2: which is a very political approach also, it revolves around
• 18:19
  Speaker 2: you know, like what is the messaging and is the
• 18:22
  Speaker 2: messaging in line with our belief systems? If it is,
• 18:26
  Speaker 2: then we will consider this to be good art, and
• 18:27
  Speaker 2: then we will promote that. And I think that YouTube
• 18:29
  Speaker 2: does the same thing and engages in the same kind
• 18:33
  Speaker 2: of curation of ideas, because ultimately, art is the way
• 18:37
  Speaker 2: that we express, like something about ourselves, something that we
• 18:42
  Speaker 2: want to say.
• 18:43
  Speaker 1: Sometimes it's benign.
• 18:45
  Speaker 2: Maybe it's just the idea that this is beautiful and
• 18:47
  Speaker 2: we want to share this, that this is beautiful, or
• 18:50
  Speaker 2: that this thing is divine or whatever. But there are
• 18:54
  Speaker 2: people like the kind of people that run and curate
• 19:00
  Speaker 2: the online spaces that are intent on controlling what the
• 19:05
  Speaker 2: conversation looks like. And if you remember, there's a number
• 19:09
  Speaker 2: of things that happened on YouTube. It even like caused
• 19:13
  Speaker 2: that one woman. Do you remember the woman that did
• 19:15
  Speaker 2: those weird like fitness videos and she went to YouTube
• 19:18
  Speaker 2: headquarters with a gun.
• 19:21
  Speaker 1: Do you remember that?
• 19:22
  Speaker 4: Yeah? Yeah, yeah, I remember going.
• 19:24
  Speaker 2: Yeah, like she was feeling but she she was angry
• 19:28
  Speaker 2: because she felt that her platform wasn't being uh you know,
• 19:33
  Speaker 2: was it was being suppressed. Now, maybe it was just
• 19:35
  Speaker 2: not good content and therefore didn't reach a lot of people,
• 19:38
  Speaker 2: but she thought YouTube was responsible. And I think that
• 19:41
  Speaker 2: there's reason for a lot of people to think that
• 19:43
  Speaker 2: because there's other stuff that you see that's like, why
• 19:46
  Speaker 2: doesn't this person have a million subscribers? You know, I
• 19:49
  Speaker 2: always felt that Mike's content was like at or stuff,
• 19:53
  Speaker 2: but YouTube is and had been for a while, you know,
• 19:57
  Speaker 2: damaging his work. Like wherever he would upload video, he
• 20:00
  Speaker 2: would lose subscribers. And it happened to our main channel,
• 20:02
  Speaker 2: and it's happened a lot.
• 20:03
  Speaker 4: So here's the thing with regard to that. Here's the
• 20:06
  Speaker 4: thing with regard to that. It doesn't it doesn't matter
• 20:08
  Speaker 4: whether any individual can prove that their channel was targeted
• 20:13
  Speaker 4: or not. The platform has admitted they do that. Yeah,
• 20:18
  Speaker 4: and so anybody that has that issue is going to
• 20:22
  Speaker 4: suspect that they're The reason they have, you know, lack
• 20:26
  Speaker 4: of us is because they're a targeted suppression. And it's
• 20:29
  Speaker 4: fair for anybody, anybody, It doesn't matter who they are,
• 20:34
  Speaker 4: doesn't matter why they think they're a targeted suppression. It's
• 20:38
  Speaker 4: fair for anybody to suggest that they're one of the
• 20:42
  Speaker 4: people that's being targeted because the platform has admitted they
• 20:47
  Speaker 4: do that, and they don't they haven't provided any Like
• 20:51
  Speaker 4: it's it's bad enough that they do it, but they
• 20:54
  Speaker 4: also won't tell you how to avoid it. It's and
• 20:59
  Speaker 4: this is something thing that I won't tell you how
• 21:03
  Speaker 4: it works. Right, They won't tell you what words you
• 21:05
  Speaker 4: can and can't say. They won't tell you what subject
• 21:10
  Speaker 4: matter you can and can't cover. You know, it's you
• 21:13
  Speaker 4: just have this vague sense, this this knowledge that this
• 21:19
  Speaker 4: is a woke company. And so anything that is non
• 21:24
  Speaker 4: woke or anti woke, anything that's politically incorrect, which for
• 21:31
  Speaker 4: people who know what political correctness started out as, where
• 21:35
  Speaker 4: where that term comes from, and what it really means,
• 21:40
  Speaker 4: it should be the biggest insult for your platform to
• 21:43
  Speaker 4: be called politically correct. Uh, it should be just as
• 21:47
  Speaker 4: bad of an insult as for your platform to to
• 21:52
  Speaker 4: be called just completely fake, because that's that's that's what
• 21:56
  Speaker 4: it is, except that it's you know, a guided way
• 22:01
  Speaker 4: of being fake rather than just randomly fake.
• 22:05
  Speaker 3: Right.
• 22:06
  Speaker 4: So yeah, the like not that it's legitimate for somebody
• 22:10
  Speaker 4: to engage in violence because of it, but it is
• 22:13
  Speaker 4: perfectly legit for any person from any background, any any
• 22:20
  Speaker 4: angle to turn around and say, well this they've admitted
• 22:24
  Speaker 4: they're doing this. I think I'm one of the people
• 22:26
  Speaker 4: they're doing it to, especially if you've been demonetized for something,
• 22:33
  Speaker 4: people's whole channels to go through and be demonetized. If
• 22:37
  Speaker 4: your whole channel is demonetized, you know that you're a target.
• 22:40
  Speaker 4: There is no that confirms it right there. Well, my
• 22:45
  Speaker 4: whole channel was demonetized before any of the rest of you,
• 22:51
  Speaker 4: Like if if Mike has a complaint, I have a
• 22:54
  Speaker 4: complaint because I was. I was demonetized when I came
• 22:59
  Speaker 4: out and said that men have a right as much
• 23:03
  Speaker 4: right as women to say no to sex, that it's
• 23:07
  Speaker 4: not okay to rape men. YouTube demonetized my whole channel
• 23:13
  Speaker 4: for saying that men should be just as much protected
• 23:17
  Speaker 4: under social standards from sexually predatory women as women are
• 23:25
  Speaker 4: from sexually predatory men.
• 23:29
  Speaker 2: Mm hmm, yep, and uh yeah, so I my my
• 23:35
  Speaker 2: My central point was essentially what I'm seeing is that
• 23:38
  Speaker 2: there is a kind of you call it censorship and demonestisation,
• 23:43
  Speaker 2: but there are various tools that YouTube uses to curate
• 23:47
  Speaker 2: the content so that some of it gets you know,
• 23:50
  Speaker 2: heard or seen with a higher frequency than others. And
• 23:54
  Speaker 2: I think the reason why the rules are vague is intentional.
• 23:58
  Speaker 2: It's so that because they're kind of arbitrary, it just
• 24:01
  Speaker 2: comes down to are you in the good Are you
• 24:04
  Speaker 2: in the good graces of YouTube politically, ideologically, whatever, philosophically,
• 24:09
  Speaker 2: then yeah, you're gonna get promoted. If you're not, then
• 24:13
  Speaker 2: you know, then you're not. You're you're gonna get suppressed.
• 24:16
  Speaker 2: And and it's just curation. Just as they do in
• 24:19
  Speaker 2: the in other art worlds, they do it here. So anyway,
• 24:23
  Speaker 2: that was just I just wanted to point that out.
• 24:25
  Speaker 2: But you know, like not happy about what happened to
• 24:30
  Speaker 2: Susan Wijiskey. It's it's always tragic when people pass away.
• 24:33
  Speaker 2: Cancer is not fun. So I don't really wish that
• 24:36
  Speaker 2: on anybody. But anyway, we're gonna move on to the
• 24:38
  Speaker 2: next story. Let us know you guys think about this
• 24:40
  Speaker 2: one in the comments section.
• 24:41
  Speaker 4: Four week move on. I want to point out one
• 24:44
  Speaker 4: other thing. Okay, so her son's death and you know,
• 24:50
  Speaker 4: as I said, he seems like he had some problems.
• 24:54
  Speaker 1: Uh.
• 24:54
  Speaker 4: And Xanax is a prescription drug, and there's two possibilities.
• 25:00
  Speaker 4: Either someone else got a prescription for it and sold
• 25:04
  Speaker 4: it to him, or he got a prescription for it
• 25:07
  Speaker 4: and it didn't help him. And if he got a
• 25:12
  Speaker 4: prescription for it and it didn't help him, it's just
• 25:16
  Speaker 4: one more incident, one more instance of the mental health
• 25:23
  Speaker 4: industry losing a man.
• 25:27
  Speaker 1: Yeah, just another brick in the wall.
• 25:30
  Speaker 4: I heard someone say it was almost as young as
• 25:33
  Speaker 4: you can possibly be and still be a man instead
• 25:35
  Speaker 4: of a boy.
• 25:36
  Speaker 2: Yeah nineteen Yeah, well all right, well let us know
• 25:41
  Speaker 2: what you guys think about that. One of the comments
• 25:42
  Speaker 2: I did get a super child that is looks pretty good.
• 25:45
  Speaker 2: So I'm gonna read that really quick. So Anon gave
• 25:48
  Speaker 2: us fifteen dollars. Thank you, Anon, and says I saw
• 25:51
  Speaker 2: your former guest philosophic hat getting triggered by Lauren Chen
• 25:54
  Speaker 2: asking why can't we just.
• 25:57
  Speaker 1: Call whoores what they are?
• 25:59
  Speaker 3: Whores?
• 26:00
  Speaker 1: How did the badgers get her?
• 26:02
  Speaker 2: And other tone policers like Lauren Southern and Sidney Wantson
• 26:04
  Speaker 2: on your shows as we got all four of them
• 26:07
  Speaker 2: philosophic at Lauren Chan, Lauren Southern, and Sydney Wantson.
• 26:11
  Speaker 1: Thank you for noticing.
• 26:12
  Speaker 2: I'd like to see Brian use more uncouth language and
• 26:15
  Speaker 2: openly criticized female behavior around female guests to weed out
• 26:19
  Speaker 2: the covert feminists and language police. Really disappointed to see
• 26:22
  Speaker 2: women whom I thought understood how men communicate to end
• 26:25
  Speaker 2: up crying because someone was crass. Sooner or later, Hannah
• 26:28
  Speaker 2: and Allison are going to yell at Brian for being
• 26:31
  Speaker 2: too mean and honest. Oh, I don't think so. I
• 26:33
  Speaker 2: think I don't think so. I think Hannah and Alison
• 26:37
  Speaker 2: and Karen, Yeah, they can.
• 26:39
  Speaker 1: Take it like my wife wants me to yell at
• 26:42
  Speaker 1: her more often. I don't know if it's like a
• 26:43
  Speaker 1: fetish thing. But but like, Brian was so.
• 26:48
  Speaker 3: Well, I don't want to say so passive, but he was.
• 26:52
  Speaker 4: He was.
• 26:52
  Speaker 3: It was very lace a fair, it was very let
• 26:55
  Speaker 3: you do whatever you want until the cancer took him
• 26:58
  Speaker 3: to the end stage. And I think I think he
• 27:01
  Speaker 3: came out of that being like, yeah, fuck all of y'all.
• 27:04
  Speaker 3: I'm not I'm not pulling any punches anymore. I came
• 27:08
  Speaker 3: back from the dead. I'm super Brian now, Brian the White.
• 27:14
  Speaker 2: There we go.
• 27:21
  Speaker 4: It's something about women. The vast, overwhelming majority of women
• 27:28
  Speaker 4: are gonna find there there there's gonna be something they're
• 27:32
  Speaker 4: over sensitive about, right, and and you have to take
• 27:39
  Speaker 4: every woman with a grain of salt, right, Yeah, yeah,
• 27:42
  Speaker 4: have to. There isn't there's no such thing as a
• 27:45
  Speaker 4: woman who you should just trust. And I'm including myself
• 27:50
  Speaker 4: in that group, because I make mistakes sometimes too, and
• 27:54
  Speaker 4: you guys know how I argue, all right. I Once
• 27:58
  Speaker 4: I have made my mind up on something, it takes
• 28:02
  Speaker 4: significant evidence to change it. And you've seen me, if
• 28:06
  Speaker 4: you've seen me on Twitter, you've seen me get rude, blunt, obnoxious,
• 28:14
  Speaker 4: and generally generally autistic about some stuff that most women
• 28:22
  Speaker 4: would back down on or most women would start playing
• 28:28
  Speaker 4: victim of it. And I laugh at people for calling
• 28:31
  Speaker 4: me a man, although I do take it as a compliment.
• 28:35
  Speaker 4: When I get accused of arguing like a man, I'm like,
• 28:38
  Speaker 4: oh good, I've accomplished something. You know, because when women argue,
• 28:44
  Speaker 4: they don't argue rationally. Most of the time, they argue emotionally.
• 28:49
  Speaker 4: And I can see the emotional side of a lot
• 28:52
  Speaker 4: of things. But if you let that eclipse the rational side,
• 28:57
  Speaker 4: then you lose the argument, because the emotional side isn't
• 29:01
  Speaker 4: sufficient to prove that that change should be made or
• 29:05
  Speaker 4: that action should be taken against any group of people.
• 29:09
  Speaker 4: When you do that, you're guaranteed to engage in human
• 29:13
  Speaker 4: rights violations instead of preventing them. But most women, most
• 29:19
  Speaker 4: women will have some degree of I guess ego attachment.
• 29:25
  Speaker 4: Oh yeah, to it, and they'll have at least, you know,
• 29:31
  Speaker 4: I don't know how to explain it other than women
• 29:35
  Speaker 4: are girls are raised to take things personally, because everything
• 29:41
  Speaker 4: is personal to a girl. Girls are raised to acquire
• 29:47
  Speaker 4: access to the resources that they need to live and
• 29:52
  Speaker 4: be safe and comfortable by expressing discontent so that somebody
• 29:57
  Speaker 4: will give it to them. And boy are raised to
• 30:01
  Speaker 4: gain their access to the resources they need for for
• 30:06
  Speaker 4: life and safety and comfort by being proactive and going
• 30:11
  Speaker 4: and getting them them. You know, they're like they're they're
• 30:14
  Speaker 4: taught you know, if you need something, go get it.
• 30:17
  Speaker 4: If you if you want something, you have to work
• 30:20
  Speaker 4: for it. Girls are not taught that if you want something,
• 30:23
  Speaker 4: you have to work for it. And that fundamental difference
• 30:28
  Speaker 4: between how kids are raised it plays on there are
• 30:35
  Speaker 4: some aspects of nature that ego that that natural narcissism
• 30:40
  Speaker 4: in in women and girls that instead of suppressing that
• 30:46
  Speaker 4: or teaching women and girls to handle that and and
• 30:52
  Speaker 4: and to thrive in spite of it and to be
• 30:56
  Speaker 4: able to have rational approaches to the challenges in their lives,
• 31:02
  Speaker 4: whether it's arguments or I got to pay my rent?
• 31:05
  Speaker 4: What am I going to do? You know, they end
• 31:09
  Speaker 4: up being the people that will whine to you, how
• 31:12
  Speaker 4: dare you treat us this way? How dare you talk
• 31:16
  Speaker 4: to us this way? Women who find themselves on the
• 31:23
  Speaker 4: wrong side of the woke mom will go to the
• 31:27
  Speaker 4: gallows whining, you misogynists, How dare you kill a woman?
• 31:32
  Speaker 4: You know, men will fight back, Men will fight until
• 31:35
  Speaker 4: there is no more fight to be had, and then
• 31:38
  Speaker 4: they'll ready themselves and they'll die. But women will go
• 31:41
  Speaker 4: out well, women will always go down whining. And so
• 31:45
  Speaker 4: when you see women who somewhat get it, like they
• 31:50
  Speaker 4: get that it's wrong for somebody to be jailed based
• 31:54
  Speaker 4: on a false allegation. They get that it's wrong for
• 31:58
  Speaker 4: men who were abused to not have the same recourse
• 32:02
  Speaker 4: under the law against their abusers. They get that it's
• 32:06
  Speaker 4: wrong for someone who is sexually predatory to get away
• 32:11
  Speaker 4: with it because they're female. But they'll have their line
• 32:16
  Speaker 4: where Yeah, but guines centrism is okay at this point.
• 32:21
  Speaker 4: Guinocentrism is never okay.
• 32:26
  Speaker 1: Is okay?
• 32:26
  Speaker 2: We need some because just some ginocentrism Sometimes that's no
• 32:31
  Speaker 2: I know, but that's what comes up because like these women,
• 32:34
  Speaker 2: they like the women that you mentioned, philosophic at Lauren Chan,
• 32:38
  Speaker 2: Laurence Southern, and Sidney Watson. And I said this when
• 32:41
  Speaker 2: I after I interviewed them, and I thought about it
• 32:44
  Speaker 2: because I remember getting into it a little bit with
• 32:47
  Speaker 2: like Sidney Watson about like, you know, things like feminism
• 32:51
  Speaker 2: of the of the past, feminism in other parts of
• 32:54
  Speaker 2: the world, and they would defend that because there was
• 32:56
  Speaker 2: and I think that it's something that I've said, it's
• 32:58
  Speaker 2: like most women, not all, because I haven't seen it
• 33:01
  Speaker 2: with Hannah, Karen or Alison yet or Lindsey for that matter,
• 33:04
  Speaker 2: but of most women, they have a line, Like no
• 33:07
  Speaker 2: matter how non feminists they claim to be or anti
• 33:09
  Speaker 2: feminists they have they claim to be the overwhelm majority
• 33:12
  Speaker 2: in my in my experience, they have a line that
• 33:16
  Speaker 2: they don't want to see crossed. And that's when they
• 33:19
  Speaker 2: become afraid of patriarchy. That's when they turn into feminists.
• 33:22
  Speaker 2: That's when they start to fear monger around men. It's
• 33:25
  Speaker 2: when they see that line is about to be crossed.
• 33:27
  Speaker 1: And you saw it.
• 33:28
  Speaker 2: Lauren Southern did it, And yeah, Laurence Southern slept on
• 33:30
  Speaker 2: Karen's couch. She went to slut walks Nick. You know,
• 33:34
  Speaker 2: Redding was like, Lauren Southern is a real g et cetera.
• 33:37
  Speaker 2: And then she she goes online and because you know,
• 33:40
  Speaker 2: now we have like these kind of like you know,
• 33:43
  Speaker 2: these let's say, rougher around the edges, Red Peel guys
• 33:47
  Speaker 2: like Andrew Tate and sneak O. They're like on the
• 33:50
  Speaker 2: rise and they're more vocal and they're getting more following
• 33:53
  Speaker 2: and and the whatever podcast and Fresh and Fit and
• 33:56
  Speaker 2: lawn Sun is like, oh my god, misogyny is company.
• 33:58
  Speaker 2: Like No, Lauren, this the natural evolution of you ignoring
• 34:02
  Speaker 2: these problems and not pushing hard enough against them when
• 34:05
  Speaker 2: we were the ones talking about them. And now you've
• 34:08
  Speaker 2: got guys that are like bigger, louder, and more. I mean,
• 34:12
  Speaker 2: I don't even really think they're bad guys, but they're
• 34:14
  Speaker 2: just more forceful. And you're like panicking and the philosophicat
• 34:17
  Speaker 2: is doing it and Sidney Watson is doing it, and
• 34:19
  Speaker 2: it's because they're not ready to handle it. And the
• 34:22
  Speaker 2: truth is, the longer I do this, the longer I've
• 34:24
  Speaker 2: been talking about these things, the more I can see
• 34:27
  Speaker 2: that women are the ones driving the engine of like
• 34:30
  Speaker 2: the end of our civilization. Carl just made a video
• 34:33
  Speaker 2: about the birth rates. I was talking about the birth
• 34:35
  Speaker 2: rates years ago. Carl just made a video about it
• 34:37
  Speaker 2: and he was like, man, it's women. And I'm like, yes, Carl,
• 34:40
  Speaker 2: it's women. Yes, you know because at the end of
• 34:44
  Speaker 2: the day, like when it comes to the conversation about
• 34:46
  Speaker 2: whether or not our civilization gets to continue to exist,
• 34:49
  Speaker 2: it's going to have to fall into the into the
• 34:51
  Speaker 2: lapse of women to make a choice. Do you live
• 34:54
  Speaker 2: for yourself or do you live for your civilization? You
• 34:59
  Speaker 2: are called too heroic grand purpose two and then the
• 35:04
  Speaker 2: men will step up. But people like philosophicat Lauren Southern
• 35:07
  Speaker 2: and Sydney Watson. I think Lauren Chen is actually realizing
• 35:11
  Speaker 2: this because she had a good conversation with a couple
• 35:13
  Speaker 2: of other people that have more of the kind of
• 35:15
  Speaker 2: like coming from the place where I'm coming from, and
• 35:17
  Speaker 2: I think she's realizing that women are not stepping up,
• 35:20
  Speaker 2: but those other women they're they're realizing that they don't
• 35:24
  Speaker 2: get to live their life for themselves. Like you, your
• 35:28
  Speaker 2: purpose on this planet is not to be happy, but
• 35:31
  Speaker 2: to be useful. That is what you have to consider.
• 35:34
  Speaker 1: And you're not doing that.
• 35:35
  Speaker 2: You're living for yourself and this is what people do.
• 35:37
  Speaker 2: I'm sorry, but this is what women have been doing
• 35:39
  Speaker 2: for like seventy five years or something, and it's got
• 35:43
  Speaker 2: to be addressed. That's all I ask is that we
• 35:46
  Speaker 2: talk about it. So you know, Carl's starting to see it,
• 35:49
  Speaker 2: and I'm glad, but you know, it's maybe too little,
• 35:53
  Speaker 2: too late, man, because we're already like really into this.
• 35:56
  Speaker 2: And at the end of the day, you know, the
• 35:57
  Speaker 2: people who are having kids and forming families, they're they've
• 36:00
  Speaker 2: already won. They're going to win because they will inherit
• 36:03
  Speaker 2: the earth. As they say, the meek shall inherit the earth.
• 36:06
  Speaker 2: So you know, but anyway, thank you for the super chow.
• 36:10
  Speaker 4: There's something that I want to want to get across. Right,
• 36:13
  Speaker 4: If you guys see me doing something and you think
• 36:17
  Speaker 4: I'm pulling a laur In Southern or Sydney Watson or whatever,
• 36:22
  Speaker 4: the question to hit me with is is this your opinion?
• 36:26
  Speaker 4: Is this your belief, your position whatever? Because women or
• 36:33
  Speaker 4: because some other reason. Because that's that's the dividing line
• 36:38
  Speaker 4: for me. If the only reason to take a position
• 36:42
  Speaker 4: is because of guynescentrism, then it's not a correct position.
• 36:48
  Speaker 4: If the only reason to take a position is because
• 36:51
  Speaker 4: women deserve some sort of recourse or special treatment that
• 36:57
  Speaker 4: men don't deserve, that women's sensibilities are more fra that
• 37:00
  Speaker 4: women need more assistance, that women need more comfort, or
• 37:07
  Speaker 4: anything along those lines, then it's a wrong position. So
• 37:11
  Speaker 4: if you see me doing that, call me on it,
• 37:15
  Speaker 4: because I hate being wrong. Yeah, but even more than
• 37:20
  Speaker 4: being wrong, I hate being wrong in a way that
• 37:22
  Speaker 4: affects other people and takes them with me.
• 37:26
  Speaker 1: Right yeah.
• 37:28
  Speaker 2: Well yeah, So anyway, we got to move on because
• 37:30
  Speaker 2: we were still just at the end of the first story.
• 37:32
  Speaker 2: But thank you for a non for the comment. Then
• 37:35
  Speaker 2: I got one from Mary the Chief for five dollars
• 37:37
  Speaker 2: and she says, ah, bare news for sixty seven. When
• 37:39
  Speaker 2: Jiske didn't earn her role in YouTube, she got it
• 37:42
  Speaker 2: through cronyism, and she was deeply unqualified for the role
• 37:45
  Speaker 2: she had, but she had not a problem of using
• 37:48
  Speaker 2: her power when she was in charge of the company.
• 37:50
  Speaker 2: I'm sure that that's true.
• 37:52
  Speaker 1: I have no doubt.
• 37:53
  Speaker 2: And then I got a super chat from Zarah Anks
• 37:56
  Speaker 2: and he gives us five dollars and says, no, Hannah,
• 37:59
  Speaker 2: I'll just forbid you from entering the kitchen and take
• 38:02
  Speaker 2: away your apron.
• 38:04
  Speaker 4: No, how am I gonna make my sandwiches?
• 38:09
  Speaker 1: All right?
• 38:09
  Speaker 2: Thanks for the super chats and super childs. We're gonna
• 38:12
  Speaker 2: move on to the next one. Let me just make
• 38:14
  Speaker 2: sure no rumble rants came through. I think I get
• 38:16
  Speaker 2: those now, so don't worry about that. Let us you
• 38:19
  Speaker 2: guys think about this in the comments. We're moving on
• 38:21
  Speaker 2: to the next story.
• 38:22
  Speaker 1: Now.
• 38:23
  Speaker 2: Let me just put it up on the screen here
• 38:25
  Speaker 2: and share it with you guys. Okay, you probably know
• 38:29
  Speaker 2: this face. Ever since the UK protest turned into riots
• 38:34
  Speaker 2: that were sparked from multiple stabbings committed by a second
• 38:37
  Speaker 2: generation immigrant, the UK Parliament has been cracking down on
• 38:41
  Speaker 2: social media and its users. UK lawmakers have made it
• 38:45
  Speaker 2: clear that any citizens caught doing so much as retweeting
• 38:48
  Speaker 2: a post that even vaguely seems to support the protests
• 38:52
  Speaker 2: will face jail time. Sir Mark Rowley, the met Police Chief,
• 38:57
  Speaker 2: has even alluded to the possibility of the extra edition
• 39:00
  Speaker 2: of non UK citizens over online postings about the protests,
• 39:05
  Speaker 2: though he did not go into detail about how that
• 39:07
  Speaker 2: would be done. Another figure threatened by the police chief
• 39:11
  Speaker 2: was current Twitter slash ex owner Elon musk or As
• 39:14
  Speaker 2: musk As Musk has been critical of the UK government
• 39:18
  Speaker 2: and on the side of protesters in several controversial Twitter
• 39:22
  Speaker 2: posts or controversial if you're like I don't know the
• 39:25
  Speaker 2: UK police or government. Musk has faced much criticism for
• 39:29
  Speaker 2: his posts, with Bruce Daisy upon pronouncing that Right, a
• 39:33
  Speaker 2: former Twitter chief, saying that a UK arrest warrant might
• 39:37
  Speaker 2: be deserved for him and that Musk's actions should be
• 39:41
  Speaker 2: a wake up call for Starmar's government to quietly legislate
• 39:45
  Speaker 2: to take back control of what we collectively agree is
• 39:48
  Speaker 2: permissible on social media. It appears that Daisy may get
• 39:52
  Speaker 2: what he wants, as Thierry Breton, current Commissioner for the
• 39:57
  Speaker 2: Internal Market of the European Union, has sent Musk a
• 40:01
  Speaker 2: strongly worded letter reminding him of the European Union's Digital
• 40:05
  Speaker 2: Service Act and how he must comply by it or
• 40:09
  Speaker 2: face the removal of his website in EU member states.
• 40:13
  Speaker 2: In addition to that, UK lawmakers are looking to update
• 40:17
  Speaker 2: the current Online Safety Bill to readd a provision that
• 40:20
  Speaker 2: was initially removed, stating that they could force tech companies
• 40:24
  Speaker 2: to remove content that they find quote.
• 40:27
  Speaker 1: Legal but harmful end quote all right, Mike, the floor
• 40:32
  Speaker 1: is yours so much.
• 40:34
  Speaker 3: I don't know if anyone else wants to speak before
• 40:37
  Speaker 3: I go after you, I will once again, I will
• 40:41
  Speaker 3: be going for twenty minutes or so. So just to
• 40:47
  Speaker 3: put this into context for everyone, as I explained on
• 40:51
  Speaker 3: last week's show, the British government and the British legacy media,
• 40:59
  Speaker 3: they're one of the entity. They're not just in each
• 41:02
  Speaker 3: other's pockets like they are in America. They are to
• 41:07
  Speaker 3: two heads of the same hydra. And last Wednesday, that
• 41:14
  Speaker 3: Hydra organized a race riot, a nationwide race riot, in
• 41:22
  Speaker 3: one hundred different locations across the country. They did this
• 41:26
  Speaker 3: by lying, not just misinforming, as they like to call it,
• 41:34
  Speaker 3: not just not just being inaccurate, just straight up lying,
• 41:41
  Speaker 3: by claiming that one hundred angry mobs of far right
• 41:46
  Speaker 3: ev L thugs would be emerging in those hundred locations
• 41:52
  Speaker 3: that day.
• 41:54
  Speaker 1: This was a lie.
• 41:57
  Speaker 3: The actual number was I believe zero. The stated estimate
• 42:09
  Speaker 3: was one hundreds, and the actual number was pretty fucking
• 42:14
  Speaker 3: close to zero. Nevertheless, thousands, thousands of warlied television zombies
• 42:22
  Speaker 3: took to the streets that faithful Wednesday to lynch their enemies,
• 42:29
  Speaker 3: and their enemies didn't turn up there was just no
• 42:35
  Speaker 3: one there because there is no EDL. It's an organization
• 42:40
  Speaker 3: that's been defunct for eleven years, I believe. But it's
• 42:45
  Speaker 3: the initialism stands for English Defense League, so now it
• 42:54
  Speaker 3: effectively means anyone defending England, one who is in league
• 43:02
  Speaker 3: with one another in the pursuit of defense of defending England.
• 43:08
  Speaker 3: Anyone who can be perceived as committing the legal but
• 43:14
  Speaker 3: harmful non crime hate incident of checks notes, defending England,
• 43:24
  Speaker 3: or looking like they might defend England during these marches
• 43:30
  Speaker 3: that took place last Wednesday, these these eikophobic zombie marches.
• 43:38
  Speaker 3: During during all of this, there was one Labor councilor
• 43:42
  Speaker 3: named Ricky Jones who was filmed leading a large crowd
• 43:48
  Speaker 3: in London, Southeast London and shouting, quote, they are disgusting
• 43:55
  Speaker 3: Nazi fascists and we need to cut all their throats
• 43:59
  Speaker 3: and get rid of them all end quote, and the
• 44:04
  Speaker 3: crowd cheered enthusiastically. I didn't hear a single hint of
• 44:10
  Speaker 3: a sort of whoa whoa, whoa whoa there, buddy, I
• 44:14
  Speaker 3: think you've gone too far there now. It's they just
• 44:17
  Speaker 3: they just cheered. Even the Amnesty International representatives as represented
• 44:24
  Speaker 3: by the by their bibs and the official insignia on
• 44:31
  Speaker 3: their bibs. It's no that they appeared to be leading
• 44:37
  Speaker 3: the cheering, ostensibly against a defunct organization named the E
• 44:44
  Speaker 3: d L. It's it's like if you can imagine if
• 44:49
  Speaker 3: English people took to the streets and they were out
• 44:53
  Speaker 3: here going, we will kill the Ottomans. What the Ottomans? Yes,
• 45:00
  Speaker 3: the Oomans. There's been no such thing as Ottomans for
• 45:04
  Speaker 3: over a century. So who are you really looking for?
• 45:09
  Speaker 3: Who are you really worried about? I think you know, Yeah,
• 45:14
  Speaker 3: I think I do know.
• 45:16
  Speaker 1: But this is not.
• 45:18
  Speaker 3: How the English are talking. It's how some people are
• 45:22
  Speaker 3: talking about the English. And they justify this kind of rhetoric,
• 45:31
  Speaker 3: the the cutold their throats, kind of kind of direct
• 45:38
  Speaker 3: incitement to murder, to murder anyone who is defending England
• 45:44
  Speaker 3: that kind of thing, by simply labeling them with this
• 45:49
  Speaker 3: scary initcimalism like idel. We've seen this all before, haven't we,
• 45:57
  Speaker 3: ladies and gems. Anyone of the offense of defending men
• 46:04
  Speaker 3: is a filthy, stinking MRA. What does what does MRA
• 46:09
  Speaker 3: stand for? It doesn't matter, It doesn't even matter. Just
• 46:12
  Speaker 3: look at the letters m ah hey, those oppressive, self
• 46:17
  Speaker 3: insistent letters. Just imagine them slanted at a perfect angle,
• 46:23
  Speaker 3: like swastikas emblazoned across a mural and draped over big
• 46:28
  Speaker 3: ben or beware, beware, the three letters that we say
• 46:34
  Speaker 3: are going to kill you. And part of that is true.
• 46:40
  Speaker 3: By the way, it actually doesn't mean anything. The dreaded initialism.
• 46:47
  Speaker 3: It's not used as a descriptive term. It's used as
• 46:50
  Speaker 3: a derogatory term. This is a slur, even though it
• 46:55
  Speaker 3: can be a literal description. Thief is a literal description,
• 47:03
  Speaker 3: like burglar or robber or thief, but it can be
• 47:08
  Speaker 3: used as a slur because the act of thievery is
• 47:13
  Speaker 3: stigmatized as should be. Abuser, it can be used as
• 47:19
  Speaker 3: a slur because the act of abuse is stigmatized as
• 47:24
  Speaker 3: it should be, and in our language, in our common palance,
• 47:31
  Speaker 3: these crimes such as thievery and abuse are no more
• 47:38
  Speaker 3: stigmatized than the unthinkable act of even so much as
• 47:43
  Speaker 3: verbally supporting men or English people. If you advocate for
• 47:53
  Speaker 3: men's rights, you're treated like you're in a terrorist organization.
• 47:59
  Speaker 3: If you defend England, you're treated like you're in a
• 48:04
  Speaker 3: terrorist organization. And it's yeah, it's a witch hunt, an
• 48:09
  Speaker 3: ongoing one, the kind that comes with actual violent mobs.
• 48:15
  Speaker 3: Last Wednesday was just thousands of useful idiots, zombified by
• 48:22
  Speaker 3: the television, parading through the streets, intimidating everyone in a
• 48:28
  Speaker 3: vulgar display of power and tearing down England flags and
• 48:34
  Speaker 3: attacking anyone who happens to be wearing England flags or
• 48:38
  Speaker 3: even British flags. And it would have resulted in violent
• 48:44
  Speaker 3: brawls in the streets of major cities all across the
• 48:48
  Speaker 3: country if the enemies of the regime fell for it,
• 48:55
  Speaker 3: If the enemies of the regime were as dollible as
• 49:00
  Speaker 3: its own hypnotized henchmen. See, they watch the TV, they
• 49:07
  Speaker 3: read the newspapers, and believe everything they're told. Their enemies
• 49:11
  Speaker 3: do not. Their enemies know that all of that shit
• 49:14
  Speaker 3: is stay propaganda. That's why they live in such vastly
• 49:18
  Speaker 3: different worlds, because some of us have escaped the circus
• 49:24
  Speaker 3: of lies that our legacy media has become under the
• 49:28
  Speaker 3: stewardship of the government. Nobody appears to be altogether sure
• 49:34
  Speaker 3: where this rumor came from. This rumor about there being
• 49:39
  Speaker 3: one hundred far right mobs across the country. This misinformation,
• 49:45
  Speaker 3: as you might call it, this fake news. It just
• 49:49
  Speaker 3: it's spontaneously appeared in almost every newspaper and every TV
• 49:54
  Speaker 3: channel at the same time. That's what happens when the
• 49:59
  Speaker 3: government is regulating the entire broadcast media industry. They can
• 50:06
  Speaker 3: just they can do that. They can propagate a lie,
• 50:10
  Speaker 3: send one hundred violent mobs to run a mark, and
• 50:14
  Speaker 3: then congratulate themselves for slaying a dragon because the dragon
• 50:20
  Speaker 3: didn't turn up. So yeah, nobody's altogether sure where the
• 50:27
  Speaker 3: rumor came from. But there's this one chap named Nick
• 50:33
  Speaker 3: Lowels who seems quite confident that the whole thing was
• 50:38
  Speaker 3: a hoax, but that it's a good thing because the
• 50:43
  Speaker 3: hoaxed question brought the country out in a unified message
• 50:48
  Speaker 3: of anti racism, or however he worded it in his
• 50:54
  Speaker 3: public confession on account if he couldn't help himself, but
• 51:01
  Speaker 3: to admit that it was a hoax, because you see,
• 51:05
  Speaker 3: Nick Lowells is part of this reinvention of the STAZI
• 51:11
  Speaker 3: that gives itself the laughable moniker hope, not hate. It's
• 51:17
  Speaker 3: what you might call an NNGO, but that too, is
• 51:21
  Speaker 3: a laughable moniker. When the government gives them ungudly amounts
• 51:27
  Speaker 3: of money to organize large scale hit pieces on anyone
• 51:32
  Speaker 3: who is remotely opposed to the incoming and ongoing Communist revolution.
• 51:38
  Speaker 3: Even the Reform Party will sack its members as and
• 51:43
  Speaker 3: when Hope not hate tells them to they when hope
• 51:48
  Speaker 3: not hate tells them to jump, they will only ask
• 51:51
  Speaker 3: how high. And Nick Lowells appears to be the top
• 51:55
  Speaker 3: brus of hope not hate. It was he who who
• 52:00
  Speaker 3: publicly started a rumor that the Native English were attacking
• 52:05
  Speaker 3: Muslim women with acid. I claim that was quickly corrected
• 52:11
  Speaker 3: by community notes on Twitter. By the way, God bless
• 52:14
  Speaker 3: your community notes. Nick Loles works for the government. Nick
• 52:19
  Speaker 3: Lowells lies for the government. Nick Lowles admitted that the
• 52:25
  Speaker 3: one hundred riots story was a hoax. Like I said,
• 52:31
  Speaker 3: nobody knows exactly where the rumor came from. But if
• 52:35
  Speaker 3: I were a betting man, I would put the farm
• 52:39
  Speaker 3: and my first born and my left leg on your
• 52:43
  Speaker 3: boy nick Lowell's being the origin of it orbit entirely
• 52:48
  Speaker 3: at the behest of his masters in Westminster. And to
• 52:52
  Speaker 3: refer to return full circles to the story at hand.
• 52:58
  Speaker 3: What is it with which which the British public are
• 53:02
  Speaker 3: being charged as they casually post tweets that nine people
• 53:08
  Speaker 3: will read. It's something along the lines of communications, especially
• 53:16
  Speaker 3: inaccurate communications that may incite violence or hatred, especially riots,
• 53:24
  Speaker 3: that things the government and its stooges and its patsies
• 53:28
  Speaker 3: and its four guys do all the fucking time at
• 53:33
  Speaker 3: unimaginable scales. Yeah, they kidnap, They kidnap us and cage
• 53:40
  Speaker 3: us for doing as even the most minuscule scales talk
• 53:48
  Speaker 3: about people in glasshouses. But our government operates from a
• 53:52
  Speaker 3: gigantic glass cathedral with walls fifty feet thick, which it
• 53:59
  Speaker 3: uses as part of the lensing apparatus in its colossal
• 54:03
  Speaker 3: death ray, which it fires randomly at the innocent British
• 54:07
  Speaker 3: public while they arrest anyone in the aforementioned British public
• 54:12
  Speaker 3: who happens to be in possession of a laser pen
• 54:17
  Speaker 3: lest they dare point that laser pen at the lens
• 54:21
  Speaker 3: the lensing apparatus of the cathedral. Our country is being
• 54:28
  Speaker 3: held hostage by an ice giant who has stamped every
• 54:34
  Speaker 3: city into a crater and is in the process of
• 54:37
  Speaker 3: stamping every small town into a crater, while prosecuting the
• 54:42
  Speaker 3: ants and the mice on suspicion of violently pummeling against
• 54:49
  Speaker 3: its giant feet while it stamps on them. Ricky Jones,
• 54:56
  Speaker 3: by the way, the Labor councilor I told you about earlier,
• 55:01
  Speaker 3: the man who shouted we need to cut all their
• 55:04
  Speaker 3: throats and get rid of them all. That guy, he
• 55:08
  Speaker 3: has been suspended by the Labor Party, and I believe
• 55:11
  Speaker 3: he is now facing charges of incitement and murder. We'll
• 55:15
  Speaker 3: see how that goes. But that's only a secondary incitement.
• 55:20
  Speaker 3: The only reason Ricky Jones was even there getting caught
• 55:25
  Speaker 3: in four K saying the quiet part out loud, it's
• 55:29
  Speaker 3: because of this nationwide.
• 55:33
  Speaker 1: Call to arms.
• 55:36
  Speaker 3: That was clearly and obviously issued by the government and
• 55:40
  Speaker 3: its monopolized media mouthpiece, based on false information, clearly and
• 55:48
  Speaker 3: unambiguously false information that was blatantly fabricated for the purposes
• 55:54
  Speaker 3: of stirring up public conflict. It clearly came from somewhere.
• 56:00
  Speaker 3: It clearly came from a powerful singularity. I, for one,
• 56:04
  Speaker 3: would like to know who it was, and I would
• 56:08
  Speaker 3: like whoever it was, to face so much as a
• 56:11
  Speaker 3: fashion of the legal consequences that are currently befalling random
• 56:17
  Speaker 3: English nobodies who so much as satirically repeated any blasphemy
• 56:24
  Speaker 3: against the untouchable ones, namely the foreigners and the minorities,
• 56:29
  Speaker 3: especially the Musclips. But it's not going to happen because
• 56:33
  Speaker 3: we are policed in multiple tiers, not just two tiers.
• 56:39
  Speaker 1: But a pyramid.
• 56:41
  Speaker 3: In many Eastern cultures, that pyramid is called a caste system,
• 56:47
  Speaker 3: but we don't call it that over it, we don't
• 56:49
  Speaker 3: call it anything. But we still have the pyramid. And
• 56:52
  Speaker 3: at the top of the pyramid is the party, the uniparty,
• 57:01
  Speaker 3: and those who work for the uniparty. They can do
• 57:06
  Speaker 3: anything they want with diplomatic community. They can fuck your
• 57:10
  Speaker 3: children right in front of you with any object of
• 57:14
  Speaker 3: their choice. They can do it until there is blood everywhere, and.
• 57:19
  Speaker 5: Then they will play around with the blood of your
• 57:22
  Speaker 5: child and there's nothing you can do about That's that's
• 57:26
  Speaker 5: that's that's the top tier, and that's always how it's been.
• 57:29
  Speaker 3: But below that is the tier of the foreigners, the
• 57:34
  Speaker 3: foreigners whom the government pays to be here, the highed mercenaries,
• 57:40
  Speaker 3: the soldier class in the cast system, which is it's
• 57:45
  Speaker 3: anyone who's not English basically, and below that anyone who's
• 57:51
  Speaker 3: not British. It's a small difference further than it's in there.
• 57:57
  Speaker 3: And though it's tempting to divide whatever's left over into
• 58:00
  Speaker 3: middle class and working class or whatever, but no, that's
• 58:04
  Speaker 3: not important. There's three main layers. The bottom layer is
• 58:09
  Speaker 3: your own countrymen, the middle layer is the other countrymen,
• 58:15
  Speaker 3: and the top layer is the party the lizard people.
• 58:20
  Speaker 3: Of course, all of these layers are also divided by stacks.
• 58:25
  Speaker 3: Foreign women are better than foreign men, but they're still
• 58:30
  Speaker 3: not as good as the as the lizard people in
• 58:33
  Speaker 3: the penthouse of the pyramid, and the rapes don't matter
• 58:37
  Speaker 3: across that divide. Yeah, one of the only points of
• 58:40
  Speaker 3: contention remaining is are native women better than foreign dark men?
• 58:48
  Speaker 3: That we're not sure about. It depends its case by case.
• 58:51
  Speaker 3: It depends how devoted any given person is to the
• 58:54
  Speaker 3: doctrines of the lizard people. And that's just how works forever.
• 59:00
  Speaker 3: There's no end in sight for at least five years,
• 59:04
  Speaker 3: because that's that's when the next election is, and it's
• 59:09
  Speaker 3: the only change is going to happen if Nigel Farage
• 59:12
  Speaker 3: gets in, and that's not gonna happen because they're already
• 59:15
  Speaker 3: trying to kill him with a mob. You may have
• 59:19
  Speaker 3: seen that happen. Ah, forgive my dooming and my black pilling. Folks.
• 59:26
  Speaker 3: I know there's a lot of there's a lot of
• 59:29
  Speaker 3: white pilling going on right now because Trump and Elon
• 59:32
  Speaker 3: had a chat last night. But in the meantime, my
• 59:36
  Speaker 3: country's fucking dying.
• 59:38
  Speaker 1: It might already be dead.
• 59:41
  Speaker 3: It feels odd to be experiencing it from here, safely
• 59:46
  Speaker 3: ensconced in Connecticut. I'm I'm going home in September, and
• 59:52
  Speaker 3: I have to wonder if I'll come home to a
• 59:54
  Speaker 3: mailbox full of court summonses and a front door longer
• 1:00:00
  Speaker 3: on its hinges. I don't I don't want to go back.
• 1:00:05
  Speaker 3: You guys, can I stay here? Can I just can
• 1:00:10
  Speaker 3: I just do what I do at potties and hide
• 1:00:12
  Speaker 3: under a pile of jackets until it's all over.
• 1:00:15
  Speaker 1: I'm scared. You guys told me just go to Mexico
• 1:00:19
  Speaker 1: and then walk through.
• 1:00:21
  Speaker 2: You'll be fine. You don't even have to do an accent.
• 1:00:24
  Speaker 2: You don't even have to do an accent.
• 1:00:26
  Speaker 1: So okay.
• 1:00:27
  Speaker 4: First of all, refugee status, and it takes forever to
• 1:00:31
  Speaker 4: decide whether you are one or not.
• 1:00:33
  Speaker 2: Yeah, you can stay here. In the meantime, however, I
• 1:00:36
  Speaker 2: must issue attraction. I believe that the League of Extraordinary
• 1:00:40
  Speaker 2: Gentlemen is real, and we have photo evidence, so they've
• 1:00:45
  Speaker 2: obviously they're real, and I'm oh, wait, no, no, it's
• 1:00:49
  Speaker 2: not the League of Extraordinary Gentlemen. It's the English Defense League. Sorry,
• 1:00:54
  Speaker 2: I must retract that was that was fake news?
• 1:00:57
  Speaker 3: Sorry?
• 1:00:59
  Speaker 2: What what?
• 1:00:59
  Speaker 4: What?
• 1:00:59
  Speaker 3: What does league officially mean? Do that means when people
• 1:01:02
  Speaker 3: are in league with each other?
• 1:01:04
  Speaker 4: Yes, basically it's a it's.
• 1:01:09
  Speaker 1: Club or team, yeah, or order.
• 1:01:12
  Speaker 4: The order the league usually implies some degree of competition
• 1:01:17
  Speaker 4: or uh responsibility or responsibility to compete with an enemy.
• 1:01:25
  Speaker 4: So yeah, yeah, no, I might take on this isn't
• 1:01:29
  Speaker 4: going to be about the UK. And it's pretty obvious
• 1:01:34
  Speaker 4: that some officials in the UK, regardless of lower high status,
• 1:01:43
  Speaker 4: just issued a warning to an American citizen who owns
• 1:01:50
  Speaker 4: an American company that American law and the American Constitution
• 1:01:58
  Speaker 4: does not apply to their company because people from the
• 1:02:03
  Speaker 4: UK can access its services. That is kind of unprecedented.
• 1:02:12
  Speaker 4: Oh wait, no, it's not, it's not. This isn't new.
• 1:02:17
  Speaker 4: I just want to let you guys know they've done
• 1:02:22
  Speaker 4: this before. I don't know if y'all remember the experience
• 1:02:29
  Speaker 4: of Mark Pearson being falsely accused on the train, not
• 1:02:38
  Speaker 4: a train station, talking through a train station, and they
• 1:02:46
  Speaker 4: were next to each other for a split second, walked
• 1:02:53
  Speaker 4: past each other right squad for rest and when that happened,
• 1:03:00
  Speaker 4: when that story came out, because under UK law you
• 1:03:05
  Speaker 4: can't say her name in conjunction with that case, there
• 1:03:11
  Speaker 4: was video evidence, by the way that proved that it
• 1:03:14
  Speaker 4: was physically impossible for him to have committed the crime.
• 1:03:20
  Speaker 4: It's not even something that she could have imagined really happened.
• 1:03:24
  Speaker 4: So it wasn't a mistake and it's not possible that
• 1:03:29
  Speaker 4: he did something that she misunderstood. It was a deliberate, knowing, wilful, malicious,
• 1:03:37
  Speaker 4: false allegation against just an ordinary guy by somebody famous
• 1:03:45
  Speaker 4: who makes her money being famous for a living, being
• 1:03:52
  Speaker 4: fake for a living, because that's what acting is, right,
• 1:03:57
  Speaker 4: And we in the United States got censored for saying
• 1:04:02
  Speaker 4: her name on Twitter when it was Twitter, when it
• 1:04:06
  Speaker 4: was run by Jack Off whatever his name was. I
• 1:04:10
  Speaker 4: can't remember his last name. But in any case, that
• 1:04:18
  Speaker 4: was the first time that UK law was applied to
• 1:04:23
  Speaker 4: American citizens by an American company, and that is probably
• 1:04:27
  Speaker 4: why they think that Musk can be intimidated right now
• 1:04:32
  Speaker 4: into complying, and if he is, it's possible, it's possible
• 1:04:37
  Speaker 4: that he could be right. I don't I don't pretend
• 1:04:42
  Speaker 4: to believe that any particular American businessman has balls big
• 1:04:52
  Speaker 4: enough to stand up to world government, even even Musk right,
• 1:04:59
  Speaker 4: even as for as big as he talks, even for
• 1:05:01
  Speaker 4: him letting Trump back on the platform and all that,
• 1:05:05
  Speaker 4: I don't know. It's possible. Everything is possible. So it
• 1:05:10
  Speaker 4: would be unfair to say, oh, he's gonna defend us,
• 1:05:12
  Speaker 4: he's going to defend us. No, be ready to defend yourself.
• 1:05:19
  Speaker 4: And that's where people who are involved in the legal
• 1:05:24
  Speaker 4: practice in regard to free speech cases, which you only
• 1:05:31
  Speaker 4: have a free speech case, really, if a government pressures
• 1:05:36
  Speaker 4: the company to silence you, and you can prove that
• 1:05:40
  Speaker 4: that happened, because the constitution applies to it's a limit
• 1:05:46
  Speaker 4: on the government. It's not a limit on private citizens.
• 1:05:49
  Speaker 4: Private citizens don't have to listen to you, and private
• 1:05:52
  Speaker 4: citizens don't have to give you anything right, and a
• 1:05:55
  Speaker 4: private company doesn't either. But if a government comes along
• 1:06:00
  Speaker 4: and says the private company has to silence you, that's
• 1:06:04
  Speaker 4: a different story. That's when we start looking at you know.
• 1:06:09
  Speaker 4: Can we file an injunction, can we file a restraining order,
• 1:06:15
  Speaker 4: can we file a lawsuit, whatever it takes to essentially
• 1:06:19
  Speaker 4: fight back on our own behalf. And whether that means
• 1:06:26
  Speaker 4: forcing the platform to stop complying with the requests of
• 1:06:32
  Speaker 4: foreign governments to silence American citizens, or whether that means
• 1:06:38
  Speaker 4: some degree of recourse against a foreign government. I don't know,
• 1:06:42
  Speaker 4: because I don't know enough about how the courts handle
• 1:06:46
  Speaker 4: things like this. There hasn't been a lot that's made
• 1:06:50
  Speaker 4: the news in regard to a court handling something like this.
• 1:06:54
  Speaker 4: But it's something that it's something that American citizens are
• 1:07:00
  Speaker 4: going to have to be prepared to do, and it's
• 1:07:02
  Speaker 4: a battle that we're going to have to be prepared
• 1:07:04
  Speaker 4: to fight because we don't know, and we can't rely
• 1:07:10
  Speaker 4: on just one man. No matter how great men are,
• 1:07:15
  Speaker 4: Musk is still just one. He's one guy, not an army.
• 1:07:20
  Speaker 4: Even if he stood up for all of us, he
• 1:07:25
  Speaker 4: still could be defeated in that just by the fact
• 1:07:29
  Speaker 4: that he has a great economic investment in that company,
• 1:07:34
  Speaker 4: and it's possible for having it shut down in Europe
• 1:07:43
  Speaker 4: to impact him economically enough that it could be quite damaging.
• 1:07:51
  Speaker 4: On the other hand, if we do see Musk standing
• 1:07:55
  Speaker 4: up for the free speech rights of American citizens in
• 1:08:00
  Speaker 4: regard to this, if he does stand up to the UK,
• 1:08:05
  Speaker 4: then it's fair to suggest that Americans should get behind
• 1:08:08
  Speaker 4: him and support him in that. I'm not happy with
• 1:08:14
  Speaker 4: everything about the way X is being run. I'm still
• 1:08:20
  Speaker 4: shadow band, but I'm also still paying my eight bucks
• 1:08:28
  Speaker 4: to get the ability to post super long posts because
• 1:08:32
  Speaker 4: I am super verbose, and I am still supporting the
• 1:08:36
  Speaker 4: platform enough to feel like I'm doing my part in
• 1:08:46
  Speaker 4: supporting what he did with the Twitter files where he
• 1:08:52
  Speaker 4: released the information that lets us know what the government
• 1:08:57
  Speaker 4: did previously, which by the way, was a violation of
• 1:09:02
  Speaker 4: the Constitution in and of itself, pressuring social media platforms
• 1:09:09
  Speaker 4: to spensor, to to basically to curate what people can
• 1:09:18
  Speaker 4: and cannot post on their platforms based on political ideology.
• 1:09:26
  Speaker 4: Like the fact that we know that we were gaslighted
• 1:09:30
  Speaker 4: over that for years while the government was doing it right,
• 1:09:36
  Speaker 4: So the fact that we know that is worth something,
• 1:09:39
  Speaker 4: and that's pretty much that's why I'm still paying that
• 1:09:43
  Speaker 4: eight bucks. But but yeah, if if Musk stands up
• 1:09:48
  Speaker 4: for us, that's a really big step, because, like I said,
• 1:09:54
  Speaker 4: you know, if if he loses access to Europe or
• 1:09:59
  Speaker 4: to several countries in Europe because of this, that is
• 1:10:03
  Speaker 4: a big financial hit. That's a big sacrifice to ask
• 1:10:07
  Speaker 4: any businessman to take. Then it is fair to suggest
• 1:10:10
  Speaker 4: that maybe people should respond by helping to support the platform, right,
• 1:10:18
  Speaker 4: And I'm not saying that everybody that is should just
• 1:10:21
  Speaker 4: stop if he doesn't, because there is, like I said, that,
• 1:10:25
  Speaker 4: that pressure as well. But so don't count on him,
• 1:10:32
  Speaker 4: don't rely on him, don't depend on him. But if
• 1:10:36
  Speaker 4: he demonstrates the courage to do that, you know, back
• 1:10:43
  Speaker 4: him certainly. Yeah, but be ready to defend yourself. Be
• 1:10:49
  Speaker 4: ready to consult an attorney if you feel that you've
• 1:10:53
  Speaker 4: been your speech has been suppressed at the behest of
• 1:10:57
  Speaker 4: a government entity, and you're in American citizen, investigate and
• 1:11:04
  Speaker 4: find out what you can do about it, and do it.
• 1:11:08
  Speaker 4: Don't just let it slide, because it's not fair to
• 1:11:12
  Speaker 4: put it all on one guy.
• 1:11:16
  Speaker 2: All right, let me see if I got any super
• 1:11:19
  Speaker 2: chats or super child. I did get a super chat
• 1:11:23
  Speaker 2: from Senior Sticks for two dollars, and he says, what
• 1:11:25
  Speaker 2: the modern day Automa Ottomans who walk away doctor, I don't.
• 1:11:31
  Speaker 1: I don't understand that, but I read it and that's
• 1:11:34
  Speaker 1: what matters.
• 1:11:35
  Speaker 2: And then I got a super rumble rant, a super
• 1:11:37
  Speaker 2: rumble rant meant to say rumble rant, a rumble rant
• 1:11:39
  Speaker 2: for Nova Fan twenty one for a dollar. And he says,
• 1:11:42
  Speaker 2: should someone give Starmar a history lesson between the Americans
• 1:11:44
  Speaker 2: and the British a few hundred years ago? I don't
• 1:11:46
  Speaker 2: know what you're talking about. Okay, well, thank you for that.
• 1:11:50
  Speaker 2: Let us know you guys thinking about this one in
• 1:11:52
  Speaker 2: the comments. We're gonna move on to the next story.
• 1:11:55
  Speaker 2: Uh yeah, so let's let's do that. So you guys
• 1:11:59
  Speaker 2: probably have seen this video circulating the internet or a
• 1:12:05
  Speaker 2: video like it.
• 1:12:06
  Speaker 3: It's an important for you guys to express yourself through
• 1:12:10
  Speaker 3: a movement, being able to move your body to convey
• 1:12:13
  Speaker 3: a message, to get something across.
• 1:12:19
  Speaker 2: I'm gonna mute this to protect us from copyright. But
• 1:12:23
  Speaker 2: you can see that the moves, the moves are hopping,
• 1:12:27
  Speaker 2: so what you're looking at.
• 1:12:28
  Speaker 3: Original, they are her own moves.
• 1:12:32
  Speaker 4: So I kid do that last week in the grocery
• 1:12:35
  Speaker 4: store because his mom woudn't buy a candy bar.
• 1:12:38
  Speaker 3: So her mom do it because husband wouldn't you wanted?
• 1:12:43
  Speaker 2: Okay, so like what you are looking at and I
• 1:12:46
  Speaker 2: know that you're bedazzled by. This is the Australian Olympics
• 1:12:53
  Speaker 2: breakdancing contestant Australian Olympic Committee President Amma marez uh Okay.
• 1:13:02
  Speaker 2: So this happened at the Olympics. We had this breakdancing thing.
• 1:13:04
  Speaker 2: I don't think that breakdancing was a thing in the Olympics,
• 1:13:08
  Speaker 2: uh in the past.
• 1:13:09
  Speaker 1: And when I saw this, I thought it was being
• 1:13:11
  Speaker 1: a thing.
• 1:13:12
  Speaker 3: It was No. I have to say this, gymnastics should
• 1:13:16
  Speaker 3: never be a thing anything that requires judges to kind
• 1:13:21
  Speaker 3: of give it a mark out of five. It's not
• 1:13:24
  Speaker 3: a sport. It's a dance that requires judges to figure
• 1:13:31
  Speaker 3: out who the fuck wan That shouldn't be in the Olympics.
• 1:13:35
  Speaker 3: It should be people who can run the fastest, people
• 1:13:38
  Speaker 3: who can throw the furthest I mean, it's.
• 1:13:41
  Speaker 1: Pick up the heaviest, low difficult people.
• 1:13:43
  Speaker 3: If you require judges to figure out who did it best,
• 1:13:48
  Speaker 3: then it's it's not best. What you're what you're what
• 1:13:52
  Speaker 3: you're describing there is not best. It's it's it's a
• 1:13:57
  Speaker 3: bunch of subjective bullshit that can be very easily corrupted.
• 1:14:03
  Speaker 3: And this, this is a good example of what happens
• 1:14:09
  Speaker 3: when well, this ship is corrupted.
• 1:14:13
  Speaker 1: I want to Okay, so this is play around on
• 1:14:15
  Speaker 1: the floor like a like a.
• 1:14:19
  Speaker 4: Child, this you know what, running and I'm traumatized.
• 1:14:23
  Speaker 2: Guys, what I imagine is, you know, when there's like
• 1:14:26
  Speaker 2: in the cartoons and sometimes like there's like a giant
• 1:14:30
  Speaker 2: like pylon and like of different cartoon characters and they're fighting,
• 1:14:34
  Speaker 2: and because the animators can't like spend a lot of time,
• 1:14:37
  Speaker 2: they just draw like a cloud with limbs, you know,
• 1:14:39
  Speaker 2: occasionally popping out of the cloud.
• 1:14:41
  Speaker 1: This is actually what happens inside of the cloud.
• 1:14:43
  Speaker 2: We're seeing it being expressed in slow motion for us
• 1:14:47
  Speaker 2: so that we know what it looks like when cartoons
• 1:14:49
  Speaker 2: get into a brawl and they show like a dust cloud.
• 1:14:53
  Speaker 2: But but okay, the reason why I picked this is
• 1:14:55
  Speaker 2: not because I just wanted to like, you know, dunk
• 1:14:58
  Speaker 2: on this awful performance. Because at first I just thought, okay,
• 1:15:02
  Speaker 2: this is cringe and awful, But then I learned that
• 1:15:05
  Speaker 2: the actual Olympic Committee president is defending this, and the
• 1:15:10
  Speaker 2: grounds under which she is defending it is what makes
• 1:15:13
  Speaker 2: this worthy of the news show. So it says here
• 1:15:16
  Speaker 2: and I'll just let this play well I read. The
• 1:15:18
  Speaker 2: Australian Olympic Committee president Anna Mayerrez has defended breakdancer Rachel Guns.
• 1:15:25
  Speaker 1: Her street name is Raygun by the way.
• 1:15:29
  Speaker 2: Performance at the Olympic Breakdancing twenty twenty four event, dubbing
• 1:15:33
  Speaker 2: it courageous. The country's first Olympic breakdancer, known as Reygun,
• 1:15:38
  Speaker 2: went viral online after debuting her unconventional dance moves, putting
• 1:15:44
  Speaker 2: it lightly at the inaugural Olympic Breakdancing twenty four twenty
• 1:15:49
  Speaker 2: twenty four competition on the ninth of August. In response
• 1:15:53
  Speaker 2: to the brutal online criticism and ruthless, ruthless.
• 1:15:57
  Speaker 1: Memes, I'm sorry, I'm not laughing at her. I'm okay.
• 1:16:02
  Speaker 1: Gun has been subjected.
• 1:16:03
  Speaker 2: I am laughing at her the brutal online criticism, when
• 1:16:06
  Speaker 2: ruthless memes Gun has been subjected to. The AOC president
• 1:16:11
  Speaker 2: what it's called has stood firm on the dancer's right
• 1:16:13
  Speaker 2: to have represented the country in the sport.
• 1:16:16
  Speaker 1: If you don't know Rachel's stories, this is what the
• 1:16:19
  Speaker 1: defense is, okay.
• 1:16:20
  Speaker 2: In two thousand and eight, she was locked in a
• 1:16:22
  Speaker 2: room crying because she was involved in a male dominated
• 1:16:26
  Speaker 2: sport as the only woman and it took great let
• 1:16:29
  Speaker 2: me finish, and it took great courage for her to
• 1:16:32
  Speaker 2: continue on and fight for her opportunity to participate in
• 1:16:37
  Speaker 2: a sport that she loved. Mary has said it got
• 1:16:39
  Speaker 2: her to winning the Olympic qualifying event. This is the
• 1:16:43
  Speaker 2: person who qualified for the Olympics.
• 1:16:46
  Speaker 1: To be here in Paris.
• 1:16:48
  Speaker 2: She is the best breakdancer, female, breakdancer female that we
• 1:16:53
  Speaker 2: have in Australia. She has represented the Olympic team and
• 1:16:56
  Speaker 2: the Olympic spirit with great enthusiasm. And I love her courage,
• 1:17:01
  Speaker 2: I love her character and I feel very disappointed for
• 1:17:04
  Speaker 2: her that she has come under the attack that she has.
• 1:17:07
  Speaker 2: The Olympics are dead.
• 1:17:09
  Speaker 4: Okay, oh my god, so so no, no, there is
• 1:17:13
  Speaker 4: no such thing as break dancing in Australia confirmed. I'm sorry.
• 1:17:17
  Speaker 4: When I was a kid growing up white in small
• 1:17:21
  Speaker 4: town USA, when black people were inventing breakdancing, I was
• 1:17:25
  Speaker 4: better than what she's doing, right, and and and that
• 1:17:30
  Speaker 4: was We're talking a bunch of elementary school kids throwing
• 1:17:34
  Speaker 4: down a piece of cardboard so we didn't get all
• 1:17:36
  Speaker 4: dirty and get get in trouble because we weren't really
• 1:17:38
  Speaker 4: allowed to roll around on our necks and shit in
• 1:17:41
  Speaker 4: the street. Uh and and imitating what we saw on TV.
• 1:17:48
  Speaker 4: That like that, that's it. That's better than that, better
• 1:17:52
  Speaker 4: than that. But I don't believe that. I do not
• 1:17:55
  Speaker 4: believe that Australia had nothing better than that. I don't
• 1:18:00
  Speaker 4: believe that Australia had.
• 1:18:02
  Speaker 1: Because there were men.
• 1:18:04
  Speaker 4: That's bullsh There were men.
• 1:18:06
  Speaker 1: There were men, and the thing.
• 1:18:09
  Speaker 4: All right, there is no such thing as male dominated anything.
• 1:18:16
  Speaker 4: And I I retweeted a video not too long ago
• 1:18:21
  Speaker 4: from a guy and his name's escaping me at the moment,
• 1:18:24
  Speaker 4: so I'm gonna have to I'm not gonna look it
• 1:18:27
  Speaker 4: up right now, but I'll try to retweet the video again,
• 1:18:31
  Speaker 4: like tonight or tomorrow so people can see it. That
• 1:18:36
  Speaker 4: that made this point. There is no such thing as
• 1:18:38
  Speaker 4: male dominated anything.
• 1:18:41
  Speaker 1: Right.
• 1:18:41
  Speaker 4: There are male interest areas, right, That's that's what women
• 1:18:48
  Speaker 4: are calling dominated. More men being interested, more men being
• 1:18:53
  Speaker 4: into something, more men doing something. Well, it's not dominated, that's.
• 1:19:01
  Speaker 3: Right.
• 1:19:01
  Speaker 4: Women are less involved, women are less interested, women are
• 1:19:05
  Speaker 4: less skilled, Women show less merit in these areas because
• 1:19:09
  Speaker 4: they are less dedicated to it or they have less
• 1:19:13
  Speaker 4: aptitude for it. It has absolutely nothing to do with domination.
• 1:19:18
  Speaker 4: Women are not kept out of doing this. Nobody can
• 1:19:21
  Speaker 4: stop you from break dancing or dancing any way that
• 1:19:26
  Speaker 4: you like to dance. They might make fun of you,
• 1:19:29
  Speaker 4: but that doesn't have to stop you. Look at me,
• 1:19:32
  Speaker 4: I sing sometimes in public and I'm shit at singing.
• 1:19:36
  Speaker 4: And I know it because I have a cousin who
• 1:19:38
  Speaker 4: is an opera singer with perfect pitch, and she isn't
• 1:19:41
  Speaker 4: she is great, right, But I do it to be
• 1:19:47
  Speaker 4: funny and I know that it's shit. It's comedy. It's
• 1:19:53
  Speaker 4: not me trying to pretend to have a talent that
• 1:19:57
  Speaker 4: I don't have. This woman doesn't realize that she is
• 1:20:03
  Speaker 4: doing comedy. She is serious.
• 1:20:06
  Speaker 1: Yes, women can in fact be funny.
• 1:20:08
  Speaker 4: Well, and yeah, somebody in our chat said that too.
• 1:20:11
  Speaker 4: But the thing is, somebody could have. At some point.
• 1:20:15
  Speaker 4: There had to have been people at every level of
• 1:20:18
  Speaker 4: her advancement, from just some chick doing this on her
• 1:20:22
  Speaker 4: own at home who thought she was pretty good, to
• 1:20:26
  Speaker 4: performing at the Olympics on live television for the entire world.
• 1:20:31
  Speaker 4: She had multiple different people working with her to get
• 1:20:36
  Speaker 4: her there.
• 1:20:36
  Speaker 1: At this point point, nobody told her that she shouldn't
• 1:20:39
  Speaker 1: do it right.
• 1:20:41
  Speaker 4: Every single one of them had the opportunity to be
• 1:20:43
  Speaker 4: harsh with her about this and say, no, you're not
• 1:20:46
  Speaker 4: good at this. None of us are good at this.
• 1:20:50
  Speaker 4: This should stop. We shouldn't send anybody, and none of
• 1:20:53
  Speaker 4: them did it. If she'd been a man and she
• 1:20:59
  Speaker 4: had that level of crist people would have criticized her
• 1:21:03
  Speaker 4: for being offended. People would have said, shame on you
• 1:21:06
  Speaker 4: for crying, for having hurt feelings about this, Right, shame
• 1:21:11
  Speaker 4: on you for feeling entitled to decide how other people
• 1:21:16
  Speaker 4: react to you and what other people like or dislike
• 1:21:19
  Speaker 4: about you. But because she's a woman, she feels entitled
• 1:21:24
  Speaker 4: to dictate how you see her and what you think
• 1:21:28
  Speaker 4: of her and how you feel about her. Right, that's
• 1:21:32
  Speaker 4: bullshit and nobody should be tolerating it. And nobody should
• 1:21:39
  Speaker 4: be tolerating this. This is embarrassing. God, I can't stand
• 1:21:43
  Speaker 4: to look at this.
• 1:21:44
  Speaker 1: I know I'm in pain. I'm in pain on behalf
• 1:21:47
  Speaker 1: of her.
• 1:21:48
  Speaker 4: I mean, you know, it's it's one thing for people
• 1:21:53
  Speaker 4: that I'm gonna say one more thing. It's one thing
• 1:21:55
  Speaker 4: for people to let women participate in stuff like this.
• 1:21:58
  Speaker 4: I mean, none of the boys. When I was growing up,
• 1:22:00
  Speaker 4: it was it was me and another girl and a
• 1:22:02
  Speaker 4: bunch of boys right doing this, and none of the
• 1:22:06
  Speaker 4: boys were like, you guys, can't you guys can't join
• 1:22:09
  Speaker 4: us doing this? You know, they were all better at
• 1:22:12
  Speaker 4: it than both of us. They were all stronger, And
• 1:22:16
  Speaker 4: there's a lot of moves that take upper body strength
• 1:22:18
  Speaker 4: and break dancing that girls just don't have unless they
• 1:22:23
  Speaker 4: work really hard to develop it at the expense of
• 1:22:27
  Speaker 4: growing breasts, because you your chest gets taken over by pectorals,
• 1:22:32
  Speaker 4: and breasts are mostly made of fat, and your body
• 1:22:34
  Speaker 4: eats that fat to make those muscles.
• 1:22:37
  Speaker 3: Right.
• 1:22:39
  Speaker 4: But in any case, they didn't stop us, but nobody
• 1:22:44
  Speaker 4: came along and said, oh, you guys are so good
• 1:22:45
  Speaker 4: because you're girls. This is this is absolutely shameful in
• 1:22:51
  Speaker 4: that she's calling it male dominated, and yet who's the
• 1:22:55
  Speaker 4: one at the Olympics? Is that one of the guys, right,
• 1:23:00
  Speaker 4: So women are not kept out of stuff like this.
• 1:23:03
  Speaker 4: Girls are not kept out of stuff like this, But
• 1:23:06
  Speaker 4: it doesn't necessarily mean that we're going to be good
• 1:23:08
  Speaker 4: at it.
• 1:23:10
  Speaker 2: I like how confused the crowd looks like they're not
• 1:23:13
  Speaker 2: sure if they're being trolled or punked by this performance,
• 1:23:18
  Speaker 2: but there and some of them are like trying to
• 1:23:20
  Speaker 2: find like, Okay, I'm at the Olympics. That means that
• 1:23:24
  Speaker 2: these people are at the top of their game and
• 1:23:26
  Speaker 2: I'm looking at the.
• 1:23:27
  Speaker 1: Best of the best in the world.
• 1:23:30
  Speaker 3: Well, a lot of this was. A lot of this
• 1:23:33
  Speaker 3: was was talked out in the nineteen eighty eight Winter
• 1:23:39
  Speaker 3: Olympics by a guy named Eddie the Eagle whose a
• 1:23:45
  Speaker 3: full name was Michael David Edwards. Was it was nineteen
• 1:23:49
  Speaker 3: eighty eight, there was no one in Britain who was
• 1:23:53
  Speaker 3: willing to do the ski jump because there are no
• 1:23:58
  Speaker 3: ski jumps written we have a lot of bad weather,
• 1:24:02
  Speaker 3: but we don't have enough snow to create any natural
• 1:24:07
  Speaker 3: ski jumps, and so and so we had very few
• 1:24:11
  Speaker 3: people who even had to know how to be able
• 1:24:14
  Speaker 3: to do a ski jump. But in nineteen eighty eight,
• 1:24:18
  Speaker 3: Michael David Edwards, otherwise known as Eddie the Eagle, he
• 1:24:24
  Speaker 3: sort of came along and went, well, I'll give it
• 1:24:27
  Speaker 3: a go, because that's how that's how the Olympics worked
• 1:24:31
  Speaker 3: for the longest time, Like someone needs to be there
• 1:24:35
  Speaker 3: to represent every country. And if you've got a guy
• 1:24:39
  Speaker 3: who has no experience, but he'll be like, yeah, I'll
• 1:24:43
  Speaker 3: give it a go, then they would let him into
• 1:24:46
  Speaker 3: into the show. And this happened with Eddie the Eagle.
• 1:24:50
  Speaker 3: His name was not Eddie. I don't know why he's
• 1:24:53
  Speaker 3: good it. It doesn't matter. But the point is the
• 1:24:58
  Speaker 3: Olympics was all was always is supposed to be open
• 1:25:01
  Speaker 3: to colorful amateurs, but after the Eddie the Eagle fiasco,
• 1:25:10
  Speaker 3: they kind of went, no, we're not. We can't. We
• 1:25:13
  Speaker 3: can't allow amateurs to do this anymore. We can only
• 1:25:16
  Speaker 3: allow people who have a career in ski jumping to
• 1:25:23
  Speaker 3: participate in in in in the in the ski jump.
• 1:25:29
  Speaker 3: So if if your country does not have the climate
• 1:25:34
  Speaker 3: that pertains to the ability to practice the ski jump,
• 1:25:40
  Speaker 3: then fuck you. If you if you can't find an
• 1:25:45
  Speaker 3: amateur who can do this, then you can't find anyone
• 1:25:48
  Speaker 3: who can do this, And we won't we we we
• 1:25:50
  Speaker 3: simply can't allow this. We can't allow some British amateur
• 1:25:56
  Speaker 3: to appear in the ski jump and us he adheres
• 1:26:02
  Speaker 3: to the rules we have or some shit like that.
• 1:26:06
  Speaker 3: They officially changed the rules after the nineteen eighty eight
• 1:26:10
  Speaker 3: Winter Olympics to not allow colorful amateurs to compete against
• 1:26:17
  Speaker 3: professional athletes. Cut to twenty twenty four, and you have
• 1:26:24
  Speaker 3: whatever the fuck her name is Reaguan. God damn it,
• 1:26:29
  Speaker 3: Chris Reagan has a lot to answer for.
• 1:26:32
  Speaker 4: He's not responsible.
• 1:26:33
  Speaker 3: This is not He's not He's not. But this, this
• 1:26:37
  Speaker 3: Australian lady is using the same did monarch. Yeah, her
• 1:26:44
  Speaker 3: name happens to sound like reagu and show. So she's
• 1:26:47
  Speaker 3: gone with reygun very there and she was she was
• 1:26:51
  Speaker 3: doing what Eddie the Eagle was doing in nineteen eighty eight.
• 1:26:55
  Speaker 3: Like she she was just she was just going. Yeah.
• 1:26:58
  Speaker 3: No one in Australia is any good at breakdancing. It
• 1:27:01
  Speaker 3: doesn't matter. Yeah, yeah, there are a bunch of people
• 1:27:04
  Speaker 3: who are good at breakdancing, but that's not the point.
• 1:27:07
  Speaker 3: I'm the only one who has the money behind her
• 1:27:11
  Speaker 3: to be able to compete in the Olympics. And I
• 1:27:14
  Speaker 3: don't know what the fuck I'm doing, but I'm gonna
• 1:27:17
  Speaker 3: do it anyway. And apparently the Eddie the Eagle rule
• 1:27:22
  Speaker 3: has has not persisted in the let me count this
• 1:27:27
  Speaker 3: thirty six years since. Yeah, and now some random Australian
• 1:27:34
  Speaker 3: bitch because no one else in Australia is aware that
• 1:27:39
  Speaker 3: they can perform in the Olympics or they cannot afford
• 1:27:44
  Speaker 3: how much it takes to appear in the Olympics. So
• 1:27:47
  Speaker 3: the only person they have in the country who has
• 1:27:52
  Speaker 3: the financial backing to appear in the Olympics is this
• 1:27:56
  Speaker 3: absolute randomer. And I'm not having go at randomers. That's
• 1:28:02
  Speaker 3: that's my people. My name is Randomer. I don't I
• 1:28:06
  Speaker 3: don't have griper's, I don't have clankers, I don't have swifties.
• 1:28:11
  Speaker 3: I just have randoms. They're not my people, They're just
• 1:28:14
  Speaker 3: random people. And that's how I like it. My people
• 1:28:17
  Speaker 3: are the random people. And apparently the best Australia had
• 1:28:24
  Speaker 3: to had to show was was this absolute shit showcase
• 1:28:31
  Speaker 3: because herself Reagun and for some reason she could get
• 1:28:36
  Speaker 3: through the the the priorities that have been keeping the
• 1:28:43
  Speaker 3: likes of Eddie the Eagle out of the Olympics for
• 1:28:45
  Speaker 3: the last thirty years forty years or so, and and
• 1:28:50
  Speaker 3: we're here going, well, what well, what the fuck even
• 1:28:53
  Speaker 3: are the rules? And apparently there are no rules. It's
• 1:28:57
  Speaker 3: it's whoever has the financial backing can can win the
• 1:29:02
  Speaker 3: Olympics or get zero in the Olympics, like a girl
• 1:29:06
  Speaker 3: Reagun did in the end.
• 1:29:09
  Speaker 6: And it's just it's it's it's like it's it's like
• 1:29:14
  Speaker 6: it's like the Eurovision Song contest, Like, oh my god,
• 1:29:18
  Speaker 6: it's not about what the best song is.
• 1:29:21
  Speaker 3: It's not about who the best athlete is. It's about
• 1:29:25
  Speaker 3: who the wokest is. Yeah, that's that's that's that's what's
• 1:29:29
  Speaker 3: happening is that's absolutely embarrassment turned up and wriggled around
• 1:29:34
  Speaker 3: like a fucking cat on heat and like she was
• 1:29:38
  Speaker 3: the best athlete and therefore everyone had to go yeah, yeah,
• 1:29:42
  Speaker 3: well she was the worst athlete, so we're gonna have
• 1:29:46
  Speaker 3: to give her zero. But it's not her fault. It's
• 1:29:50
  Speaker 3: the fault of the people who are laughing at her.
• 1:29:56
  Speaker 3: That's that's the problem. It's it's it's not that we've
• 1:29:59
  Speaker 3: lowered the stat is the people who are noticing that
• 1:30:04
  Speaker 3: we've lowered the standards. Uh, falsely, I'm spreading this fake
• 1:30:12
  Speaker 3: news that that Reygun is not an Olympic athlete.
• 1:30:20
  Speaker 1: Okay, okay, we got it. We gotta go on.
• 1:30:23
  Speaker 4: Before we go on, I found the post. So the
• 1:30:26
  Speaker 4: name of the guy whose video inspired me to say
• 1:30:31
  Speaker 4: there is no such thing as male dominated and we
• 1:30:34
  Speaker 4: should all be using the term male interest instead. Uh
• 1:30:38
  Speaker 4: is Vasu Ericsson. It's v A s U Ericsson E R.
• 1:30:43
  Speaker 4: I c S s o In and he has a
• 1:30:47
  Speaker 4: YouTube channel with with UH doesn't have a lot of
• 1:30:51
  Speaker 4: videos on it, but the one that I watched that
• 1:30:56
  Speaker 4: enlightened me on that is called my beef with with
• 1:31:01
  Speaker 4: Malayim film Journalism and UH. It's mostly not about necessarily
• 1:31:11
  Speaker 4: uh Malayalem film film journalism, that's Malayalam. There's an extra
• 1:31:18
  Speaker 4: a in there that my brain didn't see at first,
• 1:31:20
  Speaker 4: so Malayalem film journalism. But there's there's quite a bit
• 1:31:26
  Speaker 4: of discussion about men's issues and experiences packed into about
• 1:31:31
  Speaker 4: thirty four minutes there, and I think people should watch
• 1:31:34
  Speaker 4: it just for the fact of that part, but there's
• 1:31:38
  Speaker 4: a lot of other stuff in there, like I absolutely
• 1:31:40
  Speaker 4: love the video and so and he's on He's on
• 1:31:45
  Speaker 4: X under the same name as well. So definitely, and
• 1:31:50
  Speaker 4: I will retweet that uh that post for people who
• 1:31:56
  Speaker 4: follow me so that you can see that. But it's
• 1:32:01
  Speaker 4: definitely a definitely a change that should happen. Like I'm
• 1:32:08
  Speaker 4: not going to use male dominated again. I'm going going
• 1:32:11
  Speaker 4: to refer to things as male interest because he's right,
• 1:32:14
  Speaker 4: it's bullshit. Men are not dominating and keeping women and
• 1:32:17
  Speaker 4: girls out. Women and girls are either more involved. Yeah,
• 1:32:22
  Speaker 4: women and girls are either showing a lack of interest
• 1:32:24
  Speaker 4: or a lack of aptitude or both.
• 1:32:27
  Speaker 3: Yeah, all right, idea that comedy has always been a
• 1:32:32
  Speaker 3: male dominated environment. Now when you look at the audiences,
• 1:32:37
  Speaker 3: it's the audiences are female dominated because the audiences are
• 1:32:41
  Speaker 3: full of drunk girls who are fucking laughing and everything.
• 1:32:44
  Speaker 3: And people look at comedy and say it's a male
• 1:32:47
  Speaker 3: dominated space.
• 1:32:48
  Speaker 1: No it's not.
• 1:32:48
  Speaker 3: It's a male populated space. It's a male interest space
• 1:32:52
  Speaker 3: because males are the ones doing the work as the comedians,
• 1:32:57
  Speaker 3: whereas women are the ones in the audience keeping it
• 1:33:00
  Speaker 3: going by being drunk and laughing at everything, which is there.
• 1:33:04
  Speaker 3: You know, that's that's a that's a dynamic participation. Yes,
• 1:33:08
  Speaker 3: And I'm fine, Yeah, we don't and I'm saying we
• 1:33:11
  Speaker 3: don't have to fuck with it.
• 1:33:12
  Speaker 4: And it is fair to say that the audiences are
• 1:33:15
  Speaker 4: female dominated because that's a capitalistic thing.
• 1:33:19
  Speaker 3: Right.
• 1:33:19
  Speaker 4: If women don't buy your entertainment proposals, you don't make
• 1:33:26
  Speaker 4: any money.
• 1:33:30
  Speaker 2: All right, Okay, So I got some super chats and stuff,
• 1:33:34
  Speaker 2: and then we're gonna move on to the last story.
• 1:33:36
  Speaker 1: It's a short one.
• 1:33:36
  Speaker 2: So Albatross is it's five dollars and says, with a
• 1:33:40
  Speaker 2: performance like hers, maybe there's a few reasons why it's
• 1:33:43
  Speaker 2: male dominated. This was this before we addressed that term.
• 1:33:47
  Speaker 2: Albertina retro gives a two dollars Canadian says, I appreciate
• 1:33:51
  Speaker 2: her spirit. She did say after everything was said and
• 1:33:55
  Speaker 2: done that she felt for her. This is a win
• 1:33:57
  Speaker 2: because it got her attention and that's what she wanted.
• 1:34:00
  Speaker 2: So I guess congratulations for the attention. Then Albertnada retro
• 1:34:05
  Speaker 2: gives the two dollars Canadian says a guy told her
• 1:34:07
  Speaker 2: she was amazing to get in her pants.
• 1:34:08
  Speaker 1: Maybe. Then Albertina retro gives the Canadian her pants just yeah,
• 1:34:14
  Speaker 1: I don't know, but.
• 1:34:16
  Speaker 2: She doesn't strike particularly hot. And then he gives us
• 1:34:21
  Speaker 2: two dollars. Canadian says, I thought the eagle was an ausie.
• 1:34:25
  Speaker 2: All right, thank you for all of those messages. Let
• 1:34:28
  Speaker 2: us know what you guys think about that story in
• 1:34:29
  Speaker 2: the comments, specifically the part about like essentially the people
• 1:34:34
  Speaker 2: who supported her all the way here and I don't know, like,
• 1:34:39
  Speaker 2: just as an aside, I'm forming a little like list
• 1:34:41
  Speaker 2: of like old like movies and shows I want to
• 1:34:44
  Speaker 2: get back to based on every story that we've looked
• 1:34:46
  Speaker 2: at already. So you know, got to watch nineteen eighty
• 1:34:50
  Speaker 2: four The League of Extraordinary Gentleman v because of the
• 1:34:54
  Speaker 2: lizard people.
• 1:34:55
  Speaker 1: And now Cool Running.
• 1:34:56
  Speaker 2: So let's see where the last one gets us, I mean,
• 1:35:01
  Speaker 2: because these are all inspiring me to like, you know,
• 1:35:04
  Speaker 2: check out some new media or some media. I've never
• 1:35:07
  Speaker 2: seen cool Runnings, so that might be good. All right,
• 1:35:11
  Speaker 2: So last thing is just a little like announcement I
• 1:35:15
  Speaker 2: saw on a website called Womenact dot org.
• 1:35:19
  Speaker 1: But this is actually not limited to this.
• 1:35:21
  Speaker 2: It's everywhere, in specifically areas where there are science talks
• 1:35:27
  Speaker 2: and science and stem panels going on, and they have
• 1:35:31
  Speaker 2: this thing that's been.
• 1:35:32
  Speaker 1: Going around called no More Manals. You know what a
• 1:35:35
  Speaker 1: manal is? Well, we'll tell you.
• 1:35:37
  Speaker 4: I'm afraid to ask.
• 1:35:38
  Speaker 2: Yeah, this is the about section for just this one
• 1:35:41
  Speaker 2: little initiative. The presence of women in the public sphere
• 1:35:45
  Speaker 2: is directly linked to their active participation as invited speakers
• 1:35:49
  Speaker 2: in the organized panels of high level conferences and major events.
• 1:35:54
  Speaker 2: This is a milieu where women are severely underrepresented. Women
• 1:35:58
  Speaker 2: Act promotes a more dynamic public participation of women via
• 1:36:02
  Speaker 2: the initiative No More Mannals. The initiative aims at raising
• 1:36:07
  Speaker 2: awareness regarding the issue of balanced representation between men and
• 1:36:11
  Speaker 2: women in the discussion of public debates organized in Greece,
• 1:36:15
  Speaker 2: creating a network of organizations with Pledge which pledge to
• 1:36:19
  Speaker 2: promote women as speakers in the public debates they organize
• 1:36:23
  Speaker 2: or participate in. The initiative No More Mannals represents a
• 1:36:28
  Speaker 2: practical commitment to the principles of diversity and inclusion and
• 1:36:31
  Speaker 2: promotes a culture of tolerance, egal representation and respect of
• 1:36:35
  Speaker 2: human rights. So mantals meaning panels that have men on
• 1:36:38
  Speaker 2: them the usual creative and really stunning and brave feminist
• 1:36:43
  Speaker 2: news speak.
• 1:36:44
  Speaker 4: So so now y'all know that if you see a
• 1:36:51
  Speaker 4: panel that has women on it, you can pretty much
• 1:36:55
  Speaker 4: discount everything they have to say, as as as weighty
• 1:37:03
  Speaker 4: not having the level of gravitas that the men have,
• 1:37:07
  Speaker 4: because you can count on the fact that every woman
• 1:37:11
  Speaker 4: you hear is a possible diversity higher and therefore not
• 1:37:17
  Speaker 4: there on her merits and maybe not necessarily intellectually qualified
• 1:37:23
  Speaker 4: to be there. Like that's the upshot. If they have
• 1:37:28
  Speaker 4: to artificially impose a gender balance on the panels, it
• 1:37:34
  Speaker 4: is because women do not have the either the expertise
• 1:37:40
  Speaker 4: or the inclination right, it's aptitude or inclination. It's lacking, uh,
• 1:37:46
  Speaker 4: to to do as well, to be as informative, to
• 1:37:50
  Speaker 4: be right in the information that they're offering you on
• 1:37:55
  Speaker 4: these panels as the men do.
• 1:38:00
  Speaker 1: Oh I was muted.
• 1:38:01
  Speaker 2: Yeah, absolutely, one hundred percent. I just thought I would
• 1:38:04
  Speaker 2: share it. I thought it was really hilarious that they
• 1:38:07
  Speaker 2: even would put this out there. But yeah, this is
• 1:38:09
  Speaker 2: basically like something I've talked about on my other channel
• 1:38:12
  Speaker 2: as well as this one, woke entryism. First they demand
• 1:38:17
  Speaker 2: to be included in a space. Then they demand to
• 1:38:22
  Speaker 2: be have their grievances heard about the space and listen
• 1:38:26
  Speaker 2: to their criticisms. Then they demand the seat at the table.
• 1:38:29
  Speaker 2: Then they want to run the table, and then they
• 1:38:31
  Speaker 2: push you out of the space.
• 1:38:33
  Speaker 1: And this is the we want to do.
• 1:38:34
  Speaker 2: We demand the seat at the table phase of this
• 1:38:38
  Speaker 2: of this thing. And you gotta be you gotta gatekeep man,
• 1:38:41
  Speaker 2: You got to keep the bad actors out because anyone
• 1:38:44
  Speaker 2: who thinks that they deserve a seat at the table
• 1:38:46
  Speaker 2: simply because of their plumbing or their race or whatever,
• 1:38:50
  Speaker 2: then they're obviously not interested in whatever the discussion is,
• 1:38:55
  Speaker 2: and they just want to take over and control it.
• 1:38:57
  Speaker 2: It's how all of this gay race, I mean, as
• 1:39:00
  Speaker 2: it works, you know what is it? Call everything racist
• 1:39:03
  Speaker 2: until you control it, Call everything sexist until you control it,
• 1:39:07
  Speaker 2: Call everything homophobic until you control it.
• 1:39:09
  Speaker 1: And that's what they do. So that's basically what this
• 1:39:13
  Speaker 1: no More Mantals thing is.
• 1:39:14
  Speaker 2: It's just again people with no actual like value of
• 1:39:20
  Speaker 2: in and of themselves, grasping at power by shaming people
• 1:39:24
  Speaker 2: and and uh and then people fall for it. And
• 1:39:27
  Speaker 2: that's what and that's all that you have to do
• 1:39:29
  Speaker 2: is not fall for it. So anyway, that was it.
• 1:39:32
  Speaker 2: I just wanted to throw that one in at the
• 1:39:33
  Speaker 2: end because I thought it was hilarious when I saw it.
• 1:39:36
  Speaker 1: Not exactly a new thing, but something that I have
• 1:39:38
  Speaker 1: been seeing.
• 1:39:40
  Speaker 2: And uh, yeah, we're gonna basically end the show there,
• 1:39:43
  Speaker 2: so I don't have any more super Child's. We're just
• 1:39:45
  Speaker 2: gonna go now into the Patron show to look at
• 1:39:49
  Speaker 2: this article, which essentially talks about how ESGN and DEI
• 1:39:56
  Speaker 2: is coming for anime and manga and there's nothing you
• 1:39:58
  Speaker 2: can do about it.
• 1:39:59
  Speaker 1: It's coming. I mean, like there is things you just
• 1:40:02
  Speaker 1: like resist, don't give them your money, but we'll see
• 1:40:04
  Speaker 1: what the article has to say.
• 1:40:05
  Speaker 2: So join us there after this show is over by
• 1:40:11
  Speaker 2: going to feed Thebagel dot com, forward slash subscribe and
• 1:40:14
  Speaker 2: starting up a membership. I just got a super chat
• 1:40:17
  Speaker 2: at the last second bum Albinator retro because the final
• 1:40:20
  Speaker 2: is Canadian and says, well, there's a movie called Eddie
• 1:40:23
  Speaker 2: the Eagle about the ski jump guy. It's from twenty
• 1:40:25
  Speaker 2: fifteen and Hugh Jackman is in it, so you could
• 1:40:28
  Speaker 2: add that to your list. Oh I think I'll go
• 1:40:30
  Speaker 2: with cool runnings though. All right, anyway, so thanks guys
• 1:40:36
  Speaker 2: for coming on the show today. Again, please consider joining
• 1:40:40
  Speaker 2: us in the Patron show by becoming a member, and
• 1:40:43
  Speaker 2: the fundraiser is ongoing right now, so if you want
• 1:40:46
  Speaker 2: to support us there, you may do that at Feedbbagel
• 1:40:49
  Speaker 2: dot com ford slash support. But with all that said,
• 1:40:51
  Speaker 2: I'm gonna end the show here, So if you guys
• 1:40:53
  Speaker 2: like this video, please hit like subscribe. If you're not
• 1:40:55
  Speaker 2: already subscribed, hit the bellf notification that leaves the comment
• 1:40:58
  Speaker 2: let us know what you guys think about what we
• 1:40:59
  Speaker 2: discussed on all of these news topics today, and please
• 1:41:01
  Speaker 2: please please share this video because sharing is caring. Thank
• 1:41:04
  Speaker 2: you so much for coming on today's episode of HPR News,
• 1:41:07
  Speaker 2: and we will talk to.
• 1:41:08
  Speaker 1: You all in the next video.
• 1:41:10
  Speaker 7: That's right, Activists or machines, dude, Okay, they are literal machines.
• 1:41:16
  Speaker 7: They are talking point machines. They are impossible to fucking
• 1:41:20
  Speaker 7: deal with, especially if you have, like especially if you
• 1:41:22
  Speaker 7: have like a couple of dudes who have good memory.
• 1:41:24
  Speaker 7: On top of that, too, holy shit, you're fucked