Latest / Cultural Wars | America Out Loud News / Redistricting reversal and the UFO deep state files

Transcript

Redistricting reversal and the UFO deep state files · Cultural Wars | America Out Loud News

• 0:04
  In this political Coliseum, we slay the rising beast with the fate resort of truth that transcends hypocrisy and censorship.
• 0:16
  It's time to unleash yourself from the tyrants of media propaganda on the America Out Loud Talk Radio Network.
• 0:26
  This is unleashed the political news hour.
• 0:32
  Good evening, America, and welcome to Unleash the Political News Hour.
• 0:36
  I'm Nate Kane, your host.
• 0:37
  And tonight we begin with a development that fundamentally alters the battlefield for the 2026 midterm elections.
• 0:50
  In the span of just two weeks, two separate court rulings, one from the U.S.
• 0:58
  Supreme Court and one from the Virginia Supreme Court have effectively dismantled the Democrat Party's strategy to seize control of the House of Representatives through aggressive redistricting maneuvers.
• 1:17
  These decisions really uphold core constitutional principles of equal protection under the law and procedural integrity while exposing the limits of race-based electoral engineering.
• 1:35
  Let's examine the facts, their immediate implications, and why they present or why they represent, I should say, a decisive victory for fair elections and colorblind justice.
• 1:52
  So I want to start with the first case that I feel has probably the longer uh more important impact, which is the Supreme Court ruling in Louisiana versus Calais, which happened on April 29th.
• 2:10
  So on April 29th, in a six to three decision, the Supreme Court struck down Louisiana's congressional map, which had artificially created a second majority black district.
• 2:31
  Now, Justice Samuel Alito, writing for the majority ruled that the map constituted an unconstitutional racial gerrymander under the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment.
• 2:47
  Now the court had determined that race had been the predominant factor in drawing the district lines exceeding what the second section of the voting is right the voting rights act of 1965 legitimately requires.
• 3:07
  Now, this ruling, it does not eliminate the voting rights act.
• 3:12
  Rather, it clarifies that compliance with the act cannot, and this is important, cannot justify subordinating traditional redistricting criteria, such as compactness, uh continuity, and respect for political subdivisions to racial quotas because that's basically what they've been doing for the last 40 years.
• 3:42
  Now, the decision effectively it ends the era in which Southern states were compelled to prioritize race when drawing districts solely to maximize minority representation, often at the expense of broader voter interests.
• 4:01
  Dissenting justices warned of consequences for minority uh voting power, but the majority rightly affirmed that the Constitution forbids racial classifications unless they survive strict scrutiny, a standard that these maps really fail to meet.
• 4:27
  Now, I don't think most people in the media are even talking about this to any great extent.
• 4:36
  But this is massive.
• 4:38
  This is an absolutely catastrophic blow to the Democrat Party's machine, if you will, of gerrymandering, because they've been using this for 40 years in the South in order to guarantee seats.
• 4:55
  And we're already beginning to see these uh Southern states deciding to redraw their lines.
• 5:03
  And I'm gonna get more into that in a minute here.
• 5:06
  But the other case that was, I think, very important because it really put a halt uh to a scheme that the Democrats had, uh, and I talked about this in uh previous show.
• 5:21
  But uh just days ago on May 8th, the Virginia Supreme Court issued a four to three ruling striking down a voter-approved constitutional amendment pushed by Democrat lawmakers.
• 5:36
  That measure, it sought to suspend Virginia's independent redistricting commission and empower the Democrat-controlled legislature to redraw congressional districts mid decade.
• 5:51
  Now, a lot of states, their legislatures or even their governor's offices may uh have the power to redraw lines, but Virginia had voted and actually created a constitutional amendment previously that said that they were not going to allow that, that they would have a uh nonpartisan uh redistricting uh commission that would be independent, and that commission would be the ones to basically draw the districting lines for Virginia.
• 6:27
  And in a brazen attempt to really rig the Virginia election, they had intended on or they they tried to pass a law uh through a voter uh referendum, and it passed by such a small margin.
• 6:42
  Uh, but they tried to pass this law that basically would allow for them to redistrict without having to go through this, and they didn't put anything through.
• 6:51
  Uh, you know, they didn't try to do this as a a uh a new uh change to their uh to their state constitutional uh amendments, but no, they they decided to do this, you know, through trying to pass it with very uh vague language, uh, clearly meant to deceive.
• 7:00
  Uh amendments, but no, they they decided to do this, you know, through trying to pass it with very uh vague language, uh clearly meant to deceive.
• 7:10
  And what they effectively would have done was they would have turned a four to five um districts.
• 7:10
  And what they effectively would have done was they would have turned a four to five um districts, uh basically they have 11 districts, it would have turned it from four to five, and this redistricting would basically have relegated the Republicans to only having one district in Virginia.
• 7:17
  Uh basically they have 11 districts, it would have turned it from four to five, and this redistricting would basically have relegated the Republicans to only having one district in Virginia.
• 7:31
  So it was quite despicable.
• 7:34
  And uh the court found that the Democrats had violated procedural requirements under the state's constitution by placing the amendment on the April ballot without the mandated two passage process separated by a general election.
• 7:51
  So the rejected plan, it really would have transformed Virginia completely.
• 7:58
  It would have totally given the Democrats a edge, uh, you know, a 10-to-one advantage, uh, and it would have flipped four Republican-held seats by invalidating it.
• 8:10
  The Virginia Supreme Court preserved the existing maps drawn by an independent commission after the 2020 census, maps that reflect actual voter geography rather than partisan ambition.
• 8:27
  This ruling, it really stands out as textbook enforcement of the rule of law against procedural shortcuts designed for raw political gain.
• 8:39
  Now, why do these rulings matter?
• 8:45
  These decisions are not mere technicalities, folks.
• 8:49
  They safeguard the foundational integrity of our representative democracy.
• 8:55
  For decades, Democrats have relied on race conscious districting, often described by critics as packing minority voters into a handful of overwhelmingly Democrat districts to inflate their congressional delegation in the South.
• 9:13
  Now, the Supreme Court has now declared that such practices when race predominates violate the Constitution's command of equal protection.
• 9:23
  The Virginia ruling reinforces that even popular referenda must follow constitutional procedures, ends cannot justify means.
• 9:34
  Collectively, these rulings eliminate Democrats' primary counter strategy to Republican advantages elsewhere.
• 9:43
  Analysis indicates that Democrats had hoped that these maneuvers would offset expected Republican gains and position them to flip the house.
• 9:55
  That path is now foreclosed.
• 9:58
  The outcome affirms that electoral maps must serve all voters, not engineered outcomes based on race or partisan convenience.
• 10:12
  This advances the conservative principle that government must treat citizens as individuals and not as members of racial or political blocks.
• 10:24
  Now, while with the Supreme Court precedent now clear, Republican-led uh legislatures in the Southern and Sunbelt states are already moving to redraw congressional maps.
• 10:37
  Louisiana, Alabama, Tennessee, and South Carolina have initiated or signaled special sessions to revise districts.
• 10:46
  Texas has already secured Supreme Court approval for its map.
• 10:50
  Florida and Georgia are positioning to follow.
• 10:53
  The practice effectively will be to unpack densely packed majority minority districts, redistributing Democratic voters more evenly across multiple districts.
• 11:07
  This typically converts safe Democrat seats into competitive or Republican-leaning ones without violating the law.
• 11:16
  Every projection right now suggests that net Republican gains of five, anywhere from five to fourteen seats nationwide are going to occur because of these adjustments, potentially including flips in Louisiana with one seat, Tennessee, uh, the Memphis area district, Alabama, and additional opportunities in Texas and Florida, because some states are accelerating timelines or delaying primaries where necessary.
• 11:46
  A portion of these changes could take effect for the 2026 general election cycles.
• 11:54
  For Democrats, the math is unforgiving.
• 11:58
  Their window to manufacture offsetting gains in blue or purple states has narrowed dramatically.
• 12:06
  Republicans enter the midterms with a strong structural advantage, better positioned to defend or expand their House majority, and whatever national mood prevails.
• 12:23
  This is not gerrymandering in the pejorative sense.
• 12:26
  It is lawful redistricting that respects constitutional boundaries and demographic realities.
• 12:33
  Folks, these rulings remind us that the courts, when functioning as intended, protect the Constitution from political expediency.
• 12:44
  The Democrats' blueprint for regaining the House lies in ruins, not because of any conspiracy, but because two courts insisted on fidelity to law over racial engineering and procedural evasion.
• 12:58
  Stay with us as we get into other political issues that are going on right now today and that are shaping our nation.
• 13:06
  We'll be right back after a short break.
• 13:08
  Filling off since COVID?
• 13:09
  Try the wellness company Spike Detox Trio.
• 13:12
  Packed with natokinase, bromaline, and turmeric to help boost your immune system and fight off harmful spike proteins.
• 13:18
  Bounce back with energy and clarity.
• 13:20
  Go to TWC.health forward slash out loud and use promo code out loud for 20% off your first order.com forward slash out loud, get the daily V stack, protect yourself, boost your immune system, and save 20% on your first order.
• 14:01
  Well, did you see Google quietly updated its AI principles removing its pledge not to use AI for weapons or surveillance?
• 14:01
  Well, did you see Google finally updated its AI principles removing its pledge not to use AI for weapons or surveillance?
• 14:10
  A promise they agree to in 2018.
• 14:10
  A promise they agree to in 2018.
• 14:13
  Well, the American people have seen Google's track record prompt in the question.
• 14:13
  Well, the American people have seen Google's track record prompt in question is Google an untrustworthy player in the AI race.
• 14:17
  Is Google an untrustworthy player in the AI race?
• 14:26
  Now is our time, my fellow Americans.
• 14:26
  Now is our time, my fellow Americans.
• 14:29
  America.
• 14:29
  America outmaud news, liberty, and justice for all.
• 14:39
  Welcome back to Unleash the Political News Hour as we head into our second segment.
• 14:45
  I want to kind of carry on with some of what we were talking about in the last segment, except this time I want to shift our conversation a little bit more towards investigations that are going on.
• 14:58
  While the courts have certainly played their role in basically shutting down the Democratic ploy to rig the elections through gerrymandering, uh there is another issue that has been happening, and I think it's pretty uh profound in how it's going to impact uh the elections and possibly even the Democratic Party as a whole.
• 15:25
  Uh there have been multiple bombshell investigations that have been breaking in the news over the last couple of weeks.
• 15:34
  Uh the Trump FBI uh and uh congressional probes have basically targeted democratic corruption leaks and election integrity issues.
• 15:48
  So starting with the FBI raid uh that happened on the Virginia State Senator Umis Lucas uh basically exposing alleged corruption and bribery.
• 16:06
  Uh federal agents executed a search warrant at the Portsmouth office of Virginia State Senator L.
• 16:14
  Luis Lucas, the Senate President Pro Temp Tempor, and prominent Democratic leader who spearheaded the state's recent congressional redistricting efforts, talking about a backfire.
• 16:32
  Uh efforts later invalidated by the Virginia Supreme Court, which we covered in the last segment.
• 16:38
  Now, agents simultaneously targeted a neighboring cannabis dispensary co-owned by Lucas and associated businesses, including a network of group homes for older adults.
• 16:58
  The operation stems from an ongoing federal corruption and bribery investigation initiated during the prior Biden administration, but executed with renewed vigor, I must say, under the current leadership.
• 17:16
  Now, multiple law enforcement sources have confirmed agents removed boxes of materials and conducted on scene detentions.
• 17:29
  Now, in some additional details have you know come out since then.
• 17:33
  Uh, one stating that the probe focuses on potential misuse of public office for private gain in the regulated marijuana industry, an area Democrats have actively promoted.
• 17:49
  Lucas has described the raid, of course, as an overreach, but uh has not been charged yet.
• 17:58
  Now, conservative analysts notes uh that the timing coincidence coincidences with the heightened scrutiny of democratic redistricting maneuvers, raising questions about whether personal financial entanglements influenced legislative priorities.
• 18:16
  This development underscores some real vulnerabilities in the democratic strongholds, and it reinforces the principles that no public official is above the law.
• 18:29
  Now, look, the marijuana industry, it really does have a lot of problems because it is so tightly regulated.
• 18:38
  There really is no you're not talking about an industry that has um you know standard market pressures and things like that.
• 18:50
  It is highly regulated.
• 18:53
  There's maybe a handful of growers that are even allowed, a handful of companies that are allowed to sell it.
• 19:00
  And in my opinion, what that leads to is it leads to the potential for bribery and kickbacks and things like that in order for people to win the contracts to allow them to be able to produce or to be able to sell.
• 19:16
  The fact is is that uh, you know, these programs throughout multiple states, I think are rife with this kind of corruption, where basically you've got people that are bribing and paying kickbacks in order to even be able to get a license because they're so limited.
• 19:33
  Uh, I imagine it's very similar to uh, you know, any industry that is highly regulated or tightly controlled.
• 19:41
  Think about the energy industry, uh, especially with like offshore drilling where they have to get specialized permits and stuff like that.
• 19:49
  It's always a bad idea when you have essentially the government in control, completely in control of an industry to the point where uh, you know, these politicians that maybe aren't paid a lot of money, uh, there's a great temptation there for, you know, when they have control uh or have influence over who gets the licenses or who gets the uh you know gets the ability to be able to participate uh in these markets.
• 20:19
  I really wish that they would just deregulate and uh, you know, if they want to regulate certain things like uh if you're selling a product or you're manufacturing a product, you gotta show certain things, uh, you've got to have certain safety things.
• 20:33
  I'm I'm fine with that, but it's it's really kind of a ridiculous notion when they're going to uh legalize marijuana, but only make it legal uh if you buy through their restricted sources.
• 20:48
  It's kind of like when the state owns the liquor store, you know, the ABC stores.
• 20:52
  It's the same thing.
• 20:54
  So another interesting case that has popped up recently is uh federal judge um federal judges have advanced retention of Fulton County 2020 election records, which is really bolstering a probe into irregularities.
• 21:00
  Recently, is a federal judge um federal judges have advanced retention of Fulton County 2020 election records, which is really bolstering a probe into irregularities.
• 21:16
  Now, a U.S.
• 21:16
  Now, a U.S.
• 21:17
  district judge in Georgia ruled this week that the FBI and Department of Justice may retain over 600 to 700 boxes of 2020 elections.
• 21:17
  district judge in Georgia ruled this week that the FBI and Department of Justice may retain over 600 to 700 boxes of 2020 election ballots, voter rolls, and related materials seized from Fulton County's elections warehouse in January.
• 21:39
  The decision explicitly rejects Fulton County's motion to reclaim the documents, sustaining the criminal investigation into ballot handling irregularities and procedural failures in this heavily democratic jurisdiction.
• 21:55
  Judge JP Boole determined that the county failed to meet the high legal threshold of proving callous disregard for constitutional rights by federal agents.
• 22:10
  The January seizure targeted the elections hub in Atlanta, home to most of the city.
• 22:20
  The probe, it examines potential inaccuracies in record management during the 2020 presidential race, where Biden won Georgia by approximately 11,800 votes.
• 22:33
  This ruling preserves critical evidence for ongoing review, directly addressing longstanding concerns about election integrity and ensuring voters' voices are not undermined by procedural lapses.
• 22:48
  Now, look, folks, the law is very clear, and it's been clear going back to the 1968 voting rights act or civil rights act, I should say, uh, where it indicated that any election, federal election involving federal races that by law states are required to maintain all records that have to do with voting in federal elections, they have to maintain those records for up to 22 months.
• 23:24
  But, you know, one might ask, okay, well, why?
• 23:27
  So that exactly what we are seeing here can be done, so that investigations can occur.
• 23:34
  So the notion that they would try to say that this is illegal for the FBI to retain these records is ridiculous.
• 23:41
  The whole point in those records being retained in the first place is so that investigations and audits can be done.
• 23:49
  This case is really important because I believe, based on you know, a lot of election integrity work that I've been involved with, including uh, you know, election integrity works that that were uh connected to the White House in 2020 after the 2020 election, um, or I should say selection because uh there was so much corruption, so much crime that it was involved in that, but yet we didn't see anything happening, and it was very frustrating because a lot of us did a lot of good work and we showed that there were inaccuracies, but this is really the first I think attempt at really looking at whether or not they were following the law.
• 24:34
  Now, unfortunately, the Civil Rights Act hasn't been updated for a very long time when it comes to uh, you know, the amount of fines or you know, potential jail time for violations.
• 24:52
  I think it's like a thousand dollars or a year in prison.
• 24:55
  Quite honestly, that's not enough.
• 24:57
  It should be more like 10 years in prison and uh, you know, maybe a hundred thousand dollars in fines.
• 25:05
  When they are corrupting our elections, and they can prove you know that it was done intentionally, and when they destroy records so that you can't even do a true investigation or audit of an election, all of these things I think uh should come with severe penalties.
• 25:24
  But at least the courts, uh, the FBI is clearly doing something here.
• 25:29
  Uh, I'm hoping that the next step will be uh they're looking at what the numbers were coming out of the machines, comparing them against the um the ballot images in the electronic voting machines against the ballots that were supposedly submitted.
• 25:45
  And the other thing that's important that they need to do, and they need to look into this is they need to look and see how many of those ballots that were issued, uh, you know, how many of the they should have the voter registration files from that time period, and they need to do an analysis of all the people who supposedly voted and how many of those voters actually were lawfully allowed to vote in that election because this is where I think the majority of the problem has been.
• 26:14
  But this will be interesting to see what comes out of this because there is an actual FBI investigation going on here.
• 26:20
  And uh, and so if they find you know gross uh um irregularities in here, if they see you know something that looks a little bit more organized, which I suspect they will find, uh, this could end up becoming uh leading to more investigations into more of these counties and these districts where they have you know had a lot of this type of stuff going on.
• 26:46
  So it's very important that they're doing this.
• 26:49
  Uh the other thing that happened is uh there's been FBI criminal probes into Senate Intelligence Committee Democrats uh for classified leaks targeting DI Tulsi Gabbard.
• 27:00
  Uh, the FBI has launched a full criminal and counterintelligence investigation into whether Democratic members or staff of the Senate Intelligence Committee leaked classified NSA intercepts to the New York Times in an effort to damage director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbert during her confirmation process.
• 27:20
  The probe was received by FBI director Cash Battle after a dormant NSA criminal referral involving a 2017 overseas interf uh intercept referencing Gabbard.
• 27:36
  Sources confirmed that the investigation expanded to additional leaks and media contacts with the NSA verifying the intercept's authenticity while noting that Gabber did not uh did not meet with Hezbollah leader leaders as alleged.
• 27:55
  Uh, the case highlights alleged weaponization of sensitive intelligence for partisan advantage, potentially compromising national security.
• 28:00
  Partisan advantage, potentially compromising national security.
• 28:05
  The referral had languished previously.
• 28:05
  The referral had languished previously, and its activated signals or its activation signals a decisive shift towards accountability at the highest level of congressional oversight.
• 28:09
  And its activated signals, or its activation signals a decisive shift towards accountability at the highest level of congressional oversight.
• 28:18
  I think this is so critically important.
• 28:18
  I think this is so critically important.
• 28:21
  Look, if there's anything that we've learned about the Democrats and their willingness to use lawfare uh really in a
• 28:21
  Look, if there's anything that we've learned about the Democrats and their willingness to use lawfare uh really in a unfair and I would say unlawful way, Trump is basically flipped the script on them, and he's going after them.
• 28:37
  Uh, but he is using it in a lawful way.
• 28:40
  And uh, and I think if we could see some of these people get arrested and go to jail, I think it would make a difference, a huge difference in being able to ensure uh that these things don't happen again.
• 28:54
  The House Republican committees uh are also working in coordination with Department of Justice, uh continuing to intensify their investigation into Act Blue, the primary democratic fundraising platform, which probably has a lot to do with why they are in debt and not uh ahead in terms of their fundraising.
• 29:16
  Uh, a joint interim staff report released April 20th.
• 29:21
  It details illicit foreign donations, straw donor schemes, and alleged cover-up uh that triggered mass resignations and firings within Act Blue's legal and compliance team.
• 29:35
  Internal legal memos warned uh that uh CEO Regina Wallace Jones that she may have misled Congress regarding donor vetting procedures, prompting accusations of deliberate obstruction of subpoenas.
• 29:51
  Again, uh, you know, in a deeper analysis of this, the probe, which accelerated after 2024 election cycle, it examines whether Act Blue knowingly accepted illegal contributions, potentially violating federal campaign finance laws uh that threaten the financial backbone of Democratic campaigns and expose systemic weakness in small dollar fundraising mechanism.
• 30:19
  And I will tell you, uh, as somebody who ran for office myself, there's a lot of scams that go on, uh, not just with Act Blue, but even with uh Win Red, which is the Republican side.
• 30:30
  Uh, I would say it's more prolific amongst the Democrat side, but there are problems uh, you know, with with uh folks that basically use small dollar donations to uh raise a lot of money through straw donors.
• 30:44
  The uh some also some other news uh representative Ilan Omar has been linked to 250 million dollars in Minnesota fraud operations uh via an email chain, uh resurfacing uh court exhibits from 2025 federal trial in Minnesota's 250 million feeding our future fraud uh fraud case revealed that Representative Ilhan Omar's name appears at least six times in email chains and text messages with convicted fraudster uh Amy Bach.
• 31:19
  Uh one chain titled Ilhan's office, involved requests for assistance with the USDA food program.
• 31:27
  Omar's refused to turn over requested documents to the Minnesota House Fraud Prevention and State Oversight Committee, uh missing a May 5th deadline and declining to testify.
• 31:40
  The scandal involves the largest COVID-era fraud scheme targeting children's nutrition programs.
• 31:47
  Omar received campaign donations from some of the defendants and a former staffer pleading guilty to related fraud charges.
• 31:56
  It raises serious oversight questions and has fueled calls for federal subpoenas.
• 32:01
  And this, on top of all of the other problems that she's having, uh, I would say this does not bode well for her.
• 32:07
  I would expect to see uh her uh at a minimum uh be brought up on some charges uh or at a at a, you know, or at least um, you know, see her resign uh from Congress.
• 32:21
  But you know, uh the the blatency and the lack of of any kind of self-awareness uh would not surprise me that she would just continue to deny and uh you know, and try to fight this.
• 32:33
  The uh Utah Supreme Court Justice Diana Hagen uh resigned amid a conflict of interest probe.
• 32:40
  Uh Utah Supreme Court Justice Diana Hagan submitted her immediate resignation to Governor Spencer Cox on May 8th amid an investigation and allegations of an improper relationship with attorney David Raymond, who represented progressive groups in a key redistricting lawsuit before the court.
• 32:58
  So it's even within the judgeships, which we know.
• 33:02
  We know the corruption exists in the legislature, but it's also uh in the judiciary as well.
• 33:08
  But at least we are seeing uh, you know, some of these things get exposed.
• 33:12
  And again, this was a case that involved changes to uh Republican favored congressional maps and the uh resignation uh following pressure from Republican leaders for an independent review, it really highlights ongoing concerns about judicial impartiality in politically charged matters.
• 33:32
  Uh finally, uh FBI director Cash Patel really is you know has uh made some bombshell promises, uh arrests are coming over the 2020 election irregularities.
• 33:43
  And he has stated on an appearance in on Fox News Sunday morning features with Mark uh Maria Barterromo.
• 33:50
  Uh, he said that uh unequivocally that uh he made a declaration regarding accountability for alleged 2020 election misconduct.
• 34:01
  Patel said uh we've got all the information we need.
• 34:04
  We are working with our prosecutors at the Department of Justice.
• 34:08
  And so I think some things coming, and uh we're gonna see a lot of change happening, and hopefully for the better.
• 34:15
  Uh, we will see these people getting arrested, and uh we will see accountability finally for once uh within these positions of power.
• 34:26
  Folks, uh, that's all I got, all I have time for in this segment.
• 34:30
  Uh, I would definitely say that uh you're gonna want to stay on and uh listen uh for our third and final segment.
• 34:37
  I'm going to be getting into the UFO uh UAP documents that were released by the Department of War.
• 34:47
  Uh these came from multiple agencies.
• 34:49
  I've done a deep dive into these, and so I'm going to lay out for you uh what I found in them that is interesting and what was maybe not as interesting.
• 34:58
  But I will break it all down for you in the right after the break.
• 35:00
  For you in the right after the break.
• 35:01
  Coral hygiene hasn't changed in 50 years, but our diet and the way we eat has creating an environment in your mouth for bacteria to wreck havoc on your teeth and gums.
• 35:01
  Coral hygiene hasn't changed in 50 years, but our diet and the way we eat has creating an environment in your mouth for bacteria to wreck havoc on your teeth and gums for better oral health, get sprayed dental defense, an oral care line designed to combat acid creating bacteria.
• 35:11
  For better oral health, get spray dental defense, an oral care line designed to combat acid creating bacteria.
• 35:19
  The toothpaste, mouthwash, mints, and gum all contain xylitol, and natural ingredients shown to dramatically improve oral health.
• 35:19
  The toothpaste, mouthwash, mints, and gum all contain xylitol, and natural ingredients shown to dramatically improve oral health.
• 35:27
  Sprite can be found online and at all.
• 35:27
  Spry can be found online and at all fine natural retailers.
• 35:31
  Have you been looking for a healthy snack for on the go?
• 35:35
  Well, not all energy bars are soft and sugary.
• 35:55
  Most energy bars are based on chocolate or fruit and are held together with syrups or sweeteners.
• 36:02
  To learn more, just visit barebar.com/slash out loud.
• 36:07
  Feeling drained or mentally foggy, recharged for wellness company.
• 36:10
  Combines methylene blue and urolithin A to support mitochondrial health, boosts energy and enhance cognitive function.
• 36:17
  Visit TWC.
• 36:22
  And use code Outloud for 20% off your first order.
• 36:30
  Welcome back to Unleash the Political News Hour.
• 36:32
  I'm Nate Kane, your host.
• 36:34
  And as we get into this third and final segment, uh, I thought it would be appropriate to take a deep dive into these new UAP UFO files that were released on the uh government website, uh, ward.gov forward slash UFO, in case any of you guys want to go look at these files.
• 36:56
  Um, I went through and looked at every single one of them.
• 37:00
  Uh I'll be honest with you, this is a lot of stuff to go over, and there was a lot of junk, a lot of garbage in there.
• 37:07
  Um of them had been released before.
• 37:13
  Uh, and so it kind of felt a little bit like the Epstein file debacle, where you know, they said, Oh, we've got, you know, this bombshow, we're going to release all this stuff, and then they release it, and you say, Well, wait a minute.
• 37:25
  Oh, we've already seen all this.
• 37:27
  But I will say there were some interesting tidbits that were in there.
• 37:32
  Uh, and there were files that had previously been released but had more redactions, and so they had fewer redactions this time around.
• 37:42
  And so I took a look at all these files.
• 37:45
  Uh, the main agencies that were involved in release were uh you had the FBI releasing a ton of files, and and I would say theirs were kind of like the hardest to figure out as to what in the heck they were looking at.
• 37:59
  Had a lot of newspaper clippings and you know crazy, you know, insane uh you know, statements made by people that didn't necessarily have any evidence backing it up.
• 38:11
  And so you're looking at it and you're going, what in the heck is the FBI investigating this for?
• 38:19
  But um there were also files that were released by uh the Department of War, um, primarily uh Air Force files.
• 38:30
  And uh, and then you also had uh uh some interesting files from the Apollo missions released by NASA.
• 38:38
  And um, so I kind of looked at a couple of different things that I wanted to see.
• 38:45
  I wanted to see if there was a pattern of information.
• 38:49
  Uh on the, you know, as far as the the FBI files were involved.
• 38:55
  Um, I downloaded all of these files.
• 38:57
  I uploaded them into AI.
• 38:59
  I basically said, okay, I want you to identify any patterns that would not necessarily be noticed by a human being.
• 39:09
  And what it came back with was some pretty interesting findings.
• 39:13
  And so I want to go over these with you, but I'm gonna kind of break it down piece by piece, and then I'll kind of summarize it at the end with my thoughts on um, you know, what the patterns were.
• 39:25
  And uh, and I may do a little bit of that as well as we go through these.
• 39:29
  The first thing that I want to say, or one of the patterns that I noticed um, in all of these cases that were these FBI files, like I said, a lot of them really didn't make any sense.
• 39:40
  But there was one main case file, and that's 62-HQ-83894.
• 39:49
  What I found interesting about this is that there's been a long-standing theory amongst ufologists that the UFOs kind of showed up after we dropped the uh the nuclear bomb.
• 40:00
  Uh, there, then that they've had a lot of interest in our nuclear weapons development, that sort of thing.
• 40:07
  That's always been you know speculative.
• 40:10
  But these documents to me showed clear evidence of that to be true.
• 40:21
  Um, I'll give you an example.
• 40:22
  In that case file that I mentioned, uh, there were um three main files that uh or main um sightings, I guess you will, that the FBI investigated.
• 40:36
  And this is one of those things where they had released this document before, but the locations of where they were looking uh were some of the information that was uh classified before or redacted, and now they've unredacted, and you can see where these sightings were held that the FBI went and investigated.
• 40:55
  One of them was the Savannah River uh plant, another was the Los Alamos uh sightings, several of them, in fact, that happened there.
• 41:04
  And then uh the last one um related to this particular topic was Oak Ridge, uh, Oak Ridge, Tennessee.
• 41:12
  What all three of those sites have in common?
• 41:15
  Uh they are all directly uh, you know, related that especially back and during those time periods uh to the production of nuclear weapons or nuclear material uh for nuclear weapons.
• 41:29
  And so I'll start with the Savannah River plant.
• 41:33
  So while America was building hydrogen bombs at Savannah River plant in South Carolina, uh, the FBI documented multiple UFO sightings directly over this top secret nuclear facility.
• 41:46
  Uh, this wasn't some random farmland in the middle of nowhere, you know, with the aliens uh drawing crop circles in the you know, corn.
• 41:54
  No, this was one of the most sensitive nuclear weapons production sites in the entire country.
• 42:00
  The entire country.
• 42:01
  The plant was responsible for producing tritium uh and plutonium 239, the key materials needed for our hydrogen bombs.
• 42:01
  The plant was responsible for producing tritium and plutonium 239, the key materials needed for our hydrogen bombs.
• 42:11
  Uh, the fact that these objects were repeatedly seen hovering directly over this facility raises serious questions about what they were interested in.
• 42:11
  The fact that these objects were repeatedly seen hovering directly over this facility raises serious questions about what they were interested in.
• 42:23
  So that to me is is something that you think about like this is back in the, you know.
• 42:23
  So that to me is something that you think about like this is back in the, you know, this is back, you know, way before there was any kind of technology that we you know we had nowadays.
• 42:29
  This is
• 42:38
  Any kind of things that are hovering, you know, we have to wonder is it a drone?
• 42:42
  Is it, you know, is this our technology?
• 42:44
  But back then we didn't have anything like that.
• 42:47
  So, and it's clear based on the FBI's uh investigations that uh they were really truly concerned that this might have been some sort of unknown Russian um you know technology or something like that.
• 43:02
  Los Alamos, New Mexico is another place where uh they talked about in that file, and that is the very birthplace of the atomic bomb.
• 43:12
  Uh has and it has had concentrated UFO activity uh in 1948 and 1949.
• 43:21
  Um, what makes this especially compelling is that the reports weren't just from random civilians.
• 43:29
  Uh in these documents that were declassified uh and unredacted, uh, even security inspectors working at the lab itself were filing official reports uh when the people responsible for guarding America's nuclear weapons secrets are seeing these things.
• 43:50
  That carries a completely different level of credibility than you know, some random stranger uh driving down the road and seeing a supposed UFO.
• 44:00
  Uh these were reports being made by the very people involved in developing our nuclear weapons systems.
• 44:08
  So uh, of course, that's something, and and if you look at that date, right, 1948, 1949, um, which by the way, the first nuclear test, I think uh it was the the Trinity test is what they call it, or the Trinity site, um none of these nuclear, sorry, none of these these uh UFO UAP sightings were seen or even talked about prior to that nuclear site, the uh that nuclear test.
• 44:42
  Our very first nuclear test, it was about two years after that, that all of a sudden all these UFO sightings start happening, which makes you wonder.
• 44:52
  Did something happen?
• 44:54
  Did you know this nuclear chain reaction cause something in a you know from a physics standpoint to create uh you know some sort of of conditions that allowed for uh these things to be seen?
• 45:07
  Uh, you know, I I questioned um, you know, I asked uh AI uh if a nuclear you know hydrogen bomb, one of our earliest nuclear weapons was uh you know, tested what would be the impact on electromagnetic propulsion or uh you know electrostatic energy.
• 45:28
  And it was interesting because the response came back is it would basically cause a massive EMP.
• 45:33
  And so uh it's very possible there have been a number of supposed UFO crashes uh that have occurred right around the time of nuclear tests that were being done.
• 45:44
  So maybe uh it caused some disruption uh in whatever means that these things are flying around, and uh that's why people started seeing these things.
• 45:55
  I've got my own theories on that, and I'll get into that in a minute.
• 45:58
  Oak Ridge, Tennessee was another uh cornerstone of American atomic energy program.
• 46:05
  Uh it had repeated disk-shaped UFO sightings throughout the late 1440s and early 1950s.
• 46:13
  On top of that, in um in 1950, uh, the area experienced multiple mysterious green fireball sightings directly over the facility.
• 46:29
  Uh, these weren't one-time events either.
• 46:31
  They happened repeatedly over a critical nuclear site.
• 46:36
  So these were like the orb type, you know, UFOs as well.
• 46:40
  So they had sightings of the discs, and they had sightings of these green, you know, green fireball orbs uh that were being seen.
• 46:49
  Um, another interesting file that came out of the FBI files that I thought I thought was uh noteworthy was um, of course, everybody knows about Roswell and uh you know the the scene of the reported crash.
• 47:02
  Now I've been to that location.
• 47:04
  Uh one of my many moves across the country, you know, uh, as a US soldier, uh, my wife and I passed through Roswell, New Mexico, and so of course they had the uh the museum there.
• 47:15
  So we went and we looked, checked it out.
• 47:16
  And it's interesting because the US Air Force actually released in the newspapers um an official statement about uh a crashed UFO.
• 47:27
  And then of course they redacted and said, Oh, it was just a weather balloon, blah, blah, blah.
• 47:31
  Well, in these files, uh, there was a Roswell memo in 1947, uh, an FBI memo clearly states that quote, an object purporting to be a flying disk was recovered near Roswell, New Mexico.
• 47:49
  Um, this is an official internal government document written at the very beginning of the modern UFO era.
• 47:58
  Uh, the single memo has been a subject of much debate for decades, and now we have the original FBI version um with lighter redactions.
• 48:08
  So now we can see you know the names of you know different agents and things like that.
• 48:12
  So it's it's fascinating to me because again, this is one more piece of evidence uh that what happened at Roswell really did involve the UFO.
• 48:21
  Uh the NASA files I thought were very interesting as well.
• 48:24
  Um, Apollo 11, uh during the Apollo 11 mission, Buzz Aldrin reported seeing a bright, unidentified object traveling alongside their spacecraft on the way to the moon.
• 48:36
  Even more strange, he also describes mysterious flashes of light appearing inside the spacecraft cabin while he was trying to sleep.
• 48:45
  These flashes occurred consistently, roughly every couple of minutes, and he specifically called them out during an official debriefing.
• 48:54
  Um, astronaut Alan Bean during Apollo 12's mission reported seeing strange particles of light that looked like they were sailing away from the moon and escaping into space.
• 49:00
  Strange particles of light that looked like they were sailing away from the moon and escaping into space.
• 49:06
  He initially believed that they were coming from the spacecraft's water boiler system, but later realized that some of the lights appeared to be originating from the lunar surface itself.
• 49:06
  He initially believed that they were coming from the spacecraft's water boiler system, but later realized that some of the lights appeared to be originating from the lunar surface itself.
• 49:19
  This raises fascinating questions about what was happening on the moon.
• 49:19
  This raises fascinating questions about what was happening on the moon.
• 49:23
  And then on Apollo 17, um, their mission, after
• 49:23
  And then on Apollo 17, their mission, astronauts actually captured photographic evidence of three unidentified objects flying in a clear triangular formation from the lunar horizon.
• 49:41
  Now, this is actual imagery from the surface of the moon following structured objects or showing structured objects in formation.
• 49:52
  What I find very compelling about this is that, you know, at that time we had no satellites orbiting the moon.
• 50:00
  So it doesn't make any sense why they should be seeing anything like that.
• 50:05
  But I think all of those are very interesting.
• 50:08
  Now the Department of War files, um, you know, we've seen a lot of these things, and and um, you know, in a lot of the videos, they did have a lot of videos, but the videos just, you know, if you if you didn't read the reports that went along with it, which I suspect that's probably the case.
• 50:23
  Uh, you know, there was one that was like a star formation.
• 50:25
  That's actually the one that's the most interesting looking, but it's I think the least likely uh to be a UAP.
• 50:33
  To me, it looked like it's more like a flare or you know, some sort of other device because there does appear to be some sort of parachute uh that shows up attached to it.
• 50:42
  So I don't think that was an actual UAP, but the other things with the Tic Tac looking objects or the metallic objects that are moving quickly across the screen.
• 50:54
  If if that's all you saw, you'd say, okay, we've seen this before, and what's the big deal?
• 50:59
  But here's one interesting report uh East China Sea Tic Tac.
• 51:03
  In 2022, over the East China Sea, military personnel tracked a metallic Tic Tac shaped object that descended, and this part I had not heard before, descended from 80,000 feet all the way down to sea level in less than one second.
• 51:19
  You heard me correctly on that.
• 51:21
  That is an absolutely incredible rate of descent.
• 51:25
  The object then paced the aircraft at high speed, all while remaining invisible to the naked eye, but clearly visible on infrared sensors, and that is, I think very important.
• 51:38
  Multiple reports described UAPs that uh were completely invisible to the pilots looking out their cockpit, yet these same objects showed up bright and clear on thermal and infrared cameras.
• 51:51
  Uh, this creates a very strange situation where the technology can see them, but the human eye cannot, and leads me to believe that there was some sort of cloaking device uh that these things had.
• 52:02
  The other thing that comes out in some of these reports is that there were several incidences uh documenting objects moving seamlessly from the air directly into the ocean without any loss of speed.
• 52:12
  These objects transition between two completely different mediums, air and water, without slowing down at all.
• 52:20
  This is a capability that is that has there's no known human technology on Earth uh that that currently possesses this capability.
• 52:29
  So uh I think all of these things are very interesting.
• 52:33
  Um I think there's going to be more stuff coming out.
• 52:38
  Uh, this is just a I think it's going to be a bit of a drip campaign.
• 52:41
  And I'll be honest with you.
• 52:42
  Um, I I want to see this stuff come out.
• 52:44
  I think it's important as taxpayers.
• 52:47
  We have a right to know.
• 52:48
  Uh, and I don't think it's fair for the government to keep this from us.
• 52:51
  Um, there's a lot of concerns amongst uh, you know, Christian pastors and some, you know, there's been some meetings and stuff like that from former officials that have told them they need to prepare their uh you know, prepare their congregations.
• 53:05
  There's some rumors about uh information the government has about actual um you know non-human uh intelligences, uh extraterrestrials, whatever you want to call them, uh, that will be coming out in the future.
• 53:18
  Uh I if this happens, it's going to be probably the greatest uh exposure of anything in our lifetimes.
• 53:25
  Uh certainly it is going to change the world uh with that kind of new information.
• 53:30
  Um, you know, I want to mention though that uh one thing that is interesting.
• 53:34
  Uh remember, I I put in all of these things into AI and I said, look for any kind of things that you know people might not notice.
• 53:41
  And this was one of the things it found out.
• 53:43
  It said it said one of the most striking observations when reading all these documents is the remarkable consistency in how these objects are described across 75 years.
• 53:53
  The way pilots describe these objects in 1949 is almost identical to how pilots described them in 2022.
• 54:01
  Same instantaneous acceleration, same lack of visible propulsion, and same intelligent movement pattern.
• 54:08
  So that was one thing that that uh AI uh identified.
• 54:12
  It also mentioned that looking at the full picture, one pattern becomes uh impossible to ignore across multiple decades.
• 54:20
  These objects consistently showed up near America's most secret nuclear infrastructure, Los Alamos, Oak Ridge, Savannah River, and Hanford.
• 54:29
  Uh, they weren't just flying over random parts of the country.
• 54:32
  They repeatedly appeared where we were developing and producing our most destructive weapons.
• 54:37
  And the the last thing here, and I thought this was an interesting uh comment was that you know, why was the FBI involved?
• 54:43
  I asked that of AI, and it said people often ask why the FBI was even involved in UFO reports to begin with.
• 54:50
  The answer is actually spelled out in the files themselves.
• 54:53
  In 1947, the Air Force formally requested the FBI's assistance investigating flying disk reports.
• 55:00
  The FBI wasn't primarily chasing aliens, they were acting as extra field investigators and intelligence gatherers for the military during the very early and tense years of the cold war.
• 55:15
  Finally, you know, it's worth noting that with the exception of Buzz Aldrin, every single person named in these documents is now deceased.
• 55:24
  Furthermore, uh, or their name was still redacted.
• 55:27
  Furthermore, none of the individuals named in these reports, aside from Buzz Aldrin ever wrote any books, gave any interviews, or made any public statements about UFOs outside of their original official government reports.
• 55:41
  I think that's kind of interesting because it makes you wonder, you know, were they threatened?
• 55:45
  Uh, you know, why did these people stay silent?
• 55:48
  Um, you know, clearly uh they were afraid to talk to the public about it, and and you know, none of them came forward.
• 55:54
  Um, maybe there were good reasons for that, but unfortunately, we can't go back and ask these people uh any follow-on questions.
• 56:00
  Any follow on questions.
• 56:01
  Well, folks, that's all we have time for today.
• 56:01
  Well, folks, that's all we have time for today.
• 56:04
  I hope this was enlightening information, and I hope that you got a lot out of it.
• 56:04
  I hope this was enlightening information and I hope that you got a lot out of it.
• 56:08
  Uh, as more information comes out, I will continue uh to provide analysis on it.
• 56:08
  Uh, as more information comes out, I will continue uh to provide analysis on it.
• 56:13
  I think this is an important part of America, and uh obviously with our government's involvement in this is very political.
• 56:13
  I think this is an important part of America, and uh obviously with our government's involvement in this is very political.
• 56:21
  And uh so I look forward to seeing more information released to the public.
• 56:21
  And uh so I look forward to seeing more information released to the public, and like I said, uh continue uh to use.
• 56:25
  And like I said, uh continue uh to to you know keep an open mind, but continue to look for the truth uh anywhere you can find it.
• 56:34
  Don't just listen to what people tell you, go out and research these things yourself.
• 56:38
  Like I said, you can go to the war.gov forward slash UFO and you can look at these files that have been released by our government uh yourselves.
• 56:48
  But uh with that, have a uh have a good night and God bless.