Latest / How Canadian Markets Work / Episode 70: The Balance Sheet (The Photograph of Wealth)

Transcript

Episode 70: The Balance Sheet (The Photograph of Wealth) · How Canadian Markets Work

0:00
So what if I told you that a company's single
0:02
most valuable asset, let's say a globally recognized
0:06
brand that's worth tens of billions of dollars,
0:10
a name literally recognized in every household
0:12
on earth. What if I told you that might not legally
0:16
be allowed to exist on their financial statements?
0:18
Yeah, it sounds completely backwards, but it
0:20
is entirely true. Right. Today, we are tearing
0:23
apart the Canadian corporate balance sheet or
0:26
as it's formally known under IFRS accounting
0:29
standards, the statement of financial position.
0:32
Which is quite a mouthful, honestly. It really
0:34
is. But our mission for this deep dive today
0:36
is for you, the listener, to take what looks
0:39
like this dense, intimidating wall of numbers
0:42
and totally transform it into a diagnostic tool.
0:45
We want you to be able to read a company's structural
0:47
health in just a matter of minutes. And to do
0:50
that, well, we have to start with the fundamental
0:51
nature of this document, because a balance sheet
0:53
is a photograph. It is not a film. OK, a photograph.
0:57
Right. An income statement shows you a movie
0:59
of what happened over a whole year, the sales,
1:02
the expenses as they happen. But the balance
1:05
sheet captures one singular fraction of a second.
1:08
It's the close of business on the very last day
1:10
of the reporting period. Just a frozen snapshot.
1:13
Exactly. A frozen snapshot. of everything the
1:15
company owns and everything it owes at that precise
1:19
moment. Okay, but I mean, if it is just a photograph,
1:23
knowing human nature, photographs can be posed,
1:26
right? Like if I know a camera's pointing at
1:28
me, I'm absolutely gonna suck in my gut and stand
1:30
up straight. Oh, absolutely. So if management
1:33
knows the exact day the fiscal quarter ends,
1:36
they must be... managing those numbers to look
1:39
a little leaner for the shareholders. They do,
1:41
and it's actually a known practice. It's called
1:43
window dressing. Window dressing. Yeah, because
1:45
that snapshot date is completely public and fixed.
1:47
Management can orchestrate their cash flows to
1:50
look financially healthier for the camera. How
1:52
does that actually work in practice? Well, say
1:54
a company is carrying a lot of short -term, really
1:57
expensive debt, and they know investors are worried
2:00
about their leverage. They might take a massive
2:02
chunk of their operating cash and pay down that
2:05
debt on, say, December 30th. Oh, I see where
2:07
this is going. Right. So the snapshot is taken
2:09
on December 31st, showing this super lean balance
2:13
sheet with tons of debt capacity. And then on
2:16
January 2nd, they literally just borrow that
2:18
money right back to make payroll and fund their
2:20
operations. So the picture looks phenomenal,
2:23
but the economic reality, like three days later,
2:26
is entirely different. Exactly. But wait, how
2:28
do you even trust the document if it's that easily
2:31
manipulated? Do auditors just, I don't know,
2:33
shrug and let it happen? No, no. Auditors have
2:36
mechanics. to catch the really aggressive stuff.
2:38
They don't just look at the December 31st balance.
2:40
They will pull the average daily cash balances
2:45
or average debt balances for the entire fourth
2:47
quarter. Oh, so they check the tape. Yeah, exactly.
2:50
If your average short -term debt was like $50
2:53
million for 90 days, but it miraculously dropped
2:56
to zero on the last day of the year, that triggers
2:59
a massive red flag. Right, that makes sense.
3:01
But ordinary legal cash management happens all
3:04
the time. And it establishes the stakes for us
3:07
today, right? You have to know how to look past
3:10
the posing. You really need to understand the
3:12
physics of the document to spot those vulnerabilities.
3:15
Well, then let's get into those physics to figure
3:17
out if they are, you know, sucking in their gut.
3:21
We need to understand the fundamental equation
3:24
that governs the entire page. And that is assets
3:28
equal liabilities plus equity. That is the immovable
3:32
law of accounting. The golden rule. Right. It
3:34
isn't a theory. It is a rigid definition. Everything
3:37
a company has its assets. Well, it had to be
3:40
funded somehow. Because there is no spontaneous
3:42
generation of wealth in corporate finance. Exactly.
3:45
Every single asset was funded in one of three
3:47
ways. Someone lent the company the money, which
3:49
is a liability, or the owners injected their
3:51
own capital, which is equity. Or the third option,
3:55
the business generated a profit and kept it to
3:57
buy the asset, which is also categorized as equity.
4:00
Okay, so there is no free lunch here. So if I
4:03
want to figure out what the owners actually have,
4:05
I just isolate the equity side of things. It's
4:08
basically the leftover slice of the pie. The
4:11
leftover slice, yeah, that's a good way to put
4:12
it. Right, like you take every single thing the
4:14
company owns the assets and you subtract every
4:17
single dime the company owes to everyone else
4:19
the liabilities. Whatever is sitting there at
4:21
the very end is the equity. It is the ultimate
4:24
residual claim. And honestly, that residual claim
4:27
is what makes equity investing both incredibly
4:30
lucrative and really dangerous. Because you're
4:32
at the bottom of a pile. Precisely. As a shareholder,
4:36
you are standing at the very back of the line.
4:38
If the company liquidates, the secured lenders
4:41
take their cut first, the bondholders take theirs,
4:44
the suppliers get paid, and you, well, you get
4:46
the scraps. You're just the shock absorber for
4:48
the entire business. You are. But the upside
4:50
is, if the company succeeds wildly and the asset
4:54
base just explodes in value while the liabilities
4:56
stay fixed, well, your leftover slice has no
4:59
ceiling. It expands infinitely. OK. Since the
5:02
math is entirely zero sum, let's look closer
5:05
at the left side of the equation. The stuff the
5:07
company actually owns. The assets. I know we
5:10
generally split this into current and non -current,
5:13
essentially drawing a line between. liquid and
5:17
illiquid stuff. Yes, the timeline is everything
5:20
on the balance sheet. Current assets are things
5:22
expected to be converted into cash, sold or consumed
5:25
within 12 months. So we are talking about the
5:28
cash itself, the accounts receivable, and the
5:30
inventory. Right. And then non -current assets
5:33
are the long -term engines of the business, the
5:36
heavy machinery, the real estate, the patents,
5:38
and then there's a very specific intangible asset
5:42
called goodwill. OK, I have to stop you there
5:44
because whenever I see Goodwill on a balance
5:46
sheet, it feels so out of place. It does sound
5:48
a bit odd. Yeah. It sounds like the company is
5:50
just claiming they have a really great vibe,
5:52
you know, or like a strong presence in the local
5:55
community. Right. Yeah. But it has absolutely
5:57
nothing to do with corporate karma. Goodwill
6:00
is a highly specific, very mathematical plug.
6:03
It represents the premium paid in an acquisition
6:07
above the fair value of the identifiable net
6:09
assets Wait, okay. Let me translate that for
6:12
a second So if a company buys a competitor and
6:15
that competitor is actual physical stuff Their
6:20
warehouses their cash the proprietary software.
6:22
Let's say it's all appraised at 70 million dollars
6:25
Okay, 70 million, but to win a bidding war our
6:28
company pays a hundred million dollars. They
6:31
overpaid by 30 million So to make the balance
6:34
sheet balance, because of our law of physics,
6:36
they just invent an asset called Goodwill and
6:38
slap $30 million on the page. Basically, yeah.
6:41
Literally just a receipt for overpaying. That
6:42
is the exact mechanism. Now, management will
6:45
heavily dispute the term overpaying, of course.
6:47
I'm sure they would. They will argue that the
6:49
$30 million bought intangible synergies, you
6:52
know, like a brilliant corporate culture, a fiercely
6:55
loyal customer base, operational efficiencies
6:58
that will pay off over the next decade. And are
7:01
they ever right about that? Sometimes they are
7:03
correct. The acquisition generates massive cash
7:06
flow and that premium is completely justified
7:08
over time. But if they are wrong, like if the
7:12
cultures completely clash, the top executives
7:15
quit and the customers flee, that 30 million
7:18
dollar asset is just dead weight then. And this
7:21
is where impairment comes in. Under IFRS rules,
7:24
companies cannot just leave that goodwill sitting
7:26
there forever if it's worthless. They are required
7:29
to run mandatory impairment tests, usually on
7:32
an annual basis. OK, so they have to prove it's
7:34
still worth something. Exactly. They have to
7:36
build discounted cash flow models to prove that
7:39
the acquired business will actually generate
7:41
enough future cash to justify that $30 million
7:44
premium they paid. And if the math fails, the
7:47
asset is impaired. They have to write it down.
7:49
Oh, wow. So if they write off that 30 million
7:51
in goodwill, the asset side of the scale drops,
7:55
which means to stay balanced, the equity side
7:58
has to drop by 30 million. That's the map. So
8:00
the shareholders' leftover slice just evaporated.
8:03
And the brutal part is no actual cash leaves
8:06
the building today. The cash left three years
8:08
ago when the CEO got you know, overly excited
8:11
and overpaid for the competitor in the first
8:12
place. Yeah, the impairment is simply the accounting
8:15
reality finally catching up to the economic reality.
8:18
It is a lagging indicator of a past mistake.
8:21
Right. And this is exactly why you cannot just
8:24
look at a massive total assets number and feel
8:26
secure. You really have to interrogate the quality
8:29
of those assets. Because if a company blew their
8:31
cash years ago, it means they either borrowed
8:34
heavily or they burned their own profits, which
8:37
means we need to flip to the right side of the
8:39
ledger, the liabilities and equity. Right. And
8:43
liabilities, they mirror the asset timeline perfectly.
8:46
Current liabilities are the immediate pressures.
8:49
So bills from suppliers, payroll, and the portion
8:52
of any long -term debt that must be paid back
8:54
within the next 12 months. Got it. And non -current?
8:56
Non -current liabilities are the distant pressures.
8:59
Things like 20 -year corporate bonds, long -term
9:01
lease obligations, or pension deficits. OK. And
9:04
below those liabilities, we hit the equity section
9:06
again. And I want to zero in on one Line item
9:10
here because it trips up almost every single
9:12
retail investor the first time they try to read
9:14
a financial statement Let me guess retained earnings.
9:17
Yes retained earnings because when people see
9:20
a line for retained earnings sitting at say 500
9:23
million dollars the immediate assumption is that
9:26
the company has this like half billion dollar
9:29
war chest of cash sitting in a bank vault just
9:32
waiting to be deployed. Oh, it is the most dangerous
9:34
optical illusion on the balance sheet. Retained
9:37
earnings is not an asset. It is not cash. So
9:39
if it's not cash. What is the actual mechanism
9:43
here? Like, why is it sitting in the equity section
9:45
at all? It is purely a historical ledger. Think
9:48
of it as a tally of every single dollar of net
9:50
income the business has ever generated since
9:53
the day it was founded, minus every dollar it
9:56
has ever paid out to you as a dividend. OK. So
9:58
when a company makes a profit, that profit increases
10:01
the cash on the asset side, and it increases
10:04
retained earnings on the equity side to keep
10:05
the scale perfectly balanced. Exactly. But they
10:09
don't just leave the cash sitting there in a
10:11
checking account. They take that profit and immediately
10:13
spend it. Right. They buy a new fleet of delivery
10:15
trucks, or they build up their inventory for
10:17
the holiday season, or they buy out a competitor
10:20
and generate that goodwill we just talked about.
10:22
Yes. The value is physically trapped over on
10:25
the asset side. A company can have billion dollars
10:29
in retained earnings meaning they have a historically
10:31
very profitable business model but if they aggressively
10:35
reinvested all that cash into illiquid factories
10:38
that are say currently sitting idle they could
10:42
literally default on a debt payment tomorrow
10:44
because they have zero cash in the bank exactly
10:46
Wow okay let's put this into a live stress test
10:49
let's look at a concrete example So you, listening,
10:52
can see how all these moving parts actually interact
10:55
in the real world. We are going to use a company
10:57
called Meridian Tool Works. Okay, Meridian. Now,
11:00
Meridian is a completely fictional Canadian manufacturer,
11:03
but we're going to use realistic numbers to trace
11:06
the structural traps that investors so often
11:08
miss. Let's lay out Meridian's snapshot then.
11:11
We'll speak in millions to keep it simple. Perfect.
11:15
On the asset side, Meridian has $60 million in
11:18
current assets. That breaks down into $8 million
11:21
in cash, $22 million in accounts receivable,
11:23
and $30 million in inventory. OK, so $60 million
11:26
in the short -term bucket. Right. Now for non
11:29
-current assets, they have $125 million. That
11:32
says $90 million in property, plant, and equipment,
11:35
their manufacturing facilities, plus $20 million
11:38
in identifiable intangibles like patents, and
11:42
$15 million in goodwill from a past buyout. Got
11:45
it. So 60 current plus 125 non -current gives
11:48
Meridian total assets of $185 million. Exactly.
11:53
Now moving to the right side of the page, the
11:55
liabilities. Meridian has current liabilities
11:58
of $40 million. That's a mix of accounts payable
12:01
to their raw material suppliers and some short
12:03
-term bank debt. They also have $70 million in
12:06
long -term debt. Okay. 40 short -term plus 70
12:09
long -term means total liabilities are $110 million.
12:14
which actually makes finding our residual equity
12:17
slice very easy. Total assets of 185 minus total
12:21
liabilities of 110 leaves us with equity of $75
12:25
million. The math works perfectly. The arithmetic
12:28
definitely works, but now we have to run the
12:30
diagnostics. The most common metric analysts
12:32
use first is working capital. It is a pretty
12:36
crude measure of short -term survivability. You
12:39
simply subtract current liabilities from current
12:41
assets. OK. Well, Meridian has 60 million current
12:44
assets and 40 million in current liabilities.
12:47
So their working capital is a positive $20 million.
12:50
On paper, They have plenty of runaway to pay
12:53
their immediate bills. And this is exactly where
12:55
retail investors stop reading and where professionals
12:57
start digging. Look closer at the composition
13:00
of that 60 million in current assets. Oh, I see
13:02
the trap. Out of that 60 million, only 8 million
13:05
is actual cash. 30 million is inventory. literally
13:08
just pallets of drill bits sitting in a warehouse.
13:12
And 22 million is accounts receivable, which
13:15
is just IOUs from clients. Exactly. And if we
13:18
hit a sudden economic recession, those clients
13:21
might delay paying their IOUs, and the demand
13:23
for drill bits plummets. Meridian can't pay their
13:26
40 million in short -term bank debt with unsold
13:28
drill bits. No, they can't. It is a classic liquidity
13:32
trap. They are heavily asset -rich, but severely
13:35
cash -poor. Positive working capital means absolutely
13:39
nothing if the assets are moving too slowly to
13:41
meet the liability deadlines. Now zoom out a
13:44
bit and look at their overall capital structure.
13:47
They have $82 million in total debt, right? It's
13:49
12 short -term and 70 long -term. But their equity
13:52
is only $75 million. They are heavily leveraged.
13:55
They are. And look at what is actually propping
13:57
up that $75 million in equity. Remember the asset
14:00
quality we talked about? Meridian has $20 million
14:03
in patents and $15 million in goodwill. that
14:06
is $35 million of their asset base that is entirely
14:10
ethereal. Ethereal, yes. So if we carve out the
14:12
error, like if that goodwill fails its impairment
14:15
test because the acquisition was a dud and those
14:17
patents suddenly become obsolete, suddenly $35
14:20
million just vanishes from the asset side. Yep.
14:23
And to balance the scale, their equity drops
14:25
from $75 million to just $40 million. Suddenly,
14:29
they have $82 million in debt, supported by only
14:31
$40 million in equity. Their leverage ratio looks
14:34
terrifying all of a sudden. And again, not a
14:37
single dollar of cash changed hands during that
14:40
collapse. The vulnerability was just sitting
14:42
there in the photograph the entire time. You
14:44
just had to know how to read the structure. But
14:46
even with these vulnerabilities, Meridi and Geordi's
14:49
numbers balance perfectly on the page. We have
14:51
an exact snapshot. But I'm looking at this $185
14:54
million total asset number, and I realize it's
14:59
tethered to the past. It's kind of a fiction,
15:01
isn't it? It is an intentional fiction, yes.
15:03
We are bumping into the tension between book
15:06
value, which is the accounting math we just did,
15:08
and market value, which is what the company is
15:10
actually worth in the real world today. Accounting
15:12
rules under IFRS heavily prioritize reliability
15:16
over current reality. They operate on a concept
15:19
called historical cost. OK, so if Meridian Tool
15:22
Works bought their primary manufacturing facility
15:25
in the suburbs of Toronto, let's say back in
15:28
1995, for $3 million, it's just sitting on this
15:32
balance sheet at 3 million minus 30 years of
15:35
depreciation. Yes. It might be on the books for...
15:38
Like a million dollars, even if they could sell
15:40
the land to a condo developer tomorrow for 40
15:43
million. Precisely. The balance sheet might show
15:45
a microscopic fraction of the company's true
15:48
economic worth. You cannot just guess what commercial
15:51
real estate is worth today and mark up your assets.
15:54
The accountants demand a verifiable transaction.
15:57
They stick to the 1995 receipt. So historical
15:59
cost makes a company look much poorer on paper
16:01
than they actually are. It does. But it is the
16:04
invisible value that truly distorts the picture.
16:06
And this brings us back to your opening question
16:08
about the globally recognized brand. Right, the
16:10
brand worth billions. Under Canadian IFRS standards,
16:14
internally generated intangible value, like a
16:17
brand name you built entirely from scratch, is
16:20
explicitly forbidden from being recognized as
16:22
an asset. That is wild. It's like, um... It's
16:25
like building a custom vintage car from scratch
16:27
in your garage. You buy the frame, the engine
16:30
parts, the leather for the seats, and you spend
16:32
10 years painstakingly assembling an absolute
16:35
masterpiece. Sure, yeah. But the insurance company
16:37
refuses to value it at 100 grand. They only value
16:40
it based on the $5 ,000 in receipts you have
16:43
for the raw parts, completely ignoring the massive
16:46
sweat equity and craftsmanship you injected into
16:48
it. That is the perfect analogy. If Meridian
16:51
Tool Works goes out and buys a competitor's brand,
16:53
well, the rules allow them to put it on the balance
16:56
sheet as an intangible asset because there was
16:58
a verifiable market transaction. Right, a receipt.
17:00
Exactly. But if Meridian spends 50 years building
17:03
a reputation for indestructible tools, cultivating
17:06
intense customer loyalty, that brand value is
17:09
zero on the balance sheet. Why do the rules punish
17:12
organic success like that? Why won't they let
17:15
a company claim the value they actually created?
17:18
It is entirely driven by the principle of conservatism.
17:21
Conservatism? Yes. If regulators allowed CEOs
17:24
to arbitrarily value their own internally generated
17:28
brands, I mean, every balance sheet in the country
17:31
would be instantly inflated with billions of
17:34
dollars of imaginary equity. Oh, yeah, they would
17:36
definitely abuse that. Completely. So the rules
17:38
force management to keep their egos off the page.
17:42
The only proof of a brand's value is if someone
17:45
else is actually willing to pay for it. Okay,
17:47
so the photograph is deeply flawed then. We have
17:50
buildings stuck at $19 .95 prices and billion
17:53
-dollar brands hiding like ghosts. Is the whole
17:56
document just historical cost? No, and this is
17:59
where the complexity deepens even further. Before
18:01
we wrap up, you really have to understand that
18:03
the balance sheet is actually a collage. A collage?
18:07
Yeah. While real estate and equipment use historical
18:09
cost, other items, like certain financial instruments
18:13
or derivatives, are legally required to be marked
18:15
to fair value. meaning their current fluctuating
18:18
market price today. So they are mixing and matching
18:20
entirely different rule books on the exact same
18:23
page. They absolutely are and it gets way more
18:26
convoluted when you introduce deferred tax assets
18:28
and liabilities. This is a massive point of confusion
18:32
for people. I always see deferred taxes and just
18:35
assume the company, you know, hasn't paid the
18:36
government yet. Why does the tax man see a different
18:40
picture than the shareholders do? Because the
18:42
Canada Revenue Agency and the IFRS accounting
18:45
board have two completely different goals. OK.
18:48
The CRA writes tax code to stimulate the economy
18:52
rate. So they might allow a company to aggressively
18:55
deduct the cost of a new factory over just five
18:58
years to lower their tax bill today and encourage
19:01
them to invest. Right. Tax breaks for building
19:03
stuff. But the accounting rules dictate that
19:06
the factory will actually last 30 years. So you
19:08
have to spread that expense slowly on your financial
19:10
statements for them to be accurate. Oh, I see.
19:13
So the company looks highly profitable to its
19:15
shareholders because the expenses are spread
19:17
out over 30 years. But it looks poor to the government
19:19
because they shoved all the expenses into five
19:21
years to save on taxes. Yes. And that timing
19:24
difference creates a temporary imbalance. The
19:27
balance sheet has to reconcile that gap, which
19:29
it does by creating deferred tax liabilities
19:32
or assets. It is purely a mechanical bridge between
19:35
two entirely different rule books. That is exhausting.
19:38
It is. Add in the fact that regulators are constantly
19:41
changing the rules, like recently forcing companies
19:44
to finally bring massive off -balance sheet operating
19:48
leases onto the main page, and the complexity
19:50
just multiplies. So why should you, the listener,
19:53
care about any of this? Why wade through liquidity
19:56
traps and impairment testing and the conservatism
19:59
principle? Because this information is entirely
20:01
public. Every single Canadian public company's
20:04
balance sheet is available for free on the Cedar
20:07
Plus database. Yes, it is all right there. Spending
20:09
an hour pulling down five years of these collages
20:12
for a company you want to invest in is literally
20:14
the highest value exercise a retail investor
20:16
can do. A CEO can give a charismatic visionary
20:20
speech on an earnings call all they want, but
20:22
they cannot hide a deteriorating liquidity. ratio.
20:25
Exactly. The numbers leave a structural trail
20:27
that rhetoric simply cannot mask. But I do want
20:31
to leave you with a final puzzle to mull over,
20:33
one that builds on these exact limitations we've
20:35
been talking about. All right, let's hear it.
20:37
We started by calling the balance sheet a photograph.
20:40
But if that photograph is actually a collage
20:42
patched together from historical costs from 1995,
20:45
fair market values from yesterday, imaginary
20:48
goodwill buffers, invisible brands, and bridges
20:51
between conflicting tax codes, how much can you
20:54
truly trust that composite image when deciding
20:57
where to put your own hard -earned money? You
20:59
really have to know exactly who cut out the pictures,
21:02
what rules they were following, and most importantly,
21:05
what they were forced to leave on the cutting
21:06
room floor. And that means looking far past the
21:09
posed smiles and investigating the background
21:11
of the shot.