Latest / Brett Keane and Eve Show / Evolution is a Lie

Transcript

Evolution is a Lie · Brett Keane and Eve Show

• 0:01
  Hello ladies and gentlemen, my name is Brett Keene and you are
• 0:04
  watching and listening to the Brett Keene Show.
• 0:07
  Make sure you check out my International Radio, GOD TV,
• 0:11
  radio and when you get an opportunity, check out my shirts
• 0:14
  and my merchandise if you'd like to support me.
• 0:18
  And you can also donate through PayPal.
• 0:22
  The picture that you see on the right is supposedly the skeletal
• 0:26
  structure of a character scientist, referred to as Lucy.
• 0:32
  She is literally the only the only specimen that scientists
• 0:39
  actually have where they claim that this is a transition of a
• 0:44
  primate that would eventually become a human.
• 0:48
  They claim that this thing is 3,000,000 years old, and it's
• 0:52
  the only model that they have where it shows any kind of
• 0:58
  similarity to a human whatsoever.
• 1:01
  You'll notice up above that the skull on The thing is shattered
• 1:07
  when they found the pieces that they believe are part of the
• 1:11
  same skull. Could you imagine that?
• 1:15
  Could you imagine being out in the field and having to pick up
• 1:18
  these little fragments that are covered in dirt, suit and rock,
• 1:23
  and you brush it off and then decide that you think that they
• 1:29
  go together in some kind of way? I mean, how would you even know?
• 1:33
  How would you even know if it's a part of the same skull when
• 1:36
  it's shattered in the little pieces?
• 1:38
  And as you can see, there's barely any remnants.
• 1:41
  The entire structure of the skeleton was found in pieces,
• 1:48
  which is expected if you are looking back millions of years
• 1:52
  and you pick up a bunch of shattered bones.
• 1:55
  What you won't find, unfortunately, is they don't
• 1:58
  have any other skeletal structures that they can point
• 2:02
  at and say that's an ancestor of humans.
• 2:05
  This is literally the only thing they got.
• 2:08
  This is the thing that they sell us on the science books.
• 2:12
  They have a bunch of shattered bones here and there, but not an
• 2:16
  entire model. And when you look at it, you can
• 2:21
  tell yourself that there's not really an entire model, Even to
• 2:24
  Lucy, this is all you got. If you were to go to Google
• 2:30
  right now and you were to type in Lucy Evolution, you're going
• 2:37
  to get over 1000 different narrations, illustrations,
• 2:43
  images, CGI, you name it. And a majority of them, they
• 2:48
  don't look anything like the other.
• 2:51
  Like if you look at the image I have right here, you see several
• 2:57
  pictures, and all of these are supposed to represent Lucy.
• 3:02
  Every one of them looks like a Planet of the Apes gallery,
• 3:06
  doesn't it? You've got pictures where it
• 3:09
  appears as though Lucy is holding a child.
• 3:14
  They have no way of knowing by looking at those shattered
• 3:18
  bones, if this supposed female primate ever had children at
• 3:24
  all. There's no way to be able to
• 3:26
  tell if it ever gave birth. They don't know how it died.
• 3:31
  They have all these theories and and wild ideas, but there's
• 3:36
  literally nothing. To make matters worse, the
• 3:41
  skeletal structure that you see that we're looking at, they put
• 3:45
  it up in a museum and they decided to create wooden hands
• 3:49
  for it and wooden feet. And also they created wooden
• 3:53
  features of the skull to make it appear as though it was more.
• 3:58
  When you look at it, it gives the appearance that it has human
• 4:02
  features, but everything on it from the hands to the feet to
• 4:07
  the now molded skull are fake. They're generated.
• 4:12
  They're created by scientists in order to give this idea of what
• 4:17
  they theorize it may have looked like.
• 4:20
  And of course, nowadays they use computer diagrams.
• 4:24
  They let their computers theorize of what it might have
• 4:28
  looked like. The point is, ladies and
• 4:32
  gentlemen, is that we don't have any imagery whatsoever of what
• 4:38
  it actually looked like. We have nothing.
• 4:42
  We just have these shattered pieces and we have these
• 4:46
  thousands and thousands of representations on the Internet
• 4:50
  of what Lucy may have looked like, or documentaries or films
• 4:54
  and all this. There's nothing.
• 4:59
  And they're claiming that these bones are three million years
• 5:02
  old. Now, I don't know if many of you
• 5:04
  knew this, but scientists have screwed it up over 1000 times,
• 5:11
  claiming that something is older than that is, and then it turns
• 5:14
  out that it's not. Or they find something and they
• 5:18
  claim that it's really old, and then they turn around and say
• 5:22
  it's like quadruple as old as what we originally thought.
• 5:28
  The same thing goes with the universe.
• 5:30
  Originally the idea was the universe was 13 to 16 billion
• 5:35
  years old. We've listened to that sermon
• 5:38
  done by scientists for over 100 years now, claiming that the
• 5:42
  universe came from a Big Bang. But now, because of the
• 5:47
  telescope that we have a new technology, they're now claiming
• 5:51
  that the universe is actually quadruple as big.
• 5:55
  Now it goes from 13 billion years to 30 billion years.
• 6:01
  So ladies and gentlemen, you can believe that science is a self
• 6:05
  correcting system. As far as I see, science is
• 6:09
  simply a system that can doesn't correct anything.
• 6:13
  It just simply gives a different theory or some more bullshit, or
• 6:17
  sells us on some more nonsense, but it never actually gives us
• 6:21
  any facts or evidence. And some people will say, well,
• 6:25
  that's what science is supposed to be.
• 6:27
  It's supposed to attempt to explain things, but does it
• 6:31
  actually explain anything Is the question No, there's no
• 6:36
  certainty. There's no 100% and there's
• 6:39
  never going to be 100% as long as we keep on taking little
• 6:43
  pieces of crap that we find in the dirt or in caves and then
• 6:47
  tried to misrepresent it of something that it's not, or
• 6:51
  tried to theorize what something could have been when we have no
• 6:55
  idea what it actually was. So this is one of the big
• 7:00
  reasons why I question evolution.
• 7:03
  When somebody brings me a bunch of pieces of bone sitting in a
• 7:06
  fucking shoe box and claim that's millions of years old and
• 7:10
  supposedly that's related to me, how would we even know?
• 7:14
  We at this point in our society do not have the technology to be
• 7:19
  able to get DNA off of something that has been dead for three
• 7:23
  million years old. We are limited whenever it comes
• 7:27
  to that. We can scrape the bone and all
• 7:30
  that. But here's the problem.
• 7:32
  In order to be able to do comparisons with DNA, we would
• 7:37
  have to have other subjects, and we don't.
• 7:40
  Lucy is literally the only thing that we got whenever it comes to
• 7:45
  a structural deal and the fossils have been molested.
• 7:51
  As you can see, just as I said, if you were to go into a museum
• 7:55
  nowadays to look at this, they're going to show you a
• 8:00
  bunch of wooden parts that they created for it.
• 8:06
  Well, that's all I got to say. I mean, some of you out there,
• 8:11
  you don't care. You're not really interested.
• 8:14
  You don't really care what the truth is.
• 8:17
  You just simply want a different alternative to God.
• 8:20
  And that's fine, so be it. But don't lie to yourself and
• 8:24
  don't lie to other people and act like you got a whole bunch
• 8:27
  of evidence when you don't. That's the first thing that non
• 8:30
  believers go to. They say, ah, we got all this
• 8:33
  abundance of evidence. This is your evidence.
• 8:37
  This is what you claim to be. The deal is.
• 8:40
  And here's one last thing to think about before I shut the
• 8:43
  video out. Why is it that Lucy's the only
• 8:47
  thing that they were able to piece together?
• 8:51
  How do we know that this isn't just the bones of some disabled
• 8:54
  woman or someone who was suffering from some kind of
• 8:58
  condition? If you were to find the corpse,
• 9:02
  a million year old corpse of a retarded person or someone who
• 9:06
  suffered from some kind of head deformity, how would you be able
• 9:11
  to tell the difference between it and a retarded or autistic
• 9:16
  ape? Think about that.
• 9:19
  How would you? There's plenty of human beings
• 9:22
  that are born every day that have problems with their skulls
• 9:26
  and with their body. There's a girl that's on YouTube
• 9:30
  right now that does videos where guess what, she's got 2 heads.
• 9:34
  That's right. She's literally sharing a body
• 9:38
  with her sister and that it gives her the appearance of
• 9:41
  having two heads. There's also a guy that's on the
• 9:44
  Internet that was born with the deformity where he actually has
• 9:48
  one eye in the middle of his head.
• 9:50
  And I'm not talking about the fallout TV show where they try
• 9:54
  to goof and they call the young man the cyclops.
• 10:00
  So people are born with these kind of issues and there's no
• 10:04
  way to be able to dictate how old that skeleton is.
• 10:09
  Some people will say, well, it depends on how deeply it's
• 10:12
  buried. Do things not get buried deeper
• 10:17
  than normal, as there are times where there could be catastrophe
• 10:21
  in the environment or cataclysms or plate tectonics that can
• 10:26
  cause things to shift in the earth?
• 10:28
  Of course there is. Ladies and gentlemen, don't be
• 10:32
  fooled. God bless.
• 10:35
  Tomorrow at 7:00 PM Central, I'm going to be doing a live show.
• 10:39
  Everybody's welcome to come.