Latest / The Late Debate / The Late Debate | 20 November

Transcript

The Late Debate | 20 November · The Late Debate

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: Late Welcome to the Late base.
• 0:07
  Speaker 2: Good even great to have your company.
• 0:08
  Speaker 3: I'm James Macpherson with Liz Storer and Caleb Bond coming up.
• 0:12
  Speaker 3: Jockey suspended after a rank Outsider wins by.
• 0:15
  Speaker 2: Twenty two lengths. How do you explain that?
• 0:18
  Speaker 3: But more importantly, how do you explain that our good
• 0:20
  Speaker 3: friend Caleb Bond didn't give us a heads up about
• 0:23
  Speaker 3: this twenty eight to.
• 0:23
  Speaker 2: One r.
• 0:25
  Speaker 4: I didn't have any money on it either, so we
• 0:28
  Speaker 4: can all feel sorry for it.
• 0:29
  Speaker 5: We believe you.
• 0:31
  Speaker 3: Caleb will fill us in on that one a little
• 0:33
  Speaker 3: later when we get to the papers. Plans to have
• 0:36
  Speaker 3: indigenous people co design Brisbane Olympic facilities and the Albenezy
• 0:41
  Speaker 3: government using the Future Fund to invest in green energy projects. Well,
• 0:46
  Speaker 3: of course all of that when we look at the papers.
• 0:48
  Speaker 3: But first, just when you thought local government in this
• 0:51
  Speaker 3: country could not possibly get any worse, along came the
• 0:55
  Speaker 3: Adelaide City Council. They're proposing to have a blanket speed
• 1:00
  Speaker 3: limit of thirty kilometers an hour throughout the CBD have
• 1:04
  Speaker 3: listened to Lord Mayor Jane Lomax Smith tell ABC Radio
• 1:09
  Speaker 3: that improving safety came down to two options. Either a
• 1:12
  Speaker 3: thirty k speed limit, or getting motorists to wear helmets.
• 1:19
  Speaker 6: I mean, we will be much safer if we were
• 1:21
  Speaker 6: padded around our seats and all will crash helmets inside
• 1:25
  Speaker 6: a car, But it's not going to take off because
• 1:27
  Speaker 6: that's going too far. The speed limits are important because
• 1:31
  Speaker 6: ninety percent you're going to die if you're hit by
• 1:33
  Speaker 6: a car at fifty kilometers an hour, and it's down
• 1:35
  Speaker 6: to ten percent if you're only going thirty.
• 1:39
  Speaker 3: So, following this logic, if the car is doing thirty
• 1:42
  Speaker 3: ks an hour and hits a pedestrian, there's only a
• 1:45
  Speaker 3: ten percent likelihood of that person dying. Why not just
• 1:47
  Speaker 3: make it a fifteen k speed limit and reduce the
• 1:49
  Speaker 3: likelihood of death to five percent or better yet, have
• 1:52
  Speaker 3: motorists disassemble their cars when they reach the city and
• 1:55
  Speaker 3: carry them on their backs. Or they could introduce the
• 1:58
  Speaker 3: UK's red flag policy for eighteen sixty five, where motorists
• 2:02
  Speaker 3: were required to have a pedestrian walk in front of them,
• 2:04
  Speaker 3: waving a red flag to warn bystanders that a vehicle
• 2:08
  Speaker 3: was approaching. Or they could just tell pedestrians to get
• 2:10
  Speaker 3: off their phones when they're crossing the road. This is
• 2:13
  Speaker 3: a council that has eat scooters shooting down pathways without
• 2:18
  Speaker 3: regard for pedestrian safety. But they're trying to stop drivers
• 2:22
  Speaker 3: from driving at a reasonable speed.
• 2:24
  Speaker 2: Caleb.
• 2:25
  Speaker 3: This may save the life of a pedestrian, but it
• 2:27
  Speaker 3: will totally killed trade within the CBD, won't it.
• 2:30
  Speaker 4: They've already tried this well, actually not quite as bad.
• 2:33
  Speaker 4: They didn't try thirty.
• 2:34
  Speaker 1: Kilometers an hour.
• 2:35
  Speaker 4: But under these turchip of Stephen Yarwood when he was
• 2:39
  Speaker 4: the Lord Mayor some teen odd years ago, he was
• 2:42
  Speaker 4: driving around in an electric vehicle back then as well,
• 2:44
  Speaker 4: it should be noted, must be one of the first
• 2:46
  Speaker 4: blokes who ever did so. But quite proudly he always
• 2:49
  Speaker 4: had it parked out at the front of the town hall.
• 2:51
  Speaker 1: But they reduced the speed limit to.
• 2:52
  Speaker 4: Forty kilometers an hour, and I think that lasted about
• 2:55
  Speaker 4: a year and then everyone got the urates with it
• 2:57
  Speaker 4: and away it went. Because you know, you want people
• 2:59
  Speaker 4: to come to the CBD, right, you want them to
• 3:02
  Speaker 4: come into the city and shop.
• 3:04
  Speaker 1: What a great way.
• 3:04
  Speaker 4: To turn people away, say oh, you've got to go
• 3:07
  Speaker 4: thirty kilometers an hour through the whole thing. Now, this
• 3:10
  Speaker 4: is a proposal that's come back to the staff. I
• 3:13
  Speaker 4: mean It's stipped more and more ridiculous the more you
• 3:15
  Speaker 4: look at it. So the last council, this council was
• 3:18
  Speaker 4: elected in twenty twenty two, I think so the last
• 3:23
  Speaker 4: council commissioned this work to be done. So it has
• 3:26
  Speaker 4: taken years for the staff to come back and say
• 3:29
  Speaker 4: to the councilors, here's some proposals about what we could
• 3:32
  Speaker 4: do with the speed limit. You know what they've spent
• 3:34
  Speaker 4: on doing all of that, one hundred and thirty thousand dollars.
• 3:39
  Speaker 4: The Council's been one hundred and thirty thousand dollars to
• 3:43
  Speaker 4: come back and say that they should reduce the speed
• 3:45
  Speaker 4: limit to thirty k. It is simply anti car. They
• 3:51
  Speaker 4: don't want people to drive cars. But the problem is
• 3:55
  Speaker 4: particularly in a city like Adelaide. Like even in Sydney,
• 3:59
  Speaker 4: you can get away with public transport and whatever. Adelaide
• 4:02
  Speaker 4: just doesn't have the same public transport network.
• 4:04
  Speaker 1: Let's help people get around in cars.
• 4:07
  Speaker 4: Can you believe you can even park your car in
• 4:09
  Speaker 4: the CBD in Adelaide for a reasonable price, that's how
• 4:12
  Speaker 4: the city operates. You put it down to thirty k
• 4:15
  Speaker 4: an hour. No one will go there. I'm telling you
• 4:17
  Speaker 4: no one will go there.
• 4:19
  Speaker 7: Look, honestly, I just think this is pure rage bait.
• 4:22
  Speaker 7: They've had a workshop, that's all. So actually to say
• 4:26
  Speaker 7: that the council is proposing fake news as city councilor myself, No,
• 4:33
  Speaker 7: Actually the work was outsourced to a firm called Standtech,
• 4:37
  Speaker 7: which is an engineering firm, so even the council themselves
• 4:41
  Speaker 7: hadn't done the works.
• 4:42
  Speaker 2: Most of the councilors are in favor of.
• 4:44
  Speaker 5: This super come back with three three options.
• 4:48
  Speaker 7: Because we're reviewing the CBD speed limits, this is one
• 4:52
  Speaker 7: of the three options. Whether it will get up or not,
• 4:55
  Speaker 7: I don't think it is very likely at all.
• 5:00
  Speaker 2: Solids.
• 5:01
  Speaker 7: One of us used to be a city councilor and
• 5:03
  Speaker 7: it happens to be me.
• 5:05
  Speaker 5: These workshops.
• 5:07
  Speaker 1: Do you attend them the time?
• 5:10
  Speaker 5: Yes, but this is the inner workings. You attend them
• 5:13
  Speaker 5: all the time.
• 5:14
  Speaker 7: Proposals come across your desk constantly, and yes, it's your
• 5:18
  Speaker 7: job to be across them and vet the stupid ones,
• 5:21
  Speaker 7: which I'm sure unless these guys have rocks in their heads,
• 5:25
  Speaker 7: they will do. I wouldn't get too excited about it.
• 5:28
  Speaker 7: Adeladians do not listen to these.
• 5:31
  Speaker 5: Guys who are clearly just trying to freak you out.
• 5:34
  Speaker 7: This is rage bait and nothing more until there's actually
• 5:38
  Speaker 7: a proposal before counsel.
• 5:40
  Speaker 5: It's going to a council.
• 5:42
  Speaker 7: Meeting, which all of these counselors would know the outcry
• 5:46
  Speaker 7: from the public if it actually went that.
• 5:48
  Speaker 3: I can I just say it's not rage baite because
• 5:50
  Speaker 3: the Lord mayor herself you heard her, went on radio
• 5:53
  Speaker 3: and said this is a serious proposal. They spent an
• 5:55
  Speaker 3: hour and a half last night looking at it, and
• 5:58
  Speaker 3: the majority of counselors, according to the Adelaide Advertiser, like
• 6:01
  Speaker 3: the idea, there wasn't.
• 6:03
  Speaker 7: The majority of counselors at all. Also, they wouldn't reveal
• 6:07
  Speaker 7: that there was one quoted in the article you said
• 6:10
  Speaker 7: he was completely against it. Nowhere in the article does
• 6:12
  Speaker 7: it say the majority of counselors are.
• 6:14
  Speaker 5: On board at all.
• 6:15
  Speaker 2: I think you did.
• 6:16
  Speaker 7: Very rarely, the councilors very rarely flag how they're going
• 6:20
  Speaker 7: to vote on anything, especially when it's not actually going
• 6:24
  Speaker 7: to counsel.
• 6:26
  Speaker 4: Just you wait, will it will just you wait, just
• 6:29
  Speaker 4: you wait. Something tells me something bad is going to happen.
• 6:34
  Speaker 4: Bad things that are happening with Once upon a time,
• 6:38
  Speaker 4: Jaguar was basically the picture of a beautiful English car, right,
• 6:42
  Speaker 4: I mean you think of the mark too. I think
• 6:45
  Speaker 4: that was Inspector Morse's vehicle, the x J six. I
• 6:49
  Speaker 4: mean they were beautiful pieces of metal. You could look
• 6:53
  Speaker 4: at them and go, yes, that is something I would
• 6:55
  Speaker 4: want to drive around him. Well, Jaguar, these days you've
• 6:58
  Speaker 4: got some lovely example. I mean, look at that. That
• 7:01
  Speaker 4: is when cars were great. Make cars great again. There's
• 7:04
  Speaker 4: something for Donald Trump to take up. But the once
• 7:07
  Speaker 4: great brand that was Jaguar has now decided they're getting
• 7:11
  Speaker 4: out of the petrol market altogether. They've ceased selling new vehicles.
• 7:15
  Speaker 4: They're going to come back in twenty twenty six with
• 7:18
  Speaker 4: all electric vehicles. They thought, right, we need a new
• 7:22
  Speaker 4: campaign and we need a new logo to announce ourselves
• 7:25
  Speaker 4: to the world as the brand new Jaguar.
• 7:28
  Speaker 1: Watch this ad and tell.
• 7:29
  Speaker 8: Me is there anything missing?
• 8:01
  Speaker 1: Did you see a car? There?
• 8:02
  Speaker 2: No car, nor did I.
• 8:05
  Speaker 4: Jaguar is advertising themselves as some sort of I don't know.
• 8:08
  Speaker 1: Woke, trendy old look at us.
• 8:10
  Speaker 4: We've got some weird outfits in our ads.
• 8:13
  Speaker 1: Not literally, not one car to be seen now.
• 8:17
  Speaker 4: Of course, The response was swift online, with people making
• 8:20
  Speaker 4: exactly that point. Where is the car? Why do you
• 8:24
  Speaker 4: think that this is the appropriate way.
• 8:26
  Speaker 1: To sell a car?
• 8:28
  Speaker 4: It smacks so much of when bud Light, of course
• 8:31
  Speaker 4: signed up per Dylan Mulvaaney the transgender TikToker, to promote
• 8:35
  Speaker 4: their beer, and then of course sales plummeted directly after
• 8:38
  Speaker 4: that because people said, oh, hang on a minute, men
• 8:41
  Speaker 4: generally drink beer, and here we are trying to market
• 8:44
  Speaker 4: beer to men with a transgender woman who is actually
• 8:48
  Speaker 4: a man but not actually a woman. I mean, what
• 8:50
  Speaker 4: on earth do they think they are playing it? Go woke,
• 8:53
  Speaker 4: go broke, And I suspect that is exactly what will
• 8:55
  Speaker 4: happen with Jacob.
• 8:56
  Speaker 7: I wish I was sat at the marketing meetings. When
• 8:59
  Speaker 7: I see an ad like this, I'm just like, Okay,
• 9:02
  Speaker 7: how did this happen? You're sitting there and no doubt
• 9:05
  Speaker 7: the mahogany walled officers of Jaguar, and you say, he's
• 9:10
  Speaker 7: bear with me.
• 9:11
  Speaker 9: Here.
• 9:11
  Speaker 7: We're going to have a pile of androgynous looking people.
• 9:15
  Speaker 7: You won't be able to tell whether they are male
• 9:17
  Speaker 7: or female, wearing dresses that certainly no woman would wear dead,
• 9:23
  Speaker 7: and they're just going to kind of walk out.
• 9:25
  Speaker 5: Of a lift, stand around for a bit.
• 9:27
  Speaker 7: At the very end they'll be sitting down, then get
• 9:30
  Speaker 7: up and walk off.
• 9:31
  Speaker 5: What do you reckon?
• 9:32
  Speaker 7: And we're going to have just completely ambiguous meaning things
• 9:36
  Speaker 7: flashing up on the screenlight, live, vivid, delete, ordinary, break, mould, copy,
• 9:42
  Speaker 7: nothing except Jaguar. You look like you've copied every single
• 9:47
  Speaker 7: woke company who has tried this and failed for years.
• 9:51
  Speaker 7: Remember last year, Seafolly was like, oh, we're going to
• 9:54
  Speaker 7: have a trans ambassador.
• 9:55
  Speaker 5: Now, this is a.
• 9:57
  Speaker 7: Marketing ploy for women's bikinis, and they decided to have
• 10:03
  Speaker 7: a trans ambassador that had a full beard and very obvious.
• 10:07
  Speaker 7: Genitalia failed miserably. Remember in twenty nineteen where Jillette We're like,
• 10:13
  Speaker 7: we're going to create a heartwarming scene of a man
• 10:17
  Speaker 7: teaching his trans son how to shave, although by virtue
• 10:22
  Speaker 7: of being a girl there was nothing to actually shave.
• 10:26
  Speaker 7: I mean, this has never gone well. You use the
• 10:29
  Speaker 7: example of bud Light. Absolutely, that's a very famous recent one.
• 10:33
  Speaker 7: Now the same goes for all the woke movies. The
• 10:37
  Speaker 7: Rainbow Mafia get into these institutions, somehow market these ideas,
• 10:42
  Speaker 7: but it never ever has once gone well for any
• 10:47
  Speaker 7: company Why why would Jag you go for this? I
• 10:51
  Speaker 7: wonder if, although this would be a very late apology,
• 10:54
  Speaker 7: if this has anything to do with the trans employee
• 10:57
  Speaker 7: who who successfully sued them back in twenty because they
• 11:01
  Speaker 7: felt that they hadn't been supported enough transitioning.
• 11:05
  Speaker 5: At work, their work being Jaguar.
• 11:09
  Speaker 7: It's just a hunch, but I'm like, this would be
• 11:12
  Speaker 7: a very late mea culper if it's got anything to
• 11:14
  Speaker 7: do with that.
• 11:15
  Speaker 5: I'm just trying to come up with a reason, pretty.
• 11:18
  Speaker 4: Good way to just like trash the entire brand that
• 11:21
  Speaker 4: is Jaguar. Like that is the most bizarre thing about
• 11:23
  Speaker 4: this to me is that Jaguar, like I was saying before,
• 11:26
  Speaker 4: used to be a picture of class.
• 11:28
  Speaker 1: It was a status symbol.
• 11:29
  Speaker 4: You know, I'm driving around in a Jag right, and
• 11:33
  Speaker 4: now it's just going to be like every other work
• 11:35
  Speaker 4: corporate Oh look, I'm driving around in my vehicle in
• 11:38
  Speaker 4: a weird dress and a funny haircut.
• 11:40
  Speaker 1: Like, what does that tell the world.
• 11:42
  Speaker 4: I'm driving around in an electric Jaguar belonging to a
• 11:46
  Speaker 4: company that once upon a time was a Titan, a
• 11:48
  Speaker 4: British manufacturer.
• 11:49
  Speaker 3: I just love their slogan copy nothing Well, they're going
• 11:52
  Speaker 3: to sell nothing. It's like they typed into an AI bot,
• 11:56
  Speaker 3: you know, create a thirty second commercial that will absolutely
• 11:59
  Speaker 3: destroy our and the.
• 12:01
  Speaker 2: AI bot made good.
• 12:03
  Speaker 3: Someone wrote in the comments to one of the articles
• 12:05
  Speaker 3: on this, this makes me want to sell my Jaguar,
• 12:08
  Speaker 3: and I don't even have a Jaguar, which I think
• 12:10
  Speaker 3: many of us can identify. Within the sixties and the seventies,
• 12:14
  Speaker 3: Jaguar advertise themselves as grace, space and pace.
• 12:19
  Speaker 2: That's good, but this going bold copying nothing.
• 12:22
  Speaker 3: They're going electric nine years before the EU have mandated it.
• 12:26
  Speaker 2: They are copying everything.
• 12:28
  Speaker 3: The people I feel sorry for, however, are not so
• 12:30
  Speaker 3: much the Jaguar drivers who will frankly be embarrassed driving
• 12:33
  Speaker 3: their Jaguar after seeing that ad. But it's the thousands
• 12:36
  Speaker 3: of employees who work for Jaguar who rely upon Jaguar
• 12:40
  Speaker 3: for their income to be able to put food on
• 12:42
  Speaker 3: the table, whose jobs will be imperiled based on this commercial.
• 12:46
  Speaker 3: If it goes anything like bud Light, sales will go
• 12:50
  Speaker 3: through the floor and will all laugh at Jaguar. But
• 12:53
  Speaker 3: there's good people who work for the company whose jobs
• 12:55
  Speaker 3: are jeopardized because they go woke and put stupid ads
• 12:58
  Speaker 3: like this.
• 12:58
  Speaker 7: Well, it sounds like the already jeopardized. With Jagua going
• 13:02
  Speaker 7: one hundred percent electrics so quickly, the demand for electric
• 13:05
  Speaker 7: cars has not been very high.
• 13:08
  Speaker 5: Do you guys pay any attention to the markets to.
• 13:10
  Speaker 7: Capitol Hill now, where the war over biological men in
• 13:15
  Speaker 7: women's bathrooms and locker rooms and other private spaces has
• 13:20
  Speaker 7: just kicked off a new Can you believe it? We
• 13:24
  Speaker 7: actually do have a brand new Democratic rep in the
• 13:27
  Speaker 7: House after.
• 13:28
  Speaker 5: The red wave that we just saw.
• 13:31
  Speaker 7: However, this time, Sarah McBride, her name is, She's a
• 13:35
  Speaker 7: Democrat from Delaware, has just been elected. And this is
• 13:39
  Speaker 7: the first transgender congress person ever in the history.
• 13:45
  Speaker 5: Of the Capital. And so Nancy Nancy Mace.
• 13:50
  Speaker 1: Rep.
• 13:51
  Speaker 5: Nancy Mace.
• 13:52
  Speaker 7: I always got to call them MPs, but they're reps
• 13:54
  Speaker 7: over there.
• 13:55
  Speaker 1: Rep.
• 13:55
  Speaker 7: Nancy Mace has wasted no time whatsoever putting up a
• 13:59
  Speaker 7: motion to ensure that there will be no biological men
• 14:03
  Speaker 7: in the bathrooms on Capitol Hill.
• 14:06
  Speaker 5: Here she is explaining her decision. I'm not going to
• 14:10
  Speaker 5: stand for a man.
• 14:12
  Speaker 9: You know, if someone with the penis is in the
• 14:13
  Speaker 9: women's locker room, that's not okay. And I'm a victim
• 14:17
  Speaker 9: of abuse myself. I'm a rape survivor. I have PTSD
• 14:20
  Speaker 9: from the abuse I've suffered at the hands of a man.
• 14:22
  Speaker 9: I'm absolutely, one hundred percent going to stand in the
• 14:25
  Speaker 9: way of any man who wants to be in a
• 14:28
  Speaker 9: women's restroom, in our locker rooms, in our changing rooms.
• 14:33
  Speaker 5: I love this woman. She is absolutely fearless.
• 14:36
  Speaker 7: This has gone completely viral because it's taken this well
• 14:40
  Speaker 7: known locker room fight in the States to the very
• 14:44
  Speaker 7: heart of Capital Hill.
• 14:47
  Speaker 5: And she's not standing for anything.
• 14:49
  Speaker 7: She's already copped a lot of flak, but the vast
• 14:53
  Speaker 7: majority of support from what I can see on social media,
• 14:58
  Speaker 7: and of course nothing brings out the crazies like declarations
• 15:02
  Speaker 7: as unapologetic as hers. Here's just one of the people
• 15:08
  Speaker 7: online now threatening to take her.
• 15:11
  Speaker 10: Life, Congresswoman Nancy Mace. I hope that one day I
• 15:16
  Speaker 10: do find through in that woman's bathroom and I grab
• 15:19
  Speaker 10: you're ready looking hair and drag your face down to
• 15:24
  Speaker 10: the floor while I repeatedly bash it and until the
• 15:29
  Speaker 10: blood's everywhere.
• 15:31
  Speaker 7: He's in fifty million not to have biological men in
• 15:36
  Speaker 7: women's change rooms. Of course, I'm not suggesting that that's
• 15:39
  Speaker 7: every trans woman, but that was one of many videos
• 15:44
  Speaker 7: that we could have showed you tonight, directly meant for
• 15:48
  Speaker 7: the congress woman and to make.
• 15:50
  Speaker 5: Her back down.
• 15:52
  Speaker 7: It was utterly disgusting to be watching these today. I mean,
• 15:55
  Speaker 7: if you want to be in female bathrooms so bad
• 15:59
  Speaker 7: you're willing to kill for it. Wow, okay, way to
• 16:02
  Speaker 7: tell us you do not belong in female bathrooms at all.
• 16:06
  Speaker 7: And Nancy wasn't backing down when she was accosted. This
• 16:09
  Speaker 7: is one of many reporters who tried it on with
• 16:12
  Speaker 7: her today and once again she wasn't giving an inch.
• 16:17
  Speaker 9: Should legislation be created targeted at one specific person, it
• 16:20
  Speaker 9: doesn't mention anyone in the legislation, but you've said it,
• 16:23
  Speaker 9: it was aimed at her. Now I have said it's
• 16:25
  Speaker 9: a result of this, I'm not going to allow biological
• 16:28
  Speaker 9: men into women's private spaces. I will stand in the
• 16:31
  Speaker 9: brain and stand in the way of anyone on the
• 16:32
  Speaker 9: radical laugh who thinks that it's okay for a penis
• 16:35
  Speaker 9: to be in a women's locker room.
• 16:37
  Speaker 5: I love it.
• 16:38
  Speaker 7: Zero apology, zero acquiescence. Every capitulation to the left emboldens it.
• 16:44
  Speaker 5: She will not back down.
• 16:46
  Speaker 7: Strength to your arm, Nancy, I don't care what gender
• 16:51
  Speaker 7: people identify as. What repulses me every single time when
• 16:56
  Speaker 7: this debate comes up, whether it's biological men in female
• 17:00
  Speaker 7: sports or something like this where we're talking about women's
• 17:03
  Speaker 7: private spaces.
• 17:04
  Speaker 5: What I find utterly revolting.
• 17:06
  Speaker 7: Is that anyone can be so entitled, so disconcerned with
• 17:12
  Speaker 7: the discomfort you are causing so many others, being the
• 17:16
  Speaker 7: vast majority of women, and especially a rape survivor like Nancy,
• 17:21
  Speaker 7: someone who knows that and just goes, I don't care.
• 17:25
  Speaker 7: This is my right, and I will be in your spaces.
• 17:28
  Speaker 7: I don't care that it makes you uncomfortable. This is
• 17:31
  Speaker 7: about me and my rights and making me feel uncomfortable
• 17:35
  Speaker 7: that just fills me with revulsion.
• 17:38
  Speaker 5: Nothing to do with someone's gender.
• 17:40
  Speaker 7: Anyone who treats other people with such utter contempt just
• 17:45
  Speaker 7: absolutely repulfully.
• 17:47
  Speaker 3: And the way languages manipulated and emotions are manipulated in
• 17:50
  Speaker 3: this debate is quite fascinating. Serah McBride, who is the
• 17:53
  Speaker 3: transgendered Democrats, said that in going to Capitol Hill. Sera McBride, so,
• 17:59
  Speaker 3: I hope you black kind. Well, it's not kind to
• 18:03
  Speaker 3: ignore biology. It's not kind to ignore the traumatic experiences.
• 18:07
  Speaker 3: Of women who have been raped and disregard their fears
• 18:10
  Speaker 3: and anxieties. It's not kind to ignore women's safety. But
• 18:15
  Speaker 3: all of these terms get manipulated and twisted in this
• 18:21
  Speaker 3: attempt to appeal to people's better angels in order to
• 18:24
  Speaker 3: get them to do what you want them to do
• 18:27
  Speaker 3: out of your selfish ambition. Sarah McBride, before she went
• 18:31
  Speaker 3: to the Capitol Hill, she was a human rights activists,
• 18:35
  Speaker 3: which also always amuses me that human rights activists seem
• 18:39
  Speaker 3: to know nothing about human rights at all, just wanting
• 18:43
  Speaker 3: to bully their way through things. Mike Johnson, who's the
• 18:46
  Speaker 3: speaker at the Capitol he was asked, so is Sarah
• 18:50
  Speaker 3: McBride actually a man or a woman?
• 18:52
  Speaker 2: This was his response, Din's freshman elect Sarah mcbridel.
• 18:58
  Speaker 6: Or a woman.
• 19:00
  Speaker 11: Look, I'm not going to get into this. We welcome
• 19:03
  Speaker 11: all new members with open arms who are duly electric
• 19:06
  Speaker 11: representatives of the people. I believe it's a command we
• 19:12
  Speaker 11: treat all persons with dignity and respect that we will
• 19:15
  Speaker 11: and I'm not going to engage in silly debates about this.
• 19:19
  Speaker 3: So he's asked a pretty straightforward question, is this person
• 19:21
  Speaker 3: a male or a female? And he responds with I'm kind.
• 19:25
  Speaker 3: No one's questioning whether you're kind or unkind. They're just
• 19:28
  Speaker 3: asking is a male or a female. Now, obviously he
• 19:32
  Speaker 3: got a call, probably from Donald Trump that afternoon, because
• 19:34
  Speaker 3: a few hours later he clarified what he believes.
• 19:38
  Speaker 11: I was asked a question this morning at the leadership gaggle,
• 19:41
  Speaker 11: and I rejected the premise because the answer is so
• 19:44
  Speaker 11: obvious for anybody who doesn't know my well established record
• 19:48
  Speaker 11: on this issue. Let me be unequivocally clear. A man
• 19:52
  Speaker 11: is a man, and a woman is a woman, and
• 19:55
  Speaker 11: a man cannot become a woman. That said, I also
• 19:59
  Speaker 11: believe that's what scriptful teachers, what I just said, but
• 20:03
  Speaker 11: I also believe that we treat everybody with dignity, and
• 20:06
  Speaker 11: so we can do and believe all those things.
• 20:08
  Speaker 3: At the same time, noticing he did it again, A
• 20:12
  Speaker 3: man is a man, a woman as a woman. A
• 20:13
  Speaker 3: man can't become a woman. That said, I'm kind. People
• 20:18
  Speaker 3: need to stop doing this thing where you know what,
• 20:20
  Speaker 3: but I'm still a nice person, even though I subscribe
• 20:23
  Speaker 3: to biology. Forget doing that, because the more you insist
• 20:27
  Speaker 3: but I'm a kind person, the more you play into
• 20:29
  Speaker 3: this narrative. Just state the facts and take it for granted.
• 20:33
  Speaker 3: In stating the facts, I'm not being unkind or disrespectful.
• 20:37
  Speaker 2: I don't need to prove.
• 20:38
  Speaker 4: That Mike Johnson looks so uncomfortable in that clip there, right, like,
• 20:43
  Speaker 4: because he's walking this final and we're going to get
• 20:46
  Speaker 4: in trouble if I say this.
• 20:48
  Speaker 1: It's you don't get in trouble apart.
• 20:50
  Speaker 4: From lunatics for stating obvious facts, right. And the point
• 20:56
  Speaker 4: here is that you are allowed to make people feel
• 20:59
  Speaker 4: mentally uncomfortable.
• 21:00
  Speaker 1: Right.
• 21:00
  Speaker 4: If you're walking down the streets in a public space
• 21:03
  Speaker 4: and someone sees a transgender person, they go, oh.
• 21:05
  Speaker 1: I don't like that. That's a public space, that's fine.
• 21:08
  Speaker 4: What we're talking about is a bathroom, a locker room,
• 21:12
  Speaker 4: a change room, a place where your physical safety can
• 21:16
  Speaker 4: be under threat. It is entirely reasonable for biological women
• 21:20
  Speaker 4: to say I don't want someone with a penis walking
• 21:24
  Speaker 4: into my bathroom. Now, the argument from the other side is, oh,
• 21:28
  Speaker 4: but you know, I feel more comfortable as a transgender
• 21:30
  Speaker 4: woman going into that bathroom. It makes me feel uncomfortable
• 21:35
  Speaker 4: in these situations, it's not about what makes you comfortable,
• 21:38
  Speaker 4: it's about the safety of others.
• 21:40
  Speaker 1: And as a bloke.
• 21:41
  Speaker 4: If someone walks into a bathroom who looks like a
• 21:45
  Speaker 4: woman and has a penis, as a man into the men's.
• 21:47
  Speaker 1: Bathroom, I couldn't give a hoot, right because it's different
• 21:50
  Speaker 1: for men. Men and women are different.
• 21:53
  Speaker 4: I couldn't care who comes into the bathroom with me
• 21:55
  Speaker 4: because I'm a man and I have a different level
• 21:58
  Speaker 4: of physical safety and comfortableness about the people I'm around
• 22:02
  Speaker 4: than a woman obviously would. And to not take notice
• 22:05
  Speaker 4: of that yourself and say, well, I should have access
• 22:08
  Speaker 4: to a woman's bathroom even though I have a penis,
• 22:11
  Speaker 4: as you said before, is the height of selfishness and entitlement.
• 22:16
  Speaker 7: It's utterly revolting. And to see Mike Johnson, who is
• 22:20
  Speaker 7: he kept quoting the Bible and did so in both
• 22:23
  Speaker 7: those clips.
• 22:24
  Speaker 5: I don't think Trump called him.
• 22:26
  Speaker 7: His base is the Bible belt basically of America. They
• 22:30
  Speaker 7: would have been absolutely disgusted by that apologetic, limpriested response.
• 22:36
  Speaker 7: He had to face the press again to be like,
• 22:38
  Speaker 7: oh okay, so just to be clear, and then basically
• 22:43
  Speaker 7: did the same thing.
• 22:44
  Speaker 5: We need to bottle.
• 22:45
  Speaker 7: Matt Gates, who hopefully will be Attorney General as he
• 22:49
  Speaker 7: is Trump's pick.
• 22:50
  Speaker 5: You may remember the clip of him that we showed.
• 22:52
  Speaker 7: You some nights ago where a reporter said, you said
• 22:56
  Speaker 7: this and people are offended.
• 22:58
  Speaker 5: Do you have a problem with that? Response was be offended.
• 23:02
  Speaker 5: I don't care.
• 23:03
  Speaker 7: I back myself. I meant what I said. I'm sticking
• 23:06
  Speaker 7: with it. I'm not going to capitulate to you. So
• 23:09
  Speaker 7: even when we have Mike Johnson coming out saying, well,
• 23:12
  Speaker 7: I'm saying the right thing, but I'm doing so in
• 23:16
  Speaker 7: such a way that I'm still trying to, you know,
• 23:19
  Speaker 7: tickle the fancies of both sides, it's just pathetic. That
• 23:22
  Speaker 7: doesn't work with the left. And notice they never try
• 23:26
  Speaker 7: that with us. They're never trying to play fair with us.
• 23:29
  Speaker 7: They're never trying to keep everyone happy. No, it's their
• 23:32
  Speaker 7: way or the high way.
• 23:33
  Speaker 3: The thing that made me laugh about Mike Johnson is
• 23:35
  Speaker 3: he said, you know, men and men, women are women.
• 23:37
  Speaker 2: That's what the Bible teaches.
• 23:38
  Speaker 3: Why are you quoting the Bible as evidence for biology?
• 23:42
  Speaker 2: The Bible is irrelevant on the point of biology knows
• 23:45
  Speaker 2: this base.
• 23:46
  Speaker 3: He knows they in the USA, a week before the election,
• 23:49
  Speaker 3: there was a poll in The Independent that found ninety
• 23:52
  Speaker 3: five percent of Democrats feared that Trump would not accept
• 23:55
  Speaker 3: the result if he lost the election. Well, Trump won
• 23:58
  Speaker 3: the election. Democrats who won't accept the result.
• 24:04
  Speaker 12: This is for President Biden, Vice President Kamala Harris, and
• 24:07
  Speaker 12: all the Democrats that are in office. Do something.
• 24:11
  Speaker 5: Stop this. You tell us for months what a.
• 24:16
  Speaker 12: Danger this man is, and now he is proving it
• 24:19
  Speaker 12: to everybody, and you guys are nowhere to be found
• 24:22
  Speaker 12: and nothing is being done.
• 24:23
  Speaker 5: We stood by.
• 24:24
  Speaker 12: You, we did everything you asked us to do, and
• 24:27
  Speaker 12: then you just conceded and disappeared. And now we are
• 24:30
  Speaker 12: all facing the hell that is coming.
• 24:34
  Speaker 3: So the Democrats want their representatives to do something. Well,
• 24:38
  Speaker 3: in Pennsylvania, the Democrats are doing something about the election result.
• 24:42
  Speaker 3: The Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled that mail in ballots which
• 24:45
  Speaker 3: were not properly dated or.
• 24:47
  Speaker 2: Signed could not be counted.
• 24:49
  Speaker 3: But the Pennsylvania Electoral Commission, which is dominated by Democrats,
• 24:53
  Speaker 3: took a vote and decided they're going to ignore the
• 24:56
  Speaker 3: Supreme Court ruling and count those invalid votes.
• 24:59
  Speaker 2: Anyway.
• 24:59
  Speaker 6: Look, we reject all three categories of these ballots.
• 25:06
  Speaker 13: The emotion is to reject or dismiss the challenges in
• 25:09
  Speaker 13: this category in.
• 25:10
  Speaker 14: Front of you.
• 25:11
  Speaker 15: Correct, yep, not going to second, that mostly because I
• 25:15
  Speaker 15: think we all know that precedent by a court doesn't
• 25:18
  Speaker 15: matter anymore in this country, and people violate laws anytime
• 25:22
  Speaker 15: they want. So for me, if I violate this law,
• 25:25
  Speaker 15: it's because I want a court to pay attention to it.
• 25:28
  Speaker 3: But held on a second, didn't We spend weeks, months,
• 25:31
  Speaker 3: a few years hearing how Donald Trump didn't care about
• 25:34
  Speaker 3: the law at all, that he didn't care about fairness
• 25:38
  Speaker 3: or playing by the rules. And now the Democrats are
• 25:40
  Speaker 3: straight out saying, well, that's just what the court said,
• 25:42
  Speaker 3: but we don't care what the court says.
• 25:44
  Speaker 2: We'll make our own rules.
• 25:45
  Speaker 3: They said that to discard ballots because of a clerical
• 25:48
  Speaker 3: error was to deny people their constitutional rights. And maybe
• 25:52
  Speaker 3: you could argue about a clerical error and whether that
• 25:55
  Speaker 3: should be counted or not, but the bottom line is,
• 25:58
  Speaker 3: if the court says it shouldn't be care mounted, well.
• 26:01
  Speaker 2: You either have laws or you don't have laws.
• 26:03
  Speaker 3: And you can't accuse Trump of being a law breaker
• 26:06
  Speaker 3: and then boast when it doesn't go your way that
• 26:08
  Speaker 3: you're going to ignore the law.
• 26:09
  Speaker 4: You're not telling me that the Dems are a threat
• 26:11
  Speaker 4: to democracy.
• 26:12
  Speaker 1: Are you? Oh my god.
• 26:14
  Speaker 4: I cannot believe it, Like, seriously, these people don't even
• 26:19
  Speaker 4: know the irony of what they're doing here to said oh, well,
• 26:22
  Speaker 4: you know, people just break the law all the time,
• 26:24
  Speaker 4: so we don't Why don't we just break the law. Well,
• 26:26
  Speaker 4: you can't in one breath say that we must uphold
• 26:29
  Speaker 4: the law and then in the other say, well, because
• 26:31
  Speaker 4: other people are breaking the law, that now means I
• 26:34
  Speaker 4: want to do it. They carried on about, oh, you know,
• 26:37
  Speaker 4: last time Donald Trump said those stole real lurkum that
• 26:40
  Speaker 4: it was potently not true. Well, that's exactly what they're
• 26:43
  Speaker 4: trying to do now, and they were doing it three
• 26:46
  Speaker 4: months before the election even kicked off. As we talked
• 26:48
  Speaker 4: about many times, the states, multiple states tried to remove
• 26:54
  Speaker 4: from their electoral roles or asked for just basic details
• 26:58
  Speaker 4: about who we're on their electoral roles so they could
• 27:00
  Speaker 4: remove illegal immigrants and whatever so that they couldn't vote
• 27:03
  Speaker 4: in the election, and the Department of Justice, the DOJ
• 27:06
  Speaker 4: came along and took the states to court and said, no,
• 27:10
  Speaker 4: you can't do that because you missed the cutoff day
• 27:12
  Speaker 4: by two days or some nonsense. They tried absolutely everything
• 27:16
  Speaker 4: on to make sure their people could get over the line,
• 27:19
  Speaker 4: and they are still doing it long.
• 27:22
  Speaker 7: And this really matters because that commission that you just
• 27:26
  Speaker 7: told shift us defying the Supreme Court in Pennsylvania. This
• 27:32
  Speaker 7: really matters because Pennsylvania, in their specific county is having
• 27:37
  Speaker 7: a recount because in that part of the world, if
• 27:40
  Speaker 7: you win by less than zero point five percent of
• 27:45
  Speaker 7: total votes counted, there has to be recount, and that
• 27:48
  Speaker 7: costs the county a million dollars to do. But because
• 27:52
  Speaker 7: it's so close, they want to be careful. So the
• 27:55
  Speaker 7: Supreme Court, having seen their defiance, has now handed down
• 28:00
  Speaker 7: another written order saying you cannot count these and have
• 28:05
  Speaker 7: actually demanded Pennsylvania stop counting all together.
• 28:09
  Speaker 5: So whether they'll stick with that or not, who knows.
• 28:12
  Speaker 7: But check out what's happening in California, as there's this
• 28:16
  Speaker 7: seat that seems to be suddenly changing from red to blue.
• 28:21
  Speaker 7: Despite the fact that the incumbent Republican was looking well.
• 28:26
  Speaker 5: In the lead, they are still counting. So the first
• 28:31
  Speaker 5: question here is, what the heck.
• 28:33
  Speaker 7: Are you still doing counting ballots in California? Who are
• 28:37
  Speaker 7: you getting to count these for you? How is this
• 28:40
  Speaker 7: possible in the twenty first century? What is taking so long?
• 28:43
  Speaker 7: But it hasn't escaped. The Hawkeyes of certain Republicans in
• 28:48
  Speaker 7: the area are going, hang on a minute, look at
• 28:51
  Speaker 7: the ridiculous trajectory of the guy running for the Blue team.
• 28:56
  Speaker 7: So did you just stop counting Republicans votes because our
• 29:01
  Speaker 7: guy was in the lead, our lady rather in this instance,
• 29:05
  Speaker 7: and then all of a sudden, you've got thousands more to.
• 29:08
  Speaker 5: Vote and they're only going to the Blue team. What
• 29:12
  Speaker 5: are the odds? What are the odds? And now the Democrats.
• 29:16
  Speaker 7: Look set to win the forty fifth congressional seat of
• 29:20
  Speaker 7: California off the back of this absolute sham.
• 29:24
  Speaker 3: I think it's pretty obvious what they do. They just
• 29:26
  Speaker 3: keep counting until they're candidate wins, and then they stop counting.
• 29:30
  Speaker 3: And as he said, it's amazing how the more they count,
• 29:32
  Speaker 3: the more the votes seem to go in only one.
• 29:35
  Speaker 1: You know, we're James. We've got to stop the steal.
• 29:38
  Speaker 1: We had to stop the steal right now.
• 29:41
  Speaker 2: I'm awesome.
• 29:42
  Speaker 7: I know it sounds insiety, This sounds pretty insighting.
• 29:46
  Speaker 1: Terrible, terrible, terrible.
• 29:47
  Speaker 4: One bloke who's worried he might have his job stolen
• 29:50
  Speaker 4: from him, of course, is Kevin rad former Prime Minister
• 29:53
  Speaker 4: now our ambassador over in the US, and we know
• 29:56
  Speaker 4: what he posted online about Donald Trump that he then
• 29:59
  Speaker 4: quickly deleted when Trump became president elect. We've seen a
• 30:02
  Speaker 4: new video just about every day come out of his
• 30:04
  Speaker 4: former comments about Donald Trump. Well, today he's put out
• 30:07
  Speaker 4: a statement saying, don't worry, We're ready to deal with Trump.
• 30:13
  Speaker 13: Here at the Embassy, we've been working hard through the
• 30:15
  Speaker 13: course of the last year to ensure that we were
• 30:19
  Speaker 13: well prepared for this moment, and the bottom line is
• 30:22
  Speaker 13: we're ready. The team here at the Embassy and the
• 30:26
  Speaker 13: Government of Australia are ready to work closely with the
• 30:29
  Speaker 13: new Trump administration to continue to realize the benefits of
• 30:33
  Speaker 13: what is a very strong economic and security partnership.
• 30:37
  Speaker 1: They've been preparing for a year to deal with a
• 30:41
  Speaker 1: new president. How much work do you possibly need to do?
• 30:44
  Speaker 7: They have delete a lot of tweets Kayler's calling him
• 30:50
  Speaker 7: the worst threat to democracy, dragging the US through the mud,
• 30:54
  Speaker 7: all the sledgers that he has leveled at Donald Trump,
• 30:58
  Speaker 7: thinking he was safe as houses the Democrats were going
• 31:01
  Speaker 7: to get in. Trump was none of his concerned baby. Well,
• 31:05
  Speaker 7: now he's been forced to eat humble pie.
• 31:08
  Speaker 5: I still hope they get rid of him.
• 31:09
  Speaker 7: I genuinely do, and I said it earlier this evening
• 31:12
  Speaker 7: on Chris Kenny.
• 31:13
  Speaker 5: Dutton should add getting.
• 31:15
  Speaker 7: Rid of Rudd out of the policy to his election promises.
• 31:20
  Speaker 7: I think it would go very well with the vast
• 31:23
  Speaker 7: majority of Australians. The Stautz was like, you vote in
• 31:26
  Speaker 7: a coalition government, I will get us a better ambassador
• 31:30
  Speaker 7: in our closest allies a country.
• 31:34
  Speaker 3: It's a hilarious to hear Kevin Rudd saying I am
• 31:36
  Speaker 3: ready to work with Donald Trump. That's not the issue.
• 31:39
  Speaker 3: The issue is Donald Trump ready to work with Kevin Rudd.
• 31:42
  Speaker 3: Kevin Rudd went on to say Australia's relationship with the
• 31:44
  Speaker 3: USA has never been more important exactly, that's why someone
• 31:47
  Speaker 3: else should be advocating for it. And if it was
• 31:50
  Speaker 3: that important, then Kevin Rudd should never have made those
• 31:53
  Speaker 3: comments calling Trump a village idiot and the most destructive
• 31:56
  Speaker 3: president in history. Let's go to the UK quickly, with
• 32:00
  Speaker 3: thousands of farmers have protested over an inheritance tax. That's
• 32:05
  Speaker 3: tax that's going to be introduced on farms worth a
• 32:08
  Speaker 3: million pounds or more. Now this will be a twenty
• 32:11
  Speaker 3: percent inheritance tax.
• 32:13
  Speaker 2: That will be charged.
• 32:14
  Speaker 3: Farmers are calling it a bankrupt tax because of course
• 32:18
  Speaker 3: farms are well asset rich, but you don't make a
• 32:21
  Speaker 3: lot of money in farming. In fact, they reckon they
• 32:23
  Speaker 3: make less than one percent of the value of the
• 32:26
  Speaker 3: property per year in the actual farming. So if you're
• 32:28
  Speaker 3: paying twenty percent of the value of the property over
• 32:31
  Speaker 3: ten years but you're only making one percent, you are
• 32:34
  Speaker 3: going backwards at a fast rate of nots. Jeremy Clarkson,
• 32:38
  Speaker 3: who's well known around the world, he attended the protest
• 32:41
  Speaker 3: and he spoke to protests.
• 32:43
  Speaker 2: I want to show you him.
• 32:43
  Speaker 3: Speaking at the rally about how bad this is and
• 32:46
  Speaker 3: saying the government must change their mind.
• 32:49
  Speaker 2: I want to show the grab where he's yes, this
• 32:51
  Speaker 2: is the one, let's go.
• 32:53
  Speaker 4: I beg of the government.
• 32:56
  Speaker 3: To be big, to accept that this was rushed through,
• 33:00
  Speaker 3: it wasn't throught out, and it's a mistake.
• 33:03
  Speaker 1: That's the big thing to do. Admit it and back down.
• 33:09
  Speaker 3: He's exactly right, colored this hasn't been thought through because
• 33:13
  Speaker 3: if they force farmers off the land, these are farmers
• 33:16
  Speaker 3: whose families have been farming for generations.
• 33:19
  Speaker 2: They won't be replaced because do you.
• 33:21
  Speaker 3: Know anybody who when you ask them when they're a
• 33:23
  Speaker 3: little kid, they're living in a city, what do you
• 33:24
  Speaker 3: want to do.
• 33:24
  Speaker 2: When you grow up? I want to go and zaf farm.
• 33:27
  Speaker 2: It's either in your blood or it's not.
• 33:29
  Speaker 3: And Andrew Lloyd Webber makes this point, and we might
• 33:32
  Speaker 3: go to him in a moment, that if farmers are
• 33:34
  Speaker 3: removed from their land, they won't be replaced who feeds the.
• 33:37
  Speaker 4: Country precisely because it's been exempt. Farms have been exempt
• 33:41
  Speaker 4: because exactly as you say, farmers are asset rich in
• 33:44
  Speaker 4: that they own the land, but they're cash poor.
• 33:47
  Speaker 1: They don't have cash on hand. So if you're going
• 33:49
  Speaker 1: to charge the kids twenty percent of.
• 33:52
  Speaker 4: The value of the farm for the farm to go
• 33:54
  Speaker 4: into their hands and they don't have the money, well
• 33:56
  Speaker 4: then they have to sell the farm, right Andrew Lloyd
• 33:59
  Speaker 4: Webber is as James just mentioned. Of course, Douan of
• 34:02
  Speaker 4: Musical Theater went down to the protest and pointed out
• 34:05
  Speaker 4: exactly that.
• 34:08
  Speaker 16: What is the fear, Andrew, What would your fear be
• 34:12
  Speaker 16: should this tax impact these farms in the longer term.
• 34:15
  Speaker 14: In the longer term, what will happen is they'll all
• 34:17
  Speaker 14: be bought by probably foreigners, outsiders, people who don't buy
• 34:22
  Speaker 14: it are not buying it for the love of the countryside.
• 34:25
  Speaker 14: They're buying it purely as a long term investment. Many many,
• 34:28
  Speaker 14: many people hovering around at the moment, rubbing their hands
• 34:32
  Speaker 14: in glee about all of this, you know, and they
• 34:35
  Speaker 14: I can shure you they're not British.
• 34:37
  Speaker 4: And if I go back to Jeremy Classon for a second,
• 34:40
  Speaker 4: he was being questioned by a BBC reporter who seemed
• 34:42
  Speaker 4: to be running government lines essentially, and it went as
• 34:45
  Speaker 4: well as you would expect with class So it's not
• 34:49
  Speaker 4: about you.
• 34:50
  Speaker 7: It's not about your farm and the fact that you
• 34:52
  Speaker 7: bought a farm to a boid inheritance.
• 34:53
  Speaker 2: Tax classic BBC.
• 34:57
  Speaker 5: Then classic, Oh yeah, where should they get the money from?
• 35:00
  Speaker 8: It's not.
• 35:03
  Speaker 1: Where that everyone you say that you should be paying
• 35:06
  Speaker 1: for everything.
• 35:08
  Speaker 4: And I think this is really important that Clarkson is there.
• 35:10
  Speaker 4: It's a bit like the Donald Trump thing, right.
• 35:13
  Speaker 1: Clarkson has plenty of cash.
• 35:15
  Speaker 4: If he wants to give his farm to his kids,
• 35:17
  Speaker 4: they're going to have the money to pay the inheritance tax.
• 35:19
  Speaker 1: It's of no.
• 35:20
  Speaker 4: Concern to him except that he believes in what he
• 35:23
  Speaker 4: is saying. He is a rich man standing up saying
• 35:26
  Speaker 4: you are getting a raw deal from the government, and
• 35:29
  Speaker 4: it is no coincidence that it is farmers that are
• 35:32
  Speaker 4: getting a raw deal from the government because they don't
• 35:35
  Speaker 4: want people landholders to actually contribute anything to the world,
• 35:40
  Speaker 4: because oh, could be carbon emissions involved.
• 35:42
  Speaker 7: I think it's very naive to say that, oh, this
• 35:45
  Speaker 7: just hasn't been thought through.
• 35:46
  Speaker 5: They've rushed through the legislation. Are you kidding me? Where
• 35:50
  Speaker 5: have you been? For years? The war on farmers have
• 35:53
  Speaker 5: ravaged Germany, who shut down in airport.
• 35:56
  Speaker 7: They brought hundreds of their tractors to protest in Germany.
• 36:01
  Speaker 7: In France, the farmers all charged in and famously were
• 36:05
  Speaker 7: dumping manure into the houses of Parliament because.
• 36:09
  Speaker 5: They too were being persecuted.
• 36:11
  Speaker 7: In the Netherlands, again there were thousands of tractors holding
• 36:17
  Speaker 7: entire cities besieged because they too were being persecuted. Ireland
• 36:23
  Speaker 7: farmers standing in their fields crying saying, the government is
• 36:27
  Speaker 7: taking my land, it is making my living just unlivable.
• 36:31
  Speaker 5: I can't do it anymore.
• 36:33
  Speaker 7: They're either making the fertilizer too expensive, etc.
• 36:36
  Speaker 5: Etc.
• 36:37
  Speaker 7: Each and every one of these countries comes up with
• 36:40
  Speaker 7: some bogus excuse to make life unlivable for their farmers.
• 36:45
  Speaker 5: You've got to ask yourself what the heck is going on.
• 36:49
  Speaker 7: Surely no one is more important to the flourishing of
• 36:53
  Speaker 7: any country. But if you control the food, you control
• 36:57
  Speaker 7: the people like nothing else. And in my having read
• 37:00
  Speaker 7: some about this legislation, I feel like Kiirs Starmer's gone
• 37:04
  Speaker 7: full stalin. I mean, it is just absolutely unthinkable and
• 37:09
  Speaker 7: sadly in this country we don't treat our Aussie farmers
• 37:12
  Speaker 7: any better. If you know some, you know that I'm
• 37:15
  Speaker 7: telling the gospel truth. It is utterly shameful, and I
• 37:19
  Speaker 7: genuinely think there is something far more nefarious behind it.
• 37:23
  Speaker 7: People snaffling up farmland after making farmers just go, I
• 37:27
  Speaker 7: can't do this anymore. You've literally made it impossible to me.
• 37:31
  Speaker 7: It seems very nefarious.
• 37:32
  Speaker 2: Indeed, we're going to go to a break.
• 37:34
  Speaker 3: When we come back, we'll look at what's making news tomorrow,
• 37:37
  Speaker 3: including suggestions that Indigenous people should co design Brisbane's twenty
• 37:41
  Speaker 3: thirty two Olympic facilities.
• 37:43
  Speaker 2: That's coming up in tomorrow. Welcome back.
• 37:48
  Speaker 3: Let's check out what's making news in tomorrow's papers Lives.
• 37:50
  Speaker 3: You've got the Career Mail and the Brisbane Games are
• 37:54
  Speaker 3: still quite a number of years away, but it's just
• 37:56
  Speaker 3: looking like a mess.
• 38:00
  Speaker 7: Center of games plan, the splash reads, the First Nation's
• 38:04
  Speaker 7: Cultural Center, museum and permanent evening overwater drone shows telling
• 38:09
  Speaker 7: dream time stories have been proposed as ways Brisbane twenty
• 38:13
  Speaker 7: thirty two can deliver a legacy for reconciliation. Cameron Costello,
• 38:18
  Speaker 7: the deputy chair of the twenty thirty two Legacy Committee,
• 38:21
  Speaker 7: also challenged organizers to lead the world and have every
• 38:24
  Speaker 7: games venue co designed by First Nations people, to make
• 38:29
  Speaker 7: Brisbane a city where, like Florence and Paris, you're overwhelmed
• 38:33
  Speaker 7: by the integration of culture within their architecture. End quote
• 38:39
  Speaker 7: like Florence in Paris, really, I mean those buildings are
• 38:44
  Speaker 7: hundreds of years old and they're absolutely stunning. But how
• 38:49
  Speaker 7: about we just settle, Cameron Costello for any kind of
• 38:53
  Speaker 7: comprehensive games at all. We're building a new stadium. We're
• 38:58
  Speaker 7: not building a new stadium or just kinda give us
• 39:01
  Speaker 7: faithlift to these stadiums.
• 39:03
  Speaker 5: No where not we've changed.
• 39:05
  Speaker 7: Do we even have a comprehensive plan in place yet Brisbane?
• 39:09
  Speaker 7: Before we start worrying about the trimmings.
• 39:12
  Speaker 3: Serious, is he serious that the Olympic stadium, which as
• 39:15
  Speaker 3: you rightly pointed out, we don't even have one yet,
• 39:17
  Speaker 3: needs to be co designed by an Indigenous person.
• 39:21
  Speaker 2: That's absolute madness.
• 39:22
  Speaker 3: And as for this idea of leaving a legacy for reconciliation,
• 39:26
  Speaker 3: I just reckon some gold medals would be good. And
• 39:28
  Speaker 3: an Olympic Games that doesn't embarrass us or you know,
• 39:32
  Speaker 3: slam Christians at the opening ceremony, that would be pretty good.
• 39:35
  Speaker 3: Why do we need a legacy for reconciliation?
• 39:37
  Speaker 2: It's a sporting event.
• 39:39
  Speaker 4: But what the hell's the Olympics going to do for
• 39:40
  Speaker 4: reconciliation anyway? I don't think of the billions and billions
• 39:44
  Speaker 4: of dollars that will be spent on a sporting event
• 39:46
  Speaker 4: that could have been spent on, I don't know, improving
• 39:49
  Speaker 4: the lives of people in indigenous communities.
• 39:52
  Speaker 2: Like seriously, Oh.
• 39:53
  Speaker 4: We're going to fix the whole thing up through the
• 39:55
  Speaker 4: Olympic Games and so oh, we'll send in some Indigenous
• 39:58
  Speaker 4: people to help design the Okay, so that will help
• 40:01
  Speaker 4: out a small number of Indigenous people who will get
• 40:04
  Speaker 4: some money by there.
• 40:05
  Speaker 5: What does it do for.
• 40:06
  Speaker 4: Anyone else who's going to walk in to to q
• 40:09
  Speaker 4: sack or wherever it is and go, oh, yes, I
• 40:11
  Speaker 4: can tell by looking at this place that it must
• 40:13
  Speaker 4: have been co designed by an indigenous person.
• 40:16
  Speaker 3: What it doesn't make sense the velodrome has to be
• 40:19
  Speaker 3: co designed by an indigenous.
• 40:20
  Speaker 1: Oh that's good, that's the safe.
• 40:22
  Speaker 4: Genuinely, just give us an Olympic Games like they can't
• 40:26
  Speaker 4: take their mind up about anything. Actually, there will be
• 40:29
  Speaker 4: seventeen more reports to come down before they can decide
• 40:33
  Speaker 4: who they can appoint to be the indigenous co designer.
• 40:36
  Speaker 4: Let's go to the front of the Australian tomorrow, it
• 40:39
  Speaker 4: says Charmers. Future Funnel Jim Charmers is overhauling the investment
• 40:44
  Speaker 4: mandate of the two hundred and thirty billion dollar Future
• 40:47
  Speaker 4: Fund to drive capital into Labour's agenda on affordable housing,
• 40:51
  Speaker 4: green energy projects and critical infrastructure, in a major shift
• 40:54
  Speaker 4: in the role of the Sovereign Wealth Fund established by
• 40:57
  Speaker 4: the Howard government.
• 40:58
  Speaker 1: Nearly to decay AIDS AGO.
• 41:01
  Speaker 4: Now, the point of the Future Fund, as I understand it,
• 41:04
  Speaker 4: is to deliver the best return for taxpayers as possible.
• 41:09
  Speaker 1: But now the federal governments are all shivers. What can
• 41:12
  Speaker 1: we do here? Because we love this.
• 41:14
  Speaker 4: Surplus that we've had for the last couple of years,
• 41:17
  Speaker 4: and we desperately want to hang on to the surplus
• 41:19
  Speaker 4: to say that we did it and the Libs didn't.
• 41:22
  Speaker 4: So what can we do to fudge the numbers to
• 41:25
  Speaker 4: actually spend government money without spending government money?
• 41:29
  Speaker 1: I know, we'll take it out of an investment fund.
• 41:31
  Speaker 4: That is actually about making sure we've got money in
• 41:34
  Speaker 4: the bank.
• 41:34
  Speaker 1: And spend it on our pet projects instead. Brilliant idea.
• 41:37
  Speaker 3: And for charmers to claim that you can go for
• 41:39
  Speaker 3: maximum return while investing in all your pet fetishers is
• 41:45
  Speaker 3: just a fiction. Judah Sloan makes a great point in
• 41:47
  Speaker 3: her column in The Australian Tomorrow that if these projects
• 41:51
  Speaker 3: were such good investments, the government would have invested in
• 41:54
  Speaker 3: them already. I know the fact that they haven't proved
• 41:57
  Speaker 3: the point. They're not the maximum returns. They're trying to
• 42:00
  Speaker 3: do both, and of course walking both sides of the
• 42:03
  Speaker 3: street never works.
• 42:04
  Speaker 1: Good luck to them, Good luck to them. Another story
• 42:06
  Speaker 1: on the Ostermoo. This one's quite funny.
• 42:09
  Speaker 4: Alp Link Law firm sued over pay row. One of
• 42:14
  Speaker 4: Australia's most prominent workplace compensation law firms, has been accused
• 42:18
  Speaker 4: of deliberately miscalculating staff leav entitlements, failing to immediately reconcile
• 42:24
  Speaker 4: the under payments, and sacking the human resources boss who
• 42:28
  Speaker 4: blew the whistle on the alleged scandal. Slater and Gordon
• 42:32
  Speaker 4: is the firm that we are shame. I mean, you know,
• 42:37
  Speaker 4: karma eventually comes to bite you on the bum and
• 42:40
  Speaker 4: they are allegations.
• 42:41
  Speaker 1: We should say at this point.
• 42:43
  Speaker 4: But seriously, how would you like to be the leading
• 42:46
  Speaker 4: workplace law firm in the country. And then someone goes,
• 42:50
  Speaker 4: hang on a minute, the HR boss.
• 42:52
  Speaker 1: No, Liz, hang on a minute. I think you've been
• 42:54
  Speaker 1: under paying the staff. You're well done, it says.
• 42:57
  Speaker 7: The firm first announced in July that it had underpaid
• 43:00
  Speaker 7: about three hundred thousand dollars to more than one hundred
• 43:05
  Speaker 7: employees after workers who took leave at half pay from
• 43:09
  Speaker 7: twenty eleven to last year had they leave a cruel
• 43:14
  Speaker 7: calculated on a pro rata basis.
• 43:16
  Speaker 5: Rather than a full time basis.
• 43:18
  Speaker 7: I mean, it's worth a read the whole article. It
• 43:21
  Speaker 7: is an absolute nightmare. I do hope these guys get
• 43:25
  Speaker 7: their money.
• 43:26
  Speaker 5: They are just allegations.
• 43:27
  Speaker 7: At the moment, we must say, but the whole thing
• 43:30
  Speaker 7: is quite an entertaining read.
• 43:32
  Speaker 5: And it's funny how so many of my lawyer.
• 43:36
  Speaker 7: Friends speak of not being paid properly but similar complaints
• 43:44
  Speaker 7: which they wouldn't talk about obviously publicly. But I've heard
• 43:48
  Speaker 7: that law firms are some of the worst when it comes.
• 43:51
  Speaker 5: To just pink.
• 43:52
  Speaker 2: Do tell you what, They never missed their clients, that's
• 43:54
  Speaker 2: for sure.
• 43:54
  Speaker 1: Llawyers money ask go.
• 43:56
  Speaker 3: To the front page of the Newcastle Herald. Of course,
• 43:59
  Speaker 3: there's massive pro tests planned by environmental groups over the weekend,
• 44:03
  Speaker 3: ramping up. Police laid down law to protestable because they're
• 44:07
  Speaker 3: combining a protest with a rock concert. Peter Garrett is
• 44:10
  Speaker 3: one of the people playing. Police say public safety is
• 44:13
  Speaker 3: their top concern as they roll out a high visibility
• 44:16
  Speaker 3: response to rising tides Protestable in Newcastle over the next
• 44:21
  Speaker 3: few days. Now the protest is expected to attract thousands
• 44:26
  Speaker 3: of people. They're combining a sort of festival atmosphere in
• 44:30
  Speaker 3: the park. As I said, Peter Garrett from Midnight Oil
• 44:34
  Speaker 3: will be playing, and then protesters are also going to
• 44:37
  Speaker 3: take to the water. In previous years they've blocked shipping channels. Well,
• 44:42
  Speaker 3: a court has ruled that there'll be a restricted area
• 44:45
  Speaker 3: where they'll be police patrolling. Anyone in that area on
• 44:49
  Speaker 3: the water will be fined, but police will have a.
• 44:52
  Speaker 2: High presence there. And this just goes on and on.
• 44:55
  Speaker 3: Cal We're getting used to these things in Newcastle unfortunately.
• 44:58
  Speaker 4: I mean, the only reason they're going to do it
• 45:00
  Speaker 4: is to create disruption and to be a pain in
• 45:02
  Speaker 4: the ass. Right Knowing that they can't go and will
• 45:05
  Speaker 4: allegedly can't go and disrupt the ships, we'll just hang
• 45:09
  Speaker 4: around on the perimeters, which means all the police resources
• 45:12
  Speaker 4: have to be spent stopping them going from beyond those perimeters.
• 45:15
  Speaker 4: If they weren't already in the water, I'd say get
• 45:17
  Speaker 4: the water cannons out. This should just be stopped all together.
• 45:21
  Speaker 4: It's even if they're not going to go in and
• 45:23
  Speaker 4: stop the ships coming in. The point they are making
• 45:26
  Speaker 4: is to use public resources for their own ends.
• 45:30
  Speaker 1: Just stop it.
• 45:31
  Speaker 3: Yeah, well, we're going to go to a break. When
• 45:33
  Speaker 3: we come back, Caleb is going to explain to us
• 45:35
  Speaker 3: why he didn't give us the tip a rank outside
• 45:37
  Speaker 3: a winds by a mile and jockeys are suspended. Because
• 45:40
  Speaker 3: the whole thing is a little bit suss.
• 45:42
  Speaker 2: It's coming up at a moment. All right, welcome back.
• 45:48
  Speaker 3: Well, Liz, you've got a story about something you would
• 45:49
  Speaker 3: never expect to see in a candy store.
• 45:52
  Speaker 7: Your wooden shoplifting is pretty common in the States. I mean,
• 45:55
  Speaker 7: thirty eight of the states don't consider shoplifting a felony.
• 46:00
  Speaker 7: Whatever your shoplift is under a thousand dollars worth of merchandise.
• 46:06
  Speaker 7: So this particular shoplifter had nothing to worry about when
• 46:11
  Speaker 7: he wandered into a lolly store in Tennessee and just
• 46:15
  Speaker 7: stood there, not even trying to hide what he was
• 46:18
  Speaker 7: up to, in front of everyone taking the merch.
• 46:37
  Speaker 5: How could you begrudge him any tree.
• 46:40
  Speaker 2: He's so cute.
• 46:42
  Speaker 7: I love it.
• 46:42
  Speaker 5: Nobody's screaming or running around.
• 46:44
  Speaker 7: They're all just chatting in the background like nothing's happening. Here.
• 46:47
  Speaker 2: Was quite safe because he was pretty occupied and looked
• 46:49
  Speaker 2: pretty happy about it.
• 46:50
  Speaker 4: As you pointed out James earlier, you were saying was
• 46:53
  Speaker 4: eating gummy bees because I'm happy that you would be cannibalism. Now,
• 46:57
  Speaker 4: imagine you're having a bit on the first race at
• 46:59
  Speaker 4: Lingfield in the UK, which is in Surrey. He'd say
• 47:02
  Speaker 4: two mile race for a princeice jockeys only, and you
• 47:06
  Speaker 4: happen to be on the twenty eight to one outside
• 47:09
  Speaker 4: favorite in a five horse race, and this happens.
• 47:14
  Speaker 16: Two purlongs to go. Terms in Grand Duchess. Olga is
• 47:18
  Speaker 16: still at the moment holding second position with on the
• 47:21
  Speaker 16: outside gold Aura and countering in front. Is certain Style
• 47:26
  Speaker 16: handed a huge advantage by the others and is never
• 47:29
  Speaker 16: going to be caught or even challenged. So Certain Style
• 47:33
  Speaker 16: didn't quite make call, took it up after about one
• 47:35
  Speaker 16: hundred of yards, never saw anything else in the race.
• 47:38
  Speaker 16: Is a huge battle of a second place, but this
• 47:40
  Speaker 16: is only for second place, and gold Ura might have
• 47:43
  Speaker 16: got second to you.
• 47:45
  Speaker 4: Certain Style there at twenty eight to one, winning by
• 47:48
  Speaker 4: twenty two lengths. At six furlongs he had six lengths
• 47:51
  Speaker 4: sorry undred and six lengths, forty lengths. I should say
• 47:55
  Speaker 4: the princes, the apprentice jockeys were all called in and
• 47:59
  Speaker 4: given a ten day suspension because they said, oh, we
• 48:02
  Speaker 4: bagged it up. We didn't really know what we were
• 48:04
  Speaker 4: doing because we were apprentices. But I mean, honestly, I'd
• 48:07
  Speaker 4: be checking a few bidding accounts if I were the stewards.
• 48:10
  Speaker 1: Because that's one hell of a win for it doing.
• 48:14
  Speaker 2: Don't you just point and go well.
• 48:16
  Speaker 4: Apparently one of the jockey's actually loaded his horse into
• 48:19
  Speaker 4: the wrong stall began the race, So it may have
• 48:22
  Speaker 4: been amateur hour, but that would have been if I'd
• 48:25
  Speaker 4: known that that was going to happen. I wish I'd
• 48:27
  Speaker 4: been on it, Like seriously, surely if you're going to
• 48:29
  Speaker 4: set up.
• 48:30
  Speaker 5: A steal, you do it in such a way that
• 48:32
  Speaker 5: would have the meeting.
• 48:34
  Speaker 3: Yes, well, next time, Caleb, we expect the hot tip
• 48:39
  Speaker 3: before the race. We could have done very well from that.
• 48:41
  Speaker 3: That's it from us, thanks to your company. Tonight stick around.
• 48:44
  Speaker 3: Coming up is the readA Penhingra