Latest / Turley Talks / Ep. 3639 Kash & Bongino Drop Over 30 SUBPOENAS as Hillary Finally GETS CAUGHT!!!

Transcript

Ep. 3639 Kash & Bongino Drop Over 30 SUBPOENAS as Hillary Finally GETS CAUGHT!!! · Turley Talks

• 0:00
  [SPEAKER_01]: The liberal globalist order is on its brink and awakening a new conservative age.
• 0:06
  [SPEAKER_01]: Dr. Steve Turley, join me every day as we discover answers to today's toughest challenges and explore the re-bondalization of conservative civilization.
• 0:18
  [SPEAKER_01]: This is Turley Talks.
• 0:22
  [SPEAKER_00]: DC Chaos.
• 0:25
  [SPEAKER_00]: Democrats shut down the government to protect their radical priorities.
• 0:29
  [SPEAKER_00]: But House Republicans never wager.
• 0:32
  [SPEAKER_00]: We fought for the American people for paychecks, border security, and common sense.
• 0:38
  [SPEAKER_00]: Democrats cave.
• 0:40
  [SPEAKER_00]: America won.
• 0:43
  [SPEAKER_00]: Because when Republicans stand together, we deliver results for working people.
• 0:51
  [SPEAKER_01]: And the winds keep coming, we got her explosive new documents reveal that Hillary Clinton is, indeed, in the crosshairs of Pam Bondi and Cash Patel, all as Cash and Bongino have just dropped over 30 subpoenas exposing a corruption scandal, so massive that even the people investigating and are saying that they'll never be the same, it's finally happening.
• 1:17
  [SPEAKER_01]: The roof is getting blown off the deep state.
• 1:21
  [SPEAKER_01]: Yes, it took several months, but it does look like we can begin buttering the popcorn because we're about to see what it looks like when those who once thought they were untouchable and beyond reproach are finally, finally, being brought.
• 1:36
  [SPEAKER_01]: to justice.
• 1:37
  [SPEAKER_01]: Greetings, everyone.
• 1:38
  [SPEAKER_01]: It is a live stream for today.
• 1:40
  [SPEAKER_01]: I am your host, Dr. Steve, or a major professor celebrating what you made possible back on November the 5th of last year.
• 1:49
  [SPEAKER_01]: Make no mistake.
• 1:50
  [SPEAKER_01]: These subpoenas, these indictments, these grandjuries.
• 1:53
  [SPEAKER_01]: They are all happening as a direct result of what you
• 1:58
  [SPEAKER_01]: Did last November.
• 2:00
  [SPEAKER_01]: So if you want to front row seat on how you continue to change the world in ways you never even imagine Make sure to smack that bell and subscribe but you're not going to want to miss a single episode as always We got a jam pack show for you today our super chats are up so feel free to send in your comments your questions It'll be my privilege to read them and answer them all throughout this live stream.
• 2:21
  [SPEAKER_01]: Also, I do want to give a quick shout out
• 2:23
  [SPEAKER_01]: to the sponsor of this video.
• 2:25
  [SPEAKER_01]: And that's our amazing friends over at Augusta Gold.
• 2:29
  [SPEAKER_01]: Have you seen the price of gold and silver lately?
• 2:33
  [SPEAKER_01]: They're absolutely skyrocketing.
• 2:36
  [SPEAKER_01]: Gold in particulars up 50% year to date.
• 2:39
  [SPEAKER_01]: And what's so key here is that this is an acquaintance.
• 2:43
  [SPEAKER_01]: It's the direct result of President Trump's golden age, pro-growth agenda, Goldman Sachs actually just raised.
• 2:50
  [SPEAKER_01]: They're $26 gold outlook to $4900 per ounce and many analysts think they're being way too conservative.
• 2:58
  [SPEAKER_01]: And to make it even better, we got over three more years of these America first policies ahead of us.
• 3:04
  [SPEAKER_01]: But this is exactly why smart Americans are taking control of their retirement accounts by backing them with physical gold and silver.
• 3:13
  [SPEAKER_01]: My friends over to Guster precious metals are so excited to help you be a part of this new gold rush.
• 3:19
  [SPEAKER_01]: A Guster works with Americans who have over $50,000 in their IRAs, 401Ks or other retirement accounts to make the smart move in the smart money.
• 3:29
  [SPEAKER_01]: They're patriots just like you and me.
• 3:31
  [SPEAKER_01]: And they'd love to chat with you, give them a call at 844-763-3908 or text hurly to 35052.
• 3:41
  [SPEAKER_01]: That's hurly to 35052.
• 3:44
  [SPEAKER_01]: Seriously, again, this is the time.
• 3:46
  [SPEAKER_01]: Central banks around the world are stocking up on gold and silver as we speak.
• 3:51
  [SPEAKER_01]: Let the Patriots over to Guster Precious Metals make sure you don't miss out text early.
• 3:57
  [SPEAKER_01]: The 3-5-0-5-2 are click on the link below and go to turligold.com and you'll get instant access to a free two-minute report that reveals the greatest threat to your retirement today.
• 4:08
  [SPEAKER_01]: Again, that's turligold.com or text early to 3-5-0-5-2 and talk with our good friends,
• 4:21
  [SPEAKER_01]: Many of you might recall a rather chilling tweet that Dan Bongino fired off back in July.
• 4:31
  [SPEAKER_01]: It was as revealing as it was ominous.
• 4:34
  [SPEAKER_01]: He wrote, quote, I'll never be the same after learning what I've learned.
• 4:42
  [SPEAKER_01]: I'll never be the same after learning what I've learned.
• 4:48
  [SPEAKER_01]: Now think about that.
• 4:49
  [SPEAKER_01]: Dan is hardly someone
• 4:51
  [SPEAKER_01]: that we would characterize as shall we say soft.
• 4:57
  [SPEAKER_01]: He's a former secret service agent, right?
• 4:59
  [SPEAKER_01]: He's been vetted in terms of mental and physical strength and stamina.
• 5:04
  [SPEAKER_01]: He's a cancer survivor.
• 5:06
  [SPEAKER_01]: He's a man who's seen it all.
• 5:08
  [SPEAKER_01]: And for him to say that what he just discovered about public corruption has so shocked him to his core.
• 5:18
  [SPEAKER_01]: I mean, that's huge.
• 5:20
  [SPEAKER_01]: What could possibly be so bad that it rattles someone like Bongina?
• 5:26
  [SPEAKER_01]: Well, it does appear that we are all about to find out.
• 5:30
  [SPEAKER_01]: It does look as if the deep state is finally, finally, getting exposed.
• 5:34
  [SPEAKER_01]: FBI Director Cash Patel, along with Dan, just dropped a bombshell that has Washington D.C.
• 5:41
  [SPEAKER_01]: Insiders in full panic mode.
• 5:44
  [SPEAKER_01]: It's just been announced that they have, in a matter of mere days, dropped over 30 subpoenas,
• 5:50
  [SPEAKER_01]: hitting the desk of people who thought they were untouchable.
• 5:53
  [SPEAKER_01]: And the cases they're opening up are widespread and devastating for the deep state.
• 5:58
  [SPEAKER_01]: We're talking Operation Crossfire, the whole Russian collusion hoax.
• 6:01
  [SPEAKER_01]: It's getting completely exposed.
• 6:03
  [SPEAKER_01]: It turns out that's none other than Hillary Clinton, who's at the very center of it.
• 6:08
  [SPEAKER_01]: This is astonishing stuff that's happening right now as we speak.
• 6:13
  [SPEAKER_01]: So let's take stock of what we know.
• 6:17
  [SPEAKER_01]: A federal grand jury in Southern District Florida issued approximately 30 subpoenas targeting former intelligence and law enforcement officials.
• 6:27
  [SPEAKER_01]: The subpoenas were served to the likes of former CIA director John Brennan who led the agency during the Obama administration when the Russian investigation began, the Russian collusion hoax.
• 6:39
  [SPEAKER_01]: Secondly, the utterly smuggled and obnoxious Peter Stroke, the former FBI deputy assistant director of counter intelligence, who helped open the FBI's crossfire hurricane probe into Trump rush connections.
• 6:52
  [SPEAKER_01]: Third, Lisa Page, the former FBI attorney whose text messages was Stroke, revealed the absolute rampant anti-Trump sentiment throughout the FBI during the 2016 campaign.
• 7:05
  [SPEAKER_01]: for James Clapper, former director of national intelligence, and approximately 26 other officials connected to the 2017 intelligence community assessment that was deliberately altered and fabricated to make it look as if Trump and Russia colluded to interfere in the 2016 election.
• 7:29
  [SPEAKER_01]: but as it turns out, these subpoenas are in fact just the tip of the iceberg.
• 7:36
  [SPEAKER_01]: It looks as if the case against James Colmy, former FBI director, is going absolutely nuclear.
• 7:44
  [SPEAKER_01]: As it turns out, the evidence against Colmy is far more damning than anything the legacy media wants you to believe.
• 7:51
  [SPEAKER_01]: New Documents obtained by Investigative Journalist John Solomon revealed that Colmy orchestrated a very sophisticated media manipulation campaign while lying.
• 8:05
  [SPEAKER_01]: lying to Congress about.
• 8:08
  [SPEAKER_01]: And he left a paper trail proving everything.
• 8:10
  [SPEAKER_01]: So here's what makes this case basically bullet proof.
• 8:13
  [SPEAKER_01]: Now I know I know the DC court system is incredibly corrupt and its juries are so ridiculously left-wing ideological zealots who make it their mission to
• 8:29
  [SPEAKER_01]: But the key here is we want all of this corruption to be exposed in the light of day, right?
• 8:34
  [SPEAKER_01]: The worst enemy to darkness is light.
• 8:37
  [SPEAKER_01]: We want the nation to see all the depravity and degeneracy that's been happening in their three letter agencies.
• 8:44
  [SPEAKER_01]: I'm gonna talk about that.
• 8:45
  [SPEAKER_01]: Make sure you stick them into the very end of this video because I'm gonna bring that back in the end here.
• 8:51
  [SPEAKER_01]: But I do think at this point, at this point, what we're seeing is very much like an O.J.
• 8:57
  [SPEAKER_01]: Simpson replay where we know the jury is already rigged.
• 9:03
  [SPEAKER_01]: They're irreparably compromised in their biases, but at least the rest of the nation saw it.
• 9:10
  [SPEAKER_01]: At least the rest of the nation knew he was guilty as sin, but we'll talk about that later.
• 9:16
  [SPEAKER_01]: Here's what makes this case so devastating.
• 9:19
  [SPEAKER_01]: Colmy testified under oath to center Chuck Grassley back on May 3rd, 2017 that he never authorized anyone at the FBI to be an anonymous source for media leaks about Trump or Clinton investigations.
• 9:38
  [SPEAKER_01]: 3 years later in September 2020, Senator Ted Cruz gave him a chance to correct the record, Komi double down, reaffirming his testimony and stating, mine is the same today.
• 9:51
  [SPEAKER_01]: Effectively extending his lie through both time peers.
• 9:55
  [SPEAKER_01]: That's key because of the statutes of limitations.
• 9:59
  [SPEAKER_01]: As I understand it,
• 10:00
  [SPEAKER_01]: had Komi not said that to Ted Cruz back in 2020, the 2017 statute of limitations would have run out.
• 10:09
  [SPEAKER_01]: But because he's so arrogant and because he doubled down on all this nonsense, he's he's back in the time frame as it were and everything that he said back in 2017 as well.
• 10:22
  [SPEAKER_01]: Here's the problem.
• 10:23
  [SPEAKER_01]: Here's what is Killing Komi in a sense.
• 10:27
  [SPEAKER_01]: homey's own emails completely contradict his sworn testimony.
• 10:34
  [SPEAKER_01]: Newly declassified FBI documents obtained through Cache Patel's Investigation.
• 10:40
  [SPEAKER_01]: reveal that Komi built an entire shadow media operation using taxpayer dollars.
• 10:46
  [SPEAKER_01]: So he hired Columbia Law Professor Daniel Rickman as a special government employee.
• 10:52
  [SPEAKER_01]: He gave him top secret clearance with access to sensitive compartmented information.
• 10:59
  [SPEAKER_01]: And then tasked him with a single mission.
• 11:02
  [SPEAKER_01]: Burnish, Komi's reputation and shape media narratives against Donald Trump.
• 11:10
  [SPEAKER_01]: According FBI interview transcript, Rickman met with Colme back in January of 2017.
• 11:16
  [SPEAKER_01]: He received classified information.
• 11:20
  [SPEAKER_01]: I'll say that again.
• 11:21
  [SPEAKER_01]: He received classified information directly from Colme.
• 11:26
  [SPEAKER_01]: Then, at Colmy's direction, had conversations with New York Times reporter Michael Schmet, conversations that led to articles containing that same classified information being published for the public.
• 11:41
  [SPEAKER_01]: So, Komi was deliberately leaking classified information, which is a felony, to the legacy media through this surrogate through this Columbia law professor, friend of his, who he designated as special government employees so he could have access that information.
• 11:58
  [SPEAKER_01]: Now, this was part of Komi's revenge tour.
• 12:01
  [SPEAKER_01]: Okay.
• 12:01
  [SPEAKER_01]: This is after he got fired as director of FBI from President Trump during his first term.
• 12:08
  [SPEAKER_01]: John Solomon has been reporting.
• 12:10
  [SPEAKER_01]: that the Inspector General, the Justice Department through an investigation did conclude that Colmy did, in fact, intentionally leak classified information to the media through this Columbia University liaison and the entire purpose of those leaks was to establish anti-Trump narratives in the media, specifically you guessed it that Trump colluded with Putin and Russian
• 12:38
  [SPEAKER_01]: Comey wanted to sabotage the rightful coronation, or I'm sorry, because they tried to trump and put and tried to sabotage the rightful coronation of Hillary Clinton as Madam President.
• 12:50
  [SPEAKER_01]: But of course, Comey's leaks and so forth tried to sabotage Trump's own presidency.
• 12:54
  [SPEAKER_01]: That's the irony of all.
• 12:56
  [SPEAKER_01]: The irony in all of this is the deep state is accusing Trump of exactly what they did or what they tried to do, which was sabotage a campaign in a presidency.
• 13:06
  [SPEAKER_01]: Now to get a sense of how serious this is, let's take a walk through memory lane, shall we?
• 13:10
  [SPEAKER_01]: And by the way, it gets a whole lot worse.
• 13:13
  [SPEAKER_01]: I just want to build this case where you just show how it just continues to magnify and magnify in terms of its horrible sleasiness.
• 13:21
  [SPEAKER_01]: But just to show you how serious this is for Komi himself, do you remember the legacy media feeding frenzy surrounding Pete Higgseth and the signal chat controversy some months back, do you remember that?
• 13:36
  [SPEAKER_01]: Hegseth was being accused by every single legacy media outlet of miss handling classified information on an unsecured incident messaging app, right?
• 13:46
  [SPEAKER_01]: Do you remember that?
• 13:48
  [SPEAKER_01]: And that we were told, I'd nauseam by the media, of course, it's dead and buried now because it didn't work, but we were told, I'd nauseam by the legacy media that this was more than grounds.
• 13:59
  [SPEAKER_01]: for Trump to fire him immediately and perhaps the Justice Department to bring charges against him.
• 14:03
  [SPEAKER_01]: You remember that?
• 14:04
  [SPEAKER_01]: In fact, they were saying, if Trump doesn't fire him, that's the end of Trump's presidency.
• 14:09
  [SPEAKER_01]: Because I mean, after what he did, you know, with the Mara Logo classified information.
• 14:14
  [SPEAKER_01]: But it gets even worse.
• 14:16
  [SPEAKER_01]: I mean, let's go further on that stroll through memory lane speaking up.
• 14:21
  [SPEAKER_01]: Do you remember why Mara Logo was rated by the FBI supposedly?
• 14:27
  [SPEAKER_01]: Why was President Trump indicted by Jack Smith and Palm Beach, Florida?
• 14:31
  [SPEAKER_01]: Is it not because he supposedly miss handled an even leaked classified information?
• 14:39
  [SPEAKER_01]: Even though he has ultimate authority to classify as President United States, he was charged with a crime he couldn't constitutionally commit, but that's besides the point.
• 14:49
  [SPEAKER_01]: Is it therefore not strange given that legacy media precedent?
• 14:54
  [SPEAKER_01]: Is it not uncanny that the same legacy media that bento for backwards 24, 7, and their deliberate efforts to try to stoke public panic over these supposed breaches and natural security and the leaking of classified information is not the least bit concerned about what happened with coming not what isn't that interesting.
• 15:23
  [SPEAKER_01]: I mean, that would be bad enough, but this gets all the more juicier, or this get all the more juicier.
• 15:28
  [SPEAKER_01]: You don't put ERR after more, I tell my students a thousand times that when grading papers.
• 15:34
  [SPEAKER_01]: The FBI documents revealed this wasn't a rogue operation, involving just Komi and his Columbia power.
• 15:42
  [SPEAKER_01]: Komi directly ordered FBI officials, including the now infamous Peter Stroke and Lisa Page,
• 15:48
  [SPEAKER_01]: to provide official assistance to the New York Times for all their anti-Trump articles.
• 15:56
  [SPEAKER_01]: The same stroke who texted about stopping Trump from becoming president, right the same page who called Trump low some in awful.
• 16:05
  [SPEAKER_01]: Obviously these weren't neutral law enforcement officers conducting an investigation and then New York Times knew that.
• 16:15
  [SPEAKER_01]: They were all, all.
• 16:18
  [SPEAKER_01]: political operatives using classified weaponized and classified intelligence to craft media narratives.
• 16:27
  [SPEAKER_01]: Stroke brief the times three separate times and according to the documents, the times explicitly told FBI officials they possess classified information.
• 16:39
  [SPEAKER_01]: But here,
• 16:40
  [SPEAKER_01]: is where it all gets truly outrageous.
• 16:43
  [SPEAKER_01]: And they'll give you a sense of why cash and Banjino just dropped nearly three dozen subpoenas.
• 16:49
  [SPEAKER_01]: You ready for this?
• 16:51
  [SPEAKER_01]: And I'm sure you already know this, but it's just all coming out.
• 16:56
  [SPEAKER_01]: The FBI knew all of this.
• 17:02
  [SPEAKER_01]: The FBI knew all of this.
• 17:10
  [SPEAKER_01]: They had six separate criminal investigations into classified information leaks.
• 17:16
  [SPEAKER_01]: They had the evidence.
• 17:18
  [SPEAKER_01]: They had the testimonies.
• 17:20
  [SPEAKER_01]: They had the smoking guns.
• 17:23
  [SPEAKER_01]: And what did the Justice Department do?
• 17:28
  [SPEAKER_01]: What did Merrick know, one's above the law, Garland do?
• 17:31
  [SPEAKER_01]: Nothing would be,
• 17:37
  [SPEAKER_01]: Nothing would be a misleading understatement.
• 17:42
  [SPEAKER_01]: They intentionally buried it.
• 17:48
  [SPEAKER_01]: They intentionally shut those investigations down.
• 17:54
  [SPEAKER_01]: And so now it looks like all of this is coming crashing down on them.
• 17:58
  [SPEAKER_01]: Again, all the paper tray, the key here is that none of this is partisan speculation.
• 18:04
  [SPEAKER_01]: It's Colme's own words.
• 18:05
  [SPEAKER_01]: It's his own emails.
• 18:07
  [SPEAKER_01]: It's his own contemporaneous records that contradict his sworn testimony.
• 18:11
  [SPEAKER_01]: The case is straightforward.
• 18:12
  [SPEAKER_01]: Did James Colme authorize someone at the FBI to leak to the media?
• 18:17
  [SPEAKER_01]: His email say yes.
• 18:19
  [SPEAKER_01]: His public testimony says no.
• 18:22
  [SPEAKER_01]: One of those statements is a felony.
• 18:24
  [SPEAKER_01]: But if you think things are bad for Colmy, wait until you see what Pam Bondi and Cash Patel have just uncovered with none other than Hillary Clinton.
• 18:36
  [SPEAKER_01]: Some are saying we finally got her.
• 18:38
  [SPEAKER_01]: We finally got this is gonna absolutely blow you away.
• 18:43
  [SPEAKER_01]: But first gang, if you are just joining us our super chats, our ups of feel free to send in your comments and questions, I'll be happy to answer them on our live stream.
• 18:50
  [SPEAKER_01]: Also, this is a good time for all of us, everyone of us, to take steps to protect ourselves and our loved ones online.
• 18:58
  [SPEAKER_01]: And that actually begins with your home title.
• 19:01
  [SPEAKER_01]: Now, if you're a home owner like me, you need to ask yourself, when was the last time you checked on your home title?
• 19:06
  [SPEAKER_01]: Right.
• 19:07
  [SPEAKER_01]: That's the legal proof.
• 19:08
  [SPEAKER_01]: You on your house.
• 19:08
  [SPEAKER_01]: All our titles are online.
• 19:10
  [SPEAKER_01]: When's the last time you checked it?
• 19:12
  [SPEAKER_01]: Well, if you're like me, the answer's never.
• 19:14
  [SPEAKER_01]: But the problem is in today's AI and cyber world, scammers are stealing home titles.
• 19:23
  [SPEAKER_01]: And your equity is the target.
• 19:25
  [SPEAKER_01]: It works so simply.
• 19:26
  [SPEAKER_01]: It's scary.
• 19:27
  [SPEAKER_01]: Criminal's forger signature on one document.
• 19:30
  [SPEAKER_01]: They use a fake notary stamp.
• 19:32
  [SPEAKER_01]: They pay a small little fee with your county.
• 19:35
  [SPEAKER_01]: And boom, that's it, your home title has been transferred out of your name and then they take out all these loans or they they use the equity of your property, some even sell your property and you won't even know it's happened until you get collection notices or foreclosure notices that's why you need to stop what you're doing right now and find out two day if you've already been to victim use promo code to early talks.
• 19:57
  [SPEAKER_01]: At home, title lock.com to make sure your title is still in your name.
• 20:02
  [SPEAKER_01]: You also get a free title history report plus a free 40 day trial.
• 20:06
  [SPEAKER_01]: They're million dollar triple lock protection.
• 20:08
  [SPEAKER_01]: That's 24 seven monitoring of your title.
• 20:11
  [SPEAKER_01]: Urgent alerts to any changes and a fraud should happen.
• 20:14
  [SPEAKER_01]: They'll spend up to $1 million to fix a good home title lock.com right now.
• 20:19
  [SPEAKER_01]: Use promo code, curly talks, a home title lock.com, promo code, curly talks.
• 20:25
  [SPEAKER_01]: Yeah, this is going to blow you away.
• 20:27
  [SPEAKER_01]: Attorney General Pam Bonny and FBI Director Cash Patel.
• 20:31
  [SPEAKER_01]: Just brief Congress on documents exposing the Clinton Foundation as officially a pay-to-play operation.
• 20:41
  [SPEAKER_01]: It was a slush fund.
• 20:43
  [SPEAKER_01]: The evidence shows foreign and domestic interest explicitly donated money to the Clinton Foundation expecting American policy influence in return including while Hillary Clinton served as Secretary of State and it gets worse you're not going to believe this we are now learning that federal justice department officials connected to none other than special counsel Jack Smith team.
• 21:09
  [SPEAKER_01]: work to shut down an FBI inquiry into whether Hillary Clinton's 2016 presidential campaign violated campaign finance law, specifically involving the funding of the steel dossier through intermediaries, this according to newly released email.
• 21:27
  [SPEAKER_01]: So you all remember the steel dossier, right?
• 21:30
  [SPEAKER_01]: That's the
• 21:33
  [SPEAKER_01]: That depicted all these salacious details about Trump that Vladimir Putin was supposedly blackmailing him with, right, you remember that.
• 21:42
  [SPEAKER_01]: Well, that does, yeah, which was actually used as evidence for the Pfizer warrants to spy on Trump, by none other than James Komi.
• 21:50
  [SPEAKER_01]: I mean, all of this is just so incredibly interconnected.
• 21:53
  [SPEAKER_01]: It's just such a, oh, just such a nefarious web that was spun here.
• 21:59
  [SPEAKER_01]: But regardless, I'm just gonna go with the subpoenas as they're coming out to organize what happened here.
• 22:05
  [SPEAKER_01]: That dossier was bought and paid for by the Hillary Clinton campaign through her law firm Perkins Kooey.
• 22:14
  [SPEAKER_01]: Now, the Federal Election Commission ruled back in 2022 that there was indeed probable cause to believe that Hillary's campaign violated federal law by misreporting payments to the agency that put that dossier together.
• 22:29
  [SPEAKER_01]: So the Clinton campaign reportedly paid $175,000.
• 22:33
  [SPEAKER_01]: to the law firm pertains to Perkins Kooey, which then contracted with this agency Fusion GPS for the opposition research, right?
• 22:45
  [SPEAKER_01]: It's very simple.
• 22:46
  [SPEAKER_01]: Clinton campaign pays her law firm who turns around and pays for the opposition recently.
• 22:52
  [SPEAKER_01]: However, the Clinton campaign labeled these expenses as quote, legal services.
• 22:57
  [SPEAKER_01]: They were legal services deliberately obscuring their true purpose, which was opposition research to try to thwart a candidate.
• 23:04
  [SPEAKER_01]: Remember, the Clinton campaign funneled all these CD operations through their law office so as to be able to hide behind attorney client privilege, right?
• 23:14
  [SPEAKER_01]: So their law office was basically a front to cloak all these nefarious activities.
• 23:20
  [SPEAKER_01]: So the Clinton campaign lawyer, Mark Elias, he hired Fusion GPS, which subsequently hired British former intelligence officer, Christopher Steele, to produce the anti-Trump.
• 23:33
  [SPEAKER_01]: So I'll see, again, you cannot make this up.
• 23:36
  [SPEAKER_01]: It was the Clinton campaign that actually brought in foreign influence to try to and ordinantly influence the campaign.
• 23:46
  [SPEAKER_01]: It was a Clinton campaign that was colluding
• 23:49
  [SPEAKER_01]: with a foreign influence, namely Christopher Steele, former British agent.
• 23:53
  [SPEAKER_01]: So that's why it's often referred to as the Steele Dolcea because he's more or less the author.
• 23:57
  [SPEAKER_01]: He compiled this fabricated Dolcea of all these supposed salacious details of Trump that Putin was using to blackmail him.
• 24:06
  [SPEAKER_01]: Special counsel, John Durham.
• 24:09
  [SPEAKER_01]: later determined that Clinton campaign officials, Fusion GPS, that's the opt research, and Perkins Kooey, that's the law firm, all acted jointly in coordination in advancing collusion narratives during the 2016 race and beyond and trying to thwart President Trump's, President sabotages presidency.
• 24:32
  [SPEAKER_01]: But here's what makes this criminal beyond merely Clinton's corruption.
• 24:36
  [SPEAKER_01]: It's a corruption that infects the very core of the justice department in the FBI.
• 24:42
  [SPEAKER_01]: I mentioned Jack Smith shutting down the investigation into the campaign fraud, right?
• 24:47
  [SPEAKER_01]: Just like what we were seeing repeatedly with James Komi in the light.
• 24:51
  [SPEAKER_01]: We are now learning.
• 24:53
  [SPEAKER_01]: that the FBI had three separate investigations in a Clinton Foundation paid to play allegations while she was secretary of state, but all three investigations were ordered shut down by Obama Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates.
• 25:10
  [SPEAKER_01]: FBI agents uncovered evidence of the pay to play scheme back in 2016, but DOJ leadership and FBI deputy director Andrew McCabe ordered them to cease investigating completely.
• 25:25
  [SPEAKER_01]: Documents show that in February 2016, McCabe directed that no investigative steps on the Clinton Foundation could be taken without his approval.
• 25:36
  [SPEAKER_01]: and then in March of 2016, Sally Yates ordered the investigation shut down entirely.
• 25:44
  [SPEAKER_01]: And of course, this is all part of an ongoing recurring pattern in the FBI, where Democrat corruption, all the leaks that we saw, the Hillary Clinton stuff in the line, the crossfire hurricane, it's all routinely and blatantly covered up.
• 26:02
  [SPEAKER_01]: Case in point, we're now getting new evidence that's resurfacing about Joe Biden's bribery scandal.
• 26:10
  [SPEAKER_01]: I mean, you can't, again, you can't make this stuff up.
• 26:14
  [SPEAKER_01]: Sources familiar with FBI documents told Fox News that Joe Biden and Hunter Biden were each paid.
• 26:21
  [SPEAKER_01]: I kid you not $10 million in bribes by Ukraine while Biden was vice president.
• 26:30
  [SPEAKER_01]: This is according to Fox News.
• 26:32
  [SPEAKER_01]: A highly credible, confidential FBI source had multiple meetings over five years with a barisma executive who admitted that barisma, again, that's the corrupt Ukrainian energy company.
• 26:45
  [SPEAKER_01]: He admitted that barisma paid the Biden's to get rid of a meddling Ukrainian prosecutor investigating barisma for corruption.
• 26:56
  [SPEAKER_01]: The FBI documented these conversations in June of 2020 right as Biden was securing the Democrat nomination, yet the information was once again deliberately suppressed by FBI officials along, of course, with Hunter Biden's laptop.
• 27:14
  [SPEAKER_01]: And the pattern just goes on and on and on and on.
• 27:19
  [SPEAKER_01]: But thankfully,
• 27:22
  [SPEAKER_01]: that pattern has left a big enough paper trail.
• 27:26
  [SPEAKER_01]: They didn't have enough burn bags for it.
• 27:29
  [SPEAKER_01]: That appears to be the occasion for it to come crashing down.
• 27:36
  [SPEAKER_01]: What's so interesting here, Gang, is that, and as we wrap this up, and I wanna hear what you have to say, scholars have studied the signs and the characteristics of what happens,
• 27:49
  [SPEAKER_01]: when corrupt intelligence agencies around the world begin to quote the collapse.
• 27:55
  [SPEAKER_01]: When government intelligence agencies begin to dissent toward failure and eventual implosion, they don't just simply vanish overnight.
• 28:05
  [SPEAKER_01]: Instead scholars who study institutional breakdown have identified a number predictable warning signs that emerge.
• 28:16
  [SPEAKER_01]: in a specific kind of pattern, like dominoes falling in a sequence, each failure accelerating the next.
• 28:23
  [SPEAKER_01]: And I think understanding these patterns, isn't just academic curiosity.
• 28:28
  [SPEAKER_01]: It's essential for recognizing when the very institutions designed to protect national security end up becoming threats to the very democratic systems they were designed to serve.
• 28:40
  [SPEAKER_01]: And the extent to which such corrupt agencies begin to topple under the weight of their own corruption, I believe they're all showing them.
• 28:51
  [SPEAKER_01]: So the signs are all showing themselves right now, as we speak.
• 28:56
  [SPEAKER_01]: It's very interesting, it's very easy.
• 28:58
  [SPEAKER_01]: Sort of a three-fold step as I understand it.
• 29:01
  [SPEAKER_01]: It of course begins with the corruption itself.
• 29:04
  [SPEAKER_01]: And scholars note that when agencies just start weaponizing intelligence and tailoring it to match predetermined political conclusions rather than providing unbiased assessments they end up losing their fundamental purpose they actually lose their effectiveness right they end up compromising the very rationale for why they exist at all because they're no longer.
• 29:28
  [SPEAKER_01]: They're no longer run by intelligence competence, but rather by ideological fidelity.
• 29:35
  [SPEAKER_01]: So this politicalization manifests itself in several ways.
• 29:40
  [SPEAKER_01]: And again, this just comes as part of just being part of this overall political bureaucracy, that inevitably, they just seem to fall victim to weaponization, you know.
• 29:52
  [SPEAKER_01]: Analysts of intelligence analysts face pressure to reach specific inclusions for political reasons, dissenting opinions, those who are actually honest, they get suppressed, they're the ones that get passed over for promotion, and intelligence estimates become weapons in political battles rather than tools for making informed decision.
• 30:19
  [SPEAKER_01]: And so the entire system, just by its nature, ends up degenerating, right?
• 30:25
  [SPEAKER_01]: So just the moment you end up having corruption, a peer in a system that was designed for actual objective data analysis, the whole thing ends up becoming like, what is it?
• 30:42
  [SPEAKER_01]: What's the guy?
• 30:43
  [SPEAKER_01]: Sam Bankman freed, you know, it ends up just the thing it's it's supposed to be like this crypto objective, you know data and it all of a sudden just ends up falling apart after it after the process of the rot that comes from corruption and as a result, I mean these failing intelligence agencies.
• 31:03
  [SPEAKER_01]: experience massive talent hemorrhage.
• 31:07
  [SPEAKER_01]: So that's kind of like the second thing as I understand that happens.
• 31:10
  [SPEAKER_01]: They just experience a competence crisis.
• 31:12
  [SPEAKER_01]: So general what happens is that
• 31:15
  [SPEAKER_01]: when professional analysts who are really good lose faith in their institutions integrity, they just send up leaving and they end up exiting in mass.
• 31:26
  [SPEAKER_01]: And then this brain drain creates you know, a vicious cycle, a doom loop in that as experienced professionals to part institutional knowledge evaporates.
• 31:36
  [SPEAKER_01]: analytical quality deteriorates and remaining staff becoming increasingly demoralized or they doubled down on their ideological radicalness, which only exacerbates the competence crisis.
• 31:49
  [SPEAKER_01]: We actually saw this in the 90s, since this happened before, not to the extent that we're seeing now, I believe.
• 31:56
  [SPEAKER_01]: But
• 31:57
  [SPEAKER_01]: It just happened after the fall of the Soviet Union, the end of the Cold War, the Defense Intelligence Agency experienced a mass organizational decline in the early 90s, when budget cuts, combined with unclear missions, right?
• 32:12
  [SPEAKER_01]: Let's just widespread departures of experienced analysts.
• 32:15
  [SPEAKER_01]: And it left the agency unprepared for emerging threats, like terrorism and regional conflicts, perhaps I'd have to look at some studies, but perhaps that's where we started to see this radical kind of ideological weaponization inside these intelligence agencies beginning.
• 32:34
  [SPEAKER_01]: Certainly we saw a lot of that during the Gulf War that came at
• 32:41
  [SPEAKER_01]: There are rock war in the 2000s where a lot of intelligence scenes to have been deliberately manipulated to push sort of this pro WMD's Saddam WMD's narrative.
• 32:54
  [SPEAKER_01]: Well, that's been happening in the late, of course, on steroids, you know, with the wokeification of our intelligence agencies, that really did begin under Obama and just accelerated through Trump's first term and Biden.
• 33:08
  [SPEAKER_01]: they've gone through a severe brain drain, which has left these three letter agencies susceptible to institutional decay, and that decay ultimately manifests itself in more corruption.
• 33:19
  [SPEAKER_01]: So do you see how this is a doom loop, right?
• 33:22
  [SPEAKER_01]: And that's when we begin to see the transformation of public institutions really, just into vehicles for personal political advancement rather national service.
• 33:32
  [SPEAKER_01]: So scholars have know that failing intelligence agencies
• 33:36
  [SPEAKER_01]: They exhibit, they call it, the term is called patrimonial rule, going back to the Roman era of patrimony.
• 33:45
  [SPEAKER_01]: But it's bottom line, it's where leaders extract resources from public institutions for personal benefit.
• 33:53
  [SPEAKER_01]: and then what they do is they hide behind the veneer of national security to justify their actions.
• 34:00
  [SPEAKER_01]: So again, they're never at fault for what they do, because whatever they do is always justified by virtue of their position inside national security.
• 34:10
  [SPEAKER_01]: So this just creates a culture where
• 34:14
  [SPEAKER_01]: career advancement depends more on political loyalty, then professional competence.
• 34:19
  [SPEAKER_01]: And again, that's exactly what we've been seeing in our three letter agencies.
• 34:24
  [SPEAKER_01]: But the key here is that all of this corruption that we've been seeing the FBI and the CIA is actually a major indicator that these institutions are imploding.
• 34:36
  [SPEAKER_01]: And the final stage of that implosion involves the complete collapse of public trust and political support.
• 34:43
  [SPEAKER_01]: So it's the crisis of legitimacy, as it's called or technically the de-legitimation.
• 34:49
  [SPEAKER_01]: uh... that we always talk about here that is really kind of the final nail on the coffin of these dying three letter agencies when intelligence agencies are perceived as part of the actors rather neutral professionals they lose the legitimacy necessary to function effectively in democratic societies and research shows that once public trust collapses
• 35:14
  [SPEAKER_01]: Like what we saw in many ways in the 1970s church committee, revelations about CIA abuses are what we saw with the Soviet Union.
• 35:21
  [SPEAKER_01]: It either takes decades to restore or the whole thing like with the Soviet Union just collapses like a house of cards.
• 35:28
  [SPEAKER_01]: And that's of course exactly why Trump won in November.
• 35:32
  [SPEAKER_01]: Patriots like you all across the country recognize that the system was
• 35:41
  [SPEAKER_01]: from those from the outside and all these subpoenas and the eventual mass indictments are exactly what the Trump administration needs to be doing to ensure not only that his coalition stays strong and healthy and intact and vibrant, but even more important that justice and accountability will finally come to those who up until now believed.
• 36:12
  [SPEAKER_01]: No one's above the law.
• 36:14
  [SPEAKER_01]: Are they over to you?
• 36:15
  [SPEAKER_01]: Over to you as Joshua moderator assembles your questions.
• 36:18
  [SPEAKER_01]: If you've been wanting to get into the crypto game to escape the fledgling Wall Street globalist system, this is it, gang.
• 36:25
  [SPEAKER_01]: This is the single best opportunity you are ever going to get.
• 36:29
  [SPEAKER_01]: If you don't know the crypto revolution that's happening right now,
• 36:33
  [SPEAKER_01]: represents the single largest wealth transfer in American history over 80,000 new millionaires were created last year because of crypto.
• 36:43
  [SPEAKER_01]: But of course, the turnoff is its volatility.
• 36:46
  [SPEAKER_01]: Yeah, the extreme highs are great, the 30 to 40, 50 percent returns.
• 36:49
  [SPEAKER_01]: But what about the equally extreme lows?
• 36:52
  [SPEAKER_01]: Well, guess what, gang?
• 36:53
  [SPEAKER_01]: Guess what?
• 36:54
  [SPEAKER_01]: Your experience of that volatility is now officially a thing of the past,
• 37:03
  [SPEAKER_01]: The Bitcoin magazine has named the number one crypto technology platform in the world among 1500 global competitors.
• 37:11
  [SPEAKER_01]: And what that super AI does is it works 24, 7, and it analyzes global market data and predicts with uncanny accuracy, the highs and the lows, a crypto volatility, block trust IRA sells at the highs, and then it buys again at the lows, which mitigates the volatility, all the while you stand to make incredible gains.
• 37:31
  [SPEAKER_01]: That's why I'm a proud
• 37:33
  [SPEAKER_01]: I got my own account with them, and I absolutely love them, gang, and I know you will too.
• 37:37
  [SPEAKER_01]: So you've never gotten into the crypto game yet.
• 37:39
  [SPEAKER_01]: Let block trust IRA, ease you in.
• 37:42
  [SPEAKER_01]: Click on that link below or visit trolleytalkscrypto.com and find out how they can help you join the Trump financial revolution.
• 37:50
  [SPEAKER_01]: It's finally giving for gotten Americans access to the greatest crypto wealth opportunity in history.
• 37:58
  [SPEAKER_01]: And the best part for a limited time.
• 38:00
  [SPEAKER_01]: They're offering my viewers up to $2,500 in bonus crypto when you open up an account with them.
• 38:05
  [SPEAKER_01]: It's absolutely a me and may's do not wait on this.
• 38:08
  [SPEAKER_01]: Visit turlytoxcrypto.com.
• 38:11
  [SPEAKER_01]: That's turlytoxcrypto.com.
• 38:14
  [SPEAKER_01]: All right, Josh over to you.
• 38:15
  [SPEAKER_01]: What do we got?
• 38:16
  [SPEAKER_01]: What do we got?
• 38:17
  [SPEAKER_01]: Max, a million.
• 38:20
  [SPEAKER_01]: Uh, let's see, it's so the scriptura and scientific rationalism, both failure and test.
• 38:26
  [SPEAKER_01]: How do we reconcile the roles they played in the American found it easy question, surely?
• 38:32
  [SPEAKER_01]: Oh, my, oh, my, if they fail their tests.
• 38:36
  [SPEAKER_01]: Um, I think the answer to that is, um, uh, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it,
• 38:43
  [SPEAKER_01]: It depends who you ask as to whether they failed the test.
• 38:50
  [SPEAKER_01]: Scientific rationalism for sure.
• 38:54
  [SPEAKER_01]: I think that's a strong argument that can be made.
• 38:56
  [SPEAKER_01]: I don't know how I know some will argue that our founding fathers were the
• 39:06
  [SPEAKER_01]: the product of the enlightenment.
• 39:07
  [SPEAKER_01]: Well, I think everyone would argue that the product of the enlightenment, 18th century alignment.
• 39:12
  [SPEAKER_01]: But it's really it's really which side of the enlightenment they were on.
• 39:15
  [SPEAKER_01]: There was the radical side that says, you know, there is a one-size-fits-all way of knowing the world.
• 39:21
  [SPEAKER_01]: But there was another side sort of the Edmund Burke side that were still that wanted to embrace this new found knowledge and science and so forth, but we're still very, very dedicated to tradition and I think that was our founding fathers, they were still dedicated to tradition in that in that.
• 39:39
  [SPEAKER_01]: they allowed, they created a system that allowed localized governance, localized communities to flourish.
• 39:50
  [SPEAKER_01]: And that to me is the key to understanding the nature of our republic.
• 39:56
  [SPEAKER_01]: Our republic is one where the federal government function more as a system that held together
• 40:04
  [SPEAKER_01]: flourishing and very, very Christian localized societies.
• 40:11
  [SPEAKER_01]: And so I
• 40:13
  [SPEAKER_01]: I just think then it gets to the question of, well, what do you do with soloscriptor?
• 40:19
  [SPEAKER_01]: I don't know how many of them were like committed to soloscriptor, yes, they were Protestants in the line.
• 40:23
  [SPEAKER_01]: But keep in mind, many of them are Anglicans, right?
• 40:26
  [SPEAKER_01]: And so Anglicans have a, shall we say an ambiguous relationship to soloscriptor.
• 40:33
  [SPEAKER_01]: Certainly not akin to the epistemological reformed
• 40:37
  [SPEAKER_01]: position the solicitor.
• 40:39
  [SPEAKER_01]: Sorry if you guys are not not familiar with all these theological terms, I'll just for those of you who are, I'll just bottom line, uh, solicitor is the notion that the Bible is the sole and fallible authority for all matters of faith and like today.
• 40:54
  [SPEAKER_01]: It wasn't during the era of the apostles or during the Old Testament, but it is post-apostolic era for us today.
• 41:01
  [SPEAKER_01]: and more Roman Catholic Orthodox Anglican traditions see scripture as part of a wider wider and palable tradition than just scripture alone.
• 41:15
  [SPEAKER_01]: So I know I think the founding fathers
• 41:18
  [SPEAKER_01]: vision of a republic of virtue is necessarily dependent on soliccriptor as much as it ironically is dependent on a more traditionalist wing of the enlightenment.
• 41:31
  [SPEAKER_01]: So, but if there is a weakness in the American founding, it may you may have identified it, it may be found in the lack of strength in both those areas.
• 41:44
  [SPEAKER_01]: That's very, very fascinating.
• 41:46
  [SPEAKER_01]: It's always
• 41:51
  [SPEAKER_01]: Sedan bonding needs to resign.
• 41:53
  [SPEAKER_01]: Oh, I don't know.
• 41:53
  [SPEAKER_01]: I wouldn't do mon bonding.
• 41:55
  [SPEAKER_01]: Oh, yeah, maybe we'll save.
• 41:57
  [SPEAKER_01]: I'm for me.
• 41:57
  [SPEAKER_01]: My whole thing's give her a year.
• 41:59
  [SPEAKER_01]: That's up to January 20th.
• 42:02
  [SPEAKER_01]: Interestingly enough, we've got now this grand jury.
• 42:06
  [SPEAKER_01]: Who's meeting in Southern.
• 42:08
  [SPEAKER_01]: I keep saying Southern California, why am I doing that?
• 42:11
  [SPEAKER_01]: That's the second time today.
• 42:12
  [SPEAKER_01]: There must be some subliminal message in my minds is San Bernardino or San Diego, I'm gonna succeed or something, I don't know.
• 42:22
  [SPEAKER_01]: But we have a mass amount of indictments that would come from that grandeur in meeting in Southern Florida, ironically, as I understand, just now away from Mara Logo.
• 42:37
  [SPEAKER_01]: And that would that would involve in dotting the whole of crossfire hurricane, which is exactly what Tulsi had recommended, um, basically calling, uh, Obama and everyone involved in the Russian collusion, hoax, uh, treasonous.
• 42:53
  [SPEAKER_01]: So anyway, we'll see, we'll see, but don't, yeah, don't do me, don't, don't get too do me.
• 42:59
  [SPEAKER_01]: Oh, I got to see so winter Democrats could demand the rest of Bill Clinton Bill Gates and everyone else on the Epstein list now they demanded the release and Trump is clear to LOL I know they'll sweep it on the rug.
• 43:11
  [SPEAKER_01]: Yeah, they already are they already are they're voting to release
• 43:16
  [SPEAKER_01]: all of the files and Democrats are getting very, very nervous with that and they're showing their hand.
• 43:22
  [SPEAKER_01]: They don't want to release it.
• 43:24
  [SPEAKER_01]: They just want to leak it and they only want to leak those parts that ambiguously implicate Trump by the very
• 43:33
  [SPEAKER_01]: by the very people that testified under oath that Trump was not involved with Epstein in any way, shape, or form other than just how billionaires cross-pollinate in Florida and New York.
• 43:49
  [SPEAKER_01]: He was, obviously, he was in both New York and Florida.
• 43:52
  [SPEAKER_01]: both of them were.
• 43:53
  [SPEAKER_01]: And that was it.
• 43:54
  [SPEAKER_01]: They had nothing to do with it.
• 43:55
  [SPEAKER_01]: So absolutely, in the end, I just think just like the shutdown enabled Trump to pivot to domestic issues when it came to saying, offer HSAs and replace the Obamacare subsidies, or if he's talking about offering
• 44:22
  [SPEAKER_01]: Looking at the meat packing.
• 44:24
  [SPEAKER_01]: having the DOJ investigate meatpacking companies, particularly Brazilian foreign meatpacking companies to see to what extent they're jacking up prices artificially, it enabled him to pivot to domestic issues and it pulled the rug out from under Chuck Schumer's feet.
• 44:41
  [SPEAKER_01]: He had nothing else.
• 44:42
  [SPEAKER_01]: Everyone else will want at least eight Democrats, seven Democrats will want independent
• 44:52
  [SPEAKER_01]: moderate Democrats in the house, jump ship and jump ship fast.
• 44:57
  [SPEAKER_01]: And I think, yeah, I think it's going to be the same thing here.
• 45:00
  [SPEAKER_01]: I think Trump can seize this and start just like they did drop the 50,000 documents from from Epstein's estate.
• 45:10
  [SPEAKER_01]: And just just pummel the Democrats with this.
• 45:14
  [SPEAKER_01]: They're already saying he's only doing this to dilute his own involvement in it.
• 45:18
  [SPEAKER_01]: Well, okay.
• 45:18
  [SPEAKER_01]: Well, we'll see who he's going to dilute it with.
• 45:21
  [SPEAKER_01]: Obviously Clinton getting, you know, backrubs from one of the victims.
• 45:25
  [SPEAKER_01]: We got pictures on that.
• 45:26
  [SPEAKER_01]: We got pictures of Clinton on the, on the, on the, you know, what was it?
• 45:31
  [SPEAKER_01]: Lola on the.
• 45:31
  [SPEAKER_01]: I mean on the flight is private chat.
• 45:34
  [SPEAKER_01]: I mean, it's just crazy.
• 45:35
  [SPEAKER_01]: I don't know why the Democrats are doing this.
• 45:37
  [SPEAKER_01]: They just they just seem to go for their wildly coyote They just go from from one blow up in your face to another after another
• 45:50
  [SPEAKER_01]: ROT Corps, Dr.
• 45:51
  [SPEAKER_01]: Truly, with Mayor Brandon Johnson, Chicago, Mamdoni, New York, and now the newest communist mayor in Seattle.
• 45:56
  [SPEAKER_01]: Seems like communism is spreading America.
• 45:58
  [SPEAKER_01]: Can we be confident that we'll just remain in these liberal cities?
• 46:00
  [SPEAKER_01]: Can we expect it to eventually reverse and not take over 70 plus years?
• 46:04
  [SPEAKER_01]: Yes, yes.
• 46:06
  [SPEAKER_01]: It's already happening because they end up experiencing a massive
• 46:13
  [SPEAKER_01]: that only grows the power of red state.
• 46:16
  [SPEAKER_01]: So again, this is exactly what Governor Kathy Hockel is just flipping out over with what's going on in New York and Mamdoni.
• 46:29
  [SPEAKER_01]: She is scared.
• 46:30
  [SPEAKER_01]: Remember, in New York, as I'm just not just New York City, New York is a whole.
• 46:35
  [SPEAKER_01]: 1% of taxpayers pay for 30% of all taxes.
• 46:39
  [SPEAKER_01]: Man, Donnie wants to make it 60% of all taxes.
• 46:44
  [SPEAKER_01]: They've already lost hundreds of billions of dollars.
• 46:52
  [SPEAKER_01]: in tax revenue because of the left-e-g crisis of people leaving and they're going they're going to Connecticut, neighboring Connecticut, they're going to New Jersey, they're going to New Hampshire, that has very low taxes, although they tend to be left-wing Republicans up there.
• 47:09
  [SPEAKER_01]: They have a plus five plus six Republican registration advantage, but they always go blue because they're just these secular liberal wackos up there, but I know I'm
• 47:20
  [SPEAKER_01]: That's my sentiment to the ladies from my perspective.
• 47:23
  [SPEAKER_01]: So what's happening is yes, they may become, they may become governors of their states, but all they're going to do is exasperate.
• 47:31
  [SPEAKER_01]: that flight.
• 47:32
  [SPEAKER_01]: I do believe, and I've been predicting this for a while.
• 47:35
  [SPEAKER_01]: I do believe we are the default civil war, not even civil war.
• 47:41
  [SPEAKER_01]: What I call the soft secession that's happening today is that red states are getting redder blue states are getting bluer.
• 47:49
  [SPEAKER_01]: And eventually, eventually, I don't think you're going to have any.
• 47:53
  [SPEAKER_01]: Republican represented from any blue states, I don't think you're going to have any Democrat represents for at for many red states because they are going to double down on their separation of each other.
• 48:05
  [SPEAKER_01]: And so this is why, I mean, we do have to keep an eye on succession of sentiments thriving in the country.
• 48:12
  [SPEAKER_01]: So all of that's to say they can gain all the power they want in blue states, all they're going to do is
• 48:18
  [SPEAKER_01]: is exacerbate the mass residential and tax paying exodus that is already underway and virtually every single blue stick.
• 48:32
  [SPEAKER_01]: Sympologic off topic, but I feel a golden age has even started quote me on this by spring 26.
• 48:38
  [SPEAKER_01]: We will truly see it begin.
• 48:40
  [SPEAKER_01]: Panicans will eat their words.
• 48:41
  [SPEAKER_01]: I'm with you, Sympologic.
• 48:42
  [SPEAKER_01]: I love it.
• 48:43
  [SPEAKER_01]: You always give Sympologic to your wonderful, very clear thinker.
• 48:46
  [SPEAKER_01]: Now I'm with you.
• 48:47
  [SPEAKER_01]: I think again, we're just, you know, we're at Reagan had, it took Reagan two years, more than two years.
• 48:55
  [SPEAKER_01]: And things did not start absolutely exploding to 83.
• 49:00
  [SPEAKER_01]: So, and then, by 84, he could run on its morning in America again, where just the economy was just... We hadn't seen an economy like that since, well, anyway, since Nixon, right?
• 49:14
  [SPEAKER_01]: But, or since the beginning of the post World War II, Baby Boom Explosion.
• 49:19
  [SPEAKER_01]: So, yeah, I'm with you.
• 49:21
  [SPEAKER_01]: I think everything is being set up.
• 49:23
  [SPEAKER_01]: That's why I think he's getting a little...
• 49:26
  [SPEAKER_01]: He's getting a little annoyed at what, the lack of faith.
• 49:32
  [SPEAKER_01]: Because I mean, if you think about everything that's happened, the mass deportations that are going on, we're talking, we're about to hit three million within the next few months.
• 49:43
  [SPEAKER_01]: You're closing in the border.
• 49:45
  [SPEAKER_01]: We're now at a net negative immigration for the first time in what, like decades, net negative.
• 49:52
  [SPEAKER_01]: More immigrants are leaving than are coming in.
• 49:55
  [SPEAKER_01]: We have manufacturing industry coming in.
• 49:57
  [SPEAKER_01]: We have trillions of dollars of investment money pouring in from all over the world, hundreds of billions in tariff revenue that are going out in these form of dividend checks to work in class tax paying Americans.
• 50:15
  [SPEAKER_01]: I mean, you know, wokeness is basically dead and buried.
• 50:20
  [SPEAKER_01]: It's been consigned to the bowels of hell, where it belongs.
• 50:23
  [SPEAKER_01]: I mean, you could just go on and on and on.
• 50:26
  [SPEAKER_01]: The Democrats are in disarray.
• 50:27
  [SPEAKER_01]: They have no leader.
• 50:29
  [SPEAKER_01]: They're, they had a little reprieve of that because they did well in elections that all favor Democrats going in.
• 50:39
  [SPEAKER_01]: They did, they did what they were supposed to do and they think that's a victory.
• 50:44
  [SPEAKER_01]: And then they had that, again, the rug pulled out from under them when they had eight Democrats defect and joined with the Republicans.
• 50:56
  [SPEAKER_01]: So they're, I mean, they're just in disarray and Trump is crushing it.
• 51:00
  [SPEAKER_01]: So I'm with you.
• 51:01
  [SPEAKER_01]: I mean, again, I know we're seeing some some fear and anxiety among portions of the base.
• 51:08
  [SPEAKER_01]: the Trump coalition.
• 51:09
  [SPEAKER_01]: He does need to address that and they are.
• 51:12
  [SPEAKER_01]: They are.
• 51:13
  [SPEAKER_01]: There are pivoting to domestic issues.
• 51:15
  [SPEAKER_01]: JD is made that absolutely clear that that's going to be their number one focus all the way up to the midterms.
• 51:23
  [SPEAKER_01]: Hi, Q.
• 51:24
  [SPEAKER_01]: Thank you for the bound sterling, lib, celebrate cancel culture.
• 51:26
  [SPEAKER_01]: They eventually turn on each other with it.
• 51:28
  [SPEAKER_01]: Now they celebrate the assassination culture.
• 51:30
  [SPEAKER_01]: Wow.
• 51:31
  [SPEAKER_01]: Wow.
• 51:32
  [SPEAKER_01]: That's good.
• 51:33
  [SPEAKER_01]: That's good.
• 51:34
  [SPEAKER_01]: That's good.
• 51:35
  [SPEAKER_01]: Yeah.
• 51:36
  [SPEAKER_01]: Yeah.
• 51:36
  [SPEAKER_01]: I'm I'm curious how it is over there in the UK with with how your own cancel culture is manifesting itself and and somewhat the same if it's if it's working itself out in the same way.
• 51:48
  [SPEAKER_01]: But yes, they are embracing assassination cultures exactly right.
• 51:51
  [SPEAKER_01]: That's the records study.
• 51:53
  [SPEAKER_01]: that's when it's calling it.
• 51:55
  [SPEAKER_01]: The majority of self-identified leftists believed it was at least somewhat justifiable to take out President Trump, which is horrifying.
• 52:06
  [SPEAKER_01]: And it was done in the spring, so it was the time that Doge and Elon Musk were still very much a part of things, and it was
• 52:19
  [SPEAKER_01]: it's it's it's pretty horrible stuff but like you said it eventually it ends up turning on itself and I think that's what you're seeing what's going on right now is it looks like the progressive wing of the democrat party honestly believes they're not winning because they're not woke enough they actually believe this and they look at Mamedani or this new mayor and Seattle was in the examples of that brand in Johnson
• 52:45
  [SPEAKER_01]: And they're ready to primary and and get into a civil war battle with all the so called moderate Democrats and it's just going to be glorious all throughout this year.
• 52:59
  [SPEAKER_01]: Franz, where does Zionism fit into the civilizationalist era where border economic and cultural security are societal priorities?
• 53:09
  [SPEAKER_01]: Are you talking about, for us in the United States?
• 53:13
  [SPEAKER_01]: Because obviously in Zionism, Zionism is, that the, as I understand, it's the project of Greater Israel in the Middle East and ultimately for Israel to be, not just that,
• 53:27
  [SPEAKER_01]: Not just the land, the...
• 53:30
  [SPEAKER_01]: Not just the land belonging to Israel, but Israel being the primary geopolitical force in the Middle East.
• 53:42
  [SPEAKER_01]: Well, if you're asking, how does it fit in with here at home like with the latest kind of like Tucker Shapiro debates or the Candace Owens and Mark Levin's and so on?
• 53:59
  [SPEAKER_01]: I mean, there's two ways of looking at it.
• 54:01
  [SPEAKER_01]: It seems to me at one level it doesn't.
• 54:05
  [SPEAKER_01]: It's the it's the lag.
• 54:06
  [SPEAKER_01]: It's the hangover from globalism.
• 54:10
  [SPEAKER_01]: We have to remember that.
• 54:12
  [SPEAKER_01]: During the era of the height of the Cold War, Israel was our number one middle eastern Hegemon against the Soviet Union.
• 54:25
  [SPEAKER_01]: Our head, I should say, against the Soviet Union.
• 54:29
  [SPEAKER_01]: We, of course, had Saudi Arabia as well, UAE.
• 54:32
  [SPEAKER_01]: We had Pakistan, but Israel was sort of the
• 54:38
  [SPEAKER_01]: Israel was the axis around which the spokes of our Middle Eastern policy that sought to contain the Soviet Union, you know, centered.
• 54:53
  [SPEAKER_01]: So after the fall of the Soviet Union, as part of our unipolar moment,
• 55:01
  [SPEAKER_01]: and the end of history where we're going to turn all the world into splitting images of liberal democracy like ourselves.
• 55:14
  [SPEAKER_01]: Again Israel became a very key ally in that region to help
• 55:20
  [SPEAKER_01]: in that very frankly, ironically, messianic mission.
• 55:26
  [SPEAKER_01]: As the world now breaks away from any sense of ideology, liberal democracy, whatever it is, so you know, communism, whatever it is.
• 55:37
  [SPEAKER_01]: As the world breaks away from ideology, it becomes more and more civilizatialist and looking at more board of security, economic security, cultural security centered on identity and cultural identity.
• 55:49
  [SPEAKER_01]: that alliance just makes less and less sense in of itself.
• 55:54
  [SPEAKER_01]: America first people don't want to got they don't care about Israel and they don't care about Iran.
• 56:01
  [SPEAKER_01]: They don't care about the Middle East.
• 56:02
  [SPEAKER_01]: They care about middle America.
• 56:04
  [SPEAKER_01]: They don't care about foreign policy.
• 56:05
  [SPEAKER_01]: They care about food prices.
• 56:07
  [SPEAKER_01]: So as we become more
• 56:09
  [SPEAKER_01]: America first, more nationalist, more civilizatialist, we're going to be thinking about our hedge-em-on, our sphere, and much, much less about anything that's going on in the Middle East, whether if Israel wants to do a greater Israel project, hey man, more power to you, but that's your deal, don't ask us to help you.
• 56:30
  [SPEAKER_01]: So at one level, I would argue,
• 56:32
  [SPEAKER_01]: that it's got nothing to do with it.
• 56:35
  [SPEAKER_01]: It's a hangover.
• 56:35
  [SPEAKER_01]: It's got nothing to do with the civilization of the era.
• 56:38
  [SPEAKER_01]: It's a hangover of globalism.
• 56:39
  [SPEAKER_01]: It's hangover of the Cold War and then the one-size-fits-all you know, Pax Americana that really did die out officially as of 2016 with the election of Trump.
• 56:52
  [SPEAKER_01]: And then just the the rise of the so-called far-right, the Poccos, right, all throughout Europe and all throughout the world and many respects.
• 56:59
  [SPEAKER_01]: What we're seeing on the other hand is a concerted attempt of by many to try to keep
• 57:14
  [SPEAKER_01]: the Israel-America Alliance very much in tech through civilizational rhetoric.
• 57:21
  [SPEAKER_01]: So the argument there is, and in fairness, I mean, you'll see this with, like, Gehrt Builders of the Netherlands, who's a nationalist populist, but he'll say, no, we need to be 100% behind Israel.
• 57:36
  [SPEAKER_01]: because they represent the future of Western civilization in that region far more obviously and contrast to an Islamic civilization.
• 57:47
  [SPEAKER_01]: So they're part of that's where you get the whole Judeo-Christian civilization as over and against an Islamic northern African, Middle Eastern civilization.
• 57:56
  [SPEAKER_01]: So they're trying to make the argument that defensive
• 58:00
  [SPEAKER_01]: of a civilizational state whether I don't think I have just to be whether they're right or wrong they have not been very successful in that I don't believe they have they have for like the Fox news crowd or the New York Post crowd the Murdoch crowd Rupert Murdoch crowd but certainly not with the Tucker certainly not with the more populist
• 58:28
  [SPEAKER_01]: supporters of Trump.
• 58:31
  [SPEAKER_01]: Latinos, white working class, nonwhite working.
• 58:35
  [SPEAKER_01]: They're just not, they just don't care.
• 58:36
  [SPEAKER_01]: They want nothing to do with it.
• 58:38
  [SPEAKER_01]: So it is ambiguous and it's part, it seems to me it's part of this, the, it's part of the, uh, the post normal ambiguities of moving from one.
• 58:52
  [SPEAKER_01]: global paradigm to the next global paradigm and it's going to have to, it's going to be have to do something that's going to get ironed out in the process.
• 59:00
  [SPEAKER_01]: That's a great question, friends.
• 59:04
  [SPEAKER_01]: John, it was good.
• 59:05
  [SPEAKER_01]: Was it coming about Americans not having talent and accident when Laura Ingram interview?
• 59:09
  [SPEAKER_01]: Yeah, yeah, yeah, I thought so.
• 59:12
  [SPEAKER_01]: I think I think Trump with the H1 BB look as I understand it as I understand it.
• 59:19
  [SPEAKER_01]: Bottom line, he's negotiating trade.
• 59:23
  [SPEAKER_01]: That's when I'm understanding.
• 59:25
  [SPEAKER_01]: He's
• 59:31
  [SPEAKER_01]: He's negotiating trade and with with with G, it's he needs the rare earth minerals that we need for our tech tech revolution that's really happening, which is very important for techno populism, which frees us from the old liberal second industrial revolution order to a third industrial revolution order that's radically radically.
• 59:55
  [SPEAKER_01]: You know, independent and governed by the people and very decentralized and alike.
• 1:00:03
  [SPEAKER_01]: So that was for Modi, and the trade negotiations with India.
• 1:00:08
  [SPEAKER_01]: That was for G and the trade negotiations with China and keeping the rare minerals flourishing over here until we get dominance.
• 1:00:16
  [SPEAKER_01]: He has very clear aims of making sure that we dominate the rare earth mineral market.
• 1:00:23
  [SPEAKER_01]: But until then he's got to keep him happy and I think he's that's again.
• 1:00:28
  [SPEAKER_01]: It's it's it's crazy.
• 1:00:30
  [SPEAKER_01]: This is the Highwire Act of trying to hold a coalition together because the co as he said the coalition ain't just American It goes outside into a geopolitical coalition.
• 1:00:46
  [SPEAKER_01]: He's got to try to hold and balance all these things together But yes, I wish he had said it in a much different way
• 1:00:55
  [SPEAKER_01]: Cody, I'm talking to the GOP always taking the high road and doing the honorable thing.
• 1:01:00
  [SPEAKER_01]: It's time to man up and do what needs to be done.
• 1:01:02
  [SPEAKER_01]: We want large FBI rates, prep blocks, and ending the filibuster so we can force Trump's agenda.
• 1:01:08
  [SPEAKER_01]: You are absolutely right.
• 1:01:12
  [SPEAKER_01]: Cody, you, um, what you, what you are articulating is exactly what would hold Maggett together at
• 1:01:23
  [SPEAKER_01]: What holds a coalition together is pursuing.
• 1:01:27
  [SPEAKER_01]: That's why I really focus on this 80, 20 doom loop on the Democrats.
• 1:01:32
  [SPEAKER_01]: The opposite side of it is Trump is constantly on the 80% issues.
• 1:01:37
  [SPEAKER_01]: You are looking for issues and pursuing issues where 80, 90% of your diverse coalition that has differentiated interests, all agree on, and that's where you govern from.
• 1:01:53
  [SPEAKER_01]: and perp walks and FBI raids and ending the filibuster, they're agreed upon by all of them.
• 1:02:03
  [SPEAKER_01]: All of them.
• 1:02:05
  [SPEAKER_01]: Don't listen to the NRO crowd that says, you know, the filibuster is a very important instrument of a federal republic government, don't listen to a word, they say, they are not part of our coalition.
• 1:02:17
  [SPEAKER_01]: Okay, they might speak on behalf of a segment of our cola, but they are not, they will drop Trump fast and mega faster than you can say, you know, patodi, I don't know, but these guys, these, these got right at totally maybe I should say my sons and my youngest sons favorite movie would literally watch it every day after coming home to school.
• 1:02:37
  [SPEAKER_01]: So I'm with the 1,000% that's exactly what you need to be doing and hopefully hopefully that's what we're seeing with these 30 plus subpoenas.
• 1:02:50
  [SPEAKER_01]: Mitchell, according to the People's Pundit, we've already lost the midterms.
• 1:02:54
  [SPEAKER_01]: Is this just panicking?
• 1:02:55
  [SPEAKER_01]: Do you think Trump was forced to agree to the H1B visas in order to receive rare?
• 1:02:59
  [SPEAKER_01]: Yeah, there you go.
• 1:03:00
  [SPEAKER_01]: Okay.
• 1:03:00
  [SPEAKER_01]: Very good.
• 1:03:00
  [SPEAKER_01]: Good.
• 1:03:01
  [SPEAKER_01]: So you already got that part.
• 1:03:03
  [SPEAKER_01]: I haven't seen Rich yet on on this.
• 1:03:06
  [SPEAKER_01]: I think it's a little early.
• 1:03:07
  [SPEAKER_01]: I don't know.
• 1:03:08
  [SPEAKER_01]: I think it's a little early to say we've already lost the midterms.
• 1:03:12
  [SPEAKER_01]: It just seems to me there's
• 1:03:14
  [SPEAKER_01]: There's a counterfactual logic to that.
• 1:03:21
  [SPEAKER_01]: If sentiment can turn, you know, we're not even a year out from the election January 20th, where Trump had the, you know, the adulation and the loyalty of all of particularly disaffected independent populist portion of his coalition.
• 1:03:42
  [SPEAKER_01]: And if that's, if that sentiment changed over the course of 10 months, why can't sentiment change back over the course of the next 12 months?
• 1:03:53
  [SPEAKER_01]: So that's to me, or, you know, 11 months.
• 1:03:55
  [SPEAKER_01]: I just, it seems to me it's a little counter.
• 1:03:57
  [SPEAKER_01]: I'll take a look at what Rich has to say.
• 1:04:02
  [SPEAKER_01]: But look, Rich is pushing a very,
• 1:04:11
  [SPEAKER_01]: fine-tune argument as I understand it, as I understand it.
• 1:04:17
  [SPEAKER_01]: Bottom line, the Fox News crowd is more happy with Trump than ever.
• 1:04:24
  [SPEAKER_01]: The Christian conservative crowd is more happy than would trump than ever.
• 1:04:30
  [SPEAKER_01]: The Silicon Valley Tech right is more happy with Trump than ever.
• 1:04:37
  [SPEAKER_01]: They're all happy
• 1:04:39
  [SPEAKER_01]: The problems when you put them all of them together, they're not big enough of a coalition to overwhelm the all the Democrats plus left leaning independence.
• 1:04:52
  [SPEAKER_01]: What you need is these right leaning, disaffected independent populace, who there's massive number of them, they come out in mass and they give Trump the biggest election victory in 2024.
• 1:05:06
  [SPEAKER_01]: We've seen for
• 1:05:09
  [SPEAKER_01]: There are the ones who are very, very unhappy right now.
• 1:05:12
  [SPEAKER_01]: There are the ones who feel betrayed.
• 1:05:15
  [SPEAKER_01]: And they may forgive Trump, but they are not, they never were on the side of Republicans, to give all these states where the Republican Senate candidate lost while Trump won him, Arizona, right?
• 1:05:32
  [SPEAKER_01]: Michigan was consen.
• 1:05:39
  [SPEAKER_01]: They were running in comments if I were calling each one of them, but regardless, the Democrats one.
• 1:05:44
  [SPEAKER_01]: But regardless, they'll come out for Trump, but they will not necessarily come out for the Republican, and now they will definitely not come out for the Republican, now that they feel so betrayed.
• 1:05:56
  [SPEAKER_01]: That's the argument.
• 1:05:57
  [SPEAKER_01]: That's the basic just to the argument, as I, again, as I understand, rich could refine it more.
• 1:06:04
  [SPEAKER_01]: And I guess my thing is we're going to have to see how this plays out over the next few months with this with this turn towards domestic issues that Trump advance are promising and with the economy beginning to rev up prices going down and job opportunities growing.
• 1:06:27
  [SPEAKER_01]: I think Rich is also very worried about a recession.
• 1:06:30
  [SPEAKER_01]: So he's looking at all these other factors.
• 1:06:33
  [SPEAKER_01]: And he may just think it's just too late.
• 1:06:36
  [SPEAKER_01]: He may feel that Trump's messaging since November, was at November 4th, the Tuesday.
• 1:06:44
  [SPEAKER_01]: Just hasn't been on point or it's a little bit all over the place.
• 1:06:48
  [SPEAKER_01]: He's not doing the things he should be doing.
• 1:06:50
  [SPEAKER_01]: And he and Barnes, too, are very,
• 1:06:55
  [SPEAKER_01]: are very set on, this has got to be a totally and and mark Mitchell as well.
• 1:07:02
  [SPEAKER_01]: It's going to be a totally populist moment from this point of point forward.
• 1:07:06
  [SPEAKER_01]: And it's populist when you take on the big banks, when you take on big ag, when you take on big pharma, when you take on big tech, when you take these oligarchical,
• 1:07:18
  [SPEAKER_01]: managerial interest on head on that's what animates and pumps up that side of the of the base the disaffected independent pocket was so there you go that's that's where they are that's the argument they're going to be making
• 1:07:36
  [SPEAKER_01]: Um, I think I told you from the beginning, there's two, there's, there's actually three sides to everything.
• 1:07:42
  [SPEAKER_01]: One side is what happened last Tuesday is no big deal.
• 1:07:45
  [SPEAKER_01]: What happened last Tuesday is exactly what we should expect in a off your election.
• 1:07:50
  [SPEAKER_01]: Right.
• 1:07:51
  [SPEAKER_01]: Blue states went blue and in areas that had gone red like in Pennsylvania or Georgia.
• 1:07:57
  [SPEAKER_01]: It was because these are inconsequential.
• 1:08:00
  [SPEAKER_01]: you know, state local elections that nobody gave a rip about.
• 1:08:06
  [SPEAKER_01]: And the Democrats were chomping in the bit, they came out and they like they always do for the party that's out of power and DC, you know, off your election and they do what every election, off your election does.
• 1:08:20
  [SPEAKER_01]: The other side is riches.
• 1:08:21
  [SPEAKER_01]: So I know this is a five alarm fire.
• 1:08:24
  [SPEAKER_01]: This is the coalition unraveling a major portion of the coalition.
• 1:08:28
  [SPEAKER_01]: It's leaving and therefore that coalition can't stand against Democrats and left-leaning independence.
• 1:08:36
  [SPEAKER_01]: To me, the best way of approaching this is what JD Vance seems to be doing.
• 1:08:41
  [SPEAKER_01]: in his messaging is it's a combination of the two.
• 1:08:46
  [SPEAKER_01]: You got to bring the two together.
• 1:08:47
  [SPEAKER_01]: Yes, what Rich is saying is right, but yes, also we continue to crush them in voter registration.
• 1:08:55
  [SPEAKER_01]: In all of these states, it's going to be very hard for Katie Hopps to win in Arizona.
• 1:09:01
  [SPEAKER_01]: I mean, we may be looking at a nine point voter registration lead for Republicans in Arizona in 2026.
• 1:09:08
  [SPEAKER_01]: It's going to be very hard for her to win.
• 1:09:11
  [SPEAKER_01]: Voter registration continues to grow in Nevada, continues to grow all in Pennsylvania, continues to grow North Carolina.
• 1:09:17
  [SPEAKER_01]: I mean, it's just out of this world and Florida at this point.
• 1:09:22
  [SPEAKER_01]: I mean, it continues to grow in taxes.
• 1:09:25
  [SPEAKER_01]: It continues to grow in all 30 states where voter registration is tracked by party.
• 1:09:34
  [SPEAKER_01]: And so, you know, that's a very important sign.
• 1:09:37
  [SPEAKER_01]: I think we'll see.
• 1:09:38
  [SPEAKER_01]: And then if the economy begins to grow and, you know, cost a living crisis begins to fade,
• 1:09:47
  [SPEAKER_01]: Then it's gonna be hard to say Trump isn't doing anything for me.
• 1:09:52
  [SPEAKER_01]: Yeah, he's doing a lot for you
• 1:09:53
  [SPEAKER_01]: Right, so we'll have to see, but again, you know, yeah, I just get a little, I get a little nervous of the total panic and as I'm before 12 months out.
• 1:10:06
  [SPEAKER_01]: He might, you know, yeah, he might be saying, look, it's we know now how things are going to turn out in the midterm terms historically, like where things are in November of the year preceding, so we'll have to see I'm going to have to look at the argument.
• 1:10:25
  [SPEAKER_01]: Bob, thank you for the Super Sticker, very kind of you, my friend.
• 1:10:30
  [SPEAKER_01]: Who be shoots?
• 1:10:31
  [SPEAKER_01]: Good to hear from you from across the pond.
• 1:10:32
  [SPEAKER_01]: I guess you did not hear about it.
• 1:10:34
  [SPEAKER_01]: But last Sunday, our German president told the friends of our democracy to do whatever is necessary, all on November 9th, to thrice historic date in 20th century Germany.
• 1:10:46
  [SPEAKER_01]: I forgive my ignorance, my European and historical ignorance there.
• 1:10:51
  [SPEAKER_01]: I'm not sure what happened on November the 9th.
• 1:10:53
  [SPEAKER_01]: I'd have to look at that.
• 1:10:54
  [SPEAKER_01]: Let's say actually, I can get it.
• 1:10:56
  [SPEAKER_01]: I've got one computer here.
• 1:11:10
  [SPEAKER_01]: Oh, programs against the Jews got it.
• 1:11:13
  [SPEAKER_01]: Okay.
• 1:11:13
  [SPEAKER_01]: I didn't know that was November 9, 1938.
• 1:11:15
  [SPEAKER_01]: Oh, no, that sounds ominous.
• 1:11:19
  [SPEAKER_01]: My, oh, my.
• 1:11:20
  [SPEAKER_01]: I don't know what's going on there.
• 1:11:22
  [SPEAKER_01]: We will have to keep an eye out for it.
• 1:11:26
  [SPEAKER_01]: Um, yeah, I don't know.
• 1:11:29
  [SPEAKER_01]: I mean, the AFT just keeps growing and growing.
• 1:11:31
  [SPEAKER_01]: Obviously, the number one party needs from Germany.
• 1:11:34
  [SPEAKER_01]: Um, they're getting more popular in Western Germany.
• 1:11:37
  [SPEAKER_01]: Thanks to young people, Gen Z, they may be, they may be getting very nervous, the, the, the establishment clearly seems to see what's happening in Britain with the, uh, with the reform party.
• 1:11:49
  [SPEAKER_01]: Um, Let's see what's happening with the rise of Vox and Spain.
• 1:11:52
  [SPEAKER_01]: Yeah, it's, uh, and just with the rise of populism in general.
• 1:12:01
  [SPEAKER_01]: Massive will be the, sorry, sedan divilla there.
• 1:12:04
  [SPEAKER_01]: Massive will be the Amash for Trump's second term.
• 1:12:08
  [SPEAKER_01]: Yeah, looks like it.
• 1:12:09
  [SPEAKER_01]: Yeah, that's the other thing is, you know, this the part it says Trump is doomed.
• 1:12:14
  [SPEAKER_01]: He's doomed.
• 1:12:15
  [SPEAKER_01]: They all tend to be like hardcore massiites because he's not bought.
• 1:12:18
  [SPEAKER_01]: He's not bought and paid for it by this time.
• 1:12:21
  [SPEAKER_01]: Okay, okay, that's fine.
• 1:12:24
  [SPEAKER_01]: I'm gonna take on the deep state.
• 1:12:26
  [SPEAKER_01]: That's great.
• 1:12:27
  [SPEAKER_01]: But why is he going in the direction that he's got?
• 1:12:30
  [SPEAKER_01]: half the time.
• 1:12:31
  [SPEAKER_01]: I don't know.
• 1:12:32
  [SPEAKER_01]: Yeah, I even JD is very not very happy with Massey.
• 1:12:39
  [SPEAKER_01]: Ben Coler, um, this is the common topic, but I've heard of the political intrigue between Starmer, MI6 and Trump.
• 1:12:47
  [SPEAKER_01]: MI6 is not sharing intelligence with us.
• 1:12:49
  [SPEAKER_01]: The Promethean State Trump is destroying the British hold over the USA.
• 1:12:54
  [SPEAKER_01]: Also, I saw the EU Commission is establishing a secret counterintelligence agency.
• 1:12:58
  [SPEAKER_01]: Should the US go into complete isolation of England and Europe?
• 1:13:02
  [SPEAKER_01]: No, no, we don't want to get, not in a civilizationalist perspective because we share the common Western civilization.
• 1:13:08
  [SPEAKER_01]: We all share Jerusalem, Athens and Rome together as our foundational cities.
• 1:13:12
  [SPEAKER_01]: But yeah, clearly, I mean, they're going to have to disentangle themselves from previous globalist alliances and networks.
• 1:13:23
  [SPEAKER_01]: And so, yeah, it sounds to me like the girl ladies at the Permitian, you know, a lot more about this than I do.
• 1:13:29
  [SPEAKER_01]: It sounds fascinating.
• 1:13:35
  [SPEAKER_01]: William O'Toole, I've asked this before, but Trump doesn't really mention the pipeline to do a baby drill, although he talks about energy.
• 1:13:42
  [SPEAKER_01]: I'm wondering when or if the pipeline has been turned on, if new drilling is being done and if we are now energy independent will.
• 1:13:50
  [SPEAKER_01]: Yeah, I had read last time I read about this, probably based on your question well.
• 1:13:56
  [SPEAKER_01]: Well, that's time I read about this.
• 1:13:57
  [SPEAKER_01]: We were net positive energy exporters.
• 1:14:02
  [SPEAKER_01]: So we were getting more energy than we need and we were exporting it.
• 1:14:06
  [SPEAKER_01]: So yes, I think technically we are energy independent.
• 1:14:11
  [SPEAKER_01]: And the pipelines are either in the works or they've started up.
• 1:14:17
  [SPEAKER_01]: I know certainly Albert and Trump are very close.
• 1:14:21
  [SPEAKER_01]: I think it's part of their,
• 1:14:23
  [SPEAKER_01]: the leverage that Alberta is using against Ottawa in terms of terms of the build there.
• 1:14:33
  [SPEAKER_01]: Matt, long time viewer.
• 1:14:34
  [SPEAKER_01]: First time super chatter.
• 1:14:35
  [SPEAKER_01]: Well, thank you, Matt.
• 1:14:36
  [SPEAKER_01]: Very kind of you.
• 1:14:37
  [SPEAKER_01]: Sounds like they're starting the Georgia case against Trump with a new prosecutor.
• 1:14:42
  [SPEAKER_01]: I'd have to look.
• 1:14:43
  [SPEAKER_01]: I don't know.
• 1:14:43
  [SPEAKER_01]: It's a full-sare in the absolute full-sare.
• 1:14:50
  [SPEAKER_01]: Bismo, it seems Shapiro and his buds are going to wore with Tucker and friends.
• 1:14:54
  [SPEAKER_01]: Tucker Respondes, we can stay because they want to wore with Iran and he's in the way.
• 1:14:58
  [SPEAKER_01]: So, lots, yeah, yeah, yeah, I just think, I just think we're, yeah, we're, this is very common in a coalition.
• 1:15:11
  [SPEAKER_01]: As I understand it, the factions of the coalition inevitably, when they have power,
• 1:15:17
  [SPEAKER_01]: inevitably begin to sort of elbow the other side.
• 1:15:21
  [SPEAKER_01]: behind them, and they want to assume the centrality of the coalition.
• 1:15:26
  [SPEAKER_01]: They want to become that access around which all the other factions revolve.
• 1:15:35
  [SPEAKER_01]: And yeah, no, I mean, Shapiro's made no.
• 1:15:39
  [SPEAKER_01]: And Mark Levin and so forth, have not been shy in the least about their absolute vocal.
• 1:15:48
  [SPEAKER_01]: Harolding of the need for America to be to have Israel as really it's number one ally in the world and and Tucker and a number of others have pushed back against that they don't believe that and they don't understand it and it doesn't make they would say it doesn't make any geopolitical sense and they follow.
• 1:16:17
  [SPEAKER_01]: who argues actually the American Middle Eastern foreign policy makes very little sense.
• 1:16:27
  [SPEAKER_01]: If you just get rid of all the players and their names and I'll just just make them, you know, player one, player two, player three.
• 1:16:34
  [SPEAKER_01]: You get rid of all their names, you make it blind so you can't identify any of them.
• 1:16:40
  [SPEAKER_01]: And then you look at their interests, you look at all these, their makeups and everything like that, and then you say, okay, and here's the policy of this great power towards this region.
• 1:16:52
  [SPEAKER_01]: You would say, that doesn't really make sense.
• 1:16:54
  [SPEAKER_01]: Why would they do that?
• 1:16:55
  [SPEAKER_01]: Mirashimer's argument is because of what he calls the Jewish lobby.
• 1:17:00
  [SPEAKER_01]: The Jewish lobby is like air pack and so forth.
• 1:17:03
  [SPEAKER_01]: They are the most lucrative.
• 1:17:05
  [SPEAKER_01]: They are the most well-funded, well-organized foreign lobby in in in Washington DC and so they're concerned that that that liquidity shall we say that
• 1:17:21
  [SPEAKER_01]: That level of influence has inadvertently influenced our foreign policy and it should no longer do so in a MAGA America first era.
• 1:17:33
  [SPEAKER_01]: That's the argument, right?
• 1:17:35
  [SPEAKER_01]: And so Shapiro clearly is taking the other side.
• 1:17:40
  [SPEAKER_01]: They're taking a very moral argument, a very ideological.
• 1:17:44
  [SPEAKER_01]: argument of why that's not just simply lobbying money.
• 1:17:51
  [SPEAKER_01]: It is the morally right thing to be doing.
• 1:17:55
  [SPEAKER_01]: And yeah, it was, you know, in the end and they'll take out Tucker, they'll take out whoever they have to that's standing in the way of it.
• 1:18:06
  [SPEAKER_01]: And, you know, my bottom line is this, I mean, it really comes down to this, remember, I think politics is power when all said and done ideology, morality have nothing to do with it, right, there has nothing to do with it, ultimately politics is power.
• 1:18:20
  [SPEAKER_01]: because if you don't have power to institute your ideology, you've got nothing politically speaking.
• 1:18:25
  [SPEAKER_01]: You've got nothing.
• 1:18:27
  [SPEAKER_01]: You might have a very happy little on-clave that's hiding in a basement, but you've got nothing politically.
• 1:18:34
  [SPEAKER_01]: Politics is about power.
• 1:18:36
  [SPEAKER_01]: Very simple question was bombing, Tehran worth destroying maga.
• 1:18:42
  [SPEAKER_01]: If it's not, then it was a risky, freaking thing to do as it turns out.
• 1:18:47
  [SPEAKER_01]: It was a risky thing to do.
• 1:18:49
  [SPEAKER_01]: So we may look back a year from now and say, ooh, we dodged that bullet, we kept maggot together.
• 1:18:55
  [SPEAKER_01]: And we got rid of Iran's nuclear facilities.
• 1:19:00
  [SPEAKER_01]: And Trump got, you know, standing ovation, the canacet.
• 1:19:03
  [SPEAKER_01]: And we didn't get involved in a foreign war.
• 1:19:06
  [SPEAKER_01]: We didn't get deeper into that war.
• 1:19:07
  [SPEAKER_01]: You know, so all this sort of stuff, it's like, okay, you know, relax.
• 1:19:12
  [SPEAKER_01]: didn't pan out the way a major wing of our major faction of our coalition was very concerned it was going to pan out.
• 1:19:22
  [SPEAKER_01]: And so everybody kind of got what they wanted.
• 1:19:24
  [SPEAKER_01]: One side got they got the nuclear facility knocked out.
• 1:19:28
  [SPEAKER_01]: They wanted that.
• 1:19:28
  [SPEAKER_01]: They wanted their maverick.
• 1:19:31
  [SPEAKER_01]: You know, top gun moment, that's exactly how Fox News presented.
• 1:19:35
  [SPEAKER_01]: They celebrate, but the people who do not watch Fox, who voted for Trump, every bit as much as Fox News watchers, very, very upset about that.
• 1:19:44
  [SPEAKER_01]: They saw Bush 2.0.
• 1:19:46
  [SPEAKER_01]: They didn't want that.
• 1:19:47
  [SPEAKER_01]: Well, hopefully within a year, we're not, you know, they're going to say, OK, we didn't get Bush 2.0.
• 1:19:52
  [SPEAKER_01]: He pivoted to domestic issues.
• 1:19:54
  [SPEAKER_01]: He's more concerned about middle America than the Middle East.
• 1:19:56
  [SPEAKER_01]: Cool.
• 1:19:57
  [SPEAKER_01]: All right.
• 1:19:57
  [SPEAKER_01]: I'm good.
• 1:19:58
  [SPEAKER_01]: But that may not, as rich bearers say, that may not happen.
• 1:20:02
  [SPEAKER_01]: MAGA may have been shattered as a result of that.
• 1:20:06
  [SPEAKER_01]: And the fights that we're seeing, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the
• 1:20:30
  [SPEAKER_01]: I think rightly, right, this is a right assessment.
• 1:20:35
  [SPEAKER_01]: Trump took a very, maybe it's calculated.
• 1:20:41
  [SPEAKER_01]: I don't know, but he took, he made a very risky move.
• 1:20:45
  [SPEAKER_01]: He took a very significant risk in bombing the Iran nuclear facility.
• 1:20:52
  [SPEAKER_01]: Right or wrong, I can care less.
• 1:20:53
  [SPEAKER_01]: I'm looking at it politically.
• 1:20:58
  [SPEAKER_01]: very concerning risk for the cohesion of this coalition to hold together.
• 1:21:08
  [SPEAKER_01]: And that bomb may have blown up more than just a nuclear facility, right?
• 1:21:14
  [SPEAKER_01]: That's the risk.
• 1:21:16
  [SPEAKER_01]: And the very fact that we're having these arguments and armor, armor, armor is proof of it.
• 1:21:21
  [SPEAKER_01]: I can imagine, I can imagine they would still be going on
• 1:21:27
  [SPEAKER_01]: bomb Iran with the we need to we need to you know this sort of moral imploring that again that Mark Levin likes to give um and then all he does is end up isolating half the Trump coalition in the process stupidly doesn't seem to understand politics in that sense
• 1:21:49
  [SPEAKER_01]: If he does, then he's just, he's, remember, Mark Levin was not Magna.
• 1:21:54
  [SPEAKER_01]: Mark Levin is, right, he's, he's a bandwagoner.
• 1:21:58
  [SPEAKER_01]: He came out against Trump and as did Shapiro.
• 1:22:01
  [SPEAKER_01]: These are not Magna faithful people.
• 1:22:04
  [SPEAKER_01]: Whereas Tucker seems to have always been Magna.
• 1:22:07
  [SPEAKER_01]: And that's why I think, you know, of course, of course Steve Bannon as well and Steve has been very, very critical Netanyahu and the way he's kind of dragged the United States and knew his,
• 1:22:18
  [SPEAKER_01]: in all of his, his problem.
• 1:22:20
  [SPEAKER_01]: So look, in the end, this is going to have to work itself out, but in the end, I just think I think in many ways the pro is really crowd, almost needs to just say, look, take your win.
• 1:22:31
  [SPEAKER_01]: and take your trophy and go home enough, stop all the blustering and hopefully the concerns about the inordinate influence that Israel has.
• 1:22:43
  [SPEAKER_01]: And our foreign policy will begin to dissipate the more Trump and Vance focus on domestic and popular issues.
• 1:22:50
  [SPEAKER_01]: That's to me the best way to go in all of us.
• 1:22:56
  [SPEAKER_01]: Accidental bond, thank you, Dr.
• 1:22:57
  [SPEAKER_01]: Troy.
• 1:22:57
  [SPEAKER_01]: Thank you.
• 1:23:02
  [SPEAKER_01]: It's a lot easier to break things than to fix things, including the economy.
• 1:23:06
  [SPEAKER_01]: It certainly is.
• 1:23:07
  [SPEAKER_01]: Well said, yes, much, much easier to destroy things in the build.
• 1:23:14
  [SPEAKER_01]: So, can we have a serious talk about what's going on with random assay?
• 1:23:18
  [SPEAKER_01]: I don't know.
• 1:23:19
  [SPEAKER_01]: I honestly don't.
• 1:23:20
  [SPEAKER_01]: I don't.
• 1:23:22
  [SPEAKER_01]: I'll have to look at it.
• 1:23:23
  [SPEAKER_01]: That's probably a good question.
• 1:23:25
  [SPEAKER_01]: I mean, that's obviously a good question.
• 1:23:28
  [SPEAKER_01]: It's probably something we need to talk about.
• 1:23:31
  [SPEAKER_01]: But I don't know, I don't know what they're, why they're being holdouts.
• 1:23:37
  [SPEAKER_01]: The only, the only sense I can make of it is that's their business model.
• 1:23:41
  [SPEAKER_01]: That's how they make their money.
• 1:23:42
  [SPEAKER_01]: They appeal to a kind of ran poll constituency.
• 1:23:47
  [SPEAKER_01]: You know, I mean, not run, a run poll constituency that likes them voting against the whole establishment, even when our guys are in it.
• 1:23:59
  [SPEAKER_01]: So this is where I just think, you know, the libertarian mindset just seems to be so incoherent.
• 1:24:06
  [SPEAKER_01]: I like, I like massive when it comes to at least, massive is trying to take down the deep state is trying to, you know, bring out the Epstein files.
• 1:24:19
  [SPEAKER_01]: Rand Paul, I liked him when he was taking on Fauci, when is he taking on Fauci thus far?
• 1:24:24
  [SPEAKER_01]: Well, he's been part of, so by an auto pen, enough.
• 1:24:29
  [SPEAKER_01]: So yeah, I can't make any sense of it.
• 1:24:36
  [SPEAKER_01]: Just take the shutdown, for example, ran blocked every bill to pay part of the workers or to stop paying Congress.
• 1:24:43
  [SPEAKER_01]: Then by his principles, he wished to balance the books, he had votes against tariffs.
• 1:24:46
  [SPEAKER_01]: You know, I'm with you, I just, you know,
• 1:24:50
  [SPEAKER_01]: The hardcore libertarian is in the wrong century.
• 1:24:54
  [SPEAKER_01]: This is not a libertarian.
• 1:24:56
  [SPEAKER_01]: I mean, it may be through technopopulism.
• 1:25:00
  [SPEAKER_01]: You're going to ironically see sort of a techno libertarianism come about.
• 1:25:04
  [SPEAKER_01]: But the ideological libertarianism, meaning that instead of going to banks, I'm going to go to crypto, right?
• 1:25:12
  [SPEAKER_01]: Instead of going to legacy media, I'm going to go to X. I'm going to go instead of going to the centralize information centers, I'm going to go to decentralized internet for my information.
• 1:25:23
  [SPEAKER_01]: That's a natural libertarian process.
• 1:25:29
  [SPEAKER_01]: it's a natural libertarian process, but it's not ideological.
• 1:25:34
  [SPEAKER_01]: Nobody's ideologically.
• 1:25:35
  [SPEAKER_01]: Nobody's reading von Mises or you know, a hyacur or anything like that or a Rothbard.
• 1:25:43
  [SPEAKER_01]: So it's just, yeah, no, he's in this, he's in an ideological century, where's that, the century past where an identity century today.
• 1:25:55
  [SPEAKER_01]: Then when we find a secure the votes, oh, well, thank you for all these while the Republican putting in pork or no help, he tried putting substitutes for hemp seems like obvious double standards.
• 1:26:05
  [SPEAKER_01]: Yeah, I agree with you, thousand percent.
• 1:26:07
  [SPEAKER_01]: Absolutely.
• 1:26:11
  [SPEAKER_01]: Expressions of the outdoors at what point do you think the Democrats are going to learn?
• 1:26:15
  [SPEAKER_01]: They need to start moving towards a national populous position in order to stay relevant.
• 1:26:20
  [SPEAKER_01]: Well, they've learned they have to move to populous.
• 1:26:24
  [SPEAKER_01]: That's for sure.
• 1:26:25
  [SPEAKER_01]: So that's what Mamedani ironically represents.
• 1:26:28
  [SPEAKER_01]: That's what Bernie Sanders is always represented.
• 1:26:30
  [SPEAKER_01]: It's the populist left.
• 1:26:37
  [SPEAKER_01]: I think when wokeness kills them.
• 1:26:39
  [SPEAKER_01]: So the difference between populists left and populists right.
• 1:26:43
  [SPEAKER_01]: The nationalist populist is that the populist right can pivot on left on economy, but right on culture.
• 1:26:50
  [SPEAKER_01]: So that's what makes us nationalist.
• 1:26:52
  [SPEAKER_01]: So we close our borders, we're going to make English, you know, set language and we're going to destroy all things woke defend our culture traditions customs religion.
• 1:27:07
  [SPEAKER_01]: on economics, but they also pivot left on culture and so they go full woke, they go full multicultural, they go full open borders and the like sorry, those days are over, those days are done, they may be popular Manhattan, they ain't popular in Pennsylvania and just as John Fennerman.
• 1:27:26
  [SPEAKER_01]: So the populist left will always get out-flanked by the populist right because we've got something that they don't, and that is the ability to pivot both left on the economy and right on culture.
• 1:27:42
  [SPEAKER_01]: So in Germany, we just had U.P.
• 1:27:46
  [SPEAKER_01]: shoot, give us a common in Germany, in Eastern Germany.
• 1:27:52
  [SPEAKER_01]: You have a party known as Delinca.
• 1:27:54
  [SPEAKER_01]: which is from the Eastern German Socialist Party from the Berlin Walls days, and they are like Mamdoni when it comes to populist laugh, but they're like Trump when it comes to wanting to close, at least on their platform, closing the borders and embracing what's called welfare
• 1:28:24
  [SPEAKER_01]: you have to be a citizen.
• 1:28:25
  [SPEAKER_01]: So that would be I think a form of what you're thinking of in terms of a nationalist populism, but coming more from left wing collective socialist hardcore socialist side.
• 1:28:41
  [SPEAKER_01]: Doc Green, Freedom1300.com, AM1300 Beaumont, Texas 745 AM Daily.
• 1:28:49
  [SPEAKER_01]: Only 499 for that plug.
• 1:28:51
  [SPEAKER_01]: Come on, Doc Green.
• 1:28:52
  [SPEAKER_01]: Come on.
• 1:28:52
  [SPEAKER_01]: You're doing better than that.
• 1:28:54
  [SPEAKER_01]: Love it.
• 1:28:54
  [SPEAKER_01]: Freedom1300.com, AM1300 Beaumont, Texas 745 AM Daily.
• 1:29:00
  [SPEAKER_01]: There you go, brother.
• 1:29:04
  [SPEAKER_01]: Harry at New Mexico, Dr. Steve Latin American continues to flip red as Bolivia, as I saw in New President Rodrigo Paz, said at his swearing in ceremony that socialism is then the Bolivia will become the next free market powerhouse.
• 1:29:16
  [SPEAKER_01]: Yeah, it's happening.
• 1:29:17
  [SPEAKER_01]: We're seeing it in El Salvador, we're seeing an Argentina, we're seeing in Bolivia.
• 1:29:20
  [SPEAKER_01]: It's happening.
• 1:29:21
  [SPEAKER_01]: We saw it, of course, for four years in Brazil, under Bolsonaro, before COVID took him out right along with Trump,
• 1:29:32
  [SPEAKER_01]: Yeah, no, I think they recognize we're in the Arab civilizationalism.
• 1:29:36
  [SPEAKER_01]: It's time to get their economies growing and booming and reassert their Christian heritage, their Christian traditions in in thriving civilizational order.
• 1:29:48
  [SPEAKER_01]: Now again, in Latin America, that can move left.
• 1:29:52
  [SPEAKER_01]: They can see left-wing populism as the way of fighting against American banks, American corporations.
• 1:29:59
  [SPEAKER_01]: They're trying to exercise a hegemony over their economy.
• 1:30:02
  [SPEAKER_01]: So that's why you've got Lula in Brazil pushing that kind of stuff.
• 1:30:06
  [SPEAKER_01]: But yes, I love seeing this and I love seeing sort of the new trumpification as it were of the southern hemisphere.
• 1:30:16
  [SPEAKER_01]: It's awesome.
• 1:30:19
  [SPEAKER_01]: Love you say I absolutely don't care anything those anti-Trump people are saying Trump is doing all he can.
• 1:30:25
  [SPEAKER_01]: You want him to solve last 40 years mass in 10 months not to mention all the lefty's judges democrats, but that's true.
• 1:30:31
  [SPEAKER_01]: I didn't you you were saying something that's very very important there.
• 1:30:35
  [SPEAKER_01]: And that is we we have to understand that a lot of Trump's agenda has been slowed down.
• 1:30:46
  [SPEAKER_01]: not not thwarted but slowed down by these these act of this judges because the Trump administration has been doing everything they can to try to, you know, they're trying to comply.
• 1:30:58
  [SPEAKER_01]: They're trying to obey the law, right?
• 1:31:01
  [SPEAKER_01]: But yeah, I'm with you.
• 1:31:03
  [SPEAKER_01]: I'm with you.
• 1:31:05
  [SPEAKER_01]: I just think,
• 1:31:07
  [SPEAKER_01]: We have to take these single most accurate pollsters of 2024 very seriously.
• 1:31:12
  [SPEAKER_01]: They earn their cred, like Barerson Mitchell, while at the same time recognizing that
• 1:31:20
  [SPEAKER_01]: things are so in so much more infinitely better than they were just one year ago to that.
• 1:31:27
  [SPEAKER_01]: I mean, think about it.
• 1:31:28
  [SPEAKER_01]: I mean, and it's, and this and when people say it's up to Trump to kind of sell that, that's what they mean.
• 1:31:33
  [SPEAKER_01]: They're not, he's not trying to gaslight.
• 1:31:35
  [SPEAKER_01]: He needs to sell that things are infinitely better.
• 1:31:39
  [SPEAKER_01]: And we want things to continue to get better and putting back the, putting the people who created the problems in the first place back in the powers and
• 1:31:54
  [SPEAKER_01]: Gractor, Dr. C, how could Trump take care of maggot home, lower cross job taxes, and intervene to stop the Christian genocide in Nigeria in a way that the Trump coalition will support?
• 1:32:05
  [SPEAKER_01]: I don't know if he can.
• 1:32:10
  [SPEAKER_01]: I don't know if it's, I don't know if it's possible for him to do it.
• 1:32:16
  [SPEAKER_01]: He needs to stay out of, right now, it's the safest thing for him to stay out of foreign affairs.
• 1:32:29
  [SPEAKER_01]: If you're securing trade deals or things like that, if he's bringing in more money into the economy, trends, dollar short, no problem, tariffs, whatever, no problem.
• 1:32:42
  [SPEAKER_01]: But he has got to stay out of any kind of military intervention in a foreign conflict.
• 1:32:49
  [SPEAKER_01]: He has got to stay.
• 1:32:50
  [SPEAKER_01]: That is a no-no for our coalition.
• 1:32:52
  [SPEAKER_01]: You know, playing in simple.
• 1:32:57
  [SPEAKER_01]: RC, why don't we get our minerals from Canada?
• 1:33:00
  [SPEAKER_01]: Good question.
• 1:33:00
  [SPEAKER_01]: Well, I mean, we're having a little issue with Canada right now to maybe Mark Carney, but yeah, Canada is the most mineral rich natural resource rich country in the world.
• 1:33:11
  [SPEAKER_01]: And there's no reason why the two of us should not be absolutely doubling down on our alliance together and benefiting both nations.
• 1:33:25
  [SPEAKER_01]: Trump may be in the mid today.
• 1:33:27
  [SPEAKER_01]: He's already doing that, obviously, with some of the agiatic countries.
• 1:33:31
  [SPEAKER_01]: He's getting in the Southeast Asia, getting some of their minerals setting that up.
• 1:33:38
  [SPEAKER_01]: He's trying to create it in such a way that we're China.
• 1:33:42
  [SPEAKER_01]: to more or less sanction the United States with these minerals.
• 1:33:50
  [SPEAKER_01]: We wouldn't feel it at all.
• 1:33:52
  [SPEAKER_01]: He's doing, ironically, doing something very similar as what Putin was doing before the invasion of Ukraine.
• 1:34:00
  [SPEAKER_01]: It was basically decoupling itself from the west.
• 1:34:04
  [SPEAKER_01]: Trump is decoupling our dependence on minerals from China.
• 1:34:14
  [SPEAKER_01]: Molly, the Republican Party, as per the Insusciting Begging Line text calls, et cetera, I receive is as discussing an organization, as ever President Trump needs to follow through on his American agenda bubble, paying attention to what Americans need and want before any other country.
• 1:34:28
  [SPEAKER_01]: But Tucker Owens and company are off the rail.
• 1:34:31
  [SPEAKER_01]: I think you're being, yeah, I think are you being, I think you're being sarcastic in that last part.
• 1:34:39
  [SPEAKER_01]: Right, it's not Tucker and Owens who are off the rails.
• 1:34:42
  [SPEAKER_01]: It's
• 1:34:42
  [SPEAKER_01]: Well, I don't know.
• 1:34:43
  [SPEAKER_01]: I'll leave that alone.
• 1:34:44
  [SPEAKER_01]: I don't know how to put an LOL or something like that if you're trying to be sarcastic there.
• 1:34:49
  [SPEAKER_01]: Yes, absolutely.
• 1:34:51
  [SPEAKER_01]: There is nothing America first that Trump could be doing that will in any way shape or form risk the coalition.
• 1:35:00
  [SPEAKER_01]: There is nothing America first.
• 1:35:03
  [SPEAKER_01]: There's nothing Trump can be doing that is America first that will ever in any way shape or form risk the coalition.
• 1:35:10
  [SPEAKER_01]: So you're absolutely right.
• 1:35:12
  [SPEAKER_01]: Now that tough part is translating that over to the Republicans, you got to translate that over to a Republican party that still was dominated by the Romney Ryan Rove wing.
• 1:35:27
  [SPEAKER_01]: in the Republican apparatus.
• 1:35:29
  [SPEAKER_01]: So when it comes to their strategists, when it comes to advisors, when it comes to their donors, they are still thoroughly wrongly raw and raw.
• 1:35:37
  [SPEAKER_01]: which means that they serve as gatekeepers to keep populace from running as Republicans.
• 1:35:43
  [SPEAKER_01]: And that is something Trump is going to have to clean out.
• 1:35:47
  [SPEAKER_01]: Only he can.
• 1:35:48
  [SPEAKER_01]: No one else can.
• 1:35:49
  [SPEAKER_01]: We can't rely on Pennsylvania Republicans for doing it because they're all Ryan Rove Republicans, right?
• 1:35:55
  [SPEAKER_01]: We can't wait for Georgia Demer that Brian Kemper Republicans to do they're all Ryan Rove Republicans.
• 1:36:01
  [SPEAKER_01]: It's Trump that's going to have to do that, hardcore.
• 1:36:08
  [SPEAKER_01]: Brian, my good friend from Florida, Brian, Edget is my colleague from Eastern University days.
• 1:36:15
  [SPEAKER_01]: And we are both post-eastern, living our best lives, although he's much warmer than I am.
• 1:36:20
  [SPEAKER_01]: Good morning from sunny free Southwestern, Florida.
• 1:36:23
  [SPEAKER_01]: I know that the shutdown is a terrible look for Democrats despite either gas lighting.
• 1:36:27
  [SPEAKER_01]: Let's say the public blame the Republicans for it.
• 1:36:29
  [SPEAKER_01]: But they seem willing to burn the entire country down if they can get Trump in the process.
• 1:36:36
  [SPEAKER_01]: What will keep them from doing this again at the end of January when the CR expires?
• 1:36:40
  [SPEAKER_01]: And especially if they replace up-check with someone more radical, great question.
• 1:36:45
  [SPEAKER_01]: Well, let's go reverse.
• 1:36:47
  [SPEAKER_01]: It does look like up-check has gone.
• 1:36:48
  [SPEAKER_01]: So we're getting word that he has informed his inner circle.
• 1:36:54
  [SPEAKER_01]: He's not running for reelection in 2028.
• 1:36:56
  [SPEAKER_01]: So he's got, he's a casualty of it all.
• 1:37:06
  [SPEAKER_01]: So I mean, it seems to me you've got two really awesome points of big one and a more specific one at macro and a micro.
• 1:37:16
  [SPEAKER_01]: The micro is what's to stop them from doing this in January, most likely because it's full hearty.
• 1:37:23
  [SPEAKER_01]: The 8 Democrats in the Senate ain't going to go with it.
• 1:37:29
  [SPEAKER_01]: The 6 Democrats in the House ain't going to go with it.
• 1:37:31
  [SPEAKER_01]: There is no way they're going to, they do not want another shutdown.
• 1:37:34
  [SPEAKER_01]: They thought the whole thing was a disaster.
• 1:37:36
  [SPEAKER_01]: Again, as far as there's, Fetterman has the best argument back in the world, stomping grounds in Pennsylvania.
• 1:37:42
  [SPEAKER_01]: He's just like, when my constituents were telling me, they hate it and they blame the Democrats.
• 1:37:47
  [SPEAKER_01]: They don't want, again, these cohort, these aggregated polls that inordinately represent Manhattan, LA, Chicago, right?
• 1:38:02
  [SPEAKER_01]: The ones that say, oh, voters overwhelmingly blame Republicans, Democrats themselves from purple states were saying, that's not true.
• 1:38:13
  [SPEAKER_01]: That's not what I'm getting from my constituents.
• 1:38:16
  [SPEAKER_01]: They see me as a Democrat responsible, and they're thanking them for jumping ship and and and defecting over the Republicans.
• 1:38:25
  [SPEAKER_01]: But they were not blaming the Republicans.
• 1:38:28
  [SPEAKER_01]: And the two centers from New Hampshire were feeling that, the independent from Maine was feeling that.
• 1:38:36
  [SPEAKER_01]: The Sarah Masto from Nevada was feeling that these purple state centers were, I mean, New Hampshire is becoming purple.
• 1:38:43
  [SPEAKER_01]: It's still relatively blue and federal.
• 1:38:45
  [SPEAKER_01]: federal elections.
• 1:38:46
  [SPEAKER_01]: But they were starting to feel the pinch on this.
• 1:38:49
  [SPEAKER_01]: And so I don't think I don't think the holdouts would go for that.
• 1:38:53
  [SPEAKER_01]: I think you would get immediate 60 votes to move on.
• 1:38:56
  [SPEAKER_01]: That's my sense.
• 1:38:57
  [SPEAKER_01]: We'll see when we get to January again.
• 1:39:00
  [SPEAKER_01]: But the Republicans will hopefully circumvent that.
• 1:39:04
  [SPEAKER_01]: by having an HSA healthcare savings account proposal for the Obamacare subsidies, so as to bypass the insurance companies.
• 1:39:17
  [SPEAKER_01]: So as to both give money directly to the people through an HSA where you can only spend the money on healthcare related.
• 1:39:24
  [SPEAKER_01]: items and and bypass the insurance companies and and therefore stop the insane never ending inflating of prices because they could basically just like in our university days they could charge whatever they want the government's going to pay it.
• 1:39:40
  [SPEAKER_01]: But I think you're getting to a macro issue which is Democrats are willing to burn the country down just to destroy Trump.
• 1:39:51
  [SPEAKER_01]: And that's huge and that's something we're going to have to talk about more and more because they are post-American.
• 1:39:59
  [SPEAKER_01]: And as right, this is not left versus right anymore, this is Americans versus post-Americans.
• 1:40:05
  [SPEAKER_01]: Right, so as our politics is turning is turning going from horizontal to vertical.
• 1:40:10
  [SPEAKER_01]: Unfortunately, in that verticality,
• 1:40:16
  [SPEAKER_01]: We've got the maga populist, but then you also have the Mamdoni populist.
• 1:40:22
  [SPEAKER_01]: And they are post-American.
• 1:40:26
  [SPEAKER_01]: And as post-Americans, they hate America.
• 1:40:29
  [SPEAKER_01]: And they'll be more than willing to destroy this country in order to hurt Trump.
• 1:40:34
  [SPEAKER_01]: And that's something we have to think about.
• 1:40:36
  [SPEAKER_01]: That's something we're going to have to, how do you do like, you know, from that great scene from the Lord of Rings, you know, what does one do in the face of such hate?
• 1:40:44
  [SPEAKER_01]: You know, what do we do?
• 1:40:46
  [SPEAKER_01]: How do we, now again, to me, as I think you've seen, like with joy, read, and all these cancellations among these far-leftists on legacy media, hate, all the ultimate victim of hate is the hatred.
• 1:40:59
  [SPEAKER_01]: They end up sort of destroying themselves,
• 1:41:03
  [SPEAKER_01]: and they end up destroying their own coalition because they turn on each other eventually.
• 1:41:08
  [SPEAKER_01]: But yeah, I think we have to think very seriously about how do you take on a political party that's inherently post-American and therefore will not hesitate to destroy America in their attempt to bring down Trump.
• 1:41:26
  [SPEAKER_01]: That's a very good question.
• 1:41:28
  [SPEAKER_01]: I don't have an answer for that right now.
• 1:41:35
  [SPEAKER_01]: But Shinto Analyst, I love that.
• 1:41:38
  [SPEAKER_01]: Should electoral votes from states be disqualified from national elections at the state fails to verify voter rolls.
• 1:41:44
  [SPEAKER_01]: Ooh, thank you.
• 1:41:46
  [SPEAKER_01]: Wow.
• 1:41:46
  [SPEAKER_01]: Okay, so you're looking for some kind of sanction if they fail to verify voter rolls.
• 1:41:52
  [SPEAKER_01]: Well, there certainly has to be some kind of sanction.
• 1:41:56
  [SPEAKER_01]: I don't know.
• 1:41:57
  [SPEAKER_01]: That's a very good question.
• 1:41:58
  [SPEAKER_01]: I mean, that would be very interesting if that was put into as as part of an overall package that could be debated and, you know, through the deliverance of process of be very interesting.
• 1:42:10
  [SPEAKER_01]: I don't know.
• 1:42:11
  [SPEAKER_01]: I'd have to think about that.
• 1:42:14
  [SPEAKER_01]: Who'd be showed?
• 1:42:15
  [SPEAKER_01]: Welcome back.
• 1:42:16
  [SPEAKER_01]: I forgot the name of the German friend whom you frequently interview, but he certainly knows more about my last super chat to tell you.
• 1:42:23
  [SPEAKER_01]: Yes, yes.
• 1:42:24
  [SPEAKER_01]: Constantine von Hoffmeister.
• 1:42:26
  [SPEAKER_01]: I love Constantine.
• 1:42:27
  [SPEAKER_01]: Good man.
• 1:42:28
  [SPEAKER_01]: Yes.
• 1:42:29
  [SPEAKER_01]: Yes.
• 1:42:29
  [SPEAKER_01]: So there you go.
• 1:42:30
  [SPEAKER_01]: All right.
• 1:42:30
  [SPEAKER_01]: Very good.
• 1:42:31
  [SPEAKER_01]: Maybe we'll have, well, we'll bring Constantine on to talk about what's going on in Germany.
• 1:42:35
  [SPEAKER_01]: Very chilling stuff.
• 1:42:36
  [SPEAKER_01]: No question.
• 1:42:37
  [SPEAKER_01]: I mean, your, your up is is, you know, they are doing every, look, globalism, uh,
• 1:42:44
  [SPEAKER_01]: the European Union was ground, you know, ground central for globalism is ground zero, I guess I should say, for globalism.
• 1:42:55
  [SPEAKER_01]: It was supposed to be the geographic and civilizational center for this one-size-fits-all system.
• 1:43:06
  [SPEAKER_01]: And it's collapsed around the world, obviously.
• 1:43:09
  [SPEAKER_01]: But now you're just left with a bunch of bullies and Brussels with their surrogates and your individual national governments who just trying to hold onto the power structure that they've created over the last 70 years and they don't easily give it up and it's very entrenched in there.
• 1:43:40
  [SPEAKER_01]: You know, just a little drip, you know, little, we call it spitting here in the United States, when it's just being, you see the clouds and it's just beginning, oh, just a little drip 2% 3% of the population back in the 90s, 2000.
• 1:43:54
  [SPEAKER_01]: I think I got the 4, 5, 6% and I got that like 10% and then if I remember 2017, AFD first comes in the Bundestag 13% oh, that's boy they're getting
• 1:44:09
  [SPEAKER_01]: party in Germany or I'd see to you, your, your, your SP and then AF to what's going on with that.
• 1:44:15
  [SPEAKER_01]: And then what low and behold, low and behold, here we are, what eight years later, and they're, they've nearly doubled.
• 1:44:23
  [SPEAKER_01]: They've nearly doubled.
• 1:44:24
  [SPEAKER_01]: I mean, so it's almost becoming compound in its, and it's growth.
• 1:44:29
  [SPEAKER_01]: And it's just going to continue to do that.
• 1:44:31
  [SPEAKER_01]: It's just there's, you can't stop it because we're just not in and out.
• 1:44:35
  [SPEAKER_01]: We're not in a world that provided the ideological foundation for a project like globalism, and like the EU.
• 1:44:43
  [SPEAKER_01]: So you may still have the EU, but its functions give change dramatically over time.
• 1:44:47
  [SPEAKER_01]: But boy, are they entrenched, are they not?
• 1:44:52
  [SPEAKER_01]: And that's it.
• 1:44:53
  [SPEAKER_01]: All right, gang.
• 1:44:53
  [SPEAKER_01]: I will be your back porch professor all throughout the weekend.
• 1:44:57
  [SPEAKER_01]: So keep an eye out for all of brand new videos.
• 1:45:01
  [SPEAKER_01]: Until then, love you guys.
• 1:45:02
  [SPEAKER_01]: Stay safe.
• 1:45:03
  [SPEAKER_01]: God bless.
• 1:45:05
  [SPEAKER_01]: Thanks so much for listening to this episode of the Turley Talks Podcast.
• 1:45:09
  [SPEAKER_01]: Don't forget to subscribe, leave us a five-star review, and share this episode with your friends.
• 1:45:14
  [SPEAKER_01]: Help us defeat the fake news media and rank us the number one news and commentary podcast all over the world.
• 1:45:21
  [SPEAKER_01]: Come back again tomorrow for another episode celebrating the rise of a new conservative age.