Latest / Honey Badger Radio / What is "Hagmaxxing?" Baking Cakes With Tears for Clout | HBR News 457

Transcript

What is "Hagmaxxing?" Baking Cakes With Tears for Clout | HBR News 457 · Honey Badger Radio

0:27
Step. This is HBr News number four fifty seven. What is hagmaxing Baking
1:41
cakes with tears for clouts? Where we discuss the news of the week and
1:45
give it the Badger treatment. Hello everybody, and welcome to Honey Badger Radio.
1:53
I hope you guys are doing well this weekend, that you're laughing at
1:56
all of this absurdity so that you are not consumed by it. I'm your
2:00
hopefully almost completely recovered host, Brian Martinez. I'm joined by, as always,
2:06
the stalwart Hannah Wallen and Mike will be back next week, so you
2:12
will have a trio at least, if not maybe all four of us again.
2:16
So we have a great show line up for you guys this week,
2:19
so please be sure to continue the conversations both in the chat as well as
2:22
the comments section. On this week's HBr News. We're going to be talking
2:27
about the latest regarding Alec Baldwin's case. Gen Z's newest term just dropped.
2:36
It's called hag maxing. We're gonna look at that a little bit. A
2:39
woman had gone viral on the internet baking cupcakes while crying tears of suffering and
2:47
pain and woe, and that has kind of divided the internet in a conversation
2:53
and more so, stick around, it's going to be a good time and
2:55
be sure to join us afterwards for the Patron Only show. So, first
2:59
of all, kind of a slow news week. There was like a terrible
3:05
like natural disaster in Papua New Guinea, like a massive rock slide that I
3:10
think like thousands of people were very alive and it's very awful. But that
3:16
I just learned about this morning. And so aside from that, which is
3:21
big news, and we could touch on that, there isn't much going on.
3:24
So these are kind of light this week. I hope you guys are
3:27
okay with a lighter news week. I know I am, since everything is
3:30
so like you know, I don't know, like dire all the time.
3:35
But for the Patron Show, I'm gonna give the patrons a choice. So
3:39
we're gonna do a dealer's choice or guest choice, whatever you want to call
3:45
it. It's either we're gonna look at a cringe article by a feminist.
3:49
I have a couple in mind. One is the one that I'm displaying right
3:52
now, which is entitled how the romantic institution props up a racialized dating landscape,
4:00
so it doesn't get much more intersectional than that. Romantic relationships is racist,
4:06
I guess, and sexist obviously, But I also have other ones.
4:12
There is an article that I will be bringing up a little bit later.
4:15
It's called feminism isn't much use when it leaves midwife midlife women single and depressed.
4:24
You have a point, but you know there's that is true. You
4:30
got a point. And I also have a couple of other ones, Like
4:33
there's one called men get Therapy. Not a younger girlfriend by I don't know
4:39
if you remember her name, but she was also a very she's basically made
4:45
this article kind of like talking about Leonardo DiCaprio. Do you guys remember Kate
4:49
Moran. Kate Moran, Yeah, she she's she wrote I think she wrote
4:57
a book about men or something. That's it's Kate Moran. She wrote that
5:00
book about men, but it's basically like a feminist book about me, and
5:04
it's just a dumb It's a dumb thing anyway, Like the idea that it's
5:10
that an age different matters that much after your adults only applies Kate Kitlyn Moran,
5:18
that's right, Yeah, it's Katelyn Moran wrote this article, so basically
5:24
just admitting again that she's sexist. Uh yeah, yeah, And of course
5:29
it's funny because this men get therapy not a younger girlfriend. Thing kind of
5:33
goes reverse on the Hagma sing, which is one of the stories of recovering
5:38
today on the show. But we can either do that or we can go
5:41
through some of the wondrous clips that Riverside has found for us in the last
5:47
couple of live streams that Allison and I did. So I'll let the let
5:51
you guys as patrons can think that over. We can go through a cringe
5:56
article and like try to save our souls from falling into the black hole that
6:00
is feminist theory. Should I put it? I think this will have to
6:10
do, and I'll just put let me see I have this, So we'll
6:17
just put you guys back on the screen. Wait, why is there no
6:20
image? Hold on? Okay, so it crashed, think no difficulties timed
6:29
their back. Oh we are back. Okay, so there was an issue.
6:32
Unfortunately the vertical is not going out. There was an issue with the
6:35
stream. But we are back, but we're not going to be able to
6:41
put the cartoons up, so it's just gonna be us talking over this.
6:45
Uh, it's probably an issue with one of my plugins that's causing OBS to
6:50
crash, and so I'm running it in safe mode right now so that we
6:55
can still do everything as we're supposed to. So no, I'm sorry guys
7:00
for the inconvenience. I will have to figure this out. I don't know
7:02
what this involves, but maybe I have to like remove my plugins and put
7:06
them back in. I don't know so, but you guys can listen,
7:10
and that's the important thing. So anyway, sorry for vertical watchers, it's
7:15
we're not we're not gonna be able to stream to that. So anyway,
7:18
as I was saying, we're gonna be getting into the topic. So the
7:24
So, if you want to join us, become a Badger, go to
7:26
feedbadgel dot com. Set up the monthly subscription five bucks a month to get
7:30
you into the discord where where you will be able to be a part of
7:33
the great community that we have there, as well as enjoy lots of other
7:39
sort of like activities. There's always game nights as movie nights. I think
7:42
on Tuesdays they do games and it's often it's cards against Humanity. I don't.
7:46
I don't usually do that. Cards against always cards against humanity. Okay,
7:50
so they do cards against humanity after the Patron show. So if you
7:55
that and that's a great game. It's just that by the time I'm done
7:58
with everything, I gotta go to sleep cause I got to get up early
8:01
in the morning. So so yeah, please consider becoming a part of that
8:05
action. And if you don't want to wake up one morning to find that
8:07
we've been yeeded from the internet, then go to badgerfeed dot com. That's
8:11
badgerfeed dot com. That's where all of our content lives. Or Honeybadger Radio
8:15
dot com. Okay, so with all that out of the way, let's
8:18
get into the stories. But first I'm gonna start with this one because this
8:22
is recent thing that I discovered that I did not put on in the in
8:26
the show notes. So f House Bunny or Men's Rites Bunny, who is
8:31
very active on men's issues advocate on Twitter, please give her a follow.
8:37
She is always fighting with feminists on Twitter and it's kind of fun to watch.
8:41
She has tweeted about or is it called tweeting. She posted she posted
8:50
about this tweet. I'm gonna read it to you guys, can you see
8:54
this Hannah that I'm showing? Can you see the screen? Okay, so
8:56
she says in a disgusting Italian woman Valeria Valente has called, along with other
9:03
radical feminists, for this billboard to be taken down in Naples. Translated,
9:09
the billboard says quote does violence always have the same sex? As it shows
9:13
a male cowering, She is a disgrace. Us Romans never did like the
9:20
Napolitans, napolitans i napoletani erano sempre in di tiro, a disgrace to Italian
9:28
women, disgrace. And she shares a picture, so these are like the
9:31
images. This is a billboard, and it says. The Italian city of
9:35
Naples is at the center of a fierce debate as dozens of feminist groups demand
9:39
the removal of this awareness raising campaign featuring a male victim of abuse, and
9:46
it says translated, does the violence always have the same sex? And then
9:50
the next Panelt says an open letter to the mayor of Naples signed by thirty
9:54
feminist organizations has demanded the campaign be removed. And this is the feminist argument,
10:00
quote, we are negatively affected by the recent communication campaigns which in a
10:05
misleading manner, tend to nullify the efforts made so far and those still to
10:09
be done. End quote. And then it can and there's other quotes,
10:13
a false representation of domestic violence, and it's an attack not only against women
10:18
but also against anti violence centers. Valeria Valente, Senator of the Democratic Party.
10:24
Of course this is in Italy. So I think that it's worth showing
10:31
because it tells you a couple of things. One is that advocacy for men
10:37
will be opposed by feminists on principle because feminists need that they need the narrative
10:43
to be only about women. So when they say we care about men to
10:48
or feminism is for men to their line, Okay, like this is just
10:52
not true. It's not even about women at the end of the day,
10:54
because if you care about domestic violence or you know, sexual assault or whatever,
11:01
you won't treat it like a gendered problem. You'll just treat it like
11:03
a problem. And how and you look at the data honestly, with integrity,
11:09
and however it shakes out is how it shakes out. But feminist organizations,
11:13
they're not women's advocacy groups, they are feminist organizations. Their primary concern
11:20
is power and money. That's it. Mostly power, though mostly it's about
11:24
controlling the narrative to control behaviors. They don't even really care about female victims,
11:30
because if you care about domestic violence, you care about it in the
11:35
universal right, Like, who are which couples have the highest rates of domestic
11:39
violence? It's lesbian couples, right, So they don't care about those things.
11:43
They just want to maintain a certain narrative. Okay, else, I
11:48
mean, Hannah, you can say whatever you want to say about this.
11:50
There's a there's a whole bunch of things going on here. Like, first
11:54
of all, a lot of this is just as much about the money as
11:56
you think. These organization and this this started out with, you know,
12:03
a small group of women figuring out that if people believe women are in danger
12:11
and people believe women are suffering, they will throw every extra penny they have
12:18
into fixing the problem. They won't care to find out if it's actually being
12:24
done. They will just throw money at organizations that say that they are helping
12:28
women, and they don't need even testimonials or anything like that. Just oh,
12:33
well, you're helping women here, take all my money, right,
12:35
that's that's the way they started out with. I'm basically stealing the shelter movement
12:41
from from Aaron Pitsy, right, And it's not something that's contestable. It
12:48
was done, it's it's documented historically. So anybody that you know wants to
12:54
it's hate listening that wants to contest that, and the chat can can go
12:56
screw yourselves, because it's all over the internet. It's you look like an
13:01
idiot when you say it's not what happened. But that's one thing, all
13:07
right, But there is another thing going on here. The type of women
13:13
that become feminist activists are abusive people. They are not like when you look
13:18
at the percentage of the population that is not abusive, that's the normal percentage,
13:26
it's largest percentage of people. They don't act like that. They don't
13:30
try to keep other people down in order to elevate themselves and so on.
13:33
Right, So, the minority of the population that gets involved in feminism and
13:41
other cry bullying movements are bullies by nature. They are abusive by nature.
13:48
They don't just want to help women, they want to hurt men in the
13:52
process. And so they don't want men to get any help because that's the
13:58
opposite of hurting men, right. And then the other thing is they know
14:03
that if women are held accountable for being abusive, if women are held accountable
14:07
for acting violent, if women are held accountable under these standards regarding emotional abuse
14:15
that feminists have fought for men to be held accountable under, then feminists will
14:20
end up going to jail in response to their behavior in their relationships with the
14:26
men in their lives, because that's that's the way they behave. They are
14:33
the people who engage in things like boiling pouring boiling water on your spouse,
14:39
or nagging your spouse into committing suicide, or haranguing him and cornering him and
14:48
poking fingers into his chest and smacking and punching and kicking until he finally hits
14:54
back, and then lying to the cops and saying that he attacked her and
14:58
sending into jail. Mm hmm. Those are They're not wanting anything to be
15:05
done for men who are abused by women because they are the perpetrators. Yeah,
15:13
and you can guarantee if there's a woman out there, you see a
15:16
woman out there who is objecting to consideration for abuse victims on the basis of
15:22
their sex, on the basis of the sex of the perpetrator especially, it's
15:28
because she is an abuser. It is because she is a perpetrator. Mm
15:33
hmm. I would hate to see with that is a fair assessment, Yeah
15:37
for sure. All right, Well, that wasn't really a planned story,
15:41
but I thought I would get it out of the waycause I thought it was
15:43
important. So we're gonna move on to the next one. But before we
15:46
do, I do have some super chows to look at, so kind of
15:52
like doing this a different way than I usually do because I don't have all
15:54
of the tools at my disposal. But I will put a badger chan on
15:58
the screen because I can do that, and I got some from like earlier,
16:03
so I'm going to read those out right now because I don't want to
16:07
miss them. So Richard Bierre gave us five bucks. Thank you, Richard,
16:10
and says, have you heard about the CEO of Cracker Barrel who girl
16:14
boss too close to the Sun and tank the value of the stock in the
16:17
earnings call? Apparently she thought that their image wasn't relevant to the current market
16:22
or something like that. I like Crocker Barrel. I haven't been there very
16:26
much, but they're they're my pancakes. Yeah, I like cracker barrel.
16:30
It's good. I guess what she means by that is, it's what it's
16:33
too Midwest, it's too flyover country, because it is. It is a
16:37
very Midwest thing. But like that's kind of like the appeal, the whole,
16:42
the whole, I don't know, style of that restaurant is Midwest.
16:49
Yeah, you go in and you're in an old country store. Like it's
16:56
got clothes and candy and adgets and stuff like that, but it's set up
17:02
to look like the old the old country there used to be another name for
17:07
it. But you'd you'd walk in, it looked out like something at a
17:11
you know, a little house on a prairie right where Olson's store. Where
17:15
you go in and there's a counter and there's the one room and everything is
17:19
wooden. The shelves are wooden, the racks or wooden, not all the
17:23
racks, or wouldn't anymore. You know, you pull up to the store
17:27
and in front of the store are a bunch of handmade rocking chairs and I
17:37
don't know if they're still handmade. They're probably a machine made now. But
17:40
yeah, you know, they're for sale, but people always sit in them
17:44
while they're waiting to get in, and the food is always really good.
17:47
You know. It's just it's always been a really nice place to go and
17:52
a nice place to eat. The decor is it's one of those restaurants that
17:56
the decor is old ads and old signs for farming equipment and supplies and stuff
18:03
like that. You can see, you know, old types of farming equipment
18:08
and supplies. You might you might be in there and even see a butter
18:12
churn. You know, it's just cool. And you add a couple of
18:18
puzzles sitting at the table for the kids to play with. I don't even
18:22
know if they ever had crayons, because it was always little little puzzles and
18:26
stuff like. You could buy those puzzles in the store. So it was
18:30
a neat place to go. It was a neat place to take your family.
18:33
And their pancakes were better than the places that had made themselves famous for
18:41
things like pancakes and stuff like that. Yeah, the Perkins was another one
18:47
famous for its pancakes, right, but Cracker Barrel was better. Cocker Barrel
18:52
was better. They had better biscuits than Bob Evans, like Bob Evans really
18:56
has gone downhill too with the Yeah, oh god, that's awful. I
19:07
love it. Yeah, it just the restaurant didn't need any help drawing in
19:14
a customer base. There was something new they needed to do or different that
19:18
they needed to do to get people to come in and eat food there,
19:21
because everybody knew how good the food was and how much fun it was to
19:26
go there. There was candy that you could get there that you couldn't get
19:27
anywhere else. There were neat, you know, souvenirs that you could get
19:32
there that that you couldn't get anywhere else. And she started going down the
19:40
the die road, right and she kills that business. I'm gonna be mad.
19:45
We wi't got to eat much, but that's one place that if I'm
19:51
gonna cheat on the diet, if that's the place to go. Yeah.
19:56
I've been there only a couple of times, because, like you know,
19:59
they don't have in Chicago. But when we would go to gen Con every
20:03
summer, or when I drove out to visit you in Ohio, I would
20:07
like stop at the Cracker Barrel because I didn't it was like there were none
20:11
in Chicago, like none and it's very I sometimes I wonder if there isn't
20:15
more stigma against Midwestern people than there are Southern people, even because like the
20:21
South gets a lot of shit all the time, right, But I noticed
20:25
like if they're living in the South that I feel like the people who live
20:30
in the Midwest and flyover country, I think that in a way they get
20:33
it worse. But I don't know, like they're they're treated like hicks,
20:37
but like it's I think it's worse than that from the coastal elite types specific
20:42
we get treated that way partly because you know, they're mad that we do
20:47
well with them, yeah, following their rules, you know, you don't
20:51
have to. And and the thing is they can't really point to a lot
20:53
of things as they as good reasons for why they hate that. You know
20:59
that I hate people being down to earth. They hate people growing their own
21:04
food in their own gardens. They hate people, uh going to church every
21:08
Sunday. They hate you know, all of that stuff. They hate everything
21:14
to do with midwe They hate football, football, m M, Big one,
21:18
pro wrestling, you know, monster truck rallies. You refer to somebody
21:26
as you know, water parks, corn fed farm, boys. Depending on
21:30
where you are in the in the country, it can be a compliment or
21:33
a pejorative. Right you refer to somebody as a juggalo. It depending on
21:41
where you are in the country, that that may means you're part of the
21:44
group. You know, you start everybody starts going goobagaba or or it's a
21:49
pejorative or an accusation. Yeah, I have I have actually shocked the ship
21:56
out of people there are They'll accuse me of being when those you know,
22:00
red neck blah blah blah, this that juggalo Michiganders And I'm like, I'm
22:04
Ohio, but you know that doesn't don't mean I'm not a juggle Yeah right,
22:11
oh we got there's definitely Yeah. Everybody from around here right likes the
22:17
like, likes the music, likes the culture, likes the the fun the
22:22
video about it. So it's not I mean, and it's a bonding thing.
22:29
And it bugs the hell out of them. Oh man man man icp
22:36
fan in Saint Cloan Posse just not not a huge one. So I don't
22:41
ask me to go name in all their songs. But if you were to
22:45
look at my playlist that I know, not a jigglow very much. Not
22:48
the same thing. No, not sometimes just depending on who you talk to,
22:53
you and and and I want you extra money you got, But no,
23:02
it's they don't like the fact that there's a unity among country bumpkins.
23:10
Hmm. They don't like the fact that we don't even all know each other,
23:14
but we're a family. Yeah, right, okay, that book a
23:18
lot of them. Yeah, it's the idea of unity basically. So that
23:23
was the super child for Richard Pierre from before. Then we got another one.
23:27
Thank you Anonymous for twenty five dollars. Really appreciate it. And Anonymous
23:33
says, I'd love to see Brian or Hannah debate, not interview former guests
23:36
who have proven to be no different than feminists and recoil if others criticize women
23:41
Sidney Watson, Lauren Southern, Lauren Chen Natty former mra Chen seems to be
23:45
the only one who's open minded, and the first two were too Chicken.
23:48
A debate Pearl. A debate with Pearl or Andrew Wilson would be interesting,
23:53
even if you have similar views. Yeah, here's the thing that you would
23:56
have to find something for me to disagree with. As far as as pearl.
24:03
And so far people have thrown some things at me and I've looked at
24:07
them and not really had any disagreement. Yeah, I mean, I think
24:14
I'm sure she said something something. Well, nobody's completely in lockstep with a
24:18
stranger, right, yeah, Now, well the thing is go ahead,
24:22
hand, I'm sorry, go ahead. As far as some of some of
24:26
those ladies would not come on and debate us, that's just a fact.
24:30
They're not going to do that, all right, And some of them will
24:33
not accept the format. I like a print format for debate because I like
24:37
to be able to show and not just tell. And I also like to
24:41
not have the person that I'm debating with talk over me. And one of
24:48
the things that I've noticed is because when I make an argument, it's a
24:53
sandwich every time, all right. I sand which the argument between bits of
25:00
evidence and specificity for the argument, because I like to make it as airtight
25:07
as possible, so I don't leave room for people to pry under with misinterpretations
25:14
or straw man arguments or anything like that. And when I do that,
25:18
I'll get the first sentence out, or I'll get maybe half the statement out,
25:23
and somebody will jump in and start arguing with something they want to nitpick
25:29
about the part that I've said so far, and they'll tear the conversation off
25:33
on a tangent in a different direction from where I was going with what I
25:38
was going to say, and I'll never get back to the thing that I
25:41
was going to say. So I don't like to do that, but I've
25:47
had numerous rather long arguments with Naddy on Twitter and ended up ultimately having to
25:53
block her because I couldn't have conversations with other people about things that were not
26:02
the targets that I was arguing with Natty about and not have Natty come in
26:07
and interrupt that conversation with what she wanted to talk about and completely derail it
26:15
and make it about the other thing. So we might be talking about anything
26:19
from the history of suffrage to the history of you know, domestic violence,
26:27
victim's advocacy and law and policy and everything, and Naddy comes in with Project
26:33
twenty twenty five, which she's panicked about for some reason because Republicans in the
26:40
United States, which makes no sense to me since she's in the UK.
26:45
Yeah, I think she's got bigger problems be gone. Yes, Yeah,
26:48
that whole conversation would be gone because now it's all about this twenty twenty five
26:52
thing and the Christian Illuminati essentially, yeah, the fundamental Christian Yeah, the
27:02
fundamentalist Illuminati. And I just I'm not even sure if it's the non orthodox
27:07
thing because one of the people that she opposes on Twitter is also an orthodox
27:11
Christian. Wow, right, or at least claims to be. And well,
27:15
I'll let you finish before I say my piece about that. What ends
27:18
up happening is there's no debate to be had because you make a point,
27:22
you explain your position, you give evidence, you describe what's going on,
27:29
and these women will refer to thoughts, feelings, fears in particular, and
27:34
conjecture around things that have been said by other people but aren't actually solid evidence.
27:42
This guy says he thinks this should happen, therefore this is going to
27:47
happen. Well, that's how it works, right, we all know that's
27:51
not how it works. That's why rape threats on the internet aren't scary unless
27:56
the person knows where you live and has demonstrated that they're going to come find
28:00
you, right, right, But that's yeah, So I just I don't
28:04
I would out of all the people named right now. I would I would
28:08
love to have a conversation with Pearl, but I don't know that it would
28:12
be so much a debate. I'm interested in what she thinks. Yeah,
28:18
so the same Yeah, well they didn't they didn't actually request Pearl. They
28:23
said Sidney Watson, Lauren Southern, Lauren Chen Natty and then said, like,
28:30
you know, the first two or two chicken to debate Pearl. Because
28:32
Pearl's constantly putting out challenges to debate people. I think the last time I
28:36
saw her challenge someone, it was it might have been Lauren Southern, but
28:40
I don't remember. So my thinking is is that with Pearl because I saw
28:47
people in the chat talking about how Aiden Paladin is kind of like fighting with
28:49
Pearl online, and I think what what people might not quite get is that
28:56
Pearl says a lot of stuff that sounds really like a rave or offensive or
29:02
scary. But remember, what I think she's doing is she's she is putting
29:08
out absurd, almost absurd statements, not always but almost absurd statements to get
29:14
people talking about the issue. And I think that that is a I'm not
29:18
saying that she's doing this consciously. I don't know that she's a great debater,
29:22
but she gets people discussing the topic because she is able to freely say
29:30
it, like saying things about men's issues that most people don't have the balls
29:34
to say. And I gotta say this in defensive Pearl. I know people
29:37
don't like her, but you got to hear me out, Guys. Pearl
29:41
is only saying the same things that people like us, like Paul, like
29:45
Kevin Samuels, especially Kevin Samuels has been saying for a very long time.
29:49
But no one listened to Kevin Samuels. Nobody's listening to us. Nobody listens
29:53
to Paul, nobody listens to Genespia Mango. No one listens to Karen anymore
29:57
because Karen doesn't put out content anymore. But Vine Lars, they don't listen
30:00
to her. Like none of the people who are who have been doing this
30:03
for a very long time, get the platform, they don't get the attention,
30:07
but Pearl does. And you know why Pearl does because partly she's being
30:11
like intentionally let's say, I don't want to say obnoxious, but she's being
30:17
really Yeah, she's being intentionally inflammatory, and it helps that she is a
30:22
like a young woman, okay, because literally Kevin Samuels was saying the exact
30:26
same shit and nobody knew who he was. He did not make it on
30:30
the on the big screen. And I know part of this too, by
30:33
the way, has to do with the fact that he's black, because they
30:36
would have to like, they would have to like treat that with more care
30:40
because we're dealing with people that have an intersectionalist mindset. So when they see
30:45
a black man talking about relationship issues and they know they don't want to address
30:49
it, they're just going to ignore him. But when a white woman starts
30:52
saying it, because she's white, they can they can talk about it.
30:56
But because she's a woman, people can't ignore it. So there is definitely
31:00
the gender plays a role, okay, and the race does too in another
31:04
way. So all I'm saying is is that something else too. When when
31:11
we first started getting well known in the men's rights movement, a lot of
31:18
the reason that we and other MRAs became well known in the mainstream for what
31:25
we were doing was because Paul Elam did that. Yeah, Paul, right,
31:29
No, that's how Paul got a point to get under people's skin.
31:33
You get in people's ears by getting in the people's skin. And there is
31:37
a there's an article that he wrote that was satire that gets used by feminists
31:42
all the time. They try to portray it as serious and mad now because
31:48
they can't link to it with claims that it's not satire because it says it's
31:52
top the article that it's satire because feminists are too stupid to understand satire now,
31:59
so they gave him an excuse to call him stupid. Yeah, it's
32:06
exactly right. I mean what made the article it was? It was Jezebel.
32:10
It was it was Jezebel. It was Jezebel. Yeah about women.
32:15
Have you ever beat up your boyfriend? We have or something like that,
32:17
right, Yeah, the title of it that women admitting they beat up their
32:20
boyfriends and laughing about it. And the thing like, when I read that
32:25
article, if Paul hadn't done what he did, I would have probably written
32:30
something blistering at the same time, because one of the women in that group
32:36
of writers who wrote that she had hit her boyfriend hit him because he was
32:42
scared because he thought he had breast cancer, and she just assumed that it
32:47
was usurping women's experiences for him to be concerned about a legitimate health problem that
32:54
does happen to men. When it happens to men, it is often more
33:00
more deadly than when it happens to women because men don't look for it,
33:05
men don't detect it, and it progresses faster when it happens to men.
33:08
It's very dangerous. Yeah, and so she just assumed, you know,
33:15
that he was being an asshole for worrying about having breast cancer, and she
33:22
she hit him, and she thought that was funny, and she thought it
33:25
was something to brag to her readers about. So, you know, I
33:30
don't fault Paul for getting pissed off about that, for defending it right,
33:35
Yes, but that's what got people. There will be there are people that
33:39
don't know anything about the men's rights movement, that don't know anything about the
33:45
law and policy and stuff that we talk about, any of the things that
33:50
have been going on in the background, any of the changes that the National
33:52
Coalition for Men has fought for and won. They don't know any of that
33:58
stuff. You know that women usually hit first in a domestic violence relationship,
34:05
and I've run into people that know that, and they don't even know why
34:08
I run into people that know, even though they don't know why, they
34:14
know that more men commit suicide than women do, and they know that men
34:21
are less likely to get help when they are suffering from a mental health condition,
34:25
right, and they don't know that. The reason that they know that
34:30
is because that information has been spread by the men's rights movement. That there
34:34
are writers in mainstream media that have had to address those issues because MRA's brought
34:42
them up, and people like Paul Elam got under people's skins so much that
34:46
they had to try to control the narrative, and they had to talk about
34:50
those things even though they didn't want to, even though they wanted to sweep
34:52
it under the rug, even though they want to be there to be a
34:55
movement for helping men who or victims of female perpetrators of domestic violence. The
35:02
toxic masculinity narrative was just an academia until the men's rights movement, and again
35:13
mostly Paul Elam got super inflammatory about these things and people had to start talking
35:19
about it. You didn't hear toxic masculinity before, like twenty twenty twelve,
35:23
twenty thirteen in mainstream media. You definitely didn't hear about it before, and
35:30
you didn't hear much about it before twenty fourteen. Right, Yeah, all
35:34
of a sudden, it's a mainstream term. Everybody hears it, everybody knows
35:37
it because they had to pull it out of academia where it had been stagnating
35:44
for years. Because inflammatory works. Yeah. So yeah, and I'm just
35:53
saying that it works for Pearl as well. And a lot of the reason
35:57
why she gets up she picks up more traction than Paul did is because she's
36:00
a woman. I think that she knows on some level that gynocentrism is working
36:06
in her favor on social media because people are forced to pay attention. And
36:09
I think that women like Sidney Watson and Lauren Southern are getting pissed off because
36:14
but ultimately it comes down to they don't like her tone. And that's the
36:19
thing about what I've noticed with women that are in the space, especially if
36:24
you're talking about gender relations and men's issues, is that men's anger and like
36:30
the people are who are angry about like the way men are treated and talked
36:35
about. If you can ask, you can look at Alison's Twitter, you
36:37
can look at Hannah's Twitter, but also like just you know, on Pearls
36:42
as well. A lot of it comes down to the women don't like It's
36:45
not that they don't agree with what's being said because they don't know what's being
36:49
said. They're not looking at the data, they're not actually trying to figure
36:52
out if any of this is true. They're just angry about the fact that
36:55
it's being said, and especially the way it's being said. And so you
36:59
get into this thing like I watched this debate. It was a debate,
37:02
it was a discussion whatever on Tim cass On on Tenant Media. It was
37:07
Timpole was hosting it, and it was Lauren Chen, Pearl Davis, Rachel
37:10
Wilson, who is Andrew Wilson's wife, and I have her book, A
37:14
Call Feminism, and there's another woman I can't remember her name, and I
37:16
apologize, and they were essentially like getting into like the really you know,
37:23
like in depth. Whenever they started to get in death Pearl would say something
37:29
inflammatory and I know that she does this on purpose, and then Lauren Chen
37:32
would like tone police her, and it became like a whole like, well,
37:37
I wouldn't say it that way, you know, like you know what
37:38
I mean. And so the problem with that is is that it's just not
37:42
the way that it's not really a good way to communicate because you don't get
37:46
to the root of the problem if everyone's concerned about how the way somebody says
37:52
something makes somebody feel, and you never get to the root of the issue.
37:55
And so this works in her favor. Now again, if you don't
38:00
like her, whatever, and I'm not saying that we should protect her or
38:02
whatever, but I'm explaining to you why she's big because she's not a great
38:07
debater. She doesn't always have all the information available. She's not like Janice,
38:13
who's like a walking encyclopedia, right, but she is able to get
38:17
attention on the issues. And I think that if you look at it like,
38:22
you know, if you're looking at it like like you're playing an MMO
38:25
or something and you need like a tank that's gonna pull you know, the
38:30
enemy, so you don't like get sworn by too many at once, and
38:32
so in your party you have to have like one guy who's the tank,
38:35
who's the person who draws attention to himself, and then the others have a
38:38
role to play in like defeating the enemy. Pearl is like that, Karen
38:42
was like that too. Before she would like say inflammatory, shit, she's
38:45
just really tired and you know old now, so she's not doing it as
38:49
much. So it's the same purpose, right, And the I think it's
38:53
a net positive because even if she isn't really great at the debating or whatever,
39:00
she is starting the conversation and I'm seeing more and more people having that
39:02
conversation even if we aren't a part of it. I even saw like this
39:07
one chick she prove my point on Twitter. She was saying something about how
39:12
like the manosphere has changed because back in the day was like, you know,
39:16
people were more rational and now they're just kind of angry. And I
39:20
knew she was talking about Pearl without saying like it was this weird feminine like
39:23
talk around it, you know, like toal, I want to talk about
39:25
Pearl and Andrew Tait and Fresh and Fit without talking about them, right,
39:29
I'm just gonna just gonna imply who I'm talking about. And I said to
39:32
her, well, you know, I've been doing this for ten years,
39:35
but apparently I don't get promoted by the algorithm. Like our channel doesn't get
39:38
promoted by the algorithm. We don't get noticed by anybody. And She's like,
39:42
well, they still represent you, and I'm like, no, actually,
39:45
you know who I am. You can watch our content and you can
39:47
talk about us, and you can talk to us, or you could just
39:51
focus on the people that satisfy your cartoonist straw man. And that's what she
39:54
was doing. But she was a feminist, so like it's it's like,
39:59
on some level, you have to understand that the people that we're that are
40:02
in our way have no interest in actually addressing us directly. So you're gonna
40:08
need somebody like Paul and Pearl who are just going to ridicule the shit out
40:13
of them while other people have the conversation. I'd like to be the one
40:16
to have that conversation, but I can't if no one knows who we are
40:21
because the algorithm it suppresses us and it promotes the cartoonist straw men. And
40:25
you know what I mean, I don't know what we can do about that.
40:29
It's not in my control, you know. So yeah, I mean,
40:32
and look, yeah I still don't trust TikTok, but I might get
40:38
it. It could be a way to get in there, going to use
40:40
with anything else and then take it to McDonald's and upload stuff Yeah, that's
40:46
one platform where we haven't been suppressed. So yeah, that's true. That's
40:52
true. Also, I think that well Twitter is is is a lot better
40:55
for us now, so you know, Alsie gets a lot of traction.
41:00
One I'm still getting. In fact, I've had people actually tell me I'm
41:07
getting deboosted on Twitter and I contacted Twitter support about it and I was like,
41:13
yeah, you still have some algorithms that are deboosting people, because one
41:15
of them's affecting me, and the sites that track it are my my followers
41:22
who are having trouble seeing my stuff. Uh, they're telling me about it
41:27
and they're like, well, it's the quality of your content. I'm like,
41:30
yeah, I have people telling me they are trying to see my stuff
41:35
and they can't and they have to come to my profile and look at it,
41:38
and they're they're they're testing it with these deboosting sites that you know,
41:44
they are these deboosting detectors, and they're seeing that yeah, it is still
41:49
being deboosted. And they're like, oh no, they're just not looking at
41:52
your stuff. You know, you shouldn't have asked them. Well I didn't
41:53
ask These are people that have contacted me unsolicited to say this is going on
41:59
with you. And there are some people that are telling me they can't like
42:05
if they they mentioned my name at handle, it doesn't auto complete. It
42:12
doesn't like when you mentioned somebody's handle, and you know, you type the
42:20
whole thing out and everything, even if it doesn't autocomplete, as long as
42:22
you get it right, it shows up blue, yeah, instead of black
42:27
as plain text. So people are telling me that it's coming up black and
42:34
that is yeah, I know, it's yours, doesn't when I try to
42:38
Yeah, when I try to tag you and stuff, I have to type
42:42
out more of the of your word, of your name in order for it
42:45
to like find it. But it used to not find it all, but
42:49
now it's starting to. But I have to type in at least four letters
42:52
before it brings it up. So yep, and I you know, I've
42:54
found that there have been times like if I want to go back and there's
42:58
a tweet that i've you know, I want to reference that conversation and I
43:04
can remember something I said in it verbatim, which which I can do a
43:07
lot of the time. Actually, I'll go back and find my tweet and
43:13
then from there I'll find the tweet that I'm looking for, and sometimes my
43:17
tweets won't come up in search us even when I'm the one looking for them.
43:22
So yeah, it's still we're still deboosted on Twitter. It's still when
43:25
I'm talk about that an HBr talk at the beginning and every spiel you know
43:30
to you guys got to go pay attention to badger feed. It's because there
43:37
is not a social media site that we can fully trust to not de boost
43:42
us. Yeah, to not shadow baness or any of that. We left
43:45
wing, right wing, free speech, none of that. They still look
43:50
at people like us. All right, we're still the wrong thing, boogeyman.
43:53
If they are going to do it to anybody, they're going to do
43:58
it to us. Yeah. So as far as Sidney Watson, Lauren Southern,
44:02
Lauren Chen, and Natty, all of them have been on our channel
44:07
before. You can watch old interviews. I think that the Sidney Watson and
44:12
Lauren Chen interviews that I did fireside chats have aged very well because they were
44:17
still sort of feminist, but although they wouldn't admit it at the time,
44:22
and I think that their at least Lauren Chen for sure is realizing it.
44:27
Natty's character arc has certainly taken an unexpected turn, but there's not much I
44:30
can do about that. I think that she's going through something personal, and
44:34
I think it's being expressed on social media and this fear around Project twenty twenty
44:39
five and transhumanism and all this other stuff. I'm sorry, but I'm just
44:45
not that afraid, you know. So anyway, thank you for the super
44:47
chow. Anonymous Richard Bierre gives us another one for ten dollars. Thank you,
44:52
Richard, and says, waiting for one of these woke CEO types to
44:54
decide that Hooters and Twin Peaks needs to revamp their image by eliminating the tight
45:00
tops for their waitresses. Well, let them go for it. I mean
45:04
I don't go to Hooters anyway. Maybe maybe we'll win in the long run.
45:07
Also, what about Kilted Tilt or or what's the other one? Heart
45:14
attack Burger? Those are those are pretty sexual too. Kilton Kill has the
45:17
girls in the in the kilts like the schoolgirls, and then the Burger plays
45:22
they're all dressed like nurses. It's like there should be one where they're like
45:25
nuns. Why haven't somebody done that anyway, go ahead would be hilarious.
45:30
It could be called thighs or my religion. Feminist says attacked Hooters for years.
45:37
It's one of my favorite memes is the one with the protesters standing on
45:43
the sidewalk out in front of Hooters with a sign that says women are not
45:46
for decoration. Mm hmmm. One of the Hooters chicks came up and stood
45:52
in front of her, you know from the reading perspective, so anybody facing
45:58
her, she's on her left and the sign says some that's all she wrote.
46:04
Some women are not Yeah, she is. You know, the angry
46:08
feminist hasn't done anything to make herself look pretty, and the Hooter's chick obviously
46:13
has and she is adorable. So there you go, Jen Bottle, Yes,
46:17
that was me, all right, Thank you for that, Richard Bierre.
46:22
Then we got one last one from Meredith g for five dollars and she
46:27
says, HBr News four fifty seven, honey for the Badgers. Sorry I'm
46:30
late. The reason they hate the flyover States is because they are classes.
46:34
They also hate urban lower class. Thank you for that. Yes they do,
46:38
and hopefully people will realize that. But we really really got to move
46:43
on to the next story. So thank you so much. Oh I got
46:45
super chats too, God damn it, let's bring those up really quick.
46:51
Hold on a second. I just don't want to like forget them your activity.
46:54
So Albatross gave us five bucks and says five bucks because I haven't donated,
47:00
while peace sign devil horns, peace sign heart, prayer hands and dove.
47:06
Thank you, Albatross. I got to read the emojis because I don't
47:07
know how else to put them up there. Master Mo three sixteen Wrestling gave
47:13
us five euros thank you and says, you know who would have been a
47:15
better CEO, Brad's wife, who's Brad Albert Nada Retro gives the two dots
47:21
Canadian, says pearl vomit face, and then he gives a two dollars Canadian
47:24
again and says pearl vomit face. All right, well, thank you for
47:29
the superchows and we're going to move on to the next story. Let us
47:34
know what you guys think about that that Italian thing that we talked about in
47:38
the comment. Now, let me just put where's the where's the website?
47:42
Okay, let's put this back up. Okay, So got a follow up
47:46
story for Alec Baldwin. RUSS star Alec Baldwin filed three motions attempting to dismiss
47:53
his manslaughter charge that he faces for the death of Helana Hutchins, allegedly firing
48:00
a gun that killed her. One has since been denied. Baldwin's lawyers had
48:05
argued that the prosecutors flouted the rules of the grand jury proceeds to divert attention
48:09
from exculpatory evidence. His lawyers argued that these and other actions prejudiced the grand
48:15
jury against Baldwin. Baldwin's legal team also argued that the prosecution did not follow
48:21
proper rules regarding witness notification. Alex Spiro, lead lawyer for Baldwin's legal team,
48:25
said that quote, the way this is supposed to work is the grand
48:29
juries in a week. There's all these witnesses that could come and you hit
48:34
them with a subpoena, they come to the grand jury, or you have
48:37
them on standby and you talk to them. This isn't how you're supposed to
48:40
do it, period. According to Spiro, the witnesses never got their notifications.
48:45
Special prosecutor Carrie Morrissey hit back at Spiro saying that quote, mister Spirou
48:52
wants to say to this court this morning that I'm just kind of making this
48:55
up as I go along, that I had no intention of ever presenting anyone
49:00
over video. I'm not going to sit here and be called a liar.
49:02
End quote. No additional court date has been scheduled yet, as prosecutors responded
49:07
to the two additional pending motions to dismiss on May twenty. First, well,
49:13
if you want your court case to be recognized as as fair and a
49:21
and an example of due process being used, being exercised and provided for the
49:30
defendant, and so they're therefore the verdict is fair and can't be challenged.
49:36
You follow procedure, you follow the rules. So it's not it's not good
49:42
that this is happening, and I hope they get it settled. That's that's
49:47
basically the main thing I have on this. A defendant is going to take
49:52
every angle they can take to get out of any kind of legal responsibility for
49:59
something that they've been accused of. And it may be that they're innocent,
50:04
it may be that they're guilty, but if there's a even a technicality that
50:08
lets them stop the prosecution or take away part of the prosecution's case or anything
50:15
it's they're going to use it. So in a situation like this where you're
50:21
dealing with somebody famous who is kind of supported by the establishment because he's supported
50:27
the establishment and so on, you really get your ducks in a row.
50:34
There should be no mistakes, and it looks like there are mistakes happening if
50:40
what he's saying is true. So it will be interesting to see what the
50:45
ruling is on all of these and what further reporting comes out on them,
50:50
whether or not this prosecutor is actually failing to follow important rules or whether that's
50:58
not true. All right, well, I don't really have anything to say
51:05
to this other than like, good luck. I don't think Alec Baldin's getting
51:07
out of this one. Though. Let us want of you guys think about
51:10
this in the comments. We're gonna move on to the next story. What
51:15
is hagmaxing? Have you heard about this? Anybody's heard about this hag maxing
51:21
thing? That is all the rage, all the conversation. Right now,
51:24
Let's take a look. Okay, hag maxing. The term hagmaxing has recently
51:30
gained attention on social media, and this is right here for the Daily Dot,
51:34
but it's also been on lad Bible, so you could tell that this
51:37
is totally legit. But people have been talking about it on various social media
51:43
and on TikTok and such. So it's important to note though this is not
51:47
a genuine trend. What essentially means it is meant to evoke the idea of
51:53
looks maxing. It's called hag maxing, but it's essentially zoomer men dating millennial
52:00
women or older women, and there there is like it comes from the idea
52:09
of younger men dating older women. This trend spread quickly on platforms like Twitter
52:14
and TikTok, causing confusion and frustration among users who believed it to be real.
52:19
Although I do think there is something to it. So essentially what I
52:22
believe is happening, and I think this is why I'm making mentioning this.
52:27
There's always big cases where men like it's basically just cougars. It's just like
52:31
older women dating younger men. So why is this happening? And I think
52:36
this is a good thing to bring up. Well, here's what I here's
52:38
my theory. It's a couple of things going on. One is we know
52:43
that gen Z women and gen Z men's values have split like precipitously, women
52:50
have gone like young zoomer women have gone far left and young men have gone
52:55
slightly right. And I mean, if you look at the data we've talked
53:00
about on the show before, the men are not going far right. I
53:02
know that the media will tell you they are. They're not. It shows
53:05
that they're just moderately going right. And a lot of it has to do
53:08
with I think social media, the stuff they're seeing on social media. I
53:13
have noticed that there's a lot more pro mail content floating around Twitter, YouTube,
53:21
and Facebook, and it's things like you know, the whatever podcast clips
53:25
they go viral, the men on the street things you know, people talking
53:30
about like dating and such, and zoomer women are they seem to be too
53:37
much hassle. So these zoomer men might be taking an interest in millennial women,
53:44
which I think is not a good thing because millennial women are pretty crazy.
53:47
But then there's another side of the coin. It could be that millennial
53:51
women, because they waited so long and they're not finding men, are choosing
53:55
to date younger men. Or they may even have like an interest like a
53:59
said actual fetish for younger men, and I do think this is actually something
54:04
that is happening to some degree. So I don't know what you guys think
54:07
about that, but they're calling it hag maxing. Yes, I think it's
54:12
funny, and I hope it's real because I think it's funny. Well,
54:16
the fact that it appears to have been like a four chand thing. Yeah.
54:23
Fortunately, Yeah, yes, cougars exist, and yes there are also
54:30
guys that like women who are older than them as opposed to women in their
54:32
own age. And yes there are male versions of cougar, and we have
54:42
in our society a much less flattering name for them. Mm hmm. So
54:49
unfortunately there's not equal treatment of the matter. But in my opinion, if
54:53
you're an adult, the age difference between adults who are dating other adults does
55:00
not translate into something like pedophilia or any of the other allegations that get made
55:07
against men who yeah, women that they are in their twenties yeah, or
55:13
who think pigtails are cute, or any other sign of being young prefer women
55:21
with smaller breasts or any of those things. Right, So I'm not going
55:25
to condemn women who like the same things in younger men, men who are
55:30
stronger, men are healthier, and all that stuff for being quote unquote pedophiles,
55:37
because it's bullshit. But what I will to point out is when there's
55:43
a massive age difference like that, there are vulnerabilities on both sides, right,
55:49
and there are also I guess you could say neuroses on both sides.
55:55
You have to watch out if you're dating somebody and there's a big age difference,
56:00
if you're the much older person dating someone who's much younger than you.
56:05
You might be dating somebody with mommy or daddy issues, or you might be
56:09
the person trying to substitute that relationship for the type of caregiving relationship you would
56:17
have with your kid, and so you kind of have to pay attention to
56:22
your dynamics of your relationship and how you're treating each other. It doesn't mean
56:28
that people can't have those relationships, but it does mean that, you know,
56:32
you do have to exercise a little more caution in that type of a
56:37
relationship when there's an age space like that than you would in a relationship where
56:44
you're close to the same age, you have close to the same level of
56:45
experience in life and you don't have the possibility that you know, I mean,
56:53
you can still baby somebody in your own age. You know. I
56:59
did that, and I had to get out of a relationship because I was
57:02
turning into his mommy instead of his partner, and I'm holding him back in
57:09
ways that were really, really dysfunctional. And then at the same time,
57:15
I was getting frustrated myself, right, and his last fiance had done that
57:20
before me. They got married and then they got divorced over it. So
57:25
like it's it's not I'm not gonna say that it's the big deal people make
57:34
it out to be. It's just a matter of you know, you you
57:37
got to go into it like any other relationship, beware of how you're treating
57:43
the person that you're with and how they're treating you, and try to try
57:49
to make it trying to make it about the people that you are and not
57:53
about the things that you have been missing in your lives with the rest of
57:59
your family. Yeah, I think it's funny. I noticed that a lot
58:04
of people on social media are like, you know, I'm proud, I'm
58:07
looking in the thing is I officially claimed the title of a hag Maxer.
58:13
We used to call that a milf hunter like before, proud hag max proud
58:17
hag maxer here. But I think the term hagmaxer really upsets women, so
58:23
I think that's it's just a troll. I mean, at the end of
58:25
the day, I think it's funny though. So before we move on,
58:30
are you guys, is anyone in the chat hagmaxing or milf hunting. Let
58:35
me know in the comments if you uh, if you partake of the uh
58:40
of the aged aged a variety of cheese, are you a granny grabber?
58:47
Let us know in the comments. Oh, by the way, as an
58:51
aside, I think it's one of the reasons why I think this is like
58:53
kind of funny is that feminists are saying things like this, uh, Petronella.
59:00
Why it says, and this is from April of this year, feminism
59:04
has left middle aged women like me, single child is and depressed. So
59:07
imagine a trend of hagmaxers. And and it's still the feminist women not getting
59:12
picked so because they weren't feminists, because they didn't get picked, and they're
59:17
mad about it. Yes, exactly, exactly, all right, I didn't
59:23
then to get picked. I picked him. Why would you wait? Yeah,
59:30
exactly, So anyway, this is uh for those of you guys who
59:36
are into the Ara Ara. There you go. All right, let's get
59:38
into the next story, little zone. You guys think about this one in
59:42
the comments. We're in the last story. I try to make this one.
59:44
Try to make this one short, you know. So, And there
59:46
wasn't much going on today. You probably saw this viral video going around and
59:52
I thought we would like quickly comment on this. So this is Elizabeth tech
59:57
and Brock. Did you see this? Yeah? You you want me to
1:00:00
be quick because I actually have a lot of things to say about Oh I'm
1:00:04
sure that you do, but I want to I'll read the write up.
1:00:06
No, no, no, I mean I'm saying that as a as a
1:00:08
show, there isn't like a lot of like heavy news. But this was
1:00:14
this was going around and the way and the way that well, you know,
1:00:16
let me just read this. But all I will say is the Internet
1:00:19
was pretty divided, but it was divided in a certain way that I think
1:00:22
we all recognize, you know. So, all right, So Elizabeth Takeenbrock,
1:00:30
a twenty nine year old from Tampa, Florida, recently went viral after
1:00:34
posting a tearful TikTok video of herself baking her own birthday cake, highlighting the
1:00:38
struggles of being a single mom a parent. The video has a mass over
1:00:43
forty five million views. However, her ex husband Andrew responded with claims challenging
1:00:49
her portrayal of single motherhood. Cormier is Andrew's last name. Cormier, who
1:00:53
claims to have full custody he shows actual receipts full custody of their two daughters,
1:01:00
accuses Tak and Broc of rarely seeing their children and frequently going out to
1:01:05
the club. He also revealed her past arrest for fraud, confirmed by the
1:01:09
Heros Hillsborough County Sheriff's Office. Tack and Brock responded admitting that she does not
1:01:15
have custody, but alleging Cormier's abusive behavior. She claims she still sees her
1:01:20
children regularly and criticized the custody agreement made under duress. Oh there's that that
1:01:25
old chestnut. On social media, reactions have been mixed. Supporters attack and
1:01:30
Brock praise her vulnerability and resilience, and critics accuse her of misleading her followers
1:01:36
about her parents in situation. By the way, she was also twenty one
1:01:38
thousand plus dollars in child support like behind on child support. That was also
1:01:45
worth pointing out. I forgot to mention. Yeah, the revelations have sparked
1:01:49
discussions my careers would be in jail. Yeah, for sure. The revelations
1:01:53
have sparked discussions about the complexities of custody battles and the authenticity of social media
1:01:58
portrayals. The reactions support for tacker Brock. There's a lot of women.
1:02:02
Mostly they expressed empathy for her emotional struggles and they basically yas lit her into
1:02:09
the stratosphere criticism. Some users a accuser of misrepresenting the situation, especially after
1:02:15
her ex husband's counter video debates on custoding abuse. The incident has fueled broader
1:02:22
discussions on the challenges of co parenting, domestic abuse allegations, and the impact
1:02:29
of social media on personal disputes. This situation underscores the often hidden complexities behind
1:02:34
viral social media pots and the importance of considering multiple perspectives their personal confidences.
1:02:39
But another thing I want to point out is that she tried to like just
1:02:43
say he was a scientologist and thought that was like an argument, provided no
1:02:46
evidence of anything, just said scientology, and some people actually like were like,
1:02:52
well that change. I was like, but based on what what does
1:02:54
that even mean? She still fucked him, she still had kids with him,
1:02:59
Like, I don't, I really don't like this. He is a
1:03:01
blank and then insert like religion or cult here, and that means something like,
1:03:07
that's not an argument. You still had sex with him, you still
1:03:09
married him, you still had kids with him. So anyway, Hannah,
1:03:13
I'll I give it to you. I wonder, I wonder how many people
1:03:16
who have changed their outlook on this on the basis of, oh, he's
1:03:21
a scientologist have changed their outlook on the Danny Masterson case based on right,
1:03:28
I know, I got the same thing though. Scientologists, Well, I'm
1:03:30
scientologists sure are crazy. He was like, yeah, but that doesn't have
1:03:32
anything to do with the allegations, Like where's the evidence. So yeah.
1:03:38
The first thing that struck me about this case was the fact that she was
1:03:45
she filmed herself, and this is something I think. I'm not always a
1:03:50
big fan of Matt Walsh, but he pointed this out this woman and I'm
1:03:53
gonna say it fairly similar to the way he did. Right, she set
1:03:59
up for that shot to catch what she wanted to frame in it, and
1:04:05
then performed for the camera. And then she took the time to take the
1:04:14
video, to to watch the video, stop the camera, watch the video,
1:04:18
edit the video, and then post it. Right, that was calculated.
1:04:24
That was not something. There's oh poor this poor woman was trying to
1:04:28
show you something, and this is what came out of it. And she
1:04:31
posted it anyway. That's no, no, this was her whole gig.
1:04:36
And she did it for views. She did it, not for sympathy,
1:04:43
not even to get a discussion going about an issue or anything like that.
1:04:51
Right. She added music, all right, She added music designed to make
1:04:58
it even more emotional. Right, she designed she added music designed to pull
1:05:04
on your heart strings. And and and then she posted it, I'm sorry,
1:05:11
yeah, but bold Well it wasn't It wasn't just that. If you
1:05:15
watch it, it's edited like there's like it's it's yeah, yeah and whatever.
1:05:20
Yeah yeah, Oh, I'm sorry. So there's that. That's the
1:05:23
first thing. And I responded to that initially with you know, what kind
1:05:27
of a person over the age of say, maybe twenty twenty one, maybe
1:05:32
twenty five, because twenty five is like your quarter of a century, uh
1:05:38
mile marker, right, but ay older than that, getting that upset about
1:05:44
not receiving a birthday cake from someone else, having to bake your own birthday
1:05:48
cake. Oh big whoop, whack all the ambulance, all right, I
1:05:53
don't. I don't even think people older than that she should be really be
1:06:00
caring about their birthdays that much like you can celebrate your birthday, celebrate my
1:06:05
birthday. In my head, I'm happy about it. I celebrate it twice
1:06:09
in fact, like in twenty twenty two I turned fifty and twenty twenty three
1:06:14
I turned thirty. The difference number is how many years I am past the
1:06:18
date that would have been I wouldn't have been here anymore, right, Right,
1:06:21
So I have two birthdays every year, one for how old I am
1:06:25
and one for how many years it's been since I didn't die. And that's
1:06:30
a personal thing that I don't expect anybody else to be like, oh,
1:06:34
you know, it's been this many years since you were twenty one, you've
1:06:36
been you've got this many extra years. But those I think of those are
1:06:41
my as my extra year extra years, Right, I've got more extra years
1:06:45
than I had years that were allotted to me according to that doctor's assessment and
1:06:53
and it lit a fire under my parents button. I'm alive because of it.
1:06:57
So it's a good thing, right, But none of it is something
1:07:00
to you say, Well, everybody has to think about that with me all
1:07:02
the time. Everybody has to pay attention to that. Me, me,
1:07:04
me, bake my cake, you know, and and yeah, I am,
1:07:10
I am referencing something else there, bake my cake. We live in
1:07:15
a culture of narcissism at this point. That is so crippling that this woman
1:07:26
did that and people didn't call her on it until somebody got annoyed, till
1:07:31
one person got annoyed and said what the fuck right? And and not maybe
1:07:36
in those terms, but still, like that's what this is. The bottom
1:07:41
line of this is she's she made her birthday about demanding sympathy for people because
1:07:50
of her situation, because she feel sorry for herself because she is a narcissist,
1:07:55
which is probably why she is divorced. Absolutely nothing to do like not
1:08:00
that I'm a fan of scientology, but it has absolutely nothing to do with
1:08:03
scientology. Christians don't like living with narcissists either. Atheist don't be living with
1:08:09
narcissists. Nobody does, right, nobody who is not a raging narcissist can
1:08:15
even deal with someone who is. And uh, God forbid two of them
1:08:18
get together in the same room, because you don't want to be in there.
1:08:21
It kind of it must it must say something about her personality. That
1:08:26
the husband actually got the kids and child support. That is something, right,
1:08:32
Well, of course it is, of course it is. That's not
1:08:35
a simple thing to do, right. You have to go to court.
1:08:39
You have to prove not only that you're a good parent, but that she's
1:08:43
a bad parent. And a lot of times that she's dangerous to the kids
1:08:47
or can't take care of them. Might be because she was in jail.
1:08:50
You know, maybe maybe he got custody because she was in jail. He
1:08:54
tried she tried to steal like it was like fraud for like a million dollars
1:08:58
from some kind. Yeah, that's that's pretty big fraud. She's so she's
1:09:02
she shoots high there. Well, this is fraud too. Her video was
1:09:08
fraud. She's not upset about the birthday cake. She's upset about not being
1:09:14
the center of attention. Mm hm. The thing about her kids, I'll
1:09:19
go there. She had an opportunity with her kids. Your kids can start
1:09:26
baking cakes with you when they are old enough to stand on a stool and
1:09:30
not fall off of it. That's all that it takes. And you just
1:09:35
help the kid. You stand behind them and you can reach around and help
1:09:42
them do things and and so on. And I mean, I have a
1:09:45
great memory of doing that with my son the first time because it was back
1:09:50
when everybody was watching Imeral Lagassi on TV. So everything we put in the
1:09:56
bowl he went bam. And that was just priceless. Right, So she
1:10:05
could have created moment like moments like that with her kids. She could.
1:10:10
I have childhood memories of that with my mom, like over you know,
1:10:15
over forty years ago, doing things like that with my mom. She's not
1:10:20
making those memories with her kids. Maybe that's why she doesn't have custody.
1:10:26
This is what her kids remember about her birthday. They're gonna find this online
1:10:30
someday and they're gonna see it and they're gonna feel bad. You should never
1:10:36
want that about your children. So I don't have any sympathy for this woman.
1:10:44
I don't have any empathy for this woman. I think that she has
1:10:45
caused all of her own problems. I think that she is a bitch for
1:10:50
doing this to her children. We ever get to what she's doing to her
1:10:57
ex husband, right, because this was an attack on him, But she's
1:11:01
a bitch for doing this to her children before anything else. It deserves any
1:11:06
consideration because their children, they didn't marry her, they didn't make any mistakes.
1:11:13
They were born. That was it. And so there's no stretch of
1:11:16
any imagination by which you could say, well, they could have avoided this.
1:11:19
No, they couldn't. They were born. They were born. That's
1:11:24
their connection to her. Your children love you unless you do something to make
1:11:29
them not love you. And so that's the first thing, the misrepresentation thing.
1:11:36
I think it matters to people who are rational. It's not gonna matter
1:11:43
to feminists because they don't believe that it matters whether it's true or not when
1:11:47
a woman makes allegations against a man. They don't think that matters. They
1:11:51
think it matters that a woman made allegations, and they want punishment handed out
1:11:56
for that. Yeah, So, in regard to UH custody court and how
1:12:02
domestic abuse allegations are used in custody court, I still stand by my my
1:12:09
consistent position throughout my time in the men's Rights Movement. Domestic abuse allegations should
1:12:15
never enter into custody court unless they have gone through criminal court first and been
1:12:23
resolved with a with an outcome. And if the outcome is that somebody has
1:12:28
been found guilty of domestic abuse, then they can be considered in custody court
1:12:35
and only then and then, and the consideration is does this conviction make the
1:12:43
convicted parent a threat to the children? Then if the answer is yes,
1:12:49
then then that should affect custody. All right, that's it, Yeah,
1:12:56
yeah, all right. So I got some rumble rants that I missed from
1:12:59
before. I'm gonna read them really quick because my rumbles rumble rant still show
1:13:04
up in my social stream Ninja for some reason. So blade Kaiser gave us
1:13:09
five dollars. Thank you, Blaive Kaiser. And I can't put a rumble
1:13:11
chant of the screen because it's in my It's in one of the plugins,
1:13:15
So I'm sorry, uh, and give us five dollars and says just popped
1:13:17
in to ask would you rather share your feelings with a tree or a woman?
1:13:21
Romanian V Yeah, I saw that going around. I don't, I
1:13:27
mean, I yeah, thank you for that. Did you want to now
1:13:31
you got to look at the live show chat. Oh, I will let
1:13:34
me see live show chat. What's what's in the live show chat? The
1:13:41
image that I just put in the live show chat. Oh oh oh oh
1:13:45
oh this right here? I see, I see. Yes, you shared
1:13:48
this on on Twitter on Twitter, I remember that. Yeah, men,
1:13:54
only the scenario once you let her in, it's too big. You're stuck
1:13:59
with life hop belly pig or woman. Yeah, yeah, you'd have to.
1:14:03
That is that working? That is Andred working? Yeah, I knew
1:14:08
it. Yeah, I could tell. Well, capture from an image from
1:14:14
Wikimedia Commons, and it's been flipped so that it faces the pig because I
1:14:17
want them facing each other. But that is Andreid working. So it's a
1:14:26
Gmorian guard and job of the hunt, that's what you're saying. Yeah,
1:14:30
look at my my ex profile. You can find it. It's my top
1:14:34
highlighted image right now. And I might actually make it my pinned tweet at
1:14:40
some point, or the corrected version my tweet, my pinned tweet, because
1:14:46
the one that's highlighted has a typo in it, and I replied to it
1:14:50
with the one that doesn't have a typo. So well, there you go.
1:14:55
All right, And I got another two more rumble rants from Nova fan
1:14:59
to both of them, gave it a dollar and says, new lolikon Meta,
1:15:01
we're not into Lali's We're just hagmaxing. And and then you have to
1:15:09
watch out for the whole Loli Khan thing because there are multiple states right now.
1:15:13
Yeah, process of putting laws on the books that will outlaw Lollie.
1:15:17
Yeah, they don't even if they're six thousand year old vampires wild born,
1:15:21
right. They don't seem to be doing anything to protect kids who are actually
1:15:25
under threat, kids who are being trafficked in the United States right now by
1:15:29
people who are bringing them across the border illegally. But they want your cartoons
1:15:32
off the internet. Yeah. I don't really care about the cartoons one way
1:15:39
or another, but that that pisses me off because they're spending energy on that
1:15:44
that they could be using to actually protect real life, honest to god,
1:15:48
thinking, feeling, living, breathing children. Mm hmm, all right,
1:15:54
they got one more super rumble rant. Sorry if a Nova fan for a
1:15:58
dollar, and he says, Hannah, bake cake. He's saying that you're
1:16:02
saying, make yeah, bake that cake. And then I think, let
1:16:08
me see, it's not related to bacing. No, I think, I
1:16:12
yeah, I think it's a reference. The reference to a Nicholas case.
1:16:17
Oh of course it is. All right, then I got a rum a
1:16:21
superchow sorry, superchow from Tell him Nar for fifty dollars, thank you,
1:16:26
tell him Nar, thank you? Come again, and he says, uh,
1:16:30
let me see for fifty Uh. The age gap difference is, in
1:16:38
my opinion, a case of something that should not be illegal, but is
1:16:41
probably not a good idea. I've seen people talk about this. I think
1:16:45
a lot of younger men treat it as practice, and the older women are
1:16:47
divorced or permanently single, so they just view it as an opportunity to have
1:16:51
quick fun with no expectation of commitment. Ari the single mother that mugshot pick
1:16:57
surprise me, But I am more surprised at some thing on social media is
1:17:00
fake. Cakes are indeed easy to bake, lots of fun, so easy
1:17:04
it almost feels like cheating for the more basic ones. Also, happy double
1:17:09
birthday, Hannah. Feel free to save that one up for the right date.
1:17:13
All right, thank you for thank you for that. Really appreciate it.
1:17:17
And I think that's all the stories. So we're done. We're gonna
1:17:20
head into the Patron Show now, and you know, like, like I
1:17:25
said, a little one, not a lot to talk about this week.
1:17:30
Yeah, I don't really have much else to say. So we're gonna go
1:17:32
into the Patroon Show now and leave it up to the Patron to decide whether
1:17:38
we will be looking at some feminist cringe like this article from Let me put
1:17:44
the article back up so you guys can see it. This article from some
1:17:50
website called The Current entitled how the romantic institution props up a racialized dating landscape
1:17:58
by feminists or maybe it's woman is because she's black Deborah Herrick, or this
1:18:03
article from Petron Petronella Wyatt called feminism has left middle aged women like me single,
1:18:11
childless and depressed. And I also have a couple of other ones here
1:18:15
that I thought were pretty good. Let me just put them on the screen
1:18:17
for you guys, since we got a minute. We have this one from
1:18:21
Caitlin Moran. I always I forget her name, but she writes, oh,
1:18:28
this is actually the shit? Is she? This article is called men
1:18:32
get Therapy, not a younger girlfriend. And then we have and then we
1:18:38
have this one from IGN. So you guys know, the Furiosa movie came
1:18:44
out this Memorial Day weekend and it was a massive flop, Like it was
1:18:50
like a record breaking flop, like on Memorial Day weekend you're supposed to have
1:18:56
like the biggest hits, and this film re underperformed. And I hear it
1:19:02
wasn't actually a bad movie, but apparently nobody wanted to watch it. People
1:19:08
got burned by Hollywood too many times. But nonetheless, IGN is trying to
1:19:12
make the case Furiosa, why the Mad Max movies don't need Mad Max anymore?
1:19:16
That hasn't aged well. So well, we can either look at those
1:19:24
or we can look at some clips. Let us know what you guys think.
1:19:27
Join us in the Patron Show as a patron. They're going to feed
1:19:30
the Badgeler dot com forward slash subscribe and you'll get a link to the Discord
1:19:34
server where you'll be able to participate and watch all the additional content. So
1:19:40
with that said, we're gonna head into the Patren Show. Now, let
1:19:44
us know what you guys think about what we discussed on the show today.
1:19:45
We really appreciate the comments. If you guys like this video, please hit
1:19:49
like subscribe. If you're not already subscribed, hit the belt notifications, leave
1:19:53
us a comment, let us know what you guys think about what we discussed
1:19:56
on the show today today, and please please please share this video because sharing
1:20:00
is caring. Thank you so much for coming on today's episode of HBr News,
1:20:02
and we'll talk to you all in the next video. Better than you,
1:20:06
I guess I'm going a little further than you are. Yeah, I'm
1:20:09
fucking better than you. Okay, much better than you. You are garbage.