Latest / Yaron Brook Show / Fuentes vs Piers; Illegal Immigrants; Nvidia; Farm Subsidies; Japan; EU | Yaron Brook Show

Transcript

Fuentes vs Piers; Illegal Immigrants; Nvidia; Farm Subsidies; Japan; EU | Yaron Brook Show · Yaron Brook Show

• 0:02
  Speaker 1: A lot of themths of Red, last Little and an
• 0:10
  Speaker 1: individual loss. This is the show. All right, everybody, welcome
• 0:21
  Speaker 1: to you. One book show on this uh Tuesdaycember ninth.
• 0:26
  Speaker 1: That everybody is having a good start to your week.
• 0:29
  Speaker 1: Uh and uh, things are going well. Let's see what
• 0:36
  Speaker 1: I want to tell you. Yeah, I did an interview
• 0:39
  Speaker 1: the other day yesterday, I think like yesterday, maybe it's
• 0:44
  Speaker 1: yesterday with Human Progress human Progress dot com and uh,
• 0:52
  Speaker 1: they do work on human progres with Human Success. And
• 0:54
  Speaker 1: we did the interview on basically on uh, the kind
• 0:58
  Speaker 1: of Steve Well Walsh's kind of view. It's not Stephen
• 1:05
  Speaker 1: what am I talking about? Walsh's view that everything is worse,
• 1:09
  Speaker 1: everything is terrible. And the videos, you know, doing really well.
• 1:14
  Speaker 1: I think it's a really good interview. You know, I
• 1:16
  Speaker 1: got to talk about the philosophical underpinnings of of the
• 1:22
  Speaker 1: of the Matt Walsh, Thank you God, Matt Walsh. We've
• 1:27
  Speaker 1: got to talk about the philosophical underpinning of kind of
• 1:29
  Speaker 1: the new right or the alt rights pessimism. And it was,
• 1:39
  Speaker 1: it was fat, it was, it was good. It was
• 1:41
  Speaker 1: a good interviewer, good interview. It's on a bunch of
• 1:45
  Speaker 1: different platforms. You can get on next. You can also
• 1:48
  Speaker 1: see it on YouTube and I think on their website.
• 1:52
  Speaker 1: It streams on their website. The good news is I
• 1:56
  Speaker 1: get excited by this. Was that today or yesterday? Actually
• 2:02
  Speaker 1: Stephen Pinker retweeted it, so that got a lot of
• 2:06
  Speaker 1: views I think, or it got a lot of commentary.
• 2:08
  Speaker 1: The other thing they do they did in Human Progress
• 2:11
  Speaker 1: is that you've got a whole transcript of it. So
• 2:14
  Speaker 1: the whole transcript of it is is is listed there,
• 2:18
  Speaker 1: so a lot of people might be reading it rather
• 2:20
  Speaker 1: than rather than watching it. But you know, Pinker's retweet
• 2:28
  Speaker 1: was fantastic and U he called me a libertarian, So
• 2:33
  Speaker 1: what I mean, there worse things you could call me,
• 2:35
  Speaker 1: as as I'll point out in a few minutes, they
• 2:38
  Speaker 1: are much much worse things that you could call me.
• 2:42
  Speaker 1: It's sad that he calls me a libertarian, but I
• 2:44
  Speaker 1: can't blame him for doing that. I mean, what is
• 2:47
  Speaker 1: what does Stephen Pinker know? He is not in a
• 2:49
  Speaker 1: position to differentiate between objectivists and libertarians. That's our jobs
• 2:55
  Speaker 1: that our job is to do. And and objectivism is
• 2:57
  Speaker 1: not big enough, prevalent, in enough common enough out there
• 3:03
  Speaker 1: in the culture for people to see the difference, recognize
• 3:08
  Speaker 1: the difference, you know, and and and reflect the difference
• 3:12
  Speaker 1: there human progress. Guy is a libertarian for for what
• 3:15
  Speaker 1: it's worth. I mean, he defines himself as a libertarian.
• 3:18
  Speaker 1: So it is great. It got a lot of people
• 3:21
  Speaker 1: to view it. And I like Stephen Pinka. He's one
• 3:25
  Speaker 1: of the good guys. Uh So that is that is
• 3:30
  Speaker 1: good that that he did that? All right? What else?
• 3:38
  Speaker 1: I think that's all I had to tell you in
• 3:41
  Speaker 1: terms of just stuff off record. But but yeah, go
• 3:46
  Speaker 1: watch the video. I think you'll enjoy it. So and
• 3:48
  Speaker 1: and by watching the video, you the councill go up
• 3:50
  Speaker 1: and and maybe that don't courage people to to invite
• 3:54
  Speaker 1: me more to their podcasts and their various shows. All right,
• 4:03
  Speaker 1: much bigger than any interview I have done. It was
• 4:08
  Speaker 1: ever done really ever by far was Piers Morgan's interview
• 4:13
  Speaker 1: of Nick foyints. I think it was yesterday last I
• 4:18
  Speaker 1: saw it had over two million views. I think that's
• 4:21
  Speaker 1: just on YouTube. I think it's probably got many many, many,
• 4:25
  Speaker 1: many many more views, and clips of it are circulating
• 4:28
  Speaker 1: in each one of the clip has about it has
• 4:30
  Speaker 1: about a million views, so we're talking about millions and
• 4:33
  Speaker 1: millions of views for this for this interview Piers Morgan
• 4:37
  Speaker 1: interviewing Nick FOYINTIS And you know, I'll tell you I
• 4:45
  Speaker 1: think it's a it's it's a horrible, horrible mistake for
• 4:48
  Speaker 1: somebody like Piers Morgan to interview for Intis. But but
• 4:51
  Speaker 1: let me first say that, I mean, I'll give Piers
• 4:54
  Speaker 1: Morgan credit for this. I'm not going to give him
• 4:57
  Speaker 1: much credit, but I'm getting give him credit for this.
• 5:03
  Speaker 1: That is that Piers Morgan didn't just do softballs. He
• 5:08
  Speaker 1: actually challenged him on real issues, showed him clips racism,
• 5:12
  Speaker 1: anti Semitism, thinking Hitler's cool, uh, and a you know,
• 5:17
  Speaker 1: attitude to his blacks, and a bunch of other things,
• 5:21
  Speaker 1: a bunch of other things. So he really did he
• 5:25
  Speaker 1: really did a push Nick for Inis on these issues.
• 5:31
  Speaker 1: And I guess that's to his credit given that attacker
• 5:36
  Speaker 1: Carson didn't just gave him softball after softball. Stephen Crowder,
• 5:41
  Speaker 1: that was a pathetic interview of again softball after softball.
• 5:45
  Speaker 1: And then you know, Stephen Crowder did a commentary on
• 5:51
  Speaker 1: the PS for Intis interview while watching the videos, and
• 5:55
  Speaker 1: he backed four Interest throughout he was he was supporting
• 5:59
  Speaker 1: Foy intas throughout the whole thing, so at least Piers
• 6:05
  Speaker 1: was willing to challenge foyntess on his views. The problem
• 6:11
  Speaker 1: is that it serves no purpose, no function, other than
• 6:19
  Speaker 1: to give credibility to Nick Foantis. The whole interview is
• 6:27
  Speaker 1: a way to elevate the profile of Nick Foyantus. Now
• 6:31
  Speaker 1: a bunch of people who might have never heard of him,
• 6:33
  Speaker 1: who probably didn't know he existed, now you know, had
• 6:38
  Speaker 1: to be exposed to him. You know, some percentage of
• 6:43
  Speaker 1: them might even be attracted to him and might pursue
• 6:48
  Speaker 1: his channel. I think viewership of Nick Foitus's stuff, I'm
• 6:53
  Speaker 1: sure has gone through the roof since Tucker Carlson interviewed him,
• 6:57
  Speaker 1: and a bunch of others interviewed him and his in
• 7:00
  Speaker 1: the mainstream media all over the place, and everybody's talking
• 7:02
  Speaker 1: about him, including me, I guess all because these mainStreet
• 7:09
  Speaker 1: so called mainstream people are sanctioning him, are giving him
• 7:13
  Speaker 1: a platform, are giving him a stage to spout his vile, stupid,
• 7:18
  Speaker 1: ridiculous ideas. And here's the thing. While Franis's ideas are
• 7:27
  Speaker 1: violent stupid, Frantis is not stupid. Frantis is smart. Frantis
• 7:34
  Speaker 1: is smart. He's definitely a lot smarter than Piers Morgan.
• 7:42
  Speaker 1: Frantis knows what he's doing. Piers Morgan does not. What
• 7:46
  Speaker 1: was the purpose that Piers Morgan set out for himself
• 7:51
  Speaker 1: in interviewing Nick foyandees to show that he's a racist?
• 7:55
  Speaker 1: Nick Frantis admits it openly to show these anti semitic
• 8:00
  Speaker 1: and Nick just shrugs it off and denies it. Denis's
• 8:05
  Speaker 1: antisemitic and uh, Denis's a Holocaust Denia and claims everything
• 8:11
  Speaker 1: they related to that was a joke to show that
• 8:15
  Speaker 1: he's a misogynist, you know. For Just admits that he
• 8:22
  Speaker 1: has no problem. He has an exchange between Morgan and Frantis,
• 8:27
  Speaker 1: You're not gay, Frantis says no, but women are very
• 8:30
  Speaker 1: difficult to be around. Uh. Perce Morgan says this is
• 8:35
  Speaker 1: a got you question? Should they vote? Frani says no,
• 8:39
  Speaker 1: they should stay at home. For Just says, yeah, so
• 8:43
  Speaker 1: you're a misogynist dinosaur. Have you ever had sex? And
• 8:47
  Speaker 1: for Intan says no, And Piers Morgan thinks he's really
• 8:53
  Speaker 1: got him because he says, wow, this, you know, says
• 8:56
  Speaker 1: the man who never got laid. That is you've got
• 8:58
  Speaker 1: opinion about women and though you haven't got late, but
• 9:02
  Speaker 1: you know, fus comes across as yeah, I mean it's
• 9:06
  Speaker 1: an apponent set of ideas. But his audience is like, yeah,
• 9:11
  Speaker 1: somebody said on the Piers Morgan show, never being said before,
• 9:15
  Speaker 1: the women shouldn't vote. They take it as a victory.
• 9:20
  Speaker 1: And what did we learn? The Nick Foyintis hates women.
• 9:25
  Speaker 1: I mean, anybody who knows anything about Nick Fointis knows that,
• 9:27
  Speaker 1: and everybody else doesn't need to know that because Nick
• 9:29
  Speaker 1: Foyintis is irrelevant to them, And the only way Nick
• 9:35
  Speaker 1: Foyintis is going to become relevant is that people like
• 9:38
  Speaker 1: Piers Morgan make irrelevant by introducing him to the world,
• 9:43
  Speaker 1: interviewing him thinking they got getches. Pierce didn't know what
• 9:52
  Speaker 1: to do, so, you know, he says, are you euracist?
• 9:55
  Speaker 1: And Appointed says, yeah, everybody's a racist. You know, I'm
• 10:00
  Speaker 1: you know, I'm a He says, I'm a race realist
• 10:03
  Speaker 1: because I'm realistic about race and I'm realistic about people,
• 10:07
  Speaker 1: you know, being a little bit racist. Everybody's a little
• 10:10
  Speaker 1: bit racist, nicko intesses, and you can see a lot
• 10:13
  Speaker 1: of people going yeah, and he goes on about you know,
• 10:17
  Speaker 1: most crimes in America committed by blacks, and Piers Morgan
• 10:23
  Speaker 1: gets all upset and he says, well, school shootings, mass
• 10:26
  Speaker 1: school shootings are committed by whites. And it's like, you know,
• 10:33
  Speaker 1: what's the point of that? I mean, I mean, Fantis
• 10:38
  Speaker 1: wins on that point, right, because Piers Morgan has tried
• 10:42
  Speaker 1: to deny reality. It's the question of what do you
• 10:45
  Speaker 1: do with that? What conclusion do you come from that?
• 10:47
  Speaker 1: How do you behave as a consequences of that? Which
• 10:50
  Speaker 1: is the question, not the fact. The fact is true.
• 10:57
  Speaker 1: So sadly, you know, Foe just uses this opportunity to
• 11:04
  Speaker 1: kind of, you know, in a sense, make fun of
• 11:08
  Speaker 1: you know, when when Nepis Morgan asked him abou whether
• 11:10
  Speaker 1: six million were killed in the Holocaust, for Inti is
• 11:13
  Speaker 1: more than six million, probably seven million. Six million is
• 11:15
  Speaker 1: a low ball figure. And and nobody knows if he's
• 11:19
  Speaker 1: joking or if he's telling the truth, or what exactly
• 11:21
  Speaker 1: he thinks. And for Intis doesn't care because it's not
• 11:24
  Speaker 1: about the truth. It's not about what he thinks, but
• 11:28
  Speaker 1: it's about a general nihilistic, hateful agenda. That's what he's about.
• 11:34
  Speaker 1: So what are you gonna get a nihilist? What are
• 11:37
  Speaker 1: you gonna get somebody who's hateful? What are you gonna
• 11:40
  Speaker 1: get somebody? Oh he says something hummable. Well, but that's
• 11:43
  Speaker 1: his whole stick, his whole stick. Everything about Nick Foyantis
• 11:47
  Speaker 1: is about saying hubbable stuff. So what what's what's the point? Like,
• 11:55
  Speaker 1: the only the only thing that you could try to
• 11:57
  Speaker 1: achieve in an interview like this, if you were going
• 11:59
  Speaker 1: to do it's to show the Nick Foes is a nihilist,
• 12:06
  Speaker 1: and to show that, you know, in in in in
• 12:09
  Speaker 1: kind of concrete terms, you know, force him into a
• 12:12
  Speaker 1: corner of of of saying things that reveal his real
• 12:20
  Speaker 1: kind of political intellectual you know purpose, you know, And
• 12:28
  Speaker 1: I don't know how you do that. It would be
• 12:29
  Speaker 1: difficult to do that. It's not easy to do that.
• 12:35
  Speaker 1: But that's not what Morgan. You know, he showed him
• 12:39
  Speaker 1: to be crude and a racist and a misogynist, and
• 12:42
  Speaker 1: and you know, you know, he denied the anti semitism,
• 12:45
  Speaker 1: but okay, you know, who knows if if if you
• 12:49
  Speaker 1: agree with him or not, and and uh he said
• 12:51
  Speaker 1: some other horrible stuff and they got into an argument
• 12:53
  Speaker 1: about Nick Fotis's father and but nothing that nothing that
• 13:01
  Speaker 1: anybody who cared couldn't have found out very very easily,
• 13:05
  Speaker 1: and you platformed him in front of now two million
• 13:09
  Speaker 1: views in fifteen hours. According to Pierce Mugen's Twitter account,
• 13:15
  Speaker 1: he's very proud of this interview and he keeps touting
• 13:17
  Speaker 1: its success because he got a lot of views, and
• 13:23
  Speaker 1: you know, most of the comments under the reviews were
• 13:30
  Speaker 1: supportive of of you know, Fuentes Fantis went on the
• 13:37
  Speaker 1: whole thing about Catholic, being Catholic, what Catholic doctrine requires,
• 13:41
  Speaker 1: and even though Pierce claims to be a Catholic, he
• 13:43
  Speaker 1: didn't understand what he was doing. He didn't understand what
• 13:46
  Speaker 1: for Intus was talking about, because for Intis is again
• 13:49
  Speaker 1: more intelligent and knows what he's trying to do. He's
• 13:54
  Speaker 1: and he knows who his audience is. He knows who's
• 13:57
  Speaker 1: playing to and who is Piers playing. The thing about
• 14:09
  Speaker 1: Frantice is to point out that he has nothing positive,
• 14:13
  Speaker 1: nothing positive to offer human beings. That he is a
• 14:18
  Speaker 1: collectivist and a tribalist, an emotionalist who has no positive
• 14:24
  Speaker 1: values for anybody to pursue. He is a cynic, a nihilist,
• 14:32
  Speaker 1: and yes, part of that when he thinks it's fun
• 14:37
  Speaker 1: to do he's a racist and a misogynist and anti Semite,
• 14:41
  Speaker 1: and he admires Hitler when he thinks it's fun to
• 14:43
  Speaker 1: do it, and Piers was like, you'd my hitline. He says, yeah,
• 14:46
  Speaker 1: he's cool, and Piers is like, you know, he killed
• 14:49
  Speaker 1: twelve million people, and he says, yeah, but he's cool. Yeah,
• 14:52
  Speaker 1: he has these cool uh you know, uniforms, and he
• 14:56
  Speaker 1: does these cool public events and at cool look text
• 15:00
  Speaker 1: you cool, here's cool. And what does Pierce do about that?
• 15:05
  Speaker 1: I mean, it's the same, by the way as Curtis
• 15:07
  Speaker 1: Yavin that I showed you the clip the other day
• 15:10
  Speaker 1: of Curtis Yaovin saying that what turned him on, what
• 15:13
  Speaker 1: redpeled him, what made him realize that everything around in
• 15:16
  Speaker 1: the world was something that was really wrong in the world,
• 15:18
  Speaker 1: was when he saw this video of images of decadence
• 15:22
  Speaker 1: in the West, just opposed against Nazis, well dressed Nazis
• 15:27
  Speaker 1: in the uniforms. I mean, you have to be really
• 15:32
  Speaker 1: sick and depraved to take that as the alternative homeless
• 15:40
  Speaker 1: people in the streets of San Francisco defecating in the
• 15:43
  Speaker 1: streets or Nazi uniforms and Nazis in uniforms, Nazis who
• 15:49
  Speaker 1: mostly died because they leader sent him into a war.
• 15:52
  Speaker 1: They you know, they were killed him. That's somehow good,
• 15:58
  Speaker 1: that's somehow positive. So you've got to show the nihilism.
• 16:09
  Speaker 1: You've got to show the positive values. What are you
• 16:12
  Speaker 1: living for? What values should we pursue? What kind of what? What? What?
• 16:20
  Speaker 1: What would be? What would be the program to implement
• 16:23
  Speaker 1: your ideas? Nick? What do we actually do? And then
• 16:28
  Speaker 1: you can show how empty and content less and stupid
• 16:32
  Speaker 1: and there's nothing there. There literally is nothing there. So
• 16:47
  Speaker 1: uh yeah, I mean, I hope I'm hopeful that, but
• 16:53
  Speaker 1: I bet I doubt this will happen. I'm hopeful that.
• 16:55
  Speaker 1: You know, this is this is it? You know that
• 16:58
  Speaker 1: this is like the peak fluents, right, doesn't get bigger
• 17:03
  Speaker 1: than this peak foys. You know, at this point everybody
• 17:10
  Speaker 1: knows who he is, so he gets the followers that
• 17:12
  Speaker 1: he gets. He doesn't attract any new people. You know,
• 17:15
  Speaker 1: before all this attention, a significant proportion of the people
• 17:19
  Speaker 1: following nifos well all kinds of bots. I don't know
• 17:22
  Speaker 1: if a majority, but a significant number of them were
• 17:24
  Speaker 1: just bots from all kinds of places other than the
• 17:28
  Speaker 1: United States, and now a lot of people are following him,
• 17:36
  Speaker 1: a lot of people know he is, and this is it.
• 17:38
  Speaker 1: Hopefully it dies here, and hopefully, you know, the show
• 17:42
  Speaker 1: dies and his appeal dies, or it gets relegated to
• 17:47
  Speaker 1: that corner of the internet where these widows and creeps
• 17:51
  Speaker 1: and horrible people actually reside. Sadly, I don't think that's
• 17:57
  Speaker 1: going to happen. And one of the reasons I don't
• 18:01
  Speaker 1: think that's gonna happen is because I just got like,
• 18:06
  Speaker 1: I just got like. I did a post commenting on
• 18:09
  Speaker 1: another post, a post on on on something I told
• 18:13
  Speaker 1: you about this post about this contractor complaining about illegal
• 18:19
  Speaker 1: immigrants and about them taking jobs and now the ICE
• 18:23
  Speaker 1: is going after them and arresting them. How much more
• 18:28
  Speaker 1: jobs he's getting on, how much more money he can
• 18:30
  Speaker 1: make and so on, and how good it is, Well,
• 18:34
  Speaker 1: I might post. I posted this with a comment. You know,
• 18:38
  Speaker 1: I reposted with a comment, Americans, a fate of competition
• 18:41
  Speaker 1: is pathetic and un American, and it's like, I open
• 18:46
  Speaker 1: up the doors to hell. Unbelievable. The response to me,
• 18:54
  Speaker 1: as of a few minutes ago, you know, nine hundred
• 18:58
  Speaker 1: and twenty four comment I don't know if I've ever
• 19:02
  Speaker 1: got more than that. That might be the most commented
• 19:04
  Speaker 1: comments I've ever made on Twitter. On acts, I will say,
• 19:11
  Speaker 1: you know, they're two hundred and eleven likes and eighty
• 19:13
  Speaker 1: five retweets, so you know that's something. Maybe I've got
• 19:17
  Speaker 1: a little bit of support out there. But nine hundred
• 19:20
  Speaker 1: and twenty four comments all of wos You know, I
• 19:25
  Speaker 1: could say anti but horrific, horrific anywhere from you know,
• 19:36
  Speaker 1: some semi reasonable kind of stuff, like like competition is
• 19:43
  Speaker 1: always welcome. How do you all liberals, I'm a liberal,
• 19:46
  Speaker 1: of course, say it equality. You're not competing when the
• 19:49
  Speaker 1: others has no license, insurance, doesn't participate in the taxing system,
• 19:53
  Speaker 1: and their prices reflected being you know, all of that
• 19:58
  Speaker 1: being underbid and and all this. Okay, So I say,
• 20:01
  Speaker 1: if if if all that is really well, wiries you,
• 20:04
  Speaker 1: then let's legalize them? And uh, then it says, what
• 20:10
  Speaker 1: do you mean let's legalize them? Are you saying you
• 20:13
  Speaker 1: want to bring more people to Puerto Rico? They discovered
• 20:17
  Speaker 1: that I'm from Puerto Rico because it's in It's in
• 20:19
  Speaker 1: my my my now, it's in twittered description and and
• 20:25
  Speaker 1: this became a big issue that I'm from Puerto Rico. Right.
• 20:28
  Speaker 1: It's it's as if are some from some you know,
• 20:31
  Speaker 1: uh uh, some third world country and have no say
• 20:35
  Speaker 1: in America. They don't know Puerto Rican's American citizens say
• 20:39
  Speaker 1: they have no clue. I mean, these people are are
• 20:41
  Speaker 1: really stupid. Uh you know, I I said, somewhere else
• 20:46
  Speaker 1: and legalize them, and uh yeah. And then you get,
• 20:53
  Speaker 1: does that mean Jews afraid of competition from non Jews
• 20:57
  Speaker 1: since they won't let you in if you are Jewish.
• 21:01
  Speaker 1: I assume that relates to Israel. So a lot of
• 21:03
  Speaker 1: anti Semites came out. Then somebody just said you're going
• 21:06
  Speaker 1: to jail. And then when I said I'm not, then
• 21:11
  Speaker 1: he says, no, you'll flee to Israel before that, and
• 21:14
  Speaker 1: I said, no, I'm here to stay, and he said, uh,
• 21:18
  Speaker 1: we'll see. There's always the ovens otherwise, subtle, subtle, you know,
• 21:25
  Speaker 1: subtle quote, you know, fluents kind of humor, oven humor. Right,
• 21:35
  Speaker 1: let's see. Uh yeah. Another one said, uh, the lion
• 21:42
  Speaker 1: does not concern himself with the opinion of a Jew. Right,
• 21:49
  Speaker 1: we got some of those. And then this guy says,
• 21:54
  Speaker 1: I'm curious if Americans came to Puerto Rico by the
• 21:57
  Speaker 1: millions and under cut the wages to unsustainable levels and
• 22:00
  Speaker 1: displace them if they feel like cowards for wanting us removed,
• 22:05
  Speaker 1: not realizing Puerto Rico is part of America and Puerto
• 22:08
  Speaker 1: Ricans are Americans, so it doesn't quite work that way.
• 22:11
  Speaker 1: But you know, that's that's that's the way you are.
• 22:16
  Speaker 1: And he says, you're used territory. You're not a citizen.
• 22:19
  Speaker 1: You can own your citizens you in a variety of ways. No,
• 22:23
  Speaker 1: that's just not true. The ignorances is big among these people.
• 22:33
  Speaker 1: Let me see if there's any other ones worth you know.
• 22:40
  Speaker 1: Then there were just the the the straight out insults.
• 22:44
  Speaker 1: You know, we know, we just want a competition with
• 22:46
  Speaker 1: actual Americans. Competition with actual Americans, is okay? Right? Oh,
• 22:58
  Speaker 1: somebody call me a faggot with lots of teas. I'm
• 23:01
  Speaker 1: not sure what that means. And like that was retreated
• 23:04
  Speaker 1: many many times, as if that was the that was
• 23:06
  Speaker 1: the response of the decade. Yes, that was it, That's
• 23:10
  Speaker 1: exactly what it is. Of course, everybody posted, i mean
• 23:18
  Speaker 1: dozens posted open bois for Israel as well, over and
• 23:24
  Speaker 1: over and over again, as if that is a that
• 23:26
  Speaker 1: is a legitimate response to anything. Uh do you say things?
• 23:35
  Speaker 1: Same thing for Israelis who hold anti immigration views. You
• 23:40
  Speaker 1: know I do to a large extent. And uh oh
• 23:45
  Speaker 1: I got a lot of this. We're going to deport you.
• 23:49
  Speaker 1: So so they're going to deport me, They're gonna send
• 23:51
  Speaker 1: me out of the country. I am gone. Yeah, we
• 24:02
  Speaker 1: shouldn't need to compete with the entire world for domestic jobs. Huh,
• 24:06
  Speaker 1: you shouldn't. I didn't know that. You shouldn't need to
• 24:09
  Speaker 1: compete with the entire world. Only need to compete with
• 24:11
  Speaker 1: people who have officially a passport. And if people can
• 24:14
  Speaker 1: make better things overseas and cheaper things over sieves, yeah,
• 24:20
  Speaker 1: you know, we we can't compete with them. So we're
• 24:23
  Speaker 1: just gonna build walls. No trade, no immigrants, We're just
• 24:26
  Speaker 1: gonna build walls and compete among ourselves. You know. I mean,
• 24:30
  Speaker 1: that's the level of ignorance and stupidity that people have
• 24:35
  Speaker 1: have gotten to. Uh you on, you have to go back.
• 24:43
  Speaker 1: This is part of the deporting people who want to
• 24:45
  Speaker 1: send me back. A bunch of them. Oh this was
• 24:51
  Speaker 1: another one. Uh, illegal immigrants as slaves or we don't
• 24:56
  Speaker 1: want to exploit slaves, right, we don't want to exploit them.
• 25:00
  Speaker 1: It's literally slavery. This is like the Civil War. We're
• 25:03
  Speaker 1: trying to liberate the slaves. And I was like, okay,
• 25:10
  Speaker 1: I'm all for that. How about we make them citizens right?
• 25:14
  Speaker 1: And then they freaked out and then they lost it completely.
• 25:19
  Speaker 1: They lose it completely if you if you point that out, yeah,
• 25:24
  Speaker 1: we need to send all us, all these to Israel.
• 25:28
  Speaker 1: It's that that repeated itself a few times Somalis and Israel.
• 25:33
  Speaker 1: A number of people asking what where my name Uran
• 25:36
  Speaker 1: comes from. All they had to do was google me
• 25:38
  Speaker 1: and they could find out. Those who did came back
• 25:41
  Speaker 1: with the anti Semitic stuff. Those who didn't only looked
• 25:44
  Speaker 1: at my Twitter profile came back with the anti Puerto
• 25:47
  Speaker 1: Rican stuff. I can't win, can't win. When one guy
• 25:53
  Speaker 1: even tried to quote the TUMU to me the opinion
• 25:58
  Speaker 1: of a foreigner, so I guess it doesn't count. But
• 26:00
  Speaker 1: I'm not a fan. I'm an American. And then people
• 26:02
  Speaker 1: just posted account based in Puerto Rico that offered obviously
• 26:07
  Speaker 1: disqualifies somebody talk about racist bastards. You know, just because
• 26:11
  Speaker 1: you're from Puerto Rico means you can't have an opinion,
• 26:14
  Speaker 1: and your opinion is worthless if you do. Yep, all right,
• 26:25
  Speaker 1: you're a podcaster. You probably never worked a day in
• 26:27
  Speaker 1: your life. The labor dumping that is tearing apart my
• 26:33
  Speaker 1: generation will stop. Yeah, civil engineer worked on construction sites.
• 26:38
  Speaker 1: Maybe engineering doesn't count as work. You know, I don't
• 26:43
  Speaker 1: think my contractors would have agreed exactly. But yeah, podcasting
• 26:47
  Speaker 1: is a work. I you know, I know it doesn't
• 26:50
  Speaker 1: appear that way. I just come up and speak and
• 26:52
  Speaker 1: talk to you guys. But you know, it turns out
• 26:54
  Speaker 1: podcasting is actually a work, actually work. They have to
• 27:00
  Speaker 1: pay taxes. They don't pay taxes. That's just not true.
• 27:02
  Speaker 1: Legal immigrants do pay taxes. That's that's how they get
• 27:06
  Speaker 1: around the system. That's why we have all those fake
• 27:09
  Speaker 1: SOID security numbers. They're paying even so security taxes. It's
• 27:13
  Speaker 1: that bad. Free market capitalism is ultimately anti human, all right,
• 27:18
  Speaker 1: At least we know where they stand. And then you know,
• 27:23
  Speaker 1: this guy's Scott. It's a different Scott, not al Scott.
• 27:26
  Speaker 1: Different Scouts says, are you Jewish globalists get the bullets first?
• 27:34
  Speaker 1: I guess that's a threat. Should I let Twitter know? Yeah,
• 27:43
  Speaker 1: it's a traitorous and greedy to expect American workers to
• 27:46
  Speaker 1: compete against peasant surf and oh, slave labor hero overseas.
• 27:52
  Speaker 1: That's right, build the walls. Let's become self sufficient, poor,
• 27:57
  Speaker 1: but self sufficient. Everything will be marry made. Another one,
• 28:03
  Speaker 1: are you Jewish? This one's not, Scott, go compete in
• 28:09
  Speaker 1: your own country. This is my country. Somebody else says,
• 28:15
  Speaker 1: I think you'd be happier in Israel. No, I wouldn't
• 28:18
  Speaker 1: be happier him. Don't tell Americans what we are, okay,
• 28:26
  Speaker 1: I am an American. No, And then Theodore just goes
• 28:28
  Speaker 1: right to the point he says, one would all caps
• 28:32
  Speaker 1: jew Obviously, that disqualifies me from having an opinion. This is,
• 28:39
  Speaker 1: you know, really ugly. That's a kike? Is another one
• 28:43
  Speaker 1: you detected? Is another one? Send them to Israel? You know,
• 28:49
  Speaker 1: it's wow, It is quite amazing. And hundreds of these right, hundreds, hundreds, hundreds,
• 28:57
  Speaker 1: nine hundred and sixty two comments, almost all of them,
• 29:00
  Speaker 1: ninety nine point nine percent of them like this, like this.
• 29:08
  Speaker 1: And my guess is, you know, it's how to tell
• 29:11
  Speaker 1: who these people are. I mean, they might be bots,
• 29:14
  Speaker 1: but my guess there's a lot of them are you know,
• 29:22
  Speaker 1: you know, the kind of nik foyenttis fans, so national socialists,
• 29:28
  Speaker 1: that's basically what they are, because a lot of them
• 29:30
  Speaker 1: advocate for socialism. This one says in white genocide, you
• 29:36
  Speaker 1: are sick, cowardly villain white genocide happening in America. I
• 29:41
  Speaker 1: didn't know that. I didn't know that. I didn't know
• 29:44
  Speaker 1: some of them are bots. But if you look, you know,
• 29:46
  Speaker 1: you can look out the profile and you can see
• 29:48
  Speaker 1: where they come from. And you know, most of them
• 29:51
  Speaker 1: are coming in the United States. So bots are typically
• 29:54
  Speaker 1: from outside the United States. It's interesting it doesn't tell
• 29:58
  Speaker 1: you where in the United States they're farm but uh,
• 30:03
  Speaker 1: you know, one guy just said Boomer. I guess that
• 30:05
  Speaker 1: that is the ultimate insult is go away. Booma is
• 30:09
  Speaker 1: another guy. I'm a Boomer Jew from Puerto Rico who
• 30:15
  Speaker 1: used to live in Israel and has dual citizenship. I
• 30:18
  Speaker 1: think that basically makes me like the most evil person
• 30:21
  Speaker 1: on a planet Earth, like doctor evil. So some of
• 30:29
  Speaker 1: them are just ignorant of economics, you know, some of
• 30:33
  Speaker 1: them you just don't understand what competition actually means. But
• 30:39
  Speaker 1: most of them are just just disgusting, hullable. Uh, you know,
• 30:47
  Speaker 1: just just holloable. Human beings. That it goes a lot
• 30:51
  Speaker 1: beyond ignorance. It it it it is about anti Semitism
• 30:59
  Speaker 1: and race and uh and uh just bigoted, horrible, angry,
• 31:09
  Speaker 1: I mean, disgusting. And my guess is most of my
• 31:12
  Speaker 1: young uh and yes, some of them. Yeah, there's there's
• 31:17
  Speaker 1: more Jew noises. And there's a picture of Hitler. You're
• 31:21
  Speaker 1: sure I killed six million Jews. They ate up here.
• 31:23
  Speaker 1: He's in heaven. Hitler's in heaven saying that. So it
• 31:26
  Speaker 1: just goes on and on and on. Right, So this
• 31:29
  Speaker 1: is this is uh, the this is where the culture
• 31:32
  Speaker 1: is a piece of the culture, not not majority of
• 31:34
  Speaker 1: the culture, but this is the way a big part
• 31:36
  Speaker 1: of the American culture is today. Uh. And it's it's
• 31:42
  Speaker 1: pretty scary. This is and this is what Nick Foytis encourages, supports,
• 31:48
  Speaker 1: builds on. He takes that anger and he funnels it
• 31:51
  Speaker 1: in this direction. And uh, you know, this is this
• 31:54
  Speaker 1: is what perculs surface. I mean I had a very
• 31:58
  Speaker 1: very similar thing saying when I went after the alt
• 32:01
  Speaker 1: right in twenty twenty sixteen, Right in twenty sixteen when
• 32:08
  Speaker 1: Trump was running and the olt wright first emerged, and
• 32:12
  Speaker 1: I had swastika sent to me, and you know, ovens
• 32:16
  Speaker 1: and jew and all this stuff, all this anti so
• 32:19
  Speaker 1: many stuff thrown at me in twenty sixteen didn't amount
• 32:22
  Speaker 1: to anything. They went away and neighborhood from them again.
• 32:25
  Speaker 1: But you know, it's it's still out there. It's prevalent,
• 32:28
  Speaker 1: and Fountas is giving them a home, and people like
• 32:33
  Speaker 1: Piers Morgan and Crowder and Tucker Callson and Crowder is
• 32:37
  Speaker 1: disappointing because I thought he was a little better. All
• 32:40
  Speaker 1: of these people are legitimizing, legitimizing this kind of attitude.
• 32:45
  Speaker 1: All by interviewing Nick Foyintis and by defending Nick Pointis
• 32:50
  Speaker 1: and justifying in Nick Fointis, I just wanted the thing
• 32:56
  Speaker 1: about illegal immigrations. So there is a you know, there's
• 33:01
  Speaker 1: there's this common trope on the right that uh, you
• 33:06
  Speaker 1: know that that people constantly use that basically says that
• 33:13
  Speaker 1: basically argues that the Biden administration did this on purpose.
• 33:18
  Speaker 1: They brought all these illegal immigrants into the country on purpose.
• 33:22
  Speaker 1: It was all a plan. It was all they wanted
• 33:25
  Speaker 1: to flood the country with illegals for whatever reason you
• 33:28
  Speaker 1: can make up, whatever reason. They'll all turn into citizens
• 33:31
  Speaker 1: and they've all democratic Orthough a lot of them vote
• 33:34
  Speaker 1: voted for Republicans, and and and you know, on and
• 33:38
  Speaker 1: on and on and on. You know, this idea that
• 33:41
  Speaker 1: it was all a democratic scheme. And there's actually a
• 33:44
  Speaker 1: good article out uh basically shows I think, you know,
• 33:49
  Speaker 1: quite convincingly. And and I didn't need to read the
• 33:54
  Speaker 1: article because because I think I was I was really convinced.
• 33:59
  Speaker 1: But basically basically that this was that the surge of
• 34:03
  Speaker 1: him of mass might you know, the border, tens of
• 34:07
  Speaker 1: thousands of people crossing the border, and just the mayhem
• 34:10
  Speaker 1: and the disarray and the anarchy on the border. It
• 34:13
  Speaker 1: was not anything planned. Uh. And the basically what it
• 34:20
  Speaker 1: was was unsurprising at all, total incompetence. They just had
• 34:29
  Speaker 1: no clue what they were doing. Uh. And I think
• 34:33
  Speaker 1: that's true of the Biden administration more broadly about lots
• 34:36
  Speaker 1: of things. And there's no reason to believe that suddenly
• 34:39
  Speaker 1: when it came to the border, they became these conspiring, uh, efficacious,
• 34:45
  Speaker 1: efficient people who could pull this off. Biden administration didn't
• 34:52
  Speaker 1: know what it was doing. Now are they nonprofits encouraging
• 34:55
  Speaker 1: people to come across the border and relish? You know,
• 34:58
  Speaker 1: they are nihilists of the life left and quite happy
• 35:01
  Speaker 1: to put the lives of South American people at risk
• 35:05
  Speaker 1: in order to make a point in America and in
• 35:08
  Speaker 1: order to just disrupt the status quo. But Biden isn't that.
• 35:12
  Speaker 1: Biden is just was an incompetent old fool, and he
• 35:16
  Speaker 1: wasn't prepared for it. He hesitated to do anything about
• 35:20
  Speaker 1: it because he was afraid of the of the left
• 35:24
  Speaker 1: of his party. But there was no coherent vision, no
• 35:27
  Speaker 1: coherent strategy, no coherence. I mean, if you saw Biden,
• 35:33
  Speaker 1: you know that there was just no nothing. There was
• 35:35
  Speaker 1: nothing coherent about Biden. It was just not coherent. And
• 35:43
  Speaker 1: I think that's usually the case. It's rare that things
• 35:47
  Speaker 1: are big part of some big plan, big agenda, big
• 35:52
  Speaker 1: you know, ideology. I mean the same thing with Trump.
• 35:55
  Speaker 1: You know, Trump is not a it's not about some
• 35:58
  Speaker 1: big strategy, idea, logical strategy. With Trump, it's it's basically corruption,
• 36:05
  Speaker 1: you know, and and uh and some very very primitive
• 36:09
  Speaker 1: views about some economic things, and uh and and just
• 36:14
  Speaker 1: loving and embracing the bully in him. There's no there's
• 36:17
  Speaker 1: no grand strategy, there's no five D chess for for
• 36:21
  Speaker 1: some amazing or even bad thing that he wants. He's
• 36:24
  Speaker 1: not some evil villains scheming. Trump is just Trump. He's
• 36:29
  Speaker 1: just a He's just a thug and uh as a
• 36:33
  Speaker 1: you know, and he just does thuggish things. Again, there's
• 36:36
  Speaker 1: no and. And he wants to peace the people who
• 36:39
  Speaker 1: got him elected, so he sends out ice. You know,
• 36:41
  Speaker 1: I don't even think that Trump has particularly negative views
• 36:45
  Speaker 1: about immigration really deep down. Remember he married, he married immigrants,
• 36:49
  Speaker 1: he hired immigrants, he employed immigrants, He probably, I'm sure
• 36:53
  Speaker 1: he employed illegal immigrants. It's not a Trump idea. It's
• 37:04
  Speaker 1: what appeases his base. It's his base that's ugly. I mean,
• 37:07
  Speaker 1: he's ugly, but it's his base that has really really
• 37:10
  Speaker 1: ugly ideas. I'm afraid I'm giving Puerto Rico a bad name.
• 37:20
  Speaker 1: This guy says, you have no right to even use
• 37:23
  Speaker 1: the term American. Okay, Puerto Rican, we just hate filth.
• 37:30
  Speaker 1: Remember that joke at the Republican National Convention about Puerto
• 37:34
  Speaker 1: Rican being this floating island of garbage. Yep, yep, it's
• 37:47
  Speaker 1: pretty pretty. It's pretty you know, it really is disgusting.
• 38:00
  Speaker 1: All right, let's see where are we in video? In video?
• 38:12
  Speaker 1: You know, just when you were when you thought you'd
• 38:15
  Speaker 1: seen it all. Donald Trump on Friday, I think it
• 38:21
  Speaker 1: was agreed agreed with with xiuh to provide China with
• 38:32
  Speaker 1: not the most advanced chips, but chips that he had
• 38:36
  Speaker 1: banned in the past, and Biden had banned and from
• 38:39
  Speaker 1: I'm going to China in order to prevent them from
• 38:42
  Speaker 1: using them in military technology and in in AIH. These
• 38:46
  Speaker 1: are the H two hundred H two hundred chips, which
• 38:54
  Speaker 1: you know, the the workhorse of much of a I
• 38:59
  Speaker 1: tech today. Again, they're not the most advanced chips, but
• 39:02
  Speaker 1: you can get a lot of them. Anyway. Trump decided,
• 39:08
  Speaker 1: after speaking to the Chinese that he was going to
• 39:12
  Speaker 1: allow allow China to purchase them. Now we'll see that
• 39:19
  Speaker 1: China doesn't want them, but he's going to allow China
• 39:21
  Speaker 1: to purchase them. He's so weak, it's pathetic, right, So
• 39:25
  Speaker 1: here's here's what he wrote. I've informed President she of
• 39:28
  Speaker 1: China that the United States will allow Nvidia to ship
• 39:32
  Speaker 1: its H two hundred products to approve customers in China
• 39:35
  Speaker 1: and other countries under conditions that allow for continued strong
• 39:39
  Speaker 1: national security. What conditions. Don't put it in your missiles.
• 39:43
  Speaker 1: Don't put it in a weapon. I'm watching you. I
• 39:47
  Speaker 1: mean once you ship to China, you have no control
• 39:50
  Speaker 1: of what happens to it. Give me a break, President,
• 39:55
  Speaker 1: She responded positively. Now here's the here's the here's the thing.
• 40:00
  Speaker 1: Twenty five percent will be paid to the United States
• 40:03
  Speaker 1: of America. So, as I understand scheme, China is going
• 40:08
  Speaker 1: to buy the chips from in Video and then in
• 40:11
  Speaker 1: Vidia is going to give the US government twenty five
• 40:13
  Speaker 1: percent of the revenue. Why how how does this make sense?
• 40:21
  Speaker 1: What's going on here? This policy will support American job
• 40:25
  Speaker 1: strength in US manufacturing and benefit American taxpayers. The Biden
• 40:30
  Speaker 1: administration forced out great companies to spend billions of dollars
• 40:33
  Speaker 1: building degraded products and that nobody wanted a terrible idea
• 40:38
  Speaker 1: that slowed innovation and heard American worker, what is he
• 40:41
  Speaker 1: talking about? Oh, maybe alternateive energy. I don't know what
• 40:46
  Speaker 1: he's talking about. It that error is over. We will
• 40:48
  Speaker 1: protect national security. No, you're not just sending the chips
• 40:51
  Speaker 1: that are used in the miss out to China. What
• 40:54
  Speaker 1: are you talking about? He's completely lost the plot. Other
• 40:59
  Speaker 1: than he kind of deal with in Video in Vidia
• 41:02
  Speaker 1: promise to give him twenty five percent of the revenue,
• 41:04
  Speaker 1: and it's nothing him personally granted, but America America, we
• 41:08
  Speaker 1: got it, and you know, so he's giving the Chinese right.
• 41:16
  Speaker 1: Here's here's somebody posted this. Josh Rogan posted this. I
• 41:19
  Speaker 1: think it's really clever. Lenin said. This is a quote
• 41:22
  Speaker 1: from Lenin. The capitalists will sell us the rope with
• 41:26
  Speaker 1: which we will hang them sheets. Trump sell us your
• 41:31
  Speaker 1: advanced AI chips and we will kick you back twenty
• 41:35
  Speaker 1: five Trump deal. The only thing wrong with that is
• 41:43
  Speaker 1: that it's insulting. It's insulting to call to capitalist, to
• 41:47
  Speaker 1: call trumpet capitalists. I mean, this is a complete reversal
• 41:54
  Speaker 1: of expert controls. Now, whether it makes sense, it doesn't
• 41:58
  Speaker 1: make sense. If you had a strategy around China, we
• 42:02
  Speaker 1: could argue about it. But a lot of people in
• 42:08
  Speaker 1: AI space are saying this not puts China on paul
• 42:12
  Speaker 1: with the US. They can now compete with us. If
• 42:15
  Speaker 1: we had a huge advantage over them in the past,
• 42:18
  Speaker 1: we're not going to have one given this. Yes, we'll
• 42:20
  Speaker 1: still have a bit of advantage because the more advanced
• 42:23
  Speaker 1: chips ouse, but it's not that big, and it's just
• 42:34
  Speaker 1: and of course this is all done and Trump makes
• 42:36
  Speaker 1: the point it's all done in the name of America first.
• 42:39
  Speaker 1: Damn those foreigners. Hate those foreigners. It's all America first.
• 42:46
  Speaker 1: So as you know, somebody writes these eight two hundred
• 42:54
  Speaker 1: chips will be used to hack American personal information and
• 42:56
  Speaker 1: black and mail American voters and businesses on a large scale.
• 43:00
  Speaker 1: Trump is selling your personal security the highest better and Republicans,
• 43:05
  Speaker 1: And you know Republicans will not take a stand against them.
• 43:10
  Speaker 1: They do not, they do not. You know, this is
• 43:16
  Speaker 1: kind of funny. The same day the administration approved the
• 43:19
  Speaker 1: sale of H two hundred chips right to China, the
• 43:22
  Speaker 1: Department of Justice said that these chips, the H two
• 43:28
  Speaker 1: hundred chips. They literally said this in a deposition where
• 43:32
  Speaker 1: they were they arrested smugglers who were smuggling H two
• 43:36
  Speaker 1: hundred chips out. So people are smuggling H two hundred
• 43:38
  Speaker 1: chips to China. This is what Department Justice said in
• 43:42
  Speaker 1: catching them right, indicting them. Quote, these chips are the
• 43:46
  Speaker 1: building blocks of AI superiority and integral to modern military applications.
• 43:51
  Speaker 1: The country that controls these chips will control AI technology.
• 43:55
  Speaker 1: The country that controls AI technology will control the future.
• 43:58
  Speaker 1: Oh China, you want the future here, let me tell
• 44:00
  Speaker 1: you some we've got future on a chip. Unbelievable. And
• 44:12
  Speaker 1: you guys tell me that Trump is the greatest president
• 44:15
  Speaker 1: in American history or one of the greatest, one of
• 44:17
  Speaker 1: the greatest presidents in American history. It's just I mean,
• 44:22
  Speaker 1: it's one of the dumbest presidents in American history, there
• 44:24
  Speaker 1: is no question about that. One of the most ignorant
• 44:27
  Speaker 1: presidents in American history, there's no question about that. And
• 44:30
  Speaker 1: one of the most anti American presidents in American history.
• 44:33
  Speaker 1: I mean anti American, inadvertedly acting against the interests of America.
• 44:40
  Speaker 1: Maybe advertedly, I don't know, but you know, I don't
• 44:42
  Speaker 1: think he's smart enough to do it advertedly, so inadvertently
• 44:46
  Speaker 1: acting against the interest of me. Here's another one. So
• 44:52
  Speaker 1: yesterday Trump and veiled a twelve billion dollar bailout for farmers.
• 44:57
  Speaker 1: I told you this was coming. It was kind of obvious.
• 45:01
  Speaker 1: This is a financial package that is supposed to compensate
• 45:05
  Speaker 1: for the farmers for the fact that nobody is buying
• 45:07
  Speaker 1: or primarily China is not buying American agriculture. They're not
• 45:11
  Speaker 1: buying soybeans, that are buying corn. You know, eleven billion
• 45:16
  Speaker 1: of this will be in the form of one time
• 45:18
  Speaker 1: payments through the Farmer Bridge Assistance program, which helps America,
• 45:23
  Speaker 1: which helps your crop farmers. The remaining one billion will
• 45:27
  Speaker 1: go towards commodities not covered under the Bridge Assistance program.
• 45:32
  Speaker 1: So they want to cover all the farmers. They want
• 45:34
  Speaker 1: to make sure they all get paid. Now, why has
• 45:37
  Speaker 1: this being such a horrible year for American farmers? Well,
• 45:42
  Speaker 1: primarily because Trump decided to engage in a trade war
• 45:46
  Speaker 1: with countries like China, and as a consequence of the
• 45:51
  Speaker 1: trade war. As a consequence of the trade war, other countries,
• 45:55
  Speaker 1: they are not buying American agricultural products. And because they're
• 46:00
  Speaker 1: not buying American agricultural products, the you know, the prices
• 46:07
  Speaker 1: of soybeans, for example, have gone down significantly, and there's
• 46:12
  Speaker 1: no market to soybeans is sitting then there's no market
• 46:14
  Speaker 1: to sell them. You have to have to keep lowing
• 46:16
  Speaker 1: prices in order to get sales. So now you know,
• 46:24
  Speaker 1: it's been a challenging year. The first nine months of
• 46:27
  Speaker 1: twenty twenty five, farm bankruptcy rose by nearly fifty percent
• 46:30
  Speaker 1: compared with the same period in twenty twenty four. Trump
• 46:35
  Speaker 1: says this relief will provide much needed certainty to farmers
• 46:38
  Speaker 1: as they get this year's harvest to market and look
• 46:40
  Speaker 1: ahead to next year's crop, we're going to make them
• 46:43
  Speaker 1: so strong it will indeed be a golden age for farmers,
• 46:48
  Speaker 1: a golden age under you know, government subsidies. Really, I
• 46:56
  Speaker 1: don't think that as a golden age. I don't consider
• 46:58
  Speaker 1: that a golden age. I don't think farmers considered to
• 46:59
  Speaker 1: go in age. And he farmers complaining about this, They're saying,
• 47:04
  Speaker 1: this is no way close to compensating for the actual losses,
• 47:08
  Speaker 1: and the losses were completely unnecessary. It's not like there
• 47:11
  Speaker 1: was a drought. It's not like some natural disaster wiped
• 47:15
  Speaker 1: out all the crops. It was man made. It was
• 47:20
  Speaker 1: Trump made. Is that man or not? I don't know,
• 47:23
  Speaker 1: but it was Trump made. The I mean basically, the
• 47:36
  Speaker 1: Tarisa China cut Beijing's imports of uish soybeans from the
• 47:40
  Speaker 1: usual twenty nine million metric tons annually to zero, and
• 47:46
  Speaker 1: then a deal was cut in October, and you know,
• 47:49
  Speaker 1: they're buying a little bit of soybeans now, but nothing
• 47:51
  Speaker 1: close to what they usually buy. Roughly half of all
• 47:55
  Speaker 1: American soybeans are exported each year, about a quarter go
• 47:59
  Speaker 1: to China. That's gone now. Trump says the Chinas played
• 48:07
  Speaker 1: twelve million to buy twelve million metric tons of Emerican
• 48:10
  Speaker 1: soybeans this year and twenty five million metric tons annually
• 48:13
  Speaker 1: for the next three years. And when he did that,
• 48:16
  Speaker 1: soybean prices went up a little bit. But the reality
• 48:19
  Speaker 1: is that China has only bought about twenty percent of
• 48:24
  Speaker 1: what it'd agreed to. The China in the past has
• 48:29
  Speaker 1: agreed to buy soybeans under other deals with Trump and
• 48:35
  Speaker 1: did not. And a lot of farmers sold their soybeans
• 48:42
  Speaker 1: before the deal was cut when prices were really really low,
• 48:47
  Speaker 1: and for them it's too bad. Now they are also
• 48:53
  Speaker 1: bumper crops, and as a consequence, there's a go lot
• 48:56
  Speaker 1: of corner soybeans just naturally. A year ago, let's remember, right,
• 49:03
  Speaker 1: Congress passed a ten billion dollar bailout package for farmers
• 49:07
  Speaker 1: to help with low commodity prices. So we constantly bail
• 49:12
  Speaker 1: out farmers. During his first term, Trump sent about twenty
• 49:20
  Speaker 1: three billion dollars to farmers to compensate for his tariffs
• 49:25
  Speaker 1: on China in his first term, So we're sending tens
• 49:30
  Speaker 1: of billions of dollars for farmers on a regular basis,
• 49:35
  Speaker 1: and then add to that more tens of billions of dollars.
• 49:38
  Speaker 1: When Trump does something the pisses off the Chinese and
• 49:41
  Speaker 1: they don't buy anything from the farmers. I mean, it's
• 49:45
  Speaker 1: just despicable. It's just despicable that all of us have
• 49:57
  Speaker 1: to be sacrificed for the sake of American farmers. Again,
• 50:06
  Speaker 1: we're talking about Donald Trump, the champion of capitalism, a
• 50:10
  Speaker 1: champion of cronyism, the champion of of of turning a
• 50:14
  Speaker 1: farming community into a community of leeches, of parasites off
• 50:20
  Speaker 1: of the federal government. And yeah, pretty uh you know again,
• 50:36
  Speaker 1: one of the great presidents in American history. Some people
• 50:39
  Speaker 1: tell me, yeah, okay, that just uh repeats it. Oh,
• 50:47
  Speaker 1: this was funny, This is really funny. This is the
• 50:50
  Speaker 1: kind of stuff that the Trump administration does. Right, We've
• 50:53
  Speaker 1: talked about this in the past. They lie, lie, lie, lie, lie,
• 50:56
  Speaker 1: lie lie, and they do it con and repeatedly until
• 51:02
  Speaker 1: the lie becomes like everybody exception, it's just true, just true. Oh,
• 51:11
  Speaker 1: we've got people on the chat coming to comment on
• 51:14
  Speaker 1: my speech impediment. That's pretty funny. When you when you
• 51:20
  Speaker 1: can't actually deal with the ideas, you insult people about
• 51:24
  Speaker 1: their accent. So this is you know, the spokesman for
• 51:30
  Speaker 1: the White House quote President Trump convinced President she to
• 51:34
  Speaker 1: continue purchasing again American soybeans, which is something China wasn't
• 51:39
  Speaker 1: doing under the last administration because they had no respect
• 51:42
  Speaker 1: for President Biden in the country at the time. Now
• 51:45
  Speaker 1: here's the thing. This is not This is not even
• 51:50
  Speaker 1: close right. This is a kind of a lie that
• 51:53
  Speaker 1: you can look up in three seconds and discover it.
• 51:57
  Speaker 1: But nobody looks it up like Trump boys represent and
• 52:00
  Speaker 1: say it and say it, to say it and say it.
• 52:01
  Speaker 1: Anybody goes, oh, okay, wow, didn't realize that. But China
• 52:06
  Speaker 1: was the largest expert market for American farmers in twenty
• 52:09
  Speaker 1: twenty four, they bought twenty seven million metric tons. They
• 52:16
  Speaker 1: stopped buying completely in twenty twenty five when Trump started
• 52:19
  Speaker 1: the trade ward. This is just simple, obvious, straightforward, uncontroversial facts,
• 52:27
  Speaker 1: which this spokesone for the White House, the spokesmone for
• 52:32
  Speaker 1: President Trump just ignores and lies with a straight face.
• 52:37
  Speaker 1: In you know, the ability of this administration to lie
• 52:41
  Speaker 1: is unmatched in you know, maybe human history. Maybe human history.
• 52:58
  Speaker 1: All right, let's see, I'm just following my my Twitter
• 53:01
  Speaker 1: feed because it's it's uh, it's kind of funny. Uh.
• 53:09
  Speaker 1: Let's see, every single time they say, right, born in Israel,
• 53:16
  Speaker 1: you know that's right. Every every single time they find
• 53:18
  Speaker 1: somebody they disagree with, turns out the Jew right, that's
• 53:22
  Speaker 1: what they're getting in. Yeah. Yeah, repent or you're going
• 53:30
  Speaker 1: to perma jail. Scratch any accolade of ironmand and you'll
• 53:34
  Speaker 1: get a revisionist Zionist in no time. That's me yah.
• 53:41
  Speaker 1: So yes, they're all out there. Uh, anti Sematis, Anti
• 53:47
  Speaker 1: Semitism is is, uh is strong and with us and
• 53:52
  Speaker 1: uh quite. I mean it would be chilling if I
• 53:57
  Speaker 1: if I if I thought, you know, these people are
• 54:01
  Speaker 1: unseerious and absurd and ridiculous. All right, let's see. Uh. Yeah,
• 54:09
  Speaker 1: farmer's upset. An Arkansas farmer says, so far krift and
• 54:13
  Speaker 1: what we need? Just a loss in corn this year
• 54:15
  Speaker 1: was over sixteen billion, the loss of soybeans around eleven billion.
• 54:19
  Speaker 1: Cotton and rice even bigger losses than that. Twelve billion
• 54:23
  Speaker 1: is not going to make up for this year. I
• 54:25
  Speaker 1: mean it used to be that American farmers were like
• 54:28
  Speaker 1: too proud to take welfare. I mean, granted that was
• 54:31
  Speaker 1: before the New deal. But it's just unbelievable that here
• 54:35
  Speaker 1: they are groveling for more No. No. Twelve billion on
• 54:37
  Speaker 1: and if we need more more billions, send us more billions.
• 54:41
  Speaker 1: We lost money this year the federal government, all Americans
• 54:44
  Speaker 1: should subsidize our losses. What the hell? I mean why?
• 54:51
  Speaker 1: I mean, why why can't Why shouldn't they go bankrupt?
• 54:55
  Speaker 1: Why shouldn't they go out of business? There's no market
• 54:58
  Speaker 1: for what they produce. Now, some of it is Trump's fault, certainly, soybeans,
• 55:04
  Speaker 1: But you know, what about what about the cotton and rice?
• 55:09
  Speaker 1: I mean, think about it. Do you know that they
• 55:13
  Speaker 1: actually grow rice in California? Rice, which is a massive
• 55:18
  Speaker 1: consumer of water, is grown in a come in a
• 55:23
  Speaker 1: a in a state that has constant shortages of water.
• 55:30
  Speaker 1: So why are we growing cotton? I'm sorry? Rice or cotton? Maybe?
• 55:39
  Speaker 1: I don't know. And there are plenty of countries in
• 55:42
  Speaker 1: the world that grow rice pretty cheaply, being my gas, Vietnam, Thailand, China.
• 55:49
  Speaker 1: But you know, let's say we don't want to buy
• 55:50
  Speaker 1: from China. I guess is you could grow rice in Africa.
• 55:53
  Speaker 1: We could just import all that rice. What about cotton?
• 55:58
  Speaker 1: Should we be growing cotton? In America really seems like nah,
• 56:03
  Speaker 1: it seems like you can grow crossing a lot cheap
• 56:06
  Speaker 1: and a lot better elsewhere around the world and just
• 56:08
  Speaker 1: imported here. So this is the kind of protectionist, anti capitalist,
• 56:16
  Speaker 1: anti freedom policies that the Trumpet administration embraces, did most
• 56:21
  Speaker 1: Americans sadly, most Americans sadly embrace. They're not interested in
• 56:26
  Speaker 1: freedom anymore. They're not interested in liberty anymore. They're interested
• 56:29
  Speaker 1: in their quote American job. They have a god given
• 56:33
  Speaker 1: right to hold their job for life, or their American farm.
• 56:36
  Speaker 1: They have a god getting right for the American farm
• 56:38
  Speaker 1: for life, or they're you know, or their American wage
• 56:46
  Speaker 1: is if I mean, this is the divine right of stagnation.
• 56:49
  Speaker 1: Over and over. Nigga Americans want to stagnate. They don't
• 56:52
  Speaker 1: want growth, They want to stagnate. They don't want to
• 56:54
  Speaker 1: come me richer. They don't want to come more prosperous.
• 56:56
  Speaker 1: They don't want better technology. They just want this same.
• 57:01
  Speaker 1: They want everybody who doesn't look like them out, and
• 57:04
  Speaker 1: they want to stagnate. You know, when I said pathetic
• 57:11
  Speaker 1: and cowardly on that thing, yeah, pathetic and cowardly was
• 57:15
  Speaker 1: exactly right, exactly right, All right, Yeah, let's talk about
• 57:25
  Speaker 1: Japan and EU. Interesting story I read about Japan. So
• 57:32
  Speaker 1: Japan is it's really challenging China right now. It's basically
• 57:38
  Speaker 1: said that it would consider a Chinese invasion of Taiwan
• 57:44
  Speaker 1: a real threat to Japan, a threat that would allow them, right,
• 57:53
  Speaker 1: that would allow them, in spite of their constitution, to
• 57:57
  Speaker 1: engage in military action. You know, the Japanese constitution that
• 58:00
  Speaker 1: was written by General MacArthur really makes it difficult for
• 58:04
  Speaker 1: them to deploy military forces, right it has to. The
• 58:10
  Speaker 1: only time they can deploy military force is when they
• 58:12
  Speaker 1: face a existential crisis. Tokyo stated that any Chinese assault
• 58:21
  Speaker 1: in Taiwan could constitute an existential crisis for Japan's national security,
• 58:26
  Speaker 1: which is the only illegal classification that allows Japan to
• 58:29
  Speaker 1: deploy military force in collective defense of its allies. And
• 58:37
  Speaker 1: they mean it. They've moved now missiles, antiaircraft missiles onto
• 58:42
  Speaker 1: an island about one hundred and twenty kilometers less than
• 58:46
  Speaker 1: one hundred miles from Taiwan. Remember, Japan has the fourth
• 58:52
  Speaker 1: largest navy in the world, and they're super advanced technologically. Japanese,
• 59:01
  Speaker 1: the Japanese are good or what they do when they
• 59:04
  Speaker 1: build something, they build it well. They have some of
• 59:09
  Speaker 1: the best submarines in the world, by the way, super cheap,
• 59:12
  Speaker 1: much cheaper than American or British submarines. Super cheap submarines
• 59:16
  Speaker 1: they run now on these hyper efficient batteries. They can
• 59:20
  Speaker 1: stay underwater as long as not longer than nuke sub
• 59:24
  Speaker 1: nuclear submarines. Amazing submarines. But generally they have a phenomenal fleet.
• 59:33
  Speaker 1: And it seems like Japan is trying to is preparing
• 59:42
  Speaker 1: for war. I mean, Japan needs the Straits of Taiwan,
• 59:47
  Speaker 1: the whole area around Taiwan to stay free open outside
• 59:52
  Speaker 1: of China's complete control. Around eighty percent of Japan's energy
• 59:56
  Speaker 1: imports pass through waters near Taiwan. A Chinese blockade of
• 1:00:01
  Speaker 1: Taiwan could cripple or a Japanese Chinese blockade in that
• 1:00:07
  Speaker 1: part of the ocean would cripple Japan's economy overnight. If
• 1:00:12
  Speaker 1: Taiwan falls, Japan becomes completely isolated economically and militarily. And
• 1:00:20
  Speaker 1: Japan is basically saying to d C to a unlistening
• 1:00:26
  Speaker 1: Trumpe administration, Uh, you know, we are willing to stand
• 1:00:30
  Speaker 1: with the Taiwanese. What about you? You have made a
• 1:00:34
  Speaker 1: commitment to the Western Pacific. What are you going to do? Uh?
• 1:00:43
  Speaker 1: It would be interesting also what the South Koreans do.
• 1:00:45
  Speaker 1: Japan has become closer to South Koreans in spite of
• 1:00:49
  Speaker 1: historical grievances, justified his grievances to South Koreans have towards Japanese.
• 1:00:57
  Speaker 1: What the South Koreans could potential? And that case, would
• 1:01:00
  Speaker 1: America just sit out? Would it let its allies just
• 1:01:04
  Speaker 1: do it alone? Would it ignore what's going on? America
• 1:01:10
  Speaker 1: has a lot of troops in the area, in both
• 1:01:12
  Speaker 1: South Korea and in Japan. Would it just let them
• 1:01:15
  Speaker 1: sit there? I mean one of the things that is
• 1:01:19
  Speaker 1: a real guarantee that China will not invade Japan. Yeah, sorry,
• 1:01:26
  Speaker 1: China will not eva in Taiwan. It's strength, I mean,
• 1:01:32
  Speaker 1: Trump claims this is this basis of his national security plan,
• 1:01:35
  Speaker 1: peace through Strength. If America is perceived as strong and is,
• 1:01:41
  Speaker 1: America states they will stand up against the Chinese, they
• 1:01:44
  Speaker 1: will not invade Taiwan. They don't want to lose. And
• 1:01:49
  Speaker 1: yet it's exactly that possibly that Trump is between by
• 1:01:56
  Speaker 1: staying completely silent on h on the issue. America is
• 1:02:02
  Speaker 1: sending another aircraft carrier to the Western Pacific. So maybe
• 1:02:05
  Speaker 1: that is the US's recognition that there is some issue there,
• 1:02:14
  Speaker 1: but otherwise nothing is being said. What is interesting is
• 1:02:21
  Speaker 1: I didn't realize the extent to which America defense wise
• 1:02:25
  Speaker 1: relies on Japanese technology. It reminds me of the situation
• 1:02:30
  Speaker 1: with Israel, the extent to which the US relies on
• 1:02:32
  Speaker 1: Israeli technology. But it turns out that US anti missile
• 1:02:38
  Speaker 1: defense systems against hypersonic threats Chinese or Russian almost entirely
• 1:02:45
  Speaker 1: depends on Japanese technology. The SM three Block two A
• 1:02:52
  Speaker 1: and the Glide Phase Interceptor, the two most modern anti
• 1:02:56
  Speaker 1: missile defense systems that the United States its deployees basically
• 1:03:02
  Speaker 1: being co developed with the Japanese, with most of the
• 1:03:07
  Speaker 1: sophisticated electronics being subcontracted to the Japanese because nobody in
• 1:03:14
  Speaker 1: the US could make them, you know. And it is
• 1:03:23
  Speaker 1: a reality that the United States today, I mean, the
• 1:03:27
  Speaker 1: machine that makes all chips possible comes from the Netherlands.
• 1:03:32
  Speaker 1: They F thirty five would be a far inferior airplane
• 1:03:36
  Speaker 1: if not for what Israel has learned from using it
• 1:03:41
  Speaker 1: and the kind of technology Israel has introduced into the
• 1:03:44
  Speaker 1: F thirty five to make it better. That is then
• 1:03:47
  Speaker 1: embraced by the United States. The United States is made
• 1:03:50
  Speaker 1: stronger in so many different ways by its allies. And
• 1:03:56
  Speaker 1: if you get anything from the NSS the national security
• 1:04:01
  Speaker 1: you know, strategy, you get the attitude that America doesn't
• 1:04:06
  Speaker 1: care about its allies. And yet that attitude is unbelievably
• 1:04:14
  Speaker 1: self defeating and anti any kind of rational America for
• 1:04:18
  Speaker 1: a strategy. So again, the Trump administration is undermining American
• 1:04:23
  Speaker 1: security by not not actually engaging without allies and not
• 1:04:31
  Speaker 1: giving a space for allies in our national security strategy.
• 1:04:34
  Speaker 1: I told you Israel has no place there. You know.
• 1:04:37
  Speaker 1: Japan is barely mentioned, Europe is only condemned. Israel is
• 1:04:44
  Speaker 1: mentioned again barely. Islamist threat is not mentioned, China as
• 1:04:47
  Speaker 1: a real threat is again marginalized. Russia is not mentioned
• 1:04:50
  Speaker 1: as a threat at all. It's a really pathetic document
• 1:04:55
  Speaker 1: in many respects. But anyway, I was really happy to
• 1:05:00
  Speaker 1: read this about the missile defense system because I thought
• 1:05:04
  Speaker 1: the United States had very little to or nothing that
• 1:05:07
  Speaker 1: could really stop the hypersonic missiles that the that the
• 1:05:11
  Speaker 1: Chinese and the Russians have. But it turns out that
• 1:05:14
  Speaker 1: one system is already developed and the second system that
• 1:05:17
  Speaker 1: would kill the missile in its glide phase is being
• 1:05:20
  Speaker 1: developed right now by the Americans and the Japanese. And
• 1:05:24
  Speaker 1: again where the really crucial technology is being built by
• 1:05:28
  Speaker 1: by Japanese companies. And it's uh, you know, Japanese has
• 1:05:32
  Speaker 1: phenomenal precision instruments technology just like the Germans do, and
• 1:05:38
  Speaker 1: that America doesn't. And we we want allies, we want friends,
• 1:05:43
  Speaker 1: you know. It's it's it's such a huge, unbelievable mistake
• 1:05:47
  Speaker 1: to build walls and to isolate ourselves and to pretend
• 1:05:49
  Speaker 1: that we can build everything ourselves. There is no way
• 1:05:52
  Speaker 1: for the United States, for example, to build this what
• 1:05:57
  Speaker 1: is it, what is Trump calling it, this shield dome
• 1:06:01
  Speaker 1: that would would would shield America from all missiles without
• 1:06:08
  Speaker 1: the Japanese and the Germans and the Brits and the Israelis.
• 1:06:12
  Speaker 1: It is always building, you know, it already has these
• 1:06:16
  Speaker 1: these missiles that are knock ballistic missiles out of the sky,
• 1:06:21
  Speaker 1: and it's building already the next generation. And that next
• 1:06:23
  Speaker 1: generation is supposed to be able to deal with the
• 1:06:25
  Speaker 1: hypersonics and is always probably ahead of the United States
• 1:06:31
  Speaker 1: in uh, that kind of tech, because it is always
• 1:06:34
  Speaker 1: highly motivated to develop it because it's existential, and then
• 1:06:38
  Speaker 1: the United States will benefit from that technology to the
• 1:06:41
  Speaker 1: extent that it maintains as well as an ally, Who
• 1:06:45
  Speaker 1: is this idiot who keeps coming back? I keep blocking him,
• 1:06:48
  Speaker 1: and he keeps going back just to annoy me. It's
• 1:06:51
  Speaker 1: it's kind of people have nothing nothing to do with
• 1:06:56
  Speaker 1: their lives. Their lives are so empty and shallow that
• 1:07:00
  Speaker 1: the best they can do is come and just harass
• 1:07:02
  Speaker 1: people on various on various podcasts, A get or at
• 1:07:08
  Speaker 1: least me. I don't know people. I mean, I guess
• 1:07:11
  Speaker 1: there's two you know stories about the EU. The second
• 1:07:15
  Speaker 1: one is positive. I mean, I take the story about
• 1:07:18
  Speaker 1: Japan as positive. Japan is taking its own self defense seriously.
• 1:07:21
  Speaker 1: They are investing, They've got the technology to do it,
• 1:07:24
  Speaker 1: they are putting the effort into it. They're not sitting
• 1:07:27
  Speaker 1: on their hands. They're actually doing the right thing good
• 1:07:30
  Speaker 1: for the Japanese. And they have the technological superiority over
• 1:07:33
  Speaker 1: the Chinese to be able to build things that I
• 1:07:37
  Speaker 1: think a lot of countries in the world couldn't even
• 1:07:39
  Speaker 1: imagine doing. Europe, though, is in trouble uh and and
• 1:07:47
  Speaker 1: and there's there's this national security UH strategy document that
• 1:07:52
  Speaker 1: came out highlights this because it like slams Europe, and
• 1:07:57
  Speaker 1: you know, Europe on Friday announced that it was going
• 1:08:00
  Speaker 1: to find Twitter X one hundred and twenty million euro
• 1:08:05
  Speaker 1: fine for because of the blue check mark. Because the
• 1:08:10
  Speaker 1: blue check mark doesn't actually verify your identity like it
• 1:08:14
  Speaker 1: used to in the past. Now you just pay for it,
• 1:08:16
  Speaker 1: and you pay for it, you get the blue check mark. Now,
• 1:08:20
  Speaker 1: Really what the punishing is the fact that X is
• 1:08:25
  Speaker 1: not playing with their censorship, ploy with their you know,
• 1:08:32
  Speaker 1: their their kind of twisting the arms of Facebook and
• 1:08:37
  Speaker 1: others to restrict certain speech on their platforms, and exits
• 1:08:45
  Speaker 1: refusing to do it. And so they find them, but
• 1:08:48
  Speaker 1: they didn't find them on that, they find them on
• 1:08:50
  Speaker 1: another way. But that's basically what they are. And indeed,
• 1:08:54
  Speaker 1: the NSS, the National Security Strategy is right in the
• 1:08:59
  Speaker 1: sense that is losing. But when it comes to free speech,
• 1:09:05
  Speaker 1: it's wrong to think that right wing political parties are
• 1:09:07
  Speaker 1: going to be full free speech. They're not. They never
• 1:09:09
  Speaker 1: have been histotically, you know, they're only for free speech
• 1:09:14
  Speaker 1: if it's this speech being censored. They're anti free speech.
• 1:09:17
  Speaker 1: Once they get their power and they want to sense
• 1:09:20
  Speaker 1: that their enemies speech. And it's absolutely absolutely true. I mean,
• 1:09:26
  Speaker 1: I mean thousands of cases exist in Germany, for example,
• 1:09:32
  Speaker 1: against people who have insulted politicians. I mean literally, the
• 1:09:37
  Speaker 1: German chancellor is personally responsible for five thousand cases because
• 1:09:44
  Speaker 1: people who insulted him, calling him a filthy drunk or
• 1:09:49
  Speaker 1: stuff like that. And that's that you can sue in Oh,
• 1:09:52
  Speaker 1: there he is again, this idiot is is there again?
• 1:09:55
  Speaker 1: He has a lot of different accounts. Do I have
• 1:10:00
  Speaker 1: anybody who has what do you call it the authority
• 1:10:03
  Speaker 1: to uh to moderate and can can can block these
• 1:10:07
  Speaker 1: idiots for me? I don't know if anybody live now
• 1:10:14
  Speaker 1: has that ability. And it's not just Germany. Of course,
• 1:10:18
  Speaker 1: the UK arrests people for stuff they post on Twitter. Uh,
• 1:10:23
  Speaker 1: and it's pretty horrible. So yeah, free speech is indeed
• 1:10:27
  Speaker 1: a really really bad situation in Europe. And and and look, Europe,
• 1:10:31
  Speaker 1: it makes a lot of money. It makes a lot
• 1:10:33
  Speaker 1: of money by finding American tech companies. They keep finding
• 1:10:37
  Speaker 1: American tech companies and they make money that way. Miroslav,
• 1:10:45
  Speaker 1: thank you really appreciated. I thought I saw you there earlier.
• 1:11:20
  Speaker 1: All right, let's see. So yeah, so Europe freedom wise
• 1:11:26
  Speaker 1: is struggling, but economically. It's really suffering since a financial crisis.
• 1:11:31
  Speaker 1: The US economy has grown somewhere close to three percent
• 1:11:34
  Speaker 1: on average a year. The European economy has grown one
• 1:11:39
  Speaker 1: percent a year. Now, you know, that is a huge
• 1:11:45
  Speaker 1: difference over time, a huge difference. In twenty twenty five,
• 1:11:53
  Speaker 1: the combined GDP of European unions twenty trillion. America was
• 1:11:58
  Speaker 1: thirty trillion. In two thousand and eight, the combined GDP
• 1:12:03
  Speaker 1: was about the same between the two countries. The GDP,
• 1:12:09
  Speaker 1: the capita GDP number widens because of the difference in
• 1:12:12
  Speaker 1: growth through two percent over what is it now, ten, sixteen,
• 1:12:18
  Speaker 1: seventeen years? Two percent over seventeen years will do that
• 1:12:21
  Speaker 1: to you. Europe is struggling, and if it continues like this,
• 1:12:28
  Speaker 1: it'll fall behind dramatically to the US, and it could
• 1:12:31
  Speaker 1: become worse. Germany, the German economy hasn't really grown in
• 1:12:35
  Speaker 1: five years because of its ridiculous green policies. So Europe's
• 1:12:46
  Speaker 1: in trouble. No entrepreneurs, no big tech companies. It made
• 1:12:51
  Speaker 1: more money, I think, I think I read somewhere it
• 1:12:53
  Speaker 1: made more money finding American companies than it did taxing
• 1:12:59
  Speaker 1: its tech companies. I mean against taxes. But you know,
• 1:13:04
  Speaker 1: you get a sense the finds are bigger than the
• 1:13:06
  Speaker 1: Americans then, because there's no tech industry in your no
• 1:13:11
  Speaker 1: significant one, no entrepreneurship. And we're talking about area of
• 1:13:16
  Speaker 1: the world highly educated, highly cultured, highly productive potentially, but
• 1:13:27
  Speaker 1: the consequences of heavy regulation, heavy controls, lack of freedom,
• 1:13:35
  Speaker 1: these other consequences, this is what happens. The good news
• 1:13:41
  Speaker 1: is that the EU is starting to get an inkling
• 1:13:45
  Speaker 1: that it's a problem. Now. I'm not sure it's going
• 1:13:49
  Speaker 1: to do it enough, but it's starting to get so.
• 1:13:56
  Speaker 1: For example, just today the EU closed the deal to
• 1:14:00
  Speaker 1: slash green rules for companies, make it a lot simpler
• 1:14:06
  Speaker 1: for companies to get to meet environmental standards. And indeed,
• 1:14:13
  Speaker 1: you know, a lot of what cripples cripples development, entrepreneurs,
• 1:14:18
  Speaker 1: you know, productivity in Europe is the green agenda. And
• 1:14:25
  Speaker 1: the political parties in the European Parliament of the Rights
• 1:14:30
  Speaker 1: have basically teamed up to reduce regulations. And this is
• 1:14:34
  Speaker 1: part of an effort we'll see if it succeeds, part
• 1:14:37
  Speaker 1: of an effort in Europe to start at the European
• 1:14:41
  Speaker 1: Union level to start reducing regulations, to try to eliminate regulations.
• 1:14:46
  Speaker 1: By the way, the UK, which is not part of
• 1:14:48
  Speaker 1: the EU, could have done this under conservative government. They
• 1:14:51
  Speaker 1: could have done it. They could have reduced regulations dramatically,
• 1:14:55
  Speaker 1: but of course they didn't. It's why Brexit is such
• 1:14:58
  Speaker 1: a failure. So you know, there's going to be backlash.
• 1:15:04
  Speaker 1: All the environmental groups are flipping out and the green
• 1:15:07
  Speaker 1: parties are flipping out. But it does seem right now
• 1:15:11
  Speaker 1: that right of center and far right political parties have
• 1:15:14
  Speaker 1: enough seats in the European Parliament to be able to
• 1:15:17
  Speaker 1: pretty much get this done. So maybe maybe maybe maybe,
• 1:15:22
  Speaker 1: probably very and still very unlikely, but maybe Europe is
• 1:15:27
  Speaker 1: waking up to the evils of statism, the evils of
• 1:15:31
  Speaker 1: regulations and controls and high taxes and all of that,
• 1:15:34
  Speaker 1: and maybe maybe maybe as a consequence they are changing.
• 1:15:39
  Speaker 1: We'll see, we will see, all right, guys. That is
• 1:15:45
  Speaker 1: the news for this Tuesday, December ninth. Yeah, day of
• 1:15:52
  Speaker 1: rabid anti semitism, racism, and just plain stupid ignorance on Twitter.
• 1:16:00
  Speaker 1: But then I think that's every day. Just sometimes it's
• 1:16:05
  Speaker 1: it's targeted at me, so I notice, But that's every day,
• 1:16:10
  Speaker 1: all right, guys. Thank you reminded that This show is
• 1:16:16
  Speaker 1: funded to contributions of people like you and the uh yeah,
• 1:16:31
  Speaker 1: you know, the show is funded by through contributions by
• 1:16:34
  Speaker 1: people like you. You can contribute here live using the
• 1:16:37
  Speaker 1: super chat. We met our first hour goal, we're into
• 1:16:41
  Speaker 1: our second hour goal. We'd be great if we could
• 1:16:42
  Speaker 1: meet our second hour goal or maybe even our third
• 1:16:45
  Speaker 1: hour goal. If there's enough questions that seemed to be
• 1:16:47
  Speaker 1: seem to be, you can ask a question, or you
• 1:16:49
  Speaker 1: can just do a sticker. A sticker is fine, you
• 1:16:52
  Speaker 1: get you know, call just that are three dollars sticker.
• 1:16:56
  Speaker 1: Thank you, call says I did a stick of Roland
• 1:17:00
  Speaker 1: Sooneric did a sticker. Let's see. I know we had others.
• 1:17:06
  Speaker 1: Jack did a sticker and Katherine did a sticker. So
• 1:17:09
  Speaker 1: thank you. Guys. Really appreciate that. And I think I
• 1:17:17
  Speaker 1: missed some. I think I had Jonathan honing there and yeah,
• 1:17:24
  Speaker 1: so thank you guys, really appreciate that. That's a way
• 1:17:26
  Speaker 1: to support the show without asking a question. But questions
• 1:17:28
  Speaker 1: are great because then you get the shape what I
• 1:17:31
  Speaker 1: talk about, which is which is perfect. I will mention
• 1:17:37
  Speaker 1: our sponsors, the imand Institute is remaining you that Iron
• 1:17:42
  Speaker 1: Rand Live starts up courses Fine rand Life startup again
• 1:17:47
  Speaker 1: on January. In January and you can sign up Ironman
• 1:17:50
  Speaker 1: dot oak slash start here and you'll get a link
• 1:17:53
  Speaker 1: to where you can start up, where you can sign up.
• 1:17:57
  Speaker 1: It is uh, it's a fabulous program. You're going to
• 1:18:03
  Speaker 1: get some of the best teachers and objectivism teach you know,
• 1:18:07
  Speaker 1: going in depth into the objective's philosophy. On cargate, Nikos
• 1:18:13
  Speaker 1: is going to be talking about kind of the ideas
• 1:18:15
  Speaker 1: of the right from Mussolini to the ult right today.
• 1:18:20
  Speaker 1: So you'll get a you'll get a real exposure to
• 1:18:22
  Speaker 1: some of our best teachers and what am I doing? Sorry, no,
• 1:18:30
  Speaker 1: not that that and uh yeah, it'll be a lot
• 1:18:37
  Speaker 1: of fun. You can take classes whenever you want. You
• 1:18:40
  Speaker 1: can take classes. You can take classes live or you
• 1:18:44
  Speaker 1: can take classes recorded. You can do homework or you cannot.
• 1:18:48
  Speaker 1: You can have a have like a mental relationship with
• 1:18:52
  Speaker 1: with with somebody from the institute or not. It's it's
• 1:18:55
  Speaker 1: really up to you. You can so you can get
• 1:18:57
  Speaker 1: a discount what twenty six x YBS ten twenty six
• 1:19:01
  Speaker 1: YBS ten that gives you ten percent discount if you
• 1:19:05
  Speaker 1: sign up for Iron rand Ali Live. All right, we
• 1:19:10
  Speaker 1: also have Alex Epstein. Alex Epstein is of course the
• 1:19:14
  Speaker 1: number one thinker in the world on issues related to
• 1:19:18
  Speaker 1: climate change and environmentalism and and energy and everything related
• 1:19:24
  Speaker 1: to energy and power power, So check him out. Alex Epstein, Epstein, Epstein,
• 1:19:31
  Speaker 1: God dot substick dot com, Alex Epstein dot substick dot com.
• 1:19:36
  Speaker 1: And yeah, you know, I think you'll you'll you'll learn
• 1:19:41
  Speaker 1: a lot from it. Okay, let's let's remind you also
• 1:19:48
  Speaker 1: that you can support the show by going to patreon
• 1:19:51
  Speaker 1: dot com and becoming a monthly supporter, a monthly supporter,
• 1:19:54
  Speaker 1: and that that is really helpful to the show because
• 1:19:58
  Speaker 1: it makes it possible for me to track and to
• 1:20:02
  Speaker 1: know how much money is coming in in the months
• 1:20:04
  Speaker 1: to come approximately right, people add and subtract, but overall
• 1:20:08
  Speaker 1: it's very predictable. I'm looking for four more people. We've
• 1:20:13
  Speaker 1: almost got to the goal. Four more people to sign
• 1:20:16
  Speaker 1: up to Patreon this month, maybe this week. Four more
• 1:20:21
  Speaker 1: people to sign up to Patreon. At ten dollars you
• 1:20:24
  Speaker 1: get you get the podcast with no ads, and the
• 1:20:29
  Speaker 1: twenty five dollars you get to participate on the video
• 1:20:32
  Speaker 1: panel on my AMA's the monthly Amaens. So sign up
• 1:20:37
  Speaker 1: for that of course, two hundred and fifty dollars you
• 1:20:39
  Speaker 1: get a one on one meeting with me once every
• 1:20:41
  Speaker 1: three months. For five hundred dollars, you get a one
• 1:20:43
  Speaker 1: on one meeting with me every month. So those who
• 1:20:47
  Speaker 1: can afford it and think the show merits the value
• 1:20:52
  Speaker 1: afforded and merits the value, then five hundred dollars is
• 1:20:56
  Speaker 1: very very much. I'm very thankful to people who can
• 1:21:02
  Speaker 1: do that. That makes a huge difference in terms of
• 1:21:05
  Speaker 1: in terms of growing the show. Let's see, Philosophical detective said,
• 1:21:12
  Speaker 1: did your son get a job where he went? He's
• 1:21:14
  Speaker 1: still he's still looking for a job. So my son,
• 1:21:17
  Speaker 1: who's a software engineer I worked for Amazon the last
• 1:21:20
  Speaker 1: few years, is UH is looking for a job in
• 1:21:23
  Speaker 1: in software engineering, either remotely or in the LA area.
• 1:21:28
  Speaker 1: So if you have anything, if you know of anything,
• 1:21:31
  Speaker 1: I know some of you have already written to me.
• 1:21:33
  Speaker 1: I really really appreciate that. I don't know he's talking
• 1:21:35
  Speaker 1: to some of you, UH, some of you. He's just
• 1:21:38
  Speaker 1: wasn't qualified for the job that you suggested. You know,
• 1:21:41
  Speaker 1: let me know, send me send me something. You can
• 1:21:45
  Speaker 1: send it to you on at your on bookshow dot
• 1:21:47
  Speaker 1: com and UH and that way, Yeah, that way we can.
• 1:21:54
  Speaker 1: I can let him know it would be great if
• 1:21:56
  Speaker 1: if you found a job through the through the your
• 1:21:58
  Speaker 1: on bookshow, that'd be fantastic. All right, let's jump in
• 1:22:01
  Speaker 1: with the super chats. Run GAVRIELI fifty dollars fifty euros.
• 1:22:08
  Speaker 1: Thank you, Ron, really appreciate that. Juron, could you review
• 1:22:12
  Speaker 1: the song Bailando bachata. It's a bachata song. It's a
• 1:22:18
  Speaker 1: Spanish love song, so refreshing. It avoids the usual needy begging,
• 1:22:23
  Speaker 1: whining and helpless worship. I feel like a genuine celebration
• 1:22:27
  Speaker 1: of values, almost an objective's view of romance. All right,
• 1:22:32
  Speaker 1: I will look, yeah, I mean, but chatta it's bachata,
• 1:22:42
  Speaker 1: so it's it's a dance, it's dance music. It's dance music.
• 1:22:45
  Speaker 1: It's bachata is a Latin dance, which I do not
• 1:22:49
  Speaker 1: do because I don't dance, I mean competent when it
• 1:22:53
  Speaker 1: comes to dancing. But yes, I will review it or
• 1:22:55
  Speaker 1: the reviews. One hundred dollars run, So you're forty two
• 1:23:00
  Speaker 1: dollars short. Everybody else is paid one hundred dollars. So
• 1:23:05
  Speaker 1: all right, let's see Michael. When people attack boomers and
• 1:23:12
  Speaker 1: say we're not in the boomer age anymore. Are they
• 1:23:15
  Speaker 1: really saying we're moving into a post enlightenment worth thinking
• 1:23:19
  Speaker 1: that your personal responsibility and capitalism is over? I mean,
• 1:23:24
  Speaker 1: I wish that anybody identified boomers with personal responsibility and capitalism.
• 1:23:31
  Speaker 1: I mean, boomers are the ones responsible for what we
• 1:23:33
  Speaker 1: have today. Boomers are the ones who created the modern
• 1:23:35
  Speaker 1: world and with all its downsides. Ideologically, there's nothing good
• 1:23:40
  Speaker 1: about boomers that we should celebrate. You know. The only
• 1:23:46
  Speaker 1: thing good about boomers is they're not gen X gen zs.
• 1:23:50
  Speaker 1: But it wasn't like boomers were capitalists or advocates for
• 1:23:53
  Speaker 1: the enlightenment. I think they're basically saying, shut up, old man.
• 1:23:58
  Speaker 1: It's all this thing is, shut up, old man. And
• 1:24:01
  Speaker 1: if the old man happens to agree with them, they
• 1:24:03
  Speaker 1: won't say you boomer. But if the old man disagrees,
• 1:24:06
  Speaker 1: so let me just shut up, old man. And you
• 1:24:08
  Speaker 1: could have it from the left or from the right
• 1:24:10
  Speaker 1: or anybody. You know, it's it's it really just as
• 1:24:13
  Speaker 1: a way to try to insult somebody into silence. It
• 1:24:19
  Speaker 1: really has no uh you know, real ideological backing or
• 1:24:28
  Speaker 1: foundation or real significant meaning. Ondesand all right, thank you, Michael,
• 1:24:45
  Speaker 1: uh let's see j jgbs uh. Watching old episodes of
• 1:25:01
  Speaker 1: Firing Line wfbg R at least was great exposing the BS.
• 1:25:11
  Speaker 1: Who's w F William F. Buckley Junior? William F. Buckley
• 1:25:14
  Speaker 1: Junior at least was great exposing the BS. We don't
• 1:25:18
  Speaker 1: seem to have talking heads who are quick or brave
• 1:25:22
  Speaker 1: enough to do that. Peers and peers in here, and
• 1:25:25
  Speaker 1: that generation is weak. Frantis looked more honest overall. I
• 1:25:30
  Speaker 1: think that's right. I think the peer is very weak.
• 1:25:32
  Speaker 1: You saw that when he tries to debate Douglas Murray.
• 1:25:36
  Speaker 1: I think Douglas Murray is the kind of person you're
• 1:25:38
  Speaker 1: looking for. I think you see that when Piers tried
• 1:25:40
  Speaker 1: to debate Douglas Murray about Hamas He's just weak. He
• 1:25:43
  Speaker 1: was weak with Frantis, although granted, at least he asked
• 1:25:47
  Speaker 1: tough questions, which which which everybody else didn't. Everybody else
• 1:25:51
  Speaker 1: softballed it. But but yeah, I I you know, you
• 1:25:58
  Speaker 1: say what you will about William F. Buckley. He was
• 1:26:00
  Speaker 1: smart and quick on his feet, and had opinions and
• 1:26:03
  Speaker 1: wasn't afraid to stand by his opinions. Shawsbutt every lie
• 1:26:10
  Speaker 1: incurs a debt to the truth. Eventually that debt must
• 1:26:13
  Speaker 1: be paid. That is from the TV series Chernobyl. That's
• 1:26:19
  Speaker 1: a great line. That is a great line because at
• 1:26:22
  Speaker 1: the end, reality is the truth, and at the end,
• 1:26:24
  Speaker 1: reality doesn't budge. Reality is what it is. And and
• 1:26:28
  Speaker 1: and you know you're you're ultimately that's who is going
• 1:26:32
  Speaker 1: to hold you accountable reality, Thomas. My brain is two
• 1:26:38
  Speaker 1: full of Nutcracker, which I start conducting tomorrow in San Jose.
• 1:26:43
  Speaker 1: To think of a good question. Happy December ninth. Thank
• 1:26:46
  Speaker 1: you Thomas, really appreciate that. And and it must be
• 1:26:50
  Speaker 1: fun conducting the Nutcracker. I mean, that's a that's such
• 1:26:52
  Speaker 1: a fun piece, and it's such a it's a piece
• 1:26:56
  Speaker 1: so associated with this time of year. So uh yeah,
• 1:27:00
  Speaker 1: good for you, and enjoy and good luck with it.
• 1:27:03
  Speaker 1: I mean not that luck has anything to do with it,
• 1:27:05
  Speaker 1: but you know, have fun with it. Remo says, why
• 1:27:11
  Speaker 1: do you think the man who shot Liberty? Why do
• 1:27:13
  Speaker 1: you like the man who shout liberty? Vallence? I find
• 1:27:15
  Speaker 1: it a bit disappointing compared to other classical questions. I
• 1:27:20
  Speaker 1: like it because it's it's it has it has the
• 1:27:28
  Speaker 1: sense of a real idea behind it. It's not just
• 1:27:33
  Speaker 1: good guy bad guy, but it has kind of a message.
• 1:27:36
  Speaker 1: It's trying to convey something. It's trying to say. Not
• 1:27:39
  Speaker 1: necessarily that I agree with that message, but I think
• 1:27:41
  Speaker 1: it's it's a smart movie. It's a clever movie. It
• 1:27:44
  Speaker 1: posits these two different types of people, the Jimmy Stewart
• 1:27:48
  Speaker 1: character and the John Wayne character, each representing something different,
• 1:27:55
  Speaker 1: one representing the past, one representing the future. And I
• 1:27:59
  Speaker 1: think it I think it just creates good drama and
• 1:28:02
  Speaker 1: and uh and does a good job of it. Not
• 1:28:04
  Speaker 1: to say that it's one of it's it's the greatest Western.
• 1:28:09
  Speaker 1: It's not. There are other westerns that are much better.
• 1:28:11
  Speaker 1: But it's good. It's good. It's a good movie. It's
• 1:28:13
  Speaker 1: it's very well made, and and it's and it it
• 1:28:18
  Speaker 1: represents real conflict, and it does so in a in
• 1:28:21
  Speaker 1: a clever way. And and it's really dramatic and interesting
• 1:28:24
  Speaker 1: and entertaining. Thanks Rimo. And then Remo says value for value,
• 1:28:30
  Speaker 1: Thank you. We will Cook says he's quoting Matt Walsh.
• 1:28:36
  Speaker 1: I have no self esteem. And it's funny because there's
• 1:28:39
  Speaker 1: a Matt Welsh, which who is from Reason Magazine, Reason
• 1:28:43
  Speaker 1: Institute and uh, people have confused the two Matts. Unfortunately,
• 1:28:49
  Speaker 1: Matt Welsh from Reason is much much better than Matt
• 1:28:54
  Speaker 1: Walsh from Daily Wire Michael. According to Objectivism Nick Foyntis's
• 1:29:02
  Speaker 1: constant manipulation and dishonesty should be bringing him nothing but
• 1:29:05
  Speaker 1: destruction and misery. Yet he's making a fortune and more
• 1:29:09
  Speaker 1: popular than ever. Yeah, I mean that doesn't make him happy.
• 1:29:13
  Speaker 1: If you watched yesterday's show with Gene, you know, the
• 1:29:17
  Speaker 1: happiness is not random, it's not arbitrary, and it doesn't
• 1:29:20
  Speaker 1: come from just making money and being popular. It doesn't
• 1:29:22
  Speaker 1: make him happy. The standard at the end of the
• 1:29:24
  Speaker 1: day's happiness, you know. And look, he's still young. There's
• 1:29:31
  Speaker 1: a lot of years of misery ahead for him. And
• 1:29:37
  Speaker 1: so I wouldn't I wouldn't consider Matt Foentis as a
• 1:29:41
  Speaker 1: successful at living. He's successful manipulating people. So it was
• 1:29:46
  Speaker 1: a Peter Keating, and Peter Keating was successful by the
• 1:29:50
  Speaker 1: measure of money and being acclaimed and building lots of buildings,
• 1:29:56
  Speaker 1: but he was miserable, and later in life he was
• 1:30:00
  Speaker 1: even more miserable than he was when he was young.
• 1:30:06
  Speaker 1: Thoughts on dual income, no kids, lifestyle, any downsides well,
• 1:30:11
  Speaker 1: I mean, the only downside is not having kids. Having
• 1:30:15
  Speaker 1: kids is an amazing experience. It's life changing, it's it's inspiring,
• 1:30:21
  Speaker 1: it's exciting, it's fun, it's interesting, it's so there's a
• 1:30:28
  Speaker 1: lot to be said for having kids, and it's a
• 1:30:32
  Speaker 1: real challenge. It stretches you. You learn a lot about yourself,
• 1:30:36
  Speaker 1: about the world, about human beings. So I think, I
• 1:30:41
  Speaker 1: think make sure that if you decide not to have kids,
• 1:30:45
  Speaker 1: which is a completely legitimate decision, that you really think
• 1:30:49
  Speaker 1: it through and and and that's a decision you make
• 1:30:52
  Speaker 1: knowing in a sense what you're giving up. But it's
• 1:30:55
  Speaker 1: okay to give that up. So the only downside is
• 1:30:58
  Speaker 1: not having the kids. But if you decide that that
• 1:31:02
  Speaker 1: that you're gaining something great value in the place, then
• 1:31:06
  Speaker 1: that's fine. There's no there's no downside in that sense.
• 1:31:12
  Speaker 1: Michael says, well, Nazi Germany have any popularity with Nick
• 1:31:14
  Speaker 1: Coentis types. He's young. Will he seek political power eventually?
• 1:31:20
  Speaker 1: I don't know. I mean, it was it was definitely yes.
• 1:31:23
  Speaker 1: I think that answers yes, not quite. As you know,
• 1:31:29
  Speaker 1: Nick foint has got to smoke in his face constantly.
• 1:31:32
  Speaker 1: He thinks he's funny, that's part of his stick. I
• 1:31:36
  Speaker 1: don't know if he had that, you had people committed
• 1:31:39
  Speaker 1: to an idea. I don't they had a positive, positive
• 1:31:43
  Speaker 1: in the not really positive, but positive in their perspective,
• 1:31:47
  Speaker 1: an agenda. They had an agenda, there's something they want
• 1:31:49
  Speaker 1: to achieve. I don't think Nick Foentis wants to achieve anything.
• 1:31:52
  Speaker 1: I think he's just a nihilist. That's why I think
• 1:31:56
  Speaker 1: he'll ultimately flat fall flat on his face. I don't
• 1:32:00
  Speaker 1: think he'll he'll achieve any kind of real political power
• 1:32:04
  Speaker 1: because he doesn't have a positive agenda. He's not rallying
• 1:32:08
  Speaker 1: the Arian race to rebuild the world and conquer Europe
• 1:32:12
  Speaker 1: and established Germany as the greatest country that ever existed.
• 1:32:18
  Speaker 1: I mean, that's it's not Anyfoentis. He's just there to
• 1:32:23
  Speaker 1: ship to slam, to disintegrate, to destroy, to put down,
• 1:32:27
  Speaker 1: to make fun of in the name of what and
• 1:32:30
  Speaker 1: they we have nothing. He's a void, He's a zero.
• 1:32:35
  Speaker 1: And in that sense, zeros don't usually attain political power.
• 1:32:43
  Speaker 1: It's possible Trump did, but Pointless is even more zero
• 1:32:48
  Speaker 1: than Trump. Michael, it's easier to collapse into nihilism than
• 1:32:52
  Speaker 1: to rise to egoism. I don't know if that's true.
• 1:32:55
  Speaker 1: And most of our intellectuals a nihilistic subjectivists to one
• 1:32:58
  Speaker 1: degree another, young people are collapsing into a burn it
• 1:33:02
  Speaker 1: all down mindset, and Nick knows how to make his
• 1:33:06
  Speaker 1: mannerisms more antagonistic and nihilistic than anyone else out there.
• 1:33:12
  Speaker 1: I mean, here's the thing, and I know I play
• 1:33:16
  Speaker 1: right it to this. So let's not exaggerating for into
• 1:33:20
  Speaker 1: as an influence. How many people really take him seriously?
• 1:33:27
  Speaker 1: How many young people are really nihilists versus how many
• 1:33:30
  Speaker 1: people go to Silicon Valley and working at Silicon Valley
• 1:33:34
  Speaker 1: are trying to build something and create something and make something.
• 1:33:39
  Speaker 1: I mean a lot of people in Silicon Valley. You
• 1:33:41
  Speaker 1: are a lot of young people in Silicon Valley building stuff,
• 1:33:43
  Speaker 1: making stuff. They a lot of young people in New
• 1:33:46
  Speaker 1: York working at investment banks and in private equity funds,
• 1:33:50
  Speaker 1: going into finance, building making stuff. There are a lot
• 1:33:54
  Speaker 1: of people all over the country engaging in work, you know,
• 1:33:59
  Speaker 1: mechanics and plums and who young people building stuff making
• 1:34:02
  Speaker 1: stuff who are not nihilistics. So let's not exaggerate his influence.
• 1:34:10
  Speaker 1: Let's not exaggerate the amount of impact he has. He
• 1:34:13
  Speaker 1: has an impact on basement dwelling. You know, people who've
• 1:34:20
  Speaker 1: lost all a sense of meaning and purpose in their life,
• 1:34:23
  Speaker 1: who do nothing, who are loses, loses, fundamental losers. Nihilism
• 1:34:30
  Speaker 1: is not not easy. It's easier to be an egoists.
• 1:34:34
  Speaker 1: Nihilism is destructive, self destructive. It's painful, it's horrible. It's
• 1:34:39
  Speaker 1: sacrificing yourself to nothing and do nothing ness. It's people
• 1:34:48
  Speaker 1: are giving up because of this lack of meaning. And
• 1:34:51
  Speaker 1: what we need to do is teach them that there
• 1:34:53
  Speaker 1: is meaning out there and that too many attracted to
• 1:34:57
  Speaker 1: this but not that many. That's not again, let's not exaggerated.
• 1:35:02
  Speaker 1: And I wish the Pierre Morgans and the crowds of
• 1:35:07
  Speaker 1: the world didn't give them a platform to increase the
• 1:35:09
  Speaker 1: number of them and them. When you say anti immigration
• 1:35:14
  Speaker 1: Americans are cowards, is that making people think you're not American?
• 1:35:19
  Speaker 1: Is it better to say anti immigration people. I'm trying
• 1:35:26
  Speaker 1: to say that these people are un American. So that's
• 1:35:30
  Speaker 1: part of it, the Americans who are un American. Maybe
• 1:35:33
  Speaker 1: if I'm saying Americans, that implies that I'm not American.
• 1:35:36
  Speaker 1: But anybody who does two seconds of research knows I'm Americans.
• 1:35:40
  Speaker 1: So maybe that's a good point. Maybe I should not
• 1:35:45
  Speaker 1: call out Americans in that sense. Although the other thing
• 1:35:48
  Speaker 1: is there's a reason for Europeans to be anti immigration
• 1:35:52
  Speaker 1: that Americans don't have the naanti slam natilam. So you know,
• 1:36:03
  Speaker 1: so it is Americans who are the problem here, not
• 1:36:07
  Speaker 1: just people, because I can understand, you know, working class
• 1:36:12
  Speaker 1: person in England who you know, lives not that far
• 1:36:17
  Speaker 1: from some of these grooming gangs, is really really pissed off.
• 1:36:21
  Speaker 1: I get that. That's completely makes sense to me. This
• 1:36:25
  Speaker 1: stuff about American jobs, that is so that is what
• 1:36:30
  Speaker 1: is disgusting. That is what is you know, so horrible,
• 1:36:35
  Speaker 1: you know, as if they as if that is what
• 1:36:38
  Speaker 1: America is about. It's about guaranteeing them a job. It's
• 1:36:41
  Speaker 1: the job of the American government to secure them a job.
• 1:36:46
  Speaker 1: It's exactly the opposite. I should say, my fellow American cowards, Yes,
• 1:36:51
  Speaker 1: my fellow anti my fellow Americans, someone like that. I
• 1:36:56
  Speaker 1: like that, Jennifer. So I could say that to make
• 1:36:58
  Speaker 1: clear that I'm an American too, But no, I mean Americans,
• 1:37:03
  Speaker 1: because I don't think this applies everywhere again in Europe,
• 1:37:08
  Speaker 1: given the overwhelming number of Muslims they're coming in, and
• 1:37:12
  Speaker 1: of those Muslims, the number of Islamists and the attitude
• 1:37:17
  Speaker 1: of them just being allowed to rape and pellage if
• 1:37:20
  Speaker 1: you will, Yeah, I mean it makes much more sense Americans.
• 1:37:24
  Speaker 1: What are they complaining about, Oh, he's undercutting me on price?
• 1:37:36
  Speaker 1: I am look, look, I am pro immigration overall, even
• 1:37:40
  Speaker 1: in Europe. I just think that, you know, in Europe,
• 1:37:43
  Speaker 1: there has to be a recognition that some people the
• 1:37:46
  Speaker 1: whole purpose of coming to Europe is terming Islamist, and
• 1:37:49
  Speaker 1: those people should be out, and the recognition there has
• 1:37:53
  Speaker 1: to be a recognition that the rule of law applies
• 1:37:55
  Speaker 1: to everybody, and if they're grooming gangs, they should be
• 1:37:57
  Speaker 1: sent to jail for the rest of their lives. If
• 1:38:00
  Speaker 1: they're raping young goals, they should never be allowed out.
• 1:38:05
  Speaker 1: And the rule of law and discriminating against enemies would
• 1:38:11
  Speaker 1: solve the whole immigration problem. But other than that, bring
• 1:38:13
  Speaker 1: them in. Run adding the remaining money for the song review.
• 1:38:19
  Speaker 1: I hadn't known the price, and I don't accept an
• 1:38:23
  Speaker 1: unearned discount. I pay full value for your mind, nothing
• 1:38:27
  Speaker 1: less or more. Thank you, Run, I really appreciate that.
• 1:38:30
  Speaker 1: Thank you, Lincoln. Any advice on con convincing sent to
• 1:38:35
  Speaker 1: left people towards objectivism. I've spent my first semester trying
• 1:38:40
  Speaker 1: to convince the TPSU conservatives to no avail. Yeah, I
• 1:38:45
  Speaker 1: mean they're useless. I mean you need to find pro science,
• 1:38:50
  Speaker 1: a pro science, pro American center leftists and use reason
• 1:38:59
  Speaker 1: as your wedge. You know, if you apply reason to
• 1:39:03
  Speaker 1: these areas, what about applying reason to morality? What about
• 1:39:06
  Speaker 1: applying reasons economics? And go for there and see if
• 1:39:10
  Speaker 1: you have better SKU, says Michael. Not all of these
• 1:39:14
  Speaker 1: racists or unemployed losers. I know quite a few well
• 1:39:19
  Speaker 1: to do people who hold these bigoted, hollable ideas. Sadly
• 1:39:23
  Speaker 1: that is true. Sadly there are quite a few who
• 1:39:25
  Speaker 1: are not just unemployed losers. It used to be a time,
• 1:39:33
  Speaker 1: not that long ago, where if you express those kind
• 1:39:36
  Speaker 1: of ideas, people wouldn't do business with you. I'm hoping
• 1:39:41
  Speaker 1: those days return at some point. Lincoln, what's the best
• 1:39:46
  Speaker 1: iron Ran book to get teens into her work? Working
• 1:39:49
  Speaker 1: on my English teacher from high school on her doing
• 1:39:52
  Speaker 1: a unit on iron Ran in her class. Atlason found
• 1:39:55
  Speaker 1: had a terrific but they're too long to make a
• 1:39:58
  Speaker 1: unit for it. In high school class. So what should
• 1:40:01
  Speaker 1: I recommend Anthem? I mean Anthem is perfect that short.
• 1:40:05
  Speaker 1: It can be combined with eighty four and Animal Farm
• 1:40:08
  Speaker 1: and other dystopian novels. So I think Anthem is the
• 1:40:14
  Speaker 1: perfect one if they don't want to do Fountain It Michael,
• 1:40:27
  Speaker 1: Part one. Should we feel sorry in some way for
• 1:40:29
  Speaker 1: these hateful losers? Their lives must be completely empty and
• 1:40:33
  Speaker 1: miserable to post this hate. Oh, we can view them
• 1:40:36
  Speaker 1: as having free will and chose to be destroyers rather
• 1:40:41
  Speaker 1: than values. Maybe they're never being present with a positive
• 1:40:44
  Speaker 1: worldview to choose from. I mean, maybe I don't feel
• 1:40:50
  Speaker 1: I mean I feel sorry for them, that human beings
• 1:40:52
  Speaker 1: who are far from living up to their potential as
• 1:40:54
  Speaker 1: human being, and that's sad, sad for all of us.
• 1:40:57
  Speaker 1: But it's also true that they're choosing this, so you know,
• 1:41:01
  Speaker 1: it's it's sad, But that doesn't eliminate the moral blame
• 1:41:07
  Speaker 1: and the fact that we should judge them. We should
• 1:41:10
  Speaker 1: judge them for what they're doing. Michael, suppose, for intest,
• 1:41:15
  Speaker 1: became president Trump is a below average intelligent authoritarian that
• 1:41:19
  Speaker 1: we can navigate around. If interest level authoritarian can't be
• 1:41:23
  Speaker 1: handled to podcast no, but for intest is not going
• 1:41:26
  Speaker 1: to become president. I mean, I thought Charlie Cook could
• 1:41:29
  Speaker 1: become presidents, and I think he would have if he
• 1:41:32
  Speaker 1: hadn't been murdered. But for intance, I don't think can.
• 1:41:34
  Speaker 1: He's too much of a nihilist. He's too he doesn't
• 1:41:37
  Speaker 1: have a positive agenda. And I think JD. Vance can
• 1:41:42
  Speaker 1: become president. And that's scary enough. That is scary enough.
• 1:41:49
  Speaker 1: Andrew this arrogance in those who think IQ explains the world.
• 1:41:55
  Speaker 1: They think others are too cowardly to admit a politically incorrect.
• 1:41:58
  Speaker 1: Truth and arrogance often fit together, well, don't they. Yes,
• 1:42:04
  Speaker 1: there's no question. And of course, I mean the funny
• 1:42:07
  Speaker 1: thing about the IQ crowd is they're the ones who
• 1:42:10
  Speaker 1: call me he's a Jew, right, And they're all IQ people.
• 1:42:14
  Speaker 1: And yet according to all the IQ tests, you know,
• 1:42:18
  Speaker 1: my people, my people have the highest IQ's in the world,
• 1:42:24
  Speaker 1: so don't mess with us. That's according to the raceed realists.
• 1:42:32
  Speaker 1: I mean the whole Yeah, I mean the ignorant, the cowardly,
• 1:42:37
  Speaker 1: the cowards. That's why they use pseudo names. None of
• 1:42:40
  Speaker 1: them put their own name on their on their posts.
• 1:42:45
  Speaker 1: You know, it's it's uh it is uh uh it ignorant.
• 1:42:53
  Speaker 1: They're ignorant and cowardly and angry and afraid. Fear is
• 1:42:57
  Speaker 1: a huge motivation for them. Fear is a huge motivation
• 1:43:01
  Speaker 1: for them because they know that in a competitive, you know,
• 1:43:04
  Speaker 1: real competitive world, they couldn't survive. They couldn't survive in
• 1:43:08
  Speaker 1: a really competitive world. The Chinese will take their jobs.
• 1:43:12
  Speaker 1: These other people take to job. I mean, they could survive,
• 1:43:14
  Speaker 1: but they can't imagine how. They're really afraid they couldn't survive.
• 1:43:19
  Speaker 1: And then robots are coming to replace them as well.
• 1:43:22
  Speaker 1: So they're really in trouble, right, So they live miserable lives.
• 1:43:27
  Speaker 1: But that's bad for all of us. It's not good
• 1:43:29
  Speaker 1: for any of us, all right, That is it. I
• 1:43:35
  Speaker 1: will see you guys tomorrow, I think at about the
• 1:43:38
  Speaker 1: same time, and we will resume. I'll discussion then I'll
• 1:43:43
  Speaker 1: fill you in and how goes my battles on Twitter?
• 1:43:47
  Speaker 1: Buy everybody