Latest / Merryn Talks Money / How Safe Is Your Pension Pot?

Transcript

How Safe Is Your Pension Pot? · Merryn Talks Money

• 0:03
  Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, Radio News. Welcome to Merrin Talks
• 0:19
  Speaker 1: Your Money, the personal finance edition of Marin Talks Money.
• 0:22
  Speaker 1: In these bonus podcasts, we talk about the best strategies
• 0:24
  Speaker 1: for making the most of your money. I'm Maren thumsat
• 0:27
  Speaker 1: Web and with Me Senior, a border and money Distilled
• 0:29
  Speaker 1: author John Stapback. Hi. Hi, right, So this week we
• 0:33
  Speaker 1: are answering a question from Mike.
• 0:35
  Speaker 2: I'd love to know your thoughts on the possible risks
• 0:38
  Speaker 2: in having all of your DC pension invested in one fund,
• 0:41
  Speaker 2: such as, for example, the Vanguard Life Strategy Fund, given
• 0:45
  Speaker 2: that the FSCs limits are only eighty five thousand. I've
• 0:50
  Speaker 2: kind of thought about this as my pension pot has increased.
• 0:52
  Speaker 2: I've wondered if it should be spread around a number
• 0:55
  Speaker 2: of similar passive funds from different providers.
• 0:58
  Speaker 1: Gosh, well, there's quite a lot in here because it's
• 1:01
  Speaker 1: not really about one fund, but it's about one provider,
• 1:03
  Speaker 1: isn't it.
• 1:04
  Speaker 3: Jump Well, the FSCs is basically where do you go
• 1:08
  Speaker 3: if all the else fails and so, say you're broker
• 1:15
  Speaker 3: goes bust, Say the platform that you're on goes bust,
• 1:18
  Speaker 3: and then not only that it terms out, it goes
• 1:21
  Speaker 3: bust and your money isn't where it should be. Because
• 1:24
  Speaker 3: the key thing if you're using a platform like how
• 1:27
  Speaker 3: gas lines down or an interactive investor for example, then
• 1:31
  Speaker 3: your assets should be separated so that even if the
• 1:35
  Speaker 3: platform provided breaks down, then your money is there somewhere
• 1:40
  Speaker 3: and then it's just a matter of trees there.
• 1:42
  Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean that's absolutely key. So everything that you
• 1:45
  Speaker 1: hold in an ISA or a pension or anything like
• 1:48
  Speaker 1: that is effectively held in a kind of trust structure
• 1:51
  Speaker 1: for you. So whatever goes wrong at the broker, that
• 1:54
  Speaker 1: structure still exists and your money is still inside it.
• 1:58
  Speaker 1: So you only run into a problem where you might
• 2:01
  Speaker 1: need back up from the FCFC if there's some kind
• 2:06
  Speaker 1: of fraud involved or your money has been moved out
• 2:09
  Speaker 1: of these these trust structures into something else. Right, So
• 2:12
  Speaker 1: it's it's incredibly unlikely unlikely that if you're broke a
• 2:17
  Speaker 1: where to go bust, which does happen, if you're broke
• 2:19
  Speaker 1: away to go bust, you might need recourse to them.
• 2:22
  Speaker 1: Is that fair?
• 2:23
  Speaker 3: Yeah, it is unlikely. I mean it's obviously it would
• 2:26
  Speaker 3: be a hassle in a nightmare if your broker goes bus,
• 2:28
  Speaker 3: then brokers do go bust, smaller brokers. You know, over
• 2:32
  Speaker 3: the years writing about this stuff, you know, there's always
• 2:35
  Speaker 3: every kind of like three or four years is usually
• 2:38
  Speaker 3: a story about some broker that most people probably haven't
• 2:41
  Speaker 3: heard of, and often what happens. One of the problems
• 2:45
  Speaker 3: is that even if there isn't actual fraud, and sometimes
• 2:49
  Speaker 3: it is fraud, but if there isn't freud, there's sometimes
• 2:52
  Speaker 3: just really sloppy paperwork, and you know, the people who
• 2:57
  Speaker 3: have got to go to the FSCs and having to
• 3:00
  Speaker 3: wait for ages. That's broadly speaking, what this is for.
• 3:04
  Speaker 3: And really, I do think that this is a really
• 3:06
  Speaker 3: good question, because it's not like this is a similar
• 3:08
  Speaker 3: thing with bank accounts. So we all remember the financial
• 3:11
  Speaker 3: crisis and how everyone actually got clued up on the
• 3:15
  Speaker 3: FSCs very quickly after that, and we all know that
• 3:19
  Speaker 3: you shouldn't hold more than eighty five thousand pounds with
• 3:21
  Speaker 3: any one bank sort of like banking group, per person,
• 3:26
  Speaker 3: because if your bank did end up having a run
• 3:29
  Speaker 3: on it and there was another two thousand and eight situation,
• 3:31
  Speaker 3: then you're only covered up to the eighty five thousand,
• 3:34
  Speaker 3: excepting certain minimal circumstances.
• 3:37
  Speaker 1: And something to say there by the way, is that
• 3:39
  Speaker 1: if you have cash, right, if you have cash at Hugger's,
• 3:41
  Speaker 1: lamsown or one of the other broadkers, in one of
• 3:43
  Speaker 1: those active saving schemes, whatever it is, that money is
• 3:46
  Speaker 1: likely to be spread across different banks as well. And
• 3:49
  Speaker 1: it's eighty five thousand for each of those.
• 3:51
  Speaker 3: Yeah, and that's both checking. If you're worried about it,
• 3:55
  Speaker 3: then you should check with your platform exactly how it
• 3:58
  Speaker 3: does that. And most of the you know, the platforms
• 4:00
  Speaker 3: will explain that to you. The price should be something
• 4:03
  Speaker 3: on their website, but if you can't find it, then
• 4:05
  Speaker 3: just email and ask them about it.
• 4:08
  Speaker 1: Well, here, listen, I'll read you the bit from huggris
• 4:09
  Speaker 1: lansdown website. Money you having an Isora funder a share
• 4:12
  Speaker 1: account is held in legally separate trust accounts across the range.
• 4:15
  Speaker 1: If you get regulated banks, this means your cash you're
• 4:17
  Speaker 1: held separately to Hl's cash and it is reconciled daily.
• 4:21
  Speaker 1: So that's the basics.
• 4:22
  Speaker 3: That a reputable platform will keep it an eye on
• 4:25
  Speaker 3: all this stuff. This is something you really do have
• 4:27
  Speaker 3: to consider if you're someone who does have more than
• 4:29
  Speaker 3: eighty five thousand pounds, and frankly, if you have a
• 4:32
  Speaker 3: pension that's going to be worth that's going to fund
• 4:35
  Speaker 3: you in retirement, then you probably will have a pension
• 4:39
  Speaker 3: that's worth more than eighty five thousand pounds. And although
• 4:43
  Speaker 3: things like brokers going bust doesn't happen very often, this
• 4:47
  Speaker 3: is one good reason why you do need to keep
• 4:48
  Speaker 3: an eye on the you know, the solvency of your broker,
• 4:54
  Speaker 3: and the easiest way to do that is to use
• 4:57
  Speaker 3: one of the big ones for at least art of
• 5:00
  Speaker 3: your pension pot, even if you've got a broker that
• 5:03
  Speaker 3: you prefer that's you know, smaller or more obscure or
• 5:06
  Speaker 3: cheaper or whatever. Because one of the important things with
• 5:11
  Speaker 3: this kind of situation is how politically sensitive it is.
• 5:16
  Speaker 3: And if you can sit there and say, this company
• 5:19
  Speaker 3: that I am invested with, would it going bust be
• 5:23
  Speaker 3: a front page headline scandal story, I think answers yes,
• 5:27
  Speaker 3: then that's actually an extra layer of protection for you
• 5:30
  Speaker 3: because politicians will react if that happens, Whereas if it's
• 5:36
  Speaker 3: just some pidly wee relatively recent startup that nobody else
• 5:41
  Speaker 3: knows about, then you are going to be on your
• 5:43
  Speaker 3: own as far as you know, getting your money back
• 5:47
  Speaker 3: goes beyond the connective SCS limits. So I think that's
• 5:51
  Speaker 3: that's a really important element to think about if you
• 5:54
  Speaker 3: are someone who's in the situation of, you know, being
• 5:57
  Speaker 3: able to think about this.
• 5:59
  Speaker 1: Of course, that's not what startup brokers want to hear,
• 6:02
  Speaker 1: is it that there are these these massive motes around
• 6:04
  Speaker 1: the big guys for that very reason? But I agree
• 6:07
  Speaker 1: with you, you know, it's one of the reasons to have
• 6:09
  Speaker 1: a big name broke up. Interestingly, though, I still have
• 6:13
  Speaker 1: my assets spread across three different organizations.
• 6:15
  Speaker 3: I think that's sensible for actually.
• 6:18
  Speaker 1: Come to think of it, simply simply because of admin. God,
• 6:21
  Speaker 1: I hate admin. I hate admin, and I can't imagine
• 6:24
  Speaker 1: having all my assets held on one platform it going
• 6:27
  Speaker 1: bust and then two years of admin and form filling
• 6:30
  Speaker 1: and all that. I don't think I could stand it.
• 6:32
  Speaker 3: Oh the way they'd be hairlish, and it's like, it's
• 6:35
  Speaker 3: just there's different levels of here. There's there's a level
• 6:37
  Speaker 3: of hell where you have to eat two years for
• 6:39
  Speaker 3: your ices, and there's a level of hell we are
• 6:41
  Speaker 3: your ices actually weren't near anymore.
• 6:44
  Speaker 1: That's the worst layer of hell. I don't think any
• 6:46
  Speaker 1: of the organizations I'm with would get me into that situation.
• 6:49
  Speaker 1: But you know, who knows, never say never, Terrible things
• 6:51
  Speaker 1: happen out there in the world of money.
• 6:52
  Speaker 3: We know that, no, absolutely, And I think I think
• 6:55
  Speaker 3: the other point, I mean, the answer makes questions specifically,
• 6:59
  Speaker 3: actually question he's asking a little bit easier to my mind,
• 7:03
  Speaker 3: because really what he's talking about is having it all
• 7:06
  Speaker 3: in one fund. And don't get wrong, I mean, Vanguard
• 7:10
  Speaker 3: falls very squarely into the headline, you know, political protections,
• 7:16
  Speaker 3: kind of like a company if that went, but then
• 7:18
  Speaker 3: that would definitely be a front page story. But you know,
• 7:22
  Speaker 3: it's very easy. He just put some of your money
• 7:24
  Speaker 3: into a different passive fund that is doing basically the
• 7:30
  Speaker 3: same thing. That's a fairly low ADMIN solution. I can
• 7:34
  Speaker 3: see why you might not want to have more than
• 7:37
  Speaker 3: one pension platform if you're only you know, if you're
• 7:41
  Speaker 3: only just over the limit and you're like, oh god,
• 7:43
  Speaker 3: I hate the ADMIN and I don't want to move
• 7:45
  Speaker 3: money to you, and I don't want to do this.
• 7:47
  Speaker 3: But with that, that's just a pretty straightforward matter of
• 7:50
  Speaker 3: taking a chunk of your pension money and putting it
• 7:54
  Speaker 3: in a slightly different index fund.
• 7:56
  Speaker 1: I mean, I just think, I mean, I would never
• 7:58
  Speaker 1: just rely on one fund for everything. I mean Vangguard
• 8:01
  Speaker 1: Life Strategy Fund. I mean, this is a well established strategy,
• 8:04
  Speaker 1: is a well established company. But why would you put
• 8:07
  Speaker 1: everything into one thing? Ever? Ever, I mean, I don't
• 8:10
  Speaker 1: think that the Vang Life Strategy Fund is going to
• 8:13
  Speaker 1: end up being wound down. I don't think it's going
• 8:16
  Speaker 1: to not have enough assets in it to be viable.
• 8:18
  Speaker 1: You know, none of those things are likely to happen.
• 8:20
  Speaker 1: But again, why not just have a couple of different things?
• 8:24
  Speaker 3: Yeah, I think this is one of those questions a
• 8:27
  Speaker 3: very basic level, just don't have all your eggs and
• 8:29
  Speaker 3: one basket. Also, the more eggs you've got, the more
• 8:32
  Speaker 3: baskets should going to required if you want to be
• 8:34
  Speaker 3: able to sleep socadly and.
• 8:36
  Speaker 1: Obviously, I mean you can take eggs baskets, how many
• 8:40
  Speaker 1: As you get more eggs, you need more baskets. Is
• 8:42
  Speaker 1: that that's what you're saying, Yes, diversify, have a couple
• 8:46
  Speaker 1: of baskets, move the eggs around them.
• 8:48
  Speaker 3: I think it's possible. Probably overly neurotic about this, but
• 8:51
  Speaker 3: the deeper you want to go into it, I have
• 8:55
  Speaker 3: to see I'm not you know, low with as I
• 8:58
  Speaker 3: am to mention the competition. The money Vator blog is
• 9:02
  Speaker 3: very good on this stuff for people who want to
• 9:04
  Speaker 3: go deep down into you know, exactly which kinds of
• 9:08
  Speaker 3: funds are protected and all that sort of stuff. As
• 9:13
  Speaker 3: I say, I think you can probably it would probably
• 9:16
  Speaker 3: be easy to get a bit too you not to
• 9:18
  Speaker 3: give about this, but at the same time it's definitely
• 9:21
  Speaker 3: something you should think about, certainly, especially if you are
• 9:24
  Speaker 3: going with small, more vulnerable providers, then you should be
• 9:28
  Speaker 3: paying more attention to this stuff. You know, if you
• 9:31
  Speaker 3: do have all your money we big brand names that
• 9:34
  Speaker 3: have got that, you know, headline protection, then you can
• 9:37
  Speaker 3: probably be a bit more relaxed about it. But if
• 9:40
  Speaker 3: it's anything off piecet, then just make sure you know
• 9:42
  Speaker 3: what you're doing.
• 9:43
  Speaker 1: And just be clear that you know you can not
• 9:45
  Speaker 1: this PARTICULARTF. But other atfs, they do get delisted, they
• 9:49
  Speaker 1: do get wound down, and then you do wait for
• 9:50
  Speaker 1: a bit of your money to come back, but it
• 9:52
  Speaker 1: does come back. And it's the same with investment trusts
• 9:55
  Speaker 1: for example. Every now and then they get wound down,
• 9:57
  Speaker 1: right and then the money will the money will turn
• 9:59
  Speaker 1: up in your bank account of it actually, and the
• 10:00
  Speaker 1: same with other types of funds. Okay, but one thing
• 10:03
  Speaker 1: to add to that, John, and I think you know
• 10:05
  Speaker 1: about this is that you do not get FSCs protection
• 10:08
  Speaker 1: anyway from investment trusts and ETFs. Is that right?
• 10:12
  Speaker 3: Yeah? I mean that's moving in your or ticktatorory. If
• 10:15
  Speaker 3: you're bordering a bit of that too much.
• 10:18
  Speaker 1: All right, well we'll leave it there. But the word
• 10:20
  Speaker 1: last thing I wanted to mention is just to be
• 10:22
  Speaker 1: absolutely clear, you will not get any compensation from the
• 10:26
  Speaker 1: FSCs or indeed from anybody else if you just make
• 10:29
  Speaker 1: a bad choice, if you choose a terrible fund and
• 10:31
  Speaker 1: it falls ninety percent, I'm afraid that's on you. Bad
• 10:34
  Speaker 1: choices have consequences, so let's try not to make too
• 10:37
  Speaker 1: many of those. Thanks for listening to this week's meren
• 10:50
  Speaker 1: Talk to Your Money. If you like us, share, rate, review,
• 10:52
  Speaker 1: and subscribe wherever you listen to podcasts. Also, be sure
• 10:54
  Speaker 1: to follow me in John on x or Twitter at
• 10:56
  Speaker 1: marinusw and John Underscore Stepic. This episode was produced by Semasadi,
• 11:01
  Speaker 1: Production support and sound designed by Moses and Questions and
• 11:05
  Speaker 1: comments on this show and all our shows are always
• 11:07
  Speaker 1: welcome our show. Email is Marimony at bloomberg dot net.