Latest / Best of LinkedIn: Digital Transformation & Tech / Best of LinkedIn: Defense Tech CW 26/ 27

Transcript

Best of LinkedIn: Defense Tech CW 26/ 27 · Best of LinkedIn: Digital Transformation & Tech

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: Provided by Thomas Allgaier and Frennus, based on the most relevant posts on LinkedIn about defense tech in CW-twenty six and twenty seven.
• 0:07
  Speaker 1: Frenness is a B to B market research company that supports ICT providers with a structured defense market entry framework designed to move them from European Defense Opportunity Landscape To qualified ministry conversations within six to eight weeks.
• 0:21
  Speaker 1: you can find more info In The Description.
• 0:23
  Speaker 1: And uh welcome to the deep dive.
• 0:26
  Speaker 1: So imagine you build this, you know revolutionary piece of defense tech.
• 0:30
  Speaker 1: You test it It works flawlessly in combat scenarios and then while you just sit back and watch your startup go totally bankrupt anyway.
• 0:36
  Speaker 0: Yeah Which is honestly a brutal reality check
• 0:39
  Speaker 1: right?
• 0:39
  Speaker 1: And it happens because you don't understand the government's plumbing.
• 0:43
  Speaker 1: So today we are diving into the top insights from the defense tech industry over calendar weeks, twenty six and twenty seven.
• 0:49
  Speaker 1: And We're breaking down what they actually mean for you?
• 0:51
  Speaker 1: You know founders engineers and strategists out there exactly
• 0:55
  Speaker 0: because the market is shifting incredibly fast right now.
• 0:57
  Speaker 0: Yeah I mean we were seeing changes in how money flows The software architecture on a battlefield even physical evolution of drums.
• 1:05
  Speaker 1: Yeah, the ground is basically moving beneath our feet.
• 1:07
  Speaker 1: So let's just start with that plumbing.
• 1:09
  Speaker 1: Alison Smith posted this incredible breakdown about the dynamic That kills so many brilliant companies.
• 1:15
  Speaker 0: Oh yeah!
• 1:15
  Speaker 0: The SBIR funding crap.
• 1:16
  Speaker 1: Exactly She points out that technically gifted founders They constantly fail because they treat early innovation grants Like SBIR Funding like an actual revenue model
• 1:26
  Speaker 0: Which it absolutely not
• 1:28
  Speaker 1: Right.
• 1:28
  Speaker 1: Alison notes An SBIR is a license to hunt.
• 1:35
  Speaker 0: Yeah, the operational system improvement money.
• 1:37
  Speaker 0: I mean that is crucial because early stage funding just proves a concept.
• 1:41
  Speaker 0: but BA-Seven Funding is where real procurement dollars actually live.
• 1:44
  Speaker 1: The big buck
• 1:45
  Speaker 0: Exactly it's the Money for Fielding and Sustaining Tech at Scale.
• 1:49
  Speaker 0: But you know getting from a prototype grant to ABA seven budget line means surviving the Valley of Death And that has made so much worse by continuing resolutions.
• 1:57
  Speaker 0: Oh
• 1:58
  Speaker 1: man, Continuing Resolutions.
• 1:59
  Speaker 1: if you are a founder A CR is basically your worst nightmare.
• 2:03
  Speaker 0: Without a doubt.
• 2:04
  Speaker 0: Congress fails to pass the budget The government operates on a C-R and federal agencies Are just frozen.
• 2:10
  Speaker 1: They can't start new programs right?
• 2:11
  Speaker 0: Right they're legally bound To last year's funding levels.
• 2:15
  Speaker 0: So If Your Startup Is Waiting For A Transition Contract A CR Basically Just Hits Pause On Your Life Support
• 2:22
  Speaker 1: which feeds perfectly into what Molly Jainer is calling the patience problem.
• 2:27
  Speaker 1: She shared this story about a founder who was four years in, The tech works.
• 2:31
  Speaker 1: he has Air Force traction but his VC fund wants the next financial milestone.
• 2:36
  Speaker 1: now
• 2:37
  Speaker 0: and in defense that milestone probably still two-and-a half years away exactly just exposes on massive structural flaw.
• 2:45
  Speaker 0: venture capital operates on seven to ten year cycle.
• 2:48
  Speaker 0: they need hyper growth an exit.
• 2:50
  Speaker 0: Defense procurement is ten to fifteen year reality.
• 2:53
  Speaker 1: Yeah, they plan budgets years in advance
• 2:55
  Speaker 0: Right.
• 2:55
  Speaker 0: so Molly makes this great point that VC's pattern matching defense startups like commercial fast timelines will literally kill good companies.
• 3:04
  Speaker 0: You need capital partners who understand you might just sit near four for a while
• 3:07
  Speaker 1: relying on non-dilutive funding.
• 3:08
  Speaker 1: yet It is like trying to sprint a marathon While holding your breath.
• 3:12
  Speaker 1: the time lines Just do not match.
• 3:13
  Speaker 0: That Is A Great Way To Put it.
• 3:15
  Speaker 0: and it is Not Just bureaucracy right?
• 3:17
  Speaker 0: It is The Physical Reality of Military Hardware.
• 3:20
  Speaker 0: Christopher Spagnoletti brought this up about solid rocket motors.
• 3:24
  Speaker 0: Oh
• 3:24
  Speaker 1: right, the qualification phase!
• 3:26
  Speaker 1: Yeah
• 3:26
  Speaker 0: people see a successful test flight and assume it is ready to ship.
• 3:30
  Speaker 0: but Christopher points out A solid rocket motor can take years just to qualify.
• 3:35
  Speaker 1: Because of all the intense testing?
• 3:37
  Speaker 0: Exactly, extreme vibration thermal cycling drop tests you Can spend a decade on one part before it actually flies.
• 3:44
  Speaker 0: You can't Just push an over-the-air software update To a rocket Motor mid flight.
• 3:48
  Speaker 0: yeah
• 3:48
  Speaker 1: physics doesn't care about your Software sprint cycle and that physical friction is why Dennis Pape Emphasize The gap between prototyping And production.
• 3:57
  Speaker 0: Right, with the DIU.
• 3:58
  Speaker 0: Yeah!
• 3:58
  Speaker 1: The Defense Innovation Unit is great at fast-tracking prototypes.
• 4:02
  Speaker 1: but a prototype just proves your tech works within the laws of physics.
• 4:05
  Speaker 1: it does not prove a business exists.
• 4:07
  Speaker 0: A business needs a funded program of record.
• 4:09
  Speaker 1: Exactly.
• 4:11
  Speaker 1: Which brings us to Brent Brown's post.
• 4:14
  Speaker 1: He basically said invention is the easy part.
• 4:16
  Speaker 1: now execution beats invention.
• 4:19
  Speaker 0: Oh, absolutely.
• 4:20
  Speaker 0: The market is definitely waking up.
• 4:21
  Speaker 1: Yeah the winners won't have the flashiest demo.
• 4:24
  Speaker 1: They will be the ones who can stamp out the ten thousandth unit as cheaply and securely As the first...
• 4:29
  Speaker 0: The Demo wins the headline but the assembly line wins the war.
• 4:33
  Speaker 0: But um let's follow that logic.
• 4:35
  Speaker 0: Say you survive the valley of death You get the funding And you manufacture Ten-thousand autonomous units.
• 4:42
  Speaker 0: What happens when you deploy them?
• 4:44
  Speaker 1: Well if you cant coordinate then they are a total operational liability.
• 4:47
  Speaker 0: Exactly The bottleneck shifts entirely to the software architecture.
• 4:52
  Speaker 0: Kublai Y published this great piece arguing.
• 4:55
  Speaker 0: militaries are doing AI totally backward right now.
• 4:58
  Speaker 1: How so?
• 4:59
  Speaker 0: Well, they buy sensors drones and tactical clouds as isolated products first And then you know They try to build some middleware patch to bolt them all together later.
• 5:07
  Speaker 0: Wait
• 5:08
  Speaker 1: I have to push back a little here.
• 5:09
  Speaker 1: haven't we been doing This kind of integration for years like with Palantir in combat zones?
• 5:14
  Speaker 0: We have, yeah.
• 5:15
  Speaker 0: But the underlying mechanics and specifically this speed Have fundamentally changed.
• 5:20
  Speaker 0: Jason Bowers brought up an incredible comparison for this.
• 5:23
  Speaker 0: In Afghanistan using software to map insurgent networks took days or even weeks.
• 5:27
  Speaker 0: Right but today look at Ukraine's Delta system.
• 5:31
  Speaker 0: They pull every drone feed Every ground sensor onto a single tablet in near real time At the tactical edge.
• 5:37
  Speaker 1: Going from days to near real time is a massive paradigm shift, and US companies are aggressively chasing this.
• 5:43
  Speaker 1: Christian Brose posted about Andrewle's lattice software winning the U.S.
• 5:47
  Speaker 1: Army's next-gen command and control...
• 5:49
  Speaker 0: Because they shrink targeting timelines from hours to under a minute!
• 5:52
  Speaker 0: Under
• 5:53
  Speaker 1: a minute?
• 5:53
  Speaker 1: That is completely insane!
• 5:55
  Speaker 0: It is new baseline for survival And it proves Kublai's whole point.
• 5:59
  Speaker 0: You have to define the command architecture first, how do you distribute the computational load?
• 6:03
  Speaker 0: How do you preserve human decision-making when comms go
• 6:06
  Speaker 0: down?".
• 6:06
  Speaker 1: It essentially makes this software the most lethal weapon we have.
• 6:10
  Speaker 1: Brenna Kuiper discussed regarding one brief in Grant Demerey.
• 6:14
  Speaker 1: They asked what if AI planning software actually generates more combat power than physical ships and aircraft combined?
• 6:21
  Speaker 0: It is a genuinely provocative thought.
• 6:23
  Speaker 1: Yeah, if your software out-thinks the adversary instantly... ...the hardware is almost a secondary commodity.
• 6:29
  Speaker 0: It becomes a commodity?
• 6:30
  Speaker 0: Yes!
• 6:31
  Speaker 0: But that Software Defined command….
• 6:33
  Speaker 0: …is really being tested in the physical world right now because, well, lattice networks assume your comms actually function
• 6:40
  Speaker 1: Right.
• 6:40
  Speaker 1: what if the adversary just severs connection or hides from sensors?
• 6:44
  Speaker 0: Exactly and this is the physical reality with drones.
• 6:47
  Speaker 0: Tim Desider posted his fascinating breakdown of the Bionic Eagle UAV.
• 6:52
  Speaker 0: We usually judge drones by range or payload.
• 6:55
  Speaker 0: But Tim says the new arms race is signature discipline,
• 6:58
  Speaker 1: specifically acoustic signatures making them quiet right
• 7:01
  Speaker 0: which is incredibly difficult engineering.
• 7:03
  Speaker 0: you have to rethink.
• 7:04
  Speaker 0: propellers dampen motors use radar absorbing materials
• 7:07
  Speaker 1: and it matters because in places like Ukraine sound as The ultimate early warning system.
• 7:12
  Speaker 1: soldiers hear them before they see them.
• 7:14
  Speaker 1: so if You can't here at coming your reaction time just vanishes.
• 7:17
  Speaker 0: And It Is Not Just Acoustics.
• 7:19
  Speaker 0: Luca Leon highlighted an even scarier trend.
• 7:22
  Speaker 0: Fiber optic controlled FPV drones.
• 7:25
  Speaker 1: Oh man, when I read this...I was blown away.
• 7:28
  Speaker 1: We are talking about a drone flying at sixty miles per hour tethered by literal glass wire.
• 7:34
  Speaker 0: It sounds like science fiction right?
• 7:35
  Speaker 0: But it unwinds the fiber-optic cable as it flies.
• 7:38
  Speaker 0: There's almost zero tension so doesn't snap
• 7:41
  Speaker 1: And tactical advantage there is huge
• 7:43
  Speaker 0: Massive Because it is not broadcasting radio frequencies, It's totally immune to traditional RF jamming.
• 7:49
  Speaker 0: You just cannot jam light traveling in a physical wire.
• 7:52
  Speaker 1: That is terrifying for a defender.
• 7:54
  Speaker 1: So if you can't jam them and they are quiet And too small for radar How do military shoot down swarms today?
• 7:59
  Speaker 0: Well brute force honestly.
• 8:01
  Speaker 0: Mark C L analyzed the South Korean live fire drill against drone swarm.
• 8:05
  Speaker 0: They use Vulcan cannons Portable lasers even soldiers with shotguns.
• 8:09
  Speaker 0: They downed forty four out of fifty drones.
• 8:11
  Speaker 1: I mean Forty-four out of fifty sounds pretty successful.
• 8:15
  Speaker 0: Paper, yeah!
• 8:16
  Speaker 0: But Aviv Barzohar pointed it out.
• 8:18
  Speaker 0: they had to use eight Vulcan cannons firing eight hundred rounds per boost to do It.
• 8:23
  Speaker 0: the sheer amount of ammo is just staggering.
• 8:25
  Speaker 1: So its completely unsustainable.
• 8:27
  Speaker 1: logistics wise.
• 8:28
  Speaker 0: Exactly Aviv argues relying on dumb rounds against some true combat swarm attacking at night for multiple vectors Unrealistic, you will run out of bullets before they run outta drones.
• 8:39
  Speaker 1: So we absolutely need autonomous interception!
• 8:42
  Speaker 1: Humans and dumb ammo just can't keep up with the math in a modern battlefield?
• 8:46
  Speaker 1: They
• 8:46
  Speaker 0: really can't... But Emre Porcolab made an important counterpoint here.
• 8:50
  Speaker 0: AI is needed for scale, yes.
• 8:53
  Speaker 0: But the ultimate strategic advantage... ...is still human machine integration.
• 8:57
  Speaker 1: Right!
• 8:57
  Speaker 1: It's not just letting tech run wild.
• 8:59
  Speaker 0: Exactly it about how effectively a human operator under extreme pressure can interface with that AI to make judgement calls
• 9:06
  Speaker 1: Amplifying Human Judgment With Machine Speed.
• 9:10
  Speaker 1: And you know this push for autonomy isn't exclusively about lethality.
• 9:14
  Speaker 1: Connor Love shared story totally refrains this.
• 9:17
  Speaker 1: An American Apache went down near the Strait of Hormuz.
• 9:20
  Speaker 1: Two pilots stranded in the water.
• 9:22
  Speaker 0: And usually you have to risk more humans and a dangerous environment to save them?
• 9:25
  Speaker 0: Yes,
• 9:26
  Speaker 1: exactly!
• 9:26
  Speaker 1: The compounding risk of rescue operations.
• 9:29
  Speaker 1: but this time they deployed a ceramic autonomous boat.
• 9:33
  Speaker 1: it navigated out reached the pilots and brought both backs safely.
• 9:37
  Speaker 1: Wow, The first rescue of its kind.
• 9:40
  Speaker 1: we talked so much about strike capabilities.
• 9:42
  Speaker 1: it is amazing to see autonomy keeping humans out of harm's way.
• 9:46
  Speaker 0: that Is incredible?
• 9:47
  Speaker 0: And you know bringing back to the human element is a perfect transition.
• 9:50
  Speaker 0: because all this tech Rescue boats fiber optic drones rocket motors It all relies on a humid ecosystem
• 9:56
  Speaker 1: the talent the geography and how it has ultimately sold.
• 10:00
  Speaker 0: Yeah, the sector is undergoing a massive restructuring to find this talent.
• 10:04
  Speaker 0: Zach Silber highlighted Bruce Katz's research on this.
• 10:07
  Speaker 0: They mapped out defense assets and found universities are becoming the new heavy anchors of the Defense Tech ecosystem.
• 10:13
  Speaker 1: Right, but they are changing how they do it.
• 10:15
  Speaker 1: They aren't just pumping out entry-level engineers—they're building massive innovation hubs aligned with industry like Old Dominion University in Virginia or Vanderbilt and Chattanooga
• 10:26
  Speaker 0: And specifically building them off campus so that they can have SCIFs those secure facilities and partner directly to the DoD in private capital?
• 10:34
  Speaker 1: They're building localized moats of cleared talent.
• 10:37
  Speaker 1: But there is a massive friction point in hiring.
• 10:40
  Speaker 1: Ron Loomis posted about veterans transitioning into tech, and it is a sobering reality check.
• 10:46
  Speaker 0: It's such a massive market failure!
• 10:49
  Speaker 1: You have a veteran who managed the fifty million dollar logistics operation in a war zone?
• 10:53
  Speaker 1: They had exact adaptability and leadership.
• 10:56
  Speaker 1: startups need... But they can't get hired for mid-level roles.
• 11:00
  Speaker 0: Because of the automated resume scanners?
• 11:02
  Speaker 1: Exactly!
• 11:03
  Speaker 1: Applicant tracking systems look for neat corporate keywords like B to B sauce pipeline, They don't know how to translate platoon leader so highly qualified vets get auto rejected by an algorithm.
• 11:14
  Speaker 0: It is a profound disconnect and that disconnect mirrors How these companies market themselves to buyers.
• 11:22
  Speaker 0: Myrth Dodens called it the dual-use marketing dilemma.
• 11:24
  Speaker 1: This was fascinating.
• 11:26
  Speaker 1: Modern defense engineering is all about being scrappy and resourceful.
• 11:30
  Speaker 1: She gave the example of soldiers' three D printing explosives with old water bottles And coconut husks,
• 11:36
  Speaker 0: which is exactly what The Warfighter wants.
• 11:38
  Speaker 1: right but if you are a duel use startup You also have to sell two enterprise commercial buyers And they do not want coconut
• 11:45
  Speaker 0: husks.
• 11:46
  Speaker 0: No, They Want Polished Scalable Certified Software Suites.
• 11:50
  Speaker 1: So how you market that?
• 11:51
  Speaker 1: It is like showing up to a pitch meeting wearing muddy combat boots and tailored tuxedo.
• 11:55
  Speaker 1: at the exact same time You try look good for CIO and alienate the battlefield commander.
• 12:01
  Speaker 1: It
• 12:01
  Speaker 0: requires such highly nuanced communication strategy Because ultimately your really selling trust.
• 12:06
  Speaker 1: So pulling all these threads together The brutal timelines The software defined command Unjammable drones The hiring friction Where's?
• 12:15
  Speaker 1: Well,
• 12:15
  Speaker 0: looking at the big picture I keep coming back to a specific financial move we saw this week.
• 12:20
  Speaker 0: Ajay Jain posted about ICI-E, The European Satellite Intelligence Company.
• 12:24
  Speaker 0: They just raised one billion euros.
• 12:27
  Speaker 1: That is massive funding round
• 12:28
  Speaker 0: It IS.
• 12:29
  Speaker 0: But look what they actually do!
• 12:31
  Speaker 0: They don't build kinetic weapons... ...they build persistent radar satellites that see through clouds and operate at night.. ..They sell continuous awareness.
• 12:39
  Speaker 1: Okay so What's the main takeaway there?
• 12:42
  Speaker 0: The provocative thought here is that the future of defense tech isn't necessarily about building the next weapon.
• 12:48
  Speaker 0: As hardware becomes commoditized, like Brett Brown said... ...the physical platform isn't the decisive advantage.
• 12:55
  Speaker 0: The real prize is owning the data layer.
• 12:58
  Speaker 1: Owning the data-layer?
• 12:59
  Speaker 0: Exactly!
• 13:00
  Speaker 0: Yeah… …The side they can continuously sense classify and understand reality faster than the adversary—that side wins.
• 13:06
  Speaker 1: Wow – That brings us full circle right back to the beginning.
• 13:09
  Speaker 1: We started talking with a plumbing of procurement But the ultimate plumbing of the future battlefield is the sensing and data infrastructure.
• 13:16
  Speaker 1: If you don't have that installed, You are just operating in the dark
• 13:19
  Speaker 0: And operating In The Dark Is The Fastest Way To Become Completely Obsolete!
• 13:37
  Speaker 1: Keep your eyes on the data layer.
• 13:38
  Speaker 1: Thank you so much for listening and remember to subscribe,