Latest / Best of: Features / Supreme Court lets Trump administration use revamped federal voter eligibility database for now

Transcript

Supreme Court lets Trump administration use revamped federal voter eligibility database for now · Best of: Features

• 0:05
  Supreme Court lets Trump administration use revamped federal voter eligibility database for
• 0:10
  now. Written by Allie Swinson, John Hannah and Lindsay Whitehurst. This article
• 0:16
  is being read by an automated voice generated by Everlett. New York,
• 0:22
  The
• 0:22
  AP. The Supreme Court on Friday lifted restrictions on a controversial Holt
• 0:26
  federal voter database before November's elections, granting President Donald Trump a temporary
• 0:31
  win in his aggressive campaign against non citizen voting. The court's three
• 0:36
  liberal leaning justices publicly dissented from the decision. The emergency order allows
• 0:42
  states for now to use the Trump administration's revamped version of a
• 0:45
  Department of Homeland Security program called Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements, or
• 0:51
  for SAVE, in their efforts to verify the eligibility of voters on
• 0:55
  their rolls It's a program that has drawn scrutiny for its use
• 0:58
  of voters sensitive personal data and its tendency to wrongly flag some
• 1:03
  eligible voters as non citizens. States use of the SAVED program is
• 1:07
  voluntary, limiting the ruling's impact on the midterm elections. Existing law also
• 1:12
  blocks most states from systematically purging voters from their roles within 90
• 1:16
  days of an election, said David Becker, an election law expert who
• 1:20
  leads the Center for Election Innovation and Research. He said DHS itself
• 1:25
  has admitted the data is not perfect. Maine Secretary of State Shenna
• 1:29
  Bellows, a Democrat who has refused to participate in the SAVE program,
• 1:33
  said the ruling will have no effect in her state because it
• 1:36
  does not force States to change the way we run our elections.
• 1:40
  The plaintiffs and their lawyers in the case called the ruling profoundly
• 1:44
  disappointing and said it puts millions of Americans at risk of being
• 1:48
  unlawfully targeted by the administration's unreliable voter purge database before the midterms.
• 1:55
  On X, James Percival, the general counsel for DHS, responded to a
• 1:59
  post about the decision with Yes, you read that right. We had
• 2:02
  to file an emergency petition in the Supreme Court just so we
• 2:05
  could use government data to help states stop non citizens from illegally
• 2:09
  voting. The White House did not immediately respond to a message seeking
• 2:14
  comment. Ruling pauses a lower court span on the
• 2:18
  tool. The Court's order puts on hold a Federal Judge's June ruling
• 2:22
  that had deemed the Republican administration's recently revamped version of SAVE illegal.
• 2:27
  U.S. District Court Judge Sparkle L. Sukninon had blocked the use of
• 2:31
  The
• 2:31
  tool, saying it violated Americans privacy rights, and could result in voters
• 2:35
  being wrongly removed from the rolls. A Federal Appeals Court let her
• 2:40
  order.
• 2:40
  Stand. But the Supreme Court majority found that a nineteen ninety six
• 2:44
  law explicitly allows DHS to obtain information on citizenship and immigration from
• 2:49
  other federal agencies. The federal government also has an obligation to respond
• 2:54
  to states seeking to verify citizenship. The order below prevents the Federal
• 2:59
  Government from using the program it believes is best suited to the
• 3:03
  task. The majority wrote in the unsigned order. Justice Katanji Brown Jackson
• 3:08
  dissented, joined by Justices Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor. The database has
• 3:14
  long been seen to fall under federal privacy laws, she wrote, and
• 3:17
  there are real risks that legitimate voter registrations could be mistakenly revoked.
• 3:22
  The harm caused by burdening or disenfranchising even a few lawful voters
• 3:27
  outweighs the nonexistent harm that The government experiences when it is prevented
• 3:31
  from taking an action that it likely lacks the authority to take,
• 3:34
  Jackson wrote. The plaintiffs pledge to do everything in our power to
• 3:39
  ensure the District Court decision stands. Trump administration tool has wrongly flagged
• 3:45
  some legal registrants. The SAVE program was created under an immigration law
• 3:50
  mandating that DHS help federal, state, and local agencies prevent government benefits
• 3:55
  from going to citizens. The Trump administration's last year moved to significantly
• 4:00
  expand its searchabilities. Since the at least 67 million registrations have been
• 4:05
  scanned through the program, but critics worry it could purge valid voters
• 4:09
  from the rolls. Some registrants have already been wrongly flagged. In Travis
• 4:14
  County, Texas, for example, officials said they investigated ninety seven voter flagged
• 4:19
  by SAVE as apparent non citizens and found that at least ten
• 4:22
  percent of them, and likely up to twenty one percent, were U.S.
• 4:26
  Citizens. The county urged the Supreme Court to reject the administration's appeal
• 4:31
  while the state of Texas submitted its own brief defending the database.
• 4:35
  In Denton, Texas, north of Dallas, voter Anthony Nells was disappointed that
• 4:40
  the Supreme Court allowed The continued use of a system that harms
• 4:43
  people's constitutional right to vote. Last year, after Texas ran its voter
• 4:48
  registrations through the
• 4:49
  SAVE system, NELS twenty nine, was flagged as a potential non citizen,
• 4:54
  even though the South Africa native had become a U.S. Citizen more
• 4:57
  than a decade ago. His local election office temporarily cancelled his registration
• 5:02
  while obtained a new passport to replace an expired one. This just
• 5:06
  seems like another illegitimate way to affect upcoming and future elections, he
• 5:11
  said in a text to the Associated Press. Stephen Richer, the Republican
• 5:15
  former top election official in Arizona's largest county, said the Supreme Court's
• 5:20
  ruling could be a positive step if used responsibly. That being said
• 5:25
  the Save programme has been shown time after time to be a
• 5:27
  highly imperfect tool, so election administrators should only use it as a
• 5:32
  starting point, not as a definitive indicator of citizenship, he wrote on
• 5:36
  social media. Save is one piece of the administration's crusade against non
• 5:41
  citizen voting. Even though the use of the SAVE program was blocked
• 5:45
  for months ahead of Friday's ruling, the administration has said in court
• 5:49
  filings that it has continued using Social Security Administration data in certain
• 5:54
  cases to verify information and help determine whether illegal voting may have
• 5:59
  occurred. DHS in August launched its own investigation to find non citizen
• 6:04
  voters on state rolls, according to a federal whistleblower statement that said
• 6:08
  the effort is rushed, filled with errors and potentially violates state laws.
• 6:12
  DHS has defended that investigation as being conducted diligently and professionally. Homeland
• 6:18
  Security Secretary Mark Wayne Mullen also suggested over the summer that there
• 6:23
  could be as many as two hundred fifty thousand non citizens registered
• 6:26
  to vote across four states, an unsubstantiated claim that puzzled state election
• 6:32
  officials who said the numbers dramatically exceeded their own findings. In one
• 6:37
  of those, Nevada, DHS said it had identified one hundred and eighty
• 6:40
  five non citizens on the voter rolls, but the state’s attorney general's
• 6:44
  office wrote to the agency earlier this week, saying a records check
• 6:48
  found that all of them were, in fact, US citizens. The effort
• 6:52
  to create a national voters. List is one of the many steps
• 6:55
  Trump has taken during his second term to try to overhaul how
• 6:58
  elections are run. Most of those steps have been blocked by various
• 7:02
  courts, in part because the Constitution gives states and Congress the authority
• 7:06
  to set election rules, but provides no such power to the President.
• 7:11
  In mid-September, the Supreme Court rejected Trump's bid from Trump to restrict
• 7:15
  mail ballot procedures before the midterms. Trump has remained fixated on the
• 7:20
  idea that massive numbers of non-citizens are voting in US races, but
• 7:24
  all evidence says otherwise. Ahead of the twenty twenty four presidential election,
• 7:29
  Georgia's Secretary of State found that twenty of the state's eight point
• 7:33
  two million registered voters were not U.S. Citizens. In Ohio, prosecutors secured
• 7:38
  indictments against nine people for voting as non citizens over the span
• 7:42
  of ten years. The state has some eight million registered voters. Even
• 7:47
  with the Trump administration laser focused on the issue in his second
• 7:50
  term, DHS said its investigations into potential non citizens on voter rolls
• 7:55
  nationwide had led to one hundred and sixty arrests. Those numbers are
• 8:00
  supported by a mountain of research at the national and state level
• 8:03
  that has found the p percentage of non citizens on voter rolls
• 8:07
  is a tiny fraction of the nation's nearly two hundred twenty eight
• 8:11
  million registered voters. Hannah reported from Topeka, Kansas, and Whitehurst reported from
• 8:16
  Washington. Associated Press writer Jessica Hill in Las Vegas also contributed.