Latest / Daniel and Kelly’s Extraordinary Universe / Do things get more massive the faster they move?
Transcript
- 0:08Speaker 1: Hey, Daniel, has particle physics done anything useful lately?
- 0:12Speaker 2: M you mean other than revealing the fundamental nature of reality?
- 0:16Speaker 1: Have you done that?
- 0:17Speaker 2: I mean it's a project.
- 0:21Speaker 1: I mean that's all nice and cool, but it doesn't
- 0:23Speaker 1: really help me, you know, with the dishes or you know,
- 0:26Speaker 1: with my diet.
- 0:27Speaker 2: I guess we did also invent the World Wide Web.
- 0:29Speaker 2: That's pretty helpful.
- 0:31Speaker 1: You mean web surfing. I would say that's not the
- 0:34Speaker 1: most helpful thing in my life, but that was a
- 0:36Speaker 1: long time ago. Anyways, what have you done for us recently?
- 0:39Speaker 2: Yeah, maybe we should be coming up with like a
- 0:41Speaker 2: fundamental physics diet plan.
- 0:43Speaker 1: It's just coffee and doughnuts all.
- 0:46Speaker 2: The time, existential angst about the nature of the universe.
- 0:50Speaker 1: I guess the problem with physics is that it says
- 0:52Speaker 1: that the faster you go, the more massive you get. Right,
- 0:55Speaker 1: that's kind of an anti diet.
- 0:57Speaker 2: I guess I was thinking, you know, black holes something
- 0:59Speaker 2: something something liposuction, black holes. I don't know. I didn't
- 1:01Speaker 2: really have it worked out.
- 1:03Speaker 1: Quantum cosmetic surgery.
- 1:05Speaker 2: Whoa, Orange County is definitely the place for.
- 1:08Speaker 1: That, and you can get a ten to the color bage.
- 1:26Speaker 1: Hi am jorhammy cartoonist and the creator of PhD comics.
- 1:29Speaker 2: Hi. I'm Daniel. I'm a particle physicist and a professor
- 1:32Speaker 2: at UC Irvine, and I was shocked when a pediatrician
- 1:36Speaker 2: offered my one year old plastic surgery.
- 1:38Speaker 1: Wait what they do that on one year.
- 1:41Speaker 2: Old in Orange County? You're never too young for plastic surgery.
- 1:45Speaker 1: Oh boy. I get to the offer like a subscription service,
- 1:49Speaker 1: like a membership or something.
- 1:51Speaker 2: It's a long term relationship. No. Our son had like
- 1:54Speaker 2: a vein on his eyelid and the doctor was like,
- 1:56Speaker 2: do you want me to remove that?
- 1:58Speaker 1: And we were like, no, please, wait the eyelid or
- 2:02Speaker 1: the vein. You're like, I think my son needs. It's
- 2:06Speaker 1: his eyelid exactly.
- 2:08Speaker 2: We were like, I'm pretty sure that's going to be fine,
- 2:11Speaker 2: And newsflash, he's fine.
- 2:12Speaker 1: Where You're like, I'm a real doctor, I don't think
- 2:14Speaker 1: he meets any surgery.
- 2:17Speaker 2: I'm not a real doctor, but I'm pretty sure he
- 2:19Speaker 2: didn't need any surgery.
- 2:22Speaker 1: Like, I'm not a real doctor, I just play one
- 2:23Speaker 1: in the lab. But anyways, welcome to our podcast. Daniel
- 2:26Speaker 1: and Jorge Explain the Universe, a production of iHeartRadio.
- 2:29Speaker 2: In which we try to show you the nature of
- 2:31Speaker 2: the universe in all of its unvarnished glory. We don't
- 2:35Speaker 2: want to edit out the ugly bits and smooth over
- 2:37Speaker 2: the bumps and wrinkles. We want to show you the
- 2:40Speaker 2: universe the way it actually is, even when it conflicts
- 2:43Speaker 2: with our intuition and runs aground for our preconceived ideas
- 2:46Speaker 2: for how things move and flow and dance in the universe.
- 2:50Speaker 1: That's right, that's because we love the universe just the
- 2:52Speaker 1: way it is. We love the og universe, the original
- 2:55Speaker 1: organic version of the universe, untreated, unvarnished, and pretty mysterious.
- 3:02Speaker 2: That's right. We prefer the granola crunchy Berkeley version, with
- 3:06Speaker 2: all of its hair and all the original places, even
- 3:08Speaker 2: on all of its black holes.
- 3:09Speaker 1: Well, let's not go too far there. I mean, I'm
- 3:12Speaker 1: a big fan of socks and sandals, but you know,
- 3:15Speaker 1: there's a time and a place.
- 3:16Speaker 2: I'm all for accepting people and universes just the way
- 3:19Speaker 2: they are.
- 3:19Speaker 1: But it is a wonderful and beautiful universe. It doesn't
- 3:22Speaker 1: need any cosmic surgery because when we look at it,
- 3:24Speaker 1: we're just stricken with awe an amazement at how wonderfully
- 3:28Speaker 1: complex and intriguing it all is.
- 3:30Speaker 2: And one of my favorite things about the universe is
- 3:33Speaker 2: that it's surprising. It's not like we look out into
- 3:36Speaker 2: the universe and we're like, oh, yeah, that's pretty much
- 3:38Speaker 2: how I expected, or oh yeah, there's nothing new out
- 3:41Speaker 2: there to discover. Every time we dig deep into something,
- 3:44Speaker 2: every time we scratch under the surface, we find out, Wow,
- 3:47Speaker 2: the universe is quite different from the way that we
- 3:49Speaker 2: imagined it, which is wonderful because it's an opportunity to
- 3:52Speaker 2: learn to discover the truth instead of just coasting on
- 3:56Speaker 2: our intuition.
- 3:57Speaker 1: Yeah, the universe is very different out there in space,
- 4:00Speaker 1: beyond our galaxy, beyond our cluster of galaxies, and it's
- 4:04Speaker 1: also very different at the molecular and atomic and particle scills.
- 4:08Speaker 1: Things are actually very different than our everyday experience.
- 4:11Speaker 2: And we're tempted when we discover these new weird wrinkles
- 4:14Speaker 2: in the universe to explain them in terms of things
- 4:17Speaker 2: that we know, things we understand. It's a very natural
- 4:20Speaker 2: a way to try to understand the universe, to describe
- 4:22Speaker 2: it in terms of the language that you already have. Sometimes, though,
- 4:25Speaker 2: that gets awkward. It's hard to understand how quantum particles
- 4:29Speaker 2: dance around if you're thinking about them as little dots
- 4:31Speaker 2: of stuff, And that's because they're not really little dots
- 4:34Speaker 2: of stuff. And it's hard to think about velocity and
- 4:37Speaker 2: energy and mass as things approach the speed of life
- 4:39Speaker 2: because the definitions of those things have to change, and
- 4:42Speaker 2: the way things move and bounce against each other and
- 4:44Speaker 2: transfer energy and momentum is really very different at high
- 4:47Speaker 2: speeds than it is down here in the slow motion
- 4:50Speaker 2: life on Earth.
- 4:51Speaker 1: Yeah, things are very weird and awkward in general when
- 4:54Speaker 1: you talk to physicists, I feel, not just when you
- 4:56Speaker 1: learn learn what they have to say.
- 4:58Speaker 2: All right, this is not a therapy podcast. We're talking
- 5:00Speaker 2: about the nature of the universe here.
- 5:02Speaker 1: That's right. That's right. In the universe is not awkward
- 5:04Speaker 1: or weird. It's just the way it is. And I
- 5:05Speaker 1: guess it's us that are weird and awkward, right, because
- 5:08Speaker 1: we have this picture of how the world works, but
- 5:10Speaker 1: that may not be how the universe actually works.
- 5:12Speaker 2: Yeah, And in physics, our project is to build a
- 5:14Speaker 2: mathematical description of how things work in the universe, something
- 5:18Speaker 2: that lets us make predictions and gives us a peek
- 5:20Speaker 2: at the machinery behind the curtains that's deciding like what
- 5:23Speaker 2: happens when two balls bounce against each other. But that
- 5:25Speaker 2: doesn't always translate in an easy or simple way to English,
- 5:29Speaker 2: the language that most humans speak. So when physicists are
- 5:33Speaker 2: trying to explain how things work when the universe gets weird,
- 5:36Speaker 2: they use the terms that we're familiar with, mass and energy, momentum,
- 5:40Speaker 2: et cetera, and try to translate the weirdness in those terms.
- 5:43Speaker 2: And so you hear a lot of explanations for what
- 5:45Speaker 2: happens when things get fast. Some of those explanations are
- 5:48Speaker 2: bang on, and some of them are a little bit misleading.
- 5:51Speaker 1: Yeah, because I guess one of the biggest mind bending
- 5:53Speaker 1: moments and autism and strangest moments in the history of
- 5:56Speaker 1: science was when we found out that the universe is
- 5:58Speaker 1: kind of difference once you start are moving really fast exactly.
- 6:02Speaker 2: We've had Newtonian and Gallean mechanics for centuries, things that
- 6:05Speaker 2: did a very good job of explaining what happens when
- 6:07Speaker 2: two balls bounce against each other, and how momentum is transferred,
- 6:10Speaker 2: and how things look when you're going fast. If you're
- 6:13Speaker 2: driving in a car at thirty miles an hour, and
- 6:15Speaker 2: you throw a ball at thirty miles an hour, then
- 6:17Speaker 2: you know that ball should be moving at sixty miles
- 6:19Speaker 2: an hour relative to the ground. All that stuff made
- 6:21Speaker 2: sense for a long time until we started looking at
- 6:24Speaker 2: things that weren't moving really really fast. We discovered there's
- 6:26Speaker 2: a speed limit to the universe, and that really changed
- 6:29Speaker 2: everything we thought about the nature of space and time
- 6:33Speaker 2: and velocity and gives rise to all sorts of weird
- 6:35Speaker 2: stuff that's very tricky to unpack.
- 6:37Speaker 1: Yeah, it gets super tricky. Well, first of all, the
- 6:40Speaker 1: idea that we have a speed limit in the universe
- 6:42Speaker 1: is kind of wild. Like, you know, you sort of
- 6:44Speaker 1: grew up thinking that disguise the limit. The more that
- 6:46Speaker 1: you push something, the faster you go. But at some
- 6:48Speaker 1: point the universe says, I think that's fast enough. It
- 6:51Speaker 1: doesn't let you go faster than a certain speed.
- 6:54Speaker 2: Yeah, it's a really bizarre feature of our universe, one
- 6:56Speaker 2: that we've discovered experimentally at the Michaelson Morley. The experiments
- 7:00Speaker 2: prove that light travels the same speed in every direction
- 7:04Speaker 2: and effectively demonstrating that there is no absolute reference, framing
- 7:06Speaker 2: that there is a maximum speed of information and transmission
- 7:10Speaker 2: in the universe, which leads to all sorts of weird consequences,
- 7:14Speaker 2: changes what we think about time and the nature of simultaneity.
- 7:18Speaker 2: Things that happen at the same time for one person
- 7:20Speaker 2: might happen in a different order for somebody else. The
- 7:23Speaker 2: whole nature of reality becomes different when there is a
- 7:26Speaker 2: maximum speed limit to the universe.
- 7:28Speaker 1: Yeah, and I think it kind of makes people wonder
- 7:30Speaker 1: what would happen if you try to go faster than
- 7:32Speaker 1: the speed of light? Does the universe police come and
- 7:35Speaker 1: flag you down and stop you? Or do you hit
- 7:38Speaker 1: a wall?
- 7:38Speaker 2: Or what are you considering trying to break some laws
- 7:40Speaker 2: of the universe? Be asking for physics legal advice?
- 7:43Speaker 1: Well, I'm trying to toe the line, you know. I'm
- 7:45Speaker 1: kind of max out my life here. I need to
- 7:47Speaker 1: know how far I can go.
- 7:50Speaker 2: I just don't want to be held responsible if you
- 7:51Speaker 2: get thrown in physics.
- 7:52Speaker 1: Jail when I need a physics lawyer.
- 7:54Speaker 2: I wonder if people who are lawyers are always on
- 7:56Speaker 2: the look at for like, is this person asking me
- 7:58Speaker 2: legal advice? I'm not going to get them in trouble
- 8:00Speaker 2: if I say the wrong thing. I don't usually have
- 8:01Speaker 2: to worry about that because most people aren't capable of
- 8:04Speaker 2: trying to break the laws of the universe.
- 8:05Speaker 1: I think most lawyers don't really care that much.
- 8:10Speaker 2: But no, there is no physics police that are just
- 8:12Speaker 2: going to pull you over. It's just that acceleration and
- 8:15Speaker 2: momentums start working differently at high speeds. So you discover
- 8:18Speaker 2: that you can pour energy into a particle, it just
- 8:21Speaker 2: doesn't go much faster. So you can discover that as
- 8:23Speaker 2: things approach the speed of light, you can keep pouring
- 8:25Speaker 2: energy into something a rock, a particle of spaceship, whatever,
- 8:28Speaker 2: it just doesn't go much faster. The same amount of
- 8:31Speaker 2: energy doesn't get you increases in velocity the same rate.
- 8:35Speaker 2: It's no longer linear. It becomes asymptotic.
- 8:38Speaker 1: So today end podcast, we'll be tackling the question do
- 8:45Speaker 1: things get more massive the faster they move? This is
- 8:49Speaker 1: kind of like the anti diet, or at least I
- 8:52Speaker 1: feel like it justifies maybe sitting down on your couch
- 8:55Speaker 1: all the time, because if I get up up for
- 8:57Speaker 1: my couch and I move, then I'm just going to
- 8:58Speaker 1: gain more mass, Right, that's true.
- 9:01Speaker 2: Well, what we're going to learn on the podcast today
- 9:02Speaker 2: is that it's a little bit more complicated than that
- 9:05Speaker 2: this is the kind of popular science thing you hear
- 9:07Speaker 2: all the time and people write in and ask me about.
- 9:10Speaker 2: And I think it was wide they taught in textbooks
- 9:12Speaker 2: until about thirty forty years ago, the feeling that everything
- 9:15Speaker 2: gets weird as you approach the speed of light, and
- 9:17Speaker 2: then even your mass might change, things might get like
- 9:20Speaker 2: infinitely heavy as you approach the speed of light. It's
- 9:23Speaker 2: an attractive concept for people, I think, because it gives
- 9:26Speaker 2: you a sense of the strange. But as we'll talk
- 9:28Speaker 2: about today on the podcast, it's a little bit more
- 9:30Speaker 2: complicated than that, and it's actually something of an outdated notion.
- 9:33Speaker 1: Wait, wait, are you saying it's a massive lie.
- 9:38Speaker 2: You know, there's a lot of different ways you can
- 9:39Speaker 2: try to translate the crisp mathematics of relativity into English
- 9:44Speaker 2: and into popular culture. This was one attempt early on
- 9:47Speaker 2: that I don't think really works very well.
- 9:49Speaker 1: I see it was just heavily exaggerated. Well, as usual,
- 9:52Speaker 1: you were wondering how many people had wondered about this
- 9:55Speaker 1: question at ask this about themselves, about the universe, about
- 9:58Speaker 1: what happens when you try to go faster and faster,
- 10:00Speaker 1: And so Daniel went out there into the Internet to
- 10:02Speaker 1: ask people do you think things get more massive as
- 10:05Speaker 1: you approach the speed of light?
- 10:07Speaker 2: I am so grateful to everybody who answers these questions.
- 10:10Speaker 2: They give me a sense for what people already know,
- 10:12Speaker 2: and they give listeners a sense of what everybody else
- 10:15Speaker 2: is thinking. If you would like to participate, please don't
- 10:18Speaker 2: be shy. You're really very welcome to join the club.
- 10:21Speaker 2: Just write to me two questions at Danielandjorge dot com.
- 10:24Speaker 1: So think about it for a second. Do you think
- 10:27Speaker 1: you should stay in your couch if you don't want
- 10:28Speaker 1: to gain any mess? Here's what people had to say.
- 10:31Speaker 3: This question just blows my mind. I'm just stumped. Do
- 10:35Speaker 3: they get more massive? I guess maybe. I don't know how,
- 10:39Speaker 3: but maybe something related to quantum mechanics.
- 10:41Speaker 4: I don't know.
- 10:42Speaker 2: As you approached the speed of light, I thought Einstein's
- 10:44Speaker 2: equations told us that you would gain mess, But to
- 10:48Speaker 2: an outside observer, I don't think you would actually look bigger.
- 10:52Speaker 5: I mean, at the speed of lighte time was slower.
- 10:54Speaker 5: Maybe space gets contracted.
- 10:57Speaker 2: So I'm kind of stormy here.
- 11:01Speaker 5: Maybe if that is true, then you will have a
- 11:04Speaker 5: higher density and in that sense, wibly be more massive.
- 11:07Speaker 2: Not sure.
- 11:08Speaker 6: I think they do get more massive, but because it's
- 11:12Speaker 6: it gets harder to move things at that speed, and
- 11:16Speaker 6: not because they get more the feet.
- 11:18Speaker 7: My understanding is mass and energy are interchangeable, so the
- 11:22Speaker 7: more energy you have to pump into something to accelerate
- 11:26Speaker 7: it closer and closer to the speed of light is
- 11:29Speaker 7: really no different than making it more massive to begin with.
- 11:33Speaker 7: So I think, yes, it gets more massive as you
- 11:36Speaker 7: approach the speed of light, just because mass and energy
- 11:39Speaker 7: are essentially the same thing.
- 11:41Speaker 4: I think I remember hearing that they do get more
- 11:44Speaker 4: massive as they approach the speed of light. I think
- 11:47Speaker 4: it takes more energy to increase the speed, and like, yeah,
- 11:50Speaker 4: they just can't really get to the speed of light
- 11:54Speaker 4: unless it's like, you know, massless.
- 11:55Speaker 5: I guess so based on the question. I'm not sure
- 11:58Speaker 5: exactly why, but if has something to do with like
- 12:02Speaker 5: the kinetic energy of something affecting its mass, then I
- 12:08Speaker 5: would guess so.
- 12:09Speaker 8: I think the answer is yes. First I was taught
- 12:11Speaker 8: it that way. I've since heard that's an old school
- 12:13Speaker 8: way of thinking about it. But definitely, if we consider
- 12:19Speaker 8: energy as being mass, you know the way it works relativistically,
- 12:25Speaker 8: you can concentrate energy as well as matter, and that
- 12:29Speaker 8: is all mass energy. Then as you add velocity, you're
- 12:32Speaker 8: adding energy and you become more massive.
- 12:35Speaker 1: All right, a lot of great answers here. I feel
- 12:37Speaker 1: like some people were blown away and some people were like, oh,
- 12:40Speaker 1: I've heard of this. The answer is yes or no.
- 12:43Speaker 2: Yeah, I thought this was really interesting. There's a lot
- 12:45Speaker 2: of different ideas here about what energy is and what
- 12:48Speaker 2: mass is. Very few people mentioned momentum even, but there's
- 12:52Speaker 2: definitely this understanding that things change as you approach the
- 12:55Speaker 2: speed of light, and that it's harder to go faster. Yeah.
- 12:59Speaker 1: Somebody one of the listeners said that it's kind of
- 13:01Speaker 1: strange that your mass would change, right, And that goes to.
- 13:04Speaker 2: The heart of what we mean by mass. I think
- 13:07Speaker 2: a lot of people think of mass is like the
- 13:09Speaker 2: amount of stuff they have, and so it's really weird
- 13:12Speaker 2: for them to imagine them getting like more stuff as
- 13:15Speaker 2: they approach the speed of light. And that's one reason
- 13:17Speaker 2: why I really don't like this concept of relativistic mass.
- 13:20Speaker 2: It gives people the impression that something physical is happening,
- 13:23Speaker 2: which isn't interesting.
- 13:24Speaker 1: All right, Well, let's dig into it, and I guess
- 13:27Speaker 1: let's start with the basics. As you said, let's start
- 13:29Speaker 1: with the concept of mass. Now. I know mass is
- 13:32Speaker 1: kind of a big mystery. We talked about it in
- 13:34Speaker 1: our book, like what is mass? Anyways, we have a
- 13:36Speaker 1: whole chapter about how we don't kind of know what
- 13:39Speaker 1: mass is. But Daniel maybe step us through it. What
- 13:41Speaker 1: do we know about what mass is?
- 13:43Speaker 2: I think in the context of relativity and motion, the
- 13:46Speaker 2: most important thing to think about is inertia, like the
- 13:49Speaker 2: fact that it's not easy to change your velocity. You're
- 13:52Speaker 2: flying through the universe at some speed. In order to
- 13:56Speaker 2: change that speed, you need a push. Right. That's really
- 13:58Speaker 2: what F equals is trying to say that to accelerate,
- 14:03Speaker 2: you need to have a force applied to you, and
- 14:05Speaker 2: that M in that equation, and F equals MA is
- 14:08Speaker 2: the mass. It relates how much acceleration you get for
- 14:11Speaker 2: how much force. We've all heard, for example, that the
- 14:13Speaker 2: Earth's gravity on you is the same as your gravity
- 14:16Speaker 2: on the Earth, Right, But we feel a much stronger
- 14:19Speaker 2: force than the Earth does because the Earth has a
- 14:21Speaker 2: huge mass. So we feel a much stronger acceleration than
- 14:24Speaker 2: the Earth does because the Earth has a huge mass,
- 14:27Speaker 2: and so its acceleration is tiny. Even though the force
- 14:30Speaker 2: is the same. So really important concept in mass is inertia.
- 14:33Speaker 2: That's really what mass is about when we're talking about motion,
- 14:36Speaker 2: and that's connected to this idea of momentum. Right. Another
- 14:40Speaker 2: way to think about F equals MA is that F
- 14:43Speaker 2: is actually a change in momentum. When you're flying through
- 14:46Speaker 2: the universe at a certain velocity, you have a certain momentum.
- 14:49Speaker 2: In order to change your momentum, you need to have
- 14:51Speaker 2: a force applied. So mass is this concept that tells
- 14:54Speaker 2: us basically how hard it is to change your momentum.
- 14:58Speaker 1: I feel like you're making us go that a rabbit
- 15:00Speaker 1: hole a little bit, because then it makes me wonder, like,
- 15:02Speaker 1: what is momentum anyways?
- 15:04Speaker 2: Yeah, a momentum is something we know is important in
- 15:07Speaker 2: the universe. It's a quantity that's conserved. Like we look
- 15:09Speaker 2: at in the universe, we watch stuff, we see things happen,
- 15:12Speaker 2: and we look for patterns, and a very important pattern
- 15:15Speaker 2: are conservation laws. Things that don't change. So two balls
- 15:18Speaker 2: bounce against each other, for example, you calculate all the
- 15:21Speaker 2: momentum beforehand and all the momentum afterwards, and you notice
- 15:23Speaker 2: it's the same. It is conserved. We actually know that
- 15:26Speaker 2: there's a deep reason for why momentum is conserved. It's
- 15:28Speaker 2: because space is the same everywhere. We did a whole
- 15:32Speaker 2: fun podcast on Nother's theorem, which tells you that because
- 15:34Speaker 2: space is the same everywhere, momentum has to be conserved.
- 15:37Speaker 2: This is deep link there. So momentum is an important
- 15:40Speaker 2: physical quantity in the universe. It's something that's really powerful
- 15:43Speaker 2: and it really gives us insight into what's happened. And
- 15:45Speaker 2: momentum is flowing through a system, right, but it's conserved
- 15:48Speaker 2: in the universe. The universe at least thinks momentum is important,
- 15:51Speaker 2: so maybe we should.
- 15:52Speaker 1: Also well, how is it different from like energy? And
- 15:56Speaker 1: is momentum the same as energy? Is the momentum of
- 15:59Speaker 1: a particle or a baseball the same as its kinetic energy?
- 16:02Speaker 1: How do the two connect?
- 16:03Speaker 2: Yeah? Great question. First of all, momentum has directionality. You
- 16:07Speaker 2: can have a momentum in one direction or momentum in
- 16:09Speaker 2: another direction. It's a vector it points and for example,
- 16:12Speaker 2: the Earth has a constant magnitude momentum, but the direction
- 16:15Speaker 2: of its momentum is changing as it goes around the Sun.
- 16:18Speaker 2: It's like an arrow that tells you which way the
- 16:20Speaker 2: Earth is headed, and that's constantly changing. So the length
- 16:23Speaker 2: of that vector isn't changing, but the direction of it is.
- 16:27Speaker 2: And that's why it takes acceleration to move around the Sun,
- 16:29Speaker 2: because you're changing the direction of that momentum vector. So
- 16:32Speaker 2: momentum is a direction, right. Energy doesn't have a direction,
- 16:35Speaker 2: it's just a number, right. And also, and energy includes
- 16:38Speaker 2: something else. The energy of an object has two components.
- 16:42Speaker 2: There's the internal energy what we call it's inertial mass,
- 16:45Speaker 2: and the energy of its motion, it's kinetic energy. So
- 16:48Speaker 2: there's two separate components there. So things could have energy
- 16:51Speaker 2: when they're not moving, like an electron just sitting there
- 16:54Speaker 2: has some mass, then that corresponds to some energy, and
- 16:57Speaker 2: there's also energy of motion. Things can have only energy
- 17:00Speaker 2: of motion, like a photon is just motion energy has
- 17:03Speaker 2: no mass, or they can have both, like an electron
- 17:06Speaker 2: flying through the universe has mass and that's energy and
- 17:09Speaker 2: also has kinetic energy. So energy has two components. There's
- 17:12Speaker 2: the mass and there's a contribution from the momentum, which
- 17:15Speaker 2: we also call kinetic energy.
- 17:16Speaker 1: And so the universe conserves both things, right, like it
- 17:19Speaker 1: somehow conserves momentum, and it also conserves energy, but not
- 17:24Speaker 1: necessarily the same way I think, right.
- 17:26Speaker 2: So there's a little asterisk there in flat space. Yes,
- 17:29Speaker 2: energy is conserved in the global universe. As space expands,
- 17:33Speaker 2: actually energy increases, so energy is not strictly conserved in
- 17:37Speaker 2: the universe. There's a whole podcast episode we did about
- 17:40Speaker 2: that if you want to dig into it. But let's
- 17:41Speaker 2: just assume we're like living in flat space and we're
- 17:44Speaker 2: bouncing balls and particles off each other. We wouldn't notice
- 17:46Speaker 2: the expansion of the universe. So let's just say for
- 17:48Speaker 2: the sake of this discussion that, yes, energy is conserved.
- 17:50Speaker 2: And so you're right, momentum is conserved and energy is conserved,
- 17:54Speaker 2: and those are actually related. Those are four separate conservation
- 17:57Speaker 2: laws because energy is one number and momentum is three numbers.
- 18:01Speaker 2: Because we have three dimensions of space, and momentums can
- 18:04Speaker 2: serve separately in each of those dimensions. So we have
- 18:07Speaker 2: four conservation laws, three from momentum and one from energy.
- 18:11Speaker 2: And in particle physics at least we group energy and
- 18:13Speaker 2: momentum together into something we call four momentum, like the
- 18:16Speaker 2: four dimensions of space time, and we say there's conservation
- 18:18Speaker 2: of form momentum, which combines momentum and energy into one
- 18:22Speaker 2: conservation law.
- 18:23Speaker 1: So then mass is related to both things, like mass
- 18:27Speaker 1: makes your momentum go higher and it makes your energy
- 18:29Speaker 1: go higher.
- 18:30Speaker 2: Yeah, that's right. So mass is like your internal stored energy.
- 18:33Speaker 2: Take a proton, for example, it has a bunch of mass.
- 18:35Speaker 2: Where does that mass come from. It comes from the
- 18:37Speaker 2: internal energy of the proton, Like there's the mass of
- 18:40Speaker 2: the quarks. They get their mass from the Higgs boson.
- 18:42Speaker 2: Then there's the mass of the binding of those quarks together,
- 18:45Speaker 2: and that's where most of the mass of the proton
- 18:47Speaker 2: comes from. So that proton has mass, and you're right,
- 18:49Speaker 2: that's part of its energy, and the proton could also
- 18:52Speaker 2: have momentum that's another part of its energy. So we
- 18:55Speaker 2: think of the mass as the thing that makes it
- 18:58Speaker 2: hard to push on something or easier to put push
- 19:00Speaker 2: on something but has low mass, and then there's also
- 19:02Speaker 2: energy stored in its motion.
- 19:04Speaker 1: Okay, So then generally speaking, mass is just what makes
- 19:07Speaker 1: things harder to move, right.
- 19:09Speaker 2: Basically, that's exactly right. That's the concept of inertial mass
- 19:12Speaker 2: basically relate to the objects inertia, which tells you how
- 19:15Speaker 2: hard is it to change its momentum.
- 19:18Speaker 1: Right, And then there's a concept of gravitational mass, which
- 19:21Speaker 1: is a different concept, but it's the same number.
- 19:24Speaker 2: Yeah, And there's a bunch of really fascinating wrinkles here.
- 19:26Speaker 2: Like in Newton's world, he had F equals maa, which
- 19:29Speaker 2: tells you about how hard it is to push something.
- 19:31Speaker 2: And he also had this number m in his gravitational
- 19:34Speaker 2: law gmm over r square, which tells you the force
- 19:37Speaker 2: between two objects. And in Newtonian physics, these two things
- 19:40Speaker 2: are different numbers. They're written in the same way, the
- 19:43Speaker 2: same letter M in F equals ma and M in
- 19:46Speaker 2: gmm over r squared. But in principle they could have
- 19:49Speaker 2: been totally different, right. It was a bit of a
- 19:51Speaker 2: mystery in Newtonian physics why these two numbers always seem
- 19:55Speaker 2: to have the same value. Einstein unified these things in
- 19:58Speaker 2: general relativity and told us that actually inertial gravitational masses
- 20:02Speaker 2: have to be the same because the corner to Einstein,
- 20:05Speaker 2: there is no acceleration due to gravity. There is no
- 20:07Speaker 2: force due to gravity. It's just inertial motion through curved
- 20:12Speaker 2: space time that when you are having inertial motion, there's
- 20:15Speaker 2: no forces on you through space time. That's what gravity
- 20:19Speaker 2: looks like. So motion due to gravity is actually just
- 20:22Speaker 2: inertial motion and you're just really in free fall.
- 20:24Speaker 1: Right, So like, for example, the Earth orbiting around the Sun.
- 20:27Speaker 1: It's not like there's a force pulling the Earth towards
- 20:31Speaker 1: the Sun, or there's no centripetal force there is, just
- 20:33Speaker 1: that the space around the Sun for the Earth is
- 20:37Speaker 1: sort of curved and it's shaped like a circle basically.
- 20:40Speaker 2: Right, Yeah, that's right. If space were flat, everything we
- 20:43Speaker 2: just move in what looks to us like straight lines.
- 20:45Speaker 2: But when space is curved, things move differently and it
- 20:48Speaker 2: looks like there's a force there bending their paths. But
- 20:51Speaker 2: really it's just motion through curved space. Because we can't
- 20:55Speaker 2: see that curvature. You can like look through space and
- 20:57Speaker 2: see the curvature of space the way you can see
- 21:00Speaker 2: curvature of a road. It seems like a bit of
- 21:02Speaker 2: a mystery why things are moving in curves, and of
- 21:04Speaker 2: course is that space is curved, so there's an apparent
- 21:07Speaker 2: force there, or.
- 21:08Speaker 1: More accurately, you mean like space time, right, Like maybe
- 21:10Speaker 1: space is not curve, but space time is.
- 21:12Speaker 2: It's definitely more coherent to think about relativity in terms
- 21:15Speaker 2: of space time because the way like energy and momentum
- 21:18Speaker 2: are linked, space and time are definitely linked. You can't
- 21:20Speaker 2: talk about the curvature of space as well and the
- 21:23Speaker 2: curvature of time separately. They make more sense when you
- 21:26Speaker 2: think about them together. But yes, space itself can also
- 21:29Speaker 2: be curved, but space time as well.
- 21:30Speaker 1: All right, So then that's mess. It's how hard it
- 21:33Speaker 1: is to push on something, and it's also sort of
- 21:36Speaker 1: like the effect something has on space time around it.
- 21:39Speaker 2: Yeah, and this is very intuitive if you're like playing billiards,
- 21:42Speaker 2: or you're shooting a basketball, or you're rolling rocks down hills,
- 21:45Speaker 2: and it's aligns with our sense that like things that
- 21:47Speaker 2: have more stuff to them are harder to push, and
- 21:51Speaker 2: that all makes sense at low speeds. Things change a
- 21:53Speaker 2: little bit as you get very high velocity, and then
- 21:56Speaker 2: you have a question for like, what do you change
- 21:58Speaker 2: you change momentum, do you change maths, change energy? What's
- 22:01Speaker 2: the most sensible way to think about these things?
- 22:04Speaker 1: Yeah, because, as we mentioned, there's the idea out there
- 22:06Speaker 1: that the faster you go, and as you approach the
- 22:08Speaker 1: speed of light, your mass starts to get bigger and bigger,
- 22:12Speaker 1: which is a problem for us who are trying to
- 22:14Speaker 1: stay slim, and so let's dig into that scenario and
- 22:18Speaker 1: the problems with that scenario and what it all means
- 22:21Speaker 1: about the loss of the universe. But first, let's take
- 22:24Speaker 1: a quick break. All right. We are talking about a
- 22:39Speaker 1: massive topic here, and it's going by really fast, and
- 22:42Speaker 1: it's about how really massive things go really fast. Things
- 22:46Speaker 1: get massive as they go really fast.
- 22:48Speaker 2: Yeah, things definitely do change as you approach the speed
- 22:50Speaker 2: of light, and a lot of your intuition goes out
- 22:52Speaker 2: the window. You can just lean into the mathematics and say, well,
- 22:55Speaker 2: there are new formulas and I can just use them
- 22:57Speaker 2: and calculate stuff. But we also want to have like
- 22:59Speaker 2: an understanding of how the universe works. We want to
- 23:02Speaker 2: develop a new intuition. So it's important that we make
- 23:06Speaker 2: sense of what the words mean as things change.
- 23:08Speaker 1: Okay, so let's talk about change. I guess now, before
- 23:11Speaker 1: when we just had Newtonian physics, things were kind of simple,
- 23:14Speaker 1: like if you wanted to change the velocity of something,
- 23:18Speaker 1: you had to apply a certain force, and a certain
- 23:20Speaker 1: force would always give you the same amount of velocity change,
- 23:24Speaker 1: kind of like no matter if you're standing still or
- 23:27Speaker 1: if you're going fast. If you applied and have you
- 23:29Speaker 1: always got that change in velocity acceleration.
- 23:32Speaker 2: Yeah, that's right, F used to equal M in a
- 23:35Speaker 2: very simple and straightforward way. Or equivalently, we could say
- 23:38Speaker 2: F is the change in momentum.
- 23:40Speaker 1: Right, So that's Newtonian physics. But then we sort of
- 23:42Speaker 1: learned a little bit more about relativity, which says that
- 23:45Speaker 1: that's not quite true.
- 23:46Speaker 2: Yeah, because there is a maximum speed to the universe.
- 23:50Speaker 2: If you pour energy into something trying to get it
- 23:52Speaker 2: going faster, you don't always get the same amount of
- 23:56Speaker 2: speed up, which means like it's harder to add velocity
- 23:59Speaker 2: in the direction something is moving. You have rocket ship
- 24:03Speaker 2: and it's already going at ninety percent of the speed
- 24:05Speaker 2: of light, and you fire the engines the same amount
- 24:07Speaker 2: you did earlier, you're not going to get the same
- 24:09Speaker 2: amount of speed up even if you're applying the same.
- 24:12Speaker 1: Force, right, Because I guess under Newtonian physics, you could
- 24:15Speaker 1: technically go infinitely fast, right, Like if you just kept
- 24:19Speaker 1: pushing on an object over a long long period of time,
- 24:22Speaker 1: we just keep going faster and faster and faster because
- 24:24Speaker 1: F equals ma A And so if I apply a
- 24:27Speaker 1: constant force to something the velocity is going to keep increasing,
- 24:30Speaker 1: increasing and increasing, and eventually you would go faster than
- 24:33Speaker 1: the speed of light in a Newtonian universe.
- 24:35Speaker 2: Yeah, that's exactly right.
- 24:36Speaker 1: But we seem to have this speed limit that says
- 24:39Speaker 1: you can go faster and faster, and so I guess
- 24:41Speaker 1: my question is what happened then? Did we have to
- 24:43Speaker 1: adjust our math or does the math tell you why
- 24:46Speaker 1: you can't go faster than the speed of light.
- 24:48Speaker 2: We definitely had to adjust our math, right, because those
- 24:51Speaker 2: formulas are wrong. As you say, they predict you could
- 24:53Speaker 2: go infinitely fast. So what was wrong about those formulas? Well,
- 24:57Speaker 2: it turns out our formula form momentum was wrong. We
- 25:01Speaker 2: thought momentum was just like mass times velocity, and then
- 25:03Speaker 2: we thought that quantity was conserved in the universe. Turns
- 25:07Speaker 2: out we were missing a term. There's another term in
- 25:10Speaker 2: that equation, this thing we call the boost factor. We
- 25:13Speaker 2: write it as gamma in relativity. It's just a number,
- 25:15Speaker 2: but if you're going at slow speeds, that number is
- 25:17Speaker 2: basically one, so it doesn't change your equation. But as
- 25:20Speaker 2: you approach to the speed of light, that number grows
- 25:22Speaker 2: to infinity. So what it means is momentum is different
- 25:25Speaker 2: from what we thought it was. We talked about how
- 25:27Speaker 2: momentum is this important quantity in the universe that's conserved.
- 25:30Speaker 2: That's true, but it's not M times V. There's a
- 25:33Speaker 2: different expression for momentum, and that's the thing that's actually
- 25:36Speaker 2: conserved in the universe. It turns out M times V
- 25:40Speaker 2: times this gamma factor. So momentum changes as you approach
- 25:44Speaker 2: the speed of light, and that's why it's harder to
- 25:47Speaker 2: increase your velocity as you approach the speed of light,
- 25:50Speaker 2: because your momentum is changing. It requires a larger force
- 25:54Speaker 2: to change your momentum.
- 25:55Speaker 1: I guess this is where it gets kind of confusing, because,
- 25:59Speaker 1: first of all, all like you're saying that as I
- 26:01Speaker 1: go faster, my momentum decreases, But doesn't that depend on
- 26:06Speaker 1: how fast I'm going relative to who or what? Like?
- 26:08Speaker 1: To me, I'm not going fast at all. If I'm
- 26:10Speaker 1: going really fast. To me, it just looks like the
- 26:12Speaker 1: universe is moving around me.
- 26:14Speaker 2: So, first of all, as you go faster, your momentum
- 26:17Speaker 2: still increases. That's always true, it's just not a linear increase.
- 26:20Speaker 2: And you're absolutely right that all of these things depend
- 26:23Speaker 2: on your frame right, depends on who's watching. Somebody who's
- 26:26Speaker 2: in a spaceship with you is going to see you
- 26:27Speaker 2: at zero velocity, and somebody who's on Earth as you
- 26:30Speaker 2: zip by, it's going to see you moving at very
- 26:32Speaker 2: high speed. So you're absolutely right. There's no sense of
- 26:35Speaker 2: talking about, like, what is my velocity in an absolute way.
- 26:38Speaker 2: It's always measured relative to some observer. So there's an
- 26:41Speaker 2: important difference between things that are invariant, where everybody agrees
- 26:44Speaker 2: on them no matter their velocity, and things that are conserved,
- 26:48Speaker 2: things that don't change in a frame of reference. So momentum,
- 26:51Speaker 2: for example, is conserved for some observer. You always see
- 26:54Speaker 2: momentum conserved, like before collision. After collision is the same momentum,
- 26:59Speaker 2: but momentum is not invariant. Another observer moving at a
- 27:02Speaker 2: different speed will see a different set of momentum, but
- 27:05Speaker 2: they will also see momentum conserved. So momentum is conserved,
- 27:09Speaker 2: meaning for a given observer it doesn't ever disappear or appear,
- 27:13Speaker 2: but it's not invariant, meaning different people will measure different
- 27:16Speaker 2: amounts at different velocities.
- 27:19Speaker 1: Okay, so then I think what you're saying is that
- 27:21Speaker 1: momentum is not linear. It gets kind of wonky the
- 27:25Speaker 1: faster you go. And the way it gets wonky is
- 27:27Speaker 1: that it gets kind of ridiculously big as you get
- 27:30Speaker 1: closer to the speed of light. Right, you said, momentum
- 27:33Speaker 1: equals mass time velocity times gamma, and gamma is basically
- 27:37Speaker 1: one when we're standing still, but it gets to infinity
- 27:41Speaker 1: as we get closer to the speed of light.
- 27:42Speaker 2: Exactly. And if you think about force not just as
- 27:45Speaker 2: mass times acceleration, but as the change in momentum, then
- 27:48Speaker 2: if your momentum is really really big, then it becomes
- 27:51Speaker 2: hard to change your momentum. You need to apply a
- 27:54Speaker 2: really really big force to change your momentum. And your
- 27:57Speaker 2: momentum grows very very quickly near the speed of light.
- 28:00Speaker 2: As you say, it approaches infinity as velocity approaches the
- 28:04Speaker 2: speed of light.
- 28:04Speaker 1: So I guess I get more concretely, it would mean
- 28:07Speaker 1: like my couch, me sitting in my couch, my momentum
- 28:10Speaker 1: would be my mass times my velocity, which in this
- 28:12Speaker 1: case I guess it's zero, but it would just in
- 28:14Speaker 1: my mass timeline my velocity. But if I was moving
- 28:17Speaker 1: at two hundred thousand kilometers per second, then my momentum
- 28:21Speaker 1: would be not just my mask my velocity, but it'ld
- 28:24Speaker 1: be mass time my velocity times a really big number,
- 28:28Speaker 1: which is this adjustment factor that gets bigger the closer
- 28:31Speaker 1: you move to the speed of light.
- 28:32Speaker 2: Exactly. This gamma factor is the thing that Newton missed
- 28:35Speaker 2: in momentum basically, and he missed it because for everything
- 28:37Speaker 2: he measured and he saw, it was just one, so
- 28:40Speaker 2: it didn't change any of his calculations. Any number multiplied
- 28:43Speaker 2: by one is just itself. So you have like a
- 28:45Speaker 2: hidden factor in your equations that's always one. You can't
- 28:48Speaker 2: discover it. You can only discover it when it changes
- 28:50Speaker 2: from one, and it only changes from one as you
- 28:52Speaker 2: approach the speed of light.
- 28:54Speaker 1: So I think kind of the message is that the
- 28:56Speaker 1: universe is kind of like, Okay, if you want to
- 28:57Speaker 1: move something from your couch to your kitchen, that's fine,
- 29:00Speaker 1: you can do that. It's going to cost you this much.
- 29:02Speaker 1: But if you want to move it from you know,
- 29:03Speaker 1: your couch to almost as to the speed of light
- 29:06Speaker 1: or super duper fast, it's going to cost you that
- 29:08Speaker 1: plus an extra like universe tax or something exactly that
- 29:12Speaker 1: says that, oh, that's going to cost you a lot
- 29:14Speaker 1: a lot, and somehow the idea is that it that
- 29:17Speaker 1: kind of lets the universe prevent you from going faster
- 29:20Speaker 1: than the speed of light.
- 29:20Speaker 2: Yeah, and the universe tax it's basically zero if you're
- 29:24Speaker 2: not moving very fast. Even if you're moving at like
- 29:26Speaker 2: half the speed of light, this gamma factor, this boost,
- 29:29Speaker 2: this universe tax is like fifteen percent. So even at
- 29:33Speaker 2: half the speed of light, it's barely noticeable. As you
- 29:36Speaker 2: get to like ninety percent of the speed of light,
- 29:37Speaker 2: it's like two point three. And if you get to
- 29:40Speaker 2: like ninety nine percent of the speed of light, it's
- 29:42Speaker 2: like seven ninety nine point nine percent of the speed
- 29:45Speaker 2: of light, it's like twenty two. So it increases very
- 29:47Speaker 2: very quickly as things get fast.
- 29:49Speaker 1: Well, I didn't know the universe was so progressive.
- 29:53Speaker 2: Exactly. Momentum, billionaires, the universe is coming for you. Yeah,
- 29:58Speaker 2: And so really that's fundamentally what's happening. We like to
- 30:01Speaker 2: think about momentum because that's something the universe conserves. That's
- 30:04Speaker 2: something that's important to the universe, energy and momentum, and
- 30:08Speaker 2: that's really what's driving this experience that it's harder to
- 30:11Speaker 2: accelerate as you get towards the speed of light. And
- 30:13Speaker 2: remember that momentum is directional, right, and so adding velocity
- 30:17Speaker 2: in the direction you're already going takes actually different amounts
- 30:21Speaker 2: of momentum than adding velocity like perpendicular to your motion.
- 30:24Speaker 2: It gets very complicated.
- 30:26Speaker 1: So I think you're saying that momentum is conserved in
- 30:28Speaker 1: the universe, but there's there's sort of a premium on
- 30:32Speaker 1: higher momenti momentumus like the bigger momentum has somehow cost
- 30:37Speaker 1: you more.
- 30:38Speaker 2: Exactly, And that raises the question like, well, what do
- 30:40Speaker 2: we do about mass. We used to have this notion
- 30:43Speaker 2: and that mass told us how hard it is to
- 30:45Speaker 2: push something, and in the old sense of momentum, it's
- 30:47Speaker 2: just mass times velocity. Then it all made sense, and
- 30:50Speaker 2: then you get the equation F equals MA, AND's a
- 30:53Speaker 2: very natural linear relationship between acceleration and force. That all
- 30:58Speaker 2: changes when we change the definition of momentum. You no
- 31:01Speaker 2: longer have F equals M, and so you have to
- 31:03Speaker 2: think about, like what do you do with mass.
- 31:06Speaker 1: I think you're saying, like, we have this tax that
- 31:09Speaker 1: the universe puts on momentum. Now do you take that
- 31:12Speaker 1: tax and fold it into the definition of mass, or
- 31:15Speaker 1: is mass still mass, but then you have this extra tax,
- 31:18Speaker 1: which is not mass exactly.
- 31:19Speaker 2: And so the modern idea, the one that most physicists use,
- 31:22Speaker 2: is exactly that to say, let's just leave mass alone.
- 31:25Speaker 2: Mass is related to your internal stored energy. Let's define
- 31:28Speaker 2: mass to be something everybody agrees on, no matter what
- 31:30Speaker 2: their velocity is. And let's just change the definition momentum,
- 31:34Speaker 2: so mass stays as M whatever it was before, and
- 31:37Speaker 2: now momentum is M comes v and we conclude the
- 31:39Speaker 2: gamma factor there in momentum. The other idea, the one
- 31:42Speaker 2: that leads to this confusion, is this concept of relativistic mass,
- 31:46Speaker 2: and say, oh, let's redefine mass to be mass times gamma.
- 31:50Speaker 2: Let's fold that gamma factor into the mass, and that
- 31:53Speaker 2: lets us keep momentum as mass times velocity because we
- 31:56Speaker 2: like that equation. And so there's sort of a choice
- 31:58Speaker 2: to be made there, like do you redefine momentum or
- 32:01Speaker 2: do you redefine mass?
- 32:03Speaker 1: Well, I see, it kind of depends on whether you
- 32:04Speaker 1: define mass as how hard you are to push when
- 32:07Speaker 1: you're just sitting on your couch, or how hard you
- 32:11Speaker 1: are to push at any point, or no matter how
- 32:13Speaker 1: fast you're moving.
- 32:14Speaker 2: It's definitely a choice, right, It's a definition, and you
- 32:16Speaker 2: can make one choice or the other, and the equations
- 32:19Speaker 2: all work. I think it's more coherent. It makes more
- 32:21Speaker 2: sense if you call mass as you say how hard
- 32:24Speaker 2: it is to push you when you're sitting on your couch.
- 32:26Speaker 2: It's tempting to say, well, it makes more sense to
- 32:28Speaker 2: use masses how hard it is to push when you're
- 32:30Speaker 2: moving fast as well. But as we can dig into
- 32:33Speaker 2: in a moment that doesn't actually hang together. You can't
- 32:35Speaker 2: have just a single number that tells you how hard
- 32:38Speaker 2: it is to speed up, because that actually depends a
- 32:40Speaker 2: little bit on the direction of your speed up. So
- 32:44Speaker 2: relativistic mass is a little bit complicated and problematic. It
- 32:46Speaker 2: doesn't really do that job. Doesn't let you use F
- 32:49Speaker 2: equals ma again by redefining m I see.
- 32:52Speaker 1: So I think maybe for the people who had heard
- 32:55Speaker 1: that the faster you go, or the closer you get
- 32:57Speaker 1: to the speed of light, the more mass if you get,
- 32:59Speaker 1: what they probably heard at that time was that you
- 33:01Speaker 1: do get harder to push as you get closer to
- 33:04Speaker 1: the speed of light. But that doesn't mean that your
- 33:05Speaker 1: mass went up, but that there's an adjustment to your momentum,
- 33:10Speaker 1: or there's a premium to how much momentum cause, which
- 33:14Speaker 1: makes it harder for you to push you, but it
- 33:16Speaker 1: doesn't change how hard you are to get off the couch.
- 33:18Speaker 2: Yeah, and physics has sort of changed its mind about this.
- 33:21Speaker 2: Even Einstein for a while used this concept of relativistic mass,
- 33:25Speaker 2: and it was taught in textbooks. So people who were told, like,
- 33:28Speaker 2: your mass increases as you approached the speed of light,
- 33:30Speaker 2: that's not wrong. It just depends on what you mean
- 33:33Speaker 2: by mass. So it really is our choice what do
- 33:36Speaker 2: we mean by this word mass. You used to have
- 33:37Speaker 2: a very crisp and clear definition that everybody agreed about
- 33:40Speaker 2: at low speeds. At high speeds, it becomes a little
- 33:43Speaker 2: bit trickier, and you can use the word relativistic mass.
- 33:46Speaker 2: It's not like it's wrong. It's just a choice for
- 33:48Speaker 2: how to organize the ideas. And now we think it
- 33:51Speaker 2: makes more sense to just describe mass as how hard
- 33:54Speaker 2: it is to push you when you're sitting on your couch,
- 33:56Speaker 2: and to leave momentum to absorb all the messiness.
- 33:59Speaker 1: I guess you're saying, like mask can just be how
- 34:01Speaker 1: hard it is to push you off your couch, but
- 34:03Speaker 1: we can introduce maybe a constantly called relativistic mass, where
- 34:06Speaker 1: people did introduce a concept called relativistic mass, which is
- 34:10Speaker 1: how hard you are to push at all speeds, and
- 34:13Speaker 1: that changes the faster you go.
- 34:14Speaker 2: That does change the faster you go, though I would
- 34:16Speaker 2: say the two choices are not equal. I would say
- 34:18Speaker 2: there's some problems with relativistic mass. I mean, problem number
- 34:21Speaker 2: one is that it's just a number, whereas momentum is
- 34:24Speaker 2: three numbers. It's a direction. And so if you're going
- 34:27Speaker 2: to talk about how hard it is to change your momentum,
- 34:29Speaker 2: then if you have a high speed in one direction,
- 34:32Speaker 2: you basically have a different relativistic mass in each direction,
- 34:36Speaker 2: because it's harder to push you in the direction you're
- 34:38Speaker 2: already going fast than it is to push you perpendicular
- 34:41Speaker 2: to that direction. So then you need like a transverse
- 34:45Speaker 2: relativistic mass and the longitudinal relativistic mass. It gets messy
- 34:49Speaker 2: very very quickly.
- 34:50Speaker 1: Well, I think what you're saying is that it's not
- 34:52Speaker 1: that it gets message is that the word relativistic mass
- 34:56Speaker 1: is a vector, like you have to define which way
- 34:59Speaker 1: you're pointing your li relativistic mass, just like you have
- 35:01Speaker 1: to define which way you're pointing your momentum.
- 35:03Speaker 2: Well, we already have that concept of momentum, right, so
- 35:06Speaker 2: we don't really need a vector of relativistic mass. And
- 35:09Speaker 2: the formula for relativistic mass, it turns out, is actually
- 35:12Speaker 2: just energy divided by the speed of light. So relativistic
- 35:15Speaker 2: mass doesn't actually give you anything new that you don't
- 35:18Speaker 2: already have for momentum and energy, so sort of unnecessary.
- 35:23Speaker 2: Whereas invariant mass, your rest mass is actually something independent
- 35:26Speaker 2: and interesting. It tells you, like what is the thing.
- 35:29Speaker 2: You know, photons and electrons and protons all have different
- 35:34Speaker 2: rest masses. That tells you a little bit about like
- 35:36Speaker 2: what the thing is, what it has to it, which
- 35:39Speaker 2: I think is more closely connected to like our intuitive
- 35:41Speaker 2: idea for what mass is that it tells you something
- 35:44Speaker 2: about like what you're made of.
- 35:46Speaker 1: And I guess for people who maybe missed it or
- 35:48Speaker 1: are not super familiar with this idea of directionality, I
- 35:53Speaker 1: think what you're saying is that, like, if I'm going
- 35:54Speaker 1: really fast from here to Andromeda, for example, in one
- 35:58Speaker 1: particular direction, and I'm going at the speed of light,
- 36:00Speaker 1: then my momentum in the direction from here to Andromeda
- 36:04Speaker 1: is really high because I'm going really fast, and so
- 36:06Speaker 1: it's really hard to accelerate be more in the direction
- 36:09Speaker 1: of Andromeda. But maybe if you're going along with me
- 36:12Speaker 1: and you try to push me in a direction that's
- 36:14Speaker 1: perpendicular to the side of the direction from here to Andromeda,
- 36:17Speaker 1: then you're not going to notice me being super massive
- 36:21Speaker 1: or having this huge relativistic mass. Is just going to
- 36:23Speaker 1: feel to you like I'm sitting on the couch, Like
- 36:26Speaker 1: I'm sitting on the couch in one direction, but I'm
- 36:27Speaker 1: going really fast in another direction.
- 36:29Speaker 2: Yeah, that's approximately true, because your motion towards and Drameda
- 36:32Speaker 2: does change your overall velocity, and the limit is on
- 36:35Speaker 2: the total velocity in any direction, not just in one direction.
- 36:39Speaker 2: But for the most part that's true. You know, what
- 36:41Speaker 2: happens at those very high speeds is like, if you
- 36:43Speaker 2: push in one direction, you don't get accelerated in the
- 36:46Speaker 2: direction you were pushing, because the pushing has a different
- 36:49Speaker 2: impact based on your momentum, right, and so in some
- 36:52Speaker 2: directions you already have a lot of momentum, and other
- 36:55Speaker 2: directions you don't have as much momentum, and so the
- 36:57Speaker 2: pushing changes your momentum differently in those different directions. So
- 37:00Speaker 2: force and acceleration no longer line up. So F doesn't
- 37:04Speaker 2: equal ME at very high velocities. Instead, you have to
- 37:08Speaker 2: use F equals change in momentum. That's the real formula.
- 37:12Speaker 1: I feel like you're kind of saying, like, just forget
- 37:14Speaker 1: about mass, like you've seen it on the couch and
- 37:16Speaker 1: nobody cares about that. Really, what we care about is
- 37:19Speaker 1: all hard you arc to push in any particular direction.
- 37:21Speaker 1: Is that kind of what you're saying, right, Like you're saying,
- 37:24Speaker 1: like res mass, that's just the thing. It doesn't really change,
- 37:27Speaker 1: nobody cares. What's really happening at these high speeds is
- 37:30Speaker 1: that weird things are happening with your momentum.
- 37:32Speaker 2: Yeah, I'm saying, let's talk about what's really important, and
- 37:34Speaker 2: it's high speeds. It's momentum that's important. Mass is still important.
- 37:38Speaker 2: It's very interesting and very important, and it tells you,
- 37:40Speaker 2: like what the thing is. In particle physics, we talk
- 37:43Speaker 2: about res mass all the time, Like we measure a
- 37:45Speaker 2: particle where like, oh, what was its mass? Okay, it
- 37:47Speaker 2: must be an electron or look we found a new
- 37:49Speaker 2: particle at one hundred and twenty five GeV mass, that's
- 37:52Speaker 2: got to be something new. We've never seen a particle
- 37:54Speaker 2: with that mass before. So mass is still very very important,
- 37:58Speaker 2: but it tells you something different. It's tells you something
- 38:00Speaker 2: about the character and the nature, the existence, the identity
- 38:03Speaker 2: of the particle. And what we're talking about here is
- 38:05Speaker 2: like motion near the speed of light, that's all about momentum.
- 38:08Speaker 2: And so really, let's talk about momentum when we're talking
- 38:10Speaker 2: about very high speed motion, and let's talk about mass
- 38:13Speaker 2: when we're talking about you know, what the thing is
- 38:15Speaker 2: made out of. I think those are two separate concepts,
- 38:18Speaker 2: and it's best to disentangle them. Is the point. Not
- 38:21Speaker 2: that nobody cares about rest mass, it's just it doesn't
- 38:23Speaker 2: help us understand motion near the speed of light as much.
- 38:26Speaker 1: No, yeah, I know what you mean. My spouse definitely
- 38:28Speaker 1: cares if I say to my count all day. But
- 38:32Speaker 1: I think what you're saying, maybe for listeners, I think
- 38:35Speaker 1: what you're saying is that if you've heard the phrase
- 38:37Speaker 1: like your mask gets bigger as you go closer to
- 38:39Speaker 1: the speed of light, then really what you should hear
- 38:42Speaker 1: in your head or how you should correct a person
- 38:44Speaker 1: saying it is that your relativistic mass gets bigger as
- 38:47Speaker 1: you get closer to the speed of light. And also
- 38:49Speaker 1: common asterisk. Nobody or modern physicists don't really talk about
- 38:54Speaker 1: relativistic mass or use that as a concept exactly.
- 38:57Speaker 2: A relativistic mass is really just another way to say energy.
- 39:01Speaker 2: Like the relationship in the formula is between relativistic mass
- 39:04Speaker 2: and energy that have exactly the same value. One is
- 39:06Speaker 2: just multiplied by the speed of light squared, so they
- 39:09Speaker 2: change in exactly the same way. So relativistic mass is
- 39:12Speaker 2: just another way to say, like how much energy does
- 39:14Speaker 2: something have. It's a way to try to combine the
- 39:17Speaker 2: rest mass and the kinetic energy together into one like
- 39:20Speaker 2: overall coherent energy, and then to say, oh, well that's
- 39:24Speaker 2: all A new kind of mass would just say that
- 39:26Speaker 2: energy of the particle is kind of like its mass
- 39:28Speaker 2: of motion. I'm just here to say, like, okay, let's
- 39:30Speaker 2: just leave mass to be mass of a rest particle
- 39:33Speaker 2: and to talk about motion. Will leave that as kinetic energy.
- 39:35Speaker 2: But we have to invent a concept called mass of motion.
- 39:38Speaker 2: We already have energy of motion. We already have this
- 39:40Speaker 2: concept described In other words, relativistic mass doesn't really add
- 39:44Speaker 2: anything if you already have momentum and you have energy.
- 39:46Speaker 2: So let's leave mass to do its job and tell
- 39:48Speaker 2: us about like the nature of the object when it's
- 39:50Speaker 2: sitting on its couch.
- 39:51Speaker 1: All right, Well, I think we've made that kind of clear,
- 39:53Speaker 1: and so let's get a little bit deeper into why
- 39:56Speaker 1: this term is not quite applicable or useful or help
- 40:00Speaker 1: or even accurate, and what it means about this speed
- 40:03Speaker 1: limit of the universe and why it exists. But first
- 40:06Speaker 1: let's take another quick break. All right, we're talking about
- 40:21Speaker 1: sitting on our couches. Who doesn't enjoy that? And when
- 40:25Speaker 1: we're sitting in our couch going at zero velocity relative
- 40:28Speaker 1: to other people, we have a certain amount of mass
- 40:30Speaker 1: and a certain resistance to movement, which Daniel, I think
- 40:33Speaker 1: you're saying, that's what we should call mass, not how
- 40:36Speaker 1: hard you are to push when you're going really.
- 40:37Speaker 2: Fast, exactly. I think the question you should ask yourself
- 40:40Speaker 2: is like what are you trying to talk about when
- 40:42Speaker 2: you talk about mass? And for me, I want to
- 40:44Speaker 2: talk about, like what is the thing made out of?
- 40:46Speaker 2: What does it have stored inside of it? And that
- 40:48Speaker 2: really doesn't change when you go to high velocity. A
- 40:51Speaker 2: proton moving and high speed doesn't have more stuff to
- 40:53Speaker 2: it doesn't have more gluons inside of it contributing to
- 40:56Speaker 2: its mass. It's the same proton. It's just moving faster.
- 40:59Speaker 2: It has energy of motion, which definitely will affect how
- 41:02Speaker 2: you accelerate it and how you push it and how
- 41:04Speaker 2: it responds to those pushes, but doesn't change what it
- 41:08Speaker 2: is fundamentally. And to me, mass is answering that question
- 41:10Speaker 2: of like, what is in this thing now?
- 41:13Speaker 1: I guess the question would be does your gravitational mass
- 41:16Speaker 1: also change as you go faster or close to the
- 41:18Speaker 1: speed of light or do you still have the same
- 41:20Speaker 1: gravity or is that not even relevant in relativity.
- 41:23Speaker 2: I think that's another reason not to use relativistic mass.
- 41:26Speaker 2: If you think about relativistic mass of things getting more
- 41:29Speaker 2: massive as their approach to speed of light and this
- 41:31Speaker 2: like mass of motion, then you're tempted to think that
- 41:34Speaker 2: things should have more gravity as they're moving faster. And
- 41:37Speaker 2: then you might go down the rabbit hole and be like, well,
- 41:39Speaker 2: if I take a proton and give it a lot
- 41:41Speaker 2: of speed, why doesn't it turn into a black hole.
- 41:44Speaker 2: Or if I throw a baseball fast enough, why doesn't
- 41:46Speaker 2: it collapse into a black hole? If it's gaining more
- 41:49Speaker 2: relativistic mass, shouldn't that give it also more gravitational mass
- 41:53Speaker 2: and collapse? Right. We talked about this once on a podcast.
- 41:56Speaker 2: It's a really interesting and fascinating question because, on one hand,
- 41:59Speaker 2: the curvature of base time, the thing that could actually
- 42:01Speaker 2: create a black hole for you, doesn't just depend on mass.
- 42:04Speaker 2: It also does depend on energy.
- 42:06Speaker 7: Right.
- 42:07Speaker 2: General relativity tells us that space bends in response to
- 42:10Speaker 2: mass and energy, and so you might think, like, oh,
- 42:13Speaker 2: it doesn't matter if you choose relativistic mass or inertial mass.
- 42:16Speaker 2: It just depends on the mass and the energy altogether.
- 42:19Speaker 2: And that's true. But general relativity is a bit more
- 42:22Speaker 2: complicated than that. You don't just like add up all
- 42:24Speaker 2: the mass and energy in space and say that tells
- 42:26Speaker 2: you the curvature. It's a stress energy tensor. There's all
- 42:29Speaker 2: these components and some ad and some subtract. It's very complicated,
- 42:33Speaker 2: and the bottom line is that kinetic energy does not
- 42:36Speaker 2: contribute to the curvature of space. We know this because
- 42:39Speaker 2: we know that black holes exist for every observer It's
- 42:42Speaker 2: not like if I'm holding a baseball, I don't see
- 42:45Speaker 2: a black hole and somebody is zipping by at high
- 42:47Speaker 2: speed sees it as a black hole. That's not possible.
- 42:50Speaker 2: Something's a black hole. It's a black hole for everybody,
- 42:53Speaker 2: And so only the rest mass can contribute to making
- 42:56Speaker 2: something a black hole, which is a long way of
- 42:58Speaker 2: saying relativistic mass confuses you because it makes you think
- 43:02Speaker 2: that you should be adding mass to this object, which
- 43:04Speaker 2: might lead it to a collapse to a black hole.
- 43:06Speaker 2: But that definitely doesn't happen, I see.
- 43:09Speaker 1: So then we just stick to mass as hell hard
- 43:12Speaker 1: it is to move me on my couch. And when
- 43:13Speaker 1: we talk about going close to the speed of light,
- 43:15Speaker 1: then we just just say that momentum gets harder to
- 43:19Speaker 1: change as you go faster and faster exactly.
- 43:22Speaker 2: And those calculations in general relativity of like folding in
- 43:24Speaker 2: kinetic energy, those are a beast And I don't even
- 43:27Speaker 2: think people have actually been able to do those calculations.
- 43:30Speaker 2: When they have to do them, they use the trick
- 43:32Speaker 2: and say, oh, well, if there's a black hole in
- 43:34Speaker 2: any frame, there's a black hole in every frame, so
- 43:36Speaker 2: let's do this calculation and the simplest for him, where
- 43:39Speaker 2: the thing is at rest, where it just depends on
- 43:41Speaker 2: its mass. I think nobody knows how to do that calculation.
- 43:44Speaker 2: It's so complicated, but it's just another way of saying
- 43:46Speaker 2: when we think about gravity also not just like the
- 43:48Speaker 2: inertial nature of the thing, but also the gravitational nature
- 43:52Speaker 2: of the thing, how much it bends space time, it
- 43:54Speaker 2: makes the most sense to think about the rest mass.
- 43:56Speaker 1: Well, I guess I'll give you that. Maybe it's easier
- 43:59Speaker 1: to think about it if you don't call something relativistic mass.
- 44:01Speaker 1: But then I guess my question would be why does
- 44:04Speaker 1: momentum get harder to change as the faster you go? Yeah,
- 44:07Speaker 1: that doesn't help you with that quobate question, right, that's
- 44:10Speaker 1: a very fundamental question about the universe. You're just calling
- 44:12Speaker 1: things differently. It's still the same question.
- 44:14Speaker 2: Yeah, it's still the same question. Why does the universe
- 44:17Speaker 2: conserve this quantity mass times velocity times gamma. The fascinating
- 44:21Speaker 2: thing is that that's what it conserves. It doesn't conserve
- 44:23Speaker 2: mass times velocity. Newtonian momentum is not conserved in the universe.
- 44:28Speaker 2: It's only this Einsteinian momentum. Mass times velocity times this
- 44:32Speaker 2: gamma factor. That's the thing that's actually conserved in the universe.
- 44:36Speaker 2: And you can see this if you take a class
- 44:37Speaker 2: in special relativity and you like think about collisions at
- 44:40Speaker 2: very very high energies and you try to use like
- 44:43Speaker 2: normal Galilean velocity edition formulas, and you see the momentum
- 44:46Speaker 2: is no longer conserved. So the universe conserves this quantity
- 44:50Speaker 2: mass times velocity times gamma. Why, well, that actually comes
- 44:53Speaker 2: out of the invariance of space. Right, space is the
- 44:57Speaker 2: same everywhere in the universe. That tells you that this
- 45:00Speaker 2: quantity mass times velocity times gamma is the thing that's conserved.
- 45:04Speaker 2: Why is that. It's because of the invariance of space.
- 45:06Speaker 2: Space seems to be the same everywhere, and that's why
- 45:09Speaker 2: momentum is conserved. That's a deep principle in physics.
- 45:12Speaker 1: Noether's theorem, Well, I think you're creating a causality there
- 45:16Speaker 1: a little bit, right, Like you don't know that one
- 45:18Speaker 1: causes the other. It's just that they just both happen
- 45:21Speaker 1: to be true.
- 45:21Speaker 2: Well, Notther's theorem tells us that there is a causality.
- 45:23Speaker 2: It says that for every symmetry in the universe, there
- 45:26Speaker 2: is a conserved quantity, and so for example, the fact
- 45:29Speaker 2: that there's no preferred direction in space leads to conservation
- 45:32Speaker 2: of angular momentum.
- 45:34Speaker 1: Or maybe the conservation of angular momentum is what space
- 45:39Speaker 1: it's invariant. Philosophically, I feel like you're making a conclusion there.
- 45:43Speaker 2: Yeah, I think that conclusion does come from Northern's theorem.
- 45:45Speaker 2: I understand the point you're making. But this is not
- 45:47Speaker 2: like an equal sign, right, It's not like a equals B,
- 45:49Speaker 2: and therefore you can't infer causality. If you follow the
- 45:52Speaker 2: derivation of Notther's theorem, then it definitely goes in one direction.
- 45:55Speaker 2: The conservation wills definitely flow from symmetries in the equations.
- 45:59Speaker 2: If you have a symmet in the laws of physics,
- 46:01Speaker 2: then it gives you these conservation laws. And it's everywhere,
- 46:05Speaker 2: like even in quantum mechanics, like local gauge. Symmetry of
- 46:08Speaker 2: quantum electrodynamics is the reason we have charge conservation in
- 46:12Speaker 2: the universe. So these things are pretty deep. And what
- 46:15Speaker 2: it tells us in this case is that it's mass
- 46:16Speaker 2: times velocity times this gamma factor. That's the thing the
- 46:20Speaker 2: universe cares about. And even if you don't like others
- 46:22Speaker 2: theorem and you don't believe in it or whatever, Observationally,
- 46:25Speaker 2: that's what we've measured Empirically. We're like, look, this is
- 46:27Speaker 2: the thing the universe seems to care about. This quantity,
- 46:30Speaker 2: not mass times velocity. So in some sense that's the
- 46:33Speaker 2: fundamental thing. That's the thing that like the universe is
- 46:36Speaker 2: telling us it cares about.
- 46:37Speaker 1: Right, That's what I mean. It's like, that's the thing
- 46:39Speaker 1: that we know is true. And whether it's caused by
- 46:42Speaker 1: symmetry or it approves the theory, or whether it enables
- 46:46Speaker 1: a symmetry that's sort of a philosophical question a little.
- 46:49Speaker 2: Bit, yeah, a little bit, I mean, or theoretical. Experimentally,
- 46:51Speaker 2: you're right, this is the thing we measure, and we
- 46:53Speaker 2: notice the universe cares about absolutely.
- 46:56Speaker 1: I guess then the question is what does that say
- 46:58Speaker 1: about the universe that it cares about something doesn't just
- 47:02Speaker 1: sit in the couch all day.
- 47:03Speaker 2: I think it tells us a little bit about the
- 47:04Speaker 2: history of human thoughts. You know, we've been like grappling
- 47:08Speaker 2: with how to deal with these new discoveries that we've
- 47:10Speaker 2: made and how to talk about them. One of my
- 47:13Speaker 2: favorite Cootes from Einstein relates to this. He says, quote,
- 47:15Speaker 2: the only justification for our concepts and systems of concepts
- 47:19Speaker 2: is that they serve to represent the complex of our experiences.
- 47:23Speaker 2: Beyond that, they have no legitimacy, by which he means like,
- 47:26Speaker 2: you know, what is mass, what is momentum, what is force?
- 47:29Speaker 2: They only make sense if they're talking about things we experience.
- 47:32Speaker 2: We put these labels on things we see and experience
- 47:34Speaker 2: in the universe, and we try to give them meaning.
- 47:37Speaker 2: And there's actually Einstein originally who created this concept of
- 47:40Speaker 2: relativistic mass when he was playing around with these equations
- 47:43Speaker 2: and he was like, hmm, maybe it's useful to have
- 47:45Speaker 2: this concept of mass that depends on your velocity. Later
- 47:49Speaker 2: on he abandoned it. He realized, n that's kind of messy.
- 47:52Speaker 2: And then later he said, it is not good to
- 47:54Speaker 2: introduce the concept of relativistic mass of a moving body
- 47:57Speaker 2: for which no clear definition can be He realized it
- 48:01Speaker 2: was a bit messy. But you know, even geniuses like
- 48:03Speaker 2: Einstein can't immediately disentangle these discoveries when he makes them.
- 48:07Speaker 2: It takes a few years, a few decades of thinking
- 48:09Speaker 2: about how this really lines up with our experience in
- 48:12Speaker 2: the universe, what's the most sensible way to organize it?
- 48:14Speaker 2: And the end is just us talking about how humans
- 48:17Speaker 2: think about these things. The math is very, very clear,
- 48:19Speaker 2: there's no ambiguity about it. It's really just like, what
- 48:22Speaker 2: do you mean by this word?
- 48:23Speaker 1: I think the basic idea is that it is true
- 48:25Speaker 1: that the faster you move, the harder it is to
- 48:28Speaker 1: move faster, and so we should think about that as
- 48:30Speaker 1: just momentum getting more and more expensive the closer you
- 48:33Speaker 1: get to the speed of light, and not use the
- 48:35Speaker 1: word mass to think about how hard things are to
- 48:39Speaker 1: move at those speeds.
- 48:40Speaker 2: Yep, the universe has a higher tax for momentum millionaires.
- 48:43Speaker 1: It's a progressive universe. Bernie Sanders and AOC would.
- 48:46Speaker 2: Be proud until they start their own space company.
- 48:49Speaker 1: All right, well, we hope you enjoyed that. Thanks for
- 48:51Speaker 1: joining us, See you next time.
- 49:00Speaker 2: Thanks for listening, and remember that Daniel and Jorge explain
- 49:03Speaker 2: the Universe is a production of iHeartRadio. For more podcasts
- 49:07Speaker 2: from iHeartRadio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever
- 49:12Speaker 2: you listen to your favorite shows.