Latest / The Epstein Chronicles / The Politics of Deflection Inside the Epstein Files Battle (4/29/26)

Transcript

The Politics of Deflection Inside the Epstein Files Battle (4/29/26) · The Epstein Chronicles

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: What's up, everyone, and welcome to another episode of the
• 0:03
  Epstein Chronicles. One of the biggest traps set by the
• 0:07
  Trump administration when it comes to the Epstein Files is
• 0:12
  the trap that everybody walk directly into. And that trap,
• 0:16
  of course, is what I've dubbed the Trump Trap. So
• 0:18
  what do I mean by the Trump Trap. I mean
• 0:21
  by turning the whole, entire Epstein story into a story
• 0:24
  about Trump, you're falling into their trap because now they
• 0:28
  can just say, look, the whole thing's a hoax and
• 0:30
  everybody is just out to get Donald Trump. And that's
• 0:33
  why I warn people to treat Trump as a symptom,
• 0:36
  not as the sickness, because I know people don't want
• 0:40
  to hear it. But the truth is, this goes much
• 0:42
  deeper than Donald Trump. It always has and it always will.
• 0:45
  And the truth is Donald Trump is just one of
• 0:48
  many actors on the stage. He is not the main character.
• 0:55
  This goes deeper than just one man. And that's the
• 0:58
  point I've been trying to hammer home for years now.
• 1:01
  It's not just one person that's responsible for this or
• 1:04
  one administration. We're talking about decades. Now. Let's not forget
• 1:08
  that Epstein was at the Clinton White House in the
• 1:10
  early nineties, and let's not forget how close they were.
• 1:14
  So the point is it's not just about one man.
• 1:17
  And if you make it just about one person, what
• 1:20
  you're going to do is give people an opening to
• 1:23
  try and hustle, people to try and gaslight, to try
• 1:26
  and frame this as nothing more than another attempt to
• 1:29
  take down Donald Trump. But for those of us who
• 1:32
  actually understand this story, we see through the bullshit and
• 1:36
  understand this is all part of the syop to get
• 1:39
  people thinking that it's a hoax, and unfortunately a lot
• 1:43
  of people have played directly into their hands. Today's article
• 1:47
  is from the New York Post, and the headline representative
• 1:51
  ann Al Pauline Luna takes pod forth one behind the
• 1:54
  scenes of Bill and Hillary Clinton's Epstein testimony and how
• 1:58
  DEM's ploy backfired. Is this, lady, for real? Are we
• 2:02
  watching the same story unfold? Because it would seem to
• 2:06
  me that what really backfired was the Clinton deposition. What
• 2:10
  did you guys get out of that? In fact, the
• 2:13
  GOP came away from it looking stupid. I mean, what
• 2:16
  did they accomplish? Did anyone get hit with perjury? Did
• 2:20
  anybody drop a bombshell. Of course, not all by design.
• 2:25
  And one of the biggest promoters of this narrative, of
• 2:29
  this gaslighting campaign is Anna Pauline A Luna. She's not
• 2:33
  fooling me and the Trump administration for all of their faults,
• 2:37
  they understand the optics and having a woman come out
• 2:39
  here and take point it looks good. It gives them
• 2:43
  some credibility, some cover, as opposed to having, you know,
• 2:46
  Stephen Miller coming out and talking a bunch of shit.
• 2:49
  Let's unleash Anna Paulina Luna. She looks like an influencer.
• 2:54
  People on the right love her, so let's use her
• 2:56
  as the face of this marketing campaign, basically because that's
• 3:00
  what it is, a marketing campaign. This article was authored
• 3:04
  by Ryan King. Democrats attempt to use the firestorm surrounding
• 3:08
  the late sex predator Jeffrey Epstein as a cudgel against
• 3:12
  President Trump backfired. According to Firebrand representative Anna Paulina Luna
• 3:17
  did it though? Did it really? Or is she just
• 3:20
  out here pushing more bullshit? You mean to tell me
• 3:25
  that Donald Trump hasn't suffered politically because of the Epstein fiasco?
• 3:30
  Is that really what Paulina Luna thinks? Because I don't
• 3:33
  think it backfired. How's Donald Trump support amongst independent voters,
• 3:39
  you know, the people that got him over the hump.
• 3:41
  MAGA should remember that there's a lot of disillusioned conservatives
• 3:45
  out there and a lot of people that consider themselves,
• 3:48
  you know, Reagan Conservatives who are looking at what's going
• 3:51
  on and they're sick to their stomach. So to say
• 3:54
  it's just Democrats is crazy. I'm certainly not a Democrat.
• 3:57
  I'm a registered independent because I know that both of
• 4:00
  these parties don't give a shit about me. So you
• 4:03
  can keep your demagoguery, you can keep your stupid party lines.
• 4:07
  I'm going to vote for the person that I think
• 4:08
  is going to affect my life the best, the person
• 4:12
  that I think is going to take the country the
• 4:15
  furthest And if that person has an R next to
• 4:18
  their name, great, if they have a D, great. But
• 4:22
  all this bullshit of vote in the party line is
• 4:24
  exactly why we are where we are. Just because somebody
• 4:28
  has an R next to their name or a D
• 4:30
  doesn't make them a good person, and it doesn't mean
• 4:33
  they share your values. And I think when you're voting
• 4:35
  for somebody, that should be the most important thing. But
• 4:38
  we're so polarized as a society that I have a
• 4:41
  hard time believing that the tribalism is ever going away.
• 4:46
  People are way too entrenched in their bunkers at this point.
• 4:49
  Luna recounted the pod fourth one how Democrats frequently peppered
• 4:53
  Epstein victims with questions about Trump and were consistently told
• 4:57
  the president wasn't involved with any of the late predators
• 5:00
  evil activities. I think it backfired, Luna told host Miranda Divine.
• 5:06
  We saw a number of individuals exonerate the president thereafter,
• 5:09
  and then you saw them basically blatantly lie and try
• 5:12
  to make a political alleging that President Trump was somehow
• 5:15
  a pedophile. Well, I'd never said that, and I don't
• 5:19
  think anybody that's serious about this investigation would say that
• 5:24
  there's no evidence pointing in that direction, just like there's
• 5:27
  no evidence pointing that Bill Clinton was engaging in that shit.
• 5:32
  But that's what they want you to focus on. This
• 5:34
  is what I warned you about. This is the Trump trap.
• 5:37
  Focus on the cover up, Focus on the tangible evidence
• 5:40
  that we have in front of us. You notice they
• 5:42
  don't talk about that, right, They send out their bulldog
• 5:46
  Anna Paulina Luna to change the game, to run a narrative,
• 5:51
  try and get you thinking in a certain direction. And
• 5:54
  I'm asking you to see through the bullshit. There's a
• 5:57
  reason that this is the person that's doing the messaging.
• 6:02
  And furthermore, about exonerating Trump, I mean, okay, yeah, that's true.
• 6:07
  No survivors have said anything about Trump and him being
• 6:11
  involved in the abuse, except for Katie Johnson and the
• 6:14
  young lady from South Carolina. But besides those two accounts,
• 6:18
  we haven't heard from one of the survivors, one of
• 6:21
  the outspoken survivors, that Donald Trump was involved in the abuse.
• 6:25
  Now does that mean that nothing ever occurred. It doesn't.
• 6:28
  What it means is we don't have the tangible evidence
• 6:31
  to back it up. Meanwhile, the evidence of this cover
• 6:34
  up is piling up as we speak. And that's why
• 6:38
  I continue to call for a special counsel. It's the
• 6:42
  only way to get to pay dirt, folks. And I'm
• 6:44
  sure you're tired of hearing it by now, but I'm
• 6:46
  going to keep saying it and eventually, oh, I don't know,
• 6:50
  a couple weeks from now, a couple months from now,
• 6:52
  that's going to end up being the narrative because it's
• 6:54
  the only way we can get to the bottom of it,
• 6:57
  or have a chance to get to the bottom of it.
• 7:00
  We can't count on the DOJ and we certainly can't
• 7:02
  count on Anna Paulina Luna. And she has some nerves saying, oh,
• 7:05
  they tried to turn a political No, you all turned
• 7:08
  it political. You took a serious issue and you've turned
• 7:13
  it into another political cudgel that both sides are looking
• 7:16
  to use to bash their opponent with. Meanwhile, the survivors,
• 7:19
  once again are being ignored. She noted how many of
• 7:23
  the same lawmakers who have been screaming about Jeffrey Epstein
• 7:26
  Justice also opposed deresent effort she championed to release the
• 7:30
  names of lawmakers who use taxpayer dollars to pay off
• 7:33
  alleged victims of sexual assault. I was talking about this
• 7:37
  five years ago, people looking at me sideways like I
• 7:41
  was crazy. Well, guess what, who's crazy now? And guess what.
• 7:45
  As much as I'm a critic of Anna Paulina Luna
• 7:48
  when it comes to her work with Epstein, she is
• 7:50
  not wrong about this. I know crazy, right. I can
• 7:54
  agree with people sometimes and disagree with them other times.
• 7:57
  I mean I know it's a novel idea in our
• 7:59
  current environment, but that's how I roll. Luna has been
• 8:03
  a staunch advocate of releasing the names of the lawmakers
• 8:06
  who tapped into congressional funds to pay off individuals who
• 8:09
  accuse them of sexual misconduct. She said people were pissed
• 8:13
  off by her advocacy for transparency on the soul called
• 8:17
  slush fund. Not me good idea. Let's see it all
• 8:20
  the names, and why are my tax dollars being used
• 8:24
  to pay off accusers? I have to think that that's
• 8:26
  a cross partisan issue that people on both sides of
• 8:30
  the aisle are disgusted by it and want transparency. So
• 8:34
  why are the lawmakers stopping that? I think Anna Pauline
• 8:39
  Luna's right to push for that being released. We should
• 8:43
  all see that, and we should see the degenerates for
• 8:46
  what they are, no more hiding behind rhetoric and virtue signaling.
• 8:51
  Put up her, shut up, and the fact that they
• 8:53
  won't even do that that should tell you everything you
• 8:56
  need to know about how they feel about transparency in general.
• 8:59
  The Floridian and Trump ally argued that Trump is faced
• 9:03
  a smear campaign from Democrats. On Epstein, this is very
• 9:07
  much so used as a political smear campaign against the president.
• 9:10
  But for those of us that are taking the investigation seriously,
• 9:14
  we do want justice. The Sunshine State Republican stressed, Oh yeah,
• 9:19
  she really wants justice. That's why she showed up to
• 9:21
  talk to Les Wexner. Hell of a job there, Anna,
• 9:25
  Pauline a luna. He did a fantastic job with the
• 9:28
  Clintons as well, considering just about everybody thinks that they steamrolled.
• 9:33
  You waited all those years, all those decades basically to
• 9:38
  get the Clintons in the hot seat, only to come
• 9:40
  up lacking. Rush Limbaugh would not be impressed. The congresswoman
• 9:47
  sits on the powerful House Oversight Committee which has been
• 9:50
  probing the Epstein saga. And she didn't sign on to
• 9:53
  the petition. By the way, she didn't want the discharge
• 9:57
  petition to go through because she is running cover for
• 10:00
  the administration. That's her job. Send out the pretty face,
• 10:04
  the woman that guys like, and have her go out
• 10:07
  there and pass on these stupid ass messages and these
• 10:11
  narratives and this propaganda being pushed by the administration, and
• 10:15
  hardly anybody's pushing back, which is crazy because this woman's
• 10:20
  out here telling more tales than old Nan. In February,
• 10:25
  the panel question former President Bill Clinton and his wife
• 10:28
  Hillary about Epstein. You know, Bill Clinton was a lot
• 10:31
  more cooperative than Hillary was. But I think the narrative
• 10:35
  and the messaging people forget that the subpoenas were issued
• 10:39
  were issued by both Democrats and Republicans. Luna said, Oh,
• 10:43
  give me a break. Do you think they did that
• 10:45
  because they thought the Clintons were guilty or because they
• 10:48
  wanted to get Trump in the dock? Listen, folks, don't
• 10:50
  ever take these people out their word. There's always something
• 10:53
  behind it. They're always trying to, you know, project other things,
• 10:58
  and that's certainly what's going on with She wants to
• 11:01
  act like there was a consensus, but there wasn't. The
• 11:03
  whole idea was to get Donald Trump in the same
• 11:06
  position as Bill Clinton ended up being in, and that's
• 11:10
  what it was all about. She acknowledged that there were
• 11:14
  some surprises during the two testimonies, particularly Slick Willie's denials
• 11:19
  about key accusations that have swirled for years. It was
• 11:22
  alleged that Bill Clinton was on Epstein's island a number
• 11:25
  of times by a now deceased victim she said, And
• 11:28
  when we asked Bill Clinton under oath if that was true,
• 11:31
  he denied it. And he was never at Jeffrey Epstein's island,
• 11:34
  but he did travel on his plane. Well, if Paulina
• 11:39
  Luna actually understood the story and knew what she was
• 11:42
  talking about, she would have brought up Steve Scully. She
• 11:45
  didn't do that, ditchy, I wonder why could it be
• 11:48
  that she has no idea what she's really talking about.
• 11:52
  And folks, look, I hate to be a dick, but
• 11:54
  I'm not going to be preached to or reprimanded by
• 11:57
  somebody that believes that inter dimensional beings are actually here
• 12:01
  on Earth. I'm sorry, but I can't get down with it.
• 12:03
  I mean, chew on that for a minute. A sitting
• 12:06
  representative in Congress is talking about interdimensional beings. Maybe she
• 12:10
  was over at Joe Rogan's smoking some mushrooms or toad
• 12:13
  venom or something. He was willing to testify. So I
• 12:18
  think that many people, specifically if they did have closer
• 12:21
  relationships with Jeffrey Epstein, are going to have to testify
• 12:24
  for sure. Well, on that much, we agree key people
• 12:28
  should be testifying. I mean, how can anyone believe the
• 12:31
  story about what happened to Jeffrey Epstein after reading all
• 12:35
  the depositions that we've read and all the information from
• 12:39
  the different reports surrounding his death, and how is it
• 12:43
  that all of those people that gave those depositions aren't
• 12:46
  brought before Congress as well? Don't you think that would
• 12:49
  be a good place to start. Don't you think if
• 12:51
  they were looking for justice and looking for answers, you
• 12:54
  have to bring everybody in that was involved, and they've
• 12:58
  shown no desire to do any of them besides Tovin.
• 13:01
  Oh weel. But it shouldn't start or stop there. Every
• 13:05
  single person that we've heard from in these depositions should
• 13:08
  be brought into But that would get us way too
• 13:10
  close to the truth, and that's the destination that annapoline
• 13:14
  A Luna has zero desire to ever visit. All the
• 13:19
  information that goes with this episode can be found in
• 13:22
  the description box.