Latest / Global Voice Radio Network's tracks / Radio Ranch with Roger Sayles REPLAY 081426 - Passport Paperwork, Prosecutorial Abuse, and Tonight’s Call

Transcript

Radio Ranch with Roger Sayles REPLAY 081426 - Passport Paperwork, Prosecutorial Abuse, and Tonight’s Call · Global Voice Radio Network's tracks

• 0:00
  Unknown: Forward moving and focused on freedom. You're listening to the Global Voice Radio Network.
• 0:10
  This mirror stream is brought to you in part by
• 0:14
  mymitoboost.com
• 0:16
  for support of the mitochondria
• 0:18
  like never before. A body trying to function without adequate mitochondrial
• 0:23
  function is kinda like running an engine without oil. It's not gonna work very well. It's also brought to you by snapfat.com.
• 0:31
  That is snap,phat,.com.
• 0:35
  It's also brought to you by the Prife International Terahertz frequency wand through iteraplanet.com.
• 0:43
  Thank you so much for joining us, and welcome to the program.
• 1:42
  Unknown: Epiphy lyrics
• 1:44
  of Alvin Lee's ten years after they're so far ahead of his time.
• 1:48
  Roger Sails with you on the January
• 1:52
  2019.
• 1:55
  Boy, that one went quick.
• 1:58
  Let's see how our levels are looking pretty good here. Radio Ranch,
• 2:03
  the name of our program and the People's Patriot
• 2:07
  Network, your network in all
• 2:10
  honesty.
• 2:12
  The platform and venue. Glad to have you along.
• 2:16
  It's a Thursday.
• 2:20
  Well, we're going to have Chris.
• 2:22
  Now, see, when Chris calls in and I don't want and nobody else is on, I just answer it and it's just like it used to be and I go, hey, Chris. It's Roger, your modern day abolitionist.
• 2:33
  You know, but we're not just looking to free the blacks.
• 2:37
  We're looking to free everyone. How you doing this morning, Chris?
• 2:41
  Unknown: Well,
• 2:42
  all things considered,
• 2:44
  pretty darn good. Had a pretty busy day. I did get my pass passport onto the, secretary of state yesterday with my
• 2:51
  evident proofs of citizenship.
• 2:54
  Unknown: Oh, good. So you got your you got your passport
• 2:58
  back that's attached to the paperwork that you submitted with the d with whichever
• 3:04
  application you used. Right? DS11 or I haven't
• 3:09
  Unknown: haven't received it back yet, but I did put it into the passport office for directing to,
• 3:15
  and I'm gonna back it up with a mailing to the secretary of state as soon as I locate the exact address to mail it to. That's not easy, you know. Yes.
• 3:23
  Unknown: I just send it to the secretary of state, administrative
• 3:27
  department,
• 3:28
  or something up there. I I've maintained for a long time
• 3:32
  that you could just address it to Foggy Bottom, Washington DC,
• 3:36
  and it'd get there.
• 3:39
  Unknown: Well, it may, but I thought I'd locate the actual mailing address. I had that before a few places, and, you
• 3:47
  know, they don't make it easy to I just go
• 3:50
  Unknown: I I really don't people doing that. I just pop on the Internet and go to the secretary of state's website, and it's probably right there.
• 3:58
  Unknown: I have done some of that.
• 4:03
  Well. I got lots of e locations,
• 4:05
  Unknown: but they don't have any actual addresses on there. Okay. Now, the the now do you let me get this right. Now, I'm confused.
• 4:12
  For what you said, I took that you got back your passport yesterday.
• 4:19
  Unknown: No. If I'd said that, I certainly misspoke. I got it into the mail to get it paid for the expeditious handling both the Oh, okay. And the clerk.
• 4:28
  Unknown: Usually,
• 4:29
  you have to go to the post office to do that. Did you go to the post office and go through the rigamarole there with the registered agent?
• 4:38
  Unknown: They actually had a passport
• 4:40
  office or two here several here in Las Vegas area. This apparently is a hotbed for immigration and passport activity.
• 4:48
  People entering and exiting,
• 4:50
  America
• 4:51
  and the Continental United States and other countries.
• 4:54
  So they've, facilitated
• 4:57
  actual passport agent offices,
• 4:59
  representatives
• 5:01
  who do that particularly. It's in the, Southern Nevada Health District building
• 5:05
  over on Decatur Boulevard, 280
• 5:08
  South Decatur as I recall specifically.
• 5:11
  And, they were pretty nice people there. It wasn't overly busy or crowded. Few minutes wait was all it was. Did have to go get a money order. They don't take cash.
• 5:21
  I could've used a debit card. In fact, I did have to do that for the agent fee, $35.
• 5:26
  You have to pay them for processing your paperwork, but that was still a bargain, all things considered.
• 5:32
  Unknown: Yeah. Well, I can imagine that being the the case in Las Vegas and I can imagine there's probably a lot of
• 5:39
  extra strain in yours in your market because of the,
• 5:43
  well, the nature of your market.
• 5:46
  Unknown: So Not only that, I I
• 5:49
  was having to go about six or seven places yesterday to get a document authorized. In fact, one of the places I went was a South
• 5:58
  American passport place called Lambda that I had a doctor to notarize there, but because the one I was sending was a DHS trip complaint
• 6:07
  to the IG
• 6:09
  of the DOJ
• 6:11
  and the secretary of state and the department of homeland security,
• 6:15
  they were,
• 6:16
  let's say, not comfortable with sending that document or putting their notary standpoint fearing
• 6:21
  Unknown: retribution from the government, I suppose. No. No. They'd never do anything like that.
• 6:27
  Unknown: Well,
• 6:28
  they did yesterday.
• 6:29
  Okay.
• 6:31
  Unknown: So you submitted your application yesterday then. You got it in in
• 6:36
  process as they say in the military. Right?
• 6:40
  Unknown: $230
• 6:41
  Unknown: worth. Yes, sir. And you expedited it?
• 6:45
  I did.
• 6:46
  Okay.
• 6:47
  So you gotta Time is of the day. You did you did you put a
• 6:52
  a trip date on there?
• 6:55
  Unknown: I
• 6:56
  did not, but I didn't claim extra circumstances
• 7:00
  because you gotta have a ticket to prove or something to prove the trip date.
• 7:04
  And so I took the two to three weeks time it takes for them to get it in the expedited processing, normal chain of events. Well, are they did they
• 7:14
  Unknown: since you did expedite it,
• 7:17
  did they you say they did require some sort of a plane ticket or verification or something of the trip?
• 7:24
  Unknown: In order to get it faster than the two to three weeks normal expedited time
• 7:29
  for exigent
• 7:31
  purposes. Although Well I did
• 7:33
  poke to them that there is a mitigating extenuating exception for life and death situations,
• 7:39
  and I think my situation definitely falls
• 7:41
  Unknown: directly under that concept. Yeah. I can imagine that's probably you could wiggle in there. Okay?
• 7:47
  But just for the average person and and and what I was told in the past, and I don't know what processes have changed in the last number of years. This isn't something I do real regular,
• 7:58
  you know? But if you did expedite it,
• 8:02
  if you put a trip date on there because they ask you, what's your trip dates? If the, if you put dates on there, then when it went to the expediting
• 8:12
  office,
• 8:13
  it goes to the top of the stack.
• 8:16
  If you don't put dates on there, it goes to the bottom of the stack.
• 8:22
  Unknown: Well, that GIGO or FIFO,
• 8:25
  Unknown: first in, first out Yeah. Is a good concept, but I didn't do that. I Okay. I was a bit under stress, believe it or not. No. No. Doing this with everything else going on. I understand, but I have gone over that and tried to accentuate that in the past with people that, for whatever reason, do wanna get it quick. Now, this
• 8:45
  affords us another really interesting opportunity,
• 8:48
  Chris.
• 8:50
  Mhmm. And that is because now you have a passport application
• 8:55
  expedited in process.
• 8:58
  I do have. Okay. Now that qualifies you to be able to go to the state department website
• 9:05
  and track the progress of your passport.
• 9:10
  Unknown: That's true. In fact, while searching around on the travel.gov
• 9:15
  and the secretary of state's websites,
• 9:17
  I found something I think that,
• 9:19
  everyone
• 9:20
  listens to this program that loves freedom and liberty and
• 9:24
  is venturesome enough to go out and put those
• 9:28
  additional
• 9:29
  evidences of citizenship and proofs of the document and affidavits and stuff with their passport form will find this most
• 9:36
  titillating.
• 9:37
  I found yesterday
• 9:38
  an article here from the United States Department of State Office of Foreign Missions,
• 9:44
  Diplomatic
• 9:45
  and Consular
• 9:46
  Immunity Guidance for Law Enforcement and Judicial Authorities.
• 9:53
  Okay. Because that noncitizen national status,
• 9:58
  the state
• 10:00
  American
• 10:02
  noncitizen
• 10:03
  US national status
• 10:04
  It's on the DSM 11 with that passport you're getting. The same reason that woman got special treatment
• 10:10
  down there in Atlanta when she was going to the TSA. LA. It
• 10:16
  LA. Oh, that's even better. Yes. It is.
• 10:20
  Well, this this
• 10:23
  noncitizen US national status,
• 10:26
  apparently, like we talked about yesterday, incorporates something
• 10:30
  not dissimilar or maybe just below a diplomatic courier. Yep. And that is diplomatic immunity,
• 10:37
  status. Now there are some qualifiers on diplomatic immunity statuses, exclusionary preclusions
• 10:43
  that in some ventures when you're acting privately outside the scope of your official
• 10:48
  diplomatic duties, you might be culpable libel. So you don't have a license to do everything,
• 10:54
  but there might be a couple of things you can't do. Murder, rob, rape, plunder, child sex trafficking.
• 11:00
  Unknown: No, you can't do. You can't do any of that kind of stuff. Those are all crimes against somebody, okay? And some sort of a physical crime
• 11:08
  but what it what it does is it moves you out from under that resident citizen in The United States total encompassing umbrella
• 11:16
  And I think that's why
• 11:19
  the the guy at t at the at the gate went over there. I don't know. I'm I'm dying to find out more and I'm gonna hear that story live tonight.
• 11:29
  Okay? Oh. And. If you have the opportunity, I wouldn't mind being on that call. Well, I we were we're going to talk about it and it's one of the things I wanted to mention today. Yesterday,
• 11:40
  I put up
• 11:41
  on on the show description
• 11:43
  on castbox.
• 11:45
  Castbox.fm,
• 11:47
  cast,
• 11:49
  castbox.fm,
• 11:51
  and go to Radio Ranch or PPN in the search, and you'll find the programs there in our channel.
• 11:58
  And if you'll go to yesterday's show and when you pop on that date,
• 12:03
  there's one of those little at the bottom of the window there, there's one of those, I think the correct term, Chris, an audience,
• 12:10
  is chevron.
• 12:12
  You know, like this. Uh-huh.
• 12:14
  Chevron's on a on a master sergeant or sergeants in the military. Well, there's one of those little chevrons there that points down
• 12:22
  And click on that and the show description is there.
• 12:26
  K? I kinda go back immediately after the show with the best of my memory, put the important things we discussed in there, and at the bottom of those
• 12:35
  are the links that are talked about that day.
• 12:40
  Yesterday,
• 12:41
  at the bottom, there's there's I put a couple in there yesterday. We may talk about them a little bit more today.
• 12:46
  But at the bottom of that were the instructions on how to get on this call tonight. Now,
• 12:52
  this is a fellow from Texas named Thomas
• 12:56
  who had called in before the the day that Michael Gatti
• 13:01
  got his got his drawers all in a wad.
• 13:04
  This was the guy that called in right before the show that set up all the confusion that day,
• 13:10
  okay?
• 13:11
  And that's when he called. I said, hey, you've called in before, right? Okay? And so, yes, it's the same guy and he's been ruminating on this and studying it. He's got a Facebook group too
• 13:23
  and
• 13:25
  I guess that maybe that story
• 13:27
  from I believe it's Veronica.
• 13:31
  Motivated him.
• 13:33
  Hold it. May not. That's I don't think that's her name. I gotta go back to look. But it starts with a V.
• 13:38
  I know. It starts with a V. Veronica,
• 13:41
  Valerie. Well, yeah. Yeah and I don't want it. I don't want. Yeah. Anyway, I'm going to hear from her tonight and he wrote me an Email said she's going to be on the call tonight and tell the story. So, anyway,
• 13:52
  he called in just this week and said, would you do this call for, you know, I think he said there maybe 40 to 60 people on there, one of these
• 14:01
  Texas groups on Take Back Texas kind of thing I think and
• 14:05
  so of course, I I accepted that and that's going to be this evening at at 09:00 Eastern, 08:00 Central and I will after the show today under these show notes, I'll go back and pull that information
• 14:19
  on how to access that call if you want to and put it on today's show description too. So, it's already on yesterday's
• 14:27
  with Paul,
• 14:28
  and it'll be on today's on this one and whoever
• 14:31
  else calls in besides me and Chris.
• 14:34
  Well,
• 14:35
  Unknown: I I'm going to copy this hyperlink from this, site that I have here
• 14:40
  and send that to you. I will tell it to you right now just in case somebody's anxious to see it, and that comes from www.state.gov/documents/organization/150546.pdf.
• 15:04
  Unknown: Well,
• 15:05
  see, Chris, if you had Skype,
• 15:07
  if if if we're connected better, you could shoot me that in an instant message and I could add that onto the show description today.
• 15:14
  Now, the other option, if you could get to an Email address
• 15:18
  before the show's over and send it to me, I can then pull it off the Email and put it in there today
• 15:24
  Unknown: But otherwise There's still email you're using now so I can get it to you.
• 15:30
  Unknown: Do what now, Chris? You've you've
• 15:33
  changed your email. You might wanna share with us now exactly Well, you can well, you can send it. The I've kinda adopted a show email,
• 15:40
  Radio Ranch, all one word, RadioRanch@mail.com.
• 15:47
  And otherwise, I haven't changed it. It went through a period of
• 15:52
  of immortality
• 15:54
  for about a month.
• 15:56
  Uh-huh. We had a little crash a rooney, you know,
• 16:00
  and and I didn't get to access that Email for a while and the problem was that's one of the the main Email I use for stuff like
• 16:09
  two factor authentifications
• 16:10
  and all of these other cyber stuff. And that's the key email, and it went down for over a month.
• 16:16
  So, just, you know, they're just all kinds of fun and technology world.
• 16:23
  Unknown: I will say, in fact, if you have the ability to Skype to my phone number, that might work, and that would give me a Skype link or at least a text return path that I could type it in there for you. Also, I have on my desktop here Mhmm. I think that that,
• 16:40
  little v that you call the Chevron is called a drop down.
• 16:44
  I think that's a perfect thing. But this case is really important
• 16:49
  for anybody like myself who has found themselves unlawfully without any facts basis whatsoever
• 16:55
  Unknown: on a do not fly or a hit list for the government of, terror watch. I think that that case. Oh yeah. I was going to say this story with her getting yanked out of that line. On top of what the other incident I had recently with the IT guy who told us this little insight.
• 17:13
  Is
• 17:14
  very revealing,
• 17:16
  okay?
• 17:18
  And and it's real important,
• 17:21
  and we're just gonna explore it more. I'd like to get some definitive answers. I'm sure she wasn't conscious enough or in that setting didn't say, hey, why'd you pull us out of this line and put us in this other one? Yeah.
• 17:33
  Unknown: Oh, oh,
• 17:35
  crap. We're going to be here in charities. They can search to get a body cavity searches. I can see where all the sports spots that go through somebody's head in that scenario.
• 17:43
  But
• 17:45
  Unknown: but but just think about it. Think about it. Why would an almost,
• 17:49
  low level diplomatic
• 17:51
  immunity
• 17:52
  attach to you when you do this?
• 17:55
  Unknown: Why? Well, because it's a special status and that sets you apart from the human cattle chattel of the small sea federal citizen,
• 18:04
  slave, serfs, and Goya'im.
• 18:07
  Unknown: It's all that stuff doesn't apply to you anymore. See? That's right.
• 18:11
  Unknown: You're outside their sphere of control. You are immune.
• 18:17
  Unknown: The old state citizen did, in essence, have diplomatic immunity.
• 18:24
  Unknown: Yeah. Yet was traveling to other countries. Now realize
• 18:28
  Unknown: realize
• 18:29
  that though and there's some there's some misinformation
• 18:33
  or disinformation.
• 18:35
  I don't know which it is
• 18:36
  but that was
• 18:39
  given to Tom Schramm,
• 18:42
  our friend Tom Schramm by Judge Anna and
• 18:46
  he was questioning
• 18:48
  her about this because he didn't wanna believe anything I say applies
• 18:52
  and so, he goes to her and she goes, well, Tom,
• 18:57
  She goes, well, Tom, why don't you go to the Secretary of State of Georgia
• 19:02
  and get a burgundy
• 19:04
  state passport?
• 19:06
  Mhmm. Now that, now okay. What I would like to know is when did the states ever issue passports?
• 19:16
  It's always been delegated to the federal government and we've got the proof all the way back to the Supreme Court case of 1835.
• 19:25
  You know, the states got together and did things
• 19:28
  and gave delegated authority to the federal government that they couldn't all do individually.
• 19:34
  They couldn't all have ambassadors
• 19:36
  to France. They couldn't all have
• 19:38
  embassies
• 19:40
  all over the world. They couldn't all have armies. They they had militia but they couldn't have all armed. They delegated those collective responsibilities
• 19:49
  to the federal government in the early days and it obviously issuing a passport
• 19:54
  was one of those.
• 19:57
  Unknown: Well, it goes back to the foundational precepts before the creation of Corp US Inc in The United States when they were all sovereign,
• 20:05
  several
• 20:05
  independent or not dependent state nations existing alone as their own countries within a geographical boundaries
• 20:12
  Unknown: of the Continental United States. I would say even under the articles of confederation that the passports were issued. Okay? By
• 20:20
  one central authority.
• 20:22
  So,
• 20:23
  anyway, that's just those are the things that,
• 20:27
  gosh, bother me
• 20:29
  because
• 20:31
  that's just damn wrong information.
• 20:36
  Unknown: Let me share this,
• 20:38
  site for you because it's really critically important. It's the opinion and order from the Portland division of the United States District Court for the District of Oregon.
• 20:48
  And it's 10
• 20:52
  hyphen Charlie Victor
• 20:54
  hyphen seven five zero
• 20:57
  hyphen b R.
• 20:59
  And this is
• 21:00
  Ayman, a y m a n, Latif,
• 21:04
  l a t I f,
• 21:05
  and several other names,
• 21:07
  Mohammed Sheikh
• 21:10
  Abduram
• 21:11
  and Karari and so on and so forth. And the plaintiffs are kinda interesting.
• 21:16
  It's Eric Holder junior in his official capacity as attorney general of The United States, Robert s Mueller the third
• 21:23
  in his official capacity as the director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and Timothy j Healy in his official capacity as director of the terrorist
• 21:31
  screening
• 21:32
  Unknown: center. Okay. I got let me tell Bob. I'm gonna get him right back. Go ahead, Chris.
• 21:38
  Unknown: Well, that's that's basically it, but this is a a really interesting read because it gives you basically a menu, a template
• 21:47
  for removing yourself with lots of those, 26 string
• 21:52
  character,
• 21:53
  parenthetical
• 21:54
  designators after the original citation
• 21:57
  to get yourself off the terrorist watch of the do not fly hit list.
• 22:02
  Unknown: Okay. Now this is a how to guide,
• 22:05
  basically?
• 22:06
  Unknown: Well,
• 22:07
  effectually, it turns out to be it's actually a supreme court decision or district court decision,
• 22:13
  that
• 22:15
  that
• 22:17
  there's another one here, and so it may in fact have gone to the supreme court. Three colon 10
• 22:24
  hyphen c v
• 22:26
  zero zero
• 22:27
  seven five zero
• 22:29
  boy rob
• 22:31
  document number 69.
• 22:34
  Unknown: Okay. Now you're gonna utilize this case to try and apply these principles for yourself is what I'm gathering out of this. Well, I have a document already put together that's called a DHS
• 22:45
  Unknown: department of Homeland Security trip complaint. Although the Department of Homeland Security has essentially transmitted all the responsibilities
• 22:52
  Unknown: to the abject corrupt domestic terrorist FBI, and I think that lies at the heart of my problem. It may be. You may hit right at the right at the ventricle in the oracle there. Hey, Bob. How you doing?
• 23:06
  Unknown: Good morning, Bob. Hello, sir.
• 23:09
  Unknown: Morning, mister Chris.
• 23:11
  How are things on the
• 23:13
  sunny Las Vegas Strip, or do you try to avoid that?
• 23:20
  Unknown: Chris, do you avoid the Las Vegas? How are things that
• 23:24
  Unknown: yeah. He didn't quite make it.
• 23:29
  Unknown: Well, it was just small talk, real fast.
• 23:32
  Roger.
• 23:33
  Unknown: Sir.
• 23:34
  Unknown: I'd like to pick a net. You know that. Uh-oh.
• 23:38
  Unknown: You're gonna go making me look bad again.
• 23:42
  Unknown: No. No. Not necessarily.
• 23:44
  I I just think it is constructive.
• 23:47
  You know, technically, it's not that the states can't
• 23:50
  or couldn't, in that case,
• 23:53
  have embassies in other nations because they were other nations, but it's that they didn't need to. That is the point of forming the federal government as a servant
• 24:03
  Yes.
• 24:04
  Which, of course, is long past. It's now the master.
• 24:08
  But
• 24:09
  it wasn't that they couldn't. It's that they chose not to, and they designate
• 24:13
  that position to the federal government
• 24:16
  in their place as their proxy
• 24:19
  to
• 24:20
  streamline things. Sure.
• 24:23
  Unknown: So my only point is you were saying they can't have, can't have, they can't have. Well, they can't have because it it well, they can't they can't have it. It's financially
• 24:32
  prohibitive.
• 24:35
  Unknown: Well, it's no more financial prohibitive than Yugoslavia or the former, you you know, now any new country, you know, puts diplomats out to other nations. It's no more prohibitive than that. But
• 24:47
  they chose
• 24:48
  to
• 24:50
  well, if you wanna say it that way, economize or streamline things by joining together in a confederation
• 24:56
  even though they dropped that nomenclature
• 24:58
  after the confederation
• 25:00
  the articles of confederation
• 25:02
  were,
• 25:04
  they're still active, but they're an unused. You know, they're still in the organic law. They're there.
• 25:10
  But my my only point is just that it wasn't a matter of camp. It's a matter of they chose a different route. Well, I think you did. At this point, that route has been totally turned on its head.
• 25:21
  Unknown: When I use that word, I've meant it really financially.
• 25:25
  They they were having a hard time providing
• 25:27
  all the services much less having their own ambassadors
• 25:31
  in every country of the world from every state. It's just not practical.
• 25:36
  Unknown: Sure. Well, if you want to look at it, it's not any different. Well, I shouldn't say it's not any different. It's it's comparable to a cooperative
• 25:44
  where a bunch of farmers get together and
• 25:47
  own things in common to do their marketing and do their
• 25:51
  you know,
• 25:53
  there's more
• 25:55
  if
• 25:55
  if they're if they're bound together
• 25:58
  voluntarily
• 25:59
  Yep. Not bound together
• 26:01
  by, you know, onerous contracts with a whip,
• 26:05
  they can do great things. And that's the point of the federal government. Yet at its inception,
• 26:10
  it was
• 26:11
  to serve the states.
• 26:13
  And, of course, you say that in in civics flash today, and people just look at you. It's like, well, no. You're missing the point. The federal government's in charge. And, of course, in the administrative state, they are correct. It has taken a dominant position,
• 26:28
  but that was never the intent
• 26:30
  Unknown: back in the day. So yeah. Anyway. You know, I picked up a talk about knits. I picked up an interesting little fact the way to listen to something this morning.
• 26:39
  Do you know what day Abraham Lincoln was assassinated
• 26:42
  on?
• 26:44
  I cannot recall. Chris, you know?
• 26:50
  Unknown: I frankly don't recall the day either but I do remember I was at Ford's Theatre.
• 26:56
  Unknown: April 15.
• 26:59
  Unknown: I was gonna say April 5 but it didn't yeah. Okay. So, what about nothing?
• 27:05
  Unknown: I've often wondered why they picked April 15 for tax
• 27:10
  freedom day,
• 27:12
  the day of holy retribution.
• 27:17
  Unknown: Yeah.
• 27:18
  I was listening to a video last night,
• 27:23
  and that was JBS,
• 27:25
  which I don't tend to
• 27:28
  get a lot of attention to, or at least I listened to it with a bit of a jaundiced ear.
• 27:34
  But this gentleman was bringing forward some things, and he was bringing up documentation
• 27:39
  to back it up. So it's
• 27:41
  I I I tend to think it was valid. He was talking about secret societies and the formation of America
• 27:48
  and the communist
• 27:49
  Illuminati
• 27:51
  tie in with, you know,
• 27:53
  with Europe.
• 27:55
  And something that I did not under didn't realize is that Lincoln
• 28:01
  was a Rosicrucian,
• 28:04
  And so was Ben Franklin.
• 28:07
  And
• 28:09
  I had just found that quite intriguing. I did not know that. I don't know that I knew Lincoln was. I knew,
• 28:16
  Unknown: Ben Franklin had all kinds of nefarious little
• 28:19
  deals going. Yeah.
• 28:22
  Unknown: Yeah. He was I do recall some
• 28:25
  specificity.
• 28:27
  Go ahead, Chris. I'm gonna say I do recall some specificity that,
• 28:31
  Lincoln was in fact a Jew suit or desolate.
• 28:34
  His mother was
• 28:36
  Jewish or at least call herself Jews.
• 28:40
  Springsteen was her name.
• 28:42
  And so there's some pretty deep nefariousity,
• 28:45
  and, of course, John Wilkes Booth is fast.
• 28:48
  Unknown: He could have been, he was Jesuit also and may have been Opus Day. Right. So, They were definitely in a they were definitely in a spin off of the Freemasons. I don't remember what they called it but,
• 29:01
  there were some association there. I I didn't know, Lincoln's mother was was a Jewish.
• 29:11
  Unknown: Mhmm.
• 29:12
  Like Bruce Springsteen. Her name was Springsteen, so it's kinda easy to remember. Well, I mean, if if
• 29:19
  Unknown: her if she was Jewish, he was a Jew.
• 29:26
  Unknown: Well, I'd have that well, of course, we still administer the pazars. Go ahead.
• 29:32
  Unknown: Bob?
• 29:35
  Unknown: I just say that's interesting. I'll have to do a little research on that. Yeah. Probably worth researching.
• 29:40
  Unknown: Chris, one of the things I wanted to see if you could do because you've got this unique opportunity
• 29:45
  here. Your passport is in process.
• 29:50
  You can go to the state department website and I used to have this, I think.
• 29:55
  And
• 29:56
  while it's in process, there's a way for you to track where it is.
• 30:02
  Okay? And in that verbiage behind the veil at the state department on this process,
• 30:08
  they literally
• 30:09
  say
• 30:10
  in two places and use the term citizenship
• 30:13
  evidence
• 30:14
  and the first part, I remember it says, you, your your, if you send in another passport, your other passport and will be and this and that will be sent to you under separate cover
• 30:26
  along with your citizenship
• 30:28
  evidence or I don't remember exactly how it uses it in context
• 30:32
  but that's kind of what it's telling you and then in the next paragraph, it references it again
• 30:38
  but I think the terminology,
• 30:41
  citizenship
• 30:42
  evidence
• 30:44
  coming from the back of the state department is extremely significant.
• 30:49
  So, what I was hoping that
• 30:51
  I might could get you to do
• 30:54
  is to do that and find those references
• 30:59
  and there's a little thing in Windows called snipping tool and you could snip what's on the screen
• 31:06
  and snip those for us.
• 31:09
  Yeah, think they call it a print screen. It's like. No. No. No. No. You go in. Here's how you access it. You go down there to windows at that little thing on the bottom left.
• 31:18
  You know, where you click on it and then just type in this this phrase,
• 31:24
  snipping
• 31:25
  tool.
• 31:27
  Snipping
• 31:28
  tool and they've got a little tool in windows
• 31:32
  that you can then pin to your task bar which is where I have mine because I use it constantly,
• 31:38
  alright? And that thing, all you gotta do is whatever you wanna click off the screen, I want that, bam, boom, boom, and you can save it whatever you wanna do but it's a really handy little thing. I turned Deanna Spingola onto that a couple of years ago and I didn't talk to her for a while and the next time we spoke, she said, I wanna tell you and thank you for turning me on to that snipping tool. She said, I use that thing every
• 32:01
  day and you'll find it really useful. So, once again, you go down to the bottom there at Windows and just put in snipping tool and that embed program
• 32:11
  will pop up.
• 32:15
  Unknown: When you, launched one of your sniping probe yesterday, and I wanna affirm what you just said because I use that exact language,
• 32:24
  proof of citizenship
• 32:26
  or citizenship evidences,
• 32:28
  my affidavit and stuff with the passport agent
• 32:32
  at their passport facility for travel.gov
• 32:35
  that's here in Las Vegas.
• 32:37
  And I spoke about that specifically and told them they had to be physically aligned, detached,
• 32:42
  connected, stapled to the documents,
• 32:45
  and he'd he cooperated.
• 32:46
  He did it. And he used those exact terms that they would be sent under separate cover,
• 32:51
  the passport and the card would not be sent together. Correct.
• 32:57
  Unknown: And if the funny thing is if you've got an already existing passport that's active, you gotta send that in with the process and then you gotta use the renewal form
• 33:06
  and they'll send you all your your usable, your your current passport back to you. They'll just turn that around immediately and then about another couple of days later, your new passport comes.
• 33:17
  So, now you got two of em. Which one you wanna use? The slave passport or the free passport?
• 33:24
  Unknown: The one I had was
• 33:26
  seriously
• 33:27
  expired,
• 33:28
  from 2007.
• 33:31
  And so it had other than that, it's still utilizable
• 33:34
  as proof of who you are to authenticate
• 33:37
  that you are who you claim you are as proof of evidence of your name, and some people call them ID, although I think that relates to residency. So I refuse to use that term of, in fact, individual in title five USC five five two.
• 33:52
  I forget the parenthetical on it.
• 33:55
  I think it might no. I don't just don't remember, so I can't tell you. But it tells you an individual means a US citizen. So that individual and resident, they both have that ID in the middle of them. And in fact, it has a BI and the end divide
• 34:10
  dual
• 34:11
  where they cut you into two and create that fictitious entity for you that they claim you are. So I'm very sensitive about the terms I used to descript myself.
• 34:21
  But they did take my my expired passport
• 34:25
  as proof, and I didn't have to bring the birth certificate with the passport. That is what they told me on the travel.gov
• 34:31
  telephone helpline before I went down there. And so it was kind of a refreshing relearning experiment experience
• 34:39
  because I hadn't been there a long time,
• 34:41
  and I know that we need to have current actual boots on the ground information. So I'm behind to share that as critically and accurately as I proceed. Okay. So if you've got an all an even an expired passport, you don't have to have the birth certificate?
• 34:57
  That was what they told see, the there's a case up in Washington State. I don't remember the citation on it, but I got it from, I think,
• 35:05
  oh, I should be able to tell you the guy's name. He was kind of a a,
• 35:11
  let's say,
• 35:13
  he talks about the Patriots.
• 35:16
  I can't remember his name right now, but on his site, he had it. And that even an expired passport because it's officially
• 35:23
  government authorized authenticated issued document.
• 35:27
  It can still be used for ID. Proving who you are or identification.
• 35:32
  Absolutely. Absolutely. It it can be done even though it's expired. Interesting. Authenticated.
• 35:38
  Unknown: Because I've heard of cases where it seems like I've been through and and they say can't use that. It's expired. Was it, well, hell, I'm not expired.
• 35:45
  That's
• 35:46
  what I was when I got it. It doesn't make any difference. It shows who I am, you know?
• 35:53
  You know, Chris. Gus
• 35:55
  goes to show what we already know. There's a lot of idiots out there in the world. Go ahead.
• 36:01
  Unknown: Well, that last,
• 36:03
  near deadly,
• 36:04
  egregious abuse of deadly force so called emergency
• 36:07
  traffic stop,
• 36:08
  the officer in his declaration
• 36:10
  of, and I insert false arrest,
• 36:14
  where I put in a rebuttal and a vermin,
• 36:17
  he claimed that I had an altered pass passport. I pointed out that I wanna know where his qualification for being a document expert came from and that my passport absolutely was not altered. Now I may have changed a little since it was entered,
• 36:32
  since it was issued back in 2007.
• 36:35
  Now the 2019,
• 36:37
  and aging is a natural enhancement and process of growing older and being on the planet. But I assured him the passport was not altered as he falsely testified showing his lack of candor
• 36:49
  and credulity and honesty.
• 36:51
  So, he was obviously seriously challenged from true knowledge.
• 36:55
  He
• 36:56
  Unknown: got on there on in his paperwork or and made that, oh, it looks like we're going to get cut off here.
• 37:04
  Made that declaration?
• 37:06
  Alright, just hold on. No, I guess we're back. Okay, good.
• 37:11
  He got on there and made that declaration that that it appeared your passport had been altered?
• 37:18
  Unknown: That's what he claimed. I don't know where he got that information or what made him think that other than it just trying to make up everything incriminating
• 37:25
  and insulting
• 37:26
  and inflammatory
• 37:28
  could possibly do to have multiple stacking charges to get leave of rage against me, to use in court, but I took apart every one of his statements in the,
• 37:39
  aberrant and rebuttal of his presumptions.
• 37:45
  Unknown: Well,
• 37:46
  they're gonna be real interested to see how all your stuff turns out, Chris.
• 37:51
  If you could, go back there and and,
• 37:54
  do and and and see that sometime in the next few days,
• 37:59
  week maybe,
• 38:00
  and snip those things for me. It'd be nice for us to have those.
• 38:07
  Be glad you're not up in Chicago today, buddy.
• 38:12
  Or the Northern Midwest. Somebody?
• 38:17
  Unknown: Yes. I agree with somebody
• 38:19
  Unknown: sent me a a Twitter thing yesterday. I think it was Greg found it and sent it to us.
• 38:25
  Guy, Clay Carroll is the guy's name up in Chicago. He's got himself a Twitter account obviously.
• 38:32
  C A R R O L L if you want to go check it out.
• 38:36
  And he walks outside. It shows him walking outside his house, Chris.
• 38:41
  And Bob, because I don't think I sent this to either one of you guys.
• 38:45
  And he's got a pan of he's
• 38:47
  got a pan of boiling water.
• 38:50
  He just took off the stove.
• 38:53
  And he goes out in the street and throws it up.
• 38:56
  And it literally turns into a cloud
• 38:59
  and drifts off with the current of air.
• 39:03
  I mean, it's amazing.
• 39:06
  Now, I knew this. That's true.
• 39:09
  When I was a kid, I lived in Alaska for four years and you couldn't do that where I was in Anchorage but they could do it up in Fairbanks because Fairbanks is in London. It gets real cold up there but this phenomena of taking the the air gets so cold that you could take boiling water and throw it out there and it literally just evaporates
• 39:29
  into a cloud.
• 39:33
  Unknown: Well, absolutely. In fact, that's freeze drying.
• 39:36
  Go ahead. Go ahead, Bob.
• 39:39
  May have a lot to do with the relative humidity when it's that cold also. That would tend to be really, really dry air. Oh, obviously.
• 39:46
  Yeah.
• 39:49
  Unknown: So, anyway, just if you're not up there in the Midwest and affected by this
• 39:55
  horrendous little cold finger coming down there, be grateful and if you are, we're sorry for you. Stay warm.
• 40:05
  Unknown: I
• 40:06
  heard a a comment
• 40:09
  Unknown: I heard a comment yesterday that
• 40:12
  the temperature
• 40:13
  at
• 40:15
  at the South Pole in Antarctica, the research station was 24,
• 40:19
  27 something below
• 40:21
  zero,
• 40:22
  and it was warmer there than it was in Minneapolis.
• 40:27
  Yeah, man. I'm telling you. I'm thinking, yeah, that's in the what?
• 40:31
  Unknown: Yep. Global Solar Minimum.
• 40:35
  So, an interesting, there's a a film that kind of caught my eye.
• 40:41
  Because it's very unusual
• 40:43
  and I'm not a big film guy.
• 40:46
  By the way, the the mule for Robert. If Robert's listening, the mule is playing down here and I'm going to try and go see it here on the next couple of nights.
• 40:55
  Can't do it tonight because I gotta do this thing for Thomas
• 40:58
  but this
• 41:00
  movie
• 41:01
  gonna be released in select theaters
• 41:04
  and it's called They Shall Not Grow Old.
• 41:09
  And
• 41:10
  it's a documentary and along with this barrage of information and
• 41:15
  exposure on World War one
• 41:17
  here as of late.
• 41:19
  This is in that vein.
• 41:22
  But what these guys did
• 41:25
  with all this technology we've got and colorization
• 41:28
  and all that kind of stuff.
• 41:30
  They went back and got all this old actual footage from the archives
• 41:35
  that I think was somehow taken by the British government back then and they've gone through and digitized
• 41:42
  and colorized all that and made it. I saw a clip of it. Just just
• 41:47
  absolutely
• 41:48
  realistic
• 41:49
  from the old black and white
• 41:52
  kind of choppy things that you see but boy, this looks really cool. Not that I like seeing all of that war stuff and people killing whatnot but the way this was done, the significance of the event,
• 42:06
  and the realization
• 42:07
  of
• 42:11
  this film being treated
• 42:14
  the way it's been is stunning.
• 42:17
  So,
• 42:17
  keep an eye out for that if that's kind of thing that interests you. It's called they shall not grow
• 42:24
  old.
• 42:28
  Unknown: That's very
• 42:30
  interesting.
• 42:31
  I'm
• 42:34
  looking here while we're talking on judicialwatch.org.
• 42:37
  That's Tom Fitton and Chris Farrell's site. Another one along with Larry Klaiman Freedom Watch that I use for resources.
• 42:47
  These are really, really critical things that there aren't very many attorneys in The United States. You know, they all claim they can do anything. Oh, yeah. Yeah. Yeah. We'll get it, and they go around
• 42:56
  Westlaw or Pacer, and they research a couple of cases, and they go through the motions and act like they know what they're doing and give you the impression they're experts
• 43:04
  in whatever field you wanna pay for.
• 43:06
  But, basically, anybody that has the ability to think critically and to do their own research can figure this stuff out.
• 43:13
  You don't need an attorney to do a lot of stuff. Although in their bar courts, it's pretty tough to get through there if you're not a bar licensed attorney. Of course, it's not a license. It's really just a union dues ticket poses a license. So, I always demand them to produce it and then I'll challenge the efficacy of their statement claiming it's a license when it's not at all.
• 43:34
  Unknown: You know, Chris, two things come to mind. One, when I was in that six month paralegal school, we were taught by practicing attorneys and
• 43:43
  one of the teachers in one of the modules got up there in front of the class and said, told us, he said, when you graduate, you'll know more than the attorney you're working for. Okay. Now, here's here's doc doc Gatton is calling and I'm gonna have to hang up on him and see if I can reconnect
• 44:01
  with him now that we got a profile that works. So,
• 44:04
  Unknown: let's see here. While you're doing that,
• 44:06
  while you're doing that function to get back to the doc, I'll tell you that I also was doing pretty interesting investigatory
• 44:14
  research
• 44:15
  and due diligence yesterday.
• 44:18
  And I I found some
• 44:22
  the things that you find when going down these paths that you don't expect, it's just really astronomical
• 44:28
  and and monumental.
• 44:30
  The information
• 44:31
  you've come across.
• 44:33
  And
• 44:35
  these different aspects
• 44:36
  of
• 44:37
  litigation
• 44:38
  and
• 44:39
  the criminality that's going on in our government is just
• 44:43
  beyond the pale. Most people would not conceive
• 44:47
  of how it's rep when the Department of Justice has become the Department
• 44:52
  of Crime and Injustice
• 44:54
  or No Justice,
• 44:56
  and they're obstructing justice,
• 44:58
  stonewalling,
• 44:59
  refusing to release documents that they have a duty and obligation
• 45:02
  under Public Records Act, Sunshine Act,
• 45:05
  and the duty of congress to oversee their activities as a legislative executive branch.
• 45:12
  We're actually they're not part of government. They're actually a private private profits corporation
• 45:16
  posed as a having the color of government attached to them.
• 45:20
  But these are really, really insidious
• 45:23
  things that the FBI, Department of Justice, the depart the Defense National Intelligence, CIA, USA,
• 45:29
  BLM,
• 45:30
  all these agencies
• 45:32
  are private for profit private profits corporations,
• 45:35
  and they're listed on Dun and Bradstreet
• 45:38
  along with Corp U S Inc. And your local county entities,
• 45:41
  their state, city,
• 45:42
  municipalities,
• 45:43
  and justice centers, and so on and so forth, and sheriff's departments and police
• 45:48
  departments are all listed on dunandbradstreet.com
• 45:51
  or manta.com,
• 45:53
  and you can come up. Did you get doc?
• 45:55
  Unknown: I don't know if we did or not. Doc, did we hook you in or not?
• 46:02
  I'm thinking not.
• 46:06
  He's got, I got three or four profiles
• 46:08
  for him and I'm just so
• 46:11
  I try and call back the one and there's there's not one that totally matches the one that shows up when he calls in.
• 46:19
  So, try it again. The doctor is not in. Well, he he's not. He's not a doctor either. So,
• 46:27
  if you wanna call you. I can and well, I can.
• 46:30
  Okay. Well, alright. Here's somebody else. We'll try Shane here. Let's see if we can hook Shane. Shane.
• 46:37
  Oh, boy. I'll tell you, they have really screwed this up. No.
• 46:42
  Most of the time, it works alright though.
• 46:45
  We can get seem to be able to get most everybody in here.
• 46:50
  Let's see if we can bring Shane in here. Shane, are you holler when you're on?
• 46:58
  Just Shane, are you there?
• 47:02
  Unknown: It shows you. I'm gonna mute out for a few minutes. I'll be back. Alright, Bob. Good. It's Shane. Shane,
• 47:07
  Unknown: it shows that you're there.
• 47:10
  Unknown: Holla.
• 47:11
  Unknown: Okay, there's Shane.
• 47:14
  Unknown: Yeah.
• 47:15
  Yeah.
• 47:15
  Unknown: I'm here. Okay, good.
• 47:18
  But why did you appear here? Do you have a a question, a comment, you just trying to throw us a line here and get this Skype thing straightened out, figured out? What what's the deal? What's going on in Silicon Valley today, Shane?
• 47:31
  Unknown: I would like to congratulate,
• 47:34
  Chris for his
• 47:37
  due diligence
• 47:40
  and, giving the affidavit
• 47:43
  or the passport application to the mail.
• 47:48
  Congratulations.
• 47:49
  Unknown: Thank very much,
• 47:50
  Shane.
• 47:52
  Mhmm.
• 47:53
  I'd like You should've done it a long time ago. Yes. You're right. Impossible.
• 47:56
  Unknown: I've
• 48:00
  been, dozing off. I turned it on at,
• 48:04
  I guess, 8AM,
• 48:05
  and somehow I I dozed off. And
• 48:09
  I'm I'm now awake, and now I want to say,
• 48:13
  thanks, Chris.
• 48:15
  Also, I'd like to say that last the last two nights, I believe,
• 48:20
  the other night, the
• 48:24
  I believe,
• 48:26
  president Donald Trump has put us on or put us on to a
• 48:30
  gold standard. He has that on his
• 48:36
  tweet
• 48:38
  thing. So if you're friends with Donald Trump
• 48:41
  and you can find out all the stuff he's been seeing within the last, what,
• 48:47
  week. You can find out what he stated that he has turned
• 48:52
  onto the gold standard.
• 48:54
  Unknown: I haven't seen anything on that yet, Shane, but I don't follow his Twitter feed.
• 49:00
  Unknown: Alright. I've heard saying
• 49:03
  some rumblings
• 49:05
  kind of subselentio
• 49:06
  below the silence, if you will, not quite below silence that he might be restoring to the original seventeen
• 49:13
  eighty seven constitution
• 49:15
  for The United States Of America and going back. And maybe that what returned to lawful monum
• 49:21
  and some recent changes in chewing posteriors out of Powell at the, so called,
• 49:29
  Federal Reserve,
• 49:30
  his new appointee,
• 49:32
  is really quite interesting.
• 49:33
  Unknown: Dear mister Powell. Well,
• 49:36
  my feeling is we're getting real close to something catastrophic here. It just it
• 49:41
  last time I was gonna open the show, we're one day closer to something catastrophic
• 49:46
  because it's coming.
• 49:48
  Okay? You can just see it building everywhere.
• 49:53
  Tell all we can do is just prepare the best we can and I'm pretty sure everybody listening to these words is prepared to some extent.
• 50:00
  Hopefully,
• 50:01
  to the fullest but I'm sure that's not the case but to some extent,
• 50:06
  if for nothing else, we know something's coming. There's a lot of people that don't even realize that.
• 50:15
  Okay.
• 50:16
  Let's see what else do I have here. Would you like would you all like to hear the Bitcoin transactions?
• 50:21
  Here you go. Well,
• 50:23
  Unknown: that's what am I going for? That'd be really important. Here's
• 50:27
  Unknown: here's every
• 50:28
  every Bitcoin
• 50:30
  transaction
• 50:30
  in the world in real time.
• 50:35
  Now, that, hear that big,
• 50:37
  that kind of orchestra sound right there?
• 50:43
  And every tone represents a different value.
• 50:46
  Now, what's going across my screen screen right now are two blocks have been created.
• 50:52
  So, even when a when a block is finished and they added on to the blockchain,
• 50:57
  they show you the block and what its number is and what its size is and all that kind of stuff. So, that's
• 51:04
  there's two of em right there and then every one of those little ding dong, ding, ding, ding is a transaction but there's
• 51:12
  a lot more of the bubbles on the screen than the tones that you hear.
• 51:17
  And the tone, the tone value is
• 51:20
  a representation
• 51:21
  of the size.
• 51:23
  And so the deeper tones, I'll wait till one of em comes. Here's the one coming along here, I think.
• 51:29
  Here the dong,
• 51:31
  dong.
• 51:32
  There's one for 565
• 51:37
  drifting across the scheme. I saw one yesterday, Shane for 3,000.
• 51:42
  3,000 Bitcoin going across the screen. There's one for 178.
• 51:47
  There's one for 225.
• 51:49
  You can go look at this on What's the name of it?
• 51:53
  Bit Listen.
• 51:55
  Bitlisten,
• 51:57
  listen.com.
• 52:00
  And it's a really,
• 52:01
  really cool site, okay?
• 52:04
  And it taps it right off of the the, you know, the the
• 52:08
  blockchain that does all of the mining for Bitcoin.
• 52:11
  So, it's got every transaction
• 52:13
  in the world on here
• 52:15
  in the amount of Bitcoin or you can toggle it over to dollars.
• 52:20
  But what's amazing about this,
• 52:23
  and I mean amazing,
• 52:25
  is the predominance
• 52:27
  of bubbles
• 52:28
  that are point o one.
• 52:31
  Point oh one. Point oh two. Now, that's not too much,
• 52:35
  okay?
• 52:40
  You saw, okay. So, Shane's Shane's got it going on, okay?
• 52:43
  See all those O ones, Shane? You got it on too, Chris?
• 52:49
  Unknown: I do. I must say it,
• 52:51
  is the only
• 52:53
  site that comes up
• 52:55
  not like usual when you get 20 or different ads with everything else. When you put in bitlisten.com,
• 53:02
  it's the only one that comes up. So, there's no decision which one to click. Nope.
• 53:06
  Unknown: And but no, what both of y'all are looking at this and it's a fascinating little site and you can turn the volume off on the tones
• 53:14
  but what I want you to notice is look at all the ones that are small amounts.
• 53:20
  Point oh 1.0
• 53:21
  one, point
• 53:22
  point one, point, I just see em everywhere. See?
• 53:27
  Unknown: Do you think those are maybe club network and No. No. Data
• 53:32
  matters?
• 53:32
  Unknown: John told us what they were the other day on Monday.
• 53:36
  There are people that are They were They're
• 53:39
  There are peep all these companies around the world that are building blockchains.
• 53:44
  This is how they're experimenting
• 53:46
  on the blockchain they're building is by throwing amounts through it and they use small amounts.
• 53:54
  So, what you're seeing is the foundation
• 53:57
  being built worldwide
• 53:59
  that's going to really have an effect years down the line. You're seeing it right here on the screen with all those point oh ones.
• 54:07
  Point oh one, point oh two, point oh four. Also,
• 54:10
  when they're, as they're putting all the things online like property
• 54:14
  so that you'll be able to buy and sell a house down the line, years down the line in one day.
• 54:19
  As every time you put property online
• 54:22
  in that in that capacity, you have to
• 54:26
  attach it with with an amount too. So, it cost them a little bit to put the property on there evidently.
• 54:31
  So, what you're seeing is all these blockchains around the world being built and perfected
• 54:37
  and you're seeing property being put on the entire system with these low amounts on there. Pretty interesting, isn't it?
• 54:46
  Unknown: Very.
• 54:47
  Hey,
• 54:50
  Unknown: Roger. Hey, Bob.
• 54:52
  Unknown: Yeah. I'm back. Say, I don't know if this was talked about in my absence since you switched over to
• 54:58
  Cybers, but the whole thing with,
• 55:02
  KBC,
• 55:05
  there was some video, and I actually didn't get to watch the whole thing. I got interrupted, never got back to it, but something about the thirty first, which is today, of course.
• 55:14
  Is that some
• 55:16
  significant deadline in the
• 55:18
  30%
• 55:19
  or 35%
• 55:21
  Unknown: extra or? Yes. They had a Cheryl
• 55:23
  Ann had gotten it extended to today
• 55:27
  because quite frankly, when they added the deadline around the this around Christmas,
• 55:33
  she was absolutely
• 55:34
  about to lose her mind
• 55:36
  and begged them to extend it. So, they extended it till today.
• 55:41
  I'm pretty sure I've never been able to follow-up on it. I'm pretty sure,
• 55:45
  I don't know whether they require the photo or not, Bob.
• 55:49
  But people that are in that that haven't touched any coins in their wallet.
• 55:55
  Get a hold of that video
• 55:57
  and
• 55:58
  maybe even send them one. Evidently, they can see your registry
• 56:02
  of your wallet when
• 56:04
  you send them that coin and they can trace that address back. So, maybe you don't need the snip of it a year back last year anymore. I just don't know, Bob, honestly.
• 56:16
  Unknown: Yeah.
• 56:17
  Well, like I this this is a month old now and it's I'm starting to lose track of what I even did but
• 56:24
  yeah. I I never had any clarity whether I had actually achieved what I needed to or not or whether I was even eligible because I hadn't taken the screenshot and sent it to him.
• 56:34
  But I guess, obviously, if I could get in on the 35%,
• 56:39
  that would be a good deal, but I haven't figured out
• 56:42
  Unknown: what's what's going on. In that video, you just said send 1 coin into some address and find it and and then you'll be if you qualify, you'll get rewarded in March.
• 56:55
  Unknown: Right.
• 56:56
  Unknown: And I took coins out of my wallet. See, I took I took coins out of my wallet. So it didn't even apply to me.
• 57:04
  Unknown: Right.
• 57:05
  And I had managed to keep both of mine untouched.
• 57:08
  But the thing is on that site for carrotbit.io,
• 57:12
  I believe,
• 57:13
  it
• 57:15
  said, you know,
• 57:18
  send the coins,
• 57:20
  and it never told you how or never gave you any way to do it. So I clicked on. I sent them, and it put me onto the next screen as if I had. And I couldn't figure out,
• 57:30
  Unknown: you know, the whole deal just confused me. Well, I I've got so confused with it a year ago. I just kinda threw my hands up really,
• 57:38
  you know,
• 57:39
  and. Yeah. We got our coins. We'll sit back. We're all gonna do very well on em and so be it.
• 57:47
  Unknown: Yeah.
• 57:49
  Unknown: Yeah. Well, I'm just curious if you had any more. No, hell. I wish I did. I I it just the whole thing aggravates me and it aggravates me even more, Bob. It because I understand why they had to do it that way And why they had to do it that way is this damn fraudulent system that I fight here every day of my life.
• 58:08
  Unknown: Yeah.
• 58:10
  Yep. I was reading
• 58:12
  several zero hedge articles over the day.
• 58:15
  And in in several cases, things came up about citizenship and how it affected this, that, or the other. Doug Casey had an article on carrying precious
• 58:25
  metal across international borders you may have read. I didn't. And
• 58:30
  it was on it was on, zero heads. But, anyway, you you know,
• 58:36
  it all had to do with the fact that, you know, yeah, as a citizen, you're under their thumb, and here's what happened.
• 58:43
  And of course,
• 58:44
  we know there's other options.
• 58:47
  Unknown: Think that you can carry
• 58:49
  as long as you declare it.
• 58:51
  It's when you don't declare it and they catch you with it that you got problems.
• 58:57
  And the reason I can tell you that
• 58:59
  is because my my deceased friend who owned that property in Argentina and
• 59:05
  in Argentina, everybody wanted dollars.
• 59:08
  That's why if you were gonna buy anything, you had to do dollars. Well, he bought this pretty big piece of property down there.
• 59:15
  Dollars 200,
• 59:16
  a little more
• 59:17
  and he carried down. He took the money out of the bank in Atlanta and carried it down on the flight
• 59:24
  and he he did all the paperwork,
• 59:27
  okay? Because he had that much
• 59:29
  and Rick, my friend was one of the guys he's going to follow all the rules anyway.
• 59:33
  So, but later on, he told me, he said, Roger, nobody said do to me, man. I walked right through, walked right in, gave him the paper, this, that, and the other. No problems, no hassles.
• 59:44
  But he declared it.
• 59:46
  Unknown: You know, there's some really important aspects to that. Doctor Jennifer Daniels,
• 59:52
  I think you know pretty well about Yeah. Well, a little bit. Down there.
• 59:55
  Somewhere down there. Panama. She ran into, yeah, she ran into FinCEN,
• 1:00:00
  and she lawfully transferred
• 1:00:02
  her own funds that she earned
• 1:00:04
  from working and stuff. And she had a new supposed love of her life down there that was a building contractor,
• 1:00:12
  and they were setting up a building contracting company. So they had a legitimate purpose.
• 1:00:16
  Of course, in Panama, they like to create the illusion and fabricate the hypothecation
• 1:00:22
  that any money you transfer down there is for illicit purposes, whether it's cocaine,
• 1:00:28
  marijuana, or drugs, or
• 1:00:30
  sex trading, or whatever else. You know, this fabrication,
• 1:00:34
  they call it constructive
• 1:00:36
  crimes where they structure up,
• 1:00:39
  in fact, Sidney Powell
• 1:00:41
  was on,
• 1:00:42
  quite a few of the talk shows yesterday talking
• 1:00:46
  about New Liar and his pit bull hitman,
• 1:00:49
  Andrew
• 1:00:51
  Weisman, I think his name is,
• 1:00:53
  who
• 1:00:54
  a Mueller runs everything by Weisman. They work really close together, and he was the one that brought down Arthur Anderson in the interim stand. I got I can play I can play the whole video on that. I've still got it queued up.
• 1:01:08
  Unknown: Right. I got I got. Quite a good I
• 1:01:10
  gave us an it's an interview with
• 1:01:13
  Levin Mark
• 1:01:15
  Levin
• 1:01:16
  who used to be with with Hannity
• 1:01:19
  talking to a real big time
• 1:01:21
  high assistant US attorney.
• 1:01:24
  You guys, you wanna hear that? You wanna hear should you think, should I play a little bit of that?
• 1:01:29
  Unknown: Well, you can. Let me let me give you the Reader's Digest so the people know what to listen for. But basically, what they did is they took two noncrimes,
• 1:01:39
  descriptors,
• 1:01:40
  and they put them together, and they invented a new crime to bring him down with Yep. And it was dismissed and turned over to the supreme court. And, they come, full
• 1:01:50
  I think it was a complete full supreme court rebukele
• 1:01:54
  of this false preposterous
• 1:01:56
  charge where they had destroyed the Arthur Andersen firm and the Enron boy. And put 85,
• 1:02:01
  Unknown: zero people out of work at Arthur Anderson
• 1:02:04
  and when it got to the Supreme Court, they said there's no crime here. You combine two statutes. Let me let me play a little bit of this. The whole clip is about sixteen minutes long.
• 1:02:15
  But the the it's a it's a very authoritative
• 1:02:18
  clip from the source here. Let me make sure I got the right one.
• 1:02:22
  It's not over yet. I think this is the right one. Let's see here.
• 1:02:26
  Unknown: I see. Ten years. Yep. You worked in three federal districts under nine different United States attorneys. Hold on. Let me get the volumes. They change over the course of time when a new administration comes in or what have you. And these US attorneys were appointed by presidents of both parties. Right? Exactly.
• 1:02:43
  Unknown: And you also had Let me start that again here.
• 1:02:46
  Unknown: That's the best volume I can get, kids. Hello, America. I'm Mark Levin. This is Life, Liberty, and Levin. A great guest, Sydney Powell. How are you, my friend? Great. Thank you. It's an honor to be here. My honor. Former federal prosecutor.
• 1:02:59
  You were, in fact, this is quite remarkable. You worked at the Department of Justice for ten years.
• 1:03:04
  You worked in three federal districts under nine different United States attorneys.
• 1:03:08
  It's not that you change, it's that they change over the course of time when a new administration comes in or what have you.
• 1:03:14
  And these US attorneys were appointed by presidents of both parties. Right? Exactly.
• 1:03:19
  And you also have been counsel lead counsel in more than 500
• 1:03:23
  federal appeals, 350
• 1:03:25
  of them as an assistant United States attorney
• 1:03:28
  and appellate section chief
• 1:03:31
  in the Western And Northern Districts of Texas. I just want our audience to know how significant that is, how impressive that is because there's a lot of brilliant assisting United States attorneys out there,
• 1:03:41
  and you were one of them. Thank you.
• 1:03:43
  And
• 1:03:44
  I wanna take a very, very close look at Robert Mueller's office.
• 1:03:49
  A lot of people focus on Robert Mueller, and they should.
• 1:03:54
  But this Vengalian there, my word,
• 1:03:56
  is the number two guy
• 1:03:58
  who Mueller relies on for everything,
• 1:04:01
  Andrew Weisman.
• 1:04:03
  So let's focus a little bit on Andrew Weisman so the American people know who he is and knows who really is the,
• 1:04:11
  in many cases, the Wizard of Oz. Tell us about Andrew Weissman.
• 1:04:15
  Unknown: Well, I've called mister Weissman the poster boy for prosecutorial
• 1:04:19
  misconduct
• 1:04:20
  because
• 1:04:21
  Mueller had a role in handpicking him for head
• 1:04:25
  of the Enron task force
• 1:04:26
  and appointing him to that position.
• 1:04:29
  Unknown: And what was Mueller at the time? Mueller was in the FBI at the time. Was the director of the FBI? Yes. So he picks Weissman to handle the Enron case. Yes.
• 1:04:38
  Unknown: Weissman was deputy director at the time when they first started under Leslie Caldwell, who was the chief of the Enron task force when it was first created
• 1:04:46
  in the collapse of Enron.
• 1:04:49
  So they set about and targeted Arthur Andersen to begin with, the venerable accounting firm. So they're investigating Enron? Yes. And they target Arthur Andersen?
• 1:04:59
  Yes. For what? For destroying
• 1:05:02
  evidence is what they called it. But they did it by making up a crime by combining two separate statutes to create a crime out of something that wasn't.
• 1:05:12
  So they destroyed Arthur Anderson. They knew they were going to destroy the company. They see How did they destroy Arthur Andersen? By indicting it. They indict Arthur Andersen because they're the financial advisers to Enron. Exactly. They were the auditors and financial advisers to Enron.
• 1:05:27
  Unknown: And they they manufacture
• 1:05:29
  crime by combining two different statutes? Exactly.
• 1:05:32
  And at that time, how many people worked for Arthur Andersen? 85,000
• 1:05:36
  people worked for Arthur thousand people.
• 1:05:39
  And Weisman was the lead investigator.
• 1:05:42
  He was the lead prosecutor on that case. And he reported, in part, he informed the director of the FBI at the time,
• 1:05:49
  Mueller. Yes. Okay.
• 1:05:51
  Well, what did they do?
• 1:05:53
  Unknown: Well, they knew they were gonna destroy the company when they indicted it because Anderson represented 2,500
• 1:06:00
  publicly traded companies.
• 1:06:02
  And no auditor who represents publicly traded companies can function
• 1:06:06
  as an auditor when they're indicted.
• 1:06:09
  So they sealed the indictment for a week while they They
• 1:06:13
  Unknown: indict them.
• 1:06:15
  Seal the indictment for the week a week. Yes.
• 1:06:18
  That's absolute disaster for accountants,
• 1:06:21
  auditors, financial advisers.
• 1:06:23
  Unknown: Yes. Okay. And they work behind the scenes during that week to avoid upheaval in the markets
• 1:06:30
  so that when they announce the indictment and unseal it publicly,
• 1:06:34
  the the markets are not as disruptive as they would have been if they had just
• 1:06:39
  indicted them publicly immediately.
• 1:06:43
  What did they indict Arthur Anderson for? They indicted them under a witness tampering statute.
• 1:06:50
  And the
• 1:06:52
  way they did it, they took essentially, it took criminal intent out of the process.
• 1:06:58
  And in fact, when the Supreme Court later got the case,
• 1:07:03
  justice Rehnquist wrote the decision for the majority
• 1:07:06
  well, for the unanimous Supreme Court and said it was shocking how little criminal culpability the jury instructions had required
• 1:07:15
  and that the Anderson had not committed a crime at the time. So Anderson gets caught up in the Senran case.
• 1:07:24
  Unknown: Weissman must know that there wasn't
• 1:07:27
  mens rea or criminal
• 1:07:30
  culpability.
• 1:07:31
  He indicts the entity,
• 1:07:34
  which for a major international corporation is a disaster to begin with because then you get documents subpoenaed and so forth. You have to be searching your computers and your records here and all over the world and so forth. So it creates great tumult
• 1:07:47
  in a company. Completely.
• 1:07:49
  And that in and of itself,
• 1:07:51
  depending on the nature of the subpoenas and the indictment and so forth,
• 1:07:55
  can can freeze a company.
• 1:07:57
  And so here's this company, Arthur Andersen, that's in the business of protecting
• 1:08:02
  other companies.
• 1:08:03
  They're auditors.
• 1:08:04
  They're accountants. They're financial advisers.
• 1:08:07
  And they're being accused
• 1:08:09
  of what? Witness tampering?
• 1:08:11
  Unknown: Yes. An obstruction of justice under two different statutes
• 1:08:15
  that combined
• 1:08:17
  created this new offense because there wasn't one. Anderson had not been subpoenaed for any documents at the time Anderson was cleaning up his files and proceeding to get ready for the investigation.
• 1:08:31
  Unknown: So they just made up a new offense by combining the two different statutes. Now do you call the name of the federal trial judge that was involved in the case? Melinda Harmon in Houston. Melinda Harmon in Houston. And then I assume they appealed it?
• 1:08:47
  Anderson did appeal it. And what happened on appeal? The Fifth Circuit affirmed it on appeal.
• 1:08:52
  Affirmed it. Then they appeal it to the United States Supreme Court, which takes the case, which is relatively rare. Yes.
• 1:08:58
  And the justices look at this. You mentioned Rehnquist,
• 1:09:01
  and they say, wait a minute.
• 1:09:04
  There's no criminal
• 1:09:05
  intent.
• 1:09:06
  There's no criminal culpability.
• 1:09:08
  This isn't even really a statute.
• 1:09:11
  The instructions
• 1:09:12
  were faulty.
• 1:09:14
  And what did the supreme court rule? They reversed it unanimously.
• 1:09:17
  Unanimously.
• 1:09:18
  Every justice said no. Exactly.
• 1:09:22
  What happened to mister Weisman since he led the case? Oh, absolutely nothing.
• 1:09:27
  Unknown: Mister Weisman went on to become director of the Enron task force.
• 1:09:31
  Mhmm. In fact, he had already by that time, by the time Anderson was reversed, he had already turned his sights on the Merrill Lynch defendants
• 1:09:39
  in what was called the Enron or Nigerian barge case
• 1:09:42
  and indicted four Merrill Lynch executives on a multi count indictment
• 1:09:46
  in which they also made up a crime.
• 1:09:49
  Unknown: Wanna get to that in a minute. What happened to Anderson?
• 1:09:52
  Unknown: Anderson was destroyed the minute it was indicted. It collapsed. It collapsed.
• 1:09:56
  Not only was it under criminal indictment, so it lost all its clients, But I think a 160
• 1:10:02
  civil plaintiffs piled on in multiple lawsuits.
• 1:10:06
  Unknown: So it was crushed.
• 1:10:08
  All those people lost their jobs. Exactly. Investors lost all their money. All the partners were lost their money. They lost everything
• 1:10:15
  on a case that was reversed nine to zero by the United States Supreme Court that mister Weissman was in charge of. Yes. And Anderson had been known to be the hallmark,
• 1:10:24
  Unknown: the benchmark for accounting standards.
• 1:10:27
  Anderson was the gold standard for accounting, a venerable accounting firm.
• 1:10:32
  Unknown: Merrill Lynch, you mentioned. Was Weissman involved in that? Oh, yes. What happened to Merrill Lynch? Merrill Lynch was indicted well, not the company, but I think
• 1:10:41
  Unknown: one of the reasons they indicted Anderson was to send a message to other companies that if they knocked on your door, if the Enron task force knocked on your door,
• 1:10:50
  you'd better cooperate
• 1:10:52
  Unknown: or you could be destroyed and given the death penalty just like Anderson was. But even if you you don't know anything, you didn't do Exactly. That's the power That is the power. That a handful of prosecutors have. Yes. Just
• 1:11:05
  and you even see it today with the indictments, when Mueller hands down indictments. It's all one-sided. People need to understand. The other side doesn't have any say in it. They haven't had a chance to respond to it. Nothing's happened, but a group of government lawyers
• 1:11:20
  have decided to charge somebody or some entity with crimes.
• 1:11:24
  That's the beginning of the process. It's not the end of the process, and I wanna pursue this with you a little bit more later because the media treat it as, well, that's it. But I want to talk about these executives with Merrill Lynch. What happened to them?
• 1:11:37
  Unknown: Well,
• 1:11:38
  Lynch offered them up as sacrificial lambs
• 1:11:41
  and entered into a non prosecution agreement with the government on behalf of Merrill Lynch, the company, that was extremely onerous.
• 1:11:50
  In fact, they agreed to have an overseer
• 1:11:53
  from the Enron Task Force installed in Merrill Lynch for a period of eighteen months to oversee everything,
• 1:12:00
  including the bills that the defense lawyers were submitting.
• 1:12:04
  They agreed that no Merrill Lynch employee could say anything that contradicted the government's view of the prosecution,
• 1:12:11
  which was absolutely
• 1:12:13
  astounding
• 1:12:14
  and, I think, illegal.
• 1:12:17
  Unknown: And then the Merrill Lynch executives So the so the government secretes itself
• 1:12:22
  within the company it's investigating Yes.
• 1:12:25
  To oversee the bills that they're paying their defense accounts. Yes.
• 1:12:29
  Unknown: And everything else that's going on in the fairly unconstitutional.
• 1:12:34
  Unknown: These four executives,
• 1:12:36
  they're indicted.
• 1:12:38
  What happens to them?
• 1:12:39
  Unknown: Their lives are destroyed.
• 1:12:42
  They went through a ten year period of unmitigated hell.
• 1:12:46
  There was the investigation,
• 1:12:48
  and then they're indicted,
• 1:12:50
  and then they face trial.
• 1:12:53
  The trial was a circus.
• 1:12:56
  I detail it at length in my book.
• 1:12:59
  Unknown: This book? Yes. License to lie? Yes.
• 1:13:02
  Unknown: They were tried in Houston in the wake of the Enron.
• 1:13:07
  In in the wake of the Enron collapse. People were angry. People were furious.
• 1:13:11
  Anderson had just been convicted,
• 1:13:14
  so there was all the uproar about that.
• 1:13:18
  All of Houston
• 1:13:19
  was in turmoil because of the collapse of the to these four? They were all convicted.
• 1:13:25
  Mhmm. The lawyers for the defense were like deer in headlights most of the time. They were blindsided at every turn. By the government. By the government.
• 1:13:34
  They had made repeated requests for what's called Brady material.
• 1:13:38
  Because
• 1:13:39
  the government holds all the cards in a Yeah. Criminal prosecution
• 1:13:43
  the government is legally,
• 1:13:45
  constitutionally,
• 1:13:46
  and ethically required to produce any evidence that is favorable to the defense that's that is within the government's possession or within its reach,
• 1:13:54
  oh, no. They steadfastly denied that there was any such Brady material.
• 1:14:00
  When the defense kept making demand after demand after demand,
• 1:14:04
  the judge at the time, judge Ewing Werlein, who was assigned the Merrill Lynch case,
• 1:14:09
  finally
• 1:14:10
  made the government produce a list of people that they had admitted might have some Brady material.
• 1:14:18
  And then upon further demand,
• 1:14:20
  he finally ordered the government to produce summaries
• 1:14:24
  Unknown: of that material. When we come back, I wanna know ultimately what happened to these four executives, then I wanna continue
• 1:14:31
  to examine
• 1:14:32
  mister Weissman
• 1:14:34
  because it's very, very crucial.
• 1:14:36
  And beyond that, how this special counsel's office is operating.
• 1:14:40
  Ladies and gentlemen, don't forget, most weeknights you can watch me on Levin TV Levin TV.
• 1:14:46
  Go to Blaze TV dot com slash Mark. I hope you'll sign up there. Blazetv.com/mark,
• 1:14:53
  or give us a call at 844
• 1:14:55
  844
• 1:14:57
  Unknown: We would love to have you. Alright. I think that's about the pertinent part of that, guys.
• 1:15:04
  Anybody still there?
• 1:15:07
  Unknown: Am. I
• 1:15:10
  Unknown: I Some comments.
• 1:15:12
  Unknown: I mean, I'm telling you, there's a mouthful said
• 1:15:15
  in that interview right there. Now, the lady
• 1:15:20
  is
• 1:15:21
  quite respectable
• 1:15:22
  and I just caught on the second time of watching it. Her book is called Licensed
• 1:15:28
  Past Tense.
• 1:15:30
  Licensed
• 1:15:31
  to Lie
• 1:15:33
  And I loved her comment on
• 1:15:35
  Weissman being the poster child of prosecutorial
• 1:15:39
  discon misconduct.
• 1:15:44
  Unknown: Know, this is Roger. I
• 1:15:46
  have to point everyone listening,
• 1:15:49
  Shane also. Thank you, Shane, for your kind comments. It's true.
• 1:15:53
  Early this morning, about 01:30, I woke up because I went to bed early because I was kind of exhausted from all the,
• 1:15:59
  fish oilities I was conducting yesterday and frustrations of trying to get notaries on some documents and so on and so forth. And so I I got up this morning, and I was reading some documents I've had for a long time. And the first part of it was on the front was an inventory report on jurisdictional
• 1:16:16
  status of federal areas within the states, and it talks about the, absolutely exclusive federally protected jurisdiction, concurrent jurisdiction, other aspects, so on so forth. Forts, arsenal, forts, arsenal,
• 1:16:29
  Unknown: and needful buildings.
• 1:16:32
  Unknown: Yes. The article one section the article one section eight clause 17,
• 1:16:37
  explicitly
• 1:16:39
  enumerated purposes of government property holdings within the states.
• 1:16:43
  And but also in relation to that, behind it,
• 1:16:47
  I didn't have it clearly
• 1:16:49
  delineated in my
• 1:16:51
  observations.
• 1:16:53
  But what I did find in there was a treatise on
• 1:16:57
  US versus Williams, Scalia's decision talking about the purpose of the grand jury,
• 1:17:03
  being effectually the people, the American people's
• 1:17:06
  oversight for the judiciary and the other offices and agencies of government
• 1:17:11
  in their actual American common law grand juries.
• 1:17:15
  And it's a very, intriguing read. It was not a light read, I will tell you, and only the most diligent
• 1:17:21
  and motivated like myself to do it.
• 1:17:24
  And that case is
• 1:17:27
  one twelve
• 1:17:29
  Supreme Court
• 1:17:30
  seventeen
• 1:17:31
  thirty five,
• 1:17:33
  and that's three excuse me. Five let me move my little flag here so I can see it. 05/1936
• 1:17:42
  and 01/18
• 1:17:43
  Lawyers edition
• 1:17:45
  two d March
• 1:17:47
  US versus John H Williams. What year? '90.
• 1:17:52
  That's 1992.
• 1:17:54
  Unknown: Mhmm.
• 1:17:56
  Unknown: And this really goes through. It tells you about some other,
• 1:18:00
  cases you never hear about. There's the Brady Act. There's also US versus Giglio.
• 1:18:06
  There's Bundy, Aguro,
• 1:18:10
  and there's another one I'm oh, Graham
• 1:18:12
  and Page.
• 1:18:14
  And there's some other ones. Oh, Lisa Page. No.
• 1:18:19
  No. No. No. No. I'd have to tell you. It looks to tell you which page it is. No. No. No.
• 1:18:26
  No.
• 1:18:26
  But this is a really good primer
• 1:18:30
  and tells you on the purposes and the, the supposed autonomy of the grand jury, although it does mention that the grand jury is actually an instrumentality
• 1:18:41
  of the prosecution because there's no defense
• 1:18:44
  in there whatsoever. It's strictly the prosecution building the case. And the grand jury is supposed to be the vindicator of rights and the precluder
• 1:18:52
  and intervener to protect against unlawful prosecutions
• 1:18:56
  to protect the people. It's supposed to be the people protecting the people with the concept of the grand jury process.
• 1:19:02
  Although this species particularly says that the grand jury has affectionately become an instrumentality of the prosecution.
• 1:19:09
  And when you have poster children for prosecutorial abuse,
• 1:19:14
  as in that case with Andrew Weissman and Muir,
• 1:19:17
  and in the cases that I've been drugged into here, there are their cases of trying to fling the blame on me, it becomes clearly evident
• 1:19:26
  that
• 1:19:27
  and I have some recent experience with that, but I can't talk specifically about those because they threatened me, but with my life apparently.
• 1:19:35
  But I can tell you things I've learned before and since, and that's what we're talking about right now.
• 1:19:40
  And judicial watch is a great source. Send, there's also another book called
• 1:19:46
  Obstruction of Justice that's just come out by a young fellow. It's a due diligence investigator,
• 1:19:51
  and he's putting a lot.
• 1:19:55
  Okay.
• 1:19:57
  Unknown: Putting a lot. He's putting a lot. It was the last we heard.
• 1:20:02
  We'll get him back here in a second, I think.
• 1:20:05
  Unknown: Interview and
• 1:20:06
  it is actually justice
• 1:20:08
  Unknown: system. Hold on. You're gonna have to go back and repeat that all over again. Let me do my little thing here.
• 1:20:16
  This is one of the, you know, tomorrow, maybe the very last day we have to put up with this CRAP.
• 1:20:22
  Okay, you were talking. Hold on. We're going to now we're we're reconnected back to the server.
• 1:20:28
  Chris, all that what you said over the last minute was lost.
• 1:20:32
  Unknown: Woah. Well, not a problem.
• 1:20:35
  What I was doing was reiterating that besides Sydney
• 1:20:39
  Powell's
• 1:20:40
  lie sin
• 1:20:42
  to lie book,
• 1:20:44
  there's also one called obstruction of justice. Oh, did she write that too? No.
• 1:20:51
  No. It's a different writer. He's another young investigator like ourselves out there beating the woods and the bushes, searching the weeds, if you will,
• 1:20:59
  for these criminality
• 1:21:00
  by the so called criminal justice system,
• 1:21:04
  where they basically perverted the whole legal system to the bar's control. That's a violation of separation of powers doctrine because they have the legislative, the judicial,
• 1:21:14
  and the executive branches all within the bar, and bar agents are filling all those positions.
• 1:21:20
  And that's a definite threat to the national security and public safety of America
• 1:21:25
  because it has become a criminal cabal
• 1:21:28
  reigning over America with almost complete abject total unbridled
• 1:21:32
  Unknown: law Why? Soul
• 1:21:34
  Unknown: that you they've destroyed our justice system here in America. Why?
• 1:21:40
  Unknown: Because they're greedy criminals. Want to No. That's not it was my why was to the earlier part of your soliloquy.
• 1:21:47
  Okay? How?
• 1:21:50
  Unknown: How which?
• 1:21:51
  Unknown: How have they accomplished everything? You just, how are they? Have they accomplished, and how are they doing everything you just led up to?
• 1:21:59
  Unknown: Well, if you remember the thirteenth, fourteenth, and fifteenth amendments where they basically replaced the titles of Mobility Act, of course, it's still in the eighth and ninth amendments of the original de jure constitution, the articles thereof.
• 1:22:12
  And two,
• 1:22:13
  as,
• 1:22:15
  titles of nobility and no honorariums and foreign agents registration act from 1940,
• 1:22:20
  This is how they do it because we, the stupid American sheeple, keep voting the flipping bar agents into these offices because they're art spinners live. No, that's not the answer. The American people who are serfs
• 1:22:34
  Unknown: put these both these people in and they get these people appointed in the administrative state to oversee, guess what? The serfs. If the serfs weren't there, the people wouldn't be there because they wouldn't have anybody to oversee.
• 1:22:47
  They'd be out doing legitimate law.
• 1:22:50
  Just like our Go
• 1:22:56
  ahead. I was gonna say just like our gal that got yanked out of the line.
• 1:23:02
  Unknown: Yes. Well, there's even a more,
• 1:23:05
  devious aspect to it is because those serfs only have the illusion of a vote
• 1:23:11
  basically being giving their proxy vote because they're registering as US citizens,
• 1:23:16
  and that's how these people are able to surreptitiously
• 1:23:19
  through the secret executive services,
• 1:23:21
  secret secret senior executive services is supranational
• 1:23:25
  autonomous above the president
• 1:23:28
  contrivance of Christine Marcy McConnell,
• 1:23:32
  who
• 1:23:33
  created this abuse of the administrative state, Philip Drew administrator
• 1:23:37
  under FDR and colonel William,
• 1:23:40
  colonel Edwin Mandel House.
• 1:23:44
  Unknown: All that stuff we talked about. The the our our friends, our female friend's name is Virginia.
• 1:23:52
  So, tag that to the state. Okay.
• 1:23:55
  So,
• 1:23:56
  but that's what Virginia experienced, I believed.
• 1:24:00
  Whatever
• 1:24:01
  caused that
• 1:24:04
  agent to have a
• 1:24:08
  lapse of sanity there and even a little bit of uh-uh of a sense of urgency because of from what Thomas said, the guy like ran over there to get him. He didn't just walk over calmly or whistle and hey, you, Virginia.
• 1:24:23
  He did he he ran over there and tapped him and grabbed him back. That's what we were told. I'll find out more about that
• 1:24:30
  but that's interesting and the reason all that happens that none of the that
• 1:24:36
  excuse me. I'm gonna have to cough here. Dead gum it. I tell you.
• 1:24:41
  The reason the administrative
• 1:24:43
  state
• 1:24:44
  grew and developed
• 1:24:46
  was because the serfs were already in place from the bankruptcy.
• 1:24:52
  Unknown: Well, they didn't know they were serfs. They pulled the Well, look. Of course, no. No. Of course, they don't know they are.
• 1:24:58
  Unknown: That's the whole that's the key to pulling the whole scam off. He gives them legitimacy.
• 1:25:06
  Unknown: Well, you can't be a legitimate. You can't be legitimate when you've done an unconscionable act of prestidigitation
• 1:25:12
  of black magic and made slaves out of all free people.
• 1:25:16
  Free.
• 1:25:17
  Unknown: They can and their and their lack of morality and their training
• 1:25:21
  that tells them from their holy book on up that they're supposed to be able to enslave everybody.
• 1:25:28
  See, that's the that that was constantly gets me is where's all this coming from? How how does this consensus among this group of people over here take effect? Where are they getting it all? Well, it's in that religious training because it's in that damn Babylonian Talmud and that's what Jesus got so POed about except it wasn't written down. He couldn't call it the Babylonian Talmud. He had to call it the tradition of the elders because it was passed down from father to son orally.
• 1:25:56
  Because it was so heinous.
• 1:25:57
  Do you understand why it was passed down from father to son orally? It wasn't because they couldn't write. It's because the damn thing is so heinous.
• 1:26:09
  And that shows you they got consciousness about it right there and you say they don't know right from wrong. Hell, they don't. They didn't write the damn thing down for five hundred years.
• 1:26:26
  So, you know, but that's where it's all coming from. Is there other things they learn in that and they're exposed to in that damn Babylonian Talmud. It's like my listener who was married to the Jewish guy, the big son of big doctor
• 1:26:37
  up in Chicago,
• 1:26:39
  you know, and at six years old, he sends him to the synagogue school, probably reformed Judaism, I'm sure. They send him to the reformed Judaism Synagogue School and the rabbis up there, these young kids impressionable at that age going, you're better than everybody else. You're better than everybody else. You're better than everybody else. Why? Because you can do little sneaky
• 1:27:00
  like this and pull all this off and then slave them in a way they don't understand
• 1:27:05
  and get the upper hand.
• 1:27:08
  Unknown: Roger,
• 1:27:09
  Lark from Texas, I think you remember him from the republicbroadcastingnetwork.org.
• 1:27:14
  Lark? Did a I did. He did a next Tuesday yesterday morning that was stellar
• 1:27:20
  on the Mishnah,
• 1:27:22
  the Zohar, the Kabbalah,
• 1:27:25
  the Talmud,
• 1:27:26
  all these different so called Jewish texts from the ancient
• 1:27:30
  Egyptian and pharisaical elite classes of these
• 1:27:34
  Caiaphas and these other black robed priests of Baal who have created this Zionist
• 1:27:39
  deception of the world.
• 1:27:41
  And this is really, really insane,
• 1:27:44
  and and it's it's you know, that people would buy these lies of this Zionist cult posing itself as a religion
• 1:27:50
  is just beyond the pale of a lunacy
• 1:27:54
  that we would fall down these lines with the help of Schofield and his,
• 1:27:59
  Zionist funded
• 1:28:01
  piece of tripe of his so called bible
• 1:28:04
  where he created the mythos of the Judeo Christian myth trying to create the illusion that we're all supposed to serve these so called fake Jews.
• 1:28:12
  That's their words, not mine, at least the Jew part.
• 1:28:16
  And, they are for sure because they're really the synagogue of Satan posing as a religion.
• 1:28:21
  Unknown: Well, I was gonna say good to hear that Lark's doing good.
• 1:28:25
  Lark's a very intellectual guy and where I think
• 1:28:29
  I used to have him on. I had him on his guest. His stuff called in occasionally. I've been hearing him for years
• 1:28:34
  and
• 1:28:35
  but the last time he was stuck on this communitarianism
• 1:28:39
  thing. Oh, Woody, it's so different. It's his community to study that. You're not talking about it enough. I said, hell, it ain't no different from all the other ones.
• 1:28:47
  It's just a new one. Well,
• 1:28:50
  Unknown: Zionism is communitarianism
• 1:28:52
  and it's reflexive law. It's all this stuff that they can make up in their tribe and their so called
• 1:28:58
  spoken
• 1:28:59
  rabbi
• 1:29:00
  rabbi
• 1:29:01
  rabbinical crap.
• 1:29:02
  These
• 1:29:04
  so called
• 1:29:05
  elders
• 1:29:06
  who are eldar cons who rely on everybody and make their own self serving interest and pose it out there as religious stuff and try to put everybody under their spell of Senegali like mister
• 1:29:20
  Levi talked about.
• 1:29:24
  Unknown: Well, you know, I want to go what what I try and cover here with my own life
• 1:29:29
  and
• 1:29:31
  and that I try and teach the
• 1:29:33
  people out there that are listening to what we say here is don't don't get distracted off in that
• 1:29:40
  You
• 1:29:42
  you know, but spend your time where it's important and where it means something and what means things is this nexus that you're born into this condition
• 1:29:52
  and A, to understand it, and B, both sides,
• 1:29:57
  because you've been up to this point on one side, now you're going to learn about the other. Now you know about both, okay?
• 1:30:04
  But that whole nexus right there and the fact that that give, that's the justification
• 1:30:10
  for everything you're they're doing that we're all that people are about.
• 1:30:16
  If if the fact that the people hadn't been changed into this condition, none of that other stuff would exist.
• 1:30:23
  Unknown: Well, and you can thank the,
• 1:30:26
  1913
• 1:30:27
  crap, the 1861
• 1:30:29
  crap, the judiciary, the experimental jurisprudence,
• 1:30:33
  and Henry Oliver.
• 1:30:34
  All the seven
• 1:30:36
  Unknown: But audiences by the bar are opera. But you know what? None none that stuff's good to know about, and it's good to understand and get it in perspective. But as long what you need to understand is
• 1:30:47
  the mechanism and how what it happened, how it happened, how the mechanism works, and how to undo it.
• 1:30:54
  You concentrate on those things right there.
• 1:30:58
  And you're not wasting your time, you're focusing like a laser beam on the things that are most critically important
• 1:31:06
  to not only this whole scheme but your future.
• 1:31:11
  Unknown: I certainly agree with you, Roger. Although it does assist
• 1:31:15
  Unknown: in teaching people who have a thirst for knowledge and being conversant and articulate in these concepts of how we got there and the deviosity they used to do it. I don't have any problem with that, Chris, and I understand that that but you but a lot of our people get so wrapped up in that that they don't get down to the essence.
• 1:31:35
  And that's when they start reaching out and they reach out because they don't have any concrete answers
• 1:31:41
  and understanding they reach out and grab these things that are not only wrong but of detrimental.
• 1:31:49
  The Social Security number. Don't have one of those.
• 1:31:52
  It's admiralty law.
• 1:31:54
  All
• 1:31:55
  those all those very
• 1:31:58
  very detrimental pieces of mis and disinformation
• 1:32:02
  to keep people away from the truth and then the problem is they take it
• 1:32:06
  to such heart
• 1:32:08
  but oh, I read it somewhere. Well, I know that's true. Okay? That you can't get it out of their heads.
• 1:32:16
  Unknown: Well, this is true. In fact,
• 1:32:18
  do what Shane? Have you read exactly right? Go ahead, Shane.
• 1:32:22
  Unknown: Oh, yeah. They are indoctrinated.
• 1:32:25
  They don't understand the concept of why
• 1:32:28
  they are here. Well,
• 1:32:30
  Unknown: they don't under purposes.
• 1:32:32
  There's a whole bunch of stuff they don't understand. That being part of it. But the problem is there, you know, it goes back to the old the old saying, the old mind is like a parachute. It only works when it's open.
• 1:32:50
  So, anyway, well, that's what we strive to do here and we'll be doing it tonight on this special call with Thomas as Thomas out in Texas got us hooked up with this. If any of you want and I'm going to approach this a little different tonight,
• 1:33:04
  Chris and Shane because
• 1:33:06
  I feel like I've made some progress
• 1:33:09
  in being able to simplify
• 1:33:11
  the explanation
• 1:33:13
  and so because we've got a limited amount of time on the call, I think an hour
• 1:33:18
  and Virginia's going to come on and talk also, I believe.
• 1:33:23
  About her experience that we've only relayed secondhand.
• 1:33:27
  That
• 1:33:28
  I thought I'd approach it with this Brown versus Board of Education. I'm approaching it at from the end rather than the beginning now.
• 1:33:36
  And I think that's much clearer and more concise
• 1:33:39
  and that's the way I thought I'd I'd do that tonight
• 1:33:44
  for my own edification and because I think it's probably the best way to do this and I'd like to practice it a bit. So, I'll put the information if any of you that are listening here today want to join that call tonight. It's at 09:00 Eastern,
• 1:33:58
  08:00 Central
• 1:34:00
  and there's it's one of these conference call
• 1:34:04
  site deals
• 1:34:05
  and so I will get you. You can either call on the computer, call on your phone, I think but you can't ask questions.
• 1:34:12
  There's a chat room.
• 1:34:14
  You can post questions in the chat room, I'm told, but we can't take calls per se.
• 1:34:20
  But I'll put all that information
• 1:34:22
  on the show description from today's show over on Castbox.
• 1:34:26
  Castbox.fmfm.
• 1:34:33
  It's like that old Steely Steely
• 1:34:35
  Dance song.
• 1:34:37
  FM
• 1:34:39
  Unknown: cast box. That's right.
• 1:34:41
  Unknown: No static at all and look for the little downward pointing carrot
• 1:34:46
  or
• 1:34:47
  what it what you call it? You called it something else. Access
• 1:34:50
  thing. Drop down. Yeah. Drop down menu. Well, it doesn't have you. It drops down. When you click on that little chevron, the show description pops up and the information will be at the bottom of the one. Today, as it is already existing over there right now as these
• 1:35:07
  sounds leave my lips. It's existing over in yesterday's show.
• 1:35:11
  So, you can check it there too. And,
• 1:35:14
  we may have some new listeners. We had to get some new listeners out of all this. Yes, Bob Robert.
• 1:35:21
  Unknown: I I equate cast box with broadcast
• 1:35:26
  which is still gets the point across, of course, casting a net or broadcast,
• 1:35:31
  but
• 1:35:32
  I was like that little memory peg on cast box was to broadcast. Right.
• 1:35:38
  Unknown: Right. That's probably the way. And
• 1:35:41
  then I don't know if it's Chinese or whoever's got it set up. But I sure am glad they got it set up because it gives us
• 1:35:47
  some extra tools.
• 1:35:50
  And
• 1:35:51
  yes, point or it could be also called Bob Point Multi Point Broadcasting.
• 1:35:58
  Unknown: Yep.
• 1:36:01
  Unknown: So, let's see. What else did you get to hear any of that interview with Mark Levin and that prosecutor,
• 1:36:07
  Bob?
• 1:36:09
  Unknown: I did.
• 1:36:10
  Makes you wanna chew nails or
• 1:36:13
  put your hands around somebody or
• 1:36:15
  Unknown: Well, it shows you the level of it shows you the level of corruption and control especially within in DOJ and FBI and Department of Justice.
• 1:36:25
  And and to have this
• 1:36:27
  guy and we heard what he did
• 1:36:30
  and and
• 1:36:31
  his work product was overturned
• 1:36:34
  above him. Not only was it overturned,
• 1:36:37
  it was overturned unanimously.
• 1:36:40
  You know how hard it is? Do
• 1:36:42
  you know how hard it is to get those nine people to agree on anything?
• 1:36:48
  Unknown: Yeah. It's very impossible.
• 1:36:51
  Unknown: There's a reason to send him down the road because he's good for something. Yeah. That's just tragic.
• 1:36:56
  Unknown: And here he is
• 1:36:58
  as Mueller's right hand man.
• 1:37:01
  So, you can see the tactics that are being used against
• 1:37:05
  Roger Stone and
• 1:37:07
  the attorney up in New York where his his house was kicked in the middle of the night. You see where all that's coming from?
• 1:37:15
  Unknown: You know, Roger, I watched
• 1:37:17
  Joe
• 1:37:19
  DiGenova
• 1:37:20
  of Genova and Tonesing,
• 1:37:22
  Victoria Tonesing, his wife, the law firm and former US attorney for New York. And he was talking about this, and this
• 1:37:31
  militant this was a crisis event managed staged production
• 1:37:36
  for effect, for fire for effect
• 1:37:39
  by these legal terrorists
• 1:37:41
  under the Mueller
• 1:37:43
  Weisman,
• 1:37:45
  tutelage and
• 1:37:46
  the new Matthew Whitaker,
• 1:37:49
  Chris Ray.
• 1:37:50
  All these people are culpable, liable, and suitable because that was a militant
• 1:37:54
  war force
• 1:37:55
  for effect,
• 1:37:57
  a mass SIOPs operation to terrorize every patriot America, everybody that loves them,
• 1:38:03
  what the Trump administration is doing, although they may not know everything they're doing. But anybody that loves America, freedom, liberty,
• 1:38:11
  morals, and culture, and Christianity,
• 1:38:14
  and other things that we embrace in this country should be maximally offended
• 1:38:19
  by the treason, the revolutionary
• 1:38:22
  terrorism of this weaponized FBI
• 1:38:25
  strike force of 27 to 29 men in SWAT team's jackets full of auto weapons and a former FBI
• 1:38:33
  Comey agent there posing as a CNN reporter,
• 1:38:37
  Operation
• 1:38:38
  Gladio,
• 1:38:39
  and,
• 1:38:40
  let's see. What's the other one? Mockingbird,
• 1:38:43
  where they embedded
• 1:38:45
  government agents inside all the broadcast media locations so they could have full command and control of the media and weaponized it as a propaganda, indoctrination,
• 1:38:54
  disinformation,
• 1:38:55
  SIOPs
• 1:38:56
  Unknown: operation against We The People. Damn. Can you take a breath in the middle of all that?
• 1:39:02
  Unknown: I did.
• 1:39:03
  Unknown: Okay.
• 1:39:04
  Well, I want him to keep doing it. CNN. See, yeah, that was CNN. See, I want him to keep doing stuff like that
• 1:39:11
  because all it does is shows everybody in the country and a lot of those people that are on the fence are not really fully awake yet.
• 1:39:18
  What the hell is going on? And the old saying is make a tyrant act like a tyrant And we're not having to make them act like a tyrant. They're doing it out of fear
• 1:39:28
  Unknown: and desperation. Make an idiot act like idiot like Nancy Pelosi. These these moves
• 1:39:34
  Unknown: are not
• 1:39:35
  the moves of a secure
• 1:39:39
  individual or organization.
• 1:39:42
  Unknown: Or sane or competent.
• 1:39:44
  Unknown: Oh,
• 1:39:45
  they're sane. They're certainly
• 1:39:47
  competency is is something that can be
• 1:39:51
  they're competent on their side,
• 1:39:53
  but they make blunders. They
• 1:39:56
  keep making these blunders, man, where they're slitting their own throats. This is the the Roger Stone thing was a perfect example of the snake eating its tail.
• 1:40:06
  Unknown: Yes, sir.
• 1:40:08
  Unknown: Did you guys pick up on Mark Levin's comment on something being unconstitutional?
• 1:40:13
  Unknown: Yes, I did.
• 1:40:17
  I wanted to get back to this grand jury thing, Chris. Here, while while we see we got a few minutes left in the program because I think this is real important.
• 1:40:25
  Roger. Yes, Bob.
• 1:40:28
  Unknown: Back to that interview. Did you catch that part where Mark Levin said something?
• 1:40:33
  I don't recall the context perfectly, but something was unconstitutional,
• 1:40:36
  something about this, you know, the way things were handled.
• 1:40:39
  Unknown: You recall that? Yes. I think it was merging the statutes together to come up with a crime. Yeah. I I just had to laugh. I mean, constitutional,
• 1:40:48
  Unknown: I'm gonna go back to my favorite hyphenated word.
• 1:40:51
  Got nothing to do with the constitution, fellows. It is extra constitutional.
• 1:40:55
  It's outside of it. It's just completely irrelevant. Well, it's But they don't understand that, of course. It it's constitutional in this new constitutional sphere
• 1:41:04
  Unknown: where this bankruptcy thing's in operation.
• 1:41:08
  Foreign corporate competition is just the bylaws of the corporation. Exactly. And what I wanna get back to is is this is that you know, I don't know how effective a tool is. I even the organization of it gives
• 1:41:22
  me cold chills but if we could ever get twelve, thirteen, 15 people in one county
• 1:41:29
  that have filed this paperwork,
• 1:41:31
  we could legitimately
• 1:41:33
  do that.
• 1:41:35
  Yep. Yep. Yep. Now, this is also interesting in the conversation I had with Thomas the other night.
• 1:41:42
  Mano Imano.
• 1:41:44
  He was telling me they had John Ainsworth on their call a while back and
• 1:41:50
  that kind of motivated him a lot too and maybe it motivates me to get a hold of John again and see if we can't get him on the air because I I think that his stuff is very valid for what we're doing. I think him and I at this point are on the same page more than we were the last time we spoke seriously a number of years ago. So, but it it dovetails right into this and what he's done is just created the old state. They've manned the offices of the old vacant state that have been sitting there unmanned.
• 1:42:25
  Wasn't that what our guy up in Colorado did was his resignation of the the jury. Yes. Grand jury. There was some government. There was a couple of people that have tried it in different states. Colorado was one and I don't remember. What was his name? Dave something?
• 1:42:42
  Unknown: I'm trying to remember his name. I should be able to tell you. I've got a diploma from him from somewhere, and he was one where I first got on to this where I was able to prevail down in Yavapai County, Arizona
• 1:42:54
  on international law treaties, private grants of land made patent, and constitutional diversity of citizenship,
• 1:43:00
  by things I learned there and other extrapolations,
• 1:43:02
  investigations,
• 1:43:03
  Unknown: due diligence that I've done on my own since then and a little help from above from extra terrestrial resources. Yeah and see that's what they've done. They've just veneered over. We mentioned the articles of confederation earlier. Same deal. There, if they weren't still in operation
• 1:43:19
  or available, they wouldn't be in the first book of this organic statutes at large.
• 1:43:25
  Sorry.
• 1:43:28
  Unknown: Yeah. You were asking something about your grandeur question.
• 1:43:32
  Yes. Well. With US
• 1:43:34
  Unknown: versus William. Go ahead. Well, was just going say all this stuff they've got now is over under this new system because there are effectively
• 1:43:42
  no old state citizens, not enough US nationals
• 1:43:46
  but if we can propagate enough through our efforts eventually,
• 1:43:50
  maybe we'll have opportunity to put this into theory. I mean, Ainsworth and the guy in Colorado
• 1:43:57
  saw what and figured out that those offices have been veneered over and they're vacant. Yep. And they went in and set them up and bam, they've got a functioning state government that is working.
• 1:44:11
  I mean, Ainsworth's been doing that up there in North Carolina for over ten years.
• 1:44:16
  North Carolina or Colorado? No. This is in North Carolina. James John Ainsworth's deals in North Carolina.
• 1:44:24
  Unknown: Is he affiliated with Rod Class down there? I don't know.
• 1:44:29
  Well, that's very intriguing.
• 1:44:31
  See, this is what we're talking about. When they
• 1:44:34
  adjourned the du jour
• 1:44:36
  common law constitution for America
• 1:44:39
  without coming to a conclusion when they were under the Articles of Confederation,
• 1:44:43
  they came back and they adjourned same day without a date of return.
• 1:44:49
  And that's when they came back, some of them the next day without a full quorum, and they created this new construct,
• 1:44:55
  constitution of The United States Of America,
• 1:44:58
  the concom where they overlaid
• 1:45:00
  the lawful seats of government
• 1:45:02
  and set old new actors in the old seats and flipped the script on the American people and deceived us. That's a long time ago, brother. Well, that's right. But we see the nice thing is we can undo all that.
• 1:45:17
  Yes. And that's what Ainsworth and the guy up
• 1:45:21
  Unknown: I think they tried it in .com. I think they tried it in Michigan too, Chris. Michigan
• 1:45:27
  kinda
• 1:45:28
  Unknown: tickles. Yeah. The Michelin Federal Society. That's right. I'm familiar with that group. Uh-huh. And all they're they're all doing the same thing.
• 1:45:37
  Unknown: Is they're getting back to those old offices but even those and and they've got a structure there but I I wonder
• 1:45:46
  still if if
• 1:45:49
  they don't go back to the Secretary of State and somehow effectively sever that presumption
• 1:45:54
  with that particular person,
• 1:45:56
  I just don't know. I think their effectiveness
• 1:45:59
  would be greatly heightened
• 1:46:01
  if they did that. Let's put it that way.
• 1:46:04
  Unknown: It would be powerfully enhanced beyond their expectations.
• 1:46:08
  And you're exactly right, Roger. When they restore
• 1:46:11
  people to their correct status
• 1:46:14
  as American,
• 1:46:16
  whatever state they're from, noncitizen US nationals, nationals, the the alternative alternative form form on on the the DSM 11 that's provided a couple different places on there. They talk about that.
• 1:46:26
  Then we are back reinhabiting
• 1:46:28
  the lawful de jure status becoming actual
• 1:46:31
  living people on the land with a vested interest in the guarding and protecting this country against all enemies, foreign domestic,
• 1:46:37
  and a duty to man the American
• 1:46:40
  common law grand juries of we the people who are supposed to do diligently
• 1:46:44
  oversee and control our government that we created as a government of the people, for the people, and by the people exclusively, and the people have gotta take back control.
• 1:46:53
  And I assure you that when you do try to do these things and educate the people, wake them up, and restore your common lawful statuses and political
• 1:47:01
  obligations
• 1:47:02
  that you will become under attack by the bar for sure because I can testify to that first party confidently.
• 1:47:09
  Unknown: Well, you haven't you you just filed your affidavit yesterday.
• 1:47:13
  You know, you've been fighting them and you've been trying to fight the jurisdictional issue from the bottom up which our people have always done which is the incorrect way to do it. They control from the top down. You're fighting it from the wrong direction. You gotta sever that nexus at the top. That's why this is so powerful. Is nobody else had ever put that connection together before?
• 1:47:35
  Unknown: I agree with you totally. I had I have been operating correctly. I've been putting those affidavits into every federal, local, state, and county municipal case that I enter and challenging jurisdictions squarely. And nobody ever rebuts my affidavit.
• 1:47:50
  They try to circumnavigate,
• 1:47:52
  go around it, abut justice,
• 1:47:53
  but it produce, and don't comply with your laws that are supposed to be. Okay. Chris, now let me ask you a question.
• 1:48:00
  Unknown: With all this history that you're talking about that you've been doing that every time,
• 1:48:04
  what about if you could have put in there this affidavit
• 1:48:08
  is currently on file and un rebutted with the secretary of state of The United States?
• 1:48:13
  Boom. I guarantee you I guarantee you you'd got a different reaction. I guarantee
• 1:48:19
  you.
• 1:48:21
  Unknown: That was what I put into those documents. I put in there that this affidavit
• 1:48:25
  has never been rebutted, although it's in multiple court
• 1:48:29
  court cases. I've had victories in sub solencio,
• 1:48:32
  and
• 1:48:33
  they call them they're put under seal,
• 1:48:37
  because they don't want all the law, facts, and evidence I put in my cases open to the public eye where they can learn from the documents I've put in. Of course scared to death of this stuff. This is like kryptonite to these It is. It's Alleged super.
• 1:48:50
  Unknown: It's it's crypt it's kryptonite to super ferricite.
• 1:48:57
  Yes, it is. And I think we're gonna give them a big dose of it. Well, I hope so. I keep trying to, you know. I mean, I've got a selfish motive here and and and one of an and an altaristic altaristic motive also
• 1:49:11
  and
• 1:49:12
  I get I get a little
• 1:49:15
  personal satisfaction
• 1:49:17
  every time I know that somebody's filed one of those.
• 1:49:21
  Whether it's with a passport application or not.
• 1:49:25
  Unknown: Okay? Here's an intriguing proposition,
• 1:49:28
  Roger. Once you have filed it or recorded it with the secretary of state or his heirs assigned agents or appointees,
• 1:49:37
  then you could do a FOIA request to the secretary of state under five US five five two.
• 1:49:43
  And there's a really interesting template that's fresh from 05/29/2018
• 1:49:49
  and later from judicial watch. It's only five pages.
• 1:49:52
  It's an easy read, and the site on it is
• 1:49:56
  it doesn't have a site on it. It's one
• 1:49:59
  colon
• 1:50:00
  one eight
• 1:50:01
  hyphen
• 1:50:03
  c v, Charlie Bictal, civil,
• 1:50:05
  hyphen zero one eight five four doc one filed
• 1:50:11
  eight seven eighteen.
• 1:50:13
  So this is fresh stuff. This is Judicial Watch Incorporated versus The US Department Of Justice,
• 1:50:19
  and it's a Freedom of Information Act demand for production
• 1:50:22
  of events that they want, and they've been seeking, and they've been the most effectuous along with Larry Klayman, his,
• 1:50:29
  Freedom Watch place and getting documents against Hillary Clinton, the gang, against the Bush Cabal, against the, Department of Justice, the FBI, and these other agencies to be forthcoming
• 1:50:41
  and forcibly complied
• 1:50:43
  by judges that have actual morals, ethics, and scruples,
• 1:50:47
  a few of them at the very least. Thank goodness. And they're having some success in getting documents produced. Well, once again, you know, I've I've said it before. I think Trump's given the the country
• 1:50:58
  Unknown: the silent majority,
• 1:51:00
  a lot of backbone that they hadn't had before. It's like, I can stand up. I don't feel as
• 1:51:06
  threatened
• 1:51:08
  or yeah, I'm inspired. I'm going to stand up and do what's right. Whatever their motivation is,
• 1:51:14
  I think you can see it out there and I think we're going to see more of it. Yes. I just got finished. I was watching. I mentioned it yesterday and we came up
• 1:51:24
  just a little bit earlier. Watch this really well produced video
• 1:51:28
  on the super
• 1:51:30
  growing black conservative movement in the country.
• 1:51:35
  Unknown: And. Kanye
• 1:51:36
  West. Those people.
• 1:51:38
  Unknown: Yeah, probably. This wasn't the peep that those weren't the people that were focused on this. It was younger females,
• 1:51:44
  and that have really gained, some through social media, I guess,
• 1:51:50
  have gained some notoriety and they're they're very articulate
• 1:51:54
  and they have a very good grasp
• 1:51:57
  of what's going on and what the Democrats have done and where they've let all the other
• 1:52:02
  rest of their ethnicity off the off the plantation
• 1:52:06
  or back onto the plantation more accurately. I sent that to Robert the other day, Chris and hopefully maybe one day he's had a chance to watch it. I'd like to hear his comments on it. Anything else we're drawing towards the close of the show today. Of course, Brent will be with us tomorrow.
• 1:52:25
  And I sent him that interview we played today by the way. So, that may come up tomorrow. No telling what it. Now, what else? Will, yes, Bob.
• 1:52:35
  Unknown: Yeah, that that call tonight. That's all gonna be on cast box description here soon? Yes, I'll put that. It's on yesterday's already. I've been in and out so I didn't hear all of that. Okay. Yeah. It's on yesterday's already and I'll put it on today's also. Okay.
• 1:52:49
  Alright.
• 1:52:50
  Unknown: Well, I'm really looking forward to hearing what Virginia's got to say. That sounds very interesting. Yes, it is and and I really applaud her for her and her husband. For those of you who don't maybe don't remember or didn't get it from the conversation.
• 1:53:05
  It's a gal that contacted us last year
• 1:53:08
  and said, I'm I'm married to a guy who's naturalized. He's he was a Mexican. He moved to this country when he was young. He went through the whole naturalization
• 1:53:17
  process. When he was younger, he's been in the military and all this and we heard you or read your book or something that somehow found the information
• 1:53:27
  and she said, I'd like to do this because I'm going to do the paperwork and stuff for him because he's working. He's still having to work for a living to support us and so, she came on the air, asked her questions. I asked her to do it publicly
• 1:53:40
  and they submitted both of them did the affidavits
• 1:53:44
  for each one of em in their respective
• 1:53:46
  statuses and situations.
• 1:53:48
  Both got back passports
• 1:53:50
  and we heard from Thomas, yes, day before yesterday on the air, they were in California for
• 1:53:57
  Christmas. This just happened last month.
• 1:54:00
  We're still on the last day. So, it was last month
• 1:54:04
  and they went to LAX to come back to Texas and they got checked in. The guy told him to go over to the TSA long line to get fleeced and X rayed and probed and groped and all the stuff that you do over there and
• 1:54:19
  they went over there and the guy that had been the ticket agent came running. I at least he said running.
• 1:54:25
  I didn't say walking briskly.
• 1:54:28
  He didn't say walking normally. He said running over to that line and pulled about a line and came and put him through the TSA
• 1:54:35
  whisk through line.
• 1:54:36
  So, it it's a very interesting story. I'm like everybody else want to hear more. That's about the best
• 1:54:44
  rendition I can give you at this point from what I've heard, Bob But it's pretty exciting. We're seeing things happen with this that are, you know, I could have only dreamed about a few years back.
• 1:54:55
  Unknown: Roger, let me reiterate
• 1:54:57
  and with emphasis, your observation that there is a change in the behavior of governmental employees. I saw it in two different locations.
• 1:55:06
  I called the usatravel.gov
• 1:55:08
  passport
• 1:55:09
  assistance number,
• 1:55:11
  in DC
• 1:55:12
  and received very helpful,
• 1:55:14
  very polite, courteous, information that was accurate. I went to the passport agent office they directed me to being closest to the federal zone identifier protocol ZIP code that I don't live in, but, nevertheless,
• 1:55:28
  that I found one to give them that gave them the ability to give me one that was close by, very close in fact. And I received the same sort of telephonic
• 1:55:37
  and direct interpersonal
• 1:55:40
  right before him at his desk,
• 1:55:42
  courteous, polite, helpful, assisted behavior that we would normally expect from our government employees that we hire to assist us in navigating these trepidatious pathways.
• 1:55:53
  Unknown: Yes, sir.
• 1:55:55
  I've never had any blowback and never problem, any problem myself. Somebody got in a argument
• 1:56:01
  with somebody at the state department on the phone one time. I don't remember all the details
• 1:56:06
  but just in like Bob, they call Bob back. He's the only person we know that's ever been called and he said, look, lady, just make sure that affidavits in my administrative folder. That's all I care about.
• 1:56:19
  Unknown: Can call me whatever you want.
• 1:56:22
  Unknown: Just call me late for dinner. Yeah, don't call me late for dinner. You know that old line.
• 1:56:28
  Okay. Well, there he is, mister Whistler.
• 1:56:32
  Guys, we'll be back with Brent tomorrow. You guys have a nice day. There's a lot of stuff bubbling,
• 1:56:37
  bubbling everywhere
• 1:56:38
  and we're one day closer to something catastrophic
• 1:56:42
  in our lives.
• 1:56:43
  So, keep that in perspective.
• 1:56:46
  We're good or bad. We're good or bad. Let's make good. Well, you want to make chicken soup out of chicken poop is what my mama always told me and we'll sure try our best to do that. I'll see y'all tomorrow with Brent. Have a good day. Hasta Luega from beautiful Ecuador.
• 1:57:01
  Ciao. Ciao.
• 1:57:04
  Unknown: Thank you. And
• 1:57:07
  Unknown: Hasta
• 1:57:08
  Luega too.
• 1:58:10
  Unknown: Blasting the Voice of Freedom Worldwide, you're listening to the Global Voice Radio Network.
• 1:58:16
  Unknown: Bye bye, boys. Have fun storming the castle.