Latest / How Canadian Markets Work / What Capital Actually Is

Transcript

What Capital Actually Is · How Canadian Markets Work

0:00
Look at your phone screen right now. Just imagine
0:02
you have your banking app open. Yeah, just visualize
0:04
that resting balance. Exactly. Let's say you
0:07
are looking at a checking account and sitting
0:10
right there, clear as day, is $4 ,000. Just resting
0:15
there. Doing absolutely nothing. I mean, you
0:17
are keeping it safe for rent, for groceries,
0:20
or maybe for a sudden emergency. It is perfectly
0:23
still. That's a very calm, quiet image. Right.
0:26
Then I want you to shift your mind's eye about
0:29
2 ,000 kilometers away. Out into the physical
0:31
world. Out in a vast open field. There is a company
0:35
out there trying to build a massive state -of
0:38
-the -art wind farm. Huge towering turbines.
0:41
Yes, and they have done all the geological surveys,
0:44
they have secured the land, the local permits
0:46
are all stamped and in hand. They're ready to
0:48
go. But there's just one thing they do not have.
0:51
They need $200 million to actually build those
0:54
towering turbines. It is such a quiet, beautiful
0:58
contrast, really. The absolute stillness of that
1:02
$4 ,000 resting gently on your digital screen
1:05
versus the massive churning industrial scale
1:09
of a $200 million infrastructure project. And
1:13
our goal for this deep dive is to gently demystify
1:16
the financial plumbing of our eponymy. To show
1:19
how those two worlds actually meet. Exactly.
1:21
Because the truth is, that seemingly insignificant
1:24
$4 ,000 you are looking at on your phone is,
1:27
very practically, connected to that towering
1:30
wind turbine 2 ,000 kilometers away. It really
1:32
is. Today, we are looking at some foundational
1:34
structural overviews of financial markets, instruments,
1:37
and real -world capital flows. We are going to
1:40
map exactly how every day, idle savings quietly
1:43
fuel massive global projects. It's a fascinating
1:46
journey. So the core question we have to explore
1:48
is, how does your $4 ,000 make that incredible
1:51
journey? Well, to trace that journey, we first
1:54
need to take a step back and look at the landscape.
1:57
Before we can track where your specific $4 ,000
2:01
goes, we have to understand what it actually
2:05
represents in the grand scheme of the economy.
2:08
We need to talk about what capital really is.
2:11
Because people use that word very loosely, right?
2:13
Like in everyday conversation. Oh, constantly.
2:15
They usually just mean cash. Or maybe, I don't
2:18
know, the total balance in their retirement account.
2:20
Exactly. And while that is not entirely wrong,
2:23
it is incomplete. The missing part of that definition
2:26
is actually the most important part. Which is
2:28
what? If we distill it down from our sources,
2:31
capital is accumulated wealth that is put to
2:34
productive use. Productive use. Right. And it
2:37
fundamentally shows up in two distinct forms.
2:40
The first is what we call real capital. Meaning
2:42
the physical stuff. Yes, these are the physical
2:45
productive things in the world. A massive manufacturing
2:47
factory. A sprawling fleet of delivery trucks.
2:51
A cross -country rail line. Or, going back to
2:53
our opening image, that physical wind turbine
2:56
spinning in the breeze. Precisely. These are
2:58
things that actually exist in the physical world
3:00
and produce something of tangible value day after
3:02
day. OK, let's unpack this. Because if real capital
3:06
is the physical stuff, the second form must be
3:08
the financial side, the financial capital. That's
3:11
right. We are talking about money, stocks, bonds,
3:15
and bank deposits. But here is the crucial distinction
3:18
that our sources make so wonderfully clear. Financial
3:22
capital is not productive on its own. No, it
3:25
really isn't. You cannot heat your house in the
3:27
dead of winter by burning a bond certificate.
3:29
That would be a very expensive, very brave fire.
3:32
Right. And you cannot plant a hundred dollar
3:35
bill in the soil and expect a tractor to grow
3:37
out of the dirt. Exactly. Financial capital simply
3:40
acts as a claim on the real stuff. Think of it
3:43
like a like a coat check ticket at a fancy restaurant.
3:46
Oh, I love that analogy. The little piece of
3:48
cardboard with a number on it isn't keeping you
3:50
warm. It isn't the coat. Light. But society has
3:53
built a system of trust that says that ticket
3:56
represents your undeniable claim to that heavy
3:59
wool coat. And it serves as a vehicle to transfer
4:02
that value. That's exactly it. And if the restaurant
4:04
burns down, well your ticket is worthless. Right.
4:07
Because the real capital is gone. Wow. Financial
4:10
capital is simply the vehicle that moves purchasing
4:12
power from one person to another. And since financial
4:16
capital is essentially a tool for moving that
4:18
purchasing power, we need to identify exactly
4:21
who is moving it. And where it's trying to go.
4:23
Exactly. In any economy, at any given moment,
4:27
there are two fundamental groups of people. The
4:30
two sides of the global equation. Right. On one
4:32
side, we have the savers. These are individuals
4:35
or organizations who are taking in more money
4:37
than they are spending right now. So that could
4:39
be anybody, really. Absolutely. It could be a
4:42
household putting away a little bit of a paycheck
4:44
each month. into a savings account. It could
4:46
be a massive pension fund collecting contributions
4:50
from thousands of workers every two weeks. Or
4:52
even a company, right? Yes. A highly profitable
4:55
technology company that simply has extra cash
4:58
on hand this quarter that it doesn't immediately
5:00
need for its operations. So the saver is you,
5:04
the listener, looking at that $4 ,000, resting
5:06
quietly in the checking account. Yes. And on
5:10
the other side of the equation, we have the users.
5:12
These are the people and organizations who need
5:15
more money right now than they currently have.
5:17
The ones who want to build things. Exactly. A
5:20
company that wants to build a new manufacturing
5:22
plant to expand their business. A city municipality
5:25
that needs to construct a modern water treatment
5:28
facility for its residents. Or just a family
5:31
trying to buy a new home. So savers have money,
5:34
but no immediate use for it. Users have an immediate
5:37
use. But no money. It sounds simple, right? It
5:40
seems like a perfect match. What's fascinating
5:42
here is that the entire financial universe, every
5:45
single commercial bank, every massive stock exchange,
5:48
every mutual fund, and every regulatory body
5:51
exists to solve this one single problem. Really?
5:55
All of it just for that. All of it. The entire
5:57
plumbing of the system is built just to move
5:59
money from savers who naturally want a return
6:02
on their idle wealth to users who are more than
6:05
willing to pay for the privilege of using that
6:06
wealth. Wait, hold on. I need to push back on
6:08
this a little bit on behalf of common sense.
6:10
Sure, go ahead. If savers desperately want a
6:13
return on their money and users are happily willing
6:15
to pay for money, why do we need all these banks
6:18
and Wall Street exchanges taking a cut in the
6:20
middle? That's a fair question. I mean, if I
6:23
have $4 ,000 and a wind farm needs money, why
6:26
can't I just gently lend it to them directly?
6:29
It is the most natural question to ask. But direct
6:32
introductions are nearly impossible because there
6:36
are four massive roadblocks. Four fundamental
6:39
mismatches that stand in the way of you simply
6:42
handing your money over to that wind farm. Okay,
6:44
what are they? Let's walk through them gently,
6:46
continuing with our wind farm example. The first
6:49
roadblock is the mismatch of size. Do you have
6:52
$4 ,000? The Wynn project needs $200 million.
6:56
Your money, while incredibly valuable to you,
6:59
is essentially useless to them on its own. Yeah,
7:02
I guess they would need to find 50 ,000 people
7:03
exactly like me just to fund the project. Exactly.
7:07
I can only imagine the sheer scale of the paperwork.
7:10
negotiating 50 ,000 individual tiny loan agreements,
7:13
notarizing all of them, managing 50 ,000 different
7:16
legal contracts. It would be a nightmare. The
7:19
legal fees and the transaction costs would kill
7:21
the project before a single shovel hit the dirt.
7:24
The transaction costs would be absolutely crushing.
7:27
So that is size. The second roadblock is the
7:30
mismatch of time. Time. You might need your $4
7:32
,000 next month if your car breaks down or for
7:35
rent or just for groceries. Right. It's my safety
7:38
net. But the wind farm, however, needs that money
7:41
locked in for 25 years to build the turbines,
7:45
generate the power, and slowly earn the money
7:48
back. That is a huge gap. You cannot afford to
7:51
lock your savings away. for two and a half decades.
7:54
And they cannot build a wind farm if their lenders
7:56
can suddenly demand their money back in month
7:59
three. Right, because they can't just, you know,
8:01
dismantle a turbine to pay for my car repairs.
8:03
Exactly. So the timeline completely falls apart.
8:05
But even if I didn't need the money, even if
8:07
I could somehow lock my $4 ,000 away for 25 years,
8:11
I would be terrified they might go bankrupt.
8:13
Which is a very valid fear. That is a massive
8:16
risk I cannot afford to take with my safety net.
8:19
Which brings us perfectly to the third mismatch.
8:22
Risk. Ah. You are keeping that $4 ,000 safe.
8:26
You absolutely cannot afford to lose it. But
8:29
building a wind farm is inherently risky. Oh,
8:32
so... Well, the new blade technology they are
8:35
using might underperform. The wholesale price
8:37
of power could collapse over the next decade
8:40
due to new regulations. Oh, sure. A crucial zoning
8:43
permit might get pulled by the city council.
8:46
The project might completely fail. And as an
8:48
individual saver, you cannot absorb that kind
8:51
of total loss. So we have size, time, and risk.
8:56
And the fourth mismatch. Information. Information.
8:59
Do you know anything about the complex economics
9:01
of wind energy in that specific geographic region?
9:04
Absolutely nothing. Do you know how to model
9:06
the expected wind shear or audit the construction
9:08
contracts to ensure the concrete foundation is
9:11
poured correctly? Definitely not. Most likely
9:13
you don't. So even if you wanted to lend them
9:15
the money directly and even if you accepted the
9:17
risk You simply do not have the information or
9:19
expertise to accurately judge if it is a sound
9:22
investment in the first place Here's where it
9:24
gets really interesting because if we look at
9:26
these four roadblocks size time risk and information
9:30
It's like trying to organize a massive potluck
9:33
dinner where absolutely everything is out of
9:36
sync. A potluck? Yeah. Imagine inviting a hundred
9:39
people to a dinner party where no one speaks
9:41
the same language, everyone wants to eat at completely
9:43
different hours of the day, and nobody likes
9:46
the same kind of food. That sounds incredibly
9:48
stressful. Right. The sheer chaos of trying to
9:51
make that work directly is impossible. You need
9:53
a caterer. You need a translator. You need a
9:55
system. That is a brilliant way to visualize
9:58
it. The financial plumbing is the caterer bringing
10:01
all those mismatched preferences together into
10:04
a coherent functional meal. So how does this
10:06
machinery actually bypass those four roadblocks
10:09
in the real world? Let's look at a concrete example
10:12
from our sources. Let's invent a company called
10:14
Bay Ridge Wind. OK, Bay Ridge Wind. Bay Ridge
10:17
needs $200 million to build their wind farm,
10:20
which, once it is up and running, will earn a
10:23
very solid 8 % return on the invested money every
10:26
year. OK. $200 million. How do they actually
10:30
get it if they can't come to me directly? They
10:33
recognize that they can't get it from one person,
10:36
and they recognize the mismatches. So they smartly
10:39
split the risk to offer different products for
10:41
different types of savers. How does that work?
10:44
First, they raise $60 million through equity.
10:47
This means they sell ownership shares of the
10:48
company. Okay, stocks. Exactly. The investors
10:51
who buy these shares are taking on the highest
10:54
risk. If the wind farm fails, these equity investors
10:57
could lose their entire 60 million. But if the
11:00
wind farm does beautifully, they capture all
11:02
the upside. They own the profits. So that naturally
11:05
appeals to the highly risk tolerant saver, maybe
11:08
a specialized green energy fund that wants the
11:10
big reward. Precisely. But what about the other
11:13
140 million dollars they need? For the remaining
11:15
140 million, they issue bonds. A bond is simply
11:20
a formal, structured IOU. Bayridge says, if you
11:25
lend us this money, we will pay you 5 % interest
11:28
every year for 20 years, and then we will give
11:30
you your initial principal back. OK, so a steady
11:33
return. Right. Bondholders do not own the company.
11:36
They do not get any extra upside if the wind
11:39
farm makes record profits. But crucially, they
11:42
get paid their 5 % before the shareholders see
11:45
a single dime. Oh, they get paid first. Always.
11:48
And if Bay Ridge collapses and goes bankrupt,
11:50
the bondholders have the first legal claim to
11:53
sell off the physical turbines and get their
11:55
money back. So by splitting the funding into
11:57
equity and bonds, Bay Ridge has smoothly solved
12:01
the risk mismatch. Exactly. They created one
12:04
high risk, high reward product for the bold investor
12:06
and one lower risk, steady income product for
12:10
the cautious investor. The plumbing naturally
12:13
sorts people by their risk appetite. Precisely.
12:16
Now let's look at the time mismatch. Who on earth
12:18
wants to lock their money up in a bond for 20
12:20
long years? Honestly, nobody I know. Actually,
12:23
a pension fund does. Imagine a large teacher's
12:25
pension fund. They know with mathematical certainty
12:28
that they have a huge wave of teachers retiring
12:30
in the year 2050. Oh, wow. And they will need
12:33
steady predictable cash to pay out those pensions.
12:37
A 20 -year bond paying a reliable 5 % interest
12:40
matches their future needs perfectly. Wow. So
12:43
the very thing that was a terrible flaw for you
12:46
and your $4 ,000 being locked in for 20 years
12:48
is actually a highly desirable feature for the
12:51
pension fund. It is. The system just had to find
12:54
the right saver to match the user. Exactly. The
12:57
catering system works beautifully. But what about
12:59
the size mismatch? How does your $4 ,000 ever
13:02
get into this mix? Yeah, because I'm definitely
13:04
not buying a $20 million chunk of Bayridge bonds
13:07
on my own. No, you aren't. This is where mutual
13:10
funds and exchange traded funds, or ETFs, come
13:12
into play. Right. Let's say you take your $4
13:15
,000 and delicately buy shares in a broad bond
13:18
ETF through your phone. That ETF acts as a massive
13:22
continuous pool. OK. It takes your sweet small
13:26
$4 ,000 and mixes it gently with the savings
13:29
of 200 ,000 other people just like you. So all
13:32
those tiny delicate streams of savings pool together
13:35
into a massive deep reservoir of capital. Yes.
13:39
And suddenly, that fund has $3 billion at its
13:43
disposal. That's huge. With that kind of size,
13:47
the fund manager can easily take $20 million
13:49
from the reservoir and buy a slice of the Bay
13:52
Ridge wind bond issue. The size mismatch is completely
13:56
solved by this elegant mechanism of pooling.
13:58
That makes perfect sense. But I have to stop
14:01
you on the information mismatch. OK, go ahead.
14:03
Because I still don't know anything about wind
14:06
shear or turbine engineering. And sure, the ETF
14:09
fund manager has a whole team of analysts who
14:11
model wind economic all day long. Right. And
14:13
the sources talk about underwriters and rating
14:15
agencies stepping in here. And to translate that
14:18
for a moment, an underwriter is basically a wholesale
14:21
buyer who double checks all the complex legal
14:23
plumbing before selling it to the public. Exactly.
14:25
And a rating agency is essentially a financial
14:28
They grade Bay Ridge Wind on how mathematically
14:31
likely they are to actually pay back the loan.
14:34
Yes, they do. So they solve the information problem.
14:37
But wait a second. These health inspectors and
14:40
legal wholesale buyers do not work for free.
14:43
Doesn't this cost eat right into my return? That
14:46
is a very sharp observation. And it is vital
14:48
to acknowledge that the financial machinery is
14:51
not a charity. Right. All of that due diligence,
14:54
the pooling, the risk modeling, it comes with
14:57
fees. Fees are a very real cost. Just as your
15:01
returns compound wonderfully for you over 30
15:03
years, those management fees and operational
15:05
costs compound quietly against you over that
15:08
same time period. So it's a trade -off. It is
15:10
a genuine trade -off. You accept for having the
15:13
deep mismatches of size, time, risk, and information
15:16
solved on your behalf. It's a sobering reminder,
15:19
really. You are paying for the caterer at that
15:22
chaotic potluck. They are doing the heavy lifting,
15:24
but they're taking a plate of food for themselves.
15:26
That is exactly the dynamic. So we've seen how
15:29
the plumbing works to connect savers to one specific
15:31
wind farm. But if we zoom out, how does this
15:34
immense load -bearing transfer machinery operate
15:37
systemwide? Because capital, remember, real wealth
15:40
put to productive use is genuinely scarce in
15:43
the world. It is. There are always more grand
15:46
ideas and ambitious infrastructure projects than
15:49
there is savings to fund them all. Which means
15:52
the system has to make difficult choices. It
15:55
has to quietly decide which projects get the
15:58
green light to become real capital and which
16:00
ones stay as dusty blueprints. And it makes those
16:03
choices based on price. In the financial world,
16:06
the price of capital is exactly what an interest
16:09
rate is. Oh, okay. Interest rates are not just
16:12
arbitrary numbers pulled out of thin air by bankers.
16:15
They are the fundamental mechanism that rations
16:18
scarce capital across the globe. Can you give
16:20
an example? Let's look back at Bay Ridge. They
16:22
expect the wind farm to earn an 8 % return on
16:25
the energy they sell. If the market allows them
16:28
to borrow money by issuing bonds at five percent,
16:31
the math works beautifully. Because they make
16:33
a profit. Yes. They pay their lenders the five
16:35
percent, they keep the three percent differences
16:37
profit, and the wind farm gets built. But if
16:39
things change in the broader economy, like if
16:42
borrowing costs rise to nine percent, then it
16:45
breaks down. Right. Suddenly, borrowing money
16:48
at 9 % to earn only 8 % is a fast recipe for
16:51
bankruptcy. The wind farm does not get built.
16:54
And that capital quietly flows somewhere else.
16:58
Somewhere that can generate a higher return to
17:00
justify the higher cost of borrowing. It's like
17:02
water finding a new path. Exactly. This machinery
17:06
ensures that savings actively connect to investment.
17:10
Because, as our sources highlight, money simply
17:13
stuffed under a mattress is not productive capital.
17:16
It's just paper. Right. It is just paper slowly
17:18
losing its value to inflation. Savings must find
17:21
their way to a user to do anything useful for
17:24
society. So this entire pricing system relies
17:27
heavily on trust and connection. The pipes have
17:30
to remain open. They absolutely do. What happens
17:32
to the real world when that trust vanishes and
17:34
the pipes freeze? Because our sources bring up
17:36
a profound point about the 2008 financial crisis.
17:39
A very dark time for the plumbing. Yeah. During
17:42
that crisis, the savings were still there in
17:44
the world. The grand projects and the ambitious
17:46
companies still existed. But the connection broke.
17:49
Completely snapped. Lenders suddenly stopped
17:52
trusting borrowers, the pipes froze solid, and
17:54
suddenly, perfectly sound, healthy companies
17:57
couldn't finance their daily operations. Which
18:00
is terrifying. The central banks didn't step
18:02
in just to save banks. They stepped in to force
18:05
the plumbing to thaw, to gracefully restart that
18:08
vital transfer of capital so the real economy
18:11
wouldn't collapse. If we connect this to the
18:14
bigger picture... It becomes overwhelmingly clear
18:17
that this transfer machinery, the exchanges,
18:20
the mutual funds, the bond markets, is not just
18:22
a decorative layer sitting on top of the real
18:25
economy. No. It is the real economy. Without
18:27
it, the idle money never becomes the wind farm,
18:30
or the hospital, or the cross -country railway
18:32
line. So what does this all mean for you, the
18:34
person listening, with $4 ,000 resting in a checking
18:37
account? That's a big question. To me, it highlights
18:39
the ultimate magic trick of this entire system.
18:42
Through the existence of secondary markets, like
18:44
the stock exchange, where you can log in on a
18:46
random Tuesday afternoon and sell your ETF shares
18:49
with the simple tap of a button, you can pull
18:51
your money out freely at any time you wish. And
18:54
yet... The massive wind turbine keeps spinning.
18:57
Exactly. The real capital itself remains permanently
19:01
committed to that 25 -year infrastructure project.
19:04
The wind farm doesn't have to tear down a turbine
19:06
and sell the steel to give you your $4 ,000 back.
19:09
Right. The secondary market means another saver.
19:13
Saver simply steps in to buy your shares, taking
19:15
your place seamlessly behind the scenes. It is
19:18
an absolute marvel that a society full of people
19:21
with short -term, unpredictable financial needs
19:25
can somehow effortlessly finance incredibly long
19:28
-term, decades -long industrial projects without
19:31
everything falling apart. It truly is an elegant
19:34
solution to a deeply complex human problem. It
19:36
really is. But as we gently near the end of our
19:39
journey today... it is important to introduce
19:41
a lingering complication. OK, let's hear it.
19:43
A deeply contested reality that our sources address,
19:46
which we have held back until now so we could
19:48
fully understand the mechanics first. Yes, let's
19:50
wade into those slightly more turbulent waters.
19:53
We've spent this entire time talking about how
19:55
the financial system allocates capital, how it
19:58
beautifully decides to build a wind farm here
20:01
or a water treatment plant there. Right, the
20:04
allocation. But the system doesn't just allocate
20:06
capital, it also distributes wealth. And by that,
20:10
I mean that owning capital inherently means receiving
20:13
an income without physically working for it.
20:15
Because if you own those Bay Ridge bonds, you
20:18
are making your 5 % a year without lifting a
20:20
finger. Exactly. Your money is doing the working,
20:23
not you. You are receiving passive income. Precisely.
20:27
The people who own capital receive a return simply
20:30
by virtue of owning it. And over long stretches
20:32
of time, that passive income compounds beautifully.
20:36
But conversely. But conversely. The people who
20:38
do not own capital do not receive that compounding
20:41
return. Over decades, this creates a deeply compounding
20:45
divide between those who hold capital and those
20:48
who rely solely on selling their daily labor.
20:50
And to be clear to you listening, this isn't
20:52
a settled issue. Not at all. This is a very live,
20:55
very passionate argument among serious, world
20:58
-renowned economists. Some argue this compounding
21:01
divide is an unavoidable natural feature of a
21:04
free market that properly incentivizes risk and
21:07
innovation. They argue without that reward, the
21:10
wind farm never gets built. Right. While others
21:13
argue it is a structural flaw that leads to destabilizing
21:16
societal inequality, demanding systemic intervention
21:19
or aggressive taxation to gently rebalance the
21:22
scales. It's a profound debate. We aren't here
21:25
to tell you which side of that debate is right.
21:27
We just want to present the reality of the mechanics
21:30
impartially. Because once you calmly understand
21:32
how the plumbing works, you can start to see
21:35
both the miracles it performs and the deep structural
21:38
questions it raises. It gives you something profound
21:41
to chew on. as you navigate the financial world.
21:44
The system is simultaneously an engine of incredible
21:46
physical creation and a mechanism of compounding
21:50
wealth distribution. It really is. So the next
21:52
time you take a slow breath, open up that app
21:54
and quietly look at your checking account. I
21:56
hope you look at that balance just a little differently.
21:59
It isn't just numbers resting on a screen. No,
22:02
it is potential energy. It is a tiny, quiet piece
22:05
of a massive global puzzle that physically builds
22:08
the world around us. Thank you so much for joining
22:10
us on this deep dive. Stay curious, take your
22:12
time, and we will gracefully catch you on the
22:14
next one.