Latest / Honey Badger Radio / Let’s get to the rat killing | HBR Talk 338

Transcript

Let’s get to the rat killing | HBR Talk 338 · Honey Badger Radio

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: Hi guys, and welcome to HBr Talk three thirty eight.
• 0:04
  Speaker 1: Let's get to the rat killing. This this week is
• 0:08
  Speaker 1: going to be kind of interesting. I'm your host Hannah
• 0:11
  Speaker 1: Wallen here with the personification of perceptivity, Mike Stevenson and
• 0:15
  Speaker 1: nonsense annihilator Lauren Brooks. And tonight we're starting a world
• 0:20
  Speaker 1: tour I guess of Biden influence pedaling. Now we are
• 0:27
  Speaker 1: skipping a section of the literature that we were looking at,
• 0:32
  Speaker 1: and I want to clarify the reason I'm skipping it
• 0:36
  Speaker 1: is because it's basically just the salacious end of the
• 0:44
  Speaker 1: investigation into Hunter Biden and his actions and everything. And
• 0:48
  Speaker 1: it's not that nobody should care about that anywhere. It's
• 0:53
  Speaker 1: just that it's not relevant to what the reasons are
• 0:58
  Speaker 1: that we're discussing this. It didn't like Hunter Biden could
• 1:03
  Speaker 1: have slept with every hooker in the world, and unless
• 1:06
  Speaker 1: one of them was a leader of a foreign foreign
• 1:08
  Speaker 1: country or the daughter of a leader of a foreign country,
• 1:11
  Speaker 1: I don't think it would have influenced the things that
• 1:15
  Speaker 1: we're what we're looking at had influenced. So I'm not
• 1:20
  Speaker 1: going into all that crap. It's just a bunch of
• 1:22
  Speaker 1: salacious bullshit, not that you know, he should get away
• 1:27
  Speaker 1: with with anything that you wouldn't get away with, just
• 1:31
  Speaker 1: that it's really not the point here. So, yes, I
• 1:37
  Speaker 1: am skipping a section. No it's not because I'm you know,
• 1:43
  Speaker 1: not opposed or no, it's not because I'm opposed to
• 1:46
  Speaker 1: holding someone accountable for things that you know, anybody else
• 1:50
  Speaker 1: would be held accountable for. It's just like I said,
• 1:53
  Speaker 1: there there isn't a hooker in the world that that
• 1:56
  Speaker 1: the guy could have screwed that would have led to
• 1:58
  Speaker 1: World War three, I don't think, or for whatever world
• 2:02
  Speaker 1: war we're in right now.
• 2:04
  Speaker 2: So, but we are at a point where, I mean
• 2:07
  Speaker 2: hunter Biden has re entered the headlines at this point
• 2:12
  Speaker 2: because apparently a bunch of his paintings were destroyed in
• 2:15
  Speaker 2: the fire. We're not sure if that happened, or if
• 2:17
  Speaker 2: it didn't, or if he did get an insurance payout
• 2:20
  Speaker 2: for it, or or or if he didn't. Uh good, good,
• 2:26
  Speaker 2: But people are talking about that again. Then you have
• 2:29
  Speaker 2: to wonder what future historians are gonna say about you know,
• 2:33
  Speaker 2: people talk about Caligula like he was a nutter who
• 2:37
  Speaker 2: tried to make his horse a senator and all this shit. Well,
• 2:41
  Speaker 2: future historians are gonna point to the Biden cartel and
• 2:47
  Speaker 2: and the Biden crime family, and they're gonna talk about
• 2:51
  Speaker 2: Hunter in terms of how he he he never paid
• 2:56
  Speaker 2: rent to his landlord in in that one place, and
• 3:00
  Speaker 2: he and one and one time he tried to paid
• 3:02
  Speaker 2: rent to pay rent using a painting made of his
• 3:08
  Speaker 2: own ship. And people aren't gonna believe it. They're gonna
• 3:12
  Speaker 2: be like, no, no, no one could be that fucked up.
• 3:15
  Speaker 2: It's with Yeah, the story is about Udai Hussein, things
• 3:21
  Speaker 2: that only surfaced like ten years ago, about the things
• 3:26
  Speaker 2: that the son of the president could get away within
• 3:29
  Speaker 2: Iraq beggar's belief like Uday Hussein's like historically one of
• 3:37
  Speaker 2: the worst bastards who ever lived.
• 3:41
  Speaker 1: And absolutely profound an unbelievable level of cruelty in that
• 3:48
  Speaker 1: that individual. Yeah, and really I can't imagine.
• 3:54
  Speaker 2: Yeah, it's it's best. It's better imagined than described. And
• 3:58
  Speaker 2: we're maybe we are only just scratching the surface of
• 4:02
  Speaker 2: what Hunter Biden has done. If you can get away
• 4:05
  Speaker 2: with selling his ship for hundreds of thousands of dollars,
• 4:12
  Speaker 2: and his dad felt the need to pardon him for
• 4:15
  Speaker 2: anything he might have done in the last ten years,
• 4:20
  Speaker 2: is it? It makes you wonder what he did beyond
• 4:26
  Speaker 2: just selling his ship for thousands of dollars, Like he
• 4:30
  Speaker 2: didn't just sleep with hookers. He's killed horkers allegedly. I'm
• 4:33
  Speaker 2: just I'm just putting it out there. I'm just I'm
• 4:37
  Speaker 2: just saying, yeah.
• 4:38
  Speaker 1: It's it's a situation where if it was any other president, Okay,
• 4:46
  Speaker 1: if especially Let's let's go back to the era when
• 4:50
  Speaker 1: I was in in school, all right, People remember the
• 4:56
  Speaker 1: Iran contra scandal and some of the other things that
• 5:00
  Speaker 1: hit the ragged administration, right, People remember the Bush scandals,
• 5:06
  Speaker 1: little little scandals, big scandals, dumb scandals even like the
• 5:10
  Speaker 1: Bush daughters getting heated over having tried to buy alcohol
• 5:18
  Speaker 1: without an idea, And you know, all of the little
• 5:22
  Speaker 1: things and all of the big things. If if somebody
• 5:24
  Speaker 1: had in any of those administrations had come along and said, well,
• 5:29
  Speaker 1: this one one of my offspring, this one kid of mine,
• 5:34
  Speaker 1: that's that's a little bit messed up as an adult,
• 5:38
  Speaker 1: I'm going to write a blanket ten year total coverage pardon,
• 5:46
  Speaker 1: not just for specific crimes, not just for specific wrongdoing
• 5:51
  Speaker 1: or allegations of wrongdoing, but anything they might have done
• 5:59
  Speaker 1: or my get accused of. During that time, people would
• 6:03
  Speaker 1: people would be asking questions, Right, what what would your
• 6:07
  Speaker 1: kid do that you you needed to cover up? Were
• 6:11
  Speaker 1: you involved? What does it lead to? Is there government involvement?
• 6:18
  Speaker 1: Is there any kind of you know, foreign activity, is
• 6:22
  Speaker 1: there any kind of money? Wondering what's going on here?
• 6:26
  Speaker 3: I think that you know, if they're going to give
• 6:28
  Speaker 3: him a pardon, it's going to be for something that
• 6:30
  Speaker 3: you know, they exchange for the truth of the thing
• 6:33
  Speaker 3: of the situation, right, none of this blanket Oh, he
• 6:37
  Speaker 3: might have done some things in WI. No, No, I
• 6:39
  Speaker 3: want to know what he did. ABC tell us what
• 6:43
  Speaker 3: he did and let the people know what the hell
• 6:46
  Speaker 3: you're letting him off the fucking hook for.
• 6:48
  Speaker 1: Yeah, That's why I think once Trump gets into office,
• 6:53
  Speaker 1: and I don't know if he'll do it or not,
• 6:55
  Speaker 1: but one of the things that he really should do,
• 6:59
  Speaker 1: and he really should be pressure to do it, is
• 7:01
  Speaker 1: to take a look at the presidential pardon powers and
• 7:06
  Speaker 1: try to get some reform in there where at the
• 7:10
  Speaker 1: very least that just just at the very least a
• 7:15
  Speaker 1: presidential pardon, because it's pretty big deal to get a
• 7:19
  Speaker 1: presidential pardon, right that should that should contain some specificity,
• 7:23
  Speaker 1: not a ten year window wherein you know, the individual
• 7:30
  Speaker 1: could have done anything like the worst wrongdoings you can
• 7:34
  Speaker 1: picture in your head. And well, because of this pardon,
• 7:38
  Speaker 1: now he can't be prosecuted for any of it, and
• 7:42
  Speaker 1: it'll protect in a sense he can't be prosecuted, it
• 7:45
  Speaker 1: will protect other people's involvement from maybe being discovered. It
• 7:50
  Speaker 1: is one thing for a president to pardon somebody because
• 7:54
  Speaker 1: he feels that they were wrongly prosecuted for the thing
• 7:58
  Speaker 1: that he is is pardoning. It's wholly another thing for
• 8:02
  Speaker 1: a blanket one to be done. You know. And if
• 8:06
  Speaker 1: if Biden, if all Hunter Biden had done was what
• 8:11
  Speaker 1: Joe Biden made it out to be and there was
• 8:14
  Speaker 1: nothing else to it, it would be it would still
• 8:18
  Speaker 1: not be ideal, because, you know, thanks to Joe Biden,
• 8:24
  Speaker 1: men all over the country were jailed for exactly the
• 8:26
  Speaker 1: thing that he pardon has done for, or that he
• 8:29
  Speaker 1: mentioned when pardoning his son. But it's pretty obvious from
• 8:34
  Speaker 1: this that there's a criminal network that spans the Biden family,
• 8:44
  Speaker 1: the actual mafia, and a syndicate within the federal bureaucracy
• 8:51
  Speaker 1: and among federal elected officials, So you have this sort
• 8:59
  Speaker 1: of vende that you could have in your head. Right.
• 9:03
  Speaker 1: Mafia is one circle, Biden crime family is another circle,
• 9:07
  Speaker 1: and the federal bureaucracy crime syndicate is a third circle.
• 9:15
  Speaker 1: And where they all overlap is Hunter Biden. That's disturbing,
• 9:24
  Speaker 1: especially considering the pardon. The length of time the pardon
• 9:29
  Speaker 1: goes back to starts with Obama's policy on Ukraine and
• 9:39
  Speaker 1: some activities in China. So we're going to start by
• 9:43
  Speaker 1: talking about the China stuff.
• 9:46
  Speaker 2: Given that Biden has been let off a bunch of
• 9:49
  Speaker 2: stuff on account of he's not mentally capable enough to
• 9:57
  Speaker 2: be responsible for his own actions. I forget what it was,
• 10:03
  Speaker 2: but it was at some point of the the Democrat
• 10:09
  Speaker 2: shills were like repeating the story that Biden can't be
• 10:12
  Speaker 2: held accountable for his crimes but because he's he's not
• 10:17
  Speaker 2: mentally capable of putting mind to act. And if there
• 10:26
  Speaker 2: isn't an amendment to deal with this situation, there really
• 10:31
  Speaker 2: ought to be one where, Yeah, if a president can't
• 10:35
  Speaker 2: be held accountable because he's senile, then the pardons he
• 10:41
  Speaker 2: handed out in the last dying embers of his present presidency,
• 10:46
  Speaker 2: there should be some sort of mechanism for undoing.
• 10:50
  Speaker 1: Those far all individuals should not be able to make
• 10:54
  Speaker 1: any binding governing decisions if he is too senile to
• 11:03
  Speaker 1: be held accountable for his actions. Right. That's and there
• 11:07
  Speaker 1: is an amendment. I want to say it passed. It
• 11:14
  Speaker 1: got mentioned quite a bit by Democrats during Trump's first term.
• 11:24
  Speaker 1: So the twenty fifth Amendment. Let me see if I
• 11:27
  Speaker 1: can find the text of it, and was ratified in
• 11:41
  Speaker 1: nineteen sixty seven. That's not what I was looking for,
• 11:45
  Speaker 1: But that does sell us it was ratified and when.
• 11:51
  Speaker 1: But this actually just starts out talking about removal of
• 11:57
  Speaker 1: the president by his death or resignation. Section two talks
• 12:02
  Speaker 1: about if there's a vacancy in the office of vice president,
• 12:06
  Speaker 1: who takes over. Let's see, it's basically just as a
• 12:19
  Speaker 1: democratic transfer of power, So it really doesn't there we
• 12:26
  Speaker 1: go whenever president transmits to the President pro Temper of
• 12:31
  Speaker 1: the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives
• 12:34
  Speaker 1: his written declaration that he is unable to discharge the
• 12:37
  Speaker 1: powers and duties of his office, and until he transmits
• 12:40
  Speaker 1: to them written declaration to the contrary, such powers and
• 12:43
  Speaker 1: duties will be discharged by the vice president as acting president,
• 12:46
  Speaker 1: so he has to actually say I can't do this,
• 12:49
  Speaker 1: I'm not capable, or whenever vice President and a majority
• 12:58
  Speaker 1: of either principles office officers of the executive Departments, or
• 13:04
  Speaker 1: of such other body as Congress may by may by
• 13:07
  Speaker 1: law provide transmit to the President per temper of the
• 13:12
  Speaker 1: Senate and the Speaker of House of Representatives their written
• 13:15
  Speaker 1: declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers
• 13:18
  Speaker 1: of duty and duties of his office. The vice President
• 13:22
  Speaker 1: shall immediately assume powers. So they have to either get
• 13:27
  Speaker 1: his admission he's unfit, or it has to be so
• 13:31
  Speaker 1: bad that they declare him unfit. And there's been a
• 13:37
  Speaker 1: couple of times. There's been a couple of times where
• 13:40
  Speaker 1: in history where presidents have at the end of their
• 13:45
  Speaker 1: term been unfit and the people around them have made
• 13:52
  Speaker 1: decisions for them as a result of that, due to
• 13:55
  Speaker 1: age or health conditions that occurred. I can't remember who
• 14:01
  Speaker 1: it was that had a stroke, but there was a
• 14:03
  Speaker 1: president that had a stroke that afterward, I want to
• 14:07
  Speaker 1: say it was Woodrow Wilson, and the first lady ran
• 14:10
  Speaker 1: the president's office after that based on her understanding of
• 14:13
  Speaker 1: his goals and interests, and she basically just did what
• 14:17
  Speaker 1: she thought her husband would do, but she didn't get
• 14:23
  Speaker 1: elected to office. He did. And of course that was
• 14:29
  Speaker 1: before this amendment, so there wasn't really a mechanism for
• 14:37
  Speaker 1: Congress or any officers in the federal government to remove Wilson.
• 14:44
  Speaker 1: And I'm pretty sure it was the Wilson presidency where
• 14:48
  Speaker 1: that happened. I may don't quote me on that though,
• 14:53
  Speaker 1: because I may have the wrong guy. It may have
• 14:55
  Speaker 1: been another. And of course there was question like Ronald
• 15:01
  Speaker 1: Reagan's last couple of years were just absolutely plagued with
• 15:07
  Speaker 1: allegations that he was going senile, and every little thing
• 15:12
  Speaker 1: that he did or said was scrutinized for that right,
• 15:18
  Speaker 1: and you know, it's it's fair to do that. This
• 15:20
  Speaker 1: is the this is their leader of the nation with
• 15:23
  Speaker 1: the greatest military power in the world. At that time,
• 15:27
  Speaker 1: we were in the middle of the Cold War, so
• 15:30
  Speaker 1: people got really heated about, you know, people questioning Reagan's capabilities.
• 15:36
  Speaker 1: But imagine if he had, like he did have Alzheimer's
• 15:42
  Speaker 1: and he died with Alzheimer's, and imagine if he had
• 15:47
  Speaker 1: started having severe symptoms during those last couple of years
• 15:52
  Speaker 1: and we're in the middle of a cold war that
• 15:55
  Speaker 1: had like that. That cold war was threatening to turn
• 15:58
  Speaker 1: hot the whole time, to the degree that we had
• 16:03
  Speaker 1: songs about it, like I hope the Russians love their
• 16:06
  Speaker 1: children too? Can you imagine growing up with that? Is
• 16:11
  Speaker 1: one of the songs that gets played on their radio
• 16:13
  Speaker 1: all the time. Very depressing, and the music was designed
• 16:18
  Speaker 1: to be very depressing too. It was designed to make
• 16:21
  Speaker 1: Russia seem like a very depressing place. Pictures of it
• 16:24
  Speaker 1: don't look depressing at all, but that song really made
• 16:28
  Speaker 1: it look depressing. And there was a Genesis did a song,
• 16:33
  Speaker 1: this is the World We Live in that had like
• 16:37
  Speaker 1: a Muppet story in it that pretty much highlighted that
• 16:43
  Speaker 1: the whole You know, obviously, the president didn't roll over
• 16:47
  Speaker 1: in bed and push a button if he wanted to
• 16:50
  Speaker 1: start a nuclear war, but it sort of portrayed it
• 16:52
  Speaker 1: that way. And it had a button up on the
• 16:54
  Speaker 1: wall and it said nurse and then nukes and he
• 16:58
  Speaker 1: couldn't read it in the night and push the wrong
• 17:00
  Speaker 1: button and blew everything up. Like that kind of questioning
• 17:07
  Speaker 1: and stuff like that. It's fair to have that kind
• 17:11
  Speaker 1: of questioning going on, and it's been fair throughout the
• 17:15
  Speaker 1: entire history. Of politics, and whichever side got questioned that
• 17:20
  Speaker 1: way throughout the entire history of American politics has always
• 17:24
  Speaker 1: clapped back with you know, you're just using that because
• 17:28
  Speaker 1: you think it's an easy argument. It's you know, you're
• 17:31
  Speaker 1: just hating on old men, blah blah blah. But every time,
• 17:37
  Speaker 1: it's been better that that questioning took place than to
• 17:42
  Speaker 1: potentially ignore a situation where, like I said, what if
• 17:45
  Speaker 1: Ronald Reagan was in the throes of heavy symptomatic Alzheimer's.
• 17:51
  Speaker 1: You know, you know, he's not going to roll over
• 17:52
  Speaker 1: in bed and press a button in New Russia, but
• 17:55
  Speaker 1: he made hundreds of little diplomatic decisions every day. And
• 18:02
  Speaker 1: you know what was his primary get out of accountability
• 18:07
  Speaker 1: free card during the Iran contrast scandal, I don't remember,
• 18:12
  Speaker 1: not that I don't remember. That was you you can
• 18:17
  Speaker 1: quote Reagan. His answer to almost everything in that inquiry
• 18:22
  Speaker 1: was I don't remember. And then it came out that
• 18:25
  Speaker 1: he had at Alzheimer's, so maybe he really didn't remember.
• 18:30
  Speaker 1: But it's it's a bad thing if you have a
• 18:35
  Speaker 1: leader who can make international diplomatic and aggressive decisions and
• 18:44
  Speaker 1: then have no accountability for them because he's not fit
• 18:49
  Speaker 1: for office. Now granted with Reagan, it was it was
• 18:54
  Speaker 1: later that it came out that he'd had Alzheimer's. Biden,
• 19:01
  Speaker 1: you could see an open and obvious deterioration, which, if real,
• 19:08
  Speaker 1: if it's not put on as a means of getting
• 19:10
  Speaker 1: out of accountability for his actions, which it could be.
• 19:15
  Speaker 1: Well he uh, you know, he shouldn't have been running
• 19:19
  Speaker 1: the country during his entire four years in office. He
• 19:25
  Speaker 1: never should have been president. Democrats should have run someone else, anyone.
• 19:32
  Speaker 1: They'd have been better off running a cat. Yeah, right,
• 19:38
  Speaker 1: Tabby for president. Oh my god, Morris Morris the cat
• 19:44
  Speaker 1: for president. We could have had a second president, Garfield.
• 19:50
  Speaker 4: That would be cool.
• 19:53
  Speaker 1: But uh, it just it's it's it's a pathetic situation
• 19:57
  Speaker 1: for the American people to be in because we as
• 20:03
  Speaker 1: the I hate to use the word stakeholders because it's
• 20:06
  Speaker 1: often a dog whistle for hey, I'm doing something shady,
• 20:09
  Speaker 1: But we are the stakeholders in every decision making process,
• 20:18
  Speaker 1: in everything our country does, whether it is international relations,
• 20:24
  Speaker 1: whether it's domestic relations, whether it's business and economic relations,
• 20:30
  Speaker 1: whether it's war, whether it's simple laws about taxes or
• 20:35
  Speaker 1: building roads, or we are the stakeholder in every last
• 20:38
  Speaker 1: little bit of that. That is our government. It's supposed
• 20:41
  Speaker 1: to be for the people, right, so it is in
• 20:46
  Speaker 1: our interest to be able to hold them accountable. It's
• 20:50
  Speaker 1: in our interest for the understanding to exist that competent
• 20:57
  Speaker 1: people will hold these offices. If there's not going to
• 21:01
  Speaker 1: be competent people holding these offices, nobody should m hm.
• 21:07
  Speaker 1: So So that's kind of where I'm coming from with this.
• 21:11
  Speaker 1: Is is very it may be very hard for people
• 21:15
  Speaker 1: to get to. But this degree of corruption that we've
• 21:18
  Speaker 1: been seeing, this intersection between three types of crime, syndicate
• 21:25
  Speaker 1: that their whole goal, each one of the three syndicates,
• 21:31
  Speaker 1: their whole goal has been to make money for themselves,
• 21:34
  Speaker 1: not to do the will of the American people, not
• 21:38
  Speaker 1: to protect the welfare of the American people, not to
• 21:41
  Speaker 1: prevent America from becoming the bully of the world, or
• 21:44
  Speaker 1: stop America from continuing to be the bully of the world.
• 21:50
  Speaker 1: Right Like, none of that, it's none of the things
• 21:54
  Speaker 1: that should be the goal of our leadership or was
• 22:01
  Speaker 1: met during the last four years. So we have been
• 22:07
  Speaker 1: put at risk of not only having a corrupt leadership
• 22:15
  Speaker 1: that does things that are financially bad for us, causes
• 22:19
  Speaker 1: economic problems and so on. But on top of that,
• 22:25
  Speaker 1: when you have somebody with who's completely incompetent, with a
• 22:30
  Speaker 1: complete either and deliberate put on or genuine mental incapacity,
• 22:42
  Speaker 1: that is in charge of diplomatic relations, that is in
• 22:47
  Speaker 1: charge of all foreign policy, all decision making with regard
• 22:53
  Speaker 1: to you know, what are what are we going to
• 22:55
  Speaker 1: do to this country? What are we going to do
• 22:57
  Speaker 1: for this country? Who are we going to piss off
• 23:00
  Speaker 1: in the world, Who are we going to be friends
• 23:02
  Speaker 1: with in the world. That puts your sons at risk
• 23:08
  Speaker 1: of ending up being drafted to fight in a war
• 23:11
  Speaker 1: that never should have happened, right, That puts your families
• 23:16
  Speaker 1: at risk of being in a location that gets attacked
• 23:22
  Speaker 1: by foreign interests, either physically or as we're increasingly seeing
• 23:27
  Speaker 1: cyber attacks, or ideologically, and we're seeing quite a bit
• 23:34
  Speaker 1: of ideological attack in the United States. And our government
• 23:38
  Speaker 1: did nothing to protect us from that. In fact, it
• 23:43
  Speaker 1: facilitated it, it enforced it under the Biden administration. So
• 23:48
  Speaker 1: when I talk about these things, this corruption, that's where
• 23:53
  Speaker 1: I'm coming from. This all of this criminal enterprise was
• 24:00
  Speaker 1: motivated by and led to manipulation of the American people
• 24:05
  Speaker 1: in a way that put us in danger for the
• 24:09
  Speaker 1: profit of the people involved. So with that, let's let's
• 24:17
  Speaker 1: go to China. Somebody else is gonna have to do
• 24:21
  Speaker 1: the accent because I'm not good at that. But oh
• 24:28
  Speaker 1: and uh, Quantum Cat seventy six say is wrong. You
• 24:31
  Speaker 1: can't control a cat. Yeah, that's that's that's true. You
• 24:34
  Speaker 1: can't control a cat. But the worst thing a cat
• 24:37
  Speaker 1: is going to do is knock shut off the desk
• 24:39
  Speaker 1: in the Oval office. Yes, and and maybe maybe bite some.
• 24:46
  Speaker 4: People, hopefully that that should be part of the job.
• 24:53
  Speaker 1: Yeah, uh, maybe maybe potentially sell California to the Russians
• 24:59
  Speaker 1: for a little of treats after the fire. Of course. Yeah,
• 25:04
  Speaker 1: no China. So this is sort of relevant to the
• 25:11
  Speaker 1: whole story of the paintings possibly having burned up in
• 25:15
  Speaker 1: the California fires. Hunter viewed himself as an unfulfilled artist,
• 25:20
  Speaker 1: and he said as much in his semi fictional memoir
• 25:24
  Speaker 1: Beautiful Things. In fact, art was the only thing to
• 25:28
  Speaker 1: have kept Hunter sane. It was no surprise, then, for
• 25:31
  Speaker 1: Marco Polo to discover that, when analyzing more than one
• 25:35
  Speaker 1: hundred and twenty eight thousand emails on the Biden laptop,
• 25:38
  Speaker 1: almost none of Hunter's free time or private conversations were
• 25:41
  Speaker 1: about business strategy or private equity market entry ideation. Interesting
• 25:50
  Speaker 1: little segue there. You will recall that Hunter graduated with
• 25:53
  Speaker 1: a bachelor's degree in history, it wrote a poem of
• 25:56
  Speaker 1: all things for his application to Yale Law School, and
• 25:59
  Speaker 1: did not even attempt to enter high finance until his
• 26:03
  Speaker 1: dad was preparing to be vetted for the VP slot
• 26:06
  Speaker 1: by Obama after Obama's folks told Joe's son to drop
• 26:10
  Speaker 1: his shameless registered lobbying grift. When Hunter was gifted a
• 26:17
  Speaker 1: portion of a hedge fund in two thousand and six
• 26:19
  Speaker 1: called Paradigm by a trustee owner to Joe, the afoeremant
• 26:24
  Speaker 1: mentioned Jeff Cooper. Former executives at Paradigm, testified in a
• 26:31
  Speaker 1: lawsuit to Hunter and his uncle Jimmy had absolutely no
• 26:34
  Speaker 1: clue what they were doing. This is a big surprise.
• 26:39
  Speaker 1: The vignettes offered in Lo Tito Versus Biden had to
• 26:46
  Speaker 1: double check on that because my brain turned that into
• 26:49
  Speaker 1: Lolito and I'm like, what the fuck? Lotito versus Biden
• 26:54
  Speaker 1: were a perfect illustration of the chasm that existed between
• 26:57
  Speaker 1: Hunter's actual business acumen and the coveted positions he held
• 27:01
  Speaker 1: for decades. That's such a fancy way of saying. Hunter
• 27:05
  Speaker 1: got a bunch of jobs for which he was fundamentally
• 27:08
  Speaker 1: incompetent because he had no skills and no knowledge. In fact,
• 27:14
  Speaker 1: Hunter and Jimmy conducted a takeover of Paradigm and fired
• 27:18
  Speaker 1: the incumbent leader. After they did this, Joe's brother assured
• 27:23
  Speaker 1: the rest of the employees with the following pep talk,
• 27:26
  Speaker 1: don't worry about investors. We've got people all around the
• 27:29
  Speaker 1: world who want to invest in Joe Biden. Yeah, we've
• 27:35
  Speaker 1: got investors lined up in a line of Boeing seven
• 27:39
  Speaker 1: forty sevens with filled with cash, ready to invest in
• 27:43
  Speaker 1: this company. It just think about this, right what he
• 27:52
  Speaker 1: just said there, don't worry about investors. We got people
• 27:55
  Speaker 1: around the world who want to invest in Joe Biden. Basically,
• 28:00
  Speaker 1: when Hunter got that position in Paradigm, it immediately became
• 28:06
  Speaker 1: a pathway for laundering money related to Joe Biden's influence.
• 28:13
  Speaker 1: Pedaling with that verified principle in mind, Hunter's employment was
• 28:21
  Speaker 1: untethered to his natural or cultivated abilities, we explored the
• 28:26
  Speaker 1: Biden's financial entanglements with the communist Chinese. You can think
• 28:31
  Speaker 1: about these entanglements in two trenches or deals with a
• 28:36
  Speaker 1: plethora of interjecting people splattering the periphery, and we kind
• 28:42
  Speaker 1: of went over who who's who of the people that
• 28:46
  Speaker 1: they're going to be talking about. But I do recommend,
• 28:49
  Speaker 1: like there's a link in our low bar to this report,
• 28:54
  Speaker 1: so that you can go back over that if you
• 28:56
  Speaker 1: really want to look at the stuff that we kind
• 28:59
  Speaker 1: of skipped, that's that's your choice. I really didn't skipping
• 29:06
  Speaker 1: over it was already not fun. There were there were
• 29:09
  Speaker 1: a lot of things that a lot of images that
• 29:12
  Speaker 1: I really didn't care for, I wasn't interested in. So
• 29:17
  Speaker 1: there you go. But so they explored explored these entanglements.
• 29:25
  Speaker 1: There's the list of who who the who's who involved
• 29:29
  Speaker 1: The people are discussed in the earlier parts that we
• 29:32
  Speaker 1: looked over. Other writers have done a tremendous job of
• 29:37
  Speaker 1: explaining the obvious conflicts of interest emanating from these two details.
• 29:41
  Speaker 1: Marco Polo was focused on the verifiable crimes committed in
• 29:46
  Speaker 1: the course of facilitating and leveraging these deal deals. Immediately
• 29:51
  Speaker 1: after Hunter Archer and Carrie's step son Chris Hines established
• 29:58
  Speaker 1: their influence peddling firms with the variations of the name
• 30:02
  Speaker 1: Rosemont Seneca. They were courted by the financial elite in China, who,
• 30:07
  Speaker 1: according to China's own laws, serve at the direction of
• 30:09
  Speaker 1: the CCP. With zero discernible quantitative skills, Hunter secured multimillion
• 30:15
  Speaker 1: dollar cave outs with Chinese backed end at EBHR and
• 30:19
  Speaker 1: the CCP's Crown Jewel overseeing their One Belt One Road project.
• 30:25
  Speaker 1: So the first thing that we're going to look at
• 30:28
  Speaker 1: see if I can find a tab where I put that,
• 30:35
  Speaker 1: because I thought I had it as the next tab,
• 30:38
  Speaker 1: and it is the timeline of influence pedaling, So I
• 30:47
  Speaker 1: hope I didn't close it by accident. I've got a
• 30:50
  Speaker 1: bunch of tabs open from other things I was looking
• 30:53
  Speaker 1: at with regard to this. This whole is discussion, including
• 31:03
  Speaker 1: descriptions of some of the types of weapons. Here it
• 31:06
  Speaker 1: is descriptions of some of the type of weapons that
• 31:09
  Speaker 1: we've been providing to Ukraine. But we'll get into that
• 31:11
  Speaker 1: stuff later. So One Belt One Road aims to develop
• 31:15
  Speaker 1: China centered and controlled global infrastructure, transportation, trade and production networks,
• 31:23
  Speaker 1: in other words, another silk road. Initially focused on Asia,
• 31:27
  Speaker 1: Europe and Africa, the scope has become global and encompasses
• 31:31
  Speaker 1: over one hundred countries, including the United States. It includes
• 31:35
  Speaker 1: a land based silk road, economic belt, a twenty first
• 31:38
  Speaker 1: century maritime silk road, and a digital silk road that
• 31:41
  Speaker 1: seeks to promote PRC, information and communications technology supply chains,
• 31:47
  Speaker 1: optical cable and satellite networks, and a health silk road.
• 31:52
  Speaker 1: This is essentially a power play by China. It's about
• 31:59
  Speaker 1: making the world dependent on China for all of these
• 32:04
  Speaker 1: things They're they're gonna They're wanting to create a solidified
• 32:10
  Speaker 1: network of many things that would be basically a monopoly
• 32:16
  Speaker 1: on all of these things. Very similar to remember when
• 32:18
  Speaker 1: we were talking about how the United States rebelled against
• 32:24
  Speaker 1: the UK initially partly because of the the black Rock
• 32:31
  Speaker 1: of the time, which was the UH, the the English
• 32:38
  Speaker 1: Trading Company. I can't think of the term for it now.
• 32:43
  Speaker 1: This is dumb, Mike. You have to remember that the
• 32:47
  Speaker 1: India Trading Company, That's what it was. But China is
• 32:52
  Speaker 1: trying to create the same recreate the same thing, and
• 32:56
  Speaker 1: they have a five year plan. They had a five
• 32:58
  Speaker 1: year plan ending this year. So the effort emphasizes policy coordination,
• 33:07
  Speaker 1: trade and investment, facilitation, dispute settlement, tourism, student and personnel exchanges,
• 33:12
  Speaker 1: and priorities in China's fourteenth five Year Plan twenty twenty
• 33:16
  Speaker 1: one to twenty twenty five, such as health research and standards,
• 33:21
  Speaker 1: setting one Belt one, road projects and energy, ICT manufacturing,
• 33:27
  Speaker 1: industrial parks and trade zones, transportation, rail roads, ports, and airports.
• 33:35
  Speaker 1: So basically, any travel you might want to do, any
• 33:39
  Speaker 1: goods you might want to transport, would be controlled by
• 33:41
  Speaker 1: this look to vertically integrate PRC, production, supply chains, technology,
• 33:46
  Speaker 1: infrastructure and transportation networks. The effort involves technology and financial
• 33:51
  Speaker 1: integration that expands the use of China's digital platforms and currency.
• 33:56
  Speaker 1: And you know what that means, right, If the currency
• 34:05
  Speaker 1: of the world, if the communications platforms of the world,
• 34:09
  Speaker 1: where any place you wanted to do business, any place
• 34:13
  Speaker 1: you wanted to travel to, any place that you wanted
• 34:16
  Speaker 1: to live, you had to be able to use the
• 34:23
  Speaker 1: Chinese run communications platforms and Chinese currency. What would you
• 34:31
  Speaker 1: be subject to? Anybody got to guess.
• 34:42
  Speaker 4: Torture?
• 34:43
  Speaker 1: Torture. Yeah, But what is the thing that we've been
• 34:46
  Speaker 1: talking about that they're doing in China that controls every
• 34:49
  Speaker 1: decision people make? Like this connection is pretty huh.
• 35:00
  Speaker 2: No, Social credit right.
• 35:01
  Speaker 1: Yeah, you'd be subject to this Chinese social credit system.
• 35:07
  Speaker 1: So for instance, let's let's bring it home to gamers, right,
• 35:14
  Speaker 1: and you think of a game that you didn't buy
• 35:16
  Speaker 1: this year or last year because instead of having a
• 35:22
  Speaker 1: great storyline and great characters, instead of being interesting and fun,
• 35:29
  Speaker 1: the writers decided that being woke was a substitute for
• 35:33
  Speaker 1: all of those things, not something that they could do
• 35:36
  Speaker 1: in addition to it, not something that you know, like,
• 35:39
  Speaker 1: there is at least there's been at least one or
• 35:41
  Speaker 1: two games out there that, yeah, there's there's a bunch
• 35:43
  Speaker 1: of bullshit in this game, but the game is good
• 35:46
  Speaker 1: and people liked it, and it wasn't necessarily shoving it
• 35:49
  Speaker 1: down their throats, so people enjoyed the game. And you know,
• 35:54
  Speaker 1: there there's one in particular, and I can't think of
• 35:56
  Speaker 1: the title of it, but there was a lot of
• 35:58
  Speaker 1: pre preemptive Oh, everybody's gonna hate this game, this game
• 36:02
  Speaker 1: is going to be the right is going to reject
• 36:07
  Speaker 1: this game. Everything turned out they were big fans, and
• 36:09
  Speaker 1: then the people who made those predictions got mad. But
• 36:13
  Speaker 1: there are a lot of games that people didn't buy
• 36:16
  Speaker 1: because they sucked, and the reason they sucked was because
• 36:22
  Speaker 1: pandering to the goals of this type of social credit system, right,
• 36:28
  Speaker 1: because the social credit system is already being applied to
• 36:31
  Speaker 1: businesses all over the world. That took a front seat
• 36:37
  Speaker 1: and it acted as a substitute instead of, you know,
• 36:41
  Speaker 1: an addition to story development, character development, setting development, so on.
• 36:47
  Speaker 1: And you have the right to object to that. You
• 36:50
  Speaker 1: have the right to choose your entertainment, right. But imagine, okay,
• 36:56
  Speaker 1: that one of the games that game creators, that game
• 37:02
  Speaker 1: developers who worked on those games criticized for being sexist, racist, homophobic,
• 37:09
  Speaker 1: blah blah blah blah all the way down the line
• 37:13
  Speaker 1: because it's competition and it didn't pander to the woke mindset.
• 37:19
  Speaker 1: You bought that game, and all of a sudden, because
• 37:24
  Speaker 1: you bought that game, you can't ride on a train anymore,
• 37:29
  Speaker 1: or you can't take a greyhound bus halfway across the
• 37:33
  Speaker 1: country to go do something in another state. You better
• 37:37
  Speaker 1: have your own car. But you know, let's hope your
• 37:40
  Speaker 1: car isn't one of those that has an onboard computer
• 37:44
  Speaker 1: system that allows it to be stopped remotely, because again,
• 37:51
  Speaker 1: you know, well, your social credit score has been impacted,
• 37:53
  Speaker 1: and it's been decided that you can't travel a certain
• 37:56
  Speaker 1: amount and you know, sorry, you can't can't go. You
• 38:00
  Speaker 1: bought the wrong game, or you bought the wrong appliance,
• 38:06
  Speaker 1: You said the wrong thing online, you associated with someone
• 38:11
  Speaker 1: who said the wrong thing on We saw that you
• 38:13
  Speaker 1: had tea and cookies with persona non gradis detriment to
• 38:20
  Speaker 1: your social credit score. Sorry, you don't get access to
• 38:24
  Speaker 1: the currency you need in order to pay your rent,
• 38:28
  Speaker 1: or make your purchases, or travel to your mom's house
• 38:32
  Speaker 1: or go to your job. That's basically what the threat
• 38:39
  Speaker 1: of this is. This is about essentially creating a system
• 38:45
  Speaker 1: that can control access to goods and services by controlling
• 38:51
  Speaker 1: communications and currency. Having control over those two things would
• 38:56
  Speaker 1: give any entity that had it control over the entire populace.
• 39:03
  Speaker 1: And yeah, Richard Berre points out, even if you don't
• 39:06
  Speaker 1: activate on Star, they can still deactivate your vehicle. But
• 39:11
  Speaker 1: they can't. They can't deactivate my vehicle. You know why
• 39:17
  Speaker 1: Why because it was made in nineteen ninety nine. Yeah, yeah,
• 39:25
  Speaker 1: they would have to shoot out my tires. But I'm
• 39:30
  Speaker 1: not gonna go over. There's a whole bunch here. This
• 39:32
  Speaker 1: is by the way. Let me, I'm gonna remind myself
• 39:38
  Speaker 1: the source on this because it's government source. So this
• 39:43
  Speaker 1: is from a congressional report CRS reports Congress dot gov.
• 39:49
  Speaker 1: And I cannot remember which which group in Congress this
• 39:58
  Speaker 1: came from, but it doesn't really matter. This is basically
• 40:02
  Speaker 1: this is what these for this project is about. And
• 40:10
  Speaker 1: so just one more thing about this for the discussion
• 40:14
  Speaker 1: we had on Tuesday, by the way, and with regard
• 40:17
  Speaker 1: to the fires and the potential associated logic and reasoning
• 40:28
  Speaker 1: and causes and everything behind. So the decisions that were
• 40:32
  Speaker 1: made around the fire in Hawaii, in the fire in California,
• 40:40
  Speaker 1: number we talked about we get people have been called
• 40:43
  Speaker 1: conspiracy theorists for this, but we talked about the smart
• 40:47
  Speaker 1: city project, right. So in twenty twenty one, g presented
• 40:54
  Speaker 1: at the United Nations General Assembly a Global Development Initiative
• 40:59
  Speaker 1: to compliment One Belt, one Road with small and smart
• 41:04
  Speaker 1: development projects. So there's this. The smart thing has been,
• 41:11
  Speaker 1: you know, it says today GDI projects have been in
• 41:13
  Speaker 1: food and medicine, so these are things that you can't
• 41:17
  Speaker 1: live without, right, But the smart projects have been things
• 41:19
  Speaker 1: like we hear about smart cities, but they've been things
• 41:23
  Speaker 1: like everything in your hospital room is now computerized. There
• 41:30
  Speaker 1: are smart houses for people with disabilities and people who
• 41:35
  Speaker 1: decide that they want one and can afford to pay
• 41:38
  Speaker 1: for one. People use Alexa and Google's version of Alexa,
• 41:45
  Speaker 1: and there's another another one out there that isn't Google
• 41:50
  Speaker 1: or Amazon that does the same thing. So there's three
• 41:53
  Speaker 1: different smart systems that you can hook up to your
• 41:56
  Speaker 1: house that you can use to turn on your lights.
• 41:58
  Speaker 1: You can use it to turn on your security system,
• 42:02
  Speaker 1: turn on and off your security system, set your your
• 42:07
  Speaker 1: passwords and everything, uh, lock and unlock your doors. It's
• 42:11
  Speaker 1: it has control over a large portion. There are smart
• 42:15
  Speaker 1: appliances that will work with it. You can turn your
• 42:18
  Speaker 1: oven on and off. Everything in your house that is
• 42:22
  Speaker 1: electronic can be influenced by one of these systems. And
• 42:26
  Speaker 1: of course these systems can be hacked, and there have
• 42:33
  Speaker 1: been instances where somebody's uh yeah, Kortana, Richard Beer, that's
• 42:37
  Speaker 1: the one I was thinking of. And you it's more limited,
• 42:42
  Speaker 1: but there are there are ways you can give Kortana
• 42:45
  Speaker 1: access to like your smart microwave, your smart refrigerator and
• 42:48
  Speaker 1: stuff like that. All right, so your you have your
• 42:52
  Speaker 1: house set up this way. I obviously I do not
• 42:54
  Speaker 1: have my house set up this way. I'm not going to.
• 42:57
  Speaker 1: But you have your house set up this way, and
• 43:00
  Speaker 1: you got your lights hooked up to it, you got
• 43:02
  Speaker 1: your refrigerator hooked up to it, you got your microwave,
• 43:05
  Speaker 1: your stove, your security system and all that, and you
• 43:08
  Speaker 1: can tell it what to put on your shopping list.
• 43:10
  Speaker 1: You can even have it order things from the grocery
• 43:13
  Speaker 1: store for you and pay for them. So you've now
• 43:18
  Speaker 1: given it access to either a credit card or your
• 43:22
  Speaker 1: banking information. And one day you discovered that your bank
• 43:28
  Speaker 1: account's been empty, and when you traced through to find
• 43:32
  Speaker 1: out what happened, somebody hacked your microwave, and they used
• 43:38
  Speaker 1: your microwave to get access to Siri or Kortana or Alexa,
• 43:45
  Speaker 1: and then they used Alexa to get access to your
• 43:47
  Speaker 1: bank account. So it's not difficult. Even if you trusted
• 43:54
  Speaker 1: these entities to do these services for you that actually
• 44:01
  Speaker 1: give them a significant amount of control over everything in
• 44:05
  Speaker 1: your house, you still put yourself at risk right to hackers.
• 44:12
  Speaker 1: I wouldn't want to have a smart house or a
• 44:16
  Speaker 1: smart vehicle, not like the little dinky smart cars. I
• 44:20
  Speaker 1: wouldn't one of those either. You could park one of
• 44:22
  Speaker 1: those inside my van, but I also wouldn't want to
• 44:27
  Speaker 1: have a car that was smart, like a smart house.
• 44:30
  Speaker 1: I wouldn't want any of that no way, because it
• 44:34
  Speaker 1: could be hacked and it's really easy. It seems like
• 44:40
  Speaker 1: it should be really hard, but it's not. All you
• 44:42
  Speaker 1: have to do is find the weakest link, and the
• 44:44
  Speaker 1: weakest link might be some minor thing that it does
• 44:49
  Speaker 1: that all you know, you get into get into the
• 44:53
  Speaker 1: way the radio works, or you get into the trunk
• 44:57
  Speaker 1: and suddenly you have access. You've figured out how to
• 45:00
  Speaker 1: unlock the trunk. Okay, now you've got the password for
• 45:03
  Speaker 1: the trunk, you can hack into the rest of the car.
• 45:07
  Speaker 2: Your biggest problem is the government could hack into all
• 45:11
  Speaker 2: of these devices the moment you say something in the
• 45:15
  Speaker 2: government doesn't like, such as you criticize the government for
• 45:21
  Speaker 2: whatever reason.
• 45:23
  Speaker 1: They can.
• 45:24
  Speaker 2: They can remotely lock your entire house while while the
• 45:30
  Speaker 2: police are on the way. And let us not forget
• 45:33
  Speaker 2: that the government is incompetent, extremely incompetent compared with the
• 45:40
  Speaker 2: potentially infinite independent hackers out there. If the government can
• 45:46
  Speaker 2: hack your system, then some rando somewhere in the world
• 45:51
  Speaker 2: can also hack your system, because because no matter how
• 45:56
  Speaker 2: totalitarian the government is they will always suffer from the
• 46:03
  Speaker 2: incompetence of the bureaucracy that comes along with them, and
• 46:07
  Speaker 2: they will and they will always be superseded by some
• 46:13
  Speaker 2: random hacker in China who is able to just completely
• 46:23
  Speaker 2: lock you out of your life. Yeah, we always imagined
• 46:28
  Speaker 2: this Jetson's future as being this amazing utopia where you
• 46:38
  Speaker 2: can just voice control everything. But the idea that you
• 46:43
  Speaker 2: can voice control it and no one else can voice
• 46:46
  Speaker 2: control it is like, we really should have got in
• 46:50
  Speaker 2: there in the seventies.
• 46:53
  Speaker 1: Sort of.
• 47:00
  Speaker 2: I know we were watching the Jetsons as children, but
• 47:03
  Speaker 2: what we should have been is been like, how could
• 47:08
  Speaker 2: this possibly be implemented in a way that makes the
• 47:12
  Speaker 2: individual more powerful than the government? And it was never addressed.
• 47:22
  Speaker 2: It's we like to think that all of this is
• 47:26
  Speaker 2: making life easier for the individual. That was what the
• 47:29
  Speaker 2: Jetsons future was all about.
• 47:33
  Speaker 1: But I don't know.
• 47:36
  Speaker 2: The government's been sucking on the coattails of the private
• 47:47
  Speaker 2: industry this whole time, making sure that it can fuck
• 47:54
  Speaker 2: up your life at a moment's notice. And yeah, I
• 48:02
  Speaker 2: don't want to sound like a like a Luod Eye.
• 48:05
  Speaker 2: I don't I don't want to sound like uh somebody
• 48:09
  Speaker 2: who pushes back against all these technological advances. But technological
• 48:15
  Speaker 2: advances mean nothing is in control of everything. Uh, technological
• 48:24
  Speaker 2: advances in the time when the government is in control
• 48:28
  Speaker 2: of everything, he's not even a technological advance. It's technological
• 48:34
  Speaker 2: dystopian nightmare. And I, you know, I don't know how
• 48:39
  Speaker 2: we avoid that. I don't know how we can have
• 48:42
  Speaker 2: all these advantages of technology without.
• 48:48
  Speaker 1: Yeah, without risk. Well, there's there's a degree to it.
• 48:53
  Speaker 2: The totalitarian influence of the government.
• 48:56
  Speaker 1: There, there's a degree to which some of that risk
• 48:59
  Speaker 1: is is inevitable. But the totalitarian end of it, well,
• 49:05
  Speaker 1: for one thing, aren't for ers pointed out, you can
• 49:11
  Speaker 1: build a smart house without always being connected, right. It
• 49:16
  Speaker 1: doesn't have to be online, but you have to. This
• 49:22
  Speaker 1: is something you'd have to either know yourself or have
• 49:25
  Speaker 1: somebody come in who knew what they were doing to
• 49:28
  Speaker 1: provide all of the services without having to have it
• 49:31
  Speaker 1: run by remotely by some system online. And it can
• 49:37
  Speaker 1: be done, and probably wealthy people have this. You wouldn't
• 49:41
  Speaker 1: be able to use it to order your groceries because
• 49:45
  Speaker 1: that would be an online thing, right, but you would
• 49:48
  Speaker 1: be able to use it to do everything else. Your
• 49:50
  Speaker 1: security system, all of your control, all of your appliances
• 49:54
  Speaker 1: and everything. And if it didn't have a means of
• 50:00
  Speaker 1: connecting to an internet service of any kind, somebody would
• 50:05
  Speaker 1: actually have to attach to it with with you know,
• 50:09
  Speaker 1: they'd have to actually find a way to plug themselves
• 50:11
  Speaker 1: into it in order to hack it. That would be
• 50:14
  Speaker 1: much smarter. That would be a smarter smart house. In fact,
• 50:17
  Speaker 1: it's the only smart way to do a smart house.
• 50:20
  Speaker 1: And the same thing could be done with your car.
• 50:22
  Speaker 1: You just wouldn't have something like on Star where you
• 50:26
  Speaker 1: know it they communicates remotely with something or or somebody,
• 50:32
  Speaker 1: so you wouldn't be able to use it for GPS
• 50:36
  Speaker 1: or connecting with some service when you're in an accident
• 50:41
  Speaker 1: or something. But you could have it run every other
• 50:43
  Speaker 1: aspect of your car, including monitoring you know, what's what's
• 50:47
  Speaker 1: going on with your engine and so on, and telling
• 50:49
  Speaker 1: you what might be wrong with the car. These are
• 50:51
  Speaker 1: things that would be valuable, right and the ability to
• 50:56
  Speaker 1: for for a car to have some cape abilities to
• 51:00
  Speaker 1: assist you in steering and in stopping quickly when there's
• 51:07
  Speaker 1: a reason that you need to and you're it has
• 51:09
  Speaker 1: faster reflexes than you do, and so on, but you
• 51:12
  Speaker 1: certainly wouldn't be smart to have it set up so
• 51:17
  Speaker 1: that someone else can remotely make it do that. And
• 51:23
  Speaker 1: the movie that the Obamas just came out with it
• 51:27
  Speaker 1: was so weird, the Apocalypse movie where they didn't exactly
• 51:32
  Speaker 1: say what was going on. They just followed these two families,
• 51:37
  Speaker 1: the one that had rented the other family's house, dealing
• 51:42
  Speaker 1: with the situation. There was a scene in this movie
• 51:46
  Speaker 1: where one of the individuals who has gone out to
• 51:53
  Speaker 1: check on something encounters a line of self self driving Oh,
• 52:06
  Speaker 1: Tesla's I think it is. I'm pretty sure it was
• 52:10
  Speaker 1: the brand name Tesla. I think they're the only ones
• 52:13
  Speaker 1: that have self driving cars besides Google the one Google car.
• 52:19
  Speaker 1: But their self driving cars were all going down this
• 52:23
  Speaker 1: one road and then crashing into the back end of
• 52:27
  Speaker 1: the Tesla in front of them, and it was this
• 52:30
  Speaker 1: whole long line. You couldn't see the car at the beginning,
• 52:32
  Speaker 1: you couldn't see the car at the end. Really, Richard
• 52:39
  Speaker 1: Bierre says, GPS doesn't require an online connection, so you
• 52:42
  Speaker 1: could use you could use it. You wouldn't be able
• 52:46
  Speaker 1: to remote start your car though, but yeah, in any case,
• 52:50
  Speaker 1: these cars just kept going and they were all. They
• 52:53
  Speaker 1: may have all been coming from like they theorized the movie.
• 52:57
  Speaker 1: They may have all been coming from a dealership. They
• 52:58
  Speaker 1: weren't necessarily people's car cars, right, And so something had
• 53:03
  Speaker 1: been done that screwed up their programming and caused them
• 53:06
  Speaker 1: to do that. But if you could do that with
• 53:09
  Speaker 1: a self driving car, that would actually happen, and the
• 53:11
  Speaker 1: car would take off on its own, and it has
• 53:16
  Speaker 1: the capability of steering independently of human control within the car,
• 53:21
  Speaker 1: and it has the capability of stopping and starting and
• 53:24
  Speaker 1: driving independently of there being a person controlling it inside
• 53:29
  Speaker 1: the car. Then it has the capacity to be used
• 53:33
  Speaker 1: against people as a weapon. Right.
• 53:36
  Speaker 4: Some people say that's what happened to Anne Hash.
• 53:39
  Speaker 1: Yeah, it could be like a truck of peace that
• 53:42
  Speaker 1: you have no control over. And if it can be
• 53:44
  Speaker 1: set like if it's set up so that you can't
• 53:47
  Speaker 1: override the controls as a passenger inside the car, that
• 53:51
  Speaker 1: there's a way to make it so that there's nothing
• 53:53
  Speaker 1: you as a passenger can do. It can kill the
• 53:56
  Speaker 1: individual inside the car, or it can be you used
• 54:00
  Speaker 1: to drive over a crowded people. It can be weaponized
• 54:04
  Speaker 1: in a you know, one hundred different ways destroy property, right,
• 54:09
  Speaker 1: open up a building that shouldn't be opened up so
• 54:12
  Speaker 1: that people who shouldn't be in there can get in there.
• 54:14
  Speaker 1: Just anything that you could do with a wrecking ball, right,
• 54:19
  Speaker 1: anything that you could do with a container that has
• 54:24
  Speaker 1: a person in it to harm the person inside, anything
• 54:27
  Speaker 1: that you could do, you know, with with a large projectile.
• 54:33
  Speaker 1: It would be quite dangerous to have something like that hackable.
• 54:40
  Speaker 1: So here we have a foreign power that treats US
• 54:46
  Speaker 1: as a not necessarily full on enemy, but an untrusted
• 54:54
  Speaker 1: foreign power that they they may or may not do
• 54:58
  Speaker 1: business with us, and they may or may not have
• 55:04
  Speaker 1: conflict with us, and they may or may not support
• 55:07
  Speaker 1: interests that we are up against. Ah. So you know,
• 55:13
  Speaker 1: there's there's possibilities, multiple possibilities of what kind of reactions
• 55:18
  Speaker 1: on things we might get from from China. It's looking
• 55:23
  Speaker 1: for the power to be able to control something like that.
• 55:28
  Speaker 1: You want China, the the CCP in China to be
• 55:32
  Speaker 1: able to control your car after you have said something
• 55:36
  Speaker 1: that perhaps they disapprove. So we go to the next page,
• 55:48
  Speaker 1: all right, and there we go. I'm going to have
• 55:57
  Speaker 1: the large print edition again because I'm still half lined,
• 56:04
  Speaker 1: and I think that was actually the only thing that
• 56:12
  Speaker 1: I wanted to go over in this Yeah, so I'm
• 56:15
  Speaker 1: going to close that, Okay. A debate over whether Hunter
• 56:24
  Speaker 1: and his business partners violated the pharah or and or
• 56:29
  Speaker 1: conspired to do so, was made simpler when one of them,
• 56:33
  Speaker 1: Archer in this particular case, used the precise wording in
• 56:36
  Speaker 1: an email to the other partners. He I think this
• 56:43
  Speaker 1: is pronounced Quinn how Zong. Quinn Howe might have been
• 56:48
  Speaker 1: been King Howe came to New York State looking for
• 56:52
  Speaker 1: powdered milk. And we've done an initial pitch with him
• 56:55
  Speaker 1: in New York City on real estate China's richest man. Literally,
• 56:59
  Speaker 1: we're going to do a follow up follow on real
• 57:02
  Speaker 1: estate pitch and just general, we can be your agent
• 57:05
  Speaker 1: in US convo, we can be your agent in US.
• 57:12
  Speaker 1: The last line confirmed the group had the unregistered agent
• 57:15
  Speaker 1: of a foreign principal game down to a science, as
• 57:19
  Speaker 1: Archer did not need to elaborate on what his agent
• 57:22
  Speaker 1: in the US convo with with Jong would would entail.
• 57:28
  Speaker 1: Before flying to the Middle Kingdom, Archer snagged three copies
• 57:32
  Speaker 1: of Joe's book Promises to Keep to hand out to
• 57:35
  Speaker 1: Jong and other big wigs at two state back entities,
• 57:41
  Speaker 1: China International Trust and Investment Corporation and China Investment Corporation.
• 57:46
  Speaker 1: And remember in China, they they don't have independent business.
• 57:55
  Speaker 1: These businesses, these organizations, these entities, all of them answer
• 58:02
  Speaker 1: to the CCP. There is no like here in the
• 58:07
  Speaker 1: United States. If you buy something from Amazon, there's regulations
• 58:13
  Speaker 1: that they have to follow. The federal government might come
• 58:15
  Speaker 1: after them if they say they're selling you a full
• 58:20
  Speaker 1: size drivable Toyota Camray and then when it gets to
• 58:24
  Speaker 1: your house, it's a model car a foot long that
• 58:27
  Speaker 1: you're supposed to put up on the mantle, and you
• 58:30
  Speaker 1: paid real car prices for it. Like those are things
• 58:33
  Speaker 1: that they but they don't necessarily they're not supposed to
• 58:37
  Speaker 1: be digging into your banking information. And so you buy
• 58:43
  Speaker 1: something from Amazon and suddenly, as a US citizen, the
• 58:48
  Speaker 1: federal government can find out where you got your groceries
• 58:52
  Speaker 1: and what you paid your babysitter and all that. Like
• 58:56
  Speaker 1: that's there's supposed to be a line there. That line
• 58:59
  Speaker 1: doesn't exist in and in fact, China can tell these companies,
• 59:05
  Speaker 1: we want information about this person or that person, and
• 59:07
  Speaker 1: they can they will have to use the guise of
• 59:10
  Speaker 1: doing business with you to gain it, even if it
• 59:12
  Speaker 1: has nothing to do with that business. So we're we're
• 59:15
  Speaker 1: talking a much greater level of control and a much
• 59:19
  Speaker 1: greater threat of espionage. And here we have receipts on
• 59:31
  Speaker 1: the email. Here we go the mention of the books.
• 59:40
  Speaker 1: There we go the mention of the just general. We
• 59:44
  Speaker 1: can be your agent in the US. And so we
• 59:48
  Speaker 1: go to quite a bit here that actually has links.
• 59:54
  Speaker 1: You can you really can't click on the links, but
• 59:56
  Speaker 1: you can Google search these things in quotes and you'll
• 1:00:02
  Speaker 1: find each one of them goes to an article. As noted,
• 1:00:10
  Speaker 1: Hunter's lobbying did not stop when Joe became vice president.
• 1:00:16
  Speaker 1: He merely and illegally stopped registering. So the whole time
• 1:00:24
  Speaker 1: Biden was president, his son was lobbying on behalf of
• 1:00:29
  Speaker 1: businesses that were designed to spy on US interests from
• 1:00:35
  Speaker 1: inside the United States, and he wasn't registered, so the
• 1:00:40
  Speaker 1: federal government didn't get the information they needed in order
• 1:00:43
  Speaker 1: to prevent that espionage. He violated lobbying laws by assuring
• 1:00:49
  Speaker 1: Randy Russell of his unregistered and therefore illegal back channels
• 1:00:54
  Speaker 1: to the CCP. I just had dinner with it. The
• 1:00:57
  Speaker 1: Chinese Deputy Chief of Mission Dang Hongbo here in DC,
• 1:01:05
  Speaker 1: and we've developed a little bit of a relationship. So
• 1:01:08
  Speaker 1: once the visa is Isshoe I can contact him directly.
• 1:01:11
  Speaker 1: But before Hunter pulled out the big guns, he offered
• 1:01:13
  Speaker 1: to advocate on Russell's behalf to John Carrey's aide de
• 1:01:17
  Speaker 1: camp David Wade and or someone in Joe's entourage. Should
• 1:01:22
  Speaker 1: I have someone from jrb's office wagh in or is
• 1:01:26
  Speaker 1: that overkill? And or should I send email or call
• 1:01:29
  Speaker 1: personally and willing, ready able to do all of the
• 1:01:34
  Speaker 1: above or none of the above at your direction? How
• 1:01:37
  Speaker 1: about David Wade on Carrie's staff. Hunter spoke with Yang
• 1:01:43
  Speaker 1: Jiechi of the CCP's top foreign minister and pull it
• 1:01:49
  Speaker 1: Burrow member the CCP's most powerful decision making body, and
• 1:01:53
  Speaker 1: we have again here's the These are the actual emails.
• 1:01:57
  Speaker 1: You can't really read this probably on your on your
• 1:02:00
  Speaker 1: YouTube screen. But again there is a link in the
• 1:02:04
  Speaker 1: low bar to this report. It should be the top
• 1:02:08
  Speaker 1: link in the list of links in the low bar,
• 1:02:10
  Speaker 1: so you can see. Yes, Quantum Cat seventy six a
• 1:02:14
  Speaker 1: Toyota's similar to what I was referring to. There was
• 1:02:18
  Speaker 1: an incident where a radio station advertised that they were
• 1:02:23
  Speaker 1: giving away a Toyota, and all the advertisements were played
• 1:02:28
  Speaker 1: on the radio station. There was nothing in writing, nothing
• 1:02:31
  Speaker 1: in pictures, so it was all verbal. Everybody heard the
• 1:02:36
  Speaker 1: way they said it. Everybody heard toyota like a car.
• 1:02:40
  Speaker 1: And then the woman who won, they gave her a
• 1:02:45
  Speaker 1: Yoda figurine that was a toy and she sued and
• 1:02:51
  Speaker 1: she won and they had to give her the car.
• 1:03:01
  Speaker 1: There we go, this is so slow. I don't understand
• 1:03:05
  Speaker 1: that because this computer is actually pretty fast with everything
• 1:03:07
  Speaker 1: else but going on, and here's where you've got the
• 1:03:17
  Speaker 1: influence pedaling. And then you also have some of the
• 1:03:19
  Speaker 1: shady stuff that we're not going over, the illicit stuff
• 1:03:24
  Speaker 1: that also can be blackmail material. So I will point
• 1:03:28
  Speaker 1: that out. There is a reason why Marco Polo went
• 1:03:31
  Speaker 1: into it. It's just I really don't I really don't
• 1:03:34
  Speaker 1: want to do that. But a flamboyant online an Indian
• 1:03:38
  Speaker 1: gambling industry huckster named Gary Fears finagled Hutter and Archer
• 1:03:43
  Speaker 1: to join him as an unregistered agent for China Entrepreneur Club.
• 1:03:48
  Speaker 1: China Entrepreneur Club had the reputation of being a second
• 1:03:51
  Speaker 1: Foreign Ministry for the CCP, and the group brought nearly
• 1:03:58
  Speaker 1: thirty billionaires to the White House. On built thirty billionaires,
• 1:04:03
  Speaker 1: that's crazy. On eleven fourteen, twenty eleven, Naiva has Lived said,
• 1:04:09
  Speaker 1: it's in your PC slowing you down China. No, you
• 1:04:15
  Speaker 1: can't see it because it's at the very bottom of
• 1:04:17
  Speaker 1: the page. But this report we're looking at a few
• 1:04:22
  Speaker 1: pages of a six hundred and forty four page PDF report,
• 1:04:28
  Speaker 1: a file that I'm accessing online. It's because it it
• 1:04:35
  Speaker 1: doesn't download properly, so it's probably that's probably why it's
• 1:04:42
  Speaker 1: slowing my computer down. And we're only going to have
• 1:04:46
  Speaker 1: maybe one more, maybe two more shows at tops that
• 1:04:50
  Speaker 1: I'm going to even need this because once we get
• 1:04:53
  Speaker 1: through like that, my main interests on this are China
• 1:04:57
  Speaker 1: and Ukraine. What's what what he did has done in
• 1:05:00
  Speaker 1: China and Ukraine, and the Chinese end of it is
• 1:05:04
  Speaker 1: there's a specific reason for that. I might actually jump
• 1:05:10
  Speaker 1: to that if I have it open here. But we've
• 1:05:21
  Speaker 1: heard a lot about the Ukraine conflict as a conflict
• 1:05:25
  Speaker 1: between Ukraine and Russia that the United States is interfering in,
• 1:05:33
  Speaker 1: but it's actually a conflict between Ukraine and Russia and
• 1:05:37
  Speaker 1: the United States and China and every way that we're
• 1:05:42
  Speaker 1: interfering in Ukraine. China is being a little more sneaky
• 1:05:46
  Speaker 1: about it, but they're interfering on Russia side. And I
• 1:05:49
  Speaker 1: do have a government source for that. I think it's
• 1:05:53
  Speaker 1: this one. Yeah. Today, Chinese officials have been publicly have
• 1:05:59
  Speaker 1: publicly denied providing any lethal assistance to Russia. However, don't
• 1:06:06
  Speaker 1: you love However, However, as Beijing deliberates the scale and
• 1:06:14
  Speaker 1: scope of material commitments, it probably will seek to balance
• 1:06:17
  Speaker 1: its strategic partnership with Russia while avoiding reputational and economic
• 1:06:21
  Speaker 1: costs that could result from its assistance Russia. Customs data
• 1:06:25
  Speaker 1: revealed that Chinese companies, including state owned companies under the
• 1:06:29
  Speaker 1: purview of Beijing, has sold civilian, dual use and some
• 1:06:34
  Speaker 1: minor military items to Russian military end users, such as
• 1:06:39
  Speaker 1: small arms, spare parts, navigation equipment, and protective gear. China's
• 1:06:47
  Speaker 1: expansive and unregulated commercial drone market has allowed Russian defense
• 1:06:52
  Speaker 1: forces to routinely acquire small drones and dual use unmanned
• 1:06:55
  Speaker 1: aerial vehicles to support their war in Ukraine. Between March
• 1:07:01
  Speaker 1: twenty twenty two and twenty twenty three, Chinese firms exported
• 1:07:05
  Speaker 1: more than twelve million dollars worth of drones and drone
• 1:07:08
  Speaker 1: component components to Russia. Chinese organ drones have been employed
• 1:07:12
  Speaker 1: by Russian forces for targeting, surveillance, and strike missions in Ukraine.
• 1:07:17
  Speaker 1: In August twenty twenty three, Beijing announced that it would
• 1:07:20
  Speaker 1: implement its first controls on civilian and dual use drone market,
• 1:07:23
  Speaker 1: as well as the sale of civilian use counter UAV systems,
• 1:07:27
  Speaker 1: in response to international speculation over Chinese drones use in
• 1:07:33
  Speaker 1: Russia's war of aggression in Ukraine. So now they're saying, well,
• 1:07:36
  Speaker 1: now that it's starting to wind down, we're gonna do
• 1:07:42
  Speaker 1: something about this, But they allowed it to continue the
• 1:07:46
  Speaker 1: whole time things weren't slowing down. So they're not neutral,
• 1:07:52
  Speaker 1: and they are on the other side from us. Our
• 1:07:58
  Speaker 1: administration that was was in office the last four years
• 1:08:01
  Speaker 1: put us on the Ukraine side of the Ukraine Russia conflict.
• 1:08:05
  Speaker 1: China has been on the Russia side. So the risk
• 1:08:09
  Speaker 1: that we've been talking about of this turning into a
• 1:08:14
  Speaker 1: world war where there's a hot war going between not
• 1:08:19
  Speaker 1: just Ukraine in Russia, but the United States and Russia
• 1:08:22
  Speaker 1: openly where our boys get sent over that that actually
• 1:08:29
  Speaker 1: could extend to China. And that's three superpowers with nukes
• 1:08:36
  Speaker 1: pointed at each other that could get involved in a war.
• 1:08:41
  Speaker 1: So it's not a minor thing that their influence pedaling
• 1:08:45
  Speaker 1: in China. It's not a minor thing that they've got
• 1:08:48
  Speaker 1: direct involvement with a CCP. It's not a minor thing
• 1:08:51
  Speaker 1: that they're engaging in unregistered lobbying, violating PARAH and hiding
• 1:08:59
  Speaker 1: important ination that say, our Defense department might need to
• 1:09:04
  Speaker 1: know is happening. And it wasn't just that one situation,
• 1:09:19
  Speaker 1: right for crying out loud, that's not going to stop
• 1:09:25
  Speaker 1: bo High Harvest rst BHR Chinese backed fund that Hunter
• 1:09:33
  Speaker 1: helped form. So this wasn't just oh, well, you know,
• 1:09:37
  Speaker 1: you want to do business or you gotta do business
• 1:09:39
  Speaker 1: in China. No, this is something that he actually helped
• 1:09:41
  Speaker 1: make has the potential to be perhaps the biggest payoff
• 1:09:46
  Speaker 1: for the BIDENCE. Although his former lawyer Chris Clark repeatedly
• 1:09:50
  Speaker 1: assured the press that Hunter did not either directly or
• 1:09:53
  Speaker 1: indirectly own a portion of BHR, multiple sources showed his
• 1:09:57
  Speaker 1: latest twenty twenty two that a shell company Hunter controlled
• 1:10:02
  Speaker 1: I don't even know how I can pronounce it. Scan eight, scannatles,
• 1:10:08
  Speaker 1: I don't know, skinnatalysts, Like, what the fuck is there?
• 1:10:13
  Speaker 1: Companies something like that.
• 1:10:15
  Speaker 4: Dad's weird. That's a first for me.
• 1:10:17
  Speaker 1: Yeah, it sounds like the kind of thing that dad,
• 1:10:21
  Speaker 1: trying to be funny, would come up with as a
• 1:10:23
  Speaker 1: nickname for his daughter to piss her off. Hey, come
• 1:10:27
  Speaker 1: over and sit on the couch. You get some popcorn. Scanatalysts,
• 1:10:29
  Speaker 1: We're gonna watch this movie. Still on ten percent of
• 1:10:36
  Speaker 1: the funt. In other words, it was reasonable to conclude
• 1:10:38
  Speaker 1: that Hunter had not divested from BHR. In April twenty
• 1:10:42
  Speaker 1: twenty three, it was finally revealed a Hunter transferred ownership
• 1:10:45
  Speaker 1: of Scanatalysts LLC to his sugar brother Kevin Morris for
• 1:10:50
  Speaker 1: the cost of its outstanding debt one hundred and fifty
• 1:10:55
  Speaker 1: seven thousand dollars. BHR not not by mirror conjecture presumption,
• 1:11:01
  Speaker 1: but as a matter of public record and governmental financial data,
• 1:11:04
  Speaker 1: is an organ of the Chinese state. Right, So, just
• 1:11:15
  Speaker 1: just to reiterate here, BHR a state backed a Chinese
• 1:11:24
  Speaker 1: state backed fund that Hunter helped form. Go down here
• 1:11:29
  Speaker 1: again is an organ of the Chinese state, More than
• 1:11:37
  Speaker 1: a controlling portion of its shares are owned by elites
• 1:11:40
  Speaker 1: under the purview of the CCP's Ministry of Finance, and
• 1:11:44
  Speaker 1: in its most critical deals, BHR has partnered with state
• 1:11:47
  Speaker 1: owned enterprises. In fact, the funds had Honcho explicitly stated
• 1:11:52
  Speaker 1: as much and bragged about it. Hunter Biden helped form
• 1:12:02
  Speaker 1: a business entity that has has essentially become an activist
• 1:12:16
  Speaker 1: arm of the Chinese state. Li Xiang Singh, CEO of BHR,
• 1:12:24
  Speaker 1: told local media that the fund's government strong government background
• 1:12:28
  Speaker 1: would allow it to do super big investments, saying the
• 1:12:30
  Speaker 1: fund could take loans from its shareholders such as China
• 1:12:35
  Speaker 1: Development Bank and Bank of China to complete transactions in
• 1:12:40
  Speaker 1: US media and there we go. I hate when I
• 1:12:48
  Speaker 1: move this and then I can't see where it was
• 1:12:52
  Speaker 1: in US media. The ostensible mission of BHR is to
• 1:12:56
  Speaker 1: facilitate cross border transactions, but this vanilla description was purposely obscure. Rather,
• 1:13:01
  Speaker 1: BHR has repeatedly acquired sensitive technologies that the CCP sought. Again,
• 1:13:10
  Speaker 1: BHR does not hide this fact, and a revelatory interview
• 1:13:15
  Speaker 1: with Lee and Wang Jen on bhr's own website testified
• 1:13:19
  Speaker 1: to this imperialistic economic mission. Lynn jen Lang. Michael and
• 1:13:27
  Speaker 1: Hunter have been partners for over a decade under the
• 1:13:30
  Speaker 1: watchful eye of the aforementioned Bulger, and Linn helped facilitate BHR.
• 1:13:37
  Speaker 1: So remember Bulger was the relative of Whitey Bulger, who
• 1:13:43
  Speaker 1: is directly connected to the mafia. So there's a connection
• 1:13:48
  Speaker 1: there between the CCP, the Bafia and the mafia. And
• 1:13:55
  Speaker 1: the connection is actually selling uh, sensitive technologies. When they
• 1:14:01
  Speaker 1: say sensitive technologies, we're talking about technologies the government uses
• 1:14:06
  Speaker 1: in the United States that we don't want foreign powers
• 1:14:12
  Speaker 1: to also have or know how they work, or understand
• 1:14:17
  Speaker 1: them fully. In other words, this is espionage. So so
• 1:14:25
  Speaker 1: go back again. We were looking at that whole apex fallacy,
• 1:14:28
  Speaker 1: right and the the discussion about Hunter Biden being pardoned
• 1:14:35
  Speaker 1: for a minor crime that you know it's not fair
• 1:14:41
  Speaker 1: because regular men would not get a pardon for that
• 1:14:45
  Speaker 1: minor crime. Well, this is not a minor crime. Espionage
• 1:14:50
  Speaker 1: is not a minor crime. But this is within that
• 1:14:54
  Speaker 1: ten year span, so or it's it's beyond some statute
• 1:15:01
  Speaker 1: of limitations. And I'm thinking that ten year span covers
• 1:15:05
  Speaker 1: a lot of things that may have been going on
• 1:15:09
  Speaker 1: before that ten year started. A ten year time span started,
• 1:15:13
  Speaker 1: but before ten years or longer than ten years ago
• 1:15:17
  Speaker 1: at anything that was done may not be prosecutable because
• 1:15:21
  Speaker 1: of a statute of limitations. Now we have some little
• 1:15:37
  Speaker 1: mafia bits and pieces here. This is mafia tastic tactics
• 1:15:41
  Speaker 1: or CCP tactics or Washington DC Crime Syndicate tactics. Right
• 1:15:50
  Speaker 1: before getting on the bad side of Xixiping Xi Xingping
• 1:15:55
  Speaker 1: and disappearing in June twenty fifteen, disappearing, Chifang, known as
• 1:16:03
  Speaker 1: known to Hunter as the super Chairman, served as the
• 1:16:05
  Speaker 1: ringleader who promised funding and facilitated introductions to state supported
• 1:16:10
  Speaker 1: financial firms who eventually backed BHR. So it kind of
• 1:16:14
  Speaker 1: comes full circle. We were talking before about the Biden
• 1:16:19
  Speaker 1: influence pedaling in Ukraine, and we've kind of talked about
• 1:16:23
  Speaker 1: the Ukraine China connection in that China is quietly or
• 1:16:31
  Speaker 1: has been quietly sending tools to Russia for fighting in
• 1:16:39
  Speaker 1: the conflict and pretending that it's an accident or something
• 1:16:45
  Speaker 1: that regulations need to be passed to prevent and so on,
• 1:16:49
  Speaker 1: but they're not having passed those regulations. But yeah, here
• 1:16:56
  Speaker 1: we have a company that is essentially being used for
• 1:17:02
  Speaker 1: the purpose of facilitating these types of business deals and
• 1:17:07
  Speaker 1: for spying on the US. So the son of the
• 1:17:11
  Speaker 1: President of the United States was working with a CCP
• 1:17:16
  Speaker 1: backed company that was only here to spy on US technology. Yeah,
• 1:17:28
  Speaker 1: good to go to the next page. A lot of
• 1:17:37
  Speaker 1: what's on this page is just going to be receipts.
• 1:17:40
  Speaker 1: There's a little bit more to point out here this confirmation.
• 1:17:45
  Speaker 1: Hunter's emails confirmed that he has lied to various media
• 1:17:48
  Speaker 1: outlets about the timeline and chain of events surrounding BHR,
• 1:17:52
  Speaker 1: from the date he was introduced to the CCP supported
• 1:17:55
  Speaker 1: proxies to when crucial agreements were signed. Hunter was so
• 1:17:58
  Speaker 1: enthusiastic about working with Lee Jonathan that April twenty eleven,
• 1:18:03
  Speaker 1: more than two years before BHR was put in Shanghai's
• 1:18:06
  Speaker 1: business registry, he gushed to Lee, you're the best. Just
• 1:18:10
  Speaker 1: give me my marching orders, and he orchestrated a meeting
• 1:18:21
  Speaker 1: between Joe Biden and Lee Jonathan in Joe's hotel when
• 1:18:27
  Speaker 1: Hunter tagged along with Joe to China in December twenty
• 1:18:30
  Speaker 1: thirteen on Air Force two. And as you can see,
• 1:18:34
  Speaker 1: here's again their receipts. There's emails picture of Hunter with
• 1:18:42
  Speaker 1: the men involved right now. This is where it gets
• 1:18:47
  Speaker 1: weird in terms of the layout and design here. I
• 1:18:56
  Speaker 1: think I've got that wrong. Now, yeah, it a lot
• 1:19:02
  Speaker 1: of this is in line in the middle here. There
• 1:19:07
  Speaker 1: seem to be some headings missing unless I'm misunderstanding something.
• 1:19:12
  Speaker 1: But we have a bit of all. I looked at
• 1:19:22
  Speaker 1: this before there was a separate heading. It's not this
• 1:19:27
  Speaker 1: at the bottom where it says business related crimes. But
• 1:19:31
  Speaker 1: they were still talking about the same company here. So again,
• 1:19:35
  Speaker 1: more further receipts. I'm gonna make this larger again because
• 1:19:40
  Speaker 1: it's hard for me to see and read when the
• 1:19:45
  Speaker 1: print is that small. So we go back to Devon
• 1:19:51
  Speaker 1: Archer here, who would become the vice chairman of the fund.
• 1:19:58
  Speaker 1: So it wasn't just involved in the Risthmus stuff. He's
• 1:20:01
  Speaker 1: also involved in this surprise, surprise, serious opportunity was a
• 1:20:06
  Speaker 1: serious opportunity not only on its own merits but from
• 1:20:11
  Speaker 1: an economics standpoint, but from the leverage it access in
• 1:20:16
  Speaker 1: access it provides with the big boys here in the
• 1:20:20
  Speaker 1: West who all need China, from Tiger to Blackstone to Carlisle,
• 1:20:27
  Speaker 1: et cetera. So this is a description of how they're
• 1:20:31
  Speaker 1: going to engage in influence pedaling using this company, and
• 1:20:35
  Speaker 1: here's the communication. Hunter agreed, and after seeing she's proposed
• 1:20:43
  Speaker 1: term sheet, he elatedly wrote to Archer. Bottom line is
• 1:20:47
  Speaker 1: if I slash you and me get around seven percent
• 1:20:51
  Speaker 1: of this fund, it could be in many ways, the
• 1:20:54
  Speaker 1: end all be all. I don't believe in lottery tickets anymore,
• 1:20:58
  Speaker 1: but I do believe in the super chairman. So they
• 1:21:02
  Speaker 1: were treating this as their meal ticket. If we were
• 1:21:07
  Speaker 1: twenty percent owners of a CIC China Investment Corporation superchairman backfund,
• 1:21:12
  Speaker 1: I think the sky's the limit, Hunter continued gushing to
• 1:21:16
  Speaker 1: Archer and compared him to a third Reich model. Your question,
• 1:21:21
  Speaker 1: why does super chairman love me so much? Is easily answered.
• 1:21:24
  Speaker 1: It has nothing to do with me and everything to
• 1:21:26
  Speaker 1: do with my last name. And I bring a long,
• 1:21:29
  Speaker 1: very handsome area in godlike men wherever I go. But
• 1:21:35
  Speaker 1: the important part of that, it has nothing to do
• 1:21:39
  Speaker 1: with me and everything to do with my last name.
• 1:21:43
  Speaker 1: Right there is where the influencing, influence, pedaling admission is
• 1:21:50
  Speaker 1: And here is the communication again. So let's see if
• 1:22:05
  Speaker 1: I have this in the right spot, we're gonna skip
• 1:22:11
  Speaker 1: Romania somewhere China. So, according to oversight, dot House dot
• 1:22:19
  Speaker 1: gov the timeline of Biden influence pedaling. I'm gonna try
• 1:22:30
  Speaker 1: increasing the size of this and see what happens. Okay,
• 1:22:32
  Speaker 1: it does reformat. That's good. China CEFC on March one,
• 1:22:39
  Speaker 1: twenty seventeen, less than two months after Vice President Joe
• 1:22:41
  Speaker 1: Biden left public office State Energy HK Limited, Chinese Company
• 1:22:47
  Speaker 1: wired three million to a Biden associates account. This is
• 1:22:52
  Speaker 1: the same bank account used in the above Romania section.
• 1:22:56
  Speaker 1: After Chinese company wired, the Chinese company wired Biden's associate
• 1:23:02
  Speaker 1: account three million dollars. The Biden family received approximately one million,
• 1:23:07
  Speaker 1: sixty five thousand, nine or six hundred ninety two over
• 1:23:11
  Speaker 1: a three month period in different bank accounts. Additionally, the
• 1:23:16
  Speaker 1: CEFC chairman gives Hunter Biden a diamond worth eighty thousand dollars. Lastly,
• 1:23:21
  Speaker 1: CFC creates a joint venture with the Bidens in the
• 1:23:23
  Speaker 1: summer of twenty seventeen. Timeline lays out the WhatsApp messages
• 1:23:27
  Speaker 1: and subsequent wires from the Chinese to the Bidens of
• 1:23:32
  Speaker 1: one hundred thousand dollars and five million dollars total amount
• 1:23:35
  Speaker 1: from China, specifically with CEFC and their related entities to
• 1:23:40
  Speaker 1: the Biden family and their associates. That's over eight million.
• 1:23:56
  Speaker 1: It froze. There we go, and I think, there we go.
• 1:24:04
  Speaker 1: That's so slow. Yeah, we'll go through this. She the
• 1:24:19
  Speaker 1: son in law of former People's Bank of China governor
• 1:24:23
  Speaker 1: Die Xianglong, had shamelessly wined and dined Hunter and alcoholic
• 1:24:27
  Speaker 1: in Hunter's colleagues at the Four Seasons in Hong Kong. Remember,
• 1:24:31
  Speaker 1: according to Hunter himself, She's courtship had and generosity had
• 1:24:34
  Speaker 1: everything to do with the Biden's surname. Lynn, who had
• 1:24:38
  Speaker 1: been integrating himself with sinophilic American officials and political operatives
• 1:24:43
  Speaker 1: alongside Bulger for a decade, nonchalantly told Hunter when Secret
• 1:24:48
  Speaker 1: Service wish to call to check things, as they always do,
• 1:24:53
  Speaker 1: please make sure they call Lee, Jonathan or me. Whitey,
• 1:25:00
  Speaker 1: Bulger's nephew, wanted to keep the fund hush hush until
• 1:25:03
  Speaker 1: a formal agreement was signed. Please remember that I've not
• 1:25:06
  Speaker 1: informed anyone in my office about the reason for my
• 1:25:08
  Speaker 1: trip to Hong Kong last week. I wanted to I
• 1:25:12
  Speaker 1: want to keep this effort quiet until we have a contract.
• 1:25:15
  Speaker 1: Hunter lied about not owning equity in BHR until Joe
• 1:25:19
  Speaker 1: was done with the Vice presidency. Additionally, Bulger and Hunter's
• 1:25:23
  Speaker 1: effort required zero wenty down from Hunter. His attorney, Ken
• 1:25:28
  Speaker 1: Levinson explained it in an email from April twenty sixteen,
• 1:25:34
  Speaker 1: three thousand or three hundred and sixty one thousand, one
• 1:25:37
  Speaker 1: hundred and sixty eight dollars payoff down of Devon's loan
• 1:25:41
  Speaker 1: two Hunter's investment in BHR and and of course we
• 1:25:44
  Speaker 1: have the communications again and as you can see it,
• 1:25:51
  Speaker 1: like all of that discussion about the who's who and
• 1:25:57
  Speaker 1: the separate entities and organizations involved, we are looking at
• 1:26:02
  Speaker 1: how they intermeshed for this influencing, influence, pedaling, and espionage.
• 1:26:16
  Speaker 1: We could go through and basically continued discussing this particular
• 1:26:26
  Speaker 1: this particular company and everything that happened with it. I
• 1:26:31
  Speaker 1: am going to point out everything in this report is
• 1:26:36
  Speaker 1: backed by receipts, and I'm not going to go over
• 1:26:41
  Speaker 1: every little thing, but i will point out a few
• 1:26:43
  Speaker 1: details here. So let's see if I can increase the
• 1:26:48
  Speaker 1: size of this again a lot. There we go. So
• 1:26:55
  Speaker 1: there was a global network created in which under Biden
• 1:27:00
  Speaker 1: acted kind of as a hub a you know four
• 1:27:05
  Speaker 1: between the Americans and Chinese. You had again some of
• 1:27:12
  Speaker 1: the same faces involved in in uh burgisma and other crimes,
• 1:27:20
  Speaker 1: other money laundering crimes, other influenced petting, pedaling crimes. Right,
• 1:27:26
  Speaker 1: And then you have them getting involved with people who
• 1:27:31
  Speaker 1: were movers and shakers in the CECCP. Here are the
• 1:27:37
  Speaker 1: communications again come on screen, move and a print is
• 1:27:47
  Speaker 1: going to be tiny, so we're not going to try
• 1:27:49
  Speaker 1: to read that. So now we're to the point where, well,
• 1:27:59
  Speaker 1: that minor crime, right, having a gun that he shouldn't have,
• 1:28:03
  Speaker 1: that he didn't actually use to kill anybody, has just
• 1:28:06
  Speaker 1: been expanded into not just money laundering, right, not just influencing,
• 1:28:12
  Speaker 1: influence pedaling, but facilitating espionage. And this goes back to
• 1:28:26
  Speaker 1: twenty ten, but there are things that occurred before that.
• 1:28:31
  Speaker 1: So we have the grooming process starting before twenty ten
• 1:28:35
  Speaker 1: culminating in December twenty thirteen. But let's see the involvement
• 1:28:46
  Speaker 1: of Dan Burnell. So the Chinese rolled out the red
• 1:28:50
  Speaker 1: carpet not only for Hunter, but also for the CEO
• 1:28:52
  Speaker 1: of Rosemont Realty, another one of the Bidenshell companies on
• 1:28:57
  Speaker 1: whose board sat whose advisory Hunter sat. Dan Burnell for
• 1:29:02
  Speaker 1: his connections to American princelings was given special treatment and
• 1:29:07
  Speaker 1: a flowery photo op photo op. Another two thousand and
• 1:29:11
  Speaker 1: four Carrey presidential campaign alumnus and Yale graduate Burnell facilitated
• 1:29:16
  Speaker 1: the large commercial in real estate firms pump and dump
• 1:29:19
  Speaker 1: sale to the Chinese SOE linked Gemini worked closely with
• 1:29:26
  Speaker 1: Archer Devin Archer to court foreign cash. In fact, over
• 1:29:30
  Speaker 1: two hundred million poured in from the wife of the
• 1:29:32
  Speaker 1: former mayor of Moscow and the sale of Rosemont realty
• 1:29:39
  Speaker 1: to Gemini provided hundreds of thousands dollars to Hunter and
• 1:29:43
  Speaker 1: millions to Burrell, who is also a divorcee and said
• 1:29:47
  Speaker 1: to have repeatedly indulged in cocaine and prostitute vengeince. So
• 1:29:50
  Speaker 1: they have the same kind of vices that can be
• 1:29:55
  Speaker 1: used by foreign agents, both to court them and blackmail them.
• 1:30:02
  Speaker 1: But interestingly, there's that connection to John Kerry. So we're
• 1:30:07
  Speaker 1: going back to another situation where you see that Venn
• 1:30:12
  Speaker 1: diagram and there's that overlap between the DC crime Syndicate,
• 1:30:19
  Speaker 1: the Bafia and the mafia and Hunter Biden is the
• 1:30:25
  Speaker 1: intersection between the three circles. So I'm gonna scroll here
• 1:30:39
  Speaker 1: a little bit. This goes on. There is one, two, three, four, six,
• 1:30:55
  Speaker 1: and I believe there's another set here eight, and I
• 1:30:59
  Speaker 1: think it's I think the next page starts a new Nope,
• 1:31:03
  Speaker 1: it continues. Yeah, so like nine pages of evidence in
• 1:31:09
  Speaker 1: regards to this. So we're not going to go over
• 1:31:12
  Speaker 1: every aspect of this in detail. We're not going to
• 1:31:14
  Speaker 1: crawl up the butts of it. But what what the gist.
• 1:31:17
  Speaker 1: We got the gist of it from the beginning, right,
• 1:31:21
  Speaker 1: what the gist of this is. And we're not going
• 1:31:23
  Speaker 1: to read about the Chinese energy company because that's just
• 1:31:28
  Speaker 1: related to this is the son of the President of
• 1:31:33
  Speaker 1: the United States using connections using his father's name to
• 1:31:40
  Speaker 1: make connections in China that ultimately resulted in him facilitating
• 1:31:45
  Speaker 1: Chinese espionage in the United States for profit. You know.
• 1:31:51
  Speaker 1: But it's just just a handgun, guys, just a handgun,
• 1:31:55
  Speaker 1: nothing to be worried about. And of course you're not
• 1:31:59
  Speaker 1: in danger, your kids are not in danger. You're you know,
• 1:32:04
  Speaker 1: we don't have to worry that this is going to
• 1:32:06
  Speaker 1: result in some sort of weakening of the United States
• 1:32:10
  Speaker 1: defense capabilities or anything like that. Your kids get drafted
• 1:32:16
  Speaker 1: because we're in the middle of a conflict with Russia
• 1:32:21
  Speaker 1: in Ukraine and we have suddenly pissed off Russia and Chinese.
• 1:32:27
  Speaker 1: The Chinese government enough that it's escalated into a hot
• 1:32:30
  Speaker 1: war with US. Has nothing to do with this, right,
• 1:32:33
  Speaker 1: nothing to do at all. We get back to this
• 1:32:45
  Speaker 1: is the thing. I think this is one that I
• 1:32:51
  Speaker 1: opened and intended to actually close back up again. But yeah,
• 1:32:56
  Speaker 1: because that was just about the Cobalt mind. I mean,
• 1:32:59
  Speaker 1: it was still criminal, it was still him violating Sarah,
• 1:33:05
  Speaker 1: which by the way, was criminally prosecuted when a Trump
• 1:33:12
  Speaker 1: advisor did it or was accused of doing it. And
• 1:33:23
  Speaker 1: I think this article is one that we went over
• 1:33:25
  Speaker 1: before as well hunter Biden's web of interests. So I'm
• 1:33:34
  Speaker 1: not going to try to get into it. And I
• 1:33:40
  Speaker 1: think we just looked at that. So the next step,
• 1:33:46
  Speaker 1: and I may make this a really short show tonight
• 1:33:50
  Speaker 1: just because I don't want to get started on the
• 1:33:53
  Speaker 1: Ukraine stuff. We have the Chinese Ukraine connection, and that
• 1:33:58
  Speaker 1: China has been arming Russia in small ways that can
• 1:34:05
  Speaker 1: be proved. For everything that they're doing that can be proved,
• 1:34:09
  Speaker 1: there are things they're doing that cannot be proved, right,
• 1:34:14
  Speaker 1: So we're going to get into the Ukraine stuff next week.
• 1:34:18
  Speaker 1: But what I want to talk about in regard to this,
• 1:34:22
  Speaker 1: I've had a couple of people suggest that it's just
• 1:34:25
  Speaker 1: getting political for the sake of politics. So on the
• 1:34:31
  Speaker 1: twentieth Honey Badger Radio has a group of us going
• 1:34:37
  Speaker 1: to the inauguration to talk to people. One of the
• 1:34:40
  Speaker 1: things that I want to see is what issues were
• 1:34:43
  Speaker 1: the deciding factor in the election that people we're going
• 1:34:47
  Speaker 1: to be talking to people who didn't get tickets that
• 1:34:50
  Speaker 1: are in the common areas where you can go and
• 1:34:54
  Speaker 1: listen to the inauguration. You won't be able to see much,
• 1:34:57
  Speaker 1: but just be there and show your support and stuff,
• 1:35:00
  Speaker 1: and those are those are the people that are going
• 1:35:01
  Speaker 1: to have access to and the people that were going
• 1:35:03
  Speaker 1: to talk to. And in my opinion, those are the
• 1:35:04
  Speaker 1: people that we should be talking to because the majority
• 1:35:07
  Speaker 1: of the country are those people. But I want to
• 1:35:11
  Speaker 1: find out because I think, you know, one of the
• 1:35:15
  Speaker 1: major deciding factors in this last election was just how
• 1:35:21
  Speaker 1: big of a looming threat World War was. And I
• 1:35:27
  Speaker 1: think that all of this the influence pedaling, the playing
• 1:35:36
  Speaker 1: with fire back and forth between you know, doing doing
• 1:35:41
  Speaker 1: financial business with China that openly allowed Chinese espionage to
• 1:35:47
  Speaker 1: happen as a result of the business they were doing,
• 1:35:51
  Speaker 1: and and you know, the dealing with corruption in Ukraine well,
• 1:36:00
  Speaker 1: alleging corruption in Ukraine. The decisions Biden made with regard
• 1:36:07
  Speaker 1: to the Ukraine War and everything I think was designed
• 1:36:10
  Speaker 1: actually to get us into a war, and it is
• 1:36:13
  Speaker 1: still alluming threat. I'm hoping that, like he did before,
• 1:36:19
  Speaker 1: President Trump can cool things down because I don't know
• 1:36:22
  Speaker 1: about you other parents, but I don't want my kids
• 1:36:25
  Speaker 1: involved in a war. I don't want my son to
• 1:36:27
  Speaker 1: get drafted, you know, and I don't want obviously my
• 1:36:33
  Speaker 1: daughters can't get drafted right now, but if that changes,
• 1:36:35
  Speaker 1: I don't want them to be eligible for a draft either.
• 1:36:38
  Speaker 1: I don't want my friends' kids that are in the
• 1:36:41
  Speaker 1: military to be sent to fight in Ukraine. And I
• 1:36:44
  Speaker 1: don't want to see what will happen if we suddenly
• 1:36:49
  Speaker 1: are at war with two nuclear powers. I don't want
• 1:36:54
  Speaker 1: to find that out. So I hope. Like the thing
• 1:37:00
  Speaker 1: it really sucks is, you know, even for those of
• 1:37:02
  Speaker 1: us that like Trump, you can't guarantee that everything's gonna
• 1:37:05
  Speaker 1: be okay because he's in office now. It's not like
• 1:37:07
  Speaker 1: you remember. I don't know if you remember the people
• 1:37:09
  Speaker 1: singing hymns to Obama and the one lady going, oh,
• 1:37:13
  Speaker 1: it's so wonderful. Pably gonnact it. I ain't gonna have
• 1:37:16
  Speaker 1: to pay my rent no more. None of us are
• 1:37:19
  Speaker 1: like that. I don't think any of us are like
• 1:37:21
  Speaker 1: that in terms of our you know, following the guy
• 1:37:24
  Speaker 1: and believing in him and everything. It's just a matter
• 1:37:27
  Speaker 1: of hope. I hope he makes the right decisions. I
• 1:37:30
  Speaker 1: hope other foreign leaders have the right reactions. I hope
• 1:37:34
  Speaker 1: it cools down the situation and allows for us to
• 1:37:36
  Speaker 1: go in a completely different direction as a world population. Right.
• 1:37:42
  Speaker 1: But I want to see what other people think. I
• 1:37:44
  Speaker 1: want to see what, you know, what other people that
• 1:37:48
  Speaker 1: are going to be there for the inauguration. I think,
• 1:37:52
  Speaker 1: you know, is is that what they were voting on?
• 1:37:54
  Speaker 1: Or was it economic? Was it because they're anti abortion?
• 1:37:58
  Speaker 1: Was it you know, some some single issue or some
• 1:38:01
  Speaker 1: set of issues. Because I have a feeling we're gonna
• 1:38:05
  Speaker 1: see a lot of people mention the military conflicts and
• 1:38:09
  Speaker 1: the corruption. But I it'll be interesting, you know, I
• 1:38:15
  Speaker 1: could be proven wrong, So I guess we'll find out.
• 1:38:24
  Speaker 1: But as for this, I don't know. I don't have
• 1:38:27
  Speaker 1: any super chats. Let me see if I got any
• 1:38:30
  Speaker 1: super chows. We don't have any superchows tonight either, Okay,
• 1:38:37
  Speaker 1: So I don't have anything else that I really want
• 1:38:40
  Speaker 1: to get into tonight. I don't know if you guys
• 1:38:43
  Speaker 1: had anything that you wanted to say about what we've
• 1:38:45
  Speaker 1: talked about so far. It seems like really dry and complicated.
• 1:38:48
  Speaker 1: But I don't think it is. You guys still there.
• 1:39:01
  Speaker 1: I think I've got everybody in head. No, actually I
• 1:39:09
  Speaker 1: hear what I hear is static that I could barely
• 1:39:13
  Speaker 1: tell that you're saying. Can you hear me?
• 1:39:15
  Speaker 4: Oh geez, they're about now Hello, Yes, I can't hear
• 1:39:18
  Speaker 4: you now.
• 1:39:19
  Speaker 1: Yeah.
• 1:39:20
  Speaker 4: No, I mean you're bringing up some very good things.
• 1:39:23
  Speaker 4: I just want to see them all in jail. I mean,
• 1:39:27
  Speaker 4: just you know, I I'm so perplexed by the whole
• 1:39:33
  Speaker 4: thing because it's you know, it's just cut and dry
• 1:39:38
  Speaker 4: in my eyes, you know what I mean. He doesn't
• 1:39:40
  Speaker 4: deserve to be pardoned. His ass deserves to be in
• 1:39:43
  Speaker 4: jail of all with so many of his friends, you know.
• 1:39:47
  Speaker 1: Oh yeah, I definitely see a complete lack of accountability
• 1:39:51
  Speaker 1: for the participants here, and that that does it is
• 1:39:54
  Speaker 1: galling right that they're they're getting away with it, and
• 1:39:58
  Speaker 1: they're getting away with it because of that pardon. We've
• 1:40:02
  Speaker 1: been ripped off, you and me, all of us that
• 1:40:06
  Speaker 1: pay taxes, and for you know, we're not the only
• 1:40:11
  Speaker 1: women in the United States that actually pay taxes. We're
• 1:40:15
  Speaker 1: just part of a few elite. Most taxpayers, most net
• 1:40:20
  Speaker 1: taxpayers are men. You guys have all been ripped off
• 1:40:23
  Speaker 1: bigger than we have. And it's an amazing situation to
• 1:40:29
  Speaker 1: see how just how unaccountable the rip off ripoff artists
• 1:40:35
  Speaker 1: are going to be. Mm So all right, well with that,
• 1:40:40
  Speaker 1: I think we are going to close out the show.
• 1:40:42
  Speaker 1: It's a short show tonight, but we'll be back on
• 1:40:47
  Speaker 1: Thursday after attending the inauguration with more. I may we
• 1:40:55
  Speaker 1: may focus on what we learned from people during the
• 1:40:59
  Speaker 1: inauguration with what their interests were, what they why they
• 1:41:03
  Speaker 1: voted for Trump, or if if they showed up to
• 1:41:05
  Speaker 1: see him get inaugurated but they didn't actually vote for him,
• 1:41:09
  Speaker 1: because I like people who were voting for Harris. A
• 1:41:11
  Speaker 1: lot of the women who were voting for Harris explicitly
• 1:41:14
  Speaker 1: said abortion was their only issue. So we'll see what
• 1:41:19
  Speaker 1: we find. If if there's not a lot of material
• 1:41:23
  Speaker 1: to go over and stuff with regard to that, then
• 1:41:26
  Speaker 1: we'll get back into this and we'll we'll get into Ukraine,
• 1:41:30
  Speaker 1: We'll get into the Ukraine War, We'll get out of
• 1:41:33
  Speaker 1: the Hunter Biden stuff, and a little bit more into
• 1:41:37
  Speaker 1: like the timeline of the war and the assistance the
• 1:41:40
  Speaker 1: United States has provided. Excuse me. And when we are
• 1:41:45
  Speaker 1: done talking about that, which we will be in February,
• 1:41:51
  Speaker 1: then then we've got we're going to go back in
• 1:41:54
  Speaker 1: time and we're actually going to talk about Iran. Let
• 1:41:59
  Speaker 1: me make sure I've got that right. Might be Iraq
• 1:42:01
  Speaker 1: that I found more information on, but let me see
• 1:42:08
  Speaker 1: here double checking. I've stored the news story links that
• 1:42:15
  Speaker 1: I want to actually look at for that in my
• 1:42:18
  Speaker 1: personal discord server. So yeah, it was Iran, and US
• 1:42:27
  Speaker 1: interference in Iran has led to quite a bit of
• 1:42:30
  Speaker 1: military conflict. So this isn't the first time what we're
• 1:42:37
  Speaker 1: seeing and talking about happening in Ukraine has been done
• 1:42:42
  Speaker 1: by the United States. This is the norm in US
• 1:42:48
  Speaker 1: government behavior toward other countries. So what we really ended,
• 1:42:52
  Speaker 1: ultimately what we'll end up talking about, we'll talk about
• 1:42:55
  Speaker 1: what was done in Iran, how it affected the relations
• 1:43:01
  Speaker 1: between our country and pretty much the entire Middle East,
• 1:43:05
  Speaker 1: and how much of world wars have been influenced by this,
• 1:43:11
  Speaker 1: you know, our wars around the world, because there there
• 1:43:14
  Speaker 1: are definitely some changes that need to be made toward
• 1:43:19
  Speaker 1: UH are in regard to the US military's activities, the
• 1:43:23
  Speaker 1: US intelligence agencies, and activities manipulating other countries population decisions,
• 1:43:32
  Speaker 1: their government changes, and so on that I don't know.
• 1:43:42
  Speaker 1: There's a lot of ship that has been done by
• 1:43:45
  Speaker 1: the government of the United States of America that is
• 1:43:48
  Speaker 1: in fact not just shady, but out and out corrupt.
• 1:43:57
  Speaker 1: Has led to millions of deaths, has led to war
• 1:44:04
  Speaker 1: and poverty in other countries that it just needs to stop.
• 1:44:10
  Speaker 1: And I think what has facilitated that is women voting
• 1:44:16
  Speaker 1: on one issue abortion for establishment politicians that promise to
• 1:44:23
  Speaker 1: protect it, who then go on to engage in espionage,
• 1:44:29
  Speaker 1: war mongering, manipulation of other countries, and profiteering and exploitation.
• 1:44:37
  Speaker 1: And that creates those those same women, if they do
• 1:44:40
  Speaker 1: have children that live, their children grow up to be
• 1:44:44
  Speaker 1: dragged into military conflicts, and a lot of them have
• 1:44:47
  Speaker 1: been permanently injured or died in war. Thanks moms, not mine,
• 1:44:58
  Speaker 1: though my mom voted in against candidates like that. So
• 1:45:03
  Speaker 1: we will get into that. Well, you know, the path
• 1:45:06
  Speaker 1: we're heading on we'll get into the beginning of that
• 1:45:08
  Speaker 1: next week. In the meantime, Thanks to my two co
• 1:45:12
  Speaker 1: hosts for again this is a This is a weird sausage,
• 1:45:16
  Speaker 1: just like one of those sausages with a bunch of
• 1:45:18
  Speaker 1: little grizzle pieces in it, right, Thanks for sticking out
• 1:45:21
  Speaker 1: the weird grizzly sausage with me. Thanks everybody for listening
• 1:45:25
  Speaker 1: to this again kind of a weird progression to get
• 1:45:33
  Speaker 1: from from war is bad to war is bad. And
• 1:45:38
  Speaker 1: thanks everybody who works in the background to make HBr
• 1:45:41
  Speaker 1: Talk happen. And good night all