Latest / Stephanomics / How Europe’s Pandemic Labor Policies Have Bested the U.S.

Transcript

How Europe’s Pandemic Labor Policies Have Bested the U.S. · Stephanomics

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: It just doesn't. You don't seem real, ye know, because
• 0:03
  Speaker 1: you just imagined anything happening like that. And to that extent,
• 0:10
  Speaker 1: you know, you're a color breaks down or you know,
• 0:13
  Speaker 1: an extra buil pops up. Things always happened in day
• 0:16
  Speaker 1: to day life. You know, are you thinking, how good
• 0:19
  Speaker 1: that's y? But this was everything all at once. Hello
• 0:29
  Speaker 1: and welcome to Stephanomics, the podcast that brings the global
• 0:32
  Speaker 1: economy to you. This week, a tale of two continents
• 0:35
  Speaker 1: and one job's earthquake called COVID nineteen. When a government
• 0:39
  Speaker 1: shuts down the economy to fight a pandemic, there's a
• 0:42
  Speaker 1: special duty to help all those people who suddenly can't
• 0:45
  Speaker 1: do their jobs. That was something politicians on both sides
• 0:48
  Speaker 1: of the Atlantic could agree on. When economy started going
• 0:51
  Speaker 1: into lockdown in in Europe and the US, hundreds of
• 0:56
  Speaker 1: billions of dollars was spent in emergency support for workers
• 0:59
  Speaker 1: who suddenly had nothing to do. But in the US
• 1:03
  Speaker 1: the money went largely on supporting incomes. In Europe it
• 1:07
  Speaker 1: was used to support jobs. The programs did a lot
• 1:11
  Speaker 1: of good in both places, but which will turn out
• 1:15
  Speaker 1: to have been better for the economy in the end.
• 1:18
  Speaker 1: I'm going to debate that crucial question in a few
• 1:21
  Speaker 1: minutes with the head of the Peterson Institute for International
• 1:24
  Speaker 1: Economics Adam posing. But first to help you come to
• 1:27
  Speaker 1: your own view on that, we've got two reports from
• 1:30
  Speaker 1: the US and Europe. The first is from Bloomberg U
• 1:34
  Speaker 1: S economy reporter read pick it, and straight after her
• 1:37
  Speaker 1: you'll hear from Caroline Look, a European economy reporter based
• 1:41
  Speaker 1: in Frankfurt. When millions of Americans last their jobs in
• 1:50
  Speaker 1: a matter of weeks in the spring of the flaws
• 1:53
  Speaker 1: in America's unemployment insurance system were suddenly a lot more visible.
• 1:58
  Speaker 1: It's not really a central life system, but rather a
• 2:01
  Speaker 1: patchwork of state run programs. How much you get and
• 2:05
  Speaker 1: how long the benefits last depend on where you live.
• 2:08
  Speaker 1: For example, before COVID, an unemployed person in Mississippi would
• 2:12
  Speaker 1: have received around two hundred and fifteen dollars a week
• 2:15
  Speaker 1: in jobless benefits on average. In Massachusetts, the figure was
• 2:19
  Speaker 1: closer to five hundred and fifty dollars, and those state
• 2:22
  Speaker 1: programs don't cover everyone. If you're self employed, were a
• 2:25
  Speaker 1: gig worker, you typically get nothing. Going into the pandemic,
• 2:30
  Speaker 1: the unemployment system had become narrower and less effective over time.
• 2:38
  Speaker 1: You know, as we entered the pandemic, only one out
• 2:41
  Speaker 1: of four workers who were jobless in February of two
• 2:46
  Speaker 1: thousand twenty were receiving an unemployment check. That's Andrew Stettner,
• 2:51
  Speaker 1: a senior fellow at the Century Foundation in Washington, d C.
• 2:55
  Speaker 1: He's been setting the unemployment insurance program for years. When
• 2:58
  Speaker 1: COVID nineteen hit, he knew the system wouldn't be ready
• 3:01
  Speaker 1: for the scale of job losses. So Congress stepped in
• 3:05
  Speaker 1: with a two trillion dollar package that not only expanded
• 3:08
  Speaker 1: the benefits to self employed in gig workers, but also
• 3:12
  Speaker 1: to people who couldn't work because their kids school was
• 3:14
  Speaker 1: closed or they themselves had COVID. And actually, we've been
• 3:19
  Speaker 1: largely praised. We have to get money out of the people.
• 3:22
  Speaker 1: It was China's fault. They did this horrific thing. It
• 3:25
  Speaker 1: was China's fault. We have to get money out of
• 3:28
  Speaker 1: the people. So the Cares Act also lengthened the duration
• 3:31
  Speaker 1: of benefits and increased payments by six dollars a week
• 3:35
  Speaker 1: to help make folks whole after COVID shut down the economy.
• 3:43
  Speaker 1: It sounded great, but the rollout of the program was
• 3:46
  Speaker 1: a nightmare. Many including Terry Ashman and her husband, waited
• 3:51
  Speaker 1: weeks even months for help, were playing for unemployment at
• 3:56
  Speaker 1: months and in the meantime, and we got our money
• 3:59
  Speaker 1: when all men just through all of it, we had
• 4:03
  Speaker 1: to start over. The Ashmans were working as independent contractors
• 4:07
  Speaker 1: when the pandemic first hit, doing remodeling and painting jobs
• 4:10
  Speaker 1: around Dayton, Ohio. They were evicted from their home after
• 4:14
  Speaker 1: the bills began stacking up, relying on food banks for meals.
• 4:19
  Speaker 1: Even after they finally started receiving benefits, complications kept popping
• 4:23
  Speaker 1: up that halted their weekly payments, like being mistakenly flagged
• 4:27
  Speaker 1: for fraud. There was nothing but tears and prayers all
• 4:31
  Speaker 1: the way through. State workforce agencies were understaffed, relying on
• 4:36
  Speaker 1: outdated computer systems, and overwhelmed by the tens of millions
• 4:40
  Speaker 1: of applications that were pouring in. Phone lines were jammed.
• 4:44
  Speaker 1: While many people quickly started receiving payments, others waited months
• 4:48
  Speaker 1: for a payment. Some are still waiting. But for all
• 4:53
  Speaker 1: the problems, the emergency payments did a lot to support
• 4:57
  Speaker 1: out of work Americans. Not a bad result for program
• 5:00
  Speaker 1: built on the fly. We when we look at poverty
• 5:04
  Speaker 1: in two thousand twenty compared to US nineteen. Despite the fact,
• 5:08
  Speaker 1: you know that some twenty million plus Americans lost their jobs,
• 5:12
  Speaker 1: poverty and fact went down from two thousand nineteen two
• 5:16
  Speaker 1: thousand twenty. You know that is more of it. And
• 5:20
  Speaker 1: you know the biggest group of that five and a
• 5:22
  Speaker 1: half million people for people that are prevented from falling
• 5:25
  Speaker 1: into poverty because of unemployment benefits. So you have to
• 5:28
  Speaker 1: say it was effective. People were able to maintain their
• 5:34
  Speaker 1: financial footing and the economy was able to continue growing
• 5:39
  Speaker 1: after a very short recession um in the spring up
• 5:44
  Speaker 1: two thousand twenty. The government did also try something that
• 5:47
  Speaker 1: supported workers in their existing jobs, like the European furlough
• 5:51
  Speaker 1: programs the Paycheck Protection Program, but the program was fraught
• 5:55
  Speaker 1: with difficulties and it's unclear how many jobs it ultimately saved.
• 6:04
  Speaker 1: The US has since recovered about three fourths of the
• 6:06
  Speaker 1: jobs lost at the start of the pandemic, despite severing
• 6:10
  Speaker 1: the connection between millions of workers and their employers. But
• 6:13
  Speaker 1: higher turnover and a near record number of vacancies tells
• 6:17
  Speaker 1: us that matching people to jobs has been a bumpy process.
• 6:22
  Speaker 1: The big question for the future is whether the COVID
• 6:24
  Speaker 1: experience will help the US build a safety net that
• 6:27
  Speaker 1: works better for all its workers. Here's Andrew Santner again
• 6:31
  Speaker 1: and Terry Ashman. The pattern that we seem to be
• 6:34
  Speaker 1: in US for sessions is temporary expansions of of unemployment
• 6:42
  Speaker 1: benefits paid for by the federal government. That and so
• 6:45
  Speaker 1: it's uh repeated band aid on the wound. You know.
• 6:50
  Speaker 1: The you know, the wound is that we have a
• 6:53
  Speaker 1: pretty red bear safety net bestly compared to internationally, so
• 6:59
  Speaker 1: we don't really exit. We just keep throwing a band aid,
• 7:01
  Speaker 1: you know, on it every time. It just doesn't you
• 7:04
  Speaker 1: don't seem real, you know, because you just never imagine
• 7:09
  Speaker 1: anything happening like that. And to that extent, you know,
• 7:14
  Speaker 1: you're a car brings down or you know, an extra
• 7:17
  Speaker 1: bill pops up. Things always happened in day to day live.
• 7:21
  Speaker 1: You know, are you thing goun to find me? But
• 7:23
  Speaker 1: this was everything all that want God and prand to God.
• 7:29
  Speaker 1: Nobody ever wrestling that again for Bloomberg News, I'm read pickered.
• 7:43
  Speaker 1: Remember as economies around the world pull the shutters down,
• 7:48
  Speaker 1: forecasters were predicting unemployment to reach twelve percent. Millions of
• 7:53
  Speaker 1: people were on the precipice of losing their jobs, their livelihoods,
• 7:57
  Speaker 1: their home. That's where she's soon next. Speaking last week
• 7:59
  Speaker 1: at Parties annual get together in England, here's the UK's
• 8:03
  Speaker 1: finance minister, the Chancellor of the Exchequer. It was under
• 8:06
  Speaker 1: his watch that Britain embarked on its biggest jobs experiment
• 8:09
  Speaker 1: in decades, guaranteeing the salaries of millions of workers so
• 8:13
  Speaker 1: they could stay home during the pandemic but still keep
• 8:16
  Speaker 1: their jobs. Much of Europe took a similar approach. At
• 8:20
  Speaker 1: the height of the pandemic, roughly one in four workers
• 8:23
  Speaker 1: in the UK, Germany, France, Italy and Spain we're having
• 8:27
  Speaker 1: all or most of their salaries paid by the state.
• 8:31
  Speaker 1: The main council Katy and Europian approach to this labor
• 8:36
  Speaker 1: market shook of the pandemic was that it would delay
• 8:40
  Speaker 1: some necessary adjustments if just struck to of the economy change.
• 8:44
  Speaker 1: That's my have a cousin, our senior euro Area economist.
• 8:48
  Speaker 1: So workers would stay furthered instead of being being laid off,
• 8:53
  Speaker 1: losing their jobs and starting looking file as a job.
• 8:58
  Speaker 1: The programs did what they are supposed to. Families could
• 9:01
  Speaker 1: pay their bills, and keep their jobs even those large
• 9:04
  Speaker 1: parts of the economy shut down, But there was always
• 9:07
  Speaker 1: a worry about what came next when economies opened up again,
• 9:10
  Speaker 1: would those jobs turn out not to be viable In
• 9:13
  Speaker 1: the post COVID world, economists predicted that UK unemployment, for example,
• 9:18
  Speaker 1: would more than double. In fact, it has stayed below
• 9:21
  Speaker 1: five well the full costs were wrong. Now that Europe's
• 9:31
  Speaker 1: response to the jobs crisis has stood the test of
• 9:33
  Speaker 1: nineteen months of emergency, it's reigniting a debate on whether
• 9:37
  Speaker 1: it's better to help workers keep their jobs during a
• 9:39
  Speaker 1: crisis at the risk of delaying necessary adjustments, or whether
• 9:44
  Speaker 1: it's better to let people lose their jobs but support
• 9:47
  Speaker 1: them with higher benefits, as happened in the US. The
• 9:50
  Speaker 1: titly depends on the crisis, and this one was very
• 9:53
  Speaker 1: special crisis, with very data district adjustment needed. Once vaccination
• 9:58
  Speaker 1: poem had made the popes that you can't go back
• 10:01
  Speaker 1: to something that looked like the preypond Nicknoman. Behind the
• 10:05
  Speaker 1: debate lies a more general assumption within the economics profession
• 10:09
  Speaker 1: that while Europe is often kinder to its workers, its
• 10:13
  Speaker 1: labor market is full of inefficiencies that get in the
• 10:16
  Speaker 1: way of innovation and job creation. After the global financial
• 10:20
  Speaker 1: crisis in two thousand eight, jobs were hit harder in
• 10:23
  Speaker 1: the US, but in Europe the labor pains lasted much longer,
• 10:27
  Speaker 1: with employment only starting to recover about three years after
• 10:30
  Speaker 1: the US. European leaders, of course, did not want to
• 10:34
  Speaker 1: see a repeat of that experience this time around. The
• 10:39
  Speaker 1: furlough schemes went much further in supporting jobs than Europe
• 10:42
  Speaker 1: has ever gone before. Companies could reduce hours and stop
• 10:46
  Speaker 1: paying their employees full salaries during times when they were
• 10:49
  Speaker 1: most strapped for cash. The inspiration came largely from Germany,
• 10:54
  Speaker 1: where decades old model known as kotzape It already proved
• 10:57
  Speaker 1: itself during the two thousand eight crisis, when it's estimated
• 11:01
  Speaker 1: by the o e c D to have saved half
• 11:03
  Speaker 1: a million jobs. This time the tally is much higher.
• 11:08
  Speaker 1: I think that could by singing and in general unemployment
• 11:12
  Speaker 1: insurance policy in Germany. It really made me feel safe
• 11:19
  Speaker 1: when COVID first hit. That's Psyche Jang. She moved to
• 11:24
  Speaker 1: Germany two and a half years ago from Hong Kong,
• 11:26
  Speaker 1: and just before COVID hit, she was working in sales
• 11:29
  Speaker 1: and operations for a small private jet charter operator located
• 11:33
  Speaker 1: just outside of Frankfurt, which is one of Europe's largest
• 11:36
  Speaker 1: aviation hubs. Especially as a foreigner, I was really concerned
• 11:40
  Speaker 1: if I lost my job, I lost my visa, I
• 11:43
  Speaker 1: have to go home, you know. But later on I recognized, Okay,
• 11:48
  Speaker 1: I'm actually secured. Like many in her industry, she found
• 11:52
  Speaker 1: herself with little work when business and tourists travel ground
• 11:55
  Speaker 1: to a halt in March. My company cut it the
• 11:59
  Speaker 1: workload of almost everyone in the team to round to
• 12:03
  Speaker 1: and the government would pay the part that we didn't work,
• 12:06
  Speaker 1: so eventually I would still get around of my salary
• 12:10
  Speaker 1: even though I just work fifty Psyche was actually able
• 12:14
  Speaker 1: to use her reduced work schedule to focus on building
• 12:17
  Speaker 1: up other skills, such as continuing her flying lessons to
• 12:20
  Speaker 1: get a pilot's license, and she eventually also enrolled in
• 12:23
  Speaker 1: a master's degree. She recently switched to another company in
• 12:27
  Speaker 1: the industry that was able to offer her a better salary,
• 12:30
  Speaker 1: but she says a lot of her friends back home
• 12:32
  Speaker 1: in Hong Kong who also work in aviation, have had
• 12:35
  Speaker 1: a much tougher time getting back into work. You know, nowadays,
• 12:38
  Speaker 1: I see people struggle to find a job actually in aviation,
• 12:41
  Speaker 1: so and it has been more than a year. Germany's
• 12:47
  Speaker 1: quotes APID program does have its limits. For example, it
• 12:51
  Speaker 1: isn't available to many low income earners, which included a
• 12:55
  Speaker 1: large chunk of the restaurant and hospitality workers who were
• 12:57
  Speaker 1: hit hardest by the pandemic. In addition, aid for self
• 13:02
  Speaker 1: employed people has been pretty patchy in much of Europe.
• 13:05
  Speaker 1: But by and large, the pickup in spending an employment
• 13:08
  Speaker 1: suggest the approach that was adopted by Germany and its
• 13:10
  Speaker 1: neighbors has left the labor market on pretty good footing.
• 13:14
  Speaker 1: Here's our economist may Eva. Again, the labor market is
• 13:18
  Speaker 1: in a position of relative stunts um um. It seems
• 13:23
  Speaker 1: to have worked, and it seems that actually those followed
• 13:25
  Speaker 1: workers have good east back into work relatively happy. It
• 13:29
  Speaker 1: doesn't necessarily follow that governments should do this every time
• 13:33
  Speaker 1: there is a recession. The COVID shock wasn't a normal downturn,
• 13:37
  Speaker 1: but for now Europe's approach appears to have resulted in
• 13:40
  Speaker 1: a job's rich recovery while minimizing the pain that workers
• 13:44
  Speaker 1: had to go through during the slump. Here's French finance
• 13:47
  Speaker 1: minister Bruno Lemaire, speaking on September twenty two. This also
• 13:54
  Speaker 1: proved it is that whatever the costs were, there thoughtful,
• 14:00
  Speaker 1: effective and necessary policy, and then it was much cheaper
• 14:05
  Speaker 1: to protect employees and skills companies, know how, craftsmen, traders,
• 14:12
  Speaker 1: liberal professions, rather than then have to repair the damage
• 14:16
  Speaker 1: caused by the economic crisis. For bloom Break News, I'm
• 14:20
  Speaker 1: Caroline luck Well to discuss all this. I'm joined now
• 14:28
  Speaker 1: by one of the great friends of Stephanomics, Adam Posen,
• 14:31
  Speaker 1: head of the Peterson Institute for International Economics and a
• 14:34
  Speaker 1: former Bank of England policymaker. Adam, thanks for joining us again.
• 14:38
  Speaker 1: I guess we should start by saying that governments on
• 14:41
  Speaker 1: both sides of the Atlantic have done a lot more
• 14:44
  Speaker 1: to support workers than they ever did before during COVID
• 14:47
  Speaker 1: and helped a lot of people get through this. When
• 14:49
  Speaker 1: you think about what shape those programs, those emergency programs
• 14:54
  Speaker 1: have left the economy in coming out of COVID, which
• 14:57
  Speaker 1: do you think has performed better or as likely to them? Betta,
• 15:01
  Speaker 1: thank you for having me back on Stephanomics. Stephanie, and
• 15:03
  Speaker 1: I'm so glad you're cackling this and you're right. The
• 15:06
  Speaker 1: starting point is that the US, Western Europe, even other
• 15:09
  Speaker 1: countries so to a surprising degree among emerging markets, did
• 15:13
  Speaker 1: more to cushion the blow of the pandemic to their
• 15:16
  Speaker 1: workers than ever previous shocks. But there was a clear
• 15:19
  Speaker 1: difference in the US and most Western European countries, including
• 15:23
  Speaker 1: the UK. In the UK and Western Europe, the aid
• 15:26
  Speaker 1: was tied to staying in work for the most part,
• 15:29
  Speaker 1: whereas in the US you had to basically leave your
• 15:32
  Speaker 1: job and foil for unemployment to get the extended benefits.
• 15:36
  Speaker 1: And what we're seeing is that unemployment got much higher
• 15:39
  Speaker 1: in the U S and even though it's come down
• 15:41
  Speaker 1: a lot, it still isn't down back to pre pandemic levels,
• 15:45
  Speaker 1: and people have dropped out of the workforce. We're not
• 15:48
  Speaker 1: seeing that kind of drop out of the workforce at
• 15:51
  Speaker 1: the same level, and we're certainly not seeing a fraction
• 15:53
  Speaker 1: of the unemployment in Western Europe. So it looks like
• 15:57
  Speaker 1: on a big factor, the Western European what's the right
• 16:00
  Speaker 1: one just to push back a bit, I mean, doesn't
• 16:03
  Speaker 1: the explosion in small business creation, for example, in the
• 16:06
  Speaker 1: US in the second half of twenty which is which
• 16:10
  Speaker 1: has continued, show that the US did encourage more dynamism.
• 16:14
  Speaker 1: Even though it did it also produce these greater frictions
• 16:18
  Speaker 1: and disruptions for people. It was the right call to
• 16:21
  Speaker 1: emphasize more of the reduced frictions and not worry so
• 16:25
  Speaker 1: much about dynamism. The explosion in small business in the
• 16:29
  Speaker 1: US is of course welcome, and it shows the resilience
• 16:31
  Speaker 1: of many American workers. But as always is the case,
• 16:35
  Speaker 1: and we saw this in the two thousand eight to
• 16:37
  Speaker 1: ten crisis, some of those people making small businesses are
• 16:40
  Speaker 1: just somehow making ends meet. They're unemployed, and they have
• 16:43
  Speaker 1: to create a way of getting through it. The question
• 16:46
  Speaker 1: is do those small businesses thrive, Are they preferable to
• 16:49
  Speaker 1: full time work? Are they growing in some measure over
• 16:53
  Speaker 1: the next few years, And that remains to be seen.
• 16:56
  Speaker 1: I fear that the small business numbers are flattered by
• 17:00
  Speaker 1: people just doing as best they could during the crisis.
• 17:04
  Speaker 1: I guess when you look at the furlough schemes, you
• 17:05
  Speaker 1: feel one one naturally feels it must be better for
• 17:09
  Speaker 1: keeping people attached to the labor market to have them
• 17:13
  Speaker 1: formally still in jobs for a year, even if they're
• 17:16
  Speaker 1: sitting at home, than to be unemployed, completely out of
• 17:19
  Speaker 1: or completely out of the workforce for a year. But
• 17:22
  Speaker 1: I guess at some level, just sitting on your hand
• 17:24
  Speaker 1: three years, it's going to affect your productivity either way.
• 17:27
  Speaker 1: Do you think there's going to be a productivity cost
• 17:30
  Speaker 1: to holding jobs in place the way they have in Europe?
• 17:34
  Speaker 1: I think you're right that there is going to be
• 17:39
  Speaker 1: this difficulty that anybody who's been out of work for
• 17:42
  Speaker 1: a while has some decline in what we'll call soft skills.
• 17:46
  Speaker 1: But I think that underestimates people's resilience. I wouldn't I
• 17:50
  Speaker 1: wouldn't end adaptability. I mean, remember, millions of people voluntarily
• 17:55
  Speaker 1: walk away from jobs or lose jobs in a normal
• 17:57
  Speaker 1: year anyway, as we've discussed in the past, and so
• 18:01
  Speaker 1: I don't think that's the right way to look at it.
• 18:04
  Speaker 1: The productivity growth benefits would be if, as you just said,
• 18:09
  Speaker 1: these small businesses suddenly became engines of employment and growth
• 18:13
  Speaker 1: in future. And again I'm sure that will be true
• 18:16
  Speaker 1: for some of them, but it's not big enough to
• 18:18
  Speaker 1: justify millions of people having to go through being out
• 18:21
  Speaker 1: of work. I feel like I'm defending via the US
• 18:25
  Speaker 1: case here. And we heard an a on the on
• 18:27
  Speaker 1: the piece that there were plenty of holes, and even
• 18:30
  Speaker 1: in this extraordinary scheme, plenty of people who didn't get support,
• 18:33
  Speaker 1: and questions raised about sort of the future of the
• 18:36
  Speaker 1: US safety in it. But if we if we step
• 18:38
  Speaker 1: back from that and just think about the productivity impact,
• 18:42
  Speaker 1: a very harsh view of the US approach would be,
• 18:47
  Speaker 1: you know, we helped businesses actually sees some great innovation
• 18:54
  Speaker 1: and advantages in the midst of this crisis in a
• 18:58
  Speaker 1: way that hasn't happened in your and that has given
• 19:01
  Speaker 1: us productivity growth which will stand the economy and good
• 19:03
  Speaker 1: stead in the future, even though we left a lot
• 19:06
  Speaker 1: of people behind, and that is clearly going to be
• 19:08
  Speaker 1: an issue too. I think it's fair to pursue that
• 19:12
  Speaker 1: point of view. I am not as convinced of it
• 19:15
  Speaker 1: because I think a lot of the productivity gains we're
• 19:20
  Speaker 1: talking about your your colleagues rightly document are temporary or
• 19:25
  Speaker 1: one time. I think you know, it was reasonable for example,
• 19:29
  Speaker 1: for white colored people like me do not waste so
• 19:32
  Speaker 1: much time and business travel. It was good to create
• 19:36
  Speaker 1: a lot more services of delivery and and and sort
• 19:39
  Speaker 1: of the uberization of a lot of small processes. But
• 19:43
  Speaker 1: these are not transformative, big technological big productivity jumps. The
• 19:48
  Speaker 1: other thing I would say is what we saw in
• 19:51
  Speaker 1: Europe in the nineties and in the two thousands was
• 19:54
  Speaker 1: a lot of the productivity problems are because the cutting
• 19:58
  Speaker 1: edge technologies don't diffuse from the biggest companies to throughout
• 20:04
  Speaker 1: the economy. And you've written on this. I know, um,
• 20:07
  Speaker 1: and that's true in the U S to or lesser degree,
• 20:08
  Speaker 1: But that's got less to do with the workforce incentives
• 20:11
  Speaker 1: and more to do with business dynamism in terms of
• 20:14
  Speaker 1: their investment patterns and their willingness to change. I guess
• 20:18
  Speaker 1: the final question that comes up, particularly in red Pickets
• 20:23
  Speaker 1: our reporters piece about the US was just how how
• 20:27
  Speaker 1: the massive rising unemployment last year, clearly through no fault
• 20:32
  Speaker 1: of the individuals concerned, put a spotlight on the holes
• 20:37
  Speaker 1: and the weaknesses of the US social safety net, particularly
• 20:40
  Speaker 1: when it comes to unemployed people. Do you think that
• 20:43
  Speaker 1: is something that experience is going to change the US
• 20:48
  Speaker 1: safety net forever? Or when we stop paying attention to it,
• 20:52
  Speaker 1: is it just going to go back to the same
• 20:53
  Speaker 1: old sort of patchwork of not very good systems. It
• 20:57
  Speaker 1: should change the U S State network forever because we
• 21:01
  Speaker 1: we saw how much difference it made to human well being,
• 21:05
  Speaker 1: to the society's while being to the recovery of the economy,
• 21:08
  Speaker 1: and how little it had the negative effects that people
• 21:12
  Speaker 1: worry about in terms of safety net. But I fear
• 21:15
  Speaker 1: it won't the politics, both the structural politics that everything
• 21:21
  Speaker 1: has done so decentralized at state and local government levels,
• 21:24
  Speaker 1: so it's very difficult to get in place a national
• 21:27
  Speaker 1: safety net, but also the small pop politics that there
• 21:33
  Speaker 1: you know, you saw the people attacking the extended unemployment
• 21:36
  Speaker 1: benefits making crazy claims about lazy workers or workers losing
• 21:41
  Speaker 1: the interest in working, and so I fear the lesson
• 21:44
  Speaker 1: should be taken but won't be. We tend to hear
• 21:48
  Speaker 1: President Biden talking about expanding the US safety net, and
• 21:51
  Speaker 1: we know that there's been this kind of rocky road
• 21:53
  Speaker 1: for his proposals in Congress. Is there anything he's doing
• 21:57
  Speaker 1: that will fundamentally strengthen this fifty net? I think the
• 22:02
  Speaker 1: most important thing in the proposed Reconciliation Package, or what
• 22:06
  Speaker 1: used to be called American Family Plan, are things to
• 22:10
  Speaker 1: help people with medical leave, to help women be in
• 22:13
  Speaker 1: the workforce, by building up childcare and elder care possibilities,
• 22:18
  Speaker 1: by making more equal those burdens and sharing them and
• 22:21
  Speaker 1: providing more support for children. These are all incredibly positive
• 22:24
  Speaker 1: long term for labor supply, but I don't think they
• 22:28
  Speaker 1: go to the safety net in terms of what happens
• 22:30
  Speaker 1: when there's an economic shock, so that part remains to
• 22:34
  Speaker 1: be dealt with. So Adam Poson, we've had Europe versus
• 22:38
  Speaker 1: the US on job support, and I think we've had
• 22:40
  Speaker 1: a pretty clear vote for Europe in what you said.
• 22:43
  Speaker 1: Thank you very much. That's it for this episode of Stephanomics.
• 22:53
  Speaker 1: We'll be back next week in the meantime. If you
• 22:56
  Speaker 1: like the podcast, please rate it and follow us Economics
• 22:59
  Speaker 1: on Twist for more news and analysis from Bloomberg Economics.
• 23:03
  Speaker 1: This episode was produced by Magnus Hendrickson, as always, with
• 23:06
  Speaker 1: special thanks to read Pick It, Karen and Look, and
• 23:09
  Speaker 1: Adam Poson. Mike Sasso is executive producer of Stephonomics and
• 23:13
  Speaker 1: the head of Bloomberg Podcast is Francesco leaving H