Latest / The Infographics Show Podcast / Why Inventing Color TV Was So Hard
Transcript
- 0:10Speaker 1: You know, when you when you sit down in your
- 0:16Speaker 1: living room today and turn on a sleek, incredibly thin
- 0:20Speaker 1: flat screen TV, or when you pull your smartphone out
- 0:23Speaker 1: of your pocket to watch a video, there's just this
- 0:26Speaker 1: expectation of like silent, seamless magic, right.
- 0:30Speaker 2: Yeah, it's just glowing pixels.
- 0:32Speaker 1: Exactly, It's clean, it's completely safe. You tap a glass
- 0:35Speaker 1: screen and information just materializes out of nowhere.
- 0:38Speaker 2: I mean, we are entirely accustomed to displays being solid state,
- 0:43Speaker 2: quiet and well, perfectly harmless. The technology has become so
- 0:48Speaker 2: refined that it feels less like a machine and more
- 0:51Speaker 2: like pure information simply appearing on a surface.
- 0:53Speaker 1: You know, yeah, totally.
- 0:54Speaker 2: You don't think about the physical mechanics because frankly, there
- 0:57Speaker 2: are very few physical mechanics left to think about.
- 0:59Speaker 1: But if we read why in the Clock, the reality
- 1:02Speaker 1: of how we got here is absolutely wild. So welcome
- 1:05Speaker 1: to Kurskasak podcast Science Revealed. Glad to be here today.
- 1:08Speaker 1: Our mission is to uncover the dramatic, borderline absurd, and
- 1:12Speaker 1: surprisingly dangerous history behind a device that revolutionized the entire world,
- 1:17Speaker 1: and that is, of course, the color television.
- 1:19Speaker 2: It is a bizarre chapter in the history of technology.
- 1:23Speaker 2: I mean, it's a story of vicious corporate warfare, engineering
- 1:27Speaker 2: challenges that seem physically impossible to solve, and a piece
- 1:30Speaker 2: of consumer electronics that was, at its core kind of
- 1:33Speaker 2: a monster.
- 1:34Speaker 1: Yeah, a literal monster. To give you the listener an
- 1:37Speaker 1: idea of how crazy this gets, especially if you're a
- 1:40Speaker 1: high school student who only knows iPads and led screens
- 1:43Speaker 1: before the flat screens you have today. The United States
- 1:47Speaker 1: government actually banned the production of color TVs.
- 1:50Speaker 2: Which is just wild to think about.
- 1:52Speaker 1: They were terrified that this new technology would completely ruin
- 1:56Speaker 1: the existing television network. And here's the craziest part. The
- 2:01Speaker 1: very first commercial color televisions actually relied on a literal,
- 2:06Speaker 1: physical spinning plastic wheel clattering around inside a giant wooden
- 2:11Speaker 1: box in your living.
- 2:11Speaker 2: Room, which I know sounds like a joke, but it
- 2:13Speaker 2: was a completely real, heavily debated national standard.
- 2:17Speaker 1: We'll get into that spinning wheel soon, I promise.
- 2:19Speaker 2: Yeah. Today, we're going to explore how television actually works
- 2:22Speaker 2: at a fundamental, sub atomic level. We'll look at the
- 2:26Speaker 2: intense color war between rival broadcasting corporations, the genius mathematical
- 2:30Speaker 2: trick that finally brought color to the masses without breaking
- 2:33Speaker 2: the airwaves. And the incredibly complex and honestly terrifying engineering
- 2:38Speaker 2: of the cathode ray two sounds like a plan.
- 2:40Speaker 1: Oh real quick. If you're enjoying our educational journeys here,
- 2:43Speaker 1: please take a second to rate krisgasok podcast Science Revealed
- 2:47Speaker 1: five stars. It really helps the show and we hugely appreciate.
- 2:51Speaker 2: It, definitely. Five stars is a way to go.
- 2:53Speaker 1: Okay. So to understand this massive corporate war over color,
- 2:57Speaker 1: we first have to understand the canvas they were fighting over. Right,
- 3:01Speaker 1: Let's look at the absolute powerhouse of the post WWII era,
- 3:06Speaker 1: the black and white television boom. What exactly was sitting
- 3:09Speaker 1: in everyone's living room back in the late nineteen forties
- 3:11Speaker 1: and early nineteen fifties.
- 3:13Speaker 2: So the foundation of all early television was a massive
- 3:15Speaker 2: piece of hardware called the cathode ray tube or CRT.
- 3:18Speaker 1: The dreaded heavy box.
- 3:20Speaker 2: Exactly, if you grew up with an older, incredibly heavy,
- 3:24Speaker 2: deep television set, the kind that took two people to
- 3:27Speaker 2: lift and took up half the living room, you were
- 3:29Speaker 2: looking at a CRT. And at its core, it is
- 3:32Speaker 2: a giant, thick glass vacuum tube.
- 3:36Speaker 1: A vacuum tube. Let's pause on that. We hear that
- 3:40Speaker 1: term thrown around in old sci fi movies, but what
- 3:42Speaker 1: does it actually mean in the context of a TV.
- 3:45Speaker 1: You're saying all the air has been completely sucked out
- 3:47Speaker 1: of this massive glass box.
- 3:48Speaker 2: Essentially, Yes, the inside of a CRT is evacuated to
- 3:52Speaker 2: less than a millionth of normal atmospheric pressure.
- 3:55Speaker 1: Wow.
- 3:55Speaker 2: Yeah, it is a near perfect vacuum. And the reason
- 3:57Speaker 2: you need a vacuum is because you are dealing with
- 3:59Speaker 2: so ab atomic particle, specifically electrons.
- 4:02Speaker 1: Right, Because if there were air in.
- 4:04Speaker 2: There, if there were air molecules inside that glass tube,
- 4:07Speaker 2: the electrons would crash into the oxygen and nitrogen atoms,
- 4:11Speaker 2: scatter in every direction, and just lose all their energy.
- 4:13Speaker 2: You need an empty highway for them to travel.
- 4:15Speaker 1: Okay, so we have an empty glass highway. Where do
- 4:17Speaker 1: the cars. The electrons come from.
- 4:19Speaker 2: Inside the narrow back end of this tube, which is
- 4:22Speaker 2: called the neck, sits the electron gun. The engineering here
- 4:26Speaker 2: is fascinating. It starts with a tungsten filament very similar
- 4:30Speaker 2: to the tiny coil inside an old school incandescent.
- 4:33Speaker 1: Light bulb, like the ones that gets super hot Exactly.
- 4:36Speaker 2: The TV runs an electrical current through this tungsten coil,
- 4:41Speaker 2: and it gets incredibly hot.
- 4:42Speaker 1: How hot are we talking?
- 4:43Speaker 2: Upwards of a thousand degrees celsius?
- 4:46Speaker 1: Wait? Really inside the TV?
- 4:48Speaker 2: Yes, right inside your living room. This filament is placed
- 4:51Speaker 2: directly against or inside a small Menner cylinder called the
- 4:56Speaker 2: cathode okay, and the cathode is coated with special chemicals,
- 4:59Speaker 2: usually mixtures of barium and strontium oxides. When this castode
- 5:04Speaker 2: gets superheated by the tungsten filament, the thermal energy is
- 5:07Speaker 2: so intense that the electrons in the outer orbits of
- 5:10Speaker 2: those barium and strontium atoms get too energetic to stay attached.
- 5:14Speaker 2: Oh I see, They literally boil off the surface of
- 5:16Speaker 2: the metal into the vacuum.
- 5:18Speaker 1: I love that visual. So you're just heating up metal
- 5:20Speaker 1: until the electrons vibrate so violently they pop right off
- 5:23Speaker 1: into empty space.
- 5:24Speaker 2: The technical term is thermionic emission. It creates a sort
- 5:27Speaker 2: of invisible cloud of free floating electrons just hovering around
- 5:32Speaker 2: the hot cathode.
- 5:33Speaker 1: But a cloud doesn't give you a picture, right.
- 5:35Speaker 2: A cloud is useless for a picture. You need a beam.
- 5:38Speaker 2: So the electron gun uses a series of metal cylinders
- 5:41Speaker 2: with high positive electrical charges.
- 5:44Speaker 1: Because electrons are negatively charged.
- 5:46Speaker 2: Exactly because electrons have a negative charge and opposites attract
- 5:51Speaker 2: these free electrons are violently yank forward by the positive charge.
- 5:55Speaker 2: They are shape focused and accelerated into a tight, incredible,
- 6:00Speaker 2: fast moving beam.
- 6:01Speaker 1: And this invisible beam is being fired straight across the
- 6:04Speaker 1: vacuum of the glass tube toward the front screen. The
- 6:06Speaker 1: part of the viewer is actually looking at what happens
- 6:09Speaker 1: when it hits the glass well.
- 6:10Speaker 2: The inside of that front glass screen is coated with
- 6:13Speaker 2: a chemical compound.
- 6:14Speaker 1: Called a phosphor phosphor.
- 6:15Speaker 2: Okay, yeah, phosphors have a very specific property. When they
- 6:18Speaker 2: are struck by high energy particles like electrons, they absorb
- 6:22Speaker 2: that kinetic energy and release it as a visible light.
- 6:25Speaker 2: The electrons slam into the coating and the phosphor glows
- 6:28Speaker 2: brilliantly upon impact.
- 6:29Speaker 1: Okay, I follow the physics. If you're a high school
- 6:31Speaker 1: physics student. This is basically just converting kinetic energy into light.
- 6:35Speaker 1: But if I just shoot a beam straight ahead, all
- 6:38Speaker 1: I'm going to get is a single glowing dot right
- 6:40Speaker 1: in the dead center of the screen, right.
- 6:42Speaker 2: Just one dot.
- 6:43Speaker 1: So how does one single dot turn into a moving
- 6:46Speaker 1: picture of like a baseball game or a news anchor.
- 6:50Speaker 2: That is where the genius of the raster scan comes in.
- 6:53Speaker 2: The early television doesn't flash the entire picture onto the
- 6:56Speaker 2: screen all at once, the way a film projector shines
- 6:59Speaker 2: a whole frame of a movie onto a theater screen simultaneously.
- 7:02Speaker 1: Oh, it doesn't, not at all.
- 7:04Speaker 2: Instead, the TV draws the picture using that single solitary
- 7:08Speaker 2: electron beam.
- 7:09Speaker 1: Wait, it's literally drawing the image like a.
- 7:12Speaker 2: Pencil, line by line around the neck of the tube.
- 7:15Speaker 2: Just past the electron gun, there is a heavy copper
- 7:18Speaker 2: component called the deflection yoke.
- 7:20Speaker 1: Deflection yoke, got it.
- 7:21Speaker 2: It's essentially a set of powerful electromagnets. By rapidly changing
- 7:25Speaker 2: the electrical current running through these coils, the TV changes
- 7:29Speaker 2: the magnetic field inside the neck of the tube. Because
- 7:33Speaker 2: electrons are charged particles, their path bends when they pass
- 7:36Speaker 2: through a magnetic field.
- 7:38Speaker 1: Ah, so you can steer the beam precisely.
- 7:41Speaker 2: The magnets steer the beam, forcing it to sweep across
- 7:44Speaker 2: the screen from the top left corner straight across to
- 7:47Speaker 2: the right, drawing a single horizontal line of glowing phosphor. Okay,
- 7:51Speaker 2: picturing it the moment it hits the right edge, the
- 7:54Speaker 2: beam turns off for a microsecond, what engineers call the
- 7:57Speaker 2: horizontal blanking interval, zips back to the left side, drops
- 8:01Speaker 2: down a tiny fraction of an inch, turns back on
- 8:04Speaker 2: and draws the next line.
- 8:06Speaker 1: It makes me think of the super fast, invisible high
- 8:08Speaker 1: tech typewriter.
- 8:10Speaker 2: That's a great way to think of it.
- 8:11Speaker 1: The electron beam is a typewriter key right, and it's
- 8:14Speaker 1: rapidly striking the screen, leaving glowing ink. The phosphor behind
- 8:19Speaker 1: it types a line, hits the carriage, return types the
- 8:21Speaker 1: next line, hits return, over and over until it reaches
- 8:24Speaker 1: the bottom of the screen exactly. But to create a
- 8:26Speaker 1: moving video that doesn't just look like a laser pointer
- 8:29Speaker 1: drawing slowly, it has to be doing this insanely fast.
- 8:33Speaker 2: Oh, incredibly fast. To understand the scale, let's look at
- 8:36Speaker 2: the early American black and white television standard. It was
- 8:40Speaker 2: established by a group called the National Television System Committee,
- 8:43Speaker 2: or NTSC, back in nineteen forty one.
- 8:46Speaker 1: The NTSC will be hearing that acronym a lot.
- 8:49Speaker 2: Yes you will. They decided that a single frame, one
- 8:52Speaker 2: complete picture, would be made up of five hundred and
- 8:55Speaker 2: twenty five horizontal lines.
- 8:56Speaker 1: Five hundred and twenty five lines for one picture.
- 8:59Speaker 2: Yes, trick the human eye into seeing smooth, continuous motion.
- 9:03Speaker 2: The electron beam had to draw that entire five hundred
- 9:06Speaker 2: twenty five line picture thirty times every single second, thirty.
- 9:09Speaker 1: Times a second. So wait, if I do the math,
- 9:11Speaker 1: five hundred and twenty five lines times thirty frames, that's fifteen,
- 9:15Speaker 1: seven hundred and fifty horizontal lines being drawn across the
- 9:18Speaker 1: screen every single second.
- 9:20Speaker 2: That's the map.
- 9:21Speaker 1: That is a staggering amount of mechanical and electrical speed
- 9:24Speaker 1: for the nineteen forties.
- 9:25Speaker 2: It really is, and it relies entirely on a biological
- 9:27Speaker 2: quirk of human vision. The phosphor glows for only a
- 9:30Speaker 2: fraction of a second before fading out. If you had
- 9:32Speaker 2: eyes that could process information at a microsecond level, you
- 9:35Speaker 2: wouldn't see a television show at all.
- 9:36Speaker 1: What would you see?
- 9:37Speaker 2: You would just see a single impossibly bright white dot
- 9:41Speaker 2: frantically zigzagging back and forth across a dark glass screen.
- 9:45Speaker 1: That's so creepy to think about.
- 9:46Speaker 2: But because of the persistence of vision in your retina
- 9:49Speaker 2: and the way your brain processes visual data, your biology
- 9:54Speaker 2: gives up on trying to track the dot. It just
- 9:56Speaker 2: blends all those rapidly fading lines into a smooth, seamless,
- 10:01Speaker 2: moving black and white.
- 10:02Speaker 1: Image that is mind blowing. The TV is relying on
- 10:05Speaker 1: our biological limitations to create an illusion. And you know,
- 10:09Speaker 1: there is a fun piece of trivia here about that
- 10:12Speaker 1: thirty frames per second number. It wasn't just a random choice,
- 10:15Speaker 1: was it not? At all?
- 10:16Speaker 2: It was tied directly to the American.
- 10:18Speaker 1: Electrical grid because of the wall outlets.
- 10:20Speaker 2: Right, the alternating current coming out of standard US wall
- 10:23Speaker 2: outlets cycles at sixty hertz or sixty times a second.
- 10:26Speaker 2: Early television engineers realized that if the TV's frame rate
- 10:29Speaker 2: wasn't mathematically synced to the power grid, any slight electrical
- 10:33Speaker 2: interference from the power lines would show up as a dark,
- 10:35Speaker 2: slowly rolling horizontal bar on the screen.
- 10:39Speaker 1: Well, I've seen that on old monitors.
- 10:40Speaker 2: Exactly. By sinking the TV to draw exactly half a
- 10:44Speaker 2: frame called a field sixty times a second, creating thirty
- 10:47Speaker 2: full frames a second, they perfectly masked that electrical hump.
- 10:52Speaker 1: It's the beautiful marriage of physics, electrical engineering, and biology.
- 10:55Speaker 1: And this system worked so well.
- 10:57Speaker 2: It was a massive success.
- 10:58Speaker 1: If we look at the historical context after World War II,
- 11:01Speaker 1: there was this massive, unprecedented economic boom. Millions of soldiers
- 11:06Speaker 1: returned home, started families, bought houses in the new suburbs
- 11:09Speaker 1: under the GI Bill. They had disposable income, and they
- 11:12Speaker 1: wanted entertainment in their living rooms.
- 11:14Speaker 2: And television was the ultimate modern marvel.
- 11:17Speaker 1: By nineteen fifty there were millions of these expensive black
- 11:21Speaker 1: and white CRT televisions sitting in American homes. The industry
- 11:24Speaker 1: was an absolute juggernaut.
- 11:26Speaker 2: The adoption rate was astronomical. In nineteen forty six, there
- 11:29Speaker 2: were maybe a few thousand televisions in the US. By
- 11:32Speaker 2: nineteen fifty one, there were over fifteen million, fifteen million YEP.
- 11:36Speaker 2: The entire broadcasting infrastructure, the camera equipment, the broadcast towers,
- 11:40Speaker 2: the home receivers was entirely built around this nineteen forty
- 11:43Speaker 2: one NTSC standard five hundred and twenty five lines, thirty
- 11:46Speaker 2: frames A second black and white.
- 11:48Speaker 1: Which sets the stage for our central conflict today. If
- 11:52Speaker 1: black and white was working so incredibly well, and the
- 11:55Speaker 1: industry was minting money selling millions of units, why did
- 11:59Speaker 1: television exis executives absolutely panic when engineers tried to add color. Well.
- 12:04Speaker 2: The panic was driven by that massive installed base. The
- 12:08Speaker 2: economic stakes were sky high. If you invent a completely
- 12:12Speaker 2: new way to broadcast a television signal to include color information,
- 12:16Speaker 2: you face an existential question, which is what happens to
- 12:19Speaker 2: the fifteen million existing black and white sets that people
- 12:22Speaker 2: just paid good money for?
- 12:24Speaker 1: Right a television in nineteen fifty was a massive investment.
- 12:27Speaker 1: It costs the equivalent of thousands of modern dollars. You
- 12:29Speaker 1: couldn't just tell the public, hey, sorry, throw that away,
- 12:32Speaker 1: we're doing color now.
- 12:33Speaker 2: Exactly do these millions of existing sets suddenly stop working?
- 12:37Speaker 2: Do they just show a blank screen when a color
- 12:39Speaker 2: program comes on? That was the hurdle. Any new color
- 12:42Speaker 2: system had to figure out how to navigate this massive
- 12:45Speaker 2: infrastructure of black and white technology.
- 12:47Speaker 1: You needed to play nice.
- 12:48Speaker 2: They needed what the industry called compatibility.
- 12:50Speaker 1: And this brings us to one of the most absurd
- 12:52Speaker 1: technological tangents we found in this whole story. To solve
- 12:56Speaker 1: this problem of adding color, one major broadcasting network see
- 13:00Speaker 1: came up with a solution that was, frankly a mechanical monstrosity.
- 13:05Speaker 2: It really was. It was called the CBS Field sequential system,
- 13:08Speaker 2: and it is a fascinating example of trying to solve
- 13:11Speaker 2: a highly complex electronic problem with brute force, practically nineteenth
- 13:16Speaker 2: century mechanical engineering like steampunk. Almost yeah, kind of. CBS
- 13:21Speaker 2: looked at the standard black and white CRT and thought,
- 13:24Speaker 2: what if we don't try to invent a new color
- 13:26Speaker 2: tube at all? What if we just take the perfectly
- 13:29Speaker 2: good black and white tube and put physical colored filters
- 13:32Speaker 2: in front of it.
- 13:33Speaker 1: Wait, hold on, you're telling me their solution to broadcasting
- 13:35Speaker 1: color in the atomic age was to literally bolt colored
- 13:39Speaker 1: glass to the front of the TV.
- 13:41Speaker 2: Yes, but it wasn't just a static piece of glass.
- 13:44Speaker 1: How does that even work for a moving picture?
- 13:46Speaker 2: Okay, imagine a normal, standard black and white television tube.
- 13:50Speaker 2: Now take a large physical wheel made of transparent plastic
- 13:54Speaker 2: or glass. Divide the circular wheel into segments like slices
- 13:58Speaker 2: of a pie.
- 13:58Speaker 1: Okay, I'm tracking color.
- 14:00Speaker 2: One slice red, the next green, the next blue, and repeat.
- 14:03Speaker 1: So I have a multicolored plastic wheel.
- 14:05Speaker 2: Now mount a powerful electric motor inside the wooden TV cabinet,
- 14:09Speaker 2: attach the wheel to it, and place this spinning wheel
- 14:12Speaker 2: directly in front of the glass screen.
- 14:15Speaker 1: I cannot emphasize enough to you, the listener, how ridiculous
- 14:19Speaker 1: this sounds. A literal physical spinning wheel of color inside
- 14:23Speaker 1: the TV.
- 14:24Speaker 2: Yes, the entire system relied on this mechanical rotation.
- 14:28Speaker 1: Wow.
- 14:28Speaker 2: The television camera at the CBS Broadcasting studio had an
- 14:32Speaker 2: identical matching spinning wheel in front of its lens. The
- 14:35Speaker 2: studio camera would look through the red filter and capture
- 14:38Speaker 2: a single frame of the scene.
- 14:40Speaker 1: So it's only seeing red right because.
- 14:42Speaker 2: Of the red filter, it only captured the red light
- 14:45Speaker 2: in the room, recording it as a black and white
- 14:47Speaker 2: image of red intensity.
- 14:48Speaker 1: It broadcasts that frame, so it sends a black and
- 14:50Speaker 1: white image of just the red stuff.
- 14:52Speaker 2: Then the camera wheel spins. Now the green filter is
- 14:54Speaker 2: over the lens. It captures a frame of the green light,
- 14:57Speaker 2: broadcasts that. The wheel spins again, blue filter broadcasts the
- 15:01Speaker 2: blue frame. The television receiver in your living room picks
- 15:05Speaker 2: up these frames, and its internal electric motor spins its
- 15:08Speaker 2: own color wheel in perfect synchronization with the camera.
- 15:12Speaker 1: So wait, when the TV screen displays the black and
- 15:14Speaker 1: white image of all the red information, the red slice
- 15:17Speaker 1: of the plastic wheel is physically passing in front of
- 15:20Speaker 1: the screen at that exact millisecond. I got you look
- 15:24Speaker 1: through the red plastic and the image looks red. A
- 15:27Speaker 1: fraction of a second later, the screen displays the green info,
- 15:30Speaker 1: and the green plastic spins in front of your eyes,
- 15:33Speaker 1: then the.
- 15:34Speaker 2: Blue, and because it's spinning at high speed, your brain's
- 15:37Speaker 2: persistence of vision kicks in again. You don't see distinct
- 15:40Speaker 2: flashes of red, green, and blue. Your brain blends the
- 15:44Speaker 2: three rapid sequential flashes together into a full color moving picture.
- 15:48Speaker 1: That is just It's basically a high speed, high tech flipbook.
- 15:52Speaker 2: That's exactly what it is.
- 15:53Speaker 1: From a pure physics standpoint, I can see how that works.
- 15:55Speaker 1: But from a consumer safety and practicality standpoint, this sounds
- 15:58Speaker 1: like an absolute nightmare.
- 16:00Speaker 2: The flaws were glaring and numerous. First and foremost, you're
- 16:05Speaker 2: dealing with a heavy physical moving part. It was loud
- 16:09Speaker 2: up early prototypes literally word vibrated and clattered in the
- 16:13Speaker 2: living room. It sounded like you had a large desk
- 16:16Speaker 2: fan running inside your television cabinet at all times.
- 16:20Speaker 1: That would drive me insane. And what about the size.
- 16:23Speaker 1: If the TV screen is square or rectangular and the
- 16:26Speaker 1: wheel is circular, the wheel has to be much much
- 16:29Speaker 1: larger than the screen just to cover the corners.
- 16:31Speaker 2: Right, That was the fatal physical limitation. To completely cover
- 16:35Speaker 2: the rectangular screen with one filter segment at a time,
- 16:38Speaker 2: the circular wheel had to be more than twice the
- 16:40Speaker 2: diameter of the screen itself.
- 16:41Speaker 1: Okay, let me be the mat on that. Yeah. By
- 16:43Speaker 1: nineteen fifty, people were buying large black and white sets,
- 16:46Speaker 1: maybe fifteen or twenty inches diagonally. If you wanted a
- 16:49Speaker 1: twenty inch color TV using the CBS system, the wheel inside.
- 16:54Speaker 2: Would have to be what four feet across over forty
- 16:56Speaker 2: inches in diameter. Yet, well, yeah, you would have a
- 16:58Speaker 2: heavy plastic and glass disc the size of a large
- 17:01Speaker 2: bicycle tire or a tractor wheel spinning at over one
- 17:04Speaker 2: thousand revolutions per minute inside your living room furniture.
- 17:07Speaker 1: That is terrifying. A wheel that big, spinning that fast
- 17:11Speaker 1: is basically a giant centrifuge.
- 17:13Speaker 2: It becomes a massive gyroscope. If you tried to physically
- 17:17Speaker 2: turn or move the TV while it was on, the
- 17:19Speaker 2: gyroscopic forces of the spinning wheel would fight.
- 17:22Speaker 1: Against you because it wants to stay upright.
- 17:24Speaker 2: Exactly, potentially shattering the wheel or ripping the motor right
- 17:27Speaker 2: out of its mountings. And if a piece of plastic
- 17:31Speaker 2: that large shattered while spinning.
- 17:32Speaker 1: At high speed deck like a buzzsaw.
- 17:34Speaker 2: Yeah, sending shrapnel right through the wooden cabinet. Because of
- 17:38Speaker 2: this massive physical danger, CBS was essentially forced to limit
- 17:43Speaker 2: their color TV screen sizes to about twelve point five inches.
- 17:47Speaker 2: You physically couldn't make them bigger safely.
- 17:50Speaker 1: So while your neighbor is watching a beautiful twenty inch
- 17:53Speaker 1: black and white TV, you are squinting at a tiny
- 17:57Speaker 1: twelve inch screen with a roaring motor onunderneath.
- 18:00Speaker 2: It not a great selling point.
- 18:01Speaker 1: What about the picture quality itself? Was it at least
- 18:04Speaker 1: bright and clear?
- 18:05Speaker 2: No, it was actually quite dim. Think about the physics
- 18:07Speaker 2: of a filter. A red filter works by blocking green
- 18:10Speaker 2: and blue light. A green filter blocks red and blue.
- 18:13Speaker 2: That means, at any given millisecond, the filter wheel is
- 18:15Speaker 2: physically blocking two thirds of the light coming from the
- 18:18Speaker 2: glowing phosphors screen. You are losing an immense amount of brightness.
- 18:22Speaker 1: So it's super dark.
- 18:24Speaker 2: Viewers had to watch CBS color programs in near total
- 18:27Speaker 2: darkness just to make out the image.
- 18:29Speaker 1: Okay, so it's small, it's noisy, and it's dim, but
- 18:33Speaker 1: surely the motion was smooth. I mean they figured out
- 18:35Speaker 1: that thirty frames. A second thing, well.
- 18:37Speaker 2: That introduces the mathematical problem. Remember the NTSC black and
- 18:41Speaker 2: white standard thirty frames a second. Yeah, CBS realized quickly
- 18:45Speaker 2: that if they flashed red, green, and blue at that speed,
- 18:48Speaker 2: the viewer would perceive a terrible headache inducing color flicker.
- 18:53Speaker 2: The eye would notice the gap between the red flash
- 18:55Speaker 2: and the next red flash because.
- 18:57Speaker 1: It has to wait for green and blue to take
- 18:58Speaker 1: their turns exactly.
- 19:00Speaker 2: To eliminate the flicker, CBS had to spin the wheel
- 19:03Speaker 2: much faster. They decided to run the color fields at
- 19:05Speaker 2: one hundred and forty four times a second.
- 19:07Speaker 1: Wow, that's fast.
- 19:08Speaker 2: But remember our invisible typewriter, the electron beam drawing the
- 19:12Speaker 2: raster scan. It has a physical speed limit. It cannot
- 19:15Speaker 2: draw infinite lines. If you force the beam to draw
- 19:18Speaker 2: one hundred and forty four pictures a second instead of
- 19:21Speaker 2: sixty half pictures, it doesn't have time to draw five
- 19:24Speaker 2: hundred and twenty five lines. It just can't physically sweep
- 19:27Speaker 2: back and forth that fast.
- 19:28Speaker 1: Ah. So to make the color wheel fast enough so
- 19:31Speaker 1: it doesn't cause a seizure, they have to sacrifice the
- 19:33Speaker 1: resolution of the image.
- 19:34Speaker 2: They had to drop the resolution down to four hundred and.
- 19:37Speaker 1: Five lines, which ruins the entire log and key compatibility.
- 19:41Speaker 2: Precisely, this was the ultimate fatal flaw of the CBS system.
- 19:45Speaker 2: The Federal Communications Commission the FCC, which regulates all radio
- 19:50Speaker 2: and television broadcasting in the US, used a lock and
- 19:52Speaker 2: key analogy.
- 19:53Speaker 1: Okay, laid on me.
- 19:54Speaker 2: The transmitter on the broadcast tower is the key. The
- 19:56Speaker 2: television receiver in your living room is the lock. Because
- 20:00Speaker 2: as the CBS system used a completely different mathematical language,
- 20:03Speaker 2: four hundred and five lines instead of five to twenty five,
- 20:05Speaker 2: and one hundred and forty four fields a second instead
- 20:07Speaker 2: of sixty, and existing black and white TV simply could
- 20:11Speaker 2: not understand the CBS signal.
- 20:13Speaker 1: It wouldn't just show the program in black and white
- 20:15Speaker 1: like it wouldn't just ignore the color.
- 20:16Speaker 2: No, the horizontal and vertical sink pulses would be entirely mismatched.
- 20:22Speaker 2: If the CBS color program came on, the fifteen million
- 20:25Speaker 2: expensive black and white TVs sitting in homes across America
- 20:29Speaker 2: would completely lose their minds, so would happen The screen
- 20:32Speaker 2: would dissolve into rolling, tearing incomprehensible static, or just go
- 20:37Speaker 2: totally blank.
- 20:38Speaker 1: So the existing TVs were rendered obsolete. Overnight. You couldn't
- 20:42Speaker 1: watch the new broadcasts unless you went out and bought
- 20:44Speaker 1: a separate, expensive mechanical spinning wheel adapter to bolt onto your.
- 20:49Speaker 2: Set, and that adapter would still require you to shrink
- 20:52Speaker 2: your screen size. It was a logistical nightmare knowing.
- 20:55Speaker 1: All of this, the noise, the size limits, the dimness,
- 20:58Speaker 1: the absolute destruction of compatibility. I would assume the SEC
- 21:01Speaker 1: just laughed CBS out of the room.
- 21:02Speaker 2: You would assume that, But the truth is, a glaring
- 21:05Speaker 2: technological flaw doesn't always stop a stubborn corporation or a
- 21:08Speaker 2: confused government agency. This brings us out of the engineering
- 21:12Speaker 2: labyn into the boardroom. The color War of the early
- 21:15Speaker 2: nineteen fifties is one of the most brutal corporate battles
- 21:18Speaker 2: in tech history.
- 21:19Speaker 1: The paperwork we've looked at regarding the FCC hearings is
- 21:22Speaker 1: just staggering. What actually happened when CBS presented this mechanical
- 21:27Speaker 1: monster well.
- 21:29Speaker 2: In October nineteen fifty, despite every mechanical flaw we just discussed,
- 21:32Speaker 2: the Federal Communications Commission officially approved the CBS spinning wheel
- 21:36Speaker 2: system as the sole official color television standard for the
- 21:40Speaker 2: United States.
- 21:42Speaker 1: That is a shocking decision. I am genuinely struggling to
- 21:45Speaker 1: understand how a panel of government regulators and engineers could
- 21:49Speaker 1: look at a massive, spinning plastic wheel that breaks every
- 21:53Speaker 1: TV in America and say, yes, this is the future.
- 21:56Speaker 2: They felt their hands were tied to understand the FCC's logic.
- 22:00Speaker 2: To look at the competition, the FCC had been holding
- 22:02Speaker 2: hearings for months looking at proposals from other companies, primarily RCA,
- 22:06Speaker 2: the Radio Corporation of America.
- 22:08Speaker 1: They're huge, right.
- 22:09Speaker 2: RCA was the giant of the industry. They owned the
- 22:12Speaker 2: NBC network, They manufactured the cameras, they manufactured the TVs.
- 22:15Speaker 2: And RCA promised an all electronic color system, no moving parts,
- 22:19Speaker 2: a system that would be perfectly compatible with existing black
- 22:23Speaker 2: and white sets.
- 22:23Speaker 1: Which sounds like exactly what the world needed. So why
- 22:26Speaker 1: didn't the FCC choose RCA.
- 22:29Speaker 2: Because RCA's early prototypes in nineteen forty nine and nineteen
- 22:32Speaker 2: fifty were absolutely terrible, how terrible, comically bad. The electronics
- 22:37Speaker 2: required to process color signals were so complex that RCA
- 22:41Speaker 2: couldn't fit them into a normal cabinet. Their prototype receivers
- 22:44Speaker 2: were the size of refrigerators. A refrigerator TV packed with
- 22:48Speaker 2: dozens of extra vacuum tubes that overheated constantly, and the
- 22:51Speaker 2: picture quality was abysmal. The colors drifted constantly, flesh tones
- 22:55Speaker 2: looked green or purple, the image was fuzzy gross. In
- 22:59Speaker 2: comparative demonstrations, the CBS spinning wheel, for all its clunkiness,
- 23:02Speaker 2: produced a beautifully vibrant, sharp, reliable color picture. The RCA
- 23:07Speaker 2: electronic system looked like a blurry neon mess ah.
- 23:11Speaker 1: So the FCC was faced with a choice a mechanical
- 23:13Speaker 1: system that works perfectly right now but breaks compatibility, versus
- 23:17Speaker 1: an electronic system that preserves compatibility but looks awful. It
- 23:20Speaker 1: might take a decade to figure.
- 23:21Speaker 2: Out exactly, and the FCC commissioners decided they couldn't wait.
- 23:26Speaker 2: They believed the public wanted color immediately. They stated that
- 23:29Speaker 2: the CBS picture was vastly superior in fidelity, and they
- 23:32Speaker 2: pulled the trigger. They made CBS the law of the LAMB.
- 23:36Speaker 1: I can only imagine the absolute outrage from RCA and
- 23:39Speaker 1: the rest of the industry. You've got companies pumping out
- 23:42Speaker 1: thousands of black and white TVs a day, and the
- 23:45Speaker 1: government just told the public those TVs are about to
- 23:47Speaker 1: be useless.
- 23:48Speaker 2: The backlash was instantaneous and massive. David Sarnoff, the powerful
- 23:53Speaker 2: chairman of RCA, was furious. He was a visionary who
- 23:56Speaker 2: had practically built the broadcasting industry, and he viewed mechanical
- 24:00Speaker 2: wheel as a step backer into the stone age. Rightly so, honestly,
- 24:04Speaker 2: he publicly lambasted the FCC, calling the CBS system scientifically unsound,
- 24:09Speaker 2: in a complete absurdity.
- 24:11Speaker 1: It wasn't just corporate pride either. The economic impact must
- 24:14Speaker 1: have been devastating.
- 24:15Speaker 2: It caused an immediate retail panic. Think about a family
- 24:19Speaker 2: in November nineteen fifty who had been saving up to
- 24:21Speaker 2: buy a television for Christmas. They read in the newspaper
- 24:24Speaker 2: that the FCC just approved a new color standard that
- 24:27Speaker 2: won't work on the TVs in the store. What do
- 24:29Speaker 2: they do?
- 24:30Speaker 1: They stopped buying. Nobody is going to drop thousands of
- 24:33Speaker 1: dollars on a machine if the channels are going to
- 24:36Speaker 1: turn to static next.
- 24:37Speaker 2: Month exactly, Television sales plummeted practically overnight. Warehouses were filling
- 24:42Speaker 2: up with unsold black and white inventory. Retail store owners
- 24:46Speaker 2: were screaming at manufactures. The entire billion dollar industry hit
- 24:51Speaker 2: a brick wall.
- 24:52Speaker 1: Jikes.
- 24:53Speaker 2: RCI realized they couldn't just write angry letters to the FCC.
- 24:56Speaker 2: They had to stop the rollout of the CBS system
- 24:58Speaker 2: by any means necessary.
- 25:00Speaker 1: So they took it to court.
- 25:01Speaker 2: They filed a massive federal lawsuit. RCA, joined by other
- 25:05Speaker 2: major electronics manufacturers and even powerful electrical workers' unions who
- 25:09Speaker 2: feared massive job losses, sued the United States government and
- 25:13Speaker 2: the FCC in a federal court in.
- 25:15Speaker 1: Chicago, a huge coalition.
- 25:17Speaker 2: Their argument was that the FCC was acting arbitrarily and capriciously.
- 25:21Speaker 2: They argued that FCC was stifling electronic innovation and essentially
- 25:24Speaker 2: destroying a massive American industry by forcing an incompatible, flawed
- 25:29Speaker 2: mechanical standard on the public.
- 25:30Speaker 1: The audacity of suing the federal government over television standards,
- 25:34Speaker 1: and from the legal history, this didn't just stay in
- 25:37Speaker 1: a lower court.
- 25:38Speaker 2: No, the stakes were too high. The case was expedited
- 25:42Speaker 2: and went all the way to the top the Supreme
- 25:44Speaker 2: Court if the United States heard the arguments. Wow, And
- 25:48Speaker 2: in May nineteen fifty one, the Supreme Court handed down
- 25:51Speaker 2: its decision.
- 25:52Speaker 1: And did the Supreme Court strike down the mechanical wheel?
- 25:56Speaker 2: Surprisingly? No, The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the FCCS.
- 26:00Speaker 1: Wait, really on what grounds?
- 26:02Speaker 2: The Court wasn't ruling on which technology was scientifically better,
- 26:06Speaker 2: they were ruling on administrative law. The justices stated that
- 26:10Speaker 2: the SEC had been granted the legal authority by Congress
- 26:13Speaker 2: to set bardcasting standards, and that they had acted properly
- 26:16Speaker 2: based on the evidence presented to them at the time.
- 26:18Speaker 2: Ah I say, since RCA's prototypes were demonstrably poor, the
- 26:23Speaker 2: FCC was within its rights to choose CBS. CBS had
- 26:26Speaker 2: won the ultimate legal victory. They had the green light
- 26:29Speaker 2: to roll out their mechanical color wheels across the entire nation.
- 26:33Speaker 1: But history tells us they didn't. I mean, we don't
- 26:35Speaker 1: have spinning wheels in our TVs today. If CBS won
- 26:38Speaker 1: the Supreme Court case, what stopped them from blanketing the
- 26:40Speaker 1: country with mechanical TVs?
- 26:42Speaker 2: Fate, global geopolitics and an unlikely savior, which was the
- 26:46Speaker 2: Korean War.
- 26:47Speaker 1: Let's explore that because it's a fascinating twist. How does
- 26:50Speaker 1: a war halfway across the world stop a TV rollout?
- 26:54Speaker 2: Well, just a few months after the Supreme Court victory,
- 26:56Speaker 2: in the summer of nineteen fifty one, CBS official started
- 27:00Speaker 2: broadcasting in color, but almost nobody was watching.
- 27:04Speaker 1: Why not.
- 27:04Speaker 2: Manufacturers had refused to build the mechanical sets so consumers
- 27:07Speaker 2: couldn't buy them. There were maybe a few dozen prototypes
- 27:11Speaker 2: CBS color sets and existence, and of course the fifteen
- 27:15Speaker 2: million standard TVs just saw rolling static. CBS was bleeding
- 27:19Speaker 2: money trying to produce color content for an audience of zero.
- 27:22Speaker 1: They won the battle, but were losing the war, and.
- 27:24Speaker 2: Then the actual war intervened. In October nineteen fifty one,
- 27:27Speaker 2: the US government's Office of Defense Mobilization stepped in with
- 27:31Speaker 2: a sweeping emergency order. They completely legally banned the production
- 27:35Speaker 2: of color televisions for the general public.
- 27:37Speaker 1: A total ban. Why target color TVs specifically because.
- 27:41Speaker 2: Building these new complex color systems, especially the heavily motorized
- 27:45Speaker 2: CBS sets and the massive experimental RCA electronic tubes, required
- 27:50Speaker 2: vast amounts of vital strategic materials like what Specifically, they
- 27:54Speaker 2: needed enormous amounts of copper for the heavy deflection yokes,
- 27:57Speaker 2: cobalt for magnets, aluminium, and highly specific electronic components like
- 28:01Speaker 2: specialized vacuum tubes. The military desperately needed those exact same
- 28:06Speaker 2: materials for radar rays, radio communications, and jet aircraft for
- 28:09Speaker 2: the war effort in Korea. Wow, the government deemed color
- 28:13Speaker 2: TV a non essential luxury and halted all commercial production
- 28:17Speaker 2: to conserve resources.
- 28:19Speaker 1: The irony here is absolutely delicious. A massive geopolitical conflict
- 28:24Speaker 1: accidentally saved the American consumer from being permanently stuck with
- 28:28Speaker 1: a clunky, noisy, mechanical, incompatible television system. It gave the
- 28:32Speaker 1: government an excuse to hit the pause button.
- 28:34Speaker 2: It forced CBS to stop manufacturing their spinning wheels, halting
- 28:38Speaker 2: their momentum entirely. But crucially, while commercial manufacturing was banned,
- 28:43Speaker 2: laboratory research was not.
- 28:44Speaker 1: Oh a sneaky.
- 28:45Speaker 2: The pause gave the rival engineers at RCA and a
- 28:48Speaker 2: consortium of other tech companies the one thing they desperately
- 28:51Speaker 2: needed time time.
- 28:52Speaker 1: To figure out how to do it right. Speaking of
- 28:55Speaker 1: taking a pause, if you're hooked on this story, give
- 28:57Speaker 1: kirskasog podcast field to five star rating. Okay, back to
- 29:01Speaker 1: the lab. In the world of technology, a few years
- 29:05Speaker 1: in a lab can change everything, which brings us to
- 29:09Speaker 1: the ultimate engineering challenge. Let's put ourselves in the shoes
- 29:12Speaker 1: of those RCAA engineers in nineteen fifty one. You've been
- 29:15Speaker 1: given a stay of execution, the mechanical wheel is paused.
- 29:19Speaker 1: Now you have to deliver on your promise.
- 29:21Speaker 2: And the promise was a seemingly impossible paradox, right, Think about.
- 29:26Speaker 1: The constraints here. If you're keeping track Constraint one moving parts,
- 29:30Speaker 1: no spitting wheels. Constraint two absolute lock and key compatibility,
- 29:35Speaker 1: you absolutely cannot break the fifteen million black and white
- 29:39Speaker 1: TVs already sitting in living rooms. When a color signal
- 29:42Speaker 1: goes out, the old TVs have to display a perfect
- 29:45Speaker 1: black and white picture.
- 29:45Speaker 2: That was no negotiable.
- 29:46Speaker 1: Constrain three the physics of radio waste.
- 29:48Speaker 2: That was the tightest constraint of all the sec heavily
- 29:51Speaker 2: regulates the radio spectrum. They allocate a specific lane on
- 29:54Speaker 2: the radio highway for each TV channel. That lane is
- 29:57Speaker 2: exactly six megahertz wide.
- 29:59Speaker 1: Okay, six megaher.
- 30:00Speaker 2: The original nineteen forty one black and white TV signal
- 30:03Speaker 2: was designed to take up almost that entire six megahertz
- 30:06Speaker 2: lane just to send the brightness and audio information.
- 30:09Speaker 1: So, to summarize the problem for our listeners, you have
- 30:12Speaker 1: to send three times as much visual information. You need red, green,
- 30:16Speaker 1: and blue data, and you have to cram it into
- 30:19Speaker 1: the exact same six megahertz lane that is already completely
- 30:23Speaker 1: full of black and white data without the black and
- 30:26Speaker 1: white TV noticing that the new data is even there.
- 30:29Speaker 2: Sounds impossible, right, How do.
- 30:30Speaker 1: You cram a full color image into the exact same
- 30:34Speaker 1: invisible radio wave.
- 30:35Speaker 2: That was the challenge taken up by the second National
- 30:38Speaker 2: Television System Committee, the NTSC, which reformed to solve this
- 30:46Speaker 2: exact mess. It included engineers from RCA, Philco, Hazeltyan and others,
- 30:50Speaker 2: and their solution was one of the most elegant, brilliant
- 30:53Speaker 2: electronic compromises in the history of telecommunications.
- 30:56Speaker 1: Let's break down this mathematical magic. How do they do it?
- 30:59Speaker 2: The first stroke genius was realizing they didn't actually need
- 31:02Speaker 2: to broadcast three separate full resolution pictures of red, green,
- 31:06Speaker 2: and blue. They realized they had to separate the concept
- 31:10Speaker 2: of video into two completely different properties, luminance and prominance.
- 31:15Speaker 1: Luminance and prominance, what do those mean? In practical terms?
- 31:18Speaker 2: Luminance is simply the brightness of the image. It is
- 31:20Speaker 2: the black, the white, the grays, the sharp edges, the
- 31:23Speaker 2: fine detail, and the contrast. Okay, prominance is purely the
- 31:27Speaker 2: color information, the specific hue like is it red or green?
- 31:31Speaker 2: And the saturation is it deep red or pale pink?
- 31:34Speaker 1: Okay, consider this analogy. Think of the television signal like
- 31:38Speaker 1: a page in a high quality child's coloring book. The
- 31:41Speaker 1: luminance signal is the crisp black ink outlines printed on
- 31:44Speaker 1: the page. He shows all the fine detail, the shapes
- 31:47Speaker 1: of the trees, the shading on a face.
- 31:49Speaker 2: That's a good way to picture it.
- 31:50Speaker 1: Now, the old black and white TVs sitting in millions
- 31:52Speaker 1: of homes, they only look for black ink. They receive
- 31:55Speaker 1: the NTSC signal, read the luminance data, draw the black
- 31:58Speaker 1: and white picture, and completely ignore everything else. Everyone with
- 32:02Speaker 1: an old TV is perfectly happy. Compatibility Salt.
- 32:04Speaker 2: It is a perfect analogy. The old TV doesn't even
- 32:07Speaker 2: have the circuitry to recognize that color information exists, right,
- 32:11Speaker 2: But a new, expensive color TV it receives that exact
- 32:15Speaker 2: same coloring book page. But it also receives a secret,
- 32:19Speaker 2: mathematically encoded box of crayons, the prominence signal. It draws
- 32:25Speaker 2: the crisp black lines of the luminance signal, and then
- 32:28Speaker 2: it decodes the crominince signal to know exactly where to
- 32:30Speaker 2: scribble the crayons to fill in the colors inside those lines.
- 32:34Speaker 1: But here's where I want to push back. If you
- 32:36Speaker 1: are adding a whole box of crayons to the signal,
- 32:38Speaker 1: that's still extra data. How does that fit into the
- 32:41Speaker 1: six MEGAHERTZT lane if the black ink is already taking
- 32:44Speaker 1: up all the room.
- 32:44Speaker 2: Because of a fascinating biological loophole.
- 32:47Speaker 1: Biology again, yep.
- 32:48Speaker 2: The NTSC engineers studied human vision, specifically the rods and
- 32:52Speaker 2: cones in our retinas. They discovered that the human eye
- 32:55Speaker 2: is incredibly sensitive to changes in brightness luminance, which is
- 32:59Speaker 2: how we perceive sharp edges and find details. We have
- 33:02Speaker 2: millions of rod cells dedicated to this. Okay, but our
- 33:05Speaker 2: eyes are actually quite terrible at perceiving fine detail in
- 33:08Speaker 2: pure color prominence.
- 33:09Speaker 1: Wait, really, we don't see color and high resolution we don't.
- 33:13Speaker 2: If I show you a high resolution black and white
- 33:15Speaker 2: photo and then vaguely wash some low resolution blurry water
- 33:20Speaker 2: colors over it, your brain will combine the sharp black
- 33:23Speaker 2: edges with the blurry color and perceive a sharp, full
- 33:27Speaker 2: color image.
- 33:28Speaker 1: That's amazing.
- 33:28Speaker 2: The NTSC engineers realized they didn't need to send high
- 33:31Speaker 2: definition color. They could severely compress the prominence signal, making
- 33:35Speaker 2: it a very blurry box of crans, taking up vastly
- 33:38Speaker 2: less data than a full picture would.
- 33:40Speaker 1: That is brilliant you trick the human eye. But even
- 33:43Speaker 1: a compressed blurry box of crayons takes up some room
- 33:46Speaker 1: on the radio wave. Where did they physically hide this
- 33:48Speaker 1: color data in the six megahertz lane?
- 33:51Speaker 2: This is where we dive into the real physics the
- 33:53Speaker 2: subcarrier Magic An RCA engineer named Alda Bedford, building on
- 33:57Speaker 2: work from others, made a startling mathematical discovery.
- 34:00Speaker 1: What did you find.
- 34:01Speaker 2: When you look at the radio frequency spectrum of a
- 34:04Speaker 2: black and white TV signal using Fouria analysis? The energy
- 34:08Speaker 2: isn't a solid block Because the TV picture is scanned
- 34:11Speaker 2: in horizontal lines at specific intervals, the radio energy clusters
- 34:15Speaker 2: around specific frequencies, leaving tiny microscopic gaps of completely empty
- 34:20Speaker 2: space in between. It looks like the teeth of a comb.
- 34:22Speaker 1: So there were tiny slivers of empty radio wave just
- 34:25Speaker 1: sitting there, completely unused, between the lines of the black
- 34:29Speaker 1: and white data.
- 34:30Speaker 2: Exactly the NTSC engineers decided to hide the compressed prominence
- 34:34Speaker 2: signal the color data inside those microscopic gaps. They created
- 34:38Speaker 2: a new, highly precise mathematical frequency called the color subcarrier. Specifically,
- 34:44Speaker 2: they set it at three point five seven nine five
- 34:46Speaker 2: four five megahertz.
- 34:48Speaker 1: That is a very specific number.
- 34:49Speaker 2: It had to be. By broadcasting the color data precisely
- 34:52Speaker 2: at this frequency, the peaks of the color wave perfectly
- 34:54Speaker 2: aligned with the valleys of the black and white wave.
- 34:56Speaker 2: The two signals occupied the exact same six megaherts lane,
- 35:00Speaker 2: but they interleaved. Oh see, they fit together like the
- 35:03Speaker 2: teeth of two combs sliding into each other without touching.
- 35:06Speaker 1: So the color data is just squeezed into the cracks
- 35:08Speaker 1: of the existing radio wave. That is unbelievable.
- 35:11Speaker 2: It was an absolute triumph of mathematics. However, doing this
- 35:14Speaker 2: caused one tiny unforeseen problem.
- 35:17Speaker 1: Of course it did.
- 35:18Speaker 2: The new color subcarrier frequency was so close to the
- 35:21Speaker 2: audio frequency of the broadcast that they started to interact.
- 35:24Speaker 2: They created an interference beat, a low, annoying buzzing sound
- 35:29Speaker 2: in the audio track of the television.
- 35:31Speaker 1: Physics always demands a trade off. You solve the visual problem,
- 35:35Speaker 1: you ruin the audio. How did they fix the.
- 35:37Speaker 2: Buzzing to make the math work To ensure the color
- 35:40Speaker 2: teeth didn't scrape against the audio teeth. They had to
- 35:43Speaker 2: alter the fundamental timing of the entire system by a
- 35:46Speaker 2: microscopic fraction. Remember our invisible typewriter drawing thirty frames a second.
- 35:51Speaker 1: Yes, sync to the sixty hertz power grid.
- 35:53Speaker 2: They had to slow it down just a hair. Instead
- 35:56Speaker 2: of broadcasting at exactly thirty frames per second, they slowed
- 35:59Speaker 2: the entire rasters scand down by one tenth of one percent.
- 36:03Speaker 2: They changed the national standard from thirty point zero zero
- 36:06Speaker 2: zero frames per second to twenty nine point nine seven frames.
- 36:09Speaker 1: Per second twenty nine point nine seven frames per second,
- 36:13Speaker 1: and that tiny, imperceptible slowdown shifted the math just enough
- 36:17Speaker 1: to hide the color in the gaps and eliminate the
- 36:19Speaker 1: audio buzz.
- 36:20Speaker 2: It did, and it was a compromise so vanishingly small
- 36:23Speaker 2: that the human eye couldn't perceive it. More importantly, the
- 36:27Speaker 2: millions of existing black and white televisions couldn't notice the
- 36:29Speaker 2: difference either.
- 36:30Speaker 1: Oh so they didn't break.
- 36:32Speaker 2: No, Their internal vacuum tube electronics just naturally drifted and
- 36:35Speaker 2: locked onto the slightly slower twenty nine point nine to
- 36:39Speaker 2: seven speed without missing a single beat. The picture stayed
- 36:42Speaker 2: perfectly stable.
- 36:43Speaker 1: That is, one of the greatest engineering victories of the
- 36:45Speaker 1: twentieth century. You've completely solved the lock and key.
- 36:48Speaker 2: Problem, and the government recognized it. In December nineteen fifty three,
- 36:52Speaker 2: the FCC looked at this new, fully compatible, incredibly elegant,
- 36:57Speaker 2: all electronic NTSC standard, they realized their earlier blunder with
- 37:01Speaker 2: the CBS mechanical wheel, reversed their nineteen fifty decision and
- 37:05Speaker 2: officially adopted the NTSC standard for all color broadcasting in
- 37:09Speaker 2: the United States.
- 37:10Speaker 1: The war the radio waves is over, but from our
- 37:12Speaker 1: dive into this, I know that figuring out the invisible
- 37:15Speaker 1: math in the air was only half the battle. Now,
- 37:17Speaker 1: RCA and the manufacturers actually had to physically build a
- 37:20Speaker 1: glass box for the living room that could catch that
- 37:23Speaker 1: signal and shoot three different colors of light at once
- 37:26Speaker 1: without the mixing into a giant, muddy brown mess.
- 37:29Speaker 2: That is where the elegance of mathematics slams hard into
- 37:32Speaker 2: the brutal reality of nineteen fifty's physical manufacturing. The radio
- 37:37Speaker 2: wave was a masterpiece. The color television set itself was
- 37:41Speaker 2: a heavy, inefficient, brute force hardware miracle. To display the
- 37:46Speaker 2: NTSC signal, engineers had to completely reinvent the inside of
- 37:50Speaker 2: the cathode ray tube.
- 37:51Speaker 1: Let's walk through that redesign. Earlier, we established that a
- 37:55Speaker 1: black and white tube has one single electron gun shooting
- 37:59Speaker 1: at a solid union form sheet of white phosphor. How
- 38:02Speaker 1: does a color tube change that architecture.
- 38:04Speaker 2: It multiplies the complexity exponentially. Instead of one electron gun
- 38:08Speaker 2: in the neck of the tube, a color CRT has
- 38:10Speaker 2: three distinct electron guns bundled together.
- 38:13Speaker 1: Three guns.
- 38:14Speaker 2: One gun is electronically wired to respond only to the
- 38:16Speaker 2: red prominent signal, one responds only to the green, and
- 38:19Speaker 2: one responds to the blue.
- 38:20Speaker 1: Okay, three guns firing simultaneously. What are they shooting at?
- 38:23Speaker 2: The screen is no longer a smooth uniform coating. The
- 38:27Speaker 2: inside of the front glass is now meticulously covered in
- 38:30Speaker 2: hundreds of thousands of microscopic individual phosphor dots. And they
- 38:34Speaker 2: aren't randomly placed. They are arranged in incredibly precise tiny
- 38:39Speaker 2: clusters of three, one red emitting phosphoronot, one green, one blue.
- 38:44Speaker 2: These tiny triangular clusters are called triads triads.
- 38:48Speaker 1: So you have a red gun, a green gun, and
- 38:50Speaker 1: a blue gun firing at hundreds of thousands of microscopic red, green,
- 38:53Speaker 1: and blue dots. Correct. But if I fire a spray
- 38:56Speaker 1: of electrons from the back of a tube, how do
- 38:58Speaker 1: I make absolutely sure that the beam from the red
- 39:01Speaker 1: gun only hits the red dots and doesn't accidentally splash
- 39:05Speaker 1: over onto the green and blue dots sitting a millimeter away.
- 39:08Speaker 2: That was the million dollar physical problem. If the electron
- 39:10Speaker 2: beam splashed or overlapped even slightly, the colors would bleed
- 39:13Speaker 2: together on the screen, red and green would mix, and
- 39:16Speaker 2: instead of a crisp bread apple, you'd get a muddy, yellow,
- 39:18Speaker 2: brown blob.
- 39:19Speaker 1: Nobody wants that.
- 39:20Speaker 2: The solution was based on a concept patented back in
- 39:23Speaker 2: nineteen thirty eight by a German inventor named Werner Flexig.
- 39:27Speaker 2: It is called the shadow mask.
- 39:28Speaker 1: The shadow mask. How does it work?
- 39:30Speaker 2: It is a physical object, a very thin sheet of metal,
- 39:34Speaker 2: usually steel or a specialized alloy called invar, placed directly
- 39:39Speaker 2: inside the vacuum tube, just about half an inch behind
- 39:41Speaker 2: the glass phosphor screen. And this metal sheet is completely perforated.
- 39:47Speaker 2: It is punched with hundreds of thousands of incredibly tiny, precise,
- 39:52Speaker 2: microscopic holes. There is exactly one hole in the metal
- 39:56Speaker 2: for every single triad of phosphor dots on the glass.
- 40:00Speaker 1: Okay, let's visualize this. Imagine you're trying to spray paint
- 40:03Speaker 1: a red dot, a blue dot, and a green dot
- 40:06Speaker 1: right next to each other on a brick wall, and
- 40:07Speaker 1: you're standing all the way across the room using three
- 40:10Speaker 1: different spray paint hoses.
- 40:11Speaker 2: That's a tough shot.
- 40:12Speaker 1: It's impossible to be that precise. The paint is going
- 40:15Speaker 1: to spread out, overlap and make a brown mess on
- 40:17Speaker 1: the wall. But consider the alternative. What if you take
- 40:20Speaker 1: a large piece of cardboard, poke a single tiny hole
- 40:23Speaker 1: in it, and hold it just one inch in front
- 40:25Speaker 1: of the wall. Right now, you spray from your three
- 40:27Speaker 1: different hoses across the room, but you physically separate the
- 40:30Speaker 1: hoses by a few feet. The three streams of paint
- 40:33Speaker 1: approach the cardboard from three slightly different angles. The cardboard
- 40:37Speaker 1: physically blocks all the messy, overlapping edges of the spray.
- 40:41Speaker 1: The paint only goes through that single tiny hole, and
- 40:44Speaker 1: because the hoses are angled differently, the red paint goes
- 40:47Speaker 1: through the hole and hits the left side of the brick.
- 40:49Speaker 1: The blue paint goes through on a straight angle and
- 40:51Speaker 1: hits the middle. The green paint comes from the right
- 40:54Speaker 1: and hits the right side the cardboard masks the shadow
- 40:58Speaker 1: of the spray.
- 40:59Speaker 2: That is a flowmollless analogy for the internal geometry of
- 41:02Speaker 2: a color CRT. The three electron guns are physically separated
- 41:06Speaker 2: at the back of the tube, clustered in a triangle. Therefore,
- 41:09Speaker 2: their beams travel across the vacuum and approach the shadow
- 41:13Speaker 2: mass from three slightly different angles.
- 41:15Speaker 1: Just like the hoses.
- 41:16Speaker 2: Exactly, the solid metal of the mass blocks the vast
- 41:19Speaker 2: majority of the wide electron beams. Only the electrons that
- 41:23Speaker 2: are perfectly aligned pass through the microscopic hole, and because
- 41:26Speaker 2: of their distinct approach angles, the electrons from the red
- 41:29Speaker 2: gun pass through the hole and land exclusively on the
- 41:31Speaker 2: red phosphor dot. The green gun beam passes through the
- 41:34Speaker 2: same hole, but lands exclusively on the green dot. The
- 41:37Speaker 2: geometry physically separates the colors.
- 41:40Speaker 1: Conceptually, it's a brilliant geometric trick. Yeah, but let's talk
- 41:44Speaker 1: about the manufacturing nightmare of actually building this. In nineteen
- 41:47Speaker 1: fifty three.
- 41:48Speaker 2: It was a huge headache.
- 41:49Speaker 1: You're talking about a massive sheet of metal with hundreds
- 41:53Speaker 1: of thousands of microscopic holes that have to align flawlessly
- 41:56Speaker 1: with hundreds of thousands of microscopic chemical dots on a
- 42:00Speaker 1: heavy curved piece of glass. How on earth did they
- 42:03Speaker 1: manufacture that before the invention of lasers or computer guided drills.
- 42:08Speaker 2: Well, they couldn't use physical drills. A drill bit that
- 42:10Speaker 2: small would snap instantly. They had to use chemistry. They
- 42:14Speaker 2: utilize a process called photochemical machining. It is incredibly tedious,
- 42:19Speaker 2: somewhat similar to developing a photograph or etching a modern microchip.
- 42:23Speaker 1: Walk us through the chemistry. How do you drill a
- 42:25Speaker 1: hole with light?
- 42:26Speaker 2: You start with a solid, thin sheet of invar steel.
- 42:29Speaker 2: You coat both sides of this metal completely in a
- 42:31Speaker 2: light sensitive chemical called a photoresist. Then you place a
- 42:34Speaker 2: master pattern, a glass photographic plate containing the images of
- 42:38Speaker 2: hundreds of thousands of black dots over the metal. You
- 42:41Speaker 2: expose the whole thing to intensely bright ultraviolet light.
- 42:44Speaker 1: The UV light hits the chemicals.
- 42:46Speaker 2: Where the UV light hits the photoresis, the chemical reacts
- 42:49Speaker 2: and hardens into an impenetrable plastic shell. But where the
- 42:52Speaker 2: black dots on the master plate cast a shadow, the
- 42:55Speaker 2: chemical remains soft. Then you wash the unhardened chemical away,
- 43:00Speaker 2: leaving bare metal where.
- 43:01Speaker 1: The hole should be, and then comes the acid.
- 43:03Speaker 2: Exactly, You submerge this entire sheet of metal into a
- 43:07Speaker 2: vat of highly corrosive liquid acid, usually ferric chloride. The
- 43:11Speaker 2: hardened footo resist protects the main body of the metal
- 43:14Speaker 2: that the acid eats right through the tiny, unprotected bare spots.
- 43:18Speaker 2: It literally dissolves the steel, etching out hundreds of thousands
- 43:22Speaker 2: of perfectly tapered microscopic holes.
- 43:25Speaker 1: Using vats of liquid acid to drill half a million holes.
- 43:28Speaker 1: That is hardcore nineteen fifties industrial engineering. Yeah, but that
- 43:32Speaker 1: only solves the metal mask. How do you make sure
- 43:34Speaker 1: the holes in the metal perfectly line up with the
- 43:36Speaker 1: chemical dots on the glass screen. If the mask is
- 43:39Speaker 1: off by even a millimeter, the TV is useless.
- 43:42Speaker 2: RCAA solved that with another stroke of brilliance. They didn't
- 43:45Speaker 2: try to manufacture the screen and the mask separately, and
- 43:47Speaker 2: hope they fit. They use the finished shadow mask itself
- 43:50Speaker 2: as the stencil to paint the screen.
- 43:52Speaker 1: Oh, they are a matched pair.
- 43:54Speaker 2: Yes. During assembly, they would place the freshly etched shadow
- 43:58Speaker 2: mask inside the bare glass tube. They would coat the
- 44:02Speaker 2: glass in a liquid slurry containing the red phosphor, which
- 44:05Speaker 2: was also mixed with a UV sensitive photoricist. Then they
- 44:09Speaker 2: would shine a powerful UV light through the holes in
- 44:11Speaker 2: the shadow mask from the exact position where the red
- 44:14Speaker 2: electron gun would eventually sit, so.
- 44:16Speaker 1: The light travel is exactly the same path the electronical.
- 44:19Speaker 2: Travel Exactly the UV light goes through the microscopic holes,
- 44:22Speaker 2: strikes the glass and hardens the red phosphor into tiny
- 44:26Speaker 2: dots in the exact right geometric locations. They wash away
- 44:29Speaker 2: the unhardened slurry. Then they coat the screen in green phosphor,
- 44:33Speaker 2: move the UV light to the green gun position, and
- 44:35Speaker 2: expose it again. Then they do it a third time
- 44:38Speaker 2: for the blue.
- 44:39Speaker 1: That is incredibly clever. It's a self aligning system.
- 44:41Speaker 2: And because of slight imperfections in every single piece of metal,
- 44:45Speaker 2: that specific shadow mask and that specific glass screen became
- 44:48Speaker 2: a married pair. They stay together for the rest of
- 44:51Speaker 2: the manufacturing process and went into the living room as
- 44:54Speaker 2: a single, inseparable unit.
- 44:56Speaker 1: But I want to go back to my cardboard spray
- 44:58Speaker 1: paint analogy, because there's a fundamental phys flaw I haven't mentioned.
- 45:01Speaker 1: What's that If I spray paint a piece of cardboard
- 45:03Speaker 1: to mask a dot on a wall, the cardboard just
- 45:06Speaker 1: gets wet with paint, But inside a CRT, we aren't
- 45:09Speaker 1: spraying paint. We are shooting subatomic particles traveling at tens
- 45:13Speaker 1: of thousands of miles an hour, carrying a massive amount
- 45:17Speaker 1: of kinetic and electrical energy. If the solid metal of
- 45:20Speaker 1: the shadow mask is blocking electrons, where does all that
- 45:23Speaker 1: kinetic energy go?
- 45:24Speaker 2: That question highlights the incredibly brute force inefficient nature of
- 45:29Speaker 2: this entire technology. The shadow mask is geometrically clever, but
- 45:34Speaker 2: from an energy standpoint, it is a disaster. To get
- 45:38Speaker 2: a clean picture, the solid metal of the mask has
- 45:41Speaker 2: to physically block about eighty five percent of the electrons
- 45:43Speaker 2: fired by the three guns.
- 45:45Speaker 1: Eighty five percent, so you are throwing away almost all
- 45:48Speaker 1: of the energy you generate. Only fifteen percent of the
- 45:50Speaker 1: beam actually makes it through the tiny holes to light
- 45:53Speaker 1: up the phosphor screen.
- 45:54Speaker 2: And those eighty five percent of blocked electrons don't just disappear,
- 45:57Speaker 2: They slam into the steel mask at all high velocity.
- 46:01Speaker 2: The law of conservation of energy dictates that kinetic energy
- 46:05Speaker 2: must transform. In this case, the rapid deceleration of the
- 46:08Speaker 2: electrons converts their kinetic energy into intense heat.
- 46:12Speaker 1: And what happens to a thin sheet of metal. When
- 46:14Speaker 1: you heat it up to hundreds of degrees inside a vacuum.
- 46:17Speaker 2: It expands. This caused a massive thermal engineering nightmare known
- 46:21Speaker 2: as doming. Imagine you're watching a TV show and there
- 46:25Speaker 2: is a very bright stationary object on the screen, like
- 46:28Speaker 2: a white logo or bright sun. To draw that bright
- 46:31Speaker 2: white object, the electron guns have to fire at maximum
- 46:34Speaker 2: intensity at one specific area of the.
- 46:36Speaker 1: Screen, meaning a massive concentration of electrons is slamming into
- 46:40Speaker 1: one specific spot on the shadow mass.
- 46:42Speaker 2: That localized spot of metal heats up rapidly. As the
- 46:44Speaker 2: steel heats up, it expands, and because the edges of
- 46:47Speaker 2: the mask are bolted down to a frame, the expanding
- 46:50Speaker 2: metal has nowhere to go but outward. It physically bulges
- 46:53Speaker 2: or warps towards the glass screen like a dome.
- 46:55Speaker 1: And if the metal warps, the microscopic holes move.
- 46:58Speaker 2: Even a microscopic shift ruins the geometry. If the mask
- 47:02Speaker 2: bulges by a fraction of a millimeter, the tiny hole
- 47:05Speaker 2: shift out of alignment with the phosphor doots on the glass. Suddenly,
- 47:09Speaker 2: the electron beam coming from the red gun passes through
- 47:11Speaker 2: the shifted hole and accidentally hits the green phosphor doot, and.
- 47:16Speaker 1: The bright white sun on the TV suddenly turns its
- 47:18Speaker 1: sickly muddy green.
- 47:19Speaker 2: Exactly, color purity is destroyed. So to fix a piece
- 47:22Speaker 2: of metal warping from heat inside a sealed glass vacuum tube,
- 47:26Speaker 2: engineers had to invent even more mechanical workarounds.
- 47:29Speaker 1: Oh boy, more work around.
- 47:30Speaker 2: They utilized heavily tensioned mounting frames. They welded the shadow
- 47:35Speaker 2: mass to a heavy steel ring using immense physical tension,
- 47:39Speaker 2: stretching the thin metal so tight it behaved like a drumhead, so.
- 47:42Speaker 1: Even if it heats up, the tension keeps it flat.
- 47:44Speaker 2: They also invented intricate by metal springs. These springs were
- 47:49Speaker 2: made of two different metals welded together that expand at
- 47:52Speaker 2: different rates when heated. They used these springs to attach
- 47:55Speaker 2: the mask frame to the glass. As the mask got
- 47:58Speaker 2: hot and tried to expand toward the screen, the bimetal
- 48:00Speaker 2: springs would heat up, curl backward, and mechanically pull the
- 48:04Speaker 2: entire mask assembly away from the glass to perfectly compensate
- 48:07Speaker 2: for the expansion.
- 48:09Speaker 1: I am marveling at the sheer insanity of this machine.
- 48:12Speaker 1: We're talking about a consumer appliance in the nineteen sixties,
- 48:15Speaker 1: where engineers are pumping massive amounts of high voltage subatomic
- 48:19Speaker 1: energy into a vacuum using acid edge to metal plates,
- 48:22Speaker 1: managing extreme thermal expansion with specialized tension springs. It sounds
- 48:27Speaker 1: like the inner workings of a nuclear reactor, not a
- 48:29Speaker 1: box you let your kids sit two feet away from
- 48:31Speaker 1: to watch cartoons.
- 48:32Speaker 2: Which is a perfect transition to the actual hazards of
- 48:35Speaker 2: this technology. We look back at old CRTs with nostalgia.
- 48:38Speaker 2: They were the warm, glowing hearth of the twentieth century
- 48:40Speaker 2: living room, but fundamentally, from an engineering perspective, they were heavy, fragile,
- 48:45Speaker 2: high voltage radiation boxers.
- 48:47Speaker 1: Let's talk about the danger. You mentioned that the shatter
- 48:49Speaker 1: mask blocks eighty five percent of the light producing electrons. Yeah,
- 48:53Speaker 1: if you lose eighty five percent of your light, the
- 48:55Speaker 1: picture on the screen is going to be incredibly.
- 48:57Speaker 2: Dim, unceptibly dim. To get a color picture that was
- 49:01Speaker 2: bright enough to actually watch in a sunlit living room,
- 49:03Speaker 2: the engineers had to massively overcompensate. They had to dramatically
- 49:08Speaker 2: crank up the power and intensity of the three electron
- 49:11Speaker 2: guns to punch enough energy through those tiny holes.
- 49:14Speaker 1: How much power are we talking about.
- 49:16Speaker 2: To accelerate the electrons fast enough to generate a bright
- 49:19Speaker 2: picture color CRTs required incredibly high anode voltages. We're talking
- 49:24Speaker 2: about feeding twenty five thousand to thirty thousand volts of
- 49:27Speaker 2: electricity into the back of the picture tube.
- 49:30Speaker 1: Thirty thousand volts inside a wooden cabinet in.
- 49:32Speaker 2: A home, and that extreme voltage introduces a physical phenomenon
- 49:36Speaker 2: known as bremstralong or breaking radiation. When you accelerate an
- 49:39Speaker 2: electron using thirty thousand volts, it is traveling at a
- 49:42Speaker 2: significant fraction of the speed of light. When that electron
- 49:45Speaker 2: suddenly slams into the dense metal of the shadow mask
- 49:48Speaker 2: or the phosphor coating on the glass, it decelerates instantly.
- 49:52Speaker 1: And we know from earlier that the kinetic energy turns
- 49:54Speaker 1: into heat.
- 49:55Speaker 2: Most of it turns into heat, but at those extreme voltages,
- 49:59Speaker 2: a small percentage of that kinetic energy is released as
- 50:02Speaker 2: high energy electromagnetic photons. Specifically, it generates actual measurable X
- 50:08Speaker 2: ray radiation.
- 50:09Speaker 1: Wait pause, you were telling me that the television set
- 50:14Speaker 1: in the living room was actively functioning as an X
- 50:16Speaker 1: ray machine, emitting radiation directly at the family sitting on
- 50:20Speaker 1: the couch.
- 50:21Speaker 2: It was a very real, very serious engineering concern. The
- 50:24Speaker 2: tube itself was generating X rays. To protect the viewer
- 50:28Speaker 2: from absorbing that radiation, the glass on the front of
- 50:31Speaker 2: the CRT had to be completely redesigned. It couldn't just
- 50:34Speaker 2: be normal window glass.
- 50:35Speaker 1: That wouldn't stop X rays right.
- 50:36Speaker 2: It had to be incredibly thick, sometimes over an inch
- 50:39Speaker 2: thick at the front. And more importantly, the glass was
- 50:41Speaker 2: heavily laced with elements that block radiation, like lead, the.
- 50:44Speaker 1: Way you wear a lead apron at the.
- 50:46Speaker 2: Dentist exactly, the glass of a color CRT was heavily
- 50:50Speaker 2: loaded with lead oxide. The front panel, which the viewer
- 50:54Speaker 2: looked through, also contained large amounts of specialized heavy metals
- 50:58Speaker 2: like strontium and barium, which are highly effective at absorbing
- 51:02Speaker 2: X rays while remaining transparent to visible light. The engineers
- 51:06Speaker 2: had to build a transparent radiation shield into the front of.
- 51:09Speaker 1: The TV, which explains the weight. That's why those old
- 51:12Speaker 1: color TVs were practically immobilized. You're trying to lift a
- 51:15Speaker 1: giant block of thick lead and fused glass.
- 51:17Speaker 2: A large twenty seven inch color CRT could easily weigh
- 51:21Speaker 2: over one hundred pounds, and that sheer mass, combined with
- 51:24Speaker 2: the physical vacuum in side, made the device physically dangerous
- 51:28Speaker 2: if handled improperly.
- 51:29Speaker 1: Right because earlier we established that the inside is a
- 51:32Speaker 1: near perfect vacuum, meaning all the air pressure of the
- 51:35Speaker 1: room is pushing on the outside of the glass, but
- 51:37Speaker 1: nothing is pushing back from the inside.
- 51:39Speaker 2: The atmospheric pressure exerting force on the outside of a
- 51:42Speaker 2: large CRT amounts to several tons of crushing weight. The
- 51:47Speaker 2: thick leaded glass is structurally designed to withstand that inward pressure.
- 51:51Speaker 2: But if you dropped a CRT or accidentally struck the
- 51:54Speaker 2: neck of the tube and crack the glass, the structural
- 51:57Speaker 2: integrity failed.
- 51:58Speaker 1: You wouldn't just shatter and fallow the floor.
- 52:00Speaker 2: No, it would cause a violent, terrifying event called an implosion.
- 52:04Speaker 2: The instant the glass cracked, the vacuum would violently suck
- 52:08Speaker 2: all the heavy leaded glass shards inward toward the center
- 52:11Speaker 2: of the tube at immense speeds. The shards would crash
- 52:14Speaker 2: into each other in the center, rebound, and shoot outward
- 52:17Speaker 2: in every direction into the room like shrapnel.
- 52:19Speaker 1: High voltage, literal X ray radiation, toxic heavy metals, and
- 52:24Speaker 1: a permanent risk of a glass shrapnell Bob. It's a miracle,
- 52:27Speaker 1: and entire generation survived the twentieth century. We made it
- 52:30Speaker 1: through knowing how dangerous, inefficient, and convoluted the shadow mask was.
- 52:35Speaker 1: Did anyone try to invent a safer, better way to
- 52:37Speaker 1: do this before flat screens came along?
- 52:39Speaker 2: Absolutely. While RCA's shadow mask dominated the global market for
- 52:43Speaker 2: decades because it was first, other brilliant engineers recognized the
- 52:47Speaker 2: absurdity of blocking eighty five percent of the electrons. The
- 52:51Speaker 2: most famous alternative was developed by Sony in the late
- 52:54Speaker 2: nineteen sixties. They introduced a completely different tube architecture called
- 52:59Speaker 2: the trinitron.
- 53:00Speaker 1: Remember the name Trinyitron. They were incredibly popular in the
- 53:03Speaker 1: eighties and nineties, especially for high end computer monitors. How
- 53:06Speaker 1: was it different from RCA's mask.
- 53:09Speaker 2: Instead of a metal sheet with tiny round holes, the
- 53:12Speaker 2: trinitron used something called an aperture grill. It was a
- 53:15Speaker 2: series of unbroken, vertically suspended, incredibly thin metal wires pulled
- 53:20Speaker 2: under immense tension. Imagine a microscopic metal harp inside the TV.
- 53:24Speaker 1: So there are no horizontal metal pieces blocking the beam,
- 53:27Speaker 1: just vertical slits.
- 53:28Speaker 2: Exactly because there was so much less metal in the way.
- 53:31Speaker 2: The aperture grill allowed a vastly higher percentage of the
- 53:34Speaker 2: electrons to pass through and hit the phosphor stripes on
- 53:36Speaker 2: the glass. The result was a significantly brighter, sharper, and
- 53:40Speaker 2: more vibrant picture than the traditional shadow mask.
- 53:42Speaker 1: And if you ever looked really closely at a white
- 53:45Speaker 1: scream and or old trenitron monitor, you could actually see
- 53:48Speaker 1: two tiny, saint horizontal lines. Those were the ultra thin
- 53:53Speaker 1: support wires holding the vertical grill in place.
- 53:56Speaker 2: You could there were other attempts too. Philco developed an
- 53:59Speaker 2: experiment mental CRT called the Apple Tube. It tried to
- 54:02Speaker 2: eliminate the physical mask entirely. It used a single electron
- 54:06Speaker 2: beam and painted special UV emitting index stripes on the
- 54:10Speaker 2: back of the screen. As the beam swept across, a
- 54:13Speaker 2: sensor would detect the UV flashes, telling the TV's computer
- 54:16Speaker 2: exactly where the beam was, allowing it to rapidly switch
- 54:19Speaker 2: the electron gun between red, green, and blue data on
- 54:22Speaker 2: the fly.
- 54:22Speaker 1: That is software solving a hardware problem. That sounds vastly superior.
- 54:27Speaker 1: Why didn't we all have Apple tubes?
- 54:29Speaker 2: It was brilliant in theory. It would have meant much
- 54:31Speaker 2: brighter screens and no heavy metal masks. But the high
- 54:34Speaker 2: speed computing electronics required to process that index signal in
- 54:37Speaker 2: real time were just too complex and expensive for the
- 54:40Speaker 2: analog technology of the nineteen fifties and sixties. It was
- 54:43Speaker 2: an idea ahead of its time, and it never caught
- 54:46Speaker 2: on commercially.
- 54:47Speaker 1: So the brute force RCA shadow mask and the NTSC
- 54:50Speaker 1: electronics subcarrier standards really did conquer the world. But before
- 54:55Speaker 1: we wrap up the timeline, I have to bring up
- 54:56Speaker 1: a funny historical quirk about that NTSC standard. We've praised
- 55:00Speaker 1: it as a miracle of math hiding color in the
- 55:03Speaker 1: subcarrier gaps, but it wasn't perfect in practice, was it.
- 55:07Speaker 2: No, The NTSC analog signal had a glaring vulnerability to physics.
- 55:12Speaker 2: While hiding the color data was brilliant. Extracting that data
- 55:16Speaker 2: reliably in a home relied on perfect synchronization. The TV
- 55:19Speaker 2: had to read the exact timing the phase of that
- 55:22Speaker 2: three point five to seven megahertz subcarrier wave.
- 55:25Speaker 1: What happens if the timing gets messed up.
- 55:26Speaker 2: The analog radio wave was highly susceptible to environmental interference, specifically,
- 55:31Speaker 2: something kind of multipath distortion. Imagine the radio wave leaves
- 55:35Speaker 2: the broadcast tower. Part of the wave travels in a
- 55:37Speaker 2: straight line directly to the antenna on your roof, perfect
- 55:39Speaker 2: but another part of that exact same wave shoots off
- 55:42Speaker 2: to the side, bounces off a large water tower or
- 55:44Speaker 2: an airplane flying overhead, and reflects back to your antenna.
- 55:48Speaker 2: That reflected wave arrives a tiny fraction of a millisecond
- 55:50Speaker 2: later than the direct wave.
- 55:52Speaker 1: So the TV is receiving two identical signals, but one
- 55:55Speaker 1: is slightly delayed. There out of phase exactly.
- 55:58Speaker 2: The TV's color decoder gets confused by the overlapping waves.
- 56:02Speaker 2: It interprets that slight delay in the phase of the
- 56:04Speaker 2: subcarrier wave as a mathematical instruction to change the color hue.
- 56:08Speaker 2: The colors would drift randomly on the screen. The sky
- 56:11Speaker 2: might suddenly turn a sickly green, or news inc anchor's
- 56:14Speaker 2: face might shift to a deep purple. Viewers had to
- 56:17Speaker 2: constantly get up and tweak a physical tint or Q
- 56:20Speaker 2: knob on the front of the TV to manually correct
- 56:22Speaker 2: the math.
- 56:22Speaker 1: Yes, TV engineers famously used to joke that NTSC actually
- 56:26Speaker 1: stood for never the same color or no true skin colors.
- 56:29Speaker 2: It was a very real frustration for broadcasters. In fact,
- 56:32Speaker 2: because the United States rushed to adopt color TV so
- 56:36Speaker 2: early in nineteen fifty three, the rest of the world
- 56:38Speaker 2: had the luxury of waiting and learning from our analog mistakes.
- 56:42Speaker 2: A decade later, engineers in Europe developed vastly improved, mathematically
- 56:46Speaker 2: complex standards called papal and scam.
- 56:49Speaker 1: Oh I've seen those acronyms on old DVDs.
- 56:51Speaker 2: Yeah, these systems used clever phase alternating math to automatically
- 56:55Speaker 2: cancel out those reflection errors. That is why European analog
- 56:59Speaker 2: televis and generally had much more stable, accurate color than
- 57:03Speaker 2: American television for decades.
- 57:05Speaker 1: It's the ultimate penalty of being the early adopter. You
- 57:09Speaker 1: get the miraculous technology first, but you're stuck living with
- 57:12Speaker 1: the bugs of version one point zero for the next
- 57:14Speaker 1: fifty years. So wrap up this massive historical timeline force.
- 57:19Speaker 1: The NTSC standard is approved in nineteen fifty three, when
- 57:23Speaker 1: does the CRT actually take over the world.
- 57:26Speaker 2: It was an incredibly slow burn. Even though the compatible
- 57:29Speaker 2: electronic standard was approved, early color TVs were still prohibitively expensive,
- 57:33Speaker 2: costing thousands of dollars, and for years networks only broadcast
- 57:36Speaker 2: a few hours of color programming a week. The vast
- 57:39Speaker 2: majority of the public stuck with their reliable black and
- 57:42Speaker 2: white sets. It wasn't until the early nineteen seventies that
- 57:45Speaker 2: sales of color televisions finally surpassed black and white sets
- 57:48Speaker 2: in the United States.
- 57:49Speaker 1: It took twenty years for color to become the norm.
- 57:51Speaker 2: But once it did, the color cathode ray tube dominated
- 57:54Speaker 2: the global cultural landscape entirely. It defined the esthetics of
- 57:58Speaker 2: the late twentieth century. It was the absolute, unquestioned king
- 58:03Speaker 2: of the living room, the arcade, and the office desk
- 58:05Speaker 2: until the late two thousands, when the manufacturing of flat panels,
- 58:09Speaker 2: LCDs and olds finally advanced enough to become cheap and vibrant.
- 58:13Speaker 2: Only then does society finally replace the heavy, toxic, power hungry,
- 58:17Speaker 2: dangerous crt once and for all.
- 58:20Speaker 1: Wow, let's take a breath and summarize this incredible journey
- 58:23Speaker 1: for everyone listening. We started with a massive post war
- 58:26Speaker 1: industry boom that created an impossible economic bottleneck fifteen million
- 58:31Speaker 1: existing TVs. We looked at the clunky, terrifying spinning mechanical
- 58:35Speaker 1: wheel that threatened to render all those TVs obsolete and
- 58:38Speaker 1: spark our retail apocalypse.
- 58:39Speaker 2: And we tracked a corporate war that went all the
- 58:41Speaker 2: way to the Supreme Court, only to be halted by
- 58:43Speaker 2: the geopolitical reality of the Korean War.
- 58:45Speaker 1: We witnessed a genius mathematical compromise that literally hid invisible
- 58:49Speaker 1: color data in the microscopic frequency gaps of a radio signal.
- 58:53Speaker 1: And finally we explored the physical reality of a heavy
- 58:57Speaker 1: lead lined, implosion risk glass box that showed thirty thousand
- 59:00Speaker 1: volts of subatomic particles through an acid etched metal sieve,
- 59:04Speaker 1: losing eighty five percent of its energy as heat, just
- 59:07Speaker 1: to bring a moving picture into your home.
- 59:09Speaker 2: It truly is a testament to human ingenuity. It demonstrates
- 59:12Speaker 2: the sheer willpower of engineers to solve seemingly impossible constraints,
- 59:16Speaker 2: and it also shows our collective societal willingness to accept
- 59:20Speaker 2: incredibly convoluted brute force solutions and even a certain amount
- 59:24Speaker 2: of physical danger if the end result provides us with
- 59:27Speaker 2: something we desire as deeply as entertainment and visual information.
- 59:30Speaker 1: It's an amazing story and it completely changes how I
- 59:33Speaker 1: look at the screens around us today. We've gone from
- 59:35Speaker 1: heating metal to boil off electrons to quietly vibrating liquid
- 59:39Speaker 1: crystals with almost zero power. If you enjoy this wild
- 59:43Speaker 1: history as much as I did, don't forget to rate
- 59:44Speaker 1: Kriscassack podcast Science revealed five stars to help keep these
- 59:48Speaker 1: educational journeys coming.
- 59:49Speaker 2: And I want to leave you with a final thought,
- 59:51Speaker 2: tim all over, as you look at your screens today,
- 59:54Speaker 2: As we've discussed at length, the color TVCRT was essentially
- 59:57Speaker 2: a massive, highly dangerous, in incredibly inefficient brute force workaround.
- 1:00:03Speaker 2: It blocked eighty five percent of its own energy just
- 1:00:05Speaker 2: to function, It required tension springs to stop from warping,
- 1:00:09Speaker 2: It generated X rays, and it weighed one hundred pounds.
- 1:00:11Speaker 2: Yet for fifty years, billions of people accepted it unquestioningly
- 1:00:16Speaker 2: as the absolute, perfect technological standard of modern life.
- 1:00:20Speaker 1: It's very true.
- 1:00:21Speaker 2: So as we look around at our cutting edge world today,
- 1:00:23Speaker 2: at our complex digital infrastructure, our massive artificial intelligence server farms,
- 1:00:28Speaker 2: our electric vehicle battery grids, what piece of technology that
- 1:00:31Speaker 2: we currently accept is the absolute standard is actually just
- 1:00:34Speaker 2: a messy, inefficient workaround. What are we relying on right
- 1:00:37Speaker 2: now that future generations will look back on in fifty
- 1:00:40Speaker 2: years and laugh at wondering how we ever lived with
- 1:00:42Speaker 2: such a clunky, dangerous monster in our daily lives.
- 1:00:45Speaker 1: That is a brilliant, provocative question to end on. I'll
- 1:00:49Speaker 1: be thinking about that all week. Thank you so much
- 1:00:51Speaker 1: for joining us on this exploration today. To all our
- 1:00:54Speaker 1: listeners out there, keep questioning the world, keep looking deeper
- 1:00:57Speaker 1: into the hidden mechanisms of the everyday science surround at
- 1:01:00Speaker 1: you and we will see you next time.