Latest / The Slippery Slope / The Voice Referendum Divides. But that's The Plan

Transcript

The Voice Referendum Divides. But that's The Plan · The Slippery Slope

• 0:13
  I believe globalists have launched an insidious plot, I'll
• 0:20
  call it that, where they use indigenous cultures in Western
• 0:25
  countries such as Australia, Canada.
• 0:29
  And they use these indigenous cultures to divide the nations
• 0:34
  that they're from. So they'll put forward these
• 0:37
  plots of these plans as good intentions, helping indigenous
• 0:43
  cultures while the narrative is shaped in such a way that the
• 0:47
  average person feels pressured to go along with the plan, even
• 0:52
  if even if they don't agree with it.
• 0:55
  Because if you don't go along with the plan then.
• 0:59
  Then you're accused of being racist.
• 1:02
  Maybe just you're just too stupid to understand how it's
• 1:06
  beneficial for the nation. You can't see the harm that
• 1:10
  western culture, western society has done to the indigenous
• 1:13
  communities. You must be race racist.
• 1:20
  And I think it's, I think it's a plot.
• 1:23
  That's like I said, being launched by globalists because
• 1:26
  because it does divide a nation and it takes their eyes off of
• 1:31
  the other issues that are happening as a spoken about
• 1:34
  leadership and this kind of thing.
• 1:36
  It takes their eyes off the decisions that world that global
• 1:39
  leaders are making, some of the poor leadership decisions that
• 1:43
  are happening all around the world, some of the other bigger
• 1:46
  issues that are happening globally and it it forces us to.
• 1:53
  To look within and and makes us, makes us face this idea of of
• 2:04
  racism and maybe we're racist when in fact we're not racist
• 2:08
  when we're not really having this issue with racism.
• 2:12
  But they put this narrative out there and if you don't agree
• 2:14
  with it, well then obviously you are and that you are a racist.
• 2:18
  And these are problems that they believe that they're telling us
• 2:21
  they need to be fixed. We're in reality they aren't
• 2:24
  problems that need to be fixed because these problems aren't
• 2:28
  really there all or if all the solutions that they're putting
• 2:31
  forward aren't going to fix the said problem in the 1st place.
• 2:35
  So the example I'm mainly thinking of is what's happening
• 2:39
  here in Australia with the voice, the voice to the nation,
• 2:43
  I think it's referred to as so where they want an Indigenous
• 2:46
  voice. To Parliament, I've already
• 2:51
  voiced my concerns about it and and pointed out a few of the the
• 2:55
  flaws with with the Yes campaign, with this voice that
• 3:02
  they want to put forward. I think there's, I think we're
• 3:04
  going to have some big issues if we do move forward with it and I
• 3:07
  would hope that you would read through it.
• 3:11
  The proposition yourself and and realize that there are too many
• 3:15
  problems with it and in the end what what the Yes campaign is
• 3:20
  really looking for is a path to treaty.
• 3:24
  Which, look, I believe a path to treaty is fairly nonsensical if
• 3:33
  there was ever going to be a treaty within Australia between
• 3:36
  Indigenous communities and. And what's now the Australian
• 3:43
  government? But it should have been done
• 3:46
  when Captain Cook first landed. It should have been done, you
• 3:49
  know, 200 and something years ago.
• 3:53
  Even then, I'm not sure whether it could have been achieved,
• 3:57
  whether it would have been achieved because Australia is so
• 4:00
  divided as in divided as in having so many different.
• 4:07
  Different little nations within the one landmass, so every if
• 4:12
  you don't know about Australian culture, Indigenous culture.
• 4:15
  So it wasn't just Australian Indigenous group, everyone was
• 4:20
  one people, it was all different languages like those, yeah,
• 4:24
  everyone had their own language, everyone lived within their own
• 4:26
  borders within the country. You know, generally speaking,
• 4:30
  you didn't. It wasn't.
• 4:32
  It was nomadic, nomadic people. But still you stayed within your
• 4:35
  own area. So I have doubts that a treaty
• 4:40
  would have worked back then anyway.
• 4:42
  Yeah, but that's a completely different story, I suppose.
• 4:44
  But why I say I think that this is a an argument that I think
• 4:53
  this is a plot launched by Globalist.
• 4:58
  Why I say that? Because you can see all the
• 5:00
  infighting, all the arguing that's happening with nations
• 5:02
  and everyone's made to feel like they're a racist.
• 5:05
  And we we're told that we all have these problems.
• 5:08
  In my mind, there's a lot of these problems which aren't
• 5:10
  don't really exist. And if even if they do exist,
• 5:13
  they're not, as we're magnifying them to a greater, you know, to
• 5:19
  something greater than what they really are.
• 5:21
  And the solution, as I said, is never really what what they put
• 5:25
  forward anyway. But we have another example of
• 5:28
  this. Well-being told that we have
• 5:31
  this, this problem, that's not really, that's not really a
• 5:34
  problem and yet it's also them another example of the the gas
• 5:41
  lighting that goes on in in places in especially in Western
• 5:45
  culture. When we're told no, no, even
• 5:48
  though I said this, I meant exactly the opposite or I didn't
• 5:52
  mean that. So I know it looks like I said
• 5:53
  that. I know that's the words that I
• 5:55
  said, but don't believe that's what I meant.
• 5:58
  Just because I said it was black, I actually meant it was
• 6:01
  white, even though the word I said was black.
• 6:05
  That's that's what it comes across as.
• 6:08
  It's just it's crazy times. But hey, look, let's have a look
• 6:11
  at this post here. So this deadline.
• 6:16
  So the Yes campaign leader calls in lawyers after Insta post.
• 6:21
  This is her here indigenous campaigner, OK?
• 6:26
  Marsha Langton thinking? Yeah, Marshall.
• 6:28
  Langston. Langton.
• 6:29
  So indigenous leader Marshall Langton wants the Federal
• 6:32
  Opposition leader, as in Peter Dunn, to remove a social media
• 6:36
  image claiming she branded no voters racist and stupid.
• 6:42
  Racist and stupid. So the image of Professor
• 6:46
  Langton standing next to Prime Minister Anthony Albanese
• 6:49
  includes the words no voters branded racist.
• 6:53
  Stupid by prominent voice campaigner Marshall Langton
• 6:58
  below the logo of the Australian newspaper.
• 7:02
  I will have to ask a lawyer, she says, to write to Peter Dutton,
• 7:05
  requesting that he remove the post from his Instagram because
• 7:09
  it is absolutely not true. It's absolutely not true,
• 7:16
  Professor Langton told ABC Radio on Wednesday.
• 7:19
  ABC The gatekeepers of truth in this nation.
• 7:23
  They're part of the they're they're part of the the
• 7:25
  gatekeepers. They decide what is actually
• 7:27
  true and what's not. Just because you read it in
• 7:29
  black and white doesn't mean it's true just because you hear
• 7:31
  it with your own ears. Unless the ABC says it's true,
• 7:34
  don't believe it. The funeral relates to remarks
• 7:38
  she made it at a forum in WA on Sunday, on the October 14 forum
• 7:46
  on an Indigenous voice to Parliament.
• 7:50
  Anyway, every time this is her words.
• 7:53
  Every time the no cases raise their arguments.
• 7:58
  If you start pulling it apart, so she's talking about the
• 8:01
  cases, I suppose you get down to base racism, I'm sorry to say
• 8:08
  that's where it lands, or sheer stupidity, Professor Langton
• 8:15
  told the forum. So like I said, I I think.
• 8:21
  I think. These campaigns are all
• 8:24
  launched. I think these this is really a
• 8:26
  plan conspiracy by globalists launched in order to divide
• 8:32
  Western cultures, Western nations.
• 8:34
  OK, we all get divided because we all want to support their
• 8:38
  local indigenous cultures, but we get our best supporting in
• 8:42
  the wrong way. But it just divides the nation
• 8:43
  with the arguments of racism in the end.
• 8:46
  Anyway, it says if going going on.
• 8:52
  It says if you look at any respectable fact checker,
• 8:56
  everyone of them says the no case is substantially false.
• 9:02
  They are lying to you, the no case.
• 9:05
  So look, I like I said, I said, I've said repeatedly, I believe
• 9:12
  you should vote no. I will, I will be voting no for
• 9:15
  the voice. So.
• 9:19
  But it's saying substantially false.
• 9:21
  It's it's not that hard to to look up, to read through the
• 9:25
  proposition and and see the flaws in their arguments and see
• 9:31
  how we can take us down. It'll be the start of the
• 9:34
  slippery slope on where it takes this nation and the the problems
• 9:38
  that it will raise, the problems it will cause anyway.
• 9:42
  Deputy Liberal leader Susan Lay. Told Parliament on Tuesday
• 9:47
  Professor Langton had labeled those advocating and no position
• 9:51
  as racist or stupid go back to her words every time.
• 9:55
  The no cases raise their arguments.
• 9:58
  So there she's saying their arguments.
• 10:00
  The people that means the people.
• 10:03
  If you start pulling it apart, their arguments apart, you get
• 10:08
  down to base racism. Doesn't that sound like she's
• 10:10
  calling them racist? That's what that does what it
• 10:13
  sounds like. And she says oh.
• 10:15
  She is stupidity. It sounds I would, I would have
• 10:20
  jumped to the conclusion that she's calling, calling me racist
• 10:23
  or stupid. That's what it seems like going
• 10:26
  on. I challenge anyone to consider
• 10:29
  those remarks and not feel insulted by them, she told Sky
• 10:32
  News on Wednesday, adding that the Coalition wasn't part of the
• 10:36
  official No campaign. Miss Lay also repeated her call
• 10:41
  for Indigenous Australians Minister Linda Burney.
• 10:44
  To remove Professor Langston Langton from the government's
• 10:47
  referendum working group for denigrating the No campaign, we
• 10:52
  need a respectful debates. Treasurer Jim Chalmers accused
• 10:56
  Mr. Dutton of distributing misinformation during the Voice
• 11:00
  campaign. The Leader of the Opposition has
• 11:03
  taken the weirdest whispers. Doesn't seem like a weird
• 11:06
  whisper. Seems like this is a word, she
• 11:09
  said. And you know, they're they're
• 11:12
  drawing a fairly logical. Conclusion from what she said,
• 11:16
  it's it's a fairly straight line to it, to that conclusion, it's
• 11:19
  what it seems like to me. So the weirdest whispers from
• 11:24
  the further fringes of social media and legitimize them.
• 11:27
  Further fringes of social media and amplify them.
• 11:34
  We were saying that she spoke, that she was talking to, she was
• 11:37
  talking at, she was talking at a referendum on an Indigenous
• 11:41
  voice to Parliament. At a forum in WA, how is that
• 11:46
  the weirdest fringes of social media?
• 11:50
  Further fringes of social media? He goes on saying this will drag
• 11:59
  air for as long as possible so the leader of the opposition can
• 12:02
  drip more poison into the well that.
• 12:06
  That's how he seeks to divide and diminish this country and
• 12:10
  reap a political dividend. The treasurer said the
• 12:14
  referendum would be a once in a generation opportunity to create
• 12:18
  meaningful change. You see the way, even the way he
• 12:22
  words everything here. If you don't vote for it, you're
• 12:25
  not, you're not helping create meaningful change.
• 12:29
  How? How dare you?
• 12:31
  How dare you not help create meaningful change?
• 12:34
  It'll be meaningful, all right and it's not going to be good.
• 12:36
  Meaning, Professor Langton said her comments were taken out of
• 12:41
  context and were referring to no campaign tactics, not people
• 12:48
  intending to vote, no taken out of context.
• 12:52
  Yes, there is a recording of what I said at the at the
• 12:55
  Bunbury meeting and what I said is very clear.
• 12:59
  I was explaining how the No campaign is using fear and lies
• 13:04
  to frighten voters into voting No.
• 13:07
  Now look, maybe they are okay. I don't doubt that they are
• 13:10
  using a bit of fear and maybe some lies.
• 13:15
  However, the Yes campaign is very much using fear as well.
• 13:20
  You look at, like I said, what? What the minister?
• 13:24
  Has set up here, you know you're going to be a part.
• 13:26
  This is a once in a generation opportunity to create meaningful
• 13:31
  change. Isn't that itself not creating
• 13:33
  fear? If you don't join in, if you
• 13:35
  don't support the yes vote, If you don't support it, you're not
• 13:40
  helping. You're not.
• 13:41
  You're part of the problem. You're not helping create
• 13:45
  support, You're not helping create meaningful change.
• 13:49
  So don't vote no anyway. Professor Langton said it was
• 13:57
  racist to say that if someone voted yes, indigenous people
• 14:02
  would get compensation. Yeah, OK, nobody, not
• 14:09
  Aborigines, not anybody, gets compensation unless they are
• 14:14
  legally entitled to it, she said.
• 14:16
  The no case is implying that if you vote yes, Aborigines, even
• 14:19
  if they are legally entitled to compensation, will get.
• 14:23
  That compensation. So it is the No campaign that is
• 14:26
  promising division on the base of race.
• 14:30
  The whole voice is promoting division on the base of race.
• 14:35
  That's that is the voice, The voice to Parliament that is, is
• 14:40
  promoting division based on race.
• 14:42
  So I don't get her what she's saying.
• 14:48
  The image, posted on Tuesday to Mr. Dunn's Instagram account,
• 14:51
  included comments attributed to the leader.
• 14:53
  Australians are genuinely concerned about the unknown
• 14:56
  consequences of Labour's risky voice proposal, which is the
• 14:59
  biggest constitutional change in our history.
• 15:04
  The Prime Minister should condemn these comments from
• 15:06
  leading voice advocate Marsha Langton, but back to what I
• 15:12
  originally said, you can see in different Western cultures on
• 15:16
  mainly just looking what's happening in Australia.
• 15:21
  These proposals being put forward these that using the
• 15:27
  local indigenous cultures to create division and racism, to
• 15:33
  create problems where they're where the problems really
• 15:36
  weren't, and then they're putting forward these supposed
• 15:39
  solutions that aren't going to fix the problem that they've
• 15:43
  created in the 1st place, all while we can also we can take
• 15:49
  our life. All the other things that are
• 15:51
  going on and then Western society, we're also starting to
• 15:58
  embrace, which is again being pushed by globalists to to
• 16:02
  embrace embrace Indigenous culture.
• 16:06
  And when you embrace Indigenous culture, well, you must also
• 16:10
  embrace Indigenous spirituality. But this is what the globalist
• 16:17
  wants they want. To create division within
• 16:21
  individual nations. So we're not watching what else
• 16:25
  is going on globally. And the more division they
• 16:29
  cause, the more problems they cause, then they cannot come
• 16:32
  forward with these, these solutions, these global
• 16:36
  solutions, because at the end of it all, it's all still leading,
• 16:41
  pushing towards the Great resets.
• 16:45
  They're taking us down that path of the great resets.
• 16:48
  Causing all these problems within the nations and they'll
• 16:50
  come forward with these solutions because they've
• 16:53
  already caused the problems. And so, well, we have the
• 16:56
  perfect solution. We just need a one world
• 16:58
  government. We just need a one world leader.
• 17:01
  That's my opinion. Anyway.
• 17:02
  You let me know what you think. I'm still voting no.
• 17:06
  So apparently if I vote no and if I tell you I think you should
• 17:09
  vote no. Am I racist and stupid?
• 17:12
  Am I? Or is Professor Langton just
• 17:17
  causing division, just being used by the globalists to push
• 17:23
  forward the globalist agenda dividing nations?
• 17:29
  Let me know what you think. Thank you for listening to the
• 17:31
  slippery slope. They