Latest / The SME Stream / Nicola Willis: Finance Minister on the Government pushing out surplus expectations
Transcript
- 0:00Speaker 1: So as predicted, Nikola Willis has pushed out surplus again,
- 0:02Speaker 1: which makes it the third year of delay in only
- 0:05Speaker 1: two years of this government being in office. The country's
- 0:07Speaker 1: now forecast to first be in the black and twenty
- 0:09Speaker 1: twenty nine, twenty thirty. So let's talk to the finance minister.
- 0:12Speaker 1: High Nicola, Good morning, Heather. Just clear this up for me.
- 0:14Speaker 1: Are we borrowing right now as a country just to
- 0:17Speaker 1: pay our interest bill on the debt?
- 0:20Speaker 2: We are paying in part to pay the interest bill
- 0:22Speaker 2: on the debt, which is pretty big. It's more than
- 0:24Speaker 2: nine billion dollars a year, thank you Labor. But as
- 0:27Speaker 2: we look over the next few years, around eighty percent
- 0:30Speaker 2: of our borrowing is for capital investments, so that's an
- 0:33Speaker 2: infrastructure unlike hospitals, schools and roads, so assets that we
- 0:37Speaker 2: will have for the future. Regardless, we need to get
- 0:40Speaker 2: that borrowing down, which means we need to get the
- 0:42Speaker 2: books back in balance, and that's what the government has
- 0:44Speaker 2: a plan to do.
- 0:45Speaker 1: Okay, So why not run a zero budget like Bill.
- 0:47Speaker 2: English did, because we do have pressing needs, for example,
- 0:53Speaker 2: to invest more in the health system to allow for
- 0:56Speaker 2: a growing and aging population and the demands that people
- 0:59Speaker 2: have to double the capability of our defense force, as
- 1:02Speaker 2: we have committed to our security partners to ensure that schools,
- 1:07Speaker 2: teachers and the like have a little bit more funding
- 1:10Speaker 2: to keep the lights on and keep doing their work.
- 1:13Speaker 2: So those frontline services require more funding just to stand still.
- 1:18Speaker 2: And we have committed as a government that we will
- 1:21Speaker 2: be delivering effective frontline services and making the funding commitments
- 1:24Speaker 2: needed to support that.
- 1:25Speaker 1: I mean, he had the same pressing needs, didn't he,
- 1:28Speaker 1: And he still managed to cut enough to run a
- 1:29Speaker 1: zero budget a couple of times.
- 1:31Speaker 2: That's right, and we are doing a similar thing to
- 1:34Speaker 2: him in that in order to fund all of the
- 1:36Speaker 2: commitments that we have made, we will need to keep
- 1:39Speaker 2: finding ongoing savings and reprioritization. That's been our habit over
- 1:43Speaker 2: our first two budgets, in which collectively we've delivered forty
- 1:47Speaker 2: three billion dollars worth of savings. Now, of course, those
- 1:49Speaker 2: savings have allowed us to deliver tax relief to working people,
- 1:53Speaker 2: but also to increase funding to a number of services,
- 1:57Speaker 2: doing things like increasing the number of frontline police offices.
- 2:00Speaker 1: Do you think that you've cut everything that you can,
- 2:02Speaker 1: Is all the fat gone?
- 2:05Speaker 2: No? I think we have to be pressing for.
- 2:07Speaker 1: On what ongoing fat can you see?
- 2:12Speaker 2: Well, I still think that there's room for more efficiency
- 2:14Speaker 2: in the public service. I have, together with ministers, identified
- 2:19Speaker 2: other areas where we think, look, are we getting in
- 2:22Speaker 2: our value for money to the taxpayer? There? Like what not?
- 2:25Speaker 2: Convinced well, I will be taking a number of options
- 2:29Speaker 2: to cabinet. I don't want to get ahead of my
- 2:31Speaker 2: cabinet colleagues until we've made those choices. But the way
- 2:34Speaker 2: I run a budget is I send letters out to
- 2:36Speaker 2: my colleagues saying, here's some ideas for where I think
- 2:39Speaker 2: you could make some savings. Come back to me with
- 2:41Speaker 2: what that would look like. And by the way, in
- 2:44Speaker 2: a few cases, here's an idea for where you might
- 2:47Speaker 2: need some more before.
- 2:47Speaker 1: I mean, for a start, why have you not cut nearly,
- 2:52Speaker 1: not even a fraction really of what Jacinda and Grant
- 2:55Speaker 1: piled in in terms of public servants.
- 2:58Speaker 2: Well, we have cut both the absolute number of public
- 3:02Speaker 2: side how many more than by more than two thousand
- 3:05Speaker 2: from its peak. Let me out all that down.
- 3:09Speaker 1: How many go exactly how many? It's important to say
- 3:13Speaker 1: how many they added? They added more than fourteen thousand,
- 3:17Speaker 1: and you've only cut.
- 3:17Speaker 2: Two that's right. Our focus has been making sure that
- 3:22Speaker 2: we reduce the number of people and back office roles.
- 3:24Speaker 2: So the numbers there have come down quite a lot
- 3:26Speaker 2: more dramatically, whether that's admin staff, managers, policy analysts. But
- 3:30Speaker 2: we have increased, for example, the number of corrections officers,
- 3:34Speaker 2: that is, the number of people in our prisons because
- 3:36Speaker 2: we're locking up criminals for longer when they violently offend
- 3:40Speaker 2: against people. So while some of those roles have increased
- 3:44Speaker 2: on the front line, the back office has been shrunk
- 3:46Speaker 2: pretty sick. To be fair, there's more work we can
- 3:49Speaker 2: do there, to be fair.
- 3:50Speaker 1: That when we look at these numbers that you talk
- 3:52Speaker 1: about the front the front line does not increase by
- 3:55Speaker 1: anything like fourteen or twelve thousand.
- 3:59Speaker 2: Well, it didn't owe the time that labor were an offer.
- 4:02Speaker 1: What I'm saying to you is you're fudging it slightly
- 4:04Speaker 1: by suggesting that you have cut really, really deep and
- 4:07Speaker 1: then increased the front line by a lot, you haven't.
- 4:09Speaker 2: Actually, Well, we have cut the number of back office
- 4:13Speaker 2: roles while also reducing the bill for external consultants and
- 4:17Speaker 2: contractors by around nine hundred million over the past couple
- 4:21Speaker 2: of years. For the again for context, the last national government.
- 4:24Speaker 2: All they did was cap the number of public servants.
- 4:26Speaker 2: They certainly didn't reduce it in quite terms. What about
- 4:29Speaker 2: what we've achieved so far?
- 4:30Speaker 1: What about the free year of university to students, which
- 4:33Speaker 1: which has been criticized. It's a flop, It doesn't encourage enrollment.
- 4:36Speaker 1: Why don't you cut that?
- 4:38Speaker 2: Well, we've done what we said we would in our
- 4:40Speaker 2: coalition agreement with New Zealand first, which was we took
- 4:44Speaker 2: the very ineffective first year at fees free and we
- 4:47Speaker 2: made it final years fees free. So you only get
- 4:50Speaker 2: those free fees if you actually.
- 4:51Speaker 1: Have you asked to Winston? Have you asked Winston if
- 4:54Speaker 1: he would be okay with you cutting it all together.
- 4:57Speaker 2: I'm happy to put that question to him.
- 5:00Speaker 1: Oh have you not put that question to him? Nikola?
- 5:02Speaker 1: I've been asking you about this for two.
- 5:03Speaker 2: Years because the way the coalition agreement works is the
- 5:07Speaker 2: commitments as they are in writing, is the commitments as
- 5:10Speaker 2: we deliver them, and so the commitment there in the
- 5:12Speaker 2: coalition agreement.
- 5:13Speaker 1: Now he wanted it move from the first to the
- 5:15Speaker 1: third year because having it in the first year is stupid.
- 5:17Speaker 1: But he might be open to cutting it all together.
- 5:19Speaker 1: And if you did that, you would say about a
- 5:21Speaker 1: billion dollars and four years.
- 5:23Speaker 2: It's a question that I'm happy to put to him.
- 5:25Speaker 1: Okay, why don't you end the national ticketing system?
- 5:28Speaker 2: Right?
- 5:28Speaker 1: Because Wellington's doing it itself now, it's spending five point
- 5:31Speaker 1: five mil on it, but you're in line to spend
- 5:33Speaker 1: one point four bill. Why not cut it?
- 5:36Speaker 2: Well? I agree that that is an absolutely tormented project.
- 5:39Speaker 2: It's another one of the hospital passes that we've inherited.
- 5:43Speaker 2: That is something that Chris Bishop, as Transport Minister, is
- 5:46Speaker 2: looking very carefully at because, like you, he can think
- 5:50Speaker 2: of a few better uses for more than a billion dollars,
- 5:53Speaker 2: and so he is examining keyfully whether that's a spend
- 5:56Speaker 2: that we should be doing.
- 5:57Speaker 1: Okay, have you thought about stopping the welfare that you're
- 6:00Speaker 1: giving to parents who are earning combined more than two
- 6:03Speaker 1: hundred thousand dollars a year.
- 6:05Speaker 2: Well, primarily that comes through working for families for which
- 6:10Speaker 2: support increases when people.
- 6:12Speaker 1: Have this is your family boost, right?
- 6:15Speaker 2: Well, no, family boost is, yes, a payment that is
- 6:18Speaker 2: available to some people earning that amount in some circumstances,
- 6:22Speaker 2: if they have particularly high early childhood education.
- 6:25Speaker 1: Why not cut it. If you're on two hundred thousand,
- 6:27Speaker 1: you've got enough.
- 6:27Speaker 2: Money because we're actually investing around about exactly what we
- 6:33Speaker 2: campaigned on investing. In that policy. We made a commitment
- 6:36Speaker 2: to working parents who have very high early childhood education
- 6:39Speaker 2: costs that we would refund a portion of those and
- 6:41Speaker 2: we're keeping that commitment.
- 6:42Speaker 1: Yeah, okay, have you thought about maybe income testing the
- 6:45Speaker 1: winter energy payment because there are people who are getting
- 6:47Speaker 1: getting using it to warm the pool.
- 6:49Speaker 2: Well, the Prime Minister sent out a commitment card prior
- 6:52Speaker 2: to the election and one of the commitments he made
- 6:54Speaker 2: was not to reduce the winter winter Energy payment for superinuitance.
- 6:58Speaker 2: You'll see a theme here, which is where we've made
- 7:00Speaker 2: commitments to the New Zealand people, we think it's important
- 7:04Speaker 2: we keep them. And that's relevant not just for this
- 7:06Speaker 2: three years, it's actually relevant for the next.
- 7:09Speaker 1: Sections changed change and the superlus has been pushed out
- 7:13Speaker 1: by three years and maybe you need to start breaking
- 7:15Speaker 1: some promises and not wasting so much cash.
- 7:18Speaker 2: And we are forecasting a return to surplus and the
- 7:20Speaker 2: biggest risk to that is the election of a labor
- 7:23Speaker 2: government who have shown no inclination to do any ongoing
- 7:28Speaker 2: efficiency or savings. And so what I need to do
- 7:31Speaker 2: is ensure that our government is keeping its commitments to
- 7:33Speaker 2: people that it made and its campaign pledges, while also
- 7:37Speaker 2: doing an absolutely consistent drive for more savings. And there
- 7:41Speaker 2: will be more opportunities at the next election for people
- 7:43Speaker 2: to set out their store. And I tell you this,
- 7:46Speaker 2: the stare of the National Party is going to be
- 7:48Speaker 2: far more fiscally disciplined than Labor have ever dreamed of
- 7:52Speaker 2: even pretending to be.
- 7:54Speaker 1: All Right, Nichola, thank you very much for your time,
- 7:56Speaker 1: Have a lovely day. Nichola will as Finance Minister. For
- 7:58Speaker 1: more from the mic Hosking Breakfast, listen live to News
- 8:01Speaker 1: Talks at b from six am weekdays, or follow the
- 8:04Speaker 1: podcast on iHeartRadio.