Latest / The Philosophy Insights Collection / 08 - Ways and Means - The Conquest of Bread - Peter Kropotkin
Transcript
- 0:00Chapter eight, Ways and Means, Part One. If a society, a
- 0:05city, or a territory were to guarantee the necessaries of life to its inhabitants,
- 0:10and we shall see how the conception of the necessaries of life can be
- 0:13so extended as to include luxuries, it would be compelled to take possession of
- 0:17what is absolutely needed for production. That is to say, land, machinery,
- 0:22factories, means of transport, et cetera. Capital in the hands of
- 0:26private owners would be expropriated and returned to the community. The great harm done
- 0:32by bourgeois society, as we have already mentioned, is not only that capitalist
- 0:36sees a large share of the profits of each industrial and commercial enterprise, thus
- 0:40enabling them to live without working, but that all production has taken a wrong
- 0:44direction, as it is not carried on with a view to securing well being
- 0:48to all. For this reason we condemn it. Moreover, it is impossible
- 0:52to carry on mercantile production in everybody's interest. To wish it would be to
- 0:56expect the capitalists to go beyond his province and to fulfill duties that he can
- 1:00and not fulfill, without ceasing to be what he is. A private manufacturer.
- 1:03Seeking his own enrichment. Capitalist organization, based on the personal interest of
- 1:07each individual trader, has given all that could be expected of it to society.
- 1:12It has increased the productive force of work. The capitalist, profiting by
- 1:17the revolution, affected an industry, by steam, by the sudden development of
- 1:19chemistry and machinery, and by other inventions of our century, has endeavored in
- 1:23his own interest to increase the yield of work, and in a great measure
- 1:27he has succeeded. But to attribute other duties to him would be unreasonable.
- 1:33For example, to expect that he should use the superior yield of work in
- 1:37the interests of society as a whole would be to ask philanthropy and charity of
- 1:41him, and capitalist enterprise cannot be based on charity. It now remains for
- 1:45society to extend this greater productivity, which is limited to certain industries, and
- 1:49to apply it to the general good. But it is evident that to guarantee
- 1:53well being to all, society must take back possession of all means of production.
- 1:57Economists, as is their wont will not fail to remind us of the
- 2:00comparative well being of a certain category of young, robust workmen skilled in certain
- 2:04special branches of industry. It is always this minority that is pointed out to
- 2:07us with pride. But is this well being, which is the exclusive right
- 2:12of a few secure tomorrow? Maybe negligence, improvidence, or the greed of
- 2:16their employers will deprive these privileged men of their work, and they will pay
- 2:21for the period of comfort they have enjoyed with months and years of poverty or
- 2:23destitution. How many important industries woven goods, iron, sugar, et cetera.
- 2:30Without mentioning short lived trades have we not seen decline or come to a
- 2:34standstill, alternately on account of speculations or in consequence of natural displacement of work,
- 2:39and lastly from the effects of competition due to capitalists themselves. If the
- 2:44chief weaving and mechanical industries had to pass through such a crisis as they have
- 2:47passed through in eighteen eighty six, we hardly need mention the small trades,
- 2:52all of which come periodically to a standstill. What two shall we say to
- 2:57the price which is paid for the relative well being of certain category is of
- 3:00workmen. Unfortunately, it is paid for by the ruin of agriculture, the
- 3:04shameless exploitation of peasants, the misery of the masses in comparison with the feeble
- 3:08minority of workers who enjoy a certain comfort. How many millions of human beings
- 3:13live from hand to mouth without a secure wage, ready to go wherever they
- 3:16are wanted. How many peasants work fourteen hours a day for poor pittance.
- 3:21Capital depopulates the country, exploits the colonies, and the countries where industries are
- 3:25but little developed, dooms the immense majority of workmen to remain without technical education,
- 3:30to remain mediocre even in their own trade. This is not merely accidental.
- 3:36It is a necessity of the capitalist system. In order to remunerate certain
- 3:39classes of workmen, peasants must become the beast of burden of society. The
- 3:44country must be deserted for the town small trades must agglomerate in the foul suburbs
- 3:49of large cities and manufacture a thousand things of little value for next to nothing,
- 3:53so as to bring the goods of the greater industries within reach of buyers
- 3:55with small salaries. That bad cloth may sell. Garments are made for ill
- 4:00paid workers by tailors who are satisfied with the starvation wage. Eastern lands,
- 4:04in a backward state are exploited by the West in order that, under the
- 4:09capitalist system, workers in a few privileged industries may obtain certain limited comforts of
- 4:15life. The evil of the present system is therefore not that the surplus value
- 4:18of production goes to the capitalist as Robertus and Mark said, thus narrowing the
- 4:24socialist conception and the general view of the capitalist system. The surplus value itself
- 4:29is but a consequence of deeper causes. The evil lies in the possibility of
- 4:33a surplus value existing instead of a simple surplus not consumed by each generation.
- 4:39Four. That a surplus value should exist means that men, women and children
- 4:43are compelled by hunger to sell their labor for a small part of what this
- 4:46labor produces, and above all, of what their labor is capable of producing.
- 4:51But this evil will last as long as the instruments of production belong to
- 4:56a few, as long as men are compelled to pay tribute to property holders
- 5:00for the right of cultivating land or putting machinery into action, and the property
- 5:03holder is free to produce what bids fair to bring him in the greatest profits
- 5:06rather than the greatest amount of useful commodities. Well being can only be temporarily
- 5:12guaranteed to a very few, and is only to be bought by the poverty
- 5:15of a section of society. It is not sufficient to distribute the profits realized
- 5:19by trade in equal parts if at the same time thousands of other workers are
- 5:24exploited. It is a case of producing the greatest amount of goods necessary to
- 5:29the well being of all with the least possible waste of human energy. This
- 5:34cannot be the aim of a private owner, and this is why society as
- 5:38a whole, taking this view of production as its ideal, will be compelled
- 5:42to expropriate all that enhances well being while producing wealth. It will have to
- 5:46take possession of land, factories, mines, means of communication, etc.
- 5:50And besides, it will have to study what products will promote general well being,
- 5:55as well as the ways and means of production. Two How many hours
- 6:01a day will man have to work to produce nourishing food, a comfortable home,
- 6:04and necessary clothing for his family. The question has often preoccupied socialists,
- 6:11and they generally came to the conclusion that four or five hours a day would
- 6:14suffice on condition. Be it well understood that all men work. At the
- 6:17end of last century, Benjamin Franklin fixed the limit at five hours. And
- 6:21if the need of comfort is greater now, the power of production has augmented
- 6:26two and far more rapidly. In speaking of agriculture, further on, we
- 6:30shall see what the earth can be made to yield to man when he cultivates
- 6:32it scientifically, instead of throwing seed haphazard in a badly plowed soil, as
- 6:36he mostly does today. In the great farms of Western America, some of
- 6:41which cover thirty square miles but have a poorer soil than the manured soil of
- 6:45civilized countries, only ten to fifteen English bushels per English acre are obtained,
- 6:49that is to say, half the yield of European farms or of American farms
- 6:54in Eastern States. And nevertheless, thanks the machines which enable two men to
- 6:58plow four English acres a day, one hundred men can produce in a year
- 7:00all that is necessary to deliver the bread of ten thousand people at their homes
- 7:04during a whole year. Thus, it would suffice for a man to work
- 7:09under the same conditions for thirty hours, say six half days of five hours
- 7:14each, to have bread for a whole year, and to work thirty half
- 7:18days to guarantee the same to a family of five people. We shall also
- 7:23prove, by results obtained nowadays, that if we had recourse to intensive agriculture,
- 7:27less than six half day's work could procure bread, meat, vegetables,
- 7:30and even luxurious fruit for a whole family. And again, if we study
- 7:34the cost of workmen's dwellings built in large towns today, we can ascertain that
- 7:40to obtain in a large English city a detached little house as they are built
- 7:44for workmen, from fourteen hundred to eighteen hundred, half day's work of five
- 7:48hours would be sufficient, as a house of that kind last fifty years at
- 7:53least. It follows that twenty eight to thirty six half day's work a year
- 7:57could provide well furnished, healthy quarters with all necessary comfort for a family,
- 8:01whereas when hiring the same apartment from an employer, a workman pays seventy five
- 8:05to one hundred days work per year. Mark that these figures represent the maximum
- 8:09of what a house costs in England today, being given the defective organization of
- 8:13our societies. In Belgium, workmen cities have been built far cheaper. Taking
- 8:16everything into consideration, we are justified in affirming that in a well organized society,
- 8:22thirty or forty half day's work a year will suffice to guarantee a perfectly
- 8:26comfortable home. There now remains clothing, the exact value of which is almost
- 8:31impossible to fix because the profits realized by a swarm of middlemen cannot be estimated.
- 8:35Let us take cloth, for example, and add up all the deductions
- 8:37made by landowners, sheep owners, wool merchants and all their intermediate agents than
- 8:43by railway companies, mill owners, weavers, dealers in ready made clothes,
- 8:46sellers and commission agents, and you will get idea of what is paid to
- 8:50a whole swarm of capitalists for each article of clothing. That is why it
- 8:54is perfectly impossible to say how many days work in overcoat that you pay three
- 8:58or four pounds in a large London shop represents. What is certain is that
- 9:01with present machinery they no doubt managed to manufacture an incredible amount of goods.
- 9:07A few examples will suffice. Thus, in the United States, in seven
- 9:09hundred and fifty one cotton mills for spinning and weaving, one hundred and seventy
- 9:13five thousand men and women produce two billion, thirty three million yards of cotton
- 9:18goods, besides a great quantity of thread. On the average, more than
- 9:22twelve thousand yards of cotton goods alone are obtained by a three hundred days work
- 9:26of nine and a half hours each, say forty yards of cotton in ten
- 9:28hours. Admitting that a family needs two hundred yards a year at most,
- 9:33this would be equivalent to fifty hours work, say ten half days of five
- 9:37hours each. And we should have thread besides, that is to say,
- 9:41cotton to sow with and thread to weave cloth with, so as to manufacture
- 9:45a woolen stuffs mixed with cotton. As to the results obtained by weaving alone,
- 9:48the official statistics of the United States teach us that in eighteen seventy,
- 9:52if workmen worked thirteen to fourteen hours a day, they made ten thousand yards
- 9:56of white cotton goods in a year. Thirteen years later, in eighteen eighty
- 10:01six, they wove thirty thousand yards by working only fifty five hours a week.
- 10:05Even in printed cotton goods they obtained weaving and printing included thirty two thousand
- 10:09yards in two thousand, six hundred seventy hours of work a year, say
- 10:13about twelve yards an hour. Thus, to have your two hundred yards of
- 10:18white printed cotton goods, seventeen hours of work a year would suffice. It
- 10:24is necessary to remark that raw material reaches these factories in about the same state
- 10:28as it comes from the fields, and that the transformations gone through by the
- 10:31piece before it is converted into goods are completed in the course of these seventeen
- 10:35hours. But to buy these two hundred yards from the tradesman, a well
- 10:39paid workman must give at the very least ten to fifteen days work of ten
- 10:45hours each, say one hundred to one hundred fifty hours. Find as to
- 10:50the English peasant, he would have to toil for a month or a little
- 10:52more to obtain this luxury. By this example, we already see that by
- 10:56working fifty half days per year in a well organized society, we could dress
- 11:01better than the lower middle classes today. But with all this we have only
- 11:05required sixty half day's work of five hours each to obtain the fruits of the
- 11:09earth, forty for housing and fifty for clothing, which only makes half a
- 11:15year's work, as the year consists of three hundred working days. If we
- 11:18deduct holidays, there remains still one hundred and fifty half day's work which could
- 11:24be made use of for other necessaries of life, wine, sugar, coffee,
- 11:28tea, furniture, transport, et cetera, et cetera. It is
- 11:31evident that these calculations are only approximate, but they can also be proved in
- 11:35another way. When we take into account how many in the so called civilized
- 11:39nations produced nothing, how many work at harmful trades doomed to disappear, and
- 11:45lastly, how many are useless middlemen. We see that in each nation the
- 11:48number of real producers could be doubled, and if instead of every ten men,
- 11:54twenty were occupied in producing useful commodities, and if society took the trouble
- 11:58to economize human energy, those twenty people would only have to work five hours
- 12:01a day without production decreasing, and it would suffice to reduce the waste of
- 12:05human energy at the service of wealthy families or of those administrations that have one
- 12:11official to every ten inhabitants, and to utilize those forces to augment the productivity
- 12:15of the nation, to limit work to four or even to three hours,
- 12:18on the condition that we should be satisfied with present production. After studying all
- 12:22these facts together, we may arrive then at the following conclusion. Imagine a
- 12:26society comprising a few million inhabitants engage in in agriculture and a great variety of
- 12:31industries Paris, for example, with the department of Senewas, Suppose that in
- 12:35this society all children learn to work with their hands as well as with their
- 12:37brains. Admit that all adults save women, engaged in the education of their
- 12:43children, find themselves to work five hours a day from the age of twenty
- 12:46or twenty two to forty five or fifty, and they follow occupations they have
- 12:50chosen in any one branch of human work considered necessary. Such a society could,
- 12:54in return guarantee well being to all its members, that is to say,
- 12:58a more substance financial well being than that enjoyed today by the middle classes.
- 13:03And moreover, each worker belonging to this society would have at his disposal
- 13:07at least five hours a day which he could devote to science, art,
- 13:11and individual needs, which do not come under the category of necessities, but
- 13:15will probably do so later on, when men's productivity will have augmented and those
- 13:20objects will no longer appear luxurious or inaccessible. End of Chapter eight,