Latest / The Morning Edition / Albanese basks in Modi limelight. And, his weird podcast interview
Transcript
- 0:00S1: Virginia Giuffre helped vanquish a prince and a millionaire.
- 0:04S2: And I won't stop fighting. I will never be silenced.
- 0:07S1: But one of her toughest battles was a very private one.
- 0:11S3: It was the worst thing that could have happened to her.
- 0:13S3: Her children were her life.
- 0:18S1: Virginia, a podcast from the newsrooms of the age, The
- 0:21S1: Sydney Morning Herald and WA today. Coming soon.
- 0:30S4: I'm Jacqueline Maley, and this is Inside Politics from the
- 0:33S4: newsrooms of the Sydney Morning Herald and the age. We're
- 0:36S4: very happy to have our very own chief political correspondent,
- 0:40S4: Paul Circle, back in the country this week for the podcast.
- 0:43S4: He's been at the Soccer World Cup. Paul, how was it?
- 0:46S5: It was extremely fun, probably one of the best trips
- 0:48S5: of my life. But I was wondering just in the
- 0:50S5: prep for this podcast, if it was more ill advised
- 0:53S5: to take off your excellent goalkeeper before a penalty shoot out,
- 0:57S5: or if it was even more ill advised to joke
- 1:00S5: about the Japanese prime Minister's melons on a podcast for
- 1:03S5: the Australian Prime Minister.
- 1:05S4: Nice segue there, because, of course, what Paul's talking about
- 1:08S4: is the really the big talking point story of the week.
- 1:10S4: That was this podcast that Anthony Albanese did. I think
- 1:14S4: it came out late last week, but the controversy didn't
- 1:16S4: really break until this week. Paul, tell us, what was
- 1:18S4: that all about?
- 1:19S5: It's called Bush Deep. A woman called Nikki Osborne, who's
- 1:22S5: a former model and now a now podcaster, runs it.
- 1:25S5: It's kind of it's full of double entendres. It's a
- 1:28S5: bit bawdy. She calls herself a Bushi, which of course
- 1:31S5: is also a double entendre, full of kind of sexual
- 1:34S5: gags and light FM style Kyle Sandilands like content. I'd
- 1:39S5: describe it as.
- 1:40S4: The Prime Minister was doing his best to sort of
- 1:43S4: keep up with her brand of bawdy humour, as you
- 1:45S4: put it. What were the main things that he said
- 1:48S4: that offended people?
- 1:49S5: Well, the key one that generated news this week was
- 1:52S5: a game of I always understood the game to be shag, marry, kill,
- 1:56S5: but this one was perhaps a more PG version, which
- 1:59S5: is shag marry date, which really doesn't create much jeopardy
- 2:02S5: in the choices and the choices stakes.
- 2:04S4: The stakes.
- 2:05S5: Are. The stakes are way too low.
- 2:06S4: For poor Sir Karl.
- 2:07S5: And the options that the Prime Minister were given were
- 2:09S5: Rhonda Burchmore, Nicole Kidman and Kylie Minogue. And the Prime
- 2:12S5: Minister looked a little bit reluctant at first to engage
- 2:15S5: in it. A little bit of a pause, but he
- 2:17S5: agreed with the questioner's answer that Kylie might be the
- 2:21S5: the top pick there. And so the idea of the
- 2:24S5: Prime Minister giving preferences on who he would sleep with,
- 2:27S5: while obviously tongue in cheek, probably inoffensive to a lot
- 2:31S5: of Australians, is arguably unbecoming for someone in that role.
- 2:36S5: I thought there were other elements of it that stuck
- 2:38S5: out to me even more. Just as I read the
- 2:40S5: stories on this this week, which was, I think the
- 2:42S5: Prime Minister actually leant into this one a bit more
- 2:45S5: than perhaps the shag, marry kill question, which was around
- 2:48S5: the Japanese prime minister bringing melons and him joking about
- 2:53S5: melons in a in a physical connotation.
- 2:56S4: Yeah. The setup was that this woman, Bush deep. Nikki Osborne,
- 3:01S4: asked him what was the strangest gift that he'd been
- 3:03S4: given by a foreign leader. And he said, um, yeah,
- 3:06S4: the Japanese prime Minister, Sanna Takaichi. AM I saying that right?
- 3:09S5: Yeah, I think that's pretty much right.
- 3:10S4: Yeah, yeah. Um, she brought melons to the lodge, and
- 3:13S4: so he was sort of raising his eyebrows about it.
- 3:15S4: And then there was a bunch of jokes about melons.
- 3:17S4: She came in with two melons, Pamela Anderson, etc. so
- 3:20S4: it's just like really predictable. I mean, I don't even know, like,
- 3:25S4: I just find this stuff so wearying, that kind of humor.
- 3:29S4: But for me, it was kind of like the Japanese.
- 3:31S4: It's the Japanese prime minister. Like, isn't that a diplomatic
- 3:34S4: incident to kind of mock her or to kind of
- 3:36S4: gracelessly sort of cast aspersions on the gift that she brought.
- 3:41S5: It's and she's, um, among many straight edged world leaders,
- 3:46S5: she's perhaps one of the most straight edged. I don't
- 3:48S5: think she'd appreciate that type of humor at all.
- 3:50S4: Japan's an important ally. I just thought that was an
- 3:52S4: odd thing to do in the context of the, the,
- 3:55S4: a humorous podcast that's clearly going to get back to
- 3:58S4: her through diplomatic channels anyway.
- 4:00S5: It was. And I think there's a genuine question and
- 4:02S5: a fair argument from conservatives, or at least a plausible
- 4:05S5: argument that if this was a coalition prime minister, there
- 4:08S5: would have been a quicker, more fierce reaction at a
- 4:11S5: joke like that towards a female world leader. And then
- 4:13S5: the last bit, and I know we want to move
- 4:15S5: on from this because it's important, but at the end
- 4:17S5: of the day, probably trivial, trivial in the terms of
- 4:20S5: the governance of the country. There was some jokes from
- 4:22S5: the Prime Minister around when he and his new wife would, um,
- 4:28S5: you know, get into bed together. And this was a
- 4:31S5: kind of back and forth on when, when the right
- 4:33S5: moment was for them. And, you know, I get that
- 4:35S5: we're in the highly difficult media environment to get your
- 4:40S5: voice into the algorithm. Politicians across the world are grappling
- 4:44S5: with this. You look at the feeds of Australian politicians,
- 4:47S5: particularly on the left, and it's full of TikTok dances.
- 4:51S5: It's full of these, um, you know, new formats that
- 4:53S5: are kind of used physical humor and song to get
- 4:57S5: into your, get into your attention and cause you not
- 5:00S5: to scroll past this inevitably leads to some awkward moments.
- 5:04S5: You've got to have a crack to get into people's algorithms.
- 5:08S5: So there's risk there. And so I empathise with the
- 5:11S5: Prime Minister. Um, and as I said earlier, I don't
- 5:14S5: think the majority of Australians would have found this highly offensive.
- 5:18S5: But what this kind of content leads to is, you know,
- 5:22S5: riskier moments where you might fall into some traps. Reminds
- 5:25S5: me of Peter Dutton, and some of his worst moments
- 5:28S5: were on talkback radio with Ray Hadley. He'd get in
- 5:32S5: these long winded back and forths with no challenging questions,
- 5:35S5: and he'd let things slip. And just maybe just a
- 5:38S5: final point. If we're in the era of where we've
- 5:40S5: normalised Kyle Sandilands for as long as we have that
- 5:43S5: kind of FM talkback content is not dissimilar to this
- 5:48S5: bushy podcast really at all. So perhaps this is just
- 5:51S5: the new world. Standards are lower. People move on very quickly.
- 5:54S5: This is the internet.
- 5:56S4: Yeah. I mean, I guess I have a few thoughts
- 5:58S4: about it. Like you say, it's not offensive to the
- 6:00S4: majority of Australians and I'm sure it's not. And on
- 6:02S4: one reading, it's like, oh, you know, like he's just
- 6:04S4: making this sort of off the cuff comment about Kylie Minogue,
- 6:07S4: who's like pretty hot, let's face it. Um, I, I
- 6:11S4: don't think that politicians should engage in that stuff. Maybe
- 6:14S4: I'm a prude, but I also think, I think the
- 6:16S4: rule for politicians is like 100 fold. The rule for
- 6:19S4: just general people in any kind of professional workplace, which
- 6:22S4: is just don't talk about don't talk about other people
- 6:24S4: in a sexual context, particularly men. Don't talk about women
- 6:27S4: in a sexual context. Just don't do it. Um, just
- 6:30S4: avoid it. And I thought we were all on the
- 6:32S4: same page with that stuff now. And it's not offensive,
- 6:34S4: but it's exclusionary. I mean, I don't find that funny.
- 6:38S4: I don't like women. Women aren't laughing along to like,
- 6:40S4: oh yeah, you know, melons like Kylie Minogue. So hot. Yeah,
- 6:43S4: I'd shag her. Women aren't women aren't laughing along to that.
- 6:47S4: Like it's a, it's a it's a joke for men
- 6:50S4: to men that excludes women and that that that's even
- 6:53S4: notwithstanding the fact that it was a woman who asked it.
- 6:55S4: The other thing that that I guess bugged me about
- 6:58S4: the whole thing was just. It was so low brow
- 7:01S4: and I, I don't want to be a snob, and
- 7:04S4: I don't think I am a snob, but if that
- 7:07S4: is the level of our sort of funny political debate
- 7:10S4: or our satirical political debate in America, they have this
- 7:14S4: amazing tradition of, you know, late night shows where they
- 7:17S4: do really, really pointy political satire and they have politicians
- 7:21S4: on sometimes, and they do a great job of satirizing them,
- 7:24S4: but also joking with them. In England, they have a
- 7:27S4: similar tradition. In France, they you know, as I said
- 7:29S4: in my column, they literally have philosophers on television talking
- 7:32S4: about politics. And like, if this is our cultural output
- 7:35S4: and this is the kind of thing that politicians are
- 7:36S4: cooperating with, like, Lord, help us. It's just so lowbrow.
- 7:40S5: What do you think it means, Jack, for the Prime
- 7:43S5: Minister's legacy on women's issues? Does it have a material
- 7:47S5: effect on his legacy?
- 7:48S4: So that's interesting. So I got a text message, like
- 7:51S4: a very sort of robust text message from someone in
- 7:54S4: the coalition world, shall I say. And they said, if
- 7:57S4: this was Tony Abbott, like, you know, people would be
- 8:00S4: calling for his resignation. And they and, you know, all
- 8:03S4: the times that Tony Abbott sort of transgressed in similar ways. So,
- 8:06S4: you know, he called Fiona Scott the candidate for, um,
- 8:09S4: for the liberal candidate for Lindsay.
- 8:12S5: Hot or sexy sex appeal.
- 8:14S4: That's right. She said said she had sex appeal. He
- 8:17S4: said sort of a similar thing about his own daughters
- 8:19S4: or he said they were not bad looking daughters. Um,
- 8:21S4: there was you know, there was also the famous incident
- 8:25S4: where he was on ABC radio with Jon Faine in Melbourne,
- 8:27S4: and a woman came on the line who was who
- 8:29S4: said that she had sort of worked as a sex,
- 8:31S4: as a sex worker on phone, phone, sex operator, because
- 8:34S4: she was so hard up. And Tony Abbott was caught
- 8:37S4: winking at Jon Faine in a sort of bawdy way. Right.
- 8:40S4: And he was slayed for that. Like he really was
- 8:42S4: slayed for it. And this person was like, why is
- 8:45S4: the media not treating this in the in the same way?
- 8:48S4: Now I think we did. I think we did call
- 8:50S4: Anthony Albanese out for it. But certainly all of the
- 8:53S4: labor politicians who who were the foot soldiers who were
- 8:56S4: sent out to defend him. So Tanya Plibersek and Richard
- 9:00S4: Marles went on radio that morning. He'd apologised unequivocally, which
- 9:03S4: I guess, you know, you've got to give him credit
- 9:04S4: for that. Um and they all came out and said, well,
- 9:07S4: look at what he's done. This is the best prime
- 9:09S4: minister and the best government for women's rights. And I
- 9:11S4: think that's probably the crucial difference. You could not say
- 9:13S4: that about Tony Abbott, who famously only had one woman
- 9:16S4: in his cabinet, and that he was sort of forced
- 9:18S4: to have her.
- 9:18S5: That's fair. If you're judging him on on the merits
- 9:20S5: of that theme or that policy area. Surely the actual
- 9:24S5: policy record matters to some extent. I did feel very
- 9:27S5: sorry for Tanya Plibersek because I think it was Monday
- 9:29S5: morning she went out on breakfast TV in a regular slot,
- 9:32S5: which means that the Prime Minister's office is well aware
- 9:34S5: that she's on at that time, and she had to
- 9:37S5: grit her teeth and talk about the record on women's policy,
- 9:40S5: but was not able to say that the Prime Minister
- 9:42S5: had apologized or would apologize. And I think a short
- 9:45S5: time later, perhaps hours. But I could be wrong on that.
- 9:48S5: The Prime Minister put out a very clear cut and
- 9:51S5: concise message, saying he unequivocally apologised. So spare a thought
- 9:55S5: for Tanya Plibersek, who's not a not a close friend
- 9:57S5: of the Prime Minister's in general.
- 9:58S4: No, they they they're probably not simpatico at the best
- 10:01S4: of times. So, I mean, I don't know what it
- 10:04S4: says really, except that, yeah, it's very difficult for politicians
- 10:06S4: to navigate traditional media in, you know, the things that
- 10:10S4: they've always had to do, like go on 730, talk
- 10:12S4: to Sydney Morning Herald and the Age. Um, you know,
- 10:15S4: go on ABC radio. And now they have to just, there's,
- 10:18S4: you know, people are so siloed, so they have to
- 10:21S4: be able to reach people in all sorts of different ways.
- 10:23S4: So I get that they would want to do this
- 10:25S4: kind of stuff. I just think maybe you've got to
- 10:27S4: exercise better judgment or, you know, at least go in
- 10:30S4: there thinking, I'm not going to answer any sexual questions.
- 10:32S4: Like it's a really, really low bar. Yeah.
- 10:34S5: And you, you would think he'd he's learnt his lesson.
- 10:37S5: There was a slip up in a similar moment in
- 10:39S5: a not, not quite exactly the same, but a similarly
- 10:44S5: open conversation with, I think, a News Corp newspaper editor
- 10:47S5: a few months ago. And it was one of those
- 10:49S5: forums where they give you, uh, they demand a one
- 10:52S5: word response to another person's name. They said grace tame.
- 10:55S5: And he said difficult. He had to apologize for that
- 10:57S5: as well. So these forums are really hard for politicians. Um,
- 11:02S5: but if the, if the overall aim is to try
- 11:06S5: and get your voice into the mix and say something
- 11:09S5: compelling enough or funny enough or entertaining enough to get
- 11:13S5: eyeballs onto it, I'd argue that not enough of our
- 11:16S5: politicians are making compelling policy arguments or points about the country,
- 11:22S5: or making controversial, um, entrances into interesting, important debates to
- 11:27S5: get their voice heard.
- 11:28S4: Yeah, I think it goes back to authenticity. It's like
- 11:31S4: this sort of weird thing where they they do this
- 11:33S4: sort of stuff because it's like, oh, I've got to
- 11:34S4: be relatable and authentic, and I want to be seen
- 11:37S4: in a forum where I'm a normal person, not speaking
- 11:39S4: like a political robot. But then you go into that
- 11:41S4: forum and like Anthony Albanese has basically just had to
- 11:44S4: backtrack on all the stuff that he supposedly said in
- 11:46S4: an off the cuff, casual way, in a sort of
- 11:49S4: the real him kind of way. He apologised unequivocally for it,
- 11:52S4: and all of his ministers were like, well, that's not
- 11:53S4: really what he's done in, in, in his actual public
- 11:56S4: life in policy. So was it authentic or was it not?
- 11:59S4: I mean it, yeah. I mean, I don't know what
- 12:02S4: the solution is. I don't know if I was a
- 12:03S4: media adviser to a politician, what I would tell them
- 12:06S4: to do or not do. But surely it has to
- 12:07S4: be in keeping with your own value system and in
- 12:10S4: keeping with what you're comfortable out of on a personality level,
- 12:13S4: you know, because people, people will see through it. Okay,
- 12:17S4: let's switch gears now to the economy. Deloitte Access Economics
- 12:20S4: has released a report this week about the economic conditions
- 12:22S4: of different OECD countries. And it found that Australia has
- 12:26S4: very sluggish growth. We've got much higher inflation than most
- 12:29S4: OECD countries, and our living standards are going backwards. What
- 12:31S4: else did it say, Paul?
- 12:33S5: Yeah, totally grim set of economic data. The AFR reported
- 12:36S5: on Monday that Australia's 3.6% underlying inflation rate was the
- 12:40S5: equal highest among developed countries. Then there was the Deloitte
- 12:44S5: report you refer to, which says that the country's on
- 12:46S5: track for its first consecutive sub 2% growth era since
- 12:52S5: the 1990s, recession in the very early 90s. And then
- 12:55S5: there was the OECD report, which said that Australian real
- 12:58S5: wages have fallen by 5% over the past five years,
- 13:01S5: which is one of the worst results out of the
- 13:03S5: 38 member nations. Pretty jarring time for that set of
- 13:07S5: data to come through, given the government has adopted quite
- 13:10S5: a triumphalist economic tone post its budget passing the parliament.
- 13:15S5: There are obviously historic reforms to the housing market, but
- 13:18S5: the counter to the or the criticism of the budget
- 13:21S5: was that the CGT changes might actually stifle the economy further.
- 13:25S5: At a time when we've been through a period of
- 13:27S5: sclerotic growth.
- 13:28S4: Yeah. I mean, the RBA governor, Michele Bullock, did sort
- 13:31S4: of say, I think at the last rates decision, a
- 13:34S4: slow run in the economy is sort of what we need,
- 13:37S4: because we need that inflation to come down. So, you know,
- 13:41S4: it's not what anybody wants to hear, but I suppose
- 13:44S4: it's hard to mount any kind of economic triumphalist argument,
- 13:47S4: as you say, if inflation is this high because inflation
- 13:51S4: just ruins everything. It just bites. There's no point getting
- 13:53S4: a salary increase or the wage increases that the government
- 13:57S4: has managed, managed to get for low paid workers, because
- 14:00S4: it all just gets eaten up when you go and
- 14:02S4: do supermarket shopping or you pay rent or whatever. So
- 14:05S4: it kind of ruins the whole economic pie. What did
- 14:08S4: Treasurer Jim Chalmers say in response to these data points?
- 14:12S5: Well, the treasurer talks about the fact that real wages
- 14:14S5: have grown for quite a significant period of this government's life.
- 14:19S5: There's been a better record than the previous government on
- 14:22S5: that issue. There's some really interesting data that some research sorry,
- 14:26S5: that our colleague Liam Mannix, our science reporter, published yesterday
- 14:30S5: on how inflation affects people's psyches and political cycles. And
- 14:35S5: there's strong data that now suggests that over a period
- 14:40S5: since 1948, over, I think nearly 400 elections, when inflation
- 14:44S5: rises well above expectations, extremist and populist parties have a really,
- 14:49S5: really good time. Because when people see higher prices than
- 14:52S5: they can afford, that creates a sense of general unfairness,
- 14:55S5: and people look to alternatives. And the issue with our
- 14:58S5: inflation trajectory at the moment is that even when our
- 15:02S5: economy just starts to tick up into some higher than
- 15:05S5: expected growth numbers, we see inflation tick up again, because
- 15:08S5: our low productivity economy means that we can't sustain high
- 15:12S5: levels of growth. So we're kind of locked into this
- 15:14S5: locked into this moment of low growth, high inflation at
- 15:18S5: the moment or relatively high inflation. And it's kind of
- 15:21S5: unclear how we break the cycle. AI is one clear opportunity. Uh,
- 15:26S5: our GDP has been propped up by big investment in
- 15:28S5: data centers, and the prospect of AI filtering out across
- 15:31S5: the economy could be our first high productivity moment in
- 15:35S5: a long time, but then we're going to run into
- 15:37S5: all these other challenges around social license for data centers, unions, um,
- 15:41S5: urging more involvement in the AI rollout and still trade
- 15:44S5: offs there as well.
- 15:46S4: And copyright as a, as an author. I mean, they
- 15:48S4: just rip off these large language models, just rip off
- 15:52S4: books and just steal people's content. The data center thing,
- 15:56S4: certainly the government is trying to, um, represent it as
- 15:59S4: a is a huge economic opportunity and a big boom
- 16:01S4: for us. And maybe it will be, but the RBA
- 16:03S4: actually warned this week that those data centers might add
- 16:06S4: to inflation pressures. Because if you have all this demand
- 16:09S4: coming into the economy, so demand for labor workers and
- 16:12S4: particularly energy, and because our productivity is not great, we
- 16:15S4: just can't handle the demand. So it all gets sucked
- 16:17S4: up by the data centers. Everybody else loses those resources
- 16:21S4: and prices go up. So even though AI might be better,
- 16:24S4: hopefully will be better for productivity in the long run.
- 16:26S4: In the short term, it might make inflation worse.
- 16:30S5: Yeah, there's a big political firestorm coming over data centers
- 16:33S5: where we're in the a handful of countries in the
- 16:36S5: world on investment. We have great land and energy resources. Uh,
- 16:40S5: Ed Husic, the former industry minister who was dumped by
- 16:43S5: the prime minister, is far more gloomy on AI and
- 16:47S5: its role in Australia than than the ministers in charge
- 16:49S5: at the moment. And Husic has been saying this week
- 16:52S5: that at a time when main nation building goal is
- 16:55S5: to build housing will be diverting construction resources to build
- 16:59S5: data centres, which he says are merely a function of
- 17:03S5: AI firms trying to justify their huge share market valuations
- 17:09S5: rather than actually building. Uh, you know, centres that are
- 17:13S5: going to be required to, um, feed into our, our,
- 17:17S5: our economies. So he's saying we're effectively building data centres
- 17:20S5: because tech tech firms in America need to find land
- 17:24S5: at the same time as we're struggling to build enough houses.
- 17:27S4: Yeah. Because a lot of people are saying that they've
- 17:28S4: overinvested basically in this technology and they need to recoup
- 17:31S4: some some of that investment. Um, yeah. I mean, and
- 17:35S4: that is a good point about diverting. I mean, we're
- 17:36S4: already having enough trouble building enough houses and we've got
- 17:39S4: a labor shortage and we've got supply shortages that are
- 17:42S4: contributing to that. Yeah. I don't know how it all works,
- 17:45S4: but it'll be interesting. Hey, listen, um, just quickly, the
- 17:48S4: Prime Minister has been in Fiji this week, and then
- 17:51S4: we had obviously a missile launch from China following. We
- 17:55S4: signed a mutual defense pact with Fiji. And sort of
- 17:59S4: in a petulant display, you might say China immediately launched
- 18:02S4: this missile. What was what was that all about?
- 18:05S5: Yeah. Another important moment on the government's Pacific strategy. It's
- 18:09S5: been a real win for this government over a period
- 18:11S5: of years. Now, how many deals they've been able to
- 18:13S5: sign with Pacific nations as intense competition with China in
- 18:17S5: that region to gain ascendancy and build, build security and
- 18:22S5: defence relationships with these, uh, geographically important nations. And we
- 18:27S5: just keep having wins. The J one was a surprise announcement,
- 18:31S5: and the depth of the agreement was also a surprise.
- 18:34S5: And then, as you said, I think it was a
- 18:36S5: day later, China fired a nuclear capable ballistic missile across
- 18:41S5: the Pacific without giving much notice. And we saw for
- 18:44S5: the first time in quite a while, Australian ministers language
- 18:48S5: ratchet up towards China. There's the, you know, agree where
- 18:51S5: we can disagree, where we must mantra. We saw a small, um,
- 18:55S5: reversion to some more hawkish language given China's, as you say,
- 18:59S5: petulant action which really annoyed our Pacific neighbours is an
- 19:03S5: assertion of Chinese dominance. Uh, another sign for the Pacific
- 19:08S5: that they are dealing with a nation that has huge
- 19:12S5: military might, big expansionary intent that yes, it might build
- 19:17S5: any building or freeway or port that these Pacific nations
- 19:20S5: would like, but they adopt this aggressive stance and remind
- 19:23S5: the Pacific and the world. This has made waves in
- 19:26S5: Europe and America as well, that they that they do
- 19:28S5: have an aggressive edge. So it was an important week
- 19:31S5: in China relations, which we don't have enough time to
- 19:33S5: go in into.
- 19:34S4: Yeah, yeah. There are always sort of teetering on the
- 19:37S4: edge of aggression, it seems. And then Narendra Narendra Modi,
- 19:41S4: the hugely popular Indian prime minister, at least he's hugely
- 19:44S4: popular with the diaspora here in Australia. He's in Australia
- 19:47S4: this week. The Prime Minister is trying to sort of
- 19:50S4: bask in his limelight, if you like. They'll be at
- 19:52S4: the Marvel Stadium in Melbourne with people from the Indian
- 19:57S4: diaspora who live down in Melbourne, and it'll be a
- 20:00S4: fun time. Anthony Albanese is going to be there. He's
- 20:02S4: he's done this before with Narendra Modi, where he kind of.
- 20:05S4: This was in Sydney and I think it was during
- 20:07S4: the election campaign. And he sort of said, you know,
- 20:09S4: the only other person that gets this kind of reception
- 20:11S4: is Bruce Springsteen, the boss. So it was a mutual
- 20:14S4: love fest. It's kind of like, um, it's going to
- 20:16S4: be good press, surely, for Anthony Albanese.
- 20:19S5: Great press. I suspect there'll be no mention from Anthony
- 20:21S5: Albanese about Narendra Modi's quite questionable. Human rights record. Uh,
- 20:26S5: there's two there's two elements to this. There's the geopolitical
- 20:29S5: hedge against China. India is a really important player there
- 20:33S5: in that region. And a, and a big block that,
- 20:36S5: you know, is not in in the pro-China world. It's
- 20:38S5: not quite in the pro America world either. So it's
- 20:41S5: crucial to keep India on side. So there is that
- 20:43S5: important geopolitical task. But the Indian diaspora in Australia means
- 20:47S5: that relations with India are also a domestically important issue.
- 20:53S5: And it's a really key part of Labor's voting coalition.
- 20:56S4: And surely this is um you know, it's a bit
- 20:58S4: of a sort of he's he'd be making a bit
- 21:00S4: of a point, sort of standing alongside the Indian Prime Minister,
- 21:03S4: as you say, in front of Indian born voters or
- 21:06S4: people of Indian background, voters, at a time when his
- 21:10S4: main political competitors coalition, the Coalition and One Nation, are very,
- 21:13S4: very reluctant to even say that they support multiculturalism. So
- 21:17S4: it's a bit of a statement in that sense.
- 21:19S5: Very striking contrast, I agree.
- 21:21S4: Yeah, Paul, that was really interesting. It was a big
- 21:24S4: news week and it's really good to have you back.
- 21:26S4: We'll see you next week. Who knows what might happen then.
- 21:29S4: Maybe we should. Um, I don't know. Maybe we should
- 21:32S4: get more bawdy on our podcast.
- 21:34S5: I actually love Kylie Minogue. She's one of my favorite.
- 21:37S5: Like her dance music is fantastic. Yeah, we're highbrow and
- 21:40S5: people probably think we're annoying and distasteful. So that's the world.
- 21:43S4: Yeah. Okay, let's be annoying. Distasteful. Let's keep doing that
- 21:47S4: next week.
- 21:48S6: See Jack.
- 21:51S4: You can read all of our political news on our
- 21:53S4: website dot com.au or smh.com.au. Today's episode was produced by
- 21:59S4: Kea Wong. Our executive producer is Tammy Mills, and our
- 22:02S4: podcasts are overseen by Lisa Muxworthy and Tom McKendrick. Before
- 22:07S4: you go, follow Inside Politics and leave a review for
- 22:09S4: us on Apple or Spotify. I'm Jacqueline Maley, thank you
- 22:13S4: for listening.