Latest / The Epstein Chronicles / Leon Black Wins Epstein-Linked Sanctions Battle as Judge Finds Misconduct by Wigdor Lawyer (4/27/26)

Transcript

Leon Black Wins Epstein-Linked Sanctions Battle as Judge Finds Misconduct by Wigdor Lawyer (4/27/26) · The Epstein Chronicles

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: What's up everyone, and welcome to another episode of the
• 0:02
  Epstein Chronicles. So, Leon Black has been engaged in a
• 0:07
  battle with Douglas Wigdor and his firm, and the issue
• 0:12
  stems from a lawsuit that was brought by Wigdoor and
• 0:15
  lawyer Jean Christiansen against Leon Black. And Leon Black said
• 0:20
  that the lawsuit was made up and that Douglas Wigdor
• 0:25
  and the Whigdoor law firm were in on it, and
• 0:28
  that the whole entire thing was nothing more than a
• 0:30
  hustle and a shakedown to try and get money from
• 0:33
  Leon Black. Well, Leon Black has now won that sanctioned
• 0:37
  battle against Wigdor, but remember the client that they were
• 0:41
  representing is no longer with the firm and her case
• 0:44
  against Leon Black is still active in the court. This
• 0:48
  has to do specifically with the lawyers being sanctioned. And look,
• 0:51
  you have to understand, there's a lot of people that
• 0:54
  are coming out of the woodwork, or have come out
• 0:56
  of the woodwork trying to get paid off of this.
• 0:58
  There are so many grifters out there, so many people
• 1:01
  that have no sort of moral compass and they have
• 1:05
  no problem making pretend that they were assaulted or making
• 1:09
  pretend they were part of this as they look to
• 1:12
  get a bag. And what that does, obviously, is it
• 1:15
  creates a tougher road for people that were actually harmed. Now,
• 1:20
  I'm not saying that this lady who is suing Leon
• 1:23
  Black didn't get harmed or that nothing happened to her.
• 1:25
  I don't know. But when you have lawyers like this
• 1:28
  out here playing games and they get sanctioned, certainly not
• 1:31
  a good look. Today's article is from Fox News, and
• 1:35
  the headline Federal judge says lawyer lied repeatedly during epstein
• 1:39
  Lin's suit against billionaire Leon Black. I mean, geez, Louise,
• 1:44
  why do you have to lie? Plenty of evidence out there.
• 1:47
  What are you lying about? And if you're gonna lie
• 1:51
  against a dude like Leon Black, you have to know
• 1:53
  that his lawyers are going to do everything in their
• 1:56
  power to destroy your narrative. And I don't know if
• 2:01
  there's anybody out there with more money than Leon Black
• 2:04
  when it comes to this kind of thing. God's worth
• 2:06
  what fifteen billion dollars? You think he cares about paying
• 2:09
  lawyers two thousand dollars an hour? Most certainly not. This
• 2:13
  article was authored by Sophia Compton, a federal judge has
• 2:18
  sanctioned the law firm representing a woman in a lawsuit
• 2:21
  accusing billionairely On Black of sexual assault linked to the
• 2:24
  late disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein, but stopped short of throwing
• 2:29
  the case out entirely. And I think that's important because
• 2:32
  the judge obviously is seen enough here for this to
• 2:36
  go forward. If this was so egregious that there was
• 2:39
  no evidence whatsoever, I think Judge Clark would have thrown
• 2:43
  the whole entire thing out, but she didn't do that.
• 2:46
  In a seventy six page opinion and order, US District
• 2:50
  Judge Jessica Clark found that attorney Jean Christensen and her
• 2:54
  firm Whigdoor LLP engaged in serious, sanctionable misconduct during the
• 2:59
  litigation and that should never happen, not from a high
• 3:02
  powered firm like Whigdor. Completely unacceptable. And what it does
• 3:07
  is it gives ammunition of people who want to call
• 3:10
  this a hoax. And I think some of these lawyers
• 3:14
  that are involved have questionable motives at best. I mean,
• 3:17
  look at some of the lawyers that were involved with
• 3:19
  Diddy when we were covering that. I mean, Tyrone Blackburn,
• 3:24
  you had the other woman, I forget her name now
• 3:26
  she got sanctioned, Ariel Mitchell, Ariel Mitchell, kid was it
• 3:30
  something like that? Anyway, she was threatening to be sanctioned.
• 3:34
  It was a shit show, and you had people coming
• 3:36
  out of the woodwork making all kinds of crazy claims.
• 3:38
  So it was interesting to watch how the judges reacted
• 3:41
  to all of that and what they allowed to move
• 3:44
  forward and what they threw out. And I think we're
• 3:46
  seeing shades of that here with Leon Black as well.
• 3:49
  The judge is not willing to throw the whole thing out.
• 3:51
  But it's obvious that the lawyers over at wigdoor were
• 3:56
  engaging in sanctionable offenses. Because a judge doesn't just sanction
• 4:01
  a lawyer out of the blue, right, it has to
• 4:04
  be a serious offense because it's a big deal. I mean,
• 4:08
  this lawyer, Jean Christensen, she has to file the sanction
• 4:12
  with every case he takes in SDNY, and I mean
• 4:16
  that's you know, a death knell right. As a client,
• 4:19
  are you going to go to a lawyer who's under sanctioned?
• 4:22
  I know I'm not. I'm going to somebody that has
• 4:25
  a great reputation and somebody that's going to have a great,
• 4:29
  you know, relationship with the judge and the court. That's
• 4:32
  what I'm looking for, not somebody under sanctioned. Clark wrote
• 4:37
  that Christiansen lied repeatedly to the court and opposing counsel
• 4:41
  about a related case and directed or client to delete
• 4:44
  a potentially irrelevant social media account. Well that's not good.
• 4:50
  And if you have to play games and you have to,
• 4:53
  you know, have your client do things that are not acceptable,
• 4:57
  chances are you don't have the evidence to back up
• 4:59
  what you're saying, right, I mean, that's the only thing
• 5:02
  I can take from it. And it's bizarre. If you're
• 5:04
  going to go after a guy like Leon Frickin Black,
• 5:07
  you better have your ducks in a row. This is
• 5:09
  a serious man with a lot of serious power and
• 5:12
  a lot of serious friends. So if you don't have
• 5:15
  your ducks in a row and you don't have the
• 5:17
  evidence to back up what you're saying, Leon Black will
• 5:20
  eat you alive. We've seen it plenty of times before.
• 5:24
  In light of the serious and varied misconduct, the court
• 5:27
  strongly considered granting the case terminating sanctions defendant requests in
• 5:31
  this matter, Clark wrote, However, the court ultimately concluded that
• 5:36
  lesser sanctions can address the misconduct. And again that's because
• 5:40
  Judge Clark has probably seen something here that disturbs her,
• 5:44
  and there's probably enough there for her to say that
• 5:46
  a jury should look at it as opposed to just
• 5:49
  her dismissing it. Now, that's my speculation. Of course, I
• 5:53
  don't know what Judge Clark's mental state is or you
• 5:56
  know what she's thinking, but that seems like the likeliest
• 5:59
  scenario in my opinion. The lawsuit alleges that Black, co
• 6:02
  founder of the Apollo Global Management, raped the sixteen year
• 6:06
  old girl in New York City in two thousand and two.
• 6:10
  The accuser, identified as Jane Doe, claimed she was previously
• 6:13
  abused and groomed by Jeffrey Epstein and Glenn Maxwell, who
• 6:17
  she says trafficktor to other men, including Leon Black. The
• 6:22
  judge also raised concerns about the plaintiff's evidence, finding that
• 6:25
  some material, including sonogram images contained in personal journals, had
• 6:30
  been falsified. Clark did not rule on the underlying allegations,
• 6:35
  but determined that certain supporting evidence could not be relied
• 6:38
  upon not looking good, not looking good at all. Now,
• 6:42
  of course, we'll have to see how it all ends
• 6:45
  up right, but so far not looking good for the plaintiff.
• 6:49
  And if they found falsified sonogram reports, that's not going
• 6:52
  to look good to a jury, I can promise you.
• 6:56
  The plaintiff has alleged that she was subjected to an
• 6:59
  impregnation game involving Epstein and others, claiming she was forced
• 7:02
  to carry pregnancies resulting from sexual abuse. Well, that tracks.
• 7:07
  We've heard that from multiple people. So I'm certainly not
• 7:10
  writing that off, and I'm not writing off her story,
• 7:12
  but we have to deal with the cards we've been dealt,
• 7:15
  and according to Judge Clark, there's some issues here. According
• 7:21
  to plaintiff, she was forced to carry out pregnancies that
• 7:23
  resulted from the men who sexually abused her, and Maxwell
• 7:27
  took photographs of Plaintiff's body as it changed during her pregnancies,
• 7:31
  Clark wrote. Plaintiff testified that all of the sonograms in
• 7:35
  the journals were hers from several abuse related pregnancies, including
• 7:39
  some pregnancies that came to term and others that were terminated. Look,
• 7:45
  you have to know that the court is going to
• 7:46
  be onto the game, and if you have false documentation,
• 7:51
  that's never going to cut it. That's the kind of
• 7:54
  thing that the court is going to sniff out right away.
• 7:57
  And I'm beyond shock to hear that Whigdor wouldn't get
• 8:00
  age in this. I mean, we're talking about a pretty
• 8:03
  reputable firm, you know, one of these white collar gunshoe
• 8:07
  firms that has a lot of big clients. So for
• 8:10
  me anyway, it's pretty concerning to hear that they're going
• 8:13
  about their business like this. The judge ordered Christiansen to
• 8:19
  file the misconduct ruling in all of her federal cases
• 8:22
  in the Second Circuit for the next year and for
• 8:24
  five years in any case in which sanctions are sought
• 8:27
  against her, her firm, or her client. Not looking good
• 8:31
  for Miss Christiansen. Imagine having to file that every single
• 8:36
  time that you take a case. Yikes, every time your
• 8:41
  boss asks you to do something, you have to show
• 8:43
  up with your reprimand and be like, hey, you know what,
• 8:45
  I don't know if I should be working this case.
• 8:47
  I'm under sanction still. Well, here's an idea. Don't try
• 8:51
  and game the system. Don't try and be a scumbag,
• 8:54
  and just do the right thing. Charge hard for your clients,
• 8:57
  but don't cross the line. And I know people are
• 9:01
  not big fans of somebody like Alan Jackson, but boy
• 9:05
  does he know what he's doing. And if I was
• 9:07
  ever in trouble and I have the money, certainly one
• 9:10
  of the first people I'd call. There's an art to this.
• 9:16
  You can't be hamhanded in the court. You have to
• 9:18
  use some finesse, right, you have to make sure that
• 9:20
  you're towing the line without crossing it. And according to
• 9:24
  Judge Clark, Wigdor crossed it and it's going to have
• 9:28
  ramifications for the whole firm. Make no mistake about that. Now.
• 9:31
  Doesn't mean it's the end of Wigdor. Probably not. It's
• 9:35
  a gigantic firm, and I'm sure other lawyers have been
• 9:37
  sanctioned there before. But it's not a good look and
• 9:40
  it gives the detractors something to latch onto. Well, what
• 9:43
  about Leon Black? What about the case I got sanctioned?
• 9:46
  And that's the only kind of inroad people really need.
• 9:49
  They'll latch onto that and they'll say, look, this is
• 9:50
  all bs. It's a hoax, just like Donald Trump said.
• 9:53
  Wigdor LLP, which no longer represents the plaintiff, said it
• 9:57
  was upset by the sanctions, but noted the case remains active.
• 10:01
  Political reported. We're pleased that our former client will get
• 10:04
  our day in court, firm founder Douglas Wigdor said in
• 10:07
  a statement. Black's attorney said the plaintiff's credibility has been
• 10:11
  destroyed and called for the case to be withdrawn, urging
• 10:14
  authorities to investigate what she described as fraud. Yo. If
• 10:18
  I was Leon Black, I'd be asking the same thing.
• 10:20
  Am I being defrauded? Has the court been defrauded? Look,
• 10:24
  we have to call balls and strikes when we see them,
• 10:27
  and if a court is sanctioning somebody, there's an issue there. Black,
• 10:32
  who left Apollo Global Management in twenty twenty one, has
• 10:35
  denied wrongdoing. He's also among several high profile figures expected
• 10:39
  to testify before the House Oversight Committee next month about
• 10:43
  connections to Epstein and Maxwell. Epstein died in jail in
• 10:47
  twenty nineteen while awaiting trial on federal sex trafficking charges.
• 10:51
  Maxwell is serving a twenty year prison sentence after being
• 10:54
  convicted in twenty twenty one on sex trafficking charges. Wigdor,
• 10:59
  LLP and Susan Estrich could not be immediately reached by
• 11:03
  Fox News Digital for comment. So there's a lot to
• 11:07
  take in here. First things first, the sanctions are now official.
• 11:11
  That's first thing first, And according to the judge, there
• 11:15
  has been some BS going on when it comes to
• 11:17
  plaintiff's legal team and the things are trying to pitch
• 11:20
  to the court. Now, with that said, according to Judge Clark,
• 11:26
  it didn't reach a level that the whole case should
• 11:28
  be thrown out. But even with that lifeline, I think
• 11:31
  it's going to be very difficult for this plaintiff to
• 11:33
  get the ball across the goal line. Now, once your
• 11:36
  lawyers have been sanctioned, and once the judge has basically
• 11:39
  called parts of your story BS, it's very hard to
• 11:43
  recover from that. So we'll keep an eye on it
• 11:46
  and like usual, we'll see where it all ends up.
• 11:50
  All the information that goes with this episode can be
• 11:52
  found in the description box.