Latest / Wellness Uncensored / What's a bioweapon & Vax & Covid with Dr. Tau Braun Part II

Transcript

What's a bioweapon & Vax & Covid with Dr. Tau Braun Part II · Wellness Uncensored

0:00
Speaker 1: Any health related information on the following show provides general
0:03
Speaker 1: information only. Content presented on any show by any host
0:07
Speaker 1: or guest should not be substituted for a doctor's advice.
0:09
Speaker 1: Always consult your physician before beginning any new diet, exercise
0:13
Speaker 1: or treatment program.
0:33
Speaker 2: Hey, good afternoon. Welcome everybody back to Wellness Uncensored. My
0:37
Speaker 2: name is Dr. Patty G. I am your host today.
0:40
Speaker 2: I am a psychiatric nurse practitioner by trade. I've spent
0:44
Speaker 2: more than, gosh, 40 years in the healthcare system. All
0:48
Speaker 2: things health, wellness, and a little bit, I guess, off
0:54
Speaker 2: the beaten path as well. So We're going to be
0:57
Speaker 2: picking up today where we left off. Actually, last week,
1:00
Speaker 2: we had a fabulous guest on, Dr. Tao Braun, and
1:03
Speaker 2: he is a psychologist who has been well-versed in a
1:08
Speaker 2: number of things related to bioterrorism, bio-threats. He is a
1:13
Speaker 2: clinical expert. He's got a ton of expertise in threat assessment,
1:17
Speaker 2: threat management, and counterterrorism training. He was a national expert
1:22
Speaker 2: advising on institutions on mass killing prevention response and including
1:28
Speaker 2: biowarfare mitigation response. He's an inventor of a fabulous product
1:33
Speaker 2: that I think you'll all be interested in hearing more
1:34
Speaker 2: about today. It's called copperine. And we'll talk more about
1:39
Speaker 2: that today, but it's a great tool for the use
1:42
Speaker 2: of repair from the spike protein injuries. So without further ado,
1:48
Speaker 2: let's bring on Dr. Braun. And welcome again. So good
1:54
Speaker 2: to have you here.
1:54
Speaker 3: So great to be with you again, Patty. Thank you
1:56
Speaker 3: so much. Thank you. Yeah, I really appreciate the opportunity.
2:00
Speaker 3: And I know from last time, we started talking a
2:04
Speaker 3: little bit about copperine towards the tail end of it. Yeah,
2:08
Speaker 3: let's jump right in now. Yeah, we should just jump
2:10
Speaker 3: right in. And I've got some notes as well. So
2:12
Speaker 3: if you see me looking down, I wanted to make
2:14
Speaker 3: sure that I covered some crucial aspects. Before we even
2:19
Speaker 3: do that, one, I remembered I was supposed to send
2:22
Speaker 3: you some, so it would have been nice for us
2:23
Speaker 3: to compare. compare notes, which I'm going to do. Um,
2:27
Speaker 3: so the popperine looks like this. Um, we don't supply
2:33
Speaker 3: the Mr. Anymore. And the reason that we don't supply
2:35
Speaker 3: the Mr. Anymore is that when we first, and we
2:38
Speaker 3: probably will start, um, doing it again where we can
2:41
Speaker 3: bundle it. But, um, the reason that we stopped doing
2:45
Speaker 3: the Mr. Is that generally I wanted to focus on
2:49
Speaker 3: the product itself. And, um, once you, once you start
2:52
Speaker 3: doing a Mr., if the mister gives out after a
2:57
Speaker 3: couple of months and people want a replacement, all of
3:00
Speaker 3: a sudden I found myself in a position where am
3:03
Speaker 3: I running an electronics company or am I mostly interested
3:08
Speaker 3: in the actual solution itself? So the solution is what's important.
3:14
Speaker 3: People do not have to use this one. This is
3:16
Speaker 3: the one that's recommended on the on the website. They generally,
3:23
Speaker 3: what I find with these is the reason that we
3:26
Speaker 3: recommend these is it's got this little slide mechanism. And
3:30
Speaker 3: so you can slide it open and then you can
3:33
Speaker 3: inhale the mist and it's recommended to inhale for three
3:36
Speaker 3: to five seconds. Some people still like to spray it
3:39
Speaker 3: in their mouths. My kids, my kids grew up doing
3:43
Speaker 3: both nays and mouth, but as a nasal spray, Of
3:46
Speaker 3: course it can be used both ways, but it is, um,
3:49
Speaker 3: it is predominantly, uh, a nasal spray. Um, the slide
3:54
Speaker 3: mechanism is great in that they don't, this has, doesn't
3:58
Speaker 3: have a button on that can land up, um, switching
4:00
Speaker 3: on in your pocket and making your pocket wet and
4:03
Speaker 3: also wasting the copper in. Um, but there's a cute,
4:06
Speaker 3: there's another one on the website. That's a really cute
4:08
Speaker 3: little bunny mister, which, um, kids really like. And I
4:13
Speaker 3: shouldn't say, I should say not only kids, um, I've
4:16
Speaker 3: had a lot of adults like the little, uh, uh,
4:18
Speaker 3: cuter version of this. Um, but really people can choose, um, from,
4:24
Speaker 3: you know, let's say an online store like Amazon, they
4:26
Speaker 3: just need to find themselves a cold mist atomizer is
4:30
Speaker 3: what these are called. They're also called nano misters and
4:33
Speaker 3: it just makes a very fine, it makes a very fine, uh, uh, mist. Um,
4:38
Speaker 3: the reason to do it like this as compared to, um,
4:41
Speaker 3: another nasal, um, uh, hydrator, um, or a nasal spray
4:47
Speaker 3: is generally what, what, what happens with nasal sprays. And
4:50
Speaker 3: there's some good ones out there is you spray it
4:52
Speaker 3: up in your nose, but ultimately you leaking everything down, right.
4:56
Speaker 3: Or you're taking a tissue afterwards and you're blowing out
4:59
Speaker 3: the ingredients that you just put into your nose. So
5:02
Speaker 3: it's really, it's really a nasal spray in some ways
5:05
Speaker 3: is like a, as like a rinse. Um, so this
5:08
Speaker 3: doesn't work like a rinse because what we actually want
5:10
Speaker 3: is we want these particles to stick around. And part
5:13
Speaker 3: of the reason that it has honey in it, besides
5:16
Speaker 3: honey having such incredible antimicrobial properties, the original reason to
5:23
Speaker 3: include honey was actually to make the solution very, very
5:29
Speaker 3: small particles and to coat them with a little bit
5:32
Speaker 3: of sugar. Okay. goes to stay there right it's like
5:36
Speaker 3: it it it gives it gives us some um um
5:40
Speaker 3: some surface adhesion on the mucosal lining and then of
5:44
Speaker 3: course honey itself is is wonderfully antimicrobial um and the
5:51
Speaker 3: main sort of the innovation of this product is that
5:55
Speaker 3: it uses copper and zinc in combination with the rest
5:59
Speaker 3: of the ingredients. Both copper and zinc have incredible antimicrobial properties,
6:05
Speaker 3: but we can get into today is a little bit more,
6:09
Speaker 3: not just about copperine, but around copper and zinc being
6:12
Speaker 3: central to an understanding of what spike protein is doing
6:17
Speaker 3: to the body. And then also why copper and zinc
6:20
Speaker 3: is so important for recovery from spike protein injury and
6:25
Speaker 3: obviously for general health. The other thing I want to say,
6:27
Speaker 3: and I know you've got a good, at the beginning
6:30
Speaker 3: of your show, you've got a good sort of waiver
6:34
Speaker 3: that lets people know. The challenge for me as an
6:38
Speaker 3: inventor of a product is that when I start talking
6:40
Speaker 3: about the properties of things like copper and zinc and
6:43
Speaker 3: how it relates to the spike protein, that people need
6:47
Speaker 3: to understand that by law, I'm not allowed to make
6:51
Speaker 3: those assumptions about copperine as a product. The FTC is
6:57
Speaker 3: very clear in terms of claims and even making sure
7:03
Speaker 3: that people know that when we're talking about the properties
7:06
Speaker 3: of a substance like even myrrh, which is one of
7:11
Speaker 3: the ingredients or, you know, let's say we break down
7:16
Speaker 3: some of the importance of copper. people must be discerning
7:21
Speaker 3: to understand that we're not talking about just the copper
7:23
Speaker 3: that's in copperine. We're talking about all copper, all zinc,
7:26
Speaker 3: all myrrh. So I hope that makes it clear that
7:29
Speaker 3: I'll be talking about the general properties of these substances
7:33
Speaker 3: rather than making claims around copperine itself. But of course,
7:35
Speaker 3: those ingredients are there. Before we do anything, I wanted
7:40
Speaker 3: to check in with you and see how you're doing
7:43
Speaker 3: and how you're reacting to this latest announcement that, you know,
7:48
Speaker 3: Moderna's got this cancer vaccine that's suddenly going to appear
7:52
Speaker 3: and save the world. Of course, it's on the top
7:55
Speaker 3: of my mind, and I just wanted to hear how
7:57
Speaker 3: you are with it.
7:58
Speaker 2: You know, it's really amazing to me that they come
8:01
Speaker 2: up with all these miraculous vaccines on the hinges of
8:05
Speaker 2: so many of the vaccines now that have been taken
8:08
Speaker 2: away from our children and babies because they're now deeming
8:12
Speaker 2: the unreliability and the lack of safety around all these
8:16
Speaker 2: early childhood vaccines. And now as if there's, and I
8:19
Speaker 2: often say this, Dr. Braun, it's like, they always think
8:22
Speaker 2: there's a pill for that, or there's an injection for that.
8:26
Speaker 2: And what have they always done? My impression of all
8:29
Speaker 2: that is when you instill fear and people are always
8:33
Speaker 2: afraid of dying, they're afraid of this disease, that disease,
8:36
Speaker 2: they're afraid of cancer. Now they, what can we do
8:39
Speaker 2: to get people's attention? We can stop cancer with the vaccines.
8:43
Speaker 2: There's lots of ways I believe that we can address
8:45
Speaker 2: and heal from a cancer cell, but I don't believe
8:49
Speaker 2: a vaccine is a solution because as we've seen so far,
8:52
Speaker 2: and just a little bit we touched on last week
8:54
Speaker 2: and the stuff that I've brought on the show, there's
8:58
Speaker 2: a whole lot more behind the vaccine treatment. And if
9:01
Speaker 2: you trace it back up the trail, it always comes
9:04
Speaker 2: down to the money. I just don't believe that there's
9:08
Speaker 2: such a product out there as a vaccine for cancer.
9:11
Speaker 2: And I'm worried we do need to educate the public
9:13
Speaker 2: on that. So love to hear your take on this.
9:16
Speaker 3: Yeah. I mean, yeah, I mean, that's a great, great
9:18
Speaker 3: place to start. And also I think the thing that
9:20
Speaker 3: highlights it the most is you're behind, you have a
9:23
Speaker 3: book that's got the word toxic on it. And I
9:27
Speaker 3: think that it's important for people to understand that when, when,
9:32
Speaker 3: when people are talking about vaccines, they are talking about
9:38
Speaker 3: toxins and, Essentially, it's always the missing piece of the
9:42
Speaker 3: conversation that you are putting something into your body that
9:47
Speaker 3: is stimulating the immune system in some way. And obviously,
9:52
Speaker 3: what the vaccine technologies have always relied on is this
9:55
Speaker 3: idea that you could put something pathological into the body.
9:59
Speaker 3: a pathogen, an antigen, something that could cause an allergic reaction,
10:06
Speaker 3: something that stimulates the immune system, and ultimately those are toxic. Now,
10:12
Speaker 3: what's fascinating about their own choice to change the definition
10:15
Speaker 3: of a vaccine is is they actually opened up an
10:19
Speaker 3: incredible pathway in the wellness industry because what they did
10:22
Speaker 3: is they previously had a definition of vaccine that was
10:26
Speaker 3: very specific to an illness. And it also implied that
10:31
Speaker 3: they were using some part of that illness.
10:36
Speaker 2: Right, like a virus or attenuated virus.
10:39
Speaker 3: Exactly, like a virus or attenuated virus. I don't have
10:43
Speaker 3: the definitions in front of me, but when they changed,
10:46
Speaker 3: What they really changed to is this idea that a
10:48
Speaker 3: vaccine is an immunostimulant. And now you can make the
10:53
Speaker 3: claim that if you did some great research and you showed,
10:56
Speaker 3: for example, cold plunges, cold water plunges, they are immune stimulants.
11:02
Speaker 3: By shocking your system in cold water, you can definitely...
11:09
Speaker 3: You can measure that there is an immune response to that.
11:13
Speaker 3: You can also measure the immune response to changing the
11:18
Speaker 3: pH in the body that would have an effect on
11:22
Speaker 3: the immune system. You could stimulate the immune system with
11:26
Speaker 3: grapefruit seed extract. So what it's really done, for those
11:31
Speaker 3: that want to pursue this or have the money to
11:34
Speaker 3: do it, It's opened up the avenue that basically anything
11:38
Speaker 3: on the planet, both natural and synthetic, that can stimulate
11:43
Speaker 3: the immune system becomes a vaccine. They've opened up their
11:48
Speaker 3: category so broadly that most wellness products could fit into
11:54
Speaker 3: what they would now call a vaccine. And the difference
11:56
Speaker 3: is that the wellness industry could make the claim that
12:01
Speaker 3: their immunostimulation is non-toxic, right? If you're stimulating it in
12:06
Speaker 3: a way like, let's say, like a cold water plunge
12:09
Speaker 3: or the opposite, right, like a sauna, a sauna creates
12:14
Speaker 3: something called heat shock proteins. That's an immune response. So
12:19
Speaker 3: if you were using heat shock proteins and it created
12:22
Speaker 3: an immune response, you could claim that your sauna at
12:25
Speaker 3: your wellness center is a vaccine. Yeah. And, and, and
12:30
Speaker 3: ultimately I think that that's part of the way that
12:32
Speaker 3: we deflate what they're doing with their, um, you know,
12:36
Speaker 3: by pretending that they've got these products. Importantly, I guess
12:39
Speaker 3: the message that I want to get out very quickly
12:41
Speaker 3: to people is, um, is a really good opportunity to
12:45
Speaker 3: remind people that the, when, when people claim that they
12:50
Speaker 3: had found the novel virus called SARS-CoV-2, they then said,
12:56
Speaker 3: here's the sequence of this novel virus. And then scientists
13:00
Speaker 3: went out and they said that they found this novel
13:02
Speaker 3: virus and that they were able to isolate it and
13:08
Speaker 3: do whatever they did. What they included within that framework,
13:13
Speaker 3: within that story, was that part of the sequence had
13:16
Speaker 3: this furin cleavage site that everyone talks about and the
13:21
Speaker 3: overlapping amino acids on each side of the furin cleavage site.
13:25
Speaker 3: But the strange oddity of that, which is such a
13:27
Speaker 3: great time to remind people, is that the furin cleavage
13:31
Speaker 3: site and the amino acids that's what's called flanking it
13:34
Speaker 3: or sort of bridging it on either side, that belongs
13:37
Speaker 3: to Moderna. That is Moderna's patent. When people talk about
13:41
Speaker 3: the furin cleavage site as the smoking gun, they say, well,
13:44
Speaker 3: that's what made this particular virus, quote unquote, so deadly
13:49
Speaker 3: or that it had a high rate of infectivity or
13:52
Speaker 3: that it had a high rate of transmissibility. It all
13:54
Speaker 3: comes down to this thing that they always refer to
13:58
Speaker 3: called the furin cleavage site. Well, that is a 2016 patent.
14:04
Speaker 3: That particular sequence belongs to Moderna. There was a paper
14:10
Speaker 3: on it. I think the paper said there was a
14:12
Speaker 3: one in whatever it was, one in three billion or
14:15
Speaker 3: one in three trillion chance that that was there coincidentally
14:19
Speaker 3: by nature. Then that paper sort of didn't get any traction.
14:25
Speaker 3: Stefan Bansal from Moderna was actually asked in an interview
14:29
Speaker 3: many years ago, you know, how come this sequence that's
14:35
Speaker 3: your patent was found in SARS-CoV-2? And his answer in
14:39
Speaker 3: the interview was, he'll look into it. The world just
14:43
Speaker 3: brushed this thing apart where, I mean, they just brushed
14:46
Speaker 3: it away, where not only was it the smoking gun,
14:49
Speaker 3: but it pointed to the gun manufacturer. Um, it, it,
14:53
Speaker 3: it's like, it's like finding like, you know, a product
14:57
Speaker 3: and then, you know, scraping the dirt off the top
14:59
Speaker 3: of it. And all of a sudden you see the
15:01
Speaker 3: logo and you're like, Oh, this is an Apple phone,
15:05
Speaker 3: or this is a Samsung or, Oh, I didn't know
15:08
Speaker 3: what this part was. I see it's from a, you know,
15:11
Speaker 3: a vehicle and Oh, it's got a Toyota logo on it.
15:14
Speaker 3: So not, not only is it, um, is that aspect
15:18
Speaker 3: crucial that people are reminded, um, now that they're talking
15:21
Speaker 3: about that particular sequence comes from their cancer vaccine, this
15:25
Speaker 3: particular one that they talking about that is now in a,
15:28
Speaker 3: in a phase three trial. It's, um, obviously from a
15:32
Speaker 3: standpoint of, um, of, of speculative trading and driving up your, your,
15:38
Speaker 3: your stock price and all that financial stuff that, um,
15:41
Speaker 3: that I don't get into. Um, It should be clear
15:45
Speaker 3: to everybody that it should be highly illegal to make
15:49
Speaker 3: a fuss about a press release, no data given. There's
15:55
Speaker 3: no data available from the public. And not only is that,
15:59
Speaker 3: their study is not over. They're in phase three. This
16:02
Speaker 3: is not even a completed study. And then, of course, yesterday,
16:05
Speaker 3: their stock prices just absolutely went up and people made
16:09
Speaker 3: millions yesterday. Wow. And it's the same folks over and
16:13
Speaker 3: over that are making their millions from it who then
16:18
Speaker 3: choose to not highlight the dangers or the reality of
16:23
Speaker 3: the science to the public. The other thing is that
16:26
Speaker 3: their study relies on, a vaccine is never done completely
16:33
Speaker 3: with placebo. So what they did with this particular cancer
16:37
Speaker 3: study is they paired it with this drug that they
16:41
Speaker 3: call a checkpoint inhibitor called Catruda. And what their study
16:45
Speaker 3: showed is that less people died by using their vaccine
16:50
Speaker 3: and Catruda. So all they've really done is shown that
16:53
Speaker 3: their toxins and their technology and their vaccine canceled out
16:59
Speaker 3: the Catruda. That's all they've shown because the Catruda can
17:03
Speaker 3: kill you on its own. It's highly, highly toxic. And
17:06
Speaker 3: it would basically be doing, like most people are familiar,
17:09
Speaker 3: let's say, with remdesivir, as you are. It would basically
17:12
Speaker 3: be saying, we did this study, and it was our
17:15
Speaker 3: vaccine with or without remdesivir, and less people died from
17:21
Speaker 3: using our vaccine with remdesivir. And then you would basically
17:24
Speaker 3: look at the mechanics of it, and you'd go, well,
17:26
Speaker 3: of course, it blocked the remdesivir from attacking the kidney. Yeah,
17:31
Speaker 3: they still died. They still died. but in less numbers
17:35
Speaker 3: and all you're showing, all you're showing is you found
17:38
Speaker 3: the antidote for, for the, the other, uh, toxicity of
17:42
Speaker 3: the other products, right? The catrude.
17:44
Speaker 2: It's just like a blind mice.
17:46
Speaker 3: Exactly.
17:47
Speaker 2: We've got a couple of questions. Um, and I don't
17:49
Speaker 2: know that we can answer them all, but, um, Jeff
17:53
Speaker 2: was asking about, you know, the real question is what
17:55
Speaker 2: is it they're trying to put into our body? And
17:57
Speaker 2: then some recommendations on the cold plunges and ice baths. Um,
18:03
Speaker 2: And I do believe a lot of this alternative stuff
18:05
Speaker 2: is very helpful, like cryotherapy and ice baths. Do you
18:09
Speaker 2: see a place for that anywhere to help with reduction
18:11
Speaker 2: in inflammation?
18:12
Speaker 3: Well, interestingly enough, it's fundamentally a very important question because
18:20
Speaker 3: I use it as an example of an immunostimulant. But
18:24
Speaker 3: in my opinion, it's not only useful but quite dangerous
18:30
Speaker 3: for people that have spike protein injury. Um, simply because
18:34
Speaker 3: if people have been far falling along and anybody that's
18:37
Speaker 3: new to me, um, my, my, uh, my working model
18:42
Speaker 3: of what spike protein is, is it's a protein that
18:44
Speaker 3: controls hibernation and reproduction in horseshoe bats. I don't know
18:49
Speaker 3: if we got into that last time. I don't know
18:51
Speaker 3: how much depth you wanted to go, but, um, ultimately
18:54
Speaker 3: when people talk about spike protein, um, They are talking
18:57
Speaker 3: about something that originally had this name called RATG13, that
19:05
Speaker 3: then became something called RA4991 that eventually became SARS-CoV-2. So
19:13
Speaker 3: when you look at what RATG13 was, it was a
19:17
Speaker 3: sequence that they found in an old abandoned copper mine
19:23
Speaker 3: in 2012. In Yunnan province in China, what happened is,
19:30
Speaker 3: and this is the story. Now, I'll give some alternative
19:36
Speaker 3: views on the story. But the documented story is that
19:39
Speaker 3: in 2012, six workers were working in an old abandoned
19:44
Speaker 3: copper mine in Yunnan province. They were cleaning out what's
19:49
Speaker 3: known as backyards. guano, bat shit. And they inhaled, they
19:55
Speaker 3: were inhaling the bat shit as well as whatever else
19:58
Speaker 3: is in the mine. And out of the six workers,
20:02
Speaker 3: three died. So they had a kill rate, whatever they
20:06
Speaker 3: were breathing in, killed people that were not unhealthy. These
20:12
Speaker 3: were people that, you know, these were immunocompromised people. These
20:16
Speaker 3: were workers that were perceivably strong enough to be given
20:19
Speaker 3: the job of sweeping out and cleaning and spraying down
20:23
Speaker 3: an old copper mine. And it killed very quickly. It
20:27
Speaker 3: killed three of the six. The other three that survived,
20:34
Speaker 3: one of the most important things that they did to
20:36
Speaker 3: keep the other three alive is they realized that they
20:39
Speaker 3: needed to treat essentially a fungal infection. They needed rapid
20:45
Speaker 3: help with a fungal infection. They also knew that they
20:47
Speaker 3: needed antibiotics for the bacterial involvement. And they also knew
20:52
Speaker 3: that in 2012, that the main issue that they were
20:56
Speaker 3: facing was basically a hemostatic problem, that it was affecting
21:04
Speaker 3: the blood, that it was causing clots. Some of this
21:08
Speaker 3: should start sounding familiar. For example, they noticed that they
21:12
Speaker 3: were taking a D-dimer and they noticed microclots. They noticed
21:17
Speaker 3: the ground glass opacities that we heard about in 2020.
21:24
Speaker 3: They noticed, obviously, the hypoxia. So essentially what happened in
21:30
Speaker 3: 2012 is COVID. These miners, if you didn't know that
21:35
Speaker 3: you were looking at six workers from a mine, and
21:40
Speaker 3: if I showed them to somebody without any names on it,
21:43
Speaker 3: without any date, and I said, what happened to these
21:46
Speaker 3: six people? They would say, well, this is severe COVID.
21:50
Speaker 3: These people had COVID and three of them died. It
21:52
Speaker 3: is COVID. essentially it's the exact pathology. It's the, it's,
21:56
Speaker 3: it's everything that we discovered from 2020 onwards to now
22:01
Speaker 3: is what happened to these miners in 2012. So what
22:04
Speaker 3: happens with the, with, with, with, with the story is
22:07
Speaker 3: that basically Wuhan Institute of Virology, everybody now knows about
22:14
Speaker 3: Wuhan and about WIV and they know, you know, they've
22:18
Speaker 3: heard of the back lady and her experiments. Well, Over
22:22
Speaker 3: the course of a couple of years from 2012 onwards,
22:27
Speaker 3: she sent her scientists to go and sample pretty much
22:31
Speaker 3: everything that they could get their hands out on that
22:33
Speaker 3: cave to try and work out what killed these miners.
22:36
Speaker 3: And amongst all of that, they found a sequence that
22:40
Speaker 3: became known as RATG-13. And RATG-13 is the closest match
22:47
Speaker 3: to SARS-CoV-2, to COVID-19. It's the closest match. It doesn't
22:51
Speaker 3: have the furin cleavage site that belongs to Moderna. It
22:54
Speaker 3: pretty much has everything else. And then there's a couple
22:56
Speaker 3: of other conformational changes in it. And, but you are
22:59
Speaker 3: basically looking at, if you want to, I like, I
23:03
Speaker 3: like things that people can easily visualize in their head.
23:05
Speaker 3: You show somebody a, a 2026, um, you know, Toyota, uh, Camry,
23:13
Speaker 3: and then you show them the, the 2012 version of
23:16
Speaker 3: that same Camry and And you can see the progression, right?
23:20
Speaker 3: And it's, oh, the shape is the same, but you know,
23:22
Speaker 3: it's got these modifications. So that's really what happened is
23:25
Speaker 3: that you've got this basic structure of this RATG13. And
23:31
Speaker 3: what that is, is that is the spike protein. And
23:35
Speaker 3: there was a scientist, two scientists that I know that
23:41
Speaker 3: basically looked at that sequence from a not only a
23:45
Speaker 3: sequence point of view, but they looked at where that
23:47
Speaker 3: sequence had come from. And a scientist called Steve Massey
23:51
Speaker 3: discovered that what was really weird about this particular RHED13
23:57
Speaker 3: is that normally when someone says that they found a coronavirus,
24:00
Speaker 3: it's normally heavily, like you don't find something, um, you know,
24:05
Speaker 3: by itself, um, a sample is going to have all
24:10
Speaker 3: kinds of other substances around it, right? So, you know,
24:13
Speaker 3: when they're talking about, like, let's say they find this virus,
24:17
Speaker 3: they're going to say amongst the sample that we've got,
24:22
Speaker 3: the other sequences around it are, you know, these strains
24:26
Speaker 3: of bacteria. And we also found, you know, this kind
24:30
Speaker 3: of tissue. And it has to come from somewhere, right?
24:32
Speaker 3: So the sequences around it, it would be the equivalent
24:35
Speaker 3: of another virus you know, just way to visualize this is, um,
24:41
Speaker 3: if I, if I, if, if, if I take a
24:43
Speaker 3: hamburger that's been inside, you know, the, the actual, um,
24:47
Speaker 3: beef patty and, and I, and I open it up
24:50
Speaker 3: and I take the patty out. Um, if it's got
24:54
Speaker 3: ketchup on it and if it's got some cheese on
24:56
Speaker 3: it and it's still got some bread on it, now
24:59
Speaker 3: you can say, well, there's a good chance this particular
25:01
Speaker 3: patty came from a hamburger. We recognizing that things around
25:04
Speaker 3: it with what was very unique about rat G 13,
25:07
Speaker 3: is it had all kinds of reproductive sequences instead of bacterial.
25:13
Speaker 3: It was actually, um, it was actually showing that it
25:16
Speaker 3: was more than likely from reproductive tissue. It had very high, um,
25:21
Speaker 3: sequences of seminal fluid. Um, it had copulatory plug, um, material. Now,
25:28
Speaker 3: for those that don't know what a copulatory plug is,
25:30
Speaker 3: a copulatory plug is like a, like what develops in
25:34
Speaker 3: a female, um, Like when the water breaks, a mucus plug.
25:39
Speaker 3: And in the bat, it has a very specific function
25:43
Speaker 3: in that the bat is very unique. That particular horseshoe
25:48
Speaker 3: bat is very unique in its reproductive biology because what
25:52
Speaker 3: it has to do is the sperm enters the female
25:57
Speaker 3: bat and actually does not fertilize the egg until months later. Months.
26:04
Speaker 3: So the sperm actually has to be stored. It has
26:07
Speaker 3: to form a reservoir. And this should also start making
26:10
Speaker 3: sense to people because now you can understand the problem
26:13
Speaker 3: of spike protein persistence because your whole system is built.
26:17
Speaker 3: This particular spike protein called RATG13 is built to trigger
26:22
Speaker 3: all these mechanisms to essentially store sperm and the copulatory
26:26
Speaker 3: plug that holds the whole thing together and needs to
26:29
Speaker 3: be timed with a female coming out of hibernation. And
26:34
Speaker 3: so I'm going to cut it down very short now
26:37
Speaker 3: by just saying that one of the things to be
26:41
Speaker 3: aware of is that once you understand that the protein
26:44
Speaker 3: that we're talking about and the protein that was injected
26:47
Speaker 3: into 5.8 billion people around the world, that protein is
26:53
Speaker 3: triggering hibernation in people. And it's also messing around with
27:00
Speaker 3: the reproductive cycles and hormones and timing. both in males
27:05
Speaker 3: and females. But from the reproductive standpoint, this was a
27:09
Speaker 3: very long answer to tell you that if your body
27:14
Speaker 3: is trying to tell itself not to be in hibernation,
27:19
Speaker 3: then you do not want to shock it with, with
27:23
Speaker 3: anything cold, because you're going to, you're going to trigger
27:27
Speaker 3: the same system response, the same response, the same reflex.
27:31
Speaker 3: And there's another, there's another way. I'm not going to
27:33
Speaker 3: go into the biology of it, but for those that
27:35
Speaker 3: want to research themselves, the other closest match in mammals
27:39
Speaker 3: is actually called the mammalian diving reflex, which is, um,
27:43
Speaker 3: you pictures, uh, you picture a seal that has to
27:47
Speaker 3: swim deep in very cold water, And, um, and it
27:51
Speaker 3: has to endure those pressure changes and it has to
27:53
Speaker 3: be down there for a while, holding its breath while
27:56
Speaker 3: it's looking for food or moving around. And so we
27:59
Speaker 3: have something in our bodies called the mammalian diving reflex.
28:03
Speaker 3: And if somebody falls into a cold lake, for example, um,
28:06
Speaker 3: you can be without oxygen, uh, to your brain for
28:10
Speaker 3: 45 minutes and still survive as compared to the, you know,
28:16
Speaker 3: I think it's five or six minutes, you know, max, uh,
28:19
Speaker 3: that somebody can endure it without that, what's called the
28:22
Speaker 3: mammalian diving reflex kicking in. And so ultimately that's what
28:26
Speaker 3: people call long COVID or vaccine injury that is being
28:30
Speaker 3: stuck in this functional state of low metabolism, low oxygen,
28:38
Speaker 3: thick blood. It is all a, it's a state change
28:43
Speaker 3: that the body has gone through to ultimately- Exactly, for survival.
28:47
Speaker 3: It's an extreme functional. So by recreating that, by recreating
28:53
Speaker 3: the cold, you can actually shock the system back into
28:57
Speaker 3: the mechanics that the spike protein has done. And the
29:01
Speaker 3: other thing that you're going to do in the reverse
29:03
Speaker 3: of it is that you can then see why heat, right,
29:08
Speaker 3: in terms of short bursts of soreness or getting out
29:11
Speaker 3: into the sunlight, of course, is showing your body that
29:14
Speaker 3: it's not hibernating. recharging the mitochondria like that, warming the body.
29:20
Speaker 3: If I was somebody that was suffering from a COVID
29:23
Speaker 3: vaccine injury, what I would be doing with the sauna
29:26
Speaker 3: is not actually walking into a very hot sauna and
29:31
Speaker 3: putting that stress on my body. What I would do
29:34
Speaker 3: is I would sit in the sauna and I would
29:36
Speaker 3: gently raise the heat over time in a warming kind
29:40
Speaker 3: of way. I would, you know, the same way as
29:43
Speaker 3: an animal, like a slow, slow, slow, slow coming out
29:46
Speaker 3: of the hibernation, right? The bear, the board, the bear
29:49
Speaker 3: is woken up and it's, and it's, and it's, uh,
29:52
Speaker 3: and it's springtime and you're not throwing the bear into the,
29:56
Speaker 3: into the extreme heat of summer. when it's waking up
29:59
Speaker 3: from that hibernation, you, you, you warming that cycle up
30:04
Speaker 3: from this, from, from this very low metabolic state, you're
30:08
Speaker 3: taking it back into its, its natural, its natural mitochondrial.
30:14
Speaker 3: So no, no cold shock for anybody that, that suspects
30:19
Speaker 3: that they have a vaccine injury. And I got to
30:21
Speaker 3: tell you, and I know I'm not the only one.
30:24
Speaker 3: I think it was Jack Cruz who, um, recently put
30:28
Speaker 3: out information and I don't know if his reasoning is
30:30
Speaker 3: the same. Um, but he's also, um, you know, he
30:35
Speaker 3: used to be somebody that recommended, um, uh, cold plunges
30:39
Speaker 3: and he's not recommending. And then I think, I think
30:41
Speaker 3: what people are realizing is that with, with spike protein load,
30:46
Speaker 3: especially from the vaccines in your body, um, a, a
30:50
Speaker 3: cold plunge can actually bring on a heart attack. because
30:53
Speaker 3: that's part of that mechanism. It's the super fast arousal
30:58
Speaker 3: from this functional state. So I hope that answers that question.
31:03
Speaker 3: Do you want to take another question?
31:05
Speaker 2: Yeah, let's jump into a couple others. And I guess
31:07
Speaker 2: the other question that I think is important too is
31:09
Speaker 2: I noticed altitude changes can really dramatically negatively affect. Is
31:14
Speaker 2: it the same thing? It's the dramatic change. Why are
31:18
Speaker 2: high altitudes more difficult for people with long COVID?
31:21
Speaker 3: Okay. So the same thing there. Now there's a very interesting,
31:24
Speaker 3: very sort of complicated components of this, which there's some
31:28
Speaker 3: uncertainty around and I'm getting closer for myself to, to
31:32
Speaker 3: feel more certain. Um, I wish I, I wish I
31:35
Speaker 3: didn't have to do this because COVID itself and, and,
31:38
Speaker 3: and the vaccines is so complicated. So to, to put
31:41
Speaker 3: this other layer in there, um, is useful to people,
31:45
Speaker 3: but it also complicates things. I believe that we are
31:49
Speaker 3: not only dealing with one severe form of pathology. I
31:55
Speaker 3: believe that we're dealing with two forms of severe pathology
31:59
Speaker 3: starting in 2019. And one of those is that I
32:04
Speaker 3: believe that prior to people getting infected with what they
32:08
Speaker 3: call COVID, which in my opinion is vaccine shedding, the
32:14
Speaker 3: world was actually dealing with a very severe influenza. It
32:17
Speaker 3: was dealing with an influenza that is not standard on tests.
32:21
Speaker 3: Like if you don't find your regular flus and you
32:25
Speaker 3: suspect flu for H7N9, which is a bird flu, you
32:32
Speaker 3: would have to contact the CDC and you would have
32:35
Speaker 3: to request specialized testing. And the The person who's done
32:40
Speaker 3: the most work on this that I know is a
32:42
Speaker 3: guy called John Cullen. And what John Cullen discovered, and
32:46
Speaker 3: many years ago I had a podcast with him where
32:49
Speaker 3: he explained this to me, and I looked into it,
32:51
Speaker 3: and I agreed with him, and then I left it
32:53
Speaker 3: alone for a while. There is a chance that what
32:56
Speaker 3: was really killing people in 2019 and in early 2020
32:59
Speaker 3: was actually H7N9. And I believe I've got enough evidence
33:06
Speaker 3: that it wasn't a regular H7N9, that it was a
33:09
Speaker 3: vaccine vector, DNA plasmid-based H7N9 that somebody was messing with
33:15
Speaker 3: somewhere in the world, whether it was in the US,
33:17
Speaker 3: whether it was in China. Somebody was messing with a
33:20
Speaker 3: bird flu vaccine, more than likely an mRNA one. I
33:25
Speaker 3: certainly know that Moderna has one. They were messing around
33:28
Speaker 3: with it from, I believe, 2018 onwards. Somebody was messing
33:33
Speaker 3: around with that mRNA vaccine. It didn't even have to
33:37
Speaker 3: be shed by humans. They could have been trying it
33:42
Speaker 3: on birds. It could have got into pigs. The thing
33:48
Speaker 3: that I think that is behind the scenes, and maybe
33:51
Speaker 3: one day when classified information is released, there is a
33:56
Speaker 3: plausible hypothesis that that what the world was really dealing
33:59
Speaker 3: with with a quote unquote pandemic was actually H7N9 and
34:05
Speaker 3: that the COVID and the COVID story and the COVID
34:09
Speaker 3: vaccines were brought out to counter that. Now, I don't
34:15
Speaker 3: know if it's relevant to people. I don't think most
34:18
Speaker 3: people have to care about it, but the complicated part
34:21
Speaker 3: about it is that to answer that question factually for
34:25
Speaker 3: me as a scientist, when you asked about altitude, the
34:28
Speaker 3: closest match to altitude problems in people is not actually
34:32
Speaker 3: only going to come from spike protein. That's going to
34:35
Speaker 3: have some functional changes around these hypoxic conditions. But altitude
34:43
Speaker 3: with blood thickening is going to come from your hemagglutinin
34:47
Speaker 3: from H7N9 because... What I think I'm bringing uniquely to
34:55
Speaker 3: the space of pathogens and to virology is that virology
35:03
Speaker 3: has always looked at viruses as invaders. And they've always
35:08
Speaker 3: looked at viruses as something that's out to kill you.
35:11
Speaker 3: What I've been looking at is the word virus for me.
35:15
Speaker 3: I've been looking at it only from the protein point
35:18
Speaker 3: of view. And I've been looking at it as a
35:21
Speaker 3: functional protein in a species, mostly for extreme state changes.
35:27
Speaker 3: So in other words, a bird that suddenly needs to
35:30
Speaker 3: travel thousands of miles at high altitude is going to
35:35
Speaker 3: need a software update to make that trip viable. And
35:40
Speaker 3: I think that's what we call viruses. I think when
35:42
Speaker 3: we look at what bird flu is and when we
35:44
Speaker 3: look at getting into another species or when we look
35:46
Speaker 3: at factory farming and people are breathing in all kinds
35:50
Speaker 3: of foreign proteins from other species and then we stick
35:52
Speaker 3: them in vaccines, when you look at a virus in
35:56
Speaker 3: the creature, virologists have never figured out where they always say, well,
36:00
Speaker 3: it's not pathogenic to this creature. Well, of course not.
36:03
Speaker 3: If it's not pathogenic to that creature but you find
36:06
Speaker 3: it there, it must have a use.
36:08
Speaker 2: It must have a use.
36:09
Speaker 3: God is not stupid. Yeah. I mean, there's a reason.
36:12
Speaker 3: So for example, hemagglutinin translated in Latin to blood glue. Now,
36:18
Speaker 3: if you're, if you're a migrating bird and you've got
36:21
Speaker 3: to be at high altitude and it's cold, you've got
36:24
Speaker 3: to have an entire functional system that still allows you
36:27
Speaker 3: to flap your wings, have your brain intact enough to
36:30
Speaker 3: get to know where you're going. You have to still
36:33
Speaker 3: have your eyes open. You're not in a hibernation state.
36:35
Speaker 2: You've got to be able to cardio pulmonary function.
36:38
Speaker 3: Correct. You've got to have all of that intact. But
36:41
Speaker 3: it's got to be at high altitude with low oxygen
36:44
Speaker 3: and low temperature. And that's what hemagglutinin does. And so
36:48
Speaker 3: if somebody has been vaccinated, let's say with a flu vaccine,
36:53
Speaker 3: and you've now messed around and you've got these other
36:57
Speaker 3: species of functional protein in you, and then you trigger that.
37:02
Speaker 3: That's what we'll call flu or that's what we'll call,
37:05
Speaker 3: you know, a problem at high altitude when that system
37:10
Speaker 3: kicks in. I believe the highest risk actually in terms
37:16
Speaker 3: of either the hemagglutinin or it's coming from the spike
37:19
Speaker 3: protein or a combination of both is very interesting for me.
37:22
Speaker 3: It's the combination of altitude. It's the combination of high
37:27
Speaker 3: G-forces and sudden movements and something about the twisting movement
37:32
Speaker 3: of being in a helicopter. Ever since the COVID vaccines,
37:37
Speaker 3: there has been a massive uptick in helicopter crashes, and
37:43
Speaker 3: part of that is, I believe, that there's something about
37:48
Speaker 3: the dynamics of that particular flying that That's different, let's say,
37:52
Speaker 3: from sitting in a seat like a captain of an airplane.
37:55
Speaker 3: And we know that's happening too, to a lesser degree.
37:58
Speaker 3: But there's been a tremendous uptick in basically what helicopter
38:04
Speaker 3: crashes happening where somebody is disoriented or their brain has
38:09
Speaker 3: just frozen up. Um, you know, there's, there's really weird
38:13
Speaker 3: crashes that have taken place. Anyway, you know me, I
38:15
Speaker 3: can get sidetracked on this stuff. Yeah, no, it's fascinating.
38:19
Speaker 3: So that would be the altitude thing. And, and, uh,
38:21
Speaker 3: recently I spoke to, um, uh, the paramedic, Harry Fisher.
38:25
Speaker 3: I don't know if you're familiar with him. He's the,
38:28
Speaker 3: he's the most, one of the, he is the most
38:30
Speaker 3: outspoken paramedic. You know, there's been plenty of nurses and
38:33
Speaker 3: there's been people, people like you and practitioners that have
38:36
Speaker 3: spoken up for the last, um, six and a half years.
38:39
Speaker 3: Harry is, um, the only, the only paramedic that I
38:42
Speaker 3: know that has, uh, that is, has been very vocal
38:46
Speaker 3: from the beginning. Now I had a chat to him
38:48
Speaker 3: around the same topic around this oxygen stuff. And what,
38:53
Speaker 3: what he was telling me is that at the beginning
38:55
Speaker 3: of the pandemic, what he, when he would pick up
38:57
Speaker 3: a patient who had very low sats, um, the patients
39:01
Speaker 3: that were immediately put onto high volume oxygen and, and
39:07
Speaker 3: everybody panicked about their saturation and, thought, okay, well, this
39:10
Speaker 3: person is going to die with this level of saturation
39:13
Speaker 3: and we need to do emergency medicine for them. What
39:16
Speaker 3: he found is that patients that were told to go
39:20
Speaker 3: on to low volume oxygen, patients that were told, I'll
39:24
Speaker 3: stay with you, get your breathing right, let's take a walk.
39:28
Speaker 3: These patients would actually, their saturation levels would come up.
39:31
Speaker 3: They would do better. And it was the panic. It
39:35
Speaker 3: was the panic of those low saturation patients Then they
39:38
Speaker 3: tried everything in terms of they were pumping oxygen in
39:40
Speaker 3: these people and it made it worse. And so then
39:44
Speaker 3: there was, you know, instead of looking at it and thinking,
39:46
Speaker 3: what particular physiological mechanism are we seeing here? Is this
39:51
Speaker 3: like altitude sickness? Is this like decompression sickness that divers get?
39:56
Speaker 3: Is this a mammalian diving reflex reflex? They just don't
40:03
Speaker 3: think in that way, right? So immediately it became about
40:06
Speaker 3: the BiPAP machines and it became about high flow of
40:09
Speaker 3: oxygen and then it became about the remdesivir and the
40:12
Speaker 3: ventilators and the propofol. Instead of saying, this is really weird,
40:16
Speaker 3: these people have low SATs, but they actually seem to
40:19
Speaker 3: be doing okay. So where's the mechanisms that have compensated it?
40:24
Speaker 3: And what they would have found is they would have
40:26
Speaker 3: found that there was a nitrogen switch, that the body
40:29
Speaker 3: was actually using nitrogen differently. They would have found that
40:34
Speaker 3: it was shunting oxygen away from certain parts in the
40:37
Speaker 3: body to basically preserve the heart and the brain. But
40:42
Speaker 3: they would have also realized back in 2020, and there
40:44
Speaker 3: were a few of us that already realized this, me
40:46
Speaker 3: being one of them, another, a doctor called Dr. Kyle Siddell,
40:50
Speaker 3: is they would have realized that it didn't matter how
40:52
Speaker 3: much oxygen you pump into it. It's a gaseous exchange problem.
40:56
Speaker 3: And you need to get the person out of that
40:59
Speaker 3: state and basically trigger them out of this torpid state
41:03
Speaker 3: before they can accept oxygen again. And warming would have
41:08
Speaker 3: actually been a crucial factor. It would have been better. Yeah,
41:11
Speaker 3: warming people up.
41:12
Speaker 2: That's what really puzzles me about this book. We mentioned
41:15
Speaker 2: it last time. And this is such a basic primer.
41:20
Speaker 2: about heat, warmth, getting out in the sunshine, exercising, hydrating,
41:27
Speaker 2: and working on inflammation. And yet, and I think this
41:32
Speaker 2: is the main point of all these questions that we
41:35
Speaker 2: have on here today is we were all driven away
41:37
Speaker 2: from trying things, but we were all guided through the
41:40
Speaker 2: guidance to do one thing, one protocol.
41:43
Speaker 3: This is it.
41:43
Speaker 2: This is the must be all end all. But yet
41:46
Speaker 2: some of the very basic things you mentioned about, you know,
41:50
Speaker 2: Warmth and low oxygen could have saved lives. And that's
41:55
Speaker 2: the question on here people are asking about is, you know,
41:59
Speaker 2: it's people got their hands on things that were proven
42:02
Speaker 2: to do harm. They passed it around. They made it
42:06
Speaker 2: different and then put it out there to hurt and
42:08
Speaker 2: perhaps kill people. And again, what does that bring this
42:12
Speaker 2: all down to? The other part of the question is
42:14
Speaker 2: why do they keep changing things? Why did they want
42:17
Speaker 2: to do this to confuse the masses? This is where
42:19
Speaker 2: I shoot back to the money and control. But what's
42:23
Speaker 2: the takeaway from all this of why we didn't do
42:25
Speaker 2: things to try other methods?
42:28
Speaker 3: I used to joke that my parents would often be
42:31
Speaker 3: doom and gloom at dinner parties and Sunday lunches that
42:35
Speaker 3: they would be invited to. And part of that was just... awareness, um, uh,
42:41
Speaker 3: you know, when, when you've got information and when you've
42:44
Speaker 3: got information that is crucial, um, I think that there's
42:49
Speaker 3: some people do something with it and, and other people, um,
42:53
Speaker 3: you know, sort of do the bare minimum. And then
42:55
Speaker 3: I think some people are really driven, um, from a,
42:58
Speaker 3: from a safety perspective to really share information. Um, I
43:02
Speaker 3: think the hardest thing for people to believe and why
43:05
Speaker 3: I'm still an outlier in pretty much every community is
43:08
Speaker 3: It doesn't matter, you know, there's people that I align
43:11
Speaker 3: to in the health free movement. And then there's people
43:13
Speaker 3: that I don't and, you know, amongst scientists. And I
43:15
Speaker 3: think that the, the main reason that I'm an outlier
43:19
Speaker 3: is that, um, I'm, I'm fully certain that the end
43:24
Speaker 3: point is depopulation. And I'm fully certain that it probably
43:29
Speaker 3: feels like somebody who was living next to the construction
43:34
Speaker 3: of Dachau or Auschwitz or, um, you know, any of
43:39
Speaker 3: the camps and, you know, this thing is being constructed
43:42
Speaker 3: and the locals are saying, oh, it's a spa. And,
43:46
Speaker 3: and other people are saying, oh, it's just a work camp.
43:48
Speaker 3: And other people are saying, you know, they're trying to
43:50
Speaker 3: give the people in the ghetto is a better opportunity. Um,
43:54
Speaker 3: they're very sick. They have typhus right now. You know,
43:56
Speaker 3: there were all these stories that were floating, floating around.
44:00
Speaker 3: And I think the average person where it's then, or
44:03
Speaker 3: if you talk to somebody just before in Rwanda, before
44:06
Speaker 3: they genocide, or if you talk to somebody before Pol
44:10
Speaker 3: Pot did his genocide, you know, you're talking in a
44:14
Speaker 3: bandwidth of time where this event that people can feel
44:20
Speaker 3: and that they can see the signs on it, but
44:22
Speaker 3: it's so demonstrably big, right? It's out there. The impact
44:29
Speaker 3: of our lives to fully accept this, right, is too
44:32
Speaker 3: severe for the human brain. It's a form of trauma. Yeah.
44:37
Speaker 3: And so what people will do is they'll accept pieces
44:39
Speaker 3: of it. They'll find evidence for it. They'll agree. But
44:42
Speaker 3: ultimately I think that, that the, the end point to
44:46
Speaker 3: all of this is about control and it is about
44:49
Speaker 3: money and it's basically an extraction. It is an awareness
44:54
Speaker 3: that you're extracting all the nutrients and the resources. The,
45:00
Speaker 3: the ruling class is, is a parasite in this, in this,
45:06
Speaker 3: you know, way of thinking. And they are, they're extracting
45:10
Speaker 3: everything that they can before they kill the host. And
45:14
Speaker 3: parasites don't generally kill hosts. Parasites survive because they need
45:20
Speaker 3: the host. But if a parasite figures out a way
45:23
Speaker 3: where they can use the host and move on, then
45:27
Speaker 3: they absolutely do kill the host. And they kill the
45:29
Speaker 3: host in ways that are not just about, about extracting resources. It,
45:34
Speaker 3: very much parallels where we are with the ruling class
45:37
Speaker 3: and the closest match for somebody in a very gory
45:39
Speaker 3: way is something called the parasitoid wasp. And what the
45:44
Speaker 3: parasitoid wasp does is it envenomates its prey and then
45:49
Speaker 3: it lays its eggs in the prey. And over time,
45:53
Speaker 3: the prey is still alive, tranquilized, living, but harboring the
45:59
Speaker 3: eggs and the eggs basically hatch and And then they
46:03
Speaker 3: have this living creature that they can then devour from
46:06
Speaker 3: inside out, right? But the entire process is built to
46:12
Speaker 3: essentially put the creature into a living suspended animation comestose
46:19
Speaker 3: state and then suck the life out of it. And
46:23
Speaker 3: then ultimately, well, who's going to benefit from it the
46:26
Speaker 3: most is the next generation, the offspring. And that's what
46:30
Speaker 3: the ruling class has done. They've decided that there's going
46:32
Speaker 3: to be 500 million people left on Earth at any
46:36
Speaker 3: given time. That's their number. It's not 500 million and
46:38
Speaker 3: then one. They want 500 million as a stable number
46:40
Speaker 3: so that they will ultimately control life and death from
46:44
Speaker 3: that point on. so that their numbers stay close to
46:54
Speaker 3: 500 million. They don't want it ever to get to
46:57
Speaker 3: 600 million. They don't ever want a billion again. They've
47:00
Speaker 3: decided through their discussions and their algorithm that 500 million
47:05
Speaker 3: is the perfect number once you have the sustainability of
47:10
Speaker 3: AI and robotics. Their 500 million, interestingly enough, doesn't take
47:14
Speaker 3: in interplanetary travel like Elon Musk would sell the total
47:19
Speaker 3: years that we're going to the moon or we're going
47:21
Speaker 3: to the Mars. It actually, it's very interesting because I
47:26
Speaker 3: don't pay much attention to when people talk about conspiracy
47:31
Speaker 3: theories around whether we could leave the earth or not
47:33
Speaker 3: and whether we have the dome above us and whether
47:36
Speaker 3: the Bible tells us that it's there. It's interesting that
47:39
Speaker 3: their model of their 500 million actually doesn't take interplanetary travel.
47:43
Speaker 3: So it actually supports, it supports this idea that we're
47:48
Speaker 3: on here on earth and that we actually can't go anywhere. Yeah. Now,
47:52
Speaker 3: I believe, I'll just wrap this up by saying to
47:54
Speaker 3: you that I believe that Elon Musk's contracts originally that
48:00
Speaker 3: were for Mars and this idea that we're going to
48:02
Speaker 3: Mars and then they scaled it back when they realized
48:04
Speaker 3: people would not buy into the idea that it's ever
48:07
Speaker 3: possible to get to Mars. They scaled it back and
48:10
Speaker 3: they said that we're going to the moon. I actually
48:12
Speaker 3: believe that that is, it's a narrative that's been created.
48:18
Speaker 3: All of that money is ultimately being channeled into building
48:23
Speaker 3: the infrastructure that's going to be needed here while that
48:27
Speaker 3: great culling takes place. And the data centers for me
48:31
Speaker 3: are not data centers. They start off as data centers.
48:34
Speaker 3: They shrink. They have to be that size for compute
48:37
Speaker 3: power at the beginning. But you're talking about them starting
48:40
Speaker 3: to build data centers that are the size of Manhattan, right?
48:43
Speaker 3: So in other words, why are you replacing Manhattan with
48:47
Speaker 3: something the size of Manhattan and If you know that
48:50
Speaker 3: that size is not going to be needed in five
48:52
Speaker 3: years' time for compute power, in five years' time, the
48:55
Speaker 3: compute power would split into one room in the size
48:58
Speaker 3: of a Manhattan. What are you doing with the rest
49:00
Speaker 3: of the space? And I believe that's them using infrastructure
49:04
Speaker 3: and money and under the guise of building a data center.
49:08
Speaker 3: I believe they're building the cities of the future, that
49:11
Speaker 3: they will use our cities, the 15-minute cities, as kill boxes.
49:16
Speaker 3: and as containment zones and then the data centers become
49:20
Speaker 3: their living quarters for their 500 million until they done
49:23
Speaker 3: with us. And then they can, then they can decide
49:26
Speaker 3: what they want to do after that.
49:27
Speaker 2: So let's pick up with that next week, folks. I
49:30
Speaker 2: think we'll have Dr. Braun back next week as well.
49:34
Speaker 2: And we've got lots more to kind of share. to
49:37
Speaker 2: uncover all of these things and to help you realize
49:40
Speaker 2: and understand that you can't live in fear, but you
49:43
Speaker 2: have to move forward with knowledge. Knowledge is power. We
49:46
Speaker 2: want to keep you safe. We want to give you
49:47
Speaker 2: great tips.
49:48
Speaker 3: Dr.
49:49
Speaker 2: Braun is going to talk more about copperine in the
49:51
Speaker 2: next show. What is the website for your copperine?
49:54
Speaker 3: It's copperine.com. So it's C-O-P-P-E-R-I-N-E.com. They can use the code Dr.
50:01
Speaker 3: Braun if they like a discount. And yeah, the ingredients
50:05
Speaker 3: and information is on there too. Perfect.
50:07
Speaker 2: All right. Well, listen, thanks again. We've had some great comments.
50:10
Speaker 2: So I will see you all next week. We'll have Dr.
50:12
Speaker 2: Braun back with us and have a wonderful weekend. Stay safe.
50:15
Speaker 2: Check out his website and we will see you all
50:18
Speaker 2: next Thursday at 3 p.m.
50:19
Speaker 3: Eastern.
50:20
Speaker 2: Take care, everybody. Have a great week.