Latest / Murder Files Unsealed / 20 Years Later, Franklin Double Murder Remains Unsolved

Transcript

20 Years Later, Franklin Double Murder Remains Unsolved · Murder Files Unsealed

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: Imagine you're packing your 10-year-old R's bag after like a
• 0:05
  Speaker 1: totally normal, quiet summer weekend. Right. It's the ultimate baseline
• 0:10
  Speaker 1: of suburban safety. You've got the folded T-shirts, the toothbrush,
• 0:15
  Speaker 1: the lingering smell of a Sunday barbecue.
• 0:16
  Speaker 2: Yeah, it's just everyday life.
• 0:18
  Speaker 1: Exactly. And now I want you to imagine a thunderstorm
• 0:22
  Speaker 1: of sheer violence just hitting that exact domestic scene out
• 0:26
  Speaker 1: of a clear blue sky.
• 0:27
  Speaker 2: Oh, it's completely shattering.
• 0:29
  Speaker 1: It is. Leaving behind a 12 year mystery and like
• 0:34
  Speaker 1: a literal mountain of physical evidence that somehow points to
• 0:38
  Speaker 1: absolutely no one.
• 0:39
  Speaker 2: Which is wild.
• 0:40
  Speaker 1: Welcome to the deep dive. We know you're listening because, well,
• 0:43
  Speaker 1: you want the structure, the depth and those aha moments without,
• 0:46
  Speaker 1: you know, drowning in useless information. Right.
• 0:48
  Speaker 2: Getting straight to the core of it.
• 0:50
  Speaker 1: You want to understand not just what happened in the shadows,
• 0:52
  Speaker 1: but the actual mechanics of how and why these mysteries
• 0:54
  Speaker 1: take shape. So today we are immersing ourselves in the chilling,
• 0:57
  Speaker 1: unsolved 2006 murders of a 10-year-old boy and his stepmother
• 1:01
  Speaker 1: in Franklin, Indiana.
• 1:02
  Speaker 2: And it's a narrative that fundamentally breaks the standard rules
• 1:07
  Speaker 2: of how we just assume investigations work.
• 1:10
  Speaker 1: Yeah.
• 1:11
  Speaker 2: Because this isn't a story about a lack of clues.
• 1:13
  Speaker 2: It's really an exploration of investigative paralysis.
• 1:17
  Speaker 1: Okay. Investigative paralysis. Yeah.
• 1:19
  Speaker 2: We're looking at the architecture of a cold case, you know,
• 1:22
  Speaker 2: how police tactics, community memory. the immense psychological burden on investigators,
• 1:27
  Speaker 2: and these seemingly invisible parallel events can all just collide
• 1:31
  Speaker 2: to create this massive unsolvable knot.
• 1:34
  Speaker 1: Okay, let's unpack this. Let's transport ourselves back to July 24th, 2006. Sure.
• 1:40
  Speaker 1: Picture a sweltering Monday in Franklin, Indiana. We have 10-year-old
• 1:45
  Speaker 1: Blake Dickus, who has just finished spending the weekend with
• 1:47
  Speaker 1: his father, Sean.
• 1:49
  Speaker 2: And his stepmother, Chinna, who was 26. Right, Chinna.
• 1:52
  Speaker 1: It's a completely standard blended family weekend scenario. Blake is,
• 1:56
  Speaker 1: you know, he's preparing to head back to his mother's house.
• 1:59
  Speaker 2: Yeah, just packing up his stuff.
• 2:00
  Speaker 1: And I have to pause on that specific image because
• 2:03
  Speaker 1: the jarring contrast between a kid just getting ready to
• 2:07
  Speaker 1: go back to his mom's house and what actually happens next,
• 2:11
  Speaker 1: it's almost impossible to reconcile.
• 2:13
  Speaker 2: Oh, the contrast is exactly what makes the psychology of
• 2:15
  Speaker 2: this event so difficult for both the public and the
• 2:19
  Speaker 2: first responders to process.
• 2:20
  Speaker 1: It's just a regular Monday.
• 2:22
  Speaker 2: Right. You have this highly sanitized, predictable environment suddenly subjected
• 2:26
  Speaker 2: to maximum chaos.
• 2:28
  Speaker 1: Total chaos. So Sean, the father, comes home to discover
• 2:32
  Speaker 1: just an unthinkable scene. Chinna has been stabbed to death
• 2:35
  Speaker 1: multiple times. Right. And young Blake is found nearby, having
• 2:39
  Speaker 1: been subjected to both stabbing and beating. It's an absolute
• 2:42
  Speaker 1: violation of everything that Neighborhood represents.
• 2:45
  Speaker 2: It's horrific.
• 2:46
  Speaker 1: How do investigators even begin to anchor themselves when they
• 2:49
  Speaker 1: walk into a scene that is so wildly out of
• 2:51
  Speaker 1: step with the environment it's sitting in? Like, where do
• 2:53
  Speaker 1: you start?
• 2:54
  Speaker 2: Well, they attempt to anchor themselves using physical evidence, which
• 2:59
  Speaker 2: brings us to a really fascinating paradox in this specific tragedy.
• 3:02
  Speaker 1: Okay, what paradox?
• 3:04
  Speaker 2: The records point to a mountain of evidence left behind
• 3:06
  Speaker 2: in that house. A mountain?
• 3:08
  Speaker 1: Right.
• 3:08
  Speaker 2: And to understand why a mountain of evidence can actually
• 3:11
  Speaker 2: be a curse, we have to look at the mechanics
• 3:13
  Speaker 2: of close quarters violence.
• 3:14
  Speaker 1: Like the stabbing.
• 3:15
  Speaker 2: Exactly. A double homicide involving stabbing and blunt force trauma
• 3:20
  Speaker 2: is incredibly intimate. It's physical, it's messy, and it requires
• 3:26
  Speaker 2: sustained proximity to the victims.
• 3:28
  Speaker 1: The attacker is essentially right on top of them.
• 3:31
  Speaker 2: Exactly that. In forensic terms, an environment subjected to that
• 3:34
  Speaker 2: kind of sustained dynamic violence yields just an immense volume
• 3:38
  Speaker 2: of trace material.
• 3:39
  Speaker 1: So they're leaving stuff everywhere.
• 3:41
  Speaker 2: Everywhere. We're talking about blood spatter patterns that indicate the
• 3:44
  Speaker 2: velocity and angle of a weapon. Cast-off patterns on the ceiling,
• 3:49
  Speaker 2: foreign DNA, footwear impressions in the blood, and undeniable signs
• 3:53
  Speaker 2: of a massive physical struggle. That is the mountain the
• 3:57
  Speaker 2: detectives were staring at.
• 3:58
  Speaker 1: That sounds like a lot to work with, though.
• 3:59
  Speaker 2: It does. But the paradox of forensics is that volume
• 4:03
  Speaker 2: does not equal clarity.
• 4:04
  Speaker 1: Which, I mean, that feels like a betrayal of everything
• 4:07
  Speaker 1: pop culture has taught us. Oh, absolutely.
• 4:09
  Speaker 2: Like, if you have a house full of DNA and footprints...
• 4:12
  Speaker 2: Shouldn't you just feed it into a computer and wait
• 4:15
  Speaker 2: for it to spit out a name?
• 4:16
  Speaker 1: That is the television version of science.
• 4:18
  Speaker 2: Yeah.
• 4:18
  Speaker 1: The reality of processing a domestic crime scene is an
• 4:21
  Speaker 1: absolute nightmare of cross-contamination.
• 4:24
  Speaker 2: Contamination?
• 4:24
  Speaker 1: Yeah. Think about your own living room right now. Imagine
• 4:28
  Speaker 1: having a thousand puzzle pieces dumped onto your coffee table.
• 4:31
  Speaker 2: Okay.
• 4:32
  Speaker 1: But those pieces belong to five different puzzles, and you
• 4:35
  Speaker 1: don't have the pictures on the boxes to guide you.
• 4:38
  Speaker 1: Having more pieces actually degrades your ability to form a
• 4:42
  Speaker 1: cohesive image.
• 4:43
  Speaker 2: Oh, I see.
• 4:44
  Speaker 1: The police in Franklin walked into a house saturated with
• 4:47
  Speaker 1: the normal daily biological footprint of life.
• 4:51
  Speaker 2: So like the fingerprints of the mail carrier, the DNA
• 4:55
  Speaker 2: of Blake's friends who came over to play video games.
• 4:57
  Speaker 1: Pet hair, food stains, all of it. Wow. And it
• 5:00
  Speaker 1: is entirely interwoven with the chaotic evidence of a brutal
• 5:04
  Speaker 1: double murder.
• 5:05
  Speaker 2: So it's all mixed together. Exactly. When a struggle happens
• 5:08
  Speaker 2: in a lived-in space, the killer, as Sweat, might mingle
• 5:12
  Speaker 2: with the DNA of a neighbor who sat on that
• 5:14
  Speaker 2: same couch three days prior.
• 5:15
  Speaker 1: That sounds impossible to sort out.
• 5:17
  Speaker 2: It is so tedious. The forensic technicians have to painstakingly swab, sequence,
• 5:23
  Speaker 2: and eliminate dozens of innocent genetic profiles just to isolate
• 5:27
  Speaker 2: one anomaly.
• 5:28
  Speaker 1: It's not finding a needle in a haystack.
• 5:30
  Speaker 2: No, it is analyzing every individual strand of hay to
• 5:34
  Speaker 2: determine its origin.
• 5:35
  Speaker 1: Wow.
• 5:36
  Speaker 2: Stitching the signal from that kind of deafening biological noise
• 5:40
  Speaker 2: is an incredibly slow, complex process.
• 5:43
  Speaker 1: I can see how that would immediately bog down the
• 5:44
  Speaker 1: momentum of an investigation. But, I mean, human nature and
• 5:48
  Speaker 1: standard police procedure dictates that while the lab is doing
• 5:51
  Speaker 1: that slow, methodical work, The detectives on the ground look
• 5:54
  Speaker 1: for the most obvious, immediate answer.
• 5:56
  Speaker 2: Of course.
• 5:57
  Speaker 1: Which leads us to the person who actually found the bodies.
• 6:00
  Speaker 2: The center of the victim's universe.
• 6:01
  Speaker 1: Yes, the inner circle. The focus instantly locked on to
• 6:05
  Speaker 1: Sean Dickis.
• 6:06
  Speaker 2: As it always does. Right.
• 6:08
  Speaker 1: He is the father, the husband, the last person known
• 6:11
  Speaker 1: to have seen them alive, and the first person to
• 6:13
  Speaker 1: call it in. I have to admit, as someone who
• 6:16
  Speaker 1: consumes a lot of true crime, my default setting is
• 6:20
  Speaker 1: to assume the husband did it.
• 6:21
  Speaker 2: It sasses statistical trope for a reason.
• 6:24
  Speaker 1: It really is.
• 6:25
  Speaker 2: It is the foundational rule of homicide investigation. You start
• 6:29
  Speaker 2: your concentric circles at the absolute center of the victim's
• 6:32
  Speaker 2: life and slowly work your way outward.
• 6:35
  Speaker 1: Work outward from the husband. Right.
• 6:37
  Speaker 2: Detectives are trained to look at the spouse, the ex-partner,
• 6:40
  Speaker 2: the immediate family members, because statistically, violent crime is usually
• 6:44
  Speaker 2: driven by intimate motives.
• 6:46
  Speaker 1: Like jealousy or financial gain?
• 6:48
  Speaker 2: Jealousy, money, or just deep-seated domestic grievances.
• 6:51
  Speaker 1: But here is where the narrative sharply diverges from the trope.
• 6:55
  Speaker 1: The investigators put Sean through extensive questioning.
• 6:57
  Speaker 2: Very extensive.
• 6:58
  Speaker 1: They run a polygraph test. They tear apart his timeline.
• 7:01
  Speaker 1: And ultimately, they officially clear him as a suspect.
• 7:04
  Speaker 2: They do.
• 7:04
  Speaker 1: They just cross him off the list entirely.
• 7:06
  Speaker 2: Which triggers one of the most perilous moments in any
• 7:09
  Speaker 2: major investigation.
• 7:10
  Speaker 1: Perilous how?
• 7:11
  Speaker 2: It creates investigative whiplash.
• 7:14
  Speaker 1: Walk me through the mechanics of that whiplash. Because on
• 7:17
  Speaker 1: one hand, clearing an innocent person is a triumph of
• 7:20
  Speaker 1: the justice system.
• 7:21
  Speaker 2: Absolutely.
• 7:22
  Speaker 1: But from the perspective of the detectives trying to solve
• 7:25
  Speaker 1: the case, it must feel like the floor just evaporated
• 7:28
  Speaker 1: beneath their feet.
• 7:29
  Speaker 2: It is a massive cognitive shock for them.
• 7:32
  Speaker 1: I can imagine.
• 7:33
  Speaker 2: When a murder occurs, the suspect pool is technically the
• 7:37
  Speaker 2: entire population of the planet. But practically, detectives use those
• 7:41
  Speaker 2: statistics we just talked about to instantly shrink that global
• 7:45
  Speaker 2: pool down to one or two individuals.
• 7:47
  Speaker 1: The inner circle.
• 7:48
  Speaker 2: Right. They mobilize all their resources, they direct their interrogators,
• 7:52
  Speaker 2: and focus their lab priorities on proving or disproving that
• 7:56
  Speaker 2: singular hypothesis.
• 7:57
  Speaker 1: They build a tunnel and they shine a very bright
• 8:00
  Speaker 1: light straight down it.
• 8:01
  Speaker 2: Precisely. But the moment the inner circle is irrevocably cleared,
• 8:05
  Speaker 2: the moment the polygraph confirms what the alibi suggested, that
• 8:09
  Speaker 2: tightly controlled, narrowly focused suspect pool, instantaneously explodes back outward.
• 8:14
  Speaker 1: So they're back to square one.
• 8:16
  Speaker 2: Worse than square one. The spotlight clicks off and they
• 8:19
  Speaker 2: are suddenly staring into the dark again.
• 8:22
  Speaker 1: Wow.
• 8:22
  Speaker 2: The suspect could be anyone, anywhere. And the truly terrifying
• 8:27
  Speaker 2: element for an investigator in that moment is the loss
• 8:29
  Speaker 2: of time.
• 8:30
  Speaker 1: Because while they were interrogating the father and verifying his movements,
• 8:34
  Speaker 1: the actual perpetrator was, what, putting miles between themselves and Franklin, Indiana?
• 8:39
  Speaker 2: Exactly. Time is the ultimate enemy in homicide work.
• 8:42
  Speaker 1: Right.
• 8:43
  Speaker 2: By the time Sean is officially removed from the board,
• 8:45
  Speaker 2: the critical 48-hour window has completely closed. The trail is
• 8:49
  Speaker 2: actively cooling.
• 8:50
  Speaker 1: Which means evidence is disappearing.
• 8:53
  Speaker 2: And memories are fading. Witnesses are starting to forget the
• 8:56
  Speaker 2: specific color of a car they saw, or they are
• 8:58
  Speaker 2: subconsciously blending what they saw with what they are hearing
• 9:01
  Speaker 2: on the evening news.
• 9:02
  Speaker 1: Oh, that makes sense. The media coverage messes with their memory.
• 9:05
  Speaker 2: It really does. The initial shock in the community is...
• 9:08
  Speaker 2: begins to calcify into generalized fear, making people less likely
• 9:12
  Speaker 2: to even open their doors to detectives.
• 9:14
  Speaker 1: So the inner circle is cleared, the timeline is compromised,
• 9:17
  Speaker 1: and the police are forced to cast a massive, desperate net.
• 9:20
  Speaker 2: A very wide net.
• 9:21
  Speaker 1: And this brings us to a, frankly, staggering block of time.
• 9:25
  Speaker 1: The records jump from the immediate aftermath in 2006... All
• 9:29
  Speaker 1: the way to updates in 2015, and then to a
• 9:33
  Speaker 1: grim milestone in July 2018. Such a huge gap. Twelve
• 9:37
  Speaker 1: years pass, and over that decade plus, police processed nearly
• 9:41
  Speaker 1: 500 distinct leads. 500. 500. And they still walked away
• 9:46
  Speaker 1: with zero suspects, zero motives, and absolutely no closure.
• 9:51
  Speaker 2: Processing 500 leads without a single viable suspect is... It's
• 9:56
  Speaker 2: an administrative and psychological nightmare that is really hard to
• 9:59
  Speaker 2: fully conceptualize.
• 10:00
  Speaker 1: It sounds impossible. I mean, if I have a week
• 10:02
  Speaker 1: where I have to process 500 unread emails, my brain
• 10:05
  Speaker 1: shuts down entirely. Right.
• 10:06
  Speaker 2: You just get overwhelmed.
• 10:07
  Speaker 1: Yeah. I start missing crucial details. I miss file things
• 10:10
  Speaker 1: that just go numb. I cannot fathom the cognitive load
• 10:13
  Speaker 1: of having to knock on 500 doors.
• 10:15
  Speaker 2: It's exhausting.
• 10:16
  Speaker 1: Tracking down 500 hostile or confused individuals, verifying 500 alibis,
• 10:22
  Speaker 1: and typing up 500 reports in triplicate just to find
• 10:25
  Speaker 1: out a tip was a complete waste of time. Does
• 10:29
  Speaker 1: having that many leads actually sabotage the case?
• 10:32
  Speaker 2: You are identifying a very real phenomenon known as information overload.
• 10:37
  Speaker 2: And in law enforcement, it can be fatal to a case.
• 10:40
  Speaker 1: Fatal. How so?
• 10:42
  Speaker 2: Well, a lead is rarely a neat, actionable piece of intelligence.
• 10:46
  Speaker 1: Like in the movies. Right.
• 10:47
  Speaker 2: A lead is usually a chaotic fragment of human perception.
• 10:51
  Speaker 2: It is a phone call from a neighbor who thinks
• 10:53
  Speaker 2: they saw a suspicious van, but they can't remember if
• 10:55
  Speaker 2: it was Tuesday or Wednesday.
• 10:56
  Speaker 1: Right.
• 10:57
  Speaker 2: It is a tip from a disgruntled former employee trying
• 11:00
  Speaker 2: to frame a coworker. It is even the inevitable influx
• 11:03
  Speaker 2: of psychics claiming they had a vision of a bloody
• 11:05
  Speaker 2: knife in a river.
• 11:06
  Speaker 1: Oh, wow. The psychics. And the police legally and procedurally
• 11:09
  Speaker 1: have to run down every single one of those fragments,
• 11:12
  Speaker 1: no matter how absurd they sound on their face.
• 11:14
  Speaker 2: You do, because defense attorneys will absolutely eviscerate them in
• 11:17
  Speaker 2: court if they ignore a lead that later turns out
• 11:20
  Speaker 2: to be relevant.
• 11:20
  Speaker 1: So they have no choice.
• 11:21
  Speaker 2: None. Every single one of those 500 fragments requires a
• 11:26
  Speaker 2: detective to pull a file, drive to a location, conduct
• 11:29
  Speaker 2: an interview, cross-reference databases, And document the interaction.
• 11:33
  Speaker 1: That's a massive amount of paperwork.
• 11:35
  Speaker 2: It can take three weeks to fully eliminate a single
• 11:37
  Speaker 2: bad lead. When you multiply that administrative friction by 500,
• 11:40
  Speaker 2: the noise completely drowns out whatever faint signal might actually exist.
• 11:46
  Speaker 1: The sheer bureaucratic weight of it would bury anyone.
• 11:49
  Speaker 2: It really would.
• 11:51
  Speaker 1: And amidst all that noise, one specific theory emerges that
• 11:54
  Speaker 1: I want to dissect. because it highlights exactly why local
• 11:57
  Speaker 1: police departments struggle when the threat doesn't fit their standard models.
• 12:01
  Speaker 2: Right, the construction worker theory.
• 12:02
  Speaker 1: Yeah. They heavily pursued the theory that the murders could
• 12:06
  Speaker 1: have been committed by one of the many construction workers
• 12:08
  Speaker 1: who were operating in the area at that time.
• 12:11
  Speaker 2: The transient worker theory. It is a uniquely terrifying scenario
• 12:16
  Speaker 2: for local law enforcement.
• 12:18
  Speaker 1: Why is it so terrifying for them specifically?
• 12:20
  Speaker 2: Because it introduces the concept of a geographic ghost.
• 12:23
  Speaker 1: A ghost in the sense that they have no footprint
• 12:26
  Speaker 1: in the community, like they don't live there.
• 12:27
  Speaker 2: Correct. Traditional police work is heavily reliant on social and
• 12:32
  Speaker 2: geographic anchors.
• 12:33
  Speaker 1: Like what?
• 12:33
  Speaker 2: Detectives look for local grudges, ongoing disputes, and establish criminal
• 12:39
  Speaker 2: records within the county limits. They rely on informants who
• 12:43
  Speaker 2: drink at the local bars and know who was moving
• 12:45
  Speaker 2: stolen goods.
• 12:46
  Speaker 1: Right. They work the local network.
• 12:48
  Speaker 2: But a transient population... like a roofing crew or highway
• 12:52
  Speaker 2: contractors who arrive in a town on a Monday and
• 12:54
  Speaker 2: leave on a Friday, completely circumvents that entire system of intelligence.
• 12:59
  Speaker 1: They don't drink at the local bar. They don't have
• 13:01
  Speaker 1: an ex-wife down the street. They just vanish.
• 13:03
  Speaker 2: They have zero ties to the victim, which means there
• 13:06
  Speaker 2: is no traditional motive like revenge or jealousy to uncover.
• 13:10
  Speaker 1: Wow.
• 13:10
  Speaker 2: If a transient worker commits a crime of opportunity, say,
• 13:14
  Speaker 2: They see an open garage door or an unlocked window
• 13:17
  Speaker 2: while driving past a suburban house. Which happened? They can
• 13:20
  Speaker 2: inflict horrific violence and be three states away before the
• 13:23
  Speaker 2: bodies are even discovered. They aren't in the local databases.
• 13:27
  Speaker 2: Their fingerprints aren't on file at the county precinct.
• 13:30
  Speaker 1: And their disappearance doesn't raise any red flags because they're
• 13:33
  Speaker 1: always supposed to leave anyway?
• 13:34
  Speaker 2: Exactly. They were just passing through.
• 13:36
  Speaker 1: So the local police are essentially trying to catch smoke.
• 13:38
  Speaker 1: I mean, they have the cleared father, this overwhelming contaminated
• 13:42
  Speaker 1: mountain of evidence. the soul-crushing weight of 500 dead end leads,
• 13:48
  Speaker 1: and the looming possibility that the killer was just a
• 13:50
  Speaker 1: ghost passing through. It's an impossible situation. The frustration must
• 13:55
  Speaker 1: have been absolute, which leads to a decision that fundamentally
• 13:59
  Speaker 1: changes the shape of this entire story.
• 14:01
  Speaker 2: Yes, the holdback evidence.
• 14:02
  Speaker 1: When you stare at 500 dead ends for a decade,
• 14:06
  Speaker 1: desperation sets in. The police realize their standard playbook was useless,
• 14:10
  Speaker 1: which forced them to do something they clearly hated doing.
• 14:14
  Speaker 1: They opened their secret vault.
• 14:15
  Speaker 2: The deployment of strategic secrecy is one of the most
• 14:18
  Speaker 2: debated tactics in criminal justice, and this case is a
• 14:22
  Speaker 2: prime study of its limitations.
• 14:24
  Speaker 1: The revelation here is stunning. We learn that there was
• 14:27
  Speaker 1: a series of home invasions, five separate burglaries in total.
• 14:31
  Speaker 2: Right.
• 14:32
  Speaker 1: They all occurred within a tight half-mile radius of the
• 14:35
  Speaker 1: murder scene during June and July of 2006 and 2007.
• 14:39
  Speaker 2: A very clustered area.
• 14:41
  Speaker 1: But the detail that completely stopped me in my tracks...
• 14:44
  Speaker 1: is that one of these burglaries took place on the
• 14:46
  Speaker 1: exact same street on the exact same day as the
• 14:50
  Speaker 1: murders of Blake and Shana.
• 14:52
  Speaker 2: The statistical improbability of two unrelated, highly invasive crimes occurring
• 14:57
  Speaker 2: on the same suburban street on the same afternoon is astronomical.
• 15:01
  Speaker 2: It is.
• 15:01
  Speaker 1: It really is. Yet, the police deliberately kept these burglaries
• 15:05
  Speaker 1: a closely guarded secret for years.
• 15:07
  Speaker 2: They didn't tell anyone.
• 15:09
  Speaker 1: They sat on this information while blindly searching for suspects,
• 15:12
  Speaker 1: only choosing to release the details to media outlets much
• 15:15
  Speaker 1: later in a desperate bid to jog the community's memory.
• 15:18
  Speaker 1: I have to push back hard on this tactic.
• 15:20
  Speaker 2: A lot of people do.
• 15:21
  Speaker 1: From a public relations and community safety standpoint, withholding the
• 15:24
  Speaker 1: fact that a serial burglar is actively hitting houses on
• 15:27
  Speaker 1: your street sounds like borderline criminal negligence.
• 15:30
  Speaker 2: It looks bad, certainly.
• 15:31
  Speaker 1: How do investigators possibly justify keeping the public in the
• 15:36
  Speaker 1: dark about a threat like that? I mean, people could
• 15:38
  Speaker 1: have been locking their doors.
• 15:40
  Speaker 2: To understand the justification, we have to examine the mechanics
• 15:43
  Speaker 2: of what is known as holdback evidence.
• 15:45
  Speaker 1: Okay, holdback evidence. Right.
• 15:47
  Speaker 2: While it looks like negligence from the outside, from inside
• 15:50
  Speaker 2: the precinct, it is viewed as the ultimate insurance policy.
• 15:54
  Speaker 1: An insurance policy against what, exactly?
• 15:56
  Speaker 2: Against the chaos of false confessions.
• 15:58
  Speaker 1: Really? Yes.
• 16:00
  Speaker 2: It is a disturbing reality of high-profile homicide cases that
• 16:04
  Speaker 2: they attract immense amounts of psychological instability.
• 16:07
  Speaker 1: Wow.
• 16:08
  Speaker 2: The moment a gruesome murder hits the news, police departments
• 16:12
  Speaker 2: are flooded with individuals who walk into the lobby claiming
• 16:14
  Speaker 2: they committed the crime.
• 16:15
  Speaker 1: People actually do that.
• 16:17
  Speaker 2: Constantly. Some are seeking infamy. Some are suffering from severe
• 16:20
  Speaker 2: mental illness and genuinely believe they did it. Others are
• 16:24
  Speaker 2: highly suggestible individuals who are coerced into confessing by aggressive
• 16:29
  Speaker 2: interrogation tactics.
• 16:30
  Speaker 1: I know false confessions happen, but it always boggles the
• 16:33
  Speaker 1: mind that someone would voluntarily volunteer for a murder charge.
• 16:37
  Speaker 2: It happens so frequently that investigators have to build firewalls
• 16:41
  Speaker 2: to protect the integrity of the prosecution.
• 16:43
  Speaker 1: Okay, so how does the secrecy act as a firewall?
• 16:47
  Speaker 2: If the police issue a press release detailing every aspect
• 16:50
  Speaker 2: of the crime, if they announce the killer stole a
• 16:53
  Speaker 2: specific model of digital camera, broke a specific pane of glass,
• 16:57
  Speaker 2: and hit three other houses on the block.
• 17:00
  Speaker 1: Then everyone knows. Right.
• 17:01
  Speaker 2: Then anyone off the street can memorize those facts. They
• 17:05
  Speaker 2: can sit in an interrogation room and recite those exact details,
• 17:08
  Speaker 2: making it incredibly difficult to definitively prove they are lying.
• 17:12
  Speaker 1: Oh, I see. So by hiding the burglaries, they create
• 17:14
  Speaker 1: a litmus test.
• 17:15
  Speaker 2: Exactly. The secret details act as a filter. If the
• 17:19
  Speaker 2: police are interviewing a suspect and the suspect casually volunteers, yeah,
• 17:22
  Speaker 2: I was on that street. I broke into the house
• 17:24
  Speaker 2: two doors down looking for cash.
• 17:26
  Speaker 1: Then they know.
• 17:27
  Speaker 2: The detectives instantly know beyond any shadow of a doubt
• 17:31
  Speaker 2: that they were sitting across from the actual perpetrator. Only
• 17:34
  Speaker 2: the killer and the cops know about the burglaries.
• 17:39
  Speaker 1: OK, I understand the tactical logic. It guarantees a clean conviction.
• 17:43
  Speaker 1: But it is a massive gamble, isn't it?
• 17:45
  Speaker 2: It's a huge gamble.
• 17:46
  Speaker 1: Because you are trading the immediate power of crowdsourcing for
• 17:51
  Speaker 1: the eventual security of a tight interrogation. If the public
• 17:55
  Speaker 1: doesn't know there's a burglar operating in their neighborhood that
• 17:58
  Speaker 1: specific afternoon, how can they possibly know to call the
• 18:02
  Speaker 1: tip line and say, hey, I saw a guy in
• 18:04
  Speaker 1: a blue jacket hop in a fence?
• 18:06
  Speaker 2: They wouldn't know to call.
• 18:07
  Speaker 1: Right. You are blinding your best witnesses.
• 18:10
  Speaker 2: That is the tragic flaw in the holdback strategy. The
• 18:13
  Speaker 2: insurance policy is entirely worthless if you never actually find
• 18:16
  Speaker 2: a suspect to interrogate.
• 18:17
  Speaker 1: Which they didn't.
• 18:18
  Speaker 2: And that is exactly what happened in Franklin. The shift
• 18:20
  Speaker 2: we see in this narrative, the police finally releasing the
• 18:23
  Speaker 2: details of the burglaries years later, is an admission of
• 18:27
  Speaker 2: tactical failure.
• 18:28
  Speaker 1: Wow.
• 18:28
  Speaker 2: They're transitioning from a posture of protecting the prosecution to
• 18:33
  Speaker 2: a posture of desperate realization that the case is dead.
• 18:36
  Speaker 1: They are throwing a Hail Mary pass.
• 18:38
  Speaker 2: They are. They are giving up their secret weapon, hoping
• 18:41
  Speaker 2: that throwing the details of those burglaries out into the
• 18:44
  Speaker 2: public sphere... will finally shake a memory loose in the community.
• 18:48
  Speaker 1: But it's an agonizingly late shift.
• 18:51
  Speaker 2: Very late.
• 18:51
  Speaker 1: And crucially, it doesn't seem like the local police came
• 18:54
  Speaker 1: to this realization entirely on their own. It required external pressure.
• 18:58
  Speaker 2: Yes, external pressure was key.
• 19:00
  Speaker 1: Which brings us to the most cinematic element of this
• 19:03
  Speaker 1: entire investigation. With the local department exhausted, buried under useless
• 19:08
  Speaker 1: tips and clinging to secrets, a new dynamic enters the fray.
• 19:13
  Speaker 2: A really unique dynamic.
• 19:14
  Speaker 1: And I want to emphasize that this intervention wasn't initiated
• 19:17
  Speaker 1: by the police chief or the mayor. It was driven
• 19:19
  Speaker 1: by Blake's mother, Christina.
• 19:21
  Speaker 2: The relentless advocacy of the surviving family members is often
• 19:25
  Speaker 2: the only thing that keeps a cold case from being
• 19:27
  Speaker 2: permanently archived.
• 19:28
  Speaker 1: Her refusal to let this fade away is incredible. I mean,
• 19:31
  Speaker 1: the father is cleared, the trail is frozen, but the
• 19:34
  Speaker 1: mother is still pushing, still hunting for a lever to pull.
• 19:37
  Speaker 2: She wouldn't stop.
• 19:38
  Speaker 1: And her advocacy leads investigators to a highly specialized entity
• 19:42
  Speaker 1: known as the Vidoc Society.
• 19:44
  Speaker 2: The Vidoc Society is a fascinating organization.
• 19:48
  Speaker 1: It sounds made up.
• 19:49
  Speaker 2: I know. It operates almost like a mythic institution within
• 19:52
  Speaker 2: the criminal justice world, but its methods are entirely rooted
• 19:57
  Speaker 2: in hard science and deep psychological analysis.
• 20:00
  Speaker 1: They sound like an elite superhero team for unsolved murders.
• 20:04
  Speaker 2: They kind of are.
• 20:05
  Speaker 1: They take on a maximum of 10 cases a year,
• 20:07
  Speaker 1: specifically hunting down the most stubborn cold case homicides.
• 20:11
  Speaker 2: Just 10. That's it.
• 20:13
  Speaker 1: And they're comprised of forensic experts, current and former FBI profilers,
• 20:18
  Speaker 1: seasoned detectives, forensic scientists, and psychologists. It's an incredible roster.
• 20:23
  Speaker 2: Truly elite.
• 20:24
  Speaker 1: But I want to go beyond the impressive titles. Explain
• 20:27
  Speaker 1: to me the actual mechanism of how this group functions.
• 20:30
  Speaker 1: Why is it so vital to have a psychologist and
• 20:32
  Speaker 1: a forensic scientist analyzing the same piece of evidence simultaneously?
• 20:37
  Speaker 2: That is the critical question. To understand their value, you
• 20:40
  Speaker 2: really have to understand how local policing usually works. Okay.
• 20:43
  Speaker 2: Standard police departments, out of necessity, operate in strict silos.
• 20:47
  Speaker 1: Yeah.
• 20:48
  Speaker 2: The crime scene tech measures the blood spatter and bags
• 20:51
  Speaker 2: the evidence. The medical examiner details the specific tissue damage
• 20:56
  Speaker 2: and the angle of the stab wounds.
• 20:58
  Speaker 1: Okay, so they all have their specific jobs.
• 21:01
  Speaker 2: The detective interviews the neighbors and builds timelines. They all
• 21:04
  Speaker 2: generate separate reports, and eventually they pass those reports to
• 21:08
  Speaker 2: each other.
• 21:09
  Speaker 1: It's an assembly line. Everyone just does their specific task
• 21:11
  Speaker 1: and moves it down the line.
• 21:12
  Speaker 2: Yes, and an assembly line is great for efficiency, but
• 21:15
  Speaker 2: it is terrible for synthesis.
• 21:18
  Speaker 1: Ah, I see.
• 21:18
  Speaker 2: The Vedok Society destroys those silos. They bring a multidisciplinary,
• 21:23
  Speaker 2: simultaneous approach. Let's take the mechanics of a stab wound
• 21:27
  Speaker 2: as an example.
• 21:28
  Speaker 1: Okay.
• 21:28
  Speaker 2: The forensic scientist looks at a wound and uses the
• 21:31
  Speaker 2: depth of the penetration, the angle of the blade, and
• 21:33
  Speaker 2: the bruising around the entry point to determine the physical
• 21:36
  Speaker 2: mechanics of the attack.
• 21:37
  Speaker 1: Right, the physics of it.
• 21:38
  Speaker 2: They can say the attacker was likely left-handed, significantly taller
• 21:42
  Speaker 2: than the victim, and possessed a high degree of upper
• 21:44
  Speaker 2: body strength.
• 21:45
  Speaker 1: So they build a physical blueprint of the killer.
• 21:48
  Speaker 2: Exactly. But then, sitting right next to them at the table,
• 21:51
  Speaker 2: the forensic psychologist analyzes the exact same wound pattern.
• 21:55
  Speaker 1: At the same time.
• 21:56
  Speaker 2: Yes. But they aren't looking at physics. They are looking
• 22:00
  Speaker 2: at behavior.
• 22:01
  Speaker 1: Behavior. Right.
• 22:02
  Speaker 2: If the medical examiner notes that there are 30 stab wounds,
• 22:06
  Speaker 2: but only two are fatal, the psychologist recognizes the concept
• 22:10
  Speaker 2: of overkill.
• 22:11
  Speaker 1: Overkill meaning an emotional component.
• 22:13
  Speaker 2: Correct. A transient burglar who gets surprised during a robbery
• 22:17
  Speaker 2: might stab someone once or twice just to clear their
• 22:20
  Speaker 2: escape route.
• 22:20
  Speaker 1: Just to get away. Right.
• 22:22
  Speaker 2: It is a transactional use of violence. But 30 stab
• 22:25
  Speaker 2: wounds indicate rage, personalization, and a sustained desire to inflict
• 22:30
  Speaker 2: destruction far beyond what is necessary to neutralize a threat.
• 22:34
  Speaker 1: Wow. So by putting those two experts in the same room,
• 22:37
  Speaker 1: you instantly merge the physical blueprint with the psychological profile.
• 22:40
  Speaker 2: You merge them completely.
• 22:42
  Speaker 1: You aren't just looking for a tall, left-handed man. You're
• 22:45
  Speaker 1: looking for a tall, left-handed man with deep-seated anger issues
• 22:48
  Speaker 1: who likely felt a profound loss of control in his
• 22:51
  Speaker 1: personal life. Exactly.
• 22:52
  Speaker 2: Exactly. It is the synthesis of disciplines that creates breakthroughs.
• 22:57
  Speaker 2: And more importantly, the VDOC society brings fresh, unburdened eyes
• 23:03
  Speaker 2: to a stale investigation.
• 23:04
  Speaker 1: Because they aren't bogged down by years of dead ends. Right.
• 23:08
  Speaker 2: It was the society members who heavily scrutinized the records,
• 23:11
  Speaker 2: zeroed in on the parallel burglaries, and actively pressured the
• 23:15
  Speaker 2: local police to release those details to the public.
• 23:18
  Speaker 1: They saw the pattern that the local cops were too
• 23:21
  Speaker 1: exhausted to see.
• 23:22
  Speaker 2: It is the ultimate antidote to tunnel vision.
• 23:24
  Speaker 1: Yeah, that makes so much sense.
• 23:26
  Speaker 2: The local detectives were so emotionally and administratively bogged down
• 23:31
  Speaker 2: by the horror of the scene and the failure of
• 23:33
  Speaker 2: their 500 leads that they likely compartmentalized the burglaries.
• 23:37
  Speaker 1: They just put them in a separate box.
• 23:39
  Speaker 2: They thought, we are hunting a monster who slaughters children.
• 23:42
  Speaker 2: We don't have time to worry about someone stealing flat
• 23:44
  Speaker 2: screen TVs.
• 23:45
  Speaker 1: We separated the timelines.
• 23:46
  Speaker 2: But the VDoc experts, viewing the entire board from a
• 23:50
  Speaker 2: detached analytical distance... understand the behavioral escalation of criminals. They
• 23:55
  Speaker 2: know that violent crime rarely occurs in a perfect vacuum.
• 23:59
  Speaker 2: A burglary on the exact same street on the exact
• 24:01
  Speaker 2: same day as a double homicide is not a distraction.
• 24:05
  Speaker 2: It is a blaring siren of intersecting timelines.
• 24:08
  Speaker 1: It is a stunning course correction.
• 24:10
  Speaker 2: It really is.
• 24:11
  Speaker 1: And the fact that the society only accepts 10 cases
• 24:13
  Speaker 1: a year highlights just how uniquely complex and devastating the
• 24:17
  Speaker 1: situation in Franklin truly was.
• 24:19
  Speaker 2: They saw something in it.
• 24:20
  Speaker 1: Out of thousands of stagnant investigations across the country, this
• 24:24
  Speaker 1: specific nightmare, the cleared inner circle, the contradictory mountain of evidence,
• 24:29
  Speaker 1: the phantom burglaries, warranted the attention of the absolute best
• 24:33
  Speaker 1: minds in the field.
• 24:34
  Speaker 2: It is a profound validation of Christina's intuition as a mother.
• 24:37
  Speaker 1: Yeah, she was right to keep pushing.
• 24:39
  Speaker 2: It proves that the lack of an arrest wasn't just
• 24:41
  Speaker 2: due to a simple local oversight. The case was genuinely
• 24:46
  Speaker 2: a universally perplexing anomaly. that required a complete deconstruction of
• 24:50
  Speaker 2: traditional investigative models.
• 24:52
  Speaker 1: Which opens up a much wider conversation about how we
• 24:56
  Speaker 1: as a society process these anomalies. I want to pivot
• 25:00
  Speaker 1: slightly and look at the actual framework of the information
• 25:02
  Speaker 1: we've been analyzing today.
• 25:03
  Speaker 2: Okay. The broader context.
• 25:05
  Speaker 1: Yeah. We are pulling these updates from a massive true
• 25:08
  Speaker 1: crime database, a digital aggregate page that basically archives human tragedy.
• 25:13
  Speaker 2: Examining the context of where this information lives is crucial
• 25:17
  Speaker 2: to understanding our relationship with crime.
• 25:20
  Speaker 1: It really is, because Blake and Shinra's story does not
• 25:23
  Speaker 1: exist in isolation on that page.
• 25:25
  Speaker 2: No, it's surrounded by others.
• 25:26
  Speaker 1: It is sandwiched between a relentless barrage of other headlines.
• 25:30
  Speaker 1: Just scrolling through, you see updates on DNA finally solving
• 25:34
  Speaker 1: the Sherry Black murder, breakthroughs in the Haley Dunn case,
• 25:37
  Speaker 1: and new angles on the Egypt Covington investigation.
• 25:40
  Speaker 2: All on the same page.
• 25:41
  Speaker 1: And then it devolves into these bizarre rapid-fire daily horrors,
• 25:45
  Speaker 1: like a school employee randomly stabbing a delivery driver with
• 25:49
  Speaker 1: a pen.
• 25:49
  Speaker 2: Just chaotic violence.
• 25:51
  Speaker 1: Right. The incomprehensible discovery of an infant encased in concrete,
• 25:55
  Speaker 1: a doctor shooting a 12-year-old during a road rage incident.
• 25:59
  Speaker 2: It is a firehose of systemic violence and localized terror.
• 26:02
  Speaker 1: It is. And as someone who tries to stay informed...
• 26:05
  Speaker 1: the sheer volume of it is paralyzing. How does a
• 26:09
  Speaker 1: single tragedy, the destruction of a family on a hot
• 26:11
  Speaker 1: Monday in Franklin, maintain its urgency and demand our focus
• 26:16
  Speaker 1: when it is literally drowning in a sea of a
• 26:19
  Speaker 1: dozen other equally horrific, equally urgent stories?
• 26:23
  Speaker 2: Hard to hold onto one.
• 26:24
  Speaker 1: It all just bleeds together into this dark noise.
• 26:26
  Speaker 2: Well, what you are experiencing is the cognitive load of
• 26:30
  Speaker 2: the modern information age crashing into our evolutionary limitation.
• 26:34
  Speaker 1: Our evolutionary limitation. Yes.
• 26:36
  Speaker 2: We are witnessing societal desensitization in real time.
• 26:39
  Speaker 1: Are you saying we just build a callous over our
• 26:41
  Speaker 1: empathy because there's too much of it?
• 26:43
  Speaker 2: We have to as a basic mechanism of psychological survival.
• 26:46
  Speaker 1: Wow.
• 26:47
  Speaker 2: The human brain is not wired to process the emotional
• 26:49
  Speaker 2: weight of a concrete baby, a pen stabbing, and a
• 26:53
  Speaker 2: 12-year-old cold case all before morning coffee.
• 26:56
  Speaker 1: I mean, that makes sense.
• 26:57
  Speaker 2: Too much. If you truly internalize the grief, and the
• 27:00
  Speaker 2: structural failure inherent in every single one of those headlines,
• 27:04
  Speaker 2: you would be entirely incapacitated. You wouldn't be able to
• 27:07
  Speaker 2: leave your house.
• 27:09
  Speaker 1: So we convert trauma into data. We categorize it as
• 27:12
  Speaker 1: true crime content so we can just scroll past it
• 27:14
  Speaker 1: without falling apart.
• 27:15
  Speaker 2: Precisely. We reduce shattered lives to digital links.
• 27:19
  Speaker 1: It's pretty bleak.
• 27:20
  Speaker 2: It is. But this dynamic perfectly illustrates why entities like
• 27:25
  Speaker 2: the VDoc Society are not just helpful, but absolutely mandatory
• 27:29
  Speaker 2: in the modern landscape.
• 27:30
  Speaker 1: Oh, because they force us to stop scrolling.
• 27:32
  Speaker 2: Exactly. Without dedicated, hyper-focused, exclusive attention, a case from 2006
• 27:39
  Speaker 2: simply evaporates into the background radiation of everyday violence.
• 27:43
  Speaker 1: Right.
• 27:43
  Speaker 2: The police in 2018 don't have the luxury of endless reflection.
• 27:47
  Speaker 2: They are actively dealing with the road rage shootings and
• 27:51
  Speaker 2: the domestic assaults happening right now, today.
• 27:53
  Speaker 1: So the Vidoc Society essentially acts as a massive magnifying glass.
• 27:57
  Speaker 1: They do. They take one specific fading link on that
• 28:00
  Speaker 1: crowded web page and enlarge it so dramatically that the
• 28:03
  Speaker 1: system is forced to look at it again.
• 28:05
  Speaker 2: They force focus in a culture designed by distraction and
• 28:08
  Speaker 2: moving on to the next headline.
• 28:09
  Speaker 1: Yeah.
• 28:10
  Speaker 2: They provide the necessary friction to remind us that these
• 28:13
  Speaker 2: are not just stories to be consumed. They are profound
• 28:16
  Speaker 2: failures in community safety that require structural analysis.
• 28:21
  Speaker 1: That is a phenomenal way to frame it. We aren't
• 28:23
  Speaker 1: just reading updates. We are analyzing structural failures.
• 28:27
  Speaker 2: Exactly.
• 28:28
  Speaker 1: And that brings us full circle on the journey we
• 28:30
  Speaker 1: set out on today. We started with the ultimate violation
• 28:33
  Speaker 1: of a safe baseline. A 10-year-old packing his bags, interrupted
• 28:37
  Speaker 1: by unthinkable violence.
• 28:39
  Speaker 2: The shattered mundane.
• 28:40
  Speaker 1: Right. We watched the investigation immediately target the inner circle,
• 28:44
  Speaker 1: only to experience the whiplash of clearing the father and
• 28:47
  Speaker 1: having to face a vast, terrifyingly open horizon of suspects.
• 28:51
  Speaker 2: And then we examined the administrative and cognitive paralysis of
• 28:54
  Speaker 2: processing 500 dead end leads.
• 28:57
  Speaker 1: The information overload.
• 28:58
  Speaker 2: And the unique nightmare of geographic ghosts. You know, transient
• 29:03
  Speaker 2: populations that leave physical evidence but take all social context
• 29:06
  Speaker 2: with them when they leave.
• 29:07
  Speaker 1: We debated the perilous high wire act of hold back evidence,
• 29:11
  Speaker 1: questioning the tactical gamble of keeping a neighborhood burglar secret
• 29:14
  Speaker 1: to protect a future interrogation, even as the case slowly
• 29:17
  Speaker 1: bled to death.
• 29:18
  Speaker 2: Which is a gamble they lost.
• 29:20
  Speaker 1: They did. And finally, we saw how a mother's refusal
• 29:23
  Speaker 1: to accept the silence brought in a multidisciplinary team. to
• 29:27
  Speaker 1: shatter the silos of local policing and connect the psychological
• 29:31
  Speaker 1: dots that had been missed.
• 29:33
  Speaker 2: It is a stark reminder of the sheer friction involved
• 29:36
  Speaker 2: in finding the truth.
• 29:36
  Speaker 1: Yeah, it's not easy.
• 29:37
  Speaker 2: Evidence does not interpret itself, and standard procedures are often
• 29:41
  Speaker 2: ill-equipped to handle genuine anomalies.
• 29:43
  Speaker 1: It requires a constant, active push against the noise. And
• 29:47
  Speaker 1: as we wrap up this deep dive, I want to
• 29:49
  Speaker 1: leave you with one final thought, a corollary to everything
• 29:52
  Speaker 1: we've discussed about intersecting timelines and unseen dangers in suburban neighborhoods.
• 29:56
  Speaker 2: It's an important thought.
• 29:57
  Speaker 1: In 2006, when this crime occurred, it was entirely possible
• 30:00
  Speaker 1: for a violent predator or transient burglar to walk down
• 30:03
  Speaker 1: a residential street in broad daylight, commit an atrocity, and
• 30:07
  Speaker 1: vanish like a ghost.
• 30:08
  Speaker 2: The timelines intersected in total silence.
• 30:11
  Speaker 1: Total silence.
• 30:13
  Speaker 2: The physical environment retained the evidence, but the neighborhood itself
• 30:16
  Speaker 2: had no memory of the event.
• 30:17
  Speaker 1: Exactly. But I want you to think about the street
• 30:20
  Speaker 1: you live on right now, today.
• 30:22
  Speaker 2: It's very different now.
• 30:23
  Speaker 1: The era of the unseen timeline is rapidly closing. Between
• 30:27
  Speaker 1: ring doorbell cameras on every porch, dash cams constantly recording
• 30:32
  Speaker 1: in parked Teslas, the geofencing of our cell phone data
• 30:35
  Speaker 1: and air tags pinging off passing devices, our neighborhoods have
• 30:39
  Speaker 1: become massive overlapping nets of digital surveillance.
• 30:43
  Speaker 2: The baseline of normalcy is now constantly recorded.
• 30:46
  Speaker 1: It is. If the Franklin murders happened today, the mountain
• 30:49
  Speaker 1: of evidence wouldn't just be blood spatter and DNA. It
• 30:51
  Speaker 1: would be terabytes of background data.
• 30:53
  Speaker 2: We'd have video of the street.
• 30:54
  Speaker 1: We are losing the ability to be ghosts in our
• 30:56
  Speaker 1: own neighborhoods. And while that digital footprint might solve cases faster,
• 31:00
  Speaker 1: it raises a deeply unsettling question. Are we actually any safer?
• 31:06
  Speaker 1: Or do we just have a much higher resolution video
• 31:09
  Speaker 1: of the thunderstorm when it finally hits?
• 31:11
  Speaker 2: Something to think about.
• 31:12
  Speaker 1: Keep questioning the world around you. Keep looking for the
• 31:15
  Speaker 1: hidden mechanics behind the headlines. And we will see you
• 31:18
  Speaker 1: on the next deep dive.