Latest / The Feed & The Thread / The Feed & The Thread - July 4, 2026

Transcript

The Feed & The Thread - July 4, 2026 · The Feed & The Thread

• 0:00
  Stop reporting UX activity. Report business outcomes. That
• 0:03
  feels like a trap for our teams. It's the only way to secure
• 0:07
  resources in this economy.
• 0:12
  Welcome to The Feed and The Thread, brought to you by
• 0:15
  Chicago Camps. Leadership By Design is on Thursday and
• 0:17
  Friday, September 17 and 18 and tickets are available now! And
• 0:20
  while you're at it, get caught up on UX fundamentals with five
• 0:23
  minute UX at five em UX dot com. The Feed & The Thread is
• 0:26
  available online at feed and thread dot com to submit your
• 0:29
  feeds, or download our app for all the feeds and threads
• 0:31
  delivered right to your pocket.
• 0:40
  UX teams are caught between proving their worth and adapting
• 0:44
  to tools that change how we work. The pressure is shifting
• 0:47
  from output to outcome, and from control to integration. Lola
• 0:50
  Famulegun at Nielsen Norman Group argues in "Stop Reporting
• 0:54
  UX Activity and Report Business Outcomes" that reporting
• 0:57
  activity is a losing strategy. Executives fund revenue, cost
• 1:01
  reduction, and risk mitigation, not wireframes. If you don't
• 1:04
  speak their language, your budget shrinks. Vitaly Friedman
• 1:08
  writes for Smashing Magazine in "Users Don’t Need More Tools:
• 1:11
  They Need Seamless Integrations" that users want fewer tools, not
• 1:15
  more. He advocates for quiet AI that handles repetitive tasks
• 1:18
  invisibly. Folder instructions let the system organize files
• 1:22
  based on user intent, reducing friction without adding
• 1:25
  complexity. Cassie McDaniel at UX Design.cc discusses this in
• 1:29
  "How designers need to change for an AI-powered world".
• 1:32
  Designers must move beyond pixel-pushing to strategic
• 1:35
  problem solving. Human empathy remains irreplaceable, even as
• 1:38
  AI capabilities expand. The goal is understanding limitations,
• 1:42
  not fearing replacement. Other articles today from I Love
• 1:45
  Typography on font design and Nielsen Norman Group on AI
• 1:49
  explanations.
• 1:57
  Practitioners are navigating a shift where the pressure is
• 2:00
  moving from output to outcome, and from control to integration.
• 2:03
  Over on r/UserExperience, someone pointed out the
• 2:06
  absurdity of a newsletter popup appearing point two seconds
• 2:09
  after page load. The user hasn't even read the headline yet, but
• 2:12
  the system is already demanding personal data. This highlights a
• 2:16
  tension between immediate conversion goals and the need to
• 2:19
  build trust first. Asking for value before providing it breaks
• 2:22
  the implicit social contract. We have to remember that users need
• 2:25
  to evaluate content quality before they consider sharing
• 2:28
  their information. In r/UXDesign, an industrial design
• 2:31
  student is asking what actually makes a great UX designer. They
• 2:34
  want to bridge the gap between physical products and digital
• 2:38
  experiences. The question reveals a desire for concrete
• 2:41
  competencies rather than vague buzzwords. Great designers don't
• 2:44
  just make things pretty; they solve problems with empathy and
• 2:47
  logic. The field needs to define these skills clearly to help
• 2:50
  newcomers transition from other design disciplines. Over on
• 2:53
  r/UI_Design, a post questions whether Design Week is just a
• 2:57
  celebration of work designers are already doing. It challenges
• 3:00
  the hype around industry events versus daily reality. This
• 3:03
  touches on the validation we seek versus the actual practice.
• 3:06
  If the work is already happening, do we need the
• 3:09
  spotlight? Or does the spotlight distort the perception of what
• 3:12
  design actually is? It's worth reflecting on how we measure
• 3:15
  success in our own careers. In r/UXDesign, a Brazilian designer
• 3:18
  with four years of experience is asking how to land international
• 3:22
  projects paid in stronger currencies. English is a
• 3:24
  baseline, but the real barrier is access to global markets.
• 3:28
  This highlights the economic disparity in our field.
• 3:30
  Designers in emerging markets often have top-tier skills but
• 3:34
  lack the networks to monetize them fully. It's a structural
• 3:37
  issue that requires more than just better portfolios. Over on
• 3:40
  r/UI_Design, someone asked if anyone has tried using Higgs
• 3:43
  field AI for SaaS explainer videos. They're looking for
• 3:46
  alternatives to After Effects, which can be time-consuming.
• 3:49
  This reflects the broader search for efficiency tools that don't
• 3:52
  sacrifice quality. We're all looking for ways to do more with
• 3:56
  less, but we need to know if the output holds up. The tool might
• 3:59
  save time, but does it save the user experience? The common
• 4:02
  thread today is that designers are questioning the metrics of
• 4:05
  their success, whether that's speed, visibility, or
• 4:08
  compensation.
• 4:16
  Chicago Camps is hosting Leadership By Design on Thursday
• 4:19
  & Friday, September 17 & 18. It's an online event, so you can
• 4:22
  join from anywhere in the world! Tickets are free, thanks to the
• 4:25
  generosity of the community! If it's within your budget, you can
• 4:28
  purchase a general admission ticket for only twenty six
• 4:31
  dollars - with limited early bird tickets at only fifteen
• 4:33
  dollars. Get tickets now at Chicago Camps dot org.
• 4:43
  Lola Famulegun's argument that we must report business
• 4:46
  outcomes, not activity, hits hard when you pair it with
• 4:49
  r/UserExperience thread about the aggressive newsletter popup.
• 4:52
  Executives fund revenue, not wireframes. But that popup tries
• 4:55
  to grab data before the user even sees the headline. It's a
• 4:58
  total misalignment of incentives. The system demands
• 5:00
  conversion before it provides value. Exactly. It breaks the
• 5:03
  implicit social contract. You're asking for trust without earning
• 5:07
  it. And while we're fixing that friction, Vitaly Friedman is
• 5:10
  right that users don't want more tools. They want seamless
• 5:13
  integrations. Quiet AI that handles the repetitive stuff
• 5:15
  invisibly. We're trying to sell them a process when they just
• 5:18
  want the result. But here's the tension. Cassie McDaniel says
• 5:22
  designers need to move to strategic problem solving. If
• 5:24
  the AI handles the execution, and the popup handles the data
• 5:27
  capture, what's left for the human? We risk becoming just the
• 5:30
  people who approve the algorithm's output. The
• 5:33
  strategic layer gets thin. I see it differently. The
• 5:35
  strategic layer gets thicker, not thinner. The job shifts from
• 5:38
  pushing pixels to defining intent. Folder instructions that
• 5:41
  organize files based on user intent are a perfect example.
• 5:44
  The designer's value isn't in making the folder. It's in
• 5:47
  understanding what goes inside it. That requires empathy, not
• 5:50
  just software skills. So the metric changes. We stop
• 5:53
  measuring hours spent in Figma. We start measuring how well the
• 5:56
  system anticipates user needs. That's a harder sell to a CFO
• 5:59
  who wants to see immediate cost reduction. It is. But it's the
• 6:02
  only way to survive. If we don't define the intent, the
• 6:05
  automation will just optimize for the wrong thing. We have to
• 6:08
  lead that conversation. The gap between execution and intent is
• 6:11
  widening. And the designers who bridge it won't be replacing
• 6:14
  tools. They'll be replacing assumptions.
• 6:18
  That's The Feed and The Thread for today. We'll catch you next
• 6:21
  time!