Latest / UK Column Radio / Gutsy Women: Erin Far from Eden

Transcript

Gutsy Women: Erin Far from Eden · UK Column Radio

• 0:08
  Good afternoon and welcome to the UK column viewers.
• 0:12
  Now this afternoon I have an edition of my Gutsy Women series
• 0:18
  and I'm really, really pleased to have a lady called Erin
• 0:21
  joining me today. And Erin has a a YouTube
• 0:28
  channel. She's been putting out some
• 0:29
  really interesting information. The channel is called Far From
• 0:33
  Eden. And Erin, welcome to the UK
• 0:37
  column. Thank you.
• 0:38
  Thank you for having me. Now you're in, you're in the
• 0:42
  United States. Are you able to give us a rough
• 0:45
  idea where you are in the United States?
• 0:47
  Because that's always interesting for the UK audience.
• 0:52
  I am in the southern United States, so I think that you guys
• 0:59
  are probably aware of Southern rather than Midwest or, you
• 1:03
  know, the West Coast, the southern United States, yeah.
• 1:07
  OK, that's fine. Well, I, I hope you're in the
• 1:11
  southern part of the US that's got some decent weather because
• 1:15
  relations that we've got in relations we've got in the
• 1:18
  States, send us regular texts and Whatsapps and Telegram and
• 1:24
  always Blue Sky. And sometimes I am a bit jealous
• 1:28
  about that. Erin, here we are.
• 1:33
  I made an approach to you. I've been watching some of your
• 1:37
  excellent YouTube talks and interviews and I've, I've seen
• 1:41
  you interviewed by the people and it, for me, it was
• 1:45
  fascinating because for about four months, maybe six months,
• 1:50
  I, I've been drawn towards the subject of, of women in society
• 1:56
  and things not perhaps going as well as they should do.
• 2:00
  I've seen some other people speaking on various topics about
• 2:04
  women. One is lady called Pearl or who
• 2:07
  I'm sure you know, got a very big audience.
• 2:10
  But it was really interesting for me that when I started to
• 2:15
  look at this area, I was seeing both men and women talking about
• 2:21
  it. So I'll say that although some
• 2:25
  of the channels discuss what we're about to discuss in
• 2:31
  different styles and some of them are harder than others, I
• 2:34
  thought it was very encouraging that when we looked across
• 2:39
  social media on YouTube, they were both men and women, women
• 2:43
  and men talking about this subject.
• 2:46
  And one evening when I was, I was looking at a couple of the
• 2:50
  streams, your channel came up and I watched the first of your
• 2:55
  talks. And that got me very interested.
• 2:58
  And eventually I got to the point where I thought I'd like
• 3:01
  to really like to interview this lady because you are clearly in
• 3:05
  a different, a difficult field. You're talking some very tough
• 3:10
  things to a very big audience, which is essentially women in
• 3:15
  the United States and worldwide. And this takes some courage and
• 3:20
  some guts. And I thought I think Erin is a
• 3:22
  is a good candidate for my gutsy women's series.
• 3:26
  So thank you very much for responding and joining me now.
• 3:32
  You've we had a very, very brief chat before we started this
• 3:39
  interview, recorded interview. And I wonder whether I can just
• 3:43
  ask you a little bit about yourself only as much as you
• 3:47
  care to choose, But you're, you are talking essentially about
• 3:52
  women in society and you're putting feminism on trial.
• 3:58
  When did when did you start getting interested in this
• 4:01
  subject and deciding you wanted to presumably research it more?
• 4:09
  It's a, it's a little uncomfortable, not for me to
• 4:13
  share, but I think for people to hear how it really got started
• 4:19
  and it, it was really the catalyst was when my, my mother
• 4:25
  passed away, I was very close with her.
• 4:28
  I lived with her having multiple sclerosis.
• 4:33
  She helped me help me take, you know, take care of me, etcetera.
• 4:36
  And then she passed away at the end of 2015 and I had to, you
• 4:45
  know, make do for myself, etcetera.
• 4:47
  But also my brain started to see things differently.
• 4:51
  For example, I started to see my childhood through a different
• 4:56
  lens and it her passing on, I, I still love her very much, but
• 5:02
  her passing on helped me see her in a different lens.
• 5:06
  And it helped me see what my father's experience was in a
• 5:11
  very, in a much more real way. And the opening of your eyes,
• 5:17
  like that moment everybody has, that moment where the veil is
• 5:21
  lifted. And that was really the
• 5:24
  beginning of it. And I started to see then, not
• 5:27
  just my dad, but I started to see the experience of men that I
• 5:31
  knew, family members, friends, friends that I was meeting for
• 5:35
  the first time. And they were sharing their
• 5:37
  experiences of what it was like to be married, what it was like
• 5:41
  after they got divorced, how low they got.
• 5:46
  And I got very, very interested in it.
• 5:49
  And I recognized also what that feminism had been a great big
• 5:56
  lie that to go out and and prioritize yourself and go and
• 6:02
  get a job and, and all that and you can do anything a man can
• 6:05
  do. That was all basically a lie.
• 6:08
  And so I wanted to get to the bottom of that.
• 6:10
  And I was angry that, you know, it's sort of a feminism had lied
• 6:15
  to me about what the man's experience was because
• 6:18
  supposedly it's so easy for a man.
• 6:20
  Life is so easy for a man. You know, they, they get to do
• 6:24
  all these things and they don't have the trials and tribulations
• 6:27
  that we have as women. And I found it to be the exact
• 6:30
  opposite. So it was sort of like a wave
• 6:34
  that hit me in those first couple of years about 10 years
• 6:37
  ago. And it just hasn't stopped.
• 6:40
  And the discovery hasn't stopped.
• 6:43
  And it's become a message that I feel is my responsibility to
• 6:50
  share. I want to wake women up who were
• 6:54
  kind of asleep mentally as I was, for their own sakes,
• 6:58
  because I love women, not because I hate them.
• 7:02
  And I want to speak up for men because we live in such a world
• 7:06
  that any, any grievance that a man has is, is put down, is
• 7:12
  belittled and they, they just don't have a voice.
• 7:18
  So that's kind of how it got started in the first few years
• 7:22
  and then eventually had to make a YouTube channel.
• 7:26
  Yeah, and and a very, very good YouTube channel it is.
• 7:31
  Thank you. When you realize something was
• 7:35
  wrong where and you you say it was alive, where did you go
• 7:42
  looking for information that helped teach you and perhaps
• 7:46
  reinforce the idea that it was a lie?
• 7:49
  My own experiences and my own eyeballs.
• 7:55
  Literally. Like I didn't go to research or
• 7:59
  papers or experts because those are all the same people who lied
• 8:05
  to me. So I started saying, all right,
• 8:08
  well, what is the real experience?
• 8:10
  What do people really say? I've lived a whole life where
• 8:14
  just making fun of a man. Men are trash.
• 8:17
  Anything a man can do, a woman can do better.
• 8:20
  All of these things, every movie, every song, every
• 8:23
  commercial, I all I had to do was that and go.
• 8:30
  It was right in front of my face this whole time.
• 8:33
  I looked back at my dad's experience.
• 8:35
  I looked at family members experiences that I just couldn't
• 8:38
  see before. And I looked at all the lies
• 8:40
  that women in my life had basically propagated, like, oh,
• 8:45
  you should never depend on a man.
• 8:47
  He's probably going to leave you.
• 8:48
  He might start abusing you. And I'm like, that's not the
• 8:50
  nature of most men. So for the most part, it was
• 8:54
  myself and my own reflection. And then I, when I started my
• 9:06
  YouTube channel, I didn't even watch YouTube.
• 9:09
  I wasn't even aware of the other channels in the very beginning.
• 9:14
  I, I, I wasn't. And then I finally started in
• 9:17
  the first year or so of, of being on YouTube myself,
• 9:24
  watching other content creators like myself.
• 9:29
  Better Bachelor is one of them. Terence Pop is another one.
• 9:34
  I've been on Better Bachelor's show.
• 9:35
  I've had Terence Pop on my show, and those names were given to me
• 9:40
  by none of my life that I'd started actually listening to.
• 9:44
  It's amazing what a woman can learn when she starts actually
• 9:47
  listening to men. This is this is so fascinating
• 9:51
  for me because I'll say gently, I'm a lot older than you and so
• 9:57
  I've got my particular life experiences.
• 9:59
  You, you are the age that you are, plus you're a woman and you
• 10:03
  are you are talking about suddenly coming into the
• 10:07
  realization that things that you were told and believed about
• 10:11
  being a woman and a woman's role were not correct.
• 10:16
  From my research over the last six months, I've put that
• 10:20
  against my overall lifetime. That's very, very recently.
• 10:24
  And I was just fascinated that I, I was listening to people
• 10:28
  talking about this, talking about women, talking about men,
• 10:32
  talking about relationships and saying something's changed.
• 10:36
  And it's not, it's not right. And the number of times that I,
• 10:42
  I found that this was answering things that I've been puzzled
• 10:47
  about, some of it for many years and some of it more recently.
• 10:52
  Because I think that that what you are seeing, what we're
• 10:55
  seeing, which perhaps I can loosely call a breakdown in the
• 11:00
  relationship between men and women, it's accelerating.
• 11:04
  Whatever it is that's happening is accelerating.
• 11:07
  And I can certainly say that in my own experience as a man, I
• 11:13
  know that many men in the present day are very, very wary
• 11:19
  of women, particularly in a professional setting.
• 11:26
  So they will not be themselves. They'll be a sort of very
• 11:30
  restricted sense of themselves. Humour has disappeared in many
• 11:37
  cases because humor, it's easy to say something that is a joke
• 11:42
  but it's taken in the wrong way. And now jokes and things that
• 11:47
  are taken in the wrong way can have serious implications in
• 11:51
  workplace law, for example, or whatever.
• 11:55
  So I I have found it just so interesting to be my age, to be
• 12:00
  looking back over my life and the way society has changed and
• 12:04
  to be concerned. And now in 20252026, I go onto
• 12:10
  the Internet and I find people a lot younger who who are also
• 12:15
  saying hey, something's not right.
• 12:18
  This is a very positive thing, I think.
• 12:21
  I agree. I agree.
• 12:22
  I am actually 47 so excuse me. Oh my goodness I'm 48.
• 12:27
  I don't know why I'm starting to delete birthdays.
• 12:30
  That's fine, it's allowed. I, I do remember a very, you
• 12:37
  could look at it as a very different time, but I
• 12:40
  understand, you know, my father is 75 S His life experience is
• 12:46
  obviously very different. I talk a lot about different
• 12:49
  generations on my channel 'cause I can see that first of all,
• 12:53
  their experiences are different, of course, but they'll also
• 12:56
  their reactions to what's going on in the changes, right?
• 13:01
  They, because their experiences are different, they're
• 13:03
  experiencing this, what I call entropy.
• 13:06
  It's basically, you know, it's a, it's a downward trajectory
• 13:12
  quickly and a destruction of really what made the West the
• 13:17
  West, which is the nuclear family with the father's role
• 13:21
  and the mother's role and the priority of raising children for
• 13:26
  the next generation. And that is something that's
• 13:29
  obviously falling apart, and it's falling apart because of,
• 13:34
  amongst other things, but the destruction of the relationship
• 13:38
  and the dynamic between men and women.
• 13:41
  And I couldn't help but think as you were speaking to say that
• 13:47
  it's important to recognize that, yes, you can really see
• 13:53
  like 44% of young men don't even want to date at all.
• 13:59
  They don't want to approach a woman.
• 14:00
  I should say 44% of young men don't even want to approach a
• 14:05
  woman. And yes, you're absolutely right
• 14:07
  about men in the workplace. There's so many men in the
• 14:09
  workplace that will not be alone in a room with a woman like a
• 14:14
  conference room or in her office.
• 14:16
  Because you know, the whole me Too movement believe all women.
• 14:20
  That's so dangerous for men. It's been absolutely
• 14:23
  destructive. But this all is a symptom of a
• 14:31
  cancer that has been growing for quite a while, very much like a
• 14:35
  stage 4 cancer. You finally get a symptom like
• 14:39
  stage 4 lung cancer, colon cancer, whatever those are good
• 14:42
  examples of. You're finally getting a
• 14:44
  symptom. But at that point, you're like,
• 14:46
  oh gosh, we are so far gone. But I did a study on my channel
• 14:52
  studying a book called The Decline of the American Male.
• 14:56
  It was written in the 1950s and it was talking about the decline
• 15:02
  of the American male then. And it was making the case that
• 15:09
  this is the beginning of sort of corporate America where the man
• 15:13
  goes and works for this corporation, this company.
• 15:16
  And in a way he he completely loses his identity, his his own
• 15:21
  thoughts, because now he has to sort of go along to get along in
• 15:26
  this corporation. Meanwhile, wife is at home
• 15:31
  demanding things like dishwashers and a nicer place.
• 15:35
  And the whole keeping up with the Joneses began then, at least
• 15:40
  here in America. And let me know if any of these
• 15:43
  phrases don't compute across the pond.
• 15:47
  But it was like keeping up with neighbors.
• 15:49
  Oh, look, she's got this, I need to have that.
• 15:51
  So the woman was cracking the whip on the man.
• 15:55
  You need this promotion, we need to move here, etcetera,
• 15:59
  etcetera. And she was the one at home all
• 16:03
  the time, meaning he was gone. And for many of us, we'll say,
• 16:08
  well, of course, that's just how it works.
• 16:10
  He has a job. But it really wasn't that long
• 16:12
  ago in the course of human history when you didn't have,
• 16:16
  like, jobs. You had family farms.
• 16:20
  You had, you know, town shops where you've got a blacksmith
• 16:26
  and you got a Baker OR what have you.
• 16:28
  But in general, those shops were attached to family home.
• 16:32
  So it wasn't like dad is away and woman is completely in
• 16:35
  charge of the house and completely raising the children,
• 16:38
  which separated the father from being the leader of the home and
• 16:42
  saying these are the rules of our household.
• 16:45
  This is how the House of whatever the last name is will
• 16:48
  be run. And that started at least in the
• 16:52
  20th century. Right now, Erin, I can imagine
• 16:56
  there'll be some people listening and watching this who
• 17:00
  will already be starting to get prickly, probably ladies,
• 17:05
  because we've come in from the angle of, of women.
• 17:09
  We're not going to get up. We're not going to take too much
• 17:12
  notice of that because we've got a lot more to to discuss.
• 17:15
  And ultimately, you know, my view on this is we're trying to
• 17:19
  identify, identify something which is destroying the
• 17:23
  relationship between men and women.
• 17:25
  So we're not targeting women over and above men because
• 17:30
  there's there is two sides to this.
• 17:33
  They. Separated us, like, yeah.
• 17:36
  And then they turned it into a competition between us, between
• 17:41
  men and between women, right, Where we're sort of in the same
• 17:44
  space and we're competing against one another.
• 17:47
  And that's when the roles disappear, and that is what
• 17:53
  brought men down and devalued them.
• 17:57
  Let's set the scene a little bit with figures and statistics
• 18:02
  because facts and figures always very important.
• 18:06
  Now you correct me. What I've picked up from from my
• 18:10
  research to date is that in, in the US, the divorce rate is now
• 18:16
  over of marriages over 50%. And overwhelmingly the, the, the
• 18:24
  divorce is initiated by women. We've also got the increasing
• 18:31
  breakdown of partnership. So we've got a couple of man and
• 18:34
  a woman who who were together as partners, but even those
• 18:39
  partnerships are breaking down. And then the statistics show
• 18:44
  that when people try and re establish themselves in, in
• 18:50
  either a marriage or a a partnership, the probability of
• 18:55
  breakdown of that new relationship is even greater.
• 19:00
  So we've, we've got the decline in stable partnerships.
• 19:05
  And then when people have a second go at it or a third go,
• 19:09
  or maybe 4th or 5th for some of them, they they are not managing
• 19:15
  to hold down a stable relationship.
• 19:18
  And, and yeah, do do you want to comment on that?
• 19:22
  Are those that, do those fake figures match?
• 19:24
  What? What do you believe?
• 19:26
  Absolutely they do. It's up to 90% of the time the
• 19:30
  woman is initiating the divorce if she has a higher degree like
• 19:35
  APHD. Right, It's 70% without a higher
• 19:40
  degree. Oops, sorry, but I find that
• 19:44
  interesting. But also of many times on my
• 19:48
  channel, I talk about we have to recognize a common denominator.
• 19:52
  If you're going through life and your relationships are failing,
• 19:57
  perhaps it's you. Well, you know what I mean.
• 20:00
  So we see that a lot where it's like, let me break up the
• 20:04
  relationship, let me destroy the family because.
• 20:07
  I think it's him over there, or I think it's her over there
• 20:11
  even, I'm sure in times. But in reality, it's like we
• 20:15
  need to look at ourselves and take responsibility for our own
• 20:18
  happiness, for our own fulfillment and not look at it
• 20:21
  like it's that person's responsibility or that we're
• 20:24
  entitled to it in the first place.
• 20:26
  So the stats I think reflect what I'm saying there very much.
• 20:34
  Right, OK, so if, if I throw to you some, some comments from me
• 20:40
  as a male about changes that I, I've seen in, in women over over
• 20:46
  my lifetime and well, if I go back to 1970, I'm on say I go
• 20:54
  back to 72, then then I can say right as an adult.
• 21:02
  But it's to me, it's been very clear that women have become
• 21:07
  much harder than they used to be.
• 21:10
  Or certainly you feel, as a male, you feel that in speaking
• 21:16
  to them in recent times, over what my memory says, it says it
• 21:23
  was also seen an immense change in the dress code, which many
• 21:29
  people would say, well, you know, So what?
• 21:31
  But I'm just going to flag it up because we've seen women going
• 21:35
  from essentially being dressed in a modest way and a dress code
• 21:42
  that demonstrates their feminism.
• 21:44
  I see. What you're.
• 21:45
  Saying, yeah, that's, that has changed Now we've got to be
• 21:49
  careful because of course in the 1920s, I think I'm right in
• 21:54
  saying that sort of trouser suits came in for women, that
• 21:58
  women started high class women. I I think I can see little
• 22:04
  caricatures of them wearing trousers.
• 22:07
  But but really prior to that, women were certainly wearing
• 22:12
  dresses. And if I think about a time
• 22:16
  where I always look at where there's pictures of the public
• 22:20
  and you think, wow, that's really interesting.
• 22:22
  Edwardian times when the Edwardians were out, it might be
• 22:29
  a special event, but quite often it would be the Sunday when
• 22:33
  people dressed up in order to be out on the street.
• 22:37
  And the the ladies were always in what looked to be very
• 22:43
  wonderful long dresses. And presumably they were of a
• 22:46
  quality commensurate with the income of the family.
• 22:50
  But you looked at the women, you could identify the women very
• 22:53
  clearly because they looked feminine and they were dressed
• 22:58
  as women in a very, very feminine way.
• 23:02
  And then over the years we have seen the adoption of trousers.
• 23:08
  Now part of that for me is what started to happen during the
• 23:12
  Second World War because there's a lot of women were drawn into
• 23:15
  the factories. It was happening in UK and also
• 23:19
  America. Then understandably, perhaps for
• 23:23
  health and safety reason, women were coming out of long dresses
• 23:27
  and they were getting into overalls.
• 23:29
  But of course the moment they did that, they were becoming
• 23:32
  more man like in their in their dress code.
• 23:37
  And then we've gone into a modern dress code where
• 23:41
  predominantly women are wearing jeans or trousers and the dress
• 23:46
  has taken a backstage position. So something has driven that
• 23:53
  code which has encouraged, in my view, women to adopt more male
• 23:59
  clothing. And that's something that's
• 24:02
  happened alongside the push to say, well, to be a mother is
• 24:06
  not, that's not a sort of life ambition.
• 24:10
  You're much better off getting that degree and going into the
• 24:13
  company and becoming the chief executive and wearing the power
• 24:18
  suit. Right.
• 24:21
  Absolutely. Absolutely.
• 24:22
  And didn't Queen Elizabeth herself work as a mechanic
• 24:28
  during World War 2 and have the dress?
• 24:30
  You know like mechanic where, right?
• 24:34
  I think there was a picture taken which yes which showed her
• 24:39
  in. I looked at that and I said,
• 24:42
  well, there's some propaganda for you.
• 24:44
  I really think that we have. This is something that opened my
• 24:50
  eyes as well, and this is related to what you just said.
• 24:55
  When I was in college, because I did go for a bit, I took a film
• 25:01
  class just sort of like, well, you need an elective.
• 25:04
  So that sounds interesting. And one of the things that they
• 25:07
  showed us 'cause we were looking at early film was Russian
• 25:11
  propaganda films like, oh, look at this propaganda, etcetera,
• 25:15
  etcetera. And I thought, wow, that's,
• 25:17
  that's awful. I can't believe the people
• 25:18
  didn't realize this was propaganda.
• 25:20
  Thank goodness we don't have that.
• 25:23
  And then as I started waking up, as I'm getting older, I was
• 25:27
  like, why would I think that? We don't have that.
• 25:31
  Why would I think that? Oh, well, we're America.
• 25:33
  We're the West. We don't do that.
• 25:35
  We're better than that. And I thought, no, we absolutely
• 25:41
  do that. We're just better at it.
• 25:44
  It's called movies and entertainment in Hollywood.
• 25:46
  And you know, looking at People magazine and the stars and Queen
• 25:50
  Elizabeth with her, I'm a mechanic.
• 25:52
  And our famous sign, you can do it.
• 25:56
  You know that, that Rosie the Riveter, right?
• 25:59
  And it turns out, and I can't remember the, the stat, I wish I
• 26:03
  could, but it's a low percentage, lower than a lot of
• 26:06
  people would think of women that actually did go into the
• 26:09
  workforce for World War 2, at least in the United States.
• 26:13
  We are meant to believe here in the United States that, Oh my
• 26:16
  goodness, so many women went out into the workforce.
• 26:18
  And that's just not true. There were plenty of older men
• 26:21
  that didn't get drafted that we're still working in the
• 26:25
  workforce and there's tons of jobs that women can't even do
• 26:28
  because we don't have the physical strength.
• 26:30
  But the propaganda is that, Oh yeah, we went out and we won.
• 26:34
  We are just as important as at winning the war as the men and
• 26:37
  that's just not true. Interesting you said that.
• 26:42
  You can remember some I would call propaganda of women in the
• 26:45
  20s with like trousers on here in the states.
• 26:49
  What we the propaganda from the 20s for us is the flappers
• 26:53
  wearing the shorter skirts, listening to jazz.
• 26:58
  And that was exciting. And you could even see in the
• 27:02
  show Downton Abbey, which I believe was mostly in the
• 27:05
  Edwardian time, you know, with the original.
• 27:08
  And then, oh goodness, I can't remember her name, but the main
• 27:11
  character daughter cut her hair up to here and that was very
• 27:18
  much a style of the flappers. And absolutely they should have
• 27:23
  made a bit. I look back and I'm like,
• 27:25
  Downton Abbey was completely propaganda too.
• 27:28
  Well. Because your hair, chopping your
• 27:33
  hair like that, if the daughter had actually done that in a
• 27:36
  family like that, chopped her hair to hear that would have
• 27:41
  been the father would have said absolutely not, what are you
• 27:45
  doing? This is embarrassing, etcetera.
• 27:49
  So but they want us to believe our history is different.
• 27:52
  They want us to believe that that those trends were happening
• 27:56
  more widespread than they actually were.
• 27:59
  You said 1972. My mother graduated high school
• 28:04
  in 1972 and also got married in the same year.
• 28:08
  She's pictured in her high school year yearbook as most
• 28:12
  individual and they have a picture of her walking the train
• 28:15
  tracks and she's wearing jeans. In 1972 in the South, wearing
• 28:20
  trousers, jeans, what have you, was a no, no.
• 28:26
  That was like, oh boy, look at you, you're a, a rebel.
• 28:30
  And all these trends that you were saying, whether it's the
• 28:33
  manner of dress, whether it's the hardening of women, all of
• 28:37
  that is all a result, in my opinion, of a rebellion, A
• 28:42
  rebellion against who we actually are.
• 28:46
  It's a rebellion and it is a somehow an attempt.
• 28:50
  For whatever reason, feminism teaches us that in order to be
• 28:54
  better, we have to be more like men.
• 28:56
  And to me that is that if anything is hateful to women or
• 29:01
  misogynistic, feminism is because it says in order to be a
• 29:05
  better woman, you have to actually be more like a man.
• 29:11
  And also the one thing that women can do, the biggest
• 29:15
  contribution that we can make to all of humanity is to bring
• 29:19
  forth life. We have the ability to literally
• 29:23
  grow a human being in our bodies and then feed it with our
• 29:26
  bodies. And so feminism teaches us that
• 29:29
  no, you need to be more like a man in all ways, and that makes
• 29:34
  you better. And also the one thing that
• 29:37
  makes you, you know, uniquely a woman is something you should
• 29:44
  look down upon with disdain. So if any movement or anybody is
• 29:51
  downplaying women, devaluing women, hating women, it's
• 29:55
  feminists and feminism. They just don't realize it
• 29:59
  because they believe all the propaganda.
• 30:03
  Where do I start? Because I have so many, so many
• 30:07
  things to come back on that. No, no, it's absolutely great.
• 30:11
  The first thing I'll just pick up on is, is you.
• 30:13
  You. I would think that in your head,
• 30:16
  you, you are still thinking where does this come from?
• 30:19
  Where is this? Oh, I'm sorry.
• 30:21
  Yes, No. Where is this rebellion come
• 30:24
  from? And you mentioned the Bolsheviks
• 30:28
  and I, I listened to your really excellent interview with we've
• 30:35
  got it here, Brian Martinez from Badger Live Streams.
• 30:39
  I was back, that was back in May last year.
• 30:43
  And, and you, you, you just touched on that subject and I, I
• 30:49
  was fascinated. Let's just tell the story this
• 30:52
  way. When I was at the beginning of
• 30:55
  my becoming aware the life was the world wasn't quite as I
• 30:59
  believed it, I was given a book and the book was called The EU
• 31:04
  Collective Enemy of Its member States.
• 31:08
  So it was a book about the politics of the European Union.
• 31:12
  You can still buy it, but it's very expensive and difficult to
• 31:16
  get hold of the day. I sat down in the chair to read
• 31:20
  it. I got about four pages into the
• 31:23
  book and there was a a table and the table was set out.
• 31:30
  So there were three sections. So the three steps were
• 31:36
  demoralisation, destabilisation, creation of a new society and on
• 31:43
  the left hand side was a column of different things in society.
• 31:48
  There was education, there was health, there was law and order,
• 31:51
  there was military, there was politics and then the centre
• 31:56
  column was what would be done to those areas and the third column
• 32:01
  was what the result would be. Now, if I just took an easy one
• 32:06
  that I can remember with politics, it it said the
• 32:09
  politics was was to be made aggressive and it was to become
• 32:15
  complex. So policies were to be tied up
• 32:18
  with overseas partnerships and there will be a lack of clarity
• 32:27
  in politics. That was one of the things it's
• 32:31
  said that for health, the masses were going to be fed junk food
• 32:38
  and this was going to destroy their health and well-being.
• 32:44
  For education, education was just going to be made a desert
• 32:50
  so that children had no base, they had no real education.
• 32:54
  They couldn't really make decisions.
• 32:57
  And for me, when I picked up on was women, sorry, it was the
• 33:01
  military where it said women in the military and also
• 33:08
  homosexuals in the military. And what was the outcome of this
• 33:13
  weakening of the military and military resolve?
• 33:20
  I read the the full list and when I got to the end, I just
• 33:24
  found myself thinking, my goodness, this is happening
• 33:28
  around us. But.
• 33:29
  We're here. We're here.
• 33:31
  We're here already. And I then read the book, which
• 33:34
  is worth reading if you ever get hold of it.
• 33:36
  It's very detailed. It's got a.
• 33:39
  Make sure I get the name of it from you.
• 33:41
  You, you can, you can still get it online as APDF, but it's not
• 33:46
  as easy to read, obviously, or I don't, I don't think so.
• 33:49
  But this was this was one of the first steps where I saw women in
• 33:56
  relation to the military as a means of undermining the
• 34:01
  military. Absolutely.
• 34:04
  I was so keen to, to get in this discussion with you because I
• 34:07
  want to say some things to you to see what your reaction is.
• 34:10
  So I, I was serving in the the Royal Navy.
• 34:14
  I was a naval officer from 1972 to 1993 and in 19911990 and
• 34:23
  1991. About that period, two key
• 34:26
  decisions were made. One is that they removed all the
• 34:31
  laws banning homosexual activity in the Royal Navy.
• 34:37
  And I'll just say obviously gay people had been in the military
• 34:43
  for a very long time, but they had to be very careful because
• 34:45
  if they were found out, they were going to be exposed and
• 34:50
  ultimately thrown out of the military.
• 34:52
  So that law was relaxed and so gays were accepted into in the
• 34:57
  military. And I quickly say I work with
• 35:02
  gay people and and I can have a good dialogue with them, but
• 35:06
  we'll come back onto why I have concerns about what was
• 35:09
  happening. And the other one was that they
• 35:12
  made a ruling that the Wrens. So that was the specialist, the
• 35:18
  Women's Royal Naval Service. Those girls were going to be
• 35:23
  allowed to go to sea in the ships and because I had a job
• 35:28
  that was training ships and that involved going on board
• 35:31
  warships, most of them British, but also other NATO ships, I I
• 35:37
  was able to see the impact of the girls coming on board the
• 35:42
  warships. We were told that this was going
• 35:46
  to be a good thing because it was factually true that the
• 35:51
  average academic qualification of the girls was higher than the
• 35:57
  intake for the males. And so one of the things that
• 36:02
  was said quite often was, Oh well, the girls are going to
• 36:05
  help bring up the standard on board because of their intellect
• 36:10
  and their education. However, what I witnessed was
• 36:15
  the complete opposite and the dynamic of introducing women on
• 36:22
  board a warship, a steel box with a lot of young men cooped
• 36:26
  up for long periods of times. And very quickly you could see
• 36:30
  the girls using all of their wily female powers in order to
• 36:37
  get what they wanted or manipulate.
• 36:40
  And part of that was me seeing what I'd last witnessed at
• 36:45
  school, which was of course, the girls tended to go for the older
• 36:51
  boys. So the girl in one year group
• 36:54
  would, in my experience, focus on the boys a year above them.
• 37:00
  So those boys presumably more mature and more attractive to
• 37:04
  the girls and transposed into a military scenario.
• 37:09
  This meant that the girls went up a rank or two ranks and
• 37:15
  therefore you had relationships quickly starting which
• 37:19
  absolutely destroyed the rank structure and and the basic
• 37:25
  system of of discipline. And that was also coupled with
• 37:30
  the fact that despite the the fact there was a no touch rule,
• 37:35
  very quickly sexual relationships formed.
• 37:39
  And in some cases those relationships were conducted on
• 37:43
  board the ships themselves, of course.
• 37:46
  And that then lead to many, many exposure articles coming into
• 37:52
  the British press where captains had had inappropriate
• 37:56
  relationships with female junior sailors or it had been cross
• 38:04
  rank. But nevertheless, what you saw
• 38:08
  was that the stability of an all male military service had been
• 38:13
  absolutely fragmented by the introduction of the females.
• 38:19
  And the other story I want to say to you is on one occasion I
• 38:23
  was on board one of our aircraft carriers and I was going from a
• 38:28
  particular part of the ship up to the bridge, which involves
• 38:32
  going up a a very long staircase, I'll call it a spiral
• 38:37
  staircase because it was sort of moving around as I was coming up
• 38:42
  the steps. There were three, possibly four
• 38:45
  female ratings, about half a flight in front of me.
• 38:50
  And they were talking. And what I heard them discussing
• 38:54
  was how many men they had had during the recent run ashore.
• 39:00
  And one girl was particularly pleased with herself because she
• 39:04
  said she'd, she had had, she had had four men in one evening.
• 39:10
  That was, that one night. That was, that was her special
• 39:15
  night. And the implication to me from
• 39:17
  the conversation was that that was a good night.
• 39:21
  There'd been other men in other nights.
• 39:24
  Now, I, I, at that stage had never heard the expression of
• 39:28
  body count, but what I was really interested with and what
• 39:33
  was in my head was these girls are going to bring up the
• 39:36
  intellectual standard, whereas in fact something very different
• 39:41
  was happening. So I've given you those two
• 39:45
  recollections of my time in the military, and I'm interested in
• 39:51
  your response. Well, I think it's quite obvious
• 39:54
  that when you put a bunch of women aboard a ship.
• 40:00
  The hierarchy of the men and the way they organize it changes
• 40:07
  because when it's just men, it's based on your competency.
• 40:11
  That's how you move up the ranks and that's how you organize your
• 40:15
  respect and everything for one another.
• 40:18
  It's based on competency. And to the women now, is it?
• 40:24
  Yes, it's going to coincide. It's based on also how many
• 40:27
  women you can get. But now are you looking at this?
• 40:31
  I don't know what y'all call them like first mate, second
• 40:33
  mate? Do you call them that or no?
• 40:36
  In, in, in the Royal. Navy, do you call it like
• 40:41
  captain and then? Well it would normally be
• 40:43
  captain and and then first left tenant or second second in
• 40:48
  command. OK, my father was in the British
• 40:52
  Merchant Marines, so I'm used to hearing first mate, second mate,
• 40:56
  what have you. But yeah, those are based on
• 40:59
  competency. But then when the women are kind
• 41:03
  to trying to, as they say nowadays, shoot their shot with
• 41:06
  the higher ranking men, now it sort of changes like, OK, well,
• 41:12
  he now has all the women and that adds a whole different
• 41:16
  dynamic. Also, I will say, isn't it so
• 41:19
  funny? Gosh, we're so messed up about
• 41:22
  what makes us valuable as a woman.
• 41:25
  These women are all standing there discussing their escapades
• 41:30
  and they're doing so to brag. They are trying to establish
• 41:34
  their hierarchy. That's what you witnessed is
• 41:37
  women trying to establish their hierarchy by basically, well, I
• 41:43
  slept with this guy and this guy and this guy.
• 41:45
  I bet that's better than the guys you can get.
• 41:48
  Because even to this day, women are just now learning that not
• 41:54
  to be crude, but men will sleep with whoever.
• 41:59
  Do you know what I mean? They're not going to be picky,
• 42:01
  not like women are. So women will say, well, I have
• 42:04
  this body count. And the reason they'll say it
• 42:08
  sort of proudly at least a couple years ago is because they
• 42:12
  think that makes them more valuable because they can have
• 42:15
  this conquest. They are adopting a sort of
• 42:19
  James Bond mentality of look at all the women.
• 42:24
  He's a, you know, he's a ladies man, etcetera.
• 42:27
  As if that makes a person more valuable.
• 42:30
  And The thing is, is that if you ever would like to be a wife, if
• 42:35
  you ever want to be actually chosen by a man for more than a
• 42:39
  night, those things do not make you more valuable at all.
• 42:44
  You've already devalued yourself by spreading yourself out.
• 42:48
  And now you know, Well, a lot of men have say.
• 42:53
  If we're comparing it to, I don't know, an article of
• 42:55
  clothing like shoes, a lot of men have tried you out.
• 42:59
  Well, I will say to the ladies, what pair of shoes would you
• 43:03
  like? Do you go to a used shoes store
• 43:07
  or do you like shoes that are brand new on the shelf?
• 43:10
  And every woman would say to you, EW, I don't want some shoes
• 43:15
  that like 5-10 a thousand people have worn.
• 43:20
  Well, of course, duh. It makes them less valuable.
• 43:25
  They're going to have more scuffs and what have you because
• 43:29
  of the the trauma. And I bet you that those women
• 43:32
  who said those things, whoever their future husbands were, did
• 43:36
  not know that that was how they were.
• 43:41
  And I will also address the education part of it.
• 43:44
  The reason in my opinion, that those women you know where had
• 43:50
  better academic scores, what have you, is because academics
• 43:54
  as we know it, the school system, the the whole process of
• 43:57
  it is tailored more to the way women learn.
• 44:02
  Men learn by doing. Men learn by being active,
• 44:07
  right? Women learn by sitting still and
• 44:11
  listening to the teacher ahead of them and writing quietly and
• 44:15
  whatever. And for a boy, a young man,
• 44:17
  that's absolute torture. It isn't that the women are
• 44:21
  smarter, it's that that the system that supposedly makes
• 44:26
  them smarter is absolutely tailored for them to do better
• 44:30
  on tests. It's rigged.
• 44:33
  It's absolutely rigged and the idea of competency on a ship.
• 44:39
  If you're going to tell me that your ability to take a test, no.
• 44:45
  The amount of decisions my father had to make aboard a
• 44:50
  British merchant marine ship as second mate and 1st mate over
• 44:54
  the years were had to be made in an emergency situation.
• 44:59
  It had to be the sense of spatial things because they had
• 45:03
  cargo and you had to organize and it had to be quick.
• 45:08
  These are not things that a person who can take or trust
• 45:11
  very well and so quietly is necessarily going to be good at.
• 45:14
  The idea of book smarts and real world St. smarts are two very
• 45:20
  different things. And having real world St. smarts
• 45:25
  does not mean that you don't have the information that is in
• 45:28
  that test. It actually might mean that you
• 45:30
  can apply it better. So I get very animated about the
• 45:34
  whole, you know, well, women are graduate.
• 45:37
  Women are outperforming men because they're getting more
• 45:39
  college degrees. And at this point I'm like, oh,
• 45:42
  good. So you're saying that women are
• 45:44
  more indoctrinated because the education system, both, you
• 45:49
  know, private, public, you know, from kindergarten to university,
• 45:53
  I will say tells you what to think, not how to think.
• 45:58
  And this is not conducive to an intelligent male.
• 46:03
  They will be medicated. They will be, you know, they
• 46:07
  will be in trouble. All of those things.
• 46:10
  Some of the brightest. My father, my father, one of the
• 46:14
  sorry, one of the reasons I'm so excited about this, one of the
• 46:17
  reasons I'm so passionate about this is because my father, who
• 46:21
  was born in 1950, grew up in England, all the rest of it born
• 46:26
  in Brighton, raised in London. He was asked to leave school at
• 46:32
  15. He didn't go to college or
• 46:36
  university. He went to the Merchant Marines
• 46:38
  at like 18. The man rose through the ranks
• 46:44
  of society without finishing school, without college, without
• 46:50
  all of that. He could build.
• 46:53
  You know, like he built our pool shed, right?
• 46:57
  A whole structure. No blueprints, no anything when
• 47:03
  he was in the merchant Marines. Sorry, I'll stop bragging about
• 47:05
  my dad in just a second. When he was in the merchant
• 47:07
  Marines as second mate, it was his job to navigate.
• 47:12
  He navigated by the stars, by the stars and mathematics.
• 47:18
  The man is one of the smartest people, if not the smartest
• 47:22
  person I've ever known. And if you're going to at that
• 47:26
  time, tell him to outperform some chick academically, he's
• 47:32
  not going to do it. But I learned not to put any,
• 47:37
  any credence into that at all. Yeah, Aaron did this.
• 47:42
  This is this is very, very interesting discussion.
• 47:45
  I I'm just going to move, move on a little bit.
• 47:49
  Oh, you have because there where there's so.
• 47:52
  I will just go off. On.
• 47:54
  Whatever. No, it's fine.
• 47:56
  It's just that there are, there are so many things to talk about
• 48:00
  here. And what, what I'm hoping to do
• 48:02
  with this interview with you is, is to take the lid off Pandora's
• 48:08
  box for the UK column audience. Because I, I'm pretty sure that
• 48:13
  some people are going to be watching this and they're going
• 48:16
  to be saying, Oh my goodness, I wasn't quite sure what was
• 48:20
  coming. And they will be recognizing
• 48:23
  things they've experienced. But there are just so many parts
• 48:27
  to it. If we say that somebody
• 48:30
  somewhere made the decision to bring women to sea, I'm curious
• 48:37
  as, or into the military who made that decision and why?
• 48:42
  And I can tell you that I know very, very senior level, there
• 48:46
  were a lot of people who were very, very wary of this.
• 48:50
  They were against it for what I think were lots of good reasons.
• 48:54
  But politically, the agenda was the women were going to go into
• 49:00
  the military. And even today around the world,
• 49:06
  it's been shown that you can't, you are not going to put large
• 49:12
  numbers of women in a combat position, and particularly in a
• 49:15
  physical combat position, the Army or the Marines or the
• 49:19
  Special Forces. And we keep being told it's
• 49:24
  going to happen. We keep being told some people
• 49:28
  are trialing it. But the reality is it's never
• 49:31
  working. And it's never working because
• 49:34
  the tough jobs require very tough men to do it.
• 49:38
  And I, I sit here as a, my joke is a vertically challenged man.
• 49:44
  So I'm not very tall. And I would be so foolish to
• 49:48
  think that as a male I could go up against some of the really
• 49:52
  big powerful men who are the men that do these very tough
• 49:56
  military jobs. I recognize that it would be
• 50:00
  stupid of me to put myself forward to do it, even in my
• 50:05
  younger days when I was a lot fitter.
• 50:08
  However, we're being told that women can have these roles.
• 50:12
  So if the decision was made politically and common sense
• 50:19
  across a wide spectrum of people said that this is a really bad
• 50:23
  decision, we've got a malicious political policy being enforced
• 50:30
  in order to destroy the capability not only of the
• 50:35
  military in UK, but Western, NATO, U.S. military.
• 50:40
  So somewhere somebody's got an agenda where they're enforcing
• 50:45
  policies to destroy the military.
• 50:49
  And if I just remind the audience of the table I
• 50:51
  described from Christopher's story was the author of the book
• 50:56
  the EU Collective. He he also said the other areas
• 51:00
  of society were going to be attacked in a variety of ways,
• 51:04
  such as poor food in order to destroy the health and
• 51:08
  well-being. And I believe we're clearly
• 51:11
  seeing that. And there it's therefore it's
• 51:14
  reasonable to say somebody has created this malevolent policy.
• 51:19
  You mentioned the Bolsheviks. I'm just going to say my
• 51:23
  research says, well, we then have to say who created the
• 51:27
  Bolsheviks. And perhaps we have to get into
• 51:30
  a little bit of a more murky area where we go back.
• 51:36
  We'll, we'll throw in, we'll throw in the Tavistock school of
• 51:41
  psychologists in, in Germany who were coming out with some very
• 51:44
  destructive policies. But perhaps we can just get the
• 51:48
  audience to reflect on if nasty things are happening and the
• 51:53
  breakdown of relationships between men and women has got to
• 51:57
  be short of attacking children. The breakdown of relationships
• 52:01
  between men and women has got to be, in my mind, one of the most
• 52:04
  vicious attacks going. We need to be thinking who is
• 52:10
  promoting this type of policy and who's behind it.
• 52:14
  We can't we, But we can't do all of that in this discussion.
• 52:19
  Well, I can go a little longer than you know what I originally
• 52:24
  said totally up to you. But yes, I'll say you can't have
• 52:32
  communism without feminism. You just can't the 2GO hand in
• 52:40
  hand. But how like Marx, right?
• 52:46
  He, the idea of communism, as far as, you know, published or
• 52:51
  what have you, was 1848, I believe, right.
• 52:55
  And we didn't have actual communism, as far as I know,
• 52:59
  until about 1918, around then with the Bolsheviks in Russia.
• 53:06
  So why there was such a long time there?
• 53:09
  Why couldn't that ever happen? Well, feminism started to be
• 53:15
  even a worldwide movement. the United States, the females got
• 53:20
  the vote in 1920. I think that they got it earlier
• 53:23
  in the UK, maybe 19181919. So it's interesting, but the
• 53:28
  first thing the Bolsheviks did, one of the very first things
• 53:32
  they did was take the authority away from the church and give it
• 53:39
  to the state. For example, no fault divorce.
• 53:44
  Many people don't realize that when you move, you know, the
• 53:48
  idea of marriage from being governed by a church to the
• 53:52
  state, which most people don't even realize that the state
• 53:55
  governing marriage is pretty much a brand new thing.
• 53:59
  And Russia, the Bolsheviks were like, yes, of course, this is
• 54:02
  what we need. And we're the first things they
• 54:04
  instituted was no fault divorce. Interesting that that would be
• 54:09
  such a priority. But they did that to destabilize
• 54:12
  the family. When you destabilize the family,
• 54:14
  who who's in charge when you don't have a leader of a family
• 54:17
  and you break it up. Well, the state of course, the
• 54:21
  whole idea of breaking apart the family and I just talked about
• 54:24
  this on Circle of White Light radio out of Ireland 2 days ago.
• 54:29
  The reason they want to destabilize the family is
• 54:32
  because it gives more power to the state.
• 54:34
  And the reason they wanted to give the women the vote, and in
• 54:37
  that matter universal suffrage, was because then you have people
• 54:42
  like women, like people who do not excuse me for the car
• 54:47
  outside. You have people who do not
• 54:49
  contribute, sort of the dregs of society, if you will, making
• 54:55
  decisions. There's a reason why in China,
• 54:57
  everyone is required to vote. Then well, then the state goes,
• 55:03
  well, everyone's voted and they cater to the least common
• 55:07
  denominator. They cater to the people who
• 55:11
  vote based on their emotions, based on some emotional
• 55:16
  reaction. Hence you have Barack Obama with
• 55:19
  the yes we can, Yes, we can. What?
• 55:22
  I didn't know I voted for the man twice.
• 55:25
  I just, I look back and it's like, oh, he made me feel
• 55:27
  hopeful. That's not a reason, but they
• 55:30
  did that to harness everything and move it to the left.
• 55:34
  No matter what happens, and I think people are waking up to
• 55:37
  this, no matter if in the States it's a Democrat or Republican or
• 55:40
  in the UK, it's whatever the Conservative Party versus Labour
• 55:43
  Party, nothing really changes. They'll throw you a bone.
• 55:47
  The Conservative will get in there and say, oh, well, look at
• 55:50
  this, look what we're but what if we conserved?
• 55:52
  We've conserved nothing. It's all been taken away.
• 55:55
  Ronald Reagan hailed as like a great conservative president in
• 55:59
  the United States. He when he was governor of
• 56:02
  California in 1969, instituted no fault divorce.
• 56:06
  That was the first time that law was introduced in the United
• 56:10
  States and it was by Ronald Reagan.
• 56:12
  He also And why? Because it because it caters to
• 56:16
  the female vote, because you can say, Oh my goodness, you have to
• 56:19
  be able to get out of these abusive relationships without
• 56:22
  bringing proof. I mean, you're just being abused
• 56:25
  or whatever. So it caters to the females.
• 56:27
  The other thing that caters to the females is, oh, we have to
• 56:30
  let the immigrants in. What are we going to do?
• 56:33
  All those poor people? Look, we have whatever and
• 56:37
  Ronald Reagan in California, he basically said all these illegal
• 56:44
  immigrants that were in California, millions said, OK,
• 56:49
  guess what, you're no longer illegal.
• 56:52
  In fact, you're citizens and you can vote.
• 56:56
  Well, that caters to them. And it's no different than when
• 56:59
  immigration came and people were coming in through Ellis Island
• 57:02
  and politicians started catering to the Irish or the Italians or
• 57:04
  whatever. Except now we're catering to
• 57:07
  people from completely different cultures than what makes up the
• 57:12
  West. And the reason is because of
• 57:16
  politicians catering to women and their feelings and this
• 57:19
  toxic empathy. And that is pervasive.
• 57:23
  That is why that is one reason. And there you go.
• 57:27
  It's power to the state. It's power to the state to do
• 57:31
  that. And what does the state want to
• 57:32
  do? Globalize everything, which is
• 57:35
  what you were getting at. Globalize everything.
• 57:40
  And that's why when you look at this, when you look back at
• 57:43
  COVID, you go, isn't it weird that the whole world was
• 57:47
  participating in this? Like you think we have this
• 57:50
  government and that, and I'm really getting a conspiracy
• 57:53
  theory territory. But if you open your eyes and
• 57:55
  you actually look at it, you go, it's weird that we have all
• 57:57
  these different countries supposedly, but.
• 58:01
  We're not. Really.
• 58:02
  We're really like the same people are pulling every like,
• 58:06
  who the heck elected the World Economic Forum?
• 58:09
  Nobody. Erin, absolutely brilliant
• 58:13
  because this is this is a key area.
• 58:16
  Yes, if we got policies, the same policies occurring at the
• 58:21
  same time even in different countries spread across the
• 58:25
  world, then it's obvious that somewhere in a warm, comfortable
• 58:29
  room we've got people, people making the policy.
• 58:34
  And it's also easy to see now that women are in the ascendancy
• 58:41
  in many, many powerful political positions and corporate
• 58:46
  positions. It, it's been really noticeable
• 58:51
  over the last, say, 10 years, women coming into very powerful
• 58:58
  political positions, Ursula von der Leyen, for example, in the
• 59:02
  European Union. But we've, we've also got prime
• 59:05
  ministers of European companies. We've also now got many defence
• 59:10
  ministers who are females. And I find this very, very
• 59:14
  interesting because I'm maybe one day in my life I will meet
• 59:20
  one of these women. But to date, I've never met a
• 59:23
  woman who got particularly excited about matters pertaining
• 59:28
  to defence or ships or tanks or aircraft.
• 59:33
  It's sort of not their scene. And yet standing very impeccably
• 59:38
  with the men, usually in a trouser suit, are these now very
• 59:43
  powerful women who who are appearing in in, in these very,
• 59:49
  very powerful positions. But it's not only politics
• 59:52
  because they're they're cropping up in a lot of the powerful non
• 59:57
  government organisations and they're certainly popping up in
• 1:00:01
  the very, very powerful global corporates.
• 1:00:05
  So it's very interesting to see that the recruitment base of
• 1:00:10
  women is increased. Some of that's got to be due to
• 1:00:15
  what the law is telling companies to do, but.
• 1:00:20
  I listened to a lady called Helen Andrews.
• 1:00:24
  Do you think I did? A show on her.
• 1:00:27
  Overcoming, overcoming, yeah, overcoming the feminization of
• 1:00:32
  culture. And, and what she was saying is
• 1:00:35
  pay attention to this. But, and again, you told me if
• 1:00:39
  I'm wrong on this, but I think she said that in America, you've
• 1:00:43
  now got a majority of women in law as a profession, an
• 1:00:49
  overwhelming majority of women as as veterinarians for, you
• 1:00:56
  know, OK, you could say, well, that's just animals.
• 1:00:58
  But nevertheless, it's, it's there and judges.
• 1:01:02
  And so she, as a woman is particularly flagging up that
• 1:01:07
  we're seeing a major change in society and culture, not for the
• 1:01:13
  better, as a result of women increasingly coming into these
• 1:01:18
  very powerful positions. Right.
• 1:01:21
  Think of this whole place, this whole, the West is the ship is
• 1:01:26
  the metal box where the men are organized.
• 1:01:30
  They're in their hierarchy, they're defending the ship.
• 1:01:33
  They're, you know, making sure the ship functions right.
• 1:01:35
  If you take that microcosm, look at it as a microcosm of the
• 1:01:40
  world, and then you add the women to the group of men that
• 1:01:45
  stabilize the West, build the West and stabilize it, and now
• 1:01:48
  you've got the women sort of put in those positions.
• 1:01:52
  It corrupts everything. And I love that you said that.
• 1:01:55
  Well, women aren't interested in like ships and defense and
• 1:01:58
  etcetera. Exactly.
• 1:02:00
  We're interested in power. That's what we're interested in.
• 1:02:06
  And I actually learned this from Pearl Davis, as you said, per
• 1:02:11
  capita over history, per capita. And again, I'm talking about the
• 1:02:16
  West per capita of rulers. Women start wars more, yet we
• 1:02:22
  don't fight them. But guess what?
• 1:02:26
  We're more emotional and we're more, we're more reactive.
• 1:02:29
  And a lot of women don't want to hear that.
• 1:02:30
  But here's what I will say. Yes, we're more emotional, we're
• 1:02:33
  more reactive. We're designed that way.
• 1:02:37
  We only think it's a bad thing because we're comparing it to
• 1:02:39
  men and what their jobs are, right?
• 1:02:41
  You can't be emotional and reactive on the battlefield.
• 1:02:43
  You can't make those decisions. You have to base it on logic and
• 1:02:46
  facts and reason. When you're dealing with babies,
• 1:02:53
  you have to be like babies crying.
• 1:02:56
  I have an emotion about that. I'm going to act.
• 1:03:00
  Yes, of course a man would say, well, you know, the baby needs
• 1:03:02
  to be fed and but that's not how we operate.
• 1:03:06
  We go child, I understand their emotions.
• 1:03:09
  I understand this whole dynamic because I am supposed to be
• 1:03:12
  taking care of like small children.
• 1:03:16
  And so we take what are our actual gifts and we pervert them
• 1:03:22
  by unleashing them onto the world, having us accept all the
• 1:03:27
  immigrants because that's the kind of thing to do etcetera.
• 1:03:32
  But again, that is a complete perversion of what that's truly
• 1:03:35
  intended for. I just want to put in my, my
• 1:03:40
  analogy for this, my analogy of why I don't think we're the best
• 1:03:44
  suited for politics, for defense, etcetera.
• 1:03:47
  And that is a lifeboat. Everybody can remember the movie
• 1:03:50
  Titanic, right? 1997 movie.
• 1:03:53
  And there's lifeboats and it can only see certain number of
• 1:03:57
  people. I don't remember the number of
• 1:03:58
  people. We'll say eight people, right,
• 1:04:00
  including the the guy who's rowing and, and what have you.
• 1:04:04
  There's people in the water trying to climb a board, trying
• 1:04:08
  to get in. There's women, obviously women
• 1:04:12
  and children first on the life raft saying, Oh my God, he's
• 1:04:16
  going to drown. We have to let him on board.
• 1:04:20
  Meanwhile, the guy who's rowing the boat takes his oar, smacks
• 1:04:24
  the dude on the head who's trying to climb in, and the
• 1:04:27
  women go. How could you do such a thing?
• 1:04:30
  Well, if that guy climbs up into the life raft, we're all going
• 1:04:35
  to die. If I make sure he can't do that,
• 1:04:40
  then those of us here will live. And I think that is a microcosm
• 1:04:45
  of what is going on in the West as a whole.
• 1:04:49
  Immigrants are flooding in. And whatever you may feel of,
• 1:04:51
  oh, they're looking for a better life or they're actually good
• 1:04:53
  people, doesn't matter. Doesn't matter how good the
• 1:04:56
  person is who's trying to claw their way onto the life raft, it
• 1:04:59
  can only seat so many people. You can't let him aboard.
• 1:05:02
  But the women don't understand that because of toxic empathy.
• 1:05:06
  And that's why that's how we vote, that's how we act when we
• 1:05:10
  are outside of our family. Great, you know, extended family
• 1:05:16
  and small community. We do not need to take that and
• 1:05:20
  those skills and project them politically across the world.
• 1:05:25
  Then you have Angela Merkel. Let's just let everyone in.
• 1:05:29
  Yes, another very interesting lady.
• 1:05:32
  Let me just throw this one in while it pops into my mind, but
• 1:05:37
  you talking about the emotional base in women's thinking.
• 1:05:41
  Very interestingly, a few days ago Keir Starmer, Prime Minister
• 1:05:45
  here in UK announced that the Labour Party was going to be
• 1:05:50
  taking a more emotional stance in its politics.
• 1:05:55
  And the training, reframing I will say of members of
• 1:06:01
  Parliament. There was going to be special
• 1:06:05
  education and training system set up inside the Labour Party
• 1:06:10
  in order to give a more emotional flavour to their
• 1:06:14
  politics and allow their own MPs to engage better with their
• 1:06:18
  communities. And the, the emotion, the word
• 1:06:22
  emotion, emotional perhaps only occurred, you know, 3 or 4 times
• 1:06:28
  in the article. But to me it, it jumped out of
• 1:06:31
  the page because I, I thought this is more of the destruction
• 1:06:37
  of a stable organized society, Erin, just because I suspect
• 1:06:44
  we've now done enough to really fire up some people listening to
• 1:06:48
  this, this chat. Can we just talk about men?
• 1:06:53
  Because to me it's also clear that that men, well, not only
• 1:07:00
  are men under attack, but we've seen a big change in, in boys
• 1:07:05
  and men in my lifetime. There's no question of this.
• 1:07:09
  And of course, the easy thing for me to talk about is the
• 1:07:13
  feminization of men. And, and that can be as easy as
• 1:07:17
  saying, well, just have a look at adverts for clothes for men.
• 1:07:22
  Now increasingly the the sort of clothes that are being pushed
• 1:07:26
  forward to men are more and more effeminate in in the way they
• 1:07:32
  look. Also we got cosmetic products.
• 1:07:36
  We've also got men being pushed towards a lot more female caring
• 1:07:41
  emotional roles. And in UK at least, and I think
• 1:07:46
  this is really dangerous. It's been announced in the the
• 1:07:50
  last month that in order to follow the promote the
• 1:07:56
  government's latest policy to tackle crime against women,
• 1:08:03
  particularly crimes again sexual crimes against women, boys,
• 1:08:09
  teenage boys are now going to get special classes to do with
• 1:08:14
  relationships with with women. And in my head, what this is
• 1:08:18
  going to do is further ingrain in these males that they've got
• 1:08:23
  to be absolutely careful around women, what they say, what they
• 1:08:30
  do, touching, whatever. So they, these young boys are
• 1:08:36
  going to take on the burden of crimes against women out in
• 1:08:42
  society. And I, I think this is, this is
• 1:08:45
  very, very bad. And what they're not going to
• 1:08:47
  tell the boys, of course, is that that overwhelmingly men are
• 1:08:52
  at greater risk of being attacked on the streets than
• 1:08:56
  women, or be it out of the women's percentage of crimes
• 1:09:01
  against them, a greater percentage or to do with sexual
• 1:09:05
  attacks. But nobody wants to talk about
• 1:09:08
  the fact you're actually less safe on the streets as a man
• 1:09:12
  than you are a woman, right? Because that doesn't matter.
• 1:09:16
  Because what happens to men doesn't matter.
• 1:09:18
  Right. But Erin, just talk a little bit
• 1:09:20
  about how you have seen men change because early on in in
• 1:09:26
  our discussion you did, you just did just touch on men leading in
• 1:09:30
  a family relationship and what do you mean by that and why?
• 1:09:35
  Why are you talking about that? What I mean by that, and I can
• 1:09:40
  harken back to my father being in the merchant marines and I
• 1:09:45
  understand that there's only one captain of the ship.
• 1:09:51
  There's not 2 captains. When you go on a plane, there's
• 1:09:54
  only one captain of the ship. His word is the final word.
• 1:09:59
  If even you have a copilot, there's stuff that goes on heavy
• 1:10:04
  turbulence, what have you. The captain is the captain.
• 1:10:07
  You can't be like, well I don't know copilot.
• 1:10:09
  Well, what do you have to say? Well, well, let's discuss.
• 1:10:11
  And then whoever we think like who, who's, who chooses.
• 1:10:16
  So a family dynamic is no different.
• 1:10:20
  The father should be the one who has the final say about all
• 1:10:28
  things for the family. That means are we going to move?
• 1:10:33
  That's up to Dad. All of those things, it's up to
• 1:10:38
  dad. The final say is up to him.
• 1:10:40
  Now women hear that and they think that this is an invitation
• 1:10:46
  for men to be tyrants. The idea that we hear it that
• 1:10:49
  way is based on the thinking that man bad.
• 1:10:55
  That's what is taught. If we give men that power,
• 1:11:01
  they're just going to be tyrants.
• 1:11:02
  They're just going to chain us to the kitchen, etcetera.
• 1:11:05
  When in reality that never has happened in the West.
• 1:11:09
  That's just not who the men of Christendom are.
• 1:11:12
  It's just not who you are. It's not what you want.
• 1:11:16
  The men of Christendom, when I say that that's the men of the
• 1:11:19
  West, they listen to their wives, their wives.
• 1:11:24
  Happiness greatly matters to them.
• 1:11:26
  They actually put it above their own.
• 1:11:28
  They will sacrifice themselves for their own family.
• 1:11:33
  So because they also have that responsibility where if the roof
• 1:11:38
  blows off, the man's going to fix it.
• 1:11:41
  If the intruder comes, the man's.
• 1:11:42
  And with all that responsibility, he should, as
• 1:11:46
  another content creator, Andrew Wilson says, he should get the
• 1:11:50
  big piece of chicken. He just should.
• 1:11:55
  And, and you know, I feel like as a woman, if you love your
• 1:11:59
  husband, you want him to have the big piece of chicken because
• 1:12:02
  you value him that much. It doesn't mean that you do
• 1:12:04
  value yourself, whatever. So the man leading means he has
• 1:12:08
  the final say and the woman is sort of the manager underneath
• 1:12:13
  all that. So of course it's going to be
• 1:12:14
  little decisions and such that she's in charge of, but it's all
• 1:12:17
  under the framework that he creates, much like a captain,
• 1:12:21
  first mate, second mate, crew. And it's efficient.
• 1:12:25
  And you're you're less likely to.
• 1:12:28
  I don't know what the problems are in a ship, but hey, you're
• 1:12:30
  less likely to sink. Right.
• 1:12:32
  So, Erin, what what would you say to a woman who came back on
• 1:12:35
  that and said, oh, well, that might have been true in the
• 1:12:39
  1950s, but we're now in the world.
• 1:12:42
  We are. We've got all the technology to
• 1:12:44
  make lives easier. So women don't need to put
• 1:12:48
  themselves in this type of relationship.
• 1:12:50
  They can be in a they can be in a partnership where where the
• 1:12:55
  man and woman are completely equal.
• 1:12:57
  They're they're both educated the same, they're both working
• 1:13:03
  professional jobs. So it's just a part, a
• 1:13:06
  partnership. What?
• 1:13:07
  What would you say to a woman that put that argument back?
• 1:13:11
  I'm glad you said that. I would say, first of all,
• 1:13:15
  several things to say. I would say just because you can
• 1:13:18
  doesn't mean you should. I would also say, all right, so
• 1:13:20
  that was the case in 1950. Let's look at female happiness
• 1:13:24
  between 1950 and today. They'll say, oh, well, they were
• 1:13:28
  on pills back then. I'm sorry, I think we all know
• 1:13:32
  how much more women drink, how much more they, and I don't mean
• 1:13:37
  drink to socialize, I mean like let's have a bottle of wine at
• 1:13:40
  night because it's difficult to cope with having this full time
• 1:13:43
  job and all the rest of it. They're not happy.
• 1:13:46
  Women are not happy. And the women who have the
• 1:13:50
  traditional roles, those marriages last longer.
• 1:13:54
  The comeback to that would be, Oh well, those women don't have
• 1:13:57
  as much options. Bull crap.
• 1:13:59
  They can get divorced, take half the man's stuff and the kids and
• 1:14:04
  possibly if there isn't that much money, the government will
• 1:14:07
  pay for us. The government pays for us.
• 1:14:10
  I live in government housing. Do you know who's all around
• 1:14:13
  here? This is basically should be
• 1:14:16
  called housing for single mothers.
• 1:14:19
  You know, I it, it just, you can say, well, we live in these
• 1:14:24
  times. And it that argument is so empty
• 1:14:26
  because it's like, yeah, we live in these times and they're much
• 1:14:28
  worse. Perhaps we should look back and
• 1:14:31
  say we made some wrong decisions.
• 1:14:33
  They'll say, well, we live in these times.
• 1:14:36
  Well, I'm sorry, but right is right and wrong is wrong.
• 1:14:39
  And it's still wrong and it still doesn't work.
• 1:14:42
  And you can have all the technology in the world.
• 1:14:43
  All that does is make it, it's fake.
• 1:14:46
  It's all fake. None of this is real, you know,
• 1:14:49
  It's all propped up and women will think what we can do,
• 1:14:53
  everything a man can do. And you said about back in the
• 1:14:55
  military. OK, well, I don't know if you've
• 1:14:58
  ever lifted an AK47, but I have. It is really, really heavy.
• 1:15:06
  I've got a strong upper body from working with horses and I
• 1:15:10
  was struggling just to hold it. I cannot imagine running with it
• 1:15:15
  and all the ammunition that you'd have to run with and your
• 1:15:18
  pack. We can't do that.
• 1:15:20
  We can't do these other jobs. So the idea that, oh, well, we
• 1:15:23
  can do everything a man can do, Most of our jobs are made-up HR,
• 1:15:28
  paper pushing. I feel like these jobs were sort
• 1:15:31
  of invented so women can say, oh, I'm just as equal and just
• 1:15:34
  as equal in education. Well, yeah, the education is
• 1:15:37
  suited for us. What does that even mean?
• 1:15:39
  It doesn't mean anything anymore, so.
• 1:15:42
  That's what I would say. Thank you for that.
• 1:15:47
  I have an American mother, so sometimes my American mother
• 1:15:52
  comes out and sometimes my British father is here and I'm
• 1:15:55
  very, you know. Sort of.
• 1:15:58
  I'd say that's a pretty good combination.
• 1:16:01
  Dangerous one. As you were saying that about
• 1:16:07
  sort of job titles and things when we were dealing with people
• 1:16:11
  in my early military days and, and, and for corporate
• 1:16:15
  companies, it was all personnel. You might have a personnel
• 1:16:19
  officer and then that became human resources.
• 1:16:23
  I don't know whether that expression was used in America.
• 1:16:26
  So we went from personnel to human resources.
• 1:16:28
  Yes, we had the same. Yes, and, and now I read this
• 1:16:33
  last week in the, in the British military, I think it was in the
• 1:16:36
  RAF. You have a a lady who's in the
• 1:16:40
  top position of an Air Station and her professional career in
• 1:16:45
  in the military has been as a people officer that sounds.
• 1:16:51
  Very 1980. Four.
• 1:16:53
  It does. I'm going.
• 1:16:54
  To tell you how to be a person and what that means.
• 1:16:57
  And you're very naughty. Let me go and tell the boys like
• 1:17:00
  they're five years old in kindergarten.
• 1:17:04
  Oh. Yeah, Now I, I, I touched on
• 1:17:09
  what was going wrong with with males and I talked about the
• 1:17:12
  feminine feminization of of males.
• 1:17:18
  The other thing of course, that's happening increasingly in
• 1:17:23
  Western societies is the males who are gaming.
• 1:17:28
  Now the trouble with online games is there are some pretty
• 1:17:31
  good ones and and yet they've got a big pull power, but
• 1:17:35
  nevertheless they are games. And we've now got males.
• 1:17:40
  The head of the household who should be doing a variety of
• 1:17:44
  things as a male within that household are sat in a a chair
• 1:17:50
  with a can of beer or a cup of tea and they are gaming for
• 1:17:54
  hours. So those males in my opinion,
• 1:17:59
  are also being pulled out of their roles or, or some of them
• 1:18:03
  are, some can balance it and have got it in check, but some
• 1:18:07
  are out of control. And so the women in the
• 1:18:11
  relationship are getting frustrated because the man in
• 1:18:15
  the relationship is not acting as a male, they're as an adult
• 1:18:19
  male. They're acting as a child
• 1:18:21
  playing video games. That's interesting.
• 1:18:25
  Right before you sent me the link for I am telling the truth.
• 1:18:30
  It's crazy. Right before you sent me the
• 1:18:33
  link to join this interview, I was talking to my best friend.
• 1:18:37
  She happens to be in her 20s, so she's Gen.
• 1:18:40
  Z. And we were talking about this
• 1:18:42
  very dynamic about video games and how it changed from
• 1:18:45
  generations because they kind of came out with Gen.
• 1:18:47
  X and then millennials kind of turned it into this is an OK
• 1:18:50
  hobby. Like the younger millennials,
• 1:18:52
  the people who are sort of in their 30s now, they change, they
• 1:18:56
  change it to gaming and as if this is a normal hobby.
• 1:18:59
  Whereas for my generation, it was sort of looked downed upon,
• 1:19:02
  like, oh, you just play video games, right?
• 1:19:05
  So yes, the, I would say it has now become acceptable in society
• 1:19:12
  that this is gaming is a hobby. Now.
• 1:19:17
  I was discussing with my friend, 'cause she says, you know, her
• 1:19:21
  husband only plays a couple nights a week.
• 1:19:23
  And I said, you are very lucky because a lot of these women,
• 1:19:27
  they're dealing with husbands who play chronically, like every
• 1:19:31
  waking minute. And we were discussing why that
• 1:19:34
  might be and I said I think one reason your husband does not is
• 1:19:41
  because of the wife he has. He like when they go on
• 1:19:46
  vacation, for example. She said she has friends who the
• 1:19:50
  husbands bring their gaming stuff along with them on
• 1:19:53
  vacation. So he literally just learned
• 1:19:57
  that right before you and I started talking and I couldn't
• 1:20:00
  believe it. And she said her husband doesn't
• 1:20:02
  do that. And I said, well, he has such a
• 1:20:04
  pleasant experience on vacation. She thinks about, well, what are
• 1:20:09
  you like? He likes to sleep in.
• 1:20:11
  She gets up in the morning so they get an Airbnb.
• 1:20:14
  So when he's sleeping, she has the pool and the shops.
• 1:20:17
  And then when she goes to bed early, he has the same.
• 1:20:22
  And she made the point to. Let's let's structure our
• 1:20:26
  vacations this way so you have more fun.
• 1:20:28
  I say that to say that I don't think that's the experience in a
• 1:20:32
  lot of households. I think vacation is this is what
• 1:20:35
  we're going to do and this is how you're going to be.
• 1:20:37
  And now, while I agree that it is out of control and that it is
• 1:20:43
  gaming is done far too much, I think that a big reason for it
• 1:20:49
  is the escapism. And if you're playing, for
• 1:20:53
  example, Call of Duty, which is a giant like, you know, war game
• 1:20:57
  or what have you, you know what you can be when you play Call of
• 1:21:01
  Duty, you can be a man. You're not being told that your
• 1:21:06
  natural tendencies are wrong and that you need to be more
• 1:21:10
  emotional or you need to be feminized because the whole
• 1:21:13
  thing, including what Keir Starmer is saying about we're
• 1:21:16
  going to be more emotional, Whatever.
• 1:21:18
  It's another way of saying, hey man, there's something very
• 1:21:23
  wrong with you because, and the thing they're not saying is
• 1:21:27
  because you're not more like women.
• 1:21:29
  And I think when you try to make women throughout the 20th
• 1:21:33
  century more like men, compete like men, etcetera, and you
• 1:21:37
  start to go, oh, that really can't happen.
• 1:21:42
  Well, then you have to feminize the men because you can't bring
• 1:21:45
  the women to where the men are. So you have to bring the men to
• 1:21:51
  where the women are. And then you have indeed
• 1:21:54
  destroyed the concept of that. There is a man and a woman.
• 1:22:00
  And that is what I think the whole trans thing is about,
• 1:22:02
  because now there's no such thing.
• 1:22:04
  It's a spectrum blah blah blah. And, and isn't it interesting
• 1:22:09
  that feminism have, having driven the things it has for
• 1:22:13
  women, has now pushed women into a society where they have to
• 1:22:18
  accept men coming into their toilets and changing rooms?
• 1:22:23
  Yeah. I shouldn't be as as amused by
• 1:22:26
  that as I am. Well, we're, we're very, we're
• 1:22:29
  allowed to smile because this, this is a serious discussion.
• 1:22:34
  But the smiling is good because it keeps morale up.
• 1:22:38
  So we're we're not laughing at World War 2.
• 1:22:41
  Yes. I think I have a a secret theory
• 1:22:44
  that the reason why British people have such a good sense of
• 1:22:48
  humor and sort of can laugh through difficult times is
• 1:22:52
  because of what they went through in World War 2 and sort
• 1:22:56
  of like waiting to be bombed. Like, what are you going to do?
• 1:23:00
  You can have a, you have to have a bit of a laugh.
• 1:23:02
  You have to. And anyway, I think that was
• 1:23:05
  passed down to me from my grandparents, etcetera.
• 1:23:08
  So yes, I absolutely have the habit of laughing at probably
• 1:23:12
  what people would say an inappropriate time.
• 1:23:13
  But yeah, you're going to laugh or you're going to cry.
• 1:23:15
  So but but yes, the fact that, you know, like we saw in the
• 1:23:19
  Olympics, women just getting knocked out by a man, yes, I
• 1:23:26
  think that's funny. I do because you know what you
• 1:23:29
  could have done, lady? You could have stood up for all
• 1:23:32
  the rest of the women in the competition and in the world and
• 1:23:36
  said, I'm not going to fight you.
• 1:23:39
  I'm not. Where are the women that said
• 1:23:42
  I'm not going to swim when that man or whatever his name is, I
• 1:23:46
  can't remember some some swimmer in the United States decided he
• 1:23:49
  was a girl basically, I think because he couldn't compete with
• 1:23:52
  the men. But either way, and then it
• 1:23:55
  became, well, he's taking opportunities away from women.
• 1:23:59
  Why don't you take the opportunity away from him to
• 1:24:01
  compete against you by shutting down the competition and not
• 1:24:05
  showing up, Then what's going to happen?
• 1:24:07
  They're going to have to listen to you.
• 1:24:09
  But women didn't do that. They just said, I want to get
• 1:24:14
  mine. I don't care about these other
• 1:24:16
  women. The idea of a sisterhood is
• 1:24:19
  baloney. We do not stand up for one
• 1:24:21
  another. We do not, we don't do that.
• 1:24:24
  If we did, there wouldn't be any trans men in sports.
• 1:24:27
  There wouldn't be any trans men in bathrooms.
• 1:24:29
  We need to stop blaming trans men for that or men for that.
• 1:24:33
  And so looking to ourselves, it's us.
• 1:24:35
  We have not stood up against it. In fact, we have actually
• 1:24:38
  propagated the types of policies and the types of mentalities,
• 1:24:42
  emotion. Oh, he has to identify as his
• 1:24:45
  true self and lie. He might have his feelings hurt.
• 1:24:47
  That's our mentality. That's not the men's mentality.
• 1:24:51
  Yeah. So we've basically invited them
• 1:24:54
  into our spaces. So I'm not going to be sad when
• 1:24:57
  any of that happens because it's by our own choice.
• 1:24:59
  Yeah. Well, it is out.
• 1:25:00
  But you went in the ring. Erin it is producing a push
• 1:25:04
  back. So maybe there's a good and
• 1:25:06
  unexpected result for the people who implemented the policy.
• 1:25:12
  I am I'm watching time, but just two things and and both of them
• 1:25:17
  are on the heavy side. But if, if we, if we consider
• 1:25:21
  women in, in modern society, there's 22 issues which I think
• 1:25:29
  are causing a lot of pain for women.
• 1:25:31
  One of them of course, is abortion and very emotive
• 1:25:36
  subject for a lot of people. But the reality is we now live
• 1:25:41
  in a political sphere where young girls are going to be
• 1:25:46
  taught it's are being taught it's OK to kill your baby.
• 1:25:50
  I know that that many women who've gone through.
• 1:25:53
  The procedure have been absolutely distraught at it and
• 1:25:59
  to the extent they don't even want to talk about it.
• 1:26:02
  So it was traumatizing for them. But we are seeing, particularly
• 1:26:08
  in the West, governments pushing the policy that abortion is
• 1:26:13
  completely normal and acceptable.
• 1:26:15
  And if it happens to you, just go and do it and get rid of the
• 1:26:19
  child. And of course, the the time of
• 1:26:22
  termination is getting later and later.
• 1:26:26
  So I, I've used it, I used the word baby, not fetus.
• 1:26:29
  But we're now seeing the push towards what is essentially a
• 1:26:33
  child. Fetus only means small child in
• 1:26:37
  Latin, OK. So we're calling it child no
• 1:26:42
  matter. What but the reason they?
• 1:26:43
  Want to save? Fetus is 'cause it's
• 1:26:45
  dehumanizing. It's a dehumanization.
• 1:26:48
  And do you know who likes dehumanization?
• 1:26:51
  Communists. And it dehumanizes.
• 1:26:57
  By saying, yeah, this thing isn't a life, it's.
• 1:26:59
  A clump of cells? Well, we're all clumps of cells
• 1:27:03
  anyway. It's not a life.
• 1:27:06
  Well, we also have the rise of euthanasia, isn't that?
• 1:27:09
  Funny, both at the same time. Because you're not a life
• 1:27:12
  anymore. You don't matter.
• 1:27:13
  Who's telling us who doesn't matter and who's disposable.
• 1:27:17
  It's coming from the state through propaganda.
• 1:27:20
  And not only are women being told that, oh, it's your
• 1:27:22
  absolute right, we're being told that it's a duty, a duty to kill
• 1:27:28
  our babies and it's empowering. It's a duty because you wouldn't
• 1:27:33
  want to bring the child up in poverty.
• 1:27:37
  You wouldn't want to bring the child into the world and.
• 1:27:40
  Then put it up for adoption. Because the foster care system
• 1:27:43
  is so broken, there's a waiting list in America for infants.
• 1:27:48
  These infants don't go into a broken foster system.
• 1:27:51
  Which, by the way, even if it was broken, so does that mean
• 1:27:54
  you can just kill it should be just go around killing poor
• 1:27:56
  people. Well, yeah.
• 1:27:57
  That's how the state would like it to progress.
• 1:27:59
  It's the beginning of an introduction to an ideology that
• 1:28:03
  says, well, let's just kill all these, you know, people who are
• 1:28:07
  not valuable. It's fine.
• 1:28:09
  It dehumanizes. And 1.3 billion babies have been
• 1:28:14
  murdered. More babies have been murdered
• 1:28:17
  than all the men fought in all the wars.
• 1:28:22
  That's astounding. Using the policy in America.
• 1:28:26
  We're. Seeing it in UK, we're seeing it
• 1:28:28
  throughout the European Union, Western Europe.
• 1:28:31
  So clearly it's coordinated. The other one is, is IVF.
• 1:28:38
  And interestingly, 3 days ago I think the BBC had a,
• 1:28:42
  particularly, I'm going to describe it as pernicious,
• 1:28:46
  article which was describing a woman who was having her second
• 1:28:50
  child by IVF. She did not know who the father
• 1:28:55
  was, same father for both babies, but she had no idea who
• 1:29:00
  the father was. And the whole article was
• 1:29:04
  promoting her successful life as a mother.
• 1:29:09
  Now bringing up two children from IVF and the clear message
• 1:29:16
  through very carefully crafted text was well I don't need a man
• 1:29:22
  I, I, I have or a father I have got what?
• 1:29:28
  I want. So it wasn't even about I want
• 1:29:32
  to bring children into the world.
• 1:29:33
  We, we. It was simply I and I.
• 1:29:38
  I read it, I read it 3 times actually, and I felt that it was
• 1:29:42
  a vicious article by the BBC clearly trying to say to young
• 1:29:48
  girls, well don't worry about your prime fertile period
• 1:29:53
  because you can freeze your eggs, technology will save the
• 1:29:57
  day and you can successfully live as a a single mother right?
• 1:30:02
  And that would even be preferable, because then you can
• 1:30:05
  have everything you want and. Then you don't have to answer to
• 1:30:07
  a man and you don't have to have custody battles because he's out
• 1:30:11
  of the picture. And who cares about all those
• 1:30:14
  embryos that needed to be created in order for you to have
• 1:30:17
  two successful babies? It's fine.
• 1:30:19
  They're not people, they're not human.
• 1:30:21
  Flush them down the toilet. Absolutely.
• 1:30:23
  The man doesn't matter. The father's insignificant.
• 1:30:26
  Absolutely. It's a dehumanization of men, a
• 1:30:29
  devaluing of men that has been going on for at least the past
• 1:30:34
  100 years, maybe longer. When you just send men off to
• 1:30:37
  fight bankers wars and they die in the millions, you're already
• 1:30:42
  devaluing them. We are, we are told, in all
• 1:30:44
  these wars, oh, this is for us. This is for our freedom.
• 1:30:47
  And we could be speaking German now, what have you.
• 1:30:49
  And it's like, OK, I guess just kill all the men and silly and
• 1:30:54
  and oddly, it's like, let's kill all the men and Christendom for
• 1:30:57
  that. But it's a devaluing of men.
• 1:30:59
  And it's saying you don't need there to be a man in the
• 1:31:01
  household. They're just interchangeable
• 1:31:03
  anyway. Also, what it and this has
• 1:31:06
  already been a problem and it's from celebrating single mothers
• 1:31:10
  and devaluing fathers. It is well, and and this comes
• 1:31:15
  from having birth control, actually being able to have sex
• 1:31:18
  without knowing that a child will become of it.
• 1:31:22
  They say, oh, I want children, OK.
• 1:31:28
  But that's very different. Than deciding to be a mother,
• 1:31:34
  wanting children as some accessory for your amusement or
• 1:31:40
  validation because now you're a mother so you're somehow in some
• 1:31:44
  circles higher up, you can now speak on things, etcetera.
• 1:31:49
  Having children does not make you a mother.
• 1:31:55
  It doesn't you and we talked about gaming.
• 1:31:58
  All right ladies, you can talk about gaming when you start, I
• 1:32:03
  don't know, restricting your scrolling on your phone posting.
• 1:32:10
  On your phone, no one talks. About that but we're going to
• 1:32:13
  condemn the men for gaming seems like a different you know double
• 1:32:18
  standard but yes but. Yes, there is a very big
• 1:32:20
  difference between. Having children and being a
• 1:32:24
  mother. Being a mother means reading to
• 1:32:27
  your children, teaching your children right from wrong,
• 1:32:31
  playing with your children, not putting them in front of a
• 1:32:34
  screen for Coco melon nonsense for the babies.
• 1:32:38
  And like, I don't know, Miss Rachel is for the older kids.
• 1:32:41
  Like, no, you read to your children.
• 1:32:43
  You teach them how to read before they get to school.
• 1:32:46
  I knew my alphabet by two years old because I had a mother.
• 1:32:49
  These kids can't do handwriting. Your mother works with you on
• 1:32:53
  that, not the teachers. They've put everything in the
• 1:32:56
  this is what you learn at school.
• 1:32:57
  This is what you learn at school.
• 1:32:58
  No, your mother teaches you that.
• 1:32:59
  But we don't have mothers, Erin. This is my my story just before
• 1:33:05
  I sent. You the e-mail I came across, I
• 1:33:09
  can't remember what the publication was, but I'm pretty
• 1:33:12
  sure it was American. It might have been Canadian and
• 1:33:15
  and the main title of thrust of the articles that Generation Z.
• 1:33:23
  We're going to school unable to read and write properly.
• 1:33:27
  So you know, there, there you are.
• 1:33:29
  That was one of the things I saw.
• 1:33:31
  Now. I'd I'd like to end by just
• 1:33:34
  asking you a couple of things. You you are a woman.
• 1:33:37
  You are now pretty well known over the Internet when speaking
• 1:33:42
  out on feminism and the dangers of feminism for women.
• 1:33:49
  I am sure that you've experienced a backlash of this
• 1:33:53
  and there's one of the reasons that in my opinion as a man, I'm
• 1:33:57
  going to I'm going to label you as gutsy.
• 1:34:00
  But what what has the result been of you as a woman stepping
• 1:34:05
  forward and saying come on ladies, you are being drawn into
• 1:34:09
  something which is dangerous and dark.
• 1:34:13
  Are, are, are you getting people who are having their eyes opened
• 1:34:17
  or is the, you know, is the pushback by the feminist, you
• 1:34:22
  know, sort of too powerful? How are you finding things?
• 1:34:25
  It's interesting because there's pushback.
• 1:34:30
  But there's no argument. They can't argue like they can't
• 1:34:36
  make an argument against it. They can call me a pick me,
• 1:34:40
  which means I'm just saying this because I want men to like me.
• 1:34:44
  How scandalous that you would ever want men to like you.
• 1:34:47
  As a person. But they'll call me a pick me,
• 1:34:51
  they'll say I'm a misogynist, I just hate women, whatever.
• 1:34:54
  It's personal insults. But they can't make an argument
• 1:34:57
  against what I'm saying. They can't.
• 1:34:59
  They really can't. When it comes down to the facts,
• 1:35:02
  to the statistics, to logic, their arguments do not stand.
• 1:35:09
  There are women. I have some women who watch my
• 1:35:11
  show. A few that I know of.
• 1:35:13
  Because they've been in the chat and they'll say, you know,
• 1:35:17
  things like, well, I'll be on here for a little bit, but I
• 1:35:20
  need to make my husband dinner. And they are celebrating the act
• 1:35:25
  of serving their husband. And they find that in a platform
• 1:35:29
  like mine, they can freely share that because it is not usually
• 1:35:36
  welcome. Just, you know, amongst other
• 1:35:39
  women, as you have said. What I have found is that so far
• 1:35:46
  I have had the most luck with women in real life.
• 1:35:52
  I only open up to, you know, certain people in real life
• 1:35:58
  about what I do. But what I have found is that
• 1:36:00
  when I begin to explain, when I begin to say the hardships that
• 1:36:05
  men face, say, in family court, right, the rate of suicide, the
• 1:36:09
  dangerous jobs, you see their wheels turning and they go
• 1:36:14
  because they've never thought about that before because how
• 1:36:16
  could they have? And when I've said, for example,
• 1:36:18
  to my physical therapist, now that is a profession.
• 1:36:22
  And I love her and I'm thankful that she does what she does.
• 1:36:25
  But I'm conflicted because she has children, right?
• 1:36:31
  And I'm a very big supporter of home school.
• 1:36:34
  You can't do that with a big career.
• 1:36:38
  But when I said to her what I do.
• 1:36:41
  And I said I I, I. Say to these women, I imagine
• 1:36:45
  that it was better during the sort of Little House on the
• 1:36:49
  Prairie days that was a television show in the United
• 1:36:51
  States where it's basically just like a farm with a family.
• 1:36:54
  You grow your food, you hunt your food, you travel in a
• 1:36:57
  wagon, everybody's together, extended family, etcetera.
• 1:37:02
  That wasn't that long ago. And as soon as I say that, their
• 1:37:06
  eyes light up, no matter if what job they have, what walk of life
• 1:37:12
  in my hairdresser, my physical therapist, I'll, I'll paint that
• 1:37:16
  picture to them and their eyes light up and they agree with me
• 1:37:20
  that it would be so much better if that were our reality.
• 1:37:25
  And I they are not just agreeing with me because I'm there.
• 1:37:29
  I know I can read women like it's just one of my super
• 1:37:32
  talents and it's almost a curse. But as part of how I can do my
• 1:37:36
  show is by translating what the women are saying and what their
• 1:37:39
  motivation is. And I know that they almost
• 1:37:43
  breathe a sigh of relief at that idea.
• 1:37:47
  Now I am in the. South Which?
• 1:37:49
  Helps. I'm not in New York City, I'm
• 1:37:53
  not in London. Do you know what I mean?
• 1:37:56
  But it tells me a lot about who we really are and how open we
• 1:38:02
  actually are to the idea of it. Because my thing is that as a
• 1:38:07
  physical therapist, she should be able to do this in her home
• 1:38:12
  with her own children there. And contrary to popular belief
• 1:38:17
  about, well, if you're, you know, traditional, that it's
• 1:38:19
  just you at home with your kids. No, we were with our sisters,
• 1:38:25
  which we had many because we had big families.
• 1:38:28
  We were with our sisters, We were with our mothers who
• 1:38:30
  wouldn't have been that much older than us because we would
• 1:38:32
  have been getting married young. So generations would be 20
• 1:38:35
  years, right? So you'd have your mother, your
• 1:38:38
  grandmother, your aunts, your sisters and all the kids and
• 1:38:42
  you're kind of playing a zone defense.
• 1:38:44
  I know y'all don't really have basketball there, but you're
• 1:38:46
  like, all right, these are my kids I'm watching right now.
• 1:38:48
  These are these kids I'm watching right now.
• 1:38:50
  And the women could do what they were talented at.
• 1:38:52
  Maybe somebody's over here growing herbs.
• 1:38:54
  Maybe somebody's over here. See what I'm saying?
• 1:38:56
  And we just don't have that point of reference.
• 1:39:00
  They don't want us to. They want us to think that a
• 1:39:03
  traditional home is just, oh, I'd be so bored.
• 1:39:06
  Like you'll hear women say that, Oh, I couldn't do it.
• 1:39:08
  I'd be so bored. I have to get out of the house.
• 1:39:10
  That's not true. If you had your mother, your
• 1:39:13
  sisters, etcetera, all there and ideally the men would also be
• 1:39:18
  around. Do you know what I mean?
• 1:39:20
  They wouldn't be off at some separate job.
• 1:39:24
  So when you, when I I've learned that when I'm talking to a
• 1:39:30
  woman, in order to get them to see what I'm actually saying,
• 1:39:36
  I'm not blaming women. I'm not.
• 1:39:41
  I'm saying we've been pawns, we've been fooled and it hasn't
• 1:39:48
  been better for us. And as soon as I paint that
• 1:39:49
  picture for them, they're like, yeah, you're right.
• 1:39:55
  And the and the communists, they talked about useful idiots.
• 1:40:00
  And I'm starting to go. Maybe that's a lot of us.
• 1:40:06
  Because we sure can. Be swayed and it seems.
• 1:40:09
  To always make the. State more powerful and the
• 1:40:13
  family less powerful. So who are these useful idiots
• 1:40:17
  we're talking about here? It's not looking good for us, so
• 1:40:20
  we need to be discerning and. I will say that a clear
• 1:40:27
  biblical. Message is.
• 1:40:29
  That there is a inherent order? Yes, absolutely.
• 1:40:35
  And what? What do you suggest?
• 1:40:37
  That Well, yes. I'm inviting you to give that
• 1:40:41
  biblical message about the order of Sure, God instituted a
• 1:40:47
  natural order. As soon as creation occurred, it
• 1:40:51
  is God, man, woman, child and evil people.
• 1:40:57
  And I think a lot more people are awake to the fact that evil
• 1:41:01
  exists and evil is real. Evil people fueled by Satan
• 1:41:07
  himself 'cause he's real. They love nothing more than to.
• 1:41:13
  Destroy and. Pervert God's natural order,
• 1:41:19
  making him invisible. Let's replace him and put
• 1:41:21
  science in his place. Let's replace him with
• 1:41:25
  government, right? Let's let's teach everybody that
• 1:41:29
  a, you know, Darwinism and what have you.
• 1:41:31
  And these things are brand new ideas.
• 1:41:33
  Science is a whole different religion and that removes God.
• 1:41:37
  Now let's take men and women and let's say they're equal.
• 1:41:40
  They're equal. Oh no, just kidding.
• 1:41:42
  They're not equal. They're the same.
• 1:41:44
  They're interchangeable. And by the way, that was
• 1:41:47
  something that early feminists in the United States were
• 1:41:50
  already saying They've they've, they formed cults and they were
• 1:41:55
  like, yeah, there's no such thing as men and women.
• 1:41:57
  There's no such thing as marriage.
• 1:41:58
  Just free love, literally free love.
• 1:42:01
  And, you know, the 1800s, people don't know about that.
• 1:42:06
  They think it's all new. It's not new.
• 1:42:08
  So yes, they pervert all that. Not only that, look at how much
• 1:42:12
  the children run the household. Nobody has bedtime anymore.
• 1:42:17
  Yeah, nobody has. You know, you have to eat your
• 1:42:20
  carrots first. No, it's chicken Nuggets and Mac
• 1:42:24
  and cheese. Because Johnny won't eat
• 1:42:27
  anything else We're. We're seeing an attack on.
• 1:42:30
  Women. And on men and on relationships.
• 1:42:33
  And on society. And it is very interesting that
• 1:42:37
  that attack is clearly designed to break down that God-given
• 1:42:42
  order. Absolutely, it absolutely is.
• 1:42:46
  It absolutely is. There's so.
• 1:42:48
  Much perversion of God's natural order and I I'm just saying like
• 1:42:59
  these evil, evil people who want to hide God and basically run
• 1:43:07
  the world, Is it any wonder that we're all discovering the the
• 1:43:15
  abundance of abuse against children?
• 1:43:19
  I will say. Because I am on YouTube, right?
• 1:43:23
  So I'm trained not to say certain things.
• 1:43:27
  But we'll say Epstein, right? And worse and worse.
• 1:43:32
  And that that shouldn't be a surprise to anybody because the
• 1:43:35
  corruption of innocence is another thing that these that
• 1:43:40
  evil loves is destroying God's order.
• 1:43:44
  Also I will say destroying God's order, but.
• 1:43:48
  Satan has been jealous. Of man since the very beginning
• 1:43:53
  so it's no wonder that this is an attack on men.
• 1:43:58
  Erin. What a brilliant place to finish
• 1:44:01
  and I always like to. Add that you can't fight what
• 1:44:05
  you can't see and you can't understand.
• 1:44:07
  So if people have come through this and thinking, my goodness,
• 1:44:11
  this is very heavy stuff, yes, it is.
• 1:44:14
  But you're an adult and you need to know.
• 1:44:17
  And if you know what's happening to you and why it's happening
• 1:44:20
  and how it's being done, you can actually fight back, not least
• 1:44:25
  by the simple, the simple action of saying no as often as
• 1:44:30
  possible to these policies. But yeah, Erin, absolutely
• 1:44:34
  fantastic. Lot more I could ask you.
• 1:44:37
  And many. More rabbit holes we could go
• 1:44:40
  down, but I want to say thank you very much for joining me.
• 1:44:44
  It's been utterly brilliant. And I do think you're a gutsy
• 1:44:49
  woman because as I have discovered speaking out on the
• 1:44:53
  Internet, it is amazing what comes back in.
• 1:44:57
  Yes, I do get lovely emails from people and the very nice
• 1:45:00
  letters, but people who don't like what you say are usually
• 1:45:05
  pretty tough at saying it. The truth is so powerful and
• 1:45:10
  when you know you are. Speaking the truth, that is fuel
• 1:45:16
  in and of itself. I don't.
• 1:45:18
  I I have this whole. I don't know how to call it, but
• 1:45:23
  I have this whole fortitude in me.
• 1:45:26
  Because I know. I am speaking the truth.
• 1:45:30
  God is truth, and so nothing could come against that.
• 1:45:35
  Even if they were to charge my door and say we're coming to get
• 1:45:38
  you and we're going to come arrest you, that's fine.
• 1:45:42
  You know it's fine. You have to be willing to
• 1:45:46
  believe in what you say to the point that you would literally
• 1:45:49
  die for it. And you have to make that choice
• 1:45:52
  long before you ever start speaking.
• 1:45:56
  I go by a quote. It was by an early American that
• 1:45:59
  I just. Cannot think of the name but he
• 1:46:01
  said. It might have been Jefferson.
• 1:46:03
  Whatever anguish of spirit it may cause, I'm willing to know
• 1:46:07
  the whole truth. And that's a commitment you need
• 1:46:10
  to make. And if this conversation is
• 1:46:12
  heavy or too much, then you're not there.
• 1:46:15
  You're avoiding your anguish of spirit.
• 1:46:18
  And you have to realize that's a choice that you're making.
• 1:46:21
  Brilliant. Erin, thank you very.
• 1:46:24
  Very, very much. Great, great place.
• 1:46:26
  To end on. I'd say to you, if you fancy
• 1:46:31
  having a round two at some stage, leave a little bit of
• 1:46:35
  time, I'd love to do it. I'll hold this up as a little
• 1:46:39
  bit of a teaser because again, this is some of the research
• 1:46:43
  I've got that I decided. I don't know whether you can see
• 1:46:45
  that all on camera, but it's which is feminism and the, Oh my
• 1:46:50
  goodness, which is feminism and the fall of the West.
• 1:46:53
  And the author is called Edward. Edward Dutton DU Double TON.
• 1:47:01
  He's a Let me just, I've put my glasses down.
• 1:47:05
  Let me just get my glasses. He's professor of evolutionary
• 1:47:09
  psychology, the Asbiro University in Poland, and author
• 1:47:15
  of Making Sense of Race. Now I've had this book for a
• 1:47:20
  while and one of my failings is that I get books, I do start to
• 1:47:25
  read them, then another book comes in and I get distracted.
• 1:47:30
  So when I, when I was just doing a little bit of preparation for,
• 1:47:35
  for this discussion, this book came, came to my eye and I
• 1:47:41
  started to read bits. I will read this book again
• 1:47:45
  properly because it, it is fascinating.
• 1:47:47
  It's, it's quite, it's quite challenging in what it's
• 1:47:51
  describing. And also you've, you've got to
• 1:47:53
  get into why the man is describing these various things.
• 1:47:56
  But if I read this book again, when I've done that, I'd love to
• 1:48:01
  have another chat with you. Oh yes, please, absolutely, yes,
• 1:48:05
  please. That would be great.
• 1:48:07
  Yes, I I have another channel on.
• 1:48:09
  YouTube called Literary. Archaeology.
• 1:48:12
  And we dig into old literature and new literature, and I am
• 1:48:18
  putting this book on the list immediately.
• 1:48:22
  Yes, you can go back. And if you think you know what
• 1:48:25
  fairy tales are and you think you know why they talked about
• 1:48:27
  witches, you probably don't right now.
• 1:48:31
  I know, I know. You've spoken about Fairy.
• 1:48:34
  Tales because I've listened. To some of that I I did.
• 1:48:36
  Find it very very interesting. I had to start a whole new
• 1:48:39
  channel for it. Yeah, I know it's great and I
• 1:48:43
  can easily. Bring up some other books as.
• 1:48:46
  As well that you you might find of interest.
• 1:48:48
  Oh, absolutely. We have to do this again.
• 1:48:51
  We have to Erin. Absolutely fantastic.
• 1:48:54
  Discussion Really enjoyed it. I'm so glad I took.
• 1:48:57
  The initiative of sending you an e-mail and thank you for joining
• 1:49:02
  me. Thank you so much for having me.
• 1:49:04
  It was a fabulous discussion and I'm also grateful you reached
• 1:49:08
  out.