Latest / UK Column Radio / The Ethical Doctor – David V Goliath- Dr Charles Hoffe

Transcript

The Ethical Doctor – David V Goliath- Dr Charles Hoffe · UK Column Radio

0:08
Well, it's good afternoon from UK column. If you're in the UK,
0:14
it's good evening if you're in the USA, and more importantly, as you'll
0:19
find out in a minute, it's a very early good morning to Canada.
0:24
And I really want to thank all of our international viewers, our international experts,
0:30
because hearing from everybody gives us a better picture of what's going on,
0:36
and no more so than today because many people may know that I, Debbie
0:43
Evans, am a retired state registered nurse and I trained dinosaur years ago,
0:48
and many of you will remember, I'm sure the family doctor. Do you
0:52
remember the family doctor, the doctor you could rely on, The doctor that
0:56
knew your family, knew your children, perhaps was there and delivered your children,
1:00
delivered your grandchildren, perhaps were there when some of your family passed.
1:07
The family doctor was absolutely central to the community and is central to the community.
1:15
But in twenty twenty four have we lost sight of the family doctor,
1:21
the reliable family doctor that turns up at three o'clock in the morning, that
1:25
answers the door no matter what, because they're there to help you. My
1:30
kids call me old fashioned, but sometimes I think old fashioned is good.
1:34
And normally I'm scrambling around for titles for this for interviews, but today I
1:44
haven't even chosen a title yet because I think I might throw out a few
1:49
titles to my guest, and some of those titles to give you a little
1:53
clue of what he's been through. Should we call this interview weaponizing medicine?
2:00
Perhaps with a question mark. Perhaps we should call it the doctor who listens
2:05
to patients? Maybe the good Samaritan, a pandemic of the vaccinated, David
2:13
versus Goliath, the upside down world, power of fear, towing the line
2:23
basic honesty, never give up, or perhaps fire starter. And I say
2:30
that for a reason. So I am absolutely so humbled and privileged to be
2:36
joined today by a family doctor who listens to his patients and observes his patients,
2:44
a family doctor in Canada, Doctor Charles hoff Welcome to UK column and
2:50
thank you so much for agreeing to join us. Well, you're most welcome,
2:55
and thank you so much for aligning me to be on your show.
3:00
This is a great privilege, and thank you. We've been watching very closely.
3:06
I've been watching your story, Dr Hoffen. I know our viewers and
3:09
listeners that haven't heard your story are going to be pretty shocked because you have
3:15
been through a nightmare. And we've heard from doctors in the UK. But
3:21
I've also noticed since the pandemic how closely Canada, New Zealand, Australia and
3:28
the UK seem to be acting in lockstep. And for you it all started,
3:35
really, didn't it, Because you say yourself, you're a very humble
3:38
man, you live in a humble town and you just get on with your
3:44
job, and yet things changed for you. Just give us a little background
3:49
of what happened, what changed? What did you notice? Well, I
3:54
think, well what happened was very early on I realized that COVID was being
4:01
massively the risk of COVID was being massively exaggerated by the authorities, that most
4:09
emergency rooms were much quieter than usual. Yet we were told the healthcare system
4:15
was under enormous strain and was on the verge of collapse, which I think
4:20
in each hospital, h doctor at each place thought, well, it must
4:24
be somewhere else, because obviously we're getting off very likely. But I realied
4:30
very early on that the media were not being honest and that the medical authorities
4:34
were not being honest, and that people were being terrified about something that was
4:40
literally no more dangerous than the flu, and so I was. I think
4:46
that was the first thing I noticed when there was a serious safety signal with
4:50
the Astrosenica shot in Europe and a whole number of countries in Europe had shut
4:55
it down, and Canada said no, well, it's fine for Canadians,
4:58
even though it's no good for people in Europe. I sent an email to
5:03
a group of my colleagues who were actually giving these shots because I knew there
5:09
was no safety data to assure us that these shots were safe. And so
5:12
I was given a gag order very early on for even for basically drawing attention
5:18
to a safety signal. And I was told that I was putting people at
5:23
risk because I was creating vaccine hesitancy amongst my medical colleagues. This wasn't even
5:29
with the public. This was a privately group email to people in our area,
5:32
and so I was immediately thought, this is very odd. Doctors are
5:38
supposed to be very concerned about patients safety. So if I'm given this gag
5:43
order for even questioning the safety of a product on which there was no long
5:46
term safety data, there was something very fishy and then when I started to
5:56
see the serious harm in my own patients who had received their first shot,
6:00
I knew that it was my social responsibility to protect my patients. And so
6:05
even though I'd been given this gag order, and my gag order was that
6:10
I was not allowed to say anything negative about these shots in the course of
6:15
my job as an emergency room doctor in my little town. And I was
6:18
told that this was being sent as a letter of complaint to the licensing authority
6:25
here, which is the College of Physicians and Surgeons, and so this was
6:30
a formal reprimand, and so so I initially thought that was very odd.
6:36
But nevertheless, when I saw the harm that was happening to my patients,
6:42
I knew I had a social responsibility to speak up, and so I defied
6:46
my gag order and I sent an open letter because I knew if it was
6:50
a closed letter it would be buried. It was clearly that the authorities weren't
6:55
being honest, and they were clearly covering up the evidence of harm, and
6:59
I wasn't willing to participate in that. So I sent this as an open
7:01
letter, which attracted a lot of attention, and I said in the letter,
7:04
how many people had been vaccinated, how many vaccine injuries I had seen
7:09
so far, and that our town hadn't had a single COVID casualty whatsoever until
7:15
that point, and so it was clear to me that the shots were more
7:18
dangerous than COVID. So anyway, this unfortunately really riled the authorities who well,
7:29
and then I was told that I just have to report these vaccine injuries,
7:32
and when I tried to do that, every single one was met with
7:35
denial. They said, nope, these are not vaccine injuries. These are
7:39
all coincidences. And ultimately I've tried filing fourteen vaccine injury reports and every single
7:46
one was blocked and denied, and they said, nope, they will not
7:49
register them as vaccine injuries zs are all coincidences, even though in many cases
7:55
that symptoms had literally started within a few hours, but they wouldn't accept these
7:59
were vaccine injuries because the manufacturer hadn't said that those were possible side effects.
8:03
And so I realized that the cover up was extensive, and it wasn't.
8:09
It was widespread, and it was at the highest levels. And so that's
8:15
really where the started was me seeing the the endemic corruption in those that had
8:22
authority over me, and yeah, that's really where it started. I'm horrified
8:28
actually because on a number of counts. But would it be fair to say,
8:33
I mean, I don't know how you must have felt, because essentially
8:37
i'd say, Charles, you were dobbed in by your colleagues. You know,
8:41
you were betrayed by your own your own profession, by people that you
8:48
knew this. You were asking other consultants, other doctors you were observing,
8:56
and they betrayed you. Did you feel that, yes? I did?
9:01
You know? I was part of a trying to try to remember what it
9:05
was even called. It's sort of a society of rural doctors of British Columbia,
9:11
which gave one access to all sorts of funds for medical education and other
9:16
things which are sort of perks of being in a rural area. And I
9:20
was expelled from them, In fact, I was. They told me they
9:22
were going to have a special meeting to expel me for causing vaccine hesitancy.
9:28
And so because I knew this was clearly a political thing. It was not
9:35
a moral or medical or scientific thing. This was political action. So because
9:39
I didn't want them to be able to use that against me, saying that
9:43
I was expelled. I said, well, I'm just resigning. So I
9:46
just resigned from this organization, which then cut off my access to funds that
9:50
would otherwise have been able to help me. And so this was what was
9:56
happening from my own colleagues, who were so brainwashed from watching their television set,
10:03
who really really believed that this was a terrifying disease that was going to
10:07
decimate the population, and that our only hope out of it was to get
10:11
everyone vaccinated as fast as possible. So anything possible that discouraged vaccination was seen
10:18
as literally betraying humanity. And I think, obviously I saw it from a
10:22
very different perspective. My sense of social responsibility was that doctors should do no
10:30
harm, and that seems to have gone out the window. You're a very
10:33
humble Christian gentleman, Charles, and I just want you to give our viewers
10:41
and listeners a perspective of your life, because you didn't have these massive aspirations
10:48
of being chief Medical Officer of Canada, and I think did you. You
10:52
were a family doctor doing your job in a little town in Canada, minding
10:58
your own business and loving the work. That you did with the community that
11:03
you live with. Give us a little picture of how big your town is
11:07
and whereabouts you live, and how many patients you have. Well. I
11:11
live in a fairly scruffy little town called Litton in British Columbia, and I
11:18
moved here in nineteen ninety three to be the family doctor. And I was
11:24
the only doctor in town for most of the time I've been here, being
11:28
literally the only doctor. So I delivered babies, I did everything. I
11:33
was truly a generalist in the sense, in the old fashioned sense of the
11:39
word. And I remember in that so this is a mostly Canadian First Nations
11:48
town. About seventy percent of the people are Canadian Indians. And in the
11:52
second year that I was here, which was in nineteen ninety four, my
11:54
father and mother came to visit me, and my father said to me,
11:58
what on earth are you doing here? My father, he said to me,
12:01
you are stuck in a back Eddy. You will never make a name
12:05
for yourself in a place like this. And I said to him, I'm
12:09
not trying to make a name for myself. I just want to serve these
12:13
people, and that is I suppose my spirit. And I was raised with
12:20
sort of Anglican Christian values of considering others more important than yourself and beyond that,
12:28
I embraced that because I became a Christian. I wasn't just raised Chris,
12:31
and I embraced Christ who taught us what it means to consider others more
12:37
important than yourself. And that is what That's where our sense of social responsibility
12:45
comes from. That's where our sense of duty to our fellow man comes from.
12:50
Where one should be willing, if need be, to sacrifice oneself for
12:54
the well being of those around us. And I think that's what's really inspired
12:58
me. I haven't done any of this for me. I've done this for
13:01
the love of my fellow man. That's what Christ did when you went to
13:05
the cross. That's my life and that's who I am. And as we're
13:11
going to come on to hear, you really have sacrificed yourself in every way,
13:20
and we'll come on to that. But not only were you doing your
13:26
social duty, your Christian duty, and your duty as a doctor do no
13:31
harm. You also decided to go one step further, didn't you as well?
13:35
Because you decided that you'd start your own little research project and you just
13:39
keep maybe an eye on what was going on with your patients, tell us
13:45
what you were noticing in your patients specifically, and what measures you were taking
13:50
to help them, and to also record what you were seeing. Yeah,
13:56
well, that's an interesting thing because there of medicine is always a process of
14:01
inquiry. We realize that we don't know it all and we don't have all
14:07
the answers, and so we're supposed to always question everything to see if what
14:11
we're doing is actually right, or what we're doing is actually the best,
14:16
and how we could refine it or improve it. And so fortunately, my
14:22
open letter announcing that all the neurological problems that my patients were having after their
14:28
mRNA shot attracted you know, international attention, and I was connected with a
14:33
group of people from doctors for covid Ethics who who and we had some wonderful
14:39
weekly zoom meetings trying to figure out what was causing the vaccine injuries that we
14:46
were seeing, because this was a completely new technology with most unusual side effects.
14:52
And so I started doing this blood test called a d dimer test,
14:58
and was based on the idea that the delivery system of this messenger RNA is
15:03
a delivery system that was previously used for cancer treatments. Our bodies have natural
15:07
barriers, particularly the blood brain barrier, but there's a placental barrier, and
15:11
there are various other barriers that keep toxic substances out of sensitive parts of our
15:16
body. And the delivery system that was chosen for the mRNA shots was designed
15:24
to get through those barriers, to literally get that mRNA into literally every part
15:28
of your body, into your brain, into your lungs, your heart,
15:31
places where vaccines aren't supposed to go. And so I realized that those spike
15:39
proteins were going to be made in the cells around your blood vessels in every
15:43
part of your body, and that most of it would actually be in the
15:46
cells around capillary networks because that's where most of the absorption of anything from your
15:52
bloodstream occurs. It occurs in capillary networks because that's where the blood streams,
15:56
the blood slows right down, that's where you've got the big surface area relative
16:00
to the blood volume. And so I realized that the lining of those capillaries
16:06
was going to be rough, full of spike proteins rather than smooth, and
16:11
so I thought, then it's absolutely inevitable that clotting is going to occur,
16:15
and it's going to be mostly microclotting in these capillary networks. And so in
16:19
order to try and figure that out, I started doing this blood test called
16:23
a D diamer test. Now, before I should should say that, I
16:27
should also mention that I was considered Literally a few weeks after sending my open
16:33
letter, the authorities were furious with me and were determined to try and shut
16:38
me down. So at one point we had a vaccine injured nurse that came
16:44
into our emergency room, So not a vaccine injured nurse, a vaccine injured
16:47
patient. And this was a patient who had had had COVID five weeks before,
16:52
and for whom it was a very mild event. You know, it
16:56
really wasn't as serious thing, not as bad as the flu. But this
16:59
person there had a COVID shot five weeks later and got very sick from their
17:03
COVID shot. So for this person, clearly the injection was more dangerous than
17:08
COVID. So I told the nurse to tell the patient that clearly, because
17:14
she had such a mild infection, she had natural immunity and she didn't need
17:18
to be vaccinated because she had natural immunity, and the nurse was said to
17:22
me, she's not allowed to tell anyone that they don't need this injection,
17:26
doesn't matter what kind of immunity they've got. So I said, well,
17:30
that's okay, I'll explain it to the patient. So anyway, on the
17:33
basis of me telling a nurse that a person with natural immunity to COVID didn't
17:38
need the injection, I was fired from the emergency room. So fortunately I
17:44
still had my medical license, but I was fired for telling this emergency room
17:48
nurse that a person who was vax injured and clear natural immunity didn't need the
17:56
shot. And I'd been doing emergency medicine for well, in that emergency room
18:00
for almost thirty years, but you know, elsewhere for longer than that,
18:06
with literally at that time not a single patient complaint against me. I was
18:10
fired for making that statement. So they were desperately trying to shut me down
18:17
and shut me up and trying to intimidate me. But I was determined.
18:22
I knew I had a sense of social responsibility to try and help my patients
18:26
because I was trying to figure out how do I treat these vaccine injuries.
18:32
We didn't even know what the mechanism of injury was about why people were getting
18:37
these side effects, And so I started doing this Dedimond test, and I
18:41
was looking for patients who hadn't had their shot yet so that they could do
18:45
this Dedimond test before and after their shot. So, a Dedimond test is
18:49
a blood test that is usually done to see if you have a blood clot
18:53
somewhere in your body, and it only will It won't detect an old blood
19:00
clot, it only detects recent new blood clots. So I was looking for
19:03
people who hadn't had their shot yet who I could get a baseline d dimer,
19:07
do another one a week later and see if they were getting this micro
19:12
clotting. And so I discovered, much to my horror, when I got
19:17
literally the first eight people's blood work back and five out of the eight had
19:22
a positive d dimer, I was absolutely horrified. I realized that the blood
19:26
clots were not rare that we were told that they're one in a million or
19:30
one and one hundred thousand, incredibly rare. It was sixty two percent in
19:36
my patients, and so I was so horrified. I had an interview coming
19:40
up with one of the local people here in Canada, and they asked what
19:44
was to tell me about what was happening in my patients, and I told
19:47
them, I said, look, this is very early days. I've only
19:49
got eight people's results back, but more than half have clotting. And the
19:55
problem with that is that obviously clotting, well clotting firstly permanently damages vessels,
20:00
and secondly, it's going to accumulate with every shot. And the most horrifying
20:06
thing is that these were not vaccine injured people. These were people who thought
20:10
their shot went fine, and we're having these microscopic blood clots in their brain
20:15
and wherever else. So tragically, a little over a week after that,
20:21
our entire town burned to the ground. And this wasn't a file, wasn't
20:25
fired. It wasn't We had a horrible heat wave and shortly after that something
20:32
littered spark and our entire town, on a very windy day, literally was
20:37
annihilated, and ninety percent of the town was eradicated, including my medical practice,
20:42
including the emergency room that I'd been fired from. It all went up
20:48
in smoke, and I know when I ran out of that building and when
20:52
everything was burning I just grabbed my laptop, I grabbed my d Diimer research.
20:57
I grabbed a few of the duplicated patient files on the vaccine injuries because
21:02
people kept asking me about them. And I lost everything else. But fortunately
21:07
my house survived because my house was upwind of the fire and not in the
21:11
village. So my house survived, but I'd lost my medical practice. I
21:15
was fired from this. I couldn't then do emergency medicine anywhere, and so
21:22
I then went to another town. I had moved my wife and my family
21:26
to another town about two hours driver away, to try and give my children
21:33
more of an opportunity, to a university town, a bigger town, because
21:37
they clearly needed more than this little one horse town could offer them. So
21:41
I moved them there in a few years before to try just for the benefit
21:47
of my children. But I didn't realize that my wife was strategically planning a
21:53
divorce. And when I arrived there literally two o'clock in the morning, having
22:00
led from this burning town, I shortly after that discovered I was delivered,
22:06
you know, given these divorce papers that told me I was going to be
22:11
banished from this house with a no contact order, and that so I couldn't
22:15
go back to the burned out town of Lytton, and I couldn't be there,
22:19
and so I had to decide, well, my life is crumbling around
22:23
me, where do I go next? So I was still trying my patients
22:27
obviously that were scattered for and why it still needed health care. So that
22:33
point I was giving them my cell phone number so that they could reach me
22:36
wherever I was, so that I could still care for them. And so
22:41
I put the word out that I was going to go to my little cottage
22:44
which was about six hours drive away, and I would be able to help
22:48
them from there by telephone. And so, of course the authorities, which
22:53
were still seeking things to accuse me of, then submitted a complaint to the
23:00
College of Physicians of Surgeons that I had abandoned my patients and gone to this
23:06
cottage. So, I mean they were literally as everything crumbled around me,
23:14
they redoubled their efforts to try and find points of accusation. And so,
23:23
yeah, it's been a tough time. As we said right from the beginning,
23:29
you have literally sacrificed everything. But just to summarize, because some people
23:34
that are listening might find all of this a little bit overwhelming because you've been
23:41
demonized and hounded and bullied, in my opinion, by your colleagues. You've
23:48
been betrayed by them. You've all you've ever wanted to do is the right
23:53
thing, do no harm. Your town burnt down, and I mean,
24:02
you know, when I first heard this, I thought, what, you
24:06
know, a house burning down, we hear about that, sadly, a
24:10
town, a whole town burning down, your medical center burnt to the ground,
24:18
and then your wife divorcing you. All of this to one person on
24:26
top of what we're going to come to, which is the courts, trials,
24:33
disciplinaries and everything else that you're having to go through at the moment.
24:38
But I just want to come back to the fire quickly, because you've told
24:45
me that for two years this happened a couple of years ago, and for
24:48
two years your town was roped off while they were doing investigations, while they
24:56
were trying to find out what the cause was of the fire. And I
25:02
mean, plenty of people that lost their homes. I'm sure maybe didn't have
25:04
insurance. So tell us where the town is now. I mean, the
25:11
Cordons have all gone, I presume, or is it still under investigation,
25:15
a whole town has been wiped out. What is the reason? Well,
25:19
so the first thing they did was, immediately after this the fire had sort
25:26
of died down, they fenced off the entire property, the entire area where
25:33
where the town was, not the surrounding area, but the town, and
25:37
they literally had it guarded twenty four hours a day for two years. Now.
25:41
Their reasoning was that they said it wasn't safe, you know, and
25:45
of course that's the eternal reason for everything that the authorities do is safety.
25:51
You know, That's what all the masks were about, the lockdowns, the
25:53
shots, the travel restraint. It was all about safety, you know,
25:59
that's their use for everything. And so it wasn't safe, but also that
26:04
it was under investigation. And so anyway, the government investigated it for a
26:08
year, and after a year they announced that they had absolutely no idea what
26:14
caused the fire. It wasn't you know some people that there's two railways that
26:21
go through town, and somebody said, well, it was caused by a
26:23
train that was on fire. But you know, if it had been a
26:26
train on fire and the train's going to go through here about seventy kilometers an
26:30
hour, the fire would have been all the way down the track. You
26:36
know, there would have been other places where it had ignited it further down,
26:38
and there was nowhere else. It was absolutely nowhere else. So that
26:44
theory of the train on fire is it doesn't doesn't fly it. Really it
26:48
was impossible, but and they wouldn't let. You know, I wanted to
26:52
go back to my medical practice and at least see if I could salvage my
26:56
surgical instruments and things that I knew wouldn't have been roid, but they would
27:00
not let I couldn't get anything nothing. I mean, it was a complete
27:03
loss. And because it's a humble small town, literally sixty percent of people
27:10
had no insurance, and so because of all these safety regulations, it has
27:17
taken an absurd amount of time there Finally, now it's almost three years since
27:21
the fire and they're finally they're about three houses now under construction, but most
27:26
of it has been delayed by safety regulations. And then the second thing that's
27:30
delayed it is that the First Nations people who are the Canadian Indians, get
27:38
all sorts of enormous grants from the government for cultural preservation, and so they
27:45
have had an archaeological company that has to sift through every grain of sand where
27:52
these all these houses used to be in case there's an arrowhead or a bone
27:57
or something from times gone by. And of course a lot of people here
28:03
collected arrow hits and they walked all around the surrounding areas and they pick up
28:07
these stone arrowheads because the first Nations people were stone age people here before Europeans
28:12
came, and so you can find these arrow hits. And of course when
28:15
the house burns, what's left behind in the ash of these arrow hits.
28:19
But now this now becomes an archaeological site because there are arrowheads there, and
28:23
so this has also created enormous expense and enormous delays. All of this I
28:32
suppose, Yeah, it's about cultural preservation, but it's reached absurd proportions.
28:37
Where are you now? Are you? I mean, was there anything left
28:41
of the town. You say that your house was saved, but how many
28:45
other people in the town are left? And if you've moved back into the
28:48
town, I'm presuming that you're still opening your doors to patients, Am I
28:56
right? Yes? So now there is no well, as I say,
29:02
I lost all my medical equipment, which included bedside ultrasound and other things that
29:06
I had bought to that I had in my private practice, which was in
29:11
the same building actually as that emergency room that I was banned from. But
29:15
yeah, I lost all of that, so I had to sort of retool
29:18
to some degree. I couldn't afford another ultrasound machine and that sort of thing,
29:23
but I bought instruments and other things because people were literally once I moved
29:27
back, there were literally coming and knocking on my door. You know,
29:30
people would come and say, you know, I just took the end of
29:33
my finger off with my circular saw, Please can you help me? Or
29:37
I've got you I was pruning my apple tree and I've got something in my
29:41
eye, or I've got this really sore throat, or I think I'm getting
29:45
pneumonia or whatever it is. And they would literally come and knock on my
29:48
door because there's no other emergency services here. And so I literally now treat
29:55
people in my own home and who literally just come to the door and say
30:02
I need help. And so obviously I've had to Previously, the government paid
30:07
for all of this, you know, if they need dressings or suturing or
30:11
whatever else, the government provided all of that and paid me for doing it,
30:15
for actually being available for the emergency, so I can still Fortunately I
30:18
still do have a medical license, so I can get recoup some money for
30:23
fixing up a chopped or finger or something. But obviously my overheads are much
30:30
higher because I'm now providing all of the dressing supplies and other things like that
30:34
that would normally have been provided by the government. They've got loads of legal
30:41
fees as well. I have to say, haven't you as well, which
30:44
we will come on too. So anybody that's listening thinking I want to help
30:48
doltahoff, even if it's buying an instrument or contributing towards your pages, then
30:53
we are going to come onto that. I absolutely promise, because your sense
30:59
of social honesty is simply phenomenal. I just want to bring you back very
31:07
quickly to the vaccine adverse reactions because since then, you know, you're still
31:12
trying to help people still today. And what happens when you make the call
31:19
to say a neurologist, for example, because you've got a patient that's presenting
31:26
with neurological problems and I know that you've tried very hard to get them referred.
31:30
What happens when you do that it's astonishing the level of denial in the
31:37
medical community. So initially, when I tried to find a neurologist who would
31:42
see my vaccine injured patients, and I desperately just wanted a diagnosis, because
31:48
you can't treat something if you don't know what the diagnosis is. You know,
31:52
it's like a mechanic on a car. You can't fix the car unless
31:55
you know what's gone wrong. So as doctors, we have to have got
31:59
to be able to diagnose things. And I had no idea what was causing
32:02
all the neurological problems that my patients had, and so I've initially I phoned
32:09
three tertiary, big large medical centers what we call tertiary hospitals here with neurological
32:16
neurology departments, and to try and find a neurologist who would see my most
32:22
seriously vaccine injured patients at short notice. And in every single case, as
32:28
soon as I mentioned that these symptoms started after their COVID vaccine, they would
32:31
simply go quiet on the phone and then say, well, actually that's not
32:36
their field. And so after literally and these were the three largest hospitals surrounding
32:44
in the surrounding area, two of them in Vancouver, another one in a
32:46
town called Kamlps And so I then didn't know what else to do. So
32:52
I then literally just sent a letter to a neurologist. I sent them six
32:58
letters on my most seriously injured, six most seriously neurologically injured patients and marked
33:04
them as urgent referrals. So these people were given an appointment date that was
33:09
five months after their vaccine injury. This was they literally didn't want to see
33:15
these people. So, I mean with one of them, the youngest,
33:19
who was a thirty eight year old lady who had five cranial nerve palsies whose
33:23
life was ruined by her after her first shot. She couldn't drive, she
33:28
couldn't work, and this so called urgent referral was going to be five months
33:34
after her shot. When the seniorrologist eventually saw her, he was so horrified
33:40
that he admitted her to hospital for eight days to try and figure out what
33:45
was happening to her. So these people thought, I think they just thought
33:49
I was exaggerating, But the fact that they wouldn't even look, they wouldn't
33:55
even see these I mean, this was appalling. I just think This is
34:00
just this is a dereliction of duty. And in so many cases, these
34:07
poor vaccine injured people were just told it was all in their head. Because
34:12
you know, these spike proteins are not human proteins. They're not supposed to
34:15
be in our body. There are foreign a very toxic foreign protein that that
34:22
the medical system had no tests for. There's no tests to see how many
34:27
spike proteins you've got, and so these doctors didn't know how to diagnose them.
34:30
It wouldn't that problems didn't show up unless you had a huge blood clot.
34:35
A lot of it does not show up. Like on that patient with
34:37
the five cranial nerve palsies. They keep doing MRIs, nothing shows up.
34:43
They don't know why she doesn't get better it and I think now I realized
34:50
it's an autoimmune problem. But it's called a sport small fiber neuropathy. But
34:58
they this was like a stell weapon that caused problems that the medical system literally
35:04
couldn't detect. But more concerned, they didn't want to know about them.
35:09
This was a cruel thing to these vaccine injured people because most I've now got
35:16
thirty two vaccine injured people in my little medical practice, and I'm a one
35:21
man practice. It's a small practice. We're thirty two vaccine injured people.
35:24
And as I say, after the first fourteen vaccine injury reports, I gave
35:28
up because I realized you can't report them. The whole system is censored so
35:32
that they can carry on telling people how amazingly rare the side effects are,
35:37
and the rest of the doctors don't seem to want to report them either.
35:40
I think they're terrified of being called an anti vaxxer. So the medical profession
35:50
has literally betrayed the people who they're supposed to be serving, and it grieves
35:58
me terribly that they're and I think some of it has just been quite simply,
36:04
they were brainwashed from watching their television set. They were brainwashed into believing
36:10
that the vaccine injuries are incredibly rare, and so if something bad is happening,
36:15
well, it can't be the vaccine because that's safe and effective and the
36:20
side effects are incredibly rare, So it's got to be something else, even
36:22
if we can't think of what that something else might be. But yeah,
36:30
that's been my experience of very deep disappointment in the medical profession. Who I
36:37
really think have acted in a very selfish, self serving way. You know,
36:45
the old fashioned ethic of going into medicine for doctors and nurses and physiotherapists
36:50
and other people was that you wanted to serve people. You didn't go into
36:54
this for personal gain. You went it was a calling. It's a bit
37:00
like going into the ministry, you know, to be clergy. It's a
37:04
calling where you don't do it for yourself, you do it to serve others.
37:12
And unfortunately that old fashioned Christian ethic of considering others more important than yourself
37:17
seems to have gone, and it's tragically sad. Oh my goodness, you
37:23
are a doctor after my own heart, and I would love to be a
37:28
matron in your hospital, that's for sure, because I agree with you as
37:32
a nurse, as a gobby granny as I call myself, and you as
37:39
a rural, quiet, humble gp you knew, I knew, we knew
37:46
what was going on, So there is no excuse. Of course, they
37:51
must know what's going on. And if they didn't know, if others doctors
37:53
didn't know what was going on, then I suggest they should ask some questions
37:58
or perhaps come and speak to us, because you know, it does sound
38:02
cheesy to say that medicines are calling and that becoming a doctor is a calling,
38:07
and a nurse it does sound a bit cheesy, but it's true.
38:12
I wanted to be a nurse from when I was eleven years old, and
38:17
that's exactly what I did. I was focused and there was nobody, in
38:21
nothing that was going to stop me because I wanted to be a nurse because
38:24
I wanted to help people. It was really that simple. I didn't do
38:28
it for the money. Nobody does it for the money, and nobody does
38:31
it for easy hours either or an easy time or an easy job. I
38:36
wanted to do it because I cared. And you are a doctor that listens
38:43
to patients, which is so important. And through the whole of this pandemic,
38:47
I have found the most important things, or one of the most important
38:52
things, is doctors holding space for patients, listening to them, and more
38:58
importantly, believing them. We've had many people that we've interviewed who have had
39:05
serious neurological illness, serious adverse reactions from the injection, serious cardiac and immune
39:14
damage, and yet they've been told, you're anxious. It's all down to
39:19
anxiety. It's all down to some psychosomatic thought. It's not real, it
39:25
doesn't exist. And so that's why patients when they meet doctors like you,
39:31
are so relieved. At last, somebody's listening to me, at last,
39:37
somebody's believing me, and at last somebody can help me and advise me.
39:43
And you know, you've been through all of this, Charles. You've been
39:46
through a divorce, you've been through discreditation, you've been through being bullied by
39:54
your colleagues, you've been through fire. But there's worse as well as if
39:59
we didn't think there was more to come. Tell us about the legal action
40:02
and the actions of your own professional body and how they've reacted to you and
40:09
the impact that that's taken on you. Let me back up a little bit,
40:16
so I told you about how I was fired from the er, and
40:20
yeah, all of the trials and tribulations that i'd been so when I was
40:23
finally allowed back to my house in this evacuation area, because fortunately, as
40:30
I said, my house wasn't in the fenced off part. Well it was
40:32
for a while, but even though it wasn't burnt, and when I was
40:36
eventually allowed back, there was around about the time that they were saying that
40:40
they wanted to start giving these COVID shots to children. And you know,
40:45
as I've mentioned, the risk of COVID was for everyone was massively exaggerated.
40:51
It was only really dangerous to the frail elderly, and we knew that it
40:55
was almost no risk to children. And so when they were saying that even
41:01
and in fact, you know an Pfizer or Maderna or as Doesenic, any
41:05
of these other they hadn't tested it on children. But yet when they said
41:09
they were going to roll this out for children, and they were making it
41:13
a requirement for for university entrants, or for playing sport, or for all
41:16
sorts of things, I was horrified because I knew that a lot of these
41:22
spike proteins ended up in the ovaries and the testicles, the reproductive organs,
41:27
and I thought, this, this seems like a genocide these inflaction. If
41:32
these people are getting microclotting in their reproductive organs, this is this is going
41:39
to seriously reduce fertility. It has to. You know, when when when
41:44
a baby girl is born, she's born with all the eggs she'll ever have
41:46
in her whole life. She doesn't make new eggs the way males make sperms
41:52
every day. Girls don't do that. If you can wipe, if you
41:54
can dam reduce the number of the eggs of the ovaries of a child,
42:00
she will have permanently impaired fertility. And so I teamed up with another doctor
42:07
in Here in British Columbia, who had also been outspoken about this, and
42:15
we went on a speaking tour through western Canada and I think ultimately went to
42:21
forty or fifty cities did she doing town hall presentations, And it was motivated
42:27
on trying to protect the children. A lot of the adults had already been
42:30
vaccinated, but I was just the fact that they would wanted to give this
42:35
to children, and in many case were forcing them to have it in order
42:37
to be able to enroll an education or play sport. Was very sinister because
42:44
COVID was almost no risk to them. And of course they were telling them
42:49
that you know, unless you have these shots, you're going to kill your
42:51
grandmother or whatever, which was absurd because it didn't there shots couldn't stop transmission,
42:54
and so all of that was a lie too. So I went on
42:59
the speaking ter and maybe I should even back up a bit further after sending
43:04
my open letter talking about the neurological problems that my patients were having and giving
43:09
them the numbers numbers vaccinated numbers, injured numbers treated for COVID, all that
43:15
and literally showing that this whole thing was the shots were more dangerous than COVID.
43:22
The Colleges of Physicians and surgeons, who are the licensing authorities in each
43:27
province across Canada, issued a warning after I sent that letter because they considered
43:31
my open letter to be misinformation. You know, talking about vaccine injuries was
43:37
misinformation. These shots are safe and effective. You're not allowed to talk about
43:40
vaccine injuries because it's misinformation. So they put out a warning to every doctor
43:46
warning that if you spread misinformation about COVID, you will be investigated and,
43:52
if necessary, disciplined. So my letter seemed to trigger that, so I
44:00
under investigation. I was already under fire, and my medical ethic was still
44:07
there to do no harm and to protect my patients and the public at large
44:14
who were being deceived. They had been brainwashed with fear through their television set
44:22
and were now being convinced to have these shots that they didn't need, and
44:29
that were seriously doing harm. And so the fact that I was on a
44:35
speaking tour going down to town trying to warn people to protect their children rile
44:40
the authorities even more so they then issued the citation against me. So a
44:45
citation is basically it's a it's a statement of accusation. So I was sitting
44:53
at my desk doing telephone appointments, caring for my patients, and the phone
44:58
went and it was a reporter in Toronto asking for my comments about the citation.
45:02
I said, well, what citation and so they said, well,
45:07
it's all over the news. So I said, okay, well tell me
45:13
about it. What are they doing now? So they so, this reporter
45:16
told me that the College of Physicians and Surgeons had put out this press announcement
45:21
that I was going to be disciplined. So I thought, well, that's
45:24
interesting. I thought at least they might have had the decency to tell me
45:28
first. So I literally had to go onto their website and look up to
45:32
see what they were going to do to me next. And I thought,
45:36
you know, is this is clearly an act of intimidating every doctor. The
45:42
fact that I am now going to be disciplined for my spreading misinformation for what
45:46
they call professional misconduct is what they're calling it. The fact that they put
45:52
this out across in all the main media across Canada, about this spreader of
45:58
misinformation and what they were going to be doing to me, I thought,
46:02
wow, you know, this is clearly that's why most of the doctors just
46:07
keep their head down and won't say a word. They have been intimidated.
46:12
And so, unfortunately, I'm not a naturally fearful person. I don't consider
46:19
myself the most important thing out there. I love my neighbor more than I
46:24
love myself, and so I carried on doing what I was doing. But
46:30
anyway, so so this my trial was supposed to have happened a short time
46:40
ago. So firstly, I've got a brilliant Christian lawyer called Lee Turner,
46:45
who is an incredibly clever and conscious, conscientious man and who shares the same
46:52
ethic as I do. And he has recruited eight world experts as expert witnesses
47:01
who will who have given expert testimonies to defend everything that I'm accused of.
47:07
And of course the microclotting is misinformation, and neurological injuries are misinformation, and
47:13
the fact that this could harm fertility is misinformation. And the number of a
47:16
lot of people have died from these other that's misinformation. So they've got this
47:20
list of all these things. So shortly before the trial, after my lawyer
47:25
had submitted all the expert testimonies from these eight world experts, the College clearly
47:32
realized that they were seriously outgunned and outmaneuvered and that they didn't have a leg
47:38
to stand on. So their response was to ask for something called judicial notice.
47:45
So judicial notice is a principle of Canadian law where a court can declare
47:54
that certain facts are indisputable and therefore cannot be contested. And so they're basically
48:04
saying that the facts stated by the College and Public Health that these that first
48:08
d the first fact is the vaccines work, the second one is they're safe
48:14
and affective, you know, and on. So they're claiming that this is
48:17
irrefutable evidence. And therefore, if the court will accept that this is irrefutably
48:23
correct, I mean, everyone knows that, then you're not allowed to contest
48:30
it, which therefore prevents me from giving any evidence in my defense because I'm
48:37
not allowed to contest that information that these shots are safe and effective. I've
48:39
said, they've caused serious vaccine injuries in my own patients and around the world,
48:44
and I'm a first hand witness of that as a family doctor. So
48:50
they are trying to basically bury the evidence through this process called judicial notice.
48:54
And so they haven't decided yet if they going to grant judicial notice, but
49:00
I mean, if they do, the fact that they're even trying to do
49:04
this shows that the College of Physicians and Surgeons is not interested in truth,
49:10
They're not interested in justice. They literally just want to bury the evidence.
49:15
So this is what's happened. I mean, I mean, this, or
49:17
everything that's happened to me, right from the first gag order right to this
49:23
judicial notice, just shows the level of corruption that is just endemic. It
49:30
just it seems to reveal everything that is wrong with the legal system and the
49:37
medical system. So I mean, it's sort of interesting to see what God
49:40
will do next because this is a this is a this has been quite an
49:44
adventure. I'm not sure i'd call it an adventure quite, but I mean,
49:50
Charles, I think it's important to let people know too that your world
49:55
experts, your eight world experts, will work. Had had done the reports
50:00
pro Bono were absolutely behind your cause one hundred percent. Just give us an
50:07
idea of some of those world experts that are willing and ready to stand up
50:13
for you. Because you've been working with COVID, the COVID doctors for a
50:16
long time. You've also stood up publicly at the Canada Citizens' Inquiry. So
50:24
who is going to be standing up for you if they allow people to give
50:30
evidence on your behalf? Absolutely? And so these expert witnesses, I can
50:37
give you their names. So from the UK, it's doctor Claire Craig,
50:44
who's a pathologist, and of course pathological evidence is very important, and so
50:51
anyway, he's one of them. Doctor Peter McCulloch, who's a world renowned
50:57
cardiologist and epidemiologist. From Tech, doctor Pierre Cory, who's the world expert
51:02
on ivermecton. Because of course, this is one of the accusations against me,
51:07
is that I told people to use ivermectin even you know, when when
51:12
doctors were banned in Canada from prescribing ivermectin for COVID, you could prescribe it
51:16
for anything else, but not COVID. It was was not safe to use
51:21
for COVID, but it was safe for anything else. I mean, go
51:23
and figure out the logic in that. Doctor Stephen Pellick, who is a
51:30
brilliant he's a professor at the Faculty of Medicine at the University of British Columbia.
51:36
Doctor Jessica Rose who is a world renowned virologist and immunologist. Doctor James
51:43
Thorpe who is a gynecologist from the from the United States who has been very
51:49
outspoken about what this has done to fertility in women. And doctor Eric Payne
51:57
who is a pediatric neurologist in Edmonton, Canada. And the last is doctor
52:02
Kevin McKernan. Now he's not a medical doctor, he was he was.
52:07
He's a he's the scientist who revealed that the DNA plasmid, the contamination with
52:15
with E. Coli or with with plasma DNA in these shots, that that
52:22
will literally genetically that that gives it the ability to genetically modify us because it's
52:28
DNA not RNA. So so these are the world these world experts, and
52:35
each of these people has literally offered to give their testimony free of charge.
52:42
Now, my lawyer said that because of the caliber of these people, if
52:46
they had charged, what people of this caliber are entitled to charge for their
52:52
expert testimony. I would probably be on the hook for about four hundred thousand
52:57
dollars in legal fees just for these exs testimonies. These people have worked for
53:01
days and weeks preparing their expert testimonies because they they support me one hundred percent,
53:09
and so they have said, just on a matter of principle, they
53:13
will do this free of charge. Unfortunately, with all that they've been the
53:17
College has been throwing at my lawyer. He's had to recruit other lawyers,
53:22
and so of course the legal costs are mounting. And so I'm sort of
53:27
at the mercy of the good will of the public to try and help me
53:30
with this because I think my case, because it deals with critical areas of
53:36
patient safety and vaccine injury, it'll be a precedent set in case. I
53:39
don't know if it'll help things the rest of the world, but definitely in
53:44
Canada. It will help many other medical professionals who are facing the same charges
53:50
and the same problems. This will be a precedent setting case, and so
53:55
I think it's very important that is it is one and the fact that I've
54:02
got these eight world experts who are being muzzled by the authorities. You know,
54:08
these people have submitted I think it's a total of nine hundred and sixty
54:14
seven pages of expert testimony in total between the eight of them. So this
54:19
is a vast amount of very important medical information that my lawyer would like to
54:25
make available to the world that anyone can draw on this for other cases,
54:32
you know, even if it's they're not allowed to be submitted as court documents,
54:37
we will make this information available because the world needs to know. This
54:44
is there needs to be some accountability for the people who have betrayed humanity in
54:51
what they have done in this pandemic. I'm going to ask you in a
54:54
minute for where people can help with donations. Where your pages are We're going
55:00
to get those up as well in the article that's going to be appearing beneath
55:07
this interview. But am I right in believing Charles that in Canada and please
55:14
to everybody watching in Canada, to everybody watching everywhere, please share this interview,
55:20
Please support doctor Hoff. It is incredibly it's vital. It's a vital
55:24
that we support our own and so Canada, UK, the world. I
55:30
hope you're listening, but I do think I want to ask you this one
55:34
question because I think it's very important. Am I right in the fact that
55:39
in Canada, although Charles, you've got a wonderful lawyer, and as if
55:45
you said, your lawyer's having to get advice from other people and that's racking
55:49
up fees, But do you have to pay the fees of your professional body
55:54
who are taking this action against you as well? Because that's not what happens
56:00
I believe in the UK, but is what is happening in Canada at the
56:06
moment. Yes. Yeah, So the pattern seems to be, and I
56:10
have got this from two other doctors that have had the same issues, is
56:15
that they issue this citation against you, they put you under investigation, they
56:21
spend a lot of money investigating you, and then they give you the bill.
56:24
So this happened to doctor Mark Trozzi in Ontario. He was an emergency
56:30
room doctor who in a COVID designated hospital, who realized that this was a
56:35
scandemic, that there actually wasn't any increase in the number of people dying until
56:39
the vaccine rollot happened, and literally gave up the practice of medicine in order
56:47
to try and reveal this corruption full time. So he recently had a trial,
56:52
well actually it was towards end of last year, where he lost his
56:55
case. His medical license is revoked and he was given the bill for ninety
57:02
five thousand dollars, which was the legal bill from the Ontario College of Physicians
57:07
and Surgeons for investigating him. And so this is what they do, you
57:15
know. I so people say, well, what's worst case scenario, Well,
57:16
worst case scenario is that they will revoke my medical license so that I
57:22
can't earn any money to pay my bills, and that they will give me
57:28
what will I don't know, it's going to be the probably into the hundreds
57:32
of thousand dollars. They have spent a lot of money investigating me, trying
57:36
to find fault, and so they I could end up with a crushing bill
57:42
from the medical establishment for my so called spreading misinformation. So that seems to
57:49
be what they do. And of course this is all designed to intimidate other
57:52
doctors. We now have a law in British Columbia called Bill thirty six where
57:59
if a doctor speaks misinformation you can get a two hundred thousand dollars fine and
58:04
six months in jail. So I mean it's hard to believe that this is
58:07
reality, but this is where this is where we've got to in British Columbia.
58:12
So of course misinformation is anything that the government doesn't agree with is misinformation.
58:19
So it's very arbitrary and doesn't have to be based on truth. But
58:24
that doesn't just wipe out freedom of speech. That wipes out informed consent,
58:29
you know, because as you know, DeBie, as a nurse, before
58:34
any medical procedure, you're supposed to tell them the pros and cons and give
58:37
the person the choice of whether or not they want that medical procedure. And
58:40
you have to be able to tell them your concerns with or why it may
58:45
not be safe or why it may be safe. And if you're not allowed
58:49
to speak freely in case the government doesn't agree, you can't give informed consent
58:55
anymore. So that's that is hard far down this hellhole Canada has sunk,
59:02
sadly. So yeah, I mean, technically I'm in line for all of
59:09
that, and that's why that's what this is what they're using to intimidate doctors
59:17
into just towing the party line. Charles. Informed consent doesn't exists. Let's
59:22
be real about this. It doesn't exist. They can't inform you of anything
59:28
because they're not being told. I received a letter from the president of the
59:31
Royal College of General Practitioners in the UK, and I'd asked him why doctors
59:37
weren't informing patients of the of the injection and the ingredients of the injection,
59:44
and he wrote me back a letter to say that doctors couldn't inform patients because
59:47
they weren't told the ingredients of the injection. And he put that in writing,
59:51
and we've showed it on the column many times. But you know,
59:54
sometimes as a nurse, I have to look after the doctor. And many
1:00:00
nurses that are watching that trained in the same time as I did, will
1:00:06
know that nurses end up looking after the doctors. We were the ones that
1:00:08
made you slices of toast at three o'clock in the morning on the wood.
1:00:13
And I'm just going to look after you now a little bit because I asked
1:00:19
you a big question a minute ago. But of course you're thinking about other
1:00:22
people, you're thinking about your patients, you're thinking about the public before you're
1:00:29
thinking about yourself. So I'm going to ask you again, tell us where
1:00:34
to send donations, Where are your pages. What are the links that people
1:00:39
can go to to help you helping us? Yeah, thank you. So
1:00:45
I do not have a website or or a Facebook page or any One of
1:00:52
the accusations of the college against me is that I have spread misinformation on social
1:00:57
media. So, I mean, it's interesting that I have never in my
1:00:59
life I've ever put anything on social media. I've never I'm not on LinkedIn,
1:01:04
I'm not on anything, and I've kept it that way just to show
1:01:07
how absurd the accusations of the college are. Because you know, there's not
1:01:12
not a lot of people that have never put anything on social media, but
1:01:15
I'm one of them. So I do have a donation's website at give Send
1:01:24
Go, and and so I mean, I was banned from PayPal, according
1:01:30
to them, for violating community stands. At one point, somebody tried to
1:01:32
set up a PayPal fund to raise some money for me after the fire to
1:01:37
try and buy some medical equipment, and I was it was shut down by
1:01:42
PayPal in twenty four hours because they said I had violated community standards. And
1:01:46
so, so anyway, this is is what happens. I suppose it comes
1:01:52
from every side. So there is a is a link at give, send
1:01:58
go, and so this is purely None of this money comes to me.
1:02:01
It all goes to the lawyers to pay for all of their legal expenses,
1:02:06
which seem to be mounting because they are absolutely determined to not let me be
1:02:13
vindicated, and so unfortunately the costs are rising. They are literally giving this
1:02:21
all they've got, and of course the judicial notice is the ultimate to prevent
1:02:28
the truth from coming out. I would urge everybody if you can, if
1:02:34
you possibly can, especially those of you in Canada, please please support Dr
1:02:38
Hoff. And there's a million questions if you could see me now, I've
1:02:43
got a million pieces of notepaper around me with so many questions. But I
1:02:49
have a really important question for you, and this comes from us here in
1:02:53
the UK, from UK column, And what we want to ask you is
1:03:00
how are you? How are you doctor Hoff? Are you getting any support
1:03:06
and what support are you getting? Yes, I'm getting wonderful support from interestingly
1:03:15
enough more and more from my patients. But often people would say, so
1:03:19
what do your patients think about this? So, as I mentioned, my
1:03:22
patients are very mostly, very humble, largely uneducated people who just watch their
1:03:28
television set. And that's where they get their information from. And so even
1:03:32
though I've been their family doctor for thirty years and they have trusted me implicitly,
1:03:39
they know that I am a spreader of misinformation and I'm in trouble with
1:03:44
the authorities, and they don't quite know how to put this together. Obviously,
1:03:49
I must have done something wrong, otherwise I wouldn't have been it wouldn't
1:03:52
be in trouble. But so it's created a bit of a dilemma for many
1:03:55
of them because they don't listen to the UK column or read things from the
1:04:00
alternative media. They they're just told that I'm I'm in trouble. But I
1:04:06
do get wonderful support from people who love truth and freedom all across well,
1:04:15
part of some prom across the world, but mostly in my in British Columbia,
1:04:19
who have been very generous. You know. Sometimes you know, they
1:04:24
know I live in a burnt out town where you can't buy anything. I
1:04:27
mean, you can buy petrol, but that's and and you can buy junk
1:04:30
food at the petrol station, but that's about it. There's no supermarket.
1:04:34
So I sometimes I have people that in literially come and just fill my fridge
1:04:38
with food because they know that I've got a long drive to get to a
1:04:43
grocery store. But no, I am well. I I my faith is
1:04:49
in God. I haven't done what I've done for myself. I've done it
1:04:55
for my fellow man, and I have no regrets. I literally I sleep
1:05:01
well at night because because this is God's battle. There's a war against humanity
1:05:10
and people need to realize that. You know, in Canada we have these
1:05:14
terrible euthanasia laws. They've now killed. Up until the end of last year,
1:05:17
sixty thousand Canadians who are either elderly or disabled have been killed by their
1:05:25
doctors through euthanasia. Doctors an't supposed to do this. You know, Canada
1:05:29
still kills one hundred thousand babies a year through abortion. There's a war against
1:05:34
humanity, and of course these this plandemic was just a whole new dimension on
1:05:41
that, a war against humanity, and tragically, the medical profession is right
1:05:48
at the heart of it. It is tragic. I mean, the profession
1:05:54
that is supposed to be about keeping people well and preserving life and health seems
1:06:00
to have been turned on its head. And so it's I just keep hoping
1:06:06
that more doctors will will stand up against what is happening. It just troubles
1:06:17
me. You know, the medical profession used to be one of the most
1:06:21
trusted professions, and now I endlessly have people coming to me saying, please,
1:06:29
will you be my doctor because I don't trust my doctor anymore. He
1:06:32
told me those shots were safe and effective when there was no evidence that they
1:06:36
were, and now I've got all these problems or whatever it is, there's
1:06:44
a crisis. This has been a moral integrity test for everyone, for the
1:06:47
legal profession, for our elected officials, for the government, for the medical
1:06:53
profession. It's been a moral integrity test, and most people have failed dismally
1:06:58
because they literally looked after themselves. They did not consider others more important than
1:07:03
themselves. They just did what was good for them. And that's not the
1:07:09
way ef things should be. We need to be considering others more important than
1:07:14
ourselves, and that's where our sense of social responsibility comes from. But it's
1:07:20
an old fashioned Christian ethic. You know. We live in a postmodernist world
1:07:27
where where you know truth is relative and and you do what works for you,
1:07:32
and it's all based on pragmatism, which never works because there are ethics
1:07:41
that are far greater than us that we need to be upholding Charles, your
1:07:46
passion, your tender loving care, TLC, determination, honesty, Christianity shines.
1:08:00
I just see this beautiful warm light. So Charles, before I throw
1:08:05
to you for the last word, what I really would like to do is
1:08:10
just to ask you if there's anything that we've missed out, because of course
1:08:14
your court appearance was going to be the fourth of March, and I believe
1:08:17
that that's been a journey. So perhaps you could just give us a little
1:08:20
summary on that. Yes, So the next deadline in terms of court proceedings
1:08:26
will be April the nineteenth, which was when. So this sort of jury,
1:08:30
which is called the disciplinary panel, which has been appointed by the College
1:08:35
to discipline me, they will sit on the nineteenth of April to decide whether
1:08:42
they're going to grant judicial notice or not. And so in other words,
1:08:46
they will decide whether or not I'm allowed to defend myself and if I'm not.
1:08:50
If I can't defend myself, well then I suppose there's no trial.
1:08:54
I'm just guilty and I'll get all the fines. The next deadline is nineteenth
1:09:01
to April, and I'm speechless because you've been through everything. You've literally lost
1:09:09
everything. I can't begin to know how you must possibly feel. And that's
1:09:15
why I'm so keen for people. Please share this video, please pass the
1:09:19
information around. We all need doctors like Dr Charles Hoff. We all need
1:09:27
our handsheld. We all need a door to knock on when we haven't got
1:09:30
anywhere else to go. And I want to thank you so much, not
1:09:34
just for appearing on UK column and not just telling us your story, but
1:09:40
for all you are doing for humanity, because you really are fighting the fight.
1:09:45
You really have sacrificed everything. Thank you so much. And on that
1:09:49
note, Dr Charles Hoff in Canada, your last words, I think my
1:09:57
last words are very simple. And this and and it's and it's it's simply
1:10:04
to consider others more important than yourself. This is the very basic Christian ethic
1:10:13
from the Bible of of the ultimate humility in serving others and in doing your
1:10:20
so your beauty is to consider others more important than yourself. And I think
1:10:27
there is no higher ethic than that.