Latest / Honey Badger Radio / Fail Week: JP Morgan PR Problems, Spirit Airlines is Broke, Door Dash Girl | HBR News 551

Transcript

Fail Week: JP Morgan PR Problems, Spirit Airlines is Broke, Door Dash Girl | HBR News 551 · Honey Badger Radio

• 0:04
  Speaker 1: This is HBr News number five fifty one. Fail Week,
• 0:09
  Speaker 1: JP Morgan pr problems, Spirit Airlines is broke, DoorDash Girl
• 0:13
  Speaker 1: follow Up where we discuss the news of the week
• 0:15
  Speaker 1: and give it the Badger treatment. Hello everybody, and welcome
• 0:22
  Speaker 1: back to Honey Badger Radio. I hope you guys are
• 0:24
  Speaker 1: doing well this week and that you are laughing at
• 0:26
  Speaker 1: all of the absurdities so that you are not consumed
• 0:28
  Speaker 1: by I'm your host, Brian and I'm joined by, as always,
• 0:32
  Speaker 1: my lovely co host Hannah Wallin and doctor Randamercam Yellow Yellow.
• 0:40
  Speaker 1: All right, So on today's HBr News, we're gonna be
• 0:42
  Speaker 1: talking about these, let's say, great allegations that are creating
• 0:49
  Speaker 1: some controversy over at JP Morgan. Spirit Airlines is going
• 0:53
  Speaker 1: to be closing its doors, door dash Driver that you
• 0:57
  Speaker 1: guys remember us talking about this before she's been officially indicted,
• 1:01
  Speaker 1: and more so, stick around. It's gonna be a good time.
• 1:05
  Speaker 1: And we should have joined us afterwards for the Patron
• 1:07
  Speaker 1: Only show. So, like, we just finished up that whole
• 1:11
  Speaker 1: Lauren Southern thing. It was long, it was arduous and painful,
• 1:14
  Speaker 1: so I thought we'd go with something a little bit
• 1:16
  Speaker 1: lighter and I had signed up a while ago to
• 1:21
  Speaker 1: a new feminist website all about video games called Mothership
• 1:27
  Speaker 1: dot Blog, and they have a lot of opinions, and
• 1:31
  Speaker 1: I thought we would like kind of go through. It's
• 1:33
  Speaker 1: basically like where where the activist journalists go. It's like
• 1:40
  Speaker 1: their little Heidi hole, their retreat. But little do they
• 1:43
  Speaker 1: know that I have cleverly disguised myself as myself, and
• 1:46
  Speaker 1: I have subscribed to them without giving them any money,
• 1:50
  Speaker 1: so I'm basically a free freeloader on the website looking
• 1:54
  Speaker 1: at their commentary and their thoughts. So I thought we
• 1:57
  Speaker 1: would like just sort of relax and look at filtra. Yeah,
• 2:01
  Speaker 1: we're infiltrating the webs. I'm infiltrating the website cleverly disguised
• 2:06
  Speaker 1: as myself. The last thing they'll expect is someone who
• 2:11
  Speaker 1: looks like them or not like them, but who I
• 2:14
  Speaker 1: am looking like me in their space. But if they
• 2:17
  Speaker 1: knew I was me, they probably wouldn't want me there,
• 2:19
  Speaker 1: but they'd be nice about it.
• 2:21
  Speaker 2: Anyway.
• 2:21
  Speaker 1: We're gonna scour the website and look for fun cringe
• 2:26
  Speaker 1: over at mothership dot Blog, where they have really hot
• 2:29
  Speaker 1: takes on video games, like in a post slop World,
• 2:34
  Speaker 1: Toma Dacci's Life's Humor Brings, hollow Rings, hollow the three
• 2:39
  Speaker 1: D Printed Girl am I using polyamory as a crutch
• 2:43
  Speaker 1: because my partner doesn't play games. So yeah, that should
• 2:47
  Speaker 1: be something. So if you guys want to join us
• 2:49
  Speaker 1: for that, then please consider becoming a Badger yourself by
• 2:52
  Speaker 1: going to Feed the Badger dot com, forge slast subscribe
• 2:55
  Speaker 1: to become a member. If you want us want to
• 2:56
  Speaker 1: look at the what the community is like, you can
• 2:59
  Speaker 1: join for free by just going to Badger Nation dot
• 3:02
  Speaker 1: online and giving it like a look around. See if
• 3:05
  Speaker 1: you like the company that we keep here and if
• 3:09
  Speaker 1: you don't want to wake up one morning to find
• 3:10
  Speaker 1: it we have been yeaeded from the internet, then please
• 3:13
  Speaker 1: go to badger feed dot com or Honeybadger Radio dot
• 3:17
  Speaker 1: com to find where all of our content lives. With
• 3:20
  Speaker 1: that all out of the way, let us get into
• 3:23
  Speaker 1: today's stories, all right. So this is an interesting twist
• 3:27
  Speaker 1: on a theme like we normally deal with, you know,
• 3:32
  Speaker 1: females making crazy allegations that seem really let's say, dubious,
• 3:38
  Speaker 1: and yeah, we seem to have a potentially a role
• 3:41
  Speaker 1: reversal here. So recently a lawsuit out of New York
• 3:44
  Speaker 1: has gone viral on the internet. The lawsuit, submitted under
• 3:48
  Speaker 1: the name John Doe, alleges that JP morgan Chase EXECUTIVEA
• 3:53
  Speaker 1: Lorna Hodge Deeny, the woman on the right, forced a
• 3:57
  Speaker 1: former junior banker into degrading sexual acts, drugged him, and
• 4:01
  Speaker 1: even threatened to sabotage his career should he not obey her.
• 4:06
  Speaker 1: The suit alleges that this behavior began spring of twenty
• 4:09
  Speaker 1: twenty four and lasted for several months. John Doe left
• 4:13
  Speaker 1: JP morgan Chase in late twenty twenty four, but then
• 4:16
  Speaker 1: submitted a harassment complaint with the banking company in May
• 4:20
  Speaker 1: of twenty twenty five in hopes of gaining a multimillion
• 4:23
  Speaker 1: dollar severance package, which he was ultimately denied. The John
• 4:28
  Speaker 1: Doe on the left, later identified as Chirayu Urana, goes
• 4:34
  Speaker 1: into graphic detail about his supposed interactions with Hajini, specifically
• 4:39
  Speaker 1: the degrading, vulgar, and often racist from marks she allegedly
• 4:43
  Speaker 1: said to him, including but not limited to, quote, I
• 4:47
  Speaker 1: bet your little Asian fish head wife doesn't have these
• 4:50
  Speaker 1: cannons end quote, allegedly said whilst fondling her own breasts
• 4:54
  Speaker 1: in front of him. Do women actually call their own
• 4:56
  Speaker 1: breast cannons? Okay, let's move on. Quote birth day BJ
• 5:00
  Speaker 1: for the brown boy, my little brown boy. End quote,
• 5:03
  Speaker 1: allegedly said as she prepropositioned him twice in the same
• 5:08
  Speaker 1: day for oral sex on his birthday, and then lastly
• 5:13
  Speaker 1: Orziz as examples we have quote do you want a
• 5:15
  Speaker 1: future at JP Morgan If you don't fuck me soon,
• 5:17
  Speaker 1: I'm going to ruin you. Never forget I fucking own you.
• 5:21
  Speaker 1: End quote, allegedly said after she declined her invitation for drakes.
• 5:26
  Speaker 1: Other allegations include her spiking his drinks with roy final
• 5:31
  Speaker 1: or reupneal ro hipnol sorry Roe Hipnol, that one I know,
• 5:35
  Speaker 1: and viagra, and that she used her position to threaten
• 5:39
  Speaker 1: denial of a pay bonus if he did not comply
• 5:42
  Speaker 1: with her sexual demands. As the suit exploded onto the Internet,
• 5:46
  Speaker 1: more eyes fell upon the case, and with them came
• 5:49
  Speaker 1: at its scrutiny to Rona's story. From the start, many
• 5:52
  Speaker 1: believed his claims sounded more like erotic fiction or sexual
• 5:55
  Speaker 1: fantasy rather than reality. Others noted that no corroborating witness
• 6:00
  Speaker 1: or proof was listed under other than Rana's own word.
• 6:03
  Speaker 1: Rana quickly pulled down the lawsuit, claiming that he needed
• 6:06
  Speaker 1: to amend it, but his story was already slowly unraveling.
• 6:10
  Speaker 1: As it turns out, Rana had previously made nearly identical
• 6:14
  Speaker 1: allegations against the male boss while working at Morgan Stanley,
• 6:18
  Speaker 1: which was where he worked before JP Morgan. While using
• 6:22
  Speaker 1: the chatbot of website ask a Lawyer on Call dot Com,
• 6:26
  Speaker 1: Rana alleges the following in the chat quote. I was raped,
• 6:30
  Speaker 1: sexually assaulted, harassed, and forced to do drugs by my
• 6:33
  Speaker 1: former boss at Morgan Stanley. I was then retaliated against
• 6:38
  Speaker 1: for seeking to move groups internally at the firm. HR
• 6:41
  Speaker 1: conducted an investigation, but they ultimately made me sign a
• 6:45
  Speaker 1: separation agreement. It's a lot of misspellings in this too,
• 6:47
  Speaker 1: by the way, I'm just reading it the way it
• 6:49
  Speaker 1: should be read. I signed it because I was scared
• 6:53
  Speaker 1: and felt I had no choice. He said he would
• 6:56
  Speaker 1: ruin my career if I didn't comply.
• 6:58
  Speaker 3: End quote.
• 7:00
  Speaker 1: Other discrepancies and facts that call into question Rana's character
• 7:03
  Speaker 1: have also been found since then. It appears that while
• 7:07
  Speaker 1: working at JP Morgan, Rana used his bereavement time to
• 7:10
  Speaker 1: collect paid leave due to the death of his father,
• 7:14
  Speaker 1: a man who, as it turns out, is still alive
• 7:16
  Speaker 1: so didn't die and well today. Also, despite Hagenie being
• 7:21
  Speaker 1: a senior banker and working in the same team as Rana,
• 7:25
  Speaker 1: she did not manage him or work over him. But
• 7:29
  Speaker 1: as of less than twenty four hours ago, Rana has
• 7:32
  Speaker 1: refiled the amended lawsuit and has included new spicier claims.
• 7:36
  Speaker 1: According to the amended suit, this is from less than
• 7:39
  Speaker 1: a day ago. An anonymous witness who seems to be
• 7:43
  Speaker 1: a family friend of Rana's, claimed that he was woken
• 7:46
  Speaker 1: up in the middle of the night by Haginie, who
• 7:48
  Speaker 1: begged him to join her and Rana in a threesome.
• 7:53
  Speaker 1: He attempted to go back to sleep, but a completely
• 7:56
  Speaker 1: naked Hagenie woke him up. Aginie sat on the couch
• 7:59
  Speaker 1: as he was sleeping on, lit a cigarette and began
• 8:03
  Speaker 1: begging that he joined them in the bedroom. The document
• 8:05
  Speaker 1: claims despite refusing several times, the mystery witness claims Haginie
• 8:10
  Speaker 1: told him you know I own redacted, so you better
• 8:14
  Speaker 1: come join. After she returned to the bedroom, he claims
• 8:17
  Speaker 1: that he could hear Rana pleading no, no, no, you
• 8:21
  Speaker 1: have to leave. I'm not going to do this, please stop.
• 8:25
  Speaker 1: End quote. JP Morgan has completed their own investigation and
• 8:29
  Speaker 1: calls these allegations meritless. A genie and her legal team
• 8:32
  Speaker 1: have also denied all of Rana's claims, stating that she
• 8:36
  Speaker 1: never engaged in any appropriate acts with him and was
• 8:39
  Speaker 1: never even in many of the places the suit alleged
• 8:41
  Speaker 1: her to be. So far, no criminal charges have been filed.
• 8:46
  Speaker 3: See, everyone keeps telling this story in the wrong order.
• 8:51
  Speaker 3: It's a lot funnier if you start with the background check.
• 8:56
  Speaker 3: This guy is a scammer allegedly. He's he's a thief allegedly.
• 9:02
  Speaker 3: It's a cod art allegedly, and not even a good one.
• 9:05
  Speaker 3: He's like the pickpocket of the scam artist community. He's
• 9:09
  Speaker 3: just asking the Internet how do I scam people? And
• 9:13
  Speaker 3: then he does it to the richest person he knows,
• 9:16
  Speaker 3: thinking he'll get away with it. He's got a history
• 9:19
  Speaker 3: of it. It's obvious. Maybe it's in the blood. I
• 9:23
  Speaker 3: don't know. I don't know what it caused, any harmful stereotypes,
• 9:27
  Speaker 3: But yeah, there are entire industries in India based on
• 9:32
  Speaker 3: you know, scamming people. It's pretty easy to believe that
• 9:37
  Speaker 3: one vagabond, like at the peak of the Dunning Kruger effect,
• 9:42
  Speaker 3: would would make up a story like this, And once
• 9:45
  Speaker 3: you understand that, it becomes hilarious when you hear the
• 9:52
  Speaker 3: details of the story. He pretty obviously made up. Once
• 9:55
  Speaker 3: you understand that, I bet your little Asian fish head
• 10:00
  Speaker 3: wife doesn't have these cannons, came from his own imagination.
• 10:05
  Speaker 3: I mean that that is, that's stone cold hilarious. But
• 10:11
  Speaker 3: when people tell this story, they start with the allegations like,
• 10:15
  Speaker 3: he's this guy, just a guy. You know nothing about
• 10:19
  Speaker 3: this guy, only that he has made these allegations against
• 10:23
  Speaker 3: a woman, a reportedly conventionally attractive woman. Most people will
• 10:30
  Speaker 3: instinctively go, well, obviously not true. And even if it
• 10:34
  Speaker 3: is true, what's the problem. He obviously enjoyed it, and
• 10:37
  Speaker 3: so on, and they'll laugh their asses off. But some
• 10:42
  Speaker 3: of us, me included, when told this story in that order,
• 10:48
  Speaker 3: I thinking, well, if this is true, if there really
• 10:54
  Speaker 3: are like women out there drugging and blackmailing and ritually
• 10:58
  Speaker 3: humiliating men, I think it might not be a laughing matter.
• 11:04
  Speaker 3: I think laughing might be a rather psychotic reaction actually
• 11:09
  Speaker 3: if such things were true. And then I reflect once
• 11:15
  Speaker 3: again on how many people in the world are indeed
• 11:20
  Speaker 3: like exactly that psychotic when it comes to the rduous
• 11:24
  Speaker 3: task of empathizing with men or conceptualizing the notion that
• 11:31
  Speaker 3: a man could have any reaction to a woman's sexuality
• 11:35
  Speaker 3: other than giddy worship. It is still out there, folks, everywhere. Fortunately,
• 11:46
  Speaker 3: I was able to contain my perturbation until hearing the
• 11:50
  Speaker 3: rest of the story, and I was, Oh, he's a
• 11:52
  Speaker 3: scam artist, all right. He's not just a He's not
• 11:57
  Speaker 3: just a man with a story about a woman. He's
• 12:01
  Speaker 3: he's like, he's an habitual trickster. He's like someone who
• 12:05
  Speaker 3: throws themselves against cars and hopes those cars don't have
• 12:09
  Speaker 3: a dash cams. But this is the equivalent of that
• 12:16
  Speaker 3: guy who robbed a bank with lemon juice smeared all
• 12:21
  Speaker 3: over his face because he thought it would obscure his identity.
• 12:25
  Speaker 3: You know that there's as a famous case I think
• 12:27
  Speaker 3: which I think that case is actually is the origin
• 12:30
  Speaker 3: story of the dunning Cruder Kruger effects. And yeah, this guy,
• 12:38
  Speaker 3: this guy learned about how you can scam a small
• 12:42
  Speaker 3: fortune from a company that you work with, if you
• 12:46
  Speaker 3: accuse one of your superiors of sexual abuse but he
• 12:49
  Speaker 3: didn't read the small print. Women can scam a fortune
• 12:57
  Speaker 3: by accusing men. Men are the vulnerable targets and women
• 13:03
  Speaker 3: are the effective weapons against those targets. It does not
• 13:08
  Speaker 3: work the other way around, you, paw, sweet summer child.
• 13:14
  Speaker 3: If this woman told that story about you in that order,
• 13:23
  Speaker 3: no one would be laughing with or without the context.
• 13:30
  Speaker 3: Because we live in a society, a society in which
• 13:36
  Speaker 3: women's sexuality is worshiped and men's sexuality is demonized. And
• 13:43
  Speaker 3: it's not even because of feminism. This shit is thousands
• 13:47
  Speaker 3: of years old. We don't have time to get into it,
• 13:52
  Speaker 3: and right the point is, women will not let you
• 13:55
  Speaker 3: operate on their turf. Mister Singh, when it comes to
• 14:01
  Speaker 3: this scam, you have no idea what you're dealing with,
• 14:05
  Speaker 3: My friend, You think a bunch of jeets in Calcutta
• 14:08
  Speaker 3: yelling do not redeem have got a big thing going on, mate.
• 14:12
  Speaker 3: Women falsely accusing men is a multi billion dollar business
• 14:18
  Speaker 3: and it spans the fucking globe. Hashtag me too a shit,
• 14:24
  Speaker 3: Me too was just the flavor of the month. It
• 14:28
  Speaker 3: was a limited edition, like perfume they brought out to
• 14:31
  Speaker 3: mark the occasion of another thousand fucking years of women
• 14:35
  Speaker 3: doing this shit, And only now, only just now, now
• 14:40
  Speaker 3: that a man has tried to do it to a woman,
• 14:46
  Speaker 3: does anyone brick up their ears and think? Hang on?
• 14:49
  Speaker 3: Do people lie? Do people lie and ruin other people's
• 14:53
  Speaker 3: lives to line their own pockets? Well, I am simply
• 14:57
  Speaker 3: flabber gasset range phenomenon to have poked out of the
• 15:03
  Speaker 3: soil just this very minute. What a quaint curiosity nature
• 15:10
  Speaker 3: has suddenly sneezed onto us without precedent? Wasn't this an
• 15:15
  Speaker 3: amusing tale? Ho home, Let's get on with our Lives's
• 15:19
  Speaker 3: nothing but is it here? Move on? The moral of
• 15:26
  Speaker 3: the story is, no matter how much you hate jeets,
• 15:30
  Speaker 3: you don't hate women enough. The gurus has spoken.
• 15:39
  Speaker 1: All right, Hannah, there you go.
• 15:44
  Speaker 2: Yeah, everything Mike said. And also, if women are going
• 15:51
  Speaker 2: to start getting getting falsely accused too, can we finally
• 15:57
  Speaker 2: put to bed the practice of saying, well, the real
• 16:02
  Speaker 2: victims of false accusations are the legitimate victims who don't
• 16:09
  Speaker 2: get believed automatically anymore. No, it's it's obviously, you know
• 16:17
  Speaker 2: from all of the instances that we've talked about of
• 16:20
  Speaker 2: people being wrongly jailed, men being wrongly jailed, because again,
• 16:26
  Speaker 2: like Mike said, it's not effective against women. It's obviously
• 16:32
  Speaker 2: the falsely accused individual who is the victim of the
• 16:36
  Speaker 2: false the primary victim of the false accusation, and actual
• 16:41
  Speaker 2: victims of the crime being alleged aren't affected at all
• 16:49
  Speaker 2: by false accusations against some rando. It doesn't work that way.
• 16:54
  Speaker 2: You don't.
• 16:55
  Speaker 4: You don't lose victim.
• 16:56
  Speaker 2: Points or your you know, your your accuser or your
• 17:04
  Speaker 2: perpetrator doesn't become unconvicted if if he was convicted or
• 17:08
  Speaker 2: she was convicted, more likely she got away with it, right,
• 17:16
  Speaker 2: Your your perpetrator doesn't suddenly gain new victims because some
• 17:22
  Speaker 2: rando falsely accused another rando. Nope, the primary victim of
• 17:29
  Speaker 2: the false accusation is the accused. And in this case, uh,
• 17:35
  Speaker 2: the primary victim was quite fortunate that being female, she
• 17:42
  Speaker 2: was unlikely to be suspect. Like she she may have
• 17:46
  Speaker 2: had to go through some things, and and there are
• 17:49
  Speaker 2: things that nobody should have to go through. Even being
• 17:52
  Speaker 2: falsely accused of a misdemeanor crime is actually pretty traumatic.
• 17:57
  Speaker 2: I can't imagine what it must be like when it's
• 17:59
  Speaker 2: a felony crime and it's uh, you know, even if
• 18:02
  Speaker 2: even if it's pretty obvious that you're not going to
• 18:07
  Speaker 2: be treated as a as a suspect, it's still got
• 18:11
  Speaker 2: to be humiliating, especially if you're in a situation where
• 18:17
  Speaker 2: you've made a practice of being a respectable person and
• 18:25
  Speaker 2: men go through that every day. I'm sure that feminists
• 18:30
  Speaker 2: will latch onto this one case. See men do it too,
• 18:34
  Speaker 2: men plural, because this is not just one guy, right,
• 18:37
  Speaker 2: he's every man. And it happens to women plural as well,
• 18:43
  Speaker 2: because she's not just this one woman, sees every woman.
• 18:47
  Speaker 2: Anytime feminists have an example, that's what they turn it into.
• 18:54
  Speaker 2: But in reality, this one case, it's probably the only
• 18:59
  Speaker 2: one that they'll be able to find. Whereas all we
• 19:03
  Speaker 2: have to do is point to the Innocence Project's website,
• 19:08
  Speaker 2: because the overwhelming majority of cases on their website are
• 19:13
  Speaker 2: men who were falsely accused of some sort of sexual offense,
• 19:19
  Speaker 2: most of them by women, and that happens every day.
• 19:27
  Speaker 2: People aren't laughing at the women that accused them. People
• 19:31
  Speaker 2: aren't treating it like, you know, hey, this is just
• 19:38
  Speaker 2: a scammer.
• 19:38
  Speaker 4: We don't have to take her seriously.
• 19:40
  Speaker 2: Instead, the guy gets arrested, he gets questioned, he gets
• 19:50
  Speaker 2: taken into custody, gets incarcerated for a period of time,
• 19:59
  Speaker 2: goes to try. If he's lucky and there's plenty of
• 20:04
  Speaker 2: evidence that the case can be decided on, then that's.
• 20:11
  Speaker 4: As far as it goes.
• 20:12
  Speaker 2: He can be found not guilty most of the time,
• 20:17
  Speaker 2: and he's just got that one ordeal to remember and
• 20:21
  Speaker 2: deal with. But sometimes even when the evidence proves him
• 20:27
  Speaker 2: not culpable, not guilty, that he couldn't have committed the crime,
• 20:33
  Speaker 2: sometimes the court ignores it. Sometimes the court excludes exculpatory evidence.
• 20:41
  Speaker 2: Sometimes the evidence doesn't show up until after he's been
• 20:47
  Speaker 2: found guilty and incarcerated. With violent criminals, sometimes it takes
• 20:53
  Speaker 2: years for the evidence to be properly evaluated. There are
• 20:56
  Speaker 2: men that spent years in jail between their conviction and
• 21:02
  Speaker 2: when DNA became usable as evidence and cleared them. But
• 21:14
  Speaker 2: you know, it's not that I don't have sympathy for
• 21:17
  Speaker 2: this woman. It's that I hope that women who get
• 21:22
  Speaker 2: outraged about this case will maybe have some sympathy for men,
• 21:28
  Speaker 2: because you know, this woman got maybe called a label
• 21:33
  Speaker 2: ridiculous story was told about her. She probably did have
• 21:40
  Speaker 2: to pay for an attorney. She probably did have to
• 21:45
  Speaker 2: go in and talk to her superiors about this, and
• 21:48
  Speaker 2: it was probably an embarrassment for her, and she was
• 21:51
  Speaker 2: probably very upset about that. But she didn't go to jail.
• 21:56
  Speaker 2: The police probably never interrogated her. She probably won't have
• 22:01
  Speaker 2: to go to court, and unless you know, she sues him,
• 22:05
  Speaker 2: and then she will. But most of the things that
• 22:11
  Speaker 2: a falsely accused man goes through, like she's not gonna
• 22:14
  Speaker 2: lose her job, she's not gonna lose her friends, her
• 22:17
  Speaker 2: family's not gonna have doubts about her. She's not gonna
• 22:21
  Speaker 2: have difficulty going anywhere in her community. Nobody's going to
• 22:24
  Speaker 2: look and say, oh, look it's that rapist. I'm not
• 22:26
  Speaker 2: gonna do business in this place. If you do business
• 22:30
  Speaker 2: with that rapist. None of that's going to happen to her.
• 22:34
  Speaker 2: It happens to men. And so she is the primary
• 22:39
  Speaker 2: victim of this situation. And like I said, I hope
• 22:46
  Speaker 2: it gives women the ability to have compassion for the
• 22:50
  Speaker 2: men who go through this and are victimized on a
• 22:54
  Speaker 2: whole other level that they couldn't possibly comprehend.
• 23:01
  Speaker 1: All right, So yeah, I mean in closing, first of all,
• 23:07
  Speaker 1: interesting how skeptical people were immediately when it's a man
• 23:10
  Speaker 1: making an allegation. That's setting aside maybe like you know,
• 23:14
  Speaker 1: whether they're like not, whether they are or not are
• 23:16
  Speaker 1: not look smaxed, which is irrelevant because if it was
• 23:19
  Speaker 1: a woman, it wouldn't matter what she looked like. There'd
• 23:22
  Speaker 1: be like full investigations, twenty four hour coverage, especially at
• 23:25
  Speaker 1: a high profile company like JP Morgan. I know you
• 23:28
  Speaker 1: guys already said this, but I'm just reiterating it in brief,
• 23:33
  Speaker 1: and I think that is the important takeaway. And the
• 23:35
  Speaker 1: other thing is is that what if, like, you know,
• 23:37
  Speaker 1: for example, the only reason why this guy thought this
• 23:41
  Speaker 1: might work was because he sees how many women did it,
• 23:43
  Speaker 1: how Me Too was able to essentially place women in
• 23:46
  Speaker 1: careers where they didn't belong, and he was like, oh,
• 23:48
  Speaker 1: I can do that. Of course it didn't work because
• 23:51
  Speaker 1: he didn't realize he was a man. But like, the
• 23:53
  Speaker 1: point is the attempt, you know, women's behavior during Me
• 23:57
  Speaker 1: Too could possibly have set a new standard of third
• 24:01
  Speaker 1: world behavior in general, so which is essentially to scam
• 24:06
  Speaker 1: and deceive and lie, and you know, use various legal
• 24:10
  Speaker 1: systems to get power, or get jobs or make a
• 24:13
  Speaker 1: quick buck or whatever. So there's also that. And then lastly,
• 24:18
  Speaker 1: you know, we were able to like see this and
• 24:20
  Speaker 1: squash it in record time, and the allegations against Trump,
• 24:24
  Speaker 1: for example, just one of many, still haven't gone away,
• 24:28
  Speaker 1: as ludicrous as they are. You know, there are still
• 24:30
  Speaker 1: lots of people who believe that Justice Kavanaugh, like you know,
• 24:35
  Speaker 1: sexually assaulted that woman whose name I don't even remember
• 24:39
  Speaker 1: because of how irrelevant she is now, and that believe
• 24:42
  Speaker 1: that Johnny Depp beat Amber heard like that. Just all
• 24:45
  Speaker 1: of those myths persist, and this one was squished right away.
• 24:50
  Speaker 1: Sometimes I wonder if it isn't because it was a
• 24:52
  Speaker 1: man making the allegation, regardless of whether or not it's true.
• 24:55
  Speaker 1: But yes, it's also true that this should in theory,
• 25:00
  Speaker 1: basically make it to where people start thinking about due
• 25:03
  Speaker 1: process and taking it seriously for the accused, whether or
• 25:08
  Speaker 1: not it's a man or a woman that's engaged in it.
• 25:11
  Speaker 1: I'm not gonna hold my breath, but that's sort of
• 25:14
  Speaker 1: like what it should be. And I think we may
• 25:16
  Speaker 1: have even said at one point, early early on, years
• 25:19
  Speaker 1: and years ago that the Me Too movement might open
• 25:22
  Speaker 1: the door for all kinds of allegations, and it probably
• 25:25
  Speaker 1: won't be something that people will start to consider seriously
• 25:29
  Speaker 1: until it happens the other way, where a man makes
• 25:31
  Speaker 1: an allegation and a woman suffers. Now, in this case,
• 25:35
  Speaker 1: she didn't suffer, but the allegation has come out, So
• 25:38
  Speaker 1: maybe we'll see more of them in the future. I'm
• 25:41
  Speaker 1: guessing we might, and there might be some that appear
• 25:43
  Speaker 1: to be credible but they're not. And but I don't
• 25:46
  Speaker 1: think we're gonna be throwing out due process for or
• 25:49
  Speaker 1: women anytime soon. But anyway, let me know what you
• 25:53
  Speaker 1: guys think about this one in the comments, let me
• 25:54
  Speaker 1: read your I got some super chats and stuff, and
• 25:57
  Speaker 1: then we're gonna move on to the next one. Meredith
• 25:59
  Speaker 1: gave us five dollars and says HBr News. I'm going
• 26:03
  Speaker 1: to be consistent. If I hate false allegations against men,
• 26:06
  Speaker 1: I'm going to be no different if the allegation is
• 26:08
  Speaker 1: against a woman. This is why when filing a lawsuit,
• 26:11
  Speaker 1: a person should not be able to file as a
• 26:14
  Speaker 1: John or Jane Doe. Yes, I agree, people should put
• 26:17
  Speaker 1: their name on their allegation. Richard Bierre says for five dollars,
• 26:24
  Speaker 1: thank you, Richard. I wonder if this is also a
• 26:26
  Speaker 1: smokescreen to cover up how many account discrepancies due to
• 26:29
  Speaker 1: computer problems requiring the customer to reverify their account information.
• 26:35
  Speaker 1: No idea possibly. And then we got a super chat
• 26:38
  Speaker 1: from senior Stix for two dollars and he says, woman
• 26:41
  Speaker 1: not taken serious under the law is an issue. It's true,
• 26:45
  Speaker 1: like if they actually commit a crime. Okay, last word
• 26:49
  Speaker 1: on this. Fuck you, bloody, you bloody bastard. All right,
• 26:53
  Speaker 1: so let's move on to the next story.
• 26:57
  Speaker 3: All right.
• 26:57
  Speaker 1: Spirit Airlines has ceased all operations effective immediately on May second,
• 27:04
  Speaker 1: ending its thirty four year run. I didn't know it
• 27:06
  Speaker 1: was around for that long thirty four year run as
• 27:10
  Speaker 1: a major US ultra low cost carrier. The airline announced
• 27:14
  Speaker 1: an orderly wind down or wind down orderly wind down
• 27:18
  Speaker 1: early that Saturday morning, canceling every flight nationwide and shutting
• 27:23
  Speaker 1: down customer service. Passengers were told not to go to
• 27:26
  Speaker 1: the airport, with automatic refunds issued for tickets bought directly
• 27:30
  Speaker 1: with credit or debit cards, though those booked through third
• 27:34
  Speaker 1: parties faced more complications. In its official statement that the
• 27:38
  Speaker 1: company said, quote, it is with great disappointment that on
• 27:41
  Speaker 1: May second, twenty twenty six, Spirit Airlines started an orderly
• 27:45
  Speaker 1: wind down of our operations, effective immediately. All flights have
• 27:49
  Speaker 1: been canceled and customer service is no longer available. We
• 27:53
  Speaker 1: are proud of the impact of our ultralow cost model
• 27:56
  Speaker 1: on the industry over the last thirty four years and
• 27:59
  Speaker 1: had hope to serve our guests for many years to come.
• 28:02
  Speaker 1: End quote. The shutdown stemmed from years of financial distress,
• 28:08
  Speaker 1: including two bankruptcy filings in twenty twenty four and August
• 28:12
  Speaker 1: of twenty twenty five, which left the airline unable to
• 28:16
  Speaker 1: secure the liquidity needed to survive. A key trigger was
• 28:20
  Speaker 1: the sharp recent spike in the price of jet fuel,
• 28:23
  Speaker 1: exacerbated by global events, including tensions around Iran, combined with
• 28:27
  Speaker 1: ongoing industry pressures. Spirit had reached a restructuring agreement with
• 28:32
  Speaker 1: bondholders in March of this year that could have kept
• 28:36
  Speaker 1: it flying, but talks for a five hundred million dollar
• 28:39
  Speaker 1: government bailout from the Trump administration collapsed and no further
• 28:43
  Speaker 1: funding materialized, so he didn't bail them out. CEO Dave
• 28:46
  Speaker 1: Davis noted that quote the sudden and sustained rise in
• 28:50
  Speaker 1: fuel prices in recent weeks ultimately has left us with
• 28:53
  Speaker 1: no alternative but to pursue and orderly wind down end quote.
• 28:58
  Speaker 1: The move affected roughly seventeen employees and left thousands of
• 29:01
  Speaker 1: travelers scrambling for alternatives, with some other carriers offering limited
• 29:06
  Speaker 1: rescue fares.
• 29:08
  Speaker 3: As I sorry, as I understand it, they wanted to
• 29:14
  Speaker 3: merge with Jet Blue, right, they consented. Jet Blue consented,
• 29:22
  Speaker 3: but there was someone they forgot to ask, and it
• 29:26
  Speaker 3: was Elizabeth Warren. I'm only going on what I've skimmed
• 29:31
  Speaker 3: on Twitter, but Elizabeth Warren objected in some way along
• 29:35
  Speaker 3: the lines of if there are fewer companies, there would
• 29:40
  Speaker 3: be less competition and that that'll be bad for consuments
• 29:45
  Speaker 3: or whatever. And I mean, yes, the monopolies do make
• 29:50
  Speaker 3: for poor customer service across the board, Like a lot
• 29:56
  Speaker 3: of areas only have one viable internet service service provider
• 30:01
  Speaker 3: or one only one phone company, and they're like, yeah,
• 30:04
  Speaker 3: fuck you, you get what we give you and you'll
• 30:08
  Speaker 3: like it. What else are you gonna do? And then
• 30:10
  Speaker 3: they rub their nipples and whatnot. So it can be
• 30:15
  Speaker 3: a reasonable argument. It's just bizarre to hear it coming
• 30:19
  Speaker 3: from a representative of the government. Government is of course
• 30:26
  Speaker 3: just an euphemism for mob, but it's a mob that
• 30:31
  Speaker 3: has cornered the market and become centralized. A government is
• 30:36
  Speaker 3: necessarily centralized. It is the nucleus of an organism. That
• 30:42
  Speaker 3: means there is no competition within the organism. So if
• 30:49
  Speaker 3: you truly believe in preventing monopolies, your number one concern
• 30:56
  Speaker 3: ought to be that great, big fucking monopoly that's running
• 31:01
  Speaker 3: the country. You ought to be watching it to make
• 31:05
  Speaker 3: sure it doesn't expand to engulf your infrastructural industries. In Britain,
• 31:14
  Speaker 3: it has engulfed our health service. Right, Someone thought it
• 31:21
  Speaker 3: was a good idea to put the government in charge
• 31:24
  Speaker 3: of our health and our lives, and now we practically
• 31:32
  Speaker 3: have no other option. But don't worry. The NHS is
• 31:37
  Speaker 3: the greatest thing ever according to the broadcast media, that
• 31:42
  Speaker 3: is entirely regulated by the government. That's I mean. Imagine
• 31:50
  Speaker 3: if air travel was put entirely in charge of the government.
• 31:56
  Speaker 3: Wouldn't that be fun? Another two hundred people died in
• 32:00
  Speaker 3: a fireball in the sky because the pilot, a black
• 32:05
  Speaker 3: quadriplegic with cerebral palsy, accidentally nose dive to the plane
• 32:10
  Speaker 3: into a local Wendy's. Well, how do you hold the
• 32:16
  Speaker 3: one government airline accountable? It's the only thing going on.
• 32:22
  Speaker 3: I mean, you could soothe them, sure, and then your
• 32:27
  Speaker 3: money will trickle back into them. They'll just they'll just
• 32:31
  Speaker 3: tax you. They'll just invent new taxes. They don't give
• 32:34
  Speaker 3: a ship. They're a glorified mob. They'll just tax, just
• 32:38
  Speaker 3: steal from you and call it taxes forever. And and
• 32:45
  Speaker 3: they'll keep chugging along, killing people in fireballs in the sky.
• 32:51
  Speaker 3: And then no one will travel by plane anymore because
• 32:54
  Speaker 3: the risk of dying in a fireball in the sky
• 32:58
  Speaker 3: will be like above. So I don't know to what
• 33:04
  Speaker 3: degree Elizabeth Warren is actually responsible for this, or how
• 33:09
  Speaker 3: ironic it is that the destruction of Spare Airline has
• 33:15
  Speaker 3: been just as competition reducing as the merger would have been.
• 33:25
  Speaker 3: There's just one fewer company and many thousand fewer jobs.
• 33:34
  Speaker 3: To me, none of that is the point. I'm just
• 33:36
  Speaker 3: amazed that a government representative can stand up and tell
• 33:42
  Speaker 3: us that competition reduction is bad. Well, you are a
• 33:51
  Speaker 3: representative of a centralized, top down, systematic monopoly, so kindly
• 34:00
  Speaker 3: shut the fuck down and shut the fuck up. We're
• 34:04
  Speaker 3: busy talking about how the hell we could finally get
• 34:07
  Speaker 3: rid of you whoop to swear under arrest.
• 34:15
  Speaker 1: Yeah, just for the record to add like finally to this. Also, yes,
• 34:20
  Speaker 1: there are basically talks of Spirit being bought by another airline,
• 34:24
  Speaker 1: but in them, in tear them if you're concerned about
• 34:28
  Speaker 1: the people who were inconvenienced. And I get it, there
• 34:30
  Speaker 1: were a lot of people inconvenienced by this. Southwest Airlines,
• 34:35
  Speaker 1: Jet Blue, and Delta all announced reduced fares or affected
• 34:39
  Speaker 1: Spirit travelers, so they are like basically getting off. I mean,
• 34:43
  Speaker 1: I could see how these other airlines would jump at
• 34:46
  Speaker 1: the opportunity to get some more customers, even if it
• 34:49
  Speaker 1: like you know, puts them a little like under the
• 34:52
  Speaker 1: bar in terms of profits, because they could like secure
• 34:55
  Speaker 1: you know, if they do well, they can secure a
• 34:57
  Speaker 1: whole bunch of new customers that would have only gone
• 34:59
  Speaker 1: to Spirit. So there is that. But anyway, I will
• 35:03
  Speaker 1: as far as like where it's going to go from
• 35:04
  Speaker 1: here hard to say, and may just get swallowed up
• 35:07
  Speaker 1: by another air airline.
• 35:11
  Speaker 2: Yeah, it's likely that there will be some airlines that
• 35:17
  Speaker 2: will be remembered by people as that airline that rescued
• 35:20
  Speaker 2: me and gave me a low fare, and therefore they
• 35:22
  Speaker 2: will get loyal customers out of that.
• 35:25
  Speaker 4: It's good business. Elizabeth warren't.
• 35:28
  Speaker 2: On the other hand, I hope people vote her out
• 35:32
  Speaker 2: of office for this, because what she did. She didn't
• 35:36
  Speaker 2: just disapprove. She wrote letters, she made phone calls, she lobbied,
• 35:44
  Speaker 2: She did everything she could, aside from go down there
• 35:50
  Speaker 2: and pick it outside of wherever talks to decide whether
• 35:56
  Speaker 2: the merger would be approved or not by the Department
• 36:01
  Speaker 2: of Transportation and antitrust regulators, to keep this from happening,
• 36:09
  Speaker 2: to keep the merger from happening, and then it's still
• 36:12
  Speaker 2: possible Jet Blue could just buy it outright instead, So
• 36:18
  Speaker 2: she really didn't prevent one airline from getting a hold
• 36:23
  Speaker 2: of another airline and the two becoming one. What she
• 36:27
  Speaker 2: did was prevent Spirit Airlines from retaining its name if
• 36:33
  Speaker 2: that should happen, and she made it so that it
• 36:37
  Speaker 2: was less certain whether it would be Jet Blue or
• 36:40
  Speaker 2: some other airline. And then she bitched about the whole
• 36:46
  Speaker 2: thing and blamed Trump after all of her actions going
• 36:52
  Speaker 2: into this, because obviously it's not all of the many
• 36:57
  Speaker 2: things that she did to prevent the merger. It's it's
• 37:03
  Speaker 2: the magical Trump energy. It caused this problem somehow, some way.
• 37:13
  Speaker 2: We don't know exactly how, but apparently Focahontas does.
• 37:23
  Speaker 1: All right, let's see if you guys got any super
• 37:26
  Speaker 1: chats or anything. No, nothing in the chat. But yeah,
• 37:31
  Speaker 1: I mean, I think that when you try to go
• 37:34
  Speaker 1: like really really inexpensive for something that costs so much
• 37:38
  Speaker 1: just to maintain, it's probably like there's gonna be any
• 37:44
  Speaker 1: Anything that shakes up the economy in any way, regardless
• 37:49
  Speaker 1: of what it's gonna affect, is probably gonna impact your
• 37:51
  Speaker 1: business a lot. So I think that them blaming like
• 37:54
  Speaker 1: you know, what's going on in Iran, I think it's
• 37:57
  Speaker 1: kind of a cop out because you could have done
• 38:00
  Speaker 1: other things to compensate, and they just probably they probably
• 38:03
  Speaker 1: were just like really overspending and not getting a lot
• 38:07
  Speaker 1: of profits because they wanted to be the airline that's
• 38:09
  Speaker 1: affordable and so they had to like cut corners in
• 38:13
  Speaker 1: so many places and it just wasn't sustainable. So uh,
• 38:17
  Speaker 1: it seems I.
• 38:18
  Speaker 2: Mean like they had to have already been in dire
• 38:20
  Speaker 2: streets for.
• 38:22
  Speaker 1: That's right, That's what I'm saying. Yeah, And they weren't
• 38:24
  Speaker 1: saying anything, which is why they had to suddenly just
• 38:27
  Speaker 1: like okay, we got to shut it down. So that's
• 38:29
  Speaker 1: what I'm saying because like when I was, when I
• 38:31
  Speaker 1: would fly with my family sometimes we were poor, we
• 38:35
  Speaker 1: would use Jet Blue. And jet Blue is also an
• 38:38
  Speaker 1: inexpensive or less expensive, you know, no frills airport, Like
• 38:42
  Speaker 1: you're not going to get any like, you know, anything
• 38:46
  Speaker 1: special out of it. It's not like flying American or
• 38:49
  Speaker 1: or one of these big you know airlines. But uh,
• 38:53
  Speaker 1: if Jet Blue needed to raise prices because the cost
• 38:56
  Speaker 1: of some raw material they needed was gonna go up,
• 39:00
  Speaker 1: then they would just say, you know, everybody would just
• 39:02
  Speaker 1: raise their prices, and all the other airlines had to
• 39:04
  Speaker 1: raise their prices too. So you know, it wasn't like
• 39:07
  Speaker 1: jet Blue was getting or I'm sorry, not jet Blue.
• 39:10
  Speaker 1: It wasn't like Spirit was getting special fuel that nobody
• 39:12
  Speaker 1: else was getting. So I'm just saying that's a little
• 39:15
  Speaker 1: bit of a cop out. It was probably a number
• 39:17
  Speaker 1: of other things that while they're not they're not at
• 39:20
  Speaker 1: liberty to disclose. So what.
• 39:25
  Speaker 2: Do you remember, wow, airlines?
• 39:27
  Speaker 1: I vaguely, I didn't fly that much.
• 39:30
  Speaker 2: So so that's that's the airline that I flew to
• 39:37
  Speaker 2: get to Australia.
• 39:40
  Speaker 4: I think it was Australia.
• 39:41
  Speaker 2: It might have been in the UK, but I flew
• 39:43
  Speaker 2: Wow at least once and before they went under, and
• 39:49
  Speaker 2: the way they handled it was like, you're fair was
• 39:54
  Speaker 2: super cheap as long as you didn't want to bring
• 39:58
  Speaker 2: any luggage or eat or drink anything on the jet
• 40:03
  Speaker 2: that you didn't bring with you, and like if you wanted,
• 40:07
  Speaker 2: you know how they give out usually on a on
• 40:11
  Speaker 2: a flight, though if it's a long flight, they'll give
• 40:13
  Speaker 2: out you know, those those little cookies and and coffee
• 40:17
  Speaker 2: or water and stuff. They didn't, uh, And it wasn't
• 40:21
  Speaker 2: a short flight.
• 40:22
  Speaker 4: It was a long flight, right.
• 40:24
  Speaker 2: And so you know, on the way back, I need
• 40:27
  Speaker 2: to have snacks, but on the way there I didn't.
• 40:29
  Speaker 2: And but for the price, you kind of expect all
• 40:33
  Speaker 2: those little amenities that other airlines do for free. They
• 40:36
  Speaker 2: cut those corners. Yeah, you know, that's fair. I just
• 40:41
  Speaker 2: you know, wish that it was more prominently disclosed, because
• 40:46
  Speaker 2: like to find that in the agreement, you had to
• 40:49
  Speaker 2: go through multiple paragraphs of stuff that is pretty standard
• 40:53
  Speaker 2: and not interesting to read, and so it's kind of like, hey,
• 41:00
  Speaker 2: you know, why didn't you make this more upfront. But
• 41:04
  Speaker 2: at the same time, like that's what they do.
• 41:07
  Speaker 3: You take.
• 41:11
  Speaker 2: You take a lower price, you're getting fewer amenities.
• 41:14
  Speaker 4: Your leg group might not be so much.
• 41:17
  Speaker 2: You might not have you might not get the free drinks,
• 41:20
  Speaker 2: you might not get the free snacks, you know, and some.
• 41:25
  Speaker 5: Flights, most of the seats you can't really even see
• 41:30
  Speaker 5: out the window, Like I've been on jets where there's
• 41:35
  Speaker 5: a whole section of seats in the middle and two
• 41:39
  Speaker 5: aisles on either side of it, with more seats on
• 41:44
  Speaker 5: the other side of those.
• 41:46
  Speaker 2: And obviously the cheaper seats are the ones in the
• 41:49
  Speaker 2: center because it's harder to get out off the plane
• 41:53
  Speaker 2: at the end of the flight when you're in those seats.
• 41:56
  Speaker 2: People don't think about it when they're paying, you know,
• 42:00
  Speaker 2: they think about how cheap can I get? But when
• 42:04
  Speaker 2: you're paying for your ticket and you're getting the cheaper ticket,
• 42:10
  Speaker 2: you are.
• 42:10
  Speaker 4: Giving up amenities.
• 42:12
  Speaker 2: Well, if Spirit Airlines didn't do that, if they didn't
• 42:16
  Speaker 2: cut like everybody else did, or they cut the prices
• 42:20
  Speaker 2: so low that they couldn't cut anything else out, they
• 42:23
  Speaker 2: would be a lot of financial dress and especially in
• 42:29
  Speaker 2: the last seven years, right. The airlines were seeing some
• 42:37
  Speaker 2: downturn and travel right before COVID made the news, right,
• 42:43
  Speaker 2: and then COVID hit and then it became you know,
• 42:49
  Speaker 2: dangerous in a lot of people's minds to fly. And
• 42:53
  Speaker 2: the next thing you know, there's restrictions and so on,
• 42:58
  Speaker 2: travel restrictions and and people are not using the airlines. Well,
• 43:05
  Speaker 2: that was what was blamed for, Wow, going under, I imagine
• 43:11
  Speaker 2: and put a strain on all of these companies. And
• 43:16
  Speaker 2: I don't think spirit probably escaped that. So for Warren
• 43:20
  Speaker 2: to turn around and blame it on oil prices, it's
• 43:26
  Speaker 2: very short sighted, very feminine, very feminine behavior. Oh, it's
• 43:32
  Speaker 2: this thing that just happened, because companies don't go under
• 43:37
  Speaker 2: without already being in duress for quite a while. It's
• 43:44
  Speaker 2: not something that happens most of the time. Just all
• 43:47
  Speaker 2: of a sudden, one week they're they're in great shape.
• 43:52
  Speaker 2: In the next week they're in dire straits.
• 43:54
  Speaker 4: It's bullshit, all.
• 44:00
  Speaker 1: Right, So let us know what you guys think about
• 44:02
  Speaker 1: this one of the comments. We are going to move
• 44:04
  Speaker 1: on to the next story, all right. So a New
• 44:08
  Speaker 1: York Post article reports that the recent indictment of doctor
• 44:13
  Speaker 1: Anthony Fauci's former senior advisor, David Morenz, has intensified pressure
• 44:19
  Speaker 1: on the Department of Justice to prosecute Fauci himself. Morenz,
• 44:24
  Speaker 1: seventy eight, faces up to fifty one years in prison
• 44:27
  Speaker 1: on charges including conspiracy, destruction and alteration of records, and
• 44:32
  Speaker 1: concealment of records related to the origins of COVID nineteen.
• 44:36
  Speaker 1: Critics argue that Fauci eighty five bears primary responsibility for
• 44:41
  Speaker 1: allegedly lined to Congress about NIH funding for gain of
• 44:45
  Speaker 1: function research on bat coronaviruses at the Wuhan Institute of Virology,
• 44:50
  Speaker 1: the city where the pandemic emerged. With the five year
• 44:54
  Speaker 1: statute of limitations expiring on May eleventh, twenty twenty six,
• 44:57
  Speaker 1: for potential perjury charges stemming from Fauchi's twenty twenty one
• 45:01
  Speaker 1: Senate testimony. The article highlights calls from figures like Senator
• 45:05
  Speaker 1: Ran Paul and Oversight Project President Mike Howell for accountability.
• 45:10
  Speaker 1: Paul described possible felonies including line to Congress and record destruction,
• 45:15
  Speaker 1: while noting questions around the validity of President Biden's preemptive
• 45:19
  Speaker 1: autopen pardon for Fauci, covering offenses from twenty fourteen onward,
• 45:24
  Speaker 1: which is, by the way, the autopen thing as a
• 45:25
  Speaker 1: whole other can of worms We're not going to get
• 45:27
  Speaker 1: into right now. The piece details Fauci's heated twenty twenty
• 45:31
  Speaker 1: one exchanges with Paul denying gain a function funding later
• 45:35
  Speaker 1: contradicted by NIH officials, and documents background on EcoHealth Alliance grants,
• 45:40
  Speaker 1: and Trump's interest in reviewing the matter. Under Acting AG
• 45:44
  Speaker 1: Todd Blanche. Fauci and the DOJ have not commented.
• 45:50
  Speaker 3: I look when I blackpil I don't do it for clicks.
• 45:57
  Speaker 3: I do it because I want to be as honest
• 46:01
  Speaker 3: as possible. The world isn't like one color of pill.
• 46:06
  Speaker 3: There are black parts, and there are white parts, and
• 46:09
  Speaker 3: there are red parts and a blue parts, which is
• 46:13
  Speaker 3: to say, there are some things you can change, there
• 46:16
  Speaker 3: are some things you don't need to change, and there
• 46:20
  Speaker 3: are some things you cannot change. I don't think Anthony
• 46:25
  Speaker 3: Fauci is ever going to face justice. Some people never
• 46:30
  Speaker 3: face justice. Quite a lot of people never face justice.
• 46:34
  Speaker 3: I think more people get away with crimes than are
• 46:43
  Speaker 3: charged with them, because most of them are reported anyway,
• 46:50
  Speaker 3: I mean, I mean, especially so when those crimes are
• 46:56
  Speaker 3: enormous you know, you kill one person, you probably won't
• 47:02
  Speaker 3: get away with it. You kill millions of people, you'll
• 47:07
  Speaker 3: probably live to at something and die peacefully in your sleep.
• 47:12
  Speaker 3: Statistically speaking, I mean that there are outliers, obviously, and
• 47:19
  Speaker 3: they are generally more historically memorable than the norm. But
• 47:26
  Speaker 3: the plain observation is, if you are even in a
• 47:29
  Speaker 3: position to kill millions of people, I mean you will
• 47:36
  Speaker 3: have got there under the protection and patronage of some
• 47:42
  Speaker 3: very shady organizations who are very much above the law.
• 47:49
  Speaker 3: There's countless examples of government agencies conducting nightmarish experiments on
• 47:58
  Speaker 3: innocent people, like mk Ultra or that that whole infecting
• 48:04
  Speaker 3: men with syphilis to see what happens. Is they're not
• 48:08
  Speaker 3: just conspiracies. That they are not just conspiracy theories. Like conspiracies,
• 48:16
  Speaker 3: actually happened and they are confirmed to be true. But
• 48:20
  Speaker 3: no one faces accountability for these atrocities because by the
• 48:25
  Speaker 3: time the information is declassified, everyone culpable is already dead.
• 48:32
  Speaker 3: And I don't see why it would be any different
• 48:34
  Speaker 3: with Anthony Fauci. The fact that it's on a much
• 48:39
  Speaker 3: larger scale doesn't matter. Like I said, the larger the scale,
• 48:43
  Speaker 3: the greater the immunity. So maybe fifty years from now,
• 48:52
  Speaker 3: some documents will finally be declassified and will hear the
• 48:57
  Speaker 3: confession that, yes, biochemical war was indeed deliberately inflicted upon
• 49:04
  Speaker 3: the world just to see what would happen. But by then,
• 49:08
  Speaker 3: by twenty seventy six, people won't even give a shit.
• 49:14
  Speaker 3: They'd be like, what lockdown? What mandatory experimental serums? Sure,
• 49:21
  Speaker 3: whatever you say, Grandma, Let's get you some more government
• 49:25
  Speaker 3: regulated porridge adjacent substance. Yeah, no, sorry, Anthony Fauci is
• 49:34
  Speaker 3: going to die of natural causes in an expensive bed,
• 49:41
  Speaker 3: surrounded by his loved ones. He will die believing he
• 49:45
  Speaker 3: did the right thing, and he will never suffer any
• 49:50
  Speaker 3: guilt or any consequence. That is my black pill for
• 49:55
  Speaker 3: you today, ladies and gentlemen. But I would remind you
• 49:59
  Speaker 3: that what one man experiences is literally but a drop
• 50:05
  Speaker 3: in the ocean to what many men experience. We can
• 50:11
  Speaker 3: still go on to create a world in which Anthony
• 50:15
  Speaker 3: Fauci is reviled as one of history's most harrowing villains.
• 50:21
  Speaker 3: We're doing it right now. I'm doing it as I speak.
• 50:27
  Speaker 3: A pattern with a lot of great made of history
• 50:30
  Speaker 3: is that they value their legacy more than their life.
• 50:34
  Speaker 3: They want to be remembered. To be remembered is the
• 50:38
  Speaker 3: only way to conquer death, after all, Remembrance is your
• 50:45
  Speaker 3: spirit living on well, Fauci is very probably not going
• 50:52
  Speaker 3: to get arrested or charged or whatever in the next
• 50:56
  Speaker 3: six days, I think it is now. But what we
• 50:59
  Speaker 3: can and still ruin in his lifetime is his reputation.
• 51:07
  Speaker 3: There's your white pill or your red pill or whatever.
• 51:11
  Speaker 3: There is something you can do. You can't break Fauci
• 51:14
  Speaker 3: out of his fortress of steel, in his immunity bubble,
• 51:20
  Speaker 3: but you can stand outside it as close as you
• 51:24
  Speaker 3: can get. You can accumulate in mobs physically or online,
• 51:28
  Speaker 3: and you can chant Fauci killed millions. You can keep
• 51:34
  Speaker 3: doing it until you can be guaranteed that the last
• 51:39
  Speaker 3: thing Fauci hears before he dies is Fauci killed millions,
• 51:45
  Speaker 3: chanted five millions. And to be honest, he probably won't care.
• 51:51
  Speaker 3: He seems like the kind of bloke who doesn't particularly
• 51:55
  Speaker 3: care that he killed millions. He probably gets off on it, actually,
• 52:02
  Speaker 3: But if your issue is with one man's experience, that's
• 52:11
  Speaker 3: your best shot at affecting it. But if your issue
• 52:16
  Speaker 3: is let us please set up some kind of system
• 52:22
  Speaker 3: where the Anthony Faucis of the world can never exist
• 52:27
  Speaker 3: in the first place. I eat don't let governments pay
• 52:32
  Speaker 3: and protect those who commit atrocities. Okay, I share your concern,
• 52:39
  Speaker 3: and it will take a while, no doubt. I'm just
• 52:43
  Speaker 3: saying that voice in your head that won't be satisfied
• 52:47
  Speaker 3: until Fauci is executed by lethal injection. That voice won't
• 52:52
  Speaker 3: be appeased. That's just your sense of revenge eating into you.
• 53:00
  Speaker 3: Avenge is an ugly path, bus and gentlemen, and it
• 53:05
  Speaker 3: is a path with no end. Our energy should be
• 53:11
  Speaker 3: mostly expended on preventing the next as today Fauci, and
• 53:19
  Speaker 3: there will be one unless we conquer the past and
• 53:25
  Speaker 3: go on to invade the future. That means, all right,
• 53:33
  Speaker 3: I've I've divulsed it to moms, all right.
• 53:38
  Speaker 2: So the reason I dropped this into the chat isn't
• 53:42
  Speaker 2: because that, you know, I like, I don't think Fauci.
• 53:46
  Speaker 4: Is gonna face justice on Earth either.
• 53:53
  Speaker 2: I have my beliefs about what's gonna happen to him afterward,
• 53:57
  Speaker 2: but that really doesn't do anybody any good on Earth
• 54:01
  Speaker 2: at the time. What I posted this for is because
• 54:05
  Speaker 2: of what needs to happen. What Biden did, if Biden
• 54:10
  Speaker 2: did it when he used that auto pen to sign
• 54:15
  Speaker 2: preemptive pardons, was something that needs to be prevented from
• 54:20
  Speaker 2: ever happening. Again, it's pretty much confirmed what Fauci did.
• 54:25
  Speaker 2: It's pretty much confirmed that if it wasn't for Fauci,
• 54:31
  Speaker 2: if it wasn't for Anthony Fauci, there would not have
• 54:34
  Speaker 2: been an epidemic. There wouldn't have been a pandemic. There
• 54:39
  Speaker 2: wouldn't even have been a single human case. Not COVID nineteen,
• 54:46
  Speaker 2: other forms of COVID, but not COVID nineteen. It would
• 54:49
  Speaker 2: not have existed to infect people. Span is responsible for
• 54:57
  Speaker 2: billions of death and suffering individuals suffering, not to mention
• 55:07
  Speaker 2: the financial cost in the losses of freedoms that people
• 55:14
  Speaker 2: have experienced, the changes that have taken place to every
• 55:19
  Speaker 2: civilization all around.
• 55:21
  Speaker 4: The world, that.
• 55:25
  Speaker 2: It's changed as dramatically as the before and after in
• 55:30
  Speaker 2: the United States on nine to eleven. Right, that's that's
• 55:35
  Speaker 2: what the man is responsible for, and nothing can be
• 55:39
  Speaker 2: done to hold him accountable for that because he was
• 55:45
  Speaker 2: pardoned by the President for crimes he may have committed
• 55:52
  Speaker 2: at crimes that were not he wasn't accused of or convicted,
• 55:58
  Speaker 2: not officially anyway, like a lot of us were accusing him,
• 56:02
  Speaker 2: but there was no charge, right, there was no nothing official,
• 56:10
  Speaker 2: and yet he received a pardon. Nobody should be able
• 56:15
  Speaker 2: to preemptively pardon someone for crimes they may have committed
• 56:21
  Speaker 2: or might commit in the future. Nobody should be able
• 56:28
  Speaker 2: to blanket pardon without naming the specific crimes. If a
• 56:35
  Speaker 2: politician from any political party is going to hand out
• 56:43
  Speaker 2: a get out of jail free card, like that get
• 56:49
  Speaker 2: out of accountability free card, they should have to name
• 56:55
  Speaker 2: the thing that they are pardoning and the reasons specific
• 57:00
  Speaker 2: why they are pardoning that specific thing. I could understand,
• 57:07
  Speaker 2: you know, if, for instance, he was somebody who was
• 57:12
  Speaker 2: accused of a crime he didn't commit, or he was
• 57:15
  Speaker 2: prosecuted as if an act of self defense was a
• 57:18
  Speaker 2: heinous act of brutality against an innocent person, and then
• 57:23
  Speaker 2: sentenced commensurate with the way the prosecutor made it out
• 57:28
  Speaker 2: to be. I could understand a pardon being given under
• 57:33
  Speaker 2: that circumstance. But under this circumstance, I think it's an
• 57:40
  Speaker 2: abuse of power. And someone with the level of power
• 57:47
  Speaker 2: that the President of the United States has should be
• 57:51
  Speaker 2: very limited in how they use that. They should not
• 57:58
  Speaker 2: be able to use the presidential pardon as a means
• 58:03
  Speaker 2: to prevent government bureaucrats from being prosecuted and interrogated in
• 58:13
  Speaker 2: ways that might expose bureaucratic conspiracies. We the people, have
• 58:21
  Speaker 2: the right to know who killed our grandparents, who killed
• 58:26
  Speaker 2: our fathers, who killed our mothers, who killed our friends,
• 58:32
  Speaker 2: who killed our jobs? Not mine, but hell of a
• 58:37
  Speaker 2: lot r. I lost both of my parents, and I
• 58:44
  Speaker 2: want to know. I don't just want it to stop
• 58:47
  Speaker 2: at Anthony Fauci. I want to know everybody that was involved.
• 58:53
  Speaker 2: I think we should have that information. I think we
• 58:56
  Speaker 2: have a right to that information, and I think we
• 58:58
  Speaker 2: have a right to expect justice to be done, and
• 59:02
  Speaker 2: it won't be because that loophole allows for that abuse
• 59:09
  Speaker 2: of power. That loophole needs to be closed. I don't
• 59:13
  Speaker 2: really give a rats ass about Anthony Fauci. I don't
• 59:17
  Speaker 2: care if he never sees the inside of a jail cell.
• 59:21
  Speaker 2: I don't care if he trips at the top of
• 59:23
  Speaker 2: a set of stairs and falls to his death. Everybody
• 59:28
  Speaker 2: already knows what he did, Everybody already hates him. He
• 59:32
  Speaker 2: is already living through the loss of his legacy. He
• 59:37
  Speaker 2: knows that's happening, and he knows he's going to be
• 59:41
  Speaker 2: one of the most hated men in recent history. People
• 59:47
  Speaker 2: will compare him to famous Nazi doctors in the future,
• 59:54
  Speaker 2: and he knows that. I don't care. I don't care
• 59:57
  Speaker 2: if he dies for a fucking hangnail. I want to
• 1:00:00
  Speaker 2: know who else was involved. I want to know where
• 1:00:03
  Speaker 2: that went in government and how to keep it from
• 1:00:07
  Speaker 2: ever happening again. And I want to see change made
• 1:00:12
  Speaker 2: to the presidential pardon so that nobody can put someone
• 1:00:17
  Speaker 2: like Anthony Fauci above accountability ever again. And that is
• 1:00:26
  Speaker 2: that is what needs to happen. This man is completely
• 1:00:31
  Speaker 2: insignificant when it comes to that. Who the abuse of
• 1:00:37
  Speaker 2: power was used to excuse doesn't matter, the fact that
• 1:00:45
  Speaker 2: the abuse of power can happen, that it can continue
• 1:00:50
  Speaker 2: to happen, that the next president and the next and
• 1:00:53
  Speaker 2: the next could do it. That matters, and that's what
• 1:00:57
  Speaker 2: needs to be stopped.
• 1:01:02
  Speaker 1: All right, Thank you for your guys' thoughts on that.
• 1:01:06
  Speaker 1: And I got a super chat from Senior Stix for
• 1:01:10
  Speaker 1: two dollars and he says, idea get a bank loan
• 1:01:14
  Speaker 1: obtained spirit swag obtained Spirit swag profit. That was an
• 1:01:19
  Speaker 1: old one. I guess I missed it from before. Thanks
• 1:01:21
  Speaker 1: for that, all right. So with that said, we're gonna
• 1:01:29
  Speaker 1: move on to what Okay, we're gonna move on to
• 1:01:32
  Speaker 1: the to the last story. Let us know what you
• 1:01:35
  Speaker 1: guys think about this one in the comments, all right,
• 1:01:39
  Speaker 1: So we've we have a little bit of a follow
• 1:01:41
  Speaker 1: up on the door dash ding Dong dingbat that made
• 1:01:48
  Speaker 1: the mistake of basically filling a guy in a sleep.
• 1:01:52
  Speaker 1: Olivia Henderson, a twenty three year old former DoorDash driver
• 1:01:56
  Speaker 1: from Oswego, New York, was formerly indicted by an Oswego
• 1:02:00
  Speaker 1: County grand jury on May first, twenty twenty six. She
• 1:02:03
  Speaker 1: faces two class E felony charges, unlawful surveillance in the
• 1:02:08
  Speaker 1: second degree and dissemination of an unlawful surveillance image in
• 1:02:12
  Speaker 1: the first degree. Each count carries a potential penalty of
• 1:02:16
  Speaker 1: up to four years in prison for a maximum of
• 1:02:19
  Speaker 1: eight years if convicted on both. The charges stem from
• 1:02:23
  Speaker 1: an October twelfth incident of last year, in which she
• 1:02:27
  Speaker 1: allegedly recorded video through a customer's front glass door of
• 1:02:31
  Speaker 1: a partially naked, unconscious man asleep on his couch after
• 1:02:35
  Speaker 1: a leave at door delivery, then posted the footage on TikTok,
• 1:02:39
  Speaker 1: where it went viral. Henderson appeared in Oswego County Court
• 1:02:43
  Speaker 1: that same morning, pleaded not guilty through her attorney, and
• 1:02:46
  Speaker 1: was released. As the case continued, prosecutors and her defense
• 1:02:50
  Speaker 1: are reportedly discussing a possible plea deal. She remained silent
• 1:02:53
  Speaker 1: when approached by reporters outside her courtroom. Of the courtroom,
• 1:02:58
  Speaker 1: her next court appearance is scheduled for June fifth of
• 1:03:01
  Speaker 1: this year, so basically in two months, no one month.
• 1:03:05
  Speaker 1: The case gained attention after Henderson claimed the customer had
• 1:03:08
  Speaker 1: sexually harassed her, but police investigation, including ring camera footage,
• 1:03:13
  Speaker 1: determined she was incapacity. He was incapacitated from alcohol and
• 1:03:17
  Speaker 1: posed no threat.
• 1:03:21
  Speaker 3: The very existence of a man poses a threat. That
• 1:03:27
  Speaker 3: I mean, that seems to be her case, and I
• 1:03:31
  Speaker 3: sound like I'm exaggerating, but that is where everything is
• 1:03:34
  Speaker 3: leading and over in Europe it's increasingly the case. What
• 1:03:39
  Speaker 3: has been to imposed as a trial run in Spain
• 1:03:45
  Speaker 3: for some time now is being rolled out across the EU.
• 1:03:48
  Speaker 3: Any woman who has sex with any man can legally
• 1:03:53
  Speaker 3: retroactively retract her consent and charge him with rape unless
• 1:03:59
  Speaker 3: he has kind of physical proof that she consented. Will
• 1:04:05
  Speaker 3: that be Will that be extended to I didn't consent
• 1:04:10
  Speaker 3: to seeing a man's unconscious penis, or I didn't consent
• 1:04:17
  Speaker 3: to seeing a man. Will a woman be able to
• 1:04:21
  Speaker 3: charge a man with rape if she passes by him
• 1:04:24
  Speaker 3: in the streets and happens to see a bulge in
• 1:04:29
  Speaker 3: his trousers. That sounds absurd to your Americans, doesn't it.
• 1:04:33
  Speaker 3: But in Europe we're thinking, yep, yeah, that's that sounds
• 1:04:38
  Speaker 3: perfectly feasible. European men, I mean, can be charged with
• 1:04:44
  Speaker 3: these crimes. The fifty IQ shadow beasts could go ahead
• 1:04:50
  Speaker 3: and get on a subway train and skewer one hundred
• 1:04:54
  Speaker 3: women on the end of his dick, and he will
• 1:04:56
  Speaker 3: be exonerated on the grounds that he's a fifty a
• 1:05:00
  Speaker 3: cute shadow bey, but a European man, Heaven's tibetsy. Now
• 1:05:07
  Speaker 3: he will be arrested if he looks at a woman,
• 1:05:10
  Speaker 3: and he will be arrested if a woman looks at him.
• 1:05:16
  Speaker 3: I know that sounds absurd, but in Europe it is
• 1:05:20
  Speaker 3: not absurd. It is rapidly encroaching upon reality. So yeah,
• 1:05:28
  Speaker 3: as hokey and irrelevant as this story sounds, and as
• 1:05:35
  Speaker 3: bizarre that we've now done three segments on it over
• 1:05:41
  Speaker 3: the months, it is actually kind of important in some way.
• 1:05:45
  Speaker 3: It is a landmark along the lines of God bless
• 1:05:50
  Speaker 3: America that you still have a country that hasn't yet
• 1:05:54
  Speaker 3: given women the right to simply look at a man
• 1:06:00
  Speaker 3: and ruin his life because she looked at him. It's
• 1:06:07
  Speaker 3: like Medusa in reverse, like when she looks at you,
• 1:06:12
  Speaker 3: you turned to stone. That would be an impossible foe,
• 1:06:18
  Speaker 3: that it would be a boss you cannot conceivably defeat. Well,
• 1:06:24
  Speaker 3: that right is every woman in Europe, to a greater
• 1:06:32
  Speaker 3: or lesser extent, depending on the country, but in all
• 1:06:36
  Speaker 3: cases it's gravitating in that direction. And people wonder why
• 1:06:42
  Speaker 3: the birth rate is declining. It must be because of smartphones.
• 1:06:48
  Speaker 3: It must be because people are tonally online. It must
• 1:06:52
  Speaker 3: be because someone invented a digital spatula last Tuesday. Yeah
• 1:06:58
  Speaker 3: maybe bro uh. Or I have another idea, like a
• 1:07:04
  Speaker 3: wild speculation, right, I think criminalizing men for the offense
• 1:07:12
  Speaker 3: of allowing electro magnetic signals to pass between the eyes
• 1:07:18
  Speaker 3: of the sexes, I think I think that's got a
• 1:07:23
  Speaker 3: lot to do with it. Bro. I think I think
• 1:07:27
  Speaker 3: the hate and resentment that has been deliberately instilled in
• 1:07:32
  Speaker 3: women against men over the past century probably has like
• 1:07:37
  Speaker 3: a hop, skip and a jump to do with it.
• 1:07:40
  Speaker 3: But I'm not a real doctor. No, this is medical
• 1:07:44
  Speaker 3: advice that's run became as used radio.
• 1:07:52
  Speaker 2: Yeah, this is this is gonna be an interesting situation
• 1:07:55
  Speaker 2: to watch because if you know, we we all know
• 1:07:59
  Speaker 2: that if a man had broken into a woman's house,
• 1:08:03
  Speaker 2: and I know we're gonna get feminsies. She didn't break
• 1:08:06
  Speaker 2: it through the house there, he was it locked. It's
• 1:08:08
  Speaker 2: considered breaking and entering if you open someone's door and
• 1:08:13
  Speaker 2: walk into their house, even if their door is not locked,
• 1:08:17
  Speaker 2: if you were not invited to come in and you
• 1:08:20
  Speaker 2: don't have a standing invitation, Oh you don't have to
• 1:08:22
  Speaker 2: not just come on in, right, you broke it in.
• 1:08:27
  Speaker 2: Even if you did it by accident, you know, you
• 1:08:31
  Speaker 2: still could be considered guilty. She did it on purpose,
• 1:08:37
  Speaker 2: and then she filmed him and humiliated him in a
• 1:08:43
  Speaker 2: manner that was sexual. If a man had done that
• 1:08:47
  Speaker 2: to a woman, the amount of jail time he would receive.
• 1:08:51
  Speaker 2: They would hit him with the highest charges they could
• 1:08:54
  Speaker 2: hit him with, and then they would supplement those with
• 1:08:58
  Speaker 2: all of the other charges that they could think of
• 1:09:01
  Speaker 2: that didn't overlap, and you can bet that he would
• 1:09:08
  Speaker 2: be in jail for years and he would be the
• 1:09:14
  Speaker 2: next Rock Turner or I don't know any name that
• 1:09:20
  Speaker 2: feminists have made famous as that guy who should have
• 1:09:26
  Speaker 2: had a longer sentence than he got because the crime
• 1:09:29
  Speaker 2: should have been insert thing that he didn't do here, like,
• 1:09:36
  Speaker 2: they'd probably be accusing that guy of rape even if
• 1:09:39
  Speaker 2: he didn't touch the woman, just like this woman didn't
• 1:09:43
  Speaker 2: touch the man. But you can also bet that feminists
• 1:09:50
  Speaker 2: are going to be coming out of the woodwork to
• 1:09:52
  Speaker 2: defend this woman. Oh she was scared. She opened his
• 1:09:55
  Speaker 2: door and went into his house and stood there and
• 1:09:59
  Speaker 2: filmed him.
• 1:10:00
  Speaker 4: Because she was scared.
• 1:10:03
  Speaker 2: Most people with any sense at all run away when
• 1:10:06
  Speaker 2: they're scared. They get the hell out of dodge when
• 1:10:09
  Speaker 2: they're scared, right, They might scream a lot when they're scared.
• 1:10:14
  Speaker 2: They raised the entire neighborhood, but they do not enter
• 1:10:20
  Speaker 2: the area where the person is that they're afraid of
• 1:10:24
  Speaker 2: and start filming if they actually are scared. But that's
• 1:10:30
  Speaker 2: what we're gonna hear. Oh she was scared. She was
• 1:10:33
  Speaker 2: sexually harassed. She was getting evidence. You don't get evidence
• 1:10:37
  Speaker 2: if you're scared. If you're scared, you get the hell
• 1:10:38
  Speaker 2: out of there. And this is going to be debated,
• 1:10:45
  Speaker 2: not because it's debatable legitimately debatable, but because there is
• 1:10:51
  Speaker 2: a caliber of women who does not care about facts
• 1:10:59
  Speaker 2: or human rights, civil rights. They'll call it a due
• 1:11:03
  Speaker 2: process issue. They'll continue to paint a picture of this
• 1:11:07
  Speaker 2: man as guilty of something for having passed out in
• 1:11:11
  Speaker 2: his own home, and they won't shut up about it.
• 1:11:19
  Speaker 2: Hopefully they don't affect the outcome of the case. Hopefully
• 1:11:25
  Speaker 2: he gets justice and she gets a fair hearing, and
• 1:11:33
  Speaker 2: hopefully people start to recognize that when women are aggressive,
• 1:11:40
  Speaker 2: it can cause damage. She damaged this guy's reputation, She
• 1:11:47
  Speaker 2: did damage to him, and for that, I hope she
• 1:11:52
  Speaker 2: sees justice. But it'll be interesting to watch because we
• 1:11:58
  Speaker 2: don't know. We don't know what will happen. We don't
• 1:12:01
  Speaker 2: know if the justice system is going to be biased
• 1:12:07
  Speaker 2: the way they usually are, or if the fame of
• 1:12:12
  Speaker 2: this case is going to act as sort of.
• 1:12:18
  Speaker 4: Disinfectant and prevent that bias. We don't know. We'll just
• 1:12:24
  Speaker 4: have to see.
• 1:12:26
  Speaker 2: We can talk about should have could It would all
• 1:12:29
  Speaker 2: we want, but in the end, the outcome will be
• 1:12:34
  Speaker 2: what it is, whether we talk about it or not.
• 1:12:38
  Speaker 4: So I'm looking forward to seeing what happens here.
• 1:12:43
  Speaker 1: Yeah, it should be interesting, and hopefully other women will
• 1:12:48
  Speaker 1: see this as a cautionary tale because it is. You know,
• 1:12:53
  Speaker 1: she's very young and this is basically going to be
• 1:12:55
  Speaker 1: a really serious obstacle in our life. So late pay attention.
• 1:13:01
  Speaker 1: This is not acceptable. You're not immune from consequences. Well,
• 1:13:05
  Speaker 1: I mean, you're still relatively resistant, but maybe this is
• 1:13:09
  Speaker 1: gonna set new precedent, so it might.
• 1:13:12
  Speaker 2: My suspicion is that other women aren't going to recognize
• 1:13:15
  Speaker 2: it for what it is. Instead of seeing it as
• 1:13:17
  Speaker 2: a cautionary table or tale, They're going to see it
• 1:13:20
  Speaker 2: as an outrage that they should be.
• 1:13:22
  Speaker 1: Yeah, she's a victim. Why'd you do this to her?
• 1:13:25
  Speaker 2: Right, Ruth. We'll probably see feminist lobbying as a result
• 1:13:31
  Speaker 2: of how it goes.
• 1:13:33
  Speaker 3: M h.
• 1:13:34
  Speaker 1: I mean yeah, yeah, if they think they can profit,
• 1:13:37
  Speaker 1: all right, So let us you guys think about this
• 1:13:39
  Speaker 1: one in the comments. Did you guys know about this?
• 1:13:42
  Speaker 1: Do you agree with this decision? We will find out
• 1:13:44
  Speaker 1: what the consequence of this in a month, So we'll
• 1:13:47
  Speaker 1: follow up with another news story and when we learn more.
• 1:13:51
  Speaker 1: In the meantime, I got some super chats and rumble
• 1:13:53
  Speaker 1: rants to go through, so oh I see gives us
• 1:13:57
  Speaker 1: a dollar rumble rant and says, hello, five coffee emojis.
• 1:14:02
  Speaker 1: I guess we're gonna see some coffee emojis in the chat.
• 1:14:06
  Speaker 1: Albatross four nine two zero gives us five dollars super
• 1:14:10
  Speaker 1: chat and says, if anything, she's the aggressor because she
• 1:14:13
  Speaker 1: entered and filmed without consent and then put it on
• 1:14:16
  Speaker 1: social media. Yeah, the social media thing was probably like
• 1:14:18
  Speaker 1: the real real kicker. I mean, the whole thing is wrong,
• 1:14:22
  Speaker 1: but putting it out for the world to see and
• 1:14:24
  Speaker 1: then claiming to be a victim of it, that's like.
• 1:14:29
  Speaker 3: Zara ANX gives us.
• 1:14:30
  Speaker 1: Ten dollars and says the victim might have simped and
• 1:14:32
  Speaker 1: let it all go if not for the fact that
• 1:14:35
  Speaker 1: his door dash account was impacted. Kind of glad he
• 1:14:38
  Speaker 1: was forced. If that's the case, that's true that both
• 1:14:41
  Speaker 1: of their door dashes were suspended. I'm not sure if
• 1:14:44
  Speaker 1: his was restored, but yeah, that is truly.
• 1:14:48
  Speaker 4: Why I would never use DoorDash again.
• 1:14:51
  Speaker 1: No, I'd probably just like make my own food at home,
• 1:14:55
  Speaker 1: cook my own meals.
• 1:14:58
  Speaker 2: Anyway, that happened, and then they initially suspended his account,
• 1:15:02
  Speaker 2: like that would be a reason to just be.
• 1:15:04
  Speaker 4: Like, all right, that's fine, I don't want it back.
• 1:15:08
  Speaker 3: Yeah, for sure.
• 1:15:11
  Speaker 1: Anyway, let us know what you guys think about this
• 1:15:12
  Speaker 1: one in the comments. Now we are going to go
• 1:15:18
  Speaker 1: into the Patron Show. We're gonna check out the Mothership
• 1:15:20
  Speaker 1: website and probably like just chit chat about things. I
• 1:15:24
  Speaker 1: also learned some additional news, but I'll probably discuss it
• 1:15:28
  Speaker 1: in the Patron Show. So if you guys want to
• 1:15:30
  Speaker 1: join us for that, go to feed the Badger dot
• 1:15:32
  Speaker 1: com forward slash subscribe to join the community. If you
• 1:15:36
  Speaker 1: want to just see what the community is like and
• 1:15:37
  Speaker 1: go into the discord, go to Badger Nation dot online
• 1:15:41
  Speaker 1: so you can like hang out with us in the
• 1:15:44
  Speaker 1: discord server. And yeah, I want to thank Mike and
• 1:15:48
  Speaker 1: Hannah for joining me on the show with their lovely commentary.
• 1:15:51
  Speaker 1: I want to thank Mike Jay for helping with the
• 1:15:52
  Speaker 1: write ups, but I want to thank you guys most
• 1:15:55
  Speaker 1: of all, because without you, we'd be yelling into the void.
• 1:15:58
  Speaker 1: And so it's good to have like somebody to yell
• 1:16:00
  Speaker 1: at I mean, not that we're being mean when we're yelling,
• 1:16:03
  Speaker 1: but you know what I mean, like just sort of
• 1:16:04
  Speaker 1: shouting in your general direction. So let us know what
• 1:16:07
  Speaker 1: you guys think. Again in the comments. If you guys
• 1:16:09
  Speaker 1: liked this video, please hit like subscribe. If you're not
• 1:16:11
  Speaker 1: already subscribed, hit the BELF notifications, leave us a comment,
• 1:16:15
  Speaker 1: let us know what you guys think about everything we
• 1:16:17
  Speaker 1: discussed on the show today, and share the video because
• 1:16:19
  Speaker 1: sharing is caring. Thanks guys so much for coming on
• 1:16:22
  Speaker 1: this episode of HBr News and we will see you
• 1:16:25
  Speaker 1: next Tuesday.