Latest / Global Voice Radio Network's tracks / Radio Ranch with Roger Sayles REPLAY 092626 - Keeping Our Powder Dry in an Age of Distraction

Transcript

Radio Ranch with Roger Sayles REPLAY 092626 - Keeping Our Powder Dry in an Age of Distraction · Global Voice Radio Network's tracks

• 0:12
  Unknown: Forward moving and focused on freedom.
• 0:15
  You're listening to the Global Voice Radio Network.
• 0:19
  This
• 0:22
  mirror stream is brought to you in part by
• 0:26
  mymitoboost.com
• 0:28
  for support of the mitochondria like never before. A body trying to function without adequate mitochondrial
• 0:35
  function is kind of like running an engine without oil. It's not going to work very well. It's also brought to you by snapfat.com.
• 0:43
  That is snap,phat,.com.
• 0:47
  It's also brought to you by the Prife International
• 0:50
  Terahertz frequency wand
• 0:52
  through iteraplanet.com.
• 0:55
  Thank you so much for joining us, and welcome to the program.
• 1:54
  Unknown: But he just didn't know what to do and of course, those are the familiar lyrics of our one of our other English friends, mister Alvin Lee, in a band called ten years after and that was a lot of decades ago that he wrote that, very prophetic,
• 2:07
  like those lyrics. There's another part of those lyrics, Paul. Of course, Paul, another Englishman of our friend, is with us today, and it says, Tax the rich, feed the poor, but tell me where is sanity, is the tagline there, and I've always liked to think that maybe
• 2:22
  here is a little sanity.
• 2:24
  At least we try to bring some, we try and find it for ourselves first and we try and spread it. Roger Sales
• 2:30
  is the name and freedom
• 2:33
  is the game.
• 2:35
  Radio Ranch, People's Patriot Network, as is our habit on Wednesdays,
• 2:41
  our
• 2:42
  good friend Paul is with us and we all like to hear what he has to say and the way he has to say it and all those kind of things. Paul, how you doing, man? Did you have a good Easter over there?
• 2:53
  Unknown: I didn't even know it was on.
• 2:54
  Unknown: Really?
• 2:57
  Unknown: When is Easter? Can anybody tell us when it's gonna be next year? I never have a clue. The whole thing, you know. It floats. I've been around long enough to know. It's You can tell I'd gone I'd kinda messed it up because Sunday afternoon,
• 3:09
  my sons who were too old for this sort of thing, and I don't go in for anyway, they said, dad, where's the where's the chocolate Easter eggs? I went, what?
• 3:17
  They said, come on. I said, okay. So I just thought I could go off and get one not realizing, I mean, England everything shuts down on Easter Sure. Sunday.
• 3:25
  So that's the first I kind of you can see I'm not kind of with it really. I mean, I think I sort of generally knew that it was on, but I didn't plan it right. It all went terribly wrong, but it was a good day anyway. It's a it's a floating holiday.
• 3:39
  Unknown: Could you could you call it that? Because I mean, like Christmas and the others are a set day,
• 3:43
  but but Easter floats
• 3:46
  and
• 3:47
  Unknown: of course that has Oh, Passover. Yeah, it does. Yeah. It does. It definitely floats. And there was a lot going on that weekend, you know, there was what was going on? On the Some bombings and
• 3:57
  Oh, yeah. There was that. I've not even bothered looking into that really, but what I have been made aware of is the fact that it's not really being pushed very much over here, whereas the New Zealand thing was everywhere.
• 4:08
  But the
• 4:09
  it was Adolf's birthday
• 4:11
  on Saturday,
• 4:12
  he would have been 130.
• 4:14
  Mister Hitler would have been 130 on Saturday,
• 4:17
  you had Good Friday, you've got Easter Sunday, it's all sort of yeah, it seemed to be there's a lot of sort of these numerical symbolic sorts of things that they want you to ponder about and get confused about going on
• 4:28
  And I don't know if I mentioned it last week, probably not actually because I think I only just found out about this over the weekend, but the
• 4:35
  Notre Dame thing
• 4:38
  was seven hundred and seventy seven years.
• 4:41
  I don't know if we mentioned this the other week, but seven hundred and seventy seven years in France
• 4:46
  since they burnt Talmuds,
• 4:48
  seriously. Uh-huh.
• 4:50
  So you know, they like their little dates and all that kind of junk, don't they? And then the
• 4:56
  the headquarters of Chabad Lubavitch,
• 4:59
  headed up by or used to be headed up by
• 5:03
  Rabbi Mendel Schneerson,
• 5:06
  Unknown: he's no longer alive. You know who his private secretary was don't you?
• 5:11
  No. Netanyahu's
• 5:13
  father.
• 5:15
  Unknown: Oh, that's that's good. It's nice to know they're all chummy with one another.
• 5:19
  Anyway, the head just just to let you know, the headquarters for that organization
• 5:24
  is at 777
• 5:26
  Something Boulevard, Crown Heights.
• 5:29
  So they like their numbers and it was Schneerson's birthday or would have been had he been alive on the Notre Dame thing. So there was a lot going on. They love all their numbers, don't they? All that There's kind of lot of there's a lot of real
• 5:41
  Unknown: woo woo tie ins right there in there.
• 5:44
  Unknown: Yeah. Yeah, they do. They I think, know, there's probably something in it in the sense that, know, you remember dates and numbers and stuff like that and that kind of a way of imprinting certain things
• 5:55
  in the mind
• 5:56
  Unknown: to make things happen. Sorry, it's got tinkling sound then. Hope you do. Yes. Well, I I did tinkle. I did that before the show though. The tinkling was we got Chris joined us so and Skype is really Oh, I thought
• 6:09
  Now when you do that little join
• 6:11
  thing and they give you a little
• 6:14
  noise, you know, they give you a damn noise for everything. You sing that quite nice.
• 6:19
  Hey Chris!
• 6:23
  Morning Paul and Roger. Are you traveling today or are you stationary?
• 6:29
  Unknown: At the moment, I am semi stationary.
• 6:31
  Unknown: Okay. Good. Good. Was everything okay with you today?
• 6:37
  Unknown: Yes, reasonably so, so far.
• 6:40
  Unknown: Paul, you made a real interesting comment there when you were talking to me, kinda had my antenna go up. You said that the Sierra Lanka church bombings, which are pretty horrific, were not covered much there in your place?
• 6:56
  Unknown: No, I mean, maybe I'm not the best person to talk on this, but I've got very little sense of it actually reaching
• 7:02
  anywhere much.
• 7:04
  I mean,
• 7:05
  I watch news on the television because you
• 7:10
  have to use your time valuably and that's not a good use of time really. But no, I don't get any sense of outrage like there was
• 7:18
  about the Christchurch thing.
• 7:20
  So Well But it's all going on, isn't it? Mean, you know, they pick Easter, you've got the someone said, oh, it's in revenge for Christchurch. Right. Christchurch didn't even take place. Then you've got it called Christchurch,
• 7:31
  then you've got Christ's actual church at Notre Dame going up in flames exactly one month after that. You know, so there's all these sorts of little things
• 7:40
  that they're doing. I'm not gonna get bamboozled by. On them, we're being told that we're being demoralized. I'm not. I'm actually being remoralized if there's any
• 7:48
  reenergized by it all. I I think that the more and more of these things that occur,
• 7:53
  it's simply getting obvious to everybody that they're beginning to see what's going on. It's marvelous. They and they can't seem to stop doing it on the other side. No. Can't. So they've got the ball rolling, they're committed
• 8:03
  and I still think that they feel that we can't see and of course a huge number of our people still can't see but a massive number can and that number is growing It really
• 8:12
  is. So
• 8:14
  it's
• 8:15
  Unknown: interesting times as they Well, that was what I was gonna ask you because I've seen two real interesting tidbits.
• 8:21
  Of course, don't follow the news either except on, you know, our
• 8:25
  stations
• 8:26
  and channels and web pages and stuff. But I was watching a little interview or a tape the other day and one of the guys from over there was saying, well, a small
• 8:38
  another
• 8:39
  domestic intelligence agency alerted us to this on April 11. And then the next sentence he said something about the response from the CIA. So it's pretty clear they weren't talking about the same one. And of course, the
• 8:53
  other domestic
• 8:55
  intelligence agency had to be the Mossad.
• 8:58
  And then it comes out that this was in retaliation,
• 9:02
  at least from their
• 9:03
  vocalizing of it, of the
• 9:06
  New Zealand situation, which we know
• 9:08
  sure looks like one of a Mossad deal to me.
• 9:11
  So it was interesting to me, and it goes back to something we've talked about in the show that comes from the Bible. I never understood it my whole life until one day about two years ago. It is one of those things, man, you stay on top of this information enough and you get understanding.
• 9:25
  You can have knowledge,
• 9:27
  but you don't have the understanding. And that is why it says in the Bible, Above all seek understanding.
• 9:33
  Yes. It is these things coming out like that and us being able to put our fingers on it.
• 9:42
  And you might not have proof, they cover everything pretty well, but
• 9:46
  you pretty well know these things aren't just happening out of happenstance.
• 9:52
  Unknown: No,
• 9:53
  no, and it's the speed with which they send them down
• 9:56
  the plug hole, down the memory hole.
• 9:58
  It's a bizarre landscape if you think about it say in comparison to what a news cycle used to look like even ten or twenty years ago. Things
• 10:06
  major supposed events occur, this tremendous drama, then they almost just vanish overnight over two or three days and replaced by something else.
• 10:14
  There's no and there's just one after another after another of these things and the whole sense is that,
• 10:20
  I mean, maybe this is part of our processing that they've got underway.
• 10:24
  We are not to be able to discern between something that's false or real, so they mix the two together continually
• 10:30
  to keep us in a state of being off balance.
• 10:32
  I don't know whether it's actually really gonna pan out. Things are always evolving and so you know when they think they may have got us in a lock,
• 10:39
  something tends to come along to unpick it and we
• 10:42
  members of our own tribe as it were, begin to see things in a way that they didn't see them before.
• 10:47
  But there's definitely been an increase in the tempo and speed of the stupidity of that, there's no doubt. There's a great Jewish word, Yiddish word called chutzpah. I'm sure you're familiar with that, Paul. Chutzka,
• 10:57
  Unknown: yes, I'm familiar with it. Starts
• 11:00
  with c h
• 11:01
  u t z k a or some weird, real weird spelling,
• 11:06
  but you see that's what they always do traditionally is they get so full of themselves,
• 11:11
  they're pumped full of themselves from birth on how great they are and everybody else's scum and
• 11:17
  they're the only ones that have a soul. And they go through as
• 11:21
  they grow up a system of, let's
• 11:24
  face it, David Duke is correct,
• 11:26
  tribalism.
• 11:28
  And the tribe pulls everybody up together to make themselves strong,
• 11:33
  okay? And then they get more hubris,
• 11:36
  and they get more isolated,
• 11:38
  and they get more chutzpah.
• 11:41
  And it's when at some point,
• 11:43
  they're going to step over the line. Okay? They just keep pushing.
• 11:48
  They got a big agenda behind They
• 11:51
  keep pushing, pushing, pushing,
• 11:53
  and they always
• 11:54
  press the envelope too far.
• 11:58
  Unknown: Good to hear you.
• 12:00
  Unknown: Chris, what's your observation there, buddy? We don't
• 12:03
  Unknown: well, Joseph Goebel
• 12:05
  and Hitler's
• 12:07
  right stag minister of propaganda
• 12:10
  said specifically there's 25 rules of disinformation
• 12:13
  that
• 12:14
  it makes no matter if the information that they're
• 12:19
  true or false.
• 12:20
  If it
• 12:21
  creates confusion,
• 12:23
  then it's read it's subjective and accomplished its goal. And this is what we're seeing this mass
• 12:29
  crisis managed event produced
• 12:32
  theatrical production for mass deception.
• 12:35
  And, of course, when they close down the media outlets and all news whenever one of these happens under the pretext that they're trying to protect the people
• 12:46
  so they can hide the facts so they can't be uncovered
• 12:49
  for the perpetrators
• 12:51
  who are trying to frame the blame on the Muslims
• 12:54
  by wearing their costumes or yellow vest or,
• 12:58
  alleging that they're seeking revenge or something that they did themselves to try to blame the other group before. It gets pretty preposterous absurd,
• 13:06
  and many people can see through the lies
• 13:10
  of the Zionites.
• 13:11
  Unknown: More and more are every day.
• 13:14
  I forget what it was. I was looking at one of these videos the other day and went down to the comments at the bottom. And I mean, usually they'll block those things out on some of the controversial videos, but they had not done that with this one. And there must have been 50 or 60 or more comments,
• 13:32
  and they all basically said the same thing.
• 13:36
  Okay, and it wasn't positive either, it was, you know, these guys, these guys, these guys. So there's a lot of aware people out there, what's going to be the catalyst, what's the black swan,
• 13:47
  and it's coming. We got a lull, it seems like to me here the last days, you know there's a bunch of important stuff going on in the background, but there's a
• 13:56
  lull on the surface. You're not seeing,
• 14:00
  I don't know, just something,
• 14:02
  you know it's there, but it's not really there. It's like it's a calm day,
• 14:06
  there's not too much to talk about,
• 14:08
  but we know that there's a lot to talk about and a lot of things going on in the background.
• 14:13
  Paul, yeah, I sent you an article
• 14:16
  right before the show about
• 14:18
  Chop Chop Square.
• 14:20
  I think we talked about it yesterday. I don't remember if we talked about it or not,
• 14:24
  but
• 14:25
  I had it on my mind because I sent it out to a few people. And what happened, I've got the article open over there, but let's see if I can do it from memory, They
• 14:33
  beheaded
• 14:35
  43 people,
• 14:37
  37, 43,
• 14:38
  37
• 14:40
  33 of them were Shiites and a couple of them were somebody else in one day.
• 14:46
  Okay.
• 14:47
  One one day. Yes. I mean, I know more about sorry. No. No. Go ahead.
• 14:53
  Unknown: No. Was just gonna say because you'd sent me the link, now I see what you get up to reading during the weekend. No.
• 15:00
  Because you'd sent me the link, I actually know more about that than I did about the the Sri Lankan Okay. Stuff. I mean, because it also, you know, I immediately have this thought as well just as you were speaking, then I thought, oh, is this the this is the new atrocity to supplant the Chris the the atrocity of slaughtering the Christians. Yeah. You know, because there's always something that's got to nudge in. Oh, forget that now, this is much more awful and
• 15:24
  all that kind of stuff. Just going back to Chutzpah
• 15:27
  as well, it's interesting you mention it because it's not obviously it's not a new idea around here or probably to many of the listeners as well I would have thought, but I came across a really juicy definition of it. It was
• 15:41
  I liked it, it was good, it's quite comical, but you know, which it is in the Greek. It says, a man
• 15:46
  in court accused of murdering his parents
• 15:49
  throws himself upon the mercy of of the court pleading that he's now an orphan and needs to be looked after.
• 15:55
  And that's the definition of chutzpah.
• 15:58
  Unknown: Well, tell let me tell you the one that I read in WikiLeaks that I thought you were going to use it and it deviated. Alright, okay. And they've taken it out of WikiLeaks. This was twenty
• 16:08
  something years ago when I was first really getting into this and studying it and I came on the Word and I went to look it up and I went to WikiLeaks and there it was and it said the guy was in court on trial for murdering his parents.
• 16:21
  And he said, I couldn't have murdered my parents. I was adopted.
• 16:30
  Unknown: Yeah,
• 16:31
  There is that. It's like a twist in the in the in the flow of logic
• 16:35
  and you're supposed to fall over onto that side but it's yeah. It's part of You're the supposed to bow down and worship them for being so brilliant.
• 16:47
  Unknown: It's really nice if you devote all your mental energy to This things like is something else from that whole ethnicity thing and we know we've read the Talmud,
• 16:56
  we've heard enough either stories or read things to understand
• 17:00
  pretty much what the hell is going on there,
• 17:03
  the indoctrination procedure,
• 17:05
  and so now they're telling them they're better than everybody else. Are they basing that statement on the fact that they are willing to lie, cheat, steal, murder,
• 17:14
  be racist, and all this and that makes them better? Is that the rationale here?
• 17:21
  Unknown: Well,
• 17:22
  it seems to be the evidence here, doesn't it? Yes.
• 17:26
  I mean, know,
• 17:28
  I I must admit, I've not really sort of thought about it much recently. Last couple of weeks, it's amazing now if you don't think about a thing almost like every day, you you get absorbed in other things. I don't know. I seem to find this the older I get. And then suddenly,
• 17:40
  someone will reintroduce me back to a thought pattern I had, say, five days ago, and it's like brand new. Oh, yeah. You're absolutely right. But I've often thought that the it's the
• 17:51
  it's the fact that they're bound together by
• 17:54
  supposedly the internal laws of the of the tribe
• 17:57
  that cause it that brings about the ability to
• 18:01
  attain such tremendous commercial advantage.
• 18:04
  I think that that's a key part of it. Mhmm. And
• 18:07
  so we tend to probably operate more as individuals and they're always butting heads with one another and we do it within a context of upholding
• 18:15
  the transparent
• 18:16
  law. Ho ho. I know it's not that transparent, but you know what I mean. At least everybody's got that in their heads apparently.
• 18:22
  They're they're operating to a totally different sort of operating
• 18:25
  system, and I think the computer analogy works really well.
• 18:28
  If if we are Unix, they are Windows, if you know what I mean, and within our environment and vice versa, it acts as it literally operates as a virus, as a computer virus. The operating systems appear to be similar, they appear to be going for the same sort of result, but they're actually not
• 18:45
  and because of the way in which things are done,
• 18:48
  it acts as a virus within our system because it's incompatible.
• 18:52
  There are some primary values right in that in their operating system,
• 18:56
  which we don't recognize as values at all, if you know what I mean. So I think it's and I would I wouldn't extend it just to their group. I'd say it's to any group, really. It's the same with
• 19:05
  relating to Islam or any of these other things. And when, you know, the pope comes out with we're gonna have this interfaith thing. I mean, I've even seen something I don't know whether it was the pope or not, not that I worry too much about what's going on in what's left of his brain, but the
• 19:19
  Notre Dame rebuilding process, someone's already suggested that they put a big spire on it or something that wasn't there before and it should become a sense of interfaith and all this kind of stuff. It's all madness.
• 19:30
  The whole thing
• 19:31
  is incredibly stupid and silly,
• 19:33
  but they seem to have got a lot of traction because people don't think it through. They don't think what's being proposed here
• 19:39
  can't work. People don't get it because they're just in love with this idea.
• 19:44
  This is the problem. They're in love with the idea that we're all somehow magically gonna get on and what they don't realize is that we don't need to. This is what the point I keep. There's actually no requirement for us to do that.
• 19:54
  It doesn't mean that we're gonna knock 10 bells out of each other either.
• 19:58
  The idea is to just everybody get separated and get back home and the vast majority of these troubles I mean, you look at say that, you know, what you were saying earlier Roger about blaming Muslims for things
• 20:09
  or not as the case may be. So I understand that in regard to the Sri Lankan event, there's not a great deal of pointing at the fact that it's likely to be a Muslim
• 20:18
  organization that has done it, which is a minority in
• 20:22
  I think it's primarily Buddhist in Sri Lanka, amazingly. Yes, it is.
• 20:26
  Yeah, so there's not been much point in that, you see if Muslims weren't there,
• 20:31
  you couldn't even have this scenario.
• 20:34
  It's only by placing lumps of people in
• 20:37
  enclaves and nests amongst other people that you've now got all your narrative base sorted out, you can actually trot these things out all day long. You can. And do. Abortion blame, whereas They did. No one was there, you couldn't blame them as we said, well, they're out there in Oh no, alright, so what really caused it then? Ah. So it creates room for the maneuver to create more trouble when you mix people there, the other force that wants it.
• 20:59
  You give them a lot of causative stories, narratives that they can run and everybody goes well that makes sense and of course we all hit a brick wall then and nothing can because people really need to acknowledge that everyone's got to go home.
• 21:11
  That's just nature
• 21:13
  and nature wins and it's winning now just on its way back. Well, sent that story,
• 21:19
  Unknown: the chop chop story out to a few people, including my State Department contact, who's a specialist in The Middle East. He didn't make it to lunch yesterday, something came up, and so I think we're gonna get together next week or something. This guy's, for somebody that's, as I call him, retired, he's busy. I said, Man, you don't act like you're retired.
• 21:38
  But I sent it out with the byline, I said, With
• 21:42
  allies like the Israelis
• 21:44
  and these guys here,
• 21:46
  what could possibly go wrong?
• 21:50
  Then, of course, you've got the Saudis
• 21:54
  just bombing the unmerciful
• 21:57
  Haiti's out of these people in Yemen and killing busloads and killing children and bombing
• 22:04
  women and children. And so
• 22:06
  politically,
• 22:07
  they get a bill up in the Congress and get it through
• 22:11
  to stop supporting
• 22:13
  Saudi Arabia in doing these atrocities,
• 22:15
  and Trump vetoes it last week.
• 22:21
  Unknown: Yeah, well, you know, he's he's done for.
• 22:24
  Really, he's gone.
• 22:26
  Unknown: You were mentioning Shavad
• 22:28
  Lubavitch, you know who's a Lubavitcher
• 22:30
  too is Jared Kushner.
• 22:35
  No. Well,
• 22:38
  Unknown: didn't didn't they used to put BB up?
• 22:40
  Unknown: Would
• 22:42
  Unknown: sleep in his bedroom. Well, I mean look at how we have to be absorbed into or drawn into or end up spending our
• 22:51
  brainpower and minutes and hours of our lives thinking about why
• 22:55
  you see if they wanted to kick 10 bells out of one another, said, well go on. But they they involve themselves in our spaces, this is the problem. They want you to
• 23:06
  Unknown: 10 bells out of them for them.
• 23:09
  Unknown: That's
• 23:10
  what this is all about and of course, so they will pretend to have shared values with with us when it serves bringing that about or not when they want something else. The whole thing is a nonsense and can't work. I I was
• 23:23
  I don't have it to hand, unfortunately, because it was on my phone elsewhere, but I
• 23:28
  think it was Monday, probably Monday, a couple of days back. I was on Twitter, I I actually do like Twitter.
• 23:34
  Actually that that doesn't make sense. There are certain people that I subscribe to on Twitter and I think that some of the things that come down there are great. They've not yet been banned but most of them are earmarked for it I'm sure. And
• 23:45
  there was a comment by some
• 23:46
  woman, Sarah,
• 23:48
  I don't can't remember now, Parker or something.
• 23:51
  Anyway, she saw that it was one of these amazing threads where this woman or this creature was asserting that race does not exist and that it's a social construct.
• 24:00
  And she said as a white person blah blah. Later on down the thread it turned out that she's an Ashkenazi Jew,
• 24:06
  but she was white at the beginning of the thread when it suited her purposes, then she became a Jew later on, then she reverted to being white further on down this chain of things and I'm watching this.
• 24:16
  Just I don't mind them saying this stuff because
• 24:19
  the
• 24:21
  map of understanding that the manual is now getting into more and more people's hands as we were just talking about a few minutes ago, and the rebuttals in the thread were astonishing, they were fantastic,
• 24:32
  they were coming from multiple communicators,
• 24:36
  not just one or two, twenty or 30, everybody's just piling in mocking her, picking, just crushing
• 24:43
  the insanity of the propositions that are being put forward by just using calm,
• 24:47
  relentless logic and evidential observation.
• 24:50
  And it's
• 24:51
  wonderful, it's marvelous. One guy wrote in and he said, oh fantastic, he said, so if race doesn't exist, he said, there's no way I could have ever been racist because black people don't exist, fantastic thanks.
• 25:02
  In other words, I was never I've never been racist to anybody because obviously they weren't in a race, you see, according to you.
• 25:10
  And so she was she was basically banging on against this
• 25:14
  mythical thing called white privilege,
• 25:16
  know. So basically it was terrible that we've all got this, in other words she was white when that was going on, and then she was Ashkenazi Jew when she was defending Jews against
• 25:27
  their involvement in the slave trade. I went this is just great, I don't ever want her to be shut up, please let these people keep writing and speaking and talking
• 25:37
  because it's just the more they do it, you just want to go crazy, go on, say everything you want, and the more they do it, it just becomes obvious
• 25:46
  Unknown: what's going on. There's a saying that describes that
• 25:51
  that I've used for many years. It says if you give a monkey enough rope,
• 25:56
  they'll hang themselves every time.
• 25:58
  Unknown: Well, that's what's going on. It's definitely what's going on.
• 26:02
  And we
• 26:04
  it struck me what was I watching the other day? I caught a glimpse of Gladiator that
• 26:08
  one of the last really good films made, I think.
• 26:11
  It it had a moral story to it and there was a great sense of direction and focus to the plot. I like it a lot.
• 26:18
  Of course, it's quite old now I suppose. It's what? Nearly 20 years old? Yeah. Can't believe it's 20 it doesn't feel 20 years old because these things are all held digitally now so they don't seem to age in the way that films used to. I don't know if you remember that but they don't seem to do that anymore. We love a little sequence though where
• 26:34
  I've forgotten his name the
• 26:37
  evil chap, the evil emperor, the
• 26:41
  Joachim Phoenix's character, know he's not Nero, he's a Collegial.
• 26:46
  I don't know, I've forgotten his name. He's not he's the son of I can't remember. He's killed his dad anyway. It's all pretty bad but he sat in in he sat in the temple and he's very worried about the
• 26:58
  about the rise of Russell Crowe's character, know, who is getting the energy of the people behind him
• 27:06
  and
• 27:07
  obviously,
• 27:08
  know, Russell Crowe I don't know if you've seen the film but I did years ago.
• 27:12
  Yeah. Well it's got a great plot. Anyway, but he's talking
• 27:17
  to
• 27:18
  politician who's come to see him or a
• 27:21
  member of the Senate and
• 27:23
  at first his instincts are to attack those and the Senator says no you don't do that do that. He said he
• 27:30
  starts telling them about a snake in the ocean.
• 27:33
  It's a nice little scene actually. It's a snake that stays in the ocean and it pretends to be dead
• 27:39
  and everything comes at this snake and he said that it even lets
• 27:43
  the other fish bite it up to a certain point and then it turns and kills them. He said like that snake,
• 27:50
  just wait, we will wait. He said yes, we will wait and let our enemies come to us. Now of course, I'm
• 27:56
  tilting it around a bit but effectively to some degree
• 27:59
  we are kind of in that role. I actually think if we I mean maybe we're not, maybe people are gonna go out proactively do things who's to say, but it struck me as being a rather useful guiding thought at this time that something is going on to that effect. If we sit here and keep our powder dry,
• 28:15
  and you could say that maybe we don't have too much choice in the way that we're being nullified or shut up and
• 28:19
  let them put their mouths flat out which they're doing,
• 28:24
  what they're doing is they are actually they're educating all of Akerthikin as to what's going on. We don't have to do it, yeah keep talking,
• 28:32
  please tell
• 28:34
  us more about how fabulously powerful you are and what you're gonna do, just keep
• 28:38
  please keep it and they can't stop. They they getting carried away with it. Is there is there nature?
• 28:45
  Yep. It is. It seems to be.
• 28:48
  And it's not confined literally just to them, think, you know, we've got all the turncoats from our own people that are over in that camp, these creatures who are well, double the creatures of hell, the scripture would describe them. They're
• 29:00
  in that position as well, I think they're very much in that position.
• 29:05
  Know I mean I haven't looked at Brexit much recently although there's supposed to be a six month extension to this thing. There's lots of news floating around that we actually left on the twenty ninth. There are certain commitments being made by intelligence agencies that we left.
• 29:19
  I think I mentioned the other week that the passports have changed over here and they no longer carry the EU star on them, the new ones that are being issued which is
• 29:27
  Supposedly
• 29:29
  Unknown: there was a legal opinion of somebody that I saw in an article said you left on the twenty ninth.
• 29:35
  Unknown: Yeah.
• 29:36
  Yeah. Well, I mean what we're you know what we're dealing with here, here we are this little narrow casting situation, let's call it what it is, which we would like it to become medium casting and possibly even broadcasting if we could. It's obvious that what may actually be true in law, what may actually be the honorable just measures in law,
• 29:56
  don't count if the population are unaware of them as you well know and the hull of the media is therefore without doubt the most powerful thing because it holds everybody's, I know I'm going over the same old ground but there's nothing wrong with that, it's holding everybody's
• 30:12
  thoughts and considerations
• 30:13
  and ideas of what and what is not possible in place.
• 30:18
  This is like, you know, you'll have had this all the time when you talk about the legal aspects that you cover,
• 30:23
  is that you're bringing for most people, the vast majority, you're bringing a new idea into their space.
• 30:30
  It's brand new, it's a thought they've never even considered,
• 30:34
  would you like to live without paying any income tax?
• 30:37
  Here comes the response,
• 30:39
  you can't do that they will tell you. No,
• 30:41
  have you ever considered how it could be done? No one even thinks. There's not even the muscles in the head. They're not it's not even a thought that even runs through the nervous system. The conditioning. Yeah. Absolutely.
• 30:53
  Yeah. If you gave us the the reins of the major television studios for three months, I'd have nothing but that. The whole schedule will be revised in twenty four hours, and within inside three weeks, everybody going, bloody. Did you know that? You could just see it. That
• 31:08
  that's I mean, it's it's kind of self evident, obviously, knowing how to deal with it in face of the vast amount of financial and sort of intellectual resources that they've pulled onto their side. I mean they pull the intellectual resources because they can afford to pay them, right? Yes. And keep them in the silk suits and champagne that these intelligent
• 31:26
  people like
• 31:28
  and we can't do that.
• 31:30
  That's that's the challenge, but it you know, on a on a fair playing field, ho ho, I e in a common law court,
• 31:37
  Unknown: we're gonna nail it every time. It's just that we've got to create our venues. We've got to get our venues good. I've thought about this so much for so many years, what you're talking about here and trying to get this across to people. It's why I stress
• 31:50
  and strive so hard to get this simplified,
• 31:54
  okay? So let's say because you're dealing on several levels here.
• 31:58
  First of all, you're dealing on a level that you just talked about that we don't have too much familiarity
• 32:03
  with this,
• 32:04
  and we've got a lot of conditioning into system where we are.
• 32:09
  But then you've got a two tier, another problem is that they're working on a two tier level. They're working on a conceptual level versus a colloquial level. I'll give you an example. If you're trying to talk to somebody about this stuff and you're going out there and trying to explain it to them, go, Make a statement, You're property.
• 32:29
  Unknown: First of all,
• 32:30
  Unknown: can't fathom that on the first level.
• 32:34
  On the second level, they don't know the difference between colloquial usage of the word property and the legal usage
• 32:42
  of the word property.
• 32:44
  So there's two levels that they're messing with you on and it makes it really difficult.
• 32:49
  And I mean, is something I've been going through for almost thirty years now, all right, and to get this down to where you can present
• 32:57
  the way that I've found to do it is to simplify it where you can present the dialectic.
• 33:02
  You need to present the equivocation,
• 33:04
  the dialectic,
• 33:05
  to somebody,
• 33:06
  and the best example, easiest is, Are you a citizen of The United States? Are you a citizen of The United States Of America? Well, obviously they all consider those two to be the same and they're not.
• 33:18
  There's a lot of other examples, but getting it down where you can simplify it
• 33:23
  and
• 33:25
  tickle their brain
• 33:27
  You don't even have to get in a discussion, you just have to plant the seed and leave it, all right? And then down the line,
• 33:33
  as they see these inconsistencies inconsistencies and these obvious things that we're so aware of that they never were aware of before,
• 33:43
  they come into a little slice of consciousness.
• 33:47
  Yes.
• 33:48
  There's a process, it's got to be a process because the damn plan is so complex
• 33:53
  and so
• 33:55
  skillfully
• 33:56
  executed.
• 33:58
  I mean, you don't have to I can hate these bastards
• 34:02
  and respect them.
• 34:05
  Yes. And I respect them for what they've been able to pull off, and it's a healthy respect
• 34:11
  because it's going to play into my favor down the line because I know what their capabilities
• 34:16
  are.
• 34:18
  Unknown: Yeah.
• 34:20
  Unknown: Well,
• 34:22
  we go through a little
• 34:25
  sort of
• 34:27
  peaks and troughs energy wise. Right now,
• 34:30
  the Easter thing has been subdued,
• 34:33
  I feel. I always feel as though the whole
• 34:35
  nation is subdued over Easter. It goes very quiet. Even the weather seems to sort of comply with that. There's a sort of inert dullness in the in there's very little energy in the space. It was a bit more lively yesterday and all this and the other, but it's a matter of striking, you know, whilst the iron is hot, and sometimes people are just sort of
• 34:54
  all worn out with things. This is another weapon that they use, of course, and we've had people are actually sort of mentally exhausted with the Brexit abuse process.
• 35:04
  I was unfortunate yesterday, I was due to actually go to a meeting with a lot of people that I would have liked, know even though I don't know any of them, A lot of ex servicemen and things over here, people who are looking to restore the nation back into its true light or at least begin that process. I wasn't able to attend unfortunately.
• 35:20
  But I've got some
• 35:22
  connections that somebody gathered for me which I'm looking forward to following up. Sounds like there's some very interesting people there, very bright people and of course it's very encouraging is it not to
• 35:32
  as you no doubt find, know, that when you are with people who
• 35:36
  are even if they're not on exactly the same wavelength as you are that day are very very close to it. It's it's an extremely encouraging thing
• 35:44
  because you feel that there are very solid grounds to actually bring about this restoration
• 35:49
  process
• 35:50
  and you can't do it without others. It's absolutely vital we get through to others and I still maintain that we are our biggest problem. We currently
• 35:58
  are our biggest problem because we are not a sufficiently big enough and well organized we yet. Once we are,
• 36:04
  the other things won't be that much of a problem. We can deal with anything, I'm absolutely crystal clear about that,
• 36:11
  Unknown: but we can't deal with anything much when we are not really much of a we, if you get my drift. Well you know John's famous statement from those seminars, I've used it on the air since I've been doing this, is the only way I can protect my liberty
• 36:25
  is to help you protect yours.
• 36:28
  Right.
• 36:30
  And unfortunately,
• 36:31
  what I've had to do is go out and
• 36:34
  educate up a whole bunch of people into that because
• 36:39
  virtually nobody understood this when I was doing it, not even my teachers. It took them a little bit to get it, which kind of surprised me.
• 36:47
  And that's what I've had to do all these years, and I'm
• 36:50
  real proud of what we've been able to accomplish. There's a lot of people that are in this John Ray, this thought pattern that don't join us on the air or don't know we're here probably,
• 37:00
  we have more there, but we're getting a real good core audience
• 37:04
  of people that are really
• 37:06
  aware and educated as to what's going on and therefore they're empowered and they're strong in their own sense.
• 37:13
  And when we get a bunch of strong individuals,
• 37:17
  the herd is a bunch of weak individuals.
• 37:20
  We want a band of strong individuals.
• 37:26
  Unknown: Well,
• 37:27
  we do.
• 37:28
  We do. I think I think I've definitely I feel encouraged. I feel more positive. I don't want to come across as feeling negative about things.
• 37:34
  I think there's a lot of ground for positivity,
• 37:37
  not excessive positivity,
• 37:39
  one must keep you know your eyes peeled as they say, but there is. I think it's the way that we relay our ideas back to ourselves. If you look
• 37:48
  at what our forethought was not true historically for anybody that cares to pay attention to these things. They had
• 37:55
  their own stuff to deal with
• 37:57
  and much of it was involved
• 37:59
  unfortunately tremendous
• 38:01
  physical hardship and a lot of death.
• 38:03
  We're not at that point right now and I guess we're trying to use our brains to make sure that we don't have to get to that point again. It's not something that any of us are embracing at all.
• 38:11
  But like we've said here probably before, I certainly can begin to understand how conflicts come about
• 38:17
  when one or more sides involved in a supposed communication
• 38:21
  are not communicating
• 38:23
  with honesty and integrity at all and that is definitely the case. And when one side is seeking literally manipulate
• 38:30
  and coerce purely for its own benefit at the expense of everybody else and to lie,
• 38:35
  steal,
• 38:37
  sorry, during the process,
• 38:40
  you can begin to see that communication
• 38:42
  completely breaks down and that the only thing left is force.
• 38:47
  That's all that happens. This is why many times the right
• 38:51
  is you go that's not acceptable,
• 38:54
  no I still want this thing, I'm gonna commit to your life and take it, okay well
• 38:58
  look out for some resistance because that's not gonna happen.
• 39:01
  And
• 39:02
  you know because you can't keep buckling on every single thing with a view that oh if give them this and we give them that we do this and do that everything will turn out nice. No, once once people
• 39:12
  sense that you're weak in one area they will
• 39:15
  seek to completely take you totally to the cleaners. That's
• 39:19
  the way it is down here, unfortunately, but that is the way it is a lot. The financial thing has got to break
• 39:27
  Unknown: and that being their core root, tap root of power, that's got to break. And I think everything's going to tumble after that does, and I think that's one of the reasons they're desperately trying to do everything to keep this thing propped up.
• 39:40
  It's real close to
• 39:42
  starting obvious
• 39:43
  signs.
• 39:44
  I keep waiting,
• 39:46
  you know, which week's going to be the week, we're real close,
• 39:49
  and as that starts happening, we've got the power with the cyber coins as that whole thing takes off to literally steal their power and bring it back to us. It's too bad more people don't really understand
• 40:01
  the implications
• 40:03
  of that and they keep
• 40:05
  centering so much on the traditional
• 40:09
  market
• 40:10
  ups and downs and profit motives.
• 40:12
  The motive with those things, and you can see in a lot of the old timers in the Bitcoin
• 40:17
  community,
• 40:18
  is let's take back the power and get it away from these bastards that are doing this all over the world.
• 40:25
  I mean, they're making everybody's lives miserable.
• 40:27
  Do you ever think about what a nice I mean, wouldn't be perfect by any means, but how much of a nicer world it'd be if we didn't have these creeps doing all this stuff?
• 40:39
  Unknown: Well, it's true. I think, I mean,
• 40:42
  we all of us need a challenge. We need
• 40:45
  goals.
• 40:46
  We need something in our life that you say, well, I'm striving for that. It doesn't even have to be a big
• 40:52
  I was talking to my sister about this the other day just about it
• 40:57
  was a domestic hub but we just got around to the
• 40:59
  old fashioned way of saving up for a thing. This
• 41:03
  is an old fashioned conversation.
• 41:05
  But
• 41:06
  back in the 60s and 70s and obviously every single moment before that,
• 41:11
  the idea of easy credit or the availability of a credit card to bail you out or to feed your consumerist addictions didn't exist.
• 41:19
  So people haven't developed those sorts of poor wasting commercial consumption habits that they now have in great droves, know, this, I've gotta have this, I've gotta have that, and all that kind of stuff.
• 41:29
  So when you are actually looking to get something, a bit of infrastructure for the house, like say a washing machine or a fridge, and I remember moments like that, there was this old fashioned period called saving, you remember that right?
• 41:40
  I still do it. Saving? I still do it. Yeah.
• 41:43
  It's a very interesting thing saving because
• 41:47
  it happens when you've got a goal in mind. The whole process is I I need or want this thing,
• 41:54
  I I need to get this thing, I'm gonna save up for it. When you actually finally get it using that process, the degree of satisfaction
• 42:01
  and contentment is
• 42:03
  anything
• 42:05
  I don't know. Would say it's really
• 42:07
  when you've saved for a thing and got it, the point I was thinking to make was when you save for it earnestly and then finally acquire this thing,
• 42:15
  it's a very solid sort of experience. With the use of instantaneous credit and the acquisition of things within the next five hours on a whim,
• 42:23
  there's there's something
• 42:26
  unsound about it. I think the unsoundness
• 42:29
  sort of follows in the sense that the thinking around what you want becomes weak. You actually don't prioritize around what's important. And of course, I'd say we've gone way past it. We we have the capacity
• 42:41
  or certainly in Western countries, not all all over the place, but we've got the capacity to produce so much stuff
• 42:47
  so fast
• 42:48
  and the whole game apparently is about producing stuff and having businesses that buy and sell stuff so that we can all make lots of money and somehow this is gonna be the road to happiness.
• 42:57
  And yet it
• 42:58
  obviously isn't. The buying, I don't want any more stuff, I'm just in the process of spring cleaning here, something that
• 43:05
  really is going to be the whole year cleaning, you know. And it's just tough that builds up and you look at it and you go, okay, well I know I got this when we had a young family and I know why we had that, but we've gone through quite a bit of stuff. We don't need any more stuff and I'm keen to have less and less stuff, know,
• 43:20
  and where does that lead us in terms of the economic cycle, I mean, or how
• 43:25
  we approach the whole idea of banking and stuff, you know. The the truth is people are living longer,
• 43:31
  but the threats to us are much more
• 43:33
  unsettling than they've ever been. They seem to be the sorts of threats that we don't quite know how to deal with like five g and all these other sorts of things that are coming along. The weaponization of our own culture back against us
• 43:46
  and the loss of things like beauty
• 43:48
  and other values, cultural binding which were which made life a joy.
• 43:54
  These hidden values, the little things which turn out in the end to not be very little they're not little at all, they're enormously important
• 44:00
  because they give you all these bonding and binding agents with your own people which makes life at times
• 44:05
  a gas and it's really good.
• 44:08
  It can be magical in the really positive sense of the word magic, know, a good sense, not not dark magic but a really light, a magical sense. So
• 44:17
  it's
• 44:19
  like I've probably said before, I don't think this is about we're not pursuing the presence of vast wealth. I really don't think that that is the case, I could be wrong. I know there are certain small cluster of individuals that really do want stuff and loads of stuff and they're welcome to it, you know, but I don't think that's what the vast majority want. They want the absence of economic pressure. It's a different kettle of fish and I think in the past we've had it. We've definitely had periods certainly here in England in the in the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries when people were working only twenty four, twenty five hours a week and were working only thirty weeks a year and stuff and and this happened and they were, you know, okay, so they didn't have dentists. This is a worry to all of us. Right? But of course, they didn't have a sugar industry either back then, so maybe the teeth weren't so rotten, although they were drinking an awful lot of beer.
• 45:03
  Sounds great actually.
• 45:05
  Unknown: Good old jolly that was jolly old England.
• 45:09
  Unknown: Well, that's it. Yeah, it's that mythic theory. Yeah, it is. My dear
• 45:13
  Unknown: friend, I I allude to him often, he's deceased now, wrote the foreword to my book, probably one of the finest men I've ever known in my life, really. His name was David Strait, he was a self made millionaire, put his money where his mouth was.
• 45:27
  We became great friends
• 45:29
  and
• 45:30
  David
• 45:31
  had,
• 45:32
  well, he had
• 45:33
  pretty much When the IRS came after him and he went through the whole IRS deal and
• 45:39
  he stroked him a check for $675,
• 45:44
  Most of us can't do that.
• 45:47
  But
• 45:48
  David would tell me, he said, Roger, look, I've had all the cars, I've had all that stuff, okay? And he said, The only thing money means to me now is
• 45:59
  security
• 46:00
  and lifestyle.
• 46:03
  Yep.
• 46:04
  You mentioned about saving in the old way. We used to save up to get something we want. You're setting a goal and you're taking the actions in your goal seeking there
• 46:15
  and you sacrifice
• 46:17
  because you have to do without to set that money aside, okay? And you That's keep your eye on the prize, on the goal, that's what you want, that's what you need, now whatever the motivation is, and finally you achieve it and there's that great sense of satisfaction.
• 46:32
  When they've changed us into an instant gratification
• 46:35
  society,
• 46:36
  you got a headache? Take a pill, Okay, you don't want to get pregnant? Here's this pill over here. They've turned us into this instant gratification
• 46:44
  society
• 46:45
  and what they've really done is shifted everything into the future
• 46:49
  and people don't want it. You can look back and say, I'm trying to achieve a goal and go through sacrifice and deal with it but once you get the item,
• 46:58
  you don't want to pay that monthly bill eight, ten, twelve months from now or more when it gets so big and all that interest is compounded on it.
• 47:07
  See, they've shifted everything to futures.
• 47:12
  Unknown: Well, yeah, there's a great sort of
• 47:14
  Unknown: there's great room for maneuver in there, isn't there? Well, they can control the few if they're shifting it to the future and they got the hooks in you, they can control it and they can control it, they can control you.
• 47:26
  Unknown: That's right. Because there's there's always the implied threat of what they of what doors they can open or close during that future period which will directly affect you. So there's the possibility
• 47:36
  of a threat either implied or direct
• 47:39
  that can come down the line on this kind of stuff. It's that old thing that you know the
• 47:45
  that you are basically the slave,
• 47:48
  the borrower the lender is the is a slave to the button off, the other way around. You know what I mean? Yes. I do know It's what you a bit clumsy today, but that's it. If you if you're borrowing money, you're you're in a bad you're in a bad situation.
• 47:59
  It's not that borrowing is necessarily a bad thing. It's to do with the nature of the arrangement of it. It's not that debt's a bad thing either. I don't, you know, I don't have an issue with debt. Everybody I mean, it's often that people do bang on. They go, there's this enormous debt mountain
• 48:11
  and you go, well, so what? I mean, really, you know, it's a confusing thing in the head. It's like we've said here before, if all the nations are in debt,
• 48:21
  all of them, which they all are, if they're all running a deficit, which they all are, this is quite remarkable,
• 48:26
  who are they all in debt to? It can't it doesn't add up.
• 48:30
  It's this little
• 48:31
  bloke down here, they all act to him, really. There was an article that came out yesterday,
• 48:36
  Unknown: it's been real blatant lately through the State Department
• 48:40
  and this Bolton Pompeo
• 48:42
  axis that we've got up there that's running the show.
• 48:46
  Do you know that they the State Department of the United States put out a $10,000,000
• 48:51
  reward yesterday. Did you see that?
• 48:54
  Unknown: No.
• 48:55
  Why are you telling me because you think I'm in the running to get it? No. Am I like no. I don't think so. I don't think so, but it shows
• 49:03
  Unknown: from a with all the problems we got, all right, and that particular
• 49:08
  office of great importance
• 49:10
  is out there and this is what they're doing, all right? And what he announced is a $10,000,000
• 49:15
  reward to anybody that could help facilitate
• 49:18
  the stopping of funding of Hizballah.
• 49:23
  What the hell is our Secretary of State cow telling down about Hezbollah?
• 49:29
  Okay,
• 49:30
  why did the Senate, when the Senate reconfirmed
• 49:34
  this year
• 49:35
  with the new Congress and everything up there a couple months ago,
• 49:39
  the first bill that came out of the Senate, you know what the first bill that came out of the United States Senate was this session?
• 49:46
  No.
• 49:47
  Anti BDS.
• 49:51
  Unknown: Yeah.
• 49:52
  Shows you that everybody is focusing on stuff that's not really
• 49:56
  important to themselves.
• 49:58
  Unknown: Well,
• 49:59
  sure as hell ain't important domestically in our country.
• 50:03
  No. Not to the point when the governing body and the first piece of legislation they pass in the session has to do with this foreign little bastard country over there.
• 50:15
  Unknown: Well, yeah, I mean it's obviously, you know, these things are occurring because there's leverage
• 50:19
  exists on the individuals that propose this and champion if that's the right word, it's not the right word, but you know push these agendas. I wish. There
• 50:28
  Unknown: was some way we could push BDS
• 50:30
  heavier
• 50:32
  but they're pretty isolated, you don't have any leaders, there's no this because they get attacked everywhere,
• 50:37
  and the viciousness
• 50:39
  of the attack, and that example I just used right there, and the first piece of legislation to come out of the Senate was anti BDS,
• 50:46
  this BDS thing scares the hell out of them,
• 50:50
  or else they wouldn't be having this kind of a worldwide push to demonize it and shut it down.
• 50:58
  Unknown: Well, it's true and it's one of the things that Roger Waters, the guy from Pink Floyd, is very strong on pushing that, you know, and he's
• 51:06
  and he's right. It would obviously work to some degree. But you see, you're involved
• 51:10
  my the the issue I have is that you're just involved with a permanent sort of dialogue with all this kind of stuff, and I just think that that's a waste of time.
• 51:18
  Just basically go home, you know, it's the whole thing and then we come down to, no, I'm an American, no, no, you're not. And,
• 51:25
  you know, anybody that's dual passport,
• 51:27
  you could say has to choose one, but I say no, I say we know which one is the the actual real one, that's where you're off.
• 51:34
  Yep.
• 51:35
  Bye.
• 51:36
  Yep. You know,
• 51:37
  is our
• 51:38
  playground, These
• 51:40
  Unknown: are our rules.
• 51:41
  Were those two passports there?
• 51:44
  Yeah. Which one's got the most visa stamps in the back?
• 51:50
  Unknown: Well,
• 51:53
  yeah, I know, you know, there we have it. It was it was uncle Adolph's birthday on Saturday and
• 52:00
  he said something along the lines of the whole formation of that country, you'll know this one, where he said he said the idea of them claiming that they want a a a homeland, a nation, he said this is bunk.
• 52:10
  He said they just simply want it as a world center to keep running their scam
• 52:14
  and it'll be used as a bolt hole and a I'm paraphrasing badly, as a bolt hole and a and a budding university for the next crop of thieves and really
• 52:24
  that's about he's right. He's absolutely right. So you can't be
• 52:28
  this is the thing, you can't be a deal pass bolt holder. I know people are in that position right now and people respond as if it's a real thing but it needs to be stopped. It's a nonsense.
• 52:36
  And it it's this communication
• 52:39
  about race you see and about ethnicity and and root value. It has to be had. While it's not being had in my estimation,
• 52:48
  this hole sits in the middle of everything and it's all about compromise and compromise never ever works. There's no such thing as an effective compromise. You're basically trying to hold tensions
• 52:59
  at bay to stop it escalating, but the the drive of the tensions is to go where they wanna go, So let them go. Stop trying to pretend that we can compromise.
• 53:08
  Conflict, yeah, we wanna avoid that, but obviously, you know, there's still a lot of that going on when someone feels as they often do, they can use the US military to bully some other country into submission over this, that, the other. The muscle. Which is which is repeated. Yeah.
• 53:22
  Unknown: Well, we we got into enough provocative
• 53:25
  stuff that we invoked
• 53:27
  captain Daryl
• 53:28
  out away from the lathe.
• 53:30
  How are you doing Daryl?
• 53:32
  Unknown: I'm
• 53:34
  having a great morning. Good morning, Roger. Good morning, Paul, everybody. I
• 53:40
  I
• 53:41
  love your conversation.
• 53:42
  I love it.
• 53:45
  It's powerful stuff. Big picture.
• 53:51
  It's
• 53:53
  you you know, I
• 53:56
  I've been looking at a lot of things. I'm always doing that, but
• 53:59
  it it's obvious that
• 54:04
  when I listen to
• 54:05
  even
• 54:06
  even our our own
• 54:08
  like minded people,
• 54:11
  it's so
• 54:13
  incredibly
• 54:14
  difficult
• 54:14
  to
• 54:16
  specifically
• 54:17
  articulate
• 54:19
  the issues.
• 54:21
  And
• 54:23
  I find it that for myself.
• 54:26
  And
• 54:27
  and then I I step away from that. I look at I look at who I'm surrounded by
• 54:33
  and my the proletariat,
• 54:35
  and I go, wow. I mean,
• 54:39
  okay. And and then I then I start to think and I go, well, here's the facts.
• 54:45
  Demographics determine destiny.
• 54:49
  And we have we have this huge demographic
• 54:53
  reality
• 54:54
  in all of our Western countries now, all of them.
• 54:59
  And this this demographic
• 55:04
  has to be
• 55:06
  digested
• 55:07
  and eliminated in some manner
• 55:11
  because
• 55:18
  this this compromise
• 55:20
  is
• 55:21
  got us to this point where people with mentally compromised
• 55:25
  and emotionally compromised over generations,
• 55:28
  and and now we we hit the precipice. And
• 55:33
  so
• 55:34
  I appreciate you letting me say that. I don't know if it made any sense.
• 55:38
  Unknown: Yeah. It does. It does.
• 55:40
  It does. I mean, you can't there
• 55:43
  are these little words that float around. Compromise is one of them. And it's often
• 55:48
  uttered, isn't it? As if it's a positive. Oh, we've come to a good compromise and I'm going this is like that word tolerance. Go, hang on just a minute. Really look at what you're talking about. You're saying that you want one thing, you want another thing, but you're both prepared to nullify your desires
• 56:03
  for some stupid spurious
• 56:05
  Why don't you just why don't you go deeper? Go deeper and find out what the root thing is, why don't we correct it at an engineering level and then we don't have to bother about all this stupid talking
• 56:14
  Unknown: all these other things. If you had a problem ten years ago with gays
• 56:18
  or
• 56:19
  transvestites
• 56:20
  or any of that stuff, you were called intolerant,
• 56:23
  remember?
• 56:26
  The intolerance
• 56:27
  now?
• 56:30
  When there was a There was a story I read out of your country, Paul, and Michael's joined us, out of Michael and Paul's country last week where there was a big scheduled meeting to talk about
• 56:43
  putting LGBT
• 56:45
  people
• 56:46
  in prison,
• 56:48
  the
• 56:49
  premise was they'd put a male who thought it was
• 56:54
  who's identified let's use their stupid ass terminology
• 56:58
  a male who identified
• 56:59
  as a female who committed a crime, and they put him in a women's prison, and he raped three women.
• 57:07
  They tried to have It this
• 57:09
  was scheduled.
• 57:10
  It was a board of professional people to discuss this problem and the whole meeting had to be cancelled.
• 57:17
  Why? Because
• 57:18
  of the objections of one of these LGBT
• 57:21
  groups.
• 57:24
  Unknown: Yeah. Well, when you say professionals,
• 57:27
  Unknown: I think the next question is professionals in what? I don't know. You know, these prison type Tiddly wink? People. It was a prison a bunch of prison professionals,
• 57:36
  I guess. I don't know what else the hell to call them that were gonna get in a meeting to try and deal with this problem.
• 57:42
  That's a will you say that's a pretty big problem that now virtually every woman's sport is being
• 57:48
  the champions are are males?
• 57:55
  Unknown: It's just but, you know, they've planted their own seeds and they're gonna get this is how it works. Well, we were in this is the law. We the reason we're here. Law manifesting.
• 58:04
  The reason we're the law manifesting outside of anything that we might say in this conversation, you just go, if you do that, that's gonna happen. You go, no. It's not. I'm gonna have it my way. Goes, okay. We'll come back. Let's see how that works out for you. Well, how about You can't well, it's not working. How about this one? When Obama
• 58:19
  Unknown: got elected, do you remember what the battle cry was?
• 58:22
  Respect the office.
• 58:24
  Respect the office. Where the hell is the respect for the office now?
• 58:29
  Well,
• 58:31
  Unknown: I mean, yeah. I mean, thanks for pointing out that they're hypocrites,
• 58:35
  you know, like like they care.
• 58:38
  You know? I mean, they don't care. Alright? So
• 58:42
  they're involved.
• 58:44
  They organize really the days organize
• 58:47
  the proletariat
• 58:48
  days organize
• 58:50
  really well because they are community,
• 58:53
  communism,
• 58:54
  collective,
• 58:56
  social,
• 59:00
  and they organize. It's it's in the they identify
• 59:04
  by that. They actually identify that. And
• 59:08
  and they're empowered by it because they're subsidized
• 59:11
  against the cons
• 59:12
  they're they're subsidized
• 59:14
  in in against the consequences.
• 59:17
  Now here here's just using words.
• 59:20
  Earlier
• 59:21
  in the conversation,
• 59:25
  Roger,
• 59:26
  you know, I heard the word individuals,
• 59:28
  a group a herd or a collective a group of strong individuals.
• 59:32
  Well, I'm all for that,
• 59:34
  but
• 59:35
  individuals
• 59:36
  usually
• 59:37
  don't collect.
• 59:39
  Individuals usually don't join.
• 59:41
  They're not joiners.
• 59:43
  So we we have this almost,
• 59:46
  what would you call it? A an oxymoron
• 59:49
  about individuals organizing.
• 59:52
  Alright?
• 59:53
  And and they're they're so demographically
• 59:56
  okay. Here's here's another demographic for you. The baby boomers.
• 1:00:01
  Okay. I'm a part of that. Roger, you're a part of that.
• 1:00:04
  Paul, I'm thinking you're part of that baby boomer generation,
• 1:00:08
  you know, removed across the pond.
• 1:00:10
  Yep. And and
• 1:00:12
  who and who is more
• 1:00:15
  programmed
• 1:00:17
  than baby boomers
• 1:00:19
  against
• 1:00:20
  a false narrative of history
• 1:00:23
  and experience? Okay. Who's been more propagandized?
• 1:00:26
  The baby boomer generation
• 1:00:28
  or the people
• 1:00:30
  that are our children? Well, okay.
• 1:00:33
  I mean, so our generation demographically
• 1:00:37
  is programmed.
• 1:00:38
  Alright? Invested in that program.
• 1:00:41
  And the upcoming generation of our children and their children
• 1:00:46
  are ignorant.
• 1:00:48
  Okay?
• 1:00:49
  So, I mean, you know, we have that demographic issue to deal with too.
• 1:00:54
  And,
• 1:00:56
  I mean,
• 1:00:57
  I I
• 1:00:59
  I guess I'm not cheering anybody up here. I'm just trying to No. No. I think it's great. You are you are because
• 1:01:05
  Unknown: it's this is I the thought or a prevailing thought that I've got going on a lot the last x months is this word we.
• 1:01:13
  I keep having it. You're you're talking there about individuals and groups and everything. We go, well, we're gonna we're gonna do this. I think I may have mentioned, I've had communications from people who say, well, this is what we do to restore Britain and I'm going, when you say we, who are you referring to? The people that live here. I go, well, count me out because
• 1:01:31
  some of the people that live here can't restore Britain because they're not British. Oh, no. No. They and then you get into all this kind of stuff, and I'm going, there has to be an end to this
• 1:01:40
  line of inquiry. People have to understand when they've hit a fact and not, and half of the problem is they don't. You can actually put an evidential fact in some in front of someone. They just go straight past it because the ideology
• 1:01:52
  is beckoning them on.
• 1:01:54
  And
• 1:01:55
  Unknown: Well
• 1:01:56
  Unknown: Yeah. You know, it's defining we. How do we you know,
• 1:01:59
  Unknown: who are we to? Okay. Well, Paul, here here's here's a here's a good here's a good, you know, maybe a place to enter that enter into that stream of thought is
• 1:02:10
  is what
• 1:02:12
  happens when you mix
• 1:02:14
  a group of people with a 100 IQ with a bunch of other people with a
• 1:02:19
  80 to 85 IQ? What happens?
• 1:02:22
  Unknown: The eighty twenty rule There's a separating.
• 1:02:25
  The eighty twenty rule happens.
• 1:02:30
  Unknown: Yeah. There is. There is a separating. There is absolutely a separating. And there's also Right. Yeah. I mean, if if everybody was saying the 85 range, they would be doing the bulk of the culture forming without a doubt. If you said the great, I think there's something like about five or six strands within a society. There might be seven, but the the last two are like the super intelligent, you know, the tenth of the tenth of the tenth of the percent that are like a 180, 190 IQ, those sorts of guys. We know that they exist. Right? But the the vast majority
• 1:03:00
  of the culture is formed by that median IQ group, and so nearly
• 1:03:05
  everybody else is serving that because that's where most of the supposed
• 1:03:09
  culture is consumed,
• 1:03:11
  is exchanged,
• 1:03:12
  the patterns and wavelengths of life are established there and clever people are the ones that are a notch above on the IQ curve, can see this more clearly than people immersed in it and make use of it. It seems to be natural in a way, mean there's no avoiding that.
• 1:03:28
  Unfortunate thing is that our elites are becoming hostile
• 1:03:33
  toward us
• 1:03:34
  possibly.
• 1:03:35
  Unknown: They've always
• 1:03:38
  been hostile. It was latent before.
• 1:03:43
  Unknown: In in the arc of history,
• 1:03:45
  if we look at the arc, you know,
• 1:03:47
  I I see things in
• 1:03:49
  I visually see things in in arcs and vectors.
• 1:03:53
  And I know that sounds weird, but it it it works for me. And
• 1:03:59
  we have in the arc of history, I see how anthropology has been weaponized.
• 1:04:05
  Okay. It's literally been weaponized
• 1:04:08
  by a a
• 1:04:10
  a group of highly intelligent,
• 1:04:13
  organized,
• 1:04:16
  small group
• 1:04:17
  generationally.
• 1:04:20
  Now there's
• 1:04:22
  no question that
• 1:04:25
  anthropology
• 1:04:26
  is weaponized.
• 1:04:28
  And
• 1:04:30
  so so how do we how do we deal with that? You know, the the the perpetrators
• 1:04:34
  of this
• 1:04:36
  these machinations,
• 1:04:37
  if you were to line them up
• 1:04:39
  and then mix them mix them in with us,
• 1:04:42
  we couldn't distinguish them from us.
• 1:04:45
  You see, they look white.
• 1:04:48
  Unknown: Yep.
• 1:04:49
  They look white. The exposure is It
• 1:04:52
  does. Yeah.
• 1:04:54
  Unknown: Yeah. They they look white.
• 1:04:56
  Alright.
• 1:04:57
  And and Roger said something earlier in the week. He goes, you know, Roger,
• 1:05:01
  you were reflecting on something, and it caught my ear. And
• 1:05:06
  it's like you were you were musing about, well, maybe they have a point. I mean, don't Oh, yeah. Doesn't this hurt need to be managed? Don't they need to be maybe they should be called.
• 1:05:18
  You know? I mean, it's it's a reasonable musing.
• 1:05:21
  Alright?
• 1:05:22
  And and so
• 1:05:25
  you have the 150,
• 1:05:27
  180
• 1:05:28
  IQ
• 1:05:32
  progenitors
• 1:05:33
  of this
• 1:05:34
  ideas over
• 1:05:36
  decades
• 1:05:37
  and centuries.
• 1:05:39
  And it's it's
• 1:05:40
  manifested itself because they've learned how to manipulate,
• 1:05:45
  you know, the the social environment.
• 1:05:49
  And
• 1:05:50
  so I I mean, I
• 1:05:52
  don't even know how to talk about this without getting kind of, you know, using big words.
• 1:05:58
  I really don't. And I I I don't like to, but you kinda have to,
• 1:06:03
  you know,
• 1:06:04
  get you have to go almost to a PhD level, it seems like, to articulate this. And
• 1:06:09
  Unknown: I'm I apologize for that. Daryl, I was saying that the other day, I've had that thought for a number of years since I came upon the personal realization of how big this is and what it is years ago.
• 1:06:23
  Over the years, you think about it and
• 1:06:26
  not the I think without a question that most
• 1:06:29
  people want,
• 1:06:31
  you know, it's just like in the Bible. They wanted a king,
• 1:06:33
  okay?
• 1:06:34
  They wanted somebody to lead them but the problem
• 1:06:38
  then becomes,
• 1:06:39
  is it a good king or a bad king?
• 1:06:42
  You know, what's the Bible say when there's a good king? I mentioned it the other day. The people rejoice. When there's a bad king, the people moan
• 1:06:48
  and so,
• 1:06:50
  if we could get leaders up there that could run an over
• 1:06:54
  oversight
• 1:06:55
  over the world for benevolent good purposes,
• 1:06:59
  that'd be great, but now we get back to man and man's heart is is dark,
• 1:07:04
  no man shall know it, I keep going back to these scriptures,
• 1:07:08
  and the problem is that the psychopaths
• 1:07:12
  will always achieve the levels of power
• 1:07:16
  simply because they have no morals,
• 1:07:19
  no ethics, and will do anything to achieve it and the people that have morals and ethics that would guide it in a benevolent way will not do the things that it takes to get the position of power
• 1:07:32
  over the psychopath.
• 1:07:33
  The psychopath will do anything. People like Ron Paul have limits.
• 1:07:40
  Unknown: Well, once you once you if if you are one of those beneficent
• 1:07:45
  beneficent
• 1:07:46
  peoples,
• 1:07:47
  with that spirit, by the time you've done what you have to do in order to seize power,
• 1:07:54
  you have become a psychopath Exactly.
• 1:07:56
  Spiritually damaged Exactly. And injured.
• 1:07:59
  So
• 1:08:01
  I mean, we have to be very careful.
• 1:08:05
  I see this all the time. I I don't really suffer from it too much once in a while, but I don't project onto other people
• 1:08:14
  what my
• 1:08:15
  sensibilities,
• 1:08:16
  ethics, values, morals, virtues,
• 1:08:19
  sense of righteousness is. I really don't. And most a lot of people, the the proletariat that they do, they oh, that would never happen because, see, they don't they would never think of that. Well, yeah, I mean, you actually have wolves out here,
• 1:08:33
  and and they're
• 1:08:35
  they they are they are psychopaths.
• 1:08:37
  I mean, you know,
• 1:08:39
  listen. You know, like Donald Trump, you know, he's the new Zionist Cyrus.
• 1:08:45
  He's positioning Ivanka to be the next 20
• 1:08:49
  the the president after him. Like, oh, wow. That's gonna be exciting.
• 1:08:54
  I mean, Britain is waiting for Cromwell to show up again.
• 1:08:58
  Unknown: I mean, am I am I wrong, Paul? Well, yeah, maybe or something. I I don't like him, but I know what you mean. I mean, he was
• 1:09:06
  at least his speech when he addressed the parliamentarians
• 1:09:08
  was a true word, know, be gone, get out of here you are, basically. Right. You know, that's absolutely he nailed it. He nailed it. But the rest of him, he's there's a lot of question marks against old old Oliver,
• 1:09:19
  but he was, you know, he certainly wasn't an unstrong man. But
• 1:09:23
  yeah. It's a very I think it's a very interesting it's more than that. It's a highly relevant thing to focus on. The whole process, I mean, I think I've said it before. Let's just take Trump because he's there.
• 1:09:36
  Even if he were good, and I think that we can give up on that for now,
• 1:09:39
  he was still preferable to Hillary all the time, but I mean, what is he doing? He's actually serving
• 1:09:45
  that force that that's indirectly controlling the American nation, the same force that's indirectly controlling mine Yeah. And many others through particularly,
• 1:09:54
  you know, the the ability to hold the reins of finance at first and then extend it through law and media ownership. You see that the whole thing is like a virus,
• 1:10:03
  literally, like I said, with the computer thing. This is a their operating system is a virus inside ours, and that we're infected with this replicating virus that's bugging it up. But if you send a good man, let us suppose that maybe Donald Trump at one point was a good man into a pit of vipers,
• 1:10:20
  how long does the good man remain a good man without either
• 1:10:25
  buckling in or being killed by them. How would we protect a Cromwell if we thought or whatever
• 1:10:32
  from those forces?
• 1:10:33
  So it's
• 1:10:35
  difficult to see it. If you say that they have acquired all the intelligent people on their side, well they've certainly acquired the bulk of them.
• 1:10:44
  They do that through their recruiting grounds here, Oxford and Cambridge, they do it in The States through Yale and Harvard and Princeton and elsewhere.
• 1:10:52
  These are identification systems. Go, oh yeah, this lad down here in Tennessee, get me, he's got an IQ of 140 or whatever. They all filter through, they couldn't care less, it's a system now and they're gonna have all the brighter people sitting with them and you go, okay, maybe in the realm of IQ firepower,
• 1:11:07
  we've already lost this one and you know, if we if we think it's just literally down to something like that. I think it's down to other things as well as that or at least I have to naively believe it to to give myself a sense of optimism about getting up because I don't think it can be literally that And anybody
• 1:11:24
  that steps against the patent that would actually
• 1:11:27
  represent the people in terms of the things that we feel are important such as you know, an honest money system or a judiciary that was actually bringing about true redress of grievances,
• 1:11:39
  a removal of the fluff and the lies from media that would do that. They would do him in because they're out of their
• 1:11:45
  parasite job, he's gonna go if those sorts of things happen and from that perspective, this is why the sheer
• 1:11:52
  vicious nature of the destruction of National Socialist Germany, which is how I tend to see it, is explained,
• 1:11:58
  know, and we've we've have it explained in these quotes. Germany wasn't just about National Socialism, although that was the binding agent for them at that period in history. It was that they were
• 1:12:08
  literally maneuvering right round global finance systems and demonstrating
• 1:12:12
  an order of behavior within a civilization
• 1:12:15
  that was ludicrously attractive to us on the genetic because it's the way we want to live and of course if we start living the way we actually want to live like that, they're out of all these purchase points where they can bend what we've got out of whack. We have to believe if nothing else that we can find a way through and I believe we can because
• 1:12:33
  that gives my life meaning and I wanna wake up more cheery and possibly, you know, framing optimistic thoughts than just going, oh, it cannot be done. It's just no use, is it? It is a struggle. But there you go, this is the way it is. They've done a marvelous job of demonizing old Adolf.
• 1:12:48
  Unknown: He's probably the most
• 1:12:52
  concentrated,
• 1:12:53
  demonized individual in the history of the planet.
• 1:12:57
  Well, yeah. So that nobody will know, and it's funny to me how I see people referencing
• 1:13:04
  Nazis and Hitler in other in in something a toll a totally different subject and topic but they'll bring that in and use that as the example when it's the furthest thing of away from the truth, man. For anybody that really looks into this and goes back and studies the history that they keep from us,
• 1:13:22
  your conclusions
• 1:13:24
  are pretty easy to draw to,
• 1:13:26
  Unknown: okay? Yeah. So
• 1:13:28
  Unknown: we've got a couple of people who have joined us. Shane joined us and Michael, your fellow Brit
• 1:13:33
  living out there in California joined us and now Bob has joined us. I don't want to marginalize any of those guys. Michael and Shane were first. Did you guys just wanna ride the eerie there or did you have something? Thank you, Paul. You wanted to input. No. There's Shane's gonna jump in. Thanking you, Paul. Yes. I would like to say thank you, Paul, for you were kind of defining your terms. That's very good. When I first joined this conversation,
• 1:14:00
  Unknown: I
• 1:14:01
  back at the beginning,
• 1:14:03
  there was this machinations
• 1:14:05
  of trying to
• 1:14:07
  to, I don't know,
• 1:14:10
  define
• 1:14:11
  this particular
• 1:14:17
  I'm sorry. I'm really I'm lost words.
• 1:14:19
  But the thing is is that there's
• 1:14:22
  there's the events which have been going on for, like, the fire,
• 1:14:26
  like, the the bombing,
• 1:14:28
  like,
• 1:14:30
  the the I I guess, the killing
• 1:14:33
  and destruction
• 1:14:34
  of property.
• 1:14:35
  And I don't know. It's it's just, once again, another game
• 1:14:40
  of
• 1:14:41
  toil.
• 1:14:42
  It's it's a game of toil to Mhmm. Dilute you from the truth.
• 1:14:47
  Oh, yeah. But but, yes, thank all for
• 1:14:51
  yeah. Thank you all for bringing up this
• 1:14:55
  defined
• 1:14:56
  the way you defined it, the way of you as being
• 1:15:00
  a Brit British,
• 1:15:03
  I guess, citizen.
• 1:15:06
  Unknown: Subject. They're called subject. Hey. Shane? Shane they're called. I refer to myself of course as a peasant which I'm quite happy being a peasant and
• 1:15:15
  we're all peasants here and we should be proud of our peasant heritage and there is nothing out wrong with it and it's fine. So but yes,
• 1:15:24
  We are involved in in negotiating first of all the distraction
• 1:15:28
  system.
• 1:15:29
  It's all distraction. I find I mean films, not that I wanna dwell necessarily on films, but films are so poor these days. They have they don't distract me at all. They're sort of, oh no.
• 1:15:39
  What about what about something that I really could get lost in? I find it very difficult to get lost in a film in the way that I used to. Maybe it's just middle age or something and you just become a grouch about everything. But they're not very good. They've not been very good at all. There's just not enough intellectual substance of them at all these days.
• 1:15:53
  Yet they're part of this great distraction business, are they not? And you think, oh well it doesn't really matter much, but when you look at the amount
• 1:16:00
  of it, the fact that everybody's day
• 1:16:03
  is to a great degree just crammed with one sort of explosive moment either audio or visual after another, know. There's always something going on, there'll be something next week and next month and I keep thinking, well if I'd never paid any attention to the news cycle at all, would anything be any different and what except would I have been a lot happier? I probably would have been a lot happier. I might have been stupid
• 1:16:25
  but you know maybe ignorance is bliss is not such a bad thing every now and again. You just go, I'm gonna take a little bit of time off here and just look at the clouds and remind myself of how beautiful the sea is or the flowers or anything like that. We're surrounded by a lot of stuff which we're so distracted by, we probably, I certainly in my case, don't pay as much attention to it or feel it like I used to do when I was younger. You feel a lot of things when you're younger which is part of the great joy of it all. We get lost you know.
• 1:16:52
  Unknown: Thank you. As you get older, those feeling hormones don't get produced as much anymore
• 1:16:58
  and yes Oh, okay! You get a degree with the lack of feeling hormones
• 1:17:04
  comes on a little more of the other side of cynicism.
• 1:17:08
  Michael, how are you doing out there today, man?
• 1:17:12
  Oh, you must have his name. Hi. Good morning, Paul and Roger and everyone. Yes, I'm doing well. Thank you. Just gonna get my morning coffee and a little breakfast and I'm good to go. Okay, well yeah, it's early out there where Shane and Michael are. It's like 07:00 or something in the morning when we come on.
• 1:17:29
  To Well, believe as that
• 1:17:31
  we're glad to have you along and enjoy your breakfast. If you got an observation or question or something, pop in.
• 1:17:39
  And
• 1:17:39
  Bob joined us there at the last and I know he's always got something good to observe on. He's always picking knits somewhere. Hey, Bob.
• 1:17:49
  Unknown: I had a knit I was gonna pick earlier, but I got over it. I was just going to encourage
• 1:17:55
  Daryl.
• 1:17:56
  I don't know that he needs a lot of encouragement, but, hey, everybody can stand a little. Right?
• 1:18:01
  She came on earlier and said, you know, hey, I hate to be so negative. I hate to be a downer, but I'd like to point out that no prophet in the Old Testament
• 1:18:09
  was
• 1:18:10
  preaching,
• 1:18:11
  you guys are doing great.
• 1:18:13
  Let's do it more. You know? In every case,
• 1:18:17
  if you don't understand what the problem is,
• 1:18:20
  if it isn't brought forward to be talked about and pointed out and and
• 1:18:26
  trying to understand how to do it differently,
• 1:18:29
  you're never gonna get ahead. That's right. You can't identify the prophet. I'm gonna refer to Darrell as the wise old prophet and just keep it up, Darrell.
• 1:18:37
  Unknown: Well, you know what has driven me over all these years pioneering this stuff kind of like I've done, and I use the term strong individuals,
• 1:18:46
  not as a collective of being an army or whatever, but we've got to all be strong in our own space,
• 1:18:52
  and there's reason for that, is we're not going to overturn this thing. I wouldn't want the country back if we could take it back, okay? It's gotta fall and the cleansing process has gotta go on. There's some sort of a natural process that has to it has to go through, and what I see is what we're doing is at some point in the future as the dust is settling and all is exposed,
• 1:19:17
  people are going to be looking for answers,
• 1:19:21
  and our bunch can provide some real beneficial
• 1:19:25
  answers
• 1:19:27
  and understanding
• 1:19:28
  and possibly even contribute
• 1:19:31
  foundational
• 1:19:32
  building blocks that we can rebuild on that are solid.
• 1:19:38
  Unknown: I'd like to bring something forward along that.
• 1:19:41
  Gary
• 1:19:42
  Slinghorn, your one of your first Yeah. Good guy. Accolades came from him. Yeah. Good guy. The fellow that he's the fellow that he
• 1:19:52
  has also associated with, brother Gregory Gregory Williams out in Oregon.
• 1:19:58
  He beats the drum incessantly,
• 1:20:00
  and I don't mean that in a bad way. Kinda like Daryl, you gotta keep pointing out the obvious. He beats the drum incessantly that the early church
• 1:20:08
  was comprised
• 1:20:10
  of a network.
• 1:20:11
  It was thin, it was elastic, and it was incredibly pliable
• 1:20:16
  and durable
• 1:20:18
  because it wasn't big. It wasn't monolithic. It couldn't break. It only bent.
• 1:20:22
  That's why the Christians flourished when they were persecuted
• 1:20:26
  because
• 1:20:27
  you couldn't
• 1:20:28
  like a hydra, just worse. You couldn't cut the head off. You know? It just sprang up more.
• 1:20:34
  And the thing that he often said in terms of you're a rugged individual,
• 1:20:39
  he said that's the last person you wanna be on a desert island with because he's gonna kill you. So he's not going down.
• 1:20:47
  I mean, he he's
• 1:20:49
  survivalist
• 1:20:50
  is not your friend when you're in a survival mode. You ever hear the old joke about the two guys that are out in the woods and they're surprised
• 1:20:57
  by a grizzly bear?
• 1:21:00
  And the bear is getting closer and closer, and finally one of them stops and takes his shoes off. And he says and his friend says, what what are you doing? You can't outrun that bear. He says, I don't have to outrun the bear.
• 1:21:15
  The point being, I just got outrun you.
• 1:21:20
  So you've gotta know who your friends are.
• 1:21:23
  Unknown: It's always good to know who your friends are. It's good to know who your enemies are too, Bob.
• 1:21:29
  Unknown: And always go hiking with somebody you can race away from. Yes.
• 1:21:36
  Unknown: Anyway. But you know, because I've gone through a lot of personal
• 1:21:40
  stuff over these many years of how do you what do you do with this? You know, the the herd mentality
• 1:21:47
  that
• 1:21:48
  I mentioned and alluded to that we touched on earlier, Darryl Darryl's back with us is because I kept trying to show this to people and the importance,
• 1:21:57
  and they just I mean, I got, like, very,
• 1:22:01
  very few people ever responded.
• 1:22:06
  Unknown: Well, I I apologize for the rudeness of my sudden departure, but I I had a lot of activity here with people.
• 1:22:12
  Unknown: Outrageous.
• 1:22:13
  I I actually have another go like that. It's unbelievable, isn't it? These people, Roger, they just come in here. I know. They clear off. Unbelievable.
• 1:22:21
  Unknown: Well,
• 1:22:22
  Unknown: like like, people actually have a laugh. Can't be rude to your customers, Daryl, and say a guy from said that told me to say this. Go on. Right.
• 1:22:30
  Unknown: Right. Yeah. Just just explain to them how rude they are, how dare they bring business to me. Absolutely outrageous. Yeah. I
• 1:22:37
  yeah. I
• 1:22:39
  here again, I I think that's that's symptomatic of
• 1:22:43
  of people with
• 1:22:46
  a
• 1:22:47
  some a a foundation in having a good conscience and a heart trying to be a watchman or share
• 1:22:55
  share a a a warning,
• 1:22:58
  sounding an alarm
• 1:23:00
  for for care and love of other people. And
• 1:23:03
  and we project we project this to people
• 1:23:07
  and
• 1:23:09
  or say these things to people with the with the expectation that they're gonna respond,
• 1:23:15
  and and it falls on Jeff Tears.
• 1:23:17
  And
• 1:23:20
  for for whatever reason, I think most of the time it's because they sense that if they follow this information,
• 1:23:26
  they're gonna lose their biscuit.
• 1:23:29
  And
• 1:23:31
  No goodies for you. I Yep. Goodies. Yeah. I and it's yeah. I Well, that's why same I've had to live. Yeah. Daryl, that's why I harp on the fact that they've used the fear factor to steal your power.
• 1:23:46
  Unknown: I mean, I just see it in so so many instances over so many years. Oh, no. I couldn't do that. I've got this and that and that. Well, it doesn't make any difference about this. Oh, I know but I just couldn't do it and and you see the the extent
• 1:24:01
  that they've been able to input that fear factor into the people by intimidation
• 1:24:07
  and by example, by doing it to other people.
• 1:24:10
  Well,
• 1:24:13
  Unknown: I mean, you know, the slave master would always you know, I I'm I'm I'm thinking. I mean, I have read certain instances where this happened. The slave master would pick up pick out the uppity slave
• 1:24:25
  or the or the one that was caught reading or being a little bit too big for his britches and giving giving 30 lashes in front of the other slaves.
• 1:24:33
  And,
• 1:24:34
  you
• 1:24:35
  know, this is this happens, you know, every year with the UCC and the IRS and the exchequer and and different people. They make examples of them.
• 1:24:46
  I think your friend mister Strait was made an example of. He was.
• 1:24:50
  Unknown: Yeah.
• 1:24:53
  Unknown: John and John and and
• 1:24:55
  Unknown: the other fellow, they were made an example of. They were. So, you know, it's called whack a mole. I'll tell you. I don't know. There would you know, see here, this is an important point, Darryl. There wasn't enough people that knew about John and Glenn's teachings at that point. They'd only been doing it six months,
• 1:25:14
  okay? They knew the power of this information that went right to the nucleus of this thing and buddy, they reacted real quick. Now, the rhetorical question I would ask is, have you ever seen the federal government respond
• 1:25:28
  that quickly to anything?
• 1:25:31
  To anything?
• 1:25:33
  And that was thirty years ago.
• 1:25:36
  Unknown: Yeah.
• 1:25:38
  They they might have, and I'm just not aware of it. But,
• 1:25:43
  you know, I
• 1:25:45
  I I tell you, I I if you can indulge me for maybe just about a minute here. Sure, ma'am. I have something
• 1:25:53
  because I I'm I read volumes of books and
• 1:25:58
  because I'm always
• 1:26:00
  trying to put this together.
• 1:26:03
  And I
• 1:26:04
  finished this book some time ago. It was h g Wells written in 1899.
• 1:26:09
  It was called Anticipations.
• 1:26:10
  Unknown: You're you're familiar with him, aren't you Paul? H g one? I am. Did you send me a link to that? Because I've actually still got it upset here on my browser. I think I've got the PDF of it.
• 1:26:19
  His
• 1:26:20
  Okay. His view of things to come. Yes. You sent me the link. Thank you very much for that. Great. Yeah.
• 1:26:25
  Unknown: Yeah. You you're welcome.
• 1:26:27
  Well, this was he wrote a trilogy,
• 1:26:30
  actually. The three books were called anticipations.
• 1:26:33
  The next one that was 1899.
• 1:26:35
  The open conspiracy,
• 1:26:36
  I think, was written in, like, in the twenties,
• 1:26:39
  and the New World Order was written in the late
• 1:26:43
  thirties
• 1:26:44
  prior to World War two. And
• 1:26:47
  this is what he has to say in 1899,
• 1:26:50
  folks.
• 1:26:51
  Unknown: Okay?
• 1:26:52
  Unknown: This is towards the end of his book. He goes,
• 1:26:54
  the American constitution and the British crown and constitution have to be modified or shelved at some stage in this synthesis.
• 1:27:03
  And for certain types of intelligence, there could be no more attractive problem.
• 1:27:08
  Certain curious changes in the colonial point of view will occur at these discussions
• 1:27:12
  open out as they open out.
• 1:27:15
  And
• 1:27:17
  so so what he's referring to is this this melding of the Anglo American
• 1:27:23
  structure,
• 1:27:25
  and I
• 1:27:29
  think they did it.
• 1:27:31
  Unknown: Oh, they did it.
• 1:27:33
  Unknown: Oh, yeah. They did it. They did it. Remember here This was 1899.
• 1:27:37
  Unknown: Okay. Well, this is 2019
• 1:27:39
  and if you'll remember a couple of months ago when Trump was gonna
• 1:27:45
  release the unredacted
• 1:27:46
  FISA warrants,
• 1:27:48
  Do you remember what the straw that broke the camel's back that he pulled back on that was?
• 1:27:57
  I I don't know. I A request from the crown a request from the crown
• 1:28:03
  is why Trump pulled that back.
• 1:28:08
  Unknown: And
• 1:28:11
  Unknown: if that doesn't tell you who's pulling the strings, then you're not looking or listening very close.
• 1:28:19
  Unknown: Yeah. I I mean I mean, you can look at the you can look at the we can see how things work and see that for all practical purposes.
• 1:28:28
  And I I mean, I don't I don't care about the news or anything else. For all practical purposes,
• 1:28:33
  United States is a commonwealth of Britain. Yep. Is
• 1:28:37
  that is that kind of a big statement, Paul? What do you think of that? Oh, I think it's probably true. I think what whatever force sits in London,
• 1:28:45
  Unknown: the is the crown, whoever those individuals
• 1:28:48
  are, right,
• 1:28:50
  they have the entire pool of all the nations,
• 1:28:53
  including yours and including Australia and New Zealand and all the incredibly bright people that come out of those spaces, yeah, they have them available to tap into, to pull into whatever it is that they're managing and if they have those brains there, we don't.
• 1:29:10
  You go it's a bit like playing chess against Bobby Fischer, you're not gonna win
• 1:29:14
  ever,
• 1:29:15
  you won't win.
• 1:29:16
  There's 18 steps ahead of you and they're defining the game and they're changing the rules under your eyes, you still can't see it. So So you have to go, okay. We've got you know, is this really a problem that we've got or is it just a situation that we can't resolve? It's bit like say, if the sun crashes into the earth, we go, what are we gonna do about it? You're not gonna do anything about it. You haven't got the power to affect it. I mean, I don't wanna give up. That's not
• 1:29:37
  negativity.
• 1:29:38
  I'm simply we have to stand back and look at it. I I've often thought, you know, that they try to disguise their own intelligence and make out that they're kinda goofy and I don't think they are at all. I think the whole thing is so
• 1:29:49
  sophisticated
• 1:29:50
  because they've been in charge for so long. There's a
• 1:29:53
  know, can take this all the way back to Egypt.
• 1:29:56
  The the the people in charge of those with access to data, knowledge and information about what's really taking place in a kingdom or a nation
• 1:30:05
  end up very rapidly in a totally different mind space to you or I or most normal people. We've been able to sort of bridge that gap I guess through communications,
• 1:30:15
  through mass media to some degree even though of course we know they've used it to condition us. Certainly the internet has helped us amazingly in the sense of being able to dig up these older documents which would be very difficult for us in the past to even know that they existed,
• 1:30:28
  let alone get them.
• 1:30:30
  Sounds like you wrote a book about this. Really? You know you go wow that's amazing.
• 1:30:34
  1898.
• 1:30:35
  Yeah. Yeah. Fantastic. And then you go, oh, good grief. They were like light years ahead of everybody in 1898.
• 1:30:40
  Always are. How far are they right now?
• 1:30:43
  You know, they always point out.
• 1:30:45
  Unknown: Christopher, we hadn't heard from you too much. Please point it out to us.
• 1:30:50
  Unknown: Well, it occurs to me that much like the government here in The United States has been usurped
• 1:30:57
  mine and taken over.
• 1:31:00
  Much the same in Britain because MI six, I think, now stands, if it didn't always,
• 1:31:06
  for the Mossad Israeli
• 1:31:08
  six point star bar chamber of Satan.
• 1:31:11
  So they've been undermined, taken over too, and the crown now belongs to Ish
• 1:31:16
  Ra'el, the fake Ish Ra'el.
• 1:31:19
  Yeah.
• 1:31:21
  Unknown: It does. I think that that's possibly one of the reasons why they've allowed the the royal family in Britain to carry on, whereas all the other ones, they basically nullified off. In the case of Russia destroyed totally because
• 1:31:32
  they were genuine opposition. This one's compromised here massively.
• 1:31:36
  Unknown: Somebody was Paul, I got a I got a Yeah. Yeah,
• 1:31:40
  Daryl.
• 1:31:42
  Paul, I got a question I've been begging to ask you.
• 1:31:45
  Is is
• 1:31:47
  is the square mile of City Of London, is is that the
• 1:31:51
  the evolutional
• 1:31:52
  remains
• 1:31:53
  of the East India Company
• 1:31:55
  working with the Vatican? Is that what that is?
• 1:31:58
  Unknown: Well, it's even older than that.
• 1:32:00
  Yep. It's always been there. It was there was it's been there for for a long time. I think even
• 1:32:06
  when the Romans arrived, they couldn't they didn't subdue it. They got drawn into it. It's something like a really weird strange power center that's been around for a long time. Yep. Ever since the arrival of Brutus who lends his name to Britain possibly although it might but certainly Brutus is after
• 1:32:23
  the siege of Troy,
• 1:32:25
  the story goes that Brutus arrived here and was part of the formation of the ancient, you know, is in BC era and all that kind of stuff. But it's been it was the tail end of a trade route as well very much. I mean, Khazars were involved in that trade route. The Silk Road used to terminate in London, part of of running across and so it's it's always been this independent power center. Now there's got to be some kind of obviously there's some kind of a Mexican standoff,
• 1:32:48
  although that's probably the wrong term to use. There's some kind of Well that's alright. Blow your brains out if you don't saw our legs off. Okay, that kind of situation is going on
• 1:33:00
  because there is there's just a lot of power there and and it's like Disraeli wrote you know in his book that that just you know people would be surprised to find out that the people behind the scenes are the ones with the power because we're not surprised about that but we still don't know fully who those people are and and what their day is like. Wouldn't it be great to be a fly on the wall for a few months and run it as a documentary? Here's Lord Rothschild having his
• 1:33:21
  having his cup of tea and now he's off to go and destroy this nation. Here's how he does it.
• 1:33:26
  Yeah, well I'm a bit bored with that, let's fix the price of gold and have some fun. It's all in the day, know, I mean if it is like that it probably isn't, but we could do with a farcical approach, it might give us a lift from time to time. In one of those Robert Seppner videos
• 1:33:40
  Did I answer your question Darryl?
• 1:33:41
  Unknown: I don't know if I did. Yes, did Paul, thank you very much. I wanted to elaborate on it a little bit because I got educated by this Robert Seffer guy.
• 1:33:49
  The city of London was the area that the Romans could not conquer,
• 1:33:53
  okay, and evidently
• 1:33:56
  what made England so important
• 1:33:59
  was your tin
• 1:34:01
  and the abundance of tin up there because tin allowed them to add it and make bronze.
• 1:34:08
  Unknown: That's right. It's all from Cornwall, massive tin mines even there to this day. Yep. In fact, Joseph of Arimathea,
• 1:34:16
  so the story goes and I think that there's a lot of evidence suggests it's the case, he
• 1:34:21
  was involved in the tin industry. Yes. And it was Christ's uncle and
• 1:34:25
  this is why in Cornwall where the tin mines are, that neck of the woods which is the Southwest area of England going out to,
• 1:34:33
  it's a great place. You still find a lot of English people that are Cornish people, they think of themselves as Cornishmen first and I'm fine with that, I think that's great and
• 1:34:43
  the story goes that Joseph of Arimathea brought Christ there when he was a young lad
• 1:34:48
  where he learned a lot of stuff from the druids. It may be that way, it may be another way but there are little statues all around there
• 1:34:56
  which
• 1:34:57
  have a statue of a boy that'd been five or six inches tall on street walls and couple of places like that saying to the boy who learned,
• 1:35:05
  these things have been around for a long time, right? So there's a lot of there's a lot of stuff wrapped up with the tin. There's a lot of stuff because the whole of the world as you said was dependent upon developing weaponry and other things by the
• 1:35:18
  by putting tin into the mix, getting things going. So yeah, it's
• 1:35:23
  it's amazing how these things intertwine and and reveal these patterns throughout history.
• 1:35:28
  Unknown: It really is. It's richer than we could possibly imagine, I suppose. I should promote again those Robert Seffer videos for anybody that hadn't tapped into that wealth of knowledge and
• 1:35:39
  wonderful history.
• 1:35:40
  They go to YouTube and put in Robert, r o b e r t,
• 1:35:44
  s e p e h r,
• 1:35:47
  believe is the spelling, Darryl, s e t e h r, Seffen. Excellent.
• 1:35:53
  Excellent. Excellent material.
• 1:35:56
  Unknown: Well, I I it is, and I I would would like to endorse that. I got I got another perspective for Paul to a question.
• 1:36:05
  I've been reading the
• 1:36:08
  the history of monetary crimes by
• 1:36:11
  mister Delmar and
• 1:36:14
  it's it's it's brilliant writing that was done here again in about 1890
• 1:36:21
  in Alexander Delmar.
• 1:36:23
  And he
• 1:36:24
  he spends quite a bit of time in detail
• 1:36:28
  and actually with accounting and ledger
• 1:36:30
  and and much scurrilous information
• 1:36:34
  about the feckless Charles the second and Barbara
• 1:36:37
  Varsells.
• 1:36:38
  And
• 1:36:40
  and
• 1:36:41
  that appears in the East India Company
• 1:36:44
  back in the
• 1:36:46
  beginning of this you know, in the sixteen hundreds up through
• 1:36:50
  the sixteen hundreds was a bad time for the rule of law or what was
• 1:36:56
  the basis of rule of law in in England
• 1:37:00
  due to Charles the second and his his
• 1:37:03
  his activities.
• 1:37:04
  So
• 1:37:06
  it appears that that that century was a century of usurpation
• 1:37:10
  of the East India Company
• 1:37:13
  over
• 1:37:15
  parliament and the monarchy.
• 1:37:17
  Unknown: Yeah. It would be. I think it would be because the whole thing around, you know, even with
• 1:37:24
  as I said, I I I nail it for myself personally back to the roots of it. Start with Henry the eighth, then you've got Elizabeth the first, his daughter. She's she's
• 1:37:34
  deemed to be a great queen. She she killed a far far more people than her sister bloody Mary did. I mean, it's just sort of but this is all part of the demonization process. You got the establishment of secret services under Walsingham and Cecil.
• 1:37:49
  That whole system was imported in many ways from the
• 1:37:53
  the diplomatic corps of Venice,
• 1:37:55
  that's how they operated as spies and agents. You have this guy John Dee who lived at Mortlake, a place I used to live near up in London,
• 1:38:03
  who who had the it must have had the world's largest private library in the 15 hundreds, 32,000
• 1:38:08
  volumes. Anybody here today got a 32,000 volume library. This is five hundred years ago.
• 1:38:14
  This is the guy that floated around all those courts and used to sign his letters as 007 which is where
• 1:38:20
  what's his name, you know coined it for James Bond. So they yeah.
• 1:38:24
  Ian.
• 1:38:24
  Unknown: Ian's All that's there. What was his the author was it Ian? Ian
• 1:38:29
  Fleming. Ian Fleming. Fleming.
• 1:38:33
  Unknown: Listen,
• 1:38:34
  Unknown: you're right. I think you're absolutely right, Daryl, with all that kind of stuff is that the
• 1:38:39
  where does I mean, it's from Holland that it comes from. You had the Dutch East India's company and you had First Central Bank in Holland but Holland
• 1:38:48
  Unknown: was deemed to Yeah. Be
• 1:38:50
  And why did it come out of That was the Venice Black nobility.
• 1:38:53
  Unknown: That was the Venice Black nobility when they moved up to Amsterdam.
• 1:38:58
  That's right. Here's something intrigue I found intriguing was that
• 1:39:02
  doing a
• 1:39:03
  doing a background search on Alexander Hamilton seems that this young man of the age of 30, 33,
• 1:39:13
  the an agent at the crown
• 1:39:15
  or the company
• 1:39:17
  as they call him the company.
• 1:39:20
  Okay. Well, what else do they call the company? Well, the CIA is the company, and and where do they train on the farm?
• 1:39:28
  They they train on the farm. It's called the company.
• 1:39:31
  And
• 1:39:33
  but, anyway, this Alexander Hamilton guy,
• 1:39:38
  going back through his
• 1:39:40
  re researching this guy, he has connections and and lineage to the black nobility
• 1:39:46
  and which I found, you know, absolutely fascinating digging digging into all this
• 1:39:52
  1600,
• 1:39:53
  1700, and 18 hundreds history.
• 1:39:56
  And
• 1:39:58
  so
• 1:40:00
  one other thing, somebody brought brought up o o seven, Ian Fleming
• 1:40:06
  bought and and who was that guy who was that British guy that was signing his his
• 1:40:10
  his name o o seven, Paul? John d. That cover? John d. D e e. John d. So yeah. Yeah. John d. Okay. Yeah.
• 1:40:19
  Queen Elizabeth Sorcerer.
• 1:40:21
  That's my boss.
• 1:40:23
  He
• 1:40:25
  so
• 1:40:26
  o o seven. Here's here's something interesting in symbology.
• 1:40:30
  Okay? You know, it's just a little trivia.
• 1:40:33
  But double o seven is two ball cane.
• 1:40:39
  Unknown: Is it? Is that right? Two ball cane.
• 1:40:43
  Unknown: Yeah. Two balls, double o, two balls, and the seven is a cane.
• 1:40:48
  Two ball cane.
• 1:40:49
  Unknown: You
• 1:40:51
  Unknown: you follow? You follow that, Chris? Hey. Yeah. Everybody follow that? Too many books there. Reading too many books. It's getting out of Two balls.
• 1:40:58
  I know. I'm sorry. I I I'm I'm That's great. I'm I'm I'm really I'm deep into this. Okay? It's probably story short. But
• 1:41:08
  yeah. Yeah.
• 1:41:09
  So, Raj
• 1:41:11
  Unknown: Yeah. Right? When does Judas Herro
• 1:41:14
  pen her tome
• 1:41:16
  Unknown: how the Jewish Shittar replaced the English common law? There seems to be a common denominator built developing. Well, there is, and and it all goes back to this merchant law stuff because that's how they control. But I believe
• 1:41:29
  Judith Shapiro's
• 1:41:31
  tome,
• 1:41:32
  he was written in the 70s, and for anybody that doesn't know what Chris is talking about,
• 1:41:37
  was a Jewish named Judith Shapiro,
• 1:41:40
  quite educated,
• 1:41:42
  who wrote this
• 1:41:43
  article. It was published in the Georgetown Law Review, pretty prestigious law review,
• 1:41:49
  and I believe it was the 70s.
• 1:41:53
  What And she the title of the article is How the Jewish Shattar Invaded the English Common Law,
• 1:41:59
  and she gives a wonderful,
• 1:42:01
  a really, really thorough historical background on all of this stuff, but what she fails to tell you is that the Jewish Shittar is a ten forty form and she undoubtedly
• 1:42:13
  knew it.
• 1:42:16
  Unknown: What's a ten forty form?
• 1:42:18
  Unknown: Clear me up. A ten forty form is what all the sheep file
• 1:42:22
  on the fifteenth of this month on their annual bloodletting?
• 1:42:27
  Unknown: The state's statute state will contract,
• 1:42:30
  and you missed you understate miss Shapiro's significance. She was
• 1:42:34
  the professoris
• 1:42:36
  emeritus
• 1:42:37
  at Georgetown Law School. It's it's
• 1:42:40
  Unknown: Paul, it's it's what you might call a recognizance.
• 1:42:44
  Unknown: Right.
• 1:42:45
  Okay. And, you know, I was gonna mention this earlier. From all the years I've been in this around this time of the year, all you used to hear, taxes, taxes, taxes.
• 1:42:54
  Hell, I don't hear anybody mention taxes anymore.
• 1:43:00
  Unknown: That's the low hanging fruit, it seems to me. In in in bar conversation,
• 1:43:04
  I get a lot of traction. How do you like to live without taxes? It can't be done. Yeah. It can.
• 1:43:09
  It can. Buy me a beer and I'll tell you.
• 1:43:13
  Well, here's here's Okay. I'm say, actually, I don't drink beer, so I don't wanna tell but, yeah, it's just to get it going. It's just to get it going. It's a thought. No. We must pay we must have taxes. No. No. I get No. We must That's the reason the early patriot community concentrated on taxes is because everybody's interested in your pocketbook.
• 1:43:31
  Unknown: And you find the ones that are really interested, and then they start realizing it's not about taxes.
• 1:43:37
  It's about liberty.
• 1:43:40
  Unknown: Yeah. Well, I I mean so
• 1:43:44
  mister Alexander Delmar has taught me something else that I've never heard anybody talk about.
• 1:43:50
  And I mean, if if Roger, I I apologize
• 1:43:54
  if you have or anybody else has, but I I don't remember it. And this is what he has taught me by reading his book.
• 1:44:02
  England,
• 1:44:03
  Charles the second lost
• 1:44:05
  a large
• 1:44:07
  sums of
• 1:44:09
  what was considered money
• 1:44:11
  when he contracted with the East India Company
• 1:44:14
  to allow them to mint money,
• 1:44:17
  silver and gold.
• 1:44:20
  He did when when he did that, he lost
• 1:44:24
  the ability
• 1:44:25
  to have seigniorage
• 1:44:27
  on the money. Right.
• 1:44:30
  And
• 1:44:31
  I have never heard anybody
• 1:44:33
  ever use that word
• 1:44:36
  with all the articles,
• 1:44:38
  all the people. Nobody nobody uses this word. I go senior, and then what they and he goes on to explain what it is.
• 1:44:45
  And and and so what's happened
• 1:44:48
  and so if if if Britain,
• 1:44:51
  if England had
• 1:44:52
  the capacity,
• 1:44:54
  could abrogate those contracts
• 1:44:57
  and could actually have seenerage on the pound or the money,
• 1:45:02
  that would go a long way
• 1:45:04
  that would go a long way to,
• 1:45:07
  you know, paying for much of the infrastructure
• 1:45:10
  and general purpose of the of the public use.
• 1:45:14
  That's
• 1:45:15
  what the Federal Reserve System does here is that we gave,
• 1:45:20
  abdicated, delegated that
• 1:45:23
  that authority and that right
• 1:45:25
  for our own,
• 1:45:27
  seniorage on on the dollar.
• 1:45:30
  And,
• 1:45:31
  I mean, this is a fantastic sums of money, and nobody ever talks about it. Why don't you define it for the audience?
• 1:45:38
  Unknown: Why don't you define seniorage in case there's people I was familiar with the word, I've used it, but it hadn't been in a long time, but it's the why don't you give us Mr. Del Mar's concept of seniorage,
• 1:45:49
  Darrell,
• 1:45:50
  and then I we'll get to
• 1:45:52
  Unknown: can paraphrase. I Yeah. Please. Just paraphrase it. Paraphrase Yeah.
• 1:45:56
  So
• 1:45:57
  so as the sovereign,
• 1:46:00
  okay,
• 1:46:01
  the sovereign
• 1:46:02
  creates
• 1:46:03
  the money at one price and can sell it, basically sells it, takes a commission
• 1:46:09
  on on the manufacturer of it and and distribution
• 1:46:14
  of it when it when it enters into
• 1:46:19
  the the market.
• 1:46:20
  Alright?
• 1:46:21
  And and they
• 1:46:23
  Unknown: get they get a percentage. They get a little slice. They get a slice off the top. They get a slice off the top. May I And they did. Yes, Chris. Can I point out the obvious? Please. I think it was Ford Rothschild
• 1:46:36
  Unknown: who said, give me control of the nation's money, and I care not who makes the law.
• 1:46:43
  And when we look at the gaming industry,
• 1:46:46
  we learn about vigorage, the rate, the percent of rental
• 1:46:51
  for the utilization of the gaming table or the money that they extract,
• 1:46:56
  extort, and plunder from the people for the mere
• 1:47:00
  privilege
• 1:47:00
  of issuance,
• 1:47:02
  which is also known as ejaculation
• 1:47:05
  Unknown: over the people's control of their money. Well, here, Greg sent us a dictionary definition of it, and and it's, of course, the senior age, like so much of the other language in England,
• 1:47:18
  goes back to French because of William the Conqueror,
• 1:47:22
  and
• 1:47:23
  an old French,
• 1:47:25
  seigniorage, it's spelled different, or the right of the Lord.
• 1:47:29
  The right of the Lord to mint money
• 1:47:32
  is the difference between the value of the money and the cost to produce and distribute it.
• 1:47:41
  Thank you, Greg.
• 1:47:44
  A cut off the top. They get a cut off the top. There's nothing wrong, you know, you see, I don't I don't have a problem with that. I don't need As long that
• 1:47:52
  Unknown: profit is used to uphold the the nation, that's it's fine.
• 1:47:58
  You know, someone's gonna But you do that. Yeah. That's that's it's who gets who gets to get the cut. That's the whole thing. So, you know Well well, there's even I mean, there's there's a bigger I mean, there's even a bigger
• 1:48:10
  Unknown: another item in there, another component
• 1:48:13
  is that is that at that moment of seigniorage, they're taking a cut. That's a fee. Okay? And and then it's over and done with. They they get a fee, and it's over and done with. It isn't it isn't debt on compound interest into perpetuity. Right. I mean
• 1:48:29
  Unknown: I'd rather call it tribute than a fee.
• 1:48:35
  Unknown: It's a miracle. Well, not debt.
• 1:48:37
  Unknown: It's
• 1:48:38
  it's definitely not usury. It's not usury. No. It's tribute. No. Not. Okay.
• 1:48:43
  Yeah. So I I mean, so
• 1:48:46
  if you had if if you look at these economies,
• 1:48:50
  Britain, England,
• 1:48:52
  The US,
• 1:48:53
  if you look at the GDPs
• 1:48:55
  and you had the money creation that came from the sovereign,
• 1:49:00
  which in in this country was supposed to be of
• 1:49:03
  the people and the republic and the treasury
• 1:49:06
  going back to to fund itself
• 1:49:09
  plus tariffs.
• 1:49:12
  Listen, that that's that that would be huge sums of money that would
• 1:49:18
  take away the the heavy burden of subsidizing the usury to the Federal Reserve.
• 1:49:24
  And and and and put the the financial system back into the hands
• 1:49:29
  of who it should be in.
• 1:49:33
  And they they couldn't it would I I don't know. I I just see it all coming back down to these basic issues of a corrupt financial system. It is. They all come back they all come back to that, Darryl, every time. Okay? They do. They do every time. Are you familiar with this?
• 1:49:51
  Unknown: I don't know whether this quote's true. This is slightly attention to what you've been saying. It's good that you brought up senior age because I haven't I've got a lot of books and I I was familiar with it anyway. I've got a great book called The Grip of Death
• 1:50:04
  by a guy written over here about twenty years ago called Mike Robotham which is all about usury and mortgages and that kind of stuff.
• 1:50:13
  But the the greenback period under Lincoln is very interesting. It is. It is. It's a very interesting it's it's a monetary experiment of not so long ago which
• 1:50:24
  was of course devastatingly effective.
• 1:50:26
  So much so, I mean, whether we want to say this is why it was done in or not, I don't really know. I suspect it must have had a part to play in it.
• 1:50:34
  But there is I don't you will have possibly heard this. Let me just read you this little bit. This is actually from Andrew Carrington Hitchcock's book, The Synagogue of Saint. Basically, I just I just did a search because I knew what I was looking for. It says 1862,
• 1:50:48
  by April just under $450,000,000
• 1:50:54
  worth of Lincoln's or is it 449,000?
• 1:50:57
  Heart well, don't know, big number, of Lincoln's debt free money had been printed and distributed.
• 1:51:02
  Lincoln went on to state, we gave the people of this republic the greatest blessing they ever had,
• 1:51:07
  their own paper money to pay their own debts.
• 1:51:11
  Then there is this following, it says the same year the Times of London publishes a story containing the following statement
• 1:51:19
  and this statement is brilliant, I love this. I don't know whether it's true but I think it's brilliant. It says,
• 1:51:25
  if that mischievous financial policy
• 1:51:28
  which had its origin in the North American Republic
• 1:51:32
  should become indurated down to a fixture, what a great use of language that is, I don't even know what it means, it just sounds great, doesn't it? Should become indurated down to a fixture, then that government will furnish its own money without cost. It will pay off debts and be without a debt. It will have all the money necessary to carry on its commerce.
• 1:51:52
  It will become prosperous beyond precedent in the history of civilized governments of the world. The brains and the wealth of all countries will go to North America.
• 1:52:02
  That government must be destroyed or it will destroy every monarchy on the globe. There's nothing wrong with the statement, it's absolutely true and And of course, we can see in the seeds of that exactly the same dynamic that was applied to National Socialist Germany in the thirties and forties. I've seen that
• 1:52:17
  Unknown: I'm not sure. German miracle. Yeah. I've seen that quote. Just
• 1:52:21
  Unknown: engineering. It's what happens when you
• 1:52:24
  get crud
• 1:52:25
  out of the way and you can get back to actually managing it as an engineer. Years ago, I saw, read, and stumbled on an article out of the Midwest,
• 1:52:33
  Unknown: and it was on the guy
• 1:52:35
  that taught Lincoln this monetary
• 1:52:38
  concept.
• 1:52:39
  Lincoln was exposed to this before he was president by a guy up there who had figured it out, and the whole thing is any government can produce paper just like they're saying,
• 1:52:51
  just like Lincoln did. You can produce that paper, you don't even have to have anything behind it, but you have to tax out
• 1:53:00
  what you spend in
• 1:53:02
  to circulation,
• 1:53:04
  and there's no excess out there for speculation.
• 1:53:08
  There's just enough going to run the economy and make it work and it works,
• 1:53:13
  okay?
• 1:53:15
  Unknown: Yeah. Another Another
• 1:53:20
  Unknown: example of this Go ahead, Daryl. That's alright. Go ahead, Daryl. We'll get to Chris afterwards. Oh. Well, this this was a another example of of the very thing that you're talking about
• 1:53:31
  was
• 1:53:32
  in the run up prior to the
• 1:53:35
  so called revolutionary war.
• 1:53:37
  And
• 1:53:39
  Franklin, when he was over in England, was asked how is it that the colonies can be so prosperous?
• 1:53:45
  And he says, well, we use our own script. Yep.
• 1:53:48
  Okay. So they were issuing their own script and,
• 1:53:52
  you know, the the parliament, the privy council said, well, that's that that well, that's we're gonna have to put an end to that.
• 1:53:59
  Unknown: The privy council.
• 1:54:01
  That's what we might start calling our our little group here, the Privy Council. Yes, Chris?
• 1:54:07
  Unknown: Well, remember, I think it was Rothschild only. It could have been Rockefeller who said competition
• 1:54:14
  Unknown: is That was that was John D.
• 1:54:18
  Unknown: Was? Okay. Was Rockefeller. That was Rockefeller who said that. You're absolutely right. Yeah. Yeah. Competition is And, also,
• 1:54:25
  Unknown: Tennessee Ernie Ford, I
• 1:54:28
  owe my soul to the company store. That's all they're doing. That's
• 1:54:32
  Unknown: all they're doing is running a company store.
• 1:54:35
  Unknown: You see, I you know one thing that's interesting about this conversation as well. Here we are sweeping away the mist on this foggy area,
• 1:54:42
  and note in your own life, the fog will return after we've finished this call. I've noticed this, it goes on and on and on. I'm crystal clear and I'm not allowed. Everybody here gets crystal clear about what the issue is, but then a fog sort of creeps back in again. It's an unbelievable.
• 1:54:58
  I don't mean in terms of thinking, I mean it's just like it kind of gets obscured from view and I have to remind myself to sort of bring it I used to bang on about this to the exclusion of everything else. People would just walk away and I thought well at this rate no one's going to talk to me, I better stop you know and find a different way of brokering it but it's so key and I think the reason why it's so it induces so much sleep in the listener
• 1:55:25
  is that there's something so
• 1:55:27
  you you realize that you're buffing up against
• 1:55:30
  something really really bad that the whole nature of your existence
• 1:55:34
  is completely out of whack because of this. It shouldn't be like this at all. Not it just shouldn't be like this and the whole range of thought that we have has become aberrated because
• 1:55:45
  because we are cursed currently with interest bearing debt money as supposedly the only type of money we can have. It creates all this aberrated behavior and aberrated culture people running around chasing money to pay debts off to the whole thing and then you've got an industry that services people are having mental breakdowns because they're running around to chase money and the whole thing it just goes on and on and on. Got the whole thing's rock. Promotes it promotes
• 1:56:09
  Unknown: psychopathy
• 1:56:10
  in the population
• 1:56:12
  and that's why we've got and
• 1:56:14
  I heard this from somebody else the other day in a conversation on a video,
• 1:56:18
  the estimate is that twenty one percent of the population of the world are psychopaths now.
• 1:56:26
  Unknown: Hey, which one of us here is that? Which one here then? There's five of us here, which one is it? It's not me.
• 1:56:32
  Unknown: Well,
• 1:56:33
  let me tell you, from personal experience, there's plenty of them in our community.
• 1:56:39
  Unknown: Yeah. There are. They can be Here's the
• 1:56:42
  Unknown: the oxymoron that I observed is that we we have a debased society, but the solution to a debased and and degraded society is more debasement.
• 1:56:52
  And, that's what this that's what that's what the financial system does. It continually
• 1:56:58
  debases the the money more, which debases society,
• 1:57:02
  and they it it's like inflation.
• 1:57:05
  And it it just
• 1:57:07
  it it reaches a
• 1:57:09
  some form of a tipping point. I
• 1:57:15
  Unknown: I hope that made sense. Well, speaking of tipping points, we've reached one of our own, the tipping point of time.
• 1:57:21
  And so but this is a really important and interesting conversation.
• 1:57:25
  And unless something comes up between today and tomorrow,
• 1:57:29
  let's continue and do a special show on the monetary system tomorrow because I bet there's still a bunch of people in our audience that don't have their arms around how they've got this thing structured and it is insidious.
• 1:57:41
  Okay? Why don't we do that? Is that okay with everybody?
• 1:57:45
  Unknown: Yeah. Mhmm. Roger, that's a parting joke. Yeah. If you get it quick. Paul. I don't yeah. Paul, I don't know what you call it over there, but over here at Privy is the toilet.
• 1:57:55
  Unknown: That's right. I've heard of the Privy Council, I have a hard time not imagining a bunch of old geezer sitting around the toilet. I like your comments, Bob. You're thinking in the right you're thinking in a straight line. That's how most Englishmen think. We think of them as being a category of toilet users. Yes. There you go. Well The groom of the stool. For some reason, our parting music didn't play today. Carried away. Oh, cool. That's lowered the tone. I don't Our whistler didn't come in today, but it looks like we're out of program. And it probably about to be cut off from from the server here.
• 1:58:26
  Unknown: So,
• 1:58:28
  boy, what happened there? I have no idea. Anyway, we're not gonna get a whistle out today, but I know we're gonna get cut off from the server. So, thank good show today. Thanks, Paul. Always enjoy your input. Thank you everyone. And we'll see you next week, and we'll see what happens between then and now.
• 1:58:44
  So Sorry, Nora. You guys have a good day. Yeah. We got knocked off the We're
• 1:58:50
  gone. Ciao. Ciao.
• 1:58:55
  What the hell happened here?
• 1:59:12
  Oh, now come on.
• 1:59:14
  Oh, I gotta get rid of that.
• 1:59:18
  What the heck happened? They didn't touch a darn thing.
• 1:59:48
  Oh, man.