Latest / Radio Baloney - The Richie Baloney Show! / Vivek Ramaswamy Slams Trudeau (clip) Radio Baloney Live

Transcript

Vivek Ramaswamy Slams Trudeau (clip) Radio Baloney Live · Radio Baloney - The Richie Baloney Show!

• 0:02
  Uh, okay, this is interesting. So this is an intersection of Canadian
• 0:09
  and American politics. Let's take a look. So vivek Ramaswami with Andrew Levant,
• 0:14
  who is the head of the founder of Rebel News Canada. You mentioned
• 0:19
  Trudeau in your remarks. You mentioned him again. Now what do you make
• 0:23
  of the man? He's been in power for eight years now, even though
• 0:27
  he has a minority government, he's got a coalition. Is he a cautionary
• 0:31
  tale for Americans? I don't think Americans follow Canadian politics too closely. What
• 0:36
  should an American know about justin Trudeau? This is a preview of coming attractions.
• 0:41
  I use that sarcastically unless we course correct here. He's like a Klaus
• 0:45
  Schwab junior, sort of a Klaus Schwab disciple. And I think that he
• 0:50
  is somebody who is a useful puppet. And it's not that this guy is
• 0:54
  some sort of shining intellect that is somehow a visionary in his own right.
• 0:59
  He's a pawn for a managerial class both within and outside of Canada, that
• 1:04
  uses people like him as a pawn to advance a you know, transnational globalist
• 1:10
  agenda that has a single hegemonic view that is fundamentally skeptical of self governance,
• 1:15
  does not believe in people's ability to govern themselves, believes in a worldview where
• 1:19
  people need to be told what the right way is or is, and to
• 1:21
  live by a small group of aristocratic elites in the back of the palace halls.
• 1:25
  That was the old world European view. It's what's alive and well in
• 1:27
  Canada unfortunately today. And the idea that Trudeau's actually the guy called him the
• 1:30
  shots as a joke. He's just a puppet, a pawn for that deeper
• 1:36
  what I would call permanent state. And I think that much similar to the
• 1:40
  United States. I think that that's a big part of what you're seeing happening
• 1:42
  in Canada now as well. Now that needs another round of a class.
• 1:56
  So you know, I gotta say I'm extremely impressed with a veg and he
• 2:00
  just nailed it there talking about Trudeau, right, this is a smart guy.
• 2:05
  I know a lot of people don't trust him. I mean, he's
• 2:07
  new, right, he just kind of emerged into people's consciousness. But the
• 2:10
  guy is very smart. And again I don't I'm not a mind reader.
• 2:15
  He has a great understanding of as far as I can tell geopolitics he understands
• 2:19
  Canadian politics or Trudeau anyway very well. He really nailed that one. Should
• 2:24
  we take a look at this one. That's kind of a long video.
• 2:27
  We'll watch the whole thing. Let's just get the gist of it here.
• 2:30
  Another one from the Veke. I mean, I enjoy listening to this guy.
• 2:35
  All right. We are riding with the veg here, and the question
• 2:38
  is is what are you going to do to take on the internet censorship.
• 2:40
  Look, first thing you have to realize is it's not big tech censorship.
• 2:44
  We gotta call it the right thing. The first step to solving a problem
• 2:46
  is to name it. It's government tech censorship. That's really what this mostly
• 2:51
  is. The government's using tech companies to do through the back door what the
• 2:54
  government could not directly do through the front door under the constitution. That's illeg
• 3:00
  behavior. And so I was the first person to write about this, or
• 3:02
  along with another law professor in January of twenty twenty one, writ in The
• 3:07
  Days Out In the aftermath of January sixth, I argue that when tech companies
• 3:09
  were doing right and then censoring speech, censoring Trump and otherwise was at the
• 3:14
  direction of government actors that were causing them to censor content that otherwise couldn't be
• 3:19
  censored directly through the front door, and that it was illegal. Back in
• 3:23
  twenty twenty one, it was dismissed as a conspiracy theory at the time.
• 3:25
  Now we know the reality is far worse than we imagine. That's illegal behavior.
• 3:30
  I think any government bureaucrat that has instructed a private company to do something
• 3:34
  that the government couldn't do directly needs to be held accountable. So elon did
• 3:38
  it with Twitter? Release this Twitter files. I'm going to release in first
• 3:42
  year the State Action files. Anytime a government bureaucrat is pressured a private company
• 3:46
  to do something the government couldn't do directly, we're going to publish it and
• 3:51
  we're going to hold the bad actors accountable. So that's how'm going to deal
• 3:53
  with that. Great, that's actually a really see what I mean, Like
• 3:59
  he's not is making you know, assertions right like your Twitter files, Like
• 4:02
  we know from the Twitter files that what he's saying is true. Really engage
• 4:08
  response what I run on One more policy Matterer on business Section two thirty needs
• 4:13
  to be turned into an opt in statue. So this is there's not a
• 4:16
  two thirty C one and C two. Forget C one for a second.
• 4:19
  C two says that these companies cannot be sued under state laws. There are
• 4:25
  many states that have laws that say you can't discriminate against somebody based on their
• 4:29
  political viewpoint. Section two thirty C two says, notwithstanding those state laws,
• 4:33
  a tech company can't be sued for doing it because there's a federal law that
• 4:36
  gives them a federal blanket of immunity. My view is you can't have it
• 4:40
  both ways. So if you want to be a private company, that's fine,
• 4:43
  operates a private company, but you don't get that liability rapper just the
• 4:46
  same thing do I do it for the vaccine manufacturers, by the way,
• 4:48
  But if you want the liability rapper in the tech company's case, then you're
• 4:51
  bound by the same constraints as the federal government, including the First Amendment to
• 4:57
  the Constitution. So I know it was a little technical, but I want
• 4:59
  to to give you it's an important part of the answer. Will you commit
• 5:02
  to a going agency by agency in the federal government everywhere from the FBI,
• 5:08
  the DHS, the National Science Foundation, DoD State Department, agent by agency
• 5:12
  by agency killing every single government grant and contract related to domestic mission and disinformation.
• 5:18
  Yes, that's an easy I thought this is gonna be hard. Well,
• 5:21
  I just yes, I find the guy very impressive. I mean,
• 5:26
  okay, poet, you're saying the guy is the great pretender. I don't
• 5:29
  know. I mean, look, I take everybody with a grain of salt,
• 5:30
  right, and this is certainly the kind of thing that I want to
• 5:36
  hear. I'm not a mind reader. I don't know what's in the guy's
• 5:39
  mind. Right. All I'm saying is that I like what I'm hearing,
• 5:44
  and the guy is impressive. I mean, maybe it is opal. I
• 5:47
  don't know that's entirely possible, right, But I enjoy the fact that we're
• 5:54
  starting to hear the kinds of things that we all have wanted to hear for
• 5:59
  a while, right, Like holyev is very popular in Canada because he's actually
• 6:03
  saying the things that are appealing to Canadians. Canadians have wanted to hear,
• 6:08
  and that, frankly, the Conservative leadership has been way too much of a
• 6:12
  pussy to say for a long time. Right, So we've kind of been
• 6:16
  waiting for people to kind of speak sense and cut the crap basically, So
• 6:24
  either way it's a good sign. Just the fact that there is of Avaiker
• 6:27
  almost from me saying these things is an important change. It's an important turn,
• 6:32
  you know, in the political culture. So just that in itself is
• 6:36
  a good things. It's positive